Proposed Revision of a Currently Approved Information Collection; Comment Request; Trademark Petitions, 14968-14970 [2015-06448]
Download as PDF
14968
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
Request for Public Comments
NMFS requests comment on our
analysis, the draft authorization, and
any other aspect of the Notice of
Proposed IHA for HTC’s redevelopment
of the Icy Strait Cruise Ship Terminal in
Hoonah, Alaska. Please include with
your comments any supporting data or
literature citations to help inform our
final decision on HTC’s request for an
MMPA authorization.
Dated: March 16, 2015.
Perry F. Gayaldo,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–06431 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD748–X
Marine Mammals; File No. 19133
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of application.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
Tim Gallagher, Alaska Area Manager,
HDR, Inc., 2525 C Street, Suite 305,
Anchorage, AK 99503–2632, has
applied in due form for a permit to
conduct research on spotted seals
(Phoca largha), ringed seals (Pusa
hispida), bearded seals (Erignathus
barbatus), bowhead whales (Balaena
mysticetus), and Beluga whales
(Delphinapteras leucas).
DATES: Written, telefaxed, or email
comments must be received on or before
April 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The application and related
documents are available for review by
selecting ‘‘Records Open for Public
Comment’’ from the ‘‘Features’’ box on
the Applications and Permits for
Protected Species (APPS) home page,
https://apps.nmfs.noaa.gov, and then
selecting File No. 19133 from the list of
available applications.
These documents are also available
upon written request or by appointment
in the Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301) 427–8401; fax (301) 713–0376.
Written comments on this application
should be submitted to the Chief,
Permits and Conservation Division, at
the address listed above. Comments may
also be submitted by facsimile to (301)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
713–0376, or by email to
NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov. Please
include the File No. in the subject line
of the email comment.
Those individuals requesting a public
hearing should submit a written request
to the Chief, Permits and Conservation
Division at the address listed above. The
request should set forth the specific
reasons why a hearing on this
application would be appropriate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brendan Hurley or Courtney Smith,
(301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject permit is requested under the
authority of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972, as amended
(MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the
regulations governing the taking and
importing of marine mammals (50 CFR
part 216), and the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the regulations
governing the taking, importing, and
exporting of endangered and threatened
species (50 CFR parts 222–226).
The area encompassing the Colville
River Delta (CRD) on Alaska’s North
Slope is currently being assessed for
potential oil and gas (O&G) exploration
and development. HDR proposes to
conduct semi-annual aerial surveys over
the next 5 years to better characterize
the occurrence and distribution of three
ice seal species (spotted seals (Phoca
largha), ringed seals (Pusa hispida), and
bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus)),
and provide a framework for
understanding the potential impacts of
O&G exploration and development on
these animals in and around the CRD.
Surveys will occur four times annually
(from a Cessna 180 high-mounted fixedwing or a twin engine, low-mounted
fixed-wing DA 42 Multi-Purpose
Platform (MPP) aircraft (or similar fixedwing aircraft)) at 1,000 feet, but
researchers will drop to an altitude of
700 feet when seals are observed.
Annual estimated directed takes include
up to 780 bearded seals, 780 ringed
seals, 612 spotted seals, and up to 60
bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus)
and 150 Beluga whales (Delphinapteras
leucas).
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), an initial
determination has been made that the
activity proposed is categorically
excluded from the requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Concurrent with the publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
NMFS is forwarding copies of the
application to the Marine Mammal
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: March 13, 2015.
Julia Harrison,
Chief, Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–06387 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
Proposed Revision of a Currently
Approved Information Collection;
Comment Request; Trademark
Petitions
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0061
Trademark Petitions’’ in the subject line
of the message.
• Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records
Management Division Director, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Catherine Cain,
United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO), P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313– 1450; by
telephone at 571–272–8946; or by email
at catherine.cain@uspto.gov with
‘‘Paperwork’’ in the subject line.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The USPTO administers the
Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.,
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
14969
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
which provides for the registration of
trademarks, service marks, collective
trademarks and collective service marks,
collective membership marks, and
certification marks. Individuals and
businesses that use or intend to use
such marks in commerce may file an
application to register their marks with
the USPTO.
Individuals and businesses may also
submit various communications to the
USPTO, including letters of protest,
requests to make special, responses to
petition inquiry letters, petitions to
make special, requests to restore a filing
date, and requests for reinstatement.
