Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program; Fire Prevention and Safety Grants, 15234-15239 [2015-06547]
Download as PDF
15234
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Notices
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the DOT West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received in dockets
by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review a Privacy Act statement
regarding Coast Guard public dockets in
the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Information Collection Requests
1. Title: Shipping Articles.
OMB Control Number: 1625–0006.
Summary: Title 46 United States Code
10302 and 10502 and Title 46 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) 14.201
requires applicable owners, charterers,
managing operators, masters, or
individuals in charge to make a
shipping agreement in writing with each
seaman before the seaman commences
employment. Additionally, 46 CFR
14.313 requires shipping companies to
submit to the Coast Guard Shipping
Articles three years after the article was
generated; or submitted by shipping
companies that go out of business or
merges with another company; or upon
request by the Coast Guard. Upon
receipt and acceptance, Shipping
Articles are transferred and archived at
the Federal Records Center in Suitland,
Maryland.
Need: This collection provides
verification, identification, location and
employment information of U.S.
merchant mariners to the following: (1)
Federal, state and local law enforcement
agencies for use in criminal or civil law
enforcement purpose, (2) shipping
companies, (3) labor unions, (4)
seaman’s authorized representatives, (5)
seaman’s next of kin, (6) whenever the
disclosure of such information would be
in the best interest of the seaman or his/
her family.
Forms: CG–705A.
Respondents: Shipping companies.
Frequency: On occasion.
Burden Estimate: The estimated
burden is 18,000 hours a year.
2. Title: Official Logbook.
OMB Control Number: 1625–0018.
Summary: The Official Logbook
contains information about the voyage,
the vessel’s crew, drills, watches and
operations conducted during the
voyage. Official Logbook entries identify
particulars of the voyage, including the
name of the ship, official number, port
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
of registry, tonnage, names and
merchant mariner credential numbers of
the master and crew, the nature of the
voyage, and class of ship. In addition, it
also contains entries for the vessel’s
drafts, maintenance of watertight
integrity of the ship, drills and
inspections, crew list and report of
character, a summary of laws applicable
to Official Logbooks, and miscellaneous
entries.
Need: Title 46 United States Code
(U.S.C.) 11301, 11302, 11303, and 11304
require applicable merchant vessels to
maintain an Official Logbook. The
Official Logbook contains information
about the vessel, voyage, crew, and
watch. Lack of these particulars would
make it difficult for a seaman to certify
vessel employment and wages, and for
the Coast Guard to verify compliance
with laws and regulations concerning
vessel operations and safety procedures.
The Official Logbook serves as an
official record of recordable events
transpiring at sea such as births, deaths,
marriages, disciplinary actions, etc.
Absent the Official Logbook, there
would be no official civil record of these
events. The courts accept log entries as
proof that the logged event occurred. If
this information was not collected, the
Coast Guard’s Commercial Vessel Safety
Program would be negatively impacted,
as there would be no official record of
U.S. merchant vessel voyages. Similarly,
those seeking to prove that an event
required to be logged occurred would
not have an official record available.
Forms: CG–706B.
Respondents: Shipping companies.
Frequency: On occasion.
Burden Estimate: The estimated
burden is 1,750 hours a year.
Dated: March 17, 2015.
Thomas P. Michelli,
Chief Information Officer, Acting, U.S. Coast
Guard.
[FR Doc. 2015–06585 Filed 3–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID FEMA–FEMA–2014–0035]
Assistance to Firefighters Grant
Program; Fire Prevention and Safety
Grants
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of guidance.
AGENCY:
This Notice provides
guidelines that describe the application
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
process for grants and the criteria for
awarding Fire Prevention and Safety
(FP&S) grants in the fiscal year (FY)
2014 Assistance to Firefighters Grant
(AFG) Program year. It explains the
differences, if any, between these
guidelines and those recommended by
representatives of the Nation’s fire
service leadership during the annual
Criteria Development meeting, which
was held October 27–28, 2014. The
application period for the FY 2014 FP&S
Grant Program year will be held March
16–April 17, 2015, and will be
announced on the AFG Web site
(www.fema.gov/firegrants),
www.grants.gov, and U.S. Fire
Administration Web site
(www.usfa.fema.gov).
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2229.
Grant applications for the FP&S
Grant Program will be accepted
electronically at https://portal.fema.gov,
from March 16–April 17, 2015.
DATES:
Assistance to Firefighters
Grants Branch, Stop 3620, DHS/FEMA,
800 K Street NW., Washington, DC
20472–3620.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Patterson, Chief, Assistance to
Firefighters Grants Branch, 1–866–274–
0960.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the AFG Program is to
enhance the safety of the public and
firefighters with respect to fire and firerelated hazards. The FEMA Grant
Programs Directorate administers the
FP&S Grant Program as part of the AFG
Program.
FP&S Grants are offered to support
projects in two activities:
1. Activities designed to reach highrisk target groups and mitigate the
incidence of death and injuries caused
by fire and fire-related hazards (‘‘FP&S
Activity’’).
2. Projects aimed at improving
firefighter safety, health and wellness
through research and development that
reduces firefighter fatalities and injuries
(‘‘R&D Activity’’).
The grant program’s authorizing
statute requires that each year DHS
publish in the Federal Register the
guidelines that describe the application
process and the criteria for grant
awards. Approximately 1,200
applications for FP&S Grant Program
funding are anticipated to be submitted
electronically, using the application
submission form and process available
at the AFG e-Grant application portal:
https://portal.fema.gov. Specific
information about the submission of
grant applications can be found in the
‘‘FY 2014 Fire Prevention and Safety
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Notices
Program Funding Opportunity
Announcement,’’ which will be
available for download at
www.fema.gov/firegrants and at
www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
FEMA–2014–0035.
Appropriations
Congress appropriated $340,000,000
for AFG in FY 2014 pursuant to the
Department of Homeland Security
Appropriations Act, 2014, Public Law
113–76. From this amount, $34,000,000
will be made available for FP&S Grant
awards, pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
2229(h)(5), which states that not less
than 10 percent of available grant funds
each year are awarded under the FP&S
Grant Program. Funds appropriated for
all FY 2014 AFG awards, pursuant to
Public Law 113–76, will be available for
obligation and award until September
30, 2015.
From the approximately 1,200
applications that will be requesting
assistance, FEMA anticipates that it will
award approximately 150 FP&S Grants
from available grant funding.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background of the AFG Program
DHS awards grants on a competitive
basis to the applicants that best address
the FP&S Grant Program’s priorities and
provide the most compelling
justification. Applications that best
address the Program’s priorities will be
reviewed by a panel composed of fire
service personnel.
Award Criteria
All applications for grants will be
prepared and submitted through the
AFG e-Grant application portal
(https://portal.fema.gov).
The FP&S Grant Program panels will
review the applications and score them
using the following criteria areas:
• Vulnerability
• Implementation
• Evaluation Plan
• Cost Benefit
• Sustainability
• Financial Need
• Funding Priorities
• Experience and Expertise
The applications submitted under the
R&D Activity will be reviewed first by
a panel of fire service members to
identify those applications most
relevant to the fire service. The
following evaluation criteria will be
used for this review:
• Purpose
• Potential Impact
• Implementation by the fire service
• Partners
• Barriers
The applications that are determined
most likely to be implemented to enable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
improvement in firefighter safety,
health, or wellness will be deemed to be
in the ‘‘competitive range’’ and will be
forwarded to the second level of
application review, which is the
scientific panel review process. This
panel will be comprised of scientists
and technology experts who have
expertise pertaining to the subject
matter of the proposal.
