National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP); Amending the NCP for Public Notices for Specific Superfund Activities, 17703-17706 [2015-07474]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Dated: March 25, 2015.
Susan Lewis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.475:
■ i. Remove ‘‘Chickpea’’ from the table
in paragraph (a)(1).
ii. Add alphabetically the entries for
‘‘Bushberry subgroup 13–07B’’, ‘‘Pea
and bean, dried shelled, except soybean,
subgroup 6C’’, ‘‘Pea, field, hay’’, and
‘‘Pea, field, vines’’ to the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
■ iii. Revise the entries for ‘‘Apple, wet
pomace’’ and ‘‘Fruit, pome, group 11–
10’’ in the table in paragraph (a)(1).
■ iv. Revise the entry for ‘‘Milk’’ in the
table in paragraph (a)(2).
The amendments read as follows:
■
§ 180.475 Difenoconazole; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * * (1) * * *
Parts per
million
Commodity
17703
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2014–0620; FRL–9924–
66–OSWER]
RIN 2050–AG76
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan (NCP); Amending the NCP for
Public Notices for Specific Superfund
Activities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or the Agency) is adding
language to the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP) to broaden the
methods by which the EPA can notify
the public about certain Superfund
activities.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective on
May 4, 2015.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
*
*
*
*
*
No. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2014–0620. All
Bushberry subgroup 13–07B ......
4.0
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
*
*
*
*
*
Although listed in the index, some
Fruit, pome, group 11–10 ...........
5.0
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
*
*
*
*
*
(CBI) or other information whose
Pea and bean, dried shelled, except soybean, subgroup 6C ....
0.20 disclosure is restricted by statute.
Pea, field, hay .............................
40
Certain other material, such as
Pea, field, vines ..........................
10
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
*
*
*
*
*
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
(2) * * *
the Superfund Docket (Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–SFUND–2014–0620). This
Parts per
Commodity
million
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
*
*
*
*
*
number for the Reading Room is (202)
Milk .............................................
0.02 566–1744 and the telephone number for
the Superfund Docket is (202) 566–
*
*
*
*
*
0276. The EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC)
is located at WJC West Building, Room
*
*
*
*
*
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
[FR Doc. 2015–07354 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
Washington, DC.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General Information: Superfund,
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI),
Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Risk
Management Program (RMP) and Oil
Information Center at (800) 424–9346 or
TDD (800) 553–7672 (hearing impaired).
In the Washington, DC metropolitan
area, call (703) 412–9810 or TDD (703)
412–3323.
*
*
*
*
Apple, wet pomace .....................
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
25
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
17704
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Technical information: Suzanne
Wells at (703) 603–8863,
(wells.suzanne@epa.gov), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0002, Mail Code 5204P.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is EPA publishing this final
rule?
On October 1, 2014, EPA published a
proposed rule entitled National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP); Amending the
NCP for Public Notices for Specific
Superfund Activities (79 FR 59179)
(hereafter the proposed rule). The EPA
proposed to amend the NCP to expand
the methods by which the EPA can
notify the public about certain
Superfund activities.
The NCP requires the lead Agency to
publish a notice ‘‘in a major local
newspaper of general circulation’’ when
certain Superfund site-related activities
occur. Many of these requirements were
established in 1990 or earlier versions of
the NCP when it was common practice
for government agencies to publish
notices of planned actions in
newspapers. Today, multiple ways are
used to notify the public about
Superfund site-related activities that
may be as or more effective than
publishing notices in newspapers. For
example, the public may be notified of
certain actions the lead agency takes by
distributing flyers door-to-door, mailing
notices to homes, sending email
notifications, making telephone calls or
posting on Web sites. In certain cases,
publishing a notice in a major
newspaper of general circulation may
not be the most effective way of
notifying a community about a specific
Superfund action, and may be less cost
effective than other notification
methods. EPA received seven comments
on the proposed rule. EPA is addressing
the comments and finalizing the
amendment.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Background
A. What does this amendment do?
In the October 1, 2014, proposed rule,
six sections of the NCP were proposed
to be amended to change the public
notice language in the NCP to allow
adequate notice to a community via a
major local newspaper of general
circulation or by using one or more
other mechanisms. Specifically, this
amendment will add language to:
Æ § 300.415(n)(2)(i) That requires a
notice of the availability of the
administrative record file for CERCLA
actions where, based on a site
evaluation, the lead agency determines
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
that a removal action is appropriate, and
that less than six months exists before
on-site removal action must begin.