The USPTO uses the information
described in this collection to process
letters of protest, requests to make
special, responses to petition inquiry
letters, petitions to make special,
requests to restore filing date, and
requests for reinstatement. The
information is used by the public for a
variety of private business purposes
related to establishing and enforcing
trademark rights. Information relating to
the registration of a trademark is made
publicly available by the USPTO. The
release of information in a letter of
protest is controlled and may be
available upon request only.
A letter of protest is an informal
procedure whereby third parties who
object to the registration of a mark in a
pending application may bring to the
attention of the USPTO evidence
bearing on the registrability of the mark.
A letter of protest must identify the
application being protested and the
proposed grounds for refusing
registration and include relevant
evidence to support the protest.
A request to make special may be
submitted where an applicant requests
that initial examination of an
application be advanced out of its
regular order because the mark in the
application was the subject of an
inadvertently cancelled or expired
previous registration.
A response to a petition inquiry letter
is submitted by a petitioner who is
responding to a notice of deficiency that
the USPTO issued after receiving an
incomplete Petition to the Director. A
petition may be considered incomplete
if, for example, it does not include the
fee required by 37 CFR 2.6 or if it
includes an unverified assertion that is
not supported by evidence.
The USPTO generally examines
applications in the order in which they
are received. A petition to make special
is a request by the applicant to advance
the initial examination of an application
out of its regular order.
A request to restore a filing date is
submitted by an applicant who
previously filed an application that was
denied a filing date. The request must
include evidence showing that the
applicant is entitled to the earlier filing
date.
If an applicant has proof that an
application was inadvertently
abandoned due to a USPTO error, an
applicant may file a request to reinstate
the application instead of a formal
petition to revive. To support such a
request, the applicant must include
clear evidence of the USPTO error.
II. Method of Collection
Electronically, if applicants submit
the information using the forms
available through the Trademark
Electronic Application System (TEAS).
By mail or hand delivery, if applicants
choose to submit the information in
paper form.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0061.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; business or other for-profit
organizations; not-for-profit
organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,988 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take
approximately 35 minutes (0.58 hours)
to 75 minutes (1.25 hours) to complete
this information. This includes the time
to gather the necessary information,
create the documents, and submit the
completed request to the USPTO.
The time per response, estimated
annual responses, and estimated annual
hour burden associated with each
instrument in this information
collection is shown in the table below.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
2,749.67 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden:
$1,069,620.33. The USPTO expects that
an attorney will complete the
instruments associated with this
information collection. The professional
hourly rate for attorneys is $389. Using
this hourly rate applied across the
2,749.67 respondent burden hours
associated with this collection, the
USPTO estimates $1,069,620.33 per year
for the total hourly costs associated with
respondents.
Information collection instrument
1 ........................
1 ........................
2 ........................
6 ........................
...........................................................
2 ........................
3 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated annual
burden hours
Rate
($/hr)
(b)
(a) × (b) = (c)
(c) × (d) = (e)
Letter of Protest (TEAS Global) .......
Letter of Protest (Paper) ...................
Request to Make Special TEAS
Global).
Request to Make Special (Paper) ....
Response to Petition to Director Inquiry Letter (TEAS Global).
Response to Petition to Director Inquiry Letter (Paper).
Petition to Make Special (TEAS
Global).
Petition to Make Special (Paper) .....
Request to Restore Filing Date
(TEAS Global).
Request to Restore Filing Date
(paper).
Request for Reinstatement (TEAS
Global).
Request for Reinstatement (paper) ..
Total ...........
Estimated time
for response
(hours)
(a)
IC No.
4 ........................
5 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Total cost
1.0
1.25
0.58
1,692
423
90
1,692.00
528.75
52.50
$389.00
389.00
389.00
$658,188.00
205,683.75
20,422.50
0.75
0.58
10
200
7.50
116.67
389.00
389.00
2,917.50
45,383.33
0.75
35
26.25
389.00
10,211.25
0.58
202
117.83
389.00
45,837.17
0.75
0.58
22
1
16.50
0.58
389.00
389.00
6,418.50
226.92
0.75
5
3.75
389.00
1,458.75
0.58
262
152.83
389.00
59,452.17
0.75
46
34.5
389.00
13,420.50
........................
2,988
2,749.67
........................
1,069,620.33
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
14970
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden
(Non-Hourly): $22,660.19. This
collection has no capital startup,
maintenance, or operating fees. This
collection does have postage and filing
fees.