The Scientific Technical Evaluation
Panel for the R&D Activity will review
the application and evaluate it using the
following criteria:
• Project purpose(s), goals and
objectives, and specific aims
• Literature Review
• Project Methods
• Project Measurements
• Project Analysis
• Dissemination and Implementation
• Cost vs. Benefit (additional
consideration)
• Financial Need (additional
consideration)
Eligible Applicants
The following entities are eligible to
apply directly to FEMA under this
solicitation:
1. Fire Prevention and Safety (FP&S)
Activity: Eligible applicants for this
activity include fire departments,
national, regional, state, local, Native
American tribal, and nonprofit
organizations that are recognized for
their experience and expertise in fire
prevention and safety programs and
activities. Both private and public nonprofit organizations are eligible to apply
for funding in this activity. For-profit
organizations, federal agencies, and
individuals are not eligible to receive a
FP&S Grant Award under the FP&S
Activity.
2. Firefighter Safety Research and
Development (R&D) Activity: Eligible
applicants for this activity include
national, state, local, Native American
tribal, and nonprofit organizations, such
as academic (e.g., universities), public
health, occupational health, and injury
prevention institutions. Both private
and public non-profit organizations are
eligible to apply for funding in this
activity.
The aforementioned entities are
encouraged to apply, especially those
that are recognized for their experience
and expertise in firefighter safety,
health, and wellness research and
development activities. Fire
departments are not eligible to apply for
funding in the R&D activity.
Additionally, for-profit organizations,
federal agencies, and individuals are not
eligible to receive a grant award under
the R&D Activity.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15235
Statutory Limits to Funding
Applications and awards are limited
to a maximum federal share of $1.5
million dollars, regardless of applicant
type.
Cost Sharing
Grantees must share in the costs of the
projects funded under this grant
program as required by 15 U.S.C.
2229(k)(1) and in accordance with 44
CFR 13.24 and 2 CFR 215.23, but they
are not required to have the cost-share
at the time of application nor at the time
of award. However, before a grant is
awarded, FEMA will contact potential
awardees to determine whether the
grantee has the funding in hand or if the
grantee has a viable plan to obtain the
funding necessary to fulfill the costsharing requirement.
In general, an eligible applicant
seeking an FP&S grant to carry out an
activity shall agree to make available
non-federal funds to carry out such
activity in an amount equal to, and not
less than, five percent of the grant
awarded. Cash match and in-kind
matches are both allowable in the FP&S
Grant Program. Cash (hard) matches
include non-federal cash spent for
project-related costs. In-kind (soft)
matches include, but are not limited to,
the valuation of in-kind services. Inkind is the value of something received
or provided that does not have a cost
associated with it. For example, where
an in-kind match (other than cash
payments) is permitted, then the value
of donated services could be used to
comply with the match requirement.
Also, third party in-kind contributions
may count toward satisfying match
requirements provided the grantee
receiving the contributions expends
them as allowable costs in compliance
with provisions listed above.
Grantees under this grant program
must also agree to a maintenance of
effort requirement as required by 15
U.S.C. 2229(k)(3) (referred to as a
‘‘maintenance of expenditure’’
requirement in that statute). Per this
requirement, a grantee shall agree to
maintain during the term of the grant
the grantee’s aggregate expenditures
relating to the activities allowable under
the FP&S Funding Opportunity
Announcement at not less than 80
percent (80%) of the average amount of
such expenditures in the two (2) fiscal
years preceding the fiscal year in which
the grant amounts are received.
In cases of demonstrated economic
hardship, and on the application of the
grantee, the Administrator of FEMA
may waive or reduce certain grantees’
cost share or maintenance of
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
15236
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Notices
expenditure requirements. This policy
applies to FP&S per § 33 of the Federal
Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974
(Pub. L. 93–498, as amended) (15 U.S.C.
2229). For complete requirements
concerning these waivers, including a
description of how a grantee may
demonstrate economic hardship and
apply for a waiver, please refer to FEMA
Policy FP 207–088–01, dated April 8,
2014, at: https://www.fema.gov/medialibrary-data/1398109239435ec23997d8351382710896fa77d02bc7d/
AFG+Economic+/
Hardship+Waiver+Policy.pdf. Per 15
U.S.C. 2229(k)(4)(C), FP&S Grantees that
are not fire departments are not eligible
to receive a waiver of their cost share or
economic hardship requirements.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
System for Award Management (SAM)
On July 29, 2010, the Central
Contractor Registration (CCR) was
moved into the System for Award
Management (SAM). The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) issued
guidance to federal agencies requiring
all prime recipients of federal grants to
register in SAM. SAM is the primary
vendor database for the Federal
Government to collect, validate, store,
and disseminate data from a secure
centralized system. SAM consolidated
the capabilities found in CCR and other
federal procurement systems into one
new system.
There is no charge to register in
SAM.gov. Registrations must be
completed on-line at https://
www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. The
applicant organization is responsible for
having a valid Dun and Bradstreet
(DUNS) number at the time of
registration. Organizations with an
active record in CCR have an active
record in SAM, but may need to validate
their information. For registration, go to
https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/
SAM/.
Application Process
Applicants may only submit one (1)
application, but may submit for up to
three (3) projects under each activity
(FP&S and R&D). Any applicant that
submits more than one (1) application
may have all applications for any
duplicated request(s) deemed ineligible.
Under the FP&S Activity, applicants
may apply under the following
categories:
• General Education/Awareness
• Fire & Arson Investigation
• Code Enforcement/Awareness
• National/State/Regional Programs and
Studies
Under the R&D Activity, applicants
may apply under the following
categories:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
•
•
•
•
Clinical Studies
Technology and Product Development
Database System Development
Dissemination and Implementation
Research
• Preliminary Studies
Prior to the start of the FY 2014 FP&S
Grant Program application period,
FEMA will provide applicants with
technical assistance tools (available at
the AFG Web site: www.fema.gov/
firegrants) and other online information
to help them prepare quality grant
applications. AFG will also staff a Help
Desk throughout the application period
to assist applicants with navigation
through the automated application as
well as assistance with any questions
they have. Applicants can reach the
AFG Help Desk through a toll-free
telephone number (1–866–274–0960) or
electronic mail (firegrants@dhs.gov).
Applicants are advised to access the
application electronically at https://
portal.fema.gov. The application also
will be accessible from the grants.gov
Web site (https://www.grants.gov). New
applicants are required to register and
establish a username and password for
secure access to their application.
Applicants that applied to any previous
AFG or SAFER funding opportunities
were required to use their previously
established usernames and passwords.
In completing an application under
this funding opportunity, applicants
will be asked to provide relevant
information on their organization’s
characteristics and existing capabilities.
Those applicants are asked to answer
questions about their grant request that
reflect the funding priorities, described
below. In addition, each applicant will
complete narratives for each project or
grant activity requested.
The following are the funding
priorities for each category under the
FP&S Activity:
• General Education/Awareness—
Under the General Education/
Awareness category there are two
funding priorities:
Æ The first priority will be given to
programs that target high risk
population to conduct both door-todoor smoke alarm installations and
provide home safety inspections
(including sprinkler awareness), as
part of a comprehensive home fire
safety campaign.
Æ The second priority will be given to
programs that include sprinkler
awareness that affect the entire
community, such as educating the
public about residential sprinklers,
promoting residential sprinklers,
and demonstrating working models
of residential sprinklers.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Code Enforcement/Awareness—
projects that focus on first time or
reinstatement of code adoption and
code enforcement.
• Fire & Arson Investigation—projects
that aim to aggressively investigate
every fire.
• National/State/Regional Programs
and Studies—projects that focus on
residential fire issues and/or
firefighter behavior and decisionmaking.
