2015 Annual Determination To Implement the Sea Turtle Observer Requirement, 14319-14328 [2015-06341]
Download as PDF
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
as specified below, both versions must
be filed in accordance with the
requirements of § 502.2.
(i) Confidential version. The
confidential filing must include a cover
page marked ‘‘Confidential-Restricted.’’
The specific confidential information
must be conspicuously and clearly
marked on each page, for example by
highlighting or bracing. If
confidentiality will end on a date
certain or upon the occurrence of an
event, this must be stated on the cover,
e.g., ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL [DATE],’’
or ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL DURING JUDICIAL
REVIEW.’’ The confidential version of a
document may be provided to the
presiding officer by email but should
not be filed with the Office of the
Secretary by email.
(ii) Public version. Within three
business days of filing a confidential
version of a filing, a public version must
be filed. The public version must
indicate on the cover page and on each
affected page ‘‘Public Version—
confidential materials excluded.’’ The
public version must clearly indicate any
information withheld, for example with
blackout or braces, and its pagination
and depiction of text on each page must
be identical to that of the confidential
version. For example, the confidential
filing may read: ‘‘On January 1, 2005,
complainant entered into a {25} year
lease with respondent for a monthly
rent of {$1,000}.’’ The public version
would read: ‘‘On January 1, 2005,
complainant entered into a { } year lease
with respondent for a monthly rent of
{ }.’’ Public versions of confidential
filings may be filed with the Secretary
and presiding officer by email.
(iii) Exhibits. Confidential information
in exhibits should be marked as
specified above. If marking within the
text is not feasible, individual pages
may be replaced in the public version
with a page indicating that confidential
material is excluded. Entire exhibits
should not be excluded, only those
pages containing confidential material.
(b) Motion for confidential treatment.
If confidentiality is sought for a filing
containing information not previously
designated as confidential by the
Commission or presiding officer, the
confidential filing must be accompanied
by a motion justifying confidential
treatment. This motion must identify
the specific information in a document
for which protection is sought and show
good cause by demonstrating that the
information is a trade secret or other
confidential research, development, or
commercial information pursuant to
§ 502.201(j)(1)(vii). The burden is on the
party that wants to protect the
information to show good cause for its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
protection. A motion is not required for
information, including personal privacy
and financial account numbers,
redacted pursuant to § 502.13, Privacy
protection for filings made with the
Commission.
(c) Use of confidential information.
Confidential treatment afforded by this
section is subject to the proviso that any
information designated as confidential
may be used by the administrative law
judge or the Commission if deemed
necessary to a decision in the
proceeding. [Rule 5.]
Subpart E—Proceeding; Pleadings;
Motions; Replies
§ 502.62
[Amended]
3. Amend § 502.62(b)(1) by adding ‘‘or
the Complainant’’ after the phrase
‘‘service of the complaint by the
Commission’’.
■ 4. Revise the heading for subpart H to
read as follows:
■
Subpart H—Service of Documents
■
5. Revise § 502.113 to read as follows:
§ 502.113 Service of private party
complaints.
(a) Complaints filed pursuant to
§ 502.62, amendments to complaints
(unless otherwise authorized by the
presiding officer pursuant to
§ 502.66(b)), small claims complaints
filed pursuant to § 502.304, and
Complainant’s memoranda filed in
shortened procedure cases pursuant to
§ 502.182, will be served by the
Secretary of the Commission.
(b) The Secretary will serve the
complaint using first class mail or
express mail service at the Respondent’s
address provided by the Complainant. If
the complaint cannot be delivered, for
example if the complaint is returned as
undeliverable or not accepted for
delivery, the Secretary will notify the
Complainant.
(c) Alternative service by
Complainant. The Complainant may
serve the Complaint at any time after it
has been filed with the Commission. If
Complainant serves the complaint, an
affidavit setting forth the method, time
and place of service must be filed with
the Secretary within five days following
service.
(d) The presiding officer may dismiss
a complaint that has not been served
within thirty (30) days after the
complaint was filed. [Rule 113.]
Subpart S—Informal Procedure for
Adjudication of Small Claims
6. Revise § 502.304(d) to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 502.304
14319
Procedure and filing fee.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A copy of each claim filed under
this subpart, with attachments, shall be
served by the Secretary on the
respondent named in the claim.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Revise § 502.305(b) to read as
follows:
§ 502.305
this part.
Applicability of other rules of
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The following sections in subparts
A through Q of this part apply to
situations covered by this subpart:
§§ 502.2(a) (Requirement for filing);
502.2(f)(1) (Email transmission of
filings); 502.2(i) (Continuing obligation
to provide contact information); 502.7
(Documents in foreign languages);
502.21 through 502.23 (Appearance,
Authority for representation, Notice of
appearance; substitution and
withdrawal of representative); 502.43
(Substitution of parties); 502.101
(Computation); 502.113 (Service of
private party complaints); 502.117
(Certificate of service); 502.253 (Interest
in reparation proceedings); and 502.254
(Attorney’s fees in reparation
proceedings). [Rule 305.]
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–06239 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 222
[Docket No. 140829733–5046–02]
RIN 0648–BE35
2015 Annual Determination To
Implement the Sea Turtle Observer
Requirement
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final Annual Determination (AD) for
2015, pursuant to its authority under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Through
the AD, NMFS identifies U.S. fisheries
operating in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of
Mexico, and Pacific Ocean that will be
required to take observers upon NMFS’
request. The purpose of observing
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
14320
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
identified fisheries is to learn more
about sea turtle interactions in a given
fishery, evaluate measures to prevent or
reduce sea turtle takes, and implement
the prohibition against sea turtle takes.
Fisheries identified on the 2015 AD (see
Table 1) will be eligible to carry
observers as of January 1, 2015 and will
remain on the AD for a five-year period.
The fisheries listed on the final
determination will be required to carry
observers upon NMFS’ request until
December 31, 2019.
DATES: Effective April 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for a listing of all Regional
Offices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
McNulty, Office of Protected Resources,
301–427–8402; Ellen Keane, Greater
Atlantic Region, 978–282–8476; Dennis
Klemm, Southeast Region, 727–824–
5312; Dan Lawson, West Coast Region,
562–980–3209; Irene Kelly, Pacific
Islands Region, 808–725–5141.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) List of
Fisheries (LOF) may be obtained at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
interactions/lof/ and information
regarding Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports may be obtained at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/ or
from any NMFS Regional Office at the
addresses listed below:
• NMFS, Greater Atlantic Region, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930;
• NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
• NMFS, West Coast Region, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802;
• NMFS, Pacific Islands Region,
Protected Resources, 1845 Wasp Blvd.,
Building 176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Purpose of the Sea Turtle Observer
Requirement
Under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.,
NMFS has the responsibility to
implement programs to conserve marine
species listed as endangered or
threatened. All sea turtles found in U.S.
waters are listed as either endangered or
threatened under the ESA. Kemp’s
ridley (Lepidochelys kempii),
loggerhead (Caretta caretta; North
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
Pacific distinct population segment),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) sea
turtles are listed as endangered.
Loggerhead (Caretta caretta; Northwest
Atlantic distinct population segment),
green (Chelonia mydas), and olive
ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea
turtles are listed as threatened, except
for breeding colony populations of green
turtles in Florida and on the Pacific
coast of Mexico, and breeding colony
populations of olive ridleys on the
Pacific coast of Mexico, which are listed
as endangered. Due to the inability to
distinguish between populations of
green and olive ridley turtles away from
the nesting beach, NMFS considers
these turtles endangered wherever they
occur in U.S. waters. While some sea
turtle populations have shown signs of
recovery, many populations continue to
decline.
Incidental take, or bycatch, in fishing
gear is the primary anthropogenic
source of sea turtle injury and mortality
in U.S. waters. Section 9 of the ESA
prohibits the take (including harassing,
harming, pursuing, hunting, shooting,
wounding, killing, trapping, capturing,
collecting or attempting to engage in any
such conduct), including incidental
take, of endangered sea turtles. Pursuant
to section 4(d) of the ESA, NMFS has
issued regulations extending the
prohibition of take, with exceptions, to
threatened sea turtles (50 CFR 223.205
and 223.206). The purpose of the sea
turtle observer requirement and the AD
is ultimately to implement ESA sections
9 and 4(d), which prohibit the
incidental take of endangered and
threatened sea turtles, respectively, and
to conserve sea turtles. Section 11 of the
ESA provides for civil and criminal
penalties for anyone who violates a
regulation issued pursuant to the ESA,
including regulations that implement
the take prohibition, as well as for the
issuance of regulations to enforce the
take prohibitions. NMFS may grant
exceptions to the take prohibitions for
activities that are covered by an
incidental take statement or an
incidental take permit issued pursuant
to ESA section 7 or 10, respectively. To
do so, NMFS must determine the
activity that will result in incidental
take is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the affected
listed species. For some Federal
fisheries and most state fisheries, NMFS
has not granted an exception for
incidental takes of sea turtles primarily
because we lack information about
fishery-sea turtle interactions.
The most effective way for NMFS to
learn about sea turtle-fishery
interactions, in order to implement
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
management measures and prevent or
minimize take, is to place observers
aboard fishing vessels. In 2007, NMFS
issued a regulation (50 CFR 222.402)
establishing procedures to annually
identify, pursuant to specified criteria
and after notice and opportunity for
comment, those fisheries in which the
agency intends to place observers (72 FR
43176, August 3, 2007). These
regulations specify that NMFS may
place observers on U.S. fishing vessels,
commercial or recreational, operating in
U.S. territorial waters, the U.S.
exclusive economic zone (EEZ), or on
the high seas, or on vessels that are
otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of
the United States. Failure to comply
with the requirements under this rule
may result in civil or criminal penalties
under the ESA.
NMFS will pay the direct costs for
vessels to carry observers. These include
observer salary and insurance costs.
NMFS may also evaluate other potential
direct costs, should they arise. Once
selected, a fishery will be eligible to be
observed for a period of five years
without further action by NMFS. This
will enable NMFS to develop an
appropriate sampling protocol to
investigate whether, how, when, where,
and under what conditions incidental
takes are occurring; evaluate whether
existing measures are minimizing or
preventing takes; and develop ESA
management measures that implement
the prohibitions against take and that
conserve sea turtles.
Process for Developing an Annual
Determination
Pursuant to 50 CFR 222.402, NOAA’s
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
(AA), in consultation with Regional
Administrators and Fisheries Science
Center Directors, developed a proposed
AD identifying which fisheries are
required to carry observers, if requested,
to monitor potential interactions with
sea turtles. NMFS provided an
opportunity for public comment on any
proposed determination. The
determination is based on the best
available scientific, commercial, or
other information regarding sea turtlefishery interactions; sea turtle
distribution; sea turtle strandings;
fishing techniques, gears used, target
species, seasons and areas fished; and/
or qualitative data from logbooks or
fisher reports. The AD is based on the
extent to which:
(1) The fishery operates in the same
waters and at the same time as sea
turtles are present;
(2) The fishery operates at the same
time or prior to elevated sea turtle
strandings; or
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The fishery uses a gear or
technique that is known or likely to
result in incidental take of sea turtles
based on documented or reported takes
in the same or similar fisheries; and
(4) NMFS intends to monitor the
fishery and anticipates that it will have
the funds to do so.
For the 2015 AD, the AA used the
most recent version of the annually
published MMPA List of Fisheries
(LOF) as the comprehensive list of
commercial fisheries for consideration.
The LOF includes all known state and
Federal commercial fisheries that occur
in U.S. waters and on the high seas.
However, in preparing the AD, we do
not rely on the three-part MMPA
classification scheme used for fisheries
on the LOF. In addition, unlike the LOF,
the AD may include recreational
fisheries likely to interact with sea
turtles on the basis of the best available
information.
NMFS consulted with appropriate
state and Federal fisheries officials to
identify which fisheries, both
commercial and recreational, should be
considered on the AD.
Recommendations were received from
six state agencies. Gear types
recommended for consideration
included gillnet, trawl, trap/pot, pound
net, seine, and hook-and line. NMFS
considered all recommendations
carefully in developing the proposed list
of fisheries to be included. Although the
comments and recommendations
provided to NMFS by states were based
upon the best available information on
their fisheries, NMFS received more
recommendations for fisheries to
include on the 2015 AD than is practical
based on the four previously noted
criteria (50 CFR 222.402(a)). The AD is
not an exhaustive or comprehensive list
of all fisheries with documented or
suspected takes of sea turtles. For some
fisheries, NMFS may already be
addressing incidental take through
another mechanism (e.g., rulemaking to
implement modifications to fishing gear
and/or practices), may be observing the
fishery under a separate statutory
authority, or will consider including
them in future ADs based on the four
previously noted criteria (50 CFR
222.402(a)). Note also that fisheries not
included on the 2015 AD may still be
observed under a different authority
than the ESA (e.g., MMPA, MSA).
