Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California and Imported Table Grapes; Relaxation of Handling Requirements, 11346-11349 [2015-04087]
Download as PDF
11346
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
have qualified. The consecutive terms of
office of a member shall be limited to
two terms. The terms of office of
alternate members shall not be so
limited. Members, their alternates, and
their respective successors shall be
nominated and selected by the Secretary
as provided in § 905.22 and § 905.23.
■ 9. Revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1)
and add a new paragraph (c) in § 905.22
to read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 905.22
Nominations.
(a) Grower members. (1) The
Committee shall give public notice of a
meeting of producers in each district to
be held not later than June 10th of evennumbered years, for the purpose of
making nominations for grower
members and alternate grower members.
The Committee, with the approval of the
Secretary, shall prescribe uniform rules
to govern such meetings and the
balloting thereat. The chairman of each
meeting shall publicly announce at such
meeting the names of the persons
nominated, and the chairman and
secretary of each such meeting shall
transmit to the Secretary their
certification as to the number of votes so
cast, the names of the persons
nominated, and such other information
as the Secretary may request. All
nominations shall be submitted to the
Secretary on or before the 20th day of
June.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Shipper members. (1) The
Committee shall give public notice of a
meeting for bona fide cooperative
marketing organizations which are
handlers, and a meeting for other
handlers who are not so affiliated, to be
held not later than June 10th of evennumbered years, for the purpose of
making nominations for shipper
members and their alternates. The
Committee, with the approval of the
Secretary, shall prescribe uniform rules
to govern each such meeting and the
balloting thereat. The chairperson of
each such meeting shall publicly
announce at the meeting the names of
the persons nominated and the
chairman and secretary of each such
meeting shall transmit to the Secretary
their certification as to the number of
votes cast, the weight by volume of
those shipments voted, and such other
information as the Secretary may
request. All nominations shall be
submitted to the Secretary on or before
the 20th day of June.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section,
nomination and election of members
and alternate members to the Committee
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Mar 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
may be conducted by mail, electronic
mail, or other means according to rules
and regulations recommended by the
Committee and approved by the
Secretary.
■ 10. Revise § 905.28 to read as follows:
§ 905.28
Handler’s accounts.
(a) If, at the end of a fiscal period, the
assessments collected are in excess of
expenses incurred, the Committee, with
the approval of the Secretary, may carry
over such excess into subsequent fiscal
periods as a reserve: Provided, That
funds already in the reserve do not
exceed approximately two fiscal
periods’ expenses. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Revise paragraphs (a)(4) and (a)(5),
and add a new paragraph (a)(6) in
§ 905.52 to read as follows:
§ 905.52
Issuance of regulations.
(a) * * *
(4) Establish, prescribe, and fix the
size, capacity, weight, dimensions,
marking (including labels and stamps),
or pack of the container or containers
which may be used in the packaging,
transportation, sale, shipment, or other
handling of fruit.
(5) Provide requirements that may be
different for the handling of fruit within
the production area, the handling of
fruit for export, or for the handling of
fruit between the production area and
any point outside thereof within the
United States.
(6) Any regulations or requirements
pertaining to intrastate shipments shall
not be implemented unless Florida
statutes and regulations regulating such
shipments are not in effect.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: February 23, 2015.
Rex. A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–04085 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 925 and 944
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–14–0031; FV14–925–2
PR]
Qualification and Acceptance.
Any person nominated to serve as a
member or alternate member of the
Committee shall, prior to selection by
the Secretary, qualify by filing a written
qualification and acceptance statement
indicating such person’s qualifications
and willingness to serve in the position
for which nominated.
■ 11. Revise the first sentence of
paragraph (a) in § 905.42 to read as
follows:
§ 905.42
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of
Southeastern California and Imported
Table Grapes; Relaxation of Handling
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule invites
comments on partially relaxing the
handling requirements currently
prescribed under the California table
grape marketing order (order) and the
table grape import regulation. The order
regulates the handling of table grapes
grown in a designated area of
southeastern California and is
administered locally by the California
Desert Grape Administrative Committee
(committee). The import regulation is
authorized under section 8e of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937 and regulates the importation of
table grapes into the United States. This
action would partially relax the onequarter pound minimum bunch size
requirement in the order’s regulations
and the import regulation for U.S. No.
1 Table grade grapes packed in
consumer packages known as
clamshells weighing 5 pounds or less.
