Guidance Regarding Reporting Income and Deductions of a Corporation That Becomes or Ceases To Be a Member of a Consolidated Group, 12097-12104 [2015-05123]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(i) For airplanes with a Thales pitot probe
having P/N C16195AA or P/N C16195BA
installed: After accomplishing the
replacement required by paragraph (g) of this
AD.
(ii) For airplanes without a Thales pitot
probe having P/N C16195AA or P/N
C16195BA installed: As of the effective date
of this AD.
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install on any airplane a Thales
pitot probe having part number P/N 50620–
10.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
19, 2015.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
26 CFR Part 1
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0237R1, dated
December 5, 2014, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2015–0250.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:27 Mar 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
[FR Doc. 2015–04495 Filed 3–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
[REG–100400–14]
RIN 1545–BM14
Guidance Regarding Reporting Income
and Deductions of a Corporation That
Becomes or Ceases To Be a Member
of a Consolidated Group
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed amendments to the
consolidated return regulations. These
proposed regulations would revise the
rules for reporting certain items of
income and deduction that are
reportable on the day a corporation joins
or leaves a consolidated group. The
proposed regulations would affect such
corporations and the consolidated
groups that they join or leave.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by June 4, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–100400–14), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–100400–
14), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, or sent electronically
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov/ (IRS REG–
100400–14).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Russell G. Jones, (202) 317–6847;
concerning the submission of comments
or to request a public hearing,
Oluwafunmilayo (Funmi) P. Taylor,
(202) 317–6901 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
1. Introduction
This notice of proposed rulemaking
contains proposed regulations that
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12097
amend 26 CFR part 1 under section
1502 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). Section 1502 authorizes the
Secretary to prescribe regulations for
corporations that join in filing a
consolidated return, and it expressly
provides that those rules may be
different from the provisions of chapter
1 of subtitle A of the Code that would
apply if those corporations filed
separate returns. Terms used in the
consolidated return regulations
generally are defined in § 1.1502–1.
These proposed regulations provide
guidance under § 1.1502–76, which
prescribes rules for determining the
taxable period in which items of
income, gain, deduction, loss, and credit
(tax items) of a corporation that joins in
filing a consolidated return are
included. Section 1.1502–76(b)
provides, in part, that if a corporation
(S) becomes or ceases to be a member
of a consolidated group during a
consolidated return year, S must
include in the consolidated return its
tax items for the period during which it
is a member. S also must file a separate
return (including a consolidated return
of another group) that includes its items
for the period during which it is not a
member.
2. Prior and Current Regulations
On September 8, 1966, the IRS and
the Treasury Department promulgated
regulations under § 1.1502–76 in TD
6894, 31 FR 11794 (1966 regulations).
Section 1.1502–76(b) of the 1966
regulations was silent regarding the
treatment of S’s tax items that accrued
on the day S became or ceased to be a
member of a consolidated group (S’s
change in status). Thus, whether S’s tax
items for the day of S’s change in status
should have been reflected on S’s tax
return for the short period ending with
S’s change in status, or whether these
tax items should have been reflected
instead on S’s tax return for the short
period beginning after S’s change in
status, was unclear under the 1966
regulations.
On August 15, 1994, the IRS and the
Treasury Department published final
regulations (TD 8560; 59 FR 41666)
under § 1.1502–76(b) (current
regulations) that revised the 1966
regulations to eliminate uncertainty
regarding the treatment of tax items
recognized by S on the day of S’s change
in status. Under the general rule of
§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(1) of the current
regulations (current end of the day rule),
S is treated for all federal income tax
purposes as becoming or ceasing to be
a member of a consolidated group at the
end of the day of S’s change in status,
and S’s tax items that are reportable on
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
12098
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
that day generally are included in the
tax return for the taxable year that ends
as a result of S’s change in status.
The notice of proposed rulemaking
that proposed the current end of the day
rule (57 FR 53634, Nov. 12, 1992) (1992
NPRM) indicated that the current end of
the day rule was intended to provide
certainty and prevent inconsistent
reporting of S’s items between the
consolidated and separate returns. Prior
to the 1992 NPRM, some taxpayers had
inferred (based upon the administrative
practice of the IRS) that the inclusion in
a particular return of a tax item of S
incurred on the day of S’s change in
status depended on a factual
determination of whether the
transaction occurred before or after
noon on the day of S’s change in status
(the so-called ‘‘lunch rule’’).
There are two exceptions to the
current end of the day rule. The first
exception (in § 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2))
provides that if a corporation is an S
corporation (within the meaning of
section 1361(a)(1)) immediately before
becoming a member of a consolidated
group, the corporation becomes a
member of the group at the beginning of
the day the termination of its S
corporation election is effective
(termination date), and its taxable year
ends for all federal income tax purposes
at the end of the preceding day (S
corporation exception). The S
corporation exception was added by TD
8842 (64 FR 61205; Nov. 10, 1999) to
eliminate the need to file a one-day C
corporation return for the day an S
corporation is acquired by a
consolidated group. No additional rule
was necessary with respect to a
qualified S corporation subsidiary
(QSub) of an S corporation that joins a
consolidated group. See § 1.1361–
5(a)(3).
Added at the same time as the current
end of the day rule, the second
exception (in § 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(B))
provides that if a transaction occurs on
the day of S’s change in status that is
properly allocable to the portion of S’s
day after the event resulting in S’s
change in status, S and certain related
persons must treat the transaction as
occurring at the beginning of the
following day for all federal income tax
purposes (current next day rule). The
current next day rule was added in
response to comments to the 1992
NPRM suggesting that the current end of
the day rule created a ‘‘seller beware’’
problem with respect to S’s tax items
arising on the day of S’s change in status
but after the event causing S’s change in
status. Commenters suggested that, for
example, if consolidated group A sold
the stock of S to consolidated group B,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:27 Mar 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
and group B caused S to sell one of its
divisions on the same day it was
acquired by group B, the gain from the
sale of the division would be
inappropriately allocable to group A’s
consolidated return. Commenters
recommended that final regulations
adopt rules substantially similar to the
current next day rule to protect the
reasonable expectations of sellers and
buyers of S’s stock. Commenters
suggested that a rule providing this type
of protection was most appropriate with
respect to extraordinary items, and some
commenters suggested that a rule
similar to the current next day rule
should operate unless the seller and
buyer of S agreed otherwise.
3. Proposed Regulations
A. Overview
The IRS and the Treasury Department
have determined that changes should be
made to the regulations under § 1.1502–
76(b) due to uncertainty regarding the
appropriate application of the current
next day rule. These proposed
regulations address this concern as well
as additional concerns with the current
regulations, as summarized in this
section 3.A. and discussed in greater
detail in sections 3.B. through 3.K. of
this preamble.
To provide certainty, the proposed
regulations generally clarify the period
in which S must report certain tax items
by replacing the current next day rule
with a new exception to the end of the
day rule (proposed next day rule) that
is more narrowly tailored to clearly
reflect taxable income and prevent
certain post-closing actions from
adversely impacting S’s tax return for
the period ending on the day of S’s
change in status. The proposed next day
rule applies only to ‘‘extraordinary
items’’ (as defined in § 1.1502–
76(b)(2)(ii)(C) of the proposed
regulations) that result from transactions
that occur on the day of S’s change in
status, but after the event causing the
change, and that would be taken into
account by S on that day. This rule
requires those extraordinary items to be
allocated to S’s tax return for the period
beginning the next day. The proposed
next day rule is expressly inapplicable
to any extraordinary item that arises
simultaneously with the event that
causes S’s change in status.
The proposed regulations further
clarify that fees for services rendered in
connection with S’s change in status
constitute a ‘‘compensation-related
deduction’’ for purposes of § 1.1502–
76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) (if payment of the fees
would give rise to a deduction), and
therefore an extraordinary item. The
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed regulations also clarify that
the anti-avoidance rule in § 1.1502–
76(b)(3) may apply to situations in
which a person modifies an existing
contract or other agreement in
anticipation of S’s change in status.
The proposed regulations also add a
rule (previous day rule, described in
section 3.C. of this preamble) to clarify
the application of the S corporation
exception. In addition, the proposed
regulations limit the scope of the end of
the day rule, the next day rule, the S
corporation exception, and the previous
day rule to determining the period in
which S must report certain tax items
and determining the treatment of an
asset or a tax item for purposes of
sections 382(h) and 1374 (as opposed to
applying for all federal income tax
purposes).
Additionally, the proposed
regulations provide that short taxable
years resulting from intercompany
transactions to which section 381(a)
applies (intercompany section 381
transactions) are not taken into account
in determining the carryover period for
a tax item of the distributor or transferor
member in the intercompany section
381 transaction or for purposes of
section 481(a). Furthermore, the
proposed regulations provide that the
due date for filing S’s separate return for
the taxable year that ends as a result of
S becoming a member is not accelerated
if S ceases to exist in the same
consolidated return year.
The proposed regulations make
several other conforming and nonsubstantive changes to the current
regulations as well. Finally, the
proposed regulations add several
examples to illustrate the proposed
rules.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
note that neither the current regulations
nor the proposed regulations are
intended to supersede general rules in
the Code and regulations concerning
whether an item is otherwise includible
or deductible.
B. Proposed Next Day Rule
The current next day rule provides
that S and certain related persons must
treat a transaction as occurring at the
beginning of the day following S’s
change in status if the transaction
occurs on the day of S’s change in status
and is ‘‘properly allocable’’ to the
portion of that day following S’s change
in status. The IRS and the Treasury
Department believe, however, that the
standards provided in the current next
day rule for determining whether a
transaction is ‘‘properly allocable’’ to
the portion of S’s day after the event
resulting in S’s change in status have
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
been inappropriately interpreted by
taxpayers. The current next day rule
provides that a determination of
whether a transaction is ‘‘properly
allocable’’ to the portion of S’s day after
the event resulting in S’s change in
status is respected if it is ‘‘reasonable
and consistently applied by all affected
persons.’’ In determining whether an
allocation is ‘‘reasonable,’’ certain
factors enumerated in the current
regulations are to be considered,
including whether tax items arising
from the same transaction are allocated
inconsistently. Some taxpayers have
interpreted these rules as providing
flexibility in reporting tax items that
result from transactions occurring on
the day of S’s change in status so that
those items can be allocated by
agreement to the day of, or to the day
following, S’s change in status. The IRS
and the Treasury Department view this
interpretation of the current next day
rule as inappropriate because it
effectively would permit taxpayers to
elect the income tax return on which
these tax items are reported and
therefore may not result in an allocation
that clearly reflects taxable income. This
electivity is inconsistent with the
purpose of § 1.1502–76(b) to clearly
reflect the income of S and the
consolidated group. Further, the IRS
and the Treasury Department have
observed that the current regulations
create controversy between taxpayers
and the IRS as to whether certain of S’s
tax items that become reportable on the
day of S’s change in status are properly
allocated to S’s tax return for the period
ending that day rather than to S’s tax
return for the period beginning the next
day.
