Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery and Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Framework Adjustment 26; Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; Sea Turtle Conservation, 13806-13821 [2015-05650]
Download as PDF
13806
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action. The potential costs
associated with this regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: March 11, 2015.
Nadya Chinoy Dabby,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2015–05956 Filed 3–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 648
[Docket No. 141125999–5195–01]
RIN 0648–BE68
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery
and Northeast Multispecies Fishery;
Framework Adjustment 26;
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife;
Sea Turtle Conservation
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to approve
and implement through regulations
measures included in Framework
Adjustment 26 to the Atlantic Sea
Scallop Fishery Management Plan,
which the New England Fishery
Management Council adopted and
submitted to NMFS for approval. The
purpose of Framework 26 is to prevent
overfishing, improve yield-per-recruit,
and improve the overall management of
the Atlantic sea scallop fishery. The
Framework 26 proposed measures
would also: Close a portion of the
Elephant Trunk Access Area and extend
the boundaries of the Nantucket
Lightship Access Area to protect small
scallops; adjust the State Waters
Exemption Program; allow for Vessel
Monitoring System declaration changes
for vessels to steam home with product
on board; implement a proactive
accountability measure to protect
windowpane flounder and yellowtail
flounder; align two gear measures
designed to protect sea turtles; and
implement other measures to improve
the management of the scallop fishery.
Aligning the gear designed to protect sea
turtles involves modifying existing
regulations implemented under the
Endangered Species Act; therefore, this
action would be implemented under
joint authority of the Endangered
Species Act and the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The Council developed an
environmental assessment (EA) for this
action that describes the proposed
measures and other considered
alternatives and provides a thorough
analysis of the impacts of the proposed
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
measures and alternatives. Copies of the
Framework, the EA, and the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
are available upon request from Thomas
A. Nies, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council,
50 Water Street, Newburyport, MA
01950.
You may submit comments on this
document, identified by NOAA–NMFS–
2015–0002, by either of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150002, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope,
‘‘Comments on Scallop Framework 26
Proposed Rule.’’
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to the Greater
Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office and
by email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Gilbert, Fishery Policy Analyst,
978–281–9315.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The scallop fishery’s management
unit ranges from the shorelines of Maine
through North Carolina to the outer
boundary of the Exclusive Economic
Zone. The Scallop Fishery Management
Plan (FMP), established in 1982,
includes a number of amendments and
framework adjustments that have
revised and refined the fishery’s
management. The Council sets scallop
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
fishery specifications through
framework adjustments that occur
annually or biennially. This annual
action includes allocations for fishing
year 2015, as well as other scallop
fishery management measures.
The Council adopted Framework 26
on November 20, 2014, and submitted it
to NMFS on February 17, 2015, for
review and approval. Framework 26
specifies measures for fishing year 2015,
but includes fishing year 2016 measures
that will go into place as a default,
should the next specifications-setting
framework be delayed beyond the start
of fishing year 2016. NMFS will
implement Framework 26, if approved,
after the start of fishing year 2015; 2015
default measures concerning allocations
have been in place as of March 1, 2015.
These default measures are more
conservative than the Framework 26
proposed allocations and would be
replaced by the higher Framework 26
allocations if this action is approved.
The Council has reviewed the
Framework 26 proposed rule regulations
as drafted by NMFS and deemed them
to be necessary and appropriate as
specified in section 303(c) of the MSA.
Specification of Scallop Overfishing
Limit (OFL), Acceptable Biological
Catch (ABC), Annual Catch Limits
(ACLs), Annual Catch Targets (ACTs),
and Set-Asides for the 2015 Fishing
Year and Default Specifications for
Fishing Year 2016
The proposed allocations incorporate
new biomass reference points that
resulted from the Northeast Fisheries
Science Center’s most recent scallop
stock benchmark assessment that was
completed in July 2014. The assessment
reviewed and updated the data and
models used to assess the scallop stock
13807
discards and incidental mortality. The
Scientific and Statistical Committee will
reevaluate an ABC for 2016 when the
Council develops the next framework
adjustment.
Table 2 outlines the proposed scallop
fishery catch limits that are derived
from the ABC values. After deducting
the incidental target total allowable
catch (TAC) and the research and
observer set-asides, the remaining ACL
available to the fishery is allocated
according to the fleet proportions
established in Amendment 11 to the
Scallop FMP (72 FR 20090; April 14,
2008): 94.5 percent allocated to the
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF OLD AND NEW limited access (LA) scallop fleet (i.e., the
SCALLOP REFERENCE POINTS FROM larger ‘‘trip boat’’ fleet); 5 percent
THE LAST TWO BENCHMARK SCAL- allocated to the limited access general
LOP STOCK ASSESSMENTS IN 2010 category (LAGC) individual fishing
AND 2014
quota (IFQ) fleet (i.e., the smaller ‘‘day
boat’’ fleet); and the remaining 0.5
2010
2014
percent allocated to LA scallop vessels
Assessment
Assessment that also have LAGC IFQ permits. These
separate ACLs and their corresponding
Fmsy ................ 0.38
0.48.
ACTs are referred to as sub-ACLs and
Bmsy ................ 125,000 mt
96,480 mt.
sub-ACTs, respectively, throughout this
1/2 Bmsy ......... 62,000 mt
48,240 mt.
action. Amendment 15 to the Scallop
Due to these reference point updates,
FMP (76 FR 43746; July 21, 2011)
the fishing mortality rates that the
specified that no buffers to account for
Council uses to set OFL, ABC, and ACL
management uncertainty are necessary
would be updated through this action.
in setting the LAGC sub-ACLs, meaning
The proposed OFL was set based on an
that the LAGC sub-ACL would equal the
F of 0.48, equivalent to the F threshold
LAGC sub-ACT. As a result, the LAGC
updated through the 2014 assessment.
sub-ACL values in Table 2, based on an
The proposed ABC and the equivalent
F of 0.38, represent the amount of catch
total ACL for each fishing year are based from which IFQ percentage shares will
on an F of 0.38, which is the F
be applied to calculate each vessel’s IFQ
associated with a 25-percent probability for a given fishing year. For the LA fleet,
of exceeding the OFL. The Council’s
the management uncertainty buffer is
Scientific and Statistical Committee
based on the F associated with a 75recommended scallop fishery ABCs for
percent probability of remaining below
the 2015 and 2016 fishing years of 55.9
the F associated with ABC/ACL, which,
M lb (25,352 mt) and 70.1 M lb (31,807
using the updated Fs applied to the
mt), respectively, after accounting for
ABC/ACL, now results in an F of 0.34.
and ultimately updated the reference
points for status determinations. The
scallop stock is considered overfished if
the biomass is less than half of the
biomass at maximum sustainable yield
(Bmsy), and overfishing is occurring if
fishing mortality (F) is above the fishing
mortality at maximum sustainable yield
(Fmsy). The assessment continues to find
that the scallop resource is not
overfished and overfishing is not
occurring, but the estimates for Fmsy and
Bmsy have changed. A comparison of the
old and new reference points is outlined
in Table 1.
TABLE 2—SCALLOP CATCH LIMITS FOR FISHING YEARS 2015 AND 2016 FOR THE LA AND LAGC IFQ FLEETS
2015
(mt)
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Overfishing Limit ..................................................................................................................................................
ABC/ACL w/discards removed ............................................................................................................................
Incidental TAC .....................................................................................................................................................
Research Set-Aside (RSA) ..................................................................................................................................
Observer Set-aside (1 percent of ABC/ACL) ......................................................................................................
LA sub-ACL (94.5 percent of total ACL, after deducting set-asides and incidental catch) ................................
LA sub-ACT (adjusted for management uncertainty) ..........................................................................................
LAGC IFQ sub-ACL (5.0 percent of total ACL, after deducting set-asides and incidental catch) .....................
LAGC IFQ sub-ACL for vessels with LA scallop permits (0.5 percent of total ACL, after deducting set-asides
and incidental catch) ........................................................................................................................................
This action would deduct 567 mt of
scallops annually for 2015 and 2016
from the ABC and set it aside as the
Scallop RSA to fund scallop research
and to compensate participating vessels
through the sale of scallops harvested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
under RSA projects. As of March 1,
2015, this set-aside was available for
harvest by RSA-funded projects in open
areas. Framework 26 would allow RSA
to be harvested from the Mid-Atlantic
Access Areas that is proposed to be
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2016
(mt)
38,061
25,352
22.7
567
254
23,161
19,311
1,225
45,456
31,807
22.7
567
318
29,200
23,016
1,545
123
154
open for 2015, once this action is
approved and implemented, but would
prevent RSA harvesting from access
areas under 2016 default measures. Of
this 1.25 M lb (567 mt) allocation,
NMFS has already allocated 397,470 lb
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
13808
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(180.3 mt) to previously funded multiyear projects as part of the 2014 RSA
awards process. NMFS has reviewed
proposals submitted for consideration of
2015 RSA awards and will be selecting
projects for funding in the near future.
This action would also set aside 1
percent of the ABC for the industryfunded observer program to help defray
the cost of scallop vessels that carry an
observer. The observer set-asides for
fishing years 2015 and 2016 are 254 mt
and 318 mt, respectively. The 2016
observer set-aside may be adjusted by
the Council when it develops specific,
non-default measures for 2016.
Open Area Days-at-Sea (DAS)
Allocations
This action would implement vesselspecific DAS allocations for each of the
three LA scallop DAS permit categories
(i.e., full-time, part-time, and
occasional) for 2015 and 2016 (Table 3).
Proposed 2015 DAS allocations are
almost identical to those allocated to the
LA fleet in 2014 (31 DAS for full-time,
12 DAS for part-time, and 3 DAS for
occasional vessels). Fishing year 2016
DAS allocations are precautionary, and
are set at 75 percent of what current
biomass projections indicate could be
allocated to each LA scallop vessel for
the entire fishing year. This is to avoid
over-allocating DAS to the fleet in the
event that the framework that would set
those allocations, if delayed past the
start of the 2016 fishing year, estimates
that DAS should be less than currently
projected. The proposed allocations in
Table 3 exclude any DAS deductions
that are required if the LA scallop fleet
exceeded its 2014 sub-ACL. In addition,
these DAS values take into account a
slight DAS reduction necessary for the
implementation of another proposed
measure discussed later on in this rule
(See Adjustment to Vessel Monitoring
System (VMS) Declaration Procedures
for Some Open Area Trips). If this
measure, which would allow for vessels
on specific trips to end their open area
trip and DAS accrual sooner than they
can under current regulations, is not
approved, the DAS allocations in Table
3 would increase by 0.14 DAS and 0.06
DAS for full-time and part-time vessels,
respectively (there would be no change
for occasional vessels, and there are
currently no vessels issued the
occasional permit type in the LA scallop
fleet). In addition, the Council requested
that DAS allocations now be specified to
the hundredth decimal place, rather
than rounding up or down to whole
DAS. This is consistent with DAS
accounting as vessels use DAS
throughout the year.
TABLE 3—SCALLOP OPEN AREA DAS
ALLOCATIONS FOR 2015 AND 2016
Permit
category
2015
Full-Time ...
Part-Time ..
Occasional
2016
30.86
12.94
2.58
26.00
10.40
2.17
On March 1, 2015, full-time, parttime, and occasional vessels received
17, 7, and 1 DAS, respectively. These
allocations would increase as soon as
Framework 26 is implemented, if
approved.
LA Allocations and Trip Possession
Limits for Scallop Access Areas
For fishing year 2015 and the start of
2016, Framework 26 would close all
three Georges Bank Access Areas (i.e.,
Nantucket Lightship (NLS), Closed Area
1, and Closed Area 2 Access Areas) and
open all three Mid-Atlantic Access
Areas (i.e., Elephant Trunk, Delmarva,
and Hudson Canyon Access Areas). This
action proposes to extend the
boundaries of the NLS Access Area that
would close to the scallop fleet to
include a concentration of small
scallops near the existing boundary
along the southeast corner, currently
considered part of the open area. This
proposed closure area, which would
increase the NLS Access Area boundary
by 158 square miles, would be
reconsidered in a future framework
action when the scallops are larger and
ready for harvest.
As for the Mid-Atlantic Access Areas,
this action proposes that all three access
areas be open to both the LA and LAGC
IFQ fleet, and be treated as one single
area, which this rule will now refer to
as the Mid-Atlantic Access Area.
Scallop vessels would be able to fish
across all three areas in a single access
area trip. There is one the exception:
This action proposes six 10-minute
squares (i.e., 549 square nautical miles)
in the northwest corner of the Elephant
Trunk Access Area be closed to protect
small scallops. This area constitutes
roughly 35 percent of the current
Elephant Trunk Access Area. The
closure would allow for the small
concentrations of scallops in this
portion of the access area to be
protected as they grow to a more
harvestable size. This action proposes
that no transiting be allowed across this
small area due to its small size and the
incentive to fish in the area is relatively
high due to the high abundance of
scallops.
Table 4 outlines the proposed LA
allocations that can be fished from the
Mid-Atlantic Access Area, which could
be taken in as many trips as needed, so
long as the trip possession limits (also
in Table 4) are not exceeded. These
proposed access area allocations for
2015 represent a 112-percent increase in
access area allocations compared to
2014.
TABLE 4—SCALLOP ACCESS AREA POUNDAGE ALLOCATIONS AND TRIP POSSESSION LIMITS FOR 2015 AND 2016
Possession limits
2015 Allocation
Full-Time ........................................
Part-Time .......................................
Occasional .....................................
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Permit category
17,000 lb (7,711 kg) .....................
10,200 lb ( 4,627 kg) ....................
1,420 lb (644 kg) ..........................
51,000 lb (23,133 kg) ...................
20,400 lb ( 9,253 kg) ....................
4,250 lb ( 1,928 kg) ......................
This action also proposes to modify
access area trip reporting procedures by
requiring that each LA vessel submit a
pre-landing notification form through its
VMS unit prior to returning to port at
the end of each access area trip,
including trips where no scallops were
landed. These pre-landing notifications
would replace the current broken trip
and compensation trip procedures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
Vessels would no longer be required to
submit a broken trip notification form if
they are unable to land their full
possession limits on an access area trip.
Vessels would also no longer need to
apply to NMFS to receive, or wait for
NMFS to issue, a compensation trip to
fish their remaining access area scallop
allocation.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2016 Allocation
17,000 lb (7,711 kg).
10,200 lb (4,627 kg).
1,420 lb ( 644 kg).
For example, under Framework 26
access area allocations, a full-time
vessel receives 51,000 lb (23,133 kg) in
the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, which
can be landed on as many or as few trips
as needed, so long as the 17,000-lb
(7,711-kg) possession limit is not
exceeded on any one trip. The vessel
may choose to fish its full allocation
over the course of three trips, landing
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the maximum allowance of 17,000 lb
(7,711 kg) on each trip, or it can choose
to fish its full allocation over the course
of four, five, or more trips, landing less
than the trip possession limit on each
trip. Regardless, the vessel must submit
a pre-landing notification form prior to
returning to port for each access area
trip, and would not have to wait for
NMFS to issue a compensation trip
prior to starting its next access area trip.
This action would also modify the
procedures for when scallop access area
allocation can be carried over to the
next fishing year. Under the current
regulations, vessel may fish for a
previous year’s unharvested scallop
access area allocation in the first 60
days of a fishing year if the vessel broke
a trip in the last 60 days of the previous
fishing year or open season for an access
area. In many cases, vessels in the last
60 days of the fishing year simply
crossed the VMS Demarcation Line,
submitted a broken trip report through
their VMS unit, and returned to port.
This caused confusion and created a
high number of cases for NMFS to
review as the fishing year came to an
end. Under the proposed measures, each
vessel would automatically carry over
unharvested access area allocation that
the vessel could fish in the first 60 days
of the subsequent fishing year, as long
as the access area is open for scallop
fishing during that time. This change
would result in little change to the
amount of carryover NMFS expects from
year to year because most vessels took
advantage of the broken trip provisions.
Also, Framework 26 accounts for the
uncertainty associated with carryover by
setting the LA fishery’s ACT lower than
the fishery’s ACL. This ensures that
carryover would not cause an ACL to be
exceeded from year to year.
Although vessel owners would
ultimately be responsible for tracking
their own scallop access area landings
and ensuring they do not exceed their
annual allocations, NMFS would match
dealer-reported scallop landing records
with access area trip declarations and
make that information available on FishOn-Line.
Additional Measures To Reduce
Impacts on Small Scallops
1. Crew Limit Restrictions in Access
Areas. Similar to the crew limit
restrictions NMFS implemented in
Delmarva in 2014, this action proposes
crew limits for all access areas.
Currently, LA scallop vessels have crew
size limits when fishing in open areas:
Vessels are limited to seven individuals
when fishing on a DAS, or five
individuals if the vessel is on a DAS and
participating in the small dredge
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
program. These limits have been in
place to restrict the shucking capacity of
a vessel to help reduce landings per unit
effort while on DAS. In an effort to
protect small scallops and discourage
vessels from high-grading (discarding
smaller scallops in exchange for larger
ones), Framework 26 would impose a
crew limit of eight individuals per LA
vessel, including the captain, when
fishing in any scallop access area. If a
vessel is participating in the small
dredge program, it may not have more
than six people on board, including the
operator, on an access area trip. These
crew limits may be reevaluated in a
future framework action.
2. Delayed Harvesting of Default 2016
Mid-Atlantic Access Area Allocations.
Although the Framework would include
precautionary access area allocations for
the 2016 fishing year (see 2016
allocations in Table 4), vessels would
have to wait to fish these allocations
until April 1, 2016. This precautionary
measure is designed to protect scallops
when scallop meat weights are lower
than other times of the year (generally,
this change in meat-weight is a
physiological change in scallops due to
spawning). However, if a vessel has not
fully harvested its 2015 scallop access
area allocation in fishing year 2015, it
may still fish the remainder of its
allocation in the first 60 days of 2016
(i.e., March 1, 2016, through April 29,
2016).
3. 2016 RSA Harvest Restrictions.
This action proposes that vessels
participating in RSA projects would be
prohibited from harvesting RSA under
default 2016 measures. At the start of
2016, RSA could only be harvested from
open areas. This would be re-evaluated
for the remainder of 2016 in the
framework action that would set final
2016 specifications.
LAGC Measures
1. Sub-ACL for LAGC vessels with IFQ
permits. For LAGC vessels with IFQ
permits, this action proposes a 1,225-mt
ACL for 2015 and an initial ACL of
1,545 mt for 2016 (Table 2). We
calculate IFQ allocations by applying
each vessel’s IFQ contribution
percentage to these ACLs. These
allocations assume that no LAGC IFQ
AMs are triggered. If a vessel exceeds its
IFQ in a given fishing year, its IFQ for
the subsequent fishing year would be
reduced by the amount of the overage.
Because Framework 26 would not go
into effect until after the March 1 start
of fishing year 2015, the default 2015
IFQ allocations were automatically
triggered. These default 2015 IFQ
allocations are lower than those
proposed in Framework 26. If approved,
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13809
this action would increase the current
vessel IFQ allocations. NMFS sent a
letter to IFQ permit holders providing
both March 1, 2015, IFQ allocations and
Framework 26 proposed IFQ allocations
so that vessel owners know what midyear adjustments would occur if
Framework 26 is approved.
2. Sub-ACL for LA Scallop Vessels
with IFQ Permits. For LA scallop vessels
with IFQ permits, this action proposes
a 123 mt ACL for 2015 and an initial
154 mt ACL for 2016 (Table 2). We
calculate IFQ allocations by applying
each vessel’s IFQ contribution
percentage to these ACLs. These
allocations assume that no LAGC IFQ
AMs are triggered. If a vessel exceeds its
IFQ in a given fishing year, its IFQ for
the subsequent fishing year would be
reduced by the amount of the overage.
3. LAGC IFQ Trip Allocations and
Possession Limits for Scallop Access
Areas. Framework 26 proposes that
LAGC IFQ vessels would receive a
fleetwide number of trips that could be
taken in the Mid-Atlantic Access Area.
Framework 26 would allocate 2,065 and
602 trips in 2015 and 2016, respectively,
to this area. Under default 2016
measures, LAGC IFQ vessels must wait
to fish these trips until April 1, 2016.
These trip allocations are equivalent
to the overall proportion of total catch
from access areas compared to total
catch. For example, the total projected
catch for the scallop fishery in 2015 is
20,865 mt, and 8,700 mt are projected to
come from access areas, roughly 41.7
percent. If the same proportion is
applied to total LAGC IFQ catch, the
total allocation to LAGC IFQ vessels
from access areas would be about 600
mt, roughly 44.5 percent of the total
LAGC IFQ sub-ACL for 2015 (1,348 mt).
4. NGOM TAC. This action proposes
a 70,000-lb (31,751-kg) annual NGOM
TAC for fishing years 2015 and 2016.
The allocation for 2015 assumes that
there are no overages in 2014, which
would trigger a pound-for-pound
deduction in 2015 to account for the
overage.
5. Scallop Incidental Catch Target
TAC. This action proposes a 50,000-lb
(22,680-kg) scallop incidental catch
target TAC for fishing years 2015 and
2016 to account for mortality from this
component of the fishery, and to ensure
that F targets are not exceeded. The
Council and NMFS may adjust this
target TAC in a future action if vessels
catch more scallops under the
incidental target TAC than predicted.
Adjustments to Gear Modifications To
Protect Sea Turtles
This action proposes to adjust season
regulations for the sea turtle deflector
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
13810
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
dredge (TDD) and area regulations for
the sea turtle chain mat to make them
consistent. Currently, turtle chain mats
are required in the area south of 41°9′
N. lat. from May through November, and
the TDD is required west of 71° W. long.
from May through October. When used
together, chain mats and TDDs are
thought to increase the conservation
benefit to sea turtles, because chain
mats help reduce the impact to turtles
from interactions occurring in the water
column, and the TDD helps reduce the
impact to turtles from interactions with
the dredge frame on the sea floor
(DuPaul et al. 2004; Smolowitz et al.
2010). By making the area and season
for these two gear modifications
consistent, west of 71° W. long. from
May through November, the
conservation benefit of the current chain
mat and TDD requirements is
maintained, while reducing the
regulatory complexity of differing
seasons and areas. Any reduction in the
size of the area that chain mats would
be required (east of 71° W. long. and
south of 41°9′ N. lat.) is balanced by an
extension of the season that TDDs
would be required (the month of
November). In addition, this action also
proposes a very slight modification to
the TDD gear regulations for safety
purposes. When the Council first
approved the TDD, it included the
allowance of a flaring bar to ensure safe
handling of the dredge. At the time, the
Council specified that this flaring bar
should only be attached to the dredge
frame on one side. Since the TDD’s
implementation, there has been some
interest to attach the flaring bar in a ‘‘u’’
shape, which could be attached on the
inside or outside of the bale bar, but the
current regulations unnecessarily
prohibit this. This action proposes to
adjust this regulation to allow for a bar
or ‘‘u’’-shaped flaring mechanism to
support safety at sea. Allowing a ushaped flaring mechanism should not
have an impact on sea turtles and the
effectiveness of the TDD because the
flaring bar or mechanism would still be
prohibited from being attached within
12 inches (30.5 cm) of the ‘‘bump out’’
of the TDD and not between the bale
bars. This change would require that
each side of the bar or mechanism be no
more than 12 inches (30.5 cm) in length.
This action would not change any
other regulatory requirements for the
use of chain mats and TDDs.
Adjustment to Vessel Monitoring System
(VMS) Declaration Procedures for Some
Open Area Trips
This action would enable a vessel to
declare out of a DAS trip at or south of
Cape May, NJ (specifically, at or south
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
of 39° N. lat.), once it goes inside the
VMS demarcation line, and then, with
scallops on board, steam seaward of the
VMS demarcation line to ports south of
Cape May, NJ, without being charged
DAS. This measure does not apply to
vessels that intend to land scallops in
ports north of Cape May, NJ. Once this
change in declaration to ‘‘declare out of
fishery’’ has been made, vessels would
be required to submit a scallop prelanding notification form through VMS,
return directly to port and offload
scallops immediately, and stow all gear.
In addition, such vessels would be
prohibited from having on board any inshell scallops.
The purpose of this measure is to help
increase incentive for vessels to land
scallops in the southern part of the midAtlantic by reducing some of the
steaming time to return to those more
distant ports. Due to the location of the
access areas in the mid-Atlantic, which
were at one point primary traditional
open area fishing grounds, vessels from
Virginia and North Carolina fishing on
open area DAS trips have to steam for
a long period of time to reach
productive open area fishing grounds.
Vessels are currently allowed to start
their open area DAS trip landward of
the VMS Demarcation Line, but not
necessarily from port, but are required
to accrue DAS when harvested scallops
are on board, so their return steam from
an open area trip counts against their
DAS allocation. Over time, as DAS have
been reduced dramatically and with
increased fuel costs, vessels have more
incentive to land near these primary
fishing grounds (i.e., in New Bedford,
MA, or Cape May, NJ) to avoid being
charged for DAS steaming back to
southern ports farther away that would
most impact their DAS allocations. This
decrease in landings to particular states
over time has had a great impact on
shoreside businesses that depend upon
a stable stream of landings.
Because this change in when some
vessels may ‘‘clock out’’ of their DAS
could impact overall DAS allocations to
the fleet, this action also proposes an
overall DAS deduction to each LA
scallop vessel. The proposed DAS
adjustment (which has already been
calculated into the DAS allocations
proposed in Table 3) would be a
decrease of 0.14 DAS for full-time
vessels and 0.06 DAS for part-time
vessels. This entire measure, including
the appropriate DAS deductions, was
supported by the Council’s Advisory
Panel.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Adjustments to the State Water
Exemption Program To Include
Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM)
Management Area Exemptions
Framework 26 proposes to modify the
State Water Exemption Program to
include a new exemption that would
enable scallop vessels to continue to
fish in state waters after the NGOM hard
TAC is reached.
The current State Water Exemption
Program has been in place since
Framework 2 to the Scallop FMP
(November 21, 1994; 59 FR 59967). At
that time, the purpose of the program
was to allow Federal permit holders to
compete in the state waters fishery on
a more equitable basis where Federal
and state laws are inconsistent and to
encourage vessels with general category
permits (open access, at the time) to fish
under the exemption program and
continue to submit catch and effort data.
This program specifies that a state with
a scallop fishery may be eligible for state
waters exemptions if it has a scallop
conservation program that does not
jeopardize the biomass and fishing
mortality/effort limit objectives of the
Scallop FMP. If a state is found to be
eligible for the State Waters Exemption
Program, federally permitted scallop
vessels fishing in that state’s waters may
be exempted from a limited number of
Federal scallop regulations: LA scallop
vessels could fish in state waters outside
of scallop DAS, and LA and LAGC
scallop vessels could be exempt from
Federal gear and possession limit
restrictions.
This action proposes to expand the
exemptions to include this new measure
related to the NGOM. Specifically, states
within the NGOM management area
(i.e., Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
and Maine) could request an exemption
from the regulations requiring that
scallop vessels must stop fishing in the
state waters portion of the NGOM once
the Federal TAC has been reached.
States would have to apply for this
exemption and specify to which vessels
this would apply (i.e., vessels with
NGOM permits, IFQ permits, incidental
permits, and/or LA permits).
Currently, a vessel issued a NGOM or
IFQ permit can declare a state-only
NGOM scallop trip and fish for scallops
exclusively in state waters without
those landings being attributed to the
Federal TAC, but must cease scallop
fishing entirely for the remainder of the
year, along with all other scallop
vessels, once the Federal TAC is
reached. To date this has not been an
issue because the Federal NGOM catch
has been well below the TAC. However,
total catch in both Federal and state
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
waters in this area is increasing, and
Maine permit holders are concerned
about their ability to fish in state waters
when the state season is open in the
winter if the NGOM TAC is reached.
This measure would alleviate those
concerns by giving the state the ability
to apply for an exemption through the
State Water Exemption Program.
Because the NGOM Federal TAC is set
based only on the Federal portion of the
resource, NMFS does not expect this
measure to compromise the FMP’s
limits on catch and mortality.
The process for applying to the State
Waters Exemption Program, as outlined
in the regulations, would remain the
same. In order for NMFS to make a
determination of whether or not a state
waters exemption is warranted for a
particular state’s waters, a state must
submit a request for the exemption so
that we can fully evaluate the scope of
the potential fishery in the state’s
waters. Such a request would need to
include the following information: A
complete description of scallop fishing
regulations in state waters; the number
of vessels and trips that could be
expected in state waters; the average
landings per trip for vessels fishing in
state waters; and the average per-pound
value of scallops landed by vessels
fishing for scallops in state waters. If the
information provided supports a
conclusion that a particular state’s
scallop fishery is consistent with the
FMP relative to the State Waters
Exemption Program, NMFS would then
publish the requested exemptions from
DAS, gear, and possession limits, and
NGOM closures, in a notice in the
Federal Register, consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act.
Proactive Accountability Measures
(AMs) for Flatfish Protection
Currently, all scallop vessels (i.e., LA
and LAGC) fishing for scallops with
dredges in open areas west of 71° W.
long. are required to have their dredges
configured so that no dredge has more
than seven rows of rings in the apron
(i.e., the area between the terminus of
the dredge (clubstick) and the twine top)
on the topside of the dredge. The twine
top helps finfish (flatfish in particular)
escape from the dredge during fishing
and the maximum number of rows of
rings prevents fishermen from making
the twine top small and ineffective in
reducing bycatch. Framework 26
proposes to extend this proactive
accountability measure to all areas
where scallop fishing occurs (i.e., all
access and open areas). This increased
spatial coverage may further reduce
flatfish bycatch by preventing dredge
configurations using more than seven
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
rows of rings, which is currently
required east of 71° W. long. for some
scallop vessels fishing in open areas.
This is considered to be a proactive AM
because it may help the fishery stay
below the sub-ACLs for flatfish
(yellowtail flounder and windowpane
flounder, currently). Additionally, this
measure would enable vessels to
voluntarily fish with an even shorter
apron (less than seven rings), to
proactively reduce flatfish bycatch in
any area or season.
Regulatory Corrections Under Regional
Administrator Authority
This proposed rule includes several
revisions to the regulatory text to
address text that is unnecessary,
outdated, unclear, or otherwise could be
improved. NMFS proposes these
changes consistent with section 305(d)
of the MSA which provides that the
Secretary of Commerce may promulgate
regulations necessary to ensure that
amendments to an FMP are carried out
in accordance with the FMP and the
MSA. Two revisions clarify how to
apply and measure gear modifications to
ensure compliance. The first revision at
§ 648.51 would clarify where to measure
meshes to ensure twine top compliance.
The second revision at § 648.53 clarifies
an example on how the hanging ratio
should be applied and measured if the
windowpane reactive AM implemented
through Framework 25 (June 26, 2014;
79 FR 34251) is triggered.
This action would also modify the
VMS catch report requirements at
§ 648.10(f)(4)(i) to only include the
information actually used by NMFS to
monitor flatfish bycatch. The form
currently requires that the amount of
yellowtail flounder discards be reported
daily. This requirement has been in
place since Amendment 15 (76 FR
43746; July 21, 2011), which established
the yellowtail flounder AMs in the FMP.
However, since Amendment 15, the
scallop fishery now has other bycatch
sub-ACLs and AMs (e.g., SNE/MA
windowpane flounder) which are not
captured in this form. In addition,
current bycatch monitoring relies solely
on observer reports to determine
bycatch discards for these species. In
order to minimize confusion and
because this information is not
necessary for bycatch monitoring, we
propose to remove the reference to
reporting yellowtail discards. Instead,
the vessels will report daily scallop
catch and the amount of all other
species kept.
In addition, this action would adjust
the regulations at § 648.53(a) to clarify
that the values for ABC/ACL stated in
the regulations reflect the levels from
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13811
which ACTs are set, thus they do not
include estimates of discards and
incidental mortality. This regulatory
clarification is at the request of the
Council and would more accurately
reflect the process for establishing ABCs
and ACLs in the scallop fishery.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
MSA, the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has made a preliminary
determination that this proposed rule is
consistent with the FMP, other
provisions of the MSA, and other
applicable law. In making the final
determination, NMFS will consider the
data, views, and comments received
during the public comment period.
This proposed rule does not contain
policies with Federalism or ‘‘takings’’
implications as those terms are defined
in E.O. 13132 and E.O. 12630,
respectively.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA has been prepared, as
required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA consists of Framework 26
analyses, its draft IRFA, and the
preamble to this action.
Statement of Objective and Need
This action proposes the management
measures and specifications for the
Atlantic sea scallop fishery for 2015,
with 2016 default measures. A
description of the action, why it is being
considered, and the legal basis for this
action are contained in Framework 26
and the preamble of this proposed rule
and are not repeated here.
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities to Which the Rule Would
Apply
The proposed regulations would
affect all vessels with LA and LAGC
scallop permits. The Framework 26
document provides extensive
information on the number and size of
vessels and small businesses that would
be affected by the proposed regulations,
by port and state (see ADDRESSES). There
were 313 vessels that obtained full-time
LA permits in 2013, including 250
dredge, 52 small-dredge, and 11 scallop
trawl permits. In the same year, there
were also 34 part-time LA permits in the
sea scallop fishery. No vessels were
issued occasional scallop permits.
NMFS issued 212 LAGC IFQ permits in
2013 and 155 of these vessels actively
fished for scallops that year (the
remaining permits likely leased out
scallop IFQ allocations with their
permits in Confirmation of Permit
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
13812
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
History). The RFA defines a small
business in shellfish fishery as a firm
that is independently owned and
operated and not dominant in its field
of operation, with receipts of up to $5.5
M annually. Individually-permitted
vessels may hold permits for several
fisheries, harvesting species of fish that
are regulated by several different fishery
management plans, even beyond those
impacted by the proposed action.
Furthermore, multiple permitted vessels
and/or permits may be owned by
entities affiliated by stock ownership,
common management, identity of
interest, contractual relationships, or
economic dependency. For the purposes
of this analysis, ‘‘ownership entities’’
are defined as those entities with
common ownership as listed on the
permit application. Only permits with
identical ownership are categorized as
an ‘‘ownership entity.’’ For example, if
five permits have the same seven
persons listed as co-owners on their
permit applications, those seven
persons would form one ‘‘ownership
entity,’’ that holds those five permits. If
two of those seven owners also co-own
additional vessels, that ownership
arrangement would be considered a
separate ‘‘ownership entity’’ for the
purpose of this analysis.
On June 1 of each year, ownership
entities are identified based on a list of
all permits for the most recent complete
calendar year. The current ownership
dataset is based on the calendar year
2013 permits and contains average gross
sales associated with those permits for
calendar years 2011 through 2013.
Matching the potentially impacted 2013
fishing year permits described above
(LA and LAGC IFQ) to calendar year
2013 ownership data results in 172
distinct ownership entities for the LA
fleet and 115 distinct ownership entities
for the LAGC IFQ fleet. Of these, and
based on the Small Business
Administration (SBA) guidelines, 154 of
the LA distinct ownership entities and
all 115 of the LAGC IFQ entities are
categorized as small. The remaining 18
of the LA entities are categorized as
large entities, all of which are shellfish
businesses.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of the Proposed Rule
The proposed action contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). Two requirements will be
submitted to OMB for approval under
the NMFS Northeast Region Scallop
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
Report Family of Forms (OMB Control
No. 0648–0491).
Under the proposed action, all 347 LA
vessels would be required to submit a
pre-landing notification form for each
access area trip through their VMS
units. This information collection is
intended to improve access area trip
monitoring, as well as streamline a
vessel’s ability to fish multiple access
area trips. Although this is a new
requirement, it would replace other
reporting procedures currently required
for breaking an access area trip and
receiving permission to take a
compensation trip to harvest remaining
unharvested scallop pounds from an
access area trip. The proposed action
also includes a new requirement for
some LA vessels to report a pre-landing
notification form through their VMS
unit before changing their open area trip
declaration to a ‘‘declared out of fishery
declaration,’’ which is expected to add
a burden to a very small portion of the
fleet. This requirement would only
apply to a few vessels that intend to
land open area scallops at ports south of
Cape May, NJ, and want to steam to
those ports while not using DAS. This
new pre-landing requirement is
necessary to enforce a measure intended
to assist shoreside businesses in
southern ports by providing an
incentive for vessels to steam to ports
far away from popular open area fishing
grounds.
Notification requires the
dissemination of the following
information: Operator’s permit number;
amount of scallop meats and/or bushels
to be landed; the estimated time of
arrival; the landing port and state where
the scallops will be offloaded; and the
vessel trip report (VTR) serial number
recorded from that trip’s VTR. This
information would be used by the Office
of Law Enforcement to monitor vessel
activity and ensure compliance with the
regulations.
The burden estimates for these new
requirements apply to all LA vessels. In
a given fishing year, NMFS estimates
that for access area reporting, each of
the 313 full-time LA vessels would
submit a pre-landing report 5 times
(1,565 responses) and each of the 34
part-time LA vessel would submit a prelanding report up to 3 times (102
responses), for a total of 1,667
responses. Public reporting burden for
submitting these pre-landing
notification forms is estimated to
average 5 minutes per response with an
associated cost of $1.25, that includes
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
Therefore, 1,667 responses would
impose total compliance costs of $2,084.
While this is a new requirement, it
would replace current trip termination
and compensation trip reporting
procedures, which were estimated to
cost a total of $300 annually, so the
additional burden for this new prelanding requirement would be $1,785
($2,085¥$300), or $5.14 per vessel. This
is likely an overestimate, but would
account for the potential of higher
access area scallop allocations in future
fishing years. For the new DAS prelanding requirements, NMFS estimates
that this would likely impact 30 vessels
and result in each of those vessels
reporting one time a year. Public
reporting burden for submitting these
pre-landing notification forms is also
estimated to average 5 minutes per
response with an associated cost of
$1.25. Therefore, the total cost of this
would impose total compliance costs of
$38 (30 vessels × $1.25). The total
additional burden from both of these
new pre-landing requirements would be
$1,823.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to the Regional
Administrator (See ADDRESSES above),
and email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/
services_programs/prasubs.html.
This action contains no other
compliance costs. It does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal law.
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
13813
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Federal Rules Which May Duplicate,
Overlap or Conflict With This Proposed
Rule
The proposed regulations do not
create overlapping regulations with any
state regulations or other federal laws.
Description of Significant Alternatives
to the Proposed Action
The preferred alternative for LA
allocations, which would allocate
includes 30.86 DAS and 23,133 kg of
scallops to be harvested in access areas
to full-time vessels, as well as close a
portion of the Elephant Trunk Access
Area and extend the NLS closure, is
expected to positively impact
profitability of small entities regulated
by this action. The estimated revenues
and net revenue for scallop vessels and
small business entities under all
considered allocations alternatives,
including the preferred alternative, are
expected to be higher than both the No
Action alternative (i.e., 2015 default
measures conservatively set through
Framework 25) and status quo levels
(i.e., assuming same level of access as
2014). There are four different LA
allocation alternative in Framework 26.
Alternative 1 is the no action alternative
which would allocate scallops based on
the conservative default measures in
Framework 25. Alternative 2 is the basic
run alternative and it would have
allocated the fleet access area trips
similar to past years (one access area per
trip; split trips for the fleet). Alternative
3 (preferred alternative) combines all
three Mid-Atlantic Access Areas and
allows vessels to fish their trips in the
combined area. Under Alternative 3
there are multiple options for closures
to protect small scallops. The preferred
alternative includes the options for a
closure inside the combine Mid-Atlantic
Access Area and an extension of the
NLS. Finally, Alternative 4 would have
set allocations similar to the basic run
alternative, but reduced the overall F.
The preferred alternative would have
the largest revenue compared to all
other alternatives in the 2015 fishing
year, which would translate to higher
profits (Table 5).
TABLE 5—ESTIMATED FLEET REVENUE AND REVENUE PER LIMITED ACCESS VESSEL IN 2014 DOLLARS
Fleet scallop
revenue (*)
($ million)
Alternative
2015 ..................................................
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Fishing year
ALT1. No Action ...............................
ALT2. Basic Run ..............................
ALT3. NL + ETA (Preferred alt.) ......
ALT3. 3 new closures ......................
ALT3. CA2 + NL ...............................
ALT4. Reduced F .............................
SQ. Status quo .................................
Overall LAGC IFQ allocations for the
preferred alternative will be 5.8 percent
higher than the No Action (i.e., 2015
default allocations) and is 23 percent
higher than the 2014 fishing year
allocations. As a result, the preferred
alternative is expected to have positive
economic impacts on LAGC IFQ fishery.
There are no other alternatives that
would generate higher economic
benefits for the scallop fishery as a
whole, including the small business
entities in the LAGC IFQ fishery. As for
LAGC IFQ access area allocations, the
preferred alternative would provide
proportional access for LA and LAGC
IFQ within the Mid-Atlantic Access
Area (i.e., the LAGC fishery is projected
to catch roughly 6.5 percent of the total
2015 projected catch of the fishery, so
roughly 6.5 percent of the total access
area catch available to the entire fishery
could be landed on IFQ fleetwide trips),
which should have positive impacts on
the small business entities of the LAGC
IFQ fishery by increasing flexibility and
lowering costs. The preferred alternative
would have higher economic benefits
than No Action and compared to the
2014 access area fleetwide IFQ trip
allocations, but would have lower
allocations than the alternative that
would have increased the number of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
263.0
557.8
578.1
567.1
570.3
557.6
477.2
fleetwide trips to 10.4 percent of the
total access area catch.
Because the NGOM and incidental
TACs are unchanged from previous
years, those proposed allocations are not
expected to directly impact small
business entities.
Literature Cited
DuPaul, W. D., D. B. Rudders, and R. J.
Smolowitz. 2004. Industry trials of a
modified sea scallop dredge to minimize
the catch of sea turtles. Final Report.
November 2004. VIMS Marine Resources
Report, No. 2004–12. 35 pp.
Smolowitz, R., H. Haas, H. O. Milliken, M.
Weeks and E. Matzen. 2010. Using Sea
Turtle Carcasses to Assess the
Conservation Potential of a Turtle
Deflector Dredge. North American
Journal of Fisheries Management 30:
993–1000.
50 CFR Part 223
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Transportation.
50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
748,731
1,592,242
1,650,451
1,618,858
1,627,986
1,591,748
1,361,611
Sfmt 4702
Change from
no action (%)
% Ch. from
SQ levels
0
113
120
116
117
113
82
¥45
17
21
19
20
17
0
Dated: March 6, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR parts 223 and 648 are
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 223—THREATENED MARINE
AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 223
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 1543; subpart B,
§ 223.201–202 also issued under 16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 5503(d) for
§ 223.206(d)(9).2.
2. In § 223.206 paragraph (d)(11) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 223.206 Exceptions to prohibitions
relating to sea turtles.
*
List of Subjects
PO 00000
Revenue per
FT vessel
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(11) Restrictions applicable to sea
scallop dredges in the mid-Atlantic—(i)
Gear Modification. During the time
period of May 1 through November 30,
any vessel with a sea scallop dredge and
required to have a Federal Atlantic sea
scallop fishery permit, regardless of
dredge size or vessel permit category,
that enters waters west of 71° W. long.,
from the shoreline to the outer boundary
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
13814
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
of the Exclusive Economic Zone must
have on each dredge a chain mat
described as follows. The chain mat
must be composed of horizontal
(‘‘tickler’’) chains and vertical (‘‘up-anddown’’) chains that are configured such
that the openings formed by the
intersecting chains have no more than
four sides. The vertical and horizontal
chains must be hung to cover the
opening of the dredge bag such that the
vertical chains extend from the back of
the cutting bar to the sweep. The
horizontal chains must intersect the
vertical chains such that the length of
each side of the openings formed by the
intersecting chains is less than or equal
to 14 inches (35.5 cm) with the
exception of the side of any individual
opening created by the sweep. The
chains must be connected to each other
with a shackle or link at each
intersection point. The measurement
must be taken along the chain, with the
chain held taut, and include one shackle
or link at the intersection point and all
links in the chain up to, but excluding,
the shackle or link at the other
intersection point.
(ii) Any vessel that enters the waters
described in paragraph (d)(11)(i) of this
section and that is required to have a
Federal Atlantic sea scallop fishery
permit must have the chain mat
configuration installed on all dredges
for the duration of the trip.
(iii) Vessels subject to the
requirements in paragraphs (d)(11)(i)
and (d)(11)(ii) of this section transiting
waters west of 71° W. long., from the
shoreline to the outer boundary of the
Exclusive Economic Zone, will be
exempted from the chain-mat
requirements provided the dredge gear
is stowed in accordance with § 648.2
and there are no scallops on-board.
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
3. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
4. In § 648.10, paragraphs (e)(5)(iii)
and (f)(4) are revised, and (f)(6) is added
to read as follows:
■
§ 648.10 VMS and DAS requirements for
vessel owners/operators.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(5) * * *
(iii) DAS counting for a vessel that is
under the VMS notification
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section, with the exception of vessels
that have elected to fish exclusively in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on a
particular trip, as described in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
paragraph (e)(5) of this section, begins
with the first location signal received
showing that the vessel crossed the
VMS Demarcation Line after leaving
port. DAS counting ends with the first
location signal received showing that
the vessel crossed the VMS Demarcation
Line upon its return to port, unless the
vessel is declared into a limited access
scallop DAS trip and, upon its return to
port, declares out of the scallop fishery
shoreward of the VMS Demarcation
Line at or south of 39° N. lat., as
specified in paragraph (f)(6) of this
section, and lands in a port south of 39°
N. lat.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(4) Catch reports. (i) The owner or
operator of a limited access or LAGC
IFQ vessel that fishes for, possesses, or
retains scallops, and is not fishing under
a NE Multispecies DAS or sector
allocation, must submit reports through
the VMS, in accordance with
instructions to be provided by the
Regional Administrator, for each day
fished, including open area trips, access
area trips as described in § 648.60(a)(9),
and trips accompanied by a NMFSapproved observer. The reports must be
submitted for each day (beginning at
0000 hr and ending at 2400 hr) and not
later than 0900 hr of the following day.
Such reports must include the following
information:
(A) VTR serial number;
(B) Date fish were caught;
(C) Total pounds of scallop meats
kept;
(D) Total pounds of all fish kept.
(ii) Scallop Pre-Landing Notification
Form for IFQ and NGOM vessels. A
vessel issued an IFQ or NGOM scallop
permit must report through VMS, using
the Scallop Pre-Landing Notification
Form, the amount of any scallops kept
on each trip declared as a scallop trip,
including declared scallop trips where
no scallops were landed. In addition,
vessels with an IFQ or NGOM permit
must submit a Scallop Pre-Landing
Notification Form on trips that are not
declared as scallop trips, but on which
scallops are kept incidentally. A limited
access vessel that also holds an IFQ or
NGOM permit must submit the Scallop
Pre-Landing Notification Form only
when fishing under the provisions of
the vessel’s IFQ or NGOM permit. VMS
Scallop Pre-Landing Notification forms
must be submitted no less than 6 hours
prior to arrival, or, if fishing ends less
than 6 hours before arrival, immediately
after fishing ends. If scallops will be
landed, the report must include the
vessel operator’s permit number, the
amount of scallop meats in pounds to be
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
landed, the number of bushels of inshell scallops to be landed, the
estimated time of arrival in port, the
landing port and state where the
scallops will be offloaded, the VTR
serial number recorded from that trip’s
VTR (the same VTR serial number as
reported to the dealer), and whether any
scallops were caught in the NGOM. If no
scallops will be landed, a vessel issued
an IFQ or NGOM scallop permit must
provide only the vessel’s captain/
operator’s permit number, the VTR
serial number recorded from that trip’s
VTR (the same VTR serial number as
reported to the dealer), and
confirmation that no scallops will be
landed. A vessel issued an IFQ or
NGOM scallop permit may provide a
corrected report. If the report is being
submitted as a correction of a prior
report, the information entered into the
notification form will replace the data
previously submitted in the prior report.
Submitting a correction does not
prevent NMFS from pursuing an
enforcement action for any false
reporting.
(iii) Scallop Pre-Landing Notification
Form for Limited Access Vessels fishing
on Scallop Access Area Trips. A limited
access vessel on a declared Sea Scallop
Access Area trip must report through
VMS, using the Scallop Pre-Landing
Notification Form, the amount of any
scallops kept on each access area trip,
including declared access area trips
where no scallops were landed. The
report must be submitted no less than 6
hours before arrival, or, if fishing ends
less than 6 hours before arrival,
immediately after fishing ends. If
scallops will be landed, the report must
include the vessel operator’s permit
number, the amount of scallop meats in
pounds to be landed, the number of
bushels of in-shell scallops to be landed,
the estimated time of arrival, the
landing port and state where the
scallops will be offloaded, and the VTR
serial number recorded from that trip’s
VTR (the same VTR serial number as
reported to the dealer). If no scallops
will be landed, a limited access vessel
on a declared Sea Scallop Access Area
trip must provide only the vessel’s
captain/operator’s permit number, the
VTR serial number recorded from that
trip’s VTR (the same VTR serial number
as reported to the dealer), and
confirmation that no scallops will be
landed. A limited access scallop vessel
may provide a corrected report. If the
report is being submitted as a correction
of a prior report, the information
entered into the notification form will
replace the data previously submitted in
the prior report. Submitting a correction
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
does not prevent NMFS from pursuing
an enforcement action for any false
reporting. A vessel may not offload its
catch from a Sea Scallop Access Area
trip at more than one location per trip.
(iv) Scallop Pre-Landing Notification
Form for Limited Access Vessels on a
Declared DAS Trip Landing Scallops at
Ports Located at or South of 39° N. Lat.
In order to end a declared Sea Scallop
DAS trip and steam south of 39° N. lat.,
a limited access vessel must first report
through VMS, using the Scallop PreLanding Notification Form, the amount
of any scallops kept on its DAS trip.
Upon crossing shoreward of the VMS
Demarcation Line at or south of 39° N.
lat., the Scallop Pre-Landing
Notification form must be submitted.
The report must include the vessel
operator’s permit number, the amount of
scallop meats in pounds to be landed,
the estimated time of arrival in port, the
landing port and state where the
scallops will be offloaded, and the VTR
serial number recorded from that trip’s
VTR (the same VTR serial number as
reported to the dealer). Prior to crossing
seaward of the VMS Demarcation Line
for the transit to a southern port at or
south of 39° N. lat., the vessel must
declare out of the scallop fishery. A
limited access scallop vessel may
provide a corrected report. If the report
is being submitted as a correction of a
prior report, the information entered
into the notification form will replace
the data previously submitted in the
prior report. Submitting a correction
does not prevent NMFS from pursuing
an enforcement action for any false
reporting.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Limited access scallop vessels
fishing under the DAS Program and
landing scallops at ports south of 39° N.
Lat. If landing scallops at a port located
at or south of 39° N. lat., a limited
access vessel participating in the scallop
DAS program may end its DAS trip once
it has crossed shoreward of the VMS
Demarcation Line at or south of 39° N.
lat. by declaring out of the scallop
fishery and submitting the Scallop PreLanding Notification Form, as specified
at paragraph (f)(4)(iv) of this section.
Once declared out of the scallop fishery,
and the vessel has submitted the Scallop
Pre-Landing Notification Form, the
vessel may cross seaward of the VMS
Demarcation Line and steam to a port at
or south of 39° N. lat., to land scallops
while not on a DAS. Such vessels that
elect to change their declaration to
steam to ports with scallops onboard
and not accrue DAS must comply with
all the requirements at § 648.53(f)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
5. In § 648.14, paragraphs (i)(2)(ii)(B),
(i)(2)(iii)(C), (i)(2)(v)(D), (i)(3)(iii)(C),
(i)(3)(iii)(D), (i)(4)(i)(C), (i)(5)(iii) are
revised and paragraphs (i)(2)(iv)(F) and
(i)(2)(v)(E) are added to read as follows:
■
§ 648.14
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) While under or subject to the DAS
allocation program, in possession of
more than 40 lb (18.1 kg) of shucked
scallops or 5 bu (1.76 hL) of in-shell
scallops, or fishing for scallops in the
EEZ:
(1) Fish with, or have available for
immediate use, trawl nets of mesh
smaller than the minimum size
specified in § 648.51(a)(2).
(2) Fail to comply with any chafing
gear or other gear obstruction
restrictions specified in § 648.51(a)(3).
(3) Fail to comply with the turtle
deflector dredge vessel gear restrictions
specified in § 648.51(b)(5), and turtle
dredge chain mat requirements in
§ 223.206(d)(11) of this title.
(4) Fish under the small dredge
program specified in § 648.51(e), with,
or while in possession of, a dredge that
exceeds 10.5 ft (3.2 m) in overall width,
as measured at the widest point in the
bail of the dredge.
(5) Fish under the small dredge
program specified in § 648.51(e) with
more persons on board the vessel,
including the operator, than specified in
§ 648.51(e)(3),unless otherwise
authorized by the Regional
Administrator.
(6) Participate in the DAS allocation
program with more persons on board
the vessel than the number specified in
§ 648.51(c), including the operator,
when the vessel is not docked or
moored in port, unless otherwise
authorized by the Regional
Administrator.
(7) Fish in the Mid-Atlantic Access
Area, as described in § 648.59(a), with
more persons on board the vessel than
the number specified in § 648.51(c) or
§ 648.51(e)(3)(i), unless otherwise
authorized by the Regional
Administrator.
(8) Have a shucking or sorting
machine on board a vessel that shucks
scallops at sea while fishing under the
DAS allocation program, unless
otherwise authorized by the Regional
Administrator.
(9) Fish with, possess on board, or
land scallops while in possession of
trawl nets, when fishing for scallops
under the DAS allocation program,
unless exempted as provided for in
§ 648.51(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13815
(10) Fail to comply with the gear
restrictions described in § 648.51.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(C) Fish for or land per trip, or possess
at any time, scallops in the NGOM
scallop management area after
notification in the Federal Register that
the NGOM scallop management area
TAC has been harvested, as specified in
§ 648.62, unless the vessel possesses or
lands scallops that were harvested south
of 42°20′ N. lat. and the vessel only
transits the NGOM scallop management
area with the vessel’s fishing gear
properly stowed and unavailable for
immediate use in accordance with
§ 648.2 or unless the vessel is fishing
exclusively in state waters and is
participating in an approved state
waters exemption program as specified
in § 648.54.
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) * * *
(D) Fail to comply with any
requirements for declaring out of the
DAS allocation program and steaming to
land scallops at ports located at or south
of 39° N. lat., as specified in
§ 648.53(f)(3).
(E) Possess on board or land in-shell
scallops if declaring out of the DAS
allocation program and steaming to land
scallops at ports located at or south of
39° N. lat.
(v) * * *
(D) Once declared into the scallop
fishery in accordance with § 648.10(f),
change its VMS declaration until the
trip has ended and scallop catch has
been offloaded, except as specified at
§ 648.53(f)(3).
(E) Fail to submit a scallop access area
pre-landing notification form through
VMS as specified at § 648.10(f)(4)(iii).
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(C) Declare into the NGOM scallop
management area after the effective date
of a notification published in the
Federal Register stating that the NGOM
scallop management area TAC has been
harvested as specified in § 648.62,
unless the vessel is fishing exclusively
in state waters, declared a state-waters
only NGOM trip, and is participating in
an approved state waters exemption
program as specified in § 648.54.
(D) Fish for, possess, or land scallops
in or from the NGOM scallop
management area after the effective date
of a notification published in the
Federal Register that the NGOM scallop
management area TAC has been
harvested, as specified in § 648.62,
unless the vessel possesses or lands
scallops that were harvested south of
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
13816
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
42°20′ N. lat., the vessel is transiting the
NGOM scallop management area, and
the vessel’s fishing gear is properly
stowed and unavailable for immediate
use in accordance with § 648.2 or unless
the vessel is fishing exclusively in state
waters, declared a state-waters only
NGOM trip, and is participating in an
approved state waters exemption
program as specified in § 648.54.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Declare into the NGOM scallop
management area after the effective date
of a notification published in the
Federal Register stating that the NGOM
scallop management area TAC has been
harvested as specified in § 648.62,
unless the vessel is fishing exclusively
in state waters, declared a state-waters
only NGOM trip, and is participating in
an approved state waters exemption
program as specified in § 648.54.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(iii) Fish for, possess, or land scallops
in state or Federal waters of the NGOM
management area after the effective date
of notification in the Federal Register
that the NGOM scallop management
area TAC has been harvested as
specified in § 648.62, unless the vessel
is fishing exclusively in state waters,
declared a state-waters only NGOM trip,
and is participating in an approved state
waters exemption program as specified
in § 648.54.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 648.51:
■ a. Paragraphs (b)(4)(iv) and (v),
(b)(5)(ii)(A) introductory text,
(b)(5)(ii)(A)(3), and (c) introductory text
are revised;
■ b. Paragraph (c)(1) is removed and
reserved; and
■ c. Paragraph (e)(3)(i) is revised.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 648.51
Gear and crew restrictions.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) Twine top restrictions as a
proactive accountability measure for
bycatch. In addition to the minimum
twine top mesh size specified in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, limited
access and limited access general
category IFQ vessels may not fish for
scallops with a dredge having more than
seven rows of non-overlapping steel
rings unobstructed by netting or any
other material between the terminus of
the dredge (club stick) and the net
material on the top of the dredge (twine
top) (a copy of a diagram showing a
schematic of a legal dredge with twine
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
top is available from the Regional
Administrator upon request).
(v) Measurement of twine top mesh
size. Twine top mesh size is measured
by using a wedge-shaped gauge having
a taper of 0.79 inches (2 cm) in 3.15
inches (8 cm) and a thickness of 0.09
inches (2.3 mm), inserted into the
meshes under a pressure or pull of 17.64
lb (8 kg). The mesh size is the average
of the measurements of any series of 20
consecutive meshes for twine tops
having 75 or more meshes, and 10
consecutive meshes for twine tops
having fewer than 75 meshes. The mesh
in the twine top must be measured
along the length of the twine top,
running parallel to a longitudinal axis,
and be at least five meshes away from
where the twine top mesh meets the
rings, running parallel to the long axis
of the twine top.
(5) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) From May 1 through November
30, any limited access scallop vessel
using a dredge, regardless of dredge size
or vessel permit category, or any LAGC
IFQ scallop vessel fishing with a dredge
with a width of 10.5 ft (3.2 m) or greater,
that is fishing for scallops in waters
west of 71° W long., from the shoreline
to the outer boundary of the EEZ, must
use a TDD. The TDD requires five
modifications to the rigid dredge frame,
as specified in paragraphs (b)(5)(ii)(A)(1)
through (b)(5)(ii)(A)(5) of this section.
See paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(D) of this section
for more specific descriptions of the
dredge elements mentioned below.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) All bale bars must be removed,
except the outer bale (single or double)
bars and the center support beam,
leaving an otherwise unobstructed space
between the cutting bar and forward
bale wheels, if present. The center
support beam must be less than 6 inches
(15.24 cm) wide. For the purpose of
flaring and safe handling of the dredge,
a minor appendage not to exceed 12
inches (30.5 cm) in length may be
attached to each of the outer bale bars.
If the flaring bar is attached in a ushape, none of the three sides of the
flaring bar shall exceed 12 inches (30.5
cm) in length. The appendage shall at
no point be closer than 12 inches (30.5
cm) to the cutting bar.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Crew restrictions. A limited access
vessel participating in or subject to the
scallop DAS allocation program may
have no more than seven people aboard,
including the operator, and a limited
access vessel participating in the Sea
Scallop Area Access Program as
specified in § 648.60 may have no more
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
than eight people aboard, including the
operator, when not docked or moored in
port, except as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) A vessel participating in the Sea
Scallop Area Access Program as
specified in § 648.60 may have no more
than six people, including the operator,
on board.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 648.53, paragraphs (a), (b)(1),
and (b)(4) are revised, paragraph (f)(3) is
added, and paragraph (g)(1) is revised to
read as follows:
§ 648.53 Acceptable biological catch
(ABC), annual catch limits (ACL), annual
catch targets (ACT), DAS allocations, and
individual fishing quotas (IFQ).
(a) Scallop fishery ABC. The ABC for
the scallop fishery shall be established
through the framework adjustment
process specified in § 648.55 and is
equal to the overall scallop fishery ACL
minus discards. The ABC/ACL, after
discards are removed, shall be divided
as sub-ACLs between limited access
vessels, limited access vessels that are
fishing under a LAGC permit, and LAGC
vessels as specified in paragraphs (a)(3)
and (a)(4) of this section, after deducting
the scallop incidental catch target TAC
specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, observer set-aside specified in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section, and
research set-aside specified in
§ 648.56(d). The ABC/ACL for the 2016
fishing year is subject to change through
a future framework adjustment.
(1) ABC/ACL for fishing years 2015
through 2016, excluding discards, shall
be:
(i) 2015: 25,352 mt.
(ii) 2016: 31,807 mt.
(2) Scallop incidental catch target
TAC. The annual incidental catch target
TAC for vessels with incidental catch
scallop permits is 22.7 mt.
(3) Limited access fleet sub-ACL and
ACT. The limited access scallop fishery
shall be allocated 94.5 percent of the
ACL specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, after deducting incidental
catch, observer set-aside, and research
set-aside, as specified in this paragraph
(a)(3). ACT for the limited access scallop
fishery shall be established through the
framework adjustment process
described in § 648.55. DAS specified in
paragraph (b) of this section shall be
based on the ACTs specified in
paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section. The
limited access fleet sub-ACL and ACT
for the 2016 fishing year are subject to
change through a future framework
adjustment.
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(i) The limited access fishery subACLs for fishing years 2015 and 2016
are:
(A) 2015: 23,161 mt.
(B) 2016: 29,200 mt.
(ii) The limited access fishery ACTs
for fishing years 2015 and 2016 are:
(A) 2015: 19,311 mt.
(B) 2016: 23,016 mt.
(4) LAGC fleet sub-ACL. The sub-ACL
for the LAGC IFQ fishery shall be equal
to 5.5 percent of the ACL specified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, after
deducting incidental catch, observer setaside, and research set-aside, as
specified in this paragraph (a)(4). The
LAGC IFQ fishery ACT shall be equal to
the LAGC IFQ fishery’s ACL. The ACL
for the LAGC IFQ fishery for vessels
issued only a LAGC IFQ scallop permit
shall be equal to 5 percent of the ACL
specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, after deducting incidental
catch, observer set-aside, and research
set-aside, as specified in this paragraph
(a)(4). The ACL for the LAGC IFQ
fishery for vessels issued only both a
LAGC IFQ scallop permit and a limited
access scallop permit shall be 0.5
percent of the ACL specified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, after
deducting incidental catch, observer setaside, and research set-aside, as
specified in this paragraph (a)(4).
(i) The ACLs for fishing years 2015
and 2016 for LAGC IFQ vessels without
a limited access scallop permit are:
(A) 2015: 1,225 mt.
(B) 2016: 1,545 mt.
(ii) The ACLs for fishing years 2015
and 2016 for vessels issued both a LAGC
and a limited access scallop permits are:
(A) 2015: 123 mt.
(B) 2016: 154 mt.
(b) * * *
(1) Landings per unit effort (LPUE).
LPUE is an estimate of the average
amount of scallops, in pounds, that the
limited access scallop fleet lands per
DAS fished. The estimated LPUE is the
average LPUE for all limited access
scallop vessels fishing under DAS, and
shall be used to calculate DAS specified
in paragraph (b)(4) of this section, the
DAS reduction for the AM specified in
paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this section, and
the observer set-aside DAS allocation
specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section. LPUE shall be:
(i) 2015 fishing year: 2,594 lb/DAS
(1,171 kg/DAS).
(ii) 2016 fishing year: 2,715 lb/DAS
(1,175 kg/DAS).
(iii) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Each vessel qualifying for one of
the three DAS categories specified in the
table in this paragraph (b)(4) (full-time,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
part-time, or occasional) shall be
allocated the maximum number of DAS
for each fishing year it may participate
in the open area limited access scallop
fishery, according to its category,
excluding carryover DAS in accordance
with paragraph (d) of this section. DAS
allocations shall be determined by
distributing the portion of ACT
specified in paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this
section, as reduced by access area
allocations specified in § 648.59, and
dividing that amount among vessels in
the form of DAS calculated by applying
estimates of open area LPUE specified
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
Allocation for part-time and occasional
scallop vessels shall be 40 percent and
8.33 percent of the full-time DAS
allocations, respectively. The annual
open area DAS allocations for each
category of vessel for the fishing years
indicated are as follows:
13817
excess of the ACL in fishing year 2011
would result in the DAS reduction AM
in fishing year 2012. If the AM takes
effect, and a limited access vessel uses
more open area DAS in the fishing year
in which the AM is applied, the vessel
shall have the DAS used in excess of the
allocation after applying the AM
deducted from its open area DAS
allocation in the subsequent fishing
year. For example, a vessel initially
allocated 32 DAS in 2011 uses all 32
DAS prior to application of the AM. If,
after application of the AM, the vessel’s
DAS allocation is reduced to 31 DAS,
the vessel’s DAS in 2012 would be
reduced by 1 DAS.
(iii) Limited access AM exception. If
NMFS determines, in accordance with
paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this section, that
the fishing mortality rate associated
with the limited access fleet’s landings
in a fishing year is less than 0.34, the
AM specified in paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of
SCALLOP OPEN AREA DAS
this section shall not take effect. The
fishing mortality rate of 0.34 is the
ALLOCATIONS
fishing mortality rate that is one
Permit category
2015
2016
standard deviation below the fishing
mortality rate for the scallop fishery
Full-Time .................
30.86
26
ACL, currently estimated at 0.38.
Part-Time ................
12.94
10.40
(iv) Limited access fleet AM and
Occasional ..............
2.58
2.17
exception provision timing. The
Regional Administrator shall determine
(i) [Reserved]
whether the limited access fleet
(ii) Accountability measures (AM).
Unless the limited access AM exception exceeded its ACL specified in paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section by July of the
is implemented in accordance with the
fishing year following the year for
provision specified in paragraph
which landings are being evaluated. On
(b)(4)(iii) of this section, if the ACL
or about July 1, the Regional
specified in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this
Administrator shall notify the New
section is exceeded for the applicable
England Fishery Management Council
fishing year, the DAS specified in
of the determination of whether or not
paragraph (b)(4) of this section for each
the ACL for the limited access fleet was
limited access vessel shall be reduced
exceeded, and the amount of landings in
by an amount equal to the amount of
excess of the ACL. Upon this
landings in excess of the ACL divided
notification, the Scallop Plan
by the applicable LPUE for the fishing
Development Team (PDT) shall evaluate
year in which the AM will apply as
the overage and determine if the fishing
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
mortality rate associated with total
section, then divided by the number of
landings by the limited access scallop
scallop vessels eligible to be issued a
fleet is less than 0.34. On or about
full-time limited access scallop permit.
September 1 of each year, the Scallop
For example, assuming a 300,000-lb
(136-mt) overage of the ACL in 2011, an PDT shall notify the Council of its
open area LPUE of 2,500 lb (1.13 mt) per determination, and the Council, on or
about September 30, shall make a
DAS in 2012, and 313 full-time vessels,
recommendation, based on the Scallop
each full-time vessel’s DAS would be
PDT findings, concerning whether to
reduced by 0.38 DAS (300,000 lb (136
invoke the limited access AM exception.
mt)/2,500 lb (1.13 mt) per DAS = 120 lb
If NMFS concurs with the Scallop PDT’s
(0.05 mt) per DAS/313 vessels = 0.38
DAS per vessel). Deductions in DAS for recommendation to invoke the limited
part-time and occasional scallop vessels access AM exception, in accordance
with the APA, the limited access AM
shall be 40 percent and 8.33 percent of
shall not be implemented. If NMFS does
the full-time DAS deduction,
not concur, in accordance with the
respectively, as calculated pursuant to
APA, the limited access AM shall be
this paragraph (b)(4)(ii). The AM shall
implemented as soon as possible after
take effect in the fishing year following
September 30 each year.
the fishing year in which the overage
occurred. For example, landings in
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
13818
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(f) * * *
(3) Limited access scallop vessels
fishing under the DAS Program and
landing scallops at a port located at or
south of 39° N. Lat. If landing scallops
at a port located at or south of 39° N.
lat., a limited access vessel participating
in the scallop DAS program may end its
DAS trip once shoreward of the VMS
Demarcation Line at or south of 39° N.
lat. by declaring out of the scallop
fishery. Once declared out of the scallop
fishery, the vessel may cross seaward of
the VMS Demarcation Line and steam to
ports at or south of 39° N. lat., to land
scallops while not on a DAS, provided
that the vessel complies with the
following requirements:
(i) The vessel must submit a Scallop
Pre-landing Notification Form, as
specified at § 648.10(f)(4)(iv);
(ii) The vessel’s fishing gear is stowed
and not available for immediate use as
defined in § 648.2;
(iii) The vessel must return directly to
port and offload scallops;
(iv) The vessel must land scallops at
a port located at or south of 39° N. lat.;
and
(v) The vessel may not possess inshell scallops.
(g) Set-asides for observer coverage.
(1) To help defray the cost of carrying
an observer, 1 percent of the ABC/ACL
specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section shall be set aside to be used by
vessels that are assigned to take an atsea observer on a trip. The total TAC for
observer set aside is 254 mt in fishing
year 2015, and 318 mt in fishing year
2016.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 648.54, paragraphs (a)(4) and
(b) through (g) are revised and
paragraph (h) is added to read as
follows:
§ 648.54
State waters exemption.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) The Regional Administrator has
determined that the State of Maine has
a scallop fishery conservation program
for its scallop fishery that does not
jeopardize the biomass and fishing
mortality/effort limit objectives of the
Scallop FMP. A vessel fishing in State
of Maine waters may fish under the
State of Maine state waters exemption,
subject to the exemptions specified in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section,
provided the vessel is in compliance
with paragraphs (e) through (g) of this
section.
(b) Limited access scallop vessel
exemption. Any vessel issued a limited
access scallop permit is exempt from the
DAS requirements specified in
§ 648.53(b) while fishing exclusively
landward of the outer boundary of the
waters of a state that has been issued a
state waters exemption under paragraph
(a)(4) of this section, provided the vessel
complies with paragraphs (f) through (h)
of this section.
(c) Gear and possession limit
restrictions. Any vessel issued a limited
access scallop permit, an LAGC NGOM,
or an LAGC IFQ scallop permit is
exempt from the minimum twine top
mesh size for scallop dredge gear
specified in §§ 648.51(b)(2) and
(b)(4)(iv) while fishing exclusively
landward of the outer boundary of the
waters of the State of Maine under the
state waters exemption specified in
paragraph (a)(4) of this section,
provided the vessel is in compliance
with paragraphs (d) through (g) of this
section.
(d) NGOM closure exemption. Any
vessel issued a Federal scallop permit
may be exempt from the regulations
specified in § 648.52(b)(2) requiring that
once the NGOM Federal hard TAC is
reached, no vessel issued a scallop
permit may fish in the NGOM area. This
exemption, which a state must apply for
through the process specified in
paragraph (a) of this section, would
allow vessels to continue to fish for
scallops within a state’s waters inside
the NGOM. A state applying for this
exemption must clarify to which scallop
permit types this exemption would
apply.
(e) Notification requirements. Vessels
fishing under the exemptions specified
in paragraph (b) and/or (c) of this
section must notify the Regional
Administrator in accordance with the
provisions of § 648.10(e).
(f) Restriction on fishing in the EEZ.
A vessel fishing under a state waters
exemption may not fish in the EEZ
during the time in which it is fishing
under the state waters exemption, as
declared under the notification
requirements of this section.
(g) Duration of exemption. An
exemption expires upon a change in the
vessel’s name or ownership, or upon
notification through VMS by the
participating vessel’s owner.
(h) Applicability of other provisions of
this part. A vessel fishing under the
exemptions provided by paragraphs (b)
and/or (c) of this section remains subject
to all other requirements of this part.
■ 7. Section 648.58 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 648.58
(a) Closed Area I Closed Area— No
vessel may fish for scallops in, or
possess or land scallops from, the area
known as the Closed Area I Closed Area.
No vessel may possess scallops in the
Closed Area I Closed Area, unless such
vessel is only transiting the area as
provided in paragraph (e) of this
section. The Closed Area I Closed Area
is defined by straight lines connecting
the following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request), and so
that the line connecting points CAIA3
and CAIA4 is the same as the portion of
the western boundary line of Closed
Area I, defined in § 648.81(a)(1), that
lies between points CAIA3 and CAIA4:
Point
CAIA1
CAIA2
CAIA3
CAIA4
CAIA1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Latitude
...........................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................
1 From
Rotational Closed Areas.
Longitude
Note
41°26′ N.
40°58′ N.
40°54.95′ N.
41°04.32′ N.
41°26′ N.
68°30′ W.
68°30′ W.
68°53.37′ W.
69°01.27′ W.
68°30′ W.
............
............
(1)
(1)
............
Point CAIA3 to Point CAIA4 along the western boundary of Closed Area I, defined in § 648.81(a)(1).
(b) Closed Area II Closed Area— No
vessel may fish for scallops in, or
possess or land scallops from, the area
known as the Closed Area II Closed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
Area. No vessel may possess scallops in
the Closed Area II Closed Area. The
Closed Area II Closed Area is defined by
straight lines, except where noted,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
connecting the following points in the
order stated (copies of a chart depicting
this area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request):
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
13819
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Point
CAIIA1
CAIIA2
CAIIA3
CAIIA4
CAIIA5
CAIIA1
1 The
Latitude
41°00′ N.
41°00′ N.
41°18.6′ N.
41°30′ N.
41°30′ N.
41°00′ N.
..........................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................
Longitude
Note
67°20′ W.
66°35.8′ W.
(1)
(3)
67°20′ W.
67°20′ W.
............
............
(2)
(2)
............
............
intersection of 41°18.6′ N. lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41°18.6′ N. lat. and 66°25.01′ W. long.
Point CAIIA3 connected to Point CAIIA4 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
intersection of 41°30′ N. lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41°30′ N. lat., 66°34.73′ W. long.
2 From
3 The
(c) Nantucket Lightship Closed Area—
No vessel may fish for scallops in, or
possess or land scallops from, the area
known as the Nantucket Lightship
Closed Area. No vessel may possess
scallops in the Nantucket Lightship
Closed Area, unless such vessel is only
transiting the area as provided in
paragraph (e) of this section. The
Nantucket Lightship Closed Area is
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request),
Point
NLAA1
NLAA2
NLAA3
NLAA4
NLAA5
NLAA6
NLAA1
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
Latitude
40°50′
40°50′
40°33′
40°33′
40°20′
40°20′
40°50′
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
Longitude
69°30′
69°00′
69°00′
68°48′
68°48′
69°30′
69°30′
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
(d) Elephant Trunk Closed Area— No
vessel may fish for scallops in, or
possess or land scallops from, the area
known as the Elephant Trunk Closed
Area. No vessel may possess scallops in
Elephant Trunk Closed Area. The
Elephant Trunk Closed Area is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request).
Point
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ETCA
ETCA
ETCA
ETCA
ETCA
ETCA
ETCA
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
Latitude
38°50′
38°50′
38°40′
38°40′
38°30′
38°30′
38°50′
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
Longitude
74°20′
73°40′
73°40′
73°50′
73°50′
74°20′
74°20′
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
(e) Transiting. No vessel possessing
scallops may enter or be in the area(s)
specified in paragraphs (a) and (c) of
this section unless the vessel is
transiting the area and the vessel’s
fishing gear is stowed and not available
for immediate use as defined in § 648.2,
or there is a compelling safety reason to
be in such areas without such gear being
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
stowed. A vessel may only transit the
Closed Area II Closed Area, as described
in paragraph (b) of this section, or the
Elephant Trunk Closed Area, as
described in paragraph (d) of this
section, if there is a compelling safety
reason for transiting the area and the
vessel’s fishing gear is stowed and not
available for immediate use as defined
in § 648.2.
(f) Vessels fishing for species other
than scallops. A vessel may fish for
species other than scallops within the
closed areas specified in paragraphs (a)
through (d) of this section as allowed in
this part, provided the vessel does not
fish for, catch, or retain scallops or
intend to fish for, catch, or retain
scallops. Declaration through VMS that
the vessel is fishing in the LAGC scallop
fishery is deemed to be an intent to fish
for, catch, or retain scallops.
■ 8. In § 648.59:
■ a. Paragraphs (a), (b) introductory text,
(b)(1), (c) introductory text, and (c)(1)
are revised;
■ b. Paragraph (c)(2) is removed and
reserved;
■ c. Paragraphs (d) introductory text and
(d)(1) are revised; and
■ d. Paragraphs (d)(2) and (e) are
removed and reserved.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 648.59
Sea Scallop Access Areas.
(a) Mid-Atlantic Scallop Access
Area—(1) Beginning March 1, 2015,
through February 28, 2017 (i.e., fishing
years 2015 and 2016), a vessel issued a
scallop permit may not fish for, possess,
or land scallops in or from the area
known as the Mid-Atlantic Access Area
unless the vessel is participating in, and
complies with the requirements of, the
area access program described in
§ 648.60. The Mid-Atlantic Access Area
is comprised of the following scallop
access areas: The Delmarva Scallop
Access Area, as described in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section; the Elephant Trunk
Scallop Access Area, as described in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section; and the
Hudson Canyon Scallop Access Area, as
described in paragraph (a)(4) of this
section.
(2) Delmarva Scallop Access Area.
The Delmarva Scallop Access Area is
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request):
Point
DMV1
DMV2
DMV3
DMV4
DMV1
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
Latitude
38°10′
38°10′
37°15′
37°15′
38°10′
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
Longitude
74°50′
74°00′
74°00′
74°50′
74°50′
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
(i) Season. A vessel issued a scallop
permit may not fish for, possess, or land
scallops in or from the area known as
the Delmarva Sea Scallop Access Area,
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, during the period of March 1,
2016, through March 31, 2016.
(3) Elephant Trunk Scallop Access
Area. The Elephant Trunk Scallop
Access Area is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated (copies of a chart depicting
this area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request):
Point
ETAA1
ETAA2
ETAA3
ETAA4
ETAA5
ETAA6
ETAA7
ETAA8
ETAA1
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
Latitude
38°30′
38°30′
38°40′
38°40′
38°50′
38°50′
38°10′
38°10′
38°30′
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
Longitude
74°20′
73°50′
73°50′
73°40′
73°40′
73°30′
73°30′
74°20′
74°20′
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
(4) Hudson Canyon Scallop Access
Area. The Hudson Canyon Scallop
Access Area is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated (copies of a chart depicting
this area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request):
Point
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H1
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Latitude
39°30′
39°30′
38°30′
38°50′
38°50′
39°30′
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
Longitude
73°10′
72°30′
73°30′
73°30′
73°42′
73°10′
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
13820
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(b) Closed Area I Scallop Access
Area—(1) From March 1, 2015, through
February 28, 2017 (i.e., fishing years
2015 and 2016), a vessel issued a
scallop permit may not fish for, possess,
or land scallops in or from, the area
known as the Closed Area I Scallop
Access Area, described in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, unless transiting in
accordance with paragraph (f) of this
section. A vessel issued both a NE
multispecies permit and an LAGC
scallop permit may not fish in an
approved SAP under § 648.85 and under
multispecies DAS in the scallop access
area, unless it complies with restrictions
in paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(C) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Closed Area II Scallop Access
Area—(1) From March 1, 2015, through
February 28, 2017 (i.e., fishing years
2015 and 2016), a vessel issued a
scallop permit may not fish for, possess,
or land scallops in or from, the area
known as the Closed Area II Access
Area, described in paragraph (c)(3) of
this section, unless transiting in
accordance with paragraph (f) of this
section. A vessel issued both a NE
multispecies permit and an LAGC
scallop permit may not fish in an
approved SAP under § 648.85 and under
multispecies DAS in the scallop access
area, unless it complies with restrictions
in paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(C) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Nantucket Lightship Scallop
Access Area—(1) From March 1, 2015,
through February 28, 2017 (i.e., fishing
years 2015 and 2016), a vessel issued a
scallop permit may not fish for, possess,
or land scallops in or from the area
known as the Nantucket Lightship
Access Area, described in paragraph
(d)(3) of this section, unless transiting
pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section.
A vessel issued both a NE multispecies
permit and an LAGC scallop permit may
not fish in an approved SAP under
§ 648.85 and under multispecies DAS in
the scallop access area, unless it
complies with restrictions in paragraph
(d)(5)(ii)(C) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. In § 648.60, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(3),
(a)(5)(i), (a)(9), (c), (e)(1), (g)(3)(i) are
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.60 Sea scallop access area program
requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) VMS. Each vessel participating in
the Sea Scallop Access Area Program
must have installed on board an
operational VMS unit that meets the
minimum performance criteria specified
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
in §§ 648.9 and 648.10, and paragraphs
(a)(9) and (f) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Sea Scallop Access Area
Allocations—(i) Limited access vessel
allocations.
(A) Except as provided in paragraph
(c) of this section, paragraphs (a)(3)(i)(B)
through (E) of this section specify the
total amount of scallops, in weight, that
a limited access scallop vessel may
harvest from Sea Scallop Access Areas
during applicable seasons specified in
§ 648.59. A vessel may not possess or
land in excess of its scallop allocation
assigned to specific Sea Scallop Access
Areas, unless authorized by the
Regional Administrator, as specified in
paragraph (d) of this section, unless the
vessel owner has exchanged an areaspecific scallop allocation with another
vessel owner for additional scallop
allocation in that area, as specified in
paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section. A
vessel may harvest its scallop allocation,
as specified in paragraph (a)(3)(B) of this
section, on any number of trips in a
given fishing year, provided that no
single trip exceeds the possession limits
specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this
section, unless authorized by the
Regional Administrator, as specified in
paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section,
(B) Full-time scallop vessels. (1) In
fishing year 2015, each full-time vessel
shall have a total of 51,000 lb (23,133
kg) of scallops that may be harvested
from the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, as
defined in § 648.59(a).
(2) For the 2016 fishing year, each
full-time vessel shall have a total of
17,000 lb (7,711 kg) of scallops that may
be harvested from the Mid-Atlantic
Access Area, as defined in § 648.59(a),
starting on April 1, 2016.
(C) Part-time scallop vessels. (1) For
the 2015 fishing year, each part-time
scallop vessel shall have a total of
20,400 lb (9,253 kg) of scallop that may
be harvested from the Mid-Atlantic
Access Area, as defined in § 648.59(a).
(2) For the 2015 fishing year, each
part-time scallop vessel shall have a
total of 10,200 lb (4,627 kg) of scallop
that may be harvested from the MidAtlantic Access Area, as defined in
§ 648.59(a), starting on April 1, 2016.
(D) Occasional scallop vessels. (1) For
the 2015 fishing year, each occasional
scallop vessel shall have a total of 4,250
lb (1,928 kg) of scallop that may be
harvested from the Mid-Atlantic Access
Area, as defined in § 648.59(a).
(2) For the 2016 fishing year, each
occasional scallop vessel shall have a
total of 1,420 lb (644 kg) of scallop that
may be harvested from the Mid-Atlantic
Access Area, as defined in § 648.59(a),
starting on April 1, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(ii) One-for-one area access allocation
exchanges. The owner of a vessel issued
a limited access scallop permit may
exchange unharvested scallop pounds
allocated into one access area for
another vessel’s unharvested scallop
pounds allocated into another Sea
Scallop Access Area. These exchanges
may only be made for the amount of the
current trip possession limit, as
specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. For example, if the access area
trip possession limit for full-time
vessels is 17,000 lb (7,711 kg), a fulltime vessel may exchange no less than
17,000 lb (7,711 kg), from one access
area for no more or less than 17,000 lb
(7,711 kg) allocated to another vessel for
another access area. In addition, these
exchanges may be made only between
vessels with the same permit category:
A full-time vessel may not exchange
allocations with a part-time vessel, and
vice versa. Vessel owners must request
these exchanges by submitting a
completed Access Area Allocation
Exchange Form at least 15 days before
the date on which the applicant desires
the exchange to be effective. Exchange
forms are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request. Each vessel
owner involved in an exchange is
required to submit a completed Access
Area Allocation Form. The Regional
Administrator shall review the records
for each vessel to confirm that each
vessel has enough unharvested
allocation remaining in a given access
area to exchange. The exchange is not
effective until the vessel owner(s)
receive a confirmation in writing from
the Regional Administrator that the
allocation exchange has been made
effective. A vessel owner may exchange
equal allocations up to the current
possession limit between two or more
vessels under his/her ownership. A
vessel owner holding a Confirmation of
Permit History is not eligible to
exchange allocations between another
vessel and the vessel for which a
Confirmation of Permit History has been
issued.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Possession and landing limits—(i)
Scallop possession limits. Unless
authorized by the Regional
Administrator, as specified in paragraph
(d) of this section, after declaring a trip
into a Sea Scallop Access Area, a vessel
owner or operator of a limited access
scallop vessel may fish for, possess, and
land, per trip, scallops, up to the
maximum amounts specified in the
table in this paragraph (a)(5). No vessel
declared into the Access Areas as
described in § 648.59(a) through (e) may
possess more than 50 bu (17.62 hL) of
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
in-shell scallops outside of the Access
13821
Areas described in § 648.59(a) through
(e).
Permit category possession limit
Fishing year
Full-time
2015 ...............................................
2016 ...............................................
Part-time
17,000 lb (57,711 kg) ...................
17,000 lb (57,711 kg) ...................
10,200 lb (4,627 kg) .....................
10,200 lb (4,627 kg) .....................
*
*
*
*
*
(9) Reporting. The owner or operator
must submit scallop catch reports
through the VMS, as specified in
§ 648.10(f)(4)(i), and limited access
scallop access area pre-landing
notification forms, as specified in
§ 648.10(f)(4)(iii).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Access area scallop allocation
carryover. Unless otherwise specified in
§ 648.59, a limited access scallop vessel
operator may fish any unharvested
Scallop Access Area allocation from a
given fishing year within the first 60
days of the subsequent fishing year if
the Access Area is open. For example,
if a full-time vessel has 7,000 lb (3,175
kg) remaining in the Hudson Canyon
Access Area at the end of fishing year
2013, that vessel may harvest 7,000 lb
(3,175 kg) from its 2014 fishing year
scallop access area allocation during the
first 60 days that the Hudson Canyon
Access Area is open in fishing year 2014
(March 1, 2014, through April 29, 2014).
Unless otherwise specified in § 648.59,
if an Access Area is not open in the
subsequent fishing year, then the
unharvested scallop allocation would
expire at the end of the fishing year that
the scallops were allocated. For
example, if a full-time vessel has 7,000
lb (3,175 kg) remaining in Closed Area
II Access Area at the end of a given
fishing year, and that access area would
not open the subsequent fishing year,
the 7,000 lb (3,175 kg) of scallops would
expire on the last day of the fishing
year.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Sea Scallop Research Set-Aside
Harvest in Access Areas—(1) Access
Areas available for harvest of research
set-aside (RSA). Unless otherwise
specified, RSA may be harvested in any
access area that is open in a given
fishing year, as specified through a
framework adjustment and pursuant to
§ 648.56. The amount of scallops that
Occasional
1,420 lb (644kg).
1,420 lb (644kg).
can be harvested in each access area by
vessels participating in approved RSA
projects shall be determined through the
RSA application review and approval
process. The access areas open for RSA
harvest for fishing years 2015 and 2016
are:
(i) 2015: The Mid-Atlantic Scallop
Access Area, as specified in § 648.59(a)
(ii) 2016: None.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(3) LAGC IFQ Access Area Trips. (i)
An LAGC scallop vessel authorized to
fish in the Access Areas specified in
§ 648.59(a) through (e) may land
scallops, subject to the possession limit
specified in § 648.52(a), unless the
Regional Administrator has issued a
notice that the number of LAGC IFQ
access area trips have been or are
projected to be taken. The total number
of LAGC IFQ trips in a specified Access
Area for fishing year 2015 and 2016 are:
Access area
2015
Mid-Atlantic Access Area .........................................................................................................................................
Closed Area 1 ..........................................................................................................................................................
Closed Area 2 ..........................................................................................................................................................
Nantucket Lightship .................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
10. In § 648.64, paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
10. In § 648.65, paragraph (b)(3)(ii) is
revised to read as follows:
■
■
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 648.64 Yellowtail flounder sub-ACLs and
AMs for the scallop fishery.
(a) As specified in § 648.55(d), and
pursuant to the biennial framework
adjustment process specified in
§ 648.90, the scallop fishery shall be
allocated a sub-ACL for the Georges
Bank and Southern New England/MidAtlantic stocks of yellowtail flounder.
The sub-ACLs are specified in
§ 648.90(a)(4)(iii)(C) of the NE
multispecies regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Mar 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 648.64 Windowpane flounder sub-ACLs
and AMs for the scallop fishery.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) The maximum hanging ratio for a
net, net material, or any other material
on the top of a scallop dredge (twine
top) possessed or used by vessels fishing
with scallop dredge gear does not
exceed 1.5:1 overall. An overall hanging
ratio of 1.5:1 means that the twine top
is attached to the rings in a pattern of
alternating 2 meshes per ring and 1
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
2016
2,065
0
0
0
602
0
0
0
mesh per ring (counted at the bottom
where the twine top connects to the
apron), for an overall average of 1.5
meshes per ring for the entire width of
the twine top. For example, an apron
that is 40 rings wide subtracting 5 rings
one each side of the side pieces,
yielding 30 rings, would only be able to
use a twine top with 45 or fewer meshes
so that the overall ratio of meshes to
rings did not exceed 1.5 (45 meshes/30
rings = 1.5).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–05650 Filed 3–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13806-13821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05650]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 648
[Docket No. 141125999-5195-01]
RIN 0648-BE68
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Sea Scallop
Fishery and Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Framework Adjustment 26;
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; Sea Turtle Conservation
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to approve and implement through regulations
measures included in Framework Adjustment 26 to the Atlantic Sea
Scallop Fishery Management Plan, which the New England Fishery
Management Council adopted and submitted to NMFS for approval. The
purpose of Framework 26 is to prevent overfishing, improve yield-per-
recruit, and improve the overall management of the Atlantic sea scallop
fishery. The Framework 26 proposed measures would also: Close a portion
of the Elephant Trunk Access Area and extend the boundaries of the
Nantucket Lightship Access Area to protect small scallops; adjust the
State Waters Exemption Program; allow for Vessel Monitoring System
declaration changes for vessels to steam home with product on board;
implement a proactive accountability measure to protect windowpane
flounder and yellowtail flounder; align two gear measures designed to
protect sea turtles; and implement other measures to improve the
management of the scallop fishery. Aligning the gear designed to
protect sea turtles involves modifying existing regulations implemented
under the Endangered Species Act; therefore, this action would be
implemented under joint authority of the Endangered Species Act and the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The Council developed an environmental assessment (EA) for
this action that describes the proposed measures and other considered
alternatives and provides a thorough analysis of the impacts of the
proposed measures and alternatives. Copies of the Framework, the EA,
and the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), are available
upon request from Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Newburyport, MA 01950.
You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA-NMFS-
2015-0002, by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0002, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope, ``Comments on
Scallop Framework 26 Proposed Rule.''
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to the Greater Atlantic Regional
Fisheries Office and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to
(202) 395-5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Gilbert, Fishery Policy Analyst,
978-281-9315.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The scallop fishery's management unit ranges from the shorelines of
Maine through North Carolina to the outer boundary of the Exclusive
Economic Zone. The Scallop Fishery Management Plan (FMP), established
in 1982, includes a number of amendments and framework adjustments that
have revised and refined the fishery's management. The Council sets
scallop
[[Page 13807]]
fishery specifications through framework adjustments that occur
annually or biennially. This annual action includes allocations for
fishing year 2015, as well as other scallop fishery management
measures.
The Council adopted Framework 26 on November 20, 2014, and
submitted it to NMFS on February 17, 2015, for review and approval.
Framework 26 specifies measures for fishing year 2015, but includes
fishing year 2016 measures that will go into place as a default, should
the next specifications-setting framework be delayed beyond the start
of fishing year 2016. NMFS will implement Framework 26, if approved,
after the start of fishing year 2015; 2015 default measures concerning
allocations have been in place as of March 1, 2015. These default
measures are more conservative than the Framework 26 proposed
allocations and would be replaced by the higher Framework 26
allocations if this action is approved. The Council has reviewed the
Framework 26 proposed rule regulations as drafted by NMFS and deemed
them to be necessary and appropriate as specified in section 303(c) of
the MSA.
Specification of Scallop Overfishing Limit (OFL), Acceptable Biological
Catch (ABC), Annual Catch Limits (ACLs), Annual Catch Targets (ACTs),
and Set-Asides for the 2015 Fishing Year and Default Specifications for
Fishing Year 2016
The proposed allocations incorporate new biomass reference points
that resulted from the Northeast Fisheries Science Center's most recent
scallop stock benchmark assessment that was completed in July 2014. The
assessment reviewed and updated the data and models used to assess the
scallop stock and ultimately updated the reference points for status
determinations. The scallop stock is considered overfished if the
biomass is less than half of the biomass at maximum sustainable yield
(Bmsy), and overfishing is occurring if fishing mortality
(F) is above the fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield
(Fmsy). The assessment continues to find that the scallop
resource is not overfished and overfishing is not occurring, but the
estimates for Fmsy and Bmsy have changed. A
comparison of the old and new reference points is outlined in Table 1.
Table 1--Summary of Old and New Scallop Reference Points From the Last
Two Benchmark Scallop Stock Assessments in 2010 and 2014
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 Assessment 2014 Assessment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fmsy........................... 0.38 0.48.
Bmsy........................... 125,000 mt 96,480 mt.
1/2 Bmsy....................... 62,000 mt 48,240 mt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to these reference point updates, the fishing mortality rates
that the Council uses to set OFL, ABC, and ACL would be updated through
this action. The proposed OFL was set based on an F of 0.48, equivalent
to the F threshold updated through the 2014 assessment. The proposed
ABC and the equivalent total ACL for each fishing year are based on an
F of 0.38, which is the F associated with a 25-percent probability of
exceeding the OFL. The Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee
recommended scallop fishery ABCs for the 2015 and 2016 fishing years of
55.9 M lb (25,352 mt) and 70.1 M lb (31,807 mt), respectively, after
accounting for discards and incidental mortality. The Scientific and
Statistical Committee will reevaluate an ABC for 2016 when the Council
develops the next framework adjustment.
Table 2 outlines the proposed scallop fishery catch limits that are
derived from the ABC values. After deducting the incidental target
total allowable catch (TAC) and the research and observer set-asides,
the remaining ACL available to the fishery is allocated according to
the fleet proportions established in Amendment 11 to the Scallop FMP
(72 FR 20090; April 14, 2008): 94.5 percent allocated to the limited
access (LA) scallop fleet (i.e., the larger ``trip boat'' fleet); 5
percent allocated to the limited access general category (LAGC)
individual fishing quota (IFQ) fleet (i.e., the smaller ``day boat''
fleet); and the remaining 0.5 percent allocated to LA scallop vessels
that also have LAGC IFQ permits. These separate ACLs and their
corresponding ACTs are referred to as sub-ACLs and sub-ACTs,
respectively, throughout this action. Amendment 15 to the Scallop FMP
(76 FR 43746; July 21, 2011) specified that no buffers to account for
management uncertainty are necessary in setting the LAGC sub-ACLs,
meaning that the LAGC sub-ACL would equal the LAGC sub-ACT. As a
result, the LAGC sub-ACL values in Table 2, based on an F of 0.38,
represent the amount of catch from which IFQ percentage shares will be
applied to calculate each vessel's IFQ for a given fishing year. For
the LA fleet, the management uncertainty buffer is based on the F
associated with a 75-percent probability of remaining below the F
associated with ABC/ACL, which, using the updated Fs applied to the
ABC/ACL, now results in an F of 0.34.
Table 2--Scallop Catch Limits for Fishing Years 2015 and 2016 for the LA
and LAGC IFQ Fleets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015 (mt) 2016 (mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overfishing Limit..................... 38,061 45,456
ABC/ACL w/discards removed............ 25,352 31,807
Incidental TAC........................ 22.7 22.7
Research Set-Aside (RSA).............. 567 567
Observer Set-aside (1 percent of ABC/ 254 318
ACL).................................
LA sub-ACL (94.5 percent of total ACL, 23,161 29,200
after deducting set-asides and
incidental catch)....................
LA sub-ACT (adjusted for management 19,311 23,016
uncertainty).........................
LAGC IFQ sub-ACL (5.0 percent of total 1,225 1,545
ACL, after deducting set-asides and
incidental catch)....................
LAGC IFQ sub-ACL for vessels with LA 123 154
scallop permits (0.5 percent of total
ACL, after deducting set-asides and
incidental catch)....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This action would deduct 567 mt of scallops annually for 2015 and
2016 from the ABC and set it aside as the Scallop RSA to fund scallop
research and to compensate participating vessels through the sale of
scallops harvested under RSA projects. As of March 1, 2015, this set-
aside was available for harvest by RSA-funded projects in open areas.
Framework 26 would allow RSA to be harvested from the Mid-Atlantic
Access Areas that is proposed to be open for 2015, once this action is
approved and implemented, but would prevent RSA harvesting from access
areas under 2016 default measures. Of this 1.25 M lb (567 mt)
allocation, NMFS has already allocated 397,470 lb
[[Page 13808]]
(180.3 mt) to previously funded multi-year projects as part of the 2014
RSA awards process. NMFS has reviewed proposals submitted for
consideration of 2015 RSA awards and will be selecting projects for
funding in the near future.
This action would also set aside 1 percent of the ABC for the
industry-funded observer program to help defray the cost of scallop
vessels that carry an observer. The observer set-asides for fishing
years 2015 and 2016 are 254 mt and 318 mt, respectively. The 2016
observer set-aside may be adjusted by the Council when it develops
specific, non-default measures for 2016.
Open Area Days-at-Sea (DAS) Allocations
This action would implement vessel-specific DAS allocations for
each of the three LA scallop DAS permit categories (i.e., full-time,
part-time, and occasional) for 2015 and 2016 (Table 3). Proposed 2015
DAS allocations are almost identical to those allocated to the LA fleet
in 2014 (31 DAS for full-time, 12 DAS for part-time, and 3 DAS for
occasional vessels). Fishing year 2016 DAS allocations are
precautionary, and are set at 75 percent of what current biomass
projections indicate could be allocated to each LA scallop vessel for
the entire fishing year. This is to avoid over-allocating DAS to the
fleet in the event that the framework that would set those allocations,
if delayed past the start of the 2016 fishing year, estimates that DAS
should be less than currently projected. The proposed allocations in
Table 3 exclude any DAS deductions that are required if the LA scallop
fleet exceeded its 2014 sub-ACL. In addition, these DAS values take
into account a slight DAS reduction necessary for the implementation of
another proposed measure discussed later on in this rule (See
Adjustment to Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Declaration Procedures for
Some Open Area Trips). If this measure, which would allow for vessels
on specific trips to end their open area trip and DAS accrual sooner
than they can under current regulations, is not approved, the DAS
allocations in Table 3 would increase by 0.14 DAS and 0.06 DAS for
full-time and part-time vessels, respectively (there would be no change
for occasional vessels, and there are currently no vessels issued the
occasional permit type in the LA scallop fleet). In addition, the
Council requested that DAS allocations now be specified to the
hundredth decimal place, rather than rounding up or down to whole DAS.
This is consistent with DAS accounting as vessels use DAS throughout
the year.
Table 3--Scallop Open Area DAS Allocations for 2015 and 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit category 2015 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full-Time............................... 30.86 26.00
Part-Time............................... 12.94 10.40
Occasional.............................. 2.58 2.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 1, 2015, full-time, part-time, and occasional vessels
received 17, 7, and 1 DAS, respectively. These allocations would
increase as soon as Framework 26 is implemented, if approved.
LA Allocations and Trip Possession Limits for Scallop Access Areas
For fishing year 2015 and the start of 2016, Framework 26 would
close all three Georges Bank Access Areas (i.e., Nantucket Lightship
(NLS), Closed Area 1, and Closed Area 2 Access Areas) and open all
three Mid-Atlantic Access Areas (i.e., Elephant Trunk, Delmarva, and
Hudson Canyon Access Areas). This action proposes to extend the
boundaries of the NLS Access Area that would close to the scallop fleet
to include a concentration of small scallops near the existing boundary
along the southeast corner, currently considered part of the open area.
This proposed closure area, which would increase the NLS Access Area
boundary by 158 square miles, would be reconsidered in a future
framework action when the scallops are larger and ready for harvest.
As for the Mid-Atlantic Access Areas, this action proposes that all
three access areas be open to both the LA and LAGC IFQ fleet, and be
treated as one single area, which this rule will now refer to as the
Mid-Atlantic Access Area. Scallop vessels would be able to fish across
all three areas in a single access area trip. There is one the
exception: This action proposes six 10-minute squares (i.e., 549 square
nautical miles) in the northwest corner of the Elephant Trunk Access
Area be closed to protect small scallops. This area constitutes roughly
35 percent of the current Elephant Trunk Access Area. The closure would
allow for the small concentrations of scallops in this portion of the
access area to be protected as they grow to a more harvestable size.
This action proposes that no transiting be allowed across this small
area due to its small size and the incentive to fish in the area is
relatively high due to the high abundance of scallops.
Table 4 outlines the proposed LA allocations that can be fished
from the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, which could be taken in as many
trips as needed, so long as the trip possession limits (also in Table
4) are not exceeded. These proposed access area allocations for 2015
represent a 112-percent increase in access area allocations compared to
2014.
Table 4--Scallop Access Area Poundage Allocations and Trip Possession Limits for 2015 and 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit category Possession limits 2015 Allocation 2016 Allocation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full-Time............................ 17,000 lb (7,711 kg)... 51,000 lb (23,133 kg).. 17,000 lb (7,711 kg).
Part-Time............................ 10,200 lb ( 4,627 kg).. 20,400 lb ( 9,253 kg).. 10,200 lb (4,627 kg).
Occasional........................... 1,420 lb (644 kg)...... 4,250 lb ( 1,928 kg)... 1,420 lb ( 644 kg).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This action also proposes to modify access area trip reporting
procedures by requiring that each LA vessel submit a pre-landing
notification form through its VMS unit prior to returning to port at
the end of each access area trip, including trips where no scallops
were landed. These pre-landing notifications would replace the current
broken trip and compensation trip procedures. Vessels would no longer
be required to submit a broken trip notification form if they are
unable to land their full possession limits on an access area trip.
Vessels would also no longer need to apply to NMFS to receive, or wait
for NMFS to issue, a compensation trip to fish their remaining access
area scallop allocation.
For example, under Framework 26 access area allocations, a full-
time vessel receives 51,000 lb (23,133 kg) in the Mid-Atlantic Access
Area, which can be landed on as many or as few trips as needed, so long
as the 17,000-lb (7,711-kg) possession limit is not exceeded on any one
trip. The vessel may choose to fish its full allocation over the course
of three trips, landing
[[Page 13809]]
the maximum allowance of 17,000 lb (7,711 kg) on each trip, or it can
choose to fish its full allocation over the course of four, five, or
more trips, landing less than the trip possession limit on each trip.
Regardless, the vessel must submit a pre-landing notification form
prior to returning to port for each access area trip, and would not
have to wait for NMFS to issue a compensation trip prior to starting
its next access area trip.
This action would also modify the procedures for when scallop
access area allocation can be carried over to the next fishing year.
Under the current regulations, vessel may fish for a previous year's
unharvested scallop access area allocation in the first 60 days of a
fishing year if the vessel broke a trip in the last 60 days of the
previous fishing year or open season for an access area. In many cases,
vessels in the last 60 days of the fishing year simply crossed the VMS
Demarcation Line, submitted a broken trip report through their VMS
unit, and returned to port. This caused confusion and created a high
number of cases for NMFS to review as the fishing year came to an end.
Under the proposed measures, each vessel would automatically carry over
unharvested access area allocation that the vessel could fish in the
first 60 days of the subsequent fishing year, as long as the access
area is open for scallop fishing during that time. This change would
result in little change to the amount of carryover NMFS expects from
year to year because most vessels took advantage of the broken trip
provisions. Also, Framework 26 accounts for the uncertainty associated
with carryover by setting the LA fishery's ACT lower than the fishery's
ACL. This ensures that carryover would not cause an ACL to be exceeded
from year to year.
Although vessel owners would ultimately be responsible for tracking
their own scallop access area landings and ensuring they do not exceed
their annual allocations, NMFS would match dealer-reported scallop
landing records with access area trip declarations and make that
information available on Fish-On-Line.
Additional Measures To Reduce Impacts on Small Scallops
1. Crew Limit Restrictions in Access Areas. Similar to the crew
limit restrictions NMFS implemented in Delmarva in 2014, this action
proposes crew limits for all access areas. Currently, LA scallop
vessels have crew size limits when fishing in open areas: Vessels are
limited to seven individuals when fishing on a DAS, or five individuals
if the vessel is on a DAS and participating in the small dredge
program. These limits have been in place to restrict the shucking
capacity of a vessel to help reduce landings per unit effort while on
DAS. In an effort to protect small scallops and discourage vessels from
high-grading (discarding smaller scallops in exchange for larger ones),
Framework 26 would impose a crew limit of eight individuals per LA
vessel, including the captain, when fishing in any scallop access area.
If a vessel is participating in the small dredge program, it may not
have more than six people on board, including the operator, on an
access area trip. These crew limits may be reevaluated in a future
framework action.
2. Delayed Harvesting of Default 2016 Mid-Atlantic Access Area
Allocations. Although the Framework would include precautionary access
area allocations for the 2016 fishing year (see 2016 allocations in
Table 4), vessels would have to wait to fish these allocations until
April 1, 2016. This precautionary measure is designed to protect
scallops when scallop meat weights are lower than other times of the
year (generally, this change in meat-weight is a physiological change
in scallops due to spawning). However, if a vessel has not fully
harvested its 2015 scallop access area allocation in fishing year 2015,
it may still fish the remainder of its allocation in the first 60 days
of 2016 (i.e., March 1, 2016, through April 29, 2016).
3. 2016 RSA Harvest Restrictions. This action proposes that vessels
participating in RSA projects would be prohibited from harvesting RSA
under default 2016 measures. At the start of 2016, RSA could only be
harvested from open areas. This would be re-evaluated for the remainder
of 2016 in the framework action that would set final 2016
specifications.
LAGC Measures
1. Sub-ACL for LAGC vessels with IFQ permits. For LAGC vessels with
IFQ permits, this action proposes a 1,225-mt ACL for 2015 and an
initial ACL of 1,545 mt for 2016 (Table 2). We calculate IFQ
allocations by applying each vessel's IFQ contribution percentage to
these ACLs. These allocations assume that no LAGC IFQ AMs are
triggered. If a vessel exceeds its IFQ in a given fishing year, its IFQ
for the subsequent fishing year would be reduced by the amount of the
overage.
Because Framework 26 would not go into effect until after the March
1 start of fishing year 2015, the default 2015 IFQ allocations were
automatically triggered. These default 2015 IFQ allocations are lower
than those proposed in Framework 26. If approved, this action would
increase the current vessel IFQ allocations. NMFS sent a letter to IFQ
permit holders providing both March 1, 2015, IFQ allocations and
Framework 26 proposed IFQ allocations so that vessel owners know what
mid-year adjustments would occur if Framework 26 is approved.
2. Sub-ACL for LA Scallop Vessels with IFQ Permits. For LA scallop
vessels with IFQ permits, this action proposes a 123 mt ACL for 2015
and an initial 154 mt ACL for 2016 (Table 2). We calculate IFQ
allocations by applying each vessel's IFQ contribution percentage to
these ACLs. These allocations assume that no LAGC IFQ AMs are
triggered. If a vessel exceeds its IFQ in a given fishing year, its IFQ
for the subsequent fishing year would be reduced by the amount of the
overage.
3. LAGC IFQ Trip Allocations and Possession Limits for Scallop
Access Areas. Framework 26 proposes that LAGC IFQ vessels would receive
a fleetwide number of trips that could be taken in the Mid-Atlantic
Access Area. Framework 26 would allocate 2,065 and 602 trips in 2015
and 2016, respectively, to this area. Under default 2016 measures, LAGC
IFQ vessels must wait to fish these trips until April 1, 2016.
These trip allocations are equivalent to the overall proportion of
total catch from access areas compared to total catch. For example, the
total projected catch for the scallop fishery in 2015 is 20,865 mt, and
8,700 mt are projected to come from access areas, roughly 41.7 percent.
If the same proportion is applied to total LAGC IFQ catch, the total
allocation to LAGC IFQ vessels from access areas would be about 600 mt,
roughly 44.5 percent of the total LAGC IFQ sub-ACL for 2015 (1,348 mt).
4. NGOM TAC. This action proposes a 70,000-lb (31,751-kg) annual
NGOM TAC for fishing years 2015 and 2016. The allocation for 2015
assumes that there are no overages in 2014, which would trigger a
pound-for-pound deduction in 2015 to account for the overage.
5. Scallop Incidental Catch Target TAC. This action proposes a
50,000-lb (22,680-kg) scallop incidental catch target TAC for fishing
years 2015 and 2016 to account for mortality from this component of the
fishery, and to ensure that F targets are not exceeded. The Council and
NMFS may adjust this target TAC in a future action if vessels catch
more scallops under the incidental target TAC than predicted.
Adjustments to Gear Modifications To Protect Sea Turtles
This action proposes to adjust season regulations for the sea
turtle deflector
[[Page 13810]]
dredge (TDD) and area regulations for the sea turtle chain mat to make
them consistent. Currently, turtle chain mats are required in the area
south of 41[deg]9' N. lat. from May through November, and the TDD is
required west of 71[deg] W. long. from May through October. When used
together, chain mats and TDDs are thought to increase the conservation
benefit to sea turtles, because chain mats help reduce the impact to
turtles from interactions occurring in the water column, and the TDD
helps reduce the impact to turtles from interactions with the dredge
frame on the sea floor (DuPaul et al. 2004; Smolowitz et al. 2010). By
making the area and season for these two gear modifications consistent,
west of 71[deg] W. long. from May through November, the conservation
benefit of the current chain mat and TDD requirements is maintained,
while reducing the regulatory complexity of differing seasons and
areas. Any reduction in the size of the area that chain mats would be
required (east of 71[deg] W. long. and south of 41[deg]9' N. lat.) is
balanced by an extension of the season that TDDs would be required (the
month of November). In addition, this action also proposes a very
slight modification to the TDD gear regulations for safety purposes.
When the Council first approved the TDD, it included the allowance of a
flaring bar to ensure safe handling of the dredge. At the time, the
Council specified that this flaring bar should only be attached to the
dredge frame on one side. Since the TDD's implementation, there has
been some interest to attach the flaring bar in a ``u'' shape, which
could be attached on the inside or outside of the bale bar, but the
current regulations unnecessarily prohibit this. This action proposes
to adjust this regulation to allow for a bar or ``u''-shaped flaring
mechanism to support safety at sea. Allowing a u-shaped flaring
mechanism should not have an impact on sea turtles and the
effectiveness of the TDD because the flaring bar or mechanism would
still be prohibited from being attached within 12 inches (30.5 cm) of
the ``bump out'' of the TDD and not between the bale bars. This change
would require that each side of the bar or mechanism be no more than 12
inches (30.5 cm) in length.
This action would not change any other regulatory requirements for
the use of chain mats and TDDs.
Adjustment to Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Declaration Procedures for
Some Open Area Trips
This action would enable a vessel to declare out of a DAS trip at
or south of Cape May, NJ (specifically, at or south of 39[deg] N.
lat.), once it goes inside the VMS demarcation line, and then, with
scallops on board, steam seaward of the VMS demarcation line to ports
south of Cape May, NJ, without being charged DAS. This measure does not
apply to vessels that intend to land scallops in ports north of Cape
May, NJ. Once this change in declaration to ``declare out of fishery''
has been made, vessels would be required to submit a scallop pre-
landing notification form through VMS, return directly to port and
offload scallops immediately, and stow all gear. In addition, such
vessels would be prohibited from having on board any in-shell scallops.
The purpose of this measure is to help increase incentive for
vessels to land scallops in the southern part of the mid-Atlantic by
reducing some of the steaming time to return to those more distant
ports. Due to the location of the access areas in the mid-Atlantic,
which were at one point primary traditional open area fishing grounds,
vessels from Virginia and North Carolina fishing on open area DAS trips
have to steam for a long period of time to reach productive open area
fishing grounds. Vessels are currently allowed to start their open area
DAS trip landward of the VMS Demarcation Line, but not necessarily from
port, but are required to accrue DAS when harvested scallops are on
board, so their return steam from an open area trip counts against
their DAS allocation. Over time, as DAS have been reduced dramatically
and with increased fuel costs, vessels have more incentive to land near
these primary fishing grounds (i.e., in New Bedford, MA, or Cape May,
NJ) to avoid being charged for DAS steaming back to southern ports
farther away that would most impact their DAS allocations. This
decrease in landings to particular states over time has had a great
impact on shoreside businesses that depend upon a stable stream of
landings.
Because this change in when some vessels may ``clock out'' of their
DAS could impact overall DAS allocations to the fleet, this action also
proposes an overall DAS deduction to each LA scallop vessel. The
proposed DAS adjustment (which has already been calculated into the DAS
allocations proposed in Table 3) would be a decrease of 0.14 DAS for
full-time vessels and 0.06 DAS for part-time vessels. This entire
measure, including the appropriate DAS deductions, was supported by the
Council's Advisory Panel.
Adjustments to the State Water Exemption Program To Include Northern
Gulf of Maine (NGOM) Management Area Exemptions
Framework 26 proposes to modify the State Water Exemption Program
to include a new exemption that would enable scallop vessels to
continue to fish in state waters after the NGOM hard TAC is reached.
The current State Water Exemption Program has been in place since
Framework 2 to the Scallop FMP (November 21, 1994; 59 FR 59967). At
that time, the purpose of the program was to allow Federal permit
holders to compete in the state waters fishery on a more equitable
basis where Federal and state laws are inconsistent and to encourage
vessels with general category permits (open access, at the time) to
fish under the exemption program and continue to submit catch and
effort data. This program specifies that a state with a scallop fishery
may be eligible for state waters exemptions if it has a scallop
conservation program that does not jeopardize the biomass and fishing
mortality/effort limit objectives of the Scallop FMP. If a state is
found to be eligible for the State Waters Exemption Program, federally
permitted scallop vessels fishing in that state's waters may be
exempted from a limited number of Federal scallop regulations: LA
scallop vessels could fish in state waters outside of scallop DAS, and
LA and LAGC scallop vessels could be exempt from Federal gear and
possession limit restrictions.
This action proposes to expand the exemptions to include this new
measure related to the NGOM. Specifically, states within the NGOM
management area (i.e., Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine) could
request an exemption from the regulations requiring that scallop
vessels must stop fishing in the state waters portion of the NGOM once
the Federal TAC has been reached. States would have to apply for this
exemption and specify to which vessels this would apply (i.e., vessels
with NGOM permits, IFQ permits, incidental permits, and/or LA permits).
Currently, a vessel issued a NGOM or IFQ permit can declare a
state-only NGOM scallop trip and fish for scallops exclusively in state
waters without those landings being attributed to the Federal TAC, but
must cease scallop fishing entirely for the remainder of the year,
along with all other scallop vessels, once the Federal TAC is reached.
To date this has not been an issue because the Federal NGOM catch has
been well below the TAC. However, total catch in both Federal and state
[[Page 13811]]
waters in this area is increasing, and Maine permit holders are
concerned about their ability to fish in state waters when the state
season is open in the winter if the NGOM TAC is reached. This measure
would alleviate those concerns by giving the state the ability to apply
for an exemption through the State Water Exemption Program. Because the
NGOM Federal TAC is set based only on the Federal portion of the
resource, NMFS does not expect this measure to compromise the FMP's
limits on catch and mortality.
The process for applying to the State Waters Exemption Program, as
outlined in the regulations, would remain the same. In order for NMFS
to make a determination of whether or not a state waters exemption is
warranted for a particular state's waters, a state must submit a
request for the exemption so that we can fully evaluate the scope of
the potential fishery in the state's waters. Such a request would need
to include the following information: A complete description of scallop
fishing regulations in state waters; the number of vessels and trips
that could be expected in state waters; the average landings per trip
for vessels fishing in state waters; and the average per-pound value of
scallops landed by vessels fishing for scallops in state waters. If the
information provided supports a conclusion that a particular state's
scallop fishery is consistent with the FMP relative to the State Waters
Exemption Program, NMFS would then publish the requested exemptions
from DAS, gear, and possession limits, and NGOM closures, in a notice
in the Federal Register, consistent with the Administrative Procedure
Act.
Proactive Accountability Measures (AMs) for Flatfish Protection
Currently, all scallop vessels (i.e., LA and LAGC) fishing for
scallops with dredges in open areas west of 71[deg] W. long. are
required to have their dredges configured so that no dredge has more
than seven rows of rings in the apron (i.e., the area between the
terminus of the dredge (clubstick) and the twine top) on the topside of
the dredge. The twine top helps finfish (flatfish in particular) escape
from the dredge during fishing and the maximum number of rows of rings
prevents fishermen from making the twine top small and ineffective in
reducing bycatch. Framework 26 proposes to extend this proactive
accountability measure to all areas where scallop fishing occurs (i.e.,
all access and open areas). This increased spatial coverage may further
reduce flatfish bycatch by preventing dredge configurations using more
than seven rows of rings, which is currently required east of 71[deg]
W. long. for some scallop vessels fishing in open areas. This is
considered to be a proactive AM because it may help the fishery stay
below the sub-ACLs for flatfish (yellowtail flounder and windowpane
flounder, currently). Additionally, this measure would enable vessels
to voluntarily fish with an even shorter apron (less than seven rings),
to proactively reduce flatfish bycatch in any area or season.
Regulatory Corrections Under Regional Administrator Authority
This proposed rule includes several revisions to the regulatory
text to address text that is unnecessary, outdated, unclear, or
otherwise could be improved. NMFS proposes these changes consistent
with section 305(d) of the MSA which provides that the Secretary of
Commerce may promulgate regulations necessary to ensure that amendments
to an FMP are carried out in accordance with the FMP and the MSA. Two
revisions clarify how to apply and measure gear modifications to ensure
compliance. The first revision at Sec. 648.51 would clarify where to
measure meshes to ensure twine top compliance. The second revision at
Sec. 648.53 clarifies an example on how the hanging ratio should be
applied and measured if the windowpane reactive AM implemented through
Framework 25 (June 26, 2014; 79 FR 34251) is triggered.
This action would also modify the VMS catch report requirements at
Sec. 648.10(f)(4)(i) to only include the information actually used by
NMFS to monitor flatfish bycatch. The form currently requires that the
amount of yellowtail flounder discards be reported daily. This
requirement has been in place since Amendment 15 (76 FR 43746; July 21,
2011), which established the yellowtail flounder AMs in the FMP.
However, since Amendment 15, the scallop fishery now has other bycatch
sub-ACLs and AMs (e.g., SNE/MA windowpane flounder) which are not
captured in this form. In addition, current bycatch monitoring relies
solely on observer reports to determine bycatch discards for these
species. In order to minimize confusion and because this information is
not necessary for bycatch monitoring, we propose to remove the
reference to reporting yellowtail discards. Instead, the vessels will
report daily scallop catch and the amount of all other species kept.
In addition, this action would adjust the regulations at Sec.
648.53(a) to clarify that the values for ABC/ACL stated in the
regulations reflect the levels from which ACTs are set, thus they do
not include estimates of discards and incidental mortality. This
regulatory clarification is at the request of the Council and would
more accurately reflect the process for establishing ABCs and ACLs in
the scallop fishery.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the MSA, the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has made a preliminary determination that this proposed
rule is consistent with the FMP, other provisions of the MSA, and other
applicable law. In making the final determination, NMFS will consider
the data, views, and comments received during the public comment
period.
This proposed rule does not contain policies with Federalism or
``takings'' implications as those terms are defined in E.O. 13132 and
E.O. 12630, respectively.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA has been prepared, as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA consists of Framework 26
analyses, its draft IRFA, and the preamble to this action.
Statement of Objective and Need
This action proposes the management measures and specifications for
the Atlantic sea scallop fishery for 2015, with 2016 default measures.
A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal
basis for this action are contained in Framework 26 and the preamble of
this proposed rule and are not repeated here.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule
Would Apply
The proposed regulations would affect all vessels with LA and LAGC
scallop permits. The Framework 26 document provides extensive
information on the number and size of vessels and small businesses that
would be affected by the proposed regulations, by port and state (see
ADDRESSES). There were 313 vessels that obtained full-time LA permits
in 2013, including 250 dredge, 52 small-dredge, and 11 scallop trawl
permits. In the same year, there were also 34 part-time LA permits in
the sea scallop fishery. No vessels were issued occasional scallop
permits. NMFS issued 212 LAGC IFQ permits in 2013 and 155 of these
vessels actively fished for scallops that year (the remaining permits
likely leased out scallop IFQ allocations with their permits in
Confirmation of Permit
[[Page 13812]]
History). The RFA defines a small business in shellfish fishery as a
firm that is independently owned and operated and not dominant in its
field of operation, with receipts of up to $5.5 M annually.
Individually-permitted vessels may hold permits for several fisheries,
harvesting species of fish that are regulated by several different
fishery management plans, even beyond those impacted by the proposed
action. Furthermore, multiple permitted vessels and/or permits may be
owned by entities affiliated by stock ownership, common management,
identity of interest, contractual relationships, or economic
dependency. For the purposes of this analysis, ``ownership entities''
are defined as those entities with common ownership as listed on the
permit application. Only permits with identical ownership are
categorized as an ``ownership entity.'' For example, if five permits
have the same seven persons listed as co-owners on their permit
applications, those seven persons would form one ``ownership entity,''
that holds those five permits. If two of those seven owners also co-own
additional vessels, that ownership arrangement would be considered a
separate ``ownership entity'' for the purpose of this analysis.
On June 1 of each year, ownership entities are identified based on
a list of all permits for the most recent complete calendar year. The
current ownership dataset is based on the calendar year 2013 permits
and contains average gross sales associated with those permits for
calendar years 2011 through 2013. Matching the potentially impacted
2013 fishing year permits described above (LA and LAGC IFQ) to calendar
year 2013 ownership data results in 172 distinct ownership entities for
the LA fleet and 115 distinct ownership entities for the LAGC IFQ
fleet. Of these, and based on the Small Business Administration (SBA)
guidelines, 154 of the LA distinct ownership entities and all 115 of
the LAGC IFQ entities are categorized as small. The remaining 18 of the
LA entities are categorized as large entities, all of which are
shellfish businesses.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of the Proposed Rule
The proposed action contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Two requirements will be
submitted to OMB for approval under the NMFS Northeast Region Scallop
Report Family of Forms (OMB Control No. 0648-0491).
Under the proposed action, all 347 LA vessels would be required to
submit a pre-landing notification form for each access area trip
through their VMS units. This information collection is intended to
improve access area trip monitoring, as well as streamline a vessel's
ability to fish multiple access area trips. Although this is a new
requirement, it would replace other reporting procedures currently
required for breaking an access area trip and receiving permission to
take a compensation trip to harvest remaining unharvested scallop
pounds from an access area trip. The proposed action also includes a
new requirement for some LA vessels to report a pre-landing
notification form through their VMS unit before changing their open
area trip declaration to a ``declared out of fishery declaration,''
which is expected to add a burden to a very small portion of the fleet.
This requirement would only apply to a few vessels that intend to land
open area scallops at ports south of Cape May, NJ, and want to steam to
those ports while not using DAS. This new pre-landing requirement is
necessary to enforce a measure intended to assist shoreside businesses
in southern ports by providing an incentive for vessels to steam to
ports far away from popular open area fishing grounds.
Notification requires the dissemination of the following
information: Operator's permit number; amount of scallop meats and/or
bushels to be landed; the estimated time of arrival; the landing port
and state where the scallops will be offloaded; and the vessel trip
report (VTR) serial number recorded from that trip's VTR. This
information would be used by the Office of Law Enforcement to monitor
vessel activity and ensure compliance with the regulations.
The burden estimates for these new requirements apply to all LA
vessels. In a given fishing year, NMFS estimates that for access area
reporting, each of the 313 full-time LA vessels would submit a pre-
landing report 5 times (1,565 responses) and each of the 34 part-time
LA vessel would submit a pre-landing report up to 3 times (102
responses), for a total of 1,667 responses. Public reporting burden for
submitting these pre-landing notification forms is estimated to average
5 minutes per response with an associated cost of $1.25, that includes
the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
Therefore, 1,667 responses would impose total compliance costs of
$2,084. While this is a new requirement, it would replace current trip
termination and compensation trip reporting procedures, which were
estimated to cost a total of $300 annually, so the additional burden
for this new pre-landing requirement would be $1,785 ($2,085-$300), or
$5.14 per vessel. This is likely an overestimate, but would account for
the potential of higher access area scallop allocations in future
fishing years. For the new DAS pre-landing requirements, NMFS estimates
that this would likely impact 30 vessels and result in each of those
vessels reporting one time a year. Public reporting burden for
submitting these pre-landing notification forms is also estimated to
average 5 minutes per response with an associated cost of $1.25.
Therefore, the total cost of this would impose total compliance costs
of $38 (30 vessels x $1.25). The total additional burden from both of
these new pre-landing requirements would be $1,823.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection of information to the
Regional Administrator (See ADDRESSES above), and email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number. All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.
This action contains no other compliance costs. It does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other Federal law.
[[Page 13813]]
Federal Rules Which May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With This
Proposed Rule
The proposed regulations do not create overlapping regulations with
any state regulations or other federal laws.
Description of Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Action
The preferred alternative for LA allocations, which would allocate
includes 30.86 DAS and 23,133 kg of scallops to be harvested in access
areas to full-time vessels, as well as close a portion of the Elephant
Trunk Access Area and extend the NLS closure, is expected to positively
impact profitability of small entities regulated by this action. The
estimated revenues and net revenue for scallop vessels and small
business entities under all considered allocations alternatives,
including the preferred alternative, are expected to be higher than
both the No Action alternative (i.e., 2015 default measures
conservatively set through Framework 25) and status quo levels (i.e.,
assuming same level of access as 2014). There are four different LA
allocation alternative in Framework 26. Alternative 1 is the no action
alternative which would allocate scallops based on the conservative
default measures in Framework 25. Alternative 2 is the basic run
alternative and it would have allocated the fleet access area trips
similar to past years (one access area per trip; split trips for the
fleet). Alternative 3 (preferred alternative) combines all three Mid-
Atlantic Access Areas and allows vessels to fish their trips in the
combined area. Under Alternative 3 there are multiple options for
closures to protect small scallops. The preferred alternative includes
the options for a closure inside the combine Mid-Atlantic Access Area
and an extension of the NLS. Finally, Alternative 4 would have set
allocations similar to the basic run alternative, but reduced the
overall F. The preferred alternative would have the largest revenue
compared to all other alternatives in the 2015 fishing year, which
would translate to higher profits (Table 5).
Table 5--Estimated Fleet Revenue and Revenue per Limited Access Vessel in 2014 Dollars
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fleet scallop
Fishing year Alternative revenue (*) Revenue per FT Change from no % Ch. from SQ
($ million) vessel action (%) levels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015.......................... ALT1. No Action. 263.0 748,731 0 -45
ALT2. Basic Run. 557.8 1,592,242 113 17
ALT3. NL + ETA 578.1 1,650,451 120 21
(Preferred
alt.).
ALT3. 3 new 567.1 1,618,858 116 19
closures.
ALT3. CA2 + NL.. 570.3 1,627,986 117 20
ALT4. Reduced F. 557.6 1,591,748 113 17
SQ. Status quo.. 477.2 1,361,611 82 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall LAGC IFQ allocations for the preferred alternative will be
5.8 percent higher than the No Action (i.e., 2015 default allocations)
and is 23 percent higher than the 2014 fishing year allocations. As a
result, the preferred alternative is expected to have positive economic
impacts on LAGC IFQ fishery. There are no other alternatives that would
generate higher economic benefits for the scallop fishery as a whole,
including the small business entities in the LAGC IFQ fishery. As for
LAGC IFQ access area allocations, the preferred alternative would
provide proportional access for LA and LAGC IFQ within the Mid-Atlantic
Access Area (i.e., the LAGC fishery is projected to catch roughly 6.5
percent of the total 2015 projected catch of the fishery, so roughly
6.5 percent of the total access area catch available to the entire
fishery could be landed on IFQ fleetwide trips), which should have
positive impacts on the small business entities of the LAGC IFQ fishery
by increasing flexibility and lowering costs. The preferred alternative
would have higher economic benefits than No Action and compared to the
2014 access area fleetwide IFQ trip allocations, but would have lower
allocations than the alternative that would have increased the number
of fleetwide trips to 10.4 percent of the total access area catch.
Because the NGOM and incidental TACs are unchanged from previous
years, those proposed allocations are not expected to directly impact
small business entities.
Literature Cited
DuPaul, W. D., D. B. Rudders, and R. J. Smolowitz. 2004. Industry
trials of a modified sea scallop dredge to minimize the catch of sea
turtles. Final Report. November 2004. VIMS Marine Resources Report,
No. 2004-12. 35 pp.
Smolowitz, R., H. Haas, H. O. Milliken, M. Weeks and E. Matzen.
2010. Using Sea Turtle Carcasses to Assess the Conservation
Potential of a Turtle Deflector Dredge. North American Journal of
Fisheries Management 30: 993-1000.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 223
Endangered and threatened species, Exports, Imports,
Transportation.
50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: March 6, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR parts 223 and 648
are proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 223--THREATENED MARINE AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 223 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 1543; subpart B, Sec. 223.201-202
also issued under 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 5503(d) for
Sec. 223.206(d)(9).2.
0
2. In Sec. 223.206 paragraph (d)(11) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 223.206 Exceptions to prohibitions relating to sea turtles.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(11) Restrictions applicable to sea scallop dredges in the mid-
Atlantic--(i) Gear Modification. During the time period of May 1
through November 30, any vessel with a sea scallop dredge and required
to have a Federal Atlantic sea scallop fishery permit, regardless of
dredge size or vessel permit category, that enters waters west of
71[deg] W. long., from the shoreline to the outer boundary
[[Page 13814]]
of the Exclusive Economic Zone must have on each dredge a chain mat
described as follows. The chain mat must be composed of horizontal
(``tickler'') chains and vertical (``up-and-down'') chains that are
configured such that the openings formed by the intersecting chains
have no more than four sides. The vertical and horizontal chains must
be hung to cover the opening of the dredge bag such that the vertical
chains extend from the back of the cutting bar to the sweep. The
horizontal chains must intersect the vertical chains such that the
length of each side of the openings formed by the intersecting chains
is less than or equal to 14 inches (35.5 cm) with the exception of the
side of any individual opening created by the sweep. The chains must be
connected to each other with a shackle or link at each intersection
point. The measurement must be taken along the chain, with the chain
held taut, and include one shackle or link at the intersection point
and all links in the chain up to, but excluding, the shackle or link at
the other intersection point.
(ii) Any vessel that enters the waters described in paragraph
(d)(11)(i) of this section and that is required to have a Federal
Atlantic sea scallop fishery permit must have the chain mat
configuration installed on all dredges for the duration of the trip.
(iii) Vessels subject to the requirements in paragraphs (d)(11)(i)
and (d)(11)(ii) of this section transiting waters west of 71[deg] W.
long., from the shoreline to the outer boundary of the Exclusive
Economic Zone, will be exempted from the chain-mat requirements
provided the dredge gear is stowed in accordance with Sec. 648.2 and
there are no scallops on-board.
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
3. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
4. In Sec. 648.10, paragraphs (e)(5)(iii) and (f)(4) are revised, and
(f)(6) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 648.10 VMS and DAS requirements for vessel owners/operators.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) * * *
(iii) DAS counting for a vessel that is under the VMS notification
requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, with the exception of
vessels that have elected to fish exclusively in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area on a particular trip, as described in paragraph (e)(5) of
this section, begins with the first location signal received showing
that the vessel crossed the VMS Demarcation Line after leaving port.
DAS counting ends with the first location signal received showing that
the vessel crossed the VMS Demarcation Line upon its return to port,
unless the vessel is declared into a limited access scallop DAS trip
and, upon its return to port, declares out of the scallop fishery
shoreward of the VMS Demarcation Line at or south of 39[deg] N. lat.,
as specified in paragraph (f)(6) of this section, and lands in a port
south of 39[deg] N. lat.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) Catch reports. (i) The owner or operator of a limited access or
LAGC IFQ vessel that fishes for, possesses, or retains scallops, and is
not fishing under a NE Multispecies DAS or sector allocation, must
submit reports through the VMS, in accordance with instructions to be
provided by the Regional Administrator, for each day fished, including
open area trips, access area trips as described in Sec. 648.60(a)(9),
and trips accompanied by a NMFS-approved observer. The reports must be
submitted for each day (beginning at 0000 hr and ending at 2400 hr) and
not later than 0900 hr of the following day. Such reports must include
the following information:
(A) VTR serial number;
(B) Date fish were caught;
(C) Total pounds of scallop meats kept;
(D) Total pounds of all fish kept.
(ii) Scallop Pre-Landing Notification Form for IFQ and NGOM
vessels. A vessel issued an IFQ or NGOM scallop permit must report
through VMS, using the Scallop Pre-Landing Notification Form, the
amount of any scallops kept on each trip declared as a scallop trip,
including declared scallop trips where no scallops were landed. In
addition, vessels with an IFQ or NGOM permit must submit a Scallop Pre-
Landing Notification Form on trips that are not declared as scallop
trips, but on which scallops are kept incidentally. A limited access
vessel that also holds an IFQ or NGOM permit must submit the Scallop
Pre-Landing Notification Form only when fishing under the provisions of
the vessel's IFQ or NGOM permit. VMS Scallop Pre-Landing Notification
forms must be submitted no less than 6 hours prior to arrival, or, if
fishing ends less than 6 hours before arrival, immediately after
fishing ends. If scallops will be landed, the report must include the
vessel operator's permit number, the amount of scallop meats in pounds
to be landed, the number of bushels of in-shell scallops to be landed,
the estimated time of arrival in port, the landing port and state where
the scallops will be offloaded, the VTR serial number recorded from
that trip's VTR (the same VTR serial number as reported to the dealer),
and whether any scallops were caught in the NGOM. If no scallops will
be landed, a vessel issued an IFQ or NGOM scallop permit must provide
only the vessel's captain/operator's permit number, the VTR serial
number recorded from that trip's VTR (the same VTR serial number as
reported to the dealer), and confirmation that no scallops will be
landed. A vessel issued an IFQ or NGOM scallop permit may provide a
corrected report. If the report is being submitted as a correction of a
prior report, the information entered into the notification form will
replace the data previously submitted in the prior report. Submitting a
correction does not prevent NMFS from pursuing an enforcement action
for any false reporting.
(iii) Scallop Pre-Landing Notification Form for Limited Access
Vessels fishing on Scallop Access Area Trips. A limited access vessel
on a declared Sea Scallop Access Area trip must report through VMS,
using the Scallop Pre-Landing Notification Form, the amount of any
scallops kept on each access area trip, including declared access area
trips where no scallops were landed. The report must be submitted no
less than 6 hours before arrival, or, if fishing ends less than 6 hours
before arrival, immediately after fishing ends. If scallops will be
landed, the report must include the vessel operator's permit number,
the amount of scallop meats in pounds to be landed, the number of
bushels of in-shell scallops to be landed, the estimated time of
arrival, the landing port and state where the scallops will be
offloaded, and the VTR serial number recorded from that trip's VTR (the
same VTR serial number as reported to the dealer). If no scallops will
be landed, a limited access vessel on a declared Sea Scallop Access
Area trip must provide only the vessel's captain/operator's permit
number, the VTR serial number recorded from that trip's VTR (the same
VTR serial number as reported to the dealer), and confirmation that no
scallops will be landed. A limited access scallop vessel may provide a
corrected report. If the report is being submitted as a correction of a
prior report, the information entered into the notification form will
replace the data previously submitted in the prior report. Submitting a
correction
[[Page 13815]]
does not prevent NMFS from pursuing an enforcement action for any false
reporting. A vessel may not offload its catch from a Sea Scallop Access
Area trip at more than one location per trip.
(iv) Scallop Pre-Landing Notification Form for Limited Access
Vessels on a Declared DAS Trip Landing Scallops at Ports Located at or
South of 39[deg] N. Lat. In order to end a declared Sea Scallop DAS
trip and steam south of 39[deg] N. lat., a limited access vessel must
first report through VMS, using the Scallop Pre-Landing Notification
Form, the amount of any scallops kept on its DAS trip. Upon crossing
shoreward of the VMS Demarcation Line at or south of 39[deg] N. lat.,
the Scallop Pre-Landing Notification form must be submitted. The report
must include the vessel operator's permit number, the amount of scallop
meats in pounds to be landed, the estimated time of arrival in port,
the landing port and state where the scallops will be offloaded, and
the VTR serial number recorded from that trip's VTR (the same VTR
serial number as reported to the dealer). Prior to crossing seaward of
the VMS Demarcation Line for the transit to a southern port at or south
of 39[deg] N. lat., the vessel must declare out of the scallop fishery.
A limited access scallop vessel may provide a corrected report. If the
report is being submitted as a correction of a prior report, the
information entered into the notification form will replace the data
previously submitted in the prior report. Submitting a correction does
not prevent NMFS from pursuing an enforcement action for any false
reporting.
* * * * *
(6) Limited access scallop vessels fishing under the DAS Program
and landing scallops at ports south of 39[deg] N. Lat. If landing
scallops at a port located at or south of 39[deg] N. lat., a limited
access vessel participating in the scallop DAS program may end its DAS
trip once it has crossed shoreward of the VMS Demarcation Line at or
south of 39[deg] N. lat. by declaring out of the scallop fishery and
submitting the Scallop Pre-Landing Notification Form, as specified at
paragraph (f)(4)(iv) of this section. Once declared out of the scallop
fishery, and the vessel has submitted the Scallop Pre-Landing
Notification Form, the vessel may cross seaward of the VMS Demarcation
Line and steam to a port at or south of 39[deg] N. lat., to land
scallops while not on a DAS. Such vessels that elect to change their
declaration to steam to ports with scallops onboard and not accrue DAS
must comply with all the requirements at Sec. 648.53(f)(3).
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 648.14, paragraphs (i)(2)(ii)(B), (i)(2)(iii)(C),
(i)(2)(v)(D), (i)(3)(iii)(C), (i)(3)(iii)(D), (i)(4)(i)(C), (i)(5)(iii)
are revised and paragraphs (i)(2)(iv)(F) and (i)(2)(v)(E) are added to
read as follows:
Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) While under or subject to the DAS allocation program, in
possession of more than 40 lb (18.1 kg) of shucked scallops or 5 bu
(1.76 hL) of in-shell scallops, or fishing for scallops in the EEZ:
(1) Fish with, or have available for immediate use, trawl nets of
mesh smaller than the minimum size specified in Sec. 648.51(a)(2).
(2) Fail to comply with any chafing gear or other gear obstruction
restrictions specified in Sec. 648.51(a)(3).
(3) Fail to comply with the turtle deflector dredge vessel gear
restrictions specified in Sec. 648.51(b)(5), and turtle dredge chain
mat requirements in Sec. 223.206(d)(11) of this title.
(4) Fish under the small dredge program specified in Sec.
648.51(e), with, or while in possession of, a dredge that exceeds 10.5
ft (3.2 m) in overall width, as measured at the widest point in the
bail of the dredge.
(5) Fish under the small dredge program specified in Sec.
648.51(e) with more persons on board the vessel, including the
operator, than specified in Sec. 648.51(e)(3),unless otherwise
authorized by the Regional Administrator.
(6) Participate in the DAS allocation program with more persons on
board the vessel than the number specified in Sec. 648.51(c),
including the operator, when the vessel is not docked or moored in
port, unless otherwise authorized by the Regional Administrator.
(7) Fish in the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, as described in Sec.
648.59(a), with more persons on board the vessel than the number
specified in Sec. 648.51(c) or Sec. 648.51(e)(3)(i), unless otherwise
authorized by the Regional Administrator.
(8) Have a shucking or sorting machine on board a vessel that
shucks scallops at sea while fishing under the DAS allocation program,
unless otherwise authorized by the Regional Administrator.
(9) Fish with, possess on board, or land scallops while in
possession of trawl nets, when fishing for scallops under the DAS
allocation program, unless exempted as provided for in Sec. 648.51(f).
(10) Fail to comply with the gear restrictions described in Sec.
648.51.
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
(C) Fish for or land per trip, or possess at any time, scallops in
the NGOM scallop management area after notification in the Federal
Register that the NGOM scallop management area TAC has been harvested,
as specified in Sec. 648.62, unless the vessel possesses or lands
scallops that were harvested south of 42[deg]20' N. lat. and the vessel
only transits the NGOM scallop management area with the vessel's
fishing gear properly stowed and unavailable for immediate use in
accordance with Sec. 648.2 or unless the vessel is fishing exclusively
in state waters and is participating in an approved state waters
exemption program as specified in Sec. 648.54.
* * * * *
(iv) * * *
(D) Fail to comply with any requirements for declaring out of the
DAS allocation program and steaming to land scallops at ports located
at or south of 39[deg] N. lat., as specified in Sec. 648.53(f)(3).
(E) Possess on board or land in-shell scallops if declaring out of
the DAS allocation program and steaming to land scallops at ports
located at or south of 39[deg] N. lat.
(v) * * *
(D) Once declared into the scallop fishery in accordance with Sec.
648.10(f), change its VMS declaration until the trip has ended and
scallop catch has been offloaded, except as specified at Sec.
648.53(f)(3).
(E) Fail to submit a scallop access area pre-landing notification
form through VMS as specified at Sec. 648.10(f)(4)(iii).
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(C) Declare into the NGOM scallop management area after the
effective date of a notification published in the Federal Register
stating that the NGOM scallop management area TAC has been harvested as
specified in Sec. 648.62, unless the vessel is fishing exclusively in
state waters, declared a state-waters only NGOM trip, and is
participating in an approved state waters exemption program as
specified in Sec. 648.54.
(D) Fish for, possess, or land scallops in or from the NGOM scallop
management area after the effective date of a notification published in
the Federal Register that the NGOM scallop management area TAC has been
harvested, as specified in Sec. 648.62, unless the vessel possesses or
lands scallops that were harvested south of
[[Page 13816]]
42[deg]20' N. lat., the vessel is transiting the NGOM scallop
management area, and the vessel's fishing gear is properly stowed and
unavailable for immediate use in accordance with Sec. 648.2 or unless
the vessel is fishing exclusively in state waters, declared a state-
waters only NGOM trip, and is participating in an approved state waters
exemption program as specified in Sec. 648.54.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Declare into the NGOM scallop management area after the
effective date of a notification published in the Federal Register
stating that the NGOM scallop management area TAC has been harvested as
specified in Sec. 648.62, unless the vessel is fishing exclusively in
state waters, declared a state-waters only NGOM trip, and is
participating in an approved state waters exemption program as
specified in Sec. 648.54.
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(iii) Fish for, possess, or land scallops in state or Federal
waters of the NGOM management area after the effective date of
notification in the Federal Register that the NGOM scallop management
area TAC has been harvested as specified in Sec. 648.62, unless the
vessel is fishing exclusively in state waters, declared a state-waters
only NGOM trip, and is participating in an approved state waters
exemption program as specified in Sec. 648.54.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 648.51:
0
a. Paragraphs (b)(4)(iv) and (v), (b)(5)(ii)(A) introductory text,
(b)(5)(ii)(A)(3), and (c) introductory text are revised;
0
b. Paragraph (c)(1) is removed and reserved; and
0
c. Paragraph (e)(3)(i) is revised.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 648.51 Gear and crew restrictions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) Twine top restrictions as a proactive accountability measure
for bycatch. In addition to the minimum twine top mesh size specified
in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, limited access and limited access
general category IFQ vessels may not fish for scallops with a dredge
having more than seven rows of non-overlapping steel rings unobstructed
by netting or any other material between the terminus of the dredge
(club stick) and the net material on the top of the dredge (twine top)
(a copy of a diagram showing a schematic of a legal dredge with twine
top is available from the Regional Administrator upon request).
(v) Measurement of twine top mesh size. Twine top mesh size is
measured by using a wedge-shaped gauge having a taper of 0.79 inches (2
cm) in 3.15 inches (8 cm) and a thickness of 0.09 inches (2.3 mm),
inserted into the meshes under a pressure or pull of 17.64 lb (8 kg).
The mesh size is the average of the measurements of any series of 20
consecutive meshes for twine tops having 75 or more meshes, and 10
consecutive meshes for twine tops having fewer than 75 meshes. The mesh
in the twine top must be measured along the length of the twine top,
running parallel to a longitudinal axis, and be at least five meshes
away from where the twine top mesh meets the rings, running parallel to
the long axis of the twine top.
(5) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) From May 1 through November 30, any limited access scallop
vessel using a dredge, regardless of dredge size or vessel permit
category, or any LAGC IFQ scallop vessel fishing with a dredge with a
width of 10.5 ft (3.2 m) or greater, that is fishing for scallops in
waters west of 71[deg] W long., from the shoreline to the outer
boundary of the EEZ, must use a TDD. The TDD requires five
modifications to the rigid dredge frame, as specified in paragraphs
(b)(5)(ii)(A)(1) through (b)(5)(ii)(A)(5) of this section. See
paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(D) of this section for more specific descriptions
of the dredge elements mentioned below.
* * * * *
(3) All bale bars must be removed, except the outer bale (single or
double) bars and the center support beam, leaving an otherwise
unobstructed space between the cutting bar and forward bale wheels, if
present. The center support beam must be less than 6 inches (15.24 cm)
wide. For the purpose of flaring and safe handling of the dredge, a
minor appendage not to exceed 12 inches (30.5 cm) in length may be
attached to each of the outer bale bars. If the flaring bar is attached
in a u-shape, none of the three sides of the flaring bar shall exceed
12 inches (30.5 cm) in length. The appendage shall at no point be
closer than 12 inches (30.5 cm) to the cutting bar.
* * * * *
(c) Crew restrictions. A limited access vessel participating in or
subject to the scallop DAS allocation program may have no more than
seven people aboard, including the operator, and a limited access
vessel participating in the Sea Scallop Area Access Program as
specified in Sec. 648.60 may have no more than eight people aboard,
including the operator, when not docked or moored in port, except as
follows:
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) A vessel participating in the Sea Scallop Area Access Program
as specified in Sec. 648.60 may have no more than six people,
including the operator, on board.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 648.53, paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and (b)(4) are revised,
paragraph (f)(3) is added, and paragraph (g)(1) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 648.53 Acceptable biological catch (ABC), annual catch limits
(ACL), annual catch targets (ACT), DAS allocations, and individual
fishing quotas (IFQ).
(a) Scallop fishery ABC. The ABC for the scallop fishery shall be
established through the framework adjustment process specified in Sec.
648.55 and is equal to the overall scallop fishery ACL minus discards.
The ABC/ACL, after discards are removed, shall be divided as sub-ACLs
between limited access vessels, limited access vessels that are fishing
under a LAGC permit, and LAGC vessels as specified in paragraphs (a)(3)
and (a)(4) of this section, after deducting the scallop incidental
catch target TAC specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
observer set-aside specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this section, and
research set-aside specified in Sec. 648.56(d). The ABC/ACL for the
2016 fishing year is subject to change through a future framework
adjustment.
(1) ABC/ACL for fishing years 2015 through 2016, excluding
discards, shall be:
(i) 2015: 25,352 mt.
(ii) 2016: 31,807 mt.
(2) Scallop incidental catch target TAC. The annual incidental
catch target TAC for vessels with incidental catch scallop permits is
22.7 mt.
(3) Limited access fleet sub-ACL and ACT. The limited access
scallop fishery shall be allocated 94.5 percent of the ACL specified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, after deducting incidental catch,
observer set-aside, and research set-aside, as specified in this
paragraph (a)(3). ACT for the limited access scallop fishery shall be
established through the framework adjustment process described in Sec.
648.55. DAS specified in paragraph (b) of this section shall be based
on the ACTs specified in paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section. The
limited access fleet sub-ACL and ACT for the 2016 fishing year are
subject to change through a future framework adjustment.
[[Page 13817]]
(i) The limited access fishery sub-ACLs for fishing years 2015 and
2016 are:
(A) 2015: 23,161 mt.
(B) 2016: 29,200 mt.
(ii) The limited access fishery ACTs for fishing years 2015 and
2016 are:
(A) 2015: 19,311 mt.
(B) 2016: 23,016 mt.
(4) LAGC fleet sub-ACL. The sub-ACL for the LAGC IFQ fishery shall
be equal to 5.5 percent of the ACL specified in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section, after deducting incidental catch, observer set-aside, and
research set-aside, as specified in this paragraph (a)(4). The LAGC IFQ
fishery ACT shall be equal to the LAGC IFQ fishery's ACL. The ACL for
the LAGC IFQ fishery for vessels issued only a LAGC IFQ scallop permit
shall be equal to 5 percent of the ACL specified in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section, after deducting incidental catch, observer set-aside, and
research set-aside, as specified in this paragraph (a)(4). The ACL for
the LAGC IFQ fishery for vessels issued only both a LAGC IFQ scallop
permit and a limited access scallop permit shall be 0.5 percent of the
ACL specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, after deducting
incidental catch, observer set-aside, and research set-aside, as
specified in this paragraph (a)(4).
(i) The ACLs for fishing years 2015 and 2016 for LAGC IFQ vessels
without a limited access scallop permit are:
(A) 2015: 1,225 mt.
(B) 2016: 1,545 mt.
(ii) The ACLs for fishing years 2015 and 2016 for vessels issued
both a LAGC and a limited access scallop permits are:
(A) 2015: 123 mt.
(B) 2016: 154 mt.
(b) * * *
(1) Landings per unit effort (LPUE). LPUE is an estimate of the
average amount of scallops, in pounds, that the limited access scallop
fleet lands per DAS fished. The estimated LPUE is the average LPUE for
all limited access scallop vessels fishing under DAS, and shall be used
to calculate DAS specified in paragraph (b)(4) of this section, the DAS
reduction for the AM specified in paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this section,
and the observer set-aside DAS allocation specified in paragraph (g)(1)
of this section. LPUE shall be:
(i) 2015 fishing year: 2,594 lb/DAS (1,171 kg/DAS).
(ii) 2016 fishing year: 2,715 lb/DAS (1,175 kg/DAS).
(iii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(4) Each vessel qualifying for one of the three DAS categories
specified in the table in this paragraph (b)(4) (full-time, part-time,
or occasional) shall be allocated the maximum number of DAS for each
fishing year it may participate in the open area limited access scallop
fishery, according to its category, excluding carryover DAS in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. DAS allocations shall be
determined by distributing the portion of ACT specified in paragraph
(a)(3)(ii) of this section, as reduced by access area allocations
specified in Sec. 648.59, and dividing that amount among vessels in
the form of DAS calculated by applying estimates of open area LPUE
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. Allocation for part-time
and occasional scallop vessels shall be 40 percent and 8.33 percent of
the full-time DAS allocations, respectively. The annual open area DAS
allocations for each category of vessel for the fishing years indicated
are as follows:
Scallop Open Area DAS Allocations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit category 2015 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full-Time........................................ 30.86 26
Part-Time........................................ 12.94 10.40
Occasional....................................... 2.58 2.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Accountability measures (AM). Unless the limited access AM
exception is implemented in accordance with the provision specified in
paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of this section, if the ACL specified in
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section is exceeded for the applicable
fishing year, the DAS specified in paragraph (b)(4) of this section for
each limited access vessel shall be reduced by an amount equal to the
amount of landings in excess of the ACL divided by the applicable LPUE
for the fishing year in which the AM will apply as specified in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, then divided by the number of scallop
vessels eligible to be issued a full-time limited access scallop
permit. For example, assuming a 300,000-lb (136-mt) overage of the ACL
in 2011, an open area LPUE of 2,500 lb (1.13 mt) per DAS in 2012, and
313 full-time vessels, each full-time vessel's DAS would be reduced by
0.38 DAS (300,000 lb (136 mt)/2,500 lb (1.13 mt) per DAS = 120 lb (0.05
mt) per DAS/313 vessels = 0.38 DAS per vessel). Deductions in DAS for
part-time and occasional scallop vessels shall be 40 percent and 8.33
percent of the full-time DAS deduction, respectively, as calculated
pursuant to this paragraph (b)(4)(ii). The AM shall take effect in the
fishing year following the fishing year in which the overage occurred.
For example, landings in excess of the ACL in fishing year 2011 would
result in the DAS reduction AM in fishing year 2012. If the AM takes
effect, and a limited access vessel uses more open area DAS in the
fishing year in which the AM is applied, the vessel shall have the DAS
used in excess of the allocation after applying the AM deducted from
its open area DAS allocation in the subsequent fishing year. For
example, a vessel initially allocated 32 DAS in 2011 uses all 32 DAS
prior to application of the AM. If, after application of the AM, the
vessel's DAS allocation is reduced to 31 DAS, the vessel's DAS in 2012
would be reduced by 1 DAS.
(iii) Limited access AM exception. If NMFS determines, in
accordance with paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this section, that the fishing
mortality rate associated with the limited access fleet's landings in a
fishing year is less than 0.34, the AM specified in paragraph
(b)(4)(ii) of this section shall not take effect. The fishing mortality
rate of 0.34 is the fishing mortality rate that is one standard
deviation below the fishing mortality rate for the scallop fishery ACL,
currently estimated at 0.38.
(iv) Limited access fleet AM and exception provision timing. The
Regional Administrator shall determine whether the limited access fleet
exceeded its ACL specified in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section by
July of the fishing year following the year for which landings are
being evaluated. On or about July 1, the Regional Administrator shall
notify the New England Fishery Management Council of the determination
of whether or not the ACL for the limited access fleet was exceeded,
and the amount of landings in excess of the ACL. Upon this
notification, the Scallop Plan Development Team (PDT) shall evaluate
the overage and determine if the fishing mortality rate associated with
total landings by the limited access scallop fleet is less than 0.34.
On or about September 1 of each year, the Scallop PDT shall notify the
Council of its determination, and the Council, on or about September
30, shall make a recommendation, based on the Scallop PDT findings,
concerning whether to invoke the limited access AM exception. If NMFS
concurs with the Scallop PDT's recommendation to invoke the limited
access AM exception, in accordance with the APA, the limited access AM
shall not be implemented. If NMFS does not concur, in accordance with
the APA, the limited access AM shall be implemented as soon as possible
after September 30 each year.
* * * * *
[[Page 13818]]
(f) * * *
(3) Limited access scallop vessels fishing under the DAS Program
and landing scallops at a port located at or south of 39[deg] N. Lat.
If landing scallops at a port located at or south of 39[deg] N. lat., a
limited access vessel participating in the scallop DAS program may end
its DAS trip once shoreward of the VMS Demarcation Line at or south of
39[deg] N. lat. by declaring out of the scallop fishery. Once declared
out of the scallop fishery, the vessel may cross seaward of the VMS
Demarcation Line and steam to ports at or south of 39[deg] N. lat., to
land scallops while not on a DAS, provided that the vessel complies
with the following requirements:
(i) The vessel must submit a Scallop Pre-landing Notification Form,
as specified at Sec. 648.10(f)(4)(iv);
(ii) The vessel's fishing gear is stowed and not available for
immediate use as defined in Sec. 648.2;
(iii) The vessel must return directly to port and offload scallops;
(iv) The vessel must land scallops at a port located at or south of
39[deg] N. lat.; and
(v) The vessel may not possess in-shell scallops.
(g) Set-asides for observer coverage. (1) To help defray the cost
of carrying an observer, 1 percent of the ABC/ACL specified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be set aside to be used by
vessels that are assigned to take an at-sea observer on a trip. The
total TAC for observer set aside is 254 mt in fishing year 2015, and
318 mt in fishing year 2016.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 648.54, paragraphs (a)(4) and (b) through (g) are revised
and paragraph (h) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 648.54 State waters exemption.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) The Regional Administrator has determined that the State of
Maine has a scallop fishery conservation program for its scallop
fishery that does not jeopardize the biomass and fishing mortality/
effort limit objectives of the Scallop FMP. A vessel fishing in State
of Maine waters may fish under the State of Maine state waters
exemption, subject to the exemptions specified in paragraphs (b) and
(c) of this section, provided the vessel is in compliance with
paragraphs (e) through (g) of this section.
(b) Limited access scallop vessel exemption. Any vessel issued a
limited access scallop permit is exempt from the DAS requirements
specified in Sec. 648.53(b) while fishing exclusively landward of the
outer boundary of the waters of a state that has been issued a state
waters exemption under paragraph (a)(4) of this section, provided the
vessel complies with paragraphs (f) through (h) of this section.
(c) Gear and possession limit restrictions. Any vessel issued a
limited access scallop permit, an LAGC NGOM, or an LAGC IFQ scallop
permit is exempt from the minimum twine top mesh size for scallop
dredge gear specified in Sec. Sec. 648.51(b)(2) and (b)(4)(iv) while
fishing exclusively landward of the outer boundary of the waters of the
State of Maine under the state waters exemption specified in paragraph
(a)(4) of this section, provided the vessel is in compliance with
paragraphs (d) through (g) of this section.
(d) NGOM closure exemption. Any vessel issued a Federal scallop
permit may be exempt from the regulations specified in Sec.
648.52(b)(2) requiring that once the NGOM Federal hard TAC is reached,
no vessel issued a scallop permit may fish in the NGOM area. This
exemption, which a state must apply for through the process specified
in paragraph (a) of this section, would allow vessels to continue to
fish for scallops within a state's waters inside the NGOM. A state
applying for this exemption must clarify to which scallop permit types
this exemption would apply.
(e) Notification requirements. Vessels fishing under the exemptions
specified in paragraph (b) and/or (c) of this section must notify the
Regional Administrator in accordance with the provisions of Sec.
648.10(e).
(f) Restriction on fishing in the EEZ. A vessel fishing under a
state waters exemption may not fish in the EEZ during the time in which
it is fishing under the state waters exemption, as declared under the
notification requirements of this section.
(g) Duration of exemption. An exemption expires upon a change in
the vessel's name or ownership, or upon notification through VMS by the
participating vessel's owner.
(h) Applicability of other provisions of this part. A vessel
fishing under the exemptions provided by paragraphs (b) and/or (c) of
this section remains subject to all other requirements of this part.
0
7. Section 648.58 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.58 Rotational Closed Areas.
(a) Closed Area I Closed Area-- No vessel may fish for scallops in,
or possess or land scallops from, the area known as the Closed Area I
Closed Area. No vessel may possess scallops in the Closed Area I Closed
Area, unless such vessel is only transiting the area as provided in
paragraph (e) of this section. The Closed Area I Closed Area is defined
by straight lines connecting the following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request), and so that the line connecting points
CAIA3 and CAIA4 is the same as the portion of the western boundary line
of Closed Area I, defined in Sec. 648.81(a)(1), that lies between
points CAIA3 and CAIA4:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAIA1.................................... 41[deg]26' N. 68[deg]30' W. ........
CAIA2.................................... 40[deg]58' N. 68[deg]30' W. ........
CAIA3.................................... 40[deg]54.95' N. 68[deg]53.37' W. (\1\)
CAIA4.................................... 41[deg]04.32' N. 69[deg]01.27' W. (\1\)
CAIA1.................................... 41[deg]26' N. 68[deg]30' W. ........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ From Point CAIA3 to Point CAIA4 along the western boundary of Closed Area I, defined in Sec. 648.81(a)(1).
(b) Closed Area II Closed Area-- No vessel may fish for scallops
in, or possess or land scallops from, the area known as the Closed Area
II Closed Area. No vessel may possess scallops in the Closed Area II
Closed Area. The Closed Area II Closed Area is defined by straight
lines, except where noted, connecting the following points in the order
stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available from the
Regional Administrator upon request):
[[Page 13819]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAIIA1................................... 41[deg]00' N. 67[deg]20' W. ........
CAIIA2................................... 41[deg]00' N. 66[deg]35.8' W. ........
CAIIA3................................... 41[deg]18.6' N. (\1\) (\2\)
CAIIA4................................... 41[deg]30' N. (\3\) (\2\)
CAIIA5................................... 41[deg]30' N. 67[deg]20' W. ........
CAIIA1................................... 41[deg]00' N. 67[deg]20' W. ........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 41[deg]18.6' N. lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41[deg]18.6'
N. lat. and 66[deg]25.01' W. long.
\2\ From Point CAIIA3 connected to Point CAIIA4 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
\3\ The intersection of 41[deg]30' N. lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41[deg]30' N.
lat., 66[deg]34.73' W. long.
(c) Nantucket Lightship Closed Area-- No vessel may fish for
scallops in, or possess or land scallops from, the area known as the
Nantucket Lightship Closed Area. No vessel may possess scallops in the
Nantucket Lightship Closed Area, unless such vessel is only transiting
the area as provided in paragraph (e) of this section. The Nantucket
Lightship Closed Area is defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this
area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request),
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NLAA1.......................... 40[deg]50' N. 69[deg]30' W.
NLAA2.......................... 40[deg]50' N. 69[deg]00' W.
NLAA3.......................... 40[deg]33' N. 69[deg]00' W.
NLAA4.......................... 40[deg]33' N. 68[deg]48' W.
NLAA5.......................... 40[deg]20' N. 68[deg]48' W.
NLAA6.......................... 40[deg]20' N. 69[deg]30' W.
NLAA1.......................... 40[deg]50' N. 69[deg]30' W.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Elephant Trunk Closed Area-- No vessel may fish for scallops
in, or possess or land scallops from, the area known as the Elephant
Trunk Closed Area. No vessel may possess scallops in Elephant Trunk
Closed Area. The Elephant Trunk Closed Area is defined by straight
lines connecting the following points in the order stated (copies of a
chart depicting this area are available from the Regional Administrator
upon request).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ETCA 1......................... 38[deg]50' N. 74[deg]20' W.
ETCA 2......................... 38[deg]50' N. 73[deg]40' W.
ETCA 3......................... 38[deg]40' N. 73[deg]40' W.
ETCA 4......................... 38[deg]40' N. 73[deg]50' W.
ETCA 5......................... 38[deg]30' N. 73[deg]50' W.
ETCA 6......................... 38[deg]30' N. 74[deg]20' W.
ETCA 1......................... 38[deg]50' N. 74[deg]20' W.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Transiting. No vessel possessing scallops may enter or be in
the area(s) specified in paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section unless
the vessel is transiting the area and the vessel's fishing gear is
stowed and not available for immediate use as defined in Sec. 648.2,
or there is a compelling safety reason to be in such areas without such
gear being stowed. A vessel may only transit the Closed Area II Closed
Area, as described in paragraph (b) of this section, or the Elephant
Trunk Closed Area, as described in paragraph (d) of this section, if
there is a compelling safety reason for transiting the area and the
vessel's fishing gear is stowed and not available for immediate use as
defined in Sec. 648.2.
(f) Vessels fishing for species other than scallops. A vessel may
fish for species other than scallops within the closed areas specified
in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section as allowed in this part,
provided the vessel does not fish for, catch, or retain scallops or
intend to fish for, catch, or retain scallops. Declaration through VMS
that the vessel is fishing in the LAGC scallop fishery is deemed to be
an intent to fish for, catch, or retain scallops.
0
8. In Sec. 648.59:
0
a. Paragraphs (a), (b) introductory text, (b)(1), (c) introductory
text, and (c)(1) are revised;
0
b. Paragraph (c)(2) is removed and reserved;
0
c. Paragraphs (d) introductory text and (d)(1) are revised; and
0
d. Paragraphs (d)(2) and (e) are removed and reserved.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 648.59 Sea Scallop Access Areas.
(a) Mid-Atlantic Scallop Access Area--(1) Beginning March 1, 2015,
through February 28, 2017 (i.e., fishing years 2015 and 2016), a vessel
issued a scallop permit may not fish for, possess, or land scallops in
or from the area known as the Mid-Atlantic Access Area unless the
vessel is participating in, and complies with the requirements of, the
area access program described in Sec. 648.60. The Mid-Atlantic Access
Area is comprised of the following scallop access areas: The Delmarva
Scallop Access Area, as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section;
the Elephant Trunk Scallop Access Area, as described in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section; and the Hudson Canyon Scallop Access Area, as
described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(2) Delmarva Scallop Access Area. The Delmarva Scallop Access Area
is defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the
order stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available from
the Regional Administrator upon request):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DMV1........................... 38[deg]10' N. 74[deg]50' W.
DMV2........................... 38[deg]10' N. 74[deg]00' W.
DMV3........................... 37[deg]15' N. 74[deg]00' W.
DMV4........................... 37[deg]15' N. 74[deg]50' W.
DMV1........................... 38[deg]10' N. 74[deg]50' W.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Season. A vessel issued a scallop permit may not fish for,
possess, or land scallops in or from the area known as the Delmarva Sea
Scallop Access Area, described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
during the period of March 1, 2016, through March 31, 2016.
(3) Elephant Trunk Scallop Access Area. The Elephant Trunk Scallop
Access Area is defined by straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional Administrator upon request):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ETAA1.......................... 38[deg]30' N. 74[deg]20' W.
ETAA2.......................... 38[deg]30' N. 73[deg]50' W.
ETAA3.......................... 38[deg]40' N. 73[deg]50' W.
ETAA4.......................... 38[deg]40' N. 73[deg]40' W.
ETAA5.......................... 38[deg]50' N. 73[deg]40' W.
ETAA6.......................... 38[deg]50' N. 73[deg]30' W.
ETAA7.......................... 38[deg]10' N. 73[deg]30' W.
ETAA8.......................... 38[deg]10' N. 74[deg]20' W.
ETAA1.......................... 38[deg]30' N. 74[deg]20' W.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Hudson Canyon Scallop Access Area. The Hudson Canyon Scallop
Access Area is defined by straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional Administrator upon request):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
H1............................. 39[deg]30' N. 73[deg]10' W.
H2............................. 39[deg]30' N. 72[deg]30' W.
H3............................. 38[deg]30' N. 73[deg]30' W.
H4............................. 38[deg]50' N. 73[deg]30' W.
H5............................. 38[deg]50' N. 73[deg]42' W.
H1............................. 39[deg]30' N. 73[deg]10' W.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 13820]]
(b) Closed Area I Scallop Access Area--(1) From March 1, 2015,
through February 28, 2017 (i.e., fishing years 2015 and 2016), a vessel
issued a scallop permit may not fish for, possess, or land scallops in
or from, the area known as the Closed Area I Scallop Access Area,
described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, unless transiting in
accordance with paragraph (f) of this section. A vessel issued both a
NE multispecies permit and an LAGC scallop permit may not fish in an
approved SAP under Sec. 648.85 and under multispecies DAS in the
scallop access area, unless it complies with restrictions in paragraph
(b)(5)(ii)(C) of this section.
* * * * *
(c) Closed Area II Scallop Access Area--(1) From March 1, 2015,
through February 28, 2017 (i.e., fishing years 2015 and 2016), a vessel
issued a scallop permit may not fish for, possess, or land scallops in
or from, the area known as the Closed Area II Access Area, described in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, unless transiting in accordance with
paragraph (f) of this section. A vessel issued both a NE multispecies
permit and an LAGC scallop permit may not fish in an approved SAP under
Sec. 648.85 and under multispecies DAS in the scallop access area,
unless it complies with restrictions in paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(C) of this
section.
* * * * *
(d) Nantucket Lightship Scallop Access Area--(1) From March 1,
2015, through February 28, 2017 (i.e., fishing years 2015 and 2016), a
vessel issued a scallop permit may not fish for, possess, or land
scallops in or from the area known as the Nantucket Lightship Access
Area, described in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, unless transiting
pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section. A vessel issued both a NE
multispecies permit and an LAGC scallop permit may not fish in an
approved SAP under Sec. 648.85 and under multispecies DAS in the
scallop access area, unless it complies with restrictions in paragraph
(d)(5)(ii)(C) of this section.
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 648.60, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(3), (a)(5)(i), (a)(9), (c),
(e)(1), (g)(3)(i) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.60 Sea scallop access area program requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) VMS. Each vessel participating in the Sea Scallop Access Area
Program must have installed on board an operational VMS unit that meets
the minimum performance criteria specified in Sec. Sec. 648.9 and
648.10, and paragraphs (a)(9) and (f) of this section.
* * * * *
(3) Sea Scallop Access Area Allocations--(i) Limited access vessel
allocations.
(A) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, paragraphs
(a)(3)(i)(B) through (E) of this section specify the total amount of
scallops, in weight, that a limited access scallop vessel may harvest
from Sea Scallop Access Areas during applicable seasons specified in
Sec. 648.59. A vessel may not possess or land in excess of its scallop
allocation assigned to specific Sea Scallop Access Areas, unless
authorized by the Regional Administrator, as specified in paragraph (d)
of this section, unless the vessel owner has exchanged an area-specific
scallop allocation with another vessel owner for additional scallop
allocation in that area, as specified in paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this
section. A vessel may harvest its scallop allocation, as specified in
paragraph (a)(3)(B) of this section, on any number of trips in a given
fishing year, provided that no single trip exceeds the possession
limits specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this section, unless authorized
by the Regional Administrator, as specified in paragraphs (c) and (d)
of this section,
(B) Full-time scallop vessels. (1) In fishing year 2015, each full-
time vessel shall have a total of 51,000 lb (23,133 kg) of scallops
that may be harvested from the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, as defined in
Sec. 648.59(a).
(2) For the 2016 fishing year, each full-time vessel shall have a
total of 17,000 lb (7,711 kg) of scallops that may be harvested from
the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, as defined in Sec. 648.59(a), starting
on April 1, 2016.
(C) Part-time scallop vessels. (1) For the 2015 fishing year, each
part-time scallop vessel shall have a total of 20,400 lb (9,253 kg) of
scallop that may be harvested from the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, as
defined in Sec. 648.59(a).
(2) For the 2015 fishing year, each part-time scallop vessel shall
have a total of 10,200 lb (4,627 kg) of scallop that may be harvested
from the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, as defined in Sec. 648.59(a),
starting on April 1, 2016.
(D) Occasional scallop vessels. (1) For the 2015 fishing year, each
occasional scallop vessel shall have a total of 4,250 lb (1,928 kg) of
scallop that may be harvested from the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, as
defined in Sec. 648.59(a).
(2) For the 2016 fishing year, each occasional scallop vessel shall
have a total of 1,420 lb (644 kg) of scallop that may be harvested from
the Mid-Atlantic Access Area, as defined in Sec. 648.59(a), starting
on April 1, 2016.
(ii) One-for-one area access allocation exchanges. The owner of a
vessel issued a limited access scallop permit may exchange unharvested
scallop pounds allocated into one access area for another vessel's
unharvested scallop pounds allocated into another Sea Scallop Access
Area. These exchanges may only be made for the amount of the current
trip possession limit, as specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. For example, if the access area trip possession limit for
full-time vessels is 17,000 lb (7,711 kg), a full-time vessel may
exchange no less than 17,000 lb (7,711 kg), from one access area for no
more or less than 17,000 lb (7,711 kg) allocated to another vessel for
another access area. In addition, these exchanges may be made only
between vessels with the same permit category: A full-time vessel may
not exchange allocations with a part-time vessel, and vice versa.
Vessel owners must request these exchanges by submitting a completed
Access Area Allocation Exchange Form at least 15 days before the date
on which the applicant desires the exchange to be effective. Exchange
forms are available from the Regional Administrator upon request. Each
vessel owner involved in an exchange is required to submit a completed
Access Area Allocation Form. The Regional Administrator shall review
the records for each vessel to confirm that each vessel has enough
unharvested allocation remaining in a given access area to exchange.
The exchange is not effective until the vessel owner(s) receive a
confirmation in writing from the Regional Administrator that the
allocation exchange has been made effective. A vessel owner may
exchange equal allocations up to the current possession limit between
two or more vessels under his/her ownership. A vessel owner holding a
Confirmation of Permit History is not eligible to exchange allocations
between another vessel and the vessel for which a Confirmation of
Permit History has been issued.
* * * * *
(5) Possession and landing limits--(i) Scallop possession limits.
Unless authorized by the Regional Administrator, as specified in
paragraph (d) of this section, after declaring a trip into a Sea
Scallop Access Area, a vessel owner or operator of a limited access
scallop vessel may fish for, possess, and land, per trip, scallops, up
to the maximum amounts specified in the table in this paragraph (a)(5).
No vessel declared into the Access Areas as described in Sec.
648.59(a) through (e) may possess more than 50 bu (17.62 hL) of
[[Page 13821]]
in-shell scallops outside of the Access Areas described in Sec.
648.59(a) through (e).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit category possession limit
Fishing year --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full-time Part-time Occasional
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015................................. 17,000 lb (57,711 kg).. 10,200 lb (4,627 kg)... 1,420 lb (644kg).
2016................................. 17,000 lb (57,711 kg).. 10,200 lb (4,627 kg)... 1,420 lb (644kg).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(9) Reporting. The owner or operator must submit scallop catch
reports through the VMS, as specified in Sec. 648.10(f)(4)(i), and
limited access scallop access area pre-landing notification forms, as
specified in Sec. 648.10(f)(4)(iii).
* * * * *
(c) Access area scallop allocation carryover. Unless otherwise
specified in Sec. 648.59, a limited access scallop vessel operator may
fish any unharvested Scallop Access Area allocation from a given
fishing year within the first 60 days of the subsequent fishing year if
the Access Area is open. For example, if a full-time vessel has 7,000
lb (3,175 kg) remaining in the Hudson Canyon Access Area at the end of
fishing year 2013, that vessel may harvest 7,000 lb (3,175 kg) from its
2014 fishing year scallop access area allocation during the first 60
days that the Hudson Canyon Access Area is open in fishing year 2014
(March 1, 2014, through April 29, 2014). Unless otherwise specified in
Sec. 648.59, if an Access Area is not open in the subsequent fishing
year, then the unharvested scallop allocation would expire at the end
of the fishing year that the scallops were allocated. For example, if a
full-time vessel has 7,000 lb (3,175 kg) remaining in Closed Area II
Access Area at the end of a given fishing year, and that access area
would not open the subsequent fishing year, the 7,000 lb (3,175 kg) of
scallops would expire on the last day of the fishing year.
* * * * *
(e) Sea Scallop Research Set-Aside Harvest in Access Areas--(1)
Access Areas available for harvest of research set-aside (RSA). Unless
otherwise specified, RSA may be harvested in any access area that is
open in a given fishing year, as specified through a framework
adjustment and pursuant to Sec. 648.56. The amount of scallops that
can be harvested in each access area by vessels participating in
approved RSA projects shall be determined through the RSA application
review and approval process. The access areas open for RSA harvest for
fishing years 2015 and 2016 are:
(i) 2015: The Mid-Atlantic Scallop Access Area, as specified in
Sec. 648.59(a)
(ii) 2016: None.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(3) LAGC IFQ Access Area Trips. (i) An LAGC scallop vessel
authorized to fish in the Access Areas specified in Sec. 648.59(a)
through (e) may land scallops, subject to the possession limit
specified in Sec. 648.52(a), unless the Regional Administrator has
issued a notice that the number of LAGC IFQ access area trips have been
or are projected to be taken. The total number of LAGC IFQ trips in a
specified Access Area for fishing year 2015 and 2016 are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access area 2015 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mid-Atlantic Access Area................ 2,065 602
Closed Area 1........................... 0 0
Closed Area 2........................... 0 0
Nantucket Lightship..................... 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 648.64, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.64 Yellowtail flounder sub-ACLs and AMs for the scallop
fishery.
(a) As specified in Sec. 648.55(d), and pursuant to the biennial
framework adjustment process specified in Sec. 648.90, the scallop
fishery shall be allocated a sub-ACL for the Georges Bank and Southern
New England/Mid-Atlantic stocks of yellowtail flounder. The sub-ACLs
are specified in Sec. 648.90(a)(4)(iii)(C) of the NE multispecies
regulations.
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 648.65, paragraph (b)(3)(ii) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 648.64 Windowpane flounder sub-ACLs and AMs for the scallop
fishery.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) The maximum hanging ratio for a net, net material, or any
other material on the top of a scallop dredge (twine top) possessed or
used by vessels fishing with scallop dredge gear does not exceed 1.5:1
overall. An overall hanging ratio of 1.5:1 means that the twine top is
attached to the rings in a pattern of alternating 2 meshes per ring and
1 mesh per ring (counted at the bottom where the twine top connects to
the apron), for an overall average of 1.5 meshes per ring for the
entire width of the twine top. For example, an apron that is 40 rings
wide subtracting 5 rings one each side of the side pieces, yielding 30
rings, would only be able to use a twine top with 45 or fewer meshes so
that the overall ratio of meshes to rings did not exceed 1.5 (45
meshes/30 rings = 1.5).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-05650 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P