Proposed Collection; Comment Request; “Third-Party Submissions and Protests”, 13330-13332 [2015-05781]
Download as PDF
13330
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Notices
accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), the
Department intends to issue the final
results of its antidumping duty CCR not
later than 270 days after the date on
which the review was initiated.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(b)(l) and
777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.216(b) and 351.221(b)(1).
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–05830 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; ‘‘Third-Party Submissions
and Protests’’
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on proposed and/
or continuing information collections,
as required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 12, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0062 ThirdParty Submissions and Protests’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records
Management Division Director, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo,
Senior Legal Advisor, Office of Patent
Legal Administration, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–7728; or by email
to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with
‘‘Paperwork’’ in the subject line.
Additional information about this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:27 Mar 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is required
by 35 U.S.C. 131 et seq. to examine an
application for patent and, when
appropriate, issue a patent. The
provisions of 35 U.S.C. 122(c), 122(e),
131, and 151, as well as 37 CFR 1.290
and 1.291, limit the ability of a third
party to have information entered and
considered in, or to protest, a patent
application pending before the Office.
37 CFR 1.290 provides a mechanism
for third parties to submit to the
USPTO, for consideration and inclusion
in the record of a patent application,
any patents, published patent
applications, or other printed
publications of potential relevance to
the examination of the application.
A preissuance submission under 37
CFR 1.290 may be made in any nonprovisional utility, design, and plant
application, as well as in any continuing
application. A preissuance submission
under 37 CFR 1.290 must include a
concise description of the asserted
relevance of each document submitted,
and must be submitted within a certain
statutorily specified time period.
37 CFR 1.291 permits a member of the
public to file a protest against a pending
application. Protests pursuant to 37 CFR
1.291 are supported by a separate
statutory provision from third-party
submissions under 37 CFR 1.290 (35
U.S.C. 122(c) v. 35 U.S.C. 122(e)). As a
result, there are several differences
between protests and third-party
submissions.
For example, 37 CFR 1.291 permits
the submission of information that is
not permitted in a third-party
submission under 37 CFR 1.290.
Specifically, 37 CFR 1.291 provides for
the submission of information other
than publications, including any facts or
information adverse to patentability,
and arguments to that effect. Further, 37
CFR 1.291 requires a protest to include
a concise explanation of the relevance of
each item of information submitted.
Unlike the concise description of
relevance required for a preissuance
submission under 37 CFR 1.290, which
is limited to a description of a
document’s relevance, the concise
explanation for a protest under 37 CFR
1.291 allows for arguments against
patentability. Additionally, the
specified time period for submitting a
protest differs from the time period for
submitting third-party submissions, and
is impacted by whether the protest is
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accompanied by the written consent of
the applicant.
This information collection (the
information collected via third-party
submissions under 37 CFR 1.290 and
protests under 37 CFR 1.291) is
necessary so that the public may
contribute to the quality of issued
patents. The USPTO will use this
information, as appropriate, during the
patent examination process to assist in
evaluating the patent application.
II. Method of Collection
Electronically when using the USPTO
online filing system EFS-Web, or by
mail or hand delivery.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0062.
IC Instruments: The individual
instruments in this collection, as well as
their associated forms, are listed in the
table below.
TABLE 1—INFORMATION COLLECTION
INSTRUMENTS AND FORMS
IC
No.
Information
collection
instrument
1 ....
Third-Party Submissions in
Nonissued Application; electronic.
Third-Party Submissions in
Nonissued Application; paper.
Protests by the
Public Against
Pending Applications Under
37 CFR 1.291;
paper.
2 ....
3 ....
Form number
• No Form Associated.
• PTO/SB/429.
• No Form Associated.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; businesses or other forprofits; and not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,560 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public approximately 10 hours to gather
the necessary information, prepare the
appropriate form or other documents,
and submit the information to the
USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
15,600 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden
(Hourly): $6,068,400. The USPTO
expects that attorneys will complete the
instruments associated with this
information collection. The professional
hourly rate for an attorney is $389.
Using this hourly rate, the USPTO
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
13331
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Notices
estimates $6,068,400 per year for the
total hourly costs associated with
respondents.
TABLE 2—HOURLY COST BURDEN
1 ..................
2 ..................
3 ..................
Totals ...
Estimated time
for response
(minutes)
Information collection
instrument
Estimated annual
responses
Estimated annual
burden hours
Rate
($/hr)
Total cost
($/hr)
(a)
IC Number
(b)
(a) × (b) = (c)
(d)
(c) × (d) = (e)
Third-Party Submissions in
Nonissued Applications
(electronic).
Third-Party Submissions in
Nonissued Applications
(paper).
Protests by the Public Against
Pending Applications Under
37 CFR 1.291 (paper).
10 hours
1,500
15,000
$389.00
$5,835,000.00
10 hours
50
500
389.00
194,500.00
10 hours
10
100
389.00
38,900.00
.................................................
