Pipeline Safety: Potential for Damage to Pipeline Facilities Caused by Flooding, River Scour, and River Channel Migration, 19114-19116 [2015-08148]
Download as PDF
19114
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices
workshop will be webcast. Attendees,
both in person and by webcast, are
strongly encouraged to register to help
ensure accommodations are adequate.
Presentations will be available online
at the meeting page and also be posted
in the E-Gov Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov, at docket number
PHMSA–2014–0014 within 30 days
following the meeting.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. Chapter 601 and 49
CFR 1.97.
Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto
Rico, South Carolina, and Tennessee
• Southwest Region: 713–272–2859,
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, and Texas
• Western Region: 720–963–3160,
Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado,
Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and
Wyoming
Intrastate pipeline operators should
contact the appropriate state pipeline
safety authority. A list of state pipeline
safety authorities is provided at:
www.napsr.org
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 3,
2015.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2015–08115 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am]
I. Background
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
Section 192.613(a) of the Pipeline
Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 190–
199) states that ‘‘[e]ach operator shall
have a procedure for continuing
surveillance of its facilities to determine
and take appropriate action concerning
changes in class location, failures,
leakage history, corrosion, substantial
changes in cathodic protection
requirements, and other unusual
operating and maintenance conditions.’’
Section 192.613(b) further states that
‘‘[i]f a segment of pipeline is determined
to be in unsatisfactory condition but no
immediate hazard exists, the operator
shall initiate a program to recondition or
phase out the segment involved, or, if
the segment cannot be reconditioned or
phased out, reduce the maximum
allowable operating pressure in
accordance with § 192.619(a) and (b).’’
Likewise, § 195.401(b)(1) of the
Pipeline Safety Regulations states that
‘‘[w]henever an operator discovers any
condition that could adversely affect the
safe operation of its pipeline system, it
must correct the condition within a
reasonable time. However, if the
condition is of such a nature that it
presents an immediate hazard to
persons or property, the operator may
not operate the affected part of the
system until it has corrected the unsafe
condition.’’ Section 195.401(b)(2)
further states that ‘‘[w]hen an operator
discovers a condition on a pipeline
covered under [the integrity
management requirements in] § 195.452,
the operator must correct the condition
as prescribed in § 195.452(h).’’ Severe
flooding, river scour, and river channel
migration are the types of unusual
operating conditions that can adversely
affect the safe operation of a pipeline
and require corrective action under
§§ 192.613(a) and 195.401(b).
In addition, Part 194 requires
operators of onshore oil pipelines to
‘‘include procedures and a list of
resources for responding, to the
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2015–0105]
Pipeline Safety: Potential for Damage
to Pipeline Facilities Caused by
Flooding, River Scour, and River
Channel Migration
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory
Bulletin.
AGENCY:
PHMSA is issuing this
updated advisory bulletin to all owners
and operators of gas and hazardous
liquid pipelines to communicate the
potential for damage to pipeline
facilities caused by severe flooding. This
advisory includes actions that operators
should consider taking to ensure the
integrity of pipelines in the event of
flooding, river scour, and river channel
migration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Operators of pipelines subject to
regulation by PHMSA should contact
the appropriate PHMSA Region Office.
The PHMSA Region Offices and their
contact information are as follows:
• Central Region: 816–329–3800,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota,
and Wisconsin
• Eastern Region: 609–989–2171,
Connecticut, Delaware, District of
Columbia, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and
West Virginia
• Southern Region: 404–832–1147,
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Apr 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
maximum extent practicable, to a worst
case discharge and to a substantial
threat of such a discharge’’ under
§ 194.107(a). Per § 194.115, the operator
must ‘‘identify, and ensure, by contract
or other approved means, the resources
necessary to remove, to the maximum
extent practicable, a worst case
discharge and to mitigate or prevent a
substantial threat of a worst case
discharge’’.
Furthermore, an operator must take
additional preventative and mitigative
measures beyond those already required
in Parts 192, 194, and 195 to prevent a
pipeline failure and to mitigate the
consequences of a pipeline failure per
§§ 192.935, 194.107(a) and 195.452(i).
An operator must base the additional
measures on the threats the operator has
identified for each pipeline segment. If
an operator determines outside force
damage (e.g., earth movement, floods) is
a threat to the pipeline, the operator
must take steps to minimize the
probability of damage and the
consequences of a release.
