Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Certain Oral Solution Products, 15024-15026 [2015-06434]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15024
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
are submitted will be summarized and
included in the CBP request for OMB
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record. In this
document, CBP is soliciting comments
concerning the following information
collection:
Title: Small Vessel Reporting System.
OMB Number: 1651–0137.
Abstract: The Small Vessel Reporting
System (SVRS) is a pilot program that
allows certain participants using small
pleasure boats to report their arrival
telephonically instead of having to
appear in person for inspection by a
CBP officer each time they enter the
United States. In some cases, a
participant may also be asked to report
to CBP for an in person inspection upon
arrival. Participants may be U.S.
citizens, U.S. lawful permanent
residents, Canadian citizens, and
permanent residents of Canada who are
nationals of Visa Waiver Program
countries listed in 8 CFR 217.2(a). In
addition, participants of one or more
Trusted Traveler programs and current
Canadian Border Boater Landing Permit
(CBP Form I–68) holders may
participate in SVRS.
In order to register for the SVRS pilot
program, participants enter data via the
SVRS Web site, which collects
information such as biographical
information and vessel information.
Participants will go through the in
person CBP inspection process during
SVRS registration, and in some cases,
upon arrival in the United States.
For each voyage, SVRS participants
will be required to submit a float plan
about their voyage via the SVRS Web
site in advance of arrival in the United
States. The float plan includes vessel
information, a listing of all persons on
board, estimated dates and times of
departure and return, and information
on the locations to be visited on the trip.
Participants in SVRS can create a float
plan for an individual voyage or a
template for a float plan that can be
used multiple times.
SVRS is authorized by 8 U.S.C. 1225,
8 CFR 235.1, 19 U.S.C. 1433, and 19
CFR 4.2. The SVRS Web site is
accessible at: https://svrs.cbp.dhs.gov/.
Current Actions: CBP proposes to
extend the expiration date of this
information collection with a change to
the burden hours resulting from
updated estimates of the number of
respondents. There is no change to the
information being collected.
Type of Review: Extension (with
change).
Affected Public: Individuals.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
SVRS Application
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
certain oral solution products known as
Prepopik, which may be offered to the
U.S. Government, Department of
Veterans Affairs under its Federal
Supply Schedule contract. This final
determination, HQ H253443, was issued
under procedures set forth at 19 CFR
part 177, subpart B, which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18).
In the final determination, CBP
concluded that the processing in China
results in a substantial transformation.
Therefore, the country of origin of the
oral solution is China for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Certain Oral
Solution Products
Dated: March 13, 2015.
Glen E. Vereb,
Acting Executive Director, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
7,509.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 7,509.
Estimated Time per Response: 15
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,877.
Float Plan
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,589.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 2,589.
Estimated Time per Response: 10.6
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 457.
Dated: March 11, 2015.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2015–06374 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain oral solution products
for cleansing of the colon known as
Prepopik. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded that, the
country of origin of the oral solution is
China for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on March 13, 2015. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within April 20,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Grace A. Kim, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade
(202) 325–7941.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on March 13, 2015,
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
HQ H253443
March 13, 2015
OT:RR:CTF:VS H253443 GaK
CATEGORY: Origin
Michael T. Shor
Arnold & Porter LLP
555 12th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004–1206
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Country
of Origin of PREPOPIK®; Substantial
Transformation
Dear Mr. Shor:
This is in response to your letter dated
April 23, 2014, and your supplemental
submission dated July 18, 2014, requesting a
final determination on behalf of your client,
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. (‘‘Ferring’’),
pursuant to subpart B of part 177 of the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
Regulations (19 CFR part 177). Under these
regulations, which implement Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (‘‘TAA’’), as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes
of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the
U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of Ferring’s PREPOPIK® for
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
Oral Solution (‘‘Prepopik’’), which is a
powder for oral solution for cleansing of the
colon. We note that as a U.S. importer,
Ferring is a party-at-interest within the
meaning of 19 CFR § 177.22(d)(1) and is
entitled to request this final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR § 177.22(b)(7), you
requested confidential treatment with respect
to certain information submitted. As that
information constitutes privileged or
confidential matters, it has been bracketed
and will be redacted from any published
versions.