Æ § 300.415(n)(4)(ii) that requires
notification of the engineering
evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) where
the lead agency determines that a
CERCLA removal action is appropriate
and that a planning period of at least six
months exists prior to initiation of the
on-site removal activities.
Æ § 300.425(e)(4)(ii) that requires
notification of releases that may be
deleted from the National Priorities List
(NPL).
Æ § 300.815(a) that requires
notification of the availability of the
administrative record file for the
selection of a remedial action at the
commencement of the remedial
investigation.
Æ § 300.820(a)(1) that requires
notification of the availability of the
administrative record file when an EE/
CA is made available for public
comment, if the lead agency determines
that a removal action is appropriate and
that a planning period of at least six
months exists before on-site removal
activities must be initiated.
Æ § 300.820(b)(1) that requires
notification of the availability of the
administrative record file for all other
removal actions not included in
§ 300.820(a).
B. What comments did EPA receive and
how are they addressed?
EPA received seven comments on the
proposed rule. Four of the commenters
fully supported the proposed rule to add
language to the NCP to broaden the
methods by which the EPA can notify
the public about certain Superfund
activities. One commenter wrote ‘‘It is
difficult even for organized groups to
constantly scan the local newspaper for
publication notices. To have our rights
for participation denied because we do
not have time to peruse the local
newspaper each and every day seems
contrary to EPA’s mission to inform and
protect the public.’’ Another commenter
wrote ‘‘The currently required method
of publishing notices in ‘major local
newspapers of general circulation’ is
antiquated and frequently ineffective.
By broadening the permitted methods of
notification, linked when possible to
Community Involvement Plans, EPA
can better reach populations affected by
the Superfund process.’’ A third
commenter wrote ‘‘The proposed rule
would broaden the notification methods
the lead agency will be able to use in
order to adopt a notification approach
that is most effective at informing a
community. . . . We fully support an
expanded approach to notification that
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
might include door to door flyers,
mailing notices to homes, sending
emails or making telephone calls.’’
One commenter questioned why the
proposed rule did not extend additional
methods of public notification to the
activities included under:
(1) section 117 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA) including:
Æ Section 117(a) notification of the
proposed plan (40 CFR
300.430(f)(3)(i)(A)),
Æ Section 117(b) notification of the
final remedial action plan adopted (40
CFR 300.430(f)(6)(i)), and
Æ Section 117(c) notification of an
explanation of significant differences
after adoption of a final remedial action
plan (40 CFR 300.435(c)(2)(i)(B));
(2) notice of availability of the
amended Record of Decision (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(ii)(G));
(3) notices after EPA receives a letter
of intent to apply for Technical
Assistance Grant (40 CFR 35.4110); and
(4) notices of the starts and
completions of five-year reviews or
availability of draft or final five-year
review reports.
EPA is required to follow the statutory
public notice requirements associated
with CERCLA section 117. Publication
in a major local newspaper of general
circulation will continue to be required
for 1) notice of availability of the
proposed plan (40 CFR
300.430(f)(3)(i)(A)), 2) notice of
availability of the Record of Decision
(40 CFR 300.430(f)(6)(i)), 3) notice that
briefly summarizes the explanation of
significant differences (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(i)(B)), 4) notice of
availability and a brief description of
the proposed amendment to the Record
of Decision (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(ii)(A)), and 5) notice of
availability of the amended Record of
Decision (40 CFR 300.435(c)(2)(ii)(G)).
EPA did not propose revisions to 40
CFR 35.4110 that requires the Agency to
publish a notice in a major local
newspaper of general circulation when
it receives a letter of intent to apply for
a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG).
EPA will consider whether revisions to
40 CFR 35.4110 are necessary to expand
the methods by which it notifies the
public of the receipt of a letter of intent
to apply for a TAG. If EPA decides
revisions are necessary, a proposed rule
will be published.