The proposed next day rule is
intended to eliminate the perceived
electivity and the source of these
controversies. Under the proposed
regulations, the application of the
proposed next day rule is mandatory
rather than elective—if an extraordinary
item results from a transaction that
occurs on the day of S’s change in
status, but after the event resulting in
the change, and if the item would be
taken into account by S on that day, the
transaction resulting in the
extraordinary item is treated as
occurring at the beginning of the
following day for purposes of
determining the period in which S must
report the item.
The proposed regulations also provide
that the proposed next day rule is
inapplicable to items that arise
simultaneously with the event that
causes S’s change in status. Under the
end of the day rule (as revised by these
proposed regulations), those items are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:27 Mar 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
reported on S’s tax return for the short
period ending on the day of S’s change
in status. The proposed regulations are
expected to afford taxpayers and the IRS
greater certainty regarding the period to
which S’s tax items resulting from such
a transaction are allocated.
C. Previous Day Rule
As noted in section 2 of this
preamble, the special rule for S
corporations provides an exception to
the end of the day rule if an S
corporation joins a consolidated group.
To avoid creating a one-day C
corporation tax return for the
termination date, the S corporation
exception provides that S becomes a
member of the group at the beginning of
the termination date, and that S’s
taxable year ends for all federal income
tax purposes at the end of the preceding
day.
Although these proposed regulations
retain the S corporation exception, the
proposed regulations add a previous day
rule that mirrors the principles of the
proposed next day rule. Whereas the
proposed next day rule requires
extraordinary items resulting from
transactions that occur on the day of S’s
change in status (but after the event
causing the change) to be allocated to
S’s tax return for the short period that
begins the following day, the previous
day rule requires extraordinary items
resulting from transactions that occur on
the termination date (but before or
simultaneously with the event causing
S’s status as an S corporation to
terminate) to be allocated to S’s tax
return for the short period that ends on
the previous day (that is, the day
preceding the termination date).
D. Revised Scope of the End of the Day
Rule and Related Rules
Under the current end of the day rule,
S becomes or ceases to be a member at
the end of the day on which its status
as a member changes, and its tax year
ends ‘‘for all federal income tax
purposes’’ at the end of that day.
However, applying the end of the day
rule for purposes other than the
reporting of S’s tax items could yield
results inconsistent with other
consolidated return rules. For example,
under §§ 1.1502–13 and 1.1502–
80(d)(1), if a member contributes
property subject to a liability in excess
of the property’s basis to a nonmember
in exchange for the nonmember’s stock,
and if the transferee becomes a member
of the transferor’s consolidated group as
a result of the exchange, the transaction
is treated as an intercompany
transaction and section 357(c) does not
apply. However, if the end of the day
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12099
rule applies ‘‘for all federal income tax
purposes,’’ it may be unclear whether
the transferee becomes a member
‘‘immediately after the transaction,’’
whether the transaction is an
intercompany transaction, and whether
section 357(c) could apply to the
transaction.
To eliminate possible confusion
arising from application of the current
end of the day rule and related rules,
these proposed regulations provide that
the end of the day rule, the proposed
next day rule, the S corporation
exception, and the previous day rule
apply for purposes of determining the
period in which S must report its tax
items, as well as for purposes of sections
382(h) and 1374 (discussed in section
3.I. of this preamble).
E. Extraordinary Items
The proposed next day rule
mandatorily applies to extraordinary
items that result from a transaction that
occurs on the day of S’s change in status
but after the event that causes the
change. In contrast, the previous day
rule mandatorily applies to
extraordinary items that result from a
transaction that occurs on the day of S’s
change in status but before or
simultaneously with the event that
causes S’s status as an S corporation to
terminate.
One category of extraordinary items,
set forth in § 1.1502–76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) of
the current regulations, applies to any
‘‘compensation-related deduction in
connection with S’s change in status.’’
The proposed regulations clarify that
this category of extraordinary items
includes (among other items) a
deduction for fees for services rendered
in connection with S’s change in status.
For example, if payment of a fee for the
services of a financial adviser is
contingent upon a successful
acquisition of S’s stock, to the extent the
fee gives rise to a deduction, the
deduction for the accrual of that
expense is an extraordinary item, and
the deduction is allowable only in S’s
taxable year that ends at the close of the
day of the change.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
request comments as to whether the list
of extraordinary items set forth in
§ 1.1502–76(b)(2)(ii)(C) should be
modified to include any item not
currently listed or whether any item
currently included should be deleted or
modified. Specifically, the IRS and the
Treasury Department are considering
whether the item in § 1.1502–
76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(5) (‘‘[a]ny item carried to
or from any portion of the original year
(e.g., a net operating loss carried under
section 172), and any section 481(a)
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
12100
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
adjustment’’) should be modified to
include ‘‘any section 481(a) adjustment
or the acceleration thereof,’’ and
whether the item in § 1.1502–
76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(6) (‘‘[t]he effects of any
change in accounting method initiated
by the filing of the appropriate form
after S’s change in status’’) should
continue to be included in the list of
extraordinary items.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
also request comments as to whether
any extraordinary item should be
excluded, in whole or in part, from
application of the next day rule and the
previous day rule. In particular, the IRS
and the Treasury Department request
comments as to whether the
extraordinary items set forth in
§ 1.1502–76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(5) and (6) of the
current regulations should be excluded,
in whole or in part, from application of
these rules.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
F. Ratable Allocation
Rather than require S to perform a
closing of the books on the day of its
change in status, the current regulations
under § 1.1502–76(b)(2)(ii) permit S’s
tax items, other than the extraordinary
items, to be ratably allocated between
S’s two short taxable years if certain
conditions are met. The IRS and the
Treasury Department request comments
as to whether S no longer should be
permitted to elect to ratably allocate its
tax items between the periods ending
and beginning with S’s change in status.
G. Certain Foreign Entities
Solely for purposes of determining the
short taxable year of S to which the
items of a passthrough entity in which
S owns an interest are allocated,
§ 1.1502–76(b)(2)(vi)(A) of the current
regulations generally provides that S is
treated as selling or exchanging its
entire interest in the entity immediately
before S’s change in status. This rule
does not apply to certain foreign
corporations the ownership of which
may give rise to deemed income
inclusions under the Code. In addition,
a deemed income inclusion from a
foreign corporation and a deferred tax
amount from a passive foreign
investment company under section 1291
are treated as extraordinary items under
§ 1.1502–76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(11). The IRS and
the Treasury Department request
comments as to whether such deemed
income inclusions or deferred tax
amounts should continue to be treated
as extraordinary items, whether rules
having similar effects to the rule in
§ 1.1502–76(b)(2)(vi)(A) relating to
passthrough entities should be adopted
for controlled foreign corporations and
passive foreign investment companies
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:27 Mar 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
in which S owns an interest, and
whether any other changes should be
made to § 1.1502–76(b)(2)(vi) of the
current regulations.
H. Anti-Avoidance Rule
Under § 1.1502–76(b)(3) of the current
regulations, if any person acts with a
principal purpose contrary to the
purposes of § 1.1502–76(b) to
substantially reduce the federal income
tax liability of any person (prohibited
purpose), adjustments must be made as
necessary to carry out the purposes of
§ 1.1502–76 of the current regulations
(anti-avoidance rule). The proposed
regulations clarify that the antiavoidance rule may apply to situations
in which a person modifies an existing
contract or other agreement in
anticipation of S’s change in status in
order to shift an item between the
taxable years that end and begin as a
result of S’s change in status if such
actions are undertaken with a
prohibited purpose. The IRS and the
Treasury Department request comments
regarding this proposed amendment to
the anti-avoidance rule.
I. Coordination With Sections 382(h)
and 1374
1. Section 382
For purposes of section 382, the term
recognized built-in loss (RBIL) means
any loss recognized during the
recognition period on the disposition of
any asset held by the loss corporation
immediately before the date of the
section 382 ownership change (change
date), to the extent the loss reflects a
built-in loss on the change date. Section
382(h)(2)(B). The term recognition
period means the five-year period
beginning on the change date. Section
382(h)(7)(A).
Section 382(h)(1)(B) generally
provides that if a loss corporation has a
net unrealized built-in loss (NUBIL),
then any RBIL taken into account in a
taxable year any portion of which falls
in the recognition period (recognition
period taxable year) is treated as a
deduction subject to the loss
corporation’s section 382 limitation as if
the RBIL were a pre-change loss. The
amount of RBILs subject to the section
382 limitation in any recognition period
taxable year is limited, however, to the
excess of the NUBIL over total RBILs in
prior taxable years ending in the
recognition period. (The amount of such
excess is referred to in this preamble as
the outstanding NUBIL balance.) In
other words, the amount of the NUBIL
limits the amount of RBILs that are
treated as pre-change losses, and any
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
built-in loss treated as an RBIL further
reduces the outstanding NUBIL balance.
In many cases, the event that causes
S’s change in status for purposes of
§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii) also causes S to
undergo an ownership change for
purposes of section 382. Thus, an item
of deduction or loss that becomes
reportable on the day of S’s change in
status falls within the recognition
period beginning that day, even if the
item is allocated to S’s short period
ending that day under the end of the
day rule. As a consequence, an item that
should be a pre-change loss is treated as
an RBIL that reduces the outstanding
NUBIL balance. For example, assume
consolidated group A sells all of S’s
stock to consolidated group B. If on the
day of S’s change in status (but before
the event causing the change), S
recognizes a loss on the sale of an asset,
under the end of the day rule the loss
is reported on group A’s consolidated
return. However, notwithstanding that
the loss may not be claimed by group B,
the loss may be treated as an RBIL and
reduce the outstanding NUBIL balance.
To prevent such an outcome, these
proposed regulations provide that, for
purposes of section 382(h), items
includible in the short taxable year that
ends as a result of S’s change in status
(including items allocated to that
taxable year under the end of the day
rule) are not treated as occurring in the
recognition period. Rather, only items
includible in S’s short taxable year that
begins as a result of S’s change in status
(including items allocated to that
taxable year under the proposed next
day rule) are treated as occurring in the
recognition period. Therefore, the
beginning of the recognition period for
purposes of section 382(h) would
correspond with the beginning of S’s
short taxable year that begins on the day
after S’s change in status.
2. Section 1374
Section 1374 generally imposes a
corporate-level tax (section 1374 tax) on
the recognition of gain by an S
corporation that formerly was a C
corporation (or that acquired assets from
a C corporation in a transferred basis
transaction) during a recognition period
specified in section 1374(d)(7) (section
1374 recognition period), but only to the
extent of the corporation’s net
recognized built-in gain (as defined in
section 1374(d)(2)) for a given taxable
year. The section 1374 tax also applies
to certain tax items attributable to the
corporation’s C corporation taxable
years. In addition, regulations under
section 337(d) extend section 1374
treatment to (1) a C corporation’s
conversion to a real estate investment
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
trust (REIT), regulated investment
company (RIC), and certain tax-exempt
entities, or (2) certain cases in which a
REIT, RIC, or tax-exempt entity acquires
assets in a transferred basis transaction
from a C corporation.
As with the application of section
382(h), the event that causes S’s change
in status for purposes of § 1.1502–
76(b)(1)(ii) may be the event that results
in S being a corporation that is subject
to the section 1374 tax. Therefore, it is
necessary to determine in which return
(the group’s consolidated return or S’s
separate return beginning the day after
S’s change in status) S’s tax items for the
day of S’s change in status are included.
Similarly, if the event that causes S’s
change in status for purposes of
§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii) is the event that
results in S ceasing to be a corporation
subject to the section 1374 tax, it is
necessary to determine in which return
(the group’s consolidated return or S’s
separate return for the period ending the
day before S’s change in status) S’s tax
items for the day of S’s change in status
are included. The proposed regulations
thus provide that if S ceases to be a
corporation subject to the section 1374
tax upon becoming a member, or if S
elects to be a corporation that is subject
to the section 1374 tax for its first
separate return year after ceasing to be
a member, S’s items of recognized builtin gain or loss for purposes of section
1374 will include only the amounts
reported on S’s separate return
(including items reported on that return
under the previous day rule or the next
day rule).
J. Intercompany Section 381
Transactions
Under the current consolidated return
regulations, if a member distributes or
transfers its assets to another
corporation that is a member
immediately after the distribution or
transfer in an intercompany section 381
transaction, and if the distributor or
transferor member has a net operating
loss carryover or a net capital loss
carryover, the distributor or transferor
member will not be treated as having a
short taxable year for purposes of
determining the years to which the loss
may be carried. Sections 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(iii) and 1.1502–22(b)(4).
These proposed regulations would
amend current law by moving these
rules to § 1.1502–76(b)(2)(i) and making
conforming changes to §§ 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(iii) and 1.1502–22(b)(4). In
addition, these proposed regulations
would expand these rules by providing
that a short taxable year of the
distributor or transferor member by
reason of an intercompany section 381
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:27 Mar 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
transaction is not counted as a separate
taxable year for purposes of determining
either the taxable years to which any tax
attribute of the distributor or transferor
member may be carried or the taxable
years in which an adjustment under
section 481(a) is taken into account. No
inference should be drawn from the
proposed changes to these rules as to
whether a short taxable year of a
member resulting from an intercompany
section 381 transaction is counted under
current law for purposes of determining
the years to which a tax credit may be
carried or in which a section 481
adjustment is taken into account.
K. Due Date for Filing Tax Returns
The proposed regulations also
eliminate a provision that could cause
taxpayers to inadvertently miss a return
filing deadline. Under § 1.1502–76(b)(4)
of the current regulations, if S joins a
consolidated group, the due date for
filing S’s separate return is the earlier of
the due date (with extensions) of the
group’s return or the due date (with
extensions) of S’s return if S had not
joined the group. If S goes out of
existence during the consolidated return
year in which S joins a group, its taxable
year would end. Under section 6072, the
due date for S’s short period return
would be the 15th day of the third
month (ninth month, with extensions)
following the date on which S ceases to
exist. Accordingly, if S ceases to exist
during the same consolidated return
year in which it becomes a member, the
due date for S’s tax return for the short
period that ended as a result of S
becoming a member could be
accelerated. To prevent a taxpayer from
inadvertently missing a filing date and
being subject to potential penalties for
filing a late return, the proposed
regulations provide that if S goes out of
existence in the same consolidated
return year in which it becomes a
member, the due date for filing S’s
separate return is determined without
regard to S’s ceasing to exist.
L. Non-Substantive Changes
In addition to the changes described
in this preamble, the proposed
regulations make several nonsubstantive changes to the current
regulations, including moving an
example concerning § 1.1502–80(d)
from the text of § 1.1502–
76(b)(1)(ii)(B)(2) of the current
regulations to § 1.1502–13(c)(7)(ii),
Example 3(e).
Effective/Applicability Date
The amendments to §§ 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(iii), 1.1502–22(b)(4)(i), 1.1502–
76(b)(2)(i), and 1.1502–76(b)(4) will
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12101
apply to consolidated return years
beginning on or after the date these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register. The
other amendments to § 1.1502–76(b)
will apply to corporations becoming or
ceasing to be members of consolidated
groups on or after the date these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It is hereby
certified that these regulations will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This certification is based on the fact
that the regulations apply only to
transactions involving corporations that
file consolidated federal income tax
returns, and that such corporations tend
to be larger businesses. Accordingly, a
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, these
regulations will be submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on their impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
comments that are submitted timely to
the IRS as prescribed in this preamble
under the ‘‘Addresses’’ heading. The
IRS and the Treasury Department
request comments on all aspects of the
proposed rules. All comments will be
available for public inspection and
copying. A public hearing may be
scheduled if requested in writing by any
person who timely submits written
comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date, time, and
place of the hearing will be published
in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is Russell G. Jones
of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate). However, other personnel
from the IRS and the Treasury
Department participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
12102
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.1361–5 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 1361. * * *
Section 1.1362–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 1362. * * *
Section 1.1502–13 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Section 1.1502–21 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Section 1.1502–22 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Section 1.1502–28 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Section 1.1502–76 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 382(m) and 26 U.S.C. 1502. * * *
§ 1.1361–5
[Amended]
Par. 2. Section 1.1361–5 is amended:
1. In paragraph (a)(3), by removing
‘‘§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2) (relating to a
special rule’’ and adding ‘‘§ 1.1502–
76(b)(1)(ii)(B) (relating to special rules’’
in its place.
■ 2. In paragraph (a)(4), Example 4, by
removing ‘‘§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2)’’
and adding ‘‘§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(B)(1)’’
in its place.
■
■
§ 1.1362–3
[Amended]
Par. 3. Section 1.1362–3 is amended
in paragraph (a) by removing ‘‘§ 1.1502–
76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2)’’ and adding
‘‘§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(B)’’ in its place.
■ Par. 4. Section 1.1502–13 is amended
by adding Example 3(e) to paragraph
(c)(7)(ii) to read as follows:
■
§ 1.1502–13
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
Intercompany transactions.
*
*
(c) * * *
(7) * * *
(ii) * * *
*
*
Example 3. * * *
(e) Liability in excess of basis. The facts are
the same as in paragraph (a) of this Example
3, except that S and B are not members of the
same consolidated group immediately before
S’s transfer of the land to B, and the land is
encumbered with an $80 liability.
Immediately after the transfer, S and B are
members of the same consolidated group.
Thus, the transfer is an intercompany
transaction to which section 357(c) does not
apply pursuant to § 1.1502–80(d).
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 5. Section 1.1502–21 is amended
by revising paragraph (b)(3)(iii) and
adding paragraph (h)(1)(iv) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1.1502–21
*
*
Net operating losses.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
15:27 Mar 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Short years in connection with
intercompany transactions to which
section 381(a) applies. If a member
distributes or transfers assets in an
intercompany transaction to which
section 381(a) applies, see § 1.1502–
76(b)(2)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of this section
applies to consolidated return years
beginning on or after the date these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register. For
transactions occurring before the date
these regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register, see
§ 1.1502–21(b) as contained in 26 CFR
part 1, revised as of April 1 preceding
the date these regulations are published
as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 6. Section 1.1502–22 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising paragraph (b)(4)(i).
■ 2. Revising the heading of paragraph
(h).
■ 3. Adding paragraph (h)(1)(iii).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 1.1502–22
loss.
Consolidated capital gain and
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Special rules—(i) Short years in
connection with intercompany
transactions to which section 381(a)
applies. If a member distributes or
transfers assets in an intercompany
transaction to which section 381(a)
applies, see § 1.1502–76(b)(2)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Effective/applicability date—
(1) * * *
(iii) Paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this section
applies to consolidated return years
beginning on or after the date these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register. For
transactions occurring before the date
these regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register, see
§ 1.1502–22(b) as contained in 26 CFR
part 1, revised as of April 1 preceding
the date these regulations are published
as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.1502–28
[Amended]
Par. 7. Section 1.1502–28 is amended
in paragraph (b)(11) by removing
‘‘§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(B)’’ and adding
‘‘§ 1.1502–76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2)’’ in its place.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Par. 8. Section 1.1502–76 is amended:
1. By adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (b)(1)(i).
■ 2. By revising paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(A)
and (B).
■ 3. By adding paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(D).
■ 4. By adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (b)(2)(i).
■ 5. By revising paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(C)(9).
■ 6. By removing the last sentence of
paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
■ 7. By removing the last sentence of
paragraph (b)(2)(v).
■ 8. In paragraph (b)(2)(vi)(C) by
removing ‘‘paragraph (b)(2)(v)’’ and
adding ‘‘paragraph (b)(2)(vi)’’ in its
place.
■ 9. By revising paragraph (b)(3).
■ 10. By adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (b)(4).
■ 11. By adding Examples 8, 9, and 10
to paragraph (b)(5).
■ 12. By revising paragraph (b)(6).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 1.1502–76
group.
Taxable year of members of
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * * If a corporation (S) becomes
or ceases to be a member in a stock
disposition or purchase for which an
election under section 336(e) or section
338 is made, paragraphs (b)(1)(ii),
(b)(2)(ii), and (b)(2)(iii) of this section do
not apply to the transaction.
(ii) * * *
(A) In general—(1) End of the day
rule. If S becomes or ceases to be a
member during a consolidated return
year, S’s tax year ends, and (except as
provided in paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(A)(2) or
paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B) of this section) for
purposes of determining the period in
which S must report an item of income,
gain, deduction, loss, or credit, S is
treated as becoming or ceasing to be a
member at the end of the day on which
its status as a member changes (end of
the day rule).
(2) Next day rule. If an extraordinary
item (as defined in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(C) of this section) results from
a transaction that occurs on the day of
S’s change in status as a member, but
after the event resulting in the change,
and the item would be taken into
account by S on that day, the
transaction resulting in the
extraordinary item is treated as
occurring at the beginning of the
following day for purposes of
determining the period in which S must
report the item (next day rule). The next
day rule does not apply to any
extraordinary item that becomes
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
includible or deductible simultaneously
with the event that causes the change in
S’s status.
(B) Special rules for former S
corporations—(1) Beginning of the day
rule. If an election under section 1362(a)
is in effect for S immediately before S
becomes a member, S is treated as
becoming a member at the beginning of
the day the termination of its election
under section 1362(a) is effective
(termination date), and S’s taxable year
ends at the end of the day preceding the
termination date. See § 1.1361–5(a)(3)
for the treatment of certain qualified S
corporation subsidiaries.
(2) Previous day rule. If an
extraordinary item (as defined in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C) of this section)
results from a transaction that occurs on
the termination date, but before or
simultaneously with the event resulting
in the termination of S’s election under
section 1362(a), and the item would be
taken into account by S on that day, the
transaction resulting in the
extraordinary item is treated as
occurring at the end of the previous day
for purposes of determining the period
in which S must report the item
(previous day rule). See § 1.1361–5(a)(3)
for the treatment of certain qualified S
corporation subsidiaries.
*
*
*
*
*
(D) Coordination with sections 382
and 1374. If the day of S’s change in
status is also the date of an ownership
change for purposes of section 382, the
rules and principles of this section
apply in determining the treatment of
any item or asset for purposes of section
382(h). Accordingly, if the day of S’s
change in status is also a change date,
the determination of net unrealized
built-in gain or loss will reflect the
application of both the end of the day
rule and the next day rule, to the extent
each applies. Moreover, items
includible in the taxable year that ends
as a result of S’s change in status are not
treated as occurring in the recognition
period described in section 382(h)(7)(A),
and items includible in the taxable year
that begins as a result of S’s change in
status are treated as occurring in the
recognition period. If S ceases to be a
corporation subject to the tax imposed
by section 1374 upon becoming a
member of a consolidated group, or if S
elects to be a corporation that is subject
to such tax for its first separate return
year after ceasing to be a member, S’s
items of recognized built-in gain or loss
for purposes of section 1374 will
include only the amounts reported on
S’s separate return (including items
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:27 Mar 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
reported on that return under the
previous day rule or the next day rule).
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(i) * * * If a member distributes or
transfers assets in an intercompany
transaction to which section 381(a)
applies, a short taxable year of the
distributor or transferor corporation is
not taken into account either for
purposes of determining the taxable
years to which any tax attribute of the
distributor or transferor corporation may
be carried or for purposes of
determining the taxable years in which
an adjustment under section 481(a) is
taken into account.
(ii) * * *
(C) * * *
(9) Any compensation-related
deduction in connection with S’s
change in status (including, for
example, a deduction for fees for
services rendered in connection with S’s
change in status and for bonus,
severance, and option cancellation
payments made in connection with S’s
change in status);
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Anti-avoidance rule. If any person
acts with a principal purpose contrary
to the purposes of this paragraph (b) to
substantially reduce the federal income
tax liability of any person (including by
modifying an existing contract or other
agreement in anticipation of a change in
S’s status to shift an item between the
taxable years that end and begin as a
result of S’s change in status),
adjustments must be made as necessary
to carry out the purposes of this section.
(4) * * * In addition, if S ceases to
exist in the same consolidated return
year in which S becomes a member, the
due date for filing S’s separate return
shall be determined without regard to
S’s ceasing to exist in that year.
(5) * * *
Example 8. Allocation of certain amounts
that become deductible on the day of S’s
change in status—(a) Facts. P purchases all
of the stock of S, an accrual-basis, standalone C corporation, on June 30 pursuant to
a stock purchase agreement. At the time of
the stock purchase, S has outstanding
nonqualified stock options issued to certain
employees. The options did not have a
readily ascertainable fair market value when
granted, and the options do not provide for
a deferral of compensation (as defined in
§ 1.409A–1(b)). Under the option agreements,
S is obligated to pay its employees certain
amounts in cancellation of their stock
options upon a change in control of S. P’s
purchase of S’s stock causes a change in
control of S, and S’s obligation to make
option cancellation payments to its
employees becomes fixed and determinable
upon the closing of the stock purchase.
Several days after the closing of the stock
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12103
purchase, S pays its employees the amounts
required under the option agreements.
(b) Analysis. P’s purchase of S’s stock
causes S to become a member of the P group
at the end of the day on June 30. Under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) of this section, a
deduction arising from S’s liability to pay its
employees in cancellation of their stock
options in connection with S’s change in
status is an extraordinary item that cannot be
prorated and must be allocated to June 30.
The next day rule is inapplicable to this
deduction because S’s liability to pay its
employees becomes deductible on the day of
S’s change in status simultaneously with the
event that causes S’s change in status.
Consequently, a deduction for the option
cancellation payments must be reported
under the end of the day rule on S’s tax
return for the period ending June 30.
(c) Success-based fees. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (a) of this Example 8,
except that S also engages a consulting firm
to provide services in connection with P’s
purchase of S’s stock. Under the terms of the
engagement letter, S’s obligation to pay for
these services is contingent upon the
successful closing of the stock purchase. The
stock purchase closes successfully, and S’s
obligation to pay its consultants becomes
fixed and determinable at closing. To the
extent S’s payment of a success-based fee to
its consultants is otherwise deductible, this
item is an extraordinary item that cannot be
prorated and must be reported under the end
of the day rule on S’s return for the period
ending June 30. (See paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C)(9)
of this section.) The next day rule is
inapplicable to the deduction because S’s
liability to pay its consultants becomes
deductible on the day of S’s change in status
simultaneously with the event that causes S’s
change in status.
(d) Unwanted assets. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (a) of this Example 8,
except that, after closing on June 30, S sells
to an unrelated party certain assets used in
S’s trade or business that are not wanted by
the P group. Gain or loss on the sale of these
assets is an extraordinary item that results
from a transaction that occurs on the day of
S’s change in status, but after the event
resulting in the change. Consequently, under
the next day rule, the gain or loss must be
reported on S’s tax return for the period
beginning July 1.
Example 9. Redemption that causes a
change in status—(a) Facts. P owns 80 shares
of S’s only class of outstanding stock, and a
person whose ownership of S stock is not
attributed to P under section 302(c) owns the
remaining 20 shares. On June 30, S
distributes land with a basis of $100 and a
fair market value of $140 to P in redemption
of all of P’s stock in S.
(b) Analysis. As a result of the redemption,
S ceases to be a member of P’s consolidated
group on June 30. S will recognize $40 of
gain under section 311(b) on the distribution
of the land to P. The next day rule is
inapplicable because S’s gain becomes
includible on the day of S’s change in status
simultaneously with the event that causes S’s
change in status. Consequently, S’s gain must
be reported under the end of the day rule in
its taxable year ending June 30, during which
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
12104
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
S was a member of the P group. Under
§ 1.1502–32(b)(2)(i), P’s basis in its S stock is
increased to reflect S’s $40 gain immediately
before the redemption of S’s stock.
(c) Partial redemption. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (a) of this Example 9,
except that S distributes the land to P in
redemption of 20 shares of P’s stock in S.
Thus, immediately after the redemption, P
owns 75% (60 shares/80 shares) of S’s
outstanding stock, and S’s minority
shareholder owns 25% (20 shares/80 shares).
The redemption does not satisfy the
requirements of section 302(b) and is treated
under section 302(d) as a distribution to
which section 301 applies. The end of the
day rule does not apply for purposes of
determining whether P and S are members of
the same consolidated group immediately
after the redemption. Because P owns only
75% of S’s stock immediately after the
redemption, the distribution is not an
intercompany distribution described in
§ 1.1502–13(f)(2)(i). Thus, P may not exclude
any amount of the distribution that is a
dividend, and P’s basis in S’s stock is not
reduced under § 1.1502–32(b)(2)(iv). P may
be entitled to a dividends received deduction
under section 243(c) (but see section
1059(e)). For the reasons discussed in
paragraph (b) of this Example 9, S’s gain
under section 311(b) must be reported under
the end of the day rule in S’s taxable year
ending June 30, during which S was a
member of the P group.
(d) Distribution of loss property. The facts
are the same as in paragraph (a) of this
Example 9, except that the land distributed
by S to P has a fair market value of $60 rather
than $140. The end of the day rule applies
for purposes of determining the taxable year
in which S must take into account its
realized loss on the distribution of the land.
Thus, under the end of the day rule, S’s loss
on the distribution of the land, which occurs
simultaneously with S’s ceasing to be a
member, is taken into account in S’s taxable
year that ends as a result of the redemption.
However, the end of the day rule does not
apply for other purposes; for example, the
rule does not apply in determining whether
the transaction is an intercompany
distribution or in determining the attributes
(as defined in § 1.1502–13(b)(6)) of the loss.
Therefore, because S is not a member
immediately after the distribution, S’s loss on
the distribution is not recognized under
section 311(a). Under the end of the day rule,
the loss is taken into account as a noncapital,
nondeductible expense on the P group’s
consolidated return, and under § 1.1502–
32(b)(1)(i), P’s basis in its S stock is
decreased by $40 immediately before S
leaves the group.
Example 10. Extraordinary item of S
corporation—(a) Facts. On July 1, P
purchases all the stock of S, an accrual-basis
corporation with an election in effect under
section 1362(a). Prior to the sale, S had
engaged a consulting firm to find a buyer for
S’s stock, and the consulting firm’s fee was
contingent upon the successful closing of the
sale of S’s stock.