FACTS:
Prepopik is a dual-acting osmotic and
stimulant laxative bowel preparation for a
colonoscopy in adults. Prepopik is imported
in packets containing one dose, to which a
dosing cup is added in the U.S. Prepopik is
ingested by dissolving the powder in water,
using the supplied plastic dosing cup. To
produce Prepopik, sodium picosulfate
(manufactured in Country A [******]),
magnesium oxide (manufactured in Country
B [******]), anhydrous citric acid
(manufactured in Country C [******]), and
three inactive ingredients (sourced from
Country C and Country D [******]) are sent
to China in powder form or in fine particles.
The manufacturing process, described in
detail to CBP, consists of sieving, wet mixing
the sodium picosulfate to form granules,
mixing magnesium oxide and citric acid into
a granule formulation, product flavoring, and
final blending which is stated not to result
in a chemical reaction during any of the steps
carried out in China. The final product is
placed into single dosage packets. Each
Prepopik packet contains 10mg sodium
picosulfate, 3.5g magnesium oxide, and 12g
citric acid. The packets are sent to a third
party in the U.S. to be packaged into childresistant pouches along with the pre-marked,
plastic dosing cup.
After importation, once water is added, the
magnesium oxide and citric acid combine to
form magnesium citrate. The magnesium
citrate, is an osmotic laxative that stimulates
the absorption of water into the bowel, while
the sodium picosulfate stimulates peristalsis
in the bowel to expel its contents.1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
Prepopik for purposes of U.S. government
procurement and marking?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Country of Origin
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR
177.21 et seq., which implements Title III of
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes
of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the
U.S. Government.
1 See https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/
article/002282.htm; see also https://
www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/
a613020.html.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19
U.S.C. § 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the
growth, product, or manufacture of that
country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case
of an article which consists in whole or in
part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially
transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In determining whether a substantial
transformation occurs in the manufacture of
chemical products such as pharmaceuticals,
CBP has consistently examined the
complexity of the processing, and whether
the final article retains the essential identity
and character of the raw materials. To that
end, CBP has generally held that the
processing of pharmaceutical products from
bulk form into measured doses, filtering and
packaging does not result in a substantial
transformation. See Headquarters Rulings
Letter (‘‘HQ’’) H197582, dated August 9,
2012; HQ H561975, dated April 3, 2002; and
HQ H561544, dated May 1, 2000.
In HQ H215656, dated January 11, 2013, a
pain reliever medicine called Rybix ODT was
imported from France. The active
pharmaceutical ingredient (‘‘API’’) was
manufactured in India, which was shipped to
France and processed in four stages. In the
first stage, the API was de-lumped and
granulated with a suspension of inactive
ingredients then sieved and sized. In the
second stage, several inactive ingredients
designed to assist in drug administration
were added to the API to make a flavor
preblend. In the third stage, the tablets were
formed and collected in polyethylene-lined
foil bags. In the last stage, the tablets were
packaged in child-resistant blister packs and
prepared for shipment to the U.S. CBP found
that the imported good did not undergo a
substantial transformation in France, because
the processing in France did not result in a
change in the medicinal use of the product
and the API retained its chemical and
physical properties.
However, in HQ 563207, dated June 1,
2005, Actoplus MetTM was produced in Japan
by combining two APIs: pioglitazone HCl
(pioglitazone), an insulin sensitizer
metformin, a biguanide used to decrease the
amount of glucose produced by the liver and
make muscle tissue more sensitive to insulin
so glucose can be absorbed. The two APIs
were mixed together to form a fix
combination drug. The decision noted that
with the combination of the two APIs, type
2 diabetes patients will receive more medical
benefits than taking metformin alone. CBP
held that the finished pharmaceutical,
Actoplus MetTM had a new name, character
and use distinct from the two APIs used in
the production of the finished product. It was
noted that while pioglitazone and metformin
could be prescribed separately, the final
product, Actoplus MetTM, increased the
individual effectiveness of pioglitazone and
metformin in treating type 2 diabetes
patients. Therefore, a substantial
transformation was found to take place in
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15025
Japan where the two APIs were combined to
produce Actoplus MetTM.