Under the R&D Activity, in order to
identify and address the most important
elements of firefighter safety, FEMA
looked to the fire service for its input
and recommendations. In June 2005, the
National Fallen Firefighters’ Foundation
(NFFF) hosted a working group to
facilitate the development of an agenda
for the nation’s fire service, and in
particular for firefighter safety. In May
2011, the NFFF again hosted a working
group to update the agenda with current
priorities. A copy of the research agenda
is available on the NFFF Web site at
https://www.everyonegoeshome.com/
symposium.html.
Projects that meet the intent of this
research agenda with respect to
firefighter health and safety, as
identified by the NFFF working group,
will be given consideration under the
R&D Activity. However, the applicant is
not limited to these specific projects. All
proposed projects, regardless of whether
they have been identified by this
working group, will be evaluated on
their relevance to firefighter health and
safety, and scientific rigor.
The electronic application process
will permit the applicant to enter and
save the application data. The system
does not permit the submission of
incomplete applications. Except for the
narrative textboxes, the application will
use a ‘‘point-and-click’’ selection
process or require the entry of data (e.g.,
name and address). Applicants will be
encouraged to read the FP&S Funding
Opportunity Announcement for more
details.
Criteria Development Process
Each year, DHS convenes a panel of
fire service professionals to develop the
funding priorities and other
implementation criteria for AFG. The
Criteria Development Panel is
comprised of representatives from nine
major fire service organizations who are
charged with making recommendations
to FEMA regarding the creation of new
funding priorities, the modification of
existing funding priorities, and the
development of criteria for awarding
grants. The nine major fire service
organizations represented on the panel
are:
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Notices
• Congressional Fire Services Institute
(CFSI)
• International Association of Arson
Investigators (IAAI)
• International Association of Fire
Chiefs (IAFC)
• International Association of Fire
Fighters (IAFF)
• International Society of Fire Service
Instructors (ISFSI)
• National Association of State Fire
Marshals (NASFM)
• National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA)
• National Volunteer Fire Council
(NVFC)
• North American Fire Training
Directors (NAFTD)
The FY 2014 criteria development
panel meeting occurred January 8–9,
2014. The content of the FY 2014 FP&S
Funding Opportunity Announcement
reflects the implementation of the
Criteria Development Panel’s
recommendations with respect to the
priorities, direction, and criteria for
awards. All of the funding priorities for
the FY 2014 FP&S Grant Program are
designed to address the following:
• First responder safety
• Enhancing national capabilities
• Risk
• Interoperability
Changes for FY 2014
FY 2014 FP&S Funding Opportunity
Announcement.
(1) The ‘‘Guidance and Application
Kit’’ has been reformatted to match the
DHS Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA) template.
(2) Sprinkler awareness was added as
a priority under the General Education/
Awareness category.
(3) The period of performance for
applicants under the FP&S Activity was
extended to up to 24 months.
Applicants will now have the option to
select either a 12 month period of
performance or 24 month period of
performance, based on the complexity
of the project.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Application Review Process and
Considerations
The program’s authorizing statute
requires that each year DHS publish in
the Federal Register a description of the
grant application process and the
criteria for grant awards. This
information is provided below.
DHS will review and evaluate all
FP&S applications submitted using the
funding priorities and evaluation
criteria described in this document,
which are based on recommendations
from the AFG Criteria Development
Panel.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
Peer Review Process
Technical Evaluation Process—Fire
Prevention and Safety Activity
All eligible applications will be
evaluated by a Technical Evaluation
Panel (TEP). The TEP is comprised of a
panel of Peer Reviewers. The TEP will
assess each application’s merits with
respect to the detail provided in the
Narrative Statement on the activity,
including the evaluation elements listed
in the Evaluation Criteria identified
above.
The panel of Peer Reviewers will
independently score each project within
the application, discuss the merits and/
or shortcomings of the application, and
document the findings. A consensus is
not required. The highest ranked
applications will receive further
technical review to assess strengths and
weaknesses, how readily weaknesses
may be resolved, and the likely impact
of the proposed activities on the safety
of the target audience.
Technical Evaluation Process—
Research and Development Activity
R&D applications will go through a
two-phase review process. First, all
applications will be reviewed by a panel
of fire service experts to assess
relevance, meaning the likely impact of
the proposed R&D application to enable
improvement in firefighter safety,
health, or wellness. They will also
assess the need for the research results
and the likelihood that the results
would be implemented by the fire
service in the U.S. Applications that are
deemed likely to be implemented to
enable improvement in firefighter
safety, health, or wellness will then
receive further consideration by a
science review panel. This panel will be
comprised of scientists and technology
experts who have expertise pertaining to
the subject matter of the proposal.
Reviewers will independently score
applications and, if necessary, discuss
the merits or shortcomings of the
application in order to reconcile any
major discrepancies identified by the
reviewers. A consensus is not required.
With input from these panels, for the
highest ranked applications, FEMA will
review each application’s strengths and
weaknesses, how best the strengths fit
the priorities of the FP&S Program, and
how readily the weaknesses may be
resolved to support likely impact of the
project to improve firefighter safety,
heath, or wellness.
Technical Review Process
Projects receiving the highest scores
then will undergo a technical review by
a subject matter specialist to assess the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15237
technical feasibility of the project and a
programmatic review to assess
eligibility and other factors.
After the completion of the technical
reviews, DHS will select a sufficient
number of awardees from this
application period to obligate all of the
available grant funding. It will evaluate
and act on applications within 90 days
following the close of the application
period. Award announcements will be
made on a rolling basis until all
available grant funds have been
committed. Awards will not be made in
any specified order. DHS will notify
unsuccessful applicants as soon as it is
feasible.
Evaluation Criteria for Projects—Fire
Prevention and Safety Activity
Funding decisions will be informed
by an assessment of how well the
application addresses the criteria and
considerations listed below.
Applications will be reviewed by the
TEP using weighted evaluation criteria
to score the project. These scores will
impact the ranking of a project for
funding.
The relative weight of the evaluation
criteria in the determination of the grant
award is listed below.
• Vulnerability Statement (20%): The
assessment of fire risk is essential in
the development of an effective
project goal, as well as meeting
FEMA’s goal to reduce risk by
conducting a risk analysis as a basis
for action. Vulnerability is a ‘‘weak
link’’ demonstrating high risk
behavior, living conditions or any
type of high risk situation or behavior.
The Vulnerability Statement should
include a description of the steps
taken to determine the vulnerability
(weak link) and identify the target
audience. The methodology for
determination of vulnerability (how
you found the weak link) should be
discussed in-depth in the
application’s Narrative Statement.
Æ The specific vulnerability (weak
link) that will be addressed with the
proposed project can be established
through a formal or informal risk
assessment. FEMA encourages the
use of local statistics, rather than
national statistics, when discussing
the vulnerability.
Æ The applicant should summarize
the vulnerability (weakness) the
project will address in a clear, tothe-point statement that addresses
who is at risk, what the risks are,
where the risks are, and how the
risks can be prevented.
Æ For the purpose of the FY2014
FP&S FOA, formal risk assessments
consist of the use of software
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15238
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Notices
programs or recognized expert
analysis that assess risk trends.
Æ Informal risk assessments could
include an in-house review of
available data (e.g., National Fire
Incident Reporting System) to
determine fire loss, burn injuries or
loss of life over a period of time,
and the factors that are the cause
and origin for each occurrence.
• Implementation Plan (20%): Projects
should provide details on the
implementation plan which
discusses the proposed project’s
goals and objectives. The following
information should be included to
support the implementation plan:
Æ Goals and objectives.
Æ Details regarding the methods and
specific steps that will be used to
achieve the goals and objectives.