Notice of the final determination will
be published in the Federal Register
and made in writing to individuals
permitted for each fishery identified on
the AD. NMFS will also notify state
agencies and provide notification
through publication in local
newspapers, radio broadcasts, and other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
means, as appropriate. Once included in
the final determination, a fishery will
remain eligible for observer coverage for
a period of five years to enable the
design of an appropriate sampling
program and to ensure collection of
sufficient scientific data for analysis. If
NMFS determines that more than five
years are needed to obtain sufficient
scientific data, NMFS will include the
fishery in the proposed AD again prior
to the end of the fifth year.
In the 2010 AD, NMFS identified 19
fisheries that were required to carry
observers for a period of five years,
through December 31, 2014, if requested
by NMFS. Because of a lack of resources
to implement new observer programs or
expand existing programs, NMFS has
not identified any additional fisheries
on the AD since 2010. Eleven of the 19
fisheries included on the 2010 AD have
been included on the 2015 AD, and are
described further below. The remaining
eight fisheries were summarized in the
proposed 2015 AD (October 22, 2014, 79
FR 63066).
Implementation of Observer Coverage
in a Fishery Listed in the 2015 AD
As part of the 2015 AD, NMFS has
included, to the extent practicable,
information on the fisheries or gear
types to be observed, geographic and
seasonal scope of coverage, and any
other relevant information. For each of
these fisheries or gear types, NMFS
intends to monitor the fishery and
anticipates that it will have the funds to
do so. After publication of this final AD,
a 30-day delay in the effective date for
implementing observer coverage will
follow, except for those fisheries where
the AA has determined that there is
good cause pursuant to the
Administrative Procedure Act to make
the rule effective without a 30-day
delay.
The design of any observer program
for fisheries identified through the AD
process, including how observers would
be allocated to individual vessels, will
vary among fisheries, fishing sectors,
gear types, and geographic regions and
will ultimately be determined by the
individual NMFS Regional Office,
Science Center or observer program.
During the program design, NMFS will
be guided by the following standards for
distributing and placing observers
among fisheries identified on the AD
and among vessels in those fisheries:
(1) The requirement to obtain the best
available scientific information;
(2) The requirement that observers be
assigned fairly and equitably among
fisheries and among vessels in a fishery;
(3) The requirement that no
individual person or vessel, or group of
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14321
persons or vessels, be subject to
inappropriate, excessive observer
coverage; and
(4) The need to minimize costs and
avoid duplication, where practicable.
Vessels subject to observer coverage
under the AD must comply with
observer safety requirements specified
at 50 CFR 600.725 and 50 CFR 600.746.
Specifically, 50 CFR 600.746(c) requires
vessels to provide adequate and safe
conditions for carrying an observer and
conditions that allow for operation of
normal observer functions. To provide
such conditions, a vessel must comply
with the applicable regulations
regarding observer accommodations (see
50 CFR parts 229, 300, 600, 622, 635,
648, 660, and 679) and possess a current
United States Coast Guard (USCG)
Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety
Examination decal or a USCG certificate
of examination. A vessel that fails to
meet these requirements at the time an
observer is to be deployed on the vessel
is prohibited from fishing (50 CFR
600.746(f)) unless NMFS determines
that an alternative platform (e.g., a
second vessel) may be used, or
determines that a vessel with
inadequate or unsafe facilities is not be
required to take an observer under 50
CFR 222.404. In any case, all persons on
a vessel must cooperate in the operation
of observer functions. Observer
programs designed or carried out in
accordance with 50 CFR 222.404 would
be required to be consistent with
existing observer-related NOAA policies
and regulations, such as those under the
Fair Labor and Standards Act (29 U.S.C.
201 et seq.), the Service Contract Act (41
U.S.C. 351 et seq.), Observer Health and
Safety regulations (50 CFR part 600),
and other relevant policies.
Again, note that fisheries not included
on the 2015 AD may still be observed
under statutory authority other than the
ESA (e.g., MMPA, MSA). Additional
information on observer programs in
commercial fisheries can be found on
the NMFS National Observer Program’s
Web site: https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/
observer-home/; links to individual
regional observer programs may also be
found on this Web site.
Sea Turtle Distribution
The sea turtle distribution and
ecological use of habitats that leads to
the overlap of sea turtles and fisheries
is critical information that NMFS uses
to inform the development of the final
AD. A summary of this information was
included in the proposed AD (October
22, 2014, 79 FR 63066) and was
considered in the development of the
final 2015 AD.
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
14322
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Comments and Responses
NMFS received a total of seven
comments on the proposed rule from
members of the public, the State of
North Carolina, and Turtle Island
Restoration Network. Commenters
expressed general support of the rule or
fishery observer programs, some with
additional suggestions and requests for
the inclusion or exclusion of particular
fisheries. All substantive comments are
specifically addressed below. Comments
on issues outside the scope of the AD
were noted, but are not responded to in
this final rule.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
General Comments
Comment 1: Six commenters
expressed general support of the rule.
Response: NMFS agrees, and has
included 14 fisheries on the 2015 AD to
allow for increased data gathering on
sea turtle bycatch in order to
accomplish the purposes of the rule.
Comment 2: The Turtle Island
Restoration Network recommended that
the Atlantic, Caribbean, and Gulf of
Mexico pelagic longline and highlymigratory species fisheries be divided
into independent fishery listings rather
than treated as a whole, to ensure that
adequate observer coverage is applied
and subsequent independent ESA
authority given.
Response: This recommendation is
outside the scope of this rulemaking
given the criteria for including fisheries
on the AD as codified in the 2007
regulation (50 CFR 222.402), which
specifies that NMFS will use the most
recently published LOF as the
comprehensive set of commercial
fisheries to be considered for inclusion
on the AD.
Comments on Gillnet Fisheries
Comment 3: The North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) expressed concern
on the inclusion of the North Carolina
inshore gillnet fishery and
recommended that the fishery not be
included on the 2015 AD. This concern
was based on several factors including
the low level of Federal observer effort
expended on the fishery since it was
included in the 2010 AD, the relatively
high level of observer effort associated
with the state observer program,
communication difficulties that
inclusion can create when both state
and federal observer programs interact
with fishers, existence of permits and
regulations to reduce sea turtle
interactions within the fishery, and
NMFS observer effort is already in place
under MMPA authority.
Response: After considering this
recommendation, NMFS has determined
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
the best course of action is to include
the North Carolina inshore gillnet
fishery on the 2015 AD. In 2013, NMFS
issued an ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)
incidental take permit (ITP) to NCDENR,
Division of Marine Fisheries, for the
incidental take of sea turtles in the
North Carolina inshore gillnet fishery.
As a requirement of the permit,
NCDENR must maintain a specific level
of observer coverage to monitor and
track the level of incidental take that is
occurring. Although NCDENR is
currently observing this fishery under
the authority of the ITP, the observer
coverage required by the ITP does not
include all areas where the fishery
operates. NMFS has evaluated the entire
North Carolina inshore gillnet fishery
based on the AD criteria, and has
determined that this fishery meets the
criteria for inclusion on the 2015 AD.
However, NMFS does not intend to
place observers on vessels in a fishery
subject to observer requirements under
an ITP without discussion and
coordination with the state.
NMFS understands there may be
confusion when multiple government
agencies have regulatory authority to
observe, resulting in both Federal and
state observers within a fishery. NMFS
strives to clarify and improve the
communication process regarding
fishery observer requirements with
local, state, and other federal entities to
achieve the highest possible level of
compliance and coordination.
Comment 4: The Turtle Island
Restoration Network recommended that
all drift gillnet fisheries be monitored,
particularly the California thresher
shark/swordfish drift net fishery, due to
the impacts these fisheries have on sea
turtles.
Response: NMFS acknowledges that
there are other fisheries, in addition to
those listed on the 2015 AD, that may
be a concern for sea turtles. The 2015
AD is not meant to be a comprehensive
list of fisheries that interact with sea
turtles or fisheries that require
monitoring, but rather a focused list,
based on specific inclusion criteria (see
Purpose of the Sea Turtle Observer
Requirement section). NMFS evaluates
fisheries for inclusion on the AD on an
annual basis and will re-evaluate the
gillnet fisheries recommend by Turtle
Island Restoration Network in future
AD’s. The California thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery is
currently listed as a Category I fishery
on the LOF, and therefore NMFS may
monitor this entire fishery for marine
mammals, which also allows for the
collection of information on sea turtle
bycatch. Dedicated observer coverage of
this fishery is currently a top priority of
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NMFS and is considered necessary and
essential to the successful
implementation and monitoring of the
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take
Reduction Plan and Endangered Species
Act requirements already in place for
the fishery. Indications are that observer
coverage goals and mandates for this
fishery are likely to increase in the
foreseeable future due to management
considerations already in place. Because
NMFS does not intend to monitor this
fishery beyond its existing coverage
under other authorities, NMFS is not
including this fishery on the 2015 AD.
Comments on Seine/Weir/Pound Net
Fisheries
Comment 5: The Turtle Island
Restoration Network expressed concern
that the Virginia Pound Net and U.S.
Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/
weir/pound net fisheries were not
included in the 2015 AD.
Response: In accordance with the
criteria for listing a fishery on the AD,
NMFS is not including the Virginia
Pound Net or the Mid-Atlantic mixed
species stop seine/weir/pound net on
the 2015 AD because NMFS does not
intend to monitor these fisheries for sea
turtle takes at this time. NMFS has
observed the Virginia Pound Net fishery
for sea turtle takes in the past, and
NMFS currently maintains the authority
to observe for marine mammals.
Although these fisheries are not
included on the 2015 AD, the AD is
published annually and these fisheries
may be considered for inclusion on a
future AD.
Comments on Longline Fisheries
Comment 6: The Turtle Island
Restoration Network commented that,
although sea turtle takes occur in
association with longline fisheries, no
longline fishery was included in the
2015 AD and recommended that
longline fisheries (particularly the
Hawaii deep-set and shallow-set
longline fisheries, as well as the western
Pacific pelagic deep-set fishery) be
included and observed if funding
becomes available for NMFS to
undertake additional observing effort.
Response: NMFS agrees that sea turtle
interactions occur in association with
longline fisheries. However, in
accordance with the criteria for listing a
fishery on the AD, described above,
NMFS is not including the longline
fisheries noted by the Turtle Island
Restoration Network on the 2015 AD
because NMFS does not intend to
monitor the fishery beyond the existing
coverage. At this time, NMFS believes
that monitoring efforts available through
MMPA and MSA authorities provide
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
sufficient monitoring coverage for
assessing sea turtle interactions in
longline fisheries. As noted earlier,
information on sea turtles is collected
whenever an interaction occurs on an
observed trip. NMFS does not currently
have funding available to add observer
coverage specifically for the purposes of
monitoring for sea turtle bycatch, and
therefore these fisheries did not meet
the criteria for listing on the 2015 AD.
NMFS will continue to assess these and
other fisheries for inclusion on future
ADs.
Fisheries Included on the 2015 Annual
Determination
NMFS includes 14 fisheries (12 in the
Atlantic Ocean/Gulf of Mexico and 2 in
the Pacific Ocean) on the 2015 AD. The
14 fisheries, described below and listed
in Table 1, represent several gear types,
including trawl, gillnet, trap/pot, and
weir/seine.
The 2014 LOF (79 FR 14418, March
14, 2014) was used as the
comprehensive list of commercial
fisheries to evaluate for inclusion on the
AD. All of the fisheries included on the
AD are also included in the 2015 LOF
(79 FR 77919, December 29, 2014). The
fishery name, definition, and number of
vessels/persons for fisheries listed on
the AD are taken from the most recent
LOF. Additionally, the fishery
descriptions below include a particular
fishery’s current classification on the
MMPA LOF (i.e., Category I, II, or III);
Category I and II fisheries are required
to carry observers under the MMPA if
requested by NMFS. As noted
previously, NMFS also has authority to
observe fisheries in Federal waters
under the MSA and collect sea turtle
bycatch information.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Trawl Fisheries
Interactions with trawl fisheries are of
particular concern for sea turtles,
because forced submergence in any type
of restrictive gear can lead to lack of
oxygen and subsequent death by
drowning. Metabolic changes that can
impair a sea turtle’s ability to function
can occur within minutes of forced
submergence (Lutcavage et al., 1997).
