In the Matter of: Yavuz Cizmeci, Yesiloy Cad. No. 13, Istanbul 34153, Turkey, Respondent; Order Relating to Yavuz Cizmeci, 18194-18195 [2015-07566]

Download as PDF asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 18194 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices and marine waters of the United States. To this end, NOAA’s National Marine Protected Areas Center (MPA Center), part of the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), proposes to continue and augment an ongoing effort to inventory all U.S. MPAs. The MPA Center was established under Executive Order 13158, which directs NOAA and the Department of the Interior to work collaboratively with state, federal, territorial and tribal partners to enhance ocean conservation and management throughout the nation’s system of MPAs. The Marine Protected Areas Inventory—a publicly available, online, spatial database that provides detailed and unique information on MPAs nationwide—is fundamental to this goal. Required by Executive Order 13158, the Inventory provides access to data and summary products on over 1,600 MPA sites across different management programs and all levels of government. The MPA Inventory is accessible via the MPA Center’s Web site, marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov. The MPA Inventory data collection continues the periodic and voluntary solicitation of site-specific descriptive data from all MPAs in the U.S. Typically, an individual MPA site would complete an online site data form once, and then update it if necessary to reflect changes in boundaries, regulations, management approaches, etc. The MPA Inventory is frequently used by ocean managers, users, scientists and others to better understand place-based management of U.S. waters. In addition to continuing to manage and share descriptive information on U.S. MPAs, the MPA Center proposes to contact State and Federal MPA managers to solicit and facilitate their participation in a voluntary survey about conditions and trends in recreational uses of their sites. Data addressing the nature, trends, drivers and implications of recreational uses will be collected from U.S. MPA managers electronically over a period of 6 weeks using an online survey instrument. Individual managers’ responses will remain confidential and the results aggregated to illustrate meaningful general trends rather data specific to a single MPA. Important patterns and lessons learned from this data collection will be shared directly with MPA managers around the country to assist in their management of some of the nation’s most treasured ocean and coastal areas. Affected Public: State, local and tribal governments. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Apr 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 Frequency: On occasion and biannually. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. Dated: March 30, 2015. Sarah Brabson, NOAA PRA Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–07584 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security [13–BIS–002] In the Matter of: Yavuz Cizmeci, Yesiloy Cad. No. 13, Istanbul 34153, Turkey, Respondent; Order Relating to Yavuz Cizmeci The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’), has notified Yavuz Cizmeci of Istanbul, Turkey (‘‘Cizmeci’’), that it has initiated an administrative proceeding against Cizmeci pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations (the ‘‘Regulations’’),1 and Section 13(c) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’),2 through the issuance of a Charging Letter to Cizmeci that alleges that Cizmeci committed one violation of the Regulations. Specifically, the charge is: Charge 1: 15 CFR 764.2(b)—Causing, Aiding, or Abetting Actions Contrary to the Terms of a Temporary Denial Order Between on or about June 26, 2008, and on or about June 27, 2008, Cizmeci caused, aided, abetted, induced, procured or permitted an act or actions prohibited by a BIS Temporary Denial Order (‘‘the TDO’’) 1 The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 774 (2014). The charged violation occurred in 2008. The Regulations governing the violation at issue are found in the 2008 version of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774). The 2014 Regulations set forth the procedures that apply to this matter. 2 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000). Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (Aug. 11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq.) 2006 & Supp. IV 2010)). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 issued in accordance with Section 766.24 of the Regulations. Specifically, Cizmeci caused, aided, abetted, induced, procured or permitted the participation by Dunyaya Bais Hava Tasimaciligi A.S., also known as Dunyaya Bakis Air Transportation, Inc., and doing business as Ankair (‘‘Ankair’’), of Istanbul, Turkey, in a transaction concerning a U.S.-origin Boeing 747 aircraft (manufacturer’s serial number 24134, bearing Turkish tail number TC–AKZ), and actions by Ankair facilitating the acquisition, possession and/or control by Iran Air of the aircraft. The Boeing 747 was an item subject to the Regulations, classified under Export Control Classification Number 9A991.b, controlled for anti-terrorism reasons, and valued at least at approximately $5.3 million. Cizmeci, who was the CEO and President of Ankair, submitted a letter dated June 26, 2008, to the Turkish Civil Aviation authorities directing that the Boeing 747 aircraft be de-registered in Turkey. Ankair also informed Turkish authorities that the aircraft would be subsequently re-registered in Pakistan. Ankair instead transferred physical possession and control of the aircraft to Iran Air on or about June 27, 2008. The Iran Air crew then ferried the aircraft from Turkey to Iran, where it remained under Iran Air’s possession and control. At the time, Ankair’s export privileges and those of Iran Air’s had been denied under the Regulations by the TDO, which had issued on June 6, 2008.3 The TDO prohibited Ankair from ‘‘directly or indirectly, participating in any way in any transaction involving the Boeing 747 (manufacturer serial number 24134, and current tail number TC–AKZ), including, but not limited to . . . [c]arrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving Boeing 747. . . .’’ Moreover, the TDO provided that no person ‘‘may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following . . . [t]ake any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by [Iran Air or] any Denied Person [under the TDO] of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby any Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession, or control.’’ The TDO as issued was effective for 180 days, until December 3, 2008, and continued in force at all times pertinent hereto. In so doing, Cizmeci violated Section 764.2(b) of the Regulations. Whereas, BIS and Cizmeci have entered into a Settlement Agreement pursuant to Section 766.18(b) of the 3 The June 6, 2008 TDO was published in the Federal Register on June 17, 2008 (73 FR 34249). Iran Air was subject to a standard denial order which extended to all items subject to the Regulations. Ankair’s restrictions were tailored to transactions and activities involving the Boeing 747 aircraft at issue (manufacturer’s serial number 24134). E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices Regulations, whereby they agreed to settle this matter in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth therein; and Whereas, I have approved of the terms of such Settlement Agreement; It is therefore ordered: First, Cizmeci shall be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $50,000, the payment of which shall be made to the U.S. Department of Commerce within 30 days of the date of this Order. Second, pursuant to the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as amended (31 U.S.C. 3701–3720E (2000)), the civil penalty owed under this Order accrues interest as more fully described in the attached Notice, and if payment is not made by the due date specified herein, Cizmeci will be assessed, in addition to the full amount of the civil penalty and interest, a penalty charge and an administrative charge, as more fully described in the attached Notice. Third, that for a period of twenty (20) years from the date of this Order, Yavuz Cizmeci, with a last known address of Yesiloy Cad. No. 13, Istanbul 34153, Turkey, and when acting for or on his behalf, his successors, assigns, employees, agents or representatives (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘Denied Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations. Fourth, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Apr 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. Fifth, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to the Denied Person by ownership, control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions of this Order. Sixth, Cizmeci shall not take any action or make or permit to be made any public statement, directly or indirectly, denying the allegations in the Charging Letter or this Order. The foregoing does not affect Cizmeci’s testimonial obligations in any proceeding, nor does it affect his right to take legal or factual positions in civil litigation or other civil proceedings in which the U.S. Department of Commerce is not a party. Seventh, the Charging Letter, the Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall be made available to the public. Eighth, that this Order shall be served on Cizmeci, and shall be published in the Federal Register. This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this matter, is effective immediately. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 18195 Issued this 23rd day of March, 2015. David W. Mills, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement. [FR Doc. 2015–07566 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XD834 Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico; Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 43 Data/ Assessment Workshop for Gulf of Mexico Gray Triggerfish. AGENCY: The SEDAR 43 assessment of the Gulf of Mexico Gray Triggerfish will consist of one workshop and a series of webinars. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. DATES: The SEDAR Workshop will be held from 9 a.m. on April 21, 2015 until 6 p.m. on April 23, 2015. The established time may be adjusted as necessary to accommodate the timely completion of discussion relevant to the assessment process. Such adjustments may result in the meeting being extended from, or completed prior to the time established by this notice. ADDRESSES: Meeting address: The SEDAR 43 Data/ Assessment Workshop will be held at the Courtyard Miami Coconut Grove, 2649 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, FL 33133; telephone: (800) 321–2211. SEDAR address: 4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC 29405. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Neer, SEDAR Coordinator, 4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, North Charleston, SC 29405; telephone: (843) 571–4366; Email: Julie.neer@safmc.net SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic, and Caribbean Fishery Management Councils, in conjunction with NOAA Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commissions have implemented the Southeast Data, Assessment and Review (SEDAR) process, a multi-step method for determining the status of fish stocks in the Southeast Region. SEDAR is a multistep process including: (1) Data/ Assessment Workshop, and (2) a series SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18194-18195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