Æ Timelines.
Æ Where applicable, examples of
marketing efforts to promote the
project, who will deliver the project
(e.g., effective partnerships), and
the manner in which materials or
deliverables will be distributed.
Æ Requests for props (i.e., tools used
in educational or awareness
demonstrations), including specific
goals, measurable results, and
details on the frequency for which
the prop will be utilized as part of
the implementation plan.
Applicants should include
information describing the efforts
that will be used to reach the high
risk audience and/or the number of
people reached through the
proposed project.
• Evaluation Plan (20%): Projects
should include an evaluation of
effectiveness and should identify
measurable goals. Applicants seeking
to carry out awareness and
educational projects, for example,
should identify how they intend to
determine that there has been an
increase in knowledge about fire
hazards, or measure a change in the
safety behaviors of the audience.
Applicants should demonstrate how
they will measure risk at the outset of
the project in comparison to how
much the risk decreased after the
project is finished. There are various
ways to measure the knowledge
gained including the use of surveys,
pre- and post-tests or documented
observations.
• Cost-Benefit (10%): Projects will be
evaluated based on how well the
applicant addresses the fire
prevention needs of the department or
organization in an economic and
efficient manner. It should show how
to maximize the level of funding that
goes directly into the delivery of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
•
•
•
•
project. The costs associated with the
project must also be reasonable for the
target audience that will be reached,
and a description of how the
anticipated benefit(s) of their projects
outweighs the cost(s) of the requested
item(s) should be included. Providing
justification for costs assists the
Technical Evaluation Panel with this
review.
Sustainability (15%): Each project
will also be evaluated to determine
whether the overall activity will be
sustained (continued) beyond the
grant performance period and
whether it has a greater potential for
long-term benefits. Examples of
sustainable projects can be shown
through the long-term benefits
derived from the delivery of the
project, the number of non-Federal
partners likely to continue the effort,
or the demonstrated long-term
commitment of the applicant.
Financial Need (10%): Applicants
should provide details on the need for
financial assistance to carry out the
proposed project(s). Included in the
description might be other
unsuccessful attempts to acquire
financial assistance or specific
examples of the applicant’s
operational budget.
Funding Priorities (5%): Applicants
will be evaluated on whether or not
the proposed project meets the stated
funding priority (listed below) for the
applicable category.
Æ General Education/Awareness
Priority: Comprehensive home fire
safety campaign with door-to-door
smoke alarm installations or
residential sprinkler awareness
projects/activities.
Æ Fire/Arson Investigation Priority:
Projects that aim to aggressively
investigate every fire.
Æ Code Enforcement/Awareness
Priority: Projects that focus on first
time or reinstatement of code
adoption and code enforcement.
Æ National/State/Regional Programs
and Studies Priority: Projects that
focus on residential fire issues, and/
or firefighter safety projects or
strategies that are designed to
measurably change firefighter
behavior and decision-making.
Experience and Expertise (additional
consideration): Applicants that
demonstrate their experience and
ability to conduct fire prevention and
safety activities, and to execute the
proposed or similar project(s), will
receive additional consideration.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Evaluation Criteria for Projects—
Firefighter Safety Research and
Development Activity
Funding decisions will be informed
by an assessment of how well the
application addresses the criteria and
considerations listed below.
All applications will reviewed by a
fire service expert panel using weighted
evaluation criteria, and those
applications deemed to be in the
‘‘competitive range’’ will then be
reviewed by a scientific peer review
panel evaluation using weighted
evaluation criteria to score the project.
Scientific evaluations will impact the
ranking of the project for funding.
In addition, other Science Panel
considerations are indicated in the list
below:
Fire Service Evaluation Criteria
• Purpose (25%): Applicants should
clearly identify the benefits of the
proposed research project to improve
firefighter safety, health, or wellness,
and identify specific gaps in
knowledge that will be addressed.
• Implementation by Fire Service
(25%): Applicants should discuss
how the outcomes/products of this
research, if successful, are likely to be
widely/nationally adopted and
accepted by the fire service as changes
that enhance firefighter safety, health,
or wellness.
• Potential Impact (15%): Applicants
should discuss the potential impact of
the research outcome/product on
firefighter safety by quantifying the
possible reduction in the number of
fatal or non-fatal injuries, or on
wellness by significantly improving
the overall health of firefighters.
• Barriers (15%): Applicants should
recognize that all research contains
some level of risk and that the
proposed outcomes may not be
realized. The applicant needs to
identify and discuss potential fire
service and other barriers to
successfully complete the study on
schedule, including contingencies
and strategies to deal with barriers if
they materialize. This may include
barriers that could inhibit the
proposed fire service participation in
the study or the adoption of
successful results by the fire service
when the project is completed.
• Partners (20%): Applicants should
recognize that participation of the fire
service as a partner in the research,
from development to dissemination,
is regarded as an essential part of all
projects. Applicants should describe
the fire service partners and
contractors that will support the
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
project to accomplish the objectives of
the study. The specific roles and
contributions of the partners should
be described. Partnerships may be
formed with local and regional fire
departments, and also with national
fire-related organizations. Letters of
support and letters of commitment to
actively participate in the project
should be included in the appendix of
the application. Generally,
participants of a diverse population,
including both career and volunteer
firefighters, are expected to facilitate
acceptance of results nationally. In
cases where this is not practical, due
to the nature of the study or other
limitations, these circumstances
should clearly be explained.
Science Panel Evaluation Criteria
• Project goals, objectives, and specific
aims (15%): Applicants should
address how the purpose, goals,
objectives, and aims of the proposal
will lead to results that will improve
firefighter safety, health, or wellness.
For multi-year projects, greater detail
should be given for the first year.
• Literature Review (10%): Applicants
should provide a literature review
that is relevant to the project’s goals,
objectives, and specific aims. The
citations should be placed in the text
of the narrative statement, with
references listed at the end of the
Narrative Statement (and not in the
Appendix) of the application. The
review should be in sufficient depth
to make it clear that the proposed
project is necessary, adds to an
existing body of knowledge, is
different from current and previous
studies, and offers a unique
contribution.
• Project Methods (20%): Applicants
should provide a description of how
the project will be carried out,
including demonstration of the
overall scientific and technical rigor
and merit of the project. This includes
the operations to accomplish the
purpose, goals and objectives, and the
specific aims of the project. Plans to
recruit and retain human subjects,
where applicable, should be
described. Where human subjects are
involved in the project, the applicant
should describe plans for submission
to the Institutional Review Board
(IRB) (for further guidance and
requirements, see Appendix A—
Application Guidelines and Program
Priorities, Section IX. Human Subjects
Research).
• Project Measurements (20%):
Applicants should provide evidence
of the technical rigor and merit of the
project, such as data pertaining to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Mar 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
validity, reliability, and sensitivity
(where established) of the facilities,
equipment, instruments, standards,
and procedures that will be used to
carry out the research. The applicant
should discuss the data to be
collected to evaluate the performance
methods, technologies, and products
proposed to enhance firefighter safety,
health, or wellness. The applicant
should demonstrate that the
measurement methods and equipment
selected for use are appropriate and
sufficient to successfully deliver the
proposed project objectives.
• Project Analysis (20%): The applicant
should indicate the planned approach
for analysis of the data obtained from
measurements, questionnaires, or
computations. The applicant should
specify within the plan what will be
analyzed, the statistical methods that
will be used, the sequence of steps,
and interactions as appropriate. It
should be clear that the Principal
Investigator (PI) and research team
have the expertise to perform the
planned analysis and defend the
results in a peer review process.