Finally, there are no regulatory
requirements to publish a notice in a
major local newspaper of general
circulation about the start and
completion of a five-year review or the
availability of a draft or final five-year
review report. The Comprehensive Five-
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Year Review Guidance (EPA 540–R–01–
007, OSWER No. 9355.7–03B–P, June
2001) says ‘‘[a]t a minimum, community
involvement activities during the fiveyear review should include notifying
the community that the five-year review
will be conducted and notifying the
community when the five-year review is
completed.’’ The Comprehensive FiveYear Review Guidance goes on to say
the site team should determine the best
means for notifying the community
about the five-year review. Therefore, no
revisions are necessary regarding public
notification of the start and completion
of five-year reviews or availability of
draft or final five-year review reports.
One commenter suggested that while
it need not be included in the new NCP
language, EPA staff responsible for
public notification should continuously
evaluate the effectiveness of the public
notice vehicles they use because ‘‘[i]n
this world of new media the best way
to reach people varies by group and is
continuously changing.’’ The Agency
agrees it is important to receive
feedback from the community on a
regular basis on the best ways to
communicate with them. During the
interviews conducted with community
members as part of the development of
a Community Involvement Plan, EPA
staff receive feedback on the best
methods to communicate with the
public. EPA staff also take advantage of
opportunities at public meetings and
through informal ongoing discussions
with community members about the
ways they would like to receive
information about site activities. Based
on this feedback, the Agency adjusts its
notification methods, if necessary.
Two commenters wrote the Agency
ought to provide public notifications in
English and in other prominent
languages spoken in a community. The
Agency agrees with these commenters.
In communities where languages other
than English are spoken, the Agency
does seek to translate site-related
information into the languages spoken
in the communities. When appropriate,
the Agency can provide translators at
public meetings to communicate siterelated information to community
members who do not speak English.
Some Agency staff are bilingual and are
able to help communicate site-related
information in prominent languages
spoken in a community.
One commenter wrote that some
communities are not knowledgeable
about the Superfund process, and that it
is important to provide training for
community members in order to help
them understand the Superfund
process, and how they can be involved
in the process. The Agency agrees with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
this commenter. EPA staff frequently
provide presentations in communities
about the Superfund process and how
community members can be involved in
the process. In addition, through
programs like Technical Assistance
Services for Communities (TASC), EPA
works closely with communities to
make sure they have the technical help
they need. Sometimes, a community
may need additional help to fully
understand local environmental issues
and participate in decision-making. The
purpose of the TASC program is to meet
this need.
Finally, one commenter supported
continuing to publish notices in major
local newspapers because some
communities continue to rely on local
newspapers to get their information.
This final rule allows the Agency to
publish notices in ‘‘major local
newspapers of general circulation,’’ if
the local newspaper is determined to be
the most effective vehicle for informing
a community about certain Superfund
activities.
Thus, the amendment being
promulgated is a useful and important
change that will give the Agency the
ability to determine the best method to
notify the public about certain
Superfund activities. EPA is
promulgating the change to add
language to 40 CFR part 300 as was
proposed.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
As explained previously, this rule
takes final action on an amendment for
which we received comments in
response to our October 1, 2014,
National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP);
Amending the NCP for Public Notices
for Specific Superfund Activities.
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and Executive
Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011), this action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ and is therefore not
subject to OMB review. This action
merely adds language to 40 CFR
300.415(n)(2)(i), 300.415(n)(4)(ii),
300.425(e)(4)(ii), 300.815(a),
300.820(a)(1), and 300.820(b)(1) to
expand the methods by which the lead
agency can notify the public about
certain Superfund activities. This action
will enable the lead agency to identify
effective methods to notify the public.
This action does not impose any
requirements on any entity, including
small entities. Therefore, pursuant to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.), after considering the
economic impacts of this action on
small entities, EPA certifies that this
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17705
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This action
does not contain any unfunded
mandates or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments as described in
Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1999 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104–4). This action does not
create new binding legal requirements
that substantially and directly affect
Tribes under Executive Order 13175 (63
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action does not have significant
Federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994). This action does not involve
technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272) do not apply.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: March 19, 2015.
