Notice of Funding Availability for the Department of Transportation's National Infrastructure Investments Under the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, 18283-18292 [2015-07711]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
qualified and certified rail test
professionals with recordable field
validation equipment based on GPS
location and known track features
identified within the flaw detection
electronic record. Remedial actions will
be applied based on the findings per 49
CFR 213.113 for confirmed rail defect
locations.
NS plans to test the Dearborn Division
Chicago Line approximately every 30 to
45 days and the extended territories
within a similar timeframe. The NS
Engineering Department will also
provide the FRA Rail Integrity Office
with rail test reports for review as
required. NS believes nonstop
continuous rail testing will provide the
capability to test track more quickly and
frequently, and minimize the risk of rail
service failures.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2015–
0019) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received by May 18,
2015 will be considered by FRA before
final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered as far
as practicable.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). In
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT
solicits comments from the public to
better inform its processes. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the
commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy. See also https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice
for the privacy notice of regulations.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 27,
2015.
Ron Hynes,
Director, Office of Technical Oversight.
[FR Doc. 2015–07617 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[FTA Docket No. FTA–2015–0004]
Special Notice; Correction
AGENCY:
Federal Transit Administration,
DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of Correction.
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) published a 30Day Notice of Request for Comments in
the Federal Register on March 17, 2015
Vol. 80 No. 51 entitled; ‘‘49 U.S.C.
5335(a) and (b) National Transit
Database Program.’’ The notice
contained an incorrect estimated total
annual burden on respondents. This
document corrects that error.
SUMMARY:
Tia
Swain, Office of Administration, Office
of Management Planning, (202) 366–
0354.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Correction
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
302,400 hours.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Associate Administrator for Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–07604 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18283
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation
Notice of Funding Availability for the
Department of Transportation’s
National Infrastructure Investments
Under the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of funding availability.
AGENCY:
The Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015
(Pub. L. 113–235, December 16, 2014)
(‘‘FY 2015 Appropriations Act’’ or the
‘‘Act’’) appropriated $500 million to be
awarded by the Department of
Transportation (‘‘DOT’’ or the
‘‘Department’’) for National
Infrastructure Investments. This
appropriation is similar, but not
identical, to the program funded and
implemented pursuant to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(the ‘‘Recovery Act’’) known as the
Transportation Investment Generating
Economic Recovery, or ‘‘TIGER
Discretionary Grants,’’ program. Because
of the similarity in program structure,
DOT will continue to refer to the
program as ‘‘TIGER Discretionary
Grants.’’ Funds for the FY 2015 TIGER
program (‘‘TIGER FY 2015’’) are to be
awarded on a competitive basis for
projects that will have a significant
impact on the Nation, a metropolitan
area, or a region. The purpose of this
final notice is to solicit applications for
TIGER Discretionary Grants.
DATES: Pre-applications must be
submitted by 11:59 p.m. E.D.T. on May
4, 2015. Final applications must be
submitted by 11:59 p.m. E.D.T. on June
5, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Pre-applications must be
submitted electronically through
www.dot.gov/TIGER. Final applications
must be submitted through Grants.gov.
Only applicants who comply with all
submission requirements described in
this notice and electronically submit
both valid pre-applications to DOT and
final applications through Grants.gov
will be eligible for award.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information concerning this
notice, please contact the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program staff via
email at TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call
Howard Hill at 202–366–0301. A TDD is
available for individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing at 202–366–3993. In
addition, DOT will regularly post
answers to questions and requests for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
18284
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
clarifications on DOT’s Web site at
www.dot.gov/TIGER
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is substantially similar to the
final notice published for the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program in the
Federal Register on March 3, 2014.
However, the FY 2015 Appropriations
Act does not provide dedicated funding
for the planning, preparation, or design
of capital projects (‘‘TIGER Planning
Grants’’); these activities may be eligible
to the extent that they are part of an
overall construction project that
receives TIGER Discretionary Grant
funding. Additionally, unlike the past
two rounds of TIGER Discretionary
Grants, a pre-application must be
submitted for an application to be
considered. The pre-application helps
DOT allocate staff resources for the
evaluation process, allows applicants to
provide identifying information about
their project, and assists DOT in
clarifying eligibility questions before the
final application is submitted. In
addition to the differences above, and
minor edits for clarification and those
made to conform the notice to the
statutory circumstances of this round of
TIGER Discretionary Grant funding, this
notice’s format has changed to conform
to Appendix I to 2 CFR part 200. Each
section of this notice contains
information and instructions relevant to
the application process for these TIGER
Discretionary Grants, and you should
read this notice in its entirety so that
you have the information you need to
submit eligible and competitive
applications.
Table of Contents
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Program Description
B. Federal Award Information
C. Eligibility Information
D. Application and Submission Information
E. Application Review
F. Federal Award Administration
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contacts
H. Other Information
A. Program Description
Since the TIGER Discretionary Grants
program was first created, $4.1 billion
has been awarded for capital
investments in surface transportation
infrastructure over six rounds of
competitive grants. The TIGER
Discretionary Grant program seeks to
award projects that advance DOT’s longterm priorities for the nation’s
transportation system found in DOT’s
Strategic Plan for FY 2014–FY 2018
(https://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/
docs/2014-2018-strategic-plan_0.pdf).
Section E, Application Review, of this
notice describes the TIGER
Discretionary Grant selection criteria
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
based on these priorities. Please see
DOT’s Web site at www.dot.gov/TIGER
for background on previous rounds of
TIGER Discretionary Grants.
Throughout the TIGER program,
TIGER Discretionary Grant awards have
supported innovative projects,
including multimodal and
multijurisdictional projects which are
difficult to fund through traditional
Federal programs. Successful TIGER
projects leverage resources, encourage
partnership, catalyze investment and
growth, fill a critical void in the
transportation system or provide a
substantial benefit to the nation, region
or metropolitan area in which the
project is located. The FY 2015 TIGER
program will continue to make
transformative surface transportation
investments that dramatically improve
the status quo by providing significant
and measurable improvements over
existing conditions. Transformative
improvements anchor broad and longlasting, positive changes in economic
development, safety, quality of life,
environmental sustainability, or state of
good repair. Because each TIGER project
is unique, applicants are encouraged to
present, in measurable terms, how
TIGER investment will lead to
transformative change(s) in their
community.
The FY 2015 TIGER program will
fund transformative projects of all
eligible types, including projects that
promote Ladders of Opportunity, to the
extent permitted by law. The FY 2014
TIGER program gave consideration to
projects that sought to improve access to
reliable, safe, and affordable
transportation for disconnected
communities in urban, suburban, and
rural areas. This included, but was not
limited to, capital projects that better
connected people to jobs, removed
physical barriers to access, and
strengthened communities through
neighborhood redevelopment. The FY
2015 TIGER program clearly identifies
this concept as Ladders of Opportunity.
Ladders of Opportunity projects may
increase connectivity to employment,
education, services and other
opportunities, support workforce
development, or contribute to
community revitalization, particularly
for disadvantaged groups: low income
groups, persons with visible and hidden
disabilities, elderly individuals, and
minority persons and populations.
B. Federal Award Information
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act
appropriated $500 million to be
awarded by DOT for the TIGER
Discretionary Grants program. The FY
2015 TIGER Discretionary Grants are for
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
capital investments in surface
transportation infrastructure and are to
be awarded on a competitive basis for
projects that will have a significant
impact on the Nation, a metropolitan
area, or a region. The Act also allows
DOT to use a small portion of the $500
million for oversight and administration
of grants. If this solicitation does not
result in the award and obligation of all
available funds, DOT may publish
additional solicitations.
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act
specifies that TIGER Discretionary
Grants may not be less than $10 million
and not greater than $200 million,
except that for projects located in rural
areas (as defined in Section C.3) the
minimum TIGER Discretionary Grant
size is $1 million.
Pursuant to the FY 2015
Appropriations Act, no more than 25
percent of the funds made available for
TIGER Discretionary Grants (or $125
million) may be awarded to projects in
a single State. The FY 2015
Appropriations Act directs that not less
than 20 percent of the funds provided
for TIGER Discretionary Grants (or $100
million) shall be used for projects
located in rural areas. Further, pursuant
to the FY 2015 Appropriations Act, DOT
must take measures to ensure an
equitable geographic distribution of
grant funds, an appropriate balance in
addressing the needs of urban and rural
areas, and investment in a variety of
transportation modes.
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act
requires that FY 2015 TIGER funds are
only available for obligation through
September 30, 2017. No FY 2015 TIGER
funds may be expended after September
30, 2022. As part of the review and
selection process described in Section
E.2., DOT will consider whether a
project is ready to proceed with an
obligation of grant funds from DOT
within the statutory time provided.
Under the FY 2015 Appropriations Act,
no waiver is possible for these
deadlines.
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act
allows for up to 20 percent of available
funds (or $100 million) to be used by
the Department to pay the subsidy and
administrative costs for a project
receiving credit assistance under the
Transportation Infrastructure Finance
and Innovation Act of 1998 (‘‘TIFIA’’)
program, if it would further the
purposes of the TIGER Discretionary
Grant program.
Recipients of prior TIGER
Discretionary Grants may apply for
funding to support additional phases of
a project awarded funds in earlier
rounds of this program. However, to be
competitive, the applicant should
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
demonstrate the extent to which the
previously funded project phase has
been able to meet estimated project
schedules and budget, as well as the
ability to realize the benefits expected
for the project.
DOT expects that each TIGER
Discretionary Grant will be
administered by one of the relevant
modal administrations, pursuant to a
grant agreement between the TIGER
Discretionary Grant recipient and the
relevant modal administration.
C. Eligibility Information
To be selected for a TIGER
Discretionary Grant, an applicant must
be an Eligible Applicant and the project
must be an Eligible Project.
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Applicants for TIGER
Discretionary Grants are State, local,
and tribal governments, including U.S.
territories, transit agencies, port
authorities, metropolitan planning
organizations (MPOs), and other
political subdivisions of State or local
governments.
Multiple States or jurisdictions may
submit a joint application and must
identify a lead applicant as the primary
point of contact. Each applicant in a
joint application must be an Eligible
Applicant. Joint applications must
include a description of the roles and
responsibilities of each applicant and
must be signed by each applicant.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
TIGER Discretionary Grants may be
used for up to 80 percent of the costs of
a project. 1 DOT may increase the
Federal share above 80 percent only for
projects located in rural areas, in which
case DOT may fund up to 100 percent
of the costs of a project.
DOT will consider non-Federal funds,
as well as funds from the Tribal
Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 202),
as a local match for purposes of this
program. DOT cannot consider any
funds already expended (or otherwise
encumbered) towards the matching
requirement. Please note that matching
funds provided by an applicant will not
be considered as matching funds if the
source of those funds is ultimately a
Federal program, nor can Federal funds
be used as match for other Federal
funds, unless authorized in statute.
Matching funds are subject to the same
Federal requirements described in
Section F.2. as awarded funds.
1 To meet match requirements, the minimum total
project cost for a project located in an urban area
must be $12.5 million.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
3. Other
i. Eligible Projects—Eligible projects
for TIGER Discretionary Grants are
capital projects that include, but are not
limited to: (1) Highway or bridge
projects eligible under title 23, United
States Code (including bicycle and
pedestrian related projects); (2) public
transportation projects eligible under
chapter 53 of title 49, United States
Code; (3) passenger and freight rail
transportation projects; (4) port
infrastructure investments (including
inland port infrastructure); and (5)
intermodal projects. This description of
eligible projects is identical to the
description of eligible projects under
earlier rounds of the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program.2 Research,
demonstration, or pilot projects are
eligible only if they result in long-term,
permanent surface transportation
infrastructure that has independent
utility as defined in Section C.3.iii.
ii. Rural/Urban Definition—For
purposes of this notice, DOT defines
‘‘rural area’’ as any area not in an
Urbanized Area, as such term is defined
by the Census Bureau,3 and will
consider a project to be in a rural area
if all or the majority of a project
(determined by geographic location(s)
where the majority of project money is
to be spent) is located in a rural area. In
this notice ‘‘urban’’ means not rural.
This definition affects three aspects of
the program. First, the FY 2015
Appropriations Act directs that not less
than $100 million of the funds provided
for TIGER Discretionary Grants are to be
used for projects in rural areas. Second,
for a project in a rural area the
minimum award is $1 million instead of
$10 million. Third, up to 100 percent of
the costs of a project in a rural area may
be paid for with Federal funds.
To the extent more than a de minimis
portion of a project is located in an
Urbanized Area, applicants should
identify the estimated percentage of
project costs that will be spent in
2 Please note that the Department may use a
TIGER Discretionary Grant to pay for the surface
transportation components of a broader project that
has non-surface transportation components, and
applicants are encouraged to apply for TIGER
Discretionary Grants to pay for the surface
transportation components of these projects.