• Dissemination and Implementation
(15%): Applicants should indicate
dissemination plans for scientific
audiences (such as plans for
submissions to specific peer review
publications) and for firefighter
audiences (such as Web sites,
magazines, and conferences). Also,
assuming positive results, the
applicant should indicate future steps
that would support dissemination and
implementation throughout the fire
service, where applicable. These steps
are likely to be beyond the current
study, so those features of the
research activity that will facilitate
future dissemination and
implementation should be discussed.
All applicants should specify how the
results of the project, if successful,
might be disseminated and
implemented in the fire service to
improve firefighter safety, health, or
wellness. It is expected that
successful R&D Activity Projects may
give rise to future programs including
FP&S Activity Projects.
• Cost vs. Benefit (additional
consideration): Cost vs. benefit in this
evaluation element refers to the costs
of the grant for the research and
development project as it relates to
the benefits that are projected for
firefighters who would have improved
safety, health, or wellness. Applicants
should demonstrate a high benefit for
the cost incurred, and effective
utilization of federal funds for
research activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
15239
• Financial Need (additional
consideration): In the Applicant
Information section of the application,
applicants should provide details on
the need for federal financial
assistance to carry out the proposed
project(s). Applicants may include a
description of unsuccessful attempts
to acquire financial assistance.
Applicants should provide detail
about the organization’s operating
budget, including a high-level
breakdown of the budget; describe the
department’s inability to address
financial needs without federal
assistance; and discuss other actions
the department has taken to meet
their staffing needs (e.g., state
assistance programs, other grant
programs, etc.).
Other Selection Information
Awards will be made using the results
of peer-reviewed applications as the
primary basis for decisions, regardless
of activity. However, there are some
exceptions to strictly using the peer
review results. The applicant’s prior
AFG, Staffing for Adequate Fire and
Emergency Response (SAFER), and
FP&S grant management performance
will also be taken into consideration
when making recommendations for
award. All final funding determinations
will be made by the Administrator of
FEMA, or the Administrator’s delegate.
Fire departments and other eligible
applicants that have received funding
under the FP&S program in previous
years are eligible to apply for funding in
the current year. However, DHS may
take into account an applicant’s
performance on prior grants when
making funding decisions on current
applications.
Once every application in the
competitive range has been through the
technical evaluation phase, the
applications will be ranked according to
the average score awarded by the panel.
The ranking will be summarized in a
Technical Report prepared by the AFG
Program Office. A Grants Management
Specialist will contact the applicant to
discuss and/or negotiate the content of
the application and SAM.gov
registration before making final award
decisions.
Dated: March 3, 2015.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015–06547 Filed 3–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–12–P
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15234-15239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06547]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
[Docket ID FEMA-FEMA-2014-0035]
Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program; Fire Prevention and
Safety Grants
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of guidance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Notice provides guidelines that describe the application
process for grants and the criteria for awarding Fire Prevention and
Safety (FP&S) grants in the fiscal year (FY) 2014 Assistance to
Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program year. It explains the differences, if
any, between these guidelines and those recommended by representatives
of the Nation's fire service leadership during the annual Criteria
Development meeting, which was held October 27-28, 2014. The
application period for the FY 2014 FP&S Grant Program year will be held
March 16-April 17, 2015, and will be announced on the AFG Web site
(www.fema.gov/firegrants), www.grants.gov, and U.S. Fire Administration
Web site (www.usfa.fema.gov).
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2229.
DATES: Grant applications for the FP&S Grant Program will be accepted
electronically at https://portal.fema.gov, from March 16-April 17,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Assistance to Firefighters Grants Branch, Stop 3620, DHS/
FEMA, 800 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20472-3620.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Patterson, Chief, Assistance
to Firefighters Grants Branch, 1-866-274-0960.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the AFG Program is to enhance
the safety of the public and firefighters with respect to fire and
fire-related hazards. The FEMA Grant Programs Directorate administers
the FP&S Grant Program as part of the AFG Program.
FP&S Grants are offered to support projects in two activities:
1. Activities designed to reach high-risk target groups and
mitigate the incidence of death and injuries caused by fire and fire-
related hazards (``FP&S Activity'').
2. Projects aimed at improving firefighter safety, health and
wellness through research and development that reduces firefighter
fatalities and injuries (``R&D Activity'').
The grant program's authorizing statute requires that each year DHS
publish in the Federal Register the guidelines that describe the
application process and the criteria for grant awards. Approximately
1,200 applications for FP&S Grant Program funding are anticipated to be
submitted electronically, using the application submission form and
process available at the AFG e-Grant application portal: https://portal.fema.gov. Specific information about the submission of grant
applications can be found in the ``FY 2014 Fire Prevention and Safety
[[Page 15235]]
Program Funding Opportunity Announcement,'' which will be available for
download at www.fema.gov/firegrants and at www.regulations.gov under
Docket ID FEMA-2014-0035.
Appropriations
Congress appropriated $340,000,000 for AFG in FY 2014 pursuant to
the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2014, Public
Law 113-76. From this amount, $34,000,000 will be made available for
FP&S Grant awards, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 2229(h)(5), which states that
not less than 10 percent of available grant funds each year are awarded
under the FP&S Grant Program. Funds appropriated for all FY 2014 AFG
awards, pursuant to Public Law 113-76, will be available for obligation
and award until September 30, 2015.
From the approximately 1,200 applications that will be requesting
assistance, FEMA anticipates that it will award approximately 150 FP&S
Grants from available grant funding.
Background of the AFG Program
DHS awards grants on a competitive basis to the applicants that
best address the FP&S Grant Program's priorities and provide the most
compelling justification. Applications that best address the Program's
priorities will be reviewed by a panel composed of fire service
personnel.
Award Criteria
All applications for grants will be prepared and submitted through
the AFG e-Grant application portal (https://portal.fema.gov).
The FP&S Grant Program panels will review the applications and
score them using the following criteria areas:
Vulnerability
Implementation
Evaluation Plan
Cost Benefit
Sustainability
Financial Need
Funding Priorities
Experience and Expertise
The applications submitted under the R&D Activity will be reviewed
first by a panel of fire service members to identify those applications
most relevant to the fire service. The following evaluation criteria
will be used for this review:
Purpose
Potential Impact
Implementation by the fire service
Partners
Barriers
The applications that are determined most likely to be implemented
to enable improvement in firefighter safety, health, or wellness will
be deemed to be in the ``competitive range'' and will be forwarded to
the second level of application review, which is the scientific panel
review process. This panel will be comprised of scientists and
technology experts who have expertise pertaining to the subject matter
of the proposal.
The Scientific Technical Evaluation Panel for the R&D Activity will
review the application and evaluate it using the following criteria:
Project purpose(s), goals and objectives, and specific aims
Literature Review
Project Methods
Project Measurements
Project Analysis
Dissemination and Implementation
Cost vs. Benefit (additional consideration)
Financial Need (additional consideration)
Eligible Applicants
The following entities are eligible to apply directly to FEMA under
this solicitation:
1. Fire Prevention and Safety (FP&S) Activity: Eligible applicants
for this activity include fire departments, national, regional, state,
local, Native American tribal, and nonprofit organizations that are
recognized for their experience and expertise in fire prevention and
safety programs and activities. Both private and public non-profit
organizations are eligible to apply for funding in this activity. For-
profit organizations, federal agencies, and individuals are not
eligible to receive a FP&S Grant Award under the FP&S Activity.
2. Firefighter Safety Research and Development (R&D) Activity:
Eligible applicants for this activity include national, state, local,
Native American tribal, and nonprofit organizations, such as academic
(e.g., universities), public health, occupational health, and injury
prevention institutions. Both private and public non-profit
organizations are eligible to apply for funding in this activity.