Trawls that are not outfitted with
turtle excluder devices (TEDs) may
result in forced submergence. Currently,
only otter trawl fisheries capable of
catching shrimp and operating south of
Cape Charles, Virginia, and in the Gulf
of Mexico, as well as trawl fisheries
targeting summer flounder south of
Cape Charles, Virginia, in the summer
flounder fishery-sea turtle protection
area (50 CFR 222.102), are required to
use TEDs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico Shrimp Trawl Fishery
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf
of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
(estimated 4,950 vessels/persons) targets
shrimp using various types of trawls;
NMFS will focus on the component of
the fishery that uses skimmer trawls for
the 2015 AD. Skimmer trawls are used
primarily in inshore/inland shallow
waters (typically less than 20 ft. (6.1 m))
to target shrimp. The skimmer trawl has
a rigid ‘‘L’’-shaped or triangular metal
frame with the inboard portion of the
frame attached to the vessel and the
outboard portion attached to a skid that
runs along the seabed.
Skimmer trawl use increased in
response to TED requirements for
shrimp bottom otter trawls. Skimmer
trawls currently have no TED
requirement, but are subject to tow time
limits of 55 minutes from April 1 to
October 31, and 75 minutes from
November 1 to March 31. Skimmer
trawls are used in North Carolina,
Florida (Gulf Coast), Alabama,
Mississippi, and Louisiana. There are
documented takes of sea turtles in
skimmer trawls in North Carolina and
the Gulf of Mexico. All Gulf of Mexico
states, except Texas, include skimmer
trawls as an allowable gear. In recent
years, the skimmer trawl has become a
major gear in the inshore shrimp fishery
in the Northern Gulf and also has some
use in inshore North Carolina. Louisiana
hosts the vast majority of skimmer
boats, with 2,248 skimmer and butterfly
net trawlers reporting landings in 2008.
In 2008, Mississippi had approximately
62 active skimmer, butterfly, and
chopstick boats, Alabama had 60 active
skimmer boats, and North Carolina had
97 skimmer vessels (NMFS 2014).
However, skimmer vessels in North
Carolina have declined in recent years
to 64 active vessels in 2010.
Skimmer trawl effort overlaps with
sea turtle distribution and, as noted
above, takes have been observed in this
fishery. In response to high numbers of
sea turtle strandings since 2010, a
portion of fishery observer effort was
shifted from otter trawls to the
nearshore skimmer trawls in the
northern Gulf of Mexico during the
summers of 2012, 2013, and 2014. In
2012, 119 sea days were observed in the
skimmer trawl fishery resulting in 24
observed interactions with sea turtles. In
2013, 145 sea days were observed,
resulting in 8 observed interactions with
sea turtles. In 2014, 82 sea days were
observed, resulting in 10 observed
interactions with sea turtles.
Continued observer coverage to
understand the scope and impact of
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14323
turtle takes in this fishery is needed to
inform management decisions on what
additional actions may be necessary to
minimize and prevent sea turtle takes,
and further sea turtle conservation and
recovery.
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic/Gulf
of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery is
classified as Category II on the MMPA
LOF, and mandatory observer coverage
in Federal waters began in 2007 under
the MSA. The fishery is currently
observed at approximately 1% of total
fishery effort. The fishery was
previously included in the 2010 AD,
which allowed for observer coverage to
be shifted to skimmer trawls to
specifically investigate bycatch of sea
turtles. NMFS includes this fishery
again pursuant to the criteria identified
at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for including a
fishery on the AD, because sea turtles
are known to occur in the same areas
where the fishery operates, takes have
been previously documented in this
fishery, and NMFS intends to continue
to focus observer coverage in the
component of the fishery that uses
skimmer trawls.
Gulf of Mexico Mixed Species Trawl
Fishery
The Gulf of Mexico Mixed Species
Trawl Fishery (estimated 20 vessels/
persons) targets fish using various types
of trawl gear, including bottom otter
trawl gear targeting sheepshead. This
fishery is located in state waters, and is
classified as Category III on the MMPA
LOF. NMFS has not previously required
vessels operating in this fishery to carry
an observer under MMPA authority, and
this fishery was not included in the
2010 AD. NMFS includes this fishery in
the 2015 AD pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
including a fishery on the AD, because
sea turtles are known to occur in the
same areas where the fishery operates,
takes have been documented in similar
gear types, mainly the shrimp trawl
fishery, and NMFS intends to monitor
this fishery.
Gillnet Fisheries
Sea turtles are vulnerable to
entanglement and drowning in gillnets,
especially when the gear is left
unattended. The main risk to sea turtles
from capture in gillnet gear is forced
submergence. Sea turtle entanglement in
gillnets can also result in severe
constriction wounds and/or abrasions.
Large mesh gillnets (e.g., 10–12 in.
[25.4–30.5 cm] stretched mesh or
greater) have been documented as
particularly effective at capturing sea
turtles. Additionally, sea turtles have
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
14324
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
been documented entangled in smaller
mesh gillnets.
Given known interactions between
sea turtles and this gear type, and the
need to obtain more coverage on state
inshore fisheries, NMFS includes the
California Halibut, White Seabass and
Other Species Set Gillnet Fishery;
California Yellowtail, Barracuda, and
White Seabass Drift Gillnet Fishery;
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery;
Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery;
North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery;
and Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery in
the 2015 AD. Each of these fisheries,
with the exception of the Gulf of Mexico
Gillnet Fishery, was listed on the 2010
AD.
California Halibut, White Seabass and
Other Species Set Gillnet Fishery (>3.5
in Mesh)
The California halibut, white seabass,
and other species set gillnet fishery
(estimated 50 vessels/persons) targets
halibut, white seabass, and other species
from the U.S.-Mexico border north to
Monterey Bay using 200 fathom (1,200
ft.; 366 m) gillnets with a stretch mesh
size of 8.5 in (31.6 cm). Net soak
duration is typically 8–10, 19–24, or 44–
49 hours at a depth ranging from 15–50
fathoms (90–300 ft.; 27–91 m), with
most sets from 15–35 fathoms (90–210
ft.; 27–64 m). No more than 1500
fathoms (9,000 ft.; 2,743 m) of gill or
trammel net may be fished in
combination for California halibut and
angel shark. Fishing occurs year-round,
with effort generally increasing during
summer months and declining during
the last three months of the year. The
central California portion of the fishery
from Point Arguello to Point Reyes has
been closed since September 2002,
following a state ban on gillnets inshore
of 60 fathoms (360 ft.; 110 m). Since
1990, set gill nets have been prohibited
in state waters south of Point Arguello
and within 70 fathoms (420 ft.; 128 m)
or one mile (1.6 km), whichever is less,
around the Channel Islands. The
California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG) manages the fishery as a limited
entry fishery with gear restrictions and
area closures.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
waters for marine mammal interactions
and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip.
This fishery was included in the 2010
AD. This fishery was observed at 13%
of all trips in 2010, 8% in 2011, and 6%
in 2012. During that time, no sea turtle
bycatch was observed in the fishery.
Notwithstanding the fact that no sea
turtle takes were documented in this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
fishery during this three year period,
NMFS again includes this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for including a
fishery on the AD, because it operates in
the same waters that turtles are known
to occur, this gear type is known to
result in the incidental take of sea
turtles based on documented takes, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
California Yellowtail, Barracuda, and
White Seabass Drift Gillnet Fishery
(Mesh Size >3.5 in. and <14 in.)
The California yellowtail, barracuda,
and white seabass drift gillnet fishery
(30 vessels/persons) targets primarily
yellowtail and white seabass, and
secondarily barracuda, with target
species typically determined by market
demand on a short-term basis. Drift
gillnets are up to 6,000 ft. (1,829 m) long
and are set at the surface. The mesh size
depends on target species and is
typically 6.0–6.5 in (15–16.5 cm). When
targeting yellowtail and barracuda, the
mesh size must be ≥3.5 in (9 cm); when
targeting white seabass, the mesh size
must be ≥6 in (15.2 cm). From June 16
to March 14 not more than 20%, by
number, of a load of fish may be white
seabass with a total length of 28 in (71
cm). A maximum of ten white seabass
per load may be taken if taken in gillnet
or trammel nets with meshes from 3.5–
6.0 in (9–15 cm) in length. The fishery
operates year-round, primarily south of
Point Conception with some effort
around San Clemente Island and San
Nicolas Island. This fishery is a limited
entry fishery with various gear
restrictions and area closures managed
by the CDFG.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
waters for marine mammal interactions
and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip.
This fishery was included in the 2010
AD. This fishery was observed at 5% of
all trips in 2010, 3% in 2011, and 1%
in 2012. During that time, no sea turtle
bycatch was observed in the fishery.
Notwithstanding the fact that no sea
turtle takes were documented in this
fishery during this three year period,
NMFS again includes this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for including a
fishery on the AD because it operates in
the same waters that turtles are known
to occur, this gear type is known to
result in the incidental take of sea
turtles based on documented takes, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
fishery (estimated 1,126 vessels/
persons) targets menhaden and croaker
using gillnet gear with mesh sizes
ranging from 2.875–5 in (7.3–12.7 cm),
depending on the target species. The
fishery operates between the
Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel and the
mainland. The fishery is managed under
the Interstate Fishery Management Plans
(FMPs) for Atlantic menhaden and
Atlantic croaker. Gillnets in Chesapeake
Bay also target striped bass and spot
croaker.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, and was included
in the 2010 AD. There has been limited
observer coverage in this fishery since
2010, with 12 observed trips in 2010,
one observed trip in 2011, and three
observed trips in 2013. To date, observer
coverage in gillnet fisheries has focused
on Federally-managed fisheries. There is
a need to better understand the gear
fished in state waters and the extent to
which this gear interacts with sea
turtles. Given the risk of interaction and
the limited data currently available on
interactions, NMFS again includes this
fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
listing a fishery on the AD because sea
turtles are known to occur in the same
areas where the fishery operates, takes
have been previously documented in
similar gear, the fishery operates during
a period of high sea turtle strandings,
and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Long Island Sound inshore gillnet
fishery (estimated 20 vessels/persons)
includes all gillnet fisheries operating
west of a line from the north fork of the
eastern end of Long Island, New York
(Orient Point to Plum Island to Fishers
Island) to Watch Hill, Rhode Island (59
FR 43703, August 25, 1994). Target
species include bluefish, striped bass,
weakfish, and summer flounder.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. There has been limited
observer coverage in this fishery since
2010. To date, observer coverage in
gillnet fisheries has focused on
Federally-managed fisheries. However,
the NMFS Northeast Fisheries Observer
Program has worked with the state of
New York to develop a plan to achieve
observer coverage in New York state
waters between 2014 and 2017, which
includes approximately 250 gillnet trips
annually. There is a need to better
understand the gear fished in state
waters and the extent to which this gear
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
interacts with sea turtles. Given the risk
of interaction and the limited data
currently available on interactions, and
the new partnership with the State of
New York, NMFS again includes this
fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
listing a fishery on the AD. NMFS also
makes this determination because sea
turtles are known to occur in the same
areas where the fishery operates, takes
have been previously documented in
similar gear, the fishery operates during
a period of high sea turtle strandings,
and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The North Carolina inshore gillnet
fishery (approximately 1,323 vessels/
persons) targets species including
southern flounder, weakfish, bluefish,
Atlantic croaker, striped mullet, spotted
seatrout, Spanish mackerel, striped bass,
spot, red drum, black drum, and shad.
This fishery includes any fishing effort
using any type of gillnet gear, including
set (float and sink), drift, and runaround
gillnet for any target species inshore of
the COLREGS lines in North Carolina.
This fishery is managed under state and
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission (ASMFC) interstate FMPs,
applying net and mesh size regulations,
and seasonal area closures in the
Pamlico Sound Gillnet Restricted Area.