PHMSA has released five Advisory
Bulletins on this subject, with the
earliest issued July 29, 1993, (ADB–93–
03), and the most recent on July 27,
2011, (ADB–11–04; 76 FR 44985). Each
of these bulletins followed an event that
involved severe flooding that affected
pipelines in the areas of rising waters.
Four of the more notable events are
briefly described below:
On August 13, 2011, Enterprise
Products Operating, LLC discovered a
release of 28,350 gallons (675 barrels) of
natural gasoline in the Missouri River in
Iowa. The rupture, according to the
metallurgical report, was the result of
fatigue crack growth driven by
vibrations in the pipe from vortex
shedding.
On July 1, 2011, ExxonMobil Pipeline
Company experienced a pipeline failure
near Laurel, Montana, resulting in the
release of 63,000 gallons (1,500 barrels)
of crude oil into the Yellowstone River.
According to the results of PHMSA’s
accident investigation, the rupture was
caused by channel migration and river
bottom scour, leaving a large span of the
pipeline exposed to prolonged current
forces and debris washing downstream
in the river. Those external forces
damaged the exposed pipeline.
On July 15, 2011, NuStar Pipeline
Operating Partnership, L.P. reported a
4,200 gallon (100 barrels) anhydrous
ammonia spill in the Missouri River in
Nebraska requiring extensive
environmental response and causing
supply disruption. The 6-inch-diameter
pipeline was exposed by scouring
during extreme flooding.
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices
On January 17, 2015, a breach in the
Bridger Pipeline Company’s Poplar
system resulted in another spill into the
Yellowstone River near the town of
Glendive, Montana, releasing an
estimated 28,434 gallons (677 barrels) of
crude oil into the river and impacting
local water supplies. Preliminary
information indicates over 100 feet of
pipeline was exposed on the river
bottom, and a release point was near a
girth weld.
As shown in these events, river
bottom scour and channel migration
may occur due to seasonal flooding,
increased stream velocities, and manmade and natural river bank
restrictions. River scour and channel
migration may damage a pipeline as a
result of additional stresses imposed on
the pipe by undermining underlying
support soils, exposing the pipeline to
lateral water forces and impact from
waterborne debris. Lateral water forces
may cause excessive bending loads that
lead to pipeline failures, and possible
impact forces from debris in the river or
harmonic vibrations from water rapidly
passing over pipelines can also increase
the potential for pipeline failures.
Additionally, the safety of valves,
regulators, relief sets, pressure sensors,
and other facilities normally above
ground or above water can be
jeopardized when covered by water. Not
only can these facilities become
inoperable when submerged, but they
are also at a greater risk of damage by
outside forces, floating debris, river
currents, and craft operating on the
water. Boaters involved in rescue
operations, emergency support
functions, sightseeing, and other
activities are generally not aware of the
seriousness of an incident that could
result from their craft damaging a
pipeline facility that is unseen beneath
the surface of the water. Depending on
the size of the craft and the pipeline
facility struck, significant pipeline
damage may result.
Although accidents at river crossings
account for less than one percent of the
total number of pipeline accidents, the
consequences of a release in water can
be much more severe because of the
threats to drinking water supplies and
the environment. Unlike hazardous
liquid releases on land where it can be
easier to respond to and contain spills,
swift-moving river currents will carry
hazardous liquids further downstream,
potentially impacting much larger
geographical areas and more
communities. Product releases in rivers
can create difficult, costly, and lengthy
spill response and remediation
scenarios and activities for operators,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Apr 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
communities, and local, state, and
Federal responders.
II. Advisory Bulletin (ADB–2015–01)
To: Owners and Operators of Gas and
Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Systems.
Subject: Potential for Damage to
Pipeline Facilities Caused by Severe
Flooding.
Advisory: Severe flooding can
adversely affect the safe operation of a
pipeline. Operators need to direct their
resources in a manner that will enable
them to determine and mitigate the
potential effects of flooding on their
pipeline systems in accordance with
applicable regulations. Operators are
urged to take the following actions to
prevent and mitigate damage to pipeline
facilities and ensure public and
environmental safety in areas affected
by flooding:
1. Utilize experts in river flow, such
as hydrologists or fluvial
geomorphologists, to evaluate a river’s
potential for scour or channel migration
at each pipeline river crossing.
