Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration, 16612-16615 [2015-07222]
Download as PDF
16612
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Proposed Rules
pursuant to section 110 and parts C and
D of the Federal Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before April 29, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
Ms. Adina Wiley, Air Permits Section
(6PD–R), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Comments
may also be submitted electronically or
through hand delivery/courier by
following the detailed instructions in
the ADDRESSES section of the direct final
rule located in the rules section of this
Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Adina Wiley, 214–665–2115,
wiley.adina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
final rules section of this Federal
Register, the EPA is approving the
State’s SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this action
no further activity is contemplated. If
the EPA receives relevant adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be
withdrawn and those public comments
received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Any
parties interested in commenting on this
action should do so at this time.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule which is located in the
rules section of this Federal Register.
Dated: March 16, 2015.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015–07123 Filed 3–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
[EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0028; FRL–9925–47–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Permits for Construction and
Major Modification of Major Stationary
Sources for the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Mar 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing conditional
approval for two State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection (WVDEP) for
the State of West Virginia on July 1,
2014 and June 6, 2012. These revisions
pertain to West Virginia’s Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit
program and include provisions for
preconstruction permitting
requirements for major sources of fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) found in West
Virginia regulations. This action is being
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 29, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2015–0028 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: campbell.dave@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0028,
David Campbell, Associate Director,
Office of Permits and Air Toxics,
Mailcode 3AP10, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2015–
0028. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittals are
available at the West Virginia
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street SE., Charleston, West
Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Paul Wentworth, (215) 814–2183, or by
email at Wentworth.paul@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The WVDEP submitted two SIP
revisions to EPA on June 6, 2012 (the
2012 submittal) and on July 1, 2014 (the
2014 submittal). EPA is acting on these
two submittals as a whole.1 A summary
of all the changes made in each of the
submittals has been included in the
docket for this action in a document
titled, ‘‘Summary of West Virginia PSD
Changes.’’ These SIP revision requests,
if approved, would revise West
Virginia’s currently approved PSD
program by amending Series 14 under
Title 45 of West Virginia Code of State
Rules (45CSR14).
On May 16, 2008, EPA promulgated a
rule to implement the 1997 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS), including changes to the New
Source Review (NSR) program (the 2008
NSR PM2.5 Rule). See 73 FR 28321. The
1 EPA is proposing to act on both SIP submittals
in this notice because each submittal contains
necessary procedural information related to West
Virginia’s revisions to its PSD regulations and
development of its SIP submittals, which are
required for SIP revisions by 40 CFR parts 51 and
52.
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule revised the NSR
program requirements to establish the
framework for implementing
preconstruction permit review for the
PM2.5 NAAQS in both attainment and
nonattainment areas.2 The 2008 NSR
PM2.5 rule: (1) Required NSR permits to
address directly emitted PM2.5 and
precursor pollutants; (2) established
significant emission rates for direct
PM2.5 and precursor pollutants
(including sulfur dioxide (SO2) and
oxides of nitrogen (NOX)); (3)
established PM2.5 emission offsets; and
(4) required states to account for gases
that condense to form particles
(condensables) in PM2.5 emission
limits.3
The 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule (as well as
the more general PM2.5 NAAQS
implementation rule, the 2007 ‘‘Final
Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation
Rule’’ (2007 PM2.5 Implementation
Rule) 4), was the subject of litigation
before the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (D.C. Circuit) in Natural
Resources Defense Council v. EPA
(hereafter, NRDC v. EPA).5 On January
4, 2013, the D.C. Circuit remanded to
EPA both the 2007 PM2.5
Implementation Rule and the 2008 NSR
PM2.5 Rule. The court found that in both
rules EPA erred in implementing the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS solely pursuant to
the general implementation provisions
of subpart 1 of part D of title I of the
CAA (subpart 1), rather than pursuant to
the additional implementation
provisions specific to particulate matter
in subpart 4 of part D of title I (subpart
4).6 As a result, the D.C. Circuit
remanded both rules and instructed
EPA ‘‘to re-promulgate these rules
pursuant to subpart 4 consistent with
this opinion.’’ Although the D.C. Circuit
declined to establish a deadline for
EPA’s response, EPA intends to respond
promptly to the court’s remand and to
2 The PSD permitting program is the NSR permit
program in areas attaining a particular NAAQS.
