Approval of Subzone Status; Red Wing Shoe Company; Salt Lake City, Utah, 11396 [2015-04390]

Download as PDF 11396 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Notices Dated: February 23, 2015. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–04393 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–001–2015] Approval of Subzone Status; Red Wing Shoe Company; Salt Lake City, Utah On January 8, 2015, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Salt Lake City Corporation, grantee of FTZ 30, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 30, on behalf of Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc., in Salt Lake City, Utah. The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (80 FR 1894, 01/14/2015). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 30A is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 30’s 55-acre activation limit. Dated: February 25, 2015. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–04390 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Department) is initiating a changed circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on hand trucks and certain parts thereof (hand trucks) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Based on the information received, we preliminarily intend to revoke, in part, the Order.1 Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke, or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4947 or (202) 482– 0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 2, 2004, the Department published in the Federal Register the AD order on hand trucks from the PRC.2 On December 9, 2014, in accordance with sections 751(b) and 751(d)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.216(b), and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1), Positec, an interested party, requested revocation, in part, of the Order with respect to its WORX Aerocart (Aerocart) as part of a changed circumstances review. Positec requested that the Department conduct the changed circumstances review on an expedited basis pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). On December 10, 2014, Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. and Precision Products, Inc. (collectively, Petitioners) submitted a statement asserting that Petitioners have no interest in the patented and trademarked product known as the WORX Aerocart being subject to the Order.3 On January 30, 2015, Positec clarified the language for revoking the Order, in part, with respect to Aerocart for this changed circumstances review.4 On February 2, 2015, Petitioners assented to the revised description.5 On [A–570–891] Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review, and Intent To Revoke Order In Part Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to a request by Positec USA, Inc., and RQ Direct, Inc. (collectively, Positec), and pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3)(ii), the Department of Commerce (the mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:24 Mar 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China, 69 FR 70122 (December 2, 2004) (Order). 2 Id. 3 See Petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Petitioner’s Statement That It Has No Interest In the WORX Aerocart Being Subject to the Order,’’ dated December 10, 2014 at 1. 4 See Positec’s submission, ‘‘Changed Circumstances Review—Modification Antidumping Duty Order on Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated 1/30/2015. 5 See Petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Petitioner’s Statement That It Has No Interest In the WORX Aerocart Being Subject to the Order,’’ dated February 2, 2015. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 February 12, 2015, Positec, in consultation with Petitioners, further modified the language for revoking the Order, in part, with respect to Aerocart for this changed circumstance review.6 Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this AD order consists of hand trucks manufactured from any material, whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete, suitable for any use, and certain parts thereof, namely the vertical frame, the handling area and the projecting edges or toe plate, and any combination thereof. A complete or fully assembled hand truck is a hand-propelled barrow consisting of a vertically disposed frame having a handle or more than one handle at or near the upper section of the vertical frame; at least two wheels at or near the lower section of the vertical frame; and a horizontal projecting edge or edges, or toe plate, perpendicular or angled to the vertical frame, at or near the lower section of the vertical frame. The projecting edge or edges, or toe plate, slides under a load for purposes of lifting and/or moving the load. That the vertical frame can be converted from a vertical setting to a horizontal setting, then operated in that horizontal setting as a platform, is not a basis for exclusion of the hand truck from the scope of this petition. That the vertical frame, handling area, wheels, projecting edges or other parts of the hand truck can be collapsed or folded is not a basis for exclusion of the hand truck from the scope of the petition. That other wheels may be connected to the vertical frame, handling area, projecting edges, or other parts of the hand truck, in addition to the two or more wheels located at or near the lower section of the vertical frame, is not a basis for exclusion of the hand truck from the scope of the petition. Finally, that the hand truck may exhibit physical characteristics in addition to the vertical frame, the handling area, the projecting edges or toe plate, and the two wheels at or near the lower section of the vertical frame, is not a basis for exclusion of the hand truck from the scope of the petition. Examples of names commonly used to reference hand trucks are hand truck, convertible hand truck, appliance hand truck, cylinder hand truck, bag truck, dolly, or hand trolley. They are typically imported under heading 8716.80.5010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 6 See Positec’s submission, ‘‘Changed Circumstances Review—Modification Antidumping Duty Order on Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated February 12, 2015. E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM 03MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-001-2015]


Approval of Subzone Status; Red Wing Shoe Company; Salt Lake 
City, Utah

    On January 8, 2015, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Salt Lake 
City Corporation, grantee of FTZ 30, requesting subzone status subject 
to the existing activation limit of FTZ 30, on behalf of Red Wing Shoe 
Company, Inc., in Salt Lake City, Utah.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (80 FR 1894, 01/14/2015). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the 
application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. 
Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive 
Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 30A 
is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 30's 55-acre 
activation limit.

    Dated: February 25, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04390 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.