Safety Zone, Chesapeake Bay; Cape Charles, VA, 15174-15176 [2015-06582]
Download as PDF
15174
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Proposed Rules
The Commission has considered
WCMA’s request. The Commission will
grant WCMA’s request to extend the
comment period for the ANPR until
June 1, 2015. The extension will allow
WCMA and any other party additional
time to complete studies related to
questions asked in the ANPR.
Alberta E. Mills,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–06354 Filed 3–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LCDR Gregory Knoll, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector
Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone
(757) 668–5580, email
HamptonRoadsWaterway@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Table of Acronyms
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Coast Guard
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0048]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Chesapeake Bay; Cape
Charles, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone on the navigable
waters of the Chesapeake Bay in Cape
Charles, VA. This proposed safety zone
would restrict vessel movement in the
specified area during the Cape Charles
Clam Slam fireworks display between
9:30 p.m. and 10 p.m. on August 1,
2015. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life and
property on the surrounding navigable
waters during the fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 22, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission. To submit your comment
online, go to www.regulations.gov, type
the docket number [USCG–2015–0048]
in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2015–0048] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES 15 days
prior to the close of the comment
period. Please explain why you believe
a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The town of Cape Charles has not
held a Clam Slam fireworks display in
the past. However, this same location is
used for other fireworks displays
throughout the year as published in 33
CFR 165.506.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6,
160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of this safety zone is to
protect mariners and spectators from the
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Proposed Rules
hazards associated with the fireworks
display, such as accidental discharge of
fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and
falling hot embers or other debris.
D. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port of Hampton
Roads proposes to establish a safety
zone on specified waters of the
Chesapeake Bay within a 700 foot radius
of the approximate position: 37°15′47″
N/076°01′29″ W (NAD 1983), at the end
of Bayshore Road located in the vicinity
of Cape Charles Harbor, Cape Charles,
Virginia. This safety zone will be
enforced on August 1, 2015 between the
hours of 9:30 p.m. and 10 p.m. Access
to the safety zone will be restricted
during the specified date and time.
Spectator vessels may gather nearby
to view the fireworks display. Due to the
need for vessel control during the
fireworks display, vessel traffic will be
temporarily restricted to provide for the
safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels. Except for vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative, no person
or vessel may enter or remain in the
safety zone. The Captain of the Port will
provide advance notice of the safety
zone by all appropriate means to
provide the widest dissemination of
notice among the affected segments of
the public. This will include
publication in the Local Notice to
Mariners and Marine Information
Broadcasts.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. The primary impact of these
regulations will be on vessels wishing to
transit the affected waterways during
the safety zone on the Chesapeake Bay
in the vicinity of Cape Charles, VA from
9:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on August 1,
2015. Although this safety zone
temporarily restricts traffic from
transiting a portion of the Chesapeake
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
Bay during this event, this safety zone
is limited in duration, affects only a
limited area, and will be well publicized
in advance to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the
affected area.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule will affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the waters of
the Chesapeake Bay near Cape Charles
Harbor during the outlined timeframe.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: (i) The safety
zone is limited in size and duration, and
(ii) before the enforcement period,
maritime advisories will be issued
allowing mariners to adjust their plans
accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
that this rule would have a significant
economic impact on it, please submit a
comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining
why you think it qualifies and how and
to what degree this rule would
economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15175
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule will not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
15176
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Proposed Rules
safety that may disproportionately affect
children.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
11. Indian Tribal Governments
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
33 CFR Part 165
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone. This proposed rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34–g of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
[Docket Number USCG–2014–1079]
RIN 1625–AA00
2. Add § 165.T05–0048 to read as
follows:
Safety Zone, Daytona Beach Grand
Prix of the Seas; Atlantic Ocean;
Daytona Beach, FL
§ 165.T05–0048 Safety Zone, Chesapeake
Bay; Cape Charles, VA.
AGENCY:
■
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, Captain of the Port means
the Commander, Sector Hampton Roads.
Representative means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized to act on the
behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a
proposed safety zone: Specified waters
of the Captain of the Port Sector
Hampton Roads zone, as defined in 33
CFR 3.25–10, in the vicinity of the
Chesapeake Bay near Cape Charles, VA
all waters within a 700 foot radius of
approximate location 37°15′47″ N/
076°01′29″ W (NAD 1983) which is
located at the end of Bayshore Road in
Cape Charles Harbor.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in 165.23 of this
part, entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Contact on scene contracting
vessels via VHF channel 13 and 16 for
passage instructions.