Ferring states that as imported, the only
API present in Prepopik is the sodium
picosulfate which retains its chemical and
physical properties and is merely put into a
dosage form and packaged. Ferring further
contends that the processing in China does
not result in a change in the medicinal use
of the finished product. However, we note
that magnesium oxide may be used for
different reasons, as an antacid to relieve
heartburn, sour stomach, or acid indigestion;
or as a laxative for short-term, rapid
emptying of the bowel. See https://
www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/
meds/a601074.html; see also https://
pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/
magnesium_oxide (Magnesium oxide (MgO)
is an inorganic compound that occurs in
nature as the mineral periclase and in
aqueous media combines quickly with water
to form magnesium hydroxide. It is used as
an antacid and mild laxative and has many
nonmedicinal uses). We note that combining
magnesium oxide with water results in
magnesium hydroxide which is also known
for its laxative effect. While the combination
with water by the user may cause the
‘‘chemical reaction,’’ we note that most
medicines are taken with water, so we do not
find that the addition of water in this case
is what makes the magnesium oxide to
function as a laxative. The combination of
the magnesium oxide, citric acid and water
may form the osmotic effect; however, the
fundamental laxative property is already
found in the magnesium oxide. Accordingly,
we find that as in HQ 563207, the two
ingredients (sodium picosulfate and
magnesium oxide) contribute to the purpose
of Prepopik. As the two ingredients are
combined in China, we find that as in HQ
563207 a substantial transformation occurs in
China. Individually, the sodium picosulfate
and the magnesium oxide may be used to
alleviate constipation, and together, when
combined to form Prepopik, these ingredients
have a more stiumlative effect. Therefore, we
find that the country of origin of Prepopik is
China.
Marking
Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 1304), provides that,
unless excepted, every article of foreign
origin (or its container) imported into the
United States shall be marked in a
conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and
permanently as the nature of the article (or
its container) will permit, in such a manner
as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the
United States the English name of the
country of origin of the article. Congressional
intent in enacting 19 U.S.C. § 1304 was ‘‘that
the ultimate purchaser should be able to
know by an inspection of the marking on the
imported goods the country of which the
goods is the product. The evident purpose is
to mark the goods so that at the time of
purchase the ultimate purchaser may, by
knowing where the goods were produced, be
able to buy or refuse to buy them, if such
marking should influence his will.’’ United
States v. Friedlaender & Co., 27 CCPA 297,
302, C.A.D. 104 (1940). Part 134, CBP
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
15026
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
Regulations (19 CFR § 134) implements the
country of origin marking requirements and
exceptions of 19 U.S.C. § 1304.
Section 134.1(b), CBP Regulations (19 CFR
§ 134.1(b)), defines ‘‘country of origin’’ as:
the country of manufacture, production or
growth of any article of foreign origin
entering the United States. Further work or
material added to an article in another
country must effect a substantial
transformation in order to render such other
country the ‘‘country of origin’’ within the
meaning of this part; . . .
The country of origin of an article for U.S.
tariff purposes is the country in which the
last substantial transformation took place. A
substantial transformation occurs when an
article is used in a manufacturing process or
operation that results in a new article that
has a new name, character or use different
from that of the original imported article. A
substantial transformation will not result
from a minor manufacturing or combining
process that leaves the identity of the article
intact. See United States v. Gibson-Thomsen
Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (1940); and National
Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 989 F.2d
1201 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
In the instant case, Ferring mixes all the
ingredients by blending, sieving, and mixing.
We find that this processing results in a
substantial transformation. The combination
of the two ingredients results in a more
stimulative laxative effect for purposes of
cleansing the bowels. Therefore, we find that
the country of origin of Prepopik is China for
country of origin marking purposes.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts in this case, we find that
the imported Prepopik is substantially
transformed in China. The country of origin
for government procurement and marking
purposes is China.
