Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee: Notice of Intent To Establish the Fans and Blowers Working Group To Negotiate a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) for Energy Conservation Standards, 17359-17363 [2015-07470]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
received before the public meeting,
allow time for prepared general
statements by participants, and
encourage all interested parties to share
their views on issues affecting this
rulemaking. Each participant will be
allowed to make a general statement
(within time limits determined by DOE),
before the discussion of specific topics.
DOE will allow, as time permits, other
participants to comment briefly on any
general statements.
VI. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of today’s notice of intent.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 26,
2015.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2015–07469 Filed 3–31–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE–2013–BT–STD–0006]
Appliance Standards and Rulemaking
Federal Advisory Committee: Notice of
Intent To Establish the Fans and
Blowers Working Group To Negotiate a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NOPR) for Energy Conservation
Standards
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of intent and
announcement of public meetings.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE or the Department) is
giving notice that it intends to establish
a negotiated rulemaking working group
under the Appliance Standards and
Rulemaking Federal Advisory
Committee (ASRAC) in accordance with
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) and the Negotiated Rulemaking
Act (NRA) to negotiate proposed
definitions, certain aspects of a
proposed test procedure (if applicable),
and proposed energy conservation
standards for fans and blowers. The
purpose of the working group will be to
discuss and, if possible, reach
consensus on the scope of the
rulemaking, certain key aspects of a
proposed test procedure, and proposed
energy conservation standard for fans
and blowers, as authorized by the
Energy Policy and Conservation Act
(EPCA) of 1975, as amended. As part of
its negotiations, the working group will
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
consider scope of coverage and system
interaction impacts of potential
standards for fans and blowers. The
working group will consist of
representatives of parties having a
defined stake in the outcome of the
regulations, including the proposed
standards, and will consult as
appropriate with a range of experts on
technical issues. The working group is
expected to make a concerted effort to
negotiate a final term sheet within three
(3) months of its first meeting. At the
completion of negotiation, the term
sheet will be presented to ASRAC at an
open meeting for their deliberation and
decision on whether or not to pass it on
as a formal recommendation to DOE.
Lastly, DOE is announcing the first
Working Group session, which is open
to the public, on Wednesday, May 6,
and Thursday, May 7, 2015.
DATES: DOE will hold the first meeting
for the Fans and Blowers Working
Group on Wednesday, May 6, and
Thursday, May 7, 2015, from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m., in Washington, DC. Written
comments and request to be appointed
as members of the working group are
welcome and should be submitted by
April 15, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The first Fans and Blowers
Working Group meeting, which is also
open to the public, will be held at the
U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal
Building, Room 8E–089, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. To attend,
please notify asrac@ee.doe.gov. Persons
can attend the public meeting via
webinar. For more information, refer to
section V of this document (Public
Participation).
Interested person may submit
comments, identified by docket number
EERE–2013–BT–STD–0006 by any of
the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: ASRAC@ee.doe.gov. Include
docket number EERE–2013–BT–STD–
0006 in the subject line of the message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (CD), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 950
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a CD, in which case
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17359
it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be
accepted.
Docket: The docket is available for
review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices,
public meeting attendee lists and
transcripts, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
However, not all documents listed in
the index may be publicly available,
such as information that is exempt from
public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Armstrong, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Building Technologies
(EE–5B), 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. Phone: 202–
586–6590. Email: asrac@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Authority
II. Background
III. Proposed Negotiating Procedures
IV. Comments Requested
V. Public Participation
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority
This notice of intent, announcing
DOE’s intent to negotiate a proposed
rule for fans and blowers energy
conservation standards, was developed
under the authority of sections 563 and
564 of the NRA (5 U.S.C. 561–570, Pub.
L. 104–320). The regulation of fans and
blowers for energy conservation
standards that DOE is proposing to
develop under a negotiated rulemaking
will be developed under the authority of
EPCA, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6311(1)(A)
and 42 U.S.C. 6291 et seq.
II. Background
As required by the NRA, DOE is
giving notice that it is establishing a
working group under ASRAC to develop
proposed energy conservation
standards, including the applicability of
those standards for various categories of
fans and blower currently found on the
market. EPCA, as amended, directs DOE
to adopt energy conservation standards
for fans and blowers for which
standards would be technologically
feasible and economically justified, and
would result in significant energy
savings. There currently are no Federal
energy conservation standards for fans
and blowers.
A. Negotiated Rulemaking
DOE has decided to use the negotiated
rulemaking process to develop proposed
energy conservation standards for fans
and blowers. Under EPCA, Congress
mandated that DOE develop regulations
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
17360
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
establishing energy conservation
standards for covered consumer and
commercial appliances that are
designed to achieve the maximum
improvement in energy efficiency that
are technologically feasible and
economically justified. 42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(A). The primary reason for
using the negotiated rulemaking process
for developing a proposed Federal
standard is that stakeholders strongly
support a consensual rulemaking effort.
DOE believes such a regulatory
negotiation process will be less
adversarial and better suited to
resolving complex technical issues. An
important virtue of negotiated
rulemaking is that it allows expert
dialog that is much better than
traditional techniques at getting the
facts and issues right and will result in
a proposed rule that will effectively
reflect Congressional intent.
A regulatory negotiation will enable
DOE to engage in direct and sustained
dialog with informed, interested, and
affected parties when drafting the
regulation, rather than obtaining input
during a public comment period after
developing and publishing a proposed
rule. Gaining this early understanding of
all parties’ perspectives allows DOE to
address key issues at an earlier stage of
the process, thereby allowing more time
for an iterative process to resolve issues.