2. Evaluate each pipeline crossing a
river to determine the pipeline’s
installation method and determine if
that method (and the pipeline’s current
condition) is sufficient to withstand the
risks posed by anticipated flood
conditions, river scour, or river channel
migration. In areas prone to these
conditions and risks, consider installing
pipelines using horizontal directional
drilling to help place pipelines below
elevations of maximum scour and
outside the limits of lateral channel
migration.
3. Determine the maximum flow or
flooding conditions at rivers where
pipeline integrity is at risk in the event
of flooding (e.g., where scour can occur)
and have contingency plans to shut
down and isolate those pipelines when
those conditions occur.
4. Evaluate the accessibility of
pipeline facilities and components that
may be in jeopardy, such as valve
settings, which are needed to isolate
water crossings or other sections of
pipelines.
5. Extend regulator vents and relief
stacks above the level of anticipated
flooding as appropriate.
6. Coordinate with emergency and
spill responders on pipeline locations,
crossing conditions, and the
commodities transported. Provide maps
and other relevant information to such
responders so they can develop
appropriate response strategies.
7. Coordinate with other pipeline
operators in flood areas and establish
emergency response centers to act as a
liaison for pipeline problems and
solutions.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19115
8. Deploy personnel so that they will
be in position to shut down, isolate,
contain, or perform any other
emergency action on an affected
pipeline.
9. Determine if facilities that are
normally above ground (e.g., valves,
regulators, relief sets, etc.) have become
submerged and are in danger of being
struck by vessels or debris and, if
possible, mark such facilities with U.S.
Coast Guard approval and an
appropriate buoy.
10. Perform frequent patrols,
including appropriate overflights, to
evaluate right-of-way conditions at
water crossings during flooding and
after waters subside. Report any
flooding, either localized or systemic, to
integrity staff to determine if pipeline
crossings may have been damaged or
would be in imminent jeopardy from
future flooding.
11. Have open communications with
local and state officials to address their
concerns regarding observed pipeline
exposures, localized flooding, ice dams,
debris dams, and extensive bank erosion
that may affect the integrity of pipeline
crossings.
12. Following floods, and when safe
river access is first available, determine
if flooding has exposed or undermined
pipelines because of new river channel
profiles. This is best done by a depth of
cover survey.
13. Where appropriate, surveys of
underwater pipe should include the use
of visual inspection by divers or
instrumented detection. Pipelines in
recently flooded lands adjacent to rivers
should also be evaluated to determine
the remaining depth of cover. You
should share information gathered by
these surveys with affected landowners.
Agricultural agencies may help to
inform farmers of potential hazards from
reduced cover over pipelines.
14. Ensure that line markers are still
in place or are replaced in a timely
manner. Notify contractors, highway
departments, and others involved in
post-flood restoration activities of the
presence of pipelines and the risks
posed by reduced cover.
If a pipeline has suffered damage or
is shut-in as a precautionary measure
due to flooding, the operator should
advise the appropriate PHMSA regional
office or state pipeline safety authority
before returning the line to service,
increasing its operating pressure, or
otherwise changing its operating status.
Furthermore, reporting a Safety-Related
Condition as prescribed in §§ 191.23
and 195.55 may also be required.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. Chapter 601 and 49
CFR 1.97
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
19116
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 6,
2015.
Timothy P. Butters,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–08148 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Notice of Applications for Certificates
of Public Convenience and Necessity
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed
Under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q)
During the Week Ending March 28,
2015.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The following Applications for
Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier.
Permits were filed under Subpart B
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department
of Transportation’s Procedural
Regulations (See 14 CFR 302. 201 et.
seq.). The due date for Answers,
Conforming Applications, or Motions to
Modify Scope are set forth below for
each application. Following the Answer
period DOT may process the application
by expedited procedures. Such
procedures may consist of the adoption
of a show-cause order, a tentative order,
or in appropriate cases a final order
without further proceedings.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Apr 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
Docket Number: DOT–OST–2015–
0064.
Date Filed: March 25, 2015.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: April 15, 2015.
