Irish Potatoes Grown in Southeastern States; Suspension of Marketing Order Provisions, 17307-17310 [2015-07320]
Download as PDF
17307
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 62
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206–AN11
Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment
of the Portland, ME, Appropriated Fund
Federal Wage System Wage Area
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing a final
rule to abolish the Portland, Maine,
appropriated fund Federal Wage System
(FWS) wage area and redefine
Androscoggin, Cumberland, and
Sagadahoc Counties, ME, to the
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, survey
area and Franklin and Oxford Counties,
ME, and Coos County, NH, to the
Portsmouth area of application. These
changes are necessary because the
closure of the Naval Air Station (NAS)
Brunswick left the Portland wage area
without an activity having the capability
to conduct a local wage survey.
DATES: Effective date: This regulation is
effective on April 1, 2015. Applicability
date: FWS employees remaining in the
Portland wage area will be transferred to
the Portsmouth wage area schedule on
the first day of the first applicable pay
period beginning on or after May 1,
2015. For local wage survey purposes,
this rule will add Androscoggin,
Cumberland, and Sagadahoc Counties,
ME, to the survey area for the
Portsmouth, NH, wage area beginning
with the full-scale wage survey
scheduled to begin in September 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
(202) 606–2838 or by email at pay-leavepolicy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 9, 2014, OPM issued a
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
proposed rule (79 FR 72997) to abolish
the Portland, Maine, appropriated fund
FWS wage area and redefine
Androscoggin, Cumberland, and
Sagadahoc Counties, ME, to the
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, survey
area and Franklin and Oxford Counties,
ME, and Coos County, NH, to the
Portsmouth area of application. These
changes are necessary because the
closure of NAS Brunswick in May 2011
left the Portland wage area without an
activity having the capability to conduct
a local wage survey. The Federal
Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee,
the national labor-management
committee responsible for advising
OPM on matters concerning the pay of
FWS employees, made a majority
recommendation to define the entire
wage area to the Portsmouth wage area.
The proposed rule had a 30-day
comment period, during which OPM
received no comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they will affect only Federal
agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Katherine Archuleta,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM amends 5 CFR part
532 as follows:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—
Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
*
*
*
*
*
NEW HAMPSHIRE
PORTSMOUTH
Survey Area
Maine:
Androscoggin
Cumberland
Sagadahoc
York
Massachusetts:
The following cities and towns in:
Essex County
Amesbury
Georgetown
Groveland
Haverhill
Merrimac
Newbury
Newburyport
North Andover
Salisbury
South Byfield
West Newbury
New Hampshire:
Rockingham (except the following cities and towns: Newton, Plaistow,
Salem, and Westville)
Strafford
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Maine:
Franklin
Oxford
New Hampshire:
Coos
The following cities and towns in:
Rockingham County
Newton
Plaistow
Salem
Westville
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–07405 Filed 3–31–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 532—
Amended]
7 CFR Part 953
2. Appendix A to subpart B of part
532 is amended for the State of Maine
by removing the entry for Portland.
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–14–0011; FV14–953–1
IR]
■
3. Appendix C to subpart B is
amended by removing the wage area
listing for Portland, ME, and revising
the wage area listing for the Portsmouth,
NH, wage area to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Irish Potatoes Grown in Southeastern
States; Suspension of Marketing Order
Provisions
AGENCY:
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
17308
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Interim rule with request for
comments.
ACTION:
This rule continues the
previous suspension of the marketing
order regulating the handling of Irish
potatoes grown in Southeastern states
(order). Representatives of the Virginia/
North Carolina Irish potato industry met
and requested that the suspension of all
provisions of the order, and the rules
and regulations implemented
thereunder be continued through March
1, 2017. The request was based on the
belief that the industry needs more time
to study changes in the industry, and
any new developments which could
affect the need for, or status of the order.
If the industry does not petition to have
the order reactivated by the end of the
suspension period, the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) will propose
to terminate the order.