A rule drafted by negotiation with
informed and affected parties is
expected to be potentially more
pragmatic and more easily implemented
than a rule arising from the traditional
process. Such rulemaking improvement
is likely to provide the public with the
full benefits of the rule while
minimizing the potential negative
impact of a proposed regulation
conceived or drafted without the full
prior input of outside knowledgeable
parties. Because a negotiating working
group includes representatives from the
major stakeholder groups affected by or
interested in the rule, the number of
public comments on the proposed rule
may be decreased. DOE anticipates that
there will be a need for fewer
substantive changes to a proposed rule
developed under a regulatory
negotiation process prior to the
publication of a final rule.
B. The Concept of Negotiated
Rulemaking
Usually, DOE develops a proposed
rulemaking using Department staff and
consultant resources. Typically, a
preliminary analysis is vetted for
stakeholder comments after a
Framework Document is published and
comments taken thereon. After the
notice of proposed rulemaking is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
published for comment, affected parties
may submit arguments and data
defining and supporting their positions
with regard to the issues raised in the
proposed rule. Congress noted in the
NRA, however, that regulatory
development may ‘‘discourage the
affected parties from meeting and
communicating with each other, and
may cause parties with different
interests to assume conflicting and
antagonistic positions * * *.’’ 5 U.S.C.
561(2)(2). Congress also stated that
‘‘adversarial rulemaking deprives the
affected parties and the public of the
benefits of face-to-face negotiations and
cooperation in developing and reaching
agreement on a rule. It also deprives
them of the benefits of shared
information, knowledge, expertise, and
technical abilities possessed by the
affected parties.’’ 5 U.S.C. 561(2)(3).
Using negotiated rulemaking to
develop a proposed rule differs
fundamentally from the Department
centered process. In negotiated
rulemaking, a proposed rule is
developed by an advisory committee or
working group, chartered under FACA,
5 U.S.C. App. 2, composed of members
chosen to represent the various interests
that will be significantly affected by the
rule. The goal of the advisory committee
or working group is to reach consensus
on the treatment of the major issues
involved with the rule. The process
starts with the Department’s careful
identification of all interests potentially
affected by the rulemaking under
consideration. To help with this
identification, the Department publishes
a notice of intent such as this one in the
Federal Register, identifying a
preliminary list of interested parties and
requesting public comment on that list.
Following receipt of comments, the
Department establishes an advisory
committee or working group
representing the full range of
stakeholders to negotiate a consensus on
the terms of a proposed rule.
Representation on the advisory
committee or working group may be
direct; that is, each member may
represent a specific interest, or may be
indirect, such as through trade
associations and/or similarly-situated
parties with common interests. The
Department is a member of the advisory
committee or working group and
represents the Federal government’s
interests. The advisory committee or
working group chair is assisted by a
neutral mediator who facilitates the
negotiation process. The role of the
mediator, also called a facilitator, is to
apply proven consensus-building
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
techniques to the advisory committee or
working group process.
After an advisory committee or
working group reaches consensus on the
provisions of a proposed rule, the
Department, consistent with its legal
obligations, uses such consensus as the
basis of its proposed rule, which then is
published in the Federal Register. This
publication provides the required public
notice and provides for a public
comment period. Other participants and
other interested parties retain their
rights to comment, participate in an
informal hearing (if requested), and
request judicial review. DOE
anticipates, however, that the preproposal consensus agreed upon by the
advisory committee or working group
will narrow any issues in the
subsequent rulemaking.
C. Proposed Rulemaking for Fans and
Blowers Energy Conservation Standards
The NRA enables DOE to establish an
advisory committee or working group if
it is determined that the use of the
negotiated rulemaking process is in the
public interest. DOE intends to develop
Federal regulations that build on the
depth of experience accrued in both the
public and private sectors in
implementing standards and programs.
DOE has determined that the
regulatory negotiation process will
provide for obtaining a diverse array of
in-depth input, as well as an
opportunity for increased collaborative
discussion from both private-sector
stakeholders and government officials
who are familiar with energy efficiency
of fans and blowers.
D. Department Commitment
In initiating this regulatory
negotiation process to develop energy
conservation standards for fans and
blowers, DOE is making a commitment
to provide adequate resources to
facilitate timely and successful
completion of the process. This
commitment includes making the
process a priority activity for all
representatives, components, officials,
and personnel of the Department who
need to be involved in the rulemaking,
from the time of initiation until such
time as a final rule is issued or the
process is expressly terminated. DOE
will provide administrative support for
the process and will take steps to ensure
that the advisory committee or working
group has the dedicated resources it
requires to complete its work in a timely
fashion. Specifically, DOE will make
available the following support services:
Properly equipped space adequate for
public meetings and caucuses; logistical
support; word processing and
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
distribution of background information;
the service of a facilitator; and such
additional research and other technical
assistance as may be necessary.
To the maximum extent possible
consistent with the legal obligations of
the Department, DOE will use the
consensus of the advisory committee or
working group as the basis for the rule
the Department proposes for public
notice and comment.
E. Negotiating Consensus
As discussed above, the negotiated
rulemaking process differs
fundamentally from the usual process
for developing a proposed rule.
Negotiation enables interested and
affected parties to discuss various
approaches to issues rather than asking
them only to respond to a proposal
developed by the Department. The
negotiation process involves a mutual
education of the various parties on the
practical concerns about the impact of
standards. Each advisory committee or
working group member participates in
resolving the interests and concerns of
other members, rather than leaving it up
to DOE to evaluate and incorporate
different points of view.
A key principle of negotiated
rulemaking is that agreement is by
consensus of all the interests. Thus, no
one interest or group of interests is able
to control the process. The NRA defines
consensus as the unanimous
concurrence among interests
represented on a negotiated rulemaking
committee or working group, unless the
committee or working group itself
unanimously agrees to use a different
definition. 5 U.S.C. 562. In addition,
experience has demonstrated that using
a trained mediator to facilitate this
process will assist all parties, including
DOE, in identifying their real interests
in the rule, and thus will enable parties
to focus on and resolve the important
issues.