[13-BIS-002]


In the Matter of: Yavuz Cizmeci, Yesiloy Cad. No. 13, Istanbul 
34153, Turkey, Respondent; Order Relating to Yavuz Cizmeci

    The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce 
(``BIS''), has notified Yavuz Cizmeci of Istanbul, Turkey 
(``Cizmeci''), that it has initiated an administrative proceeding 
against Cizmeci pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration 
Regulations (the ``Regulations''),\1\ and Section 13(c) of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (the ``Act''),\2\ through the 
issuance of a Charging Letter to Cizmeci that alleges that Cizmeci 
committed one violation of the Regulations. Specifically, the charge 
is:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of 
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2014). The charged 
violation occurred in 2008. The Regulations governing the violation 
at issue are found in the 2008 version of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774). The 2014 Regulations set forth 
the procedures that apply to this matter.
    \2\ 50 U.S.C. app. Sec. Sec.  2401-2420 (2000). Since August 21, 
2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive 
Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which 
has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most 
recent being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (Aug. 11, 2014)), 
has continued the Regulations in effect under the International 
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq.) 2006 & Supp. 
IV 2010)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Charge 1: 15 CFR 764.2(b)--Causing, Aiding, or Abetting Actions 
Contrary to the Terms of a Temporary Denial Order

    Between on or about June 26, 2008, and on or about June 27, 
2008, Cizmeci caused, aided, abetted, induced, procured or permitted 
an act or actions prohibited by a BIS Temporary Denial Order (``the 
TDO'') issued in accordance with Section 766.24 of the Regulations. 
Specifically, Cizmeci caused, aided, abetted, induced, procured or 
permitted the participation by Dunyaya Bais Hava Tasimaciligi A.S., 
also known as Dunyaya Bakis Air Transportation, Inc., and doing 
business as Ankair (``Ankair''), of Istanbul, Turkey, in a 
transaction concerning a U.S.-origin Boeing 747 aircraft 
(manufacturer's serial number 24134, bearing Turkish tail number TC-
AKZ), and actions by Ankair facilitating the acquisition, possession 
and/or control by Iran Air of the aircraft. The Boeing 747 was an 
item subject to the Regulations, classified under Export Control 
Classification Number 9A991.b, controlled for anti-terrorism 
reasons, and valued at least at approximately $5.3 million.
    Cizmeci, who was the CEO and President of Ankair, submitted a 
letter dated June 26, 2008, to the Turkish Civil Aviation 
authorities directing that the Boeing 747 aircraft be de-registered 
in Turkey. Ankair also informed Turkish authorities that the 
aircraft would be subsequently re-registered in Pakistan. Ankair 
instead transferred physical possession and control of the aircraft 
to Iran Air on or about June 27, 2008. The Iran Air crew then 
ferried the aircraft from Turkey to Iran, where it remained under 
Iran Air's possession and control. At the time, Ankair's export 
privileges and those of Iran Air's had been denied under the 
Regulations by the TDO, which had issued on June 6, 2008.\3\ The TDO 
prohibited Ankair from ``directly or indirectly, participating in 
any way in any transaction involving the Boeing 747 (manufacturer 
serial number 24134, and current tail number TC-AKZ), including, but 
not limited to . . . [c]arrying on negotiations concerning, or 
ordering, buying receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, 
disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise 
servicing in any way, any transaction involving Boeing 747. . . .'' 
Moreover, the TDO provided that no person ``may, directly or 
indirectly, do any of the following . . . [t]ake any action that 
facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by [Iran Air 
or] any Denied Person [under the TDO] of the ownership, possession, 
or control of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be 
exported from the United States, including financing or other 
support activities related to a transaction whereby any Denied 
Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession, 
or control.'' The TDO as issued was effective for 180 days, until 
December 3, 2008, and continued in force at all times pertinent 
hereto.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The June 6, 2008 TDO was published in the Federal Register 
on June 17, 2008 (73 FR 34249). Iran Air was subject to a standard 
denial order which extended to all items subject to the Regulations. 
Ankair's restrictions were tailored to transactions and activities 
involving the Boeing 747 aircraft at issue (manufacturer's serial 
number 24134).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In so doing, Cizmeci violated Section 764.2(b) of the 
Regulations.