DATES: Effective April 2, 2015 through
March 1, 2017; comments received by
June 1, 2015 will be considered prior to
issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this
issue of the Federal Register and will be
made available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during
regular business hours, or can be viewed
at: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Corey E. Elliott, Marketing Specialist, or
Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director,
Southeast Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 291–8614, or Email:
Corey.Elliott@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 104 and Marketing Order No. 953,
both as amended (7 CFR part 953),
regulating the handling of Irish potatoes
grown in Southeastern states,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues the previous
suspension of the marketing order
regulating the handling of Irish potatoes
grown in Southeastern states. Even
though the Committee does not function
under the suspended order and
regulations, representatives of the
Virginia/North Carolina Irish potato
industry met on December 18, 2013, and
requested that the suspension of all
provisions of the order, and the rules
and regulations implemented
thereunder be continued through March
1, 2017. The request was based on the
belief that the industry needs more time
to study changes in the industry, and
any new developments which could
affect the need for, or status of, the
order.
Marketing Order 953 has been in
effect since 1948. The order provides for
the establishment of grade, size, quality,
maturity, and inspection requirements
for Irish potatoes grown in Southeastern
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
states. The order also authorizes
reporting and recordkeeping functions
required for the operation of the order.
The order, when functioning, is funded
by assessments imposed on handlers.
The Southeastern Potato Committee
(Committee) members met on February
17, 2011, and unanimously
recommended suspension of the
marketing order for a three year period
ending on March 1, 2014. They
recommended the suspension to
eliminate the expense of administering
the marketing order, while determining
the effects of not having regulations in
place. The Committee members wanted
the industry to have the alternative of
reactivating the order, if deemed
appropriate. The rule completing that
action was published in the Federal
Register on October 21, 2011 (76 FR
65360).
Prior to the December 18, 2013,
meeting, USDA sent letters to members
of the industry, most of whom were
former Committee members. The letter
informed them that the suspension of
the order would be ending, and of the
need to review the state of the industry
and determine what action the industry
wanted to take in regards to the order.
The letter also asked that they make
others in the industry aware of the
upcoming decision and the opportunity
to express their position on what to do
with the order. USDA also sent out
several follow-up emails, and made
several telephone calls to industry
representatives in an effort to increase
participation in the meeting.
On December 18, 2013, industry
representatives of the Virginia/North
Carolina Irish potato industry met and
unanimously recommended extending
the suspension of the order for an
additional three years. During their
discussion, several industry members
expressed concerns that the quality
problems experienced prior to
promulgation of the order could
resurface and additional time was
necessary to evaluate if the order is
needed. The representatives believe
extending the suspension for three more
years would provide the industry with
further opportunity to study changes in
the industry and any new
developments, which could affect the
need for the order. The representatives
also supported suspension rather than
termination as they agreed it would be
less complicated to reactivate the
existing program if it is needed than to
promulgate a new marketing order.
Several of the industry representatives
also indicated that they had spoken
with other industry members who could
not attend the meeting, and they too
were in support of suspension.
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Therefore, this rule will suspend the
order through March 1, 2017.
If the industry does not petition to
have the order reactivated by the end of
the suspension period, AMS will
publish a proposal to terminate the
order.
It is hereby determined that Federal
Marketing Order No. 953, and the rules
and regulations issued thereunder, do
not tend effectuate the declared policy
of the Act. This action suspends,
through March 1, 2017, the provisions
of Federal Marketing Order No. 953, and
the rules and regulations issued
thereunder, including but not limited to:
Provisions of the order dealing with the
establishment and the responsibilities of
the Committee; provisions of the order
dealing with expenses and the
collection of assessments; all rules and
regulations; and, all information
collection and reporting requirements.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 10 handlers
of Irish potatoes grown in Southeastern
states who are subject to regulation
under the order and approximately 20
potato producers in the regulated area.
Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $7,000,000,
and small agricultural producers are
defined as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Using prices reported by AMS’ Market
News Service, the average F.O.B. price
for Southeastern potatoes for the 2012–
13 marketing season was around $25 per
hundredweight. USDA has estimated
production for the 2012–13 season at
approximately 600,000 hundredweight
of potatoes. Based on this information,
average annual receipts for handlers
would be less than $7,000,000.