The aforementioned entities are encouraged to apply, especially
those that are recognized for their experience and expertise in
firefighter safety, health, and wellness research and development
activities. Fire departments are not eligible to apply for funding in
the R&D activity. Additionally, for-profit organizations, federal
agencies, and individuals are not eligible to receive a grant award
under the R&D Activity.
Statutory Limits to Funding
Applications and awards are limited to a maximum federal share of
$1.5 million dollars, regardless of applicant type.
Cost Sharing
Grantees must share in the costs of the projects funded under this
grant program as required by 15 U.S.C. 2229(k)(1) and in accordance
with 44 CFR 13.24 and 2 CFR 215.23, but they are not required to have
the cost-share at the time of application nor at the time of award.
However, before a grant is awarded, FEMA will contact potential
awardees to determine whether the grantee has the funding in hand or if
the grantee has a viable plan to obtain the funding necessary to
fulfill the cost-sharing requirement.
In general, an eligible applicant seeking an FP&S grant to carry
out an activity shall agree to make available non-federal funds to
carry out such activity in an amount equal to, and not less than, five
percent of the grant awarded. Cash match and in-kind matches are both
allowable in the FP&S Grant Program. Cash (hard) matches include non-
federal cash spent for project-related costs. In-kind (soft) matches
include, but are not limited to, the valuation of in-kind services. In-
kind is the value of something received or provided that does not have
a cost associated with it. For example, where an in-kind match (other
than cash payments) is permitted, then the value of donated services
could be used to comply with the match requirement. Also, third party
in-kind contributions may count toward satisfying match requirements
provided the grantee receiving the contributions expends them as
allowable costs in compliance with provisions listed above.
Grantees under this grant program must also agree to a maintenance
of effort requirement as required by 15 U.S.C. 2229(k)(3) (referred to
as a ``maintenance of expenditure'' requirement in that statute). Per
this requirement, a grantee shall agree to maintain during the term of
the grant the grantee's aggregate expenditures relating to the
activities allowable under the FP&S Funding Opportunity Announcement at
not less than 80 percent (80%) of the average amount of such
expenditures in the two (2) fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in
which the grant amounts are received.
In cases of demonstrated economic hardship, and on the application
of the grantee, the Administrator of FEMA may waive or reduce certain
grantees' cost share or maintenance of
[[Page 15236]]
expenditure requirements. This policy applies to FP&S per Sec. 33 of
the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-498, as
amended) (15 U.S.C. 2229). For complete requirements concerning these
waivers, including a description of how a grantee may demonstrate
economic hardship and apply for a waiver, please refer to FEMA Policy
FP 207-088-01, dated April 8, 2014, at: https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1398109239435-ec23997d8351382710896fa77d02bc7d/AFG+Economic+/Hardship+Waiver+Policy.pdf. Per 15 U.S.C. 2229(k)(4)(C),
FP&S Grantees that are not fire departments are not eligible to receive
a waiver of their cost share or economic hardship requirements.
System for Award Management (SAM)
On July 29, 2010, the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) was
moved into the System for Award Management (SAM). The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) issued guidance to federal agencies
requiring all prime recipients of federal grants to register in SAM.
SAM is the primary vendor database for the Federal Government to
collect, validate, store, and disseminate data from a secure
centralized system. SAM consolidated the capabilities found in CCR and
other federal procurement systems into one new system.
There is no charge to register in SAM.gov. Registrations must be
completed on-line at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. The
applicant organization is responsible for having a valid Dun and
Bradstreet (DUNS) number at the time of registration. Organizations
with an active record in CCR have an active record in SAM, but may need
to validate their information. For registration, go to https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.
Application Process
Applicants may only submit one (1) application, but may submit for
up to three (3) projects under each activity (FP&S and R&D). Any
applicant that submits more than one (1) application may have all
applications for any duplicated request(s) deemed ineligible.
Under the FP&S Activity, applicants may apply under the following
categories:
General Education/Awareness
Fire & Arson Investigation
Code Enforcement/Awareness
National/State/Regional Programs and Studies
Under the R&D Activity, applicants may apply under the following
categories:
Clinical Studies
Technology and Product Development
Database System Development
Dissemination and Implementation Research
Preliminary Studies
Prior to the start of the FY 2014 FP&S Grant Program application
period, FEMA will provide applicants with technical assistance tools
(available at the AFG Web site: www.fema.gov/firegrants) and other
online information to help them prepare quality grant applications. AFG
will also staff a Help Desk throughout the application period to assist
applicants with navigation through the automated application as well as
assistance with any questions they have. Applicants can reach the AFG
Help Desk through a toll-free telephone number (1-866-274-0960) or
electronic mail (firegrants@dhs.gov).
Applicants are advised to access the application electronically at
https://portal.fema.gov. The application also will be accessible from
the grants.gov Web site (https://www.grants.gov). New applicants are
required to register and establish a username and password for secure
access to their application. Applicants that applied to any previous
AFG or SAFER funding opportunities were required to use their
previously established usernames and passwords.
In completing an application under this funding opportunity,
applicants will be asked to provide relevant information on their
organization's characteristics and existing capabilities. Those
applicants are asked to answer questions about their grant request that
reflect the funding priorities, described below. In addition, each
applicant will complete narratives for each project or grant activity
requested.
The following are the funding priorities for each category under
the FP&S Activity:
General Education/Awareness--Under the General Education/
Awareness category there are two funding priorities:
[cir] The first priority will be given to programs that target high
risk population to conduct both door-to-door smoke alarm installations
and provide home safety inspections (including sprinkler awareness), as
part of a comprehensive home fire safety campaign.
[cir] The second priority will be given to programs that include
sprinkler awareness that affect the entire community, such as educating
the public about residential sprinklers, promoting residential
sprinklers, and demonstrating working models of residential sprinklers.
Code Enforcement/Awareness--projects that focus on first time
or reinstatement of code adoption and code enforcement.
Fire & Arson Investigation--projects that aim to aggressively
investigate every fire.
National/State/Regional Programs and Studies--projects that
focus on residential fire issues and/or firefighter behavior and
decision-making.
Under the R&D Activity, in order to identify and address the most
important elements of firefighter safety, FEMA looked to the fire
service for its input and recommendations. In June 2005, the National
Fallen Firefighters' Foundation (NFFF) hosted a working group to
facilitate the development of an agenda for the nation's fire service,
and in particular for firefighter safety. In May 2011, the NFFF again
hosted a working group to update the agenda with current priorities. A
copy of the research agenda is available on the NFFF Web site at https://www.everyonegoeshome.com/symposium.html.
Projects that meet the intent of this research agenda with respect
to firefighter health and safety, as identified by the NFFF working
group, will be given consideration under the R&D Activity. However, the
applicant is not limited to these specific projects. All proposed
projects, regardless of whether they have been identified by this
working group, will be evaluated on their relevance to firefighter
health and safety, and scientific rigor.
The electronic application process will permit the applicant to
enter and save the application data. The system does not permit the
submission of incomplete applications. Except for the narrative
textboxes, the application will use a ``point-and-click'' selection
process or require the entry of data (e.g., name and address).
Applicants will be encouraged to read the FP&S Funding Opportunity
Announcement for more details.