Description: Application of Altius
Aviation, LLC requesting authority to
operate scheduled passenger service as
a commuter air carrier.
Docket Number: DOT–OST–2015–
0065.
Date Filed: March 26, 2015.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: April 16, 2015.
Description: Application of Air Baltic
Corporation A/S (‘‘AirBaltic’’)
requesting a foreign air carrier permit to
authorize foreign air transportation to
engage in: (i) Foreign scheduled and
charter air transportation of persons,
property and mail from any point or
points behind any Member State of the
European Union, via any point or points
in any Member State and via
intermediate points, to any point or
points in the United States and beyond;
(ii) foreign scheduled and charter air
transportation of persons, property and
mail between any point or points in the
United States and any point or points in
any member of the European Common
Aviation Area; (iii) foreign scheduled
and charter air transportation of cargo
between any point or points in the
United States and any other point or
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
points; (iv) other charters pursuant to
the prior approval requirements; and (v)
transportation authorized by any
additional route rights made available to
European Union carriers under the U.S.EU Air Transport Agreement in the
future. AirBaltic also requests an
exemption to the extent necessary to
allow it to provide the services
described above for a two-year period or
until the requested permit authority
becomes effective, whichever occurs
first.
Docket Number: DOT–OST–1999–
6663 and DOT–OST–2011–0076.
Date Filed: March 24, 2015.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: April 14, 2015.
Description: Application of United
Parcel Service Co. requesting an
amendment of its U.S.-Mexico
certificate of public convenience and
necessity and a related exemption, as
well as a designation under the U.S.Mexico Air Transport Agreement
authorizing it to provide scheduled
foreign air transportation of property
and mail between Dallas, Texas (DFW)
and Mexico City, Mexico (MEX).
Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket
Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2015–08147 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19114-19116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08148]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-2015-0105]
Pipeline Safety: Potential for Damage to Pipeline Facilities
Caused by Flooding, River Scour, and River Channel Migration
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory Bulletin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: PHMSA is issuing this updated advisory bulletin to all owners
and operators of gas and hazardous liquid pipelines to communicate the
potential for damage to pipeline facilities caused by severe flooding.
This advisory includes actions that operators should consider taking to
ensure the integrity of pipelines in the event of flooding, river
scour, and river channel migration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Operators of pipelines subject to
regulation by PHMSA should contact the appropriate PHMSA Region Office.
The PHMSA Region Offices and their contact information are as follows:
Central Region: 816-329-3800, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South
Dakota, and Wisconsin
Eastern Region: 609-989-2171, Connecticut, Delaware,
District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont,
Virginia, and West Virginia
Southern Region: 404-832-1147, Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, and
Tennessee
Southwest Region: 713-272-2859, Arkansas, Louisiana, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas
Western Region: 720-963-3160, Alaska, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and
Wyoming
Intrastate pipeline operators should contact the appropriate state
pipeline safety authority. A list of state pipeline safety authorities
is provided at: www.napsr.org
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 192.613(a) of the Pipeline Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts
190-199) states that ``[e]ach operator shall have a procedure for
continuing surveillance of its facilities to determine and take
appropriate action concerning changes in class location, failures,
leakage history, corrosion, substantial changes in cathodic protection
requirements, and other unusual operating and maintenance conditions.''
Section 192.613(b) further states that ``[i]f a segment of pipeline is
determined to be in unsatisfactory condition but no immediate hazard
exists, the operator shall initiate a program to recondition or phase
out the segment involved, or, if the segment cannot be reconditioned or
phased out, reduce the maximum allowable operating pressure in
accordance with Sec. 192.619(a) and (b).''
Likewise, Sec. 195.401(b)(1) of the Pipeline Safety Regulations
states that ``[w]henever an operator discovers any condition that could
adversely affect the safe operation of its pipeline system, it must
correct the condition within a reasonable time. However, if the
condition is of such a nature that it presents an immediate hazard to
persons or property, the operator may not operate the affected part of
the system until it has corrected the unsafe condition.'' Section
195.401(b)(2) further states that ``[w]hen an operator discovers a
condition on a pipeline covered under [the integrity management
requirements in] Sec. 195.452, the operator must correct the condition
as prescribed in Sec. 195.452(h).'' Severe flooding, river scour, and
river channel migration are the types of unusual operating conditions
that can adversely affect the safe operation of a pipeline and require
corrective action under Sec. Sec. 192.613(a) and 195.401(b).