Information provided by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service indicates
that the average producer price for Irish
potatoes grown in North Carolina and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
Virginia in 2012 was approximately
$12.16 per hundredweight. Considering
estimated production, average producer
revenue would be about $400,000 for
the 2012–13 season. Therefore, the
majority of Southeastern potato
handlers and producers may be
classified as small entities.
This rule continues the previous
suspension of the order and the
associated rules and regulations through
March 1, 2017. At a meeting on
February 17, 2011, the Committee
recommended that the order and all of
its provisions be suspended through
March 1, 2014. The Committee made
this decision based on questions
regarding the continued need for the
order and its associated costs. Industry
representatives met on December 18,
2013, and unanimously recommended
extending the suspension of the order
for three additional years. The
continued suspension was
recommended to give the industry more
time to study changes in the industry,
and any new developments which could
affect the need for, or the status of, the
order. If the industry does not petition
to have the order reactivated by the end
of the suspension period, AMS will
publish a proposal to terminate the
order. Authority for this action is
provided in section 8c(16)(A) of the Act.
Suspension of the order and its
corresponding regulations relieves
handlers of quality, inspection, and
assessment burdens during the
suspension period. Also, handler
reports will not be required. Suspension
of the order is therefore expected to
reduce the regulatory burden on
handlers and growers of all sizes.
Even though the Committee does not
function under the suspended order and
regulations, industry members met and
considered two alternatives to this
action at the December meeting. The
first alternative was to reactivate the
order. This alternative received little
support as most believe the
administrative costs of the order still
outweighed the benefits. Industry
members also considered terminating
the order. However, some members
indicated that quality concerns that the
order had resolved could return and
more time was needed to study changes
within the industry. Therefore, both
alternatives were rejected.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 Vegetable
and Specialty Crops. No changes in
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17309
those requirements are necessary as a
result of this action.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
Southeastern Irish potato handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the industry’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
Southeastern Irish potato industry and
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
industry deliberations. The December
18, 2013, meeting was an open meeting
and entities, both large and small, were
able to express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this interim rule,
including the regulatory and
informational aspects of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on the
continuation of the previous suspension
of the marketing order regulating Irish
potatoes grown in Southeastern states.
Any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
industry’s request, and other
information, it is determined that
Federal Marketing Order No. 953
suspended by this interim rule, as
herein set forth, does not tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
17310
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This action suspends
restrictions on handlers by continuing
the previous suspension of Marketing
Order No. 953; (2) this rule provides a
60-day comment period and any
comments received will be considered
prior to the finalization of this rule; (3)
no useful purpose would be served by
delaying the continued suspension of
the order.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 953
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601–674, 7 CFR part 953 is
suspended effective April 2, 2015,
through March 1, 2017.
Dated: March 26, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–07320 Filed 3–31–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0720; Special
Conditions No. 23–263–SC]
Special Conditions: Honda Aircraft
Company Model HA–420; Single-Place
Side-Facing Seat Dynamic Test
Requirements
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Honda Aircraft Company
HA–420 airplane. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with a side-facing
passenger seat. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is April 1, 2015, and
is applicable on March 25, 2015. We
must receive your comments by May 1,
2015.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 31, 2015
Jkt 235001
Send comments identified
by docket number [FAA–2015–0720]
using any of the following methods:
b Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
b Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington,
DC, 20590–0001.
b Hand Delivery of Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
b Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://regulations.gov, including any
personal information the commenter
provides. Using the search function of
the docket Web site, anyone can find
and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
Stegeman, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification
Service, Small Airplane Directorate,
ACE–111, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri, 816–329–4140, fax 816–329–
4090, email Robert.Stegeman@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined, in accordance with 5
U.S. Code §§ 553(b)(3)(B) and 553(d)(3),
that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are unnecessary
because the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Special
condition
number
23–255–
SC.
23–251–
SC.
23–105–
SC.
23–254–
SC.
Company/airplane model
Embraer Model EMB 500.
Embraer Model EMB 500.
Sino Swearingen Model SJ130.
Embraer Model EMB 505.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
Background
On October 11, 2006, Honda Aircraft
Company applied for a type certificate
for their new Model HA–420 aircraft.