Criteria Development Process
Each year, DHS convenes a panel of fire service professionals to
develop the funding priorities and other implementation criteria for
AFG. The Criteria Development Panel is comprised of representatives
from nine major fire service organizations who are charged with making
recommendations to FEMA regarding the creation of new funding
priorities, the modification of existing funding priorities, and the
development of criteria for awarding grants. The nine major fire
service organizations represented on the panel are:
[[Page 15237]]
Congressional Fire Services Institute (CFSI)
International Association of Arson Investigators (IAAI)
International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC)
International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF)
International Society of Fire Service Instructors (ISFSI)
National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM)
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC)
North American Fire Training Directors (NAFTD)
The FY 2014 criteria development panel meeting occurred January 8-
9, 2014. The content of the FY 2014 FP&S Funding Opportunity
Announcement reflects the implementation of the Criteria Development
Panel's recommendations with respect to the priorities, direction, and
criteria for awards. All of the funding priorities for the FY 2014 FP&S
Grant Program are designed to address the following:
First responder safety
Enhancing national capabilities
Risk
Interoperability
Changes for FY 2014
FY 2014 FP&S Funding Opportunity Announcement.
(1) The ``Guidance and Application Kit'' has been reformatted to
match the DHS Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) template.
(2) Sprinkler awareness was added as a priority under the General
Education/Awareness category.
(3) The period of performance for applicants under the FP&S
Activity was extended to up to 24 months. Applicants will now have the
option to select either a 12 month period of performance or 24 month
period of performance, based on the complexity of the project.
Application Review Process and Considerations
The program's authorizing statute requires that each year DHS
publish in the Federal Register a description of the grant application
process and the criteria for grant awards. This information is provided
below.
DHS will review and evaluate all FP&S applications submitted using
the funding priorities and evaluation criteria described in this
document, which are based on recommendations from the AFG Criteria
Development Panel.
Peer Review Process
Technical Evaluation Process--Fire Prevention and Safety Activity
All eligible applications will be evaluated by a Technical
Evaluation Panel (TEP). The TEP is comprised of a panel of Peer
Reviewers. The TEP will assess each application's merits with respect
to the detail provided in the Narrative Statement on the activity,
including the evaluation elements listed in the Evaluation Criteria
identified above.
The panel of Peer Reviewers will independently score each project
within the application, discuss the merits and/or shortcomings of the
application, and document the findings. A consensus is not required.
The highest ranked applications will receive further technical review
to assess strengths and weaknesses, how readily weaknesses may be
resolved, and the likely impact of the proposed activities on the
safety of the target audience.
Technical Evaluation Process--Research and Development Activity
R&D applications will go through a two-phase review process. First,
all applications will be reviewed by a panel of fire service experts to
assess relevance, meaning the likely impact of the proposed R&D
application to enable improvement in firefighter safety, health, or
wellness. They will also assess the need for the research results and
the likelihood that the results would be implemented by the fire
service in the U.S. Applications that are deemed likely to be
implemented to enable improvement in firefighter safety, health, or
wellness will then receive further consideration by a science review
panel. This panel will be comprised of scientists and technology
experts who have expertise pertaining to the subject matter of the
proposal.
Reviewers will independently score applications and, if necessary,
discuss the merits or shortcomings of the application in order to
reconcile any major discrepancies identified by the reviewers. A
consensus is not required.
With input from these panels, for the highest ranked applications,
FEMA will review each application's strengths and weaknesses, how best
the strengths fit the priorities of the FP&S Program, and how readily
the weaknesses may be resolved to support likely impact of the project
to improve firefighter safety, heath, or wellness.
Technical Review Process
Projects receiving the highest scores then will undergo a technical
review by a subject matter specialist to assess the technical
feasibility of the project and a programmatic review to assess
eligibility and other factors.
After the completion of the technical reviews, DHS will select a
sufficient number of awardees from this application period to obligate
all of the available grant funding. It will evaluate and act on
applications within 90 days following the close of the application
period. Award announcements will be made on a rolling basis until all
available grant funds have been committed. Awards will not be made in
any specified order. DHS will notify unsuccessful applicants as soon as
it is feasible.
Evaluation Criteria for Projects--Fire Prevention and Safety Activity
Funding decisions will be informed by an assessment of how well the
application addresses the criteria and considerations listed below.
Applications will be reviewed by the TEP using weighted evaluation
criteria to score the project. These scores will impact the ranking of
a project for funding.
The relative weight of the evaluation criteria in the determination
of the grant award is listed below.
Vulnerability Statement (20%): The assessment of fire risk is
essential in the development of an effective project goal, as well as
meeting FEMA's goal to reduce risk by conducting a risk analysis as a
basis for action. Vulnerability is a ``weak link'' demonstrating high
risk behavior, living conditions or any type of high risk situation or
behavior. The Vulnerability Statement should include a description of
the steps taken to determine the vulnerability (weak link) and identify
the target audience. The methodology for determination of vulnerability
(how you found the weak link) should be discussed in-depth in the
application's Narrative Statement.
[cir] The specific vulnerability (weak link) that will be addressed
with the proposed project can be established through a formal or
informal risk assessment. FEMA encourages the use of local statistics,
rather than national statistics, when discussing the vulnerability.
[cir] The applicant should summarize the vulnerability (weakness)
the project will address in a clear, to-the-point statement that
addresses who is at risk, what the risks are, where the risks are, and
how the risks can be prevented.
[cir] For the purpose of the FY2014 FP&S FOA, formal risk
assessments consist of the use of software
[[Page 15238]]
programs or recognized expert analysis that assess risk trends.
[cir] Informal risk assessments could include an in-house review of
available data (e.g., National Fire Incident Reporting System) to
determine fire loss, burn injuries or loss of life over a period of
time, and the factors that are the cause and origin for each
occurrence.
Implementation Plan (20%): Projects should provide details on
the implementation plan which discusses the proposed project's goals
and objectives. The following information should be included to support
the implementation plan:
[cir] Goals and objectives.
[cir] Details regarding the methods and specific steps that will be
used to achieve the goals and objectives.
[cir] Timelines.
[cir] Where applicable, examples of marketing efforts to promote
the project, who will deliver the project (e.g., effective
partnerships), and the manner in which materials or deliverables will
be distributed.
[cir] Requests for props (i.e., tools used in educational or
awareness demonstrations), including specific goals, measurable
results, and details on the frequency for which the prop will be
utilized as part of the implementation plan. Applicants should include
information describing the efforts that will be used to reach the high
risk audience and/or the number of people reached through the proposed
project.
Evaluation Plan (20%): Projects should include an evaluation
of effectiveness and should identify measurable goals. Applicants
seeking to carry out awareness and educational projects, for example,
should identify how they intend to determine that there has been an
increase in knowledge about fire hazards, or measure a change in the
safety behaviors of the audience. Applicants should demonstrate how
they will measure risk at the outset of the project in comparison to
how much the risk decreased after the project is finished. There are
various ways to measure the knowledge gained including the use of
surveys, pre- and post-tests or documented observations.
Cost-Benefit (10%): Projects will be evaluated based on how
well the applicant addresses the fire prevention needs of the
department or organization in an economic and efficient manner. It
should show how to maximize the level of funding that goes directly
into the delivery of the project. The costs associated with the project
must also be reasonable for the target audience that will be reached,
and a description of how the anticipated benefit(s) of their projects
outweighs the cost(s) of the requested item(s) should be included.
Providing justification for costs assists the Technical Evaluation
Panel with this review.
Sustainability (15%): Each project will also be evaluated to
determine whether the overall activity will be sustained (continued)
beyond the grant performance period and whether it has a greater
potential for long-term benefits. Examples of sustainable projects can
be shown through the long-term benefits derived from the delivery of
the project, the number of non-Federal partners likely to continue the
effort, or the demonstrated long-term commitment of the applicant.
Financial Need (10%): Applicants should provide details on the
need for financial assistance to carry out the proposed project(s).
Included in the description might be other unsuccessful attempts to
acquire financial assistance or specific examples of the applicant's
operational budget.