III. Proposed Negotiating Procedures
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Key Issues for Negotiation
The following issues and concerns
will underlie the work of the Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee on Fans and
Blowers Equipment Energy
Conservation Standards for fans and
blowers:
• Scope of coverage (including any
system interaction effects);
• Key test procedure conditions, as
applicable; and
• Proposed energy conservation
standard.
To examine the underlying issues
outlined above, and others not yet
articulated, all parties in the negotiation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
will need DOE to provide data and an
analytic framework complete and
accurate enough to support their
deliberations. DOE’s analyses must be
adequate to inform a prospective
negotiation—for example, a notice of
data availability or equivalent must be
available and timely.
B. Formation of Working Group
A working group will be formed and
operated in full compliance with the
requirements of FACA and in a manner
consistent with the requirements of the
NRA. DOE has determined that the
working group not exceed 25 members.
The Department believes that more than
25 members would make it difficult to
conduct effective negotiations. DOE is
aware that there are many more
potential participants than there are
membership slots on the working group.
The Department does not believe, nor
does the NRA contemplate, that each
potentially affected group must
participate directly in the negotiations;
nevertheless, each affected interest can
be adequately represented. To have a
successful negotiation, it is important
for interested parties to identify and
form coalitions that adequately
represent significantly affected interests.
To provide adequate representation,
those coalitions must agree to support,
both financially and technically, a
member of the working group whom
they choose to represent their interests.
DOE recognizes that when it
establishes energy conservation
standards for residential products and
commercial equipment, various
segments of society may be affected in
different ways, in some cases producing
unique ‘‘interests’’ in a proposed rule
based on income, gender, or other
factors. The Department will pay
attention to providing that any unique
interests that have been identified, and
that may be significantly affected by the
proposed rule, are represented.
FACA also requires that members of
the public have the opportunity to
attend meetings of the full committee
and speak or otherwise address the
committee during the public comment
period. In addition, any member of the
public is permitted to file a written
statement with the advisory committee.
DOE plans to follow these same
procedures in conducting meetings of
the working group.
C. Interests Involved/Working Group
Membership
DOE anticipates that the working
group will comprise no more than 25
members who represent affected and
interested stakeholder groups, at least
one of whom must be a member of the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17361
ASRAC. As required by FACA, the
Department will conduct the negotiated
rulemaking with particular attention to
ensuring full and balanced
representation of those interests that
may be significantly affected by the
proposed rule governing rules of fans
and blowers energy conservation
standards. Section 562 of the NRA
defines the term interest as ‘‘with
respect to an issue or matter, multiple
parties which have a similar point of
view or which are likely to be affected
in a similar manner.’’ Listed below are
parties the Department to date has
identified as being ‘‘significantly
affected’’ by a proposed rule regarding
the energy conservation standards of
fans and blowers.
• The Department of Energy
• Manufacturers of Fans and Blowers
• Manufacturers of Equipment that
Purchase Fans and Blowers
• Trade Associations Representing
Manufacturers of Fans and Blowers or
Equipment that Purchase Fans and
Blowers
• Utilities
• Energy Efficiency/Environmental
Advocacy Groups
• Consumers
One purpose of this notice of intent is
to determine whether Federal
regulations regarding fans and blowers
energy conservation standards will
significantly affect interests that are not
listed above. DOE invites comment and
suggestions on its initial list of
significantly affected interests.
Members may be individuals or
organizations. If the effort is to be
fruitful, participants on the working
group should be able to fully and
adequately represent the viewpoints of
their respective interests. This
document gives notice of DOE’s process
to other potential participants and
affords them the opportunity to request
representation in the negotiations.
Those who wish to be appointed as
members of the working group, should
submit a request to DOE, in accordance
with the public participation procedures
outlined in the DATES and ADDRESSES
sections of this notice of intent.
Membership of the working group is
likely to involve:
• Attendance at approximately ten
(10); one (1) to two (2) day meetings;
• Travel costs to those meetings; and
• Preparation time for those meetings.
Members serving on the working
group will not receive compensation for
their services. Interested parties who are
not selected for membership on the
working group may make valuable
contributions to this negotiated
rulemaking effort in any of the following
ways:
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
17362
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
• The person may request to be
placed on the working group mailing
list and submit written comments as
appropriate.
• The person may attend working
group meetings, which are open to the
public; caucus with his or her interest’s
member on the working group; or even
address the working group during the
public comment portion of the working
group meeting.
• The person could assist the efforts
of a workgroup that the working group
might establish.
A working group may establish
informal workgroups, which usually are
asked to facilitate committee
deliberations by assisting with various
technical matters (e.g., researching or
preparing summaries of the technical
literature or comments on specific
matters such as economic issues).
Workgroups also might assist in
estimating costs or drafting regulatory
text on issues associated with the
analysis of the costs and benefits
addressed, or formulating drafts of the
various provisions and their
justifications as previously developed
by the working group. Given their
support function, workgroups usually
consist of participants who have
expertise or particular interest in the
technical matter(s) being studied.
Because it recognizes the importance of
this support work for the working
group, DOE will provide appropriate
technical expertise for such workgroups.
D. Good Faith Negotiation
Every working group member must be
willing to negotiate in good faith and
have the authority, granted by his or her
constituency, to do so. The first step is
to ensure that each member has good
communications with his or her
constituencies. An intra-interest
network of communication should be
established to bring information from
the support organization to the member
at the table, and to take information
from the table back to the support
organization. Second, each organization
or coalition therefore should designate
as its representative a person having the
credibility and authority to ensure that
needed information is provided and
decisions are made in a timely fashion.