On October 10, 2013, Honda Aircraft
Company requested an extension with
an effective application date of October
1, 2013. This extension changed the
type certification basis to amendment
23–62.
The HA–420 is a four to five
passenger (depending on configuration),
two crew, lightweight business jet with
a 43,000-foot service ceiling and a
maximum takeoff weight of 9963
pounds. The airplane is powered by two
GE-Honda Aero Engines (GHAE) HF–
120 turbofan engines.
The HA–420 design incorporates the
installation of a side-facing belted
passenger seat as a customer
configuration option. The implication of
the term belted is that the passenger seat
will be used during takeoff and landing
and so must comply with the provisions
of §§ 23.562, 23.785, and any additional
requirements that the FAA determines
are applicable. In this case, the approval
of a side-facing seat to these provisions
is considered new and novel and as
such will require special conditions and
specific methods of compliance to
certificate.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Honda Aircraft Company must show
that the HA–420 meets the applicable
provisions of part 23, as amended by
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17307-17310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07320]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 953
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-14-0011; FV14-953-1 IR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Southeastern States; Suspension of
Marketing Order Provisions
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
[[Page 17308]]
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule continues the previous suspension of the marketing
order regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in Southeastern
states (order). Representatives of the Virginia/North Carolina Irish
potato industry met and requested that the suspension of all provisions
of the order, and the rules and regulations implemented thereunder be
continued through March 1, 2017. The request was based on the belief
that the industry needs more time to study changes in the industry, and
any new developments which could affect the need for, or status of the
order. If the industry does not petition to have the order reactivated
by the end of the suspension period, the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) will propose to terminate the order.
DATES: Effective April 2, 2015 through March 1, 2017; comments received
by June 1, 2015 will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corey E. Elliott, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax: (863)
291-8614, or Email: Corey.Elliott@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 104 and Marketing Order No. 953, both as amended (7 CFR
part 953), regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in
Southeastern states, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The
order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues the previous suspension of the marketing order
regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in Southeastern states.
Even though the Committee does not function under the suspended order
and regulations, representatives of the Virginia/North Carolina Irish
potato industry met on December 18, 2013, and requested that the
suspension of all provisions of the order, and the rules and
regulations implemented thereunder be continued through March 1, 2017.
The request was based on the belief that the industry needs more time
to study changes in the industry, and any new developments which could
affect the need for, or status of, the order.
Marketing Order 953 has been in effect since 1948. The order
provides for the establishment of grade, size, quality, maturity, and
inspection requirements for Irish potatoes grown in Southeastern
states. The order also authorizes reporting and recordkeeping functions
required for the operation of the order. The order, when functioning,
is funded by assessments imposed on handlers.
The Southeastern Potato Committee (Committee) members met on
February 17, 2011, and unanimously recommended suspension of the
marketing order for a three year period ending on March 1, 2014. They
recommended the suspension to eliminate the expense of administering
the marketing order, while determining the effects of not having
regulations in place. The Committee members wanted the industry to have
the alternative of reactivating the order, if deemed appropriate. The
rule completing that action was published in the Federal Register on
October 21, 2011 (76 FR 65360).
Prior to the December 18, 2013, meeting, USDA sent letters to
members of the industry, most of whom were former Committee members.
The letter informed them that the suspension of the order would be
ending, and of the need to review the state of the industry and
determine what action the industry wanted to take in regards to the
order. The letter also asked that they make others in the industry
aware of the upcoming decision and the opportunity to express their
position on what to do with the order. USDA also sent out several
follow-up emails, and made several telephone calls to industry
representatives in an effort to increase participation in the meeting.
On December 18, 2013, industry representatives of the Virginia/
North Carolina Irish potato industry met and unanimously recommended
extending the suspension of the order for an additional three years.
During their discussion, several industry members expressed concerns
that the quality problems experienced prior to promulgation of the
order could resurface and additional time was necessary to evaluate if
the order is needed. The representatives believe extending the
suspension for three more years would provide the industry with further
opportunity to study changes in the industry and any new developments,
which could affect the need for the order. The representatives also
supported suspension rather than termination as they agreed it would be
less complicated to reactivate the existing program if it is needed
than to promulgate a new marketing order. Several of the industry
representatives also indicated that they had spoken with other industry
members who could not attend the meeting, and they too were in support
of suspension.
[[Page 17309]]
Therefore, this rule will suspend the order through March 1, 2017.
If the industry does not petition to have the order reactivated by
the end of the suspension period, AMS will publish a proposal to
terminate the order.
It is hereby determined that Federal Marketing Order No. 953, and
the rules and regulations issued thereunder, do not tend effectuate the
declared policy of the Act. This action suspends, through March 1,
2017, the provisions of Federal Marketing Order No. 953, and the rules
and regulations issued thereunder, including but not limited to:
Provisions of the order dealing with the establishment and the
responsibilities of the Committee; provisions of the order dealing with
expenses and the collection of assessments; all rules and regulations;
and, all information collection and reporting requirements.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 10 handlers of Irish potatoes grown in
Southeastern states who are subject to regulation under the order and
approximately 20 potato producers in the regulated area. Small
agricultural service firms are defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less than
$7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those
having annual receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Using prices reported by AMS' Market News Service, the average
F.O.B. price for Southeastern potatoes for the 2012-13 marketing season
was around $25 per hundredweight. USDA has estimated production for the
2012-13 season at approximately 600,000 hundredweight of potatoes.
Based on this information, average annual receipts for handlers would
be less than $7,000,000. Information provided by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service indicates that the average producer
price for Irish potatoes grown in North Carolina and Virginia in 2012
was approximately $12.16 per hundredweight. Considering estimated
production, average producer revenue would be about $400,000 for the
2012-13 season. Therefore, the majority of Southeastern potato handlers
and producers may be classified as small entities.
This rule continues the previous suspension of the order and the
associated rules and regulations through March 1, 2017. At a meeting on
February 17, 2011, the Committee recommended that the order and all of
its provisions be suspended through March 1, 2014. The Committee made
this decision based on questions regarding the continued need for the
order and its associated costs. Industry representatives met on
December 18, 2013, and unanimously recommended extending the suspension
of the order for three additional years. The continued suspension was
recommended to give the industry more time to study changes in the
industry, and any new developments which could affect the need for, or
the status of, the order. If the industry does not petition to have the
order reactivated by the end of the suspension period, AMS will publish
a proposal to terminate the order. Authority for this action is
provided in section 8c(16)(A) of the Act.
Suspension of the order and its corresponding regulations relieves
handlers of quality, inspection, and assessment burdens during the
suspension period. Also, handler reports will not be required.
Suspension of the order is therefore expected to reduce the regulatory
burden on handlers and growers of all sizes.
Even though the Committee does not function under the suspended
order and regulations, industry members met and considered two
alternatives to this action at the December meeting. The first
alternative was to reactivate the order. This alternative received
little support as most believe the administrative costs of the order
still outweighed the benefits. Industry members also considered
terminating the order. However, some members indicated that quality
concerns that the order had resolved could return and more time was
needed to study changes within the industry. Therefore, both
alternatives were rejected.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No changes in
those requirements are necessary as a result of this action.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large Southeastern Irish potato
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Further, the industry's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the Southeastern Irish potato industry and interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in industry
deliberations. The December 18, 2013, meeting was an open meeting and
entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on
this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments
on this interim rule, including the regulatory and informational
aspects of this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on the continuation of the previous
suspension of the marketing order regulating Irish potatoes grown in
Southeastern states. Any comments received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the industry's request, and other information, it is determined that
Federal Marketing Order No. 953 suspended by this interim rule, as
herein set forth, does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective
[[Page 17310]]
date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register because: (1) This action suspends restrictions on handlers by
continuing the previous suspension of Marketing Order No. 953; (2) this
rule provides a 60-day comment period and any comments received will be
considered prior to the finalization of this rule; (3) no useful
purpose would be served by delaying the continued suspension of the
order.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 953
Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601-674, 7 CFR part 953 is suspended effective April 2, 2015,
through March 1, 2017.
Dated: March 26, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-07320 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P