Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hoquiam River, Hoquiam, WA, 18114-18116 [2015-07317]
Download as PDF
18114
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: March 27, 2015.
Eric H. Holder, Jr.,
Attorney General.
Program Office, telephone 206–220–
7282; email d13-pf-d13bridges@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2015–07772 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4110–BE–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2014–1029]
RIN 1625–AA09
A. Regulatory History and Information
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Hoquiam River, Hoquiam, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
temporarily modifying the operating
schedule that governs the Simpson
Avenue Bridge on the Hoquiam River,
mile 0.5, at Hoquiam, Washington. This
temporary final rule is necessary to
accommodate Washington State
Department of Transportation’s
(WSDOT) extensive maintenance and
restoration efforts on this bridge.
WSDOT will only open one leaf of the
double leaf bascule bridge when at least
two hours of notice is given.
DATES: This temporary final rule is
effective from 7 a.m. on April 1, 2015
to 11 p.m. on November 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2014–1029. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule change, call or email Steven M.
Fischer, Bridge Administrator,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District Bridge
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
On January 2, 2015, the Coast Guard
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled
‘‘Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Hoquiam River, Hoquiam, WA’’ in the
Federal Register (80 FR 21). We
received no comments on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective in less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register because to wait otherwise
would be impracticable because
WSDOT’s work will commence on April
1, 2015 and, as noted below, there is no
indication that the change will have a
significant impact on any waterways
users.
B. Basis and Purpose
WSDOT, who owns and operates the
Simpson Avenue Bridge on the
Hoquiam River in Hoquiam,
Washington, has requested a change to
the bridge’s existing operating
regulations in order to facilitate the
maintenance and restoration of the
bridge. The restoration project will
entail painting, rust removal, and steel
repairs which require a full containment
system to keep paint and debris out of
the Hoquiam River.
In an effort to accommodate both the
needs of the waterway and highway
users, WSDOT has requested a rule
change in order to eliminate the need to
repeatedly uninstall and reinstall the
containment system. As such, the Coast
Guard will change the bridge’s current
operating regulation from April 1, 2015
to November 30, 2015. During that time
the drawbridge would be maintained in
the closed position except that, upon at
least two hours advance notice, one leaf
of the double leaf bascule bridge would
be opened.
Vessels that are able to transit under
the bridge without an opening will be
free to do so. However, the existing
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
vertical navigation clearance of the
closed draw span leaf (one half of the
double leaf draw bridge), will be
reduced from approximately 35 feet to
approximately 25 feet at mean high tide
and the horizontal navigation clearance
will be reduced from 125 feet to
approximately 52 feet. Navigation
clearance reduction is due to the
installation of a required containment
system.
Vessel traffic along this part of the
Hoquiam River consists of vessels
ranging from commercial tug and barge
to small pleasure craft. WSDOT has
examined bridge opening logs and
contacted all waterway users that have
requested bridge openings throughout
the last year. The input WSDOT
received from waterway users indicated
that the temporary rule change will have
no impact on the known users.
C. Discussion of Final Rule
The Coast Guard will revise the
operating regulations at 33 CFR
117.1047. The regulation currently
states that the Simpson Avenue Bridge
shall open on signal if at least one hour
notice is given. The Coast Guard will
change the regulation such that from 7
a.m. on April 1, 2015 to 6 p.m. on
November 30, 2015, the draw of the
Simpson Avenue Bridge, on the
Hoquiam River at mile 0.5, at Hoquiam,
Washington, shall open half of the
bascule (single leaf) when at least two
hours of advance notice is given. No
alternate routes are available for this
waterway. Vessels that can transit under
the bridge without an opening may do
so at any time, although the existing
vertical navigation clearance of the
closed draw span (one half of the double
leaf draw bridge), will be reduced from
approximately 35 feet to approximately
25 feet at mean high tide and the
horizontal navigation clearance will be
reduced from 125 feet to approximately
52 feet. Navigation clearance reduction
is due to the installation of a required
containment system.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
E:\FR\FM\03APR1.SGM
03APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The
Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under those Orders. The
Coast Guard has made this finding
based on the fact that all requested
bridge openings will be granted with
advance notification and vessels that
can safely transit under the bridge may
do so at any time.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels needing to transit the bridge at
any time of day. This rulemaking will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: The bridge
will still be able to open upon advance
notification.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule, after receiving no
comments, under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
18115
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
10. Protection of Children
■
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\03APR1.SGM
03APR1
18116
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
§ 117.1047
[Amended]
2. In § 117.1047, effective 7 a.m. on
April 1, 2015 until 6 p.m. on November
30, 2015, suspend paragraph (c) and add
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.T1047
Hoquiam River.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Half of the draw (single leaf) of the
Simpson Avenue Bridge, mile 0.5, at
Hoquiam, WA, shall open on signal if at
least a two hour notice is given by
telephone or VHF radio to the
Washington State Department of
Transportation. The opening signal is
two prolonged blasts followed by one
short blast.