(ii) If on scene proceed as directed by
any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that
is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone may be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. until 10
p.m. on August 1, 2015.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Christopher S. Keane,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2015–06582 Filed 3–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone on the waters of
the Atlantic Ocean east of Daytona
Beach, Florida during the Daytona
Beach Grand Prix of the Seas, a series
of high-speed personal watercraft boat
races. This proposed safety zone would
be enforced from 7 a.m. on Friday until
7 p.m. on Sunday during the last
weekend in April. Approximately 50
high-speed personal watercrafts are
anticipated to participate in the races,
and approximately 20 spectator vessels
are expected to attend the event. This
safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of life on navigable waters of the
United States during the races. The
regulated area would consist of the
following location: All waters of the
Atlantic Ocean encompassed within the
following points: starting at Point 1 in
position 29°14.601′ N, 81°00.767′ W;
thence south to Point 2 in position
29°13.677′ N, 81°00.283′ W; thence east
to Point 3 in position 29°13.860′ N,
080°59.763′ W; thence north to Point 4
in position 29°14.781′ N, 80°59.802′ W;
thence west back to origin. All persons
and vessels, except those persons and
vessels participating in the high-speed
personal watercraft event, are prohibited
from entering, transiting, anchoring, or
remaining in the regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Jacksonville or a designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard by
April 22, 2015. Requests for public
meetings must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 24, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2014–1079 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
Mail or delivery: Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15174-15176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06582]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2015-0048]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Chesapeake Bay; Cape Charles, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Chesapeake Bay in Cape Charles, VA. This
proposed safety zone would restrict vessel movement in the specified
area during the Cape Charles Clam Slam fireworks display between 9:30
p.m. and 10 p.m. on August 1, 2015. This action is necessary to provide
for the safety of life and property on the surrounding navigable waters
during the fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 22, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LCDR Gregory Knoll, Waterways Management Division Chief,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone (757) 668-5580, email
HamptonRoadsWaterway@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission. To submit your
comment online, go to www.regulations.gov, type the docket number
[USCG-2015-0048] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on
``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2015-0048] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES 15
days prior to the close of the comment period. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The town of Cape Charles has not held a Clam Slam fireworks display
in the past. However, this same location is used for other fireworks
displays throughout the year as published in 33 CFR 165.506.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The purpose of this safety zone is to protect mariners and
spectators from the
[[Page 15175]]
hazards associated with the fireworks display, such as accidental
discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers
or other debris.
D. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port of Hampton Roads proposes to establish a
safety zone on specified waters of the Chesapeake Bay within a 700 foot
radius of the approximate position: 37[deg]15'47'' N/076[deg]01'29'' W
(NAD 1983), at the end of Bayshore Road located in the vicinity of Cape
Charles Harbor, Cape Charles, Virginia. This safety zone will be
enforced on August 1, 2015 between the hours of 9:30 p.m. and 10 p.m.
Access to the safety zone will be restricted during the specified date
and time.
Spectator vessels may gather nearby to view the fireworks display.
Due to the need for vessel control during the fireworks display, vessel
traffic will be temporarily restricted to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting vessels. Except for vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the safety zone. The Captain
of the Port will provide advance notice of the safety zone by all
appropriate means to provide the widest dissemination of notice among
the affected segments of the public. This will include publication in
the Local Notice to Mariners and Marine Information Broadcasts.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The primary impact of
these regulations will be on vessels wishing to transit the affected
waterways during the safety zone on the Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity
of Cape Charles, VA from 9:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on August 1, 2015.
Although this safety zone temporarily restricts traffic from transiting
a portion of the Chesapeake Bay during this event, this safety zone is
limited in duration, affects only a limited area, and will be well
publicized in advance to allow mariners to make alternative plans for
transiting the affected area.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule will affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the waters of the
Chesapeake Bay near Cape Charles Harbor during the outlined timeframe.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: (i) The
safety zone is limited in size and duration, and (ii) before the
enforcement period, maritime advisories will be issued allowing
mariners to adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule will not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to
[[Page 15176]]
safety that may disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This proposed rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone. This proposed rule is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34-g of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0048 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0048 Safety Zone, Chesapeake Bay; Cape Charles, VA.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, Captain of the
Port means the Commander, Sector Hampton Roads. Representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a proposed safety zone:
Specified waters of the Captain of the Port Sector Hampton Roads zone,
as defined in 33 CFR 3.25-10, in the vicinity of the Chesapeake Bay
near Cape Charles, VA all waters within a 700 foot radius of
approximate location 37[deg]15'47'' N/076[deg]01'29'' W (NAD 1983)
which is located at the end of Bayshore Road in Cape Charles Harbor.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Contact on scene contracting vessels via VHF channel 13 and 16
for passage instructions.
(ii) If on scene proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant
or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a
U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads in Portsmouth, Virginia
at telephone number (757) 668-5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone may
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9:30
p.m. until 10 p.m. on August 1, 2015.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Christopher S. Keane,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2015-06582 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P