Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Modernization and Repair of Piers 2 and 3, Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA, 11983 [2015-05083]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 43 / Thursday, March 5, 2015 / Notices
of the Board on Coastal Engineering
Research. The DFO, at that time, may
provide additional guidance on the
submission of written statements that
are in response to the stated agenda for
the planned meeting in question.
Dated: March 2, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015–05040 Filed 3–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the Modernization and Repair of
Piers 2 and 3, Military Ocean Terminal
Concord, CA
Department of the Army, DOD.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Army
(Army) announces the availability of the
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Modernization and Repair
of Piers 2 and 3 at Military Ocean
Terminal Concord, California (MOTCO).
The Final EIS evaluates the potential
environmental and socioeconomic
effects that could result from demolition
and reconstruction of structural
elements, replacement of infrastructure,
upgrades to shore-side roads and
electrical infrastructure, repair of piles
at Pier 3, and maintenance dredging.
Environmental consequences were
evaluated for noise; air quality; geology,
topography, and soils; water resources;
biological resources; land use and
coastal zone management;
transportation; infrastructure; visual
resources; recreational resources;
socioeconomics; environmental justice
and protection of children; cultural
resources; and hazardous materials,
hazardous waste, toxic substances, and
contaminated sites. Based on the
analysis described in the EIS, all
impacts are anticipated to be less than
significant. The potential for
environmental impacts is greatest for
the following resource areas: water
resources; biological resources;
transportation; infrastructure; and
cultural resources.
DATES: The Army will make a final
decision no sooner than 30 days after
the publication of a Notice of
Availability for the Final EIS in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Please send requests for a
copy of the Final EIS or written
comments on the Final EIS to Mr.
Malcolm Charles, Director of Public
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Mar 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
Works, Attention: SDAT–CCA–MI
(Charles), 410 Norman Avenue,
Concord, CA 94520; email comments to
usarmy.motco.sddc.mbx.list-eis@
mail.mil; or fax comments to (925) 246–
4171 (Attention: SDAT–CCA–MI
[Charles]).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Sarah Garner, Public Affairs Office,
Surface Deployment and Distribution
Command; telephone: (618) 220–6284;
email:
usarmy.scott.sddc.mbx.commandaffairs@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the proposed action is to
modernize and repair Pier 2 and repair
Pier 3 so the Army can maintain its
ability to meet Department of Defense
(DOD) mission requirements in support
of wartime and contingency operations.
Piers 2 and 3 were built in the mid1940s and are past their structural and
design life and lack modern operational
efficiencies. Based on Net Explosive
Weight handling capability, Pier 2 is the
optimum pier for mission capability, but
it cannot be used due to its degraded
and nonoperational condition. Pier 3,
currently the primary operational pier at
MOTCO, requires some level of repair to
maintain even its limited operational
capability through 2019.
Alternative 1 fully implements repairs
to Piers 2 and 3 with Pier 2 re-oriented
to align the west end with the existing
shipping channel to create a more
modernized configuration. Alternative 2
would be similar to Alternative 1, but
the Pier 2 footprint would not change.
Alternative 3 would fully implement
repairs to Piers 2 and 3, reorienting Pier
2 to create a more modernized
configuration but with a larger deck
surface and heavier load-carrying
capacity than that proposed under
Alternative 1. Under the No Action
Alternative, the modernization and
repair of Pier 2 and the repair of Pier 3
at MOTCO would not occur, and Pier 3
would continue to be used with loading
restrictions for the remainder of its
service life. The No Action Alternative
provides the environmental baseline
conditions for comparing the impacts
associated with the other alternatives.
Alternative 1 is the preferred
alternative.
The Army consulted with regulatory
agencies, to include the State Historic
Preservation Officer, the National Park
Service, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, the San Francisco Bay
Regional Water Quality Control Board,
the National Marine Fisheries Service,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and
the San Francisco Bay Conservation and
Development Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11983
Several of the comments received
during the Draft EIS review period
resulted in revisions to the Final EIS.
These revisions included minor
clarifications and the inclusion of
updated information. The Final EIS
includes responses to all comments.
Copies of the Final EIS are available
for public review at the following two
Contra Costa County libraries: (1)
Concord Library, 2900 Salvio Street,
Concord, CA 94519 and (2) Bay Point
Library, 205 Pacifica Avenue, Bay Point,
CA 94565. The Final EIS may also be
reviewed electronically at https://www.
sddc.army.mil/MOTCO/default.aspx.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–05083 Filed 3–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
United States Air Force F–35a
Operational Basing—Pacific
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DOD.
ACTION:
Notice of Intent (NOI).
