Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing Operations; Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan Regulations, 14345-14356 [2015-06272]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Leesburg Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803.
We request that you send comments
only by one of the methods described
above. We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(for more information, see the
Information Requested section of the
March 11, 2015, proposed rule at 80 FR
12846).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Ricks, Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Mississippi
Field Office, 6578 Dogwood View
Parkway, Jackson, MS 39213; telephone:
601–321–1122; facsimile: 601–965–
4340. If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
proposed rule that published in the
Federal Register on March 11, 2015, at
80 FR 12846, the ADDRESSES section
provided the wrong address for the
submission of hard-copy comments. The
corrected ADDRESSES section appears
above.
Dated: March 16, 2015.
Tina A. Campbell,
Chief, Division of Policy, Performance, and
Management Programs, U.S Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–06302 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 217
RIN 0648–BE53
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Seismic Surveys in Cook
Inlet, Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
On February 23, 2015, the
NMFS published its proposed
rulemaking to govern the take of marine
mammals, by harassment, incidental to
conducting a marine geophysical
(seismic) survey in Cook Inlet, Alaska
from March 1, 2015 to February 29,
2020. The Federal Register document
indicated that written comments are due
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
by March 25, 2015. However, in
response to a request to extend the
public comment period, NMFS has
decided to extend the public comment
period by an additional 15 calendar
days.
NMFS has extended the public
comment period published on February
23, 2015 (80 FR 9509) to April 9, 2015.
NMFS must receive written comments
and information on or before April 9,
2015.
DATES:
Address comments on the
application to Jolie Harrison,
Supervisor, Incidental Take Program,
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910. The mailbox address for
providing email comments is
ITP.Young@noaa.gov. Please include
0648–BE53 in the subject line.
Comments sent via email to ITP.Young@
noaa.gov, including all attachments,
must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size.
NMFS is not responsible for email
comments sent to addresses other than
the one provided here.
Instructions: All submitted comments
are a part of the public record and
NMFS will post them to https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications without
change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Young, NMFS, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS (301) 427–8484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Sections
101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary
of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by
U.S. citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if
certain findings are made and either
regulations are issued or, if the taking is
limited to harassment, a notice of a
proposed authorization is provided to
the public for review.
On February 23, 2015, NMFS
published a Federal Register notice (80
FR 9509, February 23, 2015) announcing
proposed issuance of regulations to
Apache Alaska Corporation (Apache) to
take marine mammals, by harassment
incidental to conducting a seismic
survey in Cook Inlet, Alaska March 1,
2015 through February 29, 2020. The
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14345
30-day public comment period for the
Federal Register notice (80 FR 9509,
February 23, 2015) ends on March 25,
2015.
This is the first time that NMFS has
proposed to issue regulations for
harassment incidental to a seismic
survey in Cook Inlet, Alaska.
On March 2, 2015, the Natural
Resource Defense Council requested an
extension of the public comment period
to aid in their review of the proposed
rulemaking. NMFS has considered the
request and will extend the comment
period to April 9, 2015. This extension
provides a total of 45 days for public
input and continuing Federal agency
reviews to inform NMFS’ final decision
to issue or deny the regulations.
NMFS refers the reader to the
February 23, 2015, notice of proposed
regulations (80 FR 9509, February 23,
2015) for background information
concerning the proposed rulemaking as
this notice does not repeat the
information here. For additional
information about Apache’s request and
the environmental analyses, please visit
the Web site at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Dated: March 11, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–06342 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 150122067–5229–01]
RIN 0648–BE83
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Commercial Fishing Operations;
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction
Plan Regulations
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to amend the
regulations implementing the Atlantic
Large Whale Take Reduction Plan. This
action proposes to change the minimum
number of traps per trawl to allow
fishing with a single trap in certain
Massachusetts and Rhode Island state
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
14346
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
waters; and proposes to modify the
requirement to use one endline on
trawls within certain areas in
Massachusetts state waters. NMFS also
proposes a 1⁄4 mile buffer in waters
surrounding certain islands in Maine to
allow fishing with a single trap. In
addition, NMFS proposes additional
gear marking requirements for those
waters allowing single traps as well as
two new high use areas for humpback
whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and
North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena
glacialis).
DATES: Submit comments on or before
April 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2015–0127, by either of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
1. Go to www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150127,
2. Click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields,
3. Enter or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Kim Damon-Randall, Assistant Regional
Administrator for Protected Resources,
NMFS Greater Atlantic Region, 55 Great
Republic Dr., Gloucester, MA 01930,
Attn: Large Whale Proposed Rule.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Swails, NMFS Greater Atlantic Regional
Fisheries Office, 978–282–8481,
Kate.Swails@noaa.gov; or, Kristy Long,
NMFS Office of Protected Resources,
206–526–4792, Kristy.Long@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
Several of the background documents
for the Plan and the take reduction
planning process can be downloaded
from the Plan Web site at https://
www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/
protected/whaletrp/. The
complete text of the regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
implementing the Plan can be found in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at
50 CFR 229.32 or downloaded from the
Web site, along with a guide to the
regulations. The draft Environmental
Assessment for this action is also
available online.
Background
NMFS published an amendment to
the Atlantic Large Whale Take
Reduction Plan (Plan) on June 27, 2014
(79 FR 36586) to address large whale
entanglement risks associated with
vertical line (or buoy lines) from
commercial trap/pot fisheries. This
amendment included gear
modifications, gear setting
requirements, a seasonal closure
(Massachusetts Restricted Area) and
gear marking for both the trap/pot and
the gillnet fisheries.
In consultation with the Atlantic
Large Whale Take Reduction Team
(Team), we developed protocols for
considering modifications or
exemptions to the regulations
implementing the Plan. Following these
protocols, on August 18, 2014, the
Massachusetts Division of Marine
Fisheries (DMF) submitted a proposal to
modify the Massachusetts Bay
Restricted Area and exempted several
areas from the gear setting requirements
to address safety and economic
concerns raised by their industry
members.
The DMF proposal adequately
addressed the protocols and criteria
established by the Team for considering
modifications or exemptions to the
Plan’s regulations enabling us to consult
with the Team. We decided to address
the modifications to the Massachusetts
Restricted Area and the exemption of
the minimum number of traps per trawl
requirements separately, beginning with
the Massachusetts Restricted Area. After
discussions with the Team, NMFS
published an amendment to the Plan on
December 12, 2014 (79 FR 73848)
changing the timing and size of the
Massachusetts Restricted Area.
Along with the DMF proposal we also
received proposals from other state
partners requesting certain waters be
exempt from the minimum number of
traps per trawl requirements due to
safety concerns. The conservation
members of the Team also submitted a
proposal in an effort to offset this
potential increase in vertical lines
should NMFS approve the proposed
state exemptions. NMFS convened the
team in January 2015 to discuss these
proposals. At the conclusion of the
January meeting, the Team, by near
consensus, recommended that we
amend the Plan as proposed by the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
states. The Team also recommended
that the current gear marking scheme be
updated to include unique marks for
those fishing singles in the proposed
exempted areas and a unique mark for
both gillnets and trap/pots fished in
Jeffreys Ledge and Jordan Basin. This
recommendation forms the basis for the
proposed alternative described below.
Changes Proposed to the Plan for Trap/
Pot Gear
This action proposes to exempt Rhode
Island state waters and portions of
Massachusetts state waters from the
minimum number of traps per trawl
requirement and allow singles to be
fished in certain state waters (see
Figures 1 and 2, respectively). This
exemption is based on safety and
financial concerns raised by the
industry. In addition, in Rhode Island
state waters and portions of
Massachusetts state waters (particularly
in Southern Massachusetts waters) the
co-occurrence of fishing effort and
whale distribution is minimal.
According to DMF along the Outer Cape
there are dynamic tides and featureless
substrate that dictate the use of single
traps in this area. Massachusetts also
has a student lobster permit that allows
for permit holders to fish alone and with
small boats. Single traps are used in this
fishery and other inshore waters as a
matter of safety.
In addition, those fishing in all
Massachusetts state waters would be
required to have one endline for trawls
less than and equal to three traps. The
current requirement of one endline for
trawls less than or equal to five traps
remains in place in all other
management areas. Larger trawls (i.e., >
5 traps/pots) will not be required to
have only one endline.
An exemption from the minimum
number of traps per trawl requirement
is also proposed for a 1⁄4 mile buffer in
waters surrounding the following
islands in Maine—Matinicus Island
Group (Metinic, Small Green, Large
Green, Seal, and Wooden Ball) and Isle
of Shoals Island Group (Duck,
Appledore, Cedar, and Smuttynose).
Boats within this 1⁄4 mile buffer would
be allowed to continue fishing single
traps rather than multiple trap trawls
due to safety issues since these waters
are generally less than 30 fathoms deep
with rocky edges and boats fishing close
to shore areas are usually small. A
similar exemption for the inhabited
islands of Monhegan, Matinicus, and
Ragged Islands was established in the
June 2014 rule. The proposed islands in
this rule have the same bottom habitat
as the previously exempt islands and
many residents from many island
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
communities fish around these islands.
Similarly, the New Hampshire side of
the Isle of Shoals group was also exempt
from the minimum number of traps per
trawl requirement in the June 2014 rule.
Allowing the islands in the chain that
fall on the Maine side of the border to
have the same exemption would
provide parity to fishermen using
islands on both sides of the border.
Maine Department of Marine Resources
(ME DMR) estimates that the fishing
effort within the proposed buffer areas
is small (0.3% of total vertical lines in
the Northeast), consists of around 20
fishermen and has peak use in the
summer months. In addition, ME DMR
is pursuing funding for aerial surveys
that would determine the use of marine
mammals in these coastal areas as well
as document the gear density.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Changes Proposed to the Plan for Gear
Marking
This action proposes to implement a
gear marking scheme that builds off the
current color combinations and the size
and frequency of the current gear
marking requirements. In an effort to
learn if entanglements occur in these
newly exempted areas, this action
proposes to add a unique gear mark to
those single vertical lines fished in the
exempted areas of Rhode Island,
Massachusetts, and Matinicus Island
Group, Maine. Also, this action
proposes unique trap/pot and gillnet
gear marking in two important high use
areas for both humpback and right
whales—Jeffreys Ledge (Figure 3) and
Jordan Basin (Figure 4). The mark must
equal 12-inches (30.5 cm) in length and
buoy lines must be marked three times
(top, middle, bottom) with the
appropriate unique color combination
for that area.
NMFS proposes a phased-in
implementation of the new gear
marking. Industry would have 30 days
from publication of the final rule to
mark gear fished in the newly exempted
areas and 90 days from publication of
the final rule to mark gear in Jeffreys
Ledge and Jordan Basin areas.
Classification
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule contains collection
of information requirements subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
specifically, the marking of fishing gear.
The collection of information
requirement was approved by OMB
under control number (0648–0364).
Public comment is sought regarding
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
performance and function of the agency,
including: The practical utility of the
information; the accuracy of the burden
estimate; the opportunities to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and the
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information, including the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate, or any other aspect
of this data collection, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to
NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax
to (202) 395–7285.
This revision to the collection of
information requirement applies to a
total of 399 vessels. The estimated
number of vessels affected by the overall
gear marking provisions in the Plan is
4,008. The estimated number of those
vessels affected only by the proposed
amendment is 399. Model vessel types
were developed for gillnet fisheries,
lobster trap/pot fisheries, and other
trap/pot fisheries. Total burden hours
for all affected vessels in the Plan are
35,571 hours over three years or 11,857
hours per year. Total cost burden for all
affected vessels in the Plan is $24,758
over three years or $8,253 per year. The
total cost burden for those vessels
affected by the proposed amendment is
$3,450 over three years or $1,150 per
year. For more information, please see
the PRA submission associated with this
rulemaking.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Control Number.
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, NMFS prepared an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA) for this proposed rule; a
summary of the IRFA follows.
A description of the reasons why this
action is being considered, its
objectives, and the legal basis for this
proposed action can be found in the
Summary section and earlier in the
Supplementary Information section of
this proposed rule, and are not repeated
here. This proposed rule would not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
other federal rules.
The small entities affected by this
proposed rule are commercial gillnet
and trap/pot fishermen. The geographic
range of the proposed rule is the
Northeast Atlantic waters. By changing
the minimum number of traps per trawl
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14347
requirement to allow singles, in the
lobster trap/pot fishery, there are
potentially 182 vessels that would be
affected. Additionally, in the other trap/
pot fisheries, there are potentially 123
vessels that would be affected. All
vessels are assumed to be small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Alternatives were evaluated using
model vessels, each of which represents
a group of vessels that share similar
operating characteristics and would face
similar requirements under a given
regulatory alternative. Both an upper
and lower bound of annual economic
savings for lobster and other trap/pot
were analyzed. A summary of analysis
describing the potential range of savings
resulting from allowing singles to be
fished follows:
1. NMFS considered a ‘‘no action’’ or
status quo alternative (Alternative 1)
that would result in no changes to the
current measures under the Plan and, as
such, would result in no additional
economic effects on the fishing
industry.
2. Alternative 2 would modify the
Plan by allowing the use of single traps
in Rhode Island state waters, in most
Massachusetts state waters, and some
waters around Maine Islands. This
change would constitute an exemption
to the minimum two-trap-per-trawl
requirement specified for these areas
under the 2014 vertical line rulemaking.
Those who until now have fished
singles in these areas would avoid the
costs associated with converting their
gear from singles to doubles, and would
also avoid other possible costs, such as
a loss in revenue due to a reduction in
catch. The proposed action also revises
gear marking requirements that would
apply to vessels fishing in waters that
would be exempt from trawling
requirements, as well as to vessels
fishing in two additional regions (Jordan
Basin and Jeffreys Ledge). The changes
would require the use of colors that
would differentiate gear set in these
areas from gear fished in other waters.
NMFS has determined, however, that
the marking requirements would
introduce minimal additional burden
for the affected vessels; thus, a
substantial increase in compliance costs
is unlikely. The proposed rule does not
include any other reporting,
recordkeeping, or compliance
requirements.
Overall, the economic impacts of the
preferred alternative results in a vessel
cost savings that would equal or range
from $163,200 to $345,700 for lobster
trap/pot vessels and $257,000 to
$512,500 for other trap/pot vessels
when compared to the no action
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
14348
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
alternative, resulting in a largely
positive impact.
NMFS has determined that this action
is consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the approved coastal
management programs of
Massachusetts. This determination was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
submitted for review by the responsible
state agency under section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
This proposed rule contains policies
with federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132. Accordingly, the Assistant
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Secretary for Legislative and
Intergovernmental Affairs will provide
notice of the proposed action to the
appropriate official(s) of affected state,
local, and/or tribal governments.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
14349
Figure 1. Proposed Rhode Island Exempted Waters
0
2.5
I
I
5
I
I
10
I
I
I
Nautical Miles
Legend
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
EP19MR15.008
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Rhode Island Slate Waters
14350
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Figure 2. Proposed Massachusetts Exempted Waters
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
5
I
10
I I I
Nautical Miles
I
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
I
19MRP1
20
I
I
!
/f4..
EP19MR15.009
0
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
14351
Figure 3. Proposed Jeffreys Ledge Area for Trap/Pot and Gillnet
Gear Marking
0
5
10
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
EP19MR15.010
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Jeffreys Ledge Gear Marking Area
14352
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Figure 4. Proposed Jordan Basin Area for Trap/Pot and Gillnet
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
EP19MR15.011
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Gear Marking
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 229
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Marine
mammals, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: March 12, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 229 is proposed
to be amended to read as follows:
PART 229—AUTHORIZATION FOR
COMMERCIAL FISHERIES UNDER THE
MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT
OF 1972
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 229 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.;
§ 229.32(f) also issued under 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.
2. In § 229.32, paragraphs (a)(3)(iii),
and (a)(6), and (b) are revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 229.32 Atlantic large whale take
reduction plan regulations.
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) Exempted waters. (i) The
regulations in this section do not apply
to waters landward of the 72 COLREGS
demarcation lines (International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972), as depicted or noted on
nautical charts published by the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (Coast Charts 1:80,000
scale), and as described in 33 CFR part
80 with the exception of the COLREGS
lines for Casco Bay (Maine), Portsmouth
Harbor (New Hampshire), Gardiners Bay
and Long Island Sound (New York), and
the state of Massachusetts.
(ii) Other exempted waters.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
Maine
The regulations in this section do not
apply to waters landward of a line
connecting the following points
(Quoddy Narrows/US-Canada border to
Odiornes Pt., Portsmouth, New
Hampshire):
44°49.67′ N. lat., 66°57.77′ W. long. (R
N ‘‘2’’, Quoddy Narrows)
44°48.64′ N. lat., 66°56.43′ W. long. (G
‘‘1’’ Whistle, West Quoddy Head)
44°47.36′ N. lat., 66°59.25′ W. long. (R
N ‘‘2’’, Morton Ledge)
44°45.51′ N. lat., 67°02.87′ W. long. (R
‘‘28M’’ Whistle, Baileys Mistake)
44°37.70′ N. lat., 67°09.75′ W. long.
(Obstruction, Southeast of Cutler)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
14353
44°27.77′ N. lat., 67°32.86′ W. long.
(Freeman Rock, East of Great Wass
Island)
44°25.74′ N. lat., 67°38.39′ W. long. (R
‘‘2SR’’ Bell, Seahorse Rock, West of
Great Wass Island)
44°21.66′ N. lat., 67°51.78′ W. long. (R
N ‘‘2’’, Petit Manan Island)
44°19.08′ N. lat., 68°02.05′ W. long. (R
‘‘2S’’ Bell, Schoodic Island)
44°13.55′ N. lat., 68°10.71′ W. long. (R
‘‘8BI’’ Whistle, Baker Island)
44°08.36′ N. lat., 68°14.75′ W. long.
(Southern Point, Great Duck Island)
43°59.36′ N. lat., 68°37.95′ W. long. (R
‘‘2’’ Bell, Roaring Bull Ledge, Isle Au
Haut)
43°59.83′ N. lat., 68°50.06′ W. long. (R
‘‘2A’’ Bell, Old Horse Ledge)
43°56.72′ N. lat., 69°04.89′ W. long. (G
‘‘5TB’’ Bell, Two Bush Channel)
43°50.28′ N. lat., 69°18.86′ W. long. (R
‘‘2 OM’’ Whistle, Old Man Ledge)
43°48.96′ N. lat., 69°31.15′ W. long. (GR
C ‘‘PL’’, Pemaquid Ledge)
43°43.64′ N. lat., 69°37.58′ W. long. (R
‘‘2BR’’ Bell, Bantam Rock)
43°41.44′ N. lat., 69°45.27′ W. long. (R
‘‘20ML’’ Bell, Mile Ledge)
43°36.04′ N. lat., 70°03.98′ W. long. (RG
N ‘‘BS’’, Bulwark Shoal)
43°31.94′ N. lat., 70°08.68′ W. long. (G
‘‘1’’, East Hue and Cry)
43°27.63′ N. lat., 70°17.48′ W. long. (RW
‘‘WI’’ Whistle, Wood Island)
43°20.23′ N. lat., 70°23.64′ W. long. (RW
‘‘CP’’ Whistle, Cape Porpoise)
43°04.06′ N. lat., 70°36.70′ W. long. (R
N ‘‘2MR’’, Murray Rock)
43°02.93′ N. lat., 70°41.47′ W. long. (R
‘‘2KR’’ Whistle, Kittery Point)
43°02.55′ N. lat., 70°43.33′ W. long.
(Odiornes Pt., Portsmouth, New
Hampshire)
A line from 41°22.441′ N. lat.,
71°30.781′ W. long. to 41°22.447′ N.
lat., 71°30.893′ W. long. (Pt. Judith
Pond Inlet)
A line from 41°21.310′ N. lat.,
71°38.300′ W. long. to 41°21.300′ N.
lat., 71°38.330′ W. long. (Ninigret
Pond Inlet)
A line from 41°19.875′ N. lat.,
71°43.061′ W. long. to 41°19.879′ N.
lat., 71°43.115′ W. long.
(Quonochontaug Pond Inlet)
A line from 41°19.660′ N. lat.,
71°45.750′ W. long. to 41°19.660′ N.
lat., 71°45.780′ W. long. (Weekapaug
Pond Inlet)
New Hampshire
South Carolina
The regulations in this section do not
apply to waters landward of a line
connecting the following points from
32°34.717′ N. lat., 80°08.565′ W. long. to
32°34.686′ N. lat., 80°08.642′ W. long.
(Captain Sams Inlet)
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Island buffer. Those fishing in
waters within 1⁄4 mile of the following
Maine islands are exempt from the
minimum number of traps per trawl
requirement in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of
this section: Monhegan Island,
Matinicus Island Group (Metinic Island,
Small Green Island, Large Green Island,
Seal Island, Wooden Ball Island,
Matinicus Island, Ragged Island) and
Isle of Shoals Island Group (Duck
Island, Appledore Island, Cedar Island,
Smuttynose Island).
(b) Gear marking requirements—(1)
Specified areas. The following areas are
specified for gear marking purposes:
New Hampshire state waters are
exempt from the minimum number of
traps per trawl requirement in
paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section.
Harbor waters landward of the following
lines are exempt from all the regulations
in this section.
A line from 42°53.691′ N. lat.,
70°48.516′ W. long. to 42°53.516′ N.
lat., 70°48.748′ W. long. (Hampton
Harbor)
A line from 42°59.986′ N. lat.,
70°44.654′ W. long. to 42°59.956′ N.,
70°44.737′ W. long. (Rye Harbor)
Rhode Island
Rhode Island state waters are exempt
from the minimum number of traps per
trawl requirement in paragraph
(c)(2)(iii) of this section. Harbor waters
landward of the following lines are
exempt from all the regulations in this
section.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
New York
The regulations in this section do not
apply to waters landward of a line that
follows the territorial sea baseline
through Block Island Sound (Watch Hill
Point, RI, to Montauk Point, NY).
Massachusetts
The regulations in this section do not
apply to waters landward of the first
bridge over any embayment, harbor, or
inlet in Massachusetts. The following
Massachusetts state waters are exempt
from the minimum number of traps per
trawl requirement in paragraph
(c)(2)(iii) of this section:
Massachusetts state waters in LMA 1
and Outer Cape north and east of Cape
Cod from 0–3 miles from shore and
including a portion of waters east of the
line connecting the following points:
41.925° N, 70.147° W and 41.792° N,
70.319° W
Massachusetts state waters in LMA 2
and Outer Cape south of 41.67°40′ N
and west of 70.0°00′ W to the Rhode
Island border
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
14354
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Northern Inshore State Trap/Pot Waters,
Cape Cod Bay Restricted Area,
Massachusetts Restricted Area,
Stellwagen Bank/Jeffreys Ledge
Restricted Area, Northern Nearshore
Trap/Pot Waters Area, Great South
Channel Restricted Trap/Pot Area, Great
South Channel Restricted Gillnet Area,
Great South Channel Sliver Restricted
Area, Southern Nearshore Trap/Pot
Waters Area, Offshore Trap/Pot Waters
Area, Other Northeast Gillnet Waters
Area, Mid/South Atlantic Gillnet Waters
Area, Other Southeast Gillnet Waters
Area, Southeast U.S. Restricted Areas,
and Southeast U.S. Monitoring Area.
(i) Jordan Basin. The Jordan Basin
Restricted Area is bounded by the
following points:
Point
JBRA1
JBRA2
JBRA3
JBRA4
JBRA5
N. Lat.
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
43°15′
43°35′
43°25′
43°05′
43°05′
W. Long.
68°50′
68°20′
68°05′
68°20′
68°35′
(ii) Jeffreys Ledge Restricted Area—
The Jeffreys Ledge Restricted Area is
bounded by the following points:
Point
JLRA1
JLRA2
JLRA3
JLRA4
N. Lat.
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
43°15′
43°15′
42°50′
42°50′
W. Long.
70°25′
70°00′
70°00′
70°25′
(2) Markings. All specified gear in
specified areas must be marked with the
color code shown in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section. The color of the color code
must be permanently marked on or
along the line or lines specified below
under paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this
section. Each color mark of the color
codes must be clearly visible when the
gear is hauled or removed from the
water, including if the color of the rope
is the same as or similar to the
respective color code. The rope must be
marked at least three times (top, middle,
bottom) and each mark must total 12inch (30.5 cm) in length. If the mark
consists of two colors then each color
mark may be 6-inch (15.25 cm) for a
total mark of 12-inch (30.5 cm). In
marking or affixing the color code, the
line may be dyed, painted, or marked
with thin colored whipping line, thin
colored plastic, or heat-shrink tubing, or
other material; or a thin line may be
woven into or through the line; or the
line may be marked as approved in
writing by the Assistant Administrator.
A brochure illustrating the techniques
for marking gear is available from the
Regional Administrator, NMFS, Greater
Atlantic Region upon request.
(i) Buoy line markings. All buoy lines
must be marked as stated above. Shark
gillnet gear in the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area S, Southeast U.S.
Monitoring Area and Other Southeast
Gillnet Waters, greater than 4 feet (1.22
m) long must be marked within 2 feet
(0.6 m) of the top of the buoy line
(closest to the surface), midway along
the length of the buoy line, and within
2 feet (0.6 m) of the bottom of the buoy
line.
(ii) Net panel markings. Shark gillnet
gear net panels in the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area S, Southeast U.S.
Monitoring Area and Other Southeast
Gillnet Waters is required to be marked.
The net panel must be marked along
both the floatline and the leadline at
least once every 100 yards (91.4 m).
(iii) Surface buoy markings. Trap/pot
and gillnet gear regulated under this
section must mark all surface buoys to
identify the vessel or fishery with one
of the following: The owner’s motorboat
registration number, the owner’s U.S.
vessel documentation number, the
federal commercial fishing permit
number, or whatever positive
identification marking is required by the
vessel’s home-port state. When marking
of surface buoys is not already required
by state or federal regulations, the letters
and numbers used to mark the gear to
identify the vessel or fishery must be at
least 1 inch (2.5 cm) in height in block
letters or arabic numbers in a color that
contrasts with the background color of
the buoy. A brochure illustrating the
techniques for marking gear is available
from the Regional Administrator,
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Region upon
request.
(3) Color code. Gear must be marked
with the appropriate colors to designate
gear types and areas as follows:
COLOR CODE SCHEME
Plan management area
Color
Trap/Pot Gear
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Massachusetts Restricted Area ......................................................................................................
Northern Nearshore .........................................................................................................................
Northern Inshore State ....................................................................................................................
Stellwagen Bank/Jeffreys Ledge Restricted Area ...........................................................................
Great South Channel Restricted Area overlapping with LMA 2 and/or Outer Cape ......................
Exempt RI state waters (single traps) .............................................................................................
Exempt MA state waters in LMA 1 (single traps) ...........................................................................
Exempt MA state waters in LMA 2 (single traps) ...........................................................................
Exempt MA state waters in Outer Cape (singles) ..........................................................................
Isle of Shoals, ME (single traps) .....................................................................................................
Southern Nearshore ........................................................................................................................
Southeast Restricted Area North (State Waters) ............................................................................
Southeast Restricted Area North (Federal Waters) ........................................................................
Offshore ...........................................................................................................................................
Great South Channel Restricted Area overlapping with LMA 2/3 and/or LMA 3 ...........................
Jordan Basin ...................................................................................................................................
Jeffreys Ledge .................................................................................................................................
Red.
Red.
Red.
Red.
Red.
Red and Blue.
Red and White.
Red and Black.
Red and Yellow.
Red and Orange.
Orange.
Blue and Orange.
Green and Orange.
Black.
Black.
Black and Purple (LMA 3); Red and and Purple
(LMA 1).
Red and Green.
Gillnet Excluding Shark Gillnet
Cape Cod Bay Restricted Area .......................................................................................................
Stellwagen Bank/Jeffreys Ledge Restricted Area ...........................................................................
Great South Channel Restricted Area ............................................................................................
Great South Channel Restricted Sliver Area ..................................................................................
Other Northeast Gillnet Waters .......................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Green.
Green.
Green.
Green.
Green.
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
14355
COLOR CODE SCHEME—Continued
Plan management area
Color
Jordan Basin ...................................................................................................................................
Jeffreys Ledge .................................................................................................................................
Mid/South Atlantic Gillnet Waters ...................................................................................................
Southeast US Restricted Area South .............................................................................................
Other Southeast Gillnet Waters ......................................................................................................
Green and Yellow.
Green and Black.
Blue.
Yellow.
Yellow.
Shark Gillnet (With Webbing of 5″ or Greater)
Southeast US Restricted Area South .............................................................................................
Southeast Monitoring Area ..............................................................................................................
Other Southeast Waters ..................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Area specific gear requirements.
Trap/pot gear must be set according to
the requirements outlined below and in
the table in paragraph(c)(2)(iii) of this
section.
(i) Single traps and multiple-trap
trawls. All traps must be set according
to the configuration outlined in the
Table (c)(2)(iii) of this section. Trawls
up to and including 5 or fewer traps
must only have one buoy line unless
specified otherwise in Table (c)(2)(iii) of
this section.
(ii) Buoy line weak links. All buoys,
flotation devices and/or weights (except
traps/pots, anchors, and leadline woven
into the buoy line), such as surface
buoys, high flyers, sub-surface buoys,
toggles, window weights, etc., must be
attached to the buoy line with a weak
link placed as close to each individual
buoy, flotation device and/or weight as
operationally feasible and that meets the
following specifications:
(A) The breaking strength of the weak
links must not exceed the breaking
strength listed in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of
this section for a specified management
area.
(B) The weak link must be chosen
from the following list approved by
Green and Blue.
Green and Blue.
Green and Blue.
NMFS: Swivels, plastic weak links, rope
of appropriate breaking strength, hog
rings, rope stapled to a buoy stick, or
other materials or devices approved in
writing by the Assistant Administrator.
A brochure illustrating the techniques
for making weak links is available from
the Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Greater Atlantic Region upon request.
(C) Weak links must break cleanly
leaving behind the bitter end of the line.
The bitter end of the line must be free
of any knots when the weak link breaks.
Splices are not considered to be knots
for the purposes of this provision.
(iii)—TABLE OF AREA SPECIFIC GEAR REQUIREMENTS
Management area
Minimum number
traps/trawl
ME State and Pocket
Waters1.
ME Zones A–G (3–6
miles) i.
ME Zones A–C (6–12
miles) 1.
ME Zones D–G (6–12
miles) 1.
ME Zones A–E (12+
miles).
ME Zones F–G (12+
miles).
MA State Waters ii .......
Northern Inshore State ...................................
2 (1 endline) ...............
≤600 lbs.
Northern Nearshore ........................................
3 (1 endline) ...............
≤600 lbs.
Northern Nearshore ........................................
5 (1 endline) ...............
≤600 lbs.
Northern Nearshore ........................................
10 ...............................
≤600 lbs.
Northern Nearshore and Offshore ..................
15 ...............................
Northern Nearshore and Offshore ..................
Northern Inshore State and Massachusetts
Restricted Area.
NH State Waters .........
LMA 1 (3–12 miles) .....
Northern Inshore State ...................................
Northern Nearshore and Massachusetts Restricted Area and Stellwagen Bank/Jeffreys
Ledge Restricted Area.
Northern Nearshore ........................................
Northern Inshore State and Massachusetts
Restricted Area.
Northern Inshore State and Massachusetts
Restricted Area.
Northern Nearshore and Massachusetts Restricted Area.
15 (Mar 1–Oct 31) 20
(Nov 1–Feb 28/29).
No minimum number
of traps per trawl.
Trawls up to and including 3 or fewer
traps must only
have one buoy line.
2 (1 endline) Trawls
up to and including
3 or fewer traps
must only have one
buoy line.
No minimum trap/trawl
10 ...............................
≤600 lbs (≤1500 lbs in offshore, 2,000 lbs if
red crab trap/pot).
≤600 lbs (≤1500 lbs in offshore, 2,000 lbs if
red crab trap/pot).
≤600 lbs.
Other MA State Waters
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Location
LMA 1 (12+ miles) .......
LMA1/OC Overlap (0–3
miles).
OC (0–3 miles) ............
OC (3–12 miles) ..........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Northern Inshore State and Massachusetts
Restricted Area.
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
20 ...............................
No minimum number
of traps per trawl.
No minimum number
of traps per trawl.
10 ...............................
Sfmt 4702
Weak link strength
≤600 lbs.
≤600 lbs.
≤600 lbs.
≤600 lbs.
≤600 lbs.
≤600 lbs.
≤600 lbs.
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
14356
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(iii)—TABLE OF AREA SPECIFIC GEAR REQUIREMENTS—Continued
Location
Management area
Minimum number
traps/trawl
OC (12+ miles) ............
Northern Nearshore and Great South Channel Restricted Area.
Northern Inshore State ...................................
20 ...............................
≤600 lbs.
No minimum number
of traps per trawl..
10 ...............................
20 ...............................
≤600 lbs.
20 ...............................
≤1500 lbs (2,000 lbs if red crab trap/pot).
20 ...............................
≤1500 lbs (2,000 lbs if red crab trap/pot).
.....................................
1 .................................
1 .................................
1 .................................
1 .................................
≤600
≤200
≤600
≤600
≤600
RI State Waters ...........
LMA 2 (3–12 miles) .....
LMA 2 (12 + miles) ......
LMA 2/3 Overlap (12+
miles).
LMA 3 (12+ miles) .......
LMA 4,5,6 ....................
FL State Waters ..........
GA State Waters .........
SC State Waters .........
Federal Waters off FL,
GA, SC.
Northern Nearshore ........................................
Northern Nearshore and Great South Channel Restricted Area.
Offshore and Great South Channel Restricted
Area.
Offshore waters North of 40° and Great
South Channel Restricted Area.
Southern Nearshore ........................................
Southeast US Restricted Area North iii ...........
Southeast US Restricted Area North 3 ............
Southeast US Restricted Area North 3 ............
Southeast US Restricted Area North 3 ............
Weak link strength
≤600 lbs.
≤600 lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
1 The
pocket waters and 6-mile line as defined in paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)–(a)(2)(iii) of this section.
State waters as defined in paragraphs (a)(3)(iii) of this section.
3 See § 229.32 (f)(1) for description of area.
2 MA
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–06272 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am]
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Mar 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\19MRP1.SGM
19MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14345-14356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06272]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 150122067-5229-01]
RIN 0648-BE83
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing
Operations; Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan Regulations
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to amend the regulations implementing the
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan. This action proposes to
change the minimum number of traps per trawl to allow fishing with a
single trap in certain Massachusetts and Rhode Island state
[[Page 14346]]
waters; and proposes to modify the requirement to use one endline on
trawls within certain areas in Massachusetts state waters. NMFS also
proposes a \1/4\ mile buffer in waters surrounding certain islands in
Maine to allow fishing with a single trap. In addition, NMFS proposes
additional gear marking requirements for those waters allowing single
traps as well as two new high use areas for humpback whales (Megaptera
novaeangliae) and North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis).
DATES: Submit comments on or before April 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2015-0127, by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
1. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0127,
2. Click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields,
3. Enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Kim Damon-Randall,
Assistant Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS Greater
Atlantic Region, 55 Great Republic Dr., Gloucester, MA 01930, Attn:
Large Whale Proposed Rule.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Swails, NMFS Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 978-282-8481, Kate.Swails@noaa.gov; or,
Kristy Long, NMFS Office of Protected Resources, 206-526-4792,
Kristy.Long@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
Several of the background documents for the Plan and the take
reduction planning process can be downloaded from the Plan Web site at
https://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected/whaletrp/. The complete text of the regulations implementing the Plan
can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 229.32
or downloaded from the Web site, along with a guide to the regulations.
The draft Environmental Assessment for this action is also available
online.
Background
NMFS published an amendment to the Atlantic Large Whale Take
Reduction Plan (Plan) on June 27, 2014 (79 FR 36586) to address large
whale entanglement risks associated with vertical line (or buoy lines)
from commercial trap/pot fisheries. This amendment included gear
modifications, gear setting requirements, a seasonal closure
(Massachusetts Restricted Area) and gear marking for both the trap/pot
and the gillnet fisheries.
In consultation with the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Team
(Team), we developed protocols for considering modifications or
exemptions to the regulations implementing the Plan. Following these
protocols, on August 18, 2014, the Massachusetts Division of Marine
Fisheries (DMF) submitted a proposal to modify the Massachusetts Bay
Restricted Area and exempted several areas from the gear setting
requirements to address safety and economic concerns raised by their
industry members.
The DMF proposal adequately addressed the protocols and criteria
established by the Team for considering modifications or exemptions to
the Plan's regulations enabling us to consult with the Team. We decided
to address the modifications to the Massachusetts Restricted Area and
the exemption of the minimum number of traps per trawl requirements
separately, beginning with the Massachusetts Restricted Area. After
discussions with the Team, NMFS published an amendment to the Plan on
December 12, 2014 (79 FR 73848) changing the timing and size of the
Massachusetts Restricted Area.
Along with the DMF proposal we also received proposals from other
state partners requesting certain waters be exempt from the minimum
number of traps per trawl requirements due to safety concerns. The
conservation members of the Team also submitted a proposal in an effort
to offset this potential increase in vertical lines should NMFS approve
the proposed state exemptions. NMFS convened the team in January 2015
to discuss these proposals. At the conclusion of the January meeting,
the Team, by near consensus, recommended that we amend the Plan as
proposed by the states. The Team also recommended that the current gear
marking scheme be updated to include unique marks for those fishing
singles in the proposed exempted areas and a unique mark for both
gillnets and trap/pots fished in Jeffreys Ledge and Jordan Basin. This
recommendation forms the basis for the proposed alternative described
below.
Changes Proposed to the Plan for Trap/Pot Gear
This action proposes to exempt Rhode Island state waters and
portions of Massachusetts state waters from the minimum number of traps
per trawl requirement and allow singles to be fished in certain state
waters (see Figures 1 and 2, respectively). This exemption is based on
safety and financial concerns raised by the industry. In addition, in
Rhode Island state waters and portions of Massachusetts state waters
(particularly in Southern Massachusetts waters) the co-occurrence of
fishing effort and whale distribution is minimal. According to DMF
along the Outer Cape there are dynamic tides and featureless substrate
that dictate the use of single traps in this area. Massachusetts also
has a student lobster permit that allows for permit holders to fish
alone and with small boats. Single traps are used in this fishery and
other inshore waters as a matter of safety.
In addition, those fishing in all Massachusetts state waters would
be required to have one endline for trawls less than and equal to three
traps. The current requirement of one endline for trawls less than or
equal to five traps remains in place in all other management areas.
Larger trawls (i.e., > 5 traps/pots) will not be required to have only
one endline.
An exemption from the minimum number of traps per trawl requirement
is also proposed for a \1/4\ mile buffer in waters surrounding the
following islands in Maine--Matinicus Island Group (Metinic, Small
Green, Large Green, Seal, and Wooden Ball) and Isle of Shoals Island
Group (Duck, Appledore, Cedar, and Smuttynose).
Boats within this \1/4\ mile buffer would be allowed to continue
fishing single traps rather than multiple trap trawls due to safety
issues since these waters are generally less than 30 fathoms deep with
rocky edges and boats fishing close to shore areas are usually small. A
similar exemption for the inhabited islands of Monhegan, Matinicus, and
Ragged Islands was established in the June 2014 rule. The proposed
islands in this rule have the same bottom habitat as the previously
exempt islands and many residents from many island
[[Page 14347]]
communities fish around these islands. Similarly, the New Hampshire
side of the Isle of Shoals group was also exempt from the minimum
number of traps per trawl requirement in the June 2014 rule. Allowing
the islands in the chain that fall on the Maine side of the border to
have the same exemption would provide parity to fishermen using islands
on both sides of the border. Maine Department of Marine Resources (ME
DMR) estimates that the fishing effort within the proposed buffer areas
is small (0.3% of total vertical lines in the Northeast), consists of
around 20 fishermen and has peak use in the summer months. In addition,
ME DMR is pursuing funding for aerial surveys that would determine the
use of marine mammals in these coastal areas as well as document the
gear density.
Changes Proposed to the Plan for Gear Marking
This action proposes to implement a gear marking scheme that builds
off the current color combinations and the size and frequency of the
current gear marking requirements. In an effort to learn if
entanglements occur in these newly exempted areas, this action proposes
to add a unique gear mark to those single vertical lines fished in the
exempted areas of Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Matinicus Island
Group, Maine. Also, this action proposes unique trap/pot and gillnet
gear marking in two important high use areas for both humpback and
right whales--Jeffreys Ledge (Figure 3) and Jordan Basin (Figure 4).
The mark must equal 12-inches (30.5 cm) in length and buoy lines must
be marked three times (top, middle, bottom) with the appropriate unique
color combination for that area.
NMFS proposes a phased-in implementation of the new gear marking.
Industry would have 30 days from publication of the final rule to mark
gear fished in the newly exempted areas and 90 days from publication of
the final rule to mark gear in Jeffreys Ledge and Jordan Basin areas.
Classification
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866. This proposed rule contains
collection of information requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), specifically, the marking of fishing gear. The
collection of information requirement was approved by OMB under control
number (0648-0364). Public comment is sought regarding whether this
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance and function of the agency, including: The practical
utility of the information; the accuracy of the burden estimate; the
opportunities to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and the ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments
regarding this burden estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202)
395-7285.
This revision to the collection of information requirement applies
to a total of 399 vessels. The estimated number of vessels affected by
the overall gear marking provisions in the Plan is 4,008. The estimated
number of those vessels affected only by the proposed amendment is 399.
Model vessel types were developed for gillnet fisheries, lobster trap/
pot fisheries, and other trap/pot fisheries. Total burden hours for all
affected vessels in the Plan are 35,571 hours over three years or
11,857 hours per year. Total cost burden for all affected vessels in
the Plan is $24,758 over three years or $8,253 per year. The total cost
burden for those vessels affected by the proposed amendment is $3,450
over three years or $1,150 per year. For more information, please see
the PRA submission associated with this rulemaking.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number.
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, NMFS prepared an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) for this proposed rule;
a summary of the IRFA follows.
A description of the reasons why this action is being considered,
its objectives, and the legal basis for this proposed action can be
found in the Summary section and earlier in the Supplementary
Information section of this proposed rule, and are not repeated here.
This proposed rule would not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
other federal rules.
The small entities affected by this proposed rule are commercial
gillnet and trap/pot fishermen. The geographic range of the proposed
rule is the Northeast Atlantic waters. By changing the minimum number
of traps per trawl requirement to allow singles, in the lobster trap/
pot fishery, there are potentially 182 vessels that would be affected.
Additionally, in the other trap/pot fisheries, there are potentially
123 vessels that would be affected. All vessels are assumed to be small
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Alternatives were evaluated using model vessels, each of which
represents a group of vessels that share similar operating
characteristics and would face similar requirements under a given
regulatory alternative. Both an upper and lower bound of annual
economic savings for lobster and other trap/pot were analyzed. A
summary of analysis describing the potential range of savings resulting
from allowing singles to be fished follows:
1. NMFS considered a ``no action'' or status quo alternative
(Alternative 1) that would result in no changes to the current measures
under the Plan and, as such, would result in no additional economic
effects on the fishing industry.
2. Alternative 2 would modify the Plan by allowing the use of
single traps in Rhode Island state waters, in most Massachusetts state
waters, and some waters around Maine Islands. This change would
constitute an exemption to the minimum two-trap-per-trawl requirement
specified for these areas under the 2014 vertical line rulemaking.
Those who until now have fished singles in these areas would avoid the
costs associated with converting their gear from singles to doubles,
and would also avoid other possible costs, such as a loss in revenue
due to a reduction in catch. The proposed action also revises gear
marking requirements that would apply to vessels fishing in waters that
would be exempt from trawling requirements, as well as to vessels
fishing in two additional regions (Jordan Basin and Jeffreys Ledge).
The changes would require the use of colors that would differentiate
gear set in these areas from gear fished in other waters. NMFS has
determined, however, that the marking requirements would introduce
minimal additional burden for the affected vessels; thus, a substantial
increase in compliance costs is unlikely. The proposed rule does not
include any other reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements.
Overall, the economic impacts of the preferred alternative results
in a vessel cost savings that would equal or range from $163,200 to
$345,700 for lobster trap/pot vessels and $257,000 to $512,500 for
other trap/pot vessels when compared to the no action
[[Page 14348]]
alternative, resulting in a largely positive impact.
NMFS has determined that this action is consistent to the maximum
extent practicable with the approved coastal management programs of
Massachusetts. This determination was submitted for review by the
responsible state agency under section 307 of the Coastal Zone
Management Act.
This proposed rule contains policies with federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132. Accordingly, the
Assistant Secretary for Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs will
provide notice of the proposed action to the appropriate official(s) of
affected state, local, and/or tribal governments.
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
[[Page 14349]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP19MR15.008
[[Page 14350]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP19MR15.009
[[Page 14351]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP19MR15.010
[[Page 14352]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP19MR15.011
[[Page 14353]]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-C
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 229
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Marine mammals, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: March 12, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 229 is
proposed to be amended to read as follows:
PART 229--AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMERCIAL FISHERIES UNDER THE MARINE
MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1972
0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 229 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.; Sec. 229.32(f) also issued
under 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 229.32, paragraphs (a)(3)(iii), and (a)(6), and (b) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 229.32 Atlantic large whale take reduction plan regulations.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) Exempted waters. (i) The regulations in this section do not
apply to waters landward of the 72 COLREGS demarcation lines
(International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972), as
depicted or noted on nautical charts published by the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (Coast Charts 1:80,000 scale), and as
described in 33 CFR part 80 with the exception of the COLREGS lines for
Casco Bay (Maine), Portsmouth Harbor (New Hampshire), Gardiners Bay and
Long Island Sound (New York), and the state of Massachusetts.
(ii) Other exempted waters.