Postage Costs
Applicants incur postage costs when
submitting non-electronic information
to the USPTO by mail through the
United States Postal Service. The
USPTO estimates that the vast
majority—approximately 98%—of the
paper forms are submitted to the USPTO
via first-class mail, while the rest are
submitted by hand delivery. Out of 541
paper forms, the USPTO estimates that
531 forms will be mailed, at a rate of 49
cents per ounce. Therefore, the USPTO
estimates that the postage costs for the
paper submissions in this collection
will be $260.19.
Filing Fees
The only item in this information
collection with a filing fee is the
Petition to Make Special, with a filing
fee of $100. The total estimated filing
fee cost for this collection is $22,400.
Responses
(yr)
Information collection instrument
Filing fee
($)
Total non-hour
cost burden
(yr)
(a)
IC No.
(b)
(a) × (b) = (c)
4 ........................
4 ........................
Petition to Make Special (TEAS Global) ....................................
Petition to Make Special (Paper) ................................................
202
22
$100.00
100.00
$20,200.00
2,200.00
Total ..........
.....................................................................................................
224
..............................
22,400.00
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that
the total annual (non-hour) cost burden
for this collection, in the form of postage
costs ($260.19) and filing fees
($22,400.00), is $22,660.19 per year.
IV. Request for Comments
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they will also become a matter of public
record.
Dated: March 13, 2015.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director,
USPTO, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–06448 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
Proposed Revision of a Currently
Approved Information Collection;
Comment Request; Post Registration
(Trademark Processing)
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on proposed and/
or continuing information collections,
as required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0055 Post
Registration (Trademark Processing)’’ in
the subject line of the message.
• Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records
Management Division Director, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Catherine Cain,
Attorney Advisor, Office of the
Commissioner for Trademarks, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1451, by telephone at 571–272–8946, or
by email to Catherine.Cain@uspto.gov
with ‘‘Paperwork’’ in the subject line.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) administers
the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et
seq., which provides for the Federal
registration of trademarks, service
marks, collective trademarks and service
marks, collective membership marks,
and certification marks. Individuals and
businesses that use or intend to use
such marks in commerce may file an
application to register their marks with
the USPTO.
Such individuals and businesses may
also submit various communications to
the USPTO, including requests to
amend their registrations to delete goods
or services that are no longer being used
by the registrant. Registered marks
remain on the register for ten years and
can be renewed, but will be cancelled
unless the owner files with the USPTO
a declaration attesting to the continued
use (or excusable non-use) of the mark
in commerce, and a renewal
application, within specific deadlines.
Applicants may also request to amend
or divide a registration, respond to a
post-registration Office action, and
surrender a registration.
The rules implementing the Act are
set forth in 37 CFR part 2. These rules
mandate that each register entry include
the mark, the goods and/or services in
connection with which the mark is
used, ownership information, dates of
use, and certain other information. The
USPTO also provides similar
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14968-14970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06448]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Proposed Revision of a Currently Approved Information Collection;
Comment Request; Trademark Petitions
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0061 Trademark Petitions'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director,
Office of the Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Catherine Cain, United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313- 1450; by
telephone at 571-272-8946; or by email at catherine.cain@uspto.gov with
``Paperwork'' in the subject line. Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://www.reginfo.gov under
``Information Collection Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The USPTO administers the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.,
[[Page 14969]]
which provides for the registration of trademarks, service marks,
collective trademarks and collective service marks, collective
membership marks, and certification marks. Individuals and businesses
that use or intend to use such marks in commerce may file an
application to register their marks with the USPTO.
Individuals and businesses may also submit various communications
to the USPTO, including letters of protest, requests to make special,
responses to petition inquiry letters, petitions to make special,
requests to restore a filing date, and requests for reinstatement. The
USPTO uses the information described in this collection to process
letters of protest, requests to make special, responses to petition
inquiry letters, petitions to make special, requests to restore filing
date, and requests for reinstatement. The information is used by the
public for a variety of private business purposes related to
establishing and enforcing trademark rights. Information relating to
the registration of a trademark is made publicly available by the
USPTO. The release of information in a letter of protest is controlled
and may be available upon request only.
A letter of protest is an informal procedure whereby third parties
who object to the registration of a mark in a pending application may
bring to the attention of the USPTO evidence bearing on the
registrability of the mark. A letter of protest must identify the
application being protested and the proposed grounds for refusing
registration and include relevant evidence to support the protest.
A request to make special may be submitted where an applicant
requests that initial examination of an application be advanced out of
its regular order because the mark in the application was the subject
of an inadvertently cancelled or expired previous registration.
A response to a petition inquiry letter is submitted by a
petitioner who is responding to a notice of deficiency that the USPTO
issued after receiving an incomplete Petition to the Director. A
petition may be considered incomplete if, for example, it does not
include the fee required by 37 CFR 2.6 or if it includes an unverified
assertion that is not supported by evidence.