3 For Census 2010, the Census Bureau defined an
Urbanized Area (UA) as an area that consists of
densely settled territory that contains 50,000 or
more people. Updated lists of UAs are available on
the Census Bureau Web site at https://
www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10map/UAUC_
RefMap/ua/. Urban Clusters (UCs) are rural areas
for purposes of the TIGER Discretionary Grant
program. Please note that while individual
jurisdictions might have a population of fewer than
50,000, if they are included as part of an UA, they
will be classified as urban for purposes of the
TIGER program.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18285
Urbanized Areas and the estimated
percentage that will be spent in rural
areas.
iii. Project Components—An
application may describe a project that
contains more than one component.
DOT may award funds for a component,
instead of the larger project, if that
component (1) meets minimum award
amounts described in Section B and all
eligibility requirements described in
Section C; (2) has independent utility;
and (3) independently aligns well with
the selection criteria specified in
Section E.1 (Selection Criteria).
Independent utility means that the
component provides transportation
benefits in and of itself and will be
ready for intended use upon completion
of the component’s construction. All
project components that are presented
in a single application must
demonstrate a strong relationship or
connection between them (please see
Section E.1.iii.d. for Required
Approvals.)
DOT strongly encourages applicants
to identify in their applications the
project components that have
independent utility and separately
detail the costs and requested TIGER
funding for those components. If the
application identifies an independent
project component, the application must
clearly identify the benefits that the
component would produce on its own,
in addition to describing the benefits
from the full proposal.
iv. Limit on Number of
Applications—Each lead applicant may
submit no more than three applications.
Unrelated project components should
not be bundled in an application for the
purpose of avoiding the three
applications per lead applicant limit.
Please note that the three-application
limit applies only to applications where
the applicant is the lead applicant.
There is no limit on applications for
which an applicant can be listed as a
partnering agency. If a lead applicant
submits more than three applications as
the lead applicant, only the first three
received will be considered.
D. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address
Pre-application instructions and
information will be available at
www.dot.gov/TIGER, and will include
details for submitting the preapplication electronically to DOT. Final
applications must be submitted to
Grants.gov. Instructions for submitting
pre-applications and final applications
through Grants.gov can be found at
www.dot.gov/TIGER.
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
18286
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
i. Pre-Application: The preapplication requires applicants to
submit identifying information about
their project and qualifies applicants to
submit a final application. If an
applicant does not submit a preapplication, the final application will
not be considered. Pre-applications will
not be reviewed until after the preapplication deadline.
Applicants must complete the preapplication form and send it to DOT
electronically on or prior to the preapplication deadline, in accordance
with the instructions specified at
www.dot.gov/TIGER.
ii. Final Application: Final
applications will not be considered
unless a pre-application is submitted by
the applicant. Any changes from the
pre-application should be clearly
identified in the final application. DOT
may ask any applicant to supplement
data in its application, but expects
applications to be complete upon
submission. To the extent practicable,
applicants should provide data and
evidence of project merits in a form that
is verifiable or publicly available. The
final application must include the
Standard Form 424 (Application for
Federal Assistance) and the Project
Narrative. Additional clarifying
guidance and FAQs to assist applicants
in completing the SF–424 will be
available at www.dot.gov/TIGER by May
5, 2015, when the ‘‘Apply’’ function
within Grants.gov opens to accept
applications under this notice.
The Project Narrative (attachment to
SF–424) must respond to the
application requirements outlined
below. The application must include
information required for DOT to assess
each of the criteria specified in Section
E.1 (Selection Criteria). Applicants must
demonstrate the responsiveness of a
project to any pertinent selection
criteria with the most relevant
information that you can provide,
regardless of whether such information
has been specifically requested, or
identified, in this notice. An application
should provide evidence of the
feasibility of achieving project
milestones, and of financial capacity
and commitment in order to support
project readiness.
An application should also include a
description of how the project addresses
the needs of the area, creates economic
opportunity, and sparks community
revitalization, particularly for
disadvantaged groups.
DOT recommends that the project
narrative adhere to the following basic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
outline and, in addition to a detailed
statement of work, detailed project
schedule, and detailed project budget,
should include a table of contents,
maps, and graphics as appropriate that
make the information easier to review:
a. Project Description (including a
description of what TIGER funds will
support, information on the expected
users of the project, a description of the
transportation challenges that the
project aims to address, how the project
will address these challenges, and if,
and how, the project promotes Ladders
of Opportunity. The description should
include relevant data, such as passenger
or freight volumes, congestion levels,
infrastructure condition, and safety
experience.);
b. Project Location (a detailed
description of the proposed project and
geospatial data for the project, including
a map of the project’s location and its
connections to existing transportation
infrastructure, as well as a description
of the national, regional, or metropolitan
area in which the project is located,
including economic information such as
population size, median income for
transportation facility users, or major
industries affected, and project map);
c. Project Parties (information about
the grant recipient and other project
parties);
d. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of
Project Funds (information about the
amount of grant funding requested,
availability/commitment of fund
sources and uses of all project funds,
total project costs, percentage of project
costs that would be paid with TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds, and the
identity of all parties providing funds
for the project and their percentage
shares.) Include any other pending or
past Federal funding requests for the
project as well as Federal funds already
provided under other programs and the
size, nature/source of the required
match for those funds, to clarify that
these are not the same funds counted
under the matching requirement for this
grant request;
e. Selection Criteria (information
about how the project aligns with each
of the primary and secondary selection
criteria):
(i) Primary Selection Criteria
(a) State of Good Repair
(b) Economic Competitiveness
(c) Quality of Life
(d) Environmental Sustainability
(e) Safety
(ii) Secondary Selection Criteria
(a) Innovation
(b) Partnership
f. Results of Benefit-Cost Analysis;
g. Project Readiness, including
planning approvals, NEPA and other
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental reviews/approvals,
(including information about
permitting, legislative approvals, State
and local planning, and project
partnership and implementation
agreements); and
h. Federal Wage Rate Certification (an
application must include a certification,
signed by the applicant(s), stating that it
will comply with the requirements of
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40,
United States Code [Federal wage rate
requirements], as required by the FY
2015 Appropriations Act).
The purpose of this recommended
format is to ensure that applications
clearly address the program
requirements and make critical
information readily apparent.
DOT recommends that the project
narrative be prepared with standard
formatting preferences (i.e., a singlespaced document, using a standard 12point font, such as Times New Roman,
with 1-inch margins). The project
narrative may not exceed 30 pages in
length. Documentation supporting the
assertions made in the narrative portion
may also be provided, but should be
limited to relevant information. Cover
pages, tables of contents, and the federal
wage rate certification do not count
towards the 30-page limit for the
narrative portion of the application.
Otherwise, the only substantive portions
of the application that may exceed the
30-page limit are any supporting
documents (including a more detailed
discussion of the benefit-cost analysis)
provided to support assertions or
conclusions made in the 30-page
narrative section. If possible, Web site
links to supporting documentation
(including a more detailed discussion of
the benefit-cost analysis) should be
provided rather than copies of these
materials. Otherwise, supporting
documents should be included as
appendices to the application. It is
helpful if applicants’ references to
supporting documentation clearly
identify the relevant portion of that
document. At the applicant’s discretion,
relevant materials provided previously
to a relevant modal administration in
support of a different DOT discretionary
financial assistance program (for
example, New Starts or TIFIA) may be
referenced and described as unchanged.
This information need not be
resubmitted for the TIGER Discretionary
Grant application but may be referenced
as described above; Web site links to the
materials are highly recommended. DOT
recommends using appropriately
descriptive file names (e.g., ‘‘Project
Narrative,’’ ‘‘Maps,’’ ‘‘Memoranda of
Understanding and Letters of Support,’’
etc.) for all attachments.
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System
for Award Management (SAM)
DOT may not make a TIGER
Discretionary Grant award to an
applicant until the applicant has
complied with all applicable DUNS and
SAM requirements. If an applicant has
not fully complied with the
requirements by the submission
deadline, the application will not be
considered. To submit an application
through Grants.gov, applicants must:
i. Obtain a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number;
ii. Register with the System for Award
Management (SAM) at www.SAM.gov;
iii. Create a Grants.gov username and
password; and
iv. The E-Business Point of Contact
(POC) at your organization must
respond to the registration email from
Grants.gov and login at Grants.gov to
authorize you as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR).
Please note that there can be more than
one AOR for an organization.
For information and instructions on
each of these processes, please see
instructions at https://www.grants.gov/
web/grants/applicants/applicantfaqs.html.
If an applicant is selected for an
award, the applicant will be required to
maintain an active SAM registration
with current information throughout the
period of the award.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4. Submission Dates and Times
i. Deadline: Pre-applications must be
submitted by 11:59 p.m. E.D.T. on May
4, 2015. Final applications must be
submitted by 11:59 p.m. E.D.T. on June
5, 2015. The Grants.gov ‘‘Apply’’
function will open on May 5, 2015.
The Department has determined that
a pre-application deadline fewer than 60
days after this notice is appropriate
because (1) this notice is substantially
similar to notices used for previous
rounds of TIGER Discretionary Grants,
(2) minimal work is required to submit
the pre-application, and (3) the
accelerated timeframe helps the
Department ensure that it can timely
obligate the available funds.
ii. Only applicants who comply with
all submission deadlines described in
this notice and electronically submit
valid pre-applications to DOT and final
applications through Grants.gov will be
eligible for award.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
make submissions in advance of the
deadline. Please be aware that you must
complete the Grants.gov registration
process before submitting the final
application, and that this process
usually takes 2–4 weeks to complete. If
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
interested parties experience difficulties
at any point during the registration or
application process, please call the
Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline at
1–800–518–4726, Monday-Friday from
7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. EDT.
iii. Late Applications: Applications
received after the deadline will not be
considered except in the case of
unforeseen technical difficulties
outlined in Section 4.iv. Late
applications that are the result of failure
to register or comply with Grants.gov
applicant requirements in a timely
manner will not be considered.
iv. a. Pre-Application
Applicants experiencing technical
issues due to the pre-application
submission site that are beyond the
applicant’s control must contact
TIGERGrants@dot.gov or Howard Hill at
202–366–0301 prior to the preapplication deadline with the user name
of the registrant and details of the
technical issue experienced.
DOT will consider late preapplications on a case-by-case basis.
DOT encourages applicants to submit
additional information documenting the
reason for the late submissions.
b. Final Application
Applicants experiencing technical
issues with Grants.gov that are beyond
the applicant’s control must contact
TIGERGrants@dot.gov or Howard Hill at
202–366–0301 prior to the
corresponding deadline with the user
name of the registrant and details of the
technical issue experienced. The
applicant must provide:
(i) Details of the technical issue
experienced.
(ii) Screen capture(s) of the technical
issue experienced along corresponding
‘‘Grant tracking number’’ (Grants.Gov).
(iii) The ‘‘Legal Business Name’’ for
the applicant that was provided in the
SF–424 or pre-application.
(iv) The AOR name submitted in the
SF–424 (Grants.gov).
(v) The DUNS number associated with
the pre-application/application.
(vi) The Grants.gov or Pre-Application
Help Desk Tracking Number.
To ensure a fair competition for
limited discretionary funds, the
following conditions are not valid
reasons to permit late submissions: (1)
Failure to complete the registration
process before the deadline date; (2)
failure to follow Grants.gov instructions
on how to register and apply as posted
on its Web site; (3) failure to follow all
of the instructions in this notice of
funding availability; and (4) technical
issues experienced with the applicant’s
computer or information technology (IT)
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18287
environment. After DOT staff review all
of the information submitted and
contacted the Grants.gov Help Desk to
validate the technical issues you
reported, DOT staff will contact you to
either approve or deny your request to
submit a late application through
Grants.gov. If the technical issues you
reported cannot be validated, your
application will be rejected as untimely.
5. Funding Restrictions
There is no specific set aside funding
solely for pre-construction activities 4 in
the FY 2015 TIGER Discretionary Grant
program. However, these activities may
be eligible to the extent that they are
part of an overall construction project
that receives TIGER Discretionary Grant
funding. For TIGER funds to be
considered for pre-construction
activities, the applicant must clearly
state, in the application, the preconstruction activity and amount of
TIGER funds that will be expended on
the activity.
E. Application Review
1. Selection Criteria
This section specifies the criteria that
DOT will use to evaluate and award
applications for TIGER Discretionary
Grants. The criteria incorporate the
statutory eligibility requirements for this
program, which are specified in this
notice as relevant. There are two
categories of selection criterion,
‘‘Primary Selection Criteria’’ and
‘‘Secondary Selection Criteria.’’ Within
each relevant selection criteria,
applicants are encouraged to present in
measurable terms how TIGER
investment will lead to transformative
change(s) in their community. Projects
will also be evaluated for demonstrated
project readiness, benefits and costs,
and cost share.
i. Primary Selection Criteria
Applications that do not demonstrate
a likelihood of significant long-term
benefits based on these criteria will not
proceed in the evaluation process. DOT
does not consider any primary selection
criterion more important than the
others. The primary selection criteria,
which will receive equal consideration,
are:
a. Safety. Improving the safety of U.S.
transportation facilities and systems for
all modes of transportation and users.