Mathy Stanislaus,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
For the reasons set out above, title 40,
chapter I of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN
1. The authority citation for part 300
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3CFR,
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
17706
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,
3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52
FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
2. Section 300.415 is amended by
revising paragraphs (n)(2)(i) and
(n)(4)(ii) to read as follows:
■
§ 300.415
Removal action.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Publish a notice of availability of
the administrative record file
established pursuant to § 300.820 in a
major local newspaper of general
circulation or use one or more other
mechanisms to give adequate notice to
a community within 60 days of
initiation of on-site removal activity;
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(ii) Publish a notice of availability and
brief description of the EE/CA in a
major local newspaper of general
circulation or use one or more other
mechanisms to give adequate notice to
a community pursuant to § 300.820;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 300.425 is amended by
revising paragraph (e)(4)(ii) to read as
follows:
§ 300.425
Establishing remedial priorities.
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) In a major local newspaper of
general circulation at or near the release
that is proposed for deletion, publish a
notice of availability or use one or more
other mechanisms to give adequate
notice to a community of the intent to
delete;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 300.815 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
(1) The administrative record file
shall be made available for public
inspection when the engineering
evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) is
made available for public comment. At
such time, the lead agency shall publish
in a major local newspaper of general
circulation a notice or use one or more
other mechanisms to give adequate
notice to a community of the availability
of the administrative record file.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Documents included in the
administrative record file shall be made
available for public inspection no later
than 60 days after initiation of on-site
removal activity. At such time, the lead
agency shall publish in a major local
newspaper of general circulation a
notice or use one or more other
mechanisms to give adequate notice to
a community of the availability of the
administrative record file.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–07474 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
*
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 300.815 Administrative record file for a
remedial action.
(a) The administrative record file for
the selection of a remedial action shall
be made available for public inspection
at the commencement of the remedial
investigation phase. At such time, the
lead agency shall publish in a major
local newspaper of general circulation a
notice or use one or more other
mechanisms to give adequate notice to
a community of the availability of the
administrative record file.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 300.820 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) to
read as follows:
§ 300.820 Administrative record file for a
removal action.
(a) * * *
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
49 CFR Part 173
[Docket No. PHMSA–2013–0205; Notice No.
15–10]
Clarification on Policy for Additional
Name Requests Regarding Fireworks
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Clarification.
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration’s
(PHMSA), Office of Hazardous Materials
Safety (OHMS), is revising its
application-approval procedures for
previously approved firework designs
and clarifying requirements for
assigning Explosives (EX) Approval or
Fireworks Certification (FC) numbers. It
is not required or necessary for a
firework manufacturer, or designated
agent, to submit a new EX Approval
application each time an additional item
name is associated with a firework
design type (described under UN0336,
UN0335, and UN0431). PHMSA will no
longer process additional item name EX
Approval applications, effective
immediately.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective April 2, 2015.
Mr.
Ryan Paquet, Director, Approvals and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Permits Division, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, (202) 366–4512,
PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 16, 2013, PHMSA published
a final rule under docket HM–257 titled,
‘‘Hazardous Materials: Revision to
Fireworks Regulations (RRR).’’ The
intent of the final rule was to provide
regulatory flexibility in seeking
authorization for the transportation of
Division 1.4G consumer fireworks
(UN0336 Fireworks). The final rule
created a new type of DOT-approved
certification agency, the Firework
Certification Agency (FCA), which
serves as an optional alternate approvals
agency for fireworks manufacturers or
designated U.S. agents to submit
approval applications. These approvals
issued by FCAs use a ‘‘FC’’ numbering
system different from PHMSA’s ‘‘EX’’
system. As mentioned above, the intent
of the final rule was to provide
regulatory flexibility in the approval
process for 1.4G consumer fireworks.
PHMSA found that the level of effort
required to process that high-volume of
Approval applications was not
commensurate with the safety benefits
required by the APA Standard 87–1 or
the Hazardous Materials Regulations
(HMR, 49 CFR parts 171–180).
PHMSA’s Approvals and Permits
Division evaluates and approves as
many as 1,000 applications annually for
devices that are chemically and
physically identical. The only variant is
the item or device’s name. PHMSA
identified an additional area where can
streamline and expedite the approval
process. Typically, firework
manufacturers request a revised EX
Approval application each time they
add or change the name of a firework.
PHMSA has historically accepted each
EX Approval application for each
approved firework, to include the
original diagram and chemical
compositions sheets. This process
provides no additional safety benefit. As
a result, PHMSA will no longer provide
these approvals.
