Endangered and Threatened Species; Notice of Intent To Withdraw Existing Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 15986-15987 [2015-06926]
Download as PDF
15986
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 58 / Thursday, March 26, 2015 / Notices
international trade in services and direct
investment that are not collected
pursuant to the 2012 rule are described
separately in 15 CFR part 801. The BE–
45 survey forms and instructions are
available on the BEA Web site at
www.bea.gov/ssb.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Definitions
(a) Person means any individual,
branch, partnership, associated group,
association, estate, trust, corporation, or
other organization (whether or not
organized under the laws of any State),
and any government (including a
foreign government, the United States
Government, a State or local
government, and any agency,
corporation, financial institution, or
other entity or instrumentality thereof,
including a government-sponsored
agency).
(b) United States person means any
person resident in the United States or
subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States.
(c) United States, when used in a
geographic sense, means the 50 States,
the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and all
territories and possessions of the United
States.
(d) Foreign person means any person
resident outside the United States or
subject to the jurisdiction of a country
other than the United States.
Reporting
Who Must Report: (a) Reports are
required from U.S. persons whose
covered transactions exceeded $8
million (positive or negative) in the
prior fiscal year, or are expected to
exceed that amount during the current
fiscal year.
(b) Entities required to report will be
contacted individually by BEA. Entities
not contacted by BEA have no reporting
responsibilities.
What To Report: The survey collects
information on cross-border insurance
transactions between U.S. insurance
companies and foreign persons.
How To Report: Reports can be filed
using BEA’s electronic reporting system
at www.bea.gov/efile. Copies of the
survey forms and instructions, which
contain complete information on
reporting procedures and definitions,
may be obtained at the BEA Web site
given above. Form BE–45 inquiries can
be made by phone to BEA at (202) 606–
5588 or by sending an email to
be45help@bea.gov.
When To Report: Reports are due to
BEA 60 days after the end of the fiscal
quarter, except for the final quarter of
the reporter’s fiscal year, when reports
must be filed within 90 days.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Mar 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
Paperwork Reduction Act Notice
This data collection has been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act and
assigned control number 0608–0066. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a valid control number
assigned by OMB. Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 8 hours per
response. Send comments regarding this
burden estimate to Director, Bureau of
Economic Analysis (BE–1), U.S.
Department of Commerce, Washington,
DC 20230; and to the Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project 0608–0066,
Washington, DC 20503.
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 3101–3108.
Brian C. Moyer,
Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2015–06942 Filed 3–25–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD827
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Notice of Intent To Withdraw Existing
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal.
AGENCY:
NMFS is announcing the
withdrawal of a draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) that was being
prepared on two resource management
plans (RMPs) and 114 supporting
hatchery and genetic management plans
(HGMPs) for Puget Sound hatchery
programs. The plans were submitted to
NMFS by the Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife and the Puget Sound
treaty tribes (referred to as the comanagers) for evaluation under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) for
threatened Puget Sound Chinook
salmon and Puget Sound steelhead.
Subsequent to the notice of intent to
prepare an EIS in 2004, the co-managers
have made important changes in
hatchery programs for salmon and
steelhead. Changes in the programs and
updated information important for
analysis are being reflected in revised
joint RMPs that are generally organized
on a watershed-specific basis. In light of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
this and the ongoing submissions of
revised watershed-specific joint
hatchery RMPs and considering public
comments received on the draft EIS,
NMFS has determined that it is
appropriate to withdraw the draft EIS.
NMFS will conduct NEPA reviews for
the revised RMPs that are jointly
submitted to NMFS by the co-managers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Leider, telephone (360) 753–4650;
fax (360) 753–9517; electronic mail:
Steve.Leider@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
12, 2004, NMFS published the original
notice of intent in the Federal Register
to prepare an EIS for two joint 2004
state and tribal RMPs for salmon and
steelhead hatcheries in Puget Sound (69
FR 26364). On July 29, 2011, NMFS
published a second notice of intent in
the Federal Register (76 FR 45515), to
remind other agencies and the public of
its plans to analyze the effects related to
the action, and obtain information that
may not have been available in 2004
pertinent to the scope of issues to
include in the EIS. On July 25, 2014,
NMFS published notification in the
Federal Register that a draft EIS was
available for comment (79 FR 43465). In
response to requests from the public the
comment period was extended twice as
published in the Federal Register (79
FR 59767, October 3, 2014, and 79 FR
69470, November 21, 2014).