The Air Force is issuing this
notice of intent (NOI) (40 CFR 1508.22)
to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to assess the proposed
action to base two (2) F–35A squadrons
(48 Primary Assigned Aircraft (PAA)) at
Eielson Air Force Base (AFB), Alaska.
The proposed action will also include
the use of related airspace and ranges,
particularly the Joint Pacific Alaska
Range Complex (JPARC). The F–35A is
the conventional take-off and landing
version of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF).
It is a multiple-role fighter with an
emphasis on air-to-ground missions.
A No-Action Alternative will be
included in the EIS, whereby no F–35A
squadrons would be based at Eielson
AFB. The analysis of the no-action
alternative will provide a benchmark to
enable Air Force decision-makers to
compare the magnitude of the
environmental effects of the proposed
action. No-action means the proposed
action would not take place, and the
resulting environmental effects from
taking no-action will be compared with
the effects of allowing the proposed
activity to go forward.
Scoping: The public scoping process
will be used to identify community
concerns and local issues to be
considered during the draft EIS
development process. Federal, state, and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 43 (Thursday, March 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05083]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Modernization and
Repair of Piers 2 and 3, Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army (Army) announces the availability
of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Modernization
and Repair of Piers 2 and 3 at Military Ocean Terminal Concord,
California (MOTCO). The Final EIS evaluates the potential environmental
and socioeconomic effects that could result from demolition and
reconstruction of structural elements, replacement of infrastructure,
upgrades to shore-side roads and electrical infrastructure, repair of
piles at Pier 3, and maintenance dredging. Environmental consequences
were evaluated for noise; air quality; geology, topography, and soils;
water resources; biological resources; land use and coastal zone
management; transportation; infrastructure; visual resources;
recreational resources; socioeconomics; environmental justice and
protection of children; cultural resources; and hazardous materials,
hazardous waste, toxic substances, and contaminated sites. Based on the
analysis described in the EIS, all impacts are anticipated to be less
than significant. The potential for environmental impacts is greatest
for the following resource areas: water resources; biological
resources; transportation; infrastructure; and cultural resources.
DATES: The Army will make a final decision no sooner than 30 days after
the publication of a Notice of Availability for the Final EIS in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Please send requests for a copy of the Final EIS or written
comments on the Final EIS to Mr. Malcolm Charles, Director of Public
Works, Attention: SDAT-CCA-MI (Charles), 410 Norman Avenue, Concord, CA
94520; email comments to usarmy.motco.sddc.mbx.list-eis@mail.mil; or
fax comments to (925) 246-4171 (Attention: SDAT-CCA-MI [Charles]).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sarah Garner, Public Affairs
Office, Surface Deployment and Distribution Command; telephone: (618)
220-6284; email: usarmy.scott.sddc.mbx.command-affairs@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the proposed action is to
modernize and repair Pier 2 and repair Pier 3 so the Army can maintain
its ability to meet Department of Defense (DOD) mission requirements in
support of wartime and contingency operations. Piers 2 and 3 were built
in the mid-1940s and are past their structural and design life and lack
modern operational efficiencies. Based on Net Explosive Weight handling
capability, Pier 2 is the optimum pier for mission capability, but it
cannot be used due to its degraded and nonoperational condition. Pier
3, currently the primary operational pier at MOTCO, requires some level
of repair to maintain even its limited operational capability through
2019.
Alternative 1 fully implements repairs to Piers 2 and 3 with Pier 2
re-oriented to align the west end with the existing shipping channel to
create a more modernized configuration. Alternative 2 would be similar
to Alternative 1, but the Pier 2 footprint would not change.
Alternative 3 would fully implement repairs to Piers 2 and 3,
reorienting Pier 2 to create a more modernized configuration but with a
larger deck surface and heavier load-carrying capacity than that
proposed under Alternative 1. Under the No Action Alternative, the
modernization and repair of Pier 2 and the repair of Pier 3 at MOTCO
would not occur, and Pier 3 would continue to be used with loading
restrictions for the remainder of its service life. The No Action
Alternative provides the environmental baseline conditions for
comparing the impacts associated with the other alternatives.
Alternative 1 is the preferred alternative.
The Army consulted with regulatory agencies, to include the State
Historic Preservation Officer, the National Park Service, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality
Control Board, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and
Development Commission.
Several of the comments received during the Draft EIS review period
resulted in revisions to the Final EIS. These revisions included minor
clarifications and the inclusion of updated information. The Final EIS
includes responses to all comments.
Copies of the Final EIS are available for public review at the
following two Contra Costa County libraries: (1) Concord Library, 2900
Salvio Street, Concord, CA 94519 and (2) Bay Point Library, 205
Pacifica Avenue, Bay Point, CA 94565. The Final EIS may also be
reviewed electronically at https://www.sddc.army.mil/MOTCO/default.aspx.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-05083 Filed 3-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P