Maine
The regulations in this section do not apply to waters landward of
a line connecting the following points (Quoddy Narrows/US-Canada border
to Odiornes Pt., Portsmouth, New Hampshire):
44[deg]49.67' N. lat., 66[deg]57.77' W. long. (R N ``2'', Quoddy
Narrows)
44[deg]48.64' N. lat., 66[deg]56.43' W. long. (G ``1'' Whistle, West
Quoddy Head)
44[deg]47.36' N. lat., 66[deg]59.25' W. long. (R N ``2'', Morton Ledge)
44[deg]45.51' N. lat., 67[deg]02.87' W. long. (R ``28M'' Whistle,
Baileys Mistake)
44[deg]37.70' N. lat., 67[deg]09.75' W. long. (Obstruction, Southeast
of Cutler)
44[deg]27.77' N. lat., 67[deg]32.86' W. long. (Freeman Rock, East of
Great Wass Island)
44[deg]25.74' N. lat., 67[deg]38.39' W. long. (R ``2SR'' Bell, Seahorse
Rock, West of Great Wass Island)
44[deg]21.66' N. lat., 67[deg]51.78' W. long. (R N ``2'', Petit Manan
Island)
44[deg]19.08' N. lat., 68[deg]02.05' W. long. (R ``2S'' Bell, Schoodic
Island)
44[deg]13.55' N. lat., 68[deg]10.71' W. long. (R ``8BI'' Whistle, Baker
Island)
44[deg]08.36' N. lat., 68[deg]14.75' W. long. (Southern Point, Great
Duck Island)
43[deg]59.36' N. lat., 68[deg]37.95' W. long. (R ``2'' Bell, Roaring
Bull Ledge, Isle Au Haut)
43[deg]59.83' N. lat., 68[deg]50.06' W. long. (R ``2A'' Bell, Old Horse
Ledge)
43[deg]56.72' N. lat., 69[deg]04.89' W. long. (G ``5TB'' Bell, Two Bush
Channel)
43[deg]50.28' N. lat., 69[deg]18.86' W. long. (R ``2 OM'' Whistle, Old
Man Ledge)
43[deg]48.96' N. lat., 69[deg]31.15' W. long. (GR C ``PL'', Pemaquid
Ledge)
43[deg]43.64' N. lat., 69[deg]37.58' W. long. (R ``2BR'' Bell, Bantam
Rock)
43[deg]41.44' N. lat., 69[deg]45.27' W. long. (R ``20ML'' Bell, Mile
Ledge)
43[deg]36.04' N. lat., 70[deg]03.98' W. long. (RG N ``BS'', Bulwark
Shoal)
43[deg]31.94' N. lat., 70[deg]08.68' W. long. (G ``1'', East Hue and
Cry)
43[deg]27.63' N. lat., 70[deg]17.48' W. long. (RW ``WI'' Whistle, Wood
Island)
43[deg]20.23' N. lat., 70[deg]23.64' W. long. (RW ``CP'' Whistle, Cape
Porpoise)
43[deg]04.06' N. lat., 70[deg]36.70' W. long. (R N ``2MR'', Murray
Rock)
43[deg]02.93' N. lat., 70[deg]41.47' W. long. (R ``2KR'' Whistle,
Kittery Point)
43[deg]02.55' N. lat., 70[deg]43.33' W. long. (Odiornes Pt.,
Portsmouth, New Hampshire)
New Hampshire
New Hampshire state waters are exempt from the minimum number of
traps per trawl requirement in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section.
Harbor waters landward of the following lines are exempt from all the
regulations in this section.
A line from 42[deg]53.691' N. lat., 70[deg]48.516' W. long. to
42[deg]53.516' N. lat., 70[deg]48.748' W. long. (Hampton Harbor)
A line from 42[deg]59.986' N. lat., 70[deg]44.654' W. long. to
42[deg]59.956' N., 70[deg]44.737' W. long. (Rye Harbor)
Rhode Island
Rhode Island state waters are exempt from the minimum number of
traps per trawl requirement in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section.
Harbor waters landward of the following lines are exempt from all the
regulations in this section.
A line from 41[deg]22.441' N. lat., 71[deg]30.781' W. long. to
41[deg]22.447' N. lat., 71[deg]30.893' W. long. (Pt. Judith Pond Inlet)
A line from 41[deg]21.310' N. lat., 71[deg]38.300' W. long. to
41[deg]21.300' N. lat., 71[deg]38.330' W. long. (Ninigret Pond Inlet)
A line from 41[deg]19.875' N. lat., 71[deg]43.061' W. long. to
41[deg]19.879' N. lat., 71[deg]43.115' W. long. (Quonochontaug Pond
Inlet)
A line from 41[deg]19.660' N. lat., 71[deg]45.750' W. long. to
41[deg]19.660' N. lat., 71[deg]45.780' W. long. (Weekapaug Pond Inlet)
New York
The regulations in this section do not apply to waters landward of
a line that follows the territorial sea baseline through Block Island
Sound (Watch Hill Point, RI, to Montauk Point, NY).
Massachusetts
The regulations in this section do not apply to waters landward of
the first bridge over any embayment, harbor, or inlet in Massachusetts.
The following Massachusetts state waters are exempt from the minimum
number of traps per trawl requirement in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this
section:
Massachusetts state waters in LMA 1 and Outer Cape north and east
of Cape Cod from 0-3 miles from shore and including a portion of waters
east of the line connecting the following points:
41.925[deg] N, 70.147[deg] W and 41.792[deg] N, 70.319[deg] W
Massachusetts state waters in LMA 2 and Outer Cape south of
41.67[deg]40' N and west of 70.0[deg]00' W to the Rhode Island border
South Carolina
The regulations in this section do not apply to waters landward of
a line connecting the following points from 32[deg]34.717' N. lat.,
80[deg]08.565' W. long. to 32[deg]34.686' N. lat., 80[deg]08.642' W.
long. (Captain Sams Inlet)
* * * * *
(6) Island buffer. Those fishing in waters within \1/4\ mile of the
following Maine islands are exempt from the minimum number of traps per
trawl requirement in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section: Monhegan
Island, Matinicus Island Group (Metinic Island, Small Green Island,
Large Green Island, Seal Island, Wooden Ball Island, Matinicus Island,
Ragged Island) and Isle of Shoals Island Group (Duck Island, Appledore
Island, Cedar Island, Smuttynose Island).
(b) Gear marking requirements--(1) Specified areas. The following
areas are specified for gear marking purposes:
[[Page 14354]]
Northern Inshore State Trap/Pot Waters, Cape Cod Bay Restricted Area,
Massachusetts Restricted Area, Stellwagen Bank/Jeffreys Ledge
Restricted Area, Northern Nearshore Trap/Pot Waters Area, Great South
Channel Restricted Trap/Pot Area, Great South Channel Restricted
Gillnet Area, Great South Channel Sliver Restricted Area, Southern
Nearshore Trap/Pot Waters Area, Offshore Trap/Pot Waters Area, Other
Northeast Gillnet Waters Area, Mid/South Atlantic Gillnet Waters Area,
Other Southeast Gillnet Waters Area, Southeast U.S. Restricted Areas,
and Southeast U.S. Monitoring Area.
(i) Jordan Basin. The Jordan Basin Restricted Area is bounded by
the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N. Lat. W. Long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JBRA1............................. 43[deg]15' 68[deg]50'
JBRA2............................. 43[deg]35' 68[deg]20'
JBRA3............................. 43[deg]25' 68[deg]05'
JBRA4............................. 43[deg]05' 68[deg]20'
JBRA5............................. 43[deg]05' 68[deg]35'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Jeffreys Ledge Restricted Area--The Jeffreys Ledge Restricted
Area is bounded by the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N. Lat. W. Long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JLRA1............................. 43[deg]15' 70[deg]25'
JLRA2............................. 43[deg]15' 70[deg]00'
JLRA3............................. 42[deg]50' 70[deg]00'
JLRA4............................. 42[deg]50' 70[deg]25'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Markings. All specified gear in specified areas must be marked
with the color code shown in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. The
color of the color code must be permanently marked on or along the line
or lines specified below under paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this
section. Each color mark of the color codes must be clearly visible
when the gear is hauled or removed from the water, including if the
color of the rope is the same as or similar to the respective color
code. The rope must be marked at least three times (top, middle,
bottom) and each mark must total 12-inch (30.5 cm) in length. If the
mark consists of two colors then each color mark may be 6-inch (15.25
cm) for a total mark of 12-inch (30.5 cm). In marking or affixing the
color code, the line may be dyed, painted, or marked with thin colored
whipping line, thin colored plastic, or heat-shrink tubing, or other
material; or a thin line may be woven into or through the line; or the
line may be marked as approved in writing by the Assistant
Administrator. A brochure illustrating the techniques for marking gear
is available from the Regional Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
Region upon request.
(i) Buoy line markings. All buoy lines must be marked as stated
above. Shark gillnet gear in the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area S,
Southeast U.S. Monitoring Area and Other Southeast Gillnet Waters,
greater than 4 feet (1.22 m) long must be marked within 2 feet (0.6 m)
of the top of the buoy line (closest to the surface), midway along the
length of the buoy line, and within 2 feet (0.6 m) of the bottom of the
buoy line.
(ii) Net panel markings. Shark gillnet gear net panels in the
Southeast U.S. Restricted Area S, Southeast U.S. Monitoring Area and
Other Southeast Gillnet Waters is required to be marked. The net panel
must be marked along both the floatline and the leadline at least once
every 100 yards (91.4 m).
