Patent Reexaminations, 14941-14943 [2015-06461]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones; Whereas, the World Trade Center Savannah, LLC, grantee of FTZ 104, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B–9–2014, docketed 02– 04–2014) for authority to expand the service area of the zone to include the Counties of Burke, Candler, Emanuel, Jefferson, Jenkins, Johnson, Laurens, Montgomery, Tattnall, Telfair, Toombs, Treutlen, Washington and Wheeler, as described in the application, adjacent to the Savannah Customs and Border Protection port of entry; Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (79 FR 7642–7643, 02–10– 2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report (including addendum), and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied with regard to expanding the service area of FTZ 104 to include Candler, Emanuel, Jenkins, Tattnall, Toombs, and Treutlen Counties, Georgia. Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to reorganize FTZ 104 to expand the service area under the ASF is approved with regard to the inclusion of Candler, Emanuel, Jenkins, Tattnall, Toombs, and Treutlen Counties, Georgia, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone. Signed at Washington, DC, this day of March 12, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–06470 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Reexaminations United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:14 Mar 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed and/ or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 19, 2015. ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: • Email: InformationCollection@ uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0064 Patent Reexaminations’’ in the subject line of the message. • Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director, Office of the Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313– 1450. • Federal Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information should be directed to Raul Tamayo, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by telephone at 571–272–7728; or by email to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with ‘‘Paperwork’’ in the subject line. Additional information about this collection is also available at https:// www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information Collection Review.’’ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is required by 35 U.S.C. 131 and 151 to examine applications and, when appropriate, allow applications and issue them as patents. Chapter 30 of Title 35 U.S.C. provides that any person at any time may file a request for reexamination by the USPTO of any claim of a patent on the basis of prior art patents or printed publications. Once initiated, the reexamination proceedings under Chapter 30 are substantially ex parte and do not permit input from third parties. The rules outlining ex parte reexaminations are found at 37 CFR 1.510–1.570. 35 U.S.C. 257 permits a patent owner to request supplemental examination of a patent by the USPTO to consider, reconsider, or correct information believed to be relevant to the patent. The rules outlining supplemental PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14941 examination are found at 37 CFR 1.601– 1.625. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act terminated inter partes reexamination effective September 16, 2012. However, inter partes reexamination proceedings based on inter partes reexamination requests filed before September 16, 2012, continue to be prosecuted. Therefore, this collection continues to include items related to the prosecution of inter partes reexamination proceedings. The rules outlining inter partes reexaminations are found at 37 CFR 1.903–1.931. Thus, the items included in this collection cover (i) requests for ex parte reexamination, (ii) requests for supplemental examination, and (iii) information that may be submitted by patent owners and third party requesters in relation to the prosecution of an ex parte or inter partes reexamination proceeding. It should be noted that the Requests for Ex Parte Reexamination and Supplemental Examination are distinct collections from the Request for Ex Parte Reexamination and Supplemental Examination Transmittal Forms, respectively. Whereas the transmittal forms are used by a requester (patent owner or third party) as a checklist to ensure compliance with the requirements of the statutes and rules for ex parte reexaminations and supplemental examinations, the requests themselves represent the substantive analysis undertaken by requesters of ex parte reexamination and supplemental examination. The public uses this information collection to request ex parte reexamination and supplemental examination, to prosecute reexamination proceedings, and to ensure that the associated documentation is submitted to the USPTO. II. Method of Collection By mail, facsimile, hand delivery, or electronically to the USPTO. III. Data OMB Number: 0651–0064. Form Number(s): PTO/SB/57 and PTO/SB/59. Type of Review: Renewal of an existing collection. Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other forprofits; and not-for-profit institutions. Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,170 responses per year. Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take the public from 0.30 hours (18 minutes) to 55 hours to gather the necessary information, prepare the appropriate E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1 14942 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices form or other documents, and submit the information to the USPTO. The time per response, estimated annual responses, and estimated annual hour burden associated with each instrument in this information collection is shown in the table below. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 95,290 hours. Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Hourly): $37,067,810 per year. The USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be prepared by attorneys. Using the professional rate of Information collection instrument 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 11 ...................... 12 ...................... 13 ...................... Total .......... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Estimated annual responses (b) Estimated annual burden hours Rate ($/hr) Total cost (a) × (b) = (c) (c) × (d) = (e) Request for Supplemental Examination Transmittal Form (PTO/ SB/59). Request for Supplemental Examination. Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Transmittal Form (PTO/SB/ 57). Request for Ex Parte Reexamination. Petition in a Reexamination Proceeding (except for those specifically enumerated in 37 CFR 1.550(i) and 1.937(d)). Patent Owner’s 37 CFR 1.530 Statement. Third Party Requester’s 37 CFR 1.535 Reply. Amendment in Ex Parte or Inter Partes Reexamination. Third Party Requester’s 37 CFR 1.947 Comments in Inter Partes Reexamination. Response to Final Rejection in Ex Parte Reexamination. Patent Owner’s 37 CFR 1.951 Response in Inter Partes Reexamination. Third Party Requester’s 37 CFR 1.951 Comments in Inter Partes Reexamination. Petition to Request Extension of Time in Ex Parte or Inter Partes Reexamination. 18 minutes ..... 