Funding Priorities (5%): Applicants will be evaluated on
whether or not the proposed project meets the stated funding priority
(listed below) for the applicable category.
[cir] General Education/Awareness Priority: Comprehensive home fire
safety campaign with door-to-door smoke alarm installations or
residential sprinkler awareness projects/activities.
[cir] Fire/Arson Investigation Priority: Projects that aim to
aggressively investigate every fire.
[cir] Code Enforcement/Awareness Priority: Projects that focus on
first time or reinstatement of code adoption and code enforcement.
[cir] National/State/Regional Programs and Studies Priority:
Projects that focus on residential fire issues, and/or firefighter
safety projects or strategies that are designed to measurably change
firefighter behavior and decision-making.
Experience and Expertise (additional consideration):
Applicants that demonstrate their experience and ability to conduct
fire prevention and safety activities, and to execute the proposed or
similar project(s), will receive additional consideration.
Evaluation Criteria for Projects--Firefighter Safety Research and
Development Activity
Funding decisions will be informed by an assessment of how well the
application addresses the criteria and considerations listed below.
All applications will reviewed by a fire service expert panel using
weighted evaluation criteria, and those applications deemed to be in
the ``competitive range'' will then be reviewed by a scientific peer
review panel evaluation using weighted evaluation criteria to score the
project. Scientific evaluations will impact the ranking of the project
for funding.
In addition, other Science Panel considerations are indicated in
the list below:
Fire Service Evaluation Criteria
Purpose (25%): Applicants should clearly identify the benefits
of the proposed research project to improve firefighter safety, health,
or wellness, and identify specific gaps in knowledge that will be
addressed.
Implementation by Fire Service (25%): Applicants should
discuss how the outcomes/products of this research, if successful, are
likely to be widely/nationally adopted and accepted by the fire service
as changes that enhance firefighter safety, health, or wellness.
Potential Impact (15%): Applicants should discuss the
potential impact of the research outcome/product on firefighter safety
by quantifying the possible reduction in the number of fatal or non-
fatal injuries, or on wellness by significantly improving the overall
health of firefighters.
Barriers (15%): Applicants should recognize that all research
contains some level of risk and that the proposed outcomes may not be
realized. The applicant needs to identify and discuss potential fire
service and other barriers to successfully complete the study on
schedule, including contingencies and strategies to deal with barriers
if they materialize. This may include barriers that could inhibit the
proposed fire service participation in the study or the adoption of
successful results by the fire service when the project is completed.
Partners (20%): Applicants should recognize that participation
of the fire service as a partner in the research, from development to
dissemination, is regarded as an essential part of all projects.
Applicants should describe the fire service partners and contractors
that will support the
[[Page 15239]]
project to accomplish the objectives of the study. The specific roles
and contributions of the partners should be described. Partnerships may
be formed with local and regional fire departments, and also with
national fire-related organizations. Letters of support and letters of
commitment to actively participate in the project should be included in
the appendix of the application. Generally, participants of a diverse
population, including both career and volunteer firefighters, are
expected to facilitate acceptance of results nationally. In cases where
this is not practical, due to the nature of the study or other
limitations, these circumstances should clearly be explained.
Science Panel Evaluation Criteria
Project goals, objectives, and specific aims (15%): Applicants
should address how the purpose, goals, objectives, and aims of the
proposal will lead to results that will improve firefighter safety,
health, or wellness. For multi-year projects, greater detail should be
given for the first year.
Literature Review (10%): Applicants should provide a
literature review that is relevant to the project's goals, objectives,
and specific aims. The citations should be placed in the text of the
narrative statement, with references listed at the end of the Narrative
Statement (and not in the Appendix) of the application. The review
should be in sufficient depth to make it clear that the proposed
project is necessary, adds to an existing body of knowledge, is
different from current and previous studies, and offers a unique
contribution.
Project Methods (20%): Applicants should provide a description
of how the project will be carried out, including demonstration of the
overall scientific and technical rigor and merit of the project. This
includes the operations to accomplish the purpose, goals and
objectives, and the specific aims of the project. Plans to recruit and
retain human subjects, where applicable, should be described. Where
human subjects are involved in the project, the applicant should
describe plans for submission to the Institutional Review Board (IRB)
(for further guidance and requirements, see Appendix A--Application
Guidelines and Program Priorities, Section IX. Human Subjects
Research).
Project Measurements (20%): Applicants should provide evidence
of the technical rigor and merit of the project, such as data
pertaining to validity, reliability, and sensitivity (where
established) of the facilities, equipment, instruments, standards, and
procedures that will be used to carry out the research. The applicant
should discuss the data to be collected to evaluate the performance
methods, technologies, and products proposed to enhance firefighter
safety, health, or wellness. The applicant should demonstrate that the
measurement methods and equipment selected for use are appropriate and
sufficient to successfully deliver the proposed project objectives.
Project Analysis (20%): The applicant should indicate the
planned approach for analysis of the data obtained from measurements,
questionnaires, or computations. The applicant should specify within
the plan what will be analyzed, the statistical methods that will be
used, the sequence of steps, and interactions as appropriate. It should
be clear that the Principal Investigator (PI) and research team have
the expertise to perform the planned analysis and defend the results in
a peer review process.
Dissemination and Implementation (15%): Applicants should
indicate dissemination plans for scientific audiences (such as plans
for submissions to specific peer review publications) and for
firefighter audiences (such as Web sites, magazines, and conferences).
Also, assuming positive results, the applicant should indicate future
steps that would support dissemination and implementation throughout
the fire service, where applicable. These steps are likely to be beyond
the current study, so those features of the research activity that will
facilitate future dissemination and implementation should be discussed.
All applicants should specify how the results of the project, if
successful, might be disseminated and implemented in the fire service
to improve firefighter safety, health, or wellness. It is expected that
successful R&D Activity Projects may give rise to future programs
including FP&S Activity Projects.
Cost vs. Benefit (additional consideration): Cost vs. benefit
in this evaluation element refers to the costs of the grant for the
research and development project as it relates to the benefits that are
projected for firefighters who would have improved safety, health, or
wellness. Applicants should demonstrate a high benefit for the cost
incurred, and effective utilization of federal funds for research
activities.
Financial Need (additional consideration): In the Applicant
Information section of the application, applicants should provide
details on the need for federal financial assistance to carry out the
proposed project(s). Applicants may include a description of
unsuccessful attempts to acquire financial assistance. Applicants
should provide detail about the organization's operating budget,
including a high-level breakdown of the budget; describe the
department's inability to address financial needs without federal
assistance; and discuss other actions the department has taken to meet
their staffing needs (e.g., state assistance programs, other grant
programs, etc.).
Other Selection Information
Awards will be made using the results of peer-reviewed applications
as the primary basis for decisions, regardless of activity. However,
there are some exceptions to strictly using the peer review results.
The applicant's prior AFG, Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency
Response (SAFER), and FP&S grant management performance will also be
taken into consideration when making recommendations for award. All
final funding determinations will be made by the Administrator of FEMA,
or the Administrator's delegate.
Fire departments and other eligible applicants that have received
funding under the FP&S program in previous years are eligible to apply
for funding in the current year. However, DHS may take into account an
applicant's performance on prior grants when making funding decisions
on current applications.
Once every application in the competitive range has been through
the technical evaluation phase, the applications will be ranked
according to the average score awarded by the panel.
The ranking will be summarized in a Technical Report prepared by
the AFG Program Office. A Grants Management Specialist will contact the
applicant to discuss and/or negotiate the content of the application
and SAM.gov registration before making final award decisions.
Dated: March 3, 2015.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-06547 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-12-P