Dated: March 18, 2015.
R.T. Gromlich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015–07317 Filed 4–1–15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AP33
Technical Corrections
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) amends its regulations to
remove out-of-date legal citations and
add the correct authority. This
rulemaking contains only
nonsubstantive, technical changes.
DATES: This rule is effective April 3,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Rasmussen, Consultant,
Regulations Staff (211D), Compensation
Service, Department of Veterans Affairs,
810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20420, (202) 461–9700. (This is not
a toll-free telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 2, 2005, VA published a final
rule removing 38 CFR 3.5(e) and adding
38 CFR 3.10. 70 FR 72211. Section
3.10(e)(3) regards payment information
for surviving spouses in receipt of
Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation (DIC) and clearly
contains an erroneous cross reference to
§ 3.351(f), which regards death pension.
Therefore, VA is correcting this
technical error by removing the cross
reference to § 3.351(f) and adding, in its
place, a cross reference to § 3.351(e), the
paragraph regarding DIC.
On September 30, 1997, VA published
a final rule redesignating 38 CFR
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Apr 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
3.105(h) as § 3.105(i). 62 FR 51274.
However, VA failed to update the cross
reference to § 3.105(h)(1) in 38 CFR
3.655(c)(4). Therefore, VA is correcting
the cross reference in § 3.655(c)(4) to
correctly refer to § 3.105(i)(1).
Lastly, on December 29, 2006, VA
published a final rule redesignating 38
CFR 3.1000(a)(4) as § 3.1000(a)(5) and
adding a new paragraph § 3.1000(a)(4).
71 FR 78368. However, VA failed to
update the cross references to
§ 3.1000(a)(4) in §§ 3.1000(b)(3), (c)(1),
and (f) and 3.1003(a). Therefore, VA is
correcting the above-noted sections to
correctly refer to § 3.1000(a)(5).
Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), VA
has determined that prior notice and
opportunity for comment on this
rulemaking are unnecessary. This final
rule consists of nonsubstantive,
technical changes that merely amend
VA’s regulations to reflect the correct
legal citations. For this reason, VA has
also determined that there is good cause
to waive the 30-day delayed effective
date requirement under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA’s impact analysis can be
found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of this rulemaking and its impact
analysis are available on VA’s Web site
at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by
following the link for VA Regulations
Published from FY 2004 through Fiscal
Year to Date.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612). This final rule will
directly affect only individuals and will
not directly affect small entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this rulemaking is exempt from the final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of section 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
64.101, Burial Expenses Allowance for
Veterans; 64.104, Pension for NonService-Connected Disability for
Veterans; 64.105, Pension to Veterans
Surviving Spouses, and Children;
64.109, Veterans Compensation for
Service-Connected Disability; 64.110,
Veterans Dependency and Indemnity
E:\FR\FM\03APR1.SGM
03APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18114-18116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07317]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2014-1029]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hoquiam River, Hoquiam, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily modifying the operating
schedule that governs the Simpson Avenue Bridge on the Hoquiam River,
mile 0.5, at Hoquiam, Washington. This temporary final rule is
necessary to accommodate Washington State Department of
Transportation's (WSDOT) extensive maintenance and restoration efforts
on this bridge. WSDOT will only open one leaf of the double leaf
bascule bridge when at least two hours of notice is given.