............................
1,560
15,600
............................
6,068,400.00
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden
(Non-Hourly): $237,619.25 per year.
There are no capital start-up,
recordkeeping or maintenance costs
associated with this information
collection. There are, however, annual
(non-hour) costs associated with this
information collection in the form of
filing fees and postage costs.
When submitting the information in
this collection to the USPTO
electronically, the applicant is strongly
urged to retain a copy of the file
submitted to the USPTO as evidence of
authenticity in addition to keeping the
acknowledgment receipt as clear
evidence of the date the file was
received by the USPTO. The USPTO
does not, however, require this
recordkeeping, and thus does not
consider this action to be a
recordkeeping cost imposed on the
applicant.
This collection has a non-hourly
annual cost burden in the form of filing
fees. 37 CFR 1.290 requires the payment
of the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(o) for
every ten documents, or fraction thereof,
listed in each third-party preissuance
submission. The USPTO provides an
exemption from this fee requirement
where a preissuance submission listing
three or fewer total documents is the
first preissuance submission submitted
in an application by a third party, or a
party in privity with the third party.
Taking the fee and exemption into
account, the USPTO estimates that the
average fee per submission for the thirdparty submissions is $180, with the
average fee for small entities totaling
$90.
There is no fee for filing protests
under 37 CFR 1.291 unless the filed
protest is the second or subsequent
protest by the same real party in
interest, in which case the 37 CFR
1.17(i) fee of $130 must be included (the
USPTO estimates 1 of the 10 protests
filed per year will trigger this fee). The
table below illustrates the total amount
of and distribution of filing fees
associated with this collection.
TABLE 3—NON-HOURLY COST BURDEN—FILING FEES
Responses (yr)
Information collection instrument
Filing fee ($)
Total non-hour
cost burden (yr)
(a)
IC Number
(b)
(a) × (b) = (c)
Third-Party Submissions in Nonissued Applications .............................
Third-Party Submissions in Nonissued Applications (small entity) .......
Protests by the public against pending applications under 37 CFR
1.291.
1,085
465
1
$180
90
130
$195,300.00
41,850.00
130.00
Total .....
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1–2 ..............
1–2 ..............
3 ..................
.................................................................................................................
1,551
............................
237,280.00
This collection also has a non-hourly
annual cost burden in the form of
postage costs. Customers may incur
postage costs when submitting the
Information Collection instruments
contained within this collection to the
USPTO by mail through the United
States Postal Service. The USPTO
estimates that the average first class
postage cost for a one-pound submission
mailed in a flat-rate envelope to be
$5.75. The USPTO further estimates that
the vast majority—roughly 98 percent—
of all paper submissions will be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:27 Mar 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
delivered by mail, with the remainder
delivered by hand delivery, for an
estimate that approximately 59
submissions will require postage.
Therefore, the estimated postage cost for
this collection will be $339.25.
The total non-hour respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
filing fees ($237,280) and postage costs
($339.25) is approximately $237,619.25
per year.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
13332
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Notices
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they will also become a matter of public
record.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director,
USPTO, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–05781 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Ocean Exploration Advisory Board
(OEAB); Notice of Public Meeting
Office of Ocean Exploration
and Research (OER), National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), Department of Commerce
(DOC).
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice sets forth the
schedule and proposed agenda of a
forthcoming meeting of the Ocean
Exploration Advisory Board (OEAB).
OEAB members will discuss and
provide advice on Federal ocean
exploration programs, with a particular
emphasis on National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Office of Ocean Exploration and
Research (OER) activities, in the areas
of: Strategic planning, current and
future exploration priorities, the
competitive grants process, citizen
exploration, the next National Forum on
Ocean Exploration, and other matters as
described in the agenda found on the
OEAB Web site at https://oeab/noaa.gov.
Time and Dates: The announced
meeting is scheduled for Tuesday,
March 31, 2015, from 8:30 a.m.–4:30
p.m. PDT, and Wednesday, April 1,
2015, from 9:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. PDT.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
Scripps Institution of Oceanography,
Seaside Forum, 8610 Kennel Way, La
Jolla, CA 92037.
Status: The meeting will be open to
public participation with a 15-minute
public comment period on Wednesday,
April 1, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. PDT (please
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:27 Mar 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
check the agenda on the Web site to
confirm the time).
The OEAB expects that public
statements at its meetings will not be
repetitive of previously submitted
verbal or written statements. In general,
each individual or group making a
verbal presentation will be limited to a
total time of three minutes. The
Designated Federal Officer should
receive written comments by March 24,
2015, to provide sufficient time for
OEAB review. Written comments
received after March 24, 2015, will be
distributed to the OEAB but may not be
reviewed prior to the meeting date.
Seats will be available on a first-come,
first-served basis.