3 On October 25, 2012, EPA took final action to
amend the definition of ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’
promulgated in the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule regarding
the particulate matter (PM) condensable provision
at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(vi) and 52.21(b)(50)(i). See
77 FR 65107. The rulemaking removed the
inadvertent requirement in the 2008 NSR PM2.5
Rule that the measurement of condensable
‘‘particulate matter emissions’’ be included as part
of the measurement and regulation of ‘‘particulate
matter emissions.’’
4 72 FR 20586 (April 25, 2007).
5 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
6 The court’s opinion did not specifically address
the point that implementation under subpart 4
requirements would still require consideration of
subpart 1 requirements, to the extent that subpart
4 did not override subpart 1. EPA assumes that the
court presumed that EPA would address this issue
of potential overlap between subpart 1 and subpart
4 requirements in subsequent actions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Mar 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
16613
promulgate new generally applicable
implementation regulations for the
PM2.5 NAAQS in accordance with the
requirements of subpart 4. In the
interim, however, states and EPA still
need to proceed with implementation of
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in a timely and
effective fashion in order to meet
statutory obligations under the CAA and
to assure the protection of public health
intended by those NAAQS. In a June 2,
2014 final rulemaking entitled
‘‘Identification of Nonattainment
Classification and Deadlines for
Submission of State Implementation
Plan (SIP) Provisions for the 1997 Fine
Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS; Final Rule,’’ (79 FR
31566), EPA identified the classification
status under subpart 4 for areas
currently designated nonattainment for
the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.7
As the requirements of Subpart 4 only
pertain to nonattainment areas, EPA
does not consider the portions of the
2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule that address
requirements for PM2.5 attainment and
unclassifiable areas to be affected by the
NRDC v. EPA opinion. Moreover, EPA
does not anticipate the need to revise
any PSD permitting requirements
promulgated in the 2008 NSR PM2.5
Rule in order to comply with the D.C.
Circuit’s decision. This proposed
rulemaking addresses West Virginia’s
PSD regulations. Thus, EPA has
evaluated the regulations with
applicable PSD requirements in the
CAA, its implementing regulations, and
the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule.
The CAA’s PSD provisions also
establish maximum allowable increases
over baseline concentrations—also
known as ‘‘increments’’—for certain
pollutants. EPA has the task of
promulgating regulations to prevent the
significant deterioration of air quality
that would result from the emissions of
pollutants EPA began regulating after
Congress enacted the PSD provisions in
the CAA, which includes PM2.5. The
PSD provisions establish
preconstruction review and permitting
of new or modified sources of air
pollution. In 2007, EPA proposed a rule
establishing increments for PM2.5 and
also proposed two screening tools that
would exempt permit applicants from
some air quality analysis and
monitoring required for PSD: Significant
impact levels (SILs) and significant
monitoring concentration (SMC). See 72
FR 54112 (September 21, 2007). In our
October 20, 2010 final rule (the PM2.5
PSD Increments-SILs-SMC Rule), EPA
set values for both SILs and SMC for
PM2.5. See 75 FR 64864.
The Sierra Club challenged EPA’s
authority to implement PM2.5 SILs and
SMC for PSD purposes as promulgated
in the PM2.5 PSD Increments-SILs-SMC
Rule. See Sierra Club v. EPA, 705 F.3d
458 (D.C. Cir. 2013). On January 22,
2013, the D.C. Circuit granted a request
from EPA to vacate and remand to the
Agency the portions of the PM2.5 PSD
Increments-SILs-SMC Rule addressing
the SILs for PM2.5 (found in paragraph
(k)(2) in 40 CFR 51.166 and 52.21),
except for the parts codifying the PM2.5
SILs at 40 CFR 51.165(b)(2), so that the
EPA could voluntarily correct an error
in the provisions. Id. at 463–66. The
D.C. Circuit also vacated parts of the
PSD Increments-SILs-SMC Rule
establishing the PM2.5 SMC, finding that
the Agency had exceeded its statutory
authority with respect to these
provisions. Id. at 469.