    Whereas, BIS and Cizmeci have entered into a Settlement Agreement 
pursuant to Section 766.18(b) of the

[[Page 18195]]

Regulations, whereby they agreed to settle this matter in accordance 
with the terms and conditions set forth therein; and
    Whereas, I have approved of the terms of such Settlement Agreement;
    It is therefore ordered:
    First, Cizmeci shall be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of 
$50,000, the payment of which shall be made to the U.S. Department of 
Commerce within 30 days of the date of this Order.
    Second, pursuant to the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as amended (31 
U.S.C. 3701-3720E (2000)), the civil penalty owed under this Order 
accrues interest as more fully described in the attached Notice, and if 
payment is not made by the due date specified herein, Cizmeci will be 
assessed, in addition to the full amount of the civil penalty and 
interest, a penalty charge and an administrative charge, as more fully 
described in the attached Notice.
    Third, that for a period of twenty (20) years from the date of this 
Order, Yavuz Cizmeci, with a last known address of Yesiloy Cad. No. 13, 
Istanbul 34153, Turkey, and when acting for or on his behalf, his 
successors, assigns, employees, agents or representatives (hereinafter 
collectively referred to as ``Denied Person''), may not, directly or 
indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any 
commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to 
as ``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is 
subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the 
Regulations, including, but not limited to:
    A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License 
Exception, or export control document;
    B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, 
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, 
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, 
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the 
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other 
activity subject to the Regulations; or
    C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item 
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to 
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
    Fourth, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the 
following:
    A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item 
subject to the Regulations;
    B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted 
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or 
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be 
exported from the United States, including financing or other support 
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires 
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
    C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition 
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to 
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
    D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item 
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the 
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
    E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the 
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States 
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or 
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or 
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any 
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from 
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means 
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
    Fifth, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided 
in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or 
business organization related to the Denied Person by ownership, 
control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection 
in the conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the 
provisions of this Order.
    Sixth, Cizmeci shall not take any action or make or permit to be 
made any public statement, directly or indirectly, denying the 
allegations in the Charging Letter or this Order. The foregoing does 
not affect Cizmeci's testimonial obligations in any proceeding, nor 
does it affect his right to take legal or factual positions in civil 
litigation or other civil proceedings in which the U.S. Department of 
Commerce is not a party.
    Seventh, the Charging Letter, the Settlement Agreement, and this 
Order shall be made available to the public.
    Eighth, that this Order shall be served on Cizmeci, and shall be 
published in the Federal Register.
    This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this 
matter, is effective immediately.

    Issued this 23rd day of March, 2015.
David W. Mills,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015-07566 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.