Negotiated rulemaking can require the
appointed members to give a significant
sustained for as long as the duration of
the negotiated rulemaking. Other
qualities of members that can be helpful
are negotiating experience and skills,
and sufficient technical knowledge to
participate in substantive negotiations.
Certain concepts are central to
negotiating in good faith. One is the
willingness to bring all issues to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
bargaining table in an attempt to reach
a consensus, as opposed to keeping key
issues in reserve. The second is a
willingness to keep the issues at the
table and not take them to other forums.
Finally, good faith includes a
willingness to move away from some of
the positions often taken in a more
traditional rulemaking process, and
instead explore openly with other
parties all ideas that may emerge from
the working group’s discussions.
related to the functions of the working
group before beginning. DOE will
establish a meeting schedule based on
the settlement agreement and produce
the necessary documents so as to adhere
to that schedule. While the negotiated
rulemaking process is underway, DOE is
committed to performing much of the
same analysis as it would during a
normal standards rulemaking process
and to providing information and
technical support to the working group.
E. Facilitator
The facilitator will act as a neutral in
the substantive development of the
proposed standard. Rather, the
facilitator’s role generally includes:
• Impartially assisting the members of
the working group in conducting
discussions and negotiations; and
• Impartially assisting in performing
the duties of the Designated Federal
Official under FACA.
IV. Comments Requested
F. Department Representative
The DOE representative will be a full
and active participant in the consensus
building negotiations. The Department’s
representative will meet regularly with
senior Department officials, briefing
them on the negotiations and receiving
their suggestions and advice so that he
or she can effectively represent the
Department’s views regarding the issues
before the working group. DOE’s
representative also will ensure that the
entire spectrum of governmental
interests affected by the standards
rulemaking, including the Office of
Management and Budget, the Attorney
General, and other Departmental offices,
are kept informed of the negotiations
and encouraged to make their concerns
known in a timely fashion.
G. Working Group and Schedule
After evaluating the comments
submitted in response to this notice of
intent and the requests for nominations,
DOE will either inform the members of
the working group that they have been
selected or determine that conducting a
negotiated rulemaking is inappropriate.
The working group is expected to
make a concerted effort to negotiate a
final term sheet within three (3) months
of its first meeting. At the completion of
negotiation, the term sheet will be
presented to ASRAC at an open meeting
for their deliberation and decision on
whether or not to pass it on as a formal
recommendation to DOE. As part of its
negotiations, the working group should
consider scope of coverage and system
interaction impacts of potential
standards.
DOE will advise working group
members of administrative matters
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DOE requests comments on which
parties should be included in a
negotiated rulemaking to develop draft
language pertaining to the energy
conservation standards of fans and
blowers and suggestions of additional
interests and/or stakeholders that
should be represented on the working
group. All who wish to participate as
members of the working group should
submit a request for nomination to DOE.
V. Public Participation
Attendance at the Public Meeting
The time, date, and location of the
public meeting are listed in the DATES
and ADDRESSES sections. If you plan to
attend the public meeting, please notify
asrac@doe.gov. Please note that foreign
nationals participating in the public
meeting are subject to advance security
screening procedures which require
advance notice prior to attendance at
the public meeting. If a foreign national
wishes to participate in the public
meeting, please inform DOE as soon as
possible by contacting
regina.washington@ee.doe.gov so that
the necessary procedures can be
completed. Please also note that those
wishing to bring laptops into the
Forrestal Building will be required to
obtain a property pass. Visitors should
avoid bringing laptops, or allow an extra
45 minutes.
In addition, you can attend the public
meeting via webinar. Webinar
registration information, participant
instructions, and information about the
capabilities available to webinar
participants will be published on DOE’s
Web site at: https://www1.eere.energy.
gov/buildings/appliance_standards/
rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=25. Participants
are responsible for ensuring their
systems are compatible with the
webinar software.
Conduct of the Public Meeting
DOE will designate a DOE official to
preside at the public meeting and may
also use a professional facilitator to aid
discussion. The meeting will not be a
judicial or evidentiary-type public
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
hearing, but DOE will conduct it in
accordance with section 336 of EPCA.
(42 U.S.C. 6306) A court reporter will be
present to record the proceedings and
prepare a transcript. DOE reserves the
right to schedule the order of
presentations and to establish the
procedures governing the conduct of the
public meeting. After the public
meeting, interested parties may submit
further comments on the proceedings as
well as on any aspect of the rulemaking
until the end of the comment period.
The public meeting will be conducted
in an informal, conference style. DOE
will present summaries of comments
received before the public meeting,
allow time for prepared general
statements by participants, and
encourage all interested parties to share
their views on issues affecting this
rulemaking. Each participant will be
allowed to make a general statement
(within time limits determined by DOE),
before the discussion of specific topics.
DOE will allow, as time permits, other
participants to comment briefly on any
general statements.
VI. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of today’s notice of
proposed rulemaking.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 26,
2015.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2015–07470 Filed 3–31–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[EERE–2013–BT–STD–0007; EERE–2013–
BT–STD–0021]
Appliance Standards and Rulemaking
Federal Advisory Committee: Notice of
Intent To Establish the Commercial
Package Air Conditioners and Heat
Pumps and Commercial Warm Air
Furnaces Working Group To Negotiate
Potential Energy Conservation
Standards
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of intent and
announcement of a public meeting.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE or the Department) is
giving notice that it intends to establish
a negotiated rulemaking working group
under the Appliance Standards and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
Rulemaking Federal Advisory
Committee (ASRAC) in accordance with
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) and the Negotiated Rulemaking
Act (NRA) to negotiate regarding energy
conservation standards for small, large,
and very large, air-cooled commercial
package air conditioners and heat
pumps as well as commercial warm air
furnaces. The purpose of the working
group will be to discuss and, if possible,
reach consensus regarding the
development of energy conservation
standards for small, large, and very
large, air-cooled commercial package air
conditioners and heat pumps as well as
commercial warm air furnaces, as
authorized by the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (EPCA) of 1975, as
amended. The working group will
consist of representatives of parties
having a defined stake in the outcome
of the energy conservation standards,
and will consult as appropriate with a
range of experts on technical issues.