The USPTO generally examines applications in the order in which
they are received. A petition to make special is a request by the
applicant to advance the initial examination of an application out of
its regular order.
A request to restore a filing date is submitted by an applicant who
previously filed an application that was denied a filing date. The
request must include evidence showing that the applicant is entitled to
the earlier filing date.
If an applicant has proof that an application was inadvertently
abandoned due to a USPTO error, an applicant may file a request to
reinstate the application instead of a formal petition to revive. To
support such a request, the applicant must include clear evidence of
the USPTO error.
II. Method of Collection
Electronically, if applicants submit the information using the
forms available through the Trademark Electronic Application System
(TEAS). By mail or hand delivery, if applicants choose to submit the
information in paper form.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0061.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit organizations; not-for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,988 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
approximately 35 minutes (0.58 hours) to 75 minutes (1.25 hours) to
complete this information. This includes the time to gather the
necessary information, create the documents, and submit the completed
request to the USPTO.
The time per response, estimated annual responses, and estimated
annual hour burden associated with each instrument in this information
collection is shown in the table below.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 2,749.67 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden: $1,069,620.33. The USPTO
expects that an attorney will complete the instruments associated with
this information collection. The professional hourly rate for attorneys
is $389. Using this hourly rate applied across the 2,749.67 respondent
burden hours associated with this collection, the USPTO estimates
$1,069,620.33 per year for the total hourly costs associated with
respondents.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated time Estimated
IC No. Information collection for response annual Estimated annual Rate ($/hr) Total cost
instrument (hours) responses burden hours
(a) (b) (a) x (b) = (c) (c) x (d) =
(e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... Letter of Protest (TEAS Global) 1.0 1,692 1,692.00 $389.00 $658,188.00
1.................................... Letter of Protest (Paper)...... 1.25 423 528.75 389.00 205,683.75
2.................................... Request to Make Special TEAS 0.58 90 52.50 389.00 20,422.50
Global).
2.................................... Request to Make Special (Paper) 0.75 10 7.50 389.00 2,917.50
3.................................... Response to Petition to 0.58 200 116.67 389.00 45,383.33
Director Inquiry Letter (TEAS
Global).
3.................................... Response to Petition to 0.75 35 26.25 389.00 10,211.25
Director Inquiry Letter
(Paper).
4.................................... Petition to Make Special (TEAS 0.58 202 117.83 389.00 45,837.17
Global).
4.................................... Petition to Make Special 0.75 22 16.50 389.00 6,418.50
(Paper).
5.................................... Request to Restore Filing Date 0.58 1 0.58 389.00 226.92
(TEAS Global).
5.................................... Request to Restore Filing Date 0.75 5 3.75 389.00 1,458.75
(paper).
6.................................... Request for Reinstatement (TEAS 0.58 262 152.83 389.00 59,452.17
Global).
6.................................... Request for Reinstatement 0.75 46 34.5 389.00 13,420.50
(paper).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................ ............................... .............. 2,988 2,749.67 .............. 1,069,620.33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14970]]
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Non-Hourly): $22,660.19. This
collection has no capital startup, maintenance, or operating fees. This
collection does have postage and filing fees.
Postage Costs
Applicants incur postage costs when submitting non-electronic
information to the USPTO by mail through the United States Postal
Service. The USPTO estimates that the vast majority--approximately
98%--of the paper forms are submitted to the USPTO via first-class
mail, while the rest are submitted by hand delivery. Out of 541 paper
forms, the USPTO estimates that 531 forms will be mailed, at a rate of
49 cents per ounce. Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the postage
costs for the paper submissions in this collection will be $260.19.
Filing Fees
The only item in this information collection with a filing fee is
the Petition to Make Special, with a filing fee of $100. The total
estimated filing fee cost for this collection is $22,400.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information collection Total non-hour
IC No. instrument Responses (yr) Filing fee ($) cost burden (yr)
(a) (b) (a) x (b) = (c)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4............................ Petition to Make Special 202 $100.00 $20,200.00
(TEAS Global).
4............................ Petition to Make Special 22 100.00 2,200.00
(Paper).
--------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... ........................ 224 ................. 22,400.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the total annual (non-hour)
cost burden for this collection, in the form of postage costs ($260.19)
and filing fees ($22,400.00), is $22,660.19 per year.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they will also become a matter of public record.
Dated: March 13, 2015.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-06448 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P