In response to the D.C. Circuit’s
decision, EPA took final action on
December 9, 2013 to remove the SIL
provisions from the Federal PSD
regulations in 40 CFR 52.21 and to
revise the SMC for PM2.5 to zero
micrograms per cubic meter. See 78 FR
73698. Because the D.C. Circuit vacated
the SMC provisions in 40 CFR
51.166(i)(5)(i)(c) and 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c),
EPA revised the existing concentration
for the PM2.5 SMC listed in sections
51.166(i)(5)(i)(c) and 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c) to
zero micrograms per cubic meter. EPA
did not entirely remove PM2.5 as a listed
pollutant in the SMC provisions because
to do so might lead to the issuance of
permits that contradict the holding of
the D.C. Circuit as to the statutory
monitoring requirements. Id. (providing
EPA’s explanation for including the zero
micrograms per cubic meter SMC).
On May 9, 2013, EPA had
disapproved a narrow portion of a SIP
revision submitted by the State of West
Virginia on August 31, 2011 for revising
West Virginia’s PSD requirements in 45
CSR14 because the submittal did not
satisfy the Federal requirement for
inclusion of condensable emissions of
PM (condensables) within the definition
of ‘‘regulated new source review (NSR)
pollutant’’ (at 45CSR14 section 2.66) for
PM2.5 and PM emissions less than or
equal to ten micrometers in diameter
(PM10).8
7 That June 2, 2014 rulemaking (79 FR 31566) also
established a December 31, 2014 deadline for the
submission of any additional attainment related SIP
elements that may be needed to meet the applicable
requirements of subpart 4.
8 See 78 FR 27062 (May 9, 2013). The limited
disapproval of the narrow portion of the August 31,
2011 SIP provision (concerning 45CSR14 section
2.66) is discussed in 78 FR 27062 and in 40 CFR
52.2522(j)(1) specifically.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
16614
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Proposed Rules
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
A. Summary of SIP Revision
Specifically, the revisions submitted
by WVDEP on July 1, 2014 and June 6,
2012 involve amendments to 45CSR14
(Permits for Construction and Major
Modification of Major Stationary
Sources for the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration) based on the Federal
regulatory actions discussed above in
section I. A summary of the changes
made in the 2012 and 2014 submittals
are available in the docket in a
document titled, ‘‘Summary of West
Virginia NSR Changes.’’ Generally, the
revisions in the 2012 submittal were
submitted to incorporate provisions
related to the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule. The
2014 submittal revises certain
subdivisions of the 2012 submittal as
shown in the table below:
Rule 45CSR14 subdivision
Description of change
2.66.a.1 ...................................
2.66.a.2 ...................................
16.7.c ......................................
16.1.a & b ...............................
Added PM condensable emissions to definition of ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’.
Added language identifying precursors to NAAQS pollutants to the definition of ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’.
Deleted 24-hour de minimis air quality impact concentration value for PM2.5 (aka SMC for PM2.5).
Added provision exempting requirements of 9.1 for stationary sources based on completeness date of permit
applications.
Significant Impact Levels. Deleted this provision in its entirety.
9.2 ...........................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
In general, the 2014 submittal adds
PM condensable emissions to the
definition of ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’
and deletes SILs and SMC for PM2.5 in
the 45CSR14 provisions submitted for
SIP approval.