The working group is expected to
negotiate a final term sheet regarding
energy conservation standards for the
aforementioned equipment by Monday,
June 15, 2015. The final term sheet will
be presented to ASRAC at an open
meeting for their deliberation and
decision on whether to pass it on as a
formal recommendation to DOE.
DATES: Written comments and request to
be appointed as members of the CUAC
and CWAF Working Group, including
an application package, are welcome
and should be submitted by April 15,
2015.
DOE will hold the first meeting for the
CUAC and CWAF Working Group on
Tuesday, April, 28, 2015, from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m., in Washington, DC. The meeting
will also be broadcast as a webinar. See
section V Public Participation for
webinar registration information,
participant instructions, and
information about the capabilities
available to webinar participants.
ADDRESSES: The first CUAC and CWAF
Working Group meeting, which is also
open to the public, will be held at the
U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal
Building, Room 8E–089, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. To attend,
please notify asrac@ee.doe.gov. Please
note that foreign nationals participating
in the public meeting are subject to
advance security screening procedures
which require advance notice prior to
attendance at the public meeting. If a
foreign national wishes to participate in
the public meeting, please inform DOE
as soon as possible by contacting
regina.washington@ee.doe.gov so that
the necessary procedures can be
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17363
completed. Please also note that those
wishing to bring laptops into the
Forrestal Building will be required to
obtain a property pass. Visitors should
avoid bringing laptops, or allow an extra
45 minutes. Persons can attend the
public meeting via webinar. For more
information, refer to section V of this
document (Public Participation).
Interested person may submit
comments, identified by docket number
EERE–2013–BT–STD–0007; EERE–
2013–BT–STD–0021 by any of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: ASRAC@ee.doe.gov. Include
docket number EERE–2013–BT–STD–
0007; EERE–2013–BT–STD–0021 in the
subject line of the message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (CD), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 950
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a CD, in which case
it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be
accepted.
Docket: The docket is available for
review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices,
public meeting attendee lists and
transcripts, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
However, not all documents listed in
the index may be publicly available,
such as information that is exempt from
public disclosure.
John
Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Building Technologies (EE–2J),
950 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington,
DC 20024. Phone: 202–287–1692. Email:
asrac@ee.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Preamble
I. Authority
II. Background
III. Proposed Negotiating Procedures
IV. Comments Requested
V. Public Participation
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17359-17363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07470]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE-2013-BT-STD-0006]
Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee:
Notice of Intent To Establish the Fans and Blowers Working Group To
Negotiate a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) for Energy
Conservation Standards
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S.
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of intent and announcement of public meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) is
giving notice that it intends to establish a negotiated rulemaking
working group under the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal
Advisory Committee (ASRAC) in accordance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act (NRA) to
negotiate proposed definitions, certain aspects of a proposed test
procedure (if applicable), and proposed energy conservation standards
for fans and blowers. The purpose of the working group will be to
discuss and, if possible, reach consensus on the scope of the
rulemaking, certain key aspects of a proposed test procedure, and
proposed energy conservation standard for fans and blowers, as
authorized by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) of 1975, as
amended. As part of its negotiations, the working group will consider
scope of coverage and system interaction impacts of potential standards
for fans and blowers. The working group will consist of representatives
of parties having a defined stake in the outcome of the regulations,
including the proposed standards, and will consult as appropriate with
a range of experts on technical issues. The working group is expected
to make a concerted effort to negotiate a final term sheet within three
(3) months of its first meeting. At the completion of negotiation, the
term sheet will be presented to ASRAC at an open meeting for their
deliberation and decision on whether or not to pass it on as a formal
recommendation to DOE. Lastly, DOE is announcing the first Working
Group session, which is open to the public, on Wednesday, May 6, and
Thursday, May 7, 2015.
DATES: DOE will hold the first meeting for the Fans and Blowers Working
Group on Wednesday, May 6, and Thursday, May 7, 2015, from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., in Washington, DC. Written comments and request to be appointed
as members of the working group are welcome and should be submitted by
April 15, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The first Fans and Blowers Working Group meeting, which is
also open to the public, will be held at the U.S. Department of Energy,
Forrestal Building, Room 8E-089, 1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. To attend, please notify asrac@ee.doe.gov.
Persons can attend the public meeting via webinar. For more
information, refer to section V of this document (Public
Participation).
Interested person may submit comments, identified by docket number
EERE-2013-BT-STD-0006 by any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: ASRAC@ee.doe.gov. Include docket number EERE-2013-BT-STD-
0006 in the subject line of the message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. If possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (CD), in which case it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Suite
600, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD, in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be accepted.
Docket: The docket is available for review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices, public meeting attendee lists and
transcripts, comments, and other supporting documents/materials. All
documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index.
However, not all documents listed in the index may be publicly
available, such as information that is exempt from public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Armstrong, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Building Technologies (EE-5B), 950 L'Enfant Plaza
SW., Washington, DC 20024. Phone: 202-586-6590. Email:
asrac@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Authority
II. Background
III. Proposed Negotiating Procedures
IV. Comments Requested
V. Public Participation
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority
This notice of intent, announcing DOE's intent to negotiate a
proposed rule for fans and blowers energy conservation standards, was
developed under the authority of sections 563 and 564 of the NRA (5
U.S.C. 561-570, Pub. L. 104-320). The regulation of fans and blowers
for energy conservation standards that DOE is proposing to develop
under a negotiated rulemaking will be developed under the authority of
EPCA, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6311(1)(A) and 42 U.S.C. 6291 et seq.
