Notice of Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Master Development Plan for the Armed Forces Retirement Home in Washington, DC, 17715-17716 [2015-07621]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices
assessment tool, which allows users to
monitor their daily food intakes and
physical activity information. Based on
the Dietary Guidelines for Americans,
the SuperTracker delivers nutrition
education by allowing users to monitor
their intake and explore ways to
improve their food and physical activity
choices. Motivational education
messages are generated and tailored to
the user’s personal assessment results.
Individuals can use the SuperTracker
without registration. However, all users
may voluntarily enter and save
information by registering with a
username and password. The historical
and trend data entered allows users to
identify areas for improvement and
reference short- and long-term changes
to diet and physical activity behaviors.
SuperTracker includes optional
functions that consumers may use at
their discretion, including a journaling
feature to capture information for a
selected category. Consumers may also
post system-generated congratulatory
and tip messages to Facebook or Twitter
using their personal social media
account. Through leveraging the user’s
existing social network, the user is more
likely to experience positive feedback
and encouragement in achieving their
dietary and/or physical activity goals.
Social media functionality is provided
as a consumer benefit but does not
impact consumer results or reports.
Access to the SuperTracker is obtained
at SuperTracker.usda.gov.
Affected Public: Individual/
Households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
The following total annual burden
estimates are based on the data obtained
from current web trend tool, Google
Analytics from January 2014–December
2014.
• The number of annual visitors to
the Web site is expected to be about 11.2
million, and they will spend
approximately 5 minutes one time only.
• Approximately 30 percent of annual
visitors will complete a one-time
registration, log-in and assessment for
the revised online assessment tool. This
information is based on data from
17715
Google Analytics (rounded up = 3.3
million).
• The average number of weekly
visitors is approximately 200,000.
• 30 percent of the weekly visitors
return each week to complete tracking
activities (approximately 60,000).
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 4.5.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
11,200,000.
Estimated Time per Response:
0.236448065.
For the SuperTracker, it will take
individuals approximately 1 minute
(.0167) to initially register for a system
logon ID and password. It typically
takes users 30 seconds (.0083) to
routinely login to the system and
approximately 15 minutes (.25) to
complete food and physical activity data
entry log for 1 day. Repeat users will
enter data on average 3 times per week.
The amount of time spent completing
entry and using functionality is
estimated at 45 minutes per week.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 3,787,898 hours.
SUPERTRACKER BURDEN ESTIMATES
Affected public
Description of
activity
(b) Form No.
(c) Number
annual
respondents
(d) Annual
frequency of
responses per
respondent
(e) Estimated
total annual
responses
(c×d)
(f) Hours per
response
(g) Total
annual burden
(e×f)
Reporting Burden
Individual and
households.
Annual Website
Visitors.
One time SuperTracker registration.
One time SuperTracker Log-in.
Food/Physical
Activity Data
Entry for 1
Week.
Repeat Log-ins
for 1 Year.
Repeat Food/
Physical Activity Data Entries
for 1 Year.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Total Annual
Burden
Est..
........................
11,200,000
1
11,200,000
N/A
3,300,000
1
3,300,000
0.0167
55,110
N/A
3,300,000
1
3,300,000
0.0083
27,390
N/A
3,300,000
1
3,300,000
0.25
N/A
60,000
51
3,060,000.00
0.0083
N/A
60,000
51
3,060,000.00
0.75
2,295,000
............................
........................
3,600,000
0.236448065
3,787,898
Dated: March 25, 2015.
Angela M. Tagtow,
Executive Director, Center for Nutrition Policy
and Promotion.
[FR Doc. 2015–07592 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 3410–30–P
4.45
Jkt 235001
825,000
25,398
ACTION:
Notice of Intent To Prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for the Proposed Master
Development Plan for the Armed
Forces Retirement Home in
Washington, DC
SUMMARY:
Armed Forces Retirement
Home (AFRH).
20:30 Apr 01, 2015
560,000
Notice of Intent to prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement.
ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16,020,000
0.05
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pursuant to the requirements
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), AFRH plans to
prepare a Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) for the
proposed AFRH Master Development
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
17716
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Plan in Washington, DC. The SEIS will
provide new analysis based on changes
to the original master development plan,
and changes in governing regulations.
DATES: Effective: April 3, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Justin Seffens, Corporate Facilities
Director, AFRH, at (202) 541–7549, or
Tim Sheckler, Project Manager, GSA, at
(202) 401–5806. The U.S. General
Services Administrator (GSA) is
preparing the SEIS on behalf of AFRH.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 United States Code (U.S.C.)
4321–4347; the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations
(Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
Title 40, chapter V, parts 1500–1508);
and AFRH’s Environmental Policy, 38
CFR part 200, AFRH plans to prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) for the proposed
Master Plan Development at the Armed
Forces Retirement Home in Washington,
DC.
AFRH intends to prepare an SEIS to
analyze the potential impacts resulting
from the proposed changes to the
original master development plan.
Factors known to have changed since
the previous study include construction
of a new building, the Scott Building, on
the AFRH campus; a $15 million
restoration and expansion of the
Lincoln’s Cottage historic site; closure of
the Heating Plant and inclusion of the
Plant in the development area; the
anticipated development of the
McMillan Reservoir parcel immediately
south of AFRH; and other area
development.
Background
Established in 1851, the AFRH in
Washington, DC continues its mission
as a retirement community for military
veterans. The 276-acre site is currently
developed with 93 structures including
the U.S. Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home
National Landmark District.
In 2002, the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002
(Pub. L. 107–107, 24 U.S.C. 411, et seq.)
gave the AFRH, with approval of the
Secretary of Defense, authority to
dispose of any property by sale, lease,
or otherwise that is excess to the needs
of the AFRH. In 2010, The National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111–84, 24 U.S.C.
411) modified this authority to allow the
Secretary of Defense (acting on behalf of
AFRH) to lease non-excess property
upon such terms as the Secretary
considers will promote the purpose and
financial stability of the Retirement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
Home or be in the public interest.
Proceeds from such a lease are
deposited to AFRH’s Trust Fund. To
implement these authorities, AFRH
prepared a Master Development Plan
and issued a Record of Decision in 2008
for its 276-acre campus in Washington,
DC to guide the long-term use and
development of the site. AFRH was
unable to reach agreement with the
initially selected developer. AFRH now
anticipates releasing a new solicitation
and selecting a new development
partner.
Alternatives Under Consideration
AFRH will analyze the proposed
action and no action alternatives for the
proposed Master Development Plan.
The proposed action alternative(s) will
include development of a portion of the
site for office, commercial, institutional,
and residential uses. As part of the EIS,
AFRH will study the impacts of each
alternative on the human environment.
Scoping Process
In accordance with 40 CFR
1502.9(c)(4), there will be no scoping
conducted for this SEIS.
Steven G. McManus,
Chief Operating Officer, Armed Forces
Retirement Home.
[FR Doc. 2015–07621 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 3030–ZA–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
In the Matter of: Precision Image
Corporation, 22424 76th Avenue
Southeast, Woodinville, WA 98072
Order Denying Export Privileges
On October 28, 2013, in the U.S.
District Court, Western District of
Washington at Seattle, Precision Image
Corporation, was convicted of violating
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control
Act (22 U.S.C. § 2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’).
Specifically, Precision Image
Corporation willfully exported from the
United States technical data designated
on the United States Munitions List,
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations, namely, a PCB, Sensor
Motherboard, H–1 Gyro, PESK–7571,
which is covered by Category XII(f) of
the United States Munitions List,
without having obtained from the
United States Department of State a
license or written approval for the
export of this technical data. Precision
Image Corporation was sentenced to 3
years of probation, criminal fine of
$300,000 and an assessment of $400.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. § 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. §§ 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b)
of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. § 783(b)), or section 38 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
§ 2778).’’ 15 CFR. § 766.25(a); see also
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app.