B. EPA Analysis
EPA finds the revisions to 45CSR14
contained in the 2012 submittal and the
2014 submittal which were submitted
by WVDEP for approval mirror the PSD
requirements of the 2008 NSR PM2.5
Rule with certain exceptions described
in the next paragraph. The 2014
submittal addresses and corrects the
deficiency identified in EPA’s May 9,
2013 disapproval (78 FR 27062) by
adding language to the provision at
45CSR14 section 2.66.a.1 which now
includes PM condensable emissions in
the definition of ‘‘regulated NSR
pollutant.’’ Thus, EPA finds West
Virginia has addressed the deficiency
noted in our limited disapproval in 78
FR 27062.
However, while the 2014 submittal
appropriately removes SILs for PM2.5
consistent with the D.C. Circuit’s Sierra
Club v. EPA decision and our final
December 9, 2013 rulemaking (78 FR
73698), West Virginia’s PSD provision at
45CSR14–16.7.c (included in the 2014
submittal) does not include a SMC value
of zero micrograms per cubic meter for
PM2.5 consistent with the D.C. Circuit’s
Sierra Club v. EPA decision and our
December 9, 2013 rulemaking (78 FR
73698) which addressed the D.C.
Circuit’s vacature of the SMC provisions
in 40 CFR parts 51 and 52 for PM2.5.
Therefore, West Virginia’s PSD
regulation, 45CSR14, does not fully
meet the requirements for PSD programs
as set forth in the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule,
the D.C. Circuit’s decision on SILs and
SMC in Sierra Club v. EPA, and in
EPA’s December 9, 2013 rulemaking
addressing that decision for SILs and
SMC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Mar 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
However, on January 20, 2015, West
Virginia committed to submitting an
additional SIP revision with a revised
PSD regulation at 45CSR14–16.7.c
which will incorporate a SMC value of
zero micrograms per cubic meter for
PM2.5 to address this discrepancy. West
Virginia committed to submitting this
SIP revision no later than one year
following the effective date of the final
rulemaking notice for conditional
approval of the 2012 and the 2014
submittals so that EPA can
conditionally approve the 2012 and
2014 submittals.9 See CAA section
110(k)(4). With the exception of the
absence of the SMC value of zero
micrograms per cubic meter for PM2.5
which WVDEP has committed to
address, EPA finds the 2012 and 2014
submittals meet applicable requirements
for a PSD permitting program in the
CAA, its implementing regulations, and
the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule. The EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document. Any
comments submitted in a timely manner
will be considered before taking final
action.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing conditional
approval of these West Virginia SIP
revisions, the 2012 and 2014 submittals,
because West Virginia is committing to
submit an additional SIP revision
addressing the deficiency identified by
EPA regarding the deletion of the PM2.5
SMC within one year of the date of
EPA’s final conditional approval and
because the submittals otherwise meet
CAA requirements as discussed in this
proposed rulemaking. Once EPA has
determined that West Virginia has
9 West Virginia’s letter from the Secretary of
WVDEP committing to submit a revised provision
in 45CSR14 to address the SMC for PM2.5 is
available in the docket for this rulemaking (EPA–
R03–OAR–2015–0028) and available online at
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
satisfied this condition, the conditional
approval of the 2012 and 2014
submittals will become a full approval.
Should West Virginia fail to meet the
condition specified above, the
conditional approval of the 2012 and
2014 submittals will convert to a
disapproval pursuant to CAA section
110(k)(4).
The full or partial disapproval of a SIP
revision triggers the requirement under
CAA section 110(c) that EPA
promulgate a federal implementation
plan (FIP) no later than two years from
the date of the disapproval unless the
State corrects the deficiency, and the
Administrator approves the plan or plan
revision before the Administrator
promulgates such FIP. EPA has
determined that West Virginia’s 2014
submittal has rectified the deficiency
regarding including condensables in the
definition of regulated NSR pollutant
noted in our limited disapproval in 78
FR 27062. Therefore, upon final
approval of the 2014 submittal, the EPA
is no longer required to promulgate a
FIP to address the issue of PM
condensables in the definition of
regulated NSR pollutant for West
Virginia’s PSD permit program, and our
narrow disapproval of the August 31,
2011 PSD SIP (for failure to include
condensables in definition of regulated
NSR pollutant) will become a full
approval. However, EPA is proposing
conditional approval for the 2012 and
2014 submittals due to West Virginia’s
lack of a PM2.5 SMC with the value of
zero micrograms per cubic meter.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the WV regulations at 45CSR14
regarding the Prevention of Significant
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Proposed Rules
deterioration permitting requirements as
discussed in section III of this preamble.