II. Background
As required by the NRA, DOE is giving notice that it is
establishing a working group under ASRAC to develop proposed energy
conservation standards, including the applicability of those standards
for various categories of fans and blower currently found on the
market. EPCA, as amended, directs DOE to adopt energy conservation
standards for fans and blowers for which standards would be
technologically feasible and economically justified, and would result
in significant energy savings. There currently are no Federal energy
conservation standards for fans and blowers.
A. Negotiated Rulemaking
DOE has decided to use the negotiated rulemaking process to develop
proposed energy conservation standards for fans and blowers. Under
EPCA, Congress mandated that DOE develop regulations
[[Page 17360]]
establishing energy conservation standards for covered consumer and
commercial appliances that are designed to achieve the maximum
improvement in energy efficiency that are technologically feasible and
economically justified. 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A). The primary reason for
using the negotiated rulemaking process for developing a proposed
Federal standard is that stakeholders strongly support a consensual
rulemaking effort. DOE believes such a regulatory negotiation process
will be less adversarial and better suited to resolving complex
technical issues. An important virtue of negotiated rulemaking is that
it allows expert dialog that is much better than traditional techniques
at getting the facts and issues right and will result in a proposed
rule that will effectively reflect Congressional intent.
A regulatory negotiation will enable DOE to engage in direct and
sustained dialog with informed, interested, and affected parties when
drafting the regulation, rather than obtaining input during a public
comment period after developing and publishing a proposed rule. Gaining
this early understanding of all parties' perspectives allows DOE to
address key issues at an earlier stage of the process, thereby allowing
more time for an iterative process to resolve issues. A rule drafted by
negotiation with informed and affected parties is expected to be
potentially more pragmatic and more easily implemented than a rule
arising from the traditional process. Such rulemaking improvement is
likely to provide the public with the full benefits of the rule while
minimizing the potential negative impact of a proposed regulation
conceived or drafted without the full prior input of outside
knowledgeable parties. Because a negotiating working group includes
representatives from the major stakeholder groups affected by or
interested in the rule, the number of public comments on the proposed
rule may be decreased. DOE anticipates that there will be a need for
fewer substantive changes to a proposed rule developed under a
regulatory negotiation process prior to the publication of a final
rule.
B. The Concept of Negotiated Rulemaking
Usually, DOE develops a proposed rulemaking using Department staff
and consultant resources. Typically, a preliminary analysis is vetted
for stakeholder comments after a Framework Document is published and
comments taken thereon. After the notice of proposed rulemaking is
published for comment, affected parties may submit arguments and data
defining and supporting their positions with regard to the issues
raised in the proposed rule. Congress noted in the NRA, however, that
regulatory development may ``discourage the affected parties from
meeting and communicating with each other, and may cause parties with
different interests to assume conflicting and antagonistic positions *
* *.'' 5 U.S.C. 561(2)(2). Congress also stated that ``adversarial
rulemaking deprives the affected parties and the public of the benefits
of face-to-face negotiations and cooperation in developing and reaching
agreement on a rule. It also deprives them of the benefits of shared
information, knowledge, expertise, and technical abilities possessed by
the affected parties.'' 5 U.S.C. 561(2)(3).
Using negotiated rulemaking to develop a proposed rule differs
fundamentally from the Department centered process. In negotiated
rulemaking, a proposed rule is developed by an advisory committee or
working group, chartered under FACA, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, composed of
members chosen to represent the various interests that will be
significantly affected by the rule. The goal of the advisory committee
or working group is to reach consensus on the treatment of the major
issues involved with the rule. The process starts with the Department's
careful identification of all interests potentially affected by the
rulemaking under consideration. To help with this identification, the
Department publishes a notice of intent such as this one in the Federal
Register, identifying a preliminary list of interested parties and
requesting public comment on that list. Following receipt of comments,
the Department establishes an advisory committee or working group
representing the full range of stakeholders to negotiate a consensus on
the terms of a proposed rule. Representation on the advisory committee
or working group may be direct; that is, each member may represent a
specific interest, or may be indirect, such as through trade
associations and/or similarly-situated parties with common interests.
The Department is a member of the advisory committee or working group
and represents the Federal government's interests. The advisory
committee or working group chair is assisted by a neutral mediator who
facilitates the negotiation process. The role of the mediator, also
called a facilitator, is to apply proven consensus-building techniques
to the advisory committee or working group process.
After an advisory committee or working group reaches consensus on
the provisions of a proposed rule, the Department, consistent with its
legal obligations, uses such consensus as the basis of its proposed
rule, which then is published in the Federal Register. This publication
provides the required public notice and provides for a public comment
period. Other participants and other interested parties retain their
rights to comment, participate in an informal hearing (if requested),
and request judicial review. DOE anticipates, however, that the pre-
proposal consensus agreed upon by the advisory committee or working
group will narrow any issues in the subsequent rulemaking.
C. Proposed Rulemaking for Fans and Blowers Energy Conservation
Standards
The NRA enables DOE to establish an advisory committee or working
group if it is determined that the use of the negotiated rulemaking
process is in the public interest. DOE intends to develop Federal
regulations that build on the depth of experience accrued in both the
public and private sectors in implementing standards and programs.
DOE has determined that the regulatory negotiation process will
provide for obtaining a diverse array of in-depth input, as well as an
opportunity for increased collaborative discussion from both private-
sector stakeholders and government officials who are familiar with
energy efficiency of fans and blowers.
