Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELTs), 12697-12698 [2015-05500]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices
3. Specified Data Elements
We will conduct the match using the
Social Security number, name, date of
birth, and VA claim number on both the
VA file and the Supplemental Security
Record.
4. Frequency of Matching
VA will furnish us with an electronic
file containing VA compensation and
pension payment data monthly. The
actual match will take place
approximately during the first week of
every month.
E. Inclusive Dates of the Matching
Program
The effective date of this matching
program is November 11, 2014 provided
that the following notice periods have
lapsed: 30 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register and 40
days after notice of the matching
program is sent to Congress and the
Office of Management and Budget. The
matching program will continue for 18
months from the effective date and, if
both agencies meet certain conditions, it
may extend for an additional 12 months
thereafter.
[FR Doc. 2015–05510 Filed 3–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 9058]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Prepare for the One Hundred and
Second Session of the International
Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Legal
Committee; Notice of Public Meeting
Dated: February 26, 2015.
Marc Zlomek,
U.S. Coast Guard Detailee, Office of Ocean
and Polar Affairs, Department of State.
The Department of State will conduct
an open meeting at 10:00 a.m. on
Friday, April 3rd, 2015, in Room 2E16–
06, United States Coast Guard
Headquarters, 2703 Martin Luther King
Jr. Ave SE., Washington, DC 20593–
7213. The primary purpose of the
meeting is to prepare for the one
hundred and second Session of the
International Maritime Organization’s
(IMO) Legal Committee to be held at the
IMO Headquarters, United Kingdom,
April 14–April 16, 2015.
The agenda items to be considered
include:
• Adoption of the agenda and report
on delegation credentials
• HNS Protocol, 2010
• Fair treatment of seafarers in the
event of a maritime accident
• Piracy
• Technical cooperation activities
related to maritime legislation
• Review of the status of conventions
and other treaty instruments emanating
from the Legal Committee
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Mar 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Members of the public may attend
this meeting up to the seating capacity
of the room. To facilitate the building
security process, and to request
reasonable accommodation, those who
plan to attend should contact the
meeting coordinator, Ms. Bronwyn
Douglass, by email at
bronwyn.douglass@uscg.mil, by phone
at 202.372.3793, or in writing at
Commandant (CG–094), ATTN: Office of
Maritime & International Law, US Coast
Guard STOP 7213, 2703 Martin Luther
King Jr. Ave SE., Washington DC 20593–
7213 not later than March 27, 2015, 7
days prior to the meeting. Requests
made after March 27, 2015 most likely
will not be accommodated, and same
day requests cannot be accommodated
due to the building’s security process.
Please note that due to security
considerations, two valid, government
issued photo identifications must be
presented to gain entrance to the
Headquarters building. The
Headquarters building is accessible by
taxi and privately owned conveyance
(public transportation is not generally
available). However, parking in the
vicinity of the building is extremely
limited. Additional information
regarding security and parking may be
found at: https://www.uscg.mil/
baseNCR/documents/visit_
instructions.pdf. Additional information
regarding this and other IMO public
meetings may be found at:
www.uscg.mil/imo.
[FR Doc. 2015–05241 Filed 3–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Emergency Locator Transmitters
(ELTs)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice recommending voluntary
change to securing existing ELTs as
specified in Technical Standard Order
(TSO)-C126b, 406MHz Emergency
Locator Transmitter.
AGENCY:
FAA evaluated five separate
courses of action with regard to the
airworthiness approvals for securing
ELTs with hook and loop fasteners. This
notice summarizes the inadequacies of
hook and loop fasteners as a means for
securing ELTs, and avoids placing an
undue burden on aircraft owners while
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12697
acknowledging the voluntary efforts of
ELT manufacturers to improve designs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 9, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Charisse R. Green, AIR–131, Federal
Aviation Administration, 470 L’Enfant
Plaza, Suite 4102, Washington, DC
20024. Telephone (202) 267–8551, fax
(202) 267–8589, email to:
Charisse.Green@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Investigations of some recent aircraft
accidents disclosed that ELTs mounted
with hook and loop fasteners became
dislodged from their mounting trays on
impact. The separation of those ELTs
from their mounting trays caused their
antenna connection to sever, thus
rendering the ELTs to be ineffective and
unable to perform their intended
function.