The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these documents generally
available electronically through
www.regulations.com and/or in hard
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Mar 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
16615
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
relating to West Virginia’s PSD program,
does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because
the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 12, 2015.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2015–07222 Filed 3–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 60 (Monday, March 30, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16612-16615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07222]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0028; FRL-9925-47-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major
Stationary Sources for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
conditional approval for two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection
(WVDEP) for the State of West Virginia on July 1, 2014 and June 6,
2012. These revisions pertain to West Virginia's Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit program and include provisions
for preconstruction permitting requirements for major sources of fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) found in West Virginia
regulations. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 29, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2015-0028 by one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. Email: campbell.dave@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0028, David Campbell, Associate Director,
Office of Permits and Air Toxics, Mailcode 3AP10, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2015-0028. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittals are available at the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street SE.,
Charleston, West Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Wentworth, (215) 814-2183, or
by email at Wentworth.paul@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The WVDEP submitted two SIP revisions to EPA on June 6, 2012 (the
2012 submittal) and on July 1, 2014 (the 2014 submittal). EPA is acting
on these two submittals as a whole.\1\ A summary of all the changes
made in each of the submittals has been included in the docket for this
action in a document titled, ``Summary of West Virginia PSD Changes.''
These SIP revision requests, if approved, would revise West Virginia's
currently approved PSD program by amending Series 14 under Title 45 of
West Virginia Code of State Rules (45CSR14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA is proposing to act on both SIP submittals in this
notice because each submittal contains necessary procedural
information related to West Virginia's revisions to its PSD
regulations and development of its SIP submittals, which are
required for SIP revisions by 40 CFR parts 51 and 52.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 16, 2008, EPA promulgated a rule to implement the 1997
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS),
including changes to the New Source Review (NSR) program (the 2008 NSR
PM2.5 Rule). See 73 FR 28321. The
[[Page 16613]]
2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule revised the NSR program requirements to
establish the framework for implementing preconstruction permit review
for the PM2.5 NAAQS in both attainment and nonattainment
areas.\2\ The 2008 NSR PM2.5 rule: (1) Required NSR permits
to address directly emitted PM2.5 and precursor pollutants;
(2) established significant emission rates for direct PM2.5
and precursor pollutants (including sulfur dioxide (SO2) and
oxides of nitrogen (NOX)); (3) established PM2.5
emission offsets; and (4) required states to account for gases that
condense to form particles (condensables) in PM2.5 emission
limits.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The PSD permitting program is the NSR permit program in
areas attaining a particular NAAQS.
\3\ On October 25, 2012, EPA took final action to amend the
definition of ``regulated NSR pollutant'' promulgated in the 2008
NSR PM2.5 Rule regarding the particulate matter (PM)
condensable provision at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(vi) and
52.21(b)(50)(i). See 77 FR 65107. The rulemaking removed the
inadvertent requirement in the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule that
the measurement of condensable ``particulate matter emissions'' be
included as part of the measurement and regulation of ``particulate
matter emissions.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule (as well as the more general
PM2.5 NAAQS implementation rule, the 2007 ``Final Clean Air
Fine Particle Implementation Rule'' (2007 PM2.5
Implementation Rule) \4\), was the subject of litigation before the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
(D.C. Circuit) in Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA (hereafter,
NRDC v. EPA).\5\ On January 4, 2013, the D.C. Circuit remanded to EPA
both the 2007 PM2.5 Implementation Rule and the 2008 NSR
PM2.5 Rule. The court found that in both rules EPA erred in
implementing the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS solely pursuant to the
general implementation provisions of subpart 1 of part D of title I of
the CAA (subpart 1), rather than pursuant to the additional
implementation provisions specific to particulate matter in subpart 4
of part D of title I (subpart 4).\6\ As a result, the D.C. Circuit
remanded both rules and instructed EPA ``to re-promulgate these rules
pursuant to subpart 4 consistent with this opinion.'' Although the D.C.
