Vessel Documentation Renewal Fees, 11361-11362 [2015-03651]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(11) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line 1.2 miles to the ‘‘Y’’ in an
unimproved road 0.1 mile south of the
800-foot contour line, west of Happy
Canyon Road, T6R/R30W; then
(12) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line for 0.5 mile, crossing onto
the Los Olivos map, and continuing
approximately 2.3 miles to the third
intersection of the line with the 1,000foot contour line northwest of BM 812,
T7N/R30W; then
(13) Proceed westerly along the
meandering 1,000-foot contour line to
the contour line’s intersection with an
unnamed, unimproved road, an
unnamed light-duty road, and the
northern boundary line of section 23,
T7N/R31W; then
(14) Proceed northerly, then westerly,
along the unnamed, unimproved road to
Figueroa Mountain Road, near the
marked 895-foot elevation, T7N/R31W;
then
(15) Proceed north on Figueroa
Mountain Road approximately 400 feet
to the 920-foot contour line, T7N/R31W;
then
(16) Proceed initially south, then
northeasterly along the meandering 920foot contour line, crossing onto the Zaca
Creek map, to Foxen Canyon Road,
T7N/R31W; then
(17) Proceed southeasterly on Foxen
Canyon Road approximately 1.7 miles,
crossing onto the Los Olivos map,
returning to the beginning point.
Dated: February 23, 2015.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–EPA–HQ–OPPT–2014–
0760; FRL–9923–25]
RIN 2070–AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rule on
Certain Chemical Substances;
Extension of Comment Period
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
Follow the detailed
instructions provided under ADDRESSES
in the Federal Register document of
January 7, 2015 (80 FR 845) (FRL–9919–
23).
ADDRESSES:
For
technical information contact: Kenneth
Moss, Chemical Control Division, Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(202) 564–9232; email address:
moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This
document extends the public comment
period established in the Federal
Register proposed rule of January 7,
2015. In that document, EPA proposed
significant new use rules for 13
chemical substances which were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). EPA is hereby extending the
comment period, which was set to end
on March 9, 2015, to April 23, 2015.
To submit comments, or access the
docket, please follow the detailed
instructions provided under ADDRESSES
in the Federal Register proposed rule of
January 7, 2015. If you have questions,
consult the technical person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
EPA issued a proposed rule in
the Federal Register of January 7, 2015,
concerning proposed significant new
use rules for 13 chemical substances
which were the subject of
premanufacture notices (PMNs). This
document extends the comment period
SUMMARY:
17:16 Mar 02, 2015
The comment period for the
proposed rule published on January 7,
2015 (80 FR 845) is extended.
Comments, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPPT–2014–0760 must be received on
or before April 23, 2015.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2015–04253 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
for 45 days, from March 9, 2015 to April
23, 2015. Multiple commenters
requested additional time to research
and submit more detailed comments
concerning the proposed SNURs. EPA is
therefore extending the comment period
in order to give all interested persons
the opportunity to comment fully.
Jkt 235001
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 20, 2015.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2015–04406 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11361
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Part 67
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0990]
RIN 1625–AB56
Vessel Documentation Renewal Fees
Coast Guard, DHS.
Request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard seeks public
comment on whether to increase the
period of validity for renewing
endorsements on Certificates of
Documentation. A separate fee of $26
for annual renewals of endorsements
upon the Certificate of Documentation
was established in a recent rulemaking.
The Coast Guard is considering options
for implementing multiyear renewals
and updating the fee for services, and
seeks information on factors to consider
when implementing these changes.
DATES: Comments and related material
must either be submitted to the online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before June 1, 2015 or reach the
Docket Management Facility by that
date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0990 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this
document, call or email Ms. Mary Jager,
CG–DCO–832, Coast Guard; telephone
202–372–1331, email Mary.K.Jager@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
11362
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Participation and Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments (or related material) on the
possibility of extending the period of
validity and modifying the fee for
renewal on endorsements on the
Certificate of Documentation (COD). We
will consider all submissions and may
adjust our final action based on your
comments. Comments should be marked
with docket number USCG–2010–0990
and should provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may provide personal contact
information so that we can contact you
if we have questions regarding your
comments; but please note that all
comments will be posted to the online
docket without change and that any
personal information you include can be
searchable online (see the Federal
Register Privacy Act notice regarding
our public dockets, 73 FR 3316, Jan. 17,
2008).