In addition, Part 194 requires operators of onshore oil pipelines
to ``include procedures and a list of resources for responding, to the
maximum extent practicable, to a worst case discharge and to a
substantial threat of such a discharge'' under Sec. 194.107(a). Per
Sec. 194.115, the operator must ``identify, and ensure, by contract or
other approved means, the resources necessary to remove, to the maximum
extent practicable, a worst case discharge and to mitigate or prevent a
substantial threat of a worst case discharge''.
Furthermore, an operator must take additional preventative and
mitigative measures beyond those already required in Parts 192, 194,
and 195 to prevent a pipeline failure and to mitigate the consequences
of a pipeline failure per Sec. Sec. 192.935, 194.107(a) and
195.452(i). An operator must base the additional measures on the
threats the operator has identified for each pipeline segment. If an
operator determines outside force damage (e.g., earth movement, floods)
is a threat to the pipeline, the operator must take steps to minimize
the probability of damage and the consequences of a release.
PHMSA has released five Advisory Bulletins on this subject, with
the earliest issued July 29, 1993, (ADB-93-03), and the most recent on
July 27, 2011, (ADB-11-04; 76 FR 44985). Each of these bulletins
followed an event that involved severe flooding that affected pipelines
in the areas of rising waters. Four of the more notable events are
briefly described below:
On August 13, 2011, Enterprise Products Operating, LLC discovered a
release of 28,350 gallons (675 barrels) of natural gasoline in the
Missouri River in Iowa. The rupture, according to the metallurgical
report, was the result of fatigue crack growth driven by vibrations in
the pipe from vortex shedding.
On July 1, 2011, ExxonMobil Pipeline Company experienced a pipeline
failure near Laurel, Montana, resulting in the release of 63,000
gallons (1,500 barrels) of crude oil into the Yellowstone River.
According to the results of PHMSA's accident investigation, the rupture
was caused by channel migration and river bottom scour, leaving a large
span of the pipeline exposed to prolonged current forces and debris
washing downstream in the river. Those external forces damaged the
exposed pipeline.
On July 15, 2011, NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership, L.P.
reported a 4,200 gallon (100 barrels) anhydrous ammonia spill in the
Missouri River in Nebraska requiring extensive environmental response
and causing supply disruption. The 6-inch-diameter pipeline was exposed
by scouring during extreme flooding.
[[Page 19115]]
On January 17, 2015, a breach in the Bridger Pipeline Company's
Poplar system resulted in another spill into the Yellowstone River near
the town of Glendive, Montana, releasing an estimated 28,434 gallons
(677 barrels) of crude oil into the river and impacting local water
supplies. Preliminary information indicates over 100 feet of pipeline
was exposed on the river bottom, and a release point was near a girth
weld.
As shown in these events, river bottom scour and channel migration
may occur due to seasonal flooding, increased stream velocities, and
man-made and natural river bank restrictions. River scour and channel
migration may damage a pipeline as a result of additional stresses
imposed on the pipe by undermining underlying support soils, exposing
the pipeline to lateral water forces and impact from waterborne debris.
Lateral water forces may cause excessive bending loads that lead to
pipeline failures, and possible impact forces from debris in the river
or harmonic vibrations from water rapidly passing over pipelines can
also increase the potential for pipeline failures.
Additionally, the safety of valves, regulators, relief sets,
pressure sensors, and other facilities normally above ground or above
water can be jeopardized when covered by water. Not only can these
facilities become inoperable when submerged, but they are also at a
greater risk of damage by outside forces, floating debris, river
currents, and craft operating on the water. Boaters involved in rescue
operations, emergency support functions, sightseeing, and other
activities are generally not aware of the seriousness of an incident
that could result from their craft damaging a pipeline facility that is
unseen beneath the surface of the water. Depending on the size of the
craft and the pipeline facility struck, significant pipeline damage may
result.