Circuit declined to establish a deadline for EPA's response, EPA
intends to respond promptly to the court's remand and to promulgate new
generally applicable implementation regulations for the
PM2.5 NAAQS in accordance with the requirements of subpart
4. In the interim, however, states and EPA still need to proceed with
implementation of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in a timely and
effective fashion in order to meet statutory obligations under the CAA
and to assure the protection of public health intended by those NAAQS.
In a June 2, 2014 final rulemaking entitled ``Identification of
Nonattainment Classification and Deadlines for Submission of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Provisions for the 1997 Fine Particle
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS; Final Rule,'' (79 FR 31566), EPA
identified the classification status under subpart 4 for areas
currently designated nonattainment for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 72 FR 20586 (April 25, 2007).
\5\ 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
\6\ The court's opinion did not specifically address the point
that implementation under subpart 4 requirements would still require
consideration of subpart 1 requirements, to the extent that subpart
4 did not override subpart 1. EPA assumes that the court presumed
that EPA would address this issue of potential overlap between
subpart 1 and subpart 4 requirements in subsequent actions.
\7\ That June 2, 2014 rulemaking (79 FR 31566) also established
a December 31, 2014 deadline for the submission of any additional
attainment related SIP elements that may be needed to meet the
applicable requirements of subpart 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the requirements of Subpart 4 only pertain to nonattainment
areas, EPA does not consider the portions of the 2008 NSR
PM2.5 Rule that address requirements for PM2.5
attainment and unclassifiable areas to be affected by the NRDC v. EPA
opinion. Moreover, EPA does not anticipate the need to revise any PSD
permitting requirements promulgated in the 2008 NSR PM2.5
Rule in order to comply with the D.C. Circuit's decision. This proposed
rulemaking addresses West Virginia's PSD regulations. Thus, EPA has
evaluated the regulations with applicable PSD requirements in the CAA,
its implementing regulations, and the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule.
The CAA's PSD provisions also establish maximum allowable increases
over baseline concentrations--also known as ``increments''--for certain
pollutants. EPA has the task of promulgating regulations to prevent the
significant deterioration of air quality that would result from the
emissions of pollutants EPA began regulating after Congress enacted the
PSD provisions in the CAA, which includes PM2.5. The PSD
provisions establish preconstruction review and permitting of new or
modified sources of air pollution. In 2007, EPA proposed a rule
establishing increments for PM2.5 and also proposed two
screening tools that would exempt permit applicants from some air
quality analysis and monitoring required for PSD: Significant impact
levels (SILs) and significant monitoring concentration (SMC). See 72 FR
54112 (September 21, 2007). In our October 20, 2010 final rule (the
PM2.5 PSD Increments-SILs-SMC Rule), EPA set values for both
SILs and SMC for PM2.5. See 75 FR 64864.
The Sierra Club challenged EPA's authority to implement
PM2.5 SILs and SMC for PSD purposes as promulgated in the
PM2.5 PSD Increments-SILs-SMC Rule. See Sierra Club v. EPA,
705 F.3d 458 (D.C. Cir. 2013). On January 22, 2013, the D.C. Circuit
granted a request from EPA to vacate and remand to the Agency the
portions of the PM2.5 PSD Increments-SILs-SMC Rule
addressing the SILs for PM2.5 (found in paragraph (k)(2) in
40 CFR 51.166 and 52.21), except for the parts codifying the
PM2.5 SILs at 40 CFR 51.165(b)(2), so that the EPA could
voluntarily correct an error in the provisions. Id. at 463-66. The D.C.
