Order Denying Export Privileges, 17722-17723 [2015-07642]
Download as PDF
17722
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices
sampling, implantable and suction-cup
tagging, photo-identification, behavioral
observation, passive acoustic recording,
post-tag monitoring, and/or import,
receive or export parts. The permit
expires December 31, 2018. Dr. Mate is
requesting the permit be amended to
increase the number of humpback
whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) that
may be taken by Level B harassment
during surveys from 1,000 to 2,000
animals annually to account for all
approaches within 100 yards. No other
changes to the permit or manner of
research would occur.
A draft supplemental environmental
assessment (SEA) has been prepared in
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), to examine whether
significant environmental impacts could
result from issuance of the proposed
scientific research permit. The draft
SEA is available for review and
comment simultaneous with the
scientific research permit application.
Concurrent with the publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
NMFS is forwarding copies of this
application to the Marine Mammal
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: March 27, 2015.
Julia Harrison,
Chief, Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–07493 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–838]
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and
Tube From Mexico: Rescission, in Part,
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3874 or (202) 482–5973,
respectively.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On November 3, 2014, the Department
of Commerce (Department) published a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on seamless
refined copper pipe and tube from
Mexico covering the period November
1, 2013, through October 31, 2014.1 The
Department received a timely request
for an antidumping duty administrative
review from the petitioners (i.e., Cerro
Flow Products, LLC; Wieland Copper
Products, LLC; Mueller Copper Tube
Products, Inc.; and Mueller Copper
Tube Company, Inc.) for the following
companies: (1) GD Affiliates S. de R.L.
de C.V. (Golden Dragon); (2) IUSA, S.A.
de C.V. (IUSA); and (3) Nacional de
Cobre, S.A. de C.V. (Nacobre). The
Department also received timely
requests for an antidumping duty
administrative review from Golden
Dragon, IUSA, and Nacobre. On
December 23, 2013, the Department
published a notice of initiation of
administrative review with respect to
these companies.2
On January 27, 2015, March 17, 2015,
and March 19, 2015, IUSA, Golden
Dragon, and Nacobre, respectively,
withdrew their requests for an
administrative review. On March 23,
2015, the petitioners withdrew their
request for an administrative review for
IUSA and Nacobre. All of these
submissions were timely, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1).
Rescission, In Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if a party
that requested the review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. In this case, all
requests were submitted within the 90day period and, thus, are timely.
Because these withdrawals of requests
for an antidumping duty administrative
review are timely, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding
this administrative review with respect
to IUSA and Nacobre. However, we are
continuing the administrative review
with respect to Golden Dragon because
the petitioners have requested a review
of this company, and we did not receive
a timely withdrawal of review request
from the petitioners with respect to it.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 65176
(November 3, 2014).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
76956 (December 23, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the companies
for which this review is rescinded,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 27, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–07598 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of: Erik Antonio Perez-Bazan,
Inmate Number—45654–379, FCI Bastrop,
Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box
1010, Bastrop, Texas 78602, Washington, DC
20230
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On September 15, 2014, in the U.S.
District Court, Southern District of
Texas, Erik Antonio Perez-Bazan
(‘‘Perez-Bazan’’), was convicted of
violating Section 38 of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2012))
(‘‘AECA’’). Specifically, Perez-Bazan
intentionally and knowingly conspired
to knowingly and willfully export,
attempt to export, and cause to be
exported from the United States to
Mexico eight (8) M203 grenade launcher
barrels, which were designated as
defense articles on the United States
Munitions List, without first obtaining
the required license or written
authorization from the State
Department. Perez-Bazan was sentenced
to 75 months of imprisonment, three
years of supervised released, and fined
a $100 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 2410(h). The
denial of export privileges under this
provision may be for a period of up to
10 years from the date of the conviction.
15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. § 2410(h). In addition, Section
750.8 of the Regulations states that the
Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office
of Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
BIS has received notice of PerezBazan’s conviction for violating the
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–
2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August
11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
AECA, and has provided notice and an
opportunity for Perez-Bazan to make a
written submission to BIS, as provided
in Section 766.25 of the Regulations.
BIS has not received a submission from
Perez-Bazan.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Perez-Bazan’s
export privileges under the Regulations
for a period of 10 years from the date of
Perez-Bazan’s conviction. I have also
decided to revoke all licenses issued
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Perez-Bazan had an interest at
the time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until
September 15, 2024, Erik Antonio PerezBazan, with a last known address of
Inmate Number—45654–379, FCI
Bastrop, Federal Correctional
Institution, P.O. Box 1010, Bastrop,
Texas 78602, and when acting for or on
his behalf, his successors, assigns,
employees, agents or representatives
(the ‘‘Denied Person’’), may not, directly
or indirectly, participate in any way in
any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
17723
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Perez-Bazan by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Perez-Bazan may file an
appeal of this Order with the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security. The appeal must be filed
within 45 days from the date of this
Order and must comply with the
provisions of Part 756 of the
Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Perez-Bazan. This Order
shall be published in the Federal
Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until September 15, 2024.
Issued this 26th day of March, 2015.
Thomas Andrukonis,
Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–07642 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE P
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17722-17723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07642]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of: Erik Antonio Perez-Bazan, Inmate Number--
45654-379, FCI Bastrop, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box
1010, Bastrop, Texas 78602, Washington, DC 20230
[[Page 17723]]
On September 15, 2014, in the U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas, Erik Antonio Perez-Bazan (``Perez-Bazan''), was
convicted of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22
U.S.C. 2778 (2012)) (``AECA''). Specifically, Perez-Bazan intentionally
and knowingly conspired to knowingly and willfully export, attempt to
export, and cause to be exported from the United States to Mexico eight
(8) M203 grenade launcher barrels, which were designated as defense
articles on the United States Munitions List, without first obtaining
the required license or written authorization from the State
Department. Perez-Bazan was sentenced to 75 months of imprisonment,
three years of supervised released, and fined a $100 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR'' or
``Regulations'') \1\ provides, in pertinent part, that ``[t]he Director
of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director
of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of
any person who has been convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (``EAA''), the EAR, or any order, license or
authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal
Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).'' 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. Sec. 2410(h). The denial of
export privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10
years from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50
U.S.C. app. Sec. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the
Regulations states that the Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security
(``BIS'') licenses previously issued in which the person had an
interest in at the time of his conviction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2014). The Regulations
issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app.
Sec. Sec. 2401-2420 (2000)) (``EAA''). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has
been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014)), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BIS has received notice of Perez-Bazan's conviction for violating
the AECA, and has provided notice and an opportunity for Perez-Bazan to
make a written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the
Regulations. BIS has not received a submission from Perez-Bazan.
Based upon my review and consultations with BIS's Office of Export
Enforcement, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I
have decided to deny Perez-Bazan's export privileges under the
Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Perez-Bazan's
conviction. I have also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant
to the Act or Regulations in which Perez-Bazan had an interest at the
time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until September 15, 2024, Erik
Antonio Perez-Bazan, with a last known address of Inmate Number--45654-
379, FCI Bastrop, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1010,
Bastrop, Texas 78602, and when acting for or on his behalf, his
successors, assigns, employees, agents or representatives (the ``Denied
Person''), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in
any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations,
including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation,
or business organization related to Perez-Bazan by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions
of this Order in order to prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Perez-Bazan
may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce
for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from
the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be delivered to the Perez-Bazan.
This Order shall be published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective immediately and shall remain in
effect until September 15, 2024.
Issued this 26th day of March, 2015.
Thomas Andrukonis,
Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2015-07642 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE P