Patent Reexaminations, 14941-14943 [2015-06461]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) (15
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the
establishment or reorganization of
zones;
Whereas, the World Trade Center
Savannah, LLC, grantee of FTZ 104,
submitted an application to the Board
(FTZ Docket B–9–2014, docketed 02–
04–2014) for authority to expand the
service area of the zone to include the
Counties of Burke, Candler, Emanuel,
Jefferson, Jenkins, Johnson, Laurens,
Montgomery, Tattnall, Telfair, Toombs,
Treutlen, Washington and Wheeler, as
described in the application, adjacent to
the Savannah Customs and Border
Protection port of entry;
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (79 FR 7642–7643, 02–10–
2014) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report (including
addendum), and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied with
regard to expanding the service area of
FTZ 104 to include Candler, Emanuel,
Jenkins, Tattnall, Toombs, and Treutlen
Counties, Georgia.
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 104
to expand the service area under the
ASF is approved with regard to the
inclusion of Candler, Emanuel, Jenkins,
Tattnall, Toombs, and Treutlen
Counties, Georgia, subject to the FTZ
Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.13, and to the
Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation
limit for the zone.
Signed at Washington, DC, this day of
March 12, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–06470 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
Patent Reexaminations
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment
request.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on proposed and/
or continuing information collections,
as required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0064 Patent
Reexaminations’’ in the subject line of
the message.
• Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records
Management Division Director, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo,
Senior Legal Advisor, Office of Patent
Legal Administration, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–7728; or by email
to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with
‘‘Paperwork’’ in the subject line.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is required
by 35 U.S.C. 131 and 151 to examine
applications and, when appropriate,
allow applications and issue them as
patents. Chapter 30 of Title 35 U.S.C.
provides that any person at any time
may file a request for reexamination by
the USPTO of any claim of a patent on
the basis of prior art patents or printed
publications. Once initiated, the
reexamination proceedings under
Chapter 30 are substantially ex parte
and do not permit input from third
parties. The rules outlining ex parte
reexaminations are found at 37 CFR
1.510–1.570.
35 U.S.C. 257 permits a patent owner
to request supplemental examination of
a patent by the USPTO to consider,
reconsider, or correct information
believed to be relevant to the patent.
The rules outlining supplemental
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14941
examination are found at 37 CFR 1.601–
1.625.
The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
terminated inter partes reexamination
effective September 16, 2012. However,
inter partes reexamination proceedings
based on inter partes reexamination
requests filed before September 16,
2012, continue to be prosecuted.
Therefore, this collection continues to
include items related to the prosecution
of inter partes reexamination
proceedings. The rules outlining inter
partes reexaminations are found at 37
CFR 1.903–1.931.
Thus, the items included in this
collection cover (i) requests for ex parte
reexamination, (ii) requests for
supplemental examination, and (iii)
information that may be submitted by
patent owners and third party requesters
in relation to the prosecution of an ex
parte or inter partes reexamination
proceeding. It should be noted that the
Requests for Ex Parte Reexamination
and Supplemental Examination are
distinct collections from the Request for
Ex Parte Reexamination and
Supplemental Examination Transmittal
Forms, respectively. Whereas the
transmittal forms are used by a requester
(patent owner or third party) as a
checklist to ensure compliance with the
requirements of the statutes and rules
for ex parte reexaminations and
supplemental examinations, the
requests themselves represent the
substantive analysis undertaken by
requesters of ex parte reexamination
and supplemental examination.
The public uses this information
collection to request ex parte
reexamination and supplemental
examination, to prosecute
reexamination proceedings, and to
ensure that the associated
documentation is submitted to the
USPTO.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, hand delivery, or
electronically to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0064.
Form Number(s): PTO/SB/57 and
PTO/SB/59.
Type of Review: Renewal of an
existing collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; businesses or other forprofits; and not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
4,170 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public from 0.30 hours (18 minutes) to
55 hours to gather the necessary
information, prepare the appropriate
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
14942
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
form or other documents, and submit
the information to the USPTO. The time
per response, estimated annual
responses, and estimated annual hour
burden associated with each instrument
in this information collection is shown
in the table below.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
95,290 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden
(Hourly): $37,067,810 per year. The
USPTO expects that the information in
this collection will be prepared by
attorneys. Using the professional rate of
Information collection instrument
1 ........................
2 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
11 ......................
12 ......................
13 ......................
Total ..........
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Estimated
annual
responses
(b)
Estimated annual
burden hours
Rate
($/hr)
Total cost
(a) × (b) = (c)
(c) × (d) = (e)
Request for Supplemental Examination Transmittal Form (PTO/
SB/59).
Request for Supplemental Examination.
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Transmittal Form (PTO/SB/
57).
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination.
Petition in a Reexamination Proceeding (except for those specifically enumerated in 37 CFR
1.550(i) and 1.937(d)).
Patent Owner’s 37 CFR 1.530
Statement.
Third Party Requester’s 37 CFR
1.535 Reply.
Amendment in Ex Parte or Inter
Partes Reexamination.
Third Party Requester’s 37 CFR
1.947 Comments in Inter Partes
Reexamination.
Response to Final Rejection in Ex
Parte Reexamination.
Patent Owner’s 37 CFR 1.951
Response in Inter Partes Reexamination.
Third Party Requester’s 37 CFR
1.951 Comments in Inter Partes
Reexamination.
Petition to Request Extension of
Time in Ex Parte or Inter Partes
Reexamination.
18 minutes .....
50
15
$389.00
$5,835
25 hours .........
50
1,250
389.00
486,250
18 minutes .....
450
135
389.00
52,515
55 hours .........
450
24,750
389.00
9,627,750
23 hours .........
1,250
28,750
389.00
11,183,750
8 hours ...........
160
1,280
389.00
497,920
8 hours ...........
50
400
389.00
155,600
33 hours .........
700
23,100
389.00
8,985,900
41 hours .........
10
410
389.00
159,490
17 hours .........
400
6,800
389.00
2,645,200
41 hours .........
100
4,100
389.00
1,594,900
41 hours .........
100
4,100
389.00
1,594,900
30 minutes .....
400
200
389.00
77,800
.......................................................
........................
4,170
95,290
........................
37,067,810
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden
(Non-Hourly): $929.80 per year. There
are no capital start-up, recordkeeping, or
maintenance costs associated with this
information collection. However, this
collection does have annual (non-hour)
costs in the form of postage costs.
Postage
The USPTO expects that
approximately 95 percent of the
responses in this collection will be
submitted electronically. Of the
remaining 5 percent, the vast majority—
98 percent—will be submitted by mail,
for a total of 204 mailed submissions.
The documentation for requests for
supplemental examination and requests
for ex parte reexamination will typically
be mailed to the USPTO with the
appropriate transmittal form, reducing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Estimated
time for
response
(a)
IC No.
$389 per hour for attorneys in private
firms, the USPTO estimates that the
respondent cost burden for this
collection will be approximately
$37,067,810 per year.
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
the number of unique mailings to 180.
The USPTO estimates that the average
postage cost for a mailed submission
will be $0.49 cents for Petitions to
Request Extension of Time and $5.75 for
all other mailed submissions. Therefore,
the USPTO estimates a total postage cost
of approximately $929.80 per year.
The total non-hour respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
postage costs is approximately $929.80
per year.
Filing Fees
The fees in 0651–0064 were moved
into collection 0651–0072 (America
Invents Act Section 10 Patent Fee
Adjustments). As a result, this
collection no longer includes any filing
or processing fees.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
14943
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they will also become a matter of public
record.
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3874 or (202) 482–
5973, respectively.
Dated: March 13, 2015.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director,
USPTO, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
On the same day the Department
initiated this CVD investigation, the
Department also initiated a CVD
investigation of welded line pipe from
the Republic of Korea (Korea) and AD
investigations of welded line pipe from
Korea and Turkey.1 The CVD and AD
investigations cover the same
merchandise. On February 27, 2015, in
accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act), the
petitioners 2 requested alignment of the
final CVD determination with the final
AD determination of welded line pipe
from Turkey. Therefore, in accordance
with section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(b)(4), we are aligning the
final CVD determination with the final
AD determination. Consequently, the
final CVD determination will be issued
on the same date as the final AD
determination, which is currently
scheduled to be issued no later than July
28, 2015, unless postponed.