50 15 $389.00 $5,835 25 hours ......... 50 1,250 389.00 486,250 18 minutes ..... 450 135 389.00 52,515 55 hours ......... 450 24,750 389.00 9,627,750 23 hours ......... 1,250 28,750 389.00 11,183,750 8 hours ........... 160 1,280 389.00 497,920 8 hours ........... 50 400 389.00 155,600 33 hours ......... 700 23,100 389.00 8,985,900 41 hours ......... 10 410 389.00 159,490 17 hours ......... 400 6,800 389.00 2,645,200 41 hours ......... 100 4,100 389.00 1,594,900 41 hours ......... 100 4,100 389.00 1,594,900 30 minutes ..... 400 200 389.00 77,800 ....................................................... ........................ 4,170 95,290 ........................ 37,067,810 Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Non-Hourly): $929.80 per year. There are no capital start-up, recordkeeping, or maintenance costs associated with this information collection. However, this collection does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of postage costs. Postage The USPTO expects that approximately 95 percent of the responses in this collection will be submitted electronically. Of the remaining 5 percent, the vast majority— 98 percent—will be submitted by mail, for a total of 204 mailed submissions. The documentation for requests for supplemental examination and requests for ex parte reexamination will typically be mailed to the USPTO with the appropriate transmittal form, reducing VerDate Sep<11>2014 Estimated time for response (a) IC No. $389 per hour for attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the respondent cost burden for this collection will be approximately $37,067,810 per year. 20:14 Mar 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 the number of unique mailings to 180. The USPTO estimates that the average postage cost for a mailed submission will be $0.49 cents for Petitions to Request Extension of Time and $5.75 for all other mailed submissions. Therefore, the USPTO estimates a total postage cost of approximately $929.80 per year. The total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in the form of postage costs is approximately $929.80 per year. Filing Fees The fees in 0651–0064 were moved into collection 0651–0072 (America Invents Act Section 10 Patent Fee Adjustments). As a result, this collection no longer includes any filing or processing fees. PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1 14943 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they will also become a matter of public record. Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3874 or (202) 482– 5973, respectively. Dated: March 13, 2015. Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer. On the same day the Department initiated this CVD investigation, the Department also initiated a CVD investigation of welded line pipe from the Republic of Korea (Korea) and AD investigations of welded line pipe from Korea and Turkey.1 The CVD and AD investigations cover the same merchandise. On February 27, 2015, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act), the petitioners 2 requested alignment of the final CVD determination with the final AD determination of welded line pipe from Turkey. Therefore, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4), we are aligning the final CVD determination with the final AD determination. Consequently, the final CVD determination will be issued on the same date as the final AD determination, which is currently scheduled to be issued no later than July 28, 2015, unless postponed. [FR Doc. 2015–06461 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–16–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–489–823] Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Determination Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of welded line pipe from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey). The period of investigation is January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES: Effective March 20, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of AGENCY: Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty (CVD) Determination With Final Antidumping Duty (AD) Determination Scope of the Investigation The scope of the investigation covers welded line pipe, which is carbon and alloy steel pipe of a kind used for oil or gas pipelines, not more than 24 inches in nominal outside diameter. For a complete description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix I. Scope Comments Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. For discussion of those comments, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3 Methodology The Department is conducting this CVD investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy (i.e., a financial contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient) and that the subsidy is specific.4 For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).5 ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Determination and Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 703(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, we calculated a CVD rate for each individuallyinvestigated producer/exporter of the subject merchandise. For companies not individually investigated, we have calculated an ‘‘all others’’ rate as described below. We preliminarily determine the countervailable subsidy rates to be: Subsidy rate (percent) Company mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Borusan Istikbal Ticaret, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Borusan Mannesmann Boru Yatirim Holding A.S., and Borusan Holding A.S ................................................................................................................................................................ Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Tosyali Demir Celik Sanayi A.S., Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., Tosyali Elektrik Enerjisi Toptan ¸ Satis Ith. Ihr. A.S., and Tosyali Holding A.S.6 ................................................................................................................................. 1 See Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations, 79 FR 67419 (November 13, 2014) (Initiation Notice). See also Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Less-Than-FairValue Investigations, 79 FR 68213 (November 14, 2014). 2 The petitioners in this investigation are American Cast Iron Pipe Company, Energex (a division of JMC Steel Group), Maverick Tube Corporation, Northwest Pipe Company, Stupp Corporation (a division of Stupp Bros., Inc.), Tex- VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:14 Mar 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 Tube Company, TMK IPSCO, and Welspun Tubular LLC USA. 3 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Affirmative Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Turkey,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 8.85 3.76 of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. 5 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The Web site location was changed from https:// iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).’’ E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM 20MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14941-14943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