(b) Analysis. To the extent S’s payment of
the success-based fee to its consultants is
otherwise deductible, this item is an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:27 Mar 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
extraordinary item (see paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) of this section) that becomes
deductible on July 1 simultaneously with the
event that terminates S’s election as an S
corporation. Under paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B)(2)
of this section, S’s obligation to pay the fee
is treated as becoming deductible on June 30
under the previous day rule.
(6) Effective/applicability date.
Paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(4) of this
section apply to consolidated return
years beginning on or after the date
these regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Otherwise, this paragraph (b) applies to
corporations becoming or ceasing to be
members of consolidated groups on or
after the date these regulations are
published as final regulations in the
Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015–05123 Filed 3–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 15
[Docket No. CIV 150; AG Order No. 3504–
2015]
RIN 1105–AB37
Determination That an Individual Shall
Not Be Deemed an Employee of the
Public Health Service
Department of Justice.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The proposed rule proposes
criteria and a process by which the
Attorney General or designee may
determine that an individual shall not
be deemed an employee of the Public
Health Service for purposes of coverage
under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
postmarked on or before May 5, 2015,
and electronic comments must be sent
on or before midnight Eastern time May
5, 2015.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. CIV 150’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence. Written
comments being sent via regular or
express mail should be sent to James G.
Touhey, Jr., Director, Torts Branch, Civil
Division, Department of Justice, Room
8098N National Place Building, 1331
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20530. Comments may also be sent
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov using the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
electronic comment form provided on
that site. An electronic copy of this
document is also available at the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
The Department will accept attachments
to electronic comments in Microsoft
Word, WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or
Excel file formats only. The Department
will not accept any file formats other
than those specifically listed here.
Please note that the Department is
requesting that electronic comments be
submitted before midnight Eastern Time
on the day the comment period closes
because https://www.regulations.gov
terminates the public’s ability to submit
comments at midnight Eastern Time on
the day the comment period closes.
Commenters in time zones other than
Eastern Time may want to consider this
so that their electronic comments are
received. All comments sent via regular
or express mail will be considered
timely if postmarked on the day the
comment period closes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James G. Touhey, Jr., Director, Torts
Branch, Civil Division, Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20530, (202)
616–4400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments. Please
note that all comments received are
considered part of the public record and
made available for public inspection
online at https://www.regulations.gov
and in the Department’s public docket.
Such information includes personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter.
You are not required to submit
personal identifying information in
order to comment on this rule.
Nevertheless, if you want to submit
personal identifying information (such
as your name, address, etc.) as part of
your comment, but do not want it to be
posted online or made available in the
public docket, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also place
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online or made
available in the public docket in the first
paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online or made available in the
public docket, you must include the
phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12097-12104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05123]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-100400-14]
RIN 1545-BM14
Guidance Regarding Reporting Income and Deductions of a
Corporation That Becomes or Ceases To Be a Member of a Consolidated
Group
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed amendments to the consolidated
return regulations. These proposed regulations would revise the rules
for reporting certain items of income and deduction that are reportable
on the day a corporation joins or leaves a consolidated group. The
proposed regulations would affect such corporations and the
consolidated groups that they join or leave.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by June 4, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-100400-14), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
100400-14), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov/ (IRS REG-100400-14).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Russell G. Jones, (202) 317-6847; concerning the submission of comments
or to request a public hearing, Oluwafunmilayo (Funmi) P. Taylor, (202)
317-6901 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of Provisions
1. Introduction
This notice of proposed rulemaking contains proposed regulations
that amend 26 CFR part 1 under section 1502 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). Section 1502 authorizes the Secretary to prescribe
regulations for corporations that join in filing a consolidated return,
and it expressly provides that those rules may be different from the
provisions of chapter 1 of subtitle A of the Code that would apply if
those corporations filed separate returns. Terms used in the
consolidated return regulations generally are defined in Sec. 1.1502-
1.
These proposed regulations provide guidance under Sec. 1.1502-76,
which prescribes rules for determining the taxable period in which
items of income, gain, deduction, loss, and credit (tax items) of a
corporation that joins in filing a consolidated return are included.
Section 1.1502-76(b) provides, in part, that if a corporation (S)
becomes or ceases to be a member of a consolidated group during a
consolidated return year, S must include in the consolidated return its
tax items for the period during which it is a member. S also must file
a separate return (including a consolidated return of another group)
that includes its items for the period during which it is not a member.
2. Prior and Current Regulations
On September 8, 1966, the IRS and the Treasury Department
promulgated regulations under Sec. 1.1502-76 in TD 6894, 31 FR 11794
(1966 regulations). Section 1.1502-76(b) of the 1966 regulations was
silent regarding the treatment of S's tax items that accrued on the day
S became or ceased to be a member of a consolidated group (S's change
in status). Thus, whether S's tax items for the day of S's change in
status should have been reflected on S's tax return for the short
period ending with S's change in status, or whether these tax items
should have been reflected instead on S's tax return for the short
period beginning after S's change in status, was unclear under the 1966
regulations.
On August 15, 1994, the IRS and the Treasury Department published
final regulations (TD 8560; 59 FR 41666) under Sec. 1.1502-76(b)
(current regulations) that revised the 1966 regulations to eliminate
uncertainty regarding the treatment of tax items recognized by S on the
day of S's change in status. Under the general rule of Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(1) of the current regulations (current end of the day
rule), S is treated for all federal income tax purposes as becoming or
ceasing to be a member of a consolidated group at the end of the day of
S's change in status, and S's tax items that are reportable on
[[Page 12098]]
that day generally are included in the tax return for the taxable year
that ends as a result of S's change in status.
The notice of proposed rulemaking that proposed the current end of
the day rule (57 FR 53634, Nov. 12, 1992) (1992 NPRM) indicated that
the current end of the day rule was intended to provide certainty and
prevent inconsistent reporting of S's items between the consolidated
and separate returns. Prior to the 1992 NPRM, some taxpayers had
inferred (based upon the administrative practice of the IRS) that the
inclusion in a particular return of a tax item of S incurred on the day
of S's change in status depended on a factual determination of whether
the transaction occurred before or after noon on the day of S's change
in status (the so-called ``lunch rule'').
There are two exceptions to the current end of the day rule. The
first exception (in Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2)) provides that if a
corporation is an S corporation (within the meaning of section
1361(a)(1)) immediately before becoming a member of a consolidated
group, the corporation becomes a member of the group at the beginning
of the day the termination of its S corporation election is effective
(termination date), and its taxable year ends for all federal income
tax purposes at the end of the preceding day (S corporation exception).
The S corporation exception was added by TD 8842 (64 FR 61205; Nov. 10,
1999) to eliminate the need to file a one-day C corporation return for
the day an S corporation is acquired by a consolidated group. No
additional rule was necessary with respect to a qualified S corporation
subsidiary (QSub) of an S corporation that joins a consolidated group.
See Sec. 1.1361-5(a)(3).
Added at the same time as the current end of the day rule, the
second exception (in Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(B)) provides that if a
transaction occurs on the day of S's change in status that is properly
allocable to the portion of S's day after the event resulting in S's
change in status, S and certain related persons must treat the
transaction as occurring at the beginning of the following day for all
federal income tax purposes (current next day rule). The current next
day rule was added in response to comments to the 1992 NPRM suggesting
that the current end of the day rule created a ``seller beware''
problem with respect to S's tax items arising on the day of S's change
in status but after the event causing S's change in status. Commenters
suggested that, for example, if consolidated group A sold the stock of
S to consolidated group B, and group B caused S to sell one of its
divisions on the same day it was acquired by group B, the gain from the
sale of the division would be inappropriately allocable to group A's
consolidated return. Commenters recommended that final regulations
adopt rules substantially similar to the current next day rule to
protect the reasonable expectations of sellers and buyers of S's stock.
Commenters suggested that a rule providing this type of protection was
most appropriate with respect to extraordinary items, and some
commenters suggested that a rule similar to the current next day rule
should operate unless the seller and buyer of S agreed otherwise.
3. Proposed Regulations
A. Overview
The IRS and the Treasury Department have determined that changes
should be made to the regulations under Sec. 1.1502-76(b) due to
uncertainty regarding the appropriate application of the current next
day rule. These proposed regulations address this concern as well as
additional concerns with the current regulations, as summarized in this
section 3.A. and discussed in greater detail in sections 3.B. through
3.K. of this preamble.
To provide certainty, the proposed regulations generally clarify
the period in which S must report certain tax items by replacing the
current next day rule with a new exception to the end of the day rule
(proposed next day rule) that is more narrowly tailored to clearly
reflect taxable income and prevent certain post-closing actions from
adversely impacting S's tax return for the period ending on the day of
S's change in status. The proposed next day rule applies only to
``extraordinary items'' (as defined in Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(2)(ii)(C) of
the proposed regulations) that result from transactions that occur on
the day of S's change in status, but after the event causing the
change, and that would be taken into account by S on that day. This
rule requires those extraordinary items to be allocated to S's tax
return for the period beginning the next day. The proposed next day
rule is expressly inapplicable to any extraordinary item that arises
simultaneously with the event that causes S's change in status.
The proposed regulations further clarify that fees for services
rendered in connection with S's change in status constitute a
``compensation-related deduction'' for purposes of Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) (if payment of the fees would give rise to a
deduction), and therefore an extraordinary item. The proposed
regulations also clarify that the anti-avoidance rule in Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(3) may apply to situations in which a person modifies an existing
contract or other agreement in anticipation of S's change in status.
The proposed regulations also add a rule (previous day rule,
described in section 3.C. of this preamble) to clarify the application
of the S corporation exception. In addition, the proposed regulations
limit the scope of the end of the day rule, the next day rule, the S
corporation exception, and the previous day rule to determining the
period in which S must report certain tax items and determining the
treatment of an asset or a tax item for purposes of sections 382(h) and
1374 (as opposed to applying for all federal income tax purposes).
Additionally, the proposed regulations provide that short taxable
years resulting from intercompany transactions to which section 381(a)
applies (intercompany section 381 transactions) are not taken into
account in determining the carryover period for a tax item of the
distributor or transferor member in the intercompany section 381
transaction or for purposes of section 481(a). Furthermore, the
proposed regulations provide that the due date for filing S's separate
return for the taxable year that ends as a result of S becoming a
member is not accelerated if S ceases to exist in the same consolidated
return year.
The proposed regulations make several other conforming and non-
substantive changes to the current regulations as well. Finally, the
proposed regulations add several examples to illustrate the proposed
rules.