Notice of this final determination will be
given in the Federal Register, as required by
19 CFR § 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to 19
CFR § 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter
anew and issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR § 177.30, any party-atinterest may, within 30 days of publication
of the Federal Register Notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Glen E. Vereb,
Acting Executive Director, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2015–06434 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Accreditation and Approval of Amspec
Services, LLC, as a Commercial
Gauger and Laboratory
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of accreditation and
approval of AmSpec Services, LLC, as a
commercial gauger and laboratory.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to CBP regulations, that
AmSpec Services, LLC, has been
approved to gauge petroleum and
certain petroleum products and
accredited to test petroleum and certain
petroleum products for customs
purposes for the next three years as of
October 27, 2014.
DATES: Effective Dates: The
accreditation and approval of AmSpec
Services, LLC, as commercial gauger
and laboratory became effective on
October 27, 2014. The next triennial
inspection date will be scheduled for
October 2017.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Approved Gauger and Accredited
Laboratories Manager, Laboratories and
Scientific Services Directorate, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
1500N, Washington, DC 20229, tel. 202–
344–1060.
Notice is
hereby given pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12
and 19 CFR 151.13, that AmSpec
Services, LLC, 4075 Sprig Driver, Suite
A, Concord, CA 94520, has been
approved to gauge petroleum and
certain petroleum products and
accredited to test petroleum and certain
petroleum products for customs
purposes, in accordance with the
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR
151.13. AmSpec Services, LLC is
approved for the following gauging
procedures for petroleum and certain
petroleum products from the American
Petroleum Institute (API):
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
API Chapters
1 ..............
3 ..............
7 ..............
8 ..............
11 ............
12 ............
17 ............
Title
Vocabulary.
Tank gauging.
Temperature determination.
Sampling.
Physical Properties.
Calculations.
Maritime measurement.
AmSpec Services, LLC is accredited
for the following laboratory analysis
procedures and methods for petroleum
and certain petroleum products set forth
by the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Laboratory Methods (CBPL)
and American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM):
ASTM
Title
27–13 ..............................................
ASTM D–4294 ...............................
27–06 ..............................................
ASTM D–473 .................................
27–01 ..............................................
ASTM D–287 .................................
27–46 ..............................................
ASTM D–5002 ...............................
27–05 ..............................................
ASTM D–4928 ...............................
27–48 ..............................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CBPL No.
D–4052 ..........................................
Standard test method for sulfur in petroleum and petroleum products
by energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectrometry.
Standard test method for sediment in crude oils and fuel oils by the
extraction method.
Standard test method for API gravity of crude petroleum and petroleum products (hydrometer method).
Standard test method for density and relative density of crude oils by
digital density analyzer.
Standard test method for water in crude oils by Coulometric Karl
Fischer Titration.
Density and Relative density of liquids by digital density meter.
Anyone wishing to employ this entity
to conduct laboratory analyses and
gauger services should request and
receive written assurances from the
entity that it is accredited or approved
by the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to conduct the specific test or
gauger service requested. Alternatively,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
inquiries regarding the specific test or
gauger service this entity is accredited
or approved to perform may be directed
to the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection by calling (202) 344–1060.
The inquiry may also be sent to
CBPGaugersLabs@dhs.gov. Please
reference the Web site listed below for
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a complete listing of CBP approved
gaugers and accredited laboratories.
https://www.cbp.gov/about/labsscientific/commercial-gaugers-andlaboratories
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15024-15026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06434]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Certain Oral
Solution Products
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain oral solution products for cleansing of
the colon known as Prepopik. Based upon the facts presented, CBP has
concluded that, the country of origin of the oral solution is China for
purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on March 13, 2015. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination within April 20, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grace A. Kim, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade
(202) 325-7941.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on March 13,
2015, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of origin of certain oral solution
products known as Prepopik, which may be offered to the U.S.
Government, Department of Veterans Affairs under its Federal Supply
Schedule contract. This final determination, HQ H253443, was issued
under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP concluded that the
processing in China results in a substantial transformation. Therefore,
the country of origin of the oral solution is China for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: March 13, 2015.