D. Department Commitment
In initiating this regulatory negotiation process to develop energy
conservation standards for fans and blowers, DOE is making a commitment
to provide adequate resources to facilitate timely and successful
completion of the process. This commitment includes making the process
a priority activity for all representatives, components, officials, and
personnel of the Department who need to be involved in the rulemaking,
from the time of initiation until such time as a final rule is issued
or the process is expressly terminated. DOE will provide administrative
support for the process and will take steps to ensure that the advisory
committee or working group has the dedicated resources it requires to
complete its work in a timely fashion. Specifically, DOE will make
available the following support services: Properly equipped space
adequate for public meetings and caucuses; logistical support; word
processing and
[[Page 17361]]
distribution of background information; the service of a facilitator;
and such additional research and other technical assistance as may be
necessary.
To the maximum extent possible consistent with the legal
obligations of the Department, DOE will use the consensus of the
advisory committee or working group as the basis for the rule the
Department proposes for public notice and comment.
E. Negotiating Consensus
As discussed above, the negotiated rulemaking process differs
fundamentally from the usual process for developing a proposed rule.
Negotiation enables interested and affected parties to discuss various
approaches to issues rather than asking them only to respond to a
proposal developed by the Department. The negotiation process involves
a mutual education of the various parties on the practical concerns
about the impact of standards. Each advisory committee or working group
member participates in resolving the interests and concerns of other
members, rather than leaving it up to DOE to evaluate and incorporate
different points of view.
A key principle of negotiated rulemaking is that agreement is by
consensus of all the interests. Thus, no one interest or group of
interests is able to control the process. The NRA defines consensus as
the unanimous concurrence among interests represented on a negotiated
rulemaking committee or working group, unless the committee or working
group itself unanimously agrees to use a different definition. 5 U.S.C.
562. In addition, experience has demonstrated that using a trained
mediator to facilitate this process will assist all parties, including
DOE, in identifying their real interests in the rule, and thus will
enable parties to focus on and resolve the important issues.
III. Proposed Negotiating Procedures
A. Key Issues for Negotiation
The following issues and concerns will underlie the work of the
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee on Fans and Blowers Equipment Energy
Conservation Standards for fans and blowers:
Scope of coverage (including any system interaction
effects);
Key test procedure conditions, as applicable; and
Proposed energy conservation standard.
To examine the underlying issues outlined above, and others not yet
articulated, all parties in the negotiation will need DOE to provide
data and an analytic framework complete and accurate enough to support
their deliberations. DOE's analyses must be adequate to inform a
prospective negotiation--for example, a notice of data availability or
equivalent must be available and timely.
B. Formation of Working Group
A working group will be formed and operated in full compliance with
the requirements of FACA and in a manner consistent with the
requirements of the NRA. DOE has determined that the working group not
exceed 25 members. The Department believes that more than 25 members
would make it difficult to conduct effective negotiations. DOE is aware
that there are many more potential participants than there are
membership slots on the working group. The Department does not believe,
nor does the NRA contemplate, that each potentially affected group must
participate directly in the negotiations; nevertheless, each affected
interest can be adequately represented. To have a successful
negotiation, it is important for interested parties to identify and
form coalitions that adequately represent significantly affected
interests. To provide adequate representation, those coalitions must
agree to support, both financially and technically, a member of the
working group whom they choose to represent their interests.
DOE recognizes that when it establishes energy conservation
standards for residential products and commercial equipment, various
segments of society may be affected in different ways, in some cases
producing unique ``interests'' in a proposed rule based on income,
gender, or other factors. The Department will pay attention to
providing that any unique interests that have been identified, and that
may be significantly affected by the proposed rule, are represented.
FACA also requires that members of the public have the opportunity
to attend meetings of the full committee and speak or otherwise address
the committee during the public comment period. In addition, any member
of the public is permitted to file a written statement with the
advisory committee. DOE plans to follow these same procedures in
conducting meetings of the working group.
C. Interests Involved/Working Group Membership
DOE anticipates that the working group will comprise no more than
25 members who represent affected and interested stakeholder groups, at
least one of whom must be a member of the ASRAC. As required by FACA,
the Department will conduct the negotiated rulemaking with particular
attention to ensuring full and balanced representation of those
interests that may be significantly affected by the proposed rule
governing rules of fans and blowers energy conservation standards.
Section 562 of the NRA defines the term interest as ``with respect to
an issue or matter, multiple parties which have a similar point of view
or which are likely to be affected in a similar manner.'' Listed below
are parties the Department to date has identified as being
``significantly affected'' by a proposed rule regarding the energy
conservation standards of fans and blowers.
The Department of Energy
Manufacturers of Fans and Blowers
Manufacturers of Equipment that Purchase Fans and Blowers
Trade Associations Representing Manufacturers of Fans and
Blowers or Equipment that Purchase Fans and Blowers
Utilities
Energy Efficiency/Environmental Advocacy Groups
Consumers
One purpose of this notice of intent is to determine whether
Federal regulations regarding fans and blowers energy conservation
standards will significantly affect interests that are not listed
above. DOE invites comment and suggestions on its initial list of
significantly affected interests.
Members may be individuals or organizations. If the effort is to be
fruitful, participants on the working group should be able to fully and
adequately represent the viewpoints of their respective interests. This
document gives notice of DOE's process to other potential participants
and affords them the opportunity to request representation in the
negotiations. Those who wish to be appointed as members of the working
group, should submit a request to DOE, in accordance with the public
participation procedures outlined in the DATES and ADDRESSES sections
of this notice of intent. Membership of the working group is likely to
involve:
Attendance at approximately ten (10); one (1) to two (2)
day meetings;
Travel costs to those meetings; and
Preparation time for those meetings.
Members serving on the working group will not receive compensation
for their services. Interested parties who are not selected for
membership on the working group may make valuable contributions to this
negotiated rulemaking effort in any of the following ways:
[[Page 17362]]
The person may request to be placed on the working group
mailing list and submit written comments as appropriate.
The person may attend working group meetings, which are
open to the public; caucus with his or her interest's member on the
working group; or even address the working group during the public
comment portion of the working group meeting.