The FAA Modernization and Reform
Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112–95), Section
347(b)(1), required the FAA to
determine if the ELT mounting
requirements and retention tests
specified by TSO–C91a and TSO–C126
were adequate to assess retention
capabilities in ELT designs. Based on
the determination, the Act, in Section
347(b)(2), required the Administrator to
make any necessary revisions to the
requirements and retention test to
ensure ELTs remained properly retained
in the event of an aircraft accident.
The FAA evaluated the mounting
requirements and retention tests
specified in TSO–C91a, TSO–C126, and
TSO–C126a. After this evaluation, the
FAA determined these standards did
not adequately address the use of hook
and loop fasteners. Hook and loop
fasteners were not an acceptable means
of compliance to meet the mounting and
retention requirements of the ELT TSOs.
While the evaluation of installation
approval using hook and loop fasteners
may meet the TSO requirements for
retention forces in laboratory
conditions, accident investigations
found these fasteners did not perform
their intended function.
FAA Concerns
The agency identified the following
concerns after completing its evaluation
of the use of hook and loop fasteners:
(1) Hook and loop fasteners fail to
retain the ELT when insufficient tension
is applied to close the fastener. There is
no repeatable method for installation
and no method to evaluate the tension
of the hook and loop fastener. The
allowance for pilots to secure ELTs to
the aircraft when changing ELT batteries
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
12698
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
further increases the potential for
inconsistent and unsatisfactory
installations;
(2) Hook and loop fasteners closed
with proper tension may stretch or
loosen over time due to wear, fluids,
vibration, and repeated use, leading to
insufficient tension to retain the ELT;
(3) Hook and loop fasteners closed
with proper tension do not provide
stated retention capability due to debris
which can contaminate the hooks and
loops of the fastener; and
(4) Hook and loop fasteners closed
with proper tension degrade due to
environmental factors such as repeated
heating and cooling cycles, temperature
extremes, and contamination resulting
from location in equipment areas.
FAA Actions
After publishing our initial intent to
withdraw the TSO Authorizations
(TSOA) for TSO–C91a, and TSO–C126/
126a (See 135 FR 41,473 (2012)), the
FAA considered five courses of action to
mitigate safety concerns with the use of
hook and loop fasteners to retain ELTs.
These actions addressed design,
production, and airworthiness
approvals for both the TSO and retrofit
for existing installations. Below is a
summary of the actions and their
outcomes:
(1) Recommendation to revise
Installation and Maintenance manuals.
The FAA published a Safety Awareness
Information Bulletin (SAIB) HQ–12–32,
Hook and Loop Style Fasteners as a
Mounting Mechanism for Emergency
Locator Transmitters, on May 23, 2012.
The SAIB outlined actions ELT
manufacturers could take to improve
their installation and maintenance
instructions to mitigate the concerns
with hook and loop retention.
(2) Revised TSO–C126a for 406 MHz
ELTs. The FAA published TSO–C126b,
406 MHz Emergency Locator
Transmitters, on November 26, 2012.
The TSO precluded the use of hook and
loop fasteners as a primary means of
securing an ELT in its mounting tray for
future ELT designs. TSO–C91a was
previously cancelled, and a revision was
not needed.
(3) Determined need for an
Airworthiness Directive to correct ELTs
with hook and loop fasteners. The FAA
accomplished a Corrective Action
Review Board (CARB) to determine if
existing airworthiness approvals and
existing Technical Standard Order
authorizations required 14 CFR part 39
Airworthiness Directive (AD) action.
The CARB determined an AD was not
warranted.
(4) Cease airworthiness approval of
ELTs with hook and loop fasteners. Not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Mar 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
necessary. Manufacturers with ELT
designs incorporating hook and loop
fasteners which failed to perform their
intended function in accidents either
have revised or are in the process of
revising their designs, minimizing the
need for policy in this area.
(5) Withdrawal of ELT TSO
Authorizations. Not pursued.
Manufacturers with ELT designs
incorporating hook and loop fasteners
that failed to perform their intended
function have either revised or are
revising their designs, minimizing the
need for this action.
Conclusion
The FAA issued an SAIB providing
ELT installation and maintenance
guidance and revised TSO–C126a to
eliminate hook and loop fasteners from
future TSO designs. The FAA is not
issuing an airworthiness directive or a
policy disallowing installation approval
of ELTs that use hook and loop
fasteners. Lastly, the FAA decided not
to take the action of withdrawing the
TSO authorizations of ELTs utilizing
hook and loop fasteners as a mounting
mechanism, but ask those aircraft
owners/operators with ELTs secured
with hook and loop fasteners in their
aircraft to voluntarily switch to a metal
strap type restraint method. Therefore,
the proposed June 30, 2014 date for
TSOA withdrawals is no longer
applicable.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 4,
2015.