Although accidents at river crossings account for less than one
percent of the total number of pipeline accidents, the consequences of
a release in water can be much more severe because of the threats to
drinking water supplies and the environment. Unlike hazardous liquid
releases on land where it can be easier to respond to and contain
spills, swift-moving river currents will carry hazardous liquids
further downstream, potentially impacting much larger geographical
areas and more communities. Product releases in rivers can create
difficult, costly, and lengthy spill response and remediation scenarios
and activities for operators, communities, and local, state, and
Federal responders.
II. Advisory Bulletin (ADB-2015-01)
To: Owners and Operators of Gas and Hazardous Liquid Pipeline
Systems.
Subject: Potential for Damage to Pipeline Facilities Caused by
Severe Flooding.
Advisory: Severe flooding can adversely affect the safe operation
of a pipeline. Operators need to direct their resources in a manner
that will enable them to determine and mitigate the potential effects
of flooding on their pipeline systems in accordance with applicable
regulations. Operators are urged to take the following actions to
prevent and mitigate damage to pipeline facilities and ensure public
and environmental safety in areas affected by flooding:
1. Utilize experts in river flow, such as hydrologists or fluvial
geomorphologists, to evaluate a river's potential for scour or channel
migration at each pipeline river crossing.
2. Evaluate each pipeline crossing a river to determine the
pipeline's installation method and determine if that method (and the
pipeline's current condition) is sufficient to withstand the risks
posed by anticipated flood conditions, river scour, or river channel
migration. In areas prone to these conditions and risks, consider
installing pipelines using horizontal directional drilling to help
place pipelines below elevations of maximum scour and outside the
limits of lateral channel migration.
3. Determine the maximum flow or flooding conditions at rivers
where pipeline integrity is at risk in the event of flooding (e.g.,
where scour can occur) and have contingency plans to shut down and
isolate those pipelines when those conditions occur.
4. Evaluate the accessibility of pipeline facilities and components
that may be in jeopardy, such as valve settings, which are needed to
isolate water crossings or other sections of pipelines.
5. Extend regulator vents and relief stacks above the level of
anticipated flooding as appropriate.
6. Coordinate with emergency and spill responders on pipeline
locations, crossing conditions, and the commodities transported.
Provide maps and other relevant information to such responders so they
can develop appropriate response strategies.
7. Coordinate with other pipeline operators in flood areas and
establish emergency response centers to act as a liaison for pipeline
problems and solutions.
8. Deploy personnel so that they will be in position to shut down,
isolate, contain, or perform any other emergency action on an affected
pipeline.
9. Determine if facilities that are normally above ground (e.g.,
valves, regulators, relief sets, etc.) have become submerged and are in
danger of being struck by vessels or debris and, if possible, mark such
facilities with U.S. Coast Guard approval and an appropriate buoy.
10. Perform frequent patrols, including appropriate overflights, to
evaluate right-of-way conditions at water crossings during flooding and
after waters subside. Report any flooding, either localized or
systemic, to integrity staff to determine if pipeline crossings may
have been damaged or would be in imminent jeopardy from future
flooding.
11. Have open communications with local and state officials to
address their concerns regarding observed pipeline exposures, localized
flooding, ice dams, debris dams, and extensive bank erosion that may
affect the integrity of pipeline crossings.
12. Following floods, and when safe river access is first
available, determine if flooding has exposed or undermined pipelines
because of new river channel profiles. This is best done by a depth of
cover survey.
13. Where appropriate, surveys of underwater pipe should include
the use of visual inspection by divers or instrumented detection.
Pipelines in recently flooded lands adjacent to rivers should also be
evaluated to determine the remaining depth of cover. You should share
information gathered by these surveys with affected landowners.
Agricultural agencies may help to inform farmers of potential hazards
from reduced cover over pipelines.
14. Ensure that line markers are still in place or are replaced in
a timely manner. Notify contractors, highway departments, and others
involved in post-flood restoration activities of the presence of
pipelines and the risks posed by reduced cover.
If a pipeline has suffered damage or is shut-in as a precautionary
measure due to flooding, the operator should advise the appropriate
PHMSA regional office or state pipeline safety authority before
returning the line to service, increasing its operating pressure, or
otherwise changing its operating status. Furthermore, reporting a
Safety-Related Condition as prescribed in Sec. Sec. 191.23 and 195.55
may also be required.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. Chapter 601 and 49 CFR 1.97
[[Page 19116]]
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 6, 2015.
Timothy P. Butters,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-08148 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P