Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 16426-16427 [2015-06971]
Download as PDF
16426
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Notices
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR 1610.5.
Ruth Welch,
BLM Colorado State Director.
March 24, 2015. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4523 (April 2015), entitled
Sugar From Mexico: Investigation Nos.
704–TA–1 and 734–TA–1 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 24, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–07013 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am]
67460–1247, applied to be registered as
an importer of remifentanil (9739), a
basic class of controlled substance listed
in schedule II.
The company plans to import
remifentanil for use in dosage form
manufacturing.
[FR Doc. 2015–07071 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am]
Dated: March 20, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
[FR Doc. 2015–06969 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am]
[Investigation Nos. 704–TA–1 and 734–TA–
1 (Review)]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Sugar from Mexico; Determinations
Drug Enforcement Administration
Drug Enforcement Administration
developed
On the basis of the
in the subject reviews, the United States
International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
to sections 704(h) and 734(h) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671c(h)
and 1673c(h)) (‘‘the Act’’), that
agreements the U.S. Department of
Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) has entered
into with Mexican exporters of sugar
and the government of Mexico
suspending antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations
concerning sugar from Mexico eliminate
completely the injurious effect of
subject imports.2
[Docket No. DEA–392]
[Docket No. DEA–392]
Importer of Controlled Substances
Application: HOSPIRA
Importer of Controlled Substances
Application: Meda Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.
BILLING CODE 4130–JB–P
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
record 1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Commission instituted these
investigations effective January 8, 2015,
following receipt of a petition filed with
the Commission by Imperial Sugar
Company (‘‘Imperial’’), Sugar Land,
Texas and AmCane Sugar LLC
(‘‘AmCane’’), Taylor, Michigan. The
Commission determined that Imperial
and AmCane are interested parties who
were parties to the underlying
investigations at the time the petitions
were filed, and consequently are
appropriate petitioning parties. Notice
of the scheduling of these reviews and
of a public oral presentation to be held
in connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register on January 26, 2015
(80 FR 3977). The oral presentation was
held in Washington, DC, on February
19, 2015, and all persons who requested
the opportunity were permitted to
appear in person or by counsel.
The Commission completed and filed
its determination in these reviews on
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 All six Commissioners voted in the affirmative.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Mar 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
ACTION:
Notice of application.
Registered bulk manufacturers of
the affected basic class, and applicants
therefore, may file written comments on
or objections to the issuance of the
proposed registration in accordance
with 21 CFR 1301.34(a) on or before
April 27, 2015. Such persons may also
file a written request for a hearing on
the application pursuant to 21 CFR
1301.43 on or before April 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal
Register Representative/ODW, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152. Request for hearings should be
sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: Hearing
Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Attorney General has delegated his
authority under the Controlled
Substances Act to the Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to
exercise all necessary functions with
respect to the promulgation and
implementation of 21 CFR part 1301,
incident to the registration of
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers,
importers, and exporters of controlled
substances (other than final orders in
connection with suspension, denial, or
revocation of registration) has been
redelegated to the Deputy Assistant
Administrator of the DEA Office of
Diversion Control (‘‘Deputy Assistant
Administrator’’) pursuant to section 7 of
28 CFR pt. 0, subpt. R, App.
In accordance with 21 CFR
1301.34(a), this is notice that on October
31, 2014, Hospira, 1776 North
Centennial Drive, McPherson, Kansas
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice of application.
Registered bulk manufacturers of
the affected basic class, and applicants
therefore, may file written comments on
or objections to the issuance of the
proposed registration in accordance
with 21 CFR 1301.34(a) on or before
April 27, 2015. Such persons may also
file a written request for a hearing on
the application pursuant to 21 CFR
1301.43 on or before April 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal
Register Representative/ODXL, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152. Request for hearings should be
sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: Hearing
Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Attorney General has delegated his
authority under the Controlled
Substances Act to the Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to
exercise all necessary functions with
respect to the promulgation and
implementation of 21 CFR part 1301,
incident to the registration of
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers,
importers, and exporters of controlled
substances (other than final orders in
connection with suspension, denial, or
revocation of registration) has been
redelegated to the Deputy Assistant
Administrator of the DEA Office of
Diversion Control (‘‘Deputy Assistant
Administrator’’) pursuant to section 7 of
28 CFR part 0, appendix of subpart R.
In accordance with 21 CFR
1301.34(a), this is notice that on
December 5, 2014, Meda
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Notices
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
Public comment is invited within 60
days of the date of this notice. Such
comments, including the name of the
submitter, and responses thereto, will be
posted on the Department of Justice,
Antitrust Division’s internet Web site,
filed with the Court and, under certain
circumstances, published in the Federal
Register. Comments should be directed
to William H. Stallings, Chief,
Transportation, Energy & Agriculture
Section, Antitrust Division, U.S.
Department of Justice, 450 Fifth Street
NW., Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530
(telephone: 202–514–9323).
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Patricia A. Brink
Director of Civil Enforcement.
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 705 Eldorado
Street, Decatur, Illinois 62523 applied to
be registered as an importer Nabilone
(7379), a basic class of controlled
substance listed in schedule II.
The company plans to import the
FDA approved drug product in finished
dosage form for distribution to its
customers.
Dated: March 20, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–06971 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am]
Antitrust Division
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
United States and State of New York v.