Special Accomodations: These
meetings are physically accessible to
people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to
David McKinnie, Designated Federal
Officer, at (206) 526–6950 by March 16,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David McKinnie, Designated Federal
Officer, Ocean Exploration Advisory
Board, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, 7600 Sand
Point Way, NE., Seattle, WA 98115,
(206) 526–6950.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NOAA
established the OEAB under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and
legislation that gives the agency
statutory authority to operate an ocean
exploration program and to coordinate a
national program of ocean exploration.
The OEAB advises NOAA leaderships
on strategic planning, exploration
priorities, competitive ocean
exploration grant programs and other
matters as the NOAA Administrator
requests.
OEAB members represent government
agencies involved in ocean exploration,
the private sector, academic institutions,
and not-for-profit institutions involved
in all facets of ocean exploration—from
advanced technology to citizen
exploration.
In addition to advising NOAA
leadership, NOAA expects the OEAB to
play a leadership role in helping to
define and develop a national program
of ocean exploration—a network of
stakeholders and partnerships
advancing national priorities for ocean
exploration.
Dated: March 6, 2015.
Jason Donaldson,
Chief Financial Officer, Office of Oceanic and
Atmospheric Research, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–05775 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–KA–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–918]
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 5, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the Preliminary
Results of the fifth administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on steel wire garment hangers from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1
We invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. Based on our
analysis of the comments and
information received, we have not made
changes to the final margin calculations
of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Shanghai Wells’’).2 Listed below in
the ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative
Review’’ section of this notice are the
final dumping margins. The period of
review (‘‘POR’’) is October 1, 2012,
through September 31, 2013.3
DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh
Startup or Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5260 or (202) 482–
3927, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
1 See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 79 FR 65616 (November 5, 2014)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 The Department previously found that Shanghai
Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (‘‘HK
Wells’’) and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (USA) (‘‘Wells
USA’’) are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells
Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single
entity (collectively, ‘‘Shanghai Wells’’). Because
there were no changes in this review to the facts
that supported that decision, we continue to find
Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are
affiliated and that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells
comprise a single entity. See Steel Wire Garment
Hangers From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in
Part, of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761 (November 9, 2010),
unchanged in First Administrative Review of Steel
Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011).
3 The deadline for the final results was March 5,
2015, however, due to inclement weather, the
government was closed on March 5, 2015.
Therefore, the deadline for the final results falls on
the next business day, March 6, 2015.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13330-13332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05781]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; ``Third-Party Submissions
and Protests''
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 12, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0062 Third-Party Submissions and Protests'' in the subject line of the
message.
Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director,
Office of the Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of
Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7728;
or by email to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with ``Paperwork'' in the subject
line. Additional information about this collection is also available at
https://www.reginfo.gov under ``Information Collection Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is required
by 35 U.S.C. 131 et seq. to examine an application for patent and, when
appropriate, issue a patent. The provisions of 35 U.S.C. 122(c),
122(e), 131, and 151, as well as 37 CFR 1.290 and 1.291, limit the
ability of a third party to have information entered and considered in,
or to protest, a patent application pending before the Office.
37 CFR 1.290 provides a mechanism for third parties to submit to
the USPTO, for consideration and inclusion in the record of a patent
application, any patents, published patent applications, or other
printed publications of potential relevance to the examination of the
application.
A preissuance submission under 37 CFR 1.290 may be made in any non-
provisional utility, design, and plant application, as well as in any
continuing application. A preissuance submission under 37 CFR 1.290
must include a concise description of the asserted relevance of each
document submitted, and must be submitted within a certain statutorily
specified time period.
37 CFR 1.291 permits a member of the public to file a protest
against a pending application. Protests pursuant to 37 CFR 1.291 are
supported by a separate statutory provision from third-party
submissions under 37 CFR 1.290 (35 U.S.C. 122(c) v. 35 U.S.C. 122(e)).
As a result, there are several differences between protests and third-
party submissions.
For example, 37 CFR 1.291 permits the submission of information
that is not permitted in a third-party submission under 37 CFR 1.290.
Specifically, 37 CFR 1.291 provides for the submission of information
other than publications, including any facts or information adverse to
patentability, and arguments to that effect. Further, 37 CFR 1.291
requires a protest to include a concise explanation of the relevance of
each item of information submitted. Unlike the concise description of
relevance required for a preissuance submission under 37 CFR 1.290,
which is limited to a description of a document's relevance, the
concise explanation for a protest under 37 CFR 1.291 allows for
arguments against patentability. Additionally, the specified time
period for submitting a protest differs from the time period for
submitting third-party submissions, and is impacted by whether the
protest is accompanied by the written consent of the applicant.
This information collection (the information collected via third-
party submissions under 37 CFR 1.290 and protests under 37 CFR 1.291)
is necessary so that the public may contribute to the quality of issued
patents. The USPTO will use this information, as appropriate, during
the patent examination process to assist in evaluating the patent
application.