(iii) Surface buoy markings. Trap/pot and gillnet gear regulated
under this section must mark all surface buoys to identify the vessel
or fishery with one of the following: The owner's motorboat
registration number, the owner's U.S. vessel documentation number, the
federal commercial fishing permit number, or whatever positive
identification marking is required by the vessel's home-port state.
When marking of surface buoys is not already required by state or
federal regulations, the letters and numbers used to mark the gear to
identify the vessel or fishery must be at least 1 inch (2.5 cm) in
height in block letters or arabic numbers in a color that contrasts
with the background color of the buoy. A brochure illustrating the
techniques for marking gear is available from the Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic Region upon request.
(3) Color code. Gear must be marked with the appropriate colors to
designate gear types and areas as follows:
Color Code Scheme
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan management area Color
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trap/Pot Gear
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massachusetts Restricted Area................ Red.
Northern Nearshore........................... Red.
Northern Inshore State....................... Red.
Stellwagen Bank/Jeffreys Ledge Restricted Red.
Area.
Great South Channel Restricted Area Red.
overlapping with LMA 2 and/or Outer Cape.
Exempt RI state waters (single traps)........ Red and Blue.
Exempt MA state waters in LMA 1 (single Red and White.
traps).
Exempt MA state waters in LMA 2 (single Red and Black.
traps).
Exempt MA state waters in Outer Cape Red and Yellow.
(singles).
Isle of Shoals, ME (single traps)............ Red and Orange.
Southern Nearshore........................... Orange.
Southeast Restricted Area North (State Blue and Orange.
Waters).
Southeast Restricted Area North (Federal Green and Orange.
Waters).
Offshore..................................... Black.
Great South Channel Restricted Area Black.
overlapping with LMA 2/3 and/or LMA 3.
Jordan Basin................................. Black and Purple (LMA 3);
Red and and Purple (LMA
1).
Jeffreys Ledge............................... Red and Green.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Excluding Shark Gillnet
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cape Cod Bay Restricted Area................. Green.
Stellwagen Bank/Jeffreys Ledge Restricted Green.
Area.
Great South Channel Restricted Area.......... Green.
Great South Channel Restricted Sliver Area... Green.
Other Northeast Gillnet Waters............... Green.
[[Page 14355]]
Jordan Basin................................. Green and Yellow.
Jeffreys Ledge............................... Green and Black.
Mid/South Atlantic Gillnet Waters............ Blue.
Southeast US Restricted Area South........... Yellow.
Other Southeast Gillnet Waters............... Yellow.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shark Gillnet (With Webbing of 5'' or Greater)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeast US Restricted Area South........... Green and Blue.
Southeast Monitoring Area.................... Green and Blue.
Other Southeast Waters....................... Green and Blue.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Area specific gear requirements. Trap/pot gear must be set
according to the requirements outlined below and in the table in
paragraph(c)(2)(iii) of this section.
(i) Single traps and multiple-trap trawls. All traps must be set
according to the configuration outlined in the Table (c)(2)(iii) of
this section. Trawls up to and including 5 or fewer traps must only
have one buoy line unless specified otherwise in Table (c)(2)(iii) of
this section.
(ii) Buoy line weak links. All buoys, flotation devices and/or
weights (except traps/pots, anchors, and leadline woven into the buoy
line), such as surface buoys, high flyers, sub-surface buoys, toggles,
window weights, etc., must be attached to the buoy line with a weak
link placed as close to each individual buoy, flotation device and/or
weight as operationally feasible and that meets the following
specifications:
(A) The breaking strength of the weak links must not exceed the
breaking strength listed in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section for a
specified management area.
(B) The weak link must be chosen from the following list approved
by NMFS: Swivels, plastic weak links, rope of appropriate breaking
strength, hog rings, rope stapled to a buoy stick, or other materials
or devices approved in writing by the Assistant Administrator. A
brochure illustrating the techniques for making weak links is available
from the Regional Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic Region upon
request.
(C) Weak links must break cleanly leaving behind the bitter end of
the line. The bitter end of the line must be free of any knots when the
weak link breaks. Splices are not considered to be knots for the
purposes of this provision.
(iii)--Table of Area Specific Gear Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum number traps/
Location Management area trawl Weak link strength
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ME State and Pocket Waters\1\..... Northern Inshore State.... 2 (1 endline)........ <=600 lbs.
ME Zones A-G (3-6 miles) i........ Northern Nearshore........ 3 (1 endline)........ <=600 lbs.
ME Zones A-C (6-12 miles) \1\..... Northern Nearshore........ 5 (1 endline)........ <=600 lbs.
ME Zones D-G (6-12 miles) \1\..... Northern Nearshore........ 10................... <=600 lbs.
ME Zones A-E (12+ miles).......... Northern Nearshore and 15................... <=600 lbs (<=1500 lbs in
Offshore. offshore, 2,000 lbs if
red crab trap/pot).
ME Zones F-G (12+ miles).......... Northern Nearshore and 15 (Mar 1-Oct 31) 20 <=600 lbs (<=1500 lbs in
Offshore. (Nov 1-Feb 28/29). offshore, 2,000 lbs if
red crab trap/pot).
MA State Waters ii................ Northern Inshore State and No minimum number of <=600 lbs.
Massachusetts Restricted traps per trawl.
Area. Trawls up to and
including 3 or fewer
traps must only have
one buoy line.
Other MA State Waters............. Northern Inshore State and 2 (1 endline) Trawls <=600 lbs.
Massachusetts Restricted up to and including
Area. 3 or fewer traps
must only have one
buoy line.
NH State Waters................... Northern Inshore State.... No minimum trap/trawl <=600 lbs.
LMA 1 (3-12 miles)................ Northern Nearshore and 10................... <=600 lbs.
Massachusetts Restricted
Area and Stellwagen Bank/
Jeffreys Ledge Restricted
Area.
LMA 1 (12+ miles)................. Northern Nearshore........ 20................... <=600 lbs.
LMA1/OC Overlap (0-3 miles)....... Northern Inshore State and No minimum number of <=600 lbs.
Massachusetts Restricted traps per trawl.
Area.
OC (0-3 miles).................... Northern Inshore State and No minimum number of <=600 lbs.
Massachusetts Restricted traps per trawl.
Area.
OC (3-12 miles)................... Northern Nearshore and 10................... <=600 lbs.
Massachusetts Restricted
Area.
[[Page 14356]]
OC (12+ miles).................... Northern Nearshore and 20................... <=600 lbs.
Great South Channel
Restricted Area.
RI State Waters................... Northern Inshore State.... No minimum number of <=600 lbs.
traps per trawl..
LMA 2 (3-12 miles)................ Northern Nearshore........ 10................... <=600 lbs.
LMA 2 (12 + miles)................ Northern Nearshore and 20................... <=600 lbs.
Great South Channel
Restricted Area.
LMA 2/3 Overlap (12+ miles)....... Offshore and Great South 20................... <=1500 lbs (2,000 lbs if
Channel Restricted Area. red crab trap/pot).
LMA 3 (12+ miles)................. Offshore waters North of 20................... <=1500 lbs (2,000 lbs if
40[deg] and Great South red crab trap/pot).
Channel Restricted Area.
LMA 4,5,6......................... Southern Nearshore........ ..................... <=600 lbs.
FL State Waters................... Southeast US Restricted 1.................... <=200 lbs.
Area North iii.
GA State Waters................... Southeast US Restricted 1.................... <=600 lbs.
Area North \3\.
SC State Waters................... Southeast US Restricted 1.................... <=600 lbs.
Area North \3\.
Federal Waters off FL, GA, SC..... Southeast US Restricted 1.................... <=600 lbs.
Area North \3\.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The pocket waters and 6-mile line as defined in paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)-(a)(2)(iii) of this section.
\2\ MA State waters as defined in paragraphs (a)(3)(iii) of this section.
\3\ See Sec. 229.32 (f)(1) for description of area.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-06272 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P