The IRS and the Treasury Department note that neither the current
regulations nor the proposed regulations are intended to supersede
general rules in the Code and regulations concerning whether an item is
otherwise includible or deductible.
B. Proposed Next Day Rule
The current next day rule provides that S and certain related
persons must treat a transaction as occurring at the beginning of the
day following S's change in status if the transaction occurs on the day
of S's change in status and is ``properly allocable'' to the portion of
that day following S's change in status. The IRS and the Treasury
Department believe, however, that the standards provided in the current
next day rule for determining whether a transaction is ``properly
allocable'' to the portion of S's day after the event resulting in S's
change in status have
[[Page 12099]]
been inappropriately interpreted by taxpayers. The current next day
rule provides that a determination of whether a transaction is
``properly allocable'' to the portion of S's day after the event
resulting in S's change in status is respected if it is ``reasonable
and consistently applied by all affected persons.'' In determining
whether an allocation is ``reasonable,'' certain factors enumerated in
the current regulations are to be considered, including whether tax
items arising from the same transaction are allocated inconsistently.
Some taxpayers have interpreted these rules as providing flexibility in
reporting tax items that result from transactions occurring on the day
of S's change in status so that those items can be allocated by
agreement to the day of, or to the day following, S's change in status.
The IRS and the Treasury Department view this interpretation of the
current next day rule as inappropriate because it effectively would
permit taxpayers to elect the income tax return on which these tax
items are reported and therefore may not result in an allocation that
clearly reflects taxable income. This electivity is inconsistent with
the purpose of Sec. 1.1502-76(b) to clearly reflect the income of S
and the consolidated group. Further, the IRS and the Treasury
Department have observed that the current regulations create
controversy between taxpayers and the IRS as to whether certain of S's
tax items that become reportable on the day of S's change in status are
properly allocated to S's tax return for the period ending that day
rather than to S's tax return for the period beginning the next day.
The proposed next day rule is intended to eliminate the perceived
electivity and the source of these controversies. Under the proposed
regulations, the application of the proposed next day rule is mandatory
rather than elective--if an extraordinary item results from a
transaction that occurs on the day of S's change in status, but after
the event resulting in the change, and if the item would be taken into
account by S on that day, the transaction resulting in the
extraordinary item is treated as occurring at the beginning of the
following day for purposes of determining the period in which S must
report the item.
The proposed regulations also provide that the proposed next day
rule is inapplicable to items that arise simultaneously with the event
that causes S's change in status. Under the end of the day rule (as
revised by these proposed regulations), those items are reported on S's
tax return for the short period ending on the day of S's change in
status. The proposed regulations are expected to afford taxpayers and
the IRS greater certainty regarding the period to which S's tax items
resulting from such a transaction are allocated.
C. Previous Day Rule
As noted in section 2 of this preamble, the special rule for S
corporations provides an exception to the end of the day rule if an S
corporation joins a consolidated group. To avoid creating a one-day C
corporation tax return for the termination date, the S corporation
exception provides that S becomes a member of the group at the
beginning of the termination date, and that S's taxable year ends for
all federal income tax purposes at the end of the preceding day.
Although these proposed regulations retain the S corporation
exception, the proposed regulations add a previous day rule that
mirrors the principles of the proposed next day rule. Whereas the
proposed next day rule requires extraordinary items resulting from
transactions that occur on the day of S's change in status (but after
the event causing the change) to be allocated to S's tax return for the
short period that begins the following day, the previous day rule
requires extraordinary items resulting from transactions that occur on
the termination date (but before or simultaneously with the event
causing S's status as an S corporation to terminate) to be allocated to
S's tax return for the short period that ends on the previous day (that
is, the day preceding the termination date).
D. Revised Scope of the End of the Day Rule and Related Rules
Under the current end of the day rule, S becomes or ceases to be a
member at the end of the day on which its status as a member changes,
and its tax year ends ``for all federal income tax purposes'' at the
end of that day. However, applying the end of the day rule for purposes
other than the reporting of S's tax items could yield results
inconsistent with other consolidated return rules. For example, under
Sec. Sec. 1.1502-13 and 1.1502-80(d)(1), if a member contributes
property subject to a liability in excess of the property's basis to a
nonmember in exchange for the nonmember's stock, and if the transferee
becomes a member of the transferor's consolidated group as a result of
the exchange, the transaction is treated as an intercompany transaction
and section 357(c) does not apply. However, if the end of the day rule
applies ``for all federal income tax purposes,'' it may be unclear
whether the transferee becomes a member ``immediately after the
transaction,'' whether the transaction is an intercompany transaction,
and whether section 357(c) could apply to the transaction.
To eliminate possible confusion arising from application of the
current end of the day rule and related rules, these proposed
regulations provide that the end of the day rule, the proposed next day
rule, the S corporation exception, and the previous day rule apply for
purposes of determining the period in which S must report its tax
items, as well as for purposes of sections 382(h) and 1374 (discussed
in section 3.I. of this preamble).
E. Extraordinary Items
The proposed next day rule mandatorily applies to extraordinary
items that result from a transaction that occurs on the day of S's
change in status but after the event that causes the change. In
contrast, the previous day rule mandatorily applies to extraordinary
items that result from a transaction that occurs on the day of S's
change in status but before or simultaneously with the event that
causes S's status as an S corporation to terminate.
One category of extraordinary items, set forth in Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) of the current regulations, applies to any
``compensation-related deduction in connection with S's change in
status.'' The proposed regulations clarify that this category of
extraordinary items includes (among other items) a deduction for fees
for services rendered in connection with S's change in status. For
example, if payment of a fee for the services of a financial adviser is
contingent upon a successful acquisition of S's stock, to the extent
the fee gives rise to a deduction, the deduction for the accrual of
that expense is an extraordinary item, and the deduction is allowable
only in S's taxable year that ends at the close of the day of the
change.
The IRS and the Treasury Department request comments as to whether
the list of extraordinary items set forth in Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(2)(ii)(C) should be modified to include any item not currently
listed or whether any item currently included should be deleted or
modified. Specifically, the IRS and the Treasury Department are
considering whether the item in Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(5)
(``[a]ny item carried to or from any portion of the original year
(e.g., a net operating loss carried under section 172), and any section
481(a)
[[Page 12100]]
adjustment'') should be modified to include ``any section 481(a)
adjustment or the acceleration thereof,'' and whether the item in Sec.
1.1502-76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(6) (``[t]he effects of any change in accounting
method initiated by the filing of the appropriate form after S's change
in status'') should continue to be included in the list of
extraordinary items.
The IRS and the Treasury Department also request comments as to
whether any extraordinary item should be excluded, in whole or in part,
from application of the next day rule and the previous day rule. In
particular, the IRS and the Treasury Department request comments as to
whether the extraordinary items set forth in Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(5) and (6) of the current regulations should be
excluded, in whole or in part, from application of these rules.
F. Ratable Allocation
Rather than require S to perform a closing of the books on the day
of its change in status, the current regulations under Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(2)(ii) permit S's tax items, other than the extraordinary items,
to be ratably allocated between S's two short taxable years if certain
conditions are met. The IRS and the Treasury Department request
comments as to whether S no longer should be permitted to elect to
ratably allocate its tax items between the periods ending and beginning
with S's change in status.
G. Certain Foreign Entities
Solely for purposes of determining the short taxable year of S to
which the items of a passthrough entity in which S owns an interest are
allocated, Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(2)(vi)(A) of the current regulations
generally provides that S is treated as selling or exchanging its
entire interest in the entity immediately before S's change in status.
This rule does not apply to certain foreign corporations the ownership
of which may give rise to deemed income inclusions under the Code. In
addition, a deemed income inclusion from a foreign corporation and a
deferred tax amount from a passive foreign investment company under
section 1291 are treated as extraordinary items under Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(2)(ii)(C)(11). The IRS and the Treasury Department request
comments as to whether such deemed income inclusions or deferred tax
amounts should continue to be treated as extraordinary items, whether
rules having similar effects to the rule in Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(2)(vi)(A) relating to passthrough entities should be adopted for
controlled foreign corporations and passive foreign investment
companies in which S owns an interest, and whether any other changes
should be made to Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(2)(vi) of the current regulations.
H. Anti-Avoidance Rule
Under Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(3) of the current regulations, if any
person acts with a principal purpose contrary to the purposes of Sec.
1.1502-76(b) to substantially reduce the federal income tax liability
of any person (prohibited purpose), adjustments must be made as
necessary to carry out the purposes of Sec. 1.1502-76 of the current
regulations (anti-avoidance rule). The proposed regulations clarify
that the anti-avoidance rule may apply to situations in which a person
modifies an existing contract or other agreement in anticipation of S's
change in status in order to shift an item between the taxable years
that end and begin as a result of S's change in status if such actions
are undertaken with a prohibited purpose. The IRS and the Treasury
Department request comments regarding this proposed amendment to the
anti-avoidance rule.
I. Coordination With Sections 382(h) and 1374
1. Section 382
For purposes of section 382, the term recognized built-in loss
(RBIL) means any loss recognized during the recognition period on the
disposition of any asset held by the loss corporation immediately
before the date of the section 382 ownership change (change date), to
the extent the loss reflects a built-in loss on the change date.
Section 382(h)(2)(B). The term recognition period means the five-year
period beginning on the change date. Section 382(h)(7)(A).
Section 382(h)(1)(B) generally provides that if a loss corporation
has a net unrealized built-in loss (NUBIL), then any RBIL taken into
account in a taxable year any portion of which falls in the recognition
period (recognition period taxable year) is treated as a deduction
subject to the loss corporation's section 382 limitation as if the RBIL
were a pre-change loss. The amount of RBILs subject to the section 382
limitation in any recognition period taxable year is limited, however,
to the excess of the NUBIL over total RBILs in prior taxable years
ending in the recognition period. (The amount of such excess is
referred to in this preamble as the outstanding NUBIL balance.) In
other words, the amount of the NUBIL limits the amount of RBILs that
are treated as pre-change losses, and any built-in loss treated as an
RBIL further reduces the outstanding NUBIL balance.
In many cases, the event that causes S's change in status for
purposes of Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii) also causes S to undergo an
ownership change for purposes of section 382. Thus, an item of
deduction or loss that becomes reportable on the day of S's change in
status falls within the recognition period beginning that day, even if
the item is allocated to S's short period ending that day under the end
of the day rule. As a consequence, an item that should be a pre-change
loss is treated as an RBIL that reduces the outstanding NUBIL balance.