Glen E. Vereb,
Acting Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
HQ H253443
March 13, 2015
OT:RR:CTF:VS H253443 GaK
CATEGORY: Origin
Michael T. Shor
Arnold & Porter LLP
555 12th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004-1206
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Country of Origin of PREPOPIK[supreg];
Substantial Transformation
Dear Mr. Shor:
This is in response to your letter dated April 23, 2014, and
your supplemental submission dated July 18, 2014, requesting a final
determination on behalf of your client, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(``Ferring''), pursuant to subpart B of part 177 of the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR part 177). Under
these regulations, which implement Title III of the Trade Agreements
Act of 1979 (``TAA''), as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.),
CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of
a designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of
Ferring's PREPOPIK[supreg] for
[[Page 15025]]
Oral Solution (``Prepopik''), which is a powder for oral solution
for cleansing of the colon. We note that as a U.S. importer, Ferring
is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR Sec.
177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR Sec. 177.22(b)(7), you requested
confidential treatment with respect to certain information
submitted. As that information constitutes privileged or
confidential matters, it has been bracketed and will be redacted
from any published versions.
FACTS:
Prepopik is a dual-acting osmotic and stimulant laxative bowel
preparation for a colonoscopy in adults. Prepopik is imported in
packets containing one dose, to which a dosing cup is added in the
U.S. Prepopik is ingested by dissolving the powder in water, using
the supplied plastic dosing cup. To produce Prepopik, sodium
picosulfate (manufactured in Country A [******]), magnesium oxide
(manufactured in Country B [******]), anhydrous citric acid
(manufactured in Country C [******]), and three inactive ingredients
(sourced from Country C and Country D [******]) are sent to China in
powder form or in fine particles. The manufacturing process,
described in detail to CBP, consists of sieving, wet mixing the
sodium picosulfate to form granules, mixing magnesium oxide and
citric acid into a granule formulation, product flavoring, and final
blending which is stated not to result in a chemical reaction during
any of the steps carried out in China. The final product is placed
into single dosage packets. Each Prepopik packet contains 10mg
sodium picosulfate, 3.5g magnesium oxide, and 12g citric acid. The
packets are sent to a third party in the U.S. to be packaged into
child-resistant pouches along with the pre-marked, plastic dosing
cup.
After importation, once water is added, the magnesium oxide and
citric acid combine to form magnesium citrate. The magnesium
citrate, is an osmotic laxative that stimulates the absorption of
water into the bowel, while the sodium picosulfate stimulates
peristalsis in the bowel to expel its contents.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002282.htm; see also https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a613020.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the Prepopik for purposes of
U.S. government procurement and marking?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Country of Origin
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq., which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality
for the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American''
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec.
2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if
(i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country
or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists
in whole or in part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new
and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so
transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In determining whether a substantial transformation occurs in
the manufacture of chemical products such as pharmaceuticals, CBP
has consistently examined the complexity of the processing, and
whether the final article retains the essential identity and
character of the raw materials. To that end, CBP has generally held
that the processing of pharmaceutical products from bulk form into
measured doses, filtering and packaging does not result in a
substantial transformation. See Headquarters Rulings Letter (``HQ'')
H197582, dated August 9, 2012; HQ H561975, dated April 3, 2002; and
HQ H561544, dated May 1, 2000.
In HQ H215656, dated January 11, 2013, a pain reliever medicine
called Rybix ODT was imported from France. The active pharmaceutical
ingredient (``API'') was manufactured in India, which was shipped to
France and processed in four stages. In the first stage, the API was
de-lumped and granulated with a suspension of inactive ingredients
then sieved and sized. In the second stage, several inactive
ingredients designed to assist in drug administration were added to
the API to make a flavor preblend. In the third stage, the tablets
were formed and collected in polyethylene-lined foil bags. In the
last stage, the tablets were packaged in child-resistant blister
packs and prepared for shipment to the U.S. CBP found that the
imported good did not undergo a substantial transformation in
France, because the processing in France did not result in a change
in the medicinal use of the product and the API retained its
chemical and physical properties.
However, in HQ 563207, dated June 1, 2005, Actoplus
MetTM was produced in Japan by combining two APIs:
pioglitazone HCl (pioglitazone), an insulin sensitizer metformin, a
biguanide used to decrease the amount of glucose produced by the
liver and make muscle tissue more sensitive to insulin so glucose
can be absorbed. The two APIs were mixed together to form a fix
combination drug. The decision noted that with the combination of
the two APIs, type 2 diabetes patients will receive more medical
benefits than taking metformin alone. CBP held that the finished
pharmaceutical, Actoplus MetTM had a new name, character
and use distinct from the two APIs used in the production of the
finished product. It was noted that while pioglitazone and metformin
could be prescribed separately, the final product, Actoplus
MetTM, increased the individual effectiveness of
pioglitazone and metformin in treating type 2 diabetes patients.