United States Patent and Trademark Office


Patent Reexaminations

AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on 
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 19, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by any of the following 
methods:
     Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0064 Patent Reexaminations'' in the subject line of the message.
     Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director, 
Office of the Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and 
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
should be directed to Raul Tamayo, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of 
Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office, 
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7728; 
or by email to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with ``Paperwork'' in the subject 
line. Additional information about this collection is also available at 
https://www.reginfo.gov under ``Information Collection Review.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Abstract

    The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is required 
by 35 U.S.C. 131 and 151 to examine applications and, when appropriate, 
allow applications and issue them as patents. Chapter 30 of Title 35 
U.S.C. provides that any person at any time may file a request for 
reexamination by the USPTO of any claim of a patent on the basis of 
prior art patents or printed publications. Once initiated, the 
reexamination proceedings under Chapter 30 are substantially ex parte 
and do not permit input from third parties. The rules outlining ex 
parte reexaminations are found at 37 CFR 1.510-1.570.
    35 U.S.C. 257 permits a patent owner to request supplemental 
examination of a patent by the USPTO to consider, reconsider, or 
correct information believed to be relevant to the patent. The rules 
outlining supplemental examination are found at 37 CFR 1.601-1.625.
    The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act terminated inter partes 
reexamination effective September 16, 2012. However, inter partes 
reexamination proceedings based on inter partes reexamination requests 
filed before September 16, 2012, continue to be prosecuted. Therefore, 
this collection continues to include items related to the prosecution 
of inter partes reexamination proceedings. The rules outlining inter 
partes reexaminations are found at 37 CFR 1.903-1.931.
    Thus, the items included in this collection cover (i) requests for 
ex parte reexamination, (ii) requests for supplemental examination, and 
(iii) information that may be submitted by patent owners and third 
party requesters in relation to the prosecution of an ex parte or inter 
partes reexamination proceeding. It should be noted that the Requests 
for Ex Parte Reexamination and Supplemental Examination are distinct 
collections from the Request for Ex Parte Reexamination and 
Supplemental Examination Transmittal Forms, respectively. Whereas the 
transmittal forms are used by a requester (patent owner or third party) 
as a checklist to ensure compliance with the requirements of the 
statutes and rules for ex parte reexaminations and supplemental 
examinations, the requests themselves represent the substantive 
analysis undertaken by requesters of ex parte reexamination and 
supplemental examination.
    The public uses this information collection to request ex parte 
reexamination and supplemental examination, to prosecute reexamination 
proceedings, and to ensure that the associated documentation is 
submitted to the USPTO.

II. Method of Collection

    By mail, facsimile, hand delivery, or electronically to the USPTO.