For example, assume consolidated group A sells all of S's stock to
consolidated group B. If on the day of S's change in status (but before
the event causing the change), S recognizes a loss on the sale of an
asset, under the end of the day rule the loss is reported on group A's
consolidated return. However, notwithstanding that the loss may not be
claimed by group B, the loss may be treated as an RBIL and reduce the
outstanding NUBIL balance.
To prevent such an outcome, these proposed regulations provide
that, for purposes of section 382(h), items includible in the short
taxable year that ends as a result of S's change in status (including
items allocated to that taxable year under the end of the day rule) are
not treated as occurring in the recognition period. Rather, only items
includible in S's short taxable year that begins as a result of S's
change in status (including items allocated to that taxable year under
the proposed next day rule) are treated as occurring in the recognition
period. Therefore, the beginning of the recognition period for purposes
of section 382(h) would correspond with the beginning of S's short
taxable year that begins on the day after S's change in status.
2. Section 1374
Section 1374 generally imposes a corporate-level tax (section 1374
tax) on the recognition of gain by an S corporation that formerly was a
C corporation (or that acquired assets from a C corporation in a
transferred basis transaction) during a recognition period specified in
section 1374(d)(7) (section 1374 recognition period), but only to the
extent of the corporation's net recognized built-in gain (as defined in
section 1374(d)(2)) for a given taxable year. The section 1374 tax also
applies to certain tax items attributable to the corporation's C
corporation taxable years. In addition, regulations under section
337(d) extend section 1374 treatment to (1) a C corporation's
conversion to a real estate investment
[[Page 12101]]
trust (REIT), regulated investment company (RIC), and certain tax-
exempt entities, or (2) certain cases in which a REIT, RIC, or tax-
exempt entity acquires assets in a transferred basis transaction from a
C corporation.
As with the application of section 382(h), the event that causes
S's change in status for purposes of Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii) may be
the event that results in S being a corporation that is subject to the
section 1374 tax. Therefore, it is necessary to determine in which
return (the group's consolidated return or S's separate return
beginning the day after S's change in status) S's tax items for the day
of S's change in status are included. Similarly, if the event that
causes S's change in status for purposes of Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)
is the event that results in S ceasing to be a corporation subject to
the section 1374 tax, it is necessary to determine in which return (the
group's consolidated return or S's separate return for the period
ending the day before S's change in status) S's tax items for the day
of S's change in status are included. The proposed regulations thus
provide that if S ceases to be a corporation subject to the section
1374 tax upon becoming a member, or if S elects to be a corporation
that is subject to the section 1374 tax for its first separate return
year after ceasing to be a member, S's items of recognized built-in
gain or loss for purposes of section 1374 will include only the amounts
reported on S's separate return (including items reported on that
return under the previous day rule or the next day rule).
J. Intercompany Section 381 Transactions
Under the current consolidated return regulations, if a member
distributes or transfers its assets to another corporation that is a
member immediately after the distribution or transfer in an
intercompany section 381 transaction, and if the distributor or
transferor member has a net operating loss carryover or a net capital
loss carryover, the distributor or transferor member will not be
treated as having a short taxable year for purposes of determining the
years to which the loss may be carried. Sections 1.1502-21(b)(3)(iii)
and 1.1502-22(b)(4).
These proposed regulations would amend current law by moving these
rules to Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(2)(i) and making conforming changes to
Sec. Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(iii) and 1.1502-22(b)(4). In addition, these
proposed regulations would expand these rules by providing that a short
taxable year of the distributor or transferor member by reason of an
intercompany section 381 transaction is not counted as a separate
taxable year for purposes of determining either the taxable years to
which any tax attribute of the distributor or transferor member may be
carried or the taxable years in which an adjustment under section
481(a) is taken into account. No inference should be drawn from the
proposed changes to these rules as to whether a short taxable year of a
member resulting from an intercompany section 381 transaction is
counted under current law for purposes of determining the years to
which a tax credit may be carried or in which a section 481 adjustment
is taken into account.
K. Due Date for Filing Tax Returns
The proposed regulations also eliminate a provision that could
cause taxpayers to inadvertently miss a return filing deadline. Under
Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(4) of the current regulations, if S joins a
consolidated group, the due date for filing S's separate return is the
earlier of the due date (with extensions) of the group's return or the
due date (with extensions) of S's return if S had not joined the group.
If S goes out of existence during the consolidated return year in which
S joins a group, its taxable year would end. Under section 6072, the
due date for S's short period return would be the 15th day of the third
month (ninth month, with extensions) following the date on which S
ceases to exist. Accordingly, if S ceases to exist during the same
consolidated return year in which it becomes a member, the due date for
S's tax return for the short period that ended as a result of S
becoming a member could be accelerated. To prevent a taxpayer from
inadvertently missing a filing date and being subject to potential
penalties for filing a late return, the proposed regulations provide
that if S goes out of existence in the same consolidated return year in
which it becomes a member, the due date for filing S's separate return
is determined without regard to S's ceasing to exist.
L. Non-Substantive Changes
In addition to the changes described in this preamble, the proposed
regulations make several non-substantive changes to the current
regulations, including moving an example concerning Sec. 1.1502-80(d)
from the text of Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(B)(2) of the current
regulations to Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(7)(ii), Example 3(e).
Effective/Applicability Date
The amendments to Sec. Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(iii), 1.1502-
22(b)(4)(i), 1.1502-76(b)(2)(i), and 1.1502-76(b)(4) will apply to
consolidated return years beginning on or after the date these
regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal Register.
The other amendments to Sec. 1.1502-76(b) will apply to corporations
becoming or ceasing to be members of consolidated groups on or after
the date these regulations are published as final regulations in the
Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It is hereby certified that
these regulations will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This certification is based on the fact that
the regulations apply only to transactions involving corporations that
file consolidated federal income tax returns, and that such
corporations tend to be larger businesses. Accordingly, a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
these regulations will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on
small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under the ``Addresses''
heading. The IRS and the Treasury Department request comments on all
aspects of the proposed rules. All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. A public hearing may be scheduled if
requested in writing by any person who timely submits written comments.
If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place
of the hearing will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is Russell G.
Jones of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). However,
other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated
in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 12102]]
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.1361-5 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 1361. * * *
Section 1.1362-3 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 1362. * * *
Section 1.1502-13 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Section 1.1502-21 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Section 1.1502-22 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Section 1.1502-28 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Section 1.1502-76 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 382(m) and 26
U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Sec. 1.1361-5 [Amended]
0
Par. 2. Section 1.1361-5 is amended:
0
1. In paragraph (a)(3), by removing ``Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2)
(relating to a special rule'' and adding ``Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(B)
(relating to special rules'' in its place.
0
2. In paragraph (a)(4), Example 4, by removing ``Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2)'' and adding ``Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(B)(1)'' in
its place.
Sec. 1.1362-3 [Amended]
0
Par. 3. Section 1.1362-3 is amended in paragraph (a) by removing
``Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2)'' and adding ``Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(1)(ii)(B)'' in its place.
0
Par. 4. Section 1.1502-13 is amended by adding Example 3(e) to
paragraph (c)(7)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-13 Intercompany transactions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(7) * * *
(ii) * * *
Example 3. * * *
(e) Liability in excess of basis. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (a) of this Example 3, except that S and B are not members
of the same consolidated group immediately before S's transfer of
the land to B, and the land is encumbered with an $80 liability.
Immediately after the transfer, S and B are members of the same
consolidated group. Thus, the transfer is an intercompany
transaction to which section 357(c) does not apply pursuant to Sec.
1.1502-80(d).
* * * * *
0
Par. 5. Section 1.1502-21 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(3)(iii)
and adding paragraph (h)(1)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-21 Net operating losses.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Short years in connection with intercompany transactions to
which section 381(a) applies. If a member distributes or transfers
assets in an intercompany transaction to which section 381(a) applies,
see Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(2)(i).
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of this section applies to consolidated
return years beginning on or after the date these regulations are
published as final regulations in the Federal Register. For
transactions occurring before the date these regulations are published
as final regulations in the Federal Register, see Sec. 1.1502-21(b) as
contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised as of April 1 preceding the date
these regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
* * * * *
0
Par. 6. Section 1.1502-22 is amended by:
0
1. Revising paragraph (b)(4)(i).
0
2. Revising the heading of paragraph (h).
0
3. Adding paragraph (h)(1)(iii).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-22 Consolidated capital gain and loss.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Special rules--(i) Short years in connection with intercompany
transactions to which section 381(a) applies. If a member distributes
or transfers assets in an intercompany transaction to which section
381(a) applies, see Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(2)(i).
* * * * *
(h) Effective/applicability date--
(1) * * *
(iii) Paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this section applies to consolidated
return years beginning on or after the date these regulations are
published as final regulations in the Federal Register. For
transactions occurring before the date these regulations are published
as final regulations in the Federal Register, see Sec. 1.1502-22(b) as
contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised as of April 1 preceding the date
these regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.1502-28 [Amended]
0
Par. 7. Section 1.1502-28 is amended in paragraph (b)(11) by removing
``Sec. 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(B)'' and adding ``Sec. 1.1502-
76(b)(1)(ii)(A)(2)'' in its place.
0
Par. 8. Section 1.1502-76 is amended:
0
1. By adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (b)(1)(i).
0
2. By revising paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(A) and (B).
0
3. By adding paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(D).
0
4. By adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (b)(2)(i).
0
5. By revising paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C)(9).
0
6. By removing the last sentence of paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
0
7. By removing the last sentence of paragraph (b)(2)(v).
0
8. In paragraph (b)(2)(vi)(C) by removing ``paragraph (b)(2)(v)'' and
adding ``paragraph (b)(2)(vi)'' in its place.
0
9. By revising paragraph (b)(3).
0
10. By adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (b)(4).
0
11. By adding Examples 8, 9, and 10 to paragraph (b)(5).
0
12. By revising paragraph (b)(6).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-76 Taxable year of members of group.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * * If a corporation (S) becomes or ceases to be a member in
a stock disposition or purchase for which an election under section
336(e) or section 338 is made, paragraphs (b)(1)(ii), (b)(2)(ii), and
(b)(2)(iii) of this section do not apply to the transaction.