Circuit also vacated parts of the PSD Increments-SILs-SMC Rule
establishing the PM2.5 SMC, finding that the Agency had
exceeded its statutory authority with respect to these provisions. Id.
at 469.
In response to the D.C. Circuit's decision, EPA took final action
on December 9, 2013 to remove the SIL provisions from the Federal PSD
regulations in 40 CFR 52.21 and to revise the SMC for PM2.5
to zero micrograms per cubic meter. See 78 FR 73698. Because the D.C.
Circuit vacated the SMC provisions in 40 CFR 51.166(i)(5)(i)(c) and
52.21(i)(5)(i)(c), EPA revised the existing concentration for the
PM2.5 SMC listed in sections 51.166(i)(5)(i)(c) and
52.21(i)(5)(i)(c) to zero micrograms per cubic meter. EPA did not
entirely remove PM2.5 as a listed pollutant in the SMC
provisions because to do so might lead to the issuance of permits that
contradict the holding of the D.C. Circuit as to the statutory
monitoring requirements. Id. (providing EPA's explanation for including
the zero micrograms per cubic meter SMC).
On May 9, 2013, EPA had disapproved a narrow portion of a SIP
revision submitted by the State of West Virginia on August 31, 2011 for
revising West Virginia's PSD requirements in 45 CSR14 because the
submittal did not satisfy the Federal requirement for inclusion of
condensable emissions of PM (condensables) within the definition of
``regulated new source review (NSR) pollutant'' (at 45CSR14 section
2.66) for PM2.5 and PM emissions less than or equal to ten
micrometers in diameter (PM10).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 78 FR 27062 (May 9, 2013). The limited disapproval of
the narrow portion of the August 31, 2011 SIP provision (concerning
45CSR14 section 2.66) is discussed in 78 FR 27062 and in 40 CFR
52.2522(j)(1) specifically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 16614]]
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
A. Summary of SIP Revision
Specifically, the revisions submitted by WVDEP on July 1, 2014 and
June 6, 2012 involve amendments to 45CSR14 (Permits for Construction
and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources for the Prevention
of Significant Deterioration) based on the Federal regulatory actions
discussed above in section I. A summary of the changes made in the 2012
and 2014 submittals are available in the docket in a document titled,
``Summary of West Virginia NSR Changes.'' Generally, the revisions in
the 2012 submittal were submitted to incorporate provisions related to
the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule. The 2014 submittal revises certain
subdivisions of the 2012 submittal as shown in the table below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 45CSR14 subdivision Description of change
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.66.a.1.......................... Added PM condensable emissions to
definition of ``regulated NSR
pollutant''.
2.66.a.2.......................... Added language identifying
precursors to NAAQS pollutants to
the definition of ``regulated NSR
pollutant''.
16.7.c............................ Deleted 24-hour de minimis air
quality impact concentration value
for PM2.5 (aka SMC for PM2.5).
16.1.a & b........................ Added provision exempting
requirements of 9.1 for stationary
sources based on completeness date
of permit applications.
9.2............................... Significant Impact Levels. Deleted
this provision in its entirety.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In general, the 2014 submittal adds PM condensable emissions to the
definition of ``regulated NSR pollutant'' and deletes SILs and SMC for
PM2.5 in the 45CSR14 provisions submitted for SIP approval.
B. EPA Analysis
EPA finds the revisions to 45CSR14 contained in the 2012 submittal
and the 2014 submittal which were submitted by WVDEP for approval
mirror the PSD requirements of the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule with
certain exceptions described in the next paragraph. The 2014 submittal
addresses and corrects the deficiency identified in EPA's May 9, 2013
disapproval (78 FR 27062) by adding language to the provision at
45CSR14 section 2.66.a.1 which now includes PM condensable emissions in
the definition of ``regulated NSR pollutant.'' Thus, EPA finds West
Virginia has addressed the deficiency noted in our limited disapproval
in 78 FR 27062.