Under the proposal, up to 20 percent of
the weight of such containers may
consist of single grape clusters weighing
less than one-quarter pound, but
consisting of at least five berries each.
This rule would provide California
desert grape handlers and importers
with the flexibility to respond to an
ongoing marketing opportunity to meet
consumer needs.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposal
will be included in the record and will
be made available to the public. Please
be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathie Notoro, Marketing Specialist, or
Martin Engeler, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 925, as amended (7 CFR part
925), regulating the handling of grapes
grown in a designated area of
southeastern California, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
This proposed rule is also issued
under section 8e of the Act, which
provides that whenever certain
specified commodities, including table
grapes, are regulated under a Federal
marketing order, imports of these
commodities into the United States are
prohibited unless they meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, or
maturity requirements as those in effect
for the domestically produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Mar 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative
procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of import regulations issued
under section 8e of the Act.
This proposed rule would partially
relax the one-quarter pound minimum
bunch size requirement in the order’s
regulations and the import regulation
for all U.S. No. 1 Table grade grapes
packed in clamshell consumer packages
weighing 5 pounds or less. Under the
revision, up to 20 percent of the weight
of such containers could consist of
single grape clusters weighing less than
one-quarter pound but consisting of at
least five berries each. This proposed
rule would provide California desert
grape handlers and importers with the
flexibility to respond to an ongoing
marketing opportunity. The committee
met on November 5, 2013, and
conducted an electronic vote on April 8,
2014, to unanimously recommend the
partial relaxation for California desert
grapes. The change in the import
regulation is required under section 8e
of the Act.
Section 925.52(a)(1) of the order
provides authority to regulate the
handling of any grade, size, quality,
maturity, or pack of any and all varieties
of grapes during the season. Section
925.53 provides authority for the
committee to recommend to USDA
changes to regulations issued pursuant
to § 925.52. Section 925.55 specifies that
when grapes are regulated pursuant to
§ 925.52, such grapes must be inspected
by the Federal or Federal-State
Inspection Service (FSIS) to ensure they
meet applicable requirements.
Section 925.304(a) of the order’s rules
and regulations requires grapes to meet
the minimum grade and size
requirements of U.S. No 1 Table; or to
meet all the requirements of U.S. No. 1
Institutional, except that a tolerance of
33 percent is provided for off-size
bunches. The requirements for the U.S.
No. 1 Table and U.S. No. 1 Institutional
grades are set forth in the United States
Standards for Grades of Table Grapes
(European or Vinifera Type) (7 CFR
51.880 through 51.914) (Standards). To
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11347
meet the requirements of U.S. No. 1
Table grade, grapes must have a bunch
size of at least one-quarter pound.
In 2010, the order’s regulations were
relaxed with respect to the bunch size
requirement specified in the Standards
(75 FR 17031). This change permitted
the use of bunch sizes smaller than onequarter pound, but with at least five
berries each, in packing consumer
clamshell containers containing 2
pounds net weight or less. Not more
than 20 percent of the weight of such
containers could consist of these smaller
bunches. This relaxation was made to
allow handlers to take advantage of a
new marketing opportunity for grapes
packed in small clamshell containers.
Prior to the relaxation, handlers were
experiencing difficulty filling these
containers properly with one-quarter
pound bunches; smaller bunches were
needed to fill the corners of the square
container configuration to achieve the
desired weight.
Since the order’s regulations were
amended in 2010, customers nationwide
have been increasingly requesting
grapes in larger clamshell containers.
Handlers experience difficulty properly
filling these larger containers to the
desired weights with one-quarter pound
bunch sizes, similar to the problem they
experienced with the smaller 2-pound
clamshell containers. Therefore, the
committee recommended that the bunch
size requirement in the order’s
regulations pertaining to U.S. No. 1
Table grade grapes be partially relaxed
with respect to containers weighing 5
pounds or less. Under this proposed
change, up to 20 percent of the weight
of such containers may consist of single
grape clusters weighing less than onequarter pound, but with at least five
berries each. This proposal would allow
handlers to continue to respond to
increased marketing opportunities.
Section 925.304 (a) would be revised
accordingly.