NMFS issued two ESA section
10(a)(1)(B) permits for the North
Carolina state-wide inshore gillnet
fishery to incidentally take sea turtles in
2013, and to incidentally take Atlantic
sturgeon in 2014, which include all
inshore, estuarine waters, including
Core Sound and Pamlico Sound. The
permits require the State of North
Carolina to maintain a minimum of 7%
observer coverage for large mesh gillnet
in each state management area for the
spring, summer, and fall seasons. It also
requires a minimum of 2% observer
coverage for small mesh gillnets. Since
issuance of the sea turtle incidental take
permit in September 2013, it is
estimated that 261 green sea turtles (173
alive, 88 dead) and 15 Kemp’s ridley sea
turtles (all alive), have been incidentally
taken in the inshore large mesh gillnet
fishery. Additionally, one live green sea
turtle was observed in the small mesh
gillnet fishery.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, and was included
in the 2010 AD. NMFS has observed this
fishery with limited coverage since
2010, observing 42 trips in 2010, 18
trips in 2011, 22 trips in 2012, and 28
trips in 2013. Although the state is
currently required to maintain observer
coverage in inshore waters, NMFS again
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
includes this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the
AD because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
previously documented in this fishery,
the fishery operates during a period of
high sea turtle strandings, and NMFS
intends to monitor this fishery.
Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery
The Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery
(estimated 724 vessels/persons) operates
in state inshore waters, targeting finfish,
including Spanish mackerel, king
mackerel, striped mullet, Florida
pompano, and southern flounder using
sink gillnets and strike gillnets.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery for marine
mammal interactions and to collect
information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. To better
characterize fishing effort and bycatch,
the NMFS Southeast Gillnet Observer
Program began placing observers on
state commercial gillnet vessels in
coastal Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Alabama in 2012. NMFS includes this
fishery in the 2015 AD because sea
turtles are known to occur in the same
areas where the fishery operates and
takes have been documented in similar
other fisheries using gillnet gear, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Trap/Pot Fisheries
Sea turtles are known to become
entangled in the buoy lines (also called
vertical lines) of trap/pot gear, and there
have been anecdotal reports that sea
turtles may interact with the trap/pot
itself. Turtles entangled in trap/pot gear
may drown or suffer injuries (and
potential subsequent mortality) due to
constriction by the rope or line. Takes
of both leatherback and hard-shelled sea
turtles have been documented in this
gear type. NMFS Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office (GARFO),
formerly the Northeast Regional Office,
established the Northeast Atlantic Sea
Turtle Disentanglement Network
(STDN) in 2002 to respond to
entanglements in vertical lines
associated with trap/pot gear. Reports of
entangled sea turtles come from
fishermen, boaters, and the general
public. Since 2002, entanglements in
vertical lines have averaged 20.4
annually. Takes in 2012 and 2013
increased significantly with 41 and 56
takes documented in each year,
respectively. These numbers include all
vertical line interactions, the vast
majority of which were identified as
trap/pot gear (as opposed to gillnet
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14325
gear). A more systematic data collection
on these interactions is needed to begin
understanding the extent to which
interactions occur in order to implement
the prohibitions against takes, including
preventing or minimizing takes.
Three pot/trap fisheries were
included in the 2010 AD; Atlantic Blue
Crab Trap/Pot Fishery, Atlantic Mixed
Species Trap/Pot Fishery, and the
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery. However,
limited or no observer coverage has
been achieved in these fisheries since
listing on the 2010 AD. While some pot/
trap vessels can be observed through
traditional methods, other vessels
participating in these fisheries,
especially in state waters, may be too
small to carry observers, which create
challenges for observer programs.
Further discussions regarding the most
appropriate and effective methodologies
for observing the pot/trap fisheries will
be beneficial. On June 27, 2014, NMFS
published a final rule under the MMPA
that will reduce the volume of vertical
lines in Atlantic waters (79 FR 36586).
In addition to helping conserve and
recover large whales, this reduction is
expected to benefit sea turtles. NMFS
will continue to monitor the
implementation of this rule and
evaluate its effectiveness. In addition,
staff from GARFO, the Northeast
Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC), and
Fisheries and Oceans Canada met in
December 2014 to discuss technologies
that may apply to mitigating sea turtle
interactions with vertical lines. Based
on these discussions, the GARFO and
NEFSC are developing a research plan
related to vertical line and sea turtle
interactions. This plan will consider
observer coverage in these fisheries.
New methods to more effectively
monitor these fisheries may be
developed and implemented as an
outcome of this meeting. Based on the
input from the states, NMFS again
includes all three pot/trap fisheries in
the 2015 AD, further described below.
Atlantic Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
fishery (estimated 8,557 vessels/
persons) targets blue crab using pots
baited with fish or poultry typically set
in rows in shallow water. The pot
position is marked by either a floating
or sinking buoy line attached to a
surface buoy. The fishery occurs yearround from the south shore of Long
Island at 72° 30′ W. long. in the Atlantic
and east of the fishery management
demarcation line between the Atlantic
Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR
600.105), including state waters. The
fishery is managed under state FMPs.
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
14326
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. However, since NMFS
included this fishery in the 2010 AD,
NMFS has been unable to observe the
fishery, as discussed above.
Accordingly, NMFS again includes this
fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
listing a fishery on the AD because sea
turtles are known to occur in the same
areas where the fishery operates, takes
have been documented in similar gear
types (i.e. lobster pot fishery), and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic mixed species trap/pot
fishery (estimated 3,467 vessels/
persons) targets species including
hagfish, shrimp, conch/whelk, red crab,
Jonah crab, rock crab, black sea bass,
scup, tautog, cod, haddock, pollock,
redfish (ocean perch), white hake, spot,
skate, catfish, and stone crab. The
fishery includes all trap/pot operations
from the Maine-Canada border south
through the waters east of the fishery
management demarcation line between
the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of
Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but does not
include the following trap/pot fisheries
(as defined on the MMPA LOF):
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot; Atlantic blue crab trap/
pot; Florida spiny lobster trap/pot;
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico stone crab trap/pot; U.S. MidAtlantic eel trap/pot fisheries; and the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico golden crab fishery (68 FR 1421,
January 10, 2003). The fishery is
managed under various Interstate and
Federal FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. However, since listing
this fishery on the 2010 AD, NMFS has
been unable to observe the fishery, as
discussed above. Accordingly, NMFS
again includes this fishery pursuant to
the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the
AD because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
documented in similar gear types (i.e.
lobster pot fishery), and NMFS intends
to monitor this fishery.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery
The Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery (estimated
11,693 vessels/persons) targets
American lobster primarily with traps,
while approximately 2–3% of the target
species is taken by mobile gear (trawls
and dredges). The fishery operates in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
inshore and offshore waters from Maine
to New Jersey, and may extend as far
south as Cape Hatteras, North Carolina.
Approximately 80% of American lobster
is harvested from state waters; therefore,
the ASMFC has the primary regulatory
role. The fishery is managed in state
waters under the ASMFC Interstate FMP
and in Federal waters under the Atlantic
Coastal Fisheries Cooperative
Management Act.
This fishery is classified as Category
I on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. Since that time, NMFS
observed 22 lobster trips in 2013 and 32
trips in 2014, with 216 observation days
planned for the 2014–2015 schedule.
NMFS STDN has documented 83
leatherback entanglements in lobster
trap gear operating in Maine,
Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey
since 2002. These entanglements have
occurred between May and October
(STDN, unpublished data), which is the
time period when observer coverage for
this fishery will be focused.
NMFS again includes this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
documented in this fishery, and NMFS
intends to monitor this fishery.
Weir/Seine/Floating Trap Fisheries
Pound net, weir, seine and floating
trap fisheries may use mesh similar to
that used in gillnets, but the gear is
prosecuted differently from traditional
gillnets. For example, pound net leaders
have a mesh component similar to a
gillnet; yet sea turtles have been
documented entangled in pound net
leaders. Pound net leaders in the
Virginia portion of the Chesapeake Bay
are subject to requirements designed to
reduce sea turtle bycatch. Purse seines,
weirs and floating traps also have the
potential to entangle and drown sea
turtles, as they are set similarly to
pound nets. Turtles have been
documented in the pounds of pound net
gear and/or weirs in Massachusetts,
New York, Maryland, North Carolina,
and Virginia. The turtles observed in
these pounds have generally been alive
and uninjured. In Virginia, sea turtles
have been documented becoming
entangled with the leader, which often
results in mortality.
Four pound net/weir/seine fisheries
were included on the 2010 AD: the MidAtlantic haul/beach seine, the MidAtlantic menhaden purse seine, the
Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/
weir/pound net, and the Virginia pound
net fishery. Based on the information
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
provided by states and the best available
scientific information, NMFS includes
again two of these fisheries: the MidAtlantic haul/beach seine fishery, MidAtlantic menhaden purse seine fishery,
and adds the Rhode Island floating trap
fishery on the 2015 AD.
Mid-Atlantic Haul/Beach Seine Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
fishery (estimated 565 vessels/persons)
targets striped bass, mullet, spot,
weakfish, sea trout, bluefish, kingfish,
and harvest fish using seines with one
end secured (e.g., swipe nets and long
seines) and seines secured at both ends
or those anchored to the beach and
hauled up on the beach. The beach
seine system also uses a bunt and a
wash net that are attached to the beach
and extend into the surf. The beach
seines soak for less than two hours. The
fishery occurs in waters west of 72° 30′
W. long. and north of a line extending
due east from the North Carolina-South
Carolina border. Fishing on the Outer
Banks, North Carolina occurs primarily
in the spring (April to June) and fall
(October to December). In the
Chesapeake Bay, this gear has been
historically fished in the southwest
portion of the Bay with some effort in
the northwest portion. Effort begins to
increase in early May, peaks in early/
mid-June, and continues into July.
During this time, based on historical
data from Virginia, approximately 100
haul seine trips occur. Beach haul
seines have been documented to interact
with sea turtles.
The fishery is managed under the
Interstate FMPs for Bluefish and for
Atlantic Striped Bass of the Atlantic
Coast from Maine through North
Carolina, and is subject to Bottlenose
Dolphin Take Reduction Plan
implementing regulations.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. NMFS observed this
fishery at low levels prior to 2008, but
it has not been observed since then.
NMFS again includes this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD based on suspected interactions
with sea turtles given the nature of the
gear and fishing methodology in
addition to effort overlapping with sea
turtle distribution. In the Chesapeake
Bay, the fishery operates at the same
time as historically elevated sea turtle
strandings, and NMFS intends to
monitor this fishery.
Mid-Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine
Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse
seine fishery (estimated 5 vessels/
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
14327
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
persons) targets menhaden and thread
herring using purse seine gear. Most sets
occur within 3 mi (4.8 km) of shore with
the majority of the effort occurring off
North Carolina from November to
January, and moving northward during
warmer months to southern New
England. The fishery is managed under
the Interstate FMP for Atlantic
Menhaden. In the Chesapeake Bay, this
fishery operates to a limited extent
during a period of high sea turtle
strandings (May and June). This fishery
is classified as Category II on the MMPA
LOF and was listed on the 2010 AD.
NMFS has observed this fishery at low
levels, with nine trips observed in 2010,
and three trips observed in 2012. NMFS
again includes this fishery pursuant to
the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the
AD, given the nature of the gear and
fishing methodology in addition to
effort overlapping with sea turtle
distribution, and NMFS intends to
monitor this fishery.
Rhode Island Floating Trap Fishery
The Rhode Island Floating Trap
Fishery (estimated nine vessels/persons)
is a small fishery that sets traps similar
to a weir/pound net seasonally (MayOctober) targeting scup, striped sea bass,
and squid.
This fishery is classified as Category
III on the MMPA LOF, and NMFS has
not previously required vessels
operating in this fishery to carry an
observer under MMPA authority. This
fishery was not included in the 2010
AD. Turtles have been documented in
the pounds of pound net gear and/or
weirs in Massachusetts, New York,
Maryland, and Virginia, which operates
similarly to the Rhode Island Floating
Trap Fishery. There have also been
anecdotal reports of sea turtle
interactions in this fishery, but bycatch
levels are unknown. NMFS includes
this fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
listing a fishery on the AD because sea
turtles are known to occur in the same
areas where the fishery operates, takes
have been documented in similar gear
types, such as the Virginia and
Maryland pound nets, and NMFS
intends to monitor this fishery.
TABLE 1—STATE AND FEDERAL COMMERCIAL FISHERIES INCLUDED ON THE 2015 ANNUAL DETERMINATION
Years eligible to
carry observers
Fishery
Trawl Fisheries
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl ..............................................................................................................
Gulf of Mexico mixed species fish trawl ........................................................................................................................................
2015–2019
2015–2019
Gillnet Fisheries
California halibut, white seabass and other species set gillnet (>3.5 in mesh) ...........................................................................
California yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift gillnet (mesh size >3.5 in. and <14 in.) ...............................................
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet ....................................................................................................................................................
Long Island inshore gillnet .............................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina inshore gillnet ........................................................................................................................................................
Gulf of Mexico gillnet .....................................................................................................................................................................