Susan J.M. Cabler,
Acting Manager, Design, Manufacturing, and
Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–05500 Filed 3–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Underwater Locating Devices
(Acoustic) (Self-Powered)
Federal Aviation
Administration, FAA, DOT.
ACTION: Notice to extend the revocation
date of Technical Standard Order (TSO)
C–121 and C–121a, Underwater
Locating Devices (ULD) (Acoustic) (SelfPowered).
AGENCY:
This Notice extends the
planned revocation date of Technical
Standard Order (TSO) authorization for
the production of Underwater Locating
Devices (ULD) (Acoustic) (Self-Powered)
manufactured to TSO–C121 and TSO C–
121a specifications. This action is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
necessary to facilitate an efficient
transition to UDLs with a 90-day
minimum battery operating life
manufactured to the TSO–C121b
specifications.
Mr.
John Barry, AIR–130, Federal Aviation
Administration, 470 L’Enfant Plaza,
SW., Suite 4102, Washington, DC 20024.
Telephone 202–267–1665, Fax 202–
267–8589, email: john.barry@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
The FAA published a Notice in the
Federal Resister, 76 FR 52734, August
23, 2011, announcing the planned
revocation of TSO–C121 and TSO–
C121a. Notice of that conformation was
published in the Federal Register, 77 FR
13174, March 5, 2012. Thus far, only
two manufacturers currently hold TSO
authorizations (TSOAs) under TSO–
C121 or TSO–C121a; both are domestic.
Both manufacturers are now authorized
to produce longer duration TSO–C121b
units as envisioned by the March 5,
2012 Federal Register notice. One
manufacturer received its TSO–C121b
authorization in December 2014, the
other in February 2015. Although both
manufacturers received approval to
manufacture devices meeting the
current standard, the TSOA by itself
does not authorize installation in an
aircraft. Recent events have driven
additional testing requirements for
installation of lithium batteries, which
these devices contain. Prior to the
FAA’s issuing the TSOAs to the two
applicants, testing of the lithium
batteries produced satisfactory results,
such that the newly approved TSO–
C121b devices will contain the effects of
catastrophic battery failures. The ULD
manufacturer’s data may be used to
support installations of the device on an
aircraft, but each installer must analyze
their design for safety impacts on their
aircraft. A major aircraft manufacturer
requested additional time to complete
testing and analysis of the TSO–C121b
device’s installation. They also
requested additional time to update
their part numbers and drawings in
their various Type Certificated (TC)
aircraft once the analysis is complete.
Granting this additional time will
prevent a disruption in aircraft
production as the necessary
documentation changes are updated to
reflect the current production of TSO–
C121b devices.
Conclusion
Based on the recent award of TSO–
C121b authorizations, additional testing
and analysis of lithium battery
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12697-12698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05500]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELTs)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice recommending voluntary change to securing existing ELTs
as specified in Technical Standard Order (TSO)-C126b, 406MHz Emergency
Locator Transmitter.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FAA evaluated five separate courses of action with regard to
the airworthiness approvals for securing ELTs with hook and loop
fasteners. This notice summarizes the inadequacies of hook and loop
fasteners as a means for securing ELTs, and avoids placing an undue
burden on aircraft owners while acknowledging the voluntary efforts of
ELT manufacturers to improve designs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 9, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Charisse R. Green, AIR-131,
Federal Aviation Administration, 470 L'Enfant Plaza, Suite 4102,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone (202) 267-8551, fax (202) 267-8589,
email to: Charisse.Green@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Investigations of some recent aircraft accidents disclosed that
ELTs mounted with hook and loop fasteners became dislodged from their
mounting trays on impact. The separation of those ELTs from their
mounting trays caused their antenna connection to sever, thus rendering
the ELTs to be ineffective and unable to perform their intended
function.
The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-95),
Section 347(b)(1), required the FAA to determine if the ELT mounting
requirements and retention tests specified by TSO-C91a and TSO-C126
were adequate to assess retention capabilities in ELT designs. Based on
the determination, the Act, in Section 347(b)(2), required the
Administrator to make any necessary revisions to the requirements and
retention test to ensure ELTs remained properly retained in the event
of an aircraft accident.