Under section 8e of the Act, minimum
grade, size, quality, and maturity
requirements for table grapes imported
into the United States are established
under Table Grape Import Regulation 4
(7 CFR 944.503) (import regulation). A
relaxation in the California Desert Grape
Regulation 6 minimum bunch size
requirement would require a
corresponding relaxation to the
minimum bunch size requirement for
imported table grapes. Like the domestic
industry, this proposed action would
allow importers the flexibility to
respond to an ongoing marketing
opportunity to meet consumer needs.
Section 944.503(a)(1) would be revised
accordingly.
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11348
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 15 handlers
of southeastern California grapes who
are subject to regulation under the
marketing order and about 41 grape
producers in the production area. In
addition, there are about 102 importers
of grapes. Small agricultural service
firms are defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $7,000,000,
and small agricultural producers are
defined as those whose annual receipts
are less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Ten of the 15 handlers subject to
regulation have annual grape sales of
less than $7,000,000, according to
USDA Market News Service and
committee data. Based on information
from the committee and USDA’s Market
News Service, it is estimated that at
least 10 of the 41 producers have annual
receipts of less than $750,000. Thus, it
may be concluded that a majority of
grape handlers regulated under the
order and about ten of the producers
could be classified as small entities
under the SBA definitions.
Mexico, Chile, and Peru are the major
countries that export table grapes to the
United States. According to 2013 data
from USDA’s Foreign Agricultural
Service (FAS), shipments of table grapes
imported into the United States from
Mexico totaled 16,582,989 18-pound
lugs, from Chile totaled 47,922,204 18pound lugs, and from Peru totaled
3,519,448 18-pound lugs. According to
FAS data, the value of table grapes
imported from Mexico, Chile, and Peru
was $332,284,000, $760,952,000, and
$80,912,000, respectively, for a total
value of $1,174,148,000. It is estimated
that the average importer receives $11.5
million in revenue from the sale of table
grapes. Based on this information, it
may be concluded that the average table
grape importer would not be classified
as a small entity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Mar 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
This proposed rule would revise
§ 925.304(a) of the rules and regulations
of the California desert grape order and
§ 944.503(a)(1) of the table grape import
regulation. This proposed rule would
partially relax the one-quarter pound
minimum bunch size requirement in the
order’s regulations and the import
regulation for U.S. No. 1 Table grade
grapes packed in consumer clamshell
packages weighing 5 pounds or less.
Under the proposed relaxation, up to 20
percent of the weight of each package
may consist of single grape clusters
weighing less than one-quarter pound,
but with at least five berries each.
Authority for the proposed change to
the California desert grape rules and
regulations is provided in
§§ 925.52(a)(1) and 925.53. Authority for
the change to the table grape import
regulation is provided in section 8e of
the Act.
There is agreement in the industry for
the need to expand the revised
minimum bunch size requirement for
grapes packed in these consumer
clamshell packages to allow for more
packaging options.
Regarding the impact of this proposed
rule on affected entities, this rule would
provide both California desert grape
handlers and importers with the
flexibility to continue to respond to an
ongoing marketing opportunity to meet
consumer needs. This marketing
opportunity initially existed in the 2009
season, and the minimum bunch size
regulations were revised for consumer
clamshell packages weighing 2 pounds
or less, on a test basis. In 2011, the
regulation was revised permanently for
consumer clamshell packages weighing
2 pounds or less due to the positive
market response. This proposal would
expand the revised requirements to
include larger consumer clamshell
packages weighing 5 pounds or less.
Customers have been requesting larger
sized clamshell packages, and this
proposed action would enable handlers
and importers to take advantage of
increased market opportunities, which
may result in increased shipments of
consumer grape packages. This is
expected to have a positive impact on
producers, handlers, and importers.
No additional alternatives were
considered because the 2011 revision
produced the desired results, and no
problems were identified. The
committee believes the partial
relaxation of the bunch size requirement
for grapes packed in larger consumer
clamshell packages was appropriate to
prescribe for the 2014 and subsequent
seasons.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule would not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
grape handlers or importers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the grape
industry, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and
participate in committee deliberations.
Like all committee meetings, the
November 5, 2013 meeting was a public
meeting; and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express their views
on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited
to submit comments on this proposed
rule, including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed
appropriate because this rule, if
adopted, needs to be in place as soon as
possible to allow handlers to take
advantage of this relaxation during the
regulatory period which begins on April
10, 2015. All written comments timely
received will be considered before a
final determination is made on this
matter.