(ii) * * *
(A) In general--(1) End of the day rule. If S becomes or ceases to
be a member during a consolidated return year, S's tax year ends, and
(except as provided in paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(A)(2) or paragraph
(b)(1)(ii)(B) of this section) for purposes of determining the period
in which S must report an item of income, gain, deduction, loss, or
credit, S is treated as becoming or ceasing to be a member at the end
of the day on which its status as a member changes (end of the day
rule).
(2) Next day rule. If an extraordinary item (as defined in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C) of this section) results from a transaction
that occurs on the day of S's change in status as a member, but after
the event resulting in the change, and the item would be taken into
account by S on that day, the transaction resulting in the
extraordinary item is treated as occurring at the beginning of the
following day for purposes of determining the period in which S must
report the item (next day rule). The next day rule does not apply to
any extraordinary item that becomes
[[Page 12103]]
includible or deductible simultaneously with the event that causes the
change in S's status.
(B) Special rules for former S corporations--(1) Beginning of the
day rule. If an election under section 1362(a) is in effect for S
immediately before S becomes a member, S is treated as becoming a
member at the beginning of the day the termination of its election
under section 1362(a) is effective (termination date), and S's taxable
year ends at the end of the day preceding the termination date. See
Sec. 1.1361-5(a)(3) for the treatment of certain qualified S
corporation subsidiaries.
(2) Previous day rule. If an extraordinary item (as defined in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C) of this section) results from a transaction
that occurs on the termination date, but before or simultaneously with
the event resulting in the termination of S's election under section
1362(a), and the item would be taken into account by S on that day, the
transaction resulting in the extraordinary item is treated as occurring
at the end of the previous day for purposes of determining the period
in which S must report the item (previous day rule). See Sec. 1.1361-
5(a)(3) for the treatment of certain qualified S corporation
subsidiaries.
* * * * *
(D) Coordination with sections 382 and 1374. If the day of S's
change in status is also the date of an ownership change for purposes
of section 382, the rules and principles of this section apply in
determining the treatment of any item or asset for purposes of section
382(h). Accordingly, if the day of S's change in status is also a
change date, the determination of net unrealized built-in gain or loss
will reflect the application of both the end of the day rule and the
next day rule, to the extent each applies. Moreover, items includible
in the taxable year that ends as a result of S's change in status are
not treated as occurring in the recognition period described in section
382(h)(7)(A), and items includible in the taxable year that begins as a
result of S's change in status are treated as occurring in the
recognition period. If S ceases to be a corporation subject to the tax
imposed by section 1374 upon becoming a member of a consolidated group,
or if S elects to be a corporation that is subject to such tax for its
first separate return year after ceasing to be a member, S's items of
recognized built-in gain or loss for purposes of section 1374 will
include only the amounts reported on S's separate return (including
items reported on that return under the previous day rule or the next
day rule).
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * * If a member distributes or transfers assets in an
intercompany transaction to which section 381(a) applies, a short
taxable year of the distributor or transferor corporation is not taken
into account either for purposes of determining the taxable years to
which any tax attribute of the distributor or transferor corporation
may be carried or for purposes of determining the taxable years in
which an adjustment under section 481(a) is taken into account.
(ii) * * *
(C) * * *
(9) Any compensation-related deduction in connection with S's
change in status (including, for example, a deduction for fees for
services rendered in connection with S's change in status and for
bonus, severance, and option cancellation payments made in connection
with S's change in status);
* * * * *
(3) Anti-avoidance rule. If any person acts with a principal
purpose contrary to the purposes of this paragraph (b) to substantially
reduce the federal income tax liability of any person (including by
modifying an existing contract or other agreement in anticipation of a
change in S's status to shift an item between the taxable years that
end and begin as a result of S's change in status), adjustments must be
made as necessary to carry out the purposes of this section.
(4) * * * In addition, if S ceases to exist in the same
consolidated return year in which S becomes a member, the due date for
filing S's separate return shall be determined without regard to S's
ceasing to exist in that year.
(5) * * *
Example 8. Allocation of certain amounts that become deductible
on the day of S's change in status--(a) Facts. P purchases all of
the stock of S, an accrual-basis, stand-alone C corporation, on June
30 pursuant to a stock purchase agreement. At the time of the stock
purchase, S has outstanding nonqualified stock options issued to
certain employees. The options did not have a readily ascertainable
fair market value when granted, and the options do not provide for a
deferral of compensation (as defined in Sec. 1.409A-1(b)). Under
the option agreements, S is obligated to pay its employees certain
amounts in cancellation of their stock options upon a change in
control of S. P's purchase of S's stock causes a change in control
of S, and S's obligation to make option cancellation payments to its
employees becomes fixed and determinable upon the closing of the
stock purchase. Several days after the closing of the stock
purchase, S pays its employees the amounts required under the option
agreements.
(b) Analysis. P's purchase of S's stock causes S to become a
member of the P group at the end of the day on June 30. Under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) of this section, a deduction arising from
S's liability to pay its employees in cancellation of their stock
options in connection with S's change in status is an extraordinary
item that cannot be prorated and must be allocated to June 30. The
next day rule is inapplicable to this deduction because S's
liability to pay its employees becomes deductible on the day of S's
change in status simultaneously with the event that causes S's
change in status. Consequently, a deduction for the option
cancellation payments must be reported under the end of the day rule
on S's tax return for the period ending June 30.
(c) Success-based fees. The facts are the same as in paragraph
(a) of this Example 8, except that S also engages a consulting firm
to provide services in connection with P's purchase of S's stock.
Under the terms of the engagement letter, S's obligation to pay for
these services is contingent upon the successful closing of the
stock purchase. The stock purchase closes successfully, and S's
obligation to pay its consultants becomes fixed and determinable at
closing. To the extent S's payment of a success-based fee to its
consultants is otherwise deductible, this item is an extraordinary
item that cannot be prorated and must be reported under the end of
the day rule on S's return for the period ending June 30. (See
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) of this section.) The next day rule is
inapplicable to the deduction because S's liability to pay its
consultants becomes deductible on the day of S's change in status
simultaneously with the event that causes S's change in status.
(d) Unwanted assets. The facts are the same as in paragraph (a)
of this Example 8, except that, after closing on June 30, S sells to
an unrelated party certain assets used in S's trade or business that
are not wanted by the P group. Gain or loss on the sale of these
assets is an extraordinary item that results from a transaction that
occurs on the day of S's change in status, but after the event
resulting in the change. Consequently, under the next day rule, the
gain or loss must be reported on S's tax return for the period
beginning July 1.
Example 9. Redemption that causes a change in status--(a) Facts.
P owns 80 shares of S's only class of outstanding stock, and a
person whose ownership of S stock is not attributed to P under
section 302(c) owns the remaining 20 shares. On June 30, S
distributes land with a basis of $100 and a fair market value of
$140 to P in redemption of all of P's stock in S.
(b) Analysis. As a result of the redemption, S ceases to be a
member of P's consolidated group on June 30. S will recognize $40 of
gain under section 311(b) on the distribution of the land to P. The
next day rule is inapplicable because S's gain becomes includible on
the day of S's change in status simultaneously with the event that
causes S's change in status. Consequently, S's gain must be reported
under the end of the day rule in its taxable year ending June 30,
during which
[[Page 12104]]
S was a member of the P group. Under Sec. 1.1502-32(b)(2)(i), P's
basis in its S stock is increased to reflect S's $40 gain
immediately before the redemption of S's stock.
(c) Partial redemption. The facts are the same as in paragraph
(a) of this Example 9, except that S distributes the land to P in
redemption of 20 shares of P's stock in S. Thus, immediately after
the redemption, P owns 75% (60 shares/80 shares) of S's outstanding
stock, and S's minority shareholder owns 25% (20 shares/80 shares).
The redemption does not satisfy the requirements of section 302(b)
and is treated under section 302(d) as a distribution to which
section 301 applies. The end of the day rule does not apply for
purposes of determining whether P and S are members of the same
consolidated group immediately after the redemption. Because P owns
only 75% of S's stock immediately after the redemption, the
distribution is not an intercompany distribution described in Sec.
1.1502-13(f)(2)(i). Thus, P may not exclude any amount of the
distribution that is a dividend, and P's basis in S's stock is not
reduced under Sec. 1.1502-32(b)(2)(iv). P may be entitled to a
dividends received deduction under section 243(c) (but see section
1059(e)). For the reasons discussed in paragraph (b) of this Example
9, S's gain under section 311(b) must be reported under the end of
the day rule in S's taxable year ending June 30, during which S was
a member of the P group.
(d) Distribution of loss property. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (a) of this Example 9, except that the land distributed by
S to P has a fair market value of $60 rather than $140. The end of
the day rule applies for purposes of determining the taxable year in
which S must take into account its realized loss on the distribution
of the land. Thus, under the end of the day rule, S's loss on the
distribution of the land, which occurs simultaneously with S's
ceasing to be a member, is taken into account in S's taxable year
that ends as a result of the redemption. However, the end of the day
rule does not apply for other purposes; for example, the rule does
not apply in determining whether the transaction is an intercompany
distribution or in determining the attributes (as defined in Sec.
1.1502-13(b)(6)) of the loss. Therefore, because S is not a member
immediately after the distribution, S's loss on the distribution is
not recognized under section 311(a). Under the end of the day rule,
the loss is taken into account as a noncapital, nondeductible
expense on the P group's consolidated return, and under Sec.
1.1502-32(b)(1)(i), P's basis in its S stock is decreased by $40
immediately before S leaves the group.
Example 10. Extraordinary item of S corporation--(a) Facts. On
July 1, P purchases all the stock of S, an accrual-basis corporation
with an election in effect under section 1362(a). Prior to the sale,
S had engaged a consulting firm to find a buyer for S's stock, and
the consulting firm's fee was contingent upon the successful closing
of the sale of S's stock.
(b) Analysis. To the extent S's payment of the success-based fee
to its consultants is otherwise deductible, this item is an
extraordinary item (see paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C)(9) of this section)
that becomes deductible on July 1 simultaneously with the event that
terminates S's election as an S corporation. Under paragraph
(b)(1)(ii)(B)(2) of this section, S's obligation to pay the fee is
treated as becoming deductible on June 30 under the previous day
rule.
(6) Effective/applicability date. Paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(4)
of this section apply to consolidated return years beginning on or
after the date these regulations are published as final regulations in
the Federal Register. Otherwise, this paragraph (b) applies to
corporations becoming or ceasing to be members of consolidated groups
on or after the date these regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015-05123 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P