Twin America, LLC, et al.; Proposed
Final Judgment and Competitive
Impact Statement
Notice is hereby given pursuant to the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed
Final Judgment, Stipulation and
Competitive Impact Statement have
been filed with the United States
District Court for the Southern District
of New York in United States and State
of New York v. Twin America, LLC, et
al., Civil Action No. 12–cv–8989 (ALC)
(GWG). On December 11, 2012, the
United States and the State of New York
filed a Complaint. The United States
alleged that the formation of Twin
America, LLC by Coach USA, Inc. and
CitySights LLC violated Section 7 of the
Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18) and Section
1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1). The
proposed Final Judgment, filed on
March 16, 2015, requires Defendants to
relinquish all of CitySights’s Manhattan
bus stop authorizations granted by the
New York City Department of
Transportation (NYC DOT) to NYC
DOT, and to pay $7.5 million in
disgorgement.
Copies of the Complaint, proposed
Final Judgment and Competitive Impact
Statement are available for inspection at
the Department of Justice, Antitrust
Division, Antitrust Documents Group,
450 Fifth Street NW., Suite 1010,
Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202–
514–2481), on the Department of
Justice’s Web site at https://
www.usdoj.gov/atr, and at the Office of
the Clerk of the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New
York. Copies of these materials may be
obtained from the Antitrust Division
upon request and payment of the
copying fee set by Department of Justice
regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Mar 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK
United States of America, and State of New
York, Plaintiffs, v. Twin America, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 12–cv–8989 (ALC) (GWG).
ECF CASE.
COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
Pursuant to Section 2(b) of the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act
(‘‘APPA’’ or ‘‘Tunney Act’’), 15 U.S.C.
16(b)–(h), Plaintiff United States of
America (‘‘United States’’) files this
Competitive Impact Statement relating
to the proposed Final Judgment
submitted for entry in this civil antitrust
proceeding.
I. NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE
PROCEEDING
On March 17, 2009, Defendants Coach
USA, Inc. (through subsidiary
International Bus Services, Inc. (‘‘IBS’’))
and CitySights LLC (through subsidiary
City Sights Twin, LLC) formed Twin
America, LLC (‘‘Twin America’’), a joint
venture that combined the companies’
hop-on, hop-off bus tour businesses in
New York City. The United States and
the State of New York (collectively,
‘‘Plaintiffs’’) filed a civil antitrust
Complaint on December 11, 2012,
alleging that the formation of Twin
America substantially lessened
competition in the market for hop-on,
hop-off bus tours in New York City in
violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act
(15 U.S.C. 18), and also violated Section
1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1),
Section 340 of the Donnelly Act (N.Y.
Gen. Bus. Law § 340), and Section
63(12) of the New York Executive Law
(N.Y. Exec. Law § 63(12)).1 The
1 The Tunney Act applies to ‘‘proposal[s] for a
consent judgment submitted by the United States
for entry in any civil proceeding brought by or on
behalf of the United States under the antitrust laws
[of the United States].’’ 15 U.S.C. 16(b). Therefore,
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16427
Complaint sought to remedy harm to
competition and disgorge Defendants’
ill-gotten gains.
The Parties completed discovery and
dispositive motions practice and trial
was scheduled to begin on February 23,
2015. On December 10, 2014, the Parties
informed the Court that they had
reached an agreement in principle to
settle the litigation and the trial date
was adjourned while the Parties
finalized the settlement.
Concurrent with the filing of this
Competitive Impact Statement, Plaintiffs
have filed a proposed Stipulation and
Order, a proposed Final Judgment, and
an Explanation of Consent Decree
Procedures. The proposed Final
Judgment is designed to remedy the
competitive concerns resulting from
Defendants’ formation of Twin America
and deprive Defendants of ill-gotten
gains. As explained more fully below,
the proposed Final Judgment requires
Defendants to relinquish the complete
set of City Sights’s Manhattan bus stop
authorizations to the New York City
Department of Transportation
(NYCDOT) and to pay $7.5 million in
disgorgement, among other remedial
actions.2
Plaintiffs and Defendants have
stipulated that Defendants are bound by
the terms of the proposed Final
Judgment and that the proposed Final
Judgment may be entered after
compliance with the APPA. Entry of the
proposed Final Judgment would
terminate this action, except that the
Court would retain jurisdiction to
construe, modify, or enforce the
provisions of the proposed Final
Judgment and to punish violations
thereof.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE EVENTS
GIVING RISE TO THE ALLEGED
VIOLATION
A. The Defendants and the Transaction
Coach USA, Inc. (‘‘Coach’’), a
Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business in Paramus, New
Jersey, operated hop-on, hop-off bus
tours in New York City under the ‘‘Gray
Line New York’’ brand. Coach acquired
the Gray Line business in 1998, and, by
the early 2000s, was the dominant
the proposed Final Judgment’s settlement of
Plaintiff State of New York’s claims under N.Y.
Gen. Bus. Law § 340 and N.Y. Exec. Law § 63(12)
are not subject to the Tunney Act.
2 Defendant Coach USA and the United States
have also reached a settlement relating to costs and
expenses incurred by the United States associated
with discovery into allegations that Coach did not
meet its document preservation obligations. This
settlement, which is being filed concurrently with
the filing of the proposed Final Judgment, is not
subject to Tunney Act review.
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16426-16427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06971]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA-392]
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Meda
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ACTION: Notice of application.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class, and
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR
1301.34(a) on or before April 27, 2015. Such persons may also file a
written request for a hearing on the application pursuant to 21 CFR
1301.43 on or before April 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODXL,
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for
hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention:
Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion
Control (``Deputy Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of
28 CFR part 0, appendix of subpart R.
In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on
December 5, 2014, Meda
[[Page 16427]]
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 705 Eldorado Street, Decatur, Illinois 62523
applied to be registered as an importer Nabilone (7379), a basic class
of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
The company plans to import the FDA approved drug product in
finished dosage form for distribution to its customers.
Dated: March 20, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-06971 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P