In accordance with section 8e of the
Act, the United States Trade
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Representative has concurred with the
issuance of this rule.
PART 944—FRUITS; IMPORT
REQUIREMENTS
ACTION:
List of Subjects
■
3. Amend § 944.503 by redesignating
paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) as
paragraphs (a)(1)(iii) and (a)(1)(iv),
revising paragraph (a)(1) introductory
text and adding new paragraphs (a)(1)(i)
and (a)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
SUMMARY:
7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
7 CFR Part 944
§ 944.503
4.
Avocados, Food grades and standards,
Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, Kiwifruit,
Limes, Olives, Oranges.
(a)(1) Pursuant to section 8e of the Act
and Part 944—Fruits, Import
Regulations, and except as provided in
paragraphs (a)(1)(iii) and (a)(1)(iv), the
importation into the United States of
any variety of Vinifera species table
grapes, except Emperor, Calmeria,
Almeria, and Ribier varieties, is
prohibited unless such grapes meet the
minimum grade and size requirements
established in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) or
(a)(2)(ii).
(i) U.S. No. 1 Table, as set forth in the
United States Standards for Grades of
Table Grapes (European or Vinifera
Type 7 CFR 51.880 through 51.914),
with the exception of the tolerance
percentage for bunch size when packed
in individual consumer clamshell
packages weighing 5 pounds or less: not
more than 20 percent of the weight of
such containers may consist of single
clusters weighing less than one-quarter
pound, but with at least five berries
each; or
(ii) U.S. No. 1 Institutional, with the
exception of the tolerance percentage for
bunch size. Such tolerance shall be 33
percent instead of 4 percent as is
required to meet U.S. No. 1 Institutional
grade. Grapes meeting these quality
requirements may be marked ‘‘DGAC
No. 1 Institutional’’ but shall not be
marked ‘‘Institutional Pack.’’
*
*
*
*
*
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR parts 925 and 944 are
proposed to be amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
parts 925 and 944 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A
DESIGNATED AREA OF
SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA
2. Amend § 925.304(a) by redesignating paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)
as paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4), revising
paragraph (a) introductory text and
adding new paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)
to read as follows:
■
§ 925.304 California Desert Grape
Regulation 6.
*
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11349
*
*
*
*
(a) Grade, size, and maturity. Except
as provided in paragraphs (a)(3) and
(a)(4) of this section, such grapes shall
meet the minimum grade and size
requirements established in paragraphs
(a)(1) or (a)(2).
(1) U.S. No. 1 Table, as set forth in the
United States Standards for Grades of
Table Grapes (European or Vinifera
Type 7 CFR 51.880 through 51.914),
with the exception of the tolerance
percentage for bunch size when packed
in individual consumer clamshell
packages weighing 5 pounds or less: not
more than 20 percent of the weight of
such containers may consist of single
clusters weighing less than one-quarter
pound, but with at least five berries
each; or
(2) U.S. No. 1 Institutional, with the
exception of the tolerance percentage for
bunch size. Such tolerance shall be 33
percent instead of 4 percent as is
required to meet U.S. No. 1 Institutional
grade. Grapes meeting these quality
requirements may be marked ‘‘DGAC
No. 1 Institutional’’ but shall not be
marked ‘‘Institutional Pack.’’
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Mar 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Table Grape Import Regulation
Dated: February 23, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–04087 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 217
[Regulation Q; Docket No. R–1505]
RIN 7100–AD–26
Risk-Based Capital Guidelines:
Implementation of Capital
Requirements for Global Systemically
Important Bank Holding Companies
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
On December 18, 2014, the
Board published in the Federal Register
a proposal to implement risk-based
capital surcharges for U.S.-based global
systemically important banking
organizations.
Due to the range and complexity of
the issues addressed in the proposed
rulemaking, the public comment period
has been extended until April 3, 2015.
This action will allow interested
persons additional time to analyze the
proposal and prepare their comments.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published on December
18, 2014 (79 FR 75473) to implement
risk-based capital surcharges for U.S.based global systemically important
banking organizations is extended from
March 2, 2015 to April 3, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the methods identified in the
proposed rule.1 Please submit your
comments using only one method.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jordan Bleicher, Senior Supervisory
Financial Analyst, (202) 973–6123, or
Holly Kirkpatrick, Supervisory
Financial Analyst, (202) 452–2796,
Division of Banking Supervision and
Regulation, or Christine Graham, Senior
Attorney, (202) 452–3005, Legal
Division.