[FR Doc. 2015–06461 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–823]
Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of
Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination and
Alignment of Final Determination With
Final Antidumping Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) preliminarily
determines that countervailable
subsidies are being provided to
producers and exporters of welded line
pipe from the Republic of Turkey
(Turkey). The period of investigation is
January 1, 2013, through December 31,
2013. Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective March 20, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure,
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
AGENCY:
Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty
(CVD) Determination With Final
Antidumping Duty (AD) Determination
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of the investigation covers
welded line pipe, which is carbon and
alloy steel pipe of a kind used for oil or
gas pipelines, not more than 24 inches
in nominal outside diameter. For a
complete description of the scope of the
investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
Certain interested parties commented
on the scope of the investigation as it
appeared in the Initiation Notice. For
discussion of those comments, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
CVD investigation in accordance with
section 701 of the Act. For each of the
subsidy programs found
countervailable, we preliminarily
determine that there is a subsidy (i.e., a
financial contribution by an ‘‘authority’’
that gives rise to a benefit to the
recipient) and that the subsidy is
specific.4 For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
preliminary conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).5
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Preliminary Determination and
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section
703(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, we calculated
a CVD rate for each individuallyinvestigated producer/exporter of the
subject merchandise. For companies not
individually investigated, we have
calculated an ‘‘all others’’ rate as
described below. We preliminarily
determine the countervailable subsidy
rates to be:
Subsidy rate
(percent)
Company
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Borusan Istikbal Ticaret, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Borusan Mannesmann Boru Yatirim Holding A.S.,
and Borusan Holding A.S ................................................................................................................................................................
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Tosyali Demir Celik Sanayi A.S., Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., Tosyali Elektrik Enerjisi Toptan
¸
Satis Ith. Ihr. A.S., and Tosyali Holding A.S.6 .................................................................................................................................
1 See Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of
Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigations, 79 FR 67419
(November 13, 2014) (Initiation Notice). See also
Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea and
the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Less-Than-FairValue Investigations, 79 FR 68213 (November 14,
2014).
2 The petitioners in this investigation are
American Cast Iron Pipe Company, Energex (a
division of JMC Steel Group), Maverick Tube
Corporation, Northwest Pipe Company, Stupp
Corporation (a division of Stupp Bros., Inc.), Tex-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
Tube Company, TMK IPSCO, and Welspun Tubular
LLC USA.
3 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, regarding ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Affirmative Preliminary Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Welded Line
Pipe from the Republic of Turkey,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8.85
3.76
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
5 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and
Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and
Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
The Web site location was changed from https://
iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov. The
Final Rule changing the references to the
Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014).’’
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14941-14943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06461]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Patent Reexaminations
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0064 Patent Reexaminations'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director,
Office of the Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of
Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7728;
or by email to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with ``Paperwork'' in the subject
line. Additional information about this collection is also available at
https://www.reginfo.gov under ``Information Collection Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is required
by 35 U.S.C. 131 and 151 to examine applications and, when appropriate,
allow applications and issue them as patents. Chapter 30 of Title 35
U.S.C. provides that any person at any time may file a request for
reexamination by the USPTO of any claim of a patent on the basis of
prior art patents or printed publications. Once initiated, the
reexamination proceedings under Chapter 30 are substantially ex parte
and do not permit input from third parties. The rules outlining ex
parte reexaminations are found at 37 CFR 1.510-1.570.
35 U.S.C. 257 permits a patent owner to request supplemental
examination of a patent by the USPTO to consider, reconsider, or
correct information believed to be relevant to the patent. The rules
outlining supplemental examination are found at 37 CFR 1.601-1.625.
The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act terminated inter partes
reexamination effective September 16, 2012. However, inter partes
reexamination proceedings based on inter partes reexamination requests
filed before September 16, 2012, continue to be prosecuted. Therefore,
this collection continues to include items related to the prosecution
of inter partes reexamination proceedings. The rules outlining inter
partes reexaminations are found at 37 CFR 1.903-1.931.
Thus, the items included in this collection cover (i) requests for
ex parte reexamination, (ii) requests for supplemental examination, and
(iii) information that may be submitted by patent owners and third
party requesters in relation to the prosecution of an ex parte or inter
partes reexamination proceeding. It should be noted that the Requests
for Ex Parte Reexamination and Supplemental Examination are distinct
collections from the Request for Ex Parte Reexamination and
Supplemental Examination Transmittal Forms, respectively. Whereas the
transmittal forms are used by a requester (patent owner or third party)
as a checklist to ensure compliance with the requirements of the
statutes and rules for ex parte reexaminations and supplemental
examinations, the requests themselves represent the substantive
analysis undertaken by requesters of ex parte reexamination and
supplemental examination.