II. Method of Collection
Electronically when using the USPTO online filing system EFS-Web,
or by mail or hand delivery.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0062.
IC Instruments: The individual instruments in this collection, as
well as their associated forms, are listed in the table below.
Table 1--Information Collection Instruments and Forms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information
IC No. collection Form number
instrument
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................... Third-Party No Form
Submissions in Associated.
Nonissued
Application;
electronic.
2............................... Third-Party PTO/SB/
Submissions in 429.
Nonissued
Application;
paper.
3............................... Protests by the No Form
Public Against Associated.
Pending
Applications
Under 37 CFR
1.291; paper.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other
for-profits; and not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,560 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public approximately 10 hours to gather the necessary information,
prepare the appropriate form or other documents, and submit the
information to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 15,600 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Hourly): $6,068,400. The USPTO
expects that attorneys will complete the instruments associated with
this information collection. The professional hourly rate for an
attorney is $389. Using this hourly rate, the USPTO
[[Page 13331]]
estimates $6,068,400 per year for the total hourly costs associated
with respondents.
Table 2--Hourly Cost Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated time
IC Number Information collection for response Estimated annual Estimated annual Rate ($/hr) Total cost ($/
instrument (minutes) responses burden hours hr)
(a) (b) (a) x (b) = (c) (d) (c) x (d) = (e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.............................. Third-Party Submissions in 10 hours 1,500 15,000 $389.00 $5,835,000.00
Nonissued Applications
(electronic).
2.............................. Third-Party Submissions in 10 hours 50 500 389.00 194,500.00
Nonissued Applications
(paper).
3.............................. Protests by the Public 10 hours 10 100 389.00 38,900.00
Against Pending Applications
Under 37 CFR 1.291 (paper).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals..................... ............................. ................ 1,560 15,600 ................ 6,068,400.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (Non-Hourly): $237,619.25 per
year. There are no capital start-up, recordkeeping or maintenance costs
associated with this information collection. There are, however, annual
(non-hour) costs associated with this information collection in the
form of filing fees and postage costs.
When submitting the information in this collection to the USPTO
electronically, the applicant is strongly urged to retain a copy of the
file submitted to the USPTO as evidence of authenticity in addition to
keeping the acknowledgment receipt as clear evidence of the date the
file was received by the USPTO. The USPTO does not, however, require
this recordkeeping, and thus does not consider this action to be a
recordkeeping cost imposed on the applicant.
This collection has a non-hourly annual cost burden in the form of
filing fees. 37 CFR 1.290 requires the payment of the fee set forth in
37 CFR 1.17(o) for every ten documents, or fraction thereof, listed in
each third-party preissuance submission. The USPTO provides an
exemption from this fee requirement where a preissuance submission
listing three or fewer total documents is the first preissuance
submission submitted in an application by a third party, or a party in
privity with the third party. Taking the fee and exemption into
account, the USPTO estimates that the average fee per submission for
the third-party submissions is $180, with the average fee for small
entities totaling $90.
There is no fee for filing protests under 37 CFR 1.291 unless the
filed protest is the second or subsequent protest by the same real
party in interest, in which case the 37 CFR 1.17(i) fee of $130 must be
included (the USPTO estimates 1 of the 10 protests filed per year will
trigger this fee). The table below illustrates the total amount of and
distribution of filing fees associated with this collection.
Table 3--Non-Hourly Cost Burden--Filing Fees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information collection Total non-hour
IC Number instrument Responses (yr) Filing fee ($) cost burden (yr)
(a) (b) (a) x (b) = (c)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1-2.......................... Third-Party Submissions in 1,085 $180 $195,300.00
Nonissued Applications.
1-2.......................... Third-Party Submissions in 465 90 41,850.00
Nonissued Applications
(small entity).
3............................ Protests by the public 1 130 130.00
against pending
applications under 37 CFR
1.291.
-----------------------------------------------------
Total.................... ........................... 1,551 ................ 237,280.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This collection also has a non-hourly annual cost burden in the
form of postage costs. Customers may incur postage costs when
submitting the Information Collection instruments contained within this
collection to the USPTO by mail through the United States Postal
Service. The USPTO estimates that the average first class postage cost
for a one-pound submission mailed in a flat-rate envelope to be $5.75.
The USPTO further estimates that the vast majority--roughly 98
percent--of all paper submissions will be delivered by mail, with the
remainder delivered by hand delivery, for an estimate that
approximately 59 submissions will require postage. Therefore, the
estimated postage cost for this collection will be $339.25.
The total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in
the form of filing fees ($237,280) and postage costs ($339.25) is
approximately $237,619.25 per year.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
[[Page 13332]]
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they will also become a matter of public record.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-05781 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P