By eliminating this redundant
process, PHMSA will devote the saved
time and resources toward other
applications. As a result, we will reduce
the wait-time for other Approval
applications with more substantial
safety benefits.
II. Guidelines for Adding or Changing
a Firework Product’s Name
In accordance with § 172.320, the EXnumber, FC-number, product code or
national stock number must be either
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17703-17706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07474]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-0620; FRL-9924-66-OSWER]
RIN 2050-AG76
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP); Amending the NCP for Public Notices for Specific Superfund
Activities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
adding language to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP) to broaden the methods by which the EPA can
notify the public about certain Superfund activities.
DATES: This final rule is effective on May 4, 2015.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-0620. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will
be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Superfund Docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-
0620). This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744 and the telephone number for the
Superfund Docket is (202) 566-0276. The EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) is
located at WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General Information: Superfund, Toxics Release Inventory (TRI),
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Risk
Management Program (RMP) and Oil Information Center at (800) 424-9346
or TDD (800) 553-7672 (hearing impaired). In the Washington, DC
metropolitan area, call (703) 412-9810 or TDD (703) 412-3323.
[[Page 17704]]
Technical information: Suzanne Wells at (703) 603-8863,
(wells.suzanne@epa.gov), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460-0002, Mail Code 5204P.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is EPA publishing this final rule?
On October 1, 2014, EPA published a proposed rule entitled National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP); Amending
the NCP for Public Notices for Specific Superfund Activities (79 FR
59179) (hereafter the proposed rule). The EPA proposed to amend the NCP
to expand the methods by which the EPA can notify the public about
certain Superfund activities.
The NCP requires the lead Agency to publish a notice ``in a major
local newspaper of general circulation'' when certain Superfund site-
related activities occur. Many of these requirements were established
in 1990 or earlier versions of the NCP when it was common practice for
government agencies to publish notices of planned actions in
newspapers. Today, multiple ways are used to notify the public about
Superfund site-related activities that may be as or more effective than
publishing notices in newspapers. For example, the public may be
notified of certain actions the lead agency takes by distributing
flyers door-to-door, mailing notices to homes, sending email
notifications, making telephone calls or posting on Web sites. In
certain cases, publishing a notice in a major newspaper of general
circulation may not be the most effective way of notifying a community
about a specific Superfund action, and may be less cost effective than
other notification methods. EPA received seven comments on the proposed
rule. EPA is addressing the comments and finalizing the amendment.
II. Background
A. What does this amendment do?
In the October 1, 2014, proposed rule, six sections of the NCP were
proposed to be amended to change the public notice language in the NCP
to allow adequate notice to a community via a major local newspaper of
general circulation or by using one or more other mechanisms.
Specifically, this amendment will add language to:
[cir] Sec. 300.415(n)(2)(i) That requires a notice of the
availability of the administrative record file for CERCLA actions
where, based on a site evaluation, the lead agency determines that a
removal action is appropriate, and that less than six months exists
before on-site removal action must begin.
[cir] Sec. 300.415(n)(4)(ii) that requires notification of the
engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) where the lead agency
determines that a CERCLA removal action is appropriate and that a
planning period of at least six months exists prior to initiation of
the on-site removal activities.
[cir] Sec. 300.425(e)(4)(ii) that requires notification of
releases that may be deleted from the National Priorities List (NPL).
[cir] Sec. 300.815(a) that requires notification of the
availability of the administrative record file for the selection of a
remedial action at the commencement of the remedial investigation.
[cir] Sec. 300.820(a)(1) that requires notification of the
availability of the administrative record file when an EE/CA is made
available for public comment, if the lead agency determines that a
removal action is appropriate and that a planning period of at least
six months exists before on-site removal activities must be initiated.
[cir] Sec. 300.820(b)(1) that requires notification of the
availability of the administrative record file for all other removal
actions not included in Sec. 300.820(a).