Subsequent to NMFS’ publication of
the notice of intent to prepare an EIS in
2004, and subsequent to the 2004 RMPs,
the co-managers have updated their
hatchery programs to reflect important
changes in hatchery management in
different areas of Puget Sound. Such
changes include new management
practices to respond to new scientific
information, revised purposes and sizes
of some programs, and management
responses to other issues unique to
particular watersheds. Several hatchery
programs have been terminated since
2004. Finally, the RMPs have been
updated to reflect the 2007 listing of
Puget Sound steelhead under the ESA.
In light of these changes, the comanagers have begun to submit to
NMFS for review and approval revised
joint RMPs for hatchery programs,
generally organized by watershed, but
located within the same action area as
the 2004 RMPs. Because the comanagers are in control of how to design
their RMPs and whether to revise the
underlying HGMPs, these new RMPs
replace the RMPs submitted in 2004.
While the draft EIS for Puget Sound
hatchery programs was being
developed, and in response to comanager requests, NMFS conducted
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 58 / Thursday, March 26, 2015 / Notices
environmental reviews for the RMPs
that were revised since the 2004 RMPs
were submitted to NMFS. For example,
on December 10, 2012, NMFS
completed a final Environmental
Assessment (EA) and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) for five
Elwha salmon and steelhead hatchery
programs. Subsequently, on December
15, 2014, a final supplemental EA and
FONSI for Elwha hatchery programs
was published. In addition, in February,
NMFS published a notice of availability
for a draft EA for three salmon hatchery
programs in the Dungeness River
watershed (80 FR 9260, February 20,
2015).
Public comments on the draft EIS for
Puget Sound hatchery programs noted
that the 2004 RMPs for hatchery
programs do not accurately reflect
current hatchery program purposes or
practices, and that some of the
information used was outdated. It was
also noted that the scale of the review,
incorporating more than a hundred
hatchery programs, tended to mask
effects for some species.
Therefore, considering ongoing
submissions of revised watershedspecific joint RMPs within the action
area of the 2004 RMPs and public
comments received on the draft EIS,
NMFS has determined it is appropriate
to terminate the EIS and transition this
effort into new NEPA reviews on
revised hatchery RMPs that are jointly
submitted to NMFS by the co-managers.
NMFS does not plan to formally
respond to public comments on the
draft EIS; however, information in the
terminated draft EIS, along with public
comments received on the draft EIS,
will be considered by NMFS in
subsequent NEPA reviews of watershedspecific RMPs.
Authority
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
We provide this notice in accordance
with the requirements of NEPA as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) and its
implementing regulations (40 CFR
1506.6), and other appropriate Federal
laws and regulations, and policies and
procedures of NMFS for compliance
with those regulations.
Dated: March 23, 2015.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–06926 Filed 3–25–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Mar 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–016]
Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light
Truck Tires From the People’s
Republic of China: Amended
Affirmative Preliminary Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) is amending the
preliminarily determination of the
antidumping duty (AD) investigation of
certain passenger vehicle and light truck
tires (passenger tires) from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC) to correct
significant ministerial errors.
DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page, Jun Jack Zhao, or Lingjun Wang,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1398, (202) 482–1396, or (202) 482–
2316, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On January 27, 2015, the Department
published its affirmative preliminary
determination that passenger tires from
the PRC are being, or are likely to be,
sold in the United States at less than fair
value, as provided by section 733 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).1 The Department disclosed the
calculations performed on January 26,
2015, and set a February 2, 2015
deadline for submitting comments
concerning ministerial errors.
The Sailun Group 2 and GITI 3 each
timely filed comments alleging
significant ministerial errors.4 In
1 See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck
Tires from the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value; Preliminary Affirmative Determination
of Critical Circumstances; In Part and
Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 4250
(January 27, 2015) (Preliminary Determination).