DOT will assess the project’s ability to
4 Pre-Construction activities are activities related
to the planning, preparation, or design of surface
transportation projects. These activities include but
are not limited to environmental analysis,
feasibility studies, design, and engineering of
surface transportation projects as described in
Section C.3.
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18288
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
reduce the number, rate, and
consequences of surface transportationrelated accidents, serious injuries, and
fatalities among transportation users,
the project’s contribution to the
elimination of highway/rail grade
crossings, and the project’s contribution
to preventing unintended releases of
hazardous materials. DOT will consider
the project’s ability to foster a safe,
connected, accessible transportation
system for the multimodal movement of
goods and people.
b. State of Good Repair. Improving the
condition and resilience of existing
transportation facilities and systems.
DOT will assess whether and to what
extent: (1) The project is consistent with
relevant plans to maintain
transportation facilities or systems in a
state of good repair and address current
and projected vulnerabilities; (2) if left
unimproved, the poor condition of the
asset will threaten future transportation
network efficiency, mobility of goods or
accessibility and mobility of people, or
economic growth; (3) the project is
appropriately capitalized up front and
uses asset management approaches that
optimize its long-term cost structure; (4)
a sustainable source of revenue is
available for operations and
maintenance of the project; and (5) the
project improves the transportation
asset’s ability to withstand probable
occurrence or recurrence of an
emergency or major disaster or other
impacts of climate change. Additional
consideration will be given to a project’s
contribution to improve the overall
reliability of a multimodal
transportation system that serves all
users, and to projects that offer
significant transformational
improvements to the condition of
existing transportation systems and
facilities.
c. Economic Competitiveness.
Contributing to the economic
competitiveness of the United States
over the medium- to long-term,
revitalizing communities, and creating
and preserving jobs. DOT will assess
whether the project will (1) Decrease
transportation costs and improve access
for Americans with transportation
disadvantages through reliable and
timely access to employment centers,
education and training opportunities,
and other basic needs of workers; (2)
improve long-term efficiency, reliability
or costs in the movement of workers or
goods; (3) increase the economic
productivity of land, capital, or labor at
specific locations, and through
community revitalization efforts; (4)
result in long-term job creation and
other economic opportunities; or (5)
help the United States compete in a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
global economy by facilitating efficient
and reliable freight movement,
including border infrastructure and
projects that have a significant effect on
reducing the costs of transporting export
cargoes. DOT will prioritize projects
that exhibit strong leadership and
vision, and are part of a larger strategy
to significantly revitalize communities
and increase economic opportunities.
d. Quality of Life. Increasing
transportation choices and access to
essential services for people in
communities across the United States,
particularly for disadvantaged groups.
DOT will assess whether the project
furthers the six ‘‘Livability Principles’’
developed by DOT with the Department
of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the
Partnership for Sustainable
Communities.5 DOT will focus on the
first principle, the creation of affordable
and convenient transportation choices.6
Further, DOT will prioritize projects
developed in coordination with landuse planning and economic
development decisions, including
through programs like TIGER Planning
Grants, the Department of Housing and
Urban Development’s Regional Planning
Grants, the Environmental Protection
Agency’s Brownfield Area-Wide
Planning Pilot Program, and technical
assistance programs focused on quality
of life or economic development
planning. DOT will assess the extent to
which the project will anchor
transformative, positive and long-lasting
quality of life changes at the national,
regional or metropolitan level.
e. Environmental Sustainability.
Improving energy efficiency, reducing
dependence on oil, reducing greenhouse
gas emissions, improving water quality,
avoiding and mitigating environmental
impacts and otherwise benefitting the
environment. DOT will assess the
project’s ability to: (i) Reduce energy use
and air or water pollution; (ii) avoid
adverse environmental impacts to air or
water quality, wetlands, and endangered
species; or (iii) provide environmental
benefits, such as brownfield
redevelopment, ground water recharge
in areas of water scarcity, wetlands
creation or improved habitat
connectivity, and stormwater
mitigation, including green
5 https://www.sustainablecommunities.gov/
index.html.
6 In full, this principle reads: ‘‘Provide more
transportation choices. Develop safe, reliable and
economical transportation choices to decrease
household transportation costs, reduce our nations’
dependence on foreign oil, improve air quality,
reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote
public health.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
infrastructure. Applicants are
encouraged to provide quantitative
information, including baseline
information that demonstrates how the
project will reduce energy consumption,
stormwater runoff, or achieve other
benefits for the environment.
ii. Secondary Selection Criteria
a. Innovation. Use of innovative
strategies to pursue the long-term
outcomes outlined above. DOT will also
assess the extent to which the project
uses innovative technology to pursue
one or more of the long-term outcomes
outlined above or to significantly
enhance the operational performance of
the transportation system. DOT will also
assess the extent to which the project
incorporates innovations in
transportation funding and finance and
leverages both existing and new sources
of funding through both traditional and
innovative means. Further, DOT will
consider the extent to which the project
utilizes innovative practices in
contracting, congestion management,
safety management, asset management,
or long-term operations and
maintenance. DOT is interested in
projects that apply innovative strategies
to improve the efficiency of project
development or to improve project
delivery.
b. Partnership. Demonstrating strong
collaboration among a broad range of
stakeholders, and the product of a
robust, inclusive planning process.
(i) Jurisdictional and Stakeholder
Collaboration. DOT will consider the
extent to which projects involve
multiple partners in project
development and funding, such as State
and local governments, other public
entities, and/or private or nonprofit
entities. DOT will also assess the extent
to which the project application
demonstrates collaboration among
neighboring or regional jurisdictions to
achieve national, regional, or
metropolitan benefits. In the context of
public-private partnerships, DOT will
assess the extent to which partners are
encouraged to ensure long-term asset
performance, such as through pay-forsuccess approaches.
(ii) Disciplinary Integration. DOT will
consider the extent to which projects
include partnerships that bring together
diverse transportation agencies and/or
are supported, financially or otherwise,
by non-transportation public agencies
that are pursuing similar objectives. For
example, DOT will give priority to
transportation projects that are
coordinated with economic
development, housing, water
infrastructure, and land use plans and
policies or other public service efforts.
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Similarly, DOT will give priority to
transportation projects that are
coordinated with housing, social
services, or education agencies. Projects
that grow out of a robust planning
process—such as those conducted with
DOT’s various planning programs and
initiatives, the Department of Housing
and Urban Development’s Regional
Planning Grants and Choice
Neighborhood Planning Grants, or the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Brownfield Area-Wide Planning Pilot
Program, as well as technical assistance
programs focused on livability or
economic development planning—will
also be given priority.
iii. Demonstrated Project Readiness
Projects that receive funding in this
round of TIGER must obligate funds by
September 30, 2017, or the funding will
expire. Therefore, DOT will assess every
application to determine whether the
project is likely to proceed to obligation
by the statutory deadline (see
Additional Information on Project
Readiness Guidelines located at
www.dot.gov/TIGER for further details),
as evidenced by:
a. Technical Feasibility. The technical
feasibility of the project should be
demonstrated by engineering and design
studies and activities; the development
of design criteria and/or a basis of
design; the basis for the cost estimate
presented in the TIGER application,
including the identification of
contingency levels appropriate to its
level of design; and any scope,
schedule, and budget risk-mitigation
measures. Applicants must include a
detailed statement of work that focuses
on the technical and engineering aspects
of the project and describes in detail the
project to be constructed;
b. Financial Feasibility. The viability
and completeness of the project’s
financing package (assuming the
availability of the requested TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds) should be
demonstrated including evidence of
stable and reliable capital and (as
appropriate) operating fund
commitments sufficient to cover
estimated costs; the availability of
contingency reserves should planned
capital or operating revenue sources not
materialize; evidence of the financial
condition of the project sponsor; and
evidence of the grant recipient’s ability
to manage grants. The applicant must
include a detailed project budget in this
section of the application containing a
breakdown of how the funds will be
spent. That budget must estimate—both
dollar amount and percentage of cost—
the cost of work for each project
component and provide examples. If the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
project will be completed in individual
segments or phases, a budget for each
individual segment or phase must be
included. Budget spending categories
must be broken down between TIGER,
other Federal, and non-Federal
sources 7, and identify how each
funding source will share in each
activity.
c. Project Schedule. The applicant
must include a detailed project schedule
that includes all major project
milestones—such as start and
completion of environmental reviews
and approvals; design; right of way
acquisition; approval of plan,
specification and estimate (PS&E);
procurement; and construction— with
sufficiently detailed information to
demonstrate that:
(i) all necessary pre-construction
activities will be complete to allow
grant funds to be obligated no later than
June 30, 2017, to give DOT reasonable
assurance that the TIGER Discretionary
Grant funds will be obligated
sufficiently in advance of the September
30, 2017, statutory deadline, and that
any unexpected delays will not put the
funds at risk of expiring before they are
obligated;
(ii) the project can begin construction
quickly upon receipt of a TIGER
Discretionary Grant, and that the grant
funds will be spent steadily and
expeditiously once construction starts;
and
(iii) any applicant that is applying for
a TIGER Discretionary Grant and does
not own all of the property or right-ofway required to complete the project
should provide evidence that the
property and/or right-of-way acquisition
can and will be completed
expeditiously.
DOT may revoke any award of TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds and award
those funds to another project if the
funds cannot be timely expended or
construction does not begin in
accordance with the project schedule
established in the grant agreement.
d. Required Approvals
(i) Environmental Permits and
Reviews. An application for a TIGER
Discretionary Grant must detail whether
the project will significantly impact the
natural, social and/or economic
environment. The application should
demonstrate receipt (or reasonably
anticipated receipt) of all environmental
approvals and permits necessary for the
project to proceed to construction on the
7 Non-Federal
sources include State funds
originating from State revenue funded programs,
local funds originating from State or local revenue
funded programs, private funds or other funding
sources of non-Federal origins.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18289
timeline specified in the project
schedule and necessary to meet the
statutory obligation deadline, including
satisfaction of all Federal, State and
local requirements and completion of
the National Environmental Policy Act
(‘‘NEPA’’) process. Although Section
C.3.iii (Project Components) of this
notice encourages applicants to identify
independent project components, those
components may not be separable for
the NEPA process. In such cases, the
NEPA review for the independent
project component may have to include
evaluation of all project components as
connected, similar, or cumulative
actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25.
The applicant should submit the
information listed below with your
application:
(1) Information about the NEPA status
of the project. If the NEPA process is
completed, an applicant must indicate
the date of, and provide a Web site link
or other reference to the final
Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No
Significant Impact or Record of
Decision. If the NEPA process is
underway but not complete, the
application must detail the type of
NEPA review underway, where the
project is in the process, and indicate
the anticipated date of completion. You
must provide a Web site link or other
reference to copies of any NEPA
documents prepared.
(2) Information on reviews by other
agencies. An application for a TIGER
Discretionary Grant must indicate
whether the proposed project requires
reviews or approval actions by other
agencies,8 indicate the status of such
actions, and provide detailed
information about the status of those
reviews or approvals and/or
demonstrate compliance with any other
applicable Federal, State, or local
requirements.
(3) Environmental studies or other
documents—preferably through a Web
site link—that describe in detail known
project impacts, and possible mitigation
for those impacts.
(4) A description of discussions with
the appropriate DOT modal
administration field or headquarters
office regarding compliance with NEPA
and other applicable environmental
reviews and approvals.
(ii) Legislative Approvals. The
applicant should demonstrate receipt of
state and local approvals on which the
project depends. Additional support
8 Projects that may impact protected resources
such as wetlands, species habitat, cultural or
historic resources require review and approval by
Federal and State agencies with jurisdiction over
those resources. Examples of these reviews and
approvals can be found at www.dot.gov/TIGER.
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
18290
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
from relevant State and local officials is
not required; however, an applicant
should demonstrate that the project is
broadly supported.
(iii) State and Local Planning. The
planning requirements of the modal
administration administering the TIGER
project will apply.9 You should
demonstrate that a project that is
required to be included in the relevant
State, metropolitan, and local planning
documents has been or will be included.