However, while the 2014 submittal appropriately removes SILs for
PM2.5 consistent with the D.C. Circuit's Sierra Club v. EPA
decision and our final December 9, 2013 rulemaking (78 FR 73698), West
Virginia's PSD provision at 45CSR14-16.7.c (included in the 2014
submittal) does not include a SMC value of zero micrograms per cubic
meter for PM2.5 consistent with the D.C. Circuit's Sierra
Club v. EPA decision and our December 9, 2013 rulemaking (78 FR 73698)
which addressed the D.C. Circuit's vacature of the SMC provisions in 40
CFR parts 51 and 52 for PM2.5. Therefore, West Virginia's
PSD regulation, 45CSR14, does not fully meet the requirements for PSD
programs as set forth in the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule, the D.C.
Circuit's decision on SILs and SMC in Sierra Club v. EPA, and in EPA's
December 9, 2013 rulemaking addressing that decision for SILs and SMC.
However, on January 20, 2015, West Virginia committed to submitting
an additional SIP revision with a revised PSD regulation at 45CSR14-
16.7.c which will incorporate a SMC value of zero micrograms per cubic
meter for PM2.5 to address this discrepancy. West Virginia
committed to submitting this SIP revision no later than one year
following the effective date of the final rulemaking notice for
conditional approval of the 2012 and the 2014 submittals so that EPA
can conditionally approve the 2012 and 2014 submittals.\9\ See CAA
section 110(k)(4). With the exception of the absence of the SMC value
of zero micrograms per cubic meter for PM2.5 which WVDEP has
committed to address, EPA finds the 2012 and 2014 submittals meet
applicable requirements for a PSD permitting program in the CAA, its
implementing regulations, and the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule. The
EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
document. Any comments submitted in a timely manner will be considered
before taking final action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ West Virginia's letter from the Secretary of WVDEP
committing to submit a revised provision in 45CSR14 to address the
SMC for PM2.5 is available in the docket for this
rulemaking (EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0028) and available online at
www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing conditional approval of these West Virginia SIP
revisions, the 2012 and 2014 submittals, because West Virginia is
committing to submit an additional SIP revision addressing the
deficiency identified by EPA regarding the deletion of the
PM2.5 SMC within one year of the date of EPA's final
conditional approval and because the submittals otherwise meet CAA
requirements as discussed in this proposed rulemaking. Once EPA has
determined that West Virginia has satisfied this condition, the
conditional approval of the 2012 and 2014 submittals will become a full
approval. Should West Virginia fail to meet the condition specified
above, the conditional approval of the 2012 and 2014 submittals will
convert to a disapproval pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(4).
The full or partial disapproval of a SIP revision triggers the
requirement under CAA section 110(c) that EPA promulgate a federal
implementation plan (FIP) no later than two years from the date of the
disapproval unless the State corrects the deficiency, and the
Administrator approves the plan or plan revision before the
Administrator promulgates such FIP. EPA has determined that West
Virginia's 2014 submittal has rectified the deficiency regarding
including condensables in the definition of regulated NSR pollutant
noted in our limited disapproval in 78 FR 27062. Therefore, upon final
approval of the 2014 submittal, the EPA is no longer required to
promulgate a FIP to address the issue of PM condensables in the
definition of regulated NSR pollutant for West Virginia's PSD permit
program, and our narrow disapproval of the August 31, 2011 PSD SIP (for
failure to include condensables in definition of regulated NSR
pollutant) will become a full approval. However, EPA is proposing
conditional approval for the 2012 and 2014 submittals due to West
Virginia's lack of a PM2.5 SMC with the value of zero
micrograms per cubic meter.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the WV regulations at 45CSR14 regarding the Prevention of
Significant
[[Page 16615]]
deterioration permitting requirements as discussed in section III of
this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available electronically through
www.regulations.com and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, relating to West Virginia's PSD
program, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not
approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes
that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments
or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 12, 2015.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2015-07222 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P