The person could assist the efforts of a workgroup that
the working group might establish.
A working group may establish informal workgroups, which usually
are asked to facilitate committee deliberations by assisting with
various technical matters (e.g., researching or preparing summaries of
the technical literature or comments on specific matters such as
economic issues). Workgroups also might assist in estimating costs or
drafting regulatory text on issues associated with the analysis of the
costs and benefits addressed, or formulating drafts of the various
provisions and their justifications as previously developed by the
working group. Given their support function, workgroups usually consist
of participants who have expertise or particular interest in the
technical matter(s) being studied. Because it recognizes the importance
of this support work for the working group, DOE will provide
appropriate technical expertise for such workgroups.
D. Good Faith Negotiation
Every working group member must be willing to negotiate in good
faith and have the authority, granted by his or her constituency, to do
so. The first step is to ensure that each member has good
communications with his or her constituencies. An intra-interest
network of communication should be established to bring information
from the support organization to the member at the table, and to take
information from the table back to the support organization. Second,
each organization or coalition therefore should designate as its
representative a person having the credibility and authority to ensure
that needed information is provided and decisions are made in a timely
fashion. Negotiated rulemaking can require the appointed members to
give a significant sustained for as long as the duration of the
negotiated rulemaking. Other qualities of members that can be helpful
are negotiating experience and skills, and sufficient technical
knowledge to participate in substantive negotiations.
Certain concepts are central to negotiating in good faith. One is
the willingness to bring all issues to the bargaining table in an
attempt to reach a consensus, as opposed to keeping key issues in
reserve. The second is a willingness to keep the issues at the table
and not take them to other forums. Finally, good faith includes a
willingness to move away from some of the positions often taken in a
more traditional rulemaking process, and instead explore openly with
other parties all ideas that may emerge from the working group's
discussions.
E. Facilitator
The facilitator will act as a neutral in the substantive
development of the proposed standard. Rather, the facilitator's role
generally includes:
Impartially assisting the members of the working group in
conducting discussions and negotiations; and
Impartially assisting in performing the duties of the
Designated Federal Official under FACA.
F. Department Representative
The DOE representative will be a full and active participant in the
consensus building negotiations. The Department's representative will
meet regularly with senior Department officials, briefing them on the
negotiations and receiving their suggestions and advice so that he or
she can effectively represent the Department's views regarding the
issues before the working group. DOE's representative also will ensure
that the entire spectrum of governmental interests affected by the
standards rulemaking, including the Office of Management and Budget,
the Attorney General, and other Departmental offices, are kept informed
of the negotiations and encouraged to make their concerns known in a
timely fashion.
G. Working Group and Schedule
After evaluating the comments submitted in response to this notice
of intent and the requests for nominations, DOE will either inform the
members of the working group that they have been selected or determine
that conducting a negotiated rulemaking is inappropriate.
The working group is expected to make a concerted effort to
negotiate a final term sheet within three (3) months of its first
meeting. At the completion of negotiation, the term sheet will be
presented to ASRAC at an open meeting for their deliberation and
decision on whether or not to pass it on as a formal recommendation to
DOE. As part of its negotiations, the working group should consider
scope of coverage and system interaction impacts of potential
standards.
DOE will advise working group members of administrative matters
related to the functions of the working group before beginning. DOE
will establish a meeting schedule based on the settlement agreement and
produce the necessary documents so as to adhere to that schedule. While
the negotiated rulemaking process is underway, DOE is committed to
performing much of the same analysis as it would during a normal
standards rulemaking process and to providing information and technical
support to the working group.
IV. Comments Requested
DOE requests comments on which parties should be included in a
negotiated rulemaking to develop draft language pertaining to the
energy conservation standards of fans and blowers and suggestions of
additional interests and/or stakeholders that should be represented on
the working group. All who wish to participate as members of the
working group should submit a request for nomination to DOE.
V. Public Participation
Attendance at the Public Meeting
The time, date, and location of the public meeting are listed in
the DATES and ADDRESSES sections. If you plan to attend the public
meeting, please notify asrac@doe.gov. Please note that foreign
nationals participating in the public meeting are subject to advance
security screening procedures which require advance notice prior to
attendance at the public meeting. If a foreign national wishes to
participate in the public meeting, please inform DOE as soon as
possible by contacting regina.washington@ee.doe.gov so that the
necessary procedures can be completed. Please also note that those
wishing to bring laptops into the Forrestal Building will be required
to obtain a property pass. Visitors should avoid bringing laptops, or
allow an extra 45 minutes.
In addition, you can attend the public meeting via webinar. Webinar
registration information, participant instructions, and information
about the capabilities available to webinar participants will be
published on DOE's Web site at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=25. Participants are
responsible for ensuring their systems are compatible with the webinar
software.
Conduct of the Public Meeting
DOE will designate a DOE official to preside at the public meeting
and may also use a professional facilitator to aid discussion. The
meeting will not be a judicial or evidentiary-type public
[[Page 17363]]
hearing, but DOE will conduct it in accordance with section 336 of
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6306) A court reporter will be present to record the
proceedings and prepare a transcript. DOE reserves the right to
schedule the order of presentations and to establish the procedures
governing the conduct of the public meeting. After the public meeting,
interested parties may submit further comments on the proceedings as
well as on any aspect of the rulemaking until the end of the comment
period.
The public meeting will be conducted in an informal, conference
style. DOE will present summaries of comments received before the
public meeting, allow time for prepared general statements by
participants, and encourage all interested parties to share their views
on issues affecting this rulemaking. Each participant will be allowed
to make a general statement (within time limits determined by DOE),
before the discussion of specific topics. DOE will allow, as time
permits, other participants to comment briefly on any general
statements.
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of today's notice
of proposed rulemaking.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2015.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2015-07470 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P