DATES: This temporary final rule is effective from 7 a.m. on April 1,
2015 to 11 p.m. on November 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-1029. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is
202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of three
methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule change, call or email Steven M. Fischer, Bridge
Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard District Bridge Program Office,
telephone 206-220-7282; email d13-pf-d13bridges@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Regulatory History and Information
On January 2, 2015, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hoquiam
River, Hoquiam, WA'' in the Federal Register (80 FR 21). We received no
comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because to wait otherwise would be
impracticable because WSDOT's work will commence on April 1, 2015 and,
as noted below, there is no indication that the change will have a
significant impact on any waterways users.
B. Basis and Purpose
WSDOT, who owns and operates the Simpson Avenue Bridge on the
Hoquiam River in Hoquiam, Washington, has requested a change to the
bridge's existing operating regulations in order to facilitate the
maintenance and restoration of the bridge. The restoration project will
entail painting, rust removal, and steel repairs which require a full
containment system to keep paint and debris out of the Hoquiam River.
In an effort to accommodate both the needs of the waterway and
highway users, WSDOT has requested a rule change in order to eliminate
the need to repeatedly uninstall and reinstall the containment system.
As such, the Coast Guard will change the bridge's current operating
regulation from April 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015. During that time
the drawbridge would be maintained in the closed position except that,
upon at least two hours advance notice, one leaf of the double leaf
bascule bridge would be opened.
Vessels that are able to transit under the bridge without an
opening will be free to do so. However, the existing vertical
navigation clearance of the closed draw span leaf (one half of the
double leaf draw bridge), will be reduced from approximately 35 feet to
approximately 25 feet at mean high tide and the horizontal navigation
clearance will be reduced from 125 feet to approximately 52 feet.
Navigation clearance reduction is due to the installation of a required
containment system.
Vessel traffic along this part of the Hoquiam River consists of
vessels ranging from commercial tug and barge to small pleasure craft.
WSDOT has examined bridge opening logs and contacted all waterway users
that have requested bridge openings throughout the last year. The input
WSDOT received from waterway users indicated that the temporary rule
change will have no impact on the known users.
C. Discussion of Final Rule
The Coast Guard will revise the operating regulations at 33 CFR
117.1047. The regulation currently states that the Simpson Avenue
Bridge shall open on signal if at least one hour notice is given. The
Coast Guard will change the regulation such that from 7 a.m. on April
1, 2015 to 6 p.m. on November 30, 2015, the draw of the Simpson Avenue
Bridge, on the Hoquiam River at mile 0.5, at Hoquiam, Washington, shall
open half of the bascule (single leaf) when at least two hours of
advance notice is given. No alternate routes are available for this
waterway. Vessels that can transit under the bridge without an opening
may do so at any time, although the existing vertical navigation
clearance of the closed draw span (one half of the double leaf draw
bridge), will be reduced from approximately 35 feet to approximately 25
feet at mean high tide and the horizontal navigation clearance will be
reduced from 125 feet to approximately 52 feet. Navigation clearance
reduction is due to the installation of a required containment system.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of
[[Page 18115]]
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard has made
this finding based on the fact that all requested bridge openings will
be granted with advance notification and vessels that can safely
transit under the bridge may do so at any time.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels needing to
transit the bridge at any time of day. This rulemaking will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: The bridge will still be able to open upon
advance notification.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule, after receiving no comments,
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
[[Page 18116]]
Sec. 117.1047 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 117.1047, effective 7 a.m. on April 1, 2015 until 6 p.m. on
November 30, 2015, suspend paragraph (c) and add paragraph (e) to read
as follows:
Sec. 117.T1047 Hoquiam River.
* * * * *
(e) Half of the draw (single leaf) of the Simpson Avenue Bridge,
mile 0.5, at Hoquiam, WA, shall open on signal if at least a two hour
notice is given by telephone or VHF radio to the Washington State
Department of Transportation. The opening signal is two prolonged
blasts followed by one short blast.
Dated: March 18, 2015.
R.T. Gromlich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2015-07317 Filed 4-1-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P