If the project is not included in the
relevant planning documents at the time
the application is submitted, you should
submit a certification from the
appropriate planning agency that
actions are underway to include the
project in the relevant planning
document. Because projects have
different schedules, the construction
start date for each TIGER Discretionary
Grant will be specified in the projectspecific grant agreements signed by
relevant modal administration and the
grant recipients and will be based on
critical path items identified by
applicants in response to items (i)(1)
through (4) above.
e. Assessment of Project Risks and
Mitigation Strategies. The applicant
should identify the material risks to the
project and the strategies that the lead
applicant and any project partners have
undertaken or will undertake in order to
9 All projects requiring an action by the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) or the Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) in accordance with
23 CFR part 450, must be in the metropolitan
transportation plan, transportation improvement
program (TIP) and statewide transportation
improvement program (STIP). Further, in air quality
non-attainment and maintenance areas, all
regionally significant projects, regardless of the
funding source, must be included in the conforming
metropolitan transportation plan and TIP. To the
extent a project is required to be on a metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, and/or STIP, it will not
receive a TIGER Discretionary Grant until it is
included in such plans. Projects not currently
included in these plans can be amended by the
State and metropolitan planning organization
(MPO). Projects that are not required to be in long
range transportation plans, STIPs, and TIPs will not
need to be included in such plans in order to
receive a TIGER Discretionary Grant. Port, freight
and passenger rail projects are not required to be
on the State Rail Plans called for in the Passenger
Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008. This
is consistent with the exemption for high-speed and
intercity passenger rail projects under the Recovery
Act. However, applicants seeking funding for
freight and passenger rail projects are encouraged
to demonstrate that they have done sufficient
planning to ensure that projects fit into a prioritized
list of capital needs and are consistent with longrange goals. To the extent possible, freight projects
should be included in a state freight plan and
supported by a state freight advisory committee (see
MAP–21 §§ 1117–1118). Further information and
guidance information on transportation planning
and is available from the following FHWA and FTA
sites respectively—https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
planning and https://www.fta.dot.gov/about/
12347.html. Port planning guidelines are available
at StrongPorts.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
mitigate those risks. In past rounds of
TIGER Discretionary Grants, certain
projects have been affected by
procurement delays, environmental
uncertainties, and increases in real
estate acquisition costs. The applicant
must assess the greatest risks to the
projects and identify how the project
parties will mitigate those risks. DOT
will consider projects that contain risks
so long as the applicant clearly and
directly describe achievable mitigation
strategies.
The applicant, to the extent they are
unfamiliar with the Federal program,
should contact DOT modal field or
headquarters offices for information on
what steps are pre-requisite to the
obligation of Federal funds in order to
ensure that their project schedule is
reasonable and that there are no risks of
delays in satisfying federal
requirements.
Contacts for the Federal Highway
Administration Division offices—which
are located in all 50 States, Washington,
DC, and Puerto Rico—can be found at
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/about/
field.cfm. Contacts for the ten Federal
Transit Administration regional offices
can be found at https://www.fta.dot.gov/
12926.html. Contacts for the nine
Maritime Administration Gateway
Offices can be found at https://
www.marad.dot.gov/about_us_landing_
page/gateway_offices/Gateway_
Presence.htm. For Federal Railroad
Administration Contacts, please contact
TIGER program staff via email at
TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call Howard
Hill at 202–366–0301.
iv. Project Costs and Benefits
An applicant for TIGER Discretionary
Grants is generally required to identify,
quantify, and compare expected benefits
and costs, subject to the following
qualifications: 10
An applicant should prepare and
submit an analysis of benefits and costs;
however, DOT understands that the
appropriate level of detail of analysis
(for items such as surveys, travel
demand forecasts, market forecasts, and
statistical analyses) is less for smaller
projects than for larger projects. The
level of sophistication of the benefit-cost
analysis (BCA) should be reasonably
related to the size of the overall project
and the amount of grant funds requested
in the application. Any subjective
estimates of benefits and costs should be
quantified, and the applicant should
10 DOT has a responsibility under Executive
Order 12893, Principles for Federal Infrastructure
Investments, 59 FR 4233, to base infrastructure
investments on systematic analysis of expected
benefits and costs, including both quantitative and
qualitative measures.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provide appropriate evidence to lend
credence to their subjective estimates.
Estimates of benefits should be
presented in monetary terms whenever
possible; if a monetary estimate is not
possible, then at least one non-monetary
quantitative estimate (in physical, nonmonetary terms, such as crash rates,
ridership estimates, emissions levels, or
energy efficiency improvements) should
be provided.
Based on feedback over previous
rounds of TIGER, DOT recognizes that
the benefit-cost analysis can be
particularly burdensome on Tribal
governments. Therefore, the Department
is providing additional flexibility to
Tribal governments for the purposes of
this notice. At their discretion, Tribal
applicants may elect to provide raw data
to support the need for a project (such
as crash rates, ridership estimates, and
the number of people who will benefit
from the project), without additional
analysis. This data will then be used to
allow DOT economists to make the best
estimates they can develop (given the
data provided) of benefits and costs.
Examples of BCAs by successful Tribal
applicants are also available online at
https://www.dot.gov/policy-initiatives/
tiger/tribal-tiger-bca-examples.
The lack of a useful analysis of
expected project benefits and costs may
be the basis for not selecting a project
for award of a TIGER Discretionary
Grant. If it is clear to DOT that the total
benefits of a project are not reasonably
likely to justify the project’s costs, DOT
will not award a TIGER Discretionary
Grant to the project.
Detailed guidance for the preparation
of benefit-cost analyses is provided in
the 2015 Benefit-Cost Analyses
Guidance for TIGER Grant Applicants
and in the BCA Resource Guide
(available at www.dot.gov/TIGER). A
recording of the Benefit-Cost Analysis
Practitioner’s Workshop (2010) and two
BCA-related webinars are also available
for viewing at www.dot.gov/TIGER,
along with examples of benefit-cost
analyses that have been submitted in
previous rounds of TIGER.
Spreadsheets supporting the benefitcost analysis should be original Excel
spreadsheets, not PDFs of those
spreadsheets. Benefits should be
presented, whenever possible, in a
tabular form showing benefits and costs
in each year for the useful life of the
project. The application should include
projections for both the build and nobuild scenarios for the project for each
year between the completion of the
project and a point in time at least 20
years beyond the project’s completion
date or the lifespan of the project,
whichever is closer to the present.
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
Benefits and costs should both be
discounted to the year 2015, and
calculations should be presented for
discounted values of both the stream of
benefits and the stream of costs. If the
project has multiple components, each
of which has independent utility, the
benefits and costs of each component
should be estimated and presented
separately. The results of the benefitcost analysis should be summarized in
the Project Narrative section of the
application itself, but the details should
be presented in an attachment to the
application if the full analysis cannot be
included within the page limit for the
project narrative.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
v. Cost Share
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act
directs DOT to prioritize projects that
require a contribution of Federal funds
to complete an overall financing
package, and all projects can increase
their competitiveness for purposes of
the TIGER program by demonstrating
significant non-Federal financial
contributions. The applicant should
clearly demonstrate the extent to which
the project cannot be readily and
efficiently completed without a TIGER
Discretionary Grant, and the extent to
which other sources of funds, including
Federal, State, or local funding, may or
may not be readily available for the
project. DOT recognizes that applicants
have varying abilities and resources to
contribute non-Federal contributions,
especially those communities that are
not routinely receiving and matching
Federal funds. DOT recognizes certain
communities with fewer financial
resources may struggle to provide costshare that exceeds the minimum
requirements and will, therefore,
consider an applicant’s broader fiscal
constraints when evaluating nonFederal contributions. In the first six
rounds, on average, projects attracted
more than 3.5 matching dollars for every
TIGER grant dollar.
2. Review and Selection Process
DOT reviews all eligible applications
received before the deadline. The TIGER
review and selection process consists of
three phases: Technical Review, Tier 2
Analysis consisting of project readiness
and economic analysis, and Senior
Review.
In the Technical Evaluation phase,
teams comprising staff from the Office
of the Secretary (OST) and modal
administrations review all eligible
applications and rate projects as Highly
Recommended, Recommended,
Acceptable, or Not Recommended based
on how well the projects align with the
selection criteria.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Tier 2 Analysis consists of (1) an
Economic Analysis and (2) a Project
Readiness Analysis. The Economic
Analysis Team, comprising OST and
modal administration economic staff,
assess whether total benefits of the
proposed projects are likely to outweigh
costs. The Project Readiness Team,
comprising Office of the Secretary
Office of Policy (OST–P) and modal
administration staff, evaluates the
proposed project’s technical and
financial feasibility, potential risks and
mitigation strategies, and project
schedule, including the status of
environmental approvals and readiness
to proceed.
In the third review phase, the Senior
Review Team, which includes senior
leadership from OST and the modal
administrations, consider all projects
that were rated Acceptable,
Recommended, or Highly
Recommended and determine which
projects to advance to the Secretary as
Highly Rated. The Secretary selects from
the Highly Rated projects for final
award.
F. Federal Award Administration
1. Federal Award Notice
Following the evaluation outlined in
Section E, the Secretary will announce
awarded projects by posting a list of
selected projects at www.dot.gov/TIGER.
Following the announcement, the
relevant modal administration will
contact the point of contact listed in the
SF 424 to initiate negotiation of the
grant agreement.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
All awards will be administered
pursuant to the Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
found in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted by
DOT at 2 CFR part. 1201. Additionally,
applicable Federal laws, rules and
regulations of the relevant modal
administration administering the project
will apply to the projects that receive
TIGER Discretionary Grant awards,
including planning requirements,
Service Outcome Agreements,
Stakeholder Agreements, Buy America
compliance, and other requirements
under DOT’s other highway, transit, rail,
and port grant programs.
For projects administered by the
Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), applicable Federal laws, rules,
and regulations set forth in Title 23
U.S.C. and Title 23 CFR apply. For an
illustrative list of the applicable laws,
rules, regulations, executive orders,
polices, guidelines, and requirements as
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18291
they relate to a TIGER project
administered by the FHWA, please see
[https://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/
infrastructure/tiger/fy2014_gr_exhbt_c/
index.htm]. For TIGER projects
administered by the Federal Transit
Administration and partially funded
with Federal transit assistance, all
relevant requirements under chapter 53
of title 49 U.S.C. apply. For transit
projects funded exclusively with TIGER
discretionary funds, some requirements
of chapter 53 of title 49 U.S.C. and
chapter VI of title 49 CFR apply. For
projects administered by the Federal
Railroad Administration, FRA
requirements described in 49 U.S.C.
Subtitle V, Part C apply.
Federal wage rate requirements
included in subchapter IV of chapter 31
of title 40, United States Code, apply to
all projects receiving funds under this
program, and apply to all parts of the
project, whether funded with TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds, other Federal
funds, or non-Federal funds.
3. Reporting
i. Performance Reporting—Each
applicant selected for TIGER
Discretionary Grant funding must
collect information and report on the
project’s performance with respect to
the relevant long-term outcomes that are
expected to be achieved through
construction of the project. Performance
indicators will not include formal goals
or targets, but will include baseline
measures as well as post-project
outcomes for an agreed-upon timeline,
and will be used to evaluate and
compare projects and monitor the
results that grant funds achieve to
ensure that grant funds achieve the
intended long-term outcomes of the
TIGER Discretionary Grant program.
ii. Progress Reporting —Each
applicant selected for TIGER
Discretionary Grant funding must
submit quarterly progress reports and
Federal Financial Report (SF–425) on
the financial condition of the project
and the project’s progress, as well as an
Annual Budget Review and Program
Plan to monitor the use of Federal funds
and ensure accountability and financial
transparency in the TIGER program.
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contacts
For further information concerning
this notice please contact the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program staff via
email at TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call
Howard Hill at 202–366–0301. A TDD is
available for individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing at 202–366–3993. In
addition, DOT will post answers to
questions and requests for clarifications
on DOT’s Web site at www.dot.gov/
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
18292
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
TIGER. To ensure applicants receive
accurate information about eligibility or
the program, the applicant is
encouraged to contact DOT directly,
rather than through intermediaries or
third parties, with questions. DOT staff
may also conduct briefings on the
TIGER Discretionary Grants selection
and award process upon request.
H. Other Information
1. Protection of Confidential Business
Information
All information submitted as part of
or in support of any application shall
use publicly available data or data that
can be made public and methodologies
that are accepted by industry practice
and standards, to the extent possible. If
the application includes information
you consider to be a trade secret or
confidential commercial or financial
information, the applicant should do the
following: (1) Note on the front cover
that the submission ‘‘Contains
Confidential Business Information
(CBI)’’; (2) mark each affected page
‘‘CBI’’; and (3) highlight or otherwise
denote the CBI portions. DOT protects
such information from disclosure to the
extent allowed under applicable law. In
the event DOT receives a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request for the
information, DOT will follow the
procedures described in its FOIA
regulations at 49 CFR 7.17. Only
information that is ultimately
determined to be confidential under that
procedure will be exempt from
disclosure under FOIA.
Issued On: March 30, 2015.