Therefore, a substantial transformation was found to take place in
Japan where the two APIs were combined to produce Actoplus
MetTM.
Ferring states that as imported, the only API present in
Prepopik is the sodium picosulfate which retains its chemical and
physical properties and is merely put into a dosage form and
packaged. Ferring further contends that the processing in China does
not result in a change in the medicinal use of the finished product.
However, we note that magnesium oxide may be used for different
reasons, as an antacid to relieve heartburn, sour stomach, or acid
indigestion; or as a laxative for short-term, rapid emptying of the
bowel. See https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a601074.html; see also https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/magnesium_oxide (Magnesium oxide (MgO) is an inorganic compound that
occurs in nature as the mineral periclase and in aqueous media
combines quickly with water to form magnesium hydroxide. It is used
as an antacid and mild laxative and has many nonmedicinal uses). We
note that combining magnesium oxide with water results in magnesium
hydroxide which is also known for its laxative effect. While the
combination with water by the user may cause the ``chemical
reaction,'' we note that most medicines are taken with water, so we
do not find that the addition of water in this case is what makes
the magnesium oxide to function as a laxative. The combination of
the magnesium oxide, citric acid and water may form the osmotic
effect; however, the fundamental laxative property is already found
in the magnesium oxide. Accordingly, we find that as in HQ 563207,
the two ingredients (sodium picosulfate and magnesium oxide)
contribute to the purpose of Prepopik. As the two ingredients are
combined in China, we find that as in HQ 563207 a substantial
transformation occurs in China. Individually, the sodium picosulfate
and the magnesium oxide may be used to alleviate constipation, and
together, when combined to form Prepopik, these ingredients have a
more stiumlative effect. Therefore, we find that the country of
origin of Prepopik is China.
Marking
Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
Sec. 1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of
foreign origin (or its container) imported into the United States
shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and
permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will
permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in
the United States the English name of the country of origin of the
article. Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1304 was
``that the ultimate purchaser should be able to know by an
inspection of the marking on the imported goods the country of which
the goods is the product. The evident purpose is to mark the goods
so that at the time of purchase the ultimate purchaser may, by
knowing where the goods were produced, be able to buy or refuse to
buy them, if such marking should influence his will.'' United States
v. Friedlaender & Co., 27 CCPA 297, 302, C.A.D. 104 (1940). Part
134, CBP
[[Page 15026]]
Regulations (19 CFR Sec. 134) implements the country of origin
marking requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1304.
Section 134.1(b), CBP Regulations (19 CFR Sec. 134.1(b)),
defines ``country of origin'' as:
the country of manufacture, production or growth of any article
of foreign origin entering the United States. Further work or
material added to an article in another country must effect a
substantial transformation in order to render such other country the
``country of origin'' within the meaning of this part; . . .
The country of origin of an article for U.S. tariff purposes is
the country in which the last substantial transformation took place.
A substantial transformation occurs when an article is used in a
manufacturing process or operation that results in a new article
that has a new name, character or use different from that of the
original imported article. A substantial transformation will not
result from a minor manufacturing or combining process that leaves
the identity of the article intact. See United States v. Gibson-
Thomsen Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (1940); and National Hand Tool Corp. v.
United States, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
In the instant case, Ferring mixes all the ingredients by
blending, sieving, and mixing. We find that this processing results
in a substantial transformation. The combination of the two
ingredients results in a more stimulative laxative effect for
purposes of cleansing the bowels. Therefore, we find that the
country of origin of Prepopik is China for country of origin marking
purposes.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts in this case, we find that the imported
Prepopik is substantially transformed in China. The country of
origin for government procurement and marking purposes is China.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-interest
other than the party which requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR Sec. 177.31, that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR
Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days of
publication of the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek
judicial review of this final determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Glen E. Vereb,
Acting Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2015-06434 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P