The public uses this information collection to request ex parte
reexamination and supplemental examination, to prosecute reexamination
proceedings, and to ensure that the associated documentation is
submitted to the USPTO.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, hand delivery, or electronically to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0064.
Form Number(s): PTO/SB/57 and PTO/SB/59.
Type of Review: Renewal of an existing collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other
for-profits; and not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,170 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public from 0.30 hours (18 minutes) to 55 hours to gather the
necessary information, prepare the appropriate
[[Page 14942]]
form or other documents, and submit the information to the USPTO. The
time per response, estimated annual responses, and estimated annual
hour burden associated with each instrument in this information
collection is shown in the table below.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 95,290 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Hourly): $37,067,810 per year.
The USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be
prepared by attorneys. Using the professional rate of $389 per hour for
attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the respondent
cost burden for this collection will be approximately $37,067,810 per
year.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
IC No. Information collection Estimated time for annual Estimated annual Rate ($/hr) Total cost
instrument response responses burden hours
(a)........................ (b) (a) x (b) = (c) x (d) = (e)
(c)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................ Request for Supplemental 18 minutes................. 50 15 $389.00 $5,835
Examination Transmittal
Form (PTO/SB/59).
2............................ Request for Supplemental 25 hours................... 50 1,250 389.00 486,250
Examination.
3............................ Request for Ex Parte 18 minutes................. 450 135 389.00 52,515
Reexamination
Transmittal Form (PTO/
SB/57).
4............................ Request for Ex Parte 55 hours................... 450 24,750 389.00 9,627,750
Reexamination.
5............................ Petition in a 23 hours................... 1,250 28,750 389.00 11,183,750
Reexamination
Proceeding (except for
those specifically
enumerated in 37 CFR
1.550(i) and 1.937(d)).
6............................ Patent Owner's 37 CFR 8 hours.................... 160 1,280 389.00 497,920
1.530 Statement.
7............................ Third Party Requester's 8 hours.................... 50 400 389.00 155,600
37 CFR 1.535 Reply.
8............................ Amendment in Ex Parte or 33 hours................... 700 23,100 389.00 8,985,900
Inter Partes
Reexamination.
9............................ Third Party Requester's 41 hours................... 10 410 389.00 159,490
37 CFR 1.947 Comments
in Inter Partes
Reexamination.
10........................... Response to Final 17 hours................... 400 6,800 389.00 2,645,200
Rejection in Ex Parte
Reexamination.
11........................... Patent Owner's 37 CFR 41 hours................... 100 4,100 389.00 1,594,900
1.951 Response in Inter
Partes Reexamination.
12........................... Third Party Requester's 41 hours................... 100 4,100 389.00 1,594,900
37 CFR 1.951 Comments
in Inter Partes
Reexamination.
13........................... Petition to Request 30 minutes................. 400 200 389.00 77,800
Extension of Time in Ex
Parte or Inter Partes
Reexamination.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... ........................ ........................... 4,170 95,290 .............. 37,067,810
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Non-Hourly): $929.80 per year.
There are no capital start-up, recordkeeping, or maintenance costs
associated with this information collection. However, this collection
does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of postage costs.
Postage
The USPTO expects that approximately 95 percent of the responses in
this collection will be submitted electronically. Of the remaining 5
percent, the vast majority--98 percent--will be submitted by mail, for
a total of 204 mailed submissions. The documentation for requests for
supplemental examination and requests for ex parte reexamination will
typically be mailed to the USPTO with the appropriate transmittal form,
reducing the number of unique mailings to 180. The USPTO estimates that
the average postage cost for a mailed submission will be $0.49 cents
for Petitions to Request Extension of Time and $5.75 for all other
mailed submissions. Therefore, the USPTO estimates a total postage cost
of approximately $929.80 per year.
The total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in
the form of postage costs is approximately $929.80 per year.
Filing Fees
The fees in 0651-0064 were moved into collection 0651-0072 (America
Invents Act Section 10 Patent Fee Adjustments). As a result, this
collection no longer includes any filing or processing fees.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information
[[Page 14943]]
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they will also become a matter of public record.
Dated: March 13, 2015.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-06461 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P