III. Data

    OMB Number: 0651-0064.
    Form Number(s): PTO/SB/57 and PTO/SB/59.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an existing collection.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other 
for-profits; and not-for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,170 responses per year.
    Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take 
the public from 0.30 hours (18 minutes) to 55 hours to gather the 
necessary information, prepare the appropriate

[[Page 14942]]

form or other documents, and submit the information to the USPTO. The 
time per response, estimated annual responses, and estimated annual 
hour burden associated with each instrument in this information 
collection is shown in the table below.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 95,290 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Hourly): $37,067,810 per year. 
The USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be 
prepared by attorneys. Using the professional rate of $389 per hour for 
attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the respondent 
cost burden for this collection will be approximately $37,067,810 per 
year.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                         Estimated
            IC No.              Information collection       Estimated  time for          annual      Estimated annual    Rate ($/hr)      Total cost
                                      instrument                   response              responses      burden hours
                                                         (a)........................             (b)                       (a) x (b) =   (c) x (d) = (e)
                                                                                                                                   (c)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................  Request for Supplemental  18 minutes.................              50                15         $389.00            $5,835
                                Examination Transmittal
                                Form (PTO/SB/59).
2............................  Request for Supplemental  25 hours...................              50             1,250          389.00           486,250
                                Examination.
3............................  Request for Ex Parte      18 minutes.................             450               135          389.00            52,515
                                Reexamination
                                Transmittal Form (PTO/
                                SB/57).
4............................  Request for Ex Parte      55 hours...................             450            24,750          389.00         9,627,750
                                Reexamination.
5............................  Petition in a             23 hours...................           1,250            28,750          389.00        11,183,750
                                Reexamination
                                Proceeding (except for
                                those specifically
                                enumerated in 37 CFR
                                1.550(i) and 1.937(d)).
6............................  Patent Owner's 37 CFR     8 hours....................             160             1,280          389.00           497,920
                                1.530 Statement.
7............................  Third Party Requester's   8 hours....................              50               400          389.00           155,600
                                37 CFR 1.535 Reply.
8............................  Amendment in Ex Parte or  33 hours...................             700            23,100          389.00         8,985,900
                                Inter Partes
                                Reexamination.
9............................  Third Party Requester's   41 hours...................              10               410          389.00           159,490
                                37 CFR 1.947 Comments
                                in Inter Partes
                                Reexamination.
10...........................  Response to Final         17 hours...................             400             6,800          389.00         2,645,200
                                Rejection in Ex Parte
                                Reexamination.
11...........................  Patent Owner's 37 CFR     41 hours...................             100             4,100          389.00         1,594,900
                                1.951 Response in Inter
                                Partes Reexamination.
12...........................  Third Party Requester's   41 hours...................             100             4,100          389.00         1,594,900
                                37 CFR 1.951 Comments
                                in Inter Partes
                                Reexamination.
13...........................  Petition to Request       30 minutes.................             400               200          389.00            77,800
                                Extension of Time in Ex
                                Parte or Inter Partes
                                Reexamination.
                                                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total....................  ........................  ...........................           4,170            95,290  ..............        37,067,810
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Non-Hourly): $929.80 per year. 
There are no capital start-up, recordkeeping, or maintenance costs 
associated with this information collection. However, this collection 
does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of postage costs.

Postage

    The USPTO expects that approximately 95 percent of the responses in 
this collection will be submitted electronically. Of the remaining 5 
percent, the vast majority--98 percent--will be submitted by mail, for 
a total of 204 mailed submissions. The documentation for requests for 
supplemental examination and requests for ex parte reexamination will 
typically be mailed to the USPTO with the appropriate transmittal form, 
reducing the number of unique mailings to 180. The USPTO estimates that 
the average postage cost for a mailed submission will be $0.49 cents 
for Petitions to Request Extension of Time and $5.75 for all other 
mailed submissions. Therefore, the USPTO estimates a total postage cost 
of approximately $929.80 per year.
    The total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in 
the form of postage costs is approximately $929.80 per year.

Filing Fees

    The fees in 0651-0064 were moved into collection 0651-0072 (America 
Invents Act Section 10 Patent Fee Adjustments). As a result, this 
collection no longer includes any filing or processing fees.

IV. Request for Comments

    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden 
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information, 
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information

[[Page 14943]]

technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or 
included in the request for OMB approval of this information 
collection; they will also become a matter of public record.

    Dated: March 13, 2015.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director, USPTO, Office of the Chief 
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-06461 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.