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
Trap/pot Fisheries
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot ..............................................................................................................................................................
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot ......................................................................................................................................................
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot ..........................................................................................................................
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
Pound Net/Weir/Seine Fisheries
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine ........................................................................................................................................................
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine ..............................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island floating trap .............................................................................................................................................................
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration at the
proposed rule stage that this rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. NMFS published the factual
basis for that certification in the
proposed rule, and does not repeat it
here. NMFS received no comments on
this certification. Accordingly, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required, and none was prepared.
The information collection for the AD
is approved under Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB control number 0648–0593.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA)
was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on
the issuance of the regulations to
implement this observer requirement in
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
50 CFR part 222, subpart D. The EA
concluded that implementing these
regulations would not have a significant
impact on the human environment. This
final rule would not make any
significant change in the management of
fisheries included on the AD, and
therefore, this final rule would not
change the analysis or conclusion of the
EA. If NMFS takes a management action
for a specific fishery, for example,
requiring fishing gear modifications,
NMFS would first prepare any
environmental document required
under NEPA and specific to that action.
This final rule would not affect
species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or their
associated critical habitat. The impacts
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
14328
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
of numerous fisheries have been
analyzed in various biological opinions,
and this final rule would not affect the
conclusions of those opinions. The
inclusion of fisheries on the AD is not
considered to be a management action
that would adversely affect threatened
or endangered species. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
requiring modifications to fishing gear
and/or practices, NMFS would review
the action for potential adverse effects to
listed species under the ESA.
This final rule would have no adverse
impacts on sea turtles and may have a
positive impact on sea turtles by
improving knowledge of sea turtles and
the fisheries interacting with sea turtles
through information collected from
observer programs.
This final rule would not affect the
land or water uses or natural resources
of the coastal zone, as specified under
section 307 of the Coastal Zone
Management Act.
Dated: March 12, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–06341 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 140728622–5225–02]
RIN 0648–BE44
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Red
Snapper Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS implements
management measures described in a
framework action to the Fishery
Management Plan for the Reef Fish
Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP),
as prepared by the Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council (Council).
This final rule revises the recreational
accountability measures (AMs) by
establishing a recreational annual catch
target (ACT) and quota overage
adjustment for red snapper in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the
Gulf of Mexico (Gulf). The purpose of
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
this final rule is to help achieve
optimum yield (OY) for the Gulf red
snapper resource and better ensure red
snapper recreational landings do not
exceed the recreational quota
established in the rebuilding plan.
DATES: This rule is effective April 20,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
framework action, which includes an
environmental assessment, a regulatory
impact review, and a Regulatory
Flexibility Act analysis may be obtained
from the Southeast Regional Office Web
site at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/
sustainable_fisheries/gulf_fisheries/
reef_fish/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Hood, Southeast Regional Office,
NMFS, telephone 727–824–5305; email:
Peter.Hood@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS and
the Council manage the Gulf reef fish
fishery under the FMP. The Council
prepared the FMP and NMFS
implements the FMP through
regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act).
On November 21, 2014, NMFS
published a proposed rule for the
framework action and requested public
comment (79 FR 69418). The proposed
rule and the framework action outline
the rationale for the actions contained in
this final rule. A summary of the actions
implemented by the framework action
and this final rule is provided below.
Management Measures Contained in
This Final Rule
This final rule revises the red snapper
recreational AMs to support
management efforts to maintain
landings within the recreational quota
and to mitigate any recreational quota
overages should they occur.
Red Snapper Recreational ACT and
Season Length
This final rule establishes a red
snapper recreational ACT by applying a
buffer to the recreational quota that is
based on the Council’s annual catch
limit (ACL)/ACT control rule developed
in the Generic ACL/Amendment (76 FR
82044, December 29, 2011). The ACL/
ACT control rule is used to determine
the appropriate target catch levels that
account for management uncertainty in
maintaining catches at or below the ACL
(quota). The control rule is intended to
be applied separately to the recreational
and commercial sectors because each
sector has different levels of
management uncertainty. The control
rule recommends no buffer be applied
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to the quota for the red snapper
commercial sector because the sector is
managed by an IFQ program, has
accurate landings data, and has not
exceeded its quota in the last 7 years the
IFQ program has been in effect. For the
recreational sector, the control rule
recommends applying a 20-percent
buffer to the quota primarily because the
recreational quota has been exceeded in
3 of the last 4 years. When the 20percent buffer is applied to the quota, it
results in an ACT of 4.312 million lb
(1.956 million kg), round weight.
This final rule also revises the
procedure for determining the
recreational season length (closure
date). Beginning in the 2015 fishing
year, the red snapper recreational
season closure date will be based on
when the recreational ACT will be met
instead of when the recreational quota
will be met. Using the ACT to set the
season length serves as an in-season AM
and reduces the probability of exceeding
the recreational quota during a fishing
year from 50 percent to 15 percent.
Red Snapper Recreational Post-Season
AM
This final rule also revises the
recreational AMs to include a quota
overage adjustment (payback) should
the recreational quota be exceeded
while the red snapper stock is
overfished. If red snapper are overfished
and the recreational quota is exceeded,
then in the year following the overage,
the recreational quota will be reduced
by the amount of the recreational quota
overage in the prior fishing year, unless
the best scientific information available
determines that a greater, lesser, or no
overage adjustment is necessary. If the
quota is adjusted, the recreational ACT
will also be reduced to maintain the 20percent buffer between the ACT and the
adjusted quota.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received a total of 40 public
comments on the proposed rule: 2
Comments from non-governmental
organizations, 4 comments from fishing
organizations, and the rest from
individuals. Ten commenters submitted
suggestions for the reef fish fishery that
were outside the scope of the framework
and the proposed rule, including
comments related to reallocation
between sectors, regional management,
area closures, different fishing seasons,
making red snapper a gamefish, and
establishing a recreational tag system. A
number of commenters also expressed
opinions about the status of the red
snapper stock. Eleven commenters
stated general opposition to the rule,
while 4 commenters expressed general
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14319-14328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06341]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 222
[Docket No. 140829733-5046-02]
RIN 0648-BE35
2015 Annual Determination To Implement the Sea Turtle Observer
Requirement
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final Annual Determination (AD) for 2015, pursuant to its authority
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Through the AD, NMFS identifies
U.S. fisheries operating in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Pacific Ocean that will be required to take observers upon NMFS'
request. The purpose of observing
[[Page 14320]]
identified fisheries is to learn more about sea turtle interactions in
a given fishery, evaluate measures to prevent or reduce sea turtle
takes, and implement the prohibition against sea turtle takes.
Fisheries identified on the 2015 AD (see Table 1) will be eligible to
carry observers as of January 1, 2015 and will remain on the AD for a
five-year period. The fisheries listed on the final determination will
be required to carry observers upon NMFS' request until December 31,
2019.
DATES: Effective April 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for a listing of all Regional
Offices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara McNulty, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-427-8402; Ellen Keane, Greater Atlantic Region, 978-282-
8476; Dennis Klemm, Southeast Region, 727-824-5312; Dan Lawson, West
Coast Region, 562-980-3209; Irene Kelly, Pacific Islands Region, 808-
725-5141. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-
800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) List
of Fisheries (LOF) may be obtained at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/ and information regarding Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports may be obtained at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/
or from any NMFS Regional Office at the addresses listed below:
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Region, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701;
NMFS, West Coast Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200,
Long Beach, CA 90802;
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region, Protected Resources, 1845
Wasp Blvd., Building 176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
Purpose of the Sea Turtle Observer Requirement
Under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., NMFS has the responsibility
to implement programs to conserve marine species listed as endangered
or threatened. All sea turtles found in U.S. waters are listed as
either endangered or threatened under the ESA. Kemp's ridley
(Lepidochelys kempii), loggerhead (Caretta caretta; North Pacific
distinct population segment), leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) sea turtles are listed as
endangered. Loggerhead (Caretta caretta; Northwest Atlantic distinct
population segment), green (Chelonia mydas), and olive ridley
(Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles are listed as threatened, except
for breeding colony populations of green turtles in Florida and on the
Pacific coast of Mexico, and breeding colony populations of olive
ridleys on the Pacific coast of Mexico, which are listed as endangered.
Due to the inability to distinguish between populations of green and
olive ridley turtles away from the nesting beach, NMFS considers these
turtles endangered wherever they occur in U.S. waters. While some sea
turtle populations have shown signs of recovery, many populations
continue to decline.
Incidental take, or bycatch, in fishing gear is the primary
anthropogenic source of sea turtle injury and mortality in U.S. waters.
Section 9 of the ESA prohibits the take (including harassing, harming,
pursuing, hunting, shooting, wounding, killing, trapping, capturing,
collecting or attempting to engage in any such conduct), including
incidental take, of endangered sea turtles. Pursuant to section 4(d) of
the ESA, NMFS has issued regulations extending the prohibition of take,
with exceptions, to threatened sea turtles (50 CFR 223.205 and
223.206). The purpose of the sea turtle observer requirement and the AD
is ultimately to implement ESA sections 9 and 4(d), which prohibit the
incidental take of endangered and threatened sea turtles, respectively,
and to conserve sea turtles. Section 11 of the ESA provides for civil
and criminal penalties for anyone who violates a regulation issued
pursuant to the ESA, including regulations that implement the take
prohibition, as well as for the issuance of regulations to enforce the
take prohibitions. NMFS may grant exceptions to the take prohibitions
for activities that are covered by an incidental take statement or an
incidental take permit issued pursuant to ESA section 7 or 10,
respectively. To do so, NMFS must determine the activity that will
result in incidental take is not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the affected listed species. For some Federal fisheries
and most state fisheries, NMFS has not granted an exception for
incidental takes of sea turtles primarily because we lack information
about fishery-sea turtle interactions.
The most effective way for NMFS to learn about sea turtle-fishery
interactions, in order to implement management measures and prevent or
minimize take, is to place observers aboard fishing vessels. In 2007,
NMFS issued a regulation (50 CFR 222.402) establishing procedures to
annually identify, pursuant to specified criteria and after notice and
opportunity for comment, those fisheries in which the agency intends to
place observers (72 FR 43176, August 3, 2007). These regulations
specify that NMFS may place observers on U.S. fishing vessels,
commercial or recreational, operating in U.S. territorial waters, the
U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ), or on the high seas, or on vessels
that are otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
Failure to comply with the requirements under this rule may result in
civil or criminal penalties under the ESA.
NMFS will pay the direct costs for vessels to carry observers.
These include observer salary and insurance costs. NMFS may also
evaluate other potential direct costs, should they arise. Once
selected, a fishery will be eligible to be observed for a period of
five years without further action by NMFS. This will enable NMFS to
develop an appropriate sampling protocol to investigate whether, how,
when, where, and under what conditions incidental takes are occurring;
evaluate whether existing measures are minimizing or preventing takes;
and develop ESA management measures that implement the prohibitions
against take and that conserve sea turtles.
Process for Developing an Annual Determination
Pursuant to 50 CFR 222.402, NOAA's Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries (AA), in consultation with Regional Administrators and
Fisheries Science Center Directors, developed a proposed AD identifying
which fisheries are required to carry observers, if requested, to
monitor potential interactions with sea turtles. NMFS provided an
opportunity for public comment on any proposed determination. The
determination is based on the best available scientific, commercial, or
other information regarding sea turtle-fishery interactions; sea turtle
distribution; sea turtle strandings; fishing techniques, gears used,
target species, seasons and areas fished; and/or qualitative data from
logbooks or fisher reports. The AD is based on the extent to which:
(1) The fishery operates in the same waters and at the same time as
sea turtles are present;
(2) The fishery operates at the same time or prior to elevated sea
turtle strandings; or
[[Page 14321]]
(3) The fishery uses a gear or technique that is known or likely to
result in incidental take of sea turtles based on documented or
reported takes in the same or similar fisheries; and
(4) NMFS intends to monitor the fishery and anticipates that it
will have the funds to do so.
For the 2015 AD, the AA used the most recent version of the
annually published MMPA List of Fisheries (LOF) as the comprehensive
list of commercial fisheries for consideration. The LOF includes all
known state and Federal commercial fisheries that occur in U.S. waters
and on the high seas. However, in preparing the AD, we do not rely on
the three-part MMPA classification scheme used for fisheries on the
LOF. In addition, unlike the LOF, the AD may include recreational
fisheries likely to interact with sea turtles on the basis of the best
available information.