Anthony R. Foxx,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–07711 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2006–24812]
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Petition for Waiver of Compliance and
Notice of Public Hearing
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this document provides the public
notice that by a document dated
February 6, 2015, BNSF Railway
(BNSF), has petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) for an
extension of and modification to its
waiver of compliance from certain
provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained at 49 CFR part
232, Brake System Safety Standards for
Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
and Equipment. Specifically, BNSF
requests to extend the mileage limits
specified for certain designated
extended haul trains (see 49 CFR
232.213, Extended haul trains). FRA
assigned the petition Docket Number
FRA–2006–24812.
In its petition, BNSF states that it has
a history of successfully running trains
under the existing waiver in Docket
Number FRA–2006–24812, and under
the conditions of the temporary waiver
granted in Docket Number FRA–2014–
0070. BNSF states that it safely
conducted thousands of loadings and
millions of ton-miles with a defect ratio
nearly identical to that of traditional
operations since the first waiver was
implemented in 2006. Based on the
important benefits to safety and network
fluidity associated with the successful
implementation of the temporary 1,800mile inspection waiver (Docket Number
FRA–2014–0070) and BNSF’s extensive
history running extended haul trains
under both waivers, BNSF would like to
continue and modestly extend the
current BNSF waiver in Docket Number
FRA–2006–24812 to 1,702 miles, from
the current mileage of 1,603. BNSF
states that this modest 99-mile increase
in distance to 1,702 miles would afford
a substantial portion of the benefits
identified at the 1,800-mile distance.
The incremental increase of 99 miles
would allow for 68.2 percent of the coal
and grain trains currently operating
under the waiver in FRA–2014–0070 to
be added to BNSF’s waiver in FRA–
2006–24812.
BNSF believes that the current waiver
petition is consistent with meeting
FRA’s safety focus and is appropriate for
National commerce concerns. This
petition would be for current grain and
coal trains operating within BNSF’s
network currently running at less than
1,702 miles between designated
extended haul inspection points. The
BNSF trains included in this request
operate the very same type of equipment
as the existing waiver trains. BNSF
states it is very confident that slightly
increasing the length of the extended
haul inspection points on these trains
listed will have no adverse impact on
safe operations.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. In addition, FRA has
determined that the facts of this
proceeding warrant a public hearing.
Accordingly, a hearing is hereby
scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. on May
21, 2015, at the Alliance Public Library,
1750 Sweetwater Avenue, Alliance, NE
69301. Interested parties are invited to
present oral statements at this hearing.
For information on facilities or services
for persons with disabilities, or to
request special assistance at the hearing,
contact Mr. Steven Zuiderveen, FRA
Railroad Safety Specialist, by telephone,
email, or in writing, at least 5 business
days before the date of the hearing. Mr.
Zuiderveen’s contact information is as
follows: FRA, Office of Railroad Safety,
Mail Stop 25, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590; (202) 493–
6337; Steven.Zuiderveen@dot.gov. The
informal hearing will be conducted by
a representative designated by FRA in
accordance with FRA’s Rules of Practice
(see specifically 49 CFR 211.25). FRA’s
representative will make an opening
statement outlining the scope of the
hearing, as well as any additional
procedures for the conduct of the
hearing. The hearing will be a
nonadversarial proceeding in which all
interested parties will be given the
opportunity to express their views
regarding the waiver petition without
cross examination. After all initial
statements have been completed, those
individuals wishing to make brief
rebuttal statements will be given an
opportunity to do so.
In addition, FRA is extending the
comment period for this waiver petition
to June 21, 2015, to allow adequate time
for any additional comments to be
submitted following the public hearing
on May 17, 2015.
Communications received by that date
will be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All communications
concerning these proceedings should
identify the appropriate docket number
and may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18283-18292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07711]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary of Transportation
Notice of Funding Availability for the Department of
Transportation's National Infrastructure Investments Under the
Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of funding availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act,
2015 (Pub. L. 113-235, December 16, 2014) (``FY 2015 Appropriations
Act'' or the ``Act'') appropriated $500 million to be awarded by the
Department of Transportation (``DOT'' or the ``Department'') for
National Infrastructure Investments. This appropriation is similar, but
not identical, to the program funded and implemented pursuant to the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the ``Recovery Act'')
known as the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery, or
``TIGER Discretionary Grants,'' program. Because of the similarity in
program structure, DOT will continue to refer to the program as ``TIGER
Discretionary Grants.'' Funds for the FY 2015 TIGER program (``TIGER FY
2015'') are to be awarded on a competitive basis for projects that will
have a significant impact on the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a
region. The purpose of this final notice is to solicit applications for
TIGER Discretionary Grants.
DATES: Pre-applications must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. E.D.T. on May
4, 2015. Final applications must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. E.D.T. on
June 5, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Pre-applications must be submitted electronically through
www.dot.gov/TIGER. Final applications must be submitted through
Grants.gov. Only applicants who comply with all submission requirements
described in this notice and electronically submit both valid pre-
applications to DOT and final applications through Grants.gov will be
eligible for award.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning
this notice, please contact the TIGER Discretionary Grant program staff
via email at TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call Howard Hill at 202-366-0301.
A TDD is available for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing at
202-366-3993. In addition, DOT will regularly post answers to questions
and requests for
[[Page 18284]]
clarifications on DOT's Web site at www.dot.gov/TIGER
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is substantially similar to the
final notice published for the TIGER Discretionary Grant program in the
Federal Register on March 3, 2014. However, the FY 2015 Appropriations
Act does not provide dedicated funding for the planning, preparation,
or design of capital projects (``TIGER Planning Grants''); these
activities may be eligible to the extent that they are part of an
overall construction project that receives TIGER Discretionary Grant
funding. Additionally, unlike the past two rounds of TIGER
Discretionary Grants, a pre-application must be submitted for an
application to be considered. The pre-application helps DOT allocate
staff resources for the evaluation process, allows applicants to
provide identifying information about their project, and assists DOT in
clarifying eligibility questions before the final application is
submitted. In addition to the differences above, and minor edits for
clarification and those made to conform the notice to the statutory
circumstances of this round of TIGER Discretionary Grant funding, this
notice's format has changed to conform to Appendix I to 2 CFR part 200.
Each section of this notice contains information and instructions
relevant to the application process for these TIGER Discretionary
Grants, and you should read this notice in its entirety so that you
have the information you need to submit eligible and competitive
applications.
Table of Contents
A. Program Description
B. Federal Award Information
C. Eligibility Information
D. Application and Submission Information
E. Application Review
F. Federal Award Administration
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contacts
H. Other Information
A. Program Description
Since the TIGER Discretionary Grants program was first created,
$4.1 billion has been awarded for capital investments in surface
transportation infrastructure over six rounds of competitive grants.
The TIGER Discretionary Grant program seeks to award projects that
advance DOT's long-term priorities for the nation's transportation
system found in DOT's Strategic Plan for FY 2014-FY 2018 (https://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/2014-2018-strategic-plan_0.pdf).
Section E, Application Review, of this notice describes the TIGER
Discretionary Grant selection criteria based on these priorities.
Please see DOT's Web site at www.dot.gov/TIGER for background on
previous rounds of TIGER Discretionary Grants.
Throughout the TIGER program, TIGER Discretionary Grant awards have
supported innovative projects, including multimodal and
multijurisdictional projects which are difficult to fund through
traditional Federal programs. Successful TIGER projects leverage
resources, encourage partnership, catalyze investment and growth, fill
a critical void in the transportation system or provide a substantial
benefit to the nation, region or metropolitan area in which the project
is located. The FY 2015 TIGER program will continue to make
transformative surface transportation investments that dramatically
improve the status quo by providing significant and measurable
improvements over existing conditions. Transformative improvements
anchor broad and long-lasting, positive changes in economic
development, safety, quality of life, environmental sustainability, or
state of good repair. Because each TIGER project is unique, applicants
are encouraged to present, in measurable terms, how TIGER investment
will lead to transformative change(s) in their community.
The FY 2015 TIGER program will fund transformative projects of all
eligible types, including projects that promote Ladders of Opportunity,
to the extent permitted by law. The FY 2014 TIGER program gave
consideration to projects that sought to improve access to reliable,
safe, and affordable transportation for disconnected communities in
urban, suburban, and rural areas. This included, but was not limited
to, capital projects that better connected people to jobs, removed
physical barriers to access, and strengthened communities through
neighborhood redevelopment. The FY 2015 TIGER program clearly
identifies this concept as Ladders of Opportunity. Ladders of
Opportunity projects may increase connectivity to employment,
education, services and other opportunities, support workforce
development, or contribute to community revitalization, particularly
for disadvantaged groups: low income groups, persons with visible and
hidden disabilities, elderly individuals, and minority persons and
populations.
B. Federal Award Information
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act appropriated $500 million to be
awarded by DOT for the TIGER Discretionary Grants program. The FY 2015
TIGER Discretionary Grants are for capital investments in surface
transportation infrastructure and are to be awarded on a competitive
basis for projects that will have a significant impact on the Nation, a
metropolitan area, or a region. The Act also allows DOT to use a small
portion of the $500 million for oversight and administration of grants.
If this solicitation does not result in the award and obligation of all
available funds, DOT may publish additional solicitations.
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act specifies that TIGER Discretionary
Grants may not be less than $10 million and not greater than $200
million, except that for projects located in rural areas (as defined in
Section C.3) the minimum TIGER Discretionary Grant size is $1 million.
Pursuant to the FY 2015 Appropriations Act, no more than 25 percent
of the funds made available for TIGER Discretionary Grants (or $125
million) may be awarded to projects in a single State. The FY 2015
Appropriations Act directs that not less than 20 percent of the funds
provided for TIGER Discretionary Grants (or $100 million) shall be used
for projects located in rural areas. Further, pursuant to the FY 2015
Appropriations Act, DOT must take measures to ensure an equitable
geographic distribution of grant funds, an appropriate balance in
addressing the needs of urban and rural areas, and investment in a
variety of transportation modes.
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act requires that FY 2015 TIGER funds
are only available for obligation through September 30, 2017. No FY
2015 TIGER funds may be expended after September 30, 2022. As part of
the review and selection process described in Section E.2., DOT will
consider whether a project is ready to proceed with an obligation of
grant funds from DOT within the statutory time provided. Under the FY
2015 Appropriations Act, no waiver is possible for these deadlines.
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act allows for up to 20 percent of
available funds (or $100 million) to be used by the Department to pay
the subsidy and administrative costs for a project receiving credit
assistance under the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and
Innovation Act of 1998 (``TIFIA'') program, if it would further the
purposes of the TIGER Discretionary Grant program.
Recipients of prior TIGER Discretionary Grants may apply for
funding to support additional phases of a project awarded funds in
earlier rounds of this program. However, to be competitive, the
applicant should
[[Page 18285]]
demonstrate the extent to which the previously funded project phase has
been able to meet estimated project schedules and budget, as well as
the ability to realize the benefits expected for the project.
DOT expects that each TIGER Discretionary Grant will be
administered by one of the relevant modal administrations, pursuant to
a grant agreement between the TIGER Discretionary Grant recipient and
the relevant modal administration.
C. Eligibility Information
To be selected for a TIGER Discretionary Grant, an applicant must
be an Eligible Applicant and the project must be an Eligible Project.
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Applicants for TIGER Discretionary Grants are State,
local, and tribal governments, including U.S. territories, transit
agencies, port authorities, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs),
and other political subdivisions of State or local governments.
Multiple States or jurisdictions may submit a joint application and
must identify a lead applicant as the primary point of contact. Each
applicant in a joint application must be an Eligible Applicant. Joint
applications must include a description of the roles and
responsibilities of each applicant and must be signed by each
applicant.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
TIGER Discretionary Grants may be used for up to 80 percent of the
costs of a project. \1\ DOT may increase the Federal share above 80
percent only for projects located in rural areas, in which case DOT may
fund up to 100 percent of the costs of a project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To meet match requirements, the minimum total project cost
for a project located in an urban area must be $12.5 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOT will consider non-Federal funds, as well as funds from the
Tribal Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 202), as a local match for
purposes of this program. DOT cannot consider any funds already
expended (or otherwise encumbered) towards the matching requirement.
Please note that matching funds provided by an applicant will not be
considered as matching funds if the source of those funds is ultimately
a Federal program, nor can Federal funds be used as match for other
Federal funds, unless authorized in statute. Matching funds are subject
to the same Federal requirements described in Section F.2. as awarded
funds.