On
December 18, 2014, the Board published
in the Federal Register a proposal to
implement risk-based capital surcharges
for U.S.-based global systemically
important banking organizations.2 The
proposed rule stated that the public
comment period would close on March
2, 2015.3
The Board has received a comment
letter requesting that the Board extend
the comment period for the proposal.4
The commenter suggested that an
extension of the comment period would
facilitate more detailed comments about
the implications of the proposal and its
potential consequences.
Due to the range and complexity of
the issues addressed in the proposed
rulemaking, the public comment period
has been extended until April 3, 2015.
This action will allow interested
persons additional time to analyze the
proposal and prepare their comments.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, acting through the
1 See
2 See
79 FR 75473 (December 18, 2014).
79 FR 75473 (December 18, 2014).
3 Id.
4 See, e.g., Comment letter to the Board from The
Clearing House (February 20, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11346-11349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04087]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 925 and 944
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-14-0031; FV14-925-2 PR]
Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California and
Imported Table Grapes; Relaxation of Handling Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on partially relaxing the
handling requirements currently prescribed under the California table
grape marketing order (order) and the table grape import regulation.
The order regulates the handling of table grapes grown in a designated
area of southeastern California and is administered locally by the
California Desert Grape Administrative Committee (committee). The
import regulation is authorized under section 8e of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 and regulates the importation of table
grapes into the United States. This action would partially relax the
one-quarter pound minimum bunch size requirement in the order's
regulations and the import regulation for U.S. No. 1 Table grade grapes
packed in consumer packages known as clamshells weighing 5 pounds or
less. Under the proposal, up to 20 percent of the weight of such
containers may consist of single grape clusters weighing less than one-
quarter pound, but consisting of at least five berries each. This rule
would provide California desert grape handlers and importers with the
flexibility to respond to an ongoing marketing opportunity to meet
consumer needs.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
[[Page 11347]]
hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposal will be included in the record
and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the
identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be
made public on the Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathie Notoro, Marketing Specialist,
or Martin Engeler, Regional Director, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or
Email: Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 925, as amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating the handling of
grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California,
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
This proposed rule is also issued under section 8e of the Act,
which provides that whenever certain specified commodities, including
table grapes, are regulated under a Federal marketing order, imports of
these commodities into the United States are prohibited unless they
meet the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity
requirements as those in effect for the domestically produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of import regulations
issued under section 8e of the Act.
This proposed rule would partially relax the one-quarter pound
minimum bunch size requirement in the order's regulations and the
import regulation for all U.S. No. 1 Table grade grapes packed in
clamshell consumer packages weighing 5 pounds or less. Under the
revision, up to 20 percent of the weight of such containers could
consist of single grape clusters weighing less than one-quarter pound
but consisting of at least five berries each. This proposed rule would
provide California desert grape handlers and importers with the
flexibility to respond to an ongoing marketing opportunity. The
committee met on November 5, 2013, and conducted an electronic vote on
April 8, 2014, to unanimously recommend the partial relaxation for
California desert grapes. The change in the import regulation is
required under section 8e of the Act.
Section 925.52(a)(1) of the order provides authority to regulate
the handling of any grade, size, quality, maturity, or pack of any and
all varieties of grapes during the season. Section 925.53 provides
authority for the committee to recommend to USDA changes to regulations
issued pursuant to Sec. 925.52. Section 925.55 specifies that when
grapes are regulated pursuant to Sec. 925.52, such grapes must be
inspected by the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service (FSIS) to
ensure they meet applicable requirements.
Section 925.304(a) of the order's rules and regulations requires
grapes to meet the minimum grade and size requirements of U.S. No 1
Table; or to meet all the requirements of U.S. No. 1 Institutional,
except that a tolerance of 33 percent is provided for off-size bunches.
The requirements for the U.S. No. 1 Table and U.S. No. 1 Institutional
grades are set forth in the United States Standards for Grades of Table
Grapes (European or Vinifera Type) (7 CFR 51.880 through 51.914)
(Standards). To meet the requirements of U.S. No. 1 Table grade, grapes
must have a bunch size of at least one-quarter pound.