NMFS consulted with appropriate state and Federal fisheries
officials to identify which fisheries, both commercial and
recreational, should be considered on the AD. Recommendations were
received from six state agencies. Gear types recommended for
consideration included gillnet, trawl, trap/pot, pound net, seine, and
hook-and line. NMFS considered all recommendations carefully in
developing the proposed list of fisheries to be included. Although the
comments and recommendations provided to NMFS by states were based upon
the best available information on their fisheries, NMFS received more
recommendations for fisheries to include on the 2015 AD than is
practical based on the four previously noted criteria (50 CFR
222.402(a)). The AD is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all
fisheries with documented or suspected takes of sea turtles. For some
fisheries, NMFS may already be addressing incidental take through
another mechanism (e.g., rulemaking to implement modifications to
fishing gear and/or practices), may be observing the fishery under a
separate statutory authority, or will consider including them in future
ADs based on the four previously noted criteria (50 CFR 222.402(a)).
Note also that fisheries not included on the 2015 AD may still be
observed under a different authority than the ESA (e.g., MMPA, MSA).
Notice of the final determination will be published in the Federal
Register and made in writing to individuals permitted for each fishery
identified on the AD. NMFS will also notify state agencies and provide
notification through publication in local newspapers, radio broadcasts,
and other means, as appropriate. Once included in the final
determination, a fishery will remain eligible for observer coverage for
a period of five years to enable the design of an appropriate sampling
program and to ensure collection of sufficient scientific data for
analysis. If NMFS determines that more than five years are needed to
obtain sufficient scientific data, NMFS will include the fishery in the
proposed AD again prior to the end of the fifth year.
In the 2010 AD, NMFS identified 19 fisheries that were required to
carry observers for a period of five years, through December 31, 2014,
if requested by NMFS. Because of a lack of resources to implement new
observer programs or expand existing programs, NMFS has not identified
any additional fisheries on the AD since 2010. Eleven of the 19
fisheries included on the 2010 AD have been included on the 2015 AD,
and are described further below. The remaining eight fisheries were
summarized in the proposed 2015 AD (October 22, 2014, 79 FR 63066).
Implementation of Observer Coverage in a Fishery Listed in the 2015 AD
As part of the 2015 AD, NMFS has included, to the extent
practicable, information on the fisheries or gear types to be observed,
geographic and seasonal scope of coverage, and any other relevant
information. For each of these fisheries or gear types, NMFS intends to
monitor the fishery and anticipates that it will have the funds to do
so. After publication of this final AD, a 30-day delay in the effective
date for implementing observer coverage will follow, except for those
fisheries where the AA has determined that there is good cause pursuant
to the Administrative Procedure Act to make the rule effective without
a 30-day delay.
The design of any observer program for fisheries identified through
the AD process, including how observers would be allocated to
individual vessels, will vary among fisheries, fishing sectors, gear
types, and geographic regions and will ultimately be determined by the
individual NMFS Regional Office, Science Center or observer program.
During the program design, NMFS will be guided by the following
standards for distributing and placing observers among fisheries
identified on the AD and among vessels in those fisheries:
(1) The requirement to obtain the best available scientific
information;
(2) The requirement that observers be assigned fairly and equitably
among fisheries and among vessels in a fishery;
(3) The requirement that no individual person or vessel, or group
of persons or vessels, be subject to inappropriate, excessive observer
coverage; and
(4) The need to minimize costs and avoid duplication, where
practicable.
Vessels subject to observer coverage under the AD must comply with
observer safety requirements specified at 50 CFR 600.725 and 50 CFR
600.746. Specifically, 50 CFR 600.746(c) requires vessels to provide
adequate and safe conditions for carrying an observer and conditions
that allow for operation of normal observer functions. To provide such
conditions, a vessel must comply with the applicable regulations
regarding observer accommodations (see 50 CFR parts 229, 300, 600, 622,
635, 648, 660, and 679) and possess a current United States Coast Guard
(USCG) Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Examination decal or a USCG
certificate of examination. A vessel that fails to meet these
requirements at the time an observer is to be deployed on the vessel is
prohibited from fishing (50 CFR 600.746(f)) unless NMFS determines that
an alternative platform (e.g., a second vessel) may be used, or
determines that a vessel with inadequate or unsafe facilities is not be
required to take an observer under 50 CFR 222.404. In any case, all
persons on a vessel must cooperate in the operation of observer
functions. Observer programs designed or carried out in accordance with
50 CFR 222.404 would be required to be consistent with existing
observer-related NOAA policies and regulations, such as those under the
Fair Labor and Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), the Service
Contract Act (41 U.S.C. 351 et seq.), Observer Health and Safety
regulations (50 CFR part 600), and other relevant policies.
Again, note that fisheries not included on the 2015 AD may still be
observed under statutory authority other than the ESA (e.g., MMPA,
MSA). Additional information on observer programs in commercial
fisheries can be found on the NMFS National Observer Program's Web
site: https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/observer-home/; links to individual
regional observer programs may also be found on this Web site.
Sea Turtle Distribution
The sea turtle distribution and ecological use of habitats that
leads to the overlap of sea turtles and fisheries is critical
information that NMFS uses to inform the development of the final AD. A
summary of this information was included in the proposed AD (October
22, 2014, 79 FR 63066) and was considered in the development of the
final 2015 AD.
[[Page 14322]]
Comments and Responses
NMFS received a total of seven comments on the proposed rule from
members of the public, the State of North Carolina, and Turtle Island
Restoration Network. Commenters expressed general support of the rule
or fishery observer programs, some with additional suggestions and
requests for the inclusion or exclusion of particular fisheries. All
substantive comments are specifically addressed below. Comments on
issues outside the scope of the AD were noted, but are not responded to
in this final rule.
General Comments
Comment 1: Six commenters expressed general support of the rule.
Response: NMFS agrees, and has included 14 fisheries on the 2015 AD
to allow for increased data gathering on sea turtle bycatch in order to
accomplish the purposes of the rule.
Comment 2: The Turtle Island Restoration Network recommended that
the Atlantic, Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico pelagic longline and
highly-migratory species fisheries be divided into independent fishery
listings rather than treated as a whole, to ensure that adequate
observer coverage is applied and subsequent independent ESA authority
given.
Response: This recommendation is outside the scope of this
rulemaking given the criteria for including fisheries on the AD as
codified in the 2007 regulation (50 CFR 222.402), which specifies that
NMFS will use the most recently published LOF as the comprehensive set
of commercial fisheries to be considered for inclusion on the AD.
Comments on Gillnet Fisheries
Comment 3: The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) expressed concern on the inclusion of the North
Carolina inshore gillnet fishery and recommended that the fishery not
be included on the 2015 AD. This concern was based on several factors
including the low level of Federal observer effort expended on the
fishery since it was included in the 2010 AD, the relatively high level
of observer effort associated with the state observer program,
communication difficulties that inclusion can create when both state
and federal observer programs interact with fishers, existence of
permits and regulations to reduce sea turtle interactions within the
fishery, and NMFS observer effort is already in place under MMPA
authority.
Response: After considering this recommendation, NMFS has
determined the best course of action is to include the North Carolina
inshore gillnet fishery on the 2015 AD. In 2013, NMFS issued an ESA
section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit (ITP) to NCDENR, Division of
Marine Fisheries, for the incidental take of sea turtles in the North
Carolina inshore gillnet fishery. As a requirement of the permit,
NCDENR must maintain a specific level of observer coverage to monitor
and track the level of incidental take that is occurring. Although
NCDENR is currently observing this fishery under the authority of the
ITP, the observer coverage required by the ITP does not include all
areas where the fishery operates. NMFS has evaluated the entire North
Carolina inshore gillnet fishery based on the AD criteria, and has
determined that this fishery meets the criteria for inclusion on the
2015 AD. However, NMFS does not intend to place observers on vessels in
a fishery subject to observer requirements under an ITP without
discussion and coordination with the state.
NMFS understands there may be confusion when multiple government
agencies have regulatory authority to observe, resulting in both
Federal and state observers within a fishery. NMFS strives to clarify
and improve the communication process regarding fishery observer
requirements with local, state, and other federal entities to achieve
the highest possible level of compliance and coordination.
Comment 4: The Turtle Island Restoration Network recommended that
all drift gillnet fisheries be monitored, particularly the California
thresher shark/swordfish drift net fishery, due to the impacts these
fisheries have on sea turtles.
Response: NMFS acknowledges that there are other fisheries, in
addition to those listed on the 2015 AD, that may be a concern for sea
turtles. The 2015 AD is not meant to be a comprehensive list of
fisheries that interact with sea turtles or fisheries that require
monitoring, but rather a focused list, based on specific inclusion
criteria (see Purpose of the Sea Turtle Observer Requirement section).
NMFS evaluates fisheries for inclusion on the AD on an annual basis and
will re-evaluate the gillnet fisheries recommend by Turtle Island
Restoration Network in future AD's. The California thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery is currently listed as a Category I
fishery on the LOF, and therefore NMFS may monitor this entire fishery
for marine mammals, which also allows for the collection of information
on sea turtle bycatch. Dedicated observer coverage of this fishery is
currently a top priority of NMFS and is considered necessary and
essential to the successful implementation and monitoring of the
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan and Endangered Species
Act requirements already in place for the fishery. Indications are that
observer coverage goals and mandates for this fishery are likely to
increase in the foreseeable future due to management considerations
already in place. Because NMFS does not intend to monitor this fishery
beyond its existing coverage under other authorities, NMFS is not
including this fishery on the 2015 AD.
Comments on Seine/Weir/Pound Net Fisheries
Comment 5: The Turtle Island Restoration Network expressed concern
that the Virginia Pound Net and U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop
seine/weir/pound net fisheries were not included in the 2015 AD.
Response: In accordance with the criteria for listing a fishery on
the AD, NMFS is not including the Virginia Pound Net or the Mid-
Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound net on the 2015 AD because
NMFS does not intend to monitor these fisheries for sea turtle takes at
this time. NMFS has observed the Virginia Pound Net fishery for sea
turtle takes in the past, and NMFS currently maintains the authority to
observe for marine mammals. Although these fisheries are not included
on the 2015 AD, the AD is published annually and these fisheries may be
considered for inclusion on a future AD.
Comments on Longline Fisheries
Comment 6: The Turtle Island Restoration Network commented that,
although sea turtle takes occur in association with longline fisheries,
no longline fishery was included in the 2015 AD and recommended that
longline fisheries (particularly the Hawaii deep-set and shallow-set
longline fisheries, as well as the western Pacific pelagic deep-set
fishery) be included and observed if funding becomes available for NMFS
to undertake additional observing effort.
Response: NMFS agrees that sea turtle interactions occur in
association with longline fisheries. However, in accordance with the
criteria for listing a fishery on the AD, described above, NMFS is not
including the longline fisheries noted by the Turtle Island Restoration
Network on the 2015 AD because NMFS does not intend to monitor the
fishery beyond the existing coverage. At this time, NMFS believes that
monitoring efforts available through MMPA and MSA authorities provide
[[Page 14323]]
sufficient monitoring coverage for assessing sea turtle interactions in
longline fisheries. As noted earlier, information on sea turtles is
collected whenever an interaction occurs on an observed trip. NMFS does
not currently have funding available to add observer coverage
specifically for the purposes of monitoring for sea turtle bycatch, and
therefore these fisheries did not meet the criteria for listing on the
2015 AD. NMFS will continue to assess these and other fisheries for
inclusion on future ADs.
Fisheries Included on the 2015 Annual Determination
NMFS includes 14 fisheries (12 in the Atlantic Ocean/Gulf of Mexico
and 2 in the Pacific Ocean) on the 2015 AD. The 14 fisheries, described
below and listed in Table 1, represent several gear types, including
trawl, gillnet, trap/pot, and weir/seine.
The 2014 LOF (79 FR 14418, March 14, 2014) was used as the
comprehensive list of commercial fisheries to evaluate for inclusion on
the AD. All of the fisheries included on the AD are also included in
the 2015 LOF (79 FR 77919, December 29, 2014). The fishery name,
definition, and number of vessels/persons for fisheries listed on the
AD are taken from the most recent LOF. Additionally, the fishery
descriptions below include a particular fishery's current
classification on the MMPA LOF (i.e., Category I, II, or III); Category
I and II fisheries are required to carry observers under the MMPA if
requested by NMFS. As noted previously, NMFS also has authority to
observe fisheries in Federal waters under the MSA and collect sea
turtle bycatch information.
Trawl Fisheries
Interactions with trawl fisheries are of particular concern for sea
turtles, because forced submergence in any type of restrictive gear can
lead to lack of oxygen and subsequent death by drowning. Metabolic
changes that can impair a sea turtle's ability to function can occur
within minutes of forced submergence (Lutcavage et al., 1997).