3. Other
i. Eligible Projects--Eligible projects for TIGER Discretionary
Grants are capital projects that include, but are not limited to: (1)
Highway or bridge projects eligible under title 23, United States Code
(including bicycle and pedestrian related projects); (2) public
transportation projects eligible under chapter 53 of title 49, United
States Code; (3) passenger and freight rail transportation projects;
(4) port infrastructure investments (including inland port
infrastructure); and (5) intermodal projects. This description of
eligible projects is identical to the description of eligible projects
under earlier rounds of the TIGER Discretionary Grant program.\2\
Research, demonstration, or pilot projects are eligible only if they
result in long-term, permanent surface transportation infrastructure
that has independent utility as defined in Section C.3.iii.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Please note that the Department may use a TIGER
Discretionary Grant to pay for the surface transportation components
of a broader project that has non-surface transportation components,
and applicants are encouraged to apply for TIGER Discretionary
Grants to pay for the surface transportation components of these
projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ii. Rural/Urban Definition--For purposes of this notice, DOT
defines ``rural area'' as any area not in an Urbanized Area, as such
term is defined by the Census Bureau,\3\ and will consider a project to
be in a rural area if all or the majority of a project (determined by
geographic location(s) where the majority of project money is to be
spent) is located in a rural area. In this notice ``urban'' means not
rural. This definition affects three aspects of the program. First, the
FY 2015 Appropriations Act directs that not less than $100 million of
the funds provided for TIGER Discretionary Grants are to be used for
projects in rural areas. Second, for a project in a rural area the
minimum award is $1 million instead of $10 million. Third, up to 100
percent of the costs of a project in a rural area may be paid for with
Federal funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For Census 2010, the Census Bureau defined an Urbanized Area
(UA) as an area that consists of densely settled territory that
contains 50,000 or more people. Updated lists of UAs are available
on the Census Bureau Web site at https://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10map/UAUC_RefMap/ua/. Urban Clusters (UCs) are rural areas for
purposes of the TIGER Discretionary Grant program. Please note that
while individual jurisdictions might have a population of fewer than
50,000, if they are included as part of an UA, they will be
classified as urban for purposes of the TIGER program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent more than a de minimis portion of a project is
located in an Urbanized Area, applicants should identify the estimated
percentage of project costs that will be spent in Urbanized Areas and
the estimated percentage that will be spent in rural areas.
iii. Project Components--An application may describe a project that
contains more than one component. DOT may award funds for a component,
instead of the larger project, if that component (1) meets minimum
award amounts described in Section B and all eligibility requirements
described in Section C; (2) has independent utility; and (3)
independently aligns well with the selection criteria specified in
Section E.1 (Selection Criteria). Independent utility means that the
component provides transportation benefits in and of itself and will be
ready for intended use upon completion of the component's construction.
All project components that are presented in a single application must
demonstrate a strong relationship or connection between them (please
see Section E.1.iii.d. for Required Approvals.)
DOT strongly encourages applicants to identify in their
applications the project components that have independent utility and
separately detail the costs and requested TIGER funding for those
components. If the application identifies an independent project
component, the application must clearly identify the benefits that the
component would produce on its own, in addition to describing the
benefits from the full proposal.
iv. Limit on Number of Applications--Each lead applicant may submit
no more than three applications. Unrelated project components should
not be bundled in an application for the purpose of avoiding the three
applications per lead applicant limit. Please note that the three-
application limit applies only to applications where the applicant is
the lead applicant. There is no limit on applications for which an
applicant can be listed as a partnering agency. If a lead applicant
submits more than three applications as the lead applicant, only the
first three received will be considered.
D. Application and Submission Information
1. Address
Pre-application instructions and information will be available at
www.dot.gov/TIGER, and will include details for submitting the pre-
application electronically to DOT. Final applications must be submitted
to Grants.gov. Instructions for submitting pre-applications and final
applications through Grants.gov can be found at www.dot.gov/TIGER.
[[Page 18286]]
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
i. Pre-Application: The pre-application requires applicants to
submit identifying information about their project and qualifies
applicants to submit a final application. If an applicant does not
submit a pre-application, the final application will not be considered.
Pre-applications will not be reviewed until after the pre-application
deadline.
Applicants must complete the pre-application form and send it to
DOT electronically on or prior to the pre-application deadline, in
accordance with the instructions specified at www.dot.gov/TIGER.
ii. Final Application: Final applications will not be considered
unless a pre-application is submitted by the applicant. Any changes
from the pre-application should be clearly identified in the final
application. DOT may ask any applicant to supplement data in its
application, but expects applications to be complete upon submission.
To the extent practicable, applicants should provide data and evidence
of project merits in a form that is verifiable or publicly available.
The final application must include the Standard Form 424 (Application
for Federal Assistance) and the Project Narrative. Additional
clarifying guidance and FAQs to assist applicants in completing the SF-
424 will be available at www.dot.gov/TIGER by May 5, 2015, when the
``Apply'' function within Grants.gov opens to accept applications under
this notice.
The Project Narrative (attachment to SF-424) must respond to the
application requirements outlined below. The application must include
information required for DOT to assess each of the criteria specified
in Section E.1 (Selection Criteria). Applicants must demonstrate the
responsiveness of a project to any pertinent selection criteria with
the most relevant information that you can provide, regardless of
whether such information has been specifically requested, or
identified, in this notice. An application should provide evidence of
the feasibility of achieving project milestones, and of financial
capacity and commitment in order to support project readiness.
An application should also include a description of how the project
addresses the needs of the area, creates economic opportunity, and
sparks community revitalization, particularly for disadvantaged groups.
DOT recommends that the project narrative adhere to the following
basic outline and, in addition to a detailed statement of work,
detailed project schedule, and detailed project budget, should include
a table of contents, maps, and graphics as appropriate that make the
information easier to review:
a. Project Description (including a description of what TIGER funds
will support, information on the expected users of the project, a
description of the transportation challenges that the project aims to
address, how the project will address these challenges, and if, and
how, the project promotes Ladders of Opportunity. The description
should include relevant data, such as passenger or freight volumes,
congestion levels, infrastructure condition, and safety experience.);
b. Project Location (a detailed description of the proposed project
and geospatial data for the project, including a map of the project's
location and its connections to existing transportation infrastructure,
as well as a description of the national, regional, or metropolitan
area in which the project is located, including economic information
such as population size, median income for transportation facility
users, or major industries affected, and project map);
c. Project Parties (information about the grant recipient and other
project parties);
d. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of Project Funds (information about
the amount of grant funding requested, availability/commitment of fund
sources and uses of all project funds, total project costs, percentage
of project costs that would be paid with TIGER Discretionary Grant
funds, and the identity of all parties providing funds for the project
and their percentage shares.) Include any other pending or past Federal
funding requests for the project as well as Federal funds already
provided under other programs and the size, nature/source of the
required match for those funds, to clarify that these are not the same
funds counted under the matching requirement for this grant request;
e. Selection Criteria (information about how the project aligns
with each of the primary and secondary selection criteria):
(i) Primary Selection Criteria
(a) State of Good Repair
(b) Economic Competitiveness
(c) Quality of Life
(d) Environmental Sustainability
(e) Safety
(ii) Secondary Selection Criteria
(a) Innovation
(b) Partnership
f. Results of Benefit-Cost Analysis;
g. Project Readiness, including planning approvals, NEPA and other
environmental reviews/approvals, (including information about
permitting, legislative approvals, State and local planning, and
project partnership and implementation agreements); and
h. Federal Wage Rate Certification (an application must include a
certification, signed by the applicant(s), stating that it will comply
with the requirements of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40,
United States Code [Federal wage rate requirements], as required by the
FY 2015 Appropriations Act).
The purpose of this recommended format is to ensure that
applications clearly address the program requirements and make critical
information readily apparent.
DOT recommends that the project narrative be prepared with standard
formatting preferences (i.e., a single-spaced document, using a
standard 12-point font, such as Times New Roman, with 1-inch margins).
The project narrative may not exceed 30 pages in length. Documentation
supporting the assertions made in the narrative portion may also be
provided, but should be limited to relevant information. Cover pages,
tables of contents, and the federal wage rate certification do not
count towards the 30-page limit for the narrative portion of the
application. Otherwise, the only substantive portions of the
application that may exceed the 30-page limit are any supporting
documents (including a more detailed discussion of the benefit-cost
analysis) provided to support assertions or conclusions made in the 30-
page narrative section. If possible, Web site links to supporting
documentation (including a more detailed discussion of the benefit-cost
analysis) should be provided rather than copies of these materials.
Otherwise, supporting documents should be included as appendices to the
application. It is helpful if applicants' references to supporting
documentation clearly identify the relevant portion of that document.
At the applicant's discretion, relevant materials provided previously
to a relevant modal administration in support of a different DOT
discretionary financial assistance program (for example, New Starts or
TIFIA) may be referenced and described as unchanged. This information
need not be resubmitted for the TIGER Discretionary Grant application
but may be referenced as described above; Web site links to the
materials are highly recommended. DOT recommends using appropriately
descriptive file names (e.g., ``Project Narrative,'' ``Maps,''
``Memoranda of Understanding and Letters of Support,'' etc.) for all
attachments.
[[Page 18287]]
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM)
DOT may not make a TIGER Discretionary Grant award to an applicant
until the applicant has complied with all applicable DUNS and SAM
requirements. If an applicant has not fully complied with the
requirements by the submission deadline, the application will not be
considered. To submit an application through Grants.gov, applicants
must:
i. Obtain a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number;
ii. Register with the System for Award Management (SAM) at
www.SAM.gov;
iii. Create a Grants.gov username and password; and
iv. The E-Business Point of Contact (POC) at your organization must
respond to the registration email from Grants.gov and login at
Grants.gov to authorize you as an Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR). Please note that there can be more than one AOR
for an organization.
For information and instructions on each of these processes, please
see instructions at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/applicant-faqs.html.
If an applicant is selected for an award, the applicant will be
required to maintain an active SAM registration with current
information throughout the period of the award.
4. Submission Dates and Times
i. Deadline: Pre-applications must be submitted by 11:59 p.m.
E.D.T. on May 4, 2015. Final applications must be submitted by 11:59
p.m. E.D.T. on June 5, 2015. The Grants.gov ``Apply'' function will
open on May 5, 2015.
The Department has determined that a pre-application deadline fewer
than 60 days after this notice is appropriate because (1) this notice
is substantially similar to notices used for previous rounds of TIGER
Discretionary Grants, (2) minimal work is required to submit the pre-
application, and (3) the accelerated timeframe helps the Department
ensure that it can timely obligate the available funds.
ii. Only applicants who comply with all submission deadlines
described in this notice and electronically submit valid pre-
applications to DOT and final applications through Grants.gov will be
eligible for award.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to make submissions in advance
of the deadline. Please be aware that you must complete the Grants.gov
registration process before submitting the final application, and that
this process usually takes 2-4 weeks to complete. If interested parties
experience difficulties at any point during the registration or
application process, please call the Grants.gov Customer Support
Hotline at 1-800-518-4726, Monday-Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
EDT.
iii. Late Applications: Applications received after the deadline
will not be considered except in the case of unforeseen technical
difficulties outlined in Section 4.iv. Late applications that are the
result of failure to register or comply with Grants.gov applicant
requirements in a timely manner will not be considered.
iv. a. Pre-Application
Applicants experiencing technical issues due to the pre-application
submission site that are beyond the applicant's control must contact
TIGERGrants@dot.gov or Howard Hill at 202-366-0301 prior to the pre-
application deadline with the user name of the registrant and details
of the technical issue experienced.
DOT will consider late pre-applications on a case-by-case basis.
DOT encourages applicants to submit additional information documenting
the reason for the late submissions.
b. Final Application
Applicants experiencing technical issues with Grants.gov that are
beyond the applicant's control must contact TIGERGrants@dot.gov or
Howard Hill at 202-366-0301 prior to the corresponding deadline with
the user name of the registrant and details of the technical issue
experienced. The applicant must provide:
(i) Details of the technical issue experienced.
(ii) Screen capture(s) of the technical issue experienced along
corresponding ``Grant tracking number'' (Grants.Gov).
(iii) The ``Legal Business Name'' for the applicant that was
provided in the SF-424 or pre-application.
(iv) The AOR name submitted in the SF-424 (Grants.gov).
(v) The DUNS number associated with the pre-application/
application.
(vi) The Grants.gov or Pre-Application Help Desk Tracking Number.
To ensure a fair competition for limited discretionary funds, the
following conditions are not valid reasons to permit late submissions:
(1) Failure to complete the registration process before the deadline
date; (2) failure to follow Grants.gov instructions on how to register
and apply as posted on its Web site; (3) failure to follow all of the
instructions in this notice of funding availability; and (4) technical
issues experienced with the applicant's computer or information
technology (IT) environment. After DOT staff review all of the
information submitted and contacted the Grants.gov Help Desk to
validate the technical issues you reported, DOT staff will contact you
to either approve or deny your request to submit a late application
through Grants.gov. If the technical issues you reported cannot be
validated, your application will be rejected as untimely.