§ 2410(h). The denial of export
privileges under this provision may be
for a period of up to 10 years from the
date of the conviction. 15 CFR.
§ 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. app.
§ 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of
the Regulations states that the Bureau of
Industry and Security’s Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
its conviction.
BIS has received notice of Precision
Image Corporation’s conviction for
violating the AECA, and have provided
notice and an opportunity for Precision
Image Corporation to make a written
submission to BIS, as provided in
Section 766.25 of the Regulations. BIS
has received and reviewed a submission
from Precision Image Corporation.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Precision Image
Corporation’s export privileges under
the Regulations for a period of 10 years
from the date of Precision Image
Corporation’s conviction. I have also
decided to revoke all licenses issued
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Precision Image Corporation had
an interest at the time of its conviction.
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–
2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR.,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August
11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. § 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17715-17716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07621]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for the Proposed Master Development Plan for the Armed Forces
Retirement Home in Washington, DC
AGENCY: Armed Forces Retirement Home (AFRH).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), AFRH plans to prepare a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the proposed AFRH Master
Development
[[Page 17716]]
Plan in Washington, DC. The SEIS will provide new analysis based on
changes to the original master development plan, and changes in
governing regulations.
DATES: Effective: April 3, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin Seffens, Corporate Facilities
Director, AFRH, at (202) 541-7549, or Tim Sheckler, Project Manager,
GSA, at (202) 401-5806. The U.S. General Services Administrator (GSA)
is preparing the SEIS on behalf of AFRH.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 United States Code (U.S.C.)
4321-4347; the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, chapter V, parts 1500-1508); and
AFRH's Environmental Policy, 38 CFR part 200, AFRH plans to prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the proposed
Master Plan Development at the Armed Forces Retirement Home in
Washington, DC.
AFRH intends to prepare an SEIS to analyze the potential impacts
resulting from the proposed changes to the original master development
plan. Factors known to have changed since the previous study include
construction of a new building, the Scott Building, on the AFRH campus;
a $15 million restoration and expansion of the Lincoln's Cottage
historic site; closure of the Heating Plant and inclusion of the Plant
in the development area; the anticipated development of the McMillan
Reservoir parcel immediately south of AFRH; and other area development.
Background
Established in 1851, the AFRH in Washington, DC continues its
mission as a retirement community for military veterans. The 276-acre
site is currently developed with 93 structures including the U.S.
Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National Landmark District.
In 2002, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2002 (Pub. L. 107-107, 24 U.S.C. 411, et seq.) gave the AFRH, with
approval of the Secretary of Defense, authority to dispose of any
property by sale, lease, or otherwise that is excess to the needs of
the AFRH. In 2010, The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84, 24 U.S.C. 411) modified this authority to
allow the Secretary of Defense (acting on behalf of AFRH) to lease non-
excess property upon such terms as the Secretary considers will promote
the purpose and financial stability of the Retirement Home or be in the
public interest. Proceeds from such a lease are deposited to AFRH's
Trust Fund. To implement these authorities, AFRH prepared a Master
Development Plan and issued a Record of Decision in 2008 for its 276-
acre campus in Washington, DC to guide the long-term use and
development of the site. AFRH was unable to reach agreement with the
initially selected developer. AFRH now anticipates releasing a new
solicitation and selecting a new development partner.
Alternatives Under Consideration
AFRH will analyze the proposed action and no action alternatives
for the proposed Master Development Plan. The proposed action
alternative(s) will include development of a portion of the site for
office, commercial, institutional, and residential uses. As part of the
EIS, AFRH will study the impacts of each alternative on the human
environment.
Scoping Process
In accordance with 40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4), there will be no scoping
conducted for this SEIS.
Steven G. McManus,
Chief Operating Officer, Armed Forces Retirement Home.
[FR Doc. 2015-07621 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 3030-ZA-P