Trawls that are not outfitted with turtle excluder devices (TEDs)
may result in forced submergence. Currently, only otter trawl fisheries
capable of catching shrimp and operating south of Cape Charles,
Virginia, and in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as trawl fisheries
targeting summer flounder south of Cape Charles, Virginia, in the
summer flounder fishery-sea turtle protection area (50 CFR 222.102),
are required to use TEDs.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico Shrimp Trawl Fishery
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
(estimated 4,950 vessels/persons) targets shrimp using various types of
trawls; NMFS will focus on the component of the fishery that uses
skimmer trawls for the 2015 AD. Skimmer trawls are used primarily in
inshore/inland shallow waters (typically less than 20 ft. (6.1 m)) to
target shrimp. The skimmer trawl has a rigid ``L''-shaped or triangular
metal frame with the inboard portion of the frame attached to the
vessel and the outboard portion attached to a skid that runs along the
seabed.
Skimmer trawl use increased in response to TED requirements for
shrimp bottom otter trawls. Skimmer trawls currently have no TED
requirement, but are subject to tow time limits of 55 minutes from
April 1 to October 31, and 75 minutes from November 1 to March 31.
Skimmer trawls are used in North Carolina, Florida (Gulf Coast),
Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. There are documented takes of sea
turtles in skimmer trawls in North Carolina and the Gulf of Mexico. All
Gulf of Mexico states, except Texas, include skimmer trawls as an
allowable gear. In recent years, the skimmer trawl has become a major
gear in the inshore shrimp fishery in the Northern Gulf and also has
some use in inshore North Carolina. Louisiana hosts the vast majority
of skimmer boats, with 2,248 skimmer and butterfly net trawlers
reporting landings in 2008. In 2008, Mississippi had approximately 62
active skimmer, butterfly, and chopstick boats, Alabama had 60 active
skimmer boats, and North Carolina had 97 skimmer vessels (NMFS 2014).
However, skimmer vessels in North Carolina have declined in recent
years to 64 active vessels in 2010.
Skimmer trawl effort overlaps with sea turtle distribution and, as
noted above, takes have been observed in this fishery. In response to
high numbers of sea turtle strandings since 2010, a portion of fishery
observer effort was shifted from otter trawls to the nearshore skimmer
trawls in the northern Gulf of Mexico during the summers of 2012, 2013,
and 2014. In 2012, 119 sea days were observed in the skimmer trawl
fishery resulting in 24 observed interactions with sea turtles. In
2013, 145 sea days were observed, resulting in 8 observed interactions
with sea turtles. In 2014, 82 sea days were observed, resulting in 10
observed interactions with sea turtles.
Continued observer coverage to understand the scope and impact of
turtle takes in this fishery is needed to inform management decisions
on what additional actions may be necessary to minimize and prevent sea
turtle takes, and further sea turtle conservation and recovery.
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, and mandatory observer
coverage in Federal waters began in 2007 under the MSA. The fishery is
currently observed at approximately 1% of total fishery effort. The
fishery was previously included in the 2010 AD, which allowed for
observer coverage to be shifted to skimmer trawls to specifically
investigate bycatch of sea turtles. NMFS includes this fishery again
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
including a fishery on the AD, because sea turtles are known to occur
in the same areas where the fishery operates, takes have been
previously documented in this fishery, and NMFS intends to continue to
focus observer coverage in the component of the fishery that uses
skimmer trawls.
Gulf of Mexico Mixed Species Trawl Fishery
The Gulf of Mexico Mixed Species Trawl Fishery (estimated 20
vessels/persons) targets fish using various types of trawl gear,
including bottom otter trawl gear targeting sheepshead. This fishery is
located in state waters, and is classified as Category III on the MMPA
LOF. NMFS has not previously required vessels operating in this fishery
to carry an observer under MMPA authority, and this fishery was not
included in the 2010 AD. NMFS includes this fishery in the 2015 AD
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
including a fishery on the AD, because sea turtles are known to occur
in the same areas where the fishery operates, takes have been
documented in similar gear types, mainly the shrimp trawl fishery, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Gillnet Fisheries
Sea turtles are vulnerable to entanglement and drowning in
gillnets, especially when the gear is left unattended. The main risk to
sea turtles from capture in gillnet gear is forced submergence. Sea
turtle entanglement in gillnets can also result in severe constriction
wounds and/or abrasions. Large mesh gillnets (e.g., 10-12 in. [25.4-
30.5 cm] stretched mesh or greater) have been documented as
particularly effective at capturing sea turtles. Additionally, sea
turtles have
[[Page 14324]]
been documented entangled in smaller mesh gillnets.
Given known interactions between sea turtles and this gear type,
and the need to obtain more coverage on state inshore fisheries, NMFS
includes the California Halibut, White Seabass and Other Species Set
Gillnet Fishery; California Yellowtail, Barracuda, and White Seabass
Drift Gillnet Fishery; Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery; Long
Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery; North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery;
and Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery in the 2015 AD. Each of these
fisheries, with the exception of the Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery,
was listed on the 2010 AD.
California Halibut, White Seabass and Other Species Set Gillnet Fishery
(>3.5 in Mesh)
The California halibut, white seabass, and other species set
gillnet fishery (estimated 50 vessels/persons) targets halibut, white
seabass, and other species from the U.S.-Mexico border north to
Monterey Bay using 200 fathom (1,200 ft.; 366 m) gillnets with a
stretch mesh size of 8.5 in (31.6 cm). Net soak duration is typically
8-10, 19-24, or 44-49 hours at a depth ranging from 15-50 fathoms (90-
300 ft.; 27-91 m), with most sets from 15-35 fathoms (90-210 ft.; 27-64
m). No more than 1500 fathoms (9,000 ft.; 2,743 m) of gill or trammel
net may be fished in combination for California halibut and angel
shark. Fishing occurs year-round, with effort generally increasing
during summer months and declining during the last three months of the
year. The central California portion of the fishery from Point Arguello
to Point Reyes has been closed since September 2002, following a state
ban on gillnets inshore of 60 fathoms (360 ft.; 110 m). Since 1990, set
gill nets have been prohibited in state waters south of Point Arguello
and within 70 fathoms (420 ft.; 128 m) or one mile (1.6 km), whichever
is less, around the Channel Islands. The California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG) manages the fishery as a limited entry fishery with
gear restrictions and area closures.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state waters for marine
mammal interactions and to collect information on sea turtles should a
take occur on an observed trip. This fishery was included in the 2010
AD. This fishery was observed at 13% of all trips in 2010, 8% in 2011,
and 6% in 2012. During that time, no sea turtle bycatch was observed in
the fishery. Notwithstanding the fact that no sea turtle takes were
documented in this fishery during this three year period, NMFS again
includes this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for including a fishery on the AD, because it operates in
the same waters that turtles are known to occur, this gear type is
known to result in the incidental take of sea turtles based on
documented takes, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
California Yellowtail, Barracuda, and White Seabass Drift Gillnet
Fishery (Mesh Size >3.5 in. and <14 in.)
The California yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet fishery (30 vessels/persons) targets primarily yellowtail and
white seabass, and secondarily barracuda, with target species typically
determined by market demand on a short-term basis. Drift gillnets are
up to 6,000 ft. (1,829 m) long and are set at the surface. The mesh
size depends on target species and is typically 6.0-6.5 in (15-16.5
cm). When targeting yellowtail and barracuda, the mesh size must be
>=3.5 in (9 cm); when targeting white seabass, the mesh size must be
>=6 in (15.2 cm). From June 16 to March 14 not more than 20%, by
number, of a load of fish may be white seabass with a total length of
28 in (71 cm). A maximum of ten white seabass per load may be taken if
taken in gillnet or trammel nets with meshes from 3.5-6.0 in (9-15 cm)
in length. The fishery operates year-round, primarily south of Point
Conception with some effort around San Clemente Island and San Nicolas
Island. This fishery is a limited entry fishery with various gear
restrictions and area closures managed by the CDFG.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state waters for marine
mammal interactions and to collect information on sea turtles should a
take occur on an observed trip. This fishery was included in the 2010
AD. This fishery was observed at 5% of all trips in 2010, 3% in 2011,
and 1% in 2012. During that time, no sea turtle bycatch was observed in
the fishery. Notwithstanding the fact that no sea turtle takes were
documented in this fishery during this three year period, NMFS again
includes this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for including a fishery on the AD because it operates in
the same waters that turtles are known to occur, this gear type is
known to result in the incidental take of sea turtles based on
documented takes, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery (estimated 1,126
vessels/persons) targets menhaden and croaker using gillnet gear with
mesh sizes ranging from 2.875-5 in (7.3-12.7 cm), depending on the
target species. The fishery operates between the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-
Tunnel and the mainland. The fishery is managed under the Interstate
Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) for Atlantic menhaden and Atlantic
croaker. Gillnets in Chesapeake Bay also target striped bass and spot
croaker.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, and was
included in the 2010 AD. There has been limited observer coverage in
this fishery since 2010, with 12 observed trips in 2010, one observed
trip in 2011, and three observed trips in 2013. To date, observer
coverage in gillnet fisheries has focused on Federally-managed
fisheries. There is a need to better understand the gear fished in
state waters and the extent to which this gear interacts with sea
turtles. Given the risk of interaction and the limited data currently
available on interactions, NMFS again includes this fishery pursuant to
the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery
on the AD because sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas
where the fishery operates, takes have been previously documented in
similar gear, the fishery operates during a period of high sea turtle
strandings, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Long Island Sound inshore gillnet fishery (estimated 20
vessels/persons) includes all gillnet fisheries operating west of a
line from the north fork of the eastern end of Long Island, New York
(Orient Point to Plum Island to Fishers Island) to Watch Hill, Rhode
Island (59 FR 43703, August 25, 1994). Target species include bluefish,
striped bass, weakfish, and summer flounder.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. There has been limited observer coverage in
this fishery since 2010. To date, observer coverage in gillnet
fisheries has focused on Federally-managed fisheries. However, the NMFS
Northeast Fisheries Observer Program has worked with the state of New
York to develop a plan to achieve observer coverage in New York state
waters between 2014 and 2017, which includes approximately 250 gillnet
trips annually. There is a need to better understand the gear fished in
state waters and the extent to which this gear
[[Page 14325]]
interacts with sea turtles. Given the risk of interaction and the
limited data currently available on interactions, and the new
partnership with the State of New York, NMFS again includes this
fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
listing a fishery on the AD. NMFS also makes this determination because
sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas where the fishery
operates, takes have been previously documented in similar gear, the
fishery operates during a period of high sea turtle strandings, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The North Carolina inshore gillnet fishery (approximately 1,323
vessels/persons) targets species including southern flounder, weakfish,
bluefish, Atlantic croaker, striped mullet, spotted seatrout, Spanish
mackerel, striped bass, spot, red drum, black drum, and shad. This
fishery includes any fishing effort using any type of gillnet gear,
including set (float and sink), drift, and runaround gillnet for any
target species inshore of the COLREGS lines in North Carolina. This
fishery is managed under state and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission (ASMFC) interstate FMPs, applying net and mesh size
regulations, and seasonal area closures in the Pamlico Sound Gillnet
Restricted Area.
NMFS issued two ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permits for the North
Carolina state-wide inshore gillnet fishery to incidentally take sea
turtles in 2013, and to incidentally take Atlantic sturgeon in 2014,
which include all inshore, estuarine waters, including Core Sound and
Pamlico Sound. The permits require the State of North Carolina to
maintain a minimum of 7% observer coverage for large mesh gillnet in
each state management area for the spring, summer, and fall seasons. It
also requires a minimum of 2% observer coverage for small mesh
gillnets. Since issuance of the sea turtle incidental take permit in
September 2013, it is estimated that 261 green sea turtles (173 alive,
88 dead) and 15 Kemp's ridley sea turtles (all alive), have been
incidentally taken in the inshore large mesh gillnet fishery.
Additionally, one live green sea turtle was observed in the small mesh
gillnet fishery.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, and was
included in the 2010 AD. NMFS has observed this fishery with limited
coverage since 2010, observing 42 trips in 2010, 18 trips in 2011, 22
trips in 2012, and 28 trips in 2013. Although the state is currently
required to maintain observer coverage in inshore waters, NMFS again
includes this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD because sea turtles are
known to occur in the same areas where the fishery operates, takes have
been previously documented in this fishery, the fishery operates during
a period of high sea turtle strandings, and NMFS intends to monitor
this fishery.
Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery
The Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery (estimated 724 vessels/persons)
operates in state inshore waters, targeting finfish, including Spanish
mackerel, king mackerel, striped mullet, Florida pompano, and southern
flounder using sink gillnets and strike gillnets.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery for marine mammal interactions
and to collect information on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. To better characterize fishing effort and bycatch, the
NMFS Southeast Gillnet Observer Program began placing observers on
state commercial gillnet vessels in coastal Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Alabama in 2012. NMFS includes this fishery in the 2015 AD because sea
turtles are known to occur in the same areas where the fishery operates
and takes have been documented in similar other fisheries using gillnet
gear, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Trap/Pot Fisheries
Sea turtles are known to become entangled in the buoy lines (also
called vertical lines) of trap/pot gear, and there have been anecdotal
reports that sea turtles may interact with the trap/pot itself. Turtles
entangled in trap/pot gear may drown or suffer injuries (and potential
subsequent mortality) due to constriction by the rope or line. Takes of
both leatherback and hard-shelled sea turtles have been documented in
this gear type. NMFS Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office
(GARFO), formerly the Northeast Regional Office, established the
Northeast Atlantic Sea Turtle Disentanglement Network (STDN) in 2002 to
respond to entanglements in vertical lines associated with trap/pot
gear. Reports of entangled sea turtles come from fishermen, boaters,
and the general public. Since 2002, entanglements in vertical lines
have averaged 20.4 annually. Takes in 2012 and 2013 increased
significantly with 41 and 56 takes documented in each year,
respectively. These numbers include all vertical line interactions, the
vast majority of which were identified as trap/pot gear (as opposed to
gillnet gear). A more systematic data collection on these interactions
is needed to begin understanding the extent to which interactions occur
in order to implement the prohibitions against takes, including
preventing or minimizing takes.
Three pot/trap fisheries were included in the 2010 AD; Atlantic
Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery, Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery,
and the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery.
However, limited or no observer coverage has been achieved in these
fisheries since listing on the 2010 AD. While some pot/trap vessels can
be observed through traditional methods, other vessels participating in
these fisheries, especially in state waters, may be too small to carry
observers, which create challenges for observer programs. Further
discussions regarding the most appropriate and effective methodologies
for observing the pot/trap fisheries will be beneficial. On June 27,
2014, NMFS published a final rule under the MMPA that will reduce the
volume of vertical lines in Atlantic waters (79 FR 36586). In addition
to helping conserve and recover large whales, this reduction is
expected to benefit sea turtles. NMFS will continue to monitor the
implementation of this rule and evaluate its effectiveness. In
addition, staff from GARFO, the Northeast Fisheries Science Center
(NEFSC), and Fisheries and Oceans Canada met in December 2014 to
discuss technologies that may apply to mitigating sea turtle
interactions with vertical lines. Based on these discussions, the GARFO
and NEFSC are developing a research plan related to vertical line and
sea turtle interactions. This plan will consider observer coverage in
these fisheries. New methods to more effectively monitor these
fisheries may be developed and implemented as an outcome of this
meeting. Based on the input from the states, NMFS again includes all
three pot/trap fisheries in the 2015 AD, further described below.
Atlantic Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery (estimated 8,557 vessels/
persons) targets blue crab using pots baited with fish or poultry
typically set in rows in shallow water. The pot position is marked by
either a floating or sinking buoy line attached to a surface buoy. The
fishery occurs year-round from the south shore of Long Island at
72[deg] 30' W. long. in the Atlantic and east of the fishery management
demarcation line between the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50
CFR 600.105), including state waters. The fishery is managed under
state FMPs.
[[Page 14326]]
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. However, since NMFS included this fishery in
the 2010 AD, NMFS has been unable to observe the fishery, as discussed
above. Accordingly, NMFS again includes this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD because sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas where
the fishery operates, takes have been documented in similar gear types
(i.e. lobster pot fishery), and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic mixed species trap/pot fishery (estimated 3,467
vessels/persons) targets species including hagfish, shrimp, conch/
whelk, red crab, Jonah crab, rock crab, black sea bass, scup, tautog,
cod, haddock, pollock, redfish (ocean perch), white hake, spot, skate,
catfish, and stone crab. The fishery includes all trap/pot operations
from the Maine-Canada border south through the waters east of the
fishery management demarcation line between the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but does not include the following
trap/pot fisheries (as defined on the MMPA LOF): Northeast/Mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot; Atlantic blue crab trap/pot; Florida spiny
lobster trap/pot; Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot; U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot fisheries; and the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden crab fishery (68 FR
1421, January 10, 2003). The fishery is managed under various
Interstate and Federal FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. However, since listing this fishery on the
2010 AD, NMFS has been unable to observe the fishery, as discussed
above. Accordingly, NMFS again includes this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD because sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas where
the fishery operates, takes have been documented in similar gear types
(i.e. lobster pot fishery), and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery
The Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery
(estimated 11,693 vessels/persons) targets American lobster primarily
with traps, while approximately 2-3% of the target species is taken by
mobile gear (trawls and dredges). The fishery operates in inshore and
offshore waters from Maine to New Jersey, and may extend as far south
as Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. Approximately 80% of American lobster
is harvested from state waters; therefore, the ASMFC has the primary
regulatory role. The fishery is managed in state waters under the ASMFC
Interstate FMP and in Federal waters under the Atlantic Coastal
Fisheries Cooperative Management Act.
This fishery is classified as Category I on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. Since that time, NMFS observed 22 lobster
trips in 2013 and 32 trips in 2014, with 216 observation days planned
for the 2014-2015 schedule. NMFS STDN has documented 83 leatherback
entanglements in lobster trap gear operating in Maine, Massachusetts,
Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey since 2002. These
entanglements have occurred between May and October (STDN, unpublished
data), which is the time period when observer coverage for this fishery
will be focused.
NMFS again includes this fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD
because sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been documented in this fishery, and NMFS
intends to monitor this fishery.
Weir/Seine/Floating Trap Fisheries
Pound net, weir, seine and floating trap fisheries may use mesh
similar to that used in gillnets, but the gear is prosecuted
differently from traditional gillnets. For example, pound net leaders
have a mesh component similar to a gillnet; yet sea turtles have been
documented entangled in pound net leaders. Pound net leaders in the
Virginia portion of the Chesapeake Bay are subject to requirements
designed to reduce sea turtle bycatch. Purse seines, weirs and floating
traps also have the potential to entangle and drown sea turtles, as
they are set similarly to pound nets. Turtles have been documented in
the pounds of pound net gear and/or weirs in Massachusetts, New York,
Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia. The turtles observed in these
pounds have generally been alive and uninjured. In Virginia, sea
turtles have been documented becoming entangled with the leader, which
often results in mortality.
Four pound net/weir/seine fisheries were included on the 2010 AD:
the Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine, the Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse
seine, the Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound net, and
the Virginia pound net fishery. Based on the information provided by
states and the best available scientific information, NMFS includes
again two of these fisheries: the Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
fishery, Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine fishery, and adds the Rhode
Island floating trap fishery on the 2015 AD.
Mid-Atlantic Haul/Beach Seine Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine fishery (estimated 565 vessels/
persons) targets striped bass, mullet, spot, weakfish, sea trout,
bluefish, kingfish, and harvest fish using seines with one end secured
(e.g., swipe nets and long seines) and seines secured at both ends or
those anchored to the beach and hauled up on the beach. The beach seine
system also uses a bunt and a wash net that are attached to the beach
and extend into the surf. The beach seines soak for less than two
hours. The fishery occurs in waters west of 72[deg] 30' W. long. and
north of a line extending due east from the North Carolina-South
Carolina border. Fishing on the Outer Banks, North Carolina occurs
primarily in the spring (April to June) and fall (October to December).
In the Chesapeake Bay, this gear has been historically fished in the
southwest portion of the Bay with some effort in the northwest portion.
Effort begins to increase in early May, peaks in early/mid-June, and
continues into July. During this time, based on historical data from
Virginia, approximately 100 haul seine trips occur. Beach haul seines
have been documented to interact with sea turtles.
The fishery is managed under the Interstate FMPs for Bluefish and
for Atlantic Striped Bass of the Atlantic Coast from Maine through
North Carolina, and is subject to Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction
Plan implementing regulations.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. NMFS observed this fishery at low levels prior
to 2008, but it has not been observed since then. NMFS again includes
this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD based on suspected
interactions with sea turtles given the nature of the gear and fishing
methodology in addition to effort overlapping with sea turtle
distribution. In the Chesapeake Bay, the fishery operates at the same
time as historically elevated sea turtle strandings, and NMFS intends
to monitor this fishery.
Mid-Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine fishery (estimated 5 vessels/
[[Page 14327]]
persons) targets menhaden and thread herring using purse seine gear.
Most sets occur within 3 mi (4.8 km) of shore with the majority of the
effort occurring off North Carolina from November to January, and
moving northward during warmer months to southern New England. The
fishery is managed under the Interstate FMP for Atlantic Menhaden. In
the Chesapeake Bay, this fishery operates to a limited extent during a
period of high sea turtle strandings (May and June). This fishery is
classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was listed on the 2010
AD. NMFS has observed this fishery at low levels, with nine trips
observed in 2010, and three trips observed in 2012. NMFS again includes
this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD, given the nature of the
gear and fishing methodology in addition to effort overlapping with sea
turtle distribution, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Rhode Island Floating Trap Fishery
The Rhode Island Floating Trap Fishery (estimated nine vessels/
persons) is a small fishery that sets traps similar to a weir/pound net
seasonally (May-October) targeting scup, striped sea bass, and squid.
This fishery is classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF, and
NMFS has not previously required vessels operating in this fishery to
carry an observer under MMPA authority. This fishery was not included
in the 2010 AD. Turtles have been documented in the pounds of pound net
gear and/or weirs in Massachusetts, New York, Maryland, and Virginia,
which operates similarly to the Rhode Island Floating Trap Fishery.
There have also been anecdotal reports of sea turtle interactions in
this fishery, but bycatch levels are unknown. NMFS includes this
fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
listing a fishery on the AD because sea turtles are known to occur in
the same areas where the fishery operates, takes have been documented
in similar gear types, such as the Virginia and Maryland pound nets,
and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Table 1--State and Federal Commercial Fisheries Included on the 2015
Annual Determination
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years eligible to
Fishery carry observers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trawl Fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp 2015-2019
trawl...............................................
Gulf of Mexico mixed species fish trawl.............. 2015-2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California halibut, white seabass and other species 2015-2019
set gillnet (>3.5 in mesh)..........................
California yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass 2015-2019
drift gillnet (mesh size >3.5 in. and <14 in.)......
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet....................... 2015-2019
Long Island inshore gillnet.......................... 2015-2019
North Carolina inshore gillnet....................... 2015-2019
Gulf of Mexico gillnet............................... 2015-2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trap/pot Fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.......................... 2015-2019
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot...................... 2015-2019
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot..... 2015-2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pound Net/Weir/Seine Fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine........................ 2015-2019
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine.................... 2015-2019
Rhode Island floating trap........................... 2015-2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration at the proposed rule stage that this rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. NMFS published the factual basis for that certification in
the proposed rule, and does not repeat it here. NMFS received no
comments on this certification. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required, and none was prepared.
The information collection for the AD is approved under Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0648-0593.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on the issuance of the regulations to
implement this observer requirement in 50 CFR part 222, subpart D. The
EA concluded that implementing these regulations would not have a
significant impact on the human environment. This final rule would not
make any significant change in the management of fisheries included on
the AD, and therefore, this final rule would not change the analysis or
conclusion of the EA. If NMFS takes a management action for a specific
fishery, for example, requiring fishing gear modifications, NMFS would
first prepare any environmental document required under NEPA and
specific to that action.
This final rule would not affect species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or their associated critical habitat. The
impacts
[[Page 14328]]
of numerous fisheries have been analyzed in various biological
opinions, and this final rule would not affect the conclusions of those
opinions. The inclusion of fisheries on the AD is not considered to be
a management action that would adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a management action, for example,
requiring modifications to fishing gear and/or practices, NMFS would
review the action for potential adverse effects to listed species under
the ESA.
This final rule would have no adverse impacts on sea turtles and
may have a positive impact on sea turtles by improving knowledge of sea
turtles and the fisheries interacting with sea turtles through
information collected from observer programs.
This final rule would not affect the land or water uses or natural
resources of the coastal zone, as specified under section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
Dated: March 12, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-06341 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P