In 2010, the order's regulations were relaxed with respect to the
bunch size requirement specified in the Standards (75 FR 17031). This
change permitted the use of bunch sizes smaller than one-quarter pound,
but with at least five berries each, in packing consumer clamshell
containers containing 2 pounds net weight or less. Not more than 20
percent of the weight of such containers could consist of these smaller
bunches. This relaxation was made to allow handlers to take advantage
of a new marketing opportunity for grapes packed in small clamshell
containers. Prior to the relaxation, handlers were experiencing
difficulty filling these containers properly with one-quarter pound
bunches; smaller bunches were needed to fill the corners of the square
container configuration to achieve the desired weight.
Since the order's regulations were amended in 2010, customers
nationwide have been increasingly requesting grapes in larger clamshell
containers. Handlers experience difficulty properly filling these
larger containers to the desired weights with one-quarter pound bunch
sizes, similar to the problem they experienced with the smaller 2-pound
clamshell containers. Therefore, the committee recommended that the
bunch size requirement in the order's regulations pertaining to U.S.
No. 1 Table grade grapes be partially relaxed with respect to
containers weighing 5 pounds or less. Under this proposed change, up to
20 percent of the weight of such containers may consist of single grape
clusters weighing less than one-quarter pound, but with at least five
berries each. This proposal would allow handlers to continue to respond
to increased marketing opportunities. Section 925.304 (a) would be
revised accordingly.
Under section 8e of the Act, minimum grade, size, quality, and
maturity requirements for table grapes imported into the United States
are established under Table Grape Import Regulation 4 (7 CFR 944.503)
(import regulation). A relaxation in the California Desert Grape
Regulation 6 minimum bunch size requirement would require a
corresponding relaxation to the minimum bunch size requirement for
imported table grapes. Like the domestic industry, this proposed action
would allow importers the flexibility to respond to an ongoing
marketing opportunity to meet consumer needs. Section 944.503(a)(1)
would be revised accordingly.
[[Page 11348]]
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 15 handlers of southeastern California
grapes who are subject to regulation under the marketing order and
about 41 grape producers in the production area. In addition, there are
about 102 importers of grapes. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$750,000 (13 CFR 121.201). Ten of the 15 handlers subject to regulation
have annual grape sales of less than $7,000,000, according to USDA
Market News Service and committee data. Based on information from the
committee and USDA's Market News Service, it is estimated that at least
10 of the 41 producers have annual receipts of less than $750,000.
Thus, it may be concluded that a majority of grape handlers regulated
under the order and about ten of the producers could be classified as
small entities under the SBA definitions.
Mexico, Chile, and Peru are the major countries that export table
grapes to the United States. According to 2013 data from USDA's Foreign
Agricultural Service (FAS), shipments of table grapes imported into the
United States from Mexico totaled 16,582,989 18-pound lugs, from Chile
totaled 47,922,204 18-pound lugs, and from Peru totaled 3,519,448 18-
pound lugs. According to FAS data, the value of table grapes imported
from Mexico, Chile, and Peru was $332,284,000, $760,952,000, and
$80,912,000, respectively, for a total value of $1,174,148,000. It is
estimated that the average importer receives $11.5 million in revenue
from the sale of table grapes. Based on this information, it may be
concluded that the average table grape importer would not be classified
as a small entity.
This proposed rule would revise Sec. 925.304(a) of the rules and
regulations of the California desert grape order and Sec.
944.503(a)(1) of the table grape import regulation. This proposed rule
would partially relax the one-quarter pound minimum bunch size
requirement in the order's regulations and the import regulation for
U.S. No. 1 Table grade grapes packed in consumer clamshell packages
weighing 5 pounds or less. Under the proposed relaxation, up to 20
percent of the weight of each package may consist of single grape
clusters weighing less than one-quarter pound, but with at least five
berries each. Authority for the proposed change to the California
desert grape rules and regulations is provided in Sec. Sec.
925.52(a)(1) and 925.53. Authority for the change to the table grape
import regulation is provided in section 8e of the Act.
There is agreement in the industry for the need to expand the
revised minimum bunch size requirement for grapes packed in these
consumer clamshell packages to allow for more packaging options.
Regarding the impact of this proposed rule on affected entities,
this rule would provide both California desert grape handlers and
importers with the flexibility to continue to respond to an ongoing
marketing opportunity to meet consumer needs. This marketing
opportunity initially existed in the 2009 season, and the minimum bunch
size regulations were revised for consumer clamshell packages weighing
2 pounds or less, on a test basis. In 2011, the regulation was revised
permanently for consumer clamshell packages weighing 2 pounds or less
due to the positive market response. This proposal would expand the
revised requirements to include larger consumer clamshell packages
weighing 5 pounds or less. Customers have been requesting larger sized
clamshell packages, and this proposed action would enable handlers and
importers to take advantage of increased market opportunities, which
may result in increased shipments of consumer grape packages. This is
expected to have a positive impact on producers, handlers, and
importers.
No additional alternatives were considered because the 2011
revision produced the desired results, and no problems were identified.
The committee believes the partial relaxation of the bunch size
requirement for grapes packed in larger consumer clamshell packages was
appropriate to prescribe for the 2014 and subsequent seasons.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0189. No changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule would not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large grape handlers or
importers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
Further, the committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the grape industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend
the meeting and participate in committee deliberations. Like all
committee meetings, the November 5, 2013 meeting was a public meeting;
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their
views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on this
proposed rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed appropriate because
this rule, if adopted, needs to be in place as soon as possible to
allow handlers to take advantage of this relaxation during the
regulatory period which begins on April 10, 2015. All written comments
timely received will be considered before a final determination is made
on this matter.
In accordance with section 8e of the Act, the United States Trade
[[Page 11349]]
Representative has concurred with the issuance of this rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 944
Avocados, Food grades and standards, Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports,
Kiwifruit, Limes, Olives, Oranges.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 925 and 944
are proposed to be amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 925 and 944 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
PART 925--GRAPES GROWN IN A DESIGNATED AREA OF SOUTHEASTERN
CALIFORNIA
0
2. Amend Sec. 925.304(a) by re-designating paragraphs (a)(1) and
(a)(2) as paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4), revising paragraph (a)
introductory text and adding new paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) to read
as follows:
Sec. 925.304 California Desert Grape Regulation 6.
* * * * *
(a) Grade, size, and maturity. Except as provided in paragraphs
(a)(3) and (a)(4) of this section, such grapes shall meet the minimum
grade and size requirements established in paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2).
(1) U.S. No. 1 Table, as set forth in the United States Standards
for Grades of Table Grapes (European or Vinifera Type 7 CFR 51.880
through 51.914), with the exception of the tolerance percentage for
bunch size when packed in individual consumer clamshell packages
weighing 5 pounds or less: not more than 20 percent of the weight of
such containers may consist of single clusters weighing less than one-
quarter pound, but with at least five berries each; or
(2) U.S. No. 1 Institutional, with the exception of the tolerance
percentage for bunch size. Such tolerance shall be 33 percent instead
of 4 percent as is required to meet U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade.
Grapes meeting these quality requirements may be marked ``DGAC No. 1
Institutional'' but shall not be marked ``Institutional Pack.''
* * * * *
PART 944--FRUITS; IMPORT REQUIREMENTS
0
3. Amend Sec. 944.503 by redesignating paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and
(a)(1)(ii) as paragraphs (a)(1)(iii) and (a)(1)(iv), revising paragraph
(a)(1) introductory text and adding new paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and
(a)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 944.503 Table Grape Import Regulation 4.
(a)(1) Pursuant to section 8e of the Act and Part 944--Fruits,
Import Regulations, and except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1)(iii)
and (a)(1)(iv), the importation into the United States of any variety
of Vinifera species table grapes, except Emperor, Calmeria, Almeria,
and Ribier varieties, is prohibited unless such grapes meet the minimum
grade and size requirements established in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) or
(a)(2)(ii).
(i) U.S. No. 1 Table, as set forth in the United States Standards
for Grades of Table Grapes (European or Vinifera Type 7 CFR 51.880
through 51.914), with the exception of the tolerance percentage for
bunch size when packed in individual consumer clamshell packages
weighing 5 pounds or less: not more than 20 percent of the weight of
such containers may consist of single clusters weighing less than one-
quarter pound, but with at least five berries each; or
(ii) U.S. No. 1 Institutional, with the exception of the tolerance
percentage for bunch size. Such tolerance shall be 33 percent instead
of 4 percent as is required to meet U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade.
Grapes meeting these quality requirements may be marked ``DGAC No. 1
Institutional'' but shall not be marked ``Institutional Pack.''
* * * * *
Dated: February 23, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-04087 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P