5. Funding Restrictions
There is no specific set aside funding solely for pre-construction
activities \4\ in the FY 2015 TIGER Discretionary Grant program.
However, these activities may be eligible to the extent that they are
part of an overall construction project that receives TIGER
Discretionary Grant funding. For TIGER funds to be considered for pre-
construction activities, the applicant must clearly state, in the
application, the pre-construction activity and amount of TIGER funds
that will be expended on the activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Pre-Construction activities are activities related to the
planning, preparation, or design of surface transportation projects.
These activities include but are not limited to environmental
analysis, feasibility studies, design, and engineering of surface
transportation projects as described in Section C.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Application Review
1. Selection Criteria
This section specifies the criteria that DOT will use to evaluate
and award applications for TIGER Discretionary Grants. The criteria
incorporate the statutory eligibility requirements for this program,
which are specified in this notice as relevant. There are two
categories of selection criterion, ``Primary Selection Criteria'' and
``Secondary Selection Criteria.'' Within each relevant selection
criteria, applicants are encouraged to present in measurable terms how
TIGER investment will lead to transformative change(s) in their
community. Projects will also be evaluated for demonstrated project
readiness, benefits and costs, and cost share.
i. Primary Selection Criteria
Applications that do not demonstrate a likelihood of significant
long-term benefits based on these criteria will not proceed in the
evaluation process. DOT does not consider any primary selection
criterion more important than the others. The primary selection
criteria, which will receive equal consideration, are:
a. Safety. Improving the safety of U.S. transportation facilities
and systems for all modes of transportation and users. DOT will assess
the project's ability to
[[Page 18288]]
reduce the number, rate, and consequences of surface transportation-
related accidents, serious injuries, and fatalities among
transportation users, the project's contribution to the elimination of
highway/rail grade crossings, and the project's contribution to
preventing unintended releases of hazardous materials. DOT will
consider the project's ability to foster a safe, connected, accessible
transportation system for the multimodal movement of goods and people.
b. State of Good Repair. Improving the condition and resilience of
existing transportation facilities and systems. DOT will assess whether
and to what extent: (1) The project is consistent with relevant plans
to maintain transportation facilities or systems in a state of good
repair and address current and projected vulnerabilities; (2) if left
unimproved, the poor condition of the asset will threaten future
transportation network efficiency, mobility of goods or accessibility
and mobility of people, or economic growth; (3) the project is
appropriately capitalized up front and uses asset management approaches
that optimize its long-term cost structure; (4) a sustainable source of
revenue is available for operations and maintenance of the project; and
(5) the project improves the transportation asset's ability to
withstand probable occurrence or recurrence of an emergency or major
disaster or other impacts of climate change. Additional consideration
will be given to a project's contribution to improve the overall
reliability of a multimodal transportation system that serves all
users, and to projects that offer significant transformational
improvements to the condition of existing transportation systems and
facilities.
c. Economic Competitiveness. Contributing to the economic
competitiveness of the United States over the medium- to long-term,
revitalizing communities, and creating and preserving jobs. DOT will
assess whether the project will (1) Decrease transportation costs and
improve access for Americans with transportation disadvantages through
reliable and timely access to employment centers, education and
training opportunities, and other basic needs of workers; (2) improve
long-term efficiency, reliability or costs in the movement of workers
or goods; (3) increase the economic productivity of land, capital, or
labor at specific locations, and through community revitalization
efforts; (4) result in long-term job creation and other economic
opportunities; or (5) help the United States compete in a global
economy by facilitating efficient and reliable freight movement,
including border infrastructure and projects that have a significant
effect on reducing the costs of transporting export cargoes. DOT will
prioritize projects that exhibit strong leadership and vision, and are
part of a larger strategy to significantly revitalize communities and
increase economic opportunities.
d. Quality of Life. Increasing transportation choices and access to
essential services for people in communities across the United States,
particularly for disadvantaged groups. DOT will assess whether the
project furthers the six ``Livability Principles'' developed by DOT
with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Partnership for
Sustainable Communities.\5\ DOT will focus on the first principle, the
creation of affordable and convenient transportation choices.\6\
Further, DOT will prioritize projects developed in coordination with
land-use planning and economic development decisions, including through
programs like TIGER Planning Grants, the Department of Housing and
Urban Development's Regional Planning Grants, the Environmental
Protection Agency's Brownfield Area-Wide Planning Pilot Program, and
technical assistance programs focused on quality of life or economic
development planning. DOT will assess the extent to which the project
will anchor transformative, positive and long-lasting quality of life
changes at the national, regional or metropolitan level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ https://www.sustainablecommunities.gov/.
\6\ In full, this principle reads: ``Provide more transportation
choices. Develop safe, reliable and economical transportation
choices to decrease household transportation costs, reduce our
nations' dependence on foreign oil, improve air quality, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and promote public health.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
e. Environmental Sustainability. Improving energy efficiency,
reducing dependence on oil, reducing greenhouse gas emissions,
improving water quality, avoiding and mitigating environmental impacts
and otherwise benefitting the environment. DOT will assess the
project's ability to: (i) Reduce energy use and air or water pollution;
(ii) avoid adverse environmental impacts to air or water quality,
wetlands, and endangered species; or (iii) provide environmental
benefits, such as brownfield redevelopment, ground water recharge in
areas of water scarcity, wetlands creation or improved habitat
connectivity, and stormwater mitigation, including green
infrastructure. Applicants are encouraged to provide quantitative
information, including baseline information that demonstrates how the
project will reduce energy consumption, stormwater runoff, or achieve
other benefits for the environment.
ii. Secondary Selection Criteria
a. Innovation. Use of innovative strategies to pursue the long-term
outcomes outlined above. DOT will also assess the extent to which the
project uses innovative technology to pursue one or more of the long-
term outcomes outlined above or to significantly enhance the
operational performance of the transportation system. DOT will also
assess the extent to which the project incorporates innovations in
transportation funding and finance and leverages both existing and new
sources of funding through both traditional and innovative means.
Further, DOT will consider the extent to which the project utilizes
innovative practices in contracting, congestion management, safety
management, asset management, or long-term operations and maintenance.
DOT is interested in projects that apply innovative strategies to
improve the efficiency of project development or to improve project
delivery.
b. Partnership. Demonstrating strong collaboration among a broad
range of stakeholders, and the product of a robust, inclusive planning
process.
(i) Jurisdictional and Stakeholder Collaboration. DOT will consider
the extent to which projects involve multiple partners in project
development and funding, such as State and local governments, other
public entities, and/or private or nonprofit entities. DOT will also
assess the extent to which the project application demonstrates
collaboration among neighboring or regional jurisdictions to achieve
national, regional, or metropolitan benefits. In the context of public-
private partnerships, DOT will assess the extent to which partners are
encouraged to ensure long-term asset performance, such as through pay-
for-success approaches.
(ii) Disciplinary Integration. DOT will consider the extent to
which projects include partnerships that bring together diverse
transportation agencies and/or are supported, financially or otherwise,
by non-transportation public agencies that are pursuing similar
objectives. For example, DOT will give priority to transportation
projects that are coordinated with economic development, housing, water
infrastructure, and land use plans and policies or other public service
efforts.
[[Page 18289]]
Similarly, DOT will give priority to transportation projects that are
coordinated with housing, social services, or education agencies.
Projects that grow out of a robust planning process--such as those
conducted with DOT's various planning programs and initiatives, the
Department of Housing and Urban Development's Regional Planning Grants
and Choice Neighborhood Planning Grants, or the Environmental
Protection Agency's Brownfield Area-Wide Planning Pilot Program, as
well as technical assistance programs focused on livability or economic
development planning--will also be given priority.
iii. Demonstrated Project Readiness
Projects that receive funding in this round of TIGER must obligate
funds by September 30, 2017, or the funding will expire. Therefore, DOT
will assess every application to determine whether the project is
likely to proceed to obligation by the statutory deadline (see
Additional Information on Project Readiness Guidelines located at
www.dot.gov/TIGER for further details), as evidenced by:
a. Technical Feasibility. The technical feasibility of the project
should be demonstrated by engineering and design studies and
activities; the development of design criteria and/or a basis of
design; the basis for the cost estimate presented in the TIGER
application, including the identification of contingency levels
appropriate to its level of design; and any scope, schedule, and budget
risk-mitigation measures. Applicants must include a detailed statement
of work that focuses on the technical and engineering aspects of the
project and describes in detail the project to be constructed;
b. Financial Feasibility. The viability and completeness of the
project's financing package (assuming the availability of the requested
TIGER Discretionary Grant funds) should be demonstrated including
evidence of stable and reliable capital and (as appropriate) operating
fund commitments sufficient to cover estimated costs; the availability
of contingency reserves should planned capital or operating revenue
sources not materialize; evidence of the financial condition of the
project sponsor; and evidence of the grant recipient's ability to
manage grants. The applicant must include a detailed project budget in
this section of the application containing a breakdown of how the funds
will be spent. That budget must estimate--both dollar amount and
percentage of cost-- the cost of work for each project component and
provide examples. If the project will be completed in individual
segments or phases, a budget for each individual segment or phase must
be included. Budget spending categories must be broken down between
TIGER, other Federal, and non-Federal sources \7\, and identify how
each funding source will share in each activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Non-Federal sources include State funds originating from
State revenue funded programs, local funds originating from State or
local revenue funded programs, private funds or other funding
sources of non-Federal origins.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Project Schedule. The applicant must include a detailed project
schedule that includes all major project milestones--such as start and
completion of environmental reviews and approvals; design; right of way
acquisition; approval of plan, specification and estimate (PS&E);
procurement; and construction-- with sufficiently detailed information
to demonstrate that:
(i) all necessary pre-construction activities will be complete to
allow grant funds to be obligated no later than June 30, 2017, to give
DOT reasonable assurance that the TIGER Discretionary Grant funds will
be obligated sufficiently in advance of the September 30, 2017,
statutory deadline, and that any unexpected delays will not put the
funds at risk of expiring before they are obligated;
(ii) the project can begin construction quickly upon receipt of a
TIGER Discretionary Grant, and that the grant funds will be spent
steadily and expeditiously once construction starts; and
(iii) any applicant that is applying for a TIGER Discretionary
Grant and does not own all of the property or right-of-way required to
complete the project should provide evidence that the property and/or
right-of-way acquisition can and will be completed expeditiously.
DOT may revoke any award of TIGER Discretionary Grant funds and
award those funds to another project if the funds cannot be timely
expended or construction does not begin in accordance with the project
schedule established in the grant agreement.
d. Required Approvals
(i) Environmental Permits and Reviews. An application for a TIGER
Discretionary Grant must detail whether the project will significantly
impact the natural, social and/or economic environment. The application
should demonstrate receipt (or reasonably anticipated receipt) of all
environmental approvals and permits necessary for the project to
proceed to construction on the timeline specified in the project
schedule and necessary to meet the statutory obligation deadline,
including satisfaction of all Federal, State and local requirements and
completion of the National Environmental Policy Act (``NEPA'') process.
Although Section C.3.iii (Project Components) of this notice encourages
applicants to identify independent project components, those components
may not be separable for the NEPA process. In such cases, the NEPA
review for the independent project component may have to include
evaluation of all project components as connected, similar, or
cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. The applicant should
submit the information listed below with your application:
(1) Information about the NEPA status of the project. If the NEPA
process is completed, an applicant must indicate the date of, and
provide a Web site link or other reference to the final Categorical
Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact or Record of Decision. If
the NEPA process is underway but not complete, the application must
detail the type of NEPA review underway, where the project is in the
process, and indicate the anticipated date of completion. You must
provide a Web site link or other reference to copies of any NEPA
documents prepared.
(2) Information on reviews by other agencies. An application for a
TIGER Discretionary Grant must indicate whether the proposed project
requires reviews or approval actions by other agencies,\8\ indicate the
status of such actions, and provide detailed information about the
status of those reviews or approvals and/or demonstrate compliance with
any other applicable Federal, State, or local requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Projects that may impact protected resources such as
wetlands, species habitat, cultural or historic resources require
review and approval by Federal and State agencies with jurisdiction
over those resources. Examples of these reviews and approvals can be
found at www.dot.gov/TIGER.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Environmental studies or other documents--preferably through a
Web site link--that describe in detail known project impacts, and
possible mitigation for those impacts.
(4) A description of discussions with the appropriate DOT modal
administration field or headquarters office regarding compliance with
NEPA and other applicable environmental reviews and approvals.
(ii) Legislative Approvals. The applicant should demonstrate
receipt of state and local approvals on which the project depends.
Additional support
[[Page 18290]]
from relevant State and local officials is not required; however, an
applicant should demonstrate that the project is broadly supported.