2 Sailun Group Co. and its affiliates, Sailun Tire
International Corp., Shandong Jinyu Industrial Co.,
Ltd., Jinyu International Holding Co., Limited,
Seatex International Inc., Dynamic Tire Corp.,
Husky Tire Corp., Seatex PTE. Ltd. (collectively, the
Sailun Group).
3 Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd., and its
affiliates, Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd., Giti
Tire (USA) Ltd., Giti Tire (Anhui) Company Ltd.,
Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd., Giti Tire (Hualin)
Company Ltd. (collectively, GITI).
4 See Sailun Group’s and GITI’s February 2, 2015
letters.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15987
addition, Anchi, Wanli, Federal,
Changfeng, Fullrun, Fuyingxiang,
Qingda, Doublestar and DoublestarDongfeng, and Beijing Capital each
timely filed comments regarding the
Department’s preliminary separate rate
determinations.5 Jinhaoyang requested
the Department to accept its
supplemental documentation for the
Separate Rate Application 6 which was
opposed by the Petitioner.7 Further,
GITI, Doublestar and Tyrechamp, and
CIC timely filed requests for correcting
misspelled names.8 Petitioner filed
rebuttal comments and ministerial error
comments on February 10, 2015.9 The
Sailun Group, in-turn, requested that
the Department reject Petitioner’s
rebuttal comments.10
Scope of the Investigation
For a full description of the scope of
this investigation, see ‘‘Scope of
Investigation’’ at Appendix I of the
Preliminary Determination.
Analysis of Significant Ministerial
Error Allegations
The Department will analyze any
comments received and, if appropriate,
correct any significant ministerial error
by amending the preliminary
determination according to 19 CFR
351.224(e). A ministerial error is
defined in 19 CFR 351.224(f) as ‘‘an
error in addition, subtraction, or other
arithmetic function, clerical error
resulting from inaccurate copying,
duplication, or the like, and any other
similar type of unintentional error
which the Secretary considers
ministerial.’’ Further, a significant
ministerial error is defined in 19 CFR
5 See Shandong Anchi Tyres Co., Ltd. (Anchi)’s
January 28, 2015 letter, Guangzhou Wanli Tire
Trading Co., Ltd. (Wanli)’s January 28, 2015 letter,
Highpoint Trading, Ltd. and Federal Tire (Jiangxi),
Ltd. (collectively, Federal)’s January 28, 2015 letter,
Shandong Changfeng Tyres Co., Ltd. (Changfeng)’s
January 30, 2015 letter, Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Corp.
Ltd. (Fullrun)’s January 30, 2015 letter, Qingdao
Fuyingxiang Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (Fuyingxiang)’s
January 31, 2015 letter, Zhejiang Qingda Rubber
Co., Ltd. (Qingda)’s January 31, 2015 letter, Qingdao
Doublestar Tire Industrial Co., Ltd. (Doublestar) and
Doublestar-Dongfeng Tyre Co., Ltd. (DoublestarDongfeng)’s January 31, 2015 letter, and Beijing
Capital Tire Co., Ltd. (Beijing Capital)’s February 4,
2015 letter.
6 See Qingdao Jinhaoyang International Co, Ltd.
(Jinhaoyang)’s February 4, 2015 letter.
7 See Petitioner’s February 10, 2015 letter.
8 See GITI’s January 26, 2015 letter, Qingdao
Doublestar Tire Industrial Co., Ltd. (Doublestar)’s
and Tyrechamp Group Co., Limited (Tyrechamp)’s
January 23, 2015 letter, and Crown International
Corporation (CIC)’s January 26, 2015 letter.
9 Petitioner is United Steel, Paper, and Forestry,
Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial
and Service Workers International Union, AFL–
CIO, CLC. See Petitioner’s February 10, 2015
comments.
10 See Sailun Group’s February 11, 2015 letter.
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 58 (Thursday, March 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15986-15987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06926]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XD827
Endangered and Threatened Species; Notice of Intent To Withdraw
Existing Draft Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS is announcing the withdrawal of a draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) that was being prepared on two resource
management plans (RMPs) and 114 supporting hatchery and genetic
management plans (HGMPs) for Puget Sound hatchery programs. The plans
were submitted to NMFS by the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife and the Puget Sound treaty tribes (referred to as the co-
managers) for evaluation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for
threatened Puget Sound Chinook salmon and Puget Sound steelhead.