B. What comments did EPA receive and how are they addressed?
EPA received seven comments on the proposed rule. Four of the
commenters fully supported the proposed rule to add language to the NCP
to broaden the methods by which the EPA can notify the public about
certain Superfund activities. One commenter wrote ``It is difficult
even for organized groups to constantly scan the local newspaper for
publication notices. To have our rights for participation denied
because we do not have time to peruse the local newspaper each and
every day seems contrary to EPA's mission to inform and protect the
public.'' Another commenter wrote ``The currently required method of
publishing notices in `major local newspapers of general circulation'
is antiquated and frequently ineffective. By broadening the permitted
methods of notification, linked when possible to Community Involvement
Plans, EPA can better reach populations affected by the Superfund
process.'' A third commenter wrote ``The proposed rule would broaden
the notification methods the lead agency will be able to use in order
to adopt a notification approach that is most effective at informing a
community. . . . We fully support an expanded approach to notification
that might include door to door flyers, mailing notices to homes,
sending emails or making telephone calls.''
One commenter questioned why the proposed rule did not extend
additional methods of public notification to the activities included
under:
(1) section 117 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) including:
[cir] Section 117(a) notification of the proposed plan (40 CFR
300.430(f)(3)(i)(A)),
[cir] Section 117(b) notification of the final remedial action plan
adopted (40 CFR 300.430(f)(6)(i)), and
[cir] Section 117(c) notification of an explanation of significant
differences after adoption of a final remedial action plan (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(i)(B));
(2) notice of availability of the amended Record of Decision (40
CFR 300.435(c)(2)(ii)(G));
(3) notices after EPA receives a letter of intent to apply for
Technical Assistance Grant (40 CFR 35.4110); and
(4) notices of the starts and completions of five-year reviews or
availability of draft or final five-year review reports.
EPA is required to follow the statutory public notice requirements
associated with CERCLA section 117. Publication in a major local
newspaper of general circulation will continue to be required for 1)
notice of availability of the proposed plan (40 CFR
300.430(f)(3)(i)(A)), 2) notice of availability of the Record of
Decision (40 CFR 300.430(f)(6)(i)), 3) notice that briefly summarizes
the explanation of significant differences (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(i)(B)), 4) notice of availability and a brief description
of the proposed amendment to the Record of Decision (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(ii)(A)), and 5) notice of availability of the amended
Record of Decision (40 CFR 300.435(c)(2)(ii)(G)).
EPA did not propose revisions to 40 CFR 35.4110 that requires the
Agency to publish a notice in a major local newspaper of general
circulation when it receives a letter of intent to apply for a
Technical Assistance Grant (TAG). EPA will consider whether revisions
to 40 CFR 35.4110 are necessary to expand the methods by which it
notifies the public of the receipt of a letter of intent to apply for a
TAG. If EPA decides revisions are necessary, a proposed rule will be
published.
Finally, there are no regulatory requirements to publish a notice
in a major local newspaper of general circulation about the start and
completion of a five-year review or the availability of a draft or
final five-year review report. The Comprehensive Five-
[[Page 17705]]
Year Review Guidance (EPA 540-R-01-007, OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P, June
2001) says ``[a]t a minimum, community involvement activities during
the five-year review should include notifying the community that the
five-year review will be conducted and notifying the community when the
five-year review is completed.'' The Comprehensive Five-Year Review
Guidance goes on to say the site team should determine the best means
for notifying the community about the five-year review. Therefore, no
revisions are necessary regarding public notification of the start and
completion of five-year reviews or availability of draft or final five-
year review reports.
One commenter suggested that while it need not be included in the
new NCP language, EPA staff responsible for public notification should
continuously evaluate the effectiveness of the public notice vehicles
they use because ``[i]n this world of new media the best way to reach
people varies by group and is continuously changing.'' The Agency
agrees it is important to receive feedback from the community on a
regular basis on the best ways to communicate with them. During the
interviews conducted with community members as part of the development
of a Community Involvement Plan, EPA staff receive feedback on the best
methods to communicate with the public. EPA staff also take advantage
of opportunities at public meetings and through informal ongoing
discussions with community members about the ways they would like to
receive information about site activities. Based on this feedback, the
Agency adjusts its notification methods, if necessary.
Two commenters wrote the Agency ought to provide public
notifications in English and in other prominent languages spoken in a
community. The Agency agrees with these commenters. In communities
where languages other than English are spoken, the Agency does seek to
translate site-related information into the languages spoken in the
communities. When appropriate, the Agency can provide translators at
public meetings to communicate site-related information to community
members who do not speak English. Some Agency staff are bilingual and
are able to help communicate site-related information in prominent
languages spoken in a community.