The FAA evaluated the mounting requirements and retention tests
specified in TSO-C91a, TSO-C126, and TSO-C126a. After this evaluation,
the FAA determined these standards did not adequately address the use
of hook and loop fasteners. Hook and loop fasteners were not an
acceptable means of compliance to meet the mounting and retention
requirements of the ELT TSOs. While the evaluation of installation
approval using hook and loop fasteners may meet the TSO requirements
for retention forces in laboratory conditions, accident investigations
found these fasteners did not perform their intended function.
FAA Concerns
The agency identified the following concerns after completing its
evaluation of the use of hook and loop fasteners:
(1) Hook and loop fasteners fail to retain the ELT when
insufficient tension is applied to close the fastener. There is no
repeatable method for installation and no method to evaluate the
tension of the hook and loop fastener. The allowance for pilots to
secure ELTs to the aircraft when changing ELT batteries
[[Page 12698]]
further increases the potential for inconsistent and unsatisfactory
installations;
(2) Hook and loop fasteners closed with proper tension may stretch
or loosen over time due to wear, fluids, vibration, and repeated use,
leading to insufficient tension to retain the ELT;
(3) Hook and loop fasteners closed with proper tension do not
provide stated retention capability due to debris which can contaminate
the hooks and loops of the fastener; and
(4) Hook and loop fasteners closed with proper tension degrade due
to environmental factors such as repeated heating and cooling cycles,
temperature extremes, and contamination resulting from location in
equipment areas.
FAA Actions
After publishing our initial intent to withdraw the TSO
Authorizations (TSOA) for TSO-C91a, and TSO-C126/126a (See 135 FR
41,473 (2012)), the FAA considered five courses of action to mitigate
safety concerns with the use of hook and loop fasteners to retain ELTs.
These actions addressed design, production, and airworthiness approvals
for both the TSO and retrofit for existing installations. Below is a
summary of the actions and their outcomes:
(1) Recommendation to revise Installation and Maintenance manuals.
The FAA published a Safety Awareness Information Bulletin (SAIB) HQ-12-
32, Hook and Loop Style Fasteners as a Mounting Mechanism for Emergency
Locator Transmitters, on May 23, 2012. The SAIB outlined actions ELT
manufacturers could take to improve their installation and maintenance
instructions to mitigate the concerns with hook and loop retention.
(2) Revised TSO-C126a for 406 MHz ELTs. The FAA published TSO-
C126b, 406 MHz Emergency Locator Transmitters, on November 26, 2012.
The TSO precluded the use of hook and loop fasteners as a primary means
of securing an ELT in its mounting tray for future ELT designs. TSO-
C91a was previously cancelled, and a revision was not needed.
(3) Determined need for an Airworthiness Directive to correct ELTs
with hook and loop fasteners. The FAA accomplished a Corrective Action
Review Board (CARB) to determine if existing airworthiness approvals
and existing Technical Standard Order authorizations required 14 CFR
part 39 Airworthiness Directive (AD) action. The CARB determined an AD
was not warranted.
(4) Cease airworthiness approval of ELTs with hook and loop
fasteners. Not necessary. Manufacturers with ELT designs incorporating
hook and loop fasteners which failed to perform their intended function
in accidents either have revised or are in the process of revising
their designs, minimizing the need for policy in this area.
(5) Withdrawal of ELT TSO Authorizations. Not pursued.
Manufacturers with ELT designs incorporating hook and loop fasteners
that failed to perform their intended function have either revised or
are revising their designs, minimizing the need for this action.
Conclusion
The FAA issued an SAIB providing ELT installation and maintenance
guidance and revised TSO-C126a to eliminate hook and loop fasteners
from future TSO designs. The FAA is not issuing an airworthiness
directive or a policy disallowing installation approval of ELTs that
use hook and loop fasteners. Lastly, the FAA decided not to take the
action of withdrawing the TSO authorizations of ELTs utilizing hook and
loop fasteners as a mounting mechanism, but ask those aircraft owners/
operators with ELTs secured with hook and loop fasteners in their
aircraft to voluntarily switch to a metal strap type restraint method.
Therefore, the proposed June 30, 2014 date for TSOA withdrawals is no
longer applicable.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 4, 2015.
Susan J.M. Cabler,
Acting Manager, Design, Manufacturing, and Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-05500 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P