Subsequent to the notice of intent to prepare an EIS in 2004, the co-
managers have made important changes in hatchery programs for salmon
and steelhead. Changes in the programs and updated information
important for analysis are being reflected in revised joint RMPs that
are generally organized on a watershed-specific basis. In light of this
and the ongoing submissions of revised watershed-specific joint
hatchery RMPs and considering public comments received on the draft
EIS, NMFS has determined that it is appropriate to withdraw the draft
EIS. NMFS will conduct NEPA reviews for the revised RMPs that are
jointly submitted to NMFS by the co-managers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Leider, telephone (360) 753-
4650; fax (360) 753-9517; electronic mail: Steve.Leider@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 12, 2004, NMFS published the original
notice of intent in the Federal Register to prepare an EIS for two
joint 2004 state and tribal RMPs for salmon and steelhead hatcheries in
Puget Sound (69 FR 26364). On July 29, 2011, NMFS published a second
notice of intent in the Federal Register (76 FR 45515), to remind other
agencies and the public of its plans to analyze the effects related to
the action, and obtain information that may not have been available in
2004 pertinent to the scope of issues to include in the EIS. On July
25, 2014, NMFS published notification in the Federal Register that a
draft EIS was available for comment (79 FR 43465). In response to
requests from the public the comment period was extended twice as
published in the Federal Register (79 FR 59767, October 3, 2014, and 79
FR 69470, November 21, 2014).
Subsequent to NMFS' publication of the notice of intent to prepare
an EIS in 2004, and subsequent to the 2004 RMPs, the co-managers have
updated their hatchery programs to reflect important changes in
hatchery management in different areas of Puget Sound. Such changes
include new management practices to respond to new scientific
information, revised purposes and sizes of some programs, and
management responses to other issues unique to particular watersheds.
Several hatchery programs have been terminated since 2004. Finally, the
RMPs have been updated to reflect the 2007 listing of Puget Sound
steelhead under the ESA.
In light of these changes, the co-managers have begun to submit to
NMFS for review and approval revised joint RMPs for hatchery programs,
generally organized by watershed, but located within the same action
area as the 2004 RMPs. Because the co-managers are in control of how to
design their RMPs and whether to revise the underlying HGMPs, these new
RMPs replace the RMPs submitted in 2004.
While the draft EIS for Puget Sound hatchery programs was being
developed, and in response to co-manager requests, NMFS conducted
[[Page 15987]]
environmental reviews for the RMPs that were revised since the 2004
RMPs were submitted to NMFS. For example, on December 10, 2012, NMFS
completed a final Environmental Assessment (EA) and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) for five Elwha salmon and steelhead hatchery
programs. Subsequently, on December 15, 2014, a final supplemental EA
and FONSI for Elwha hatchery programs was published. In addition, in
February, NMFS published a notice of availability for a draft EA for
three salmon hatchery programs in the Dungeness River watershed (80 FR
9260, February 20, 2015).
Public comments on the draft EIS for Puget Sound hatchery programs
noted that the 2004 RMPs for hatchery programs do not accurately
reflect current hatchery program purposes or practices, and that some
of the information used was outdated. It was also noted that the scale
of the review, incorporating more than a hundred hatchery programs,
tended to mask effects for some species.
Therefore, considering ongoing submissions of revised watershed-
specific joint RMPs within the action area of the 2004 RMPs and public
comments received on the draft EIS, NMFS has determined it is
appropriate to terminate the EIS and transition this effort into new
NEPA reviews on revised hatchery RMPs that are jointly submitted to
NMFS by the co-managers. NMFS does not plan to formally respond to
public comments on the draft EIS; however, information in the
terminated draft EIS, along with public comments received on the draft
EIS, will be considered by NMFS in subsequent NEPA reviews of
watershed-specific RMPs.
Authority
We provide this notice in accordance with the requirements of NEPA
as amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) and its implementing regulations
(40 CFR 1506.6), and other appropriate Federal laws and regulations,
and policies and procedures of NMFS for compliance with those
regulations.
Dated: March 23, 2015.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-06926 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P