One commenter wrote that some communities are not knowledgeable
about the Superfund process, and that it is important to provide
training for community members in order to help them understand the
Superfund process, and how they can be involved in the process. The
Agency agrees with this commenter. EPA staff frequently provide
presentations in communities about the Superfund process and how
community members can be involved in the process. In addition, through
programs like Technical Assistance Services for Communities (TASC), EPA
works closely with communities to make sure they have the technical
help they need. Sometimes, a community may need additional help to
fully understand local environmental issues and participate in
decision-making. The purpose of the TASC program is to meet this need.
Finally, one commenter supported continuing to publish notices in
major local newspapers because some communities continue to rely on
local newspapers to get their information. This final rule allows the
Agency to publish notices in ``major local newspapers of general
circulation,'' if the local newspaper is determined to be the most
effective vehicle for informing a community about certain Superfund
activities.
Thus, the amendment being promulgated is a useful and important
change that will give the Agency the ability to determine the best
method to notify the public about certain Superfund activities. EPA is
promulgating the change to add language to 40 CFR part 300 as was
proposed.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
As explained previously, this rule takes final action on an
amendment for which we received comments in response to our October 1,
2014, National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP); Amending the NCP for Public Notices for Specific Superfund
Activities.
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), this action is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not subject to
OMB review. This action merely adds language to 40 CFR
300.415(n)(2)(i), 300.415(n)(4)(ii), 300.425(e)(4)(ii), 300.815(a),
300.820(a)(1), and 300.820(b)(1) to expand the methods by which the
lead agency can notify the public about certain Superfund activities.
This action will enable the lead agency to identify effective methods
to notify the public. This action does not impose any requirements on
any entity, including small entities. Therefore, pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), after considering
the economic impacts of this action on small entities, EPA certifies
that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This action does not contain any
unfunded mandates or significantly or uniquely affect small governments
as described in Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1999 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). This action does not create new
binding legal requirements that substantially and directly affect
Tribes under Executive Order 13175 (63 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action does not have significant Federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Because this
action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this
final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order
13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not involve technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: March 19, 2015.
Mathy Stanislaus,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
For the reasons set out above, title 40, chapter I of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 300--NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION
CONTINGENCY PLAN
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 13626,
77 FR 56749, 3CFR,
[[Page 17706]]
2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.
351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
0
2. Section 300.415 is amended by revising paragraphs (n)(2)(i) and
(n)(4)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.415 Removal action.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Publish a notice of availability of the administrative record
file established pursuant to Sec. 300.820 in a major local newspaper
of general circulation or use one or more other mechanisms to give
adequate notice to a community within 60 days of initiation of on-site
removal activity;
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Publish a notice of availability and brief description of the
EE/CA in a major local newspaper of general circulation or use one or
more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a community pursuant
to Sec. 300.820;
* * * * *
0
3. Section 300.425 is amended by revising paragraph (e)(4)(ii) to read
as follows:
Sec. 300.425 Establishing remedial priorities.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) In a major local newspaper of general circulation at or near
the release that is proposed for deletion, publish a notice of
availability or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate
notice to a community of the intent to delete;
* * * * *
0
4. Section 300.815 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 300.815 Administrative record file for a remedial action.
(a) The administrative record file for the selection of a remedial
action shall be made available for public inspection at the
commencement of the remedial investigation phase. At such time, the
lead agency shall publish in a major local newspaper of general
circulation a notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give
adequate notice to a community of the availability of the
administrative record file.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 300.820 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1)
to read as follows:
Sec. 300.820 Administrative record file for a removal action.
(a) * * *
(1) The administrative record file shall be made available for
public inspection when the engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA)
is made available for public comment. At such time, the lead agency
shall publish in a major local newspaper of general circulation a
notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a
community of the availability of the administrative record file.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Documents included in the administrative record file shall be
made available for public inspection no later than 60 days after
initiation of on-site removal activity. At such time, the lead agency
shall publish in a major local newspaper of general circulation a
notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a
community of the availability of the administrative record file.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-07474 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P