(iii) State and Local Planning. The planning requirements of the
modal administration administering the TIGER project will apply.\9\ You
should demonstrate that a project that is required to be included in
the relevant State, metropolitan, and local planning documents has been
or will be included. If the project is not included in the relevant
planning documents at the time the application is submitted, you should
submit a certification from the appropriate planning agency that
actions are underway to include the project in the relevant planning
document. Because projects have different schedules, the construction
start date for each TIGER Discretionary Grant will be specified in the
project-specific grant agreements signed by relevant modal
administration and the grant recipients and will be based on critical
path items identified by applicants in response to items (i)(1) through
(4) above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ All projects requiring an action by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in
accordance with 23 CFR part 450, must be in the metropolitan
transportation plan, transportation improvement program (TIP) and
statewide transportation improvement program (STIP). Further, in air
quality non-attainment and maintenance areas, all regionally
significant projects, regardless of the funding source, must be
included in the conforming metropolitan transportation plan and TIP.
To the extent a project is required to be on a metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, and/or STIP, it will not receive a TIGER
Discretionary Grant until it is included in such plans. Projects not
currently included in these plans can be amended by the State and
metropolitan planning organization (MPO). Projects that are not
required to be in long range transportation plans, STIPs, and TIPs
will not need to be included in such plans in order to receive a
TIGER Discretionary Grant. Port, freight and passenger rail projects
are not required to be on the State Rail Plans called for in the
Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008. This is
consistent with the exemption for high-speed and intercity passenger
rail projects under the Recovery Act. However, applicants seeking
funding for freight and passenger rail projects are encouraged to
demonstrate that they have done sufficient planning to ensure that
projects fit into a prioritized list of capital needs and are
consistent with long-range goals. To the extent possible, freight
projects should be included in a state freight plan and supported by
a state freight advisory committee (see MAP-21 Sec. Sec. 1117-
1118). Further information and guidance information on
transportation planning and is available from the following FHWA and
FTA sites respectively--https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning and https://www.fta.dot.gov/about/12347.html. Port planning guidelines are
available at StrongPorts.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
e. Assessment of Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies. The
applicant should identify the material risks to the project and the
strategies that the lead applicant and any project partners have
undertaken or will undertake in order to mitigate those risks. In past
rounds of TIGER Discretionary Grants, certain projects have been
affected by procurement delays, environmental uncertainties, and
increases in real estate acquisition costs. The applicant must assess
the greatest risks to the projects and identify how the project parties
will mitigate those risks. DOT will consider projects that contain
risks so long as the applicant clearly and directly describe achievable
mitigation strategies.
The applicant, to the extent they are unfamiliar with the Federal
program, should contact DOT modal field or headquarters offices for
information on what steps are pre-requisite to the obligation of
Federal funds in order to ensure that their project schedule is
reasonable and that there are no risks of delays in satisfying federal
requirements.
Contacts for the Federal Highway Administration Division offices--
which are located in all 50 States, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico--
can be found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/about/field.cfm. Contacts for
the ten Federal Transit Administration regional offices can be found at
https://www.fta.dot.gov/12926.html. Contacts for the nine Maritime
Administration Gateway Offices can be found at https://www.marad.dot.gov/about_us_landing_page/gateway_offices/Gateway_Presence.htm. For Federal Railroad Administration Contacts,
please contact TIGER program staff via email at TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or
call Howard Hill at 202-366-0301.
iv. Project Costs and Benefits
An applicant for TIGER Discretionary Grants is generally required
to identify, quantify, and compare expected benefits and costs, subject
to the following qualifications: \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ DOT has a responsibility under Executive Order 12893,
Principles for Federal Infrastructure Investments, 59 FR 4233, to
base infrastructure investments on systematic analysis of expected
benefits and costs, including both quantitative and qualitative
measures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An applicant should prepare and submit an analysis of benefits and
costs; however, DOT understands that the appropriate level of detail of
analysis (for items such as surveys, travel demand forecasts, market
forecasts, and statistical analyses) is less for smaller projects than
for larger projects. The level of sophistication of the benefit-cost
analysis (BCA) should be reasonably related to the size of the overall
project and the amount of grant funds requested in the application. Any
subjective estimates of benefits and costs should be quantified, and
the applicant should provide appropriate evidence to lend credence to
their subjective estimates. Estimates of benefits should be presented
in monetary terms whenever possible; if a monetary estimate is not
possible, then at least one non-monetary quantitative estimate (in
physical, non-monetary terms, such as crash rates, ridership estimates,
emissions levels, or energy efficiency improvements) should be
provided.
Based on feedback over previous rounds of TIGER, DOT recognizes
that the benefit-cost analysis can be particularly burdensome on Tribal
governments. Therefore, the Department is providing additional
flexibility to Tribal governments for the purposes of this notice. At
their discretion, Tribal applicants may elect to provide raw data to
support the need for a project (such as crash rates, ridership
estimates, and the number of people who will benefit from the project),
without additional analysis. This data will then be used to allow DOT
economists to make the best estimates they can develop (given the data
provided) of benefits and costs. Examples of BCAs by successful Tribal
applicants are also available online at https://www.dot.gov/policy-initiatives/tiger/tribal-tiger-bca-examples.
The lack of a useful analysis of expected project benefits and
costs may be the basis for not selecting a project for award of a TIGER
Discretionary Grant. If it is clear to DOT that the total benefits of a
project are not reasonably likely to justify the project's costs, DOT
will not award a TIGER Discretionary Grant to the project.
Detailed guidance for the preparation of benefit-cost analyses is
provided in the 2015 Benefit-Cost Analyses Guidance for TIGER Grant
Applicants and in the BCA Resource Guide (available at www.dot.gov/TIGER). A recording of the Benefit-Cost Analysis Practitioner's
Workshop (2010) and two BCA-related webinars are also available for
viewing at www.dot.gov/TIGER, along with examples of benefit-cost
analyses that have been submitted in previous rounds of TIGER.
Spreadsheets supporting the benefit-cost analysis should be
original Excel spreadsheets, not PDFs of those spreadsheets. Benefits
should be presented, whenever possible, in a tabular form showing
benefits and costs in each year for the useful life of the project. The
application should include projections for both the build and no-build
scenarios for the project for each year between the completion of the
project and a point in time at least 20 years beyond the project's
completion date or the lifespan of the project, whichever is closer to
the present.
[[Page 18291]]
Benefits and costs should both be discounted to the year 2015, and
calculations should be presented for discounted values of both the
stream of benefits and the stream of costs. If the project has multiple
components, each of which has independent utility, the benefits and
costs of each component should be estimated and presented separately.
The results of the benefit-cost analysis should be summarized in the
Project Narrative section of the application itself, but the details
should be presented in an attachment to the application if the full
analysis cannot be included within the page limit for the project
narrative.
v. Cost Share
The FY 2015 Appropriations Act directs DOT to prioritize projects
that require a contribution of Federal funds to complete an overall
financing package, and all projects can increase their competitiveness
for purposes of the TIGER program by demonstrating significant non-
Federal financial contributions. The applicant should clearly
demonstrate the extent to which the project cannot be readily and
efficiently completed without a TIGER Discretionary Grant, and the
extent to which other sources of funds, including Federal, State, or
local funding, may or may not be readily available for the project. DOT
recognizes that applicants have varying abilities and resources to
contribute non-Federal contributions, especially those communities that
are not routinely receiving and matching Federal funds. DOT recognizes
certain communities with fewer financial resources may struggle to
provide cost-share that exceeds the minimum requirements and will,
therefore, consider an applicant's broader fiscal constraints when
evaluating non-Federal contributions. In the first six rounds, on
average, projects attracted more than 3.5 matching dollars for every
TIGER grant dollar.
2. Review and Selection Process
DOT reviews all eligible applications received before the deadline.
The TIGER review and selection process consists of three phases:
Technical Review, Tier 2 Analysis consisting of project readiness and
economic analysis, and Senior Review.
In the Technical Evaluation phase, teams comprising staff from the
Office of the Secretary (OST) and modal administrations review all
eligible applications and rate projects as Highly Recommended,
Recommended, Acceptable, or Not Recommended based on how well the
projects align with the selection criteria.
Tier 2 Analysis consists of (1) an Economic Analysis and (2) a
Project Readiness Analysis. The Economic Analysis Team, comprising OST
and modal administration economic staff, assess whether total benefits
of the proposed projects are likely to outweigh costs. The Project
Readiness Team, comprising Office of the Secretary Office of Policy
(OST-P) and modal administration staff, evaluates the proposed
project's technical and financial feasibility, potential risks and
mitigation strategies, and project schedule, including the status of
environmental approvals and readiness to proceed.
In the third review phase, the Senior Review Team, which includes
senior leadership from OST and the modal administrations, consider all
projects that were rated Acceptable, Recommended, or Highly Recommended
and determine which projects to advance to the Secretary as Highly
Rated. The Secretary selects from the Highly Rated projects for final
award.
F. Federal Award Administration
1. Federal Award Notice
Following the evaluation outlined in Section E, the Secretary will
announce awarded projects by posting a list of selected projects at
www.dot.gov/TIGER. Following the announcement, the relevant modal
administration will contact the point of contact listed in the SF 424
to initiate negotiation of the grant agreement.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
All awards will be administered pursuant to the Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards found in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted by DOT at 2 CFR
part. 1201. Additionally, applicable Federal laws, rules and
regulations of the relevant modal administration administering the
project will apply to the projects that receive TIGER Discretionary
Grant awards, including planning requirements, Service Outcome
Agreements, Stakeholder Agreements, Buy America compliance, and other
requirements under DOT's other highway, transit, rail, and port grant
programs.
For projects administered by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), applicable Federal laws, rules, and regulations set forth in
Title 23 U.S.C. and Title 23 CFR apply. For an illustrative list of the
applicable laws, rules, regulations, executive orders, polices,
guidelines, and requirements as they relate to a TIGER project
administered by the FHWA, please see [https://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/infrastructure/tiger/fy2014_gr_exhbt_c/index.htm]. For TIGER
projects administered by the Federal Transit Administration and
partially funded with Federal transit assistance, all relevant
requirements under chapter 53 of title 49 U.S.C. apply. For transit
projects funded exclusively with TIGER discretionary funds, some
requirements of chapter 53 of title 49 U.S.C. and chapter VI of title
49 CFR apply. For projects administered by the Federal Railroad
Administration, FRA requirements described in 49 U.S.C. Subtitle V,
Part C apply.
Federal wage rate requirements included in subchapter IV of chapter
31 of title 40, United States Code, apply to all projects receiving
funds under this program, and apply to all parts of the project,
whether funded with TIGER Discretionary Grant funds, other Federal
funds, or non-Federal funds.
3. Reporting
i. Performance Reporting--Each applicant selected for TIGER
Discretionary Grant funding must collect information and report on the
project's performance with respect to the relevant long-term outcomes
that are expected to be achieved through construction of the project.
Performance indicators will not include formal goals or targets, but
will include baseline measures as well as post-project outcomes for an
agreed-upon timeline, and will be used to evaluate and compare projects
and monitor the results that grant funds achieve to ensure that grant
funds achieve the intended long-term outcomes of the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program.
ii. Progress Reporting --Each applicant selected for TIGER
Discretionary Grant funding must submit quarterly progress reports and
Federal Financial Report (SF-425) on the financial condition of the
project and the project's progress, as well as an Annual Budget Review
and Program Plan to monitor the use of Federal funds and ensure
accountability and financial transparency in the TIGER program.
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contacts
For further information concerning this notice please contact the
TIGER Discretionary Grant program staff via email at
TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call Howard Hill at 202-366-0301. A TDD is
available for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing at 202-366-
3993. In addition, DOT will post answers to questions and requests for
clarifications on DOT's Web site at www.dot.gov/
[[Page 18292]]
TIGER. To ensure applicants receive accurate information about
eligibility or the program, the applicant is encouraged to contact DOT
directly, rather than through intermediaries or third parties, with
questions. DOT staff may also conduct briefings on the TIGER
Discretionary Grants selection and award process upon request.
H. Other Information
1. Protection of Confidential Business Information
All information submitted as part of or in support of any
application shall use publicly available data or data that can be made
public and methodologies that are accepted by industry practice and
standards, to the extent possible. If the application includes
information you consider to be a trade secret or confidential
commercial or financial information, the applicant should do the
following: (1) Note on the front cover that the submission ``Contains
Confidential Business Information (CBI)''; (2) mark each affected page
``CBI''; and (3) highlight or otherwise denote the CBI portions. DOT
protects such information from disclosure to the extent allowed under
applicable law. In the event DOT receives a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) request for the information, DOT will follow the procedures
described in its FOIA regulations at 49 CFR 7.17. Only information that
is ultimately determined to be confidential under that procedure will
be exempt from disclosure under FOIA.
Issued On: March 30, 2015.
Anthony R. Foxx,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07711 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P