Mailed or hand-delivered comments
should be in an unbound 81⁄2 x 11 inch
format suitable for reproduction. The
Docket Management Facility will
acknowledge receipt of mailed
comments if you enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope
with your submission.
Documents mentioned in this request
for comments, and all public comments,
are in our online docket at https://
www.regulations.gov and can be viewed
by following the Web site’s instructions.
You can also view the docket online at
the Docket Management Facility (see the
mailing address under ADDRESSES)
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We are not planning to hold a public
meeting but will consider doing so if
public comments indicate a meeting
would be helpful. We would issue a
separate Federal Register notice to
announce the date, time, and location of
such a meeting.
Background
On August 12, 2014, the Coast Guard
published a final rule entitled ‘‘Vessel
Documentation Renewal Fees’’ in the
Federal Register (79 FR 47015). The
final rule contained the Coast Guard’s
revision of 46 CFR part 67, setting out
fees for services provided.
The Coast Guard received 2,720
comment submissions on the proposed
fees published on March 4, 2013 (78 FR
14053). Comments were received from
individuals, law firms, commercial
vessel documentation services, industry
groups, and maritime corporations. We
considered all comments in
promulgating the final rule. The Coast
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Mar 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Guard received 1,316 comments
regarding the implementation of the
new fee. The majority of these
comments (757 comments) suggested
the Coast Guard institute a multiyear
renewal option program. We made no
changes to the final rule. However, we
are now seeking public comments in
considering options that could be
proposed in a future rulemaking. This
document provides the public with an
opportunity to continue this discussion.
Discussion
The legal basis for charging fees for
this service is found in section 10401 of
the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–508, Nov. 5, 1990,
104 Stat. 1388), codified at 46 U.S.C.
2110, which requires that the Coast
Guard establish user fees for Coast
Guard vessel documentation services.
That section provides that the Secretary
of the Department in which the Coast
Guard is operating (Secretary) shall
establish a fee or charge for a service or
thing of value that is provided to the
recipient or user of that service. The
Secretary is empowered in 46 U.S.C.
2104 to delegate the authorities in 46
U.S.C. Subtitle II to the Coast Guard.
The Secretary exercised that
delegation’s authority for fees in
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1(92)(a).
In establishing these fees, we are
required to use the criteria found in 31
U.S.C. 9701. Under this provision the
fees must be fair, and must be based on
the costs to the government, the value
of the service or thing to the recipient,
and the public policy or interest served
(see 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)). One of the
vessel documentation services the Coast
Guard provides, and for which user fees
are required under 46 U.S.C. 2110, is
renewal of endorsements upon a COD.
A COD is (1) required for the operation
of a vessel in certain trades, (2) serves
as evidence of vessel nationality, and (3)
permits owners of vessels to benefit
from preferred mortgages (46 CFR 67.1).
An endorsement means an entry that
may be made on a COD, and, except for
a recreational endorsement, is
conclusive evidence that a vessel is
entitled to engage in a specified trade
(46 CFR 67.3).
The Coast Guard sets fees at an
amount calculated to achieve recovery
of the costs of providing the service, in
a manner consistent with the general
user charges principles set out in the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A–25. Under that OMB
Circular, each recipient should pay a
reasonable user charge for Federal
Government services, resources, or
goods from which he or she derives a
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
special benefit. The user fee should be
at an amount sufficient for the Federal
Government to recover the full costs of
providing the service, resource, or good
(see OMB Circular A–25, sec. 6(a)(2)(a)).
After reviewing the comments to the
proposed rule, the Coast Guard is
seeking comment on whether it should
consider extending the period of
validity and modifying the fee for
renewal on endorsements on the COD.
Request for Information
Through this document, the Coast
Guard asks for comments and
information to consider in updating
renewal of endorsements on COD
processes and fees. Please consider the
following questions when preparing
comments:
1. Would you prefer a multiyear
renewal program with fees charged at
the time of renewal, or would you prefer
to continue annual renewals including
an annual fee for service? Please explain
why you prefer the renewal period and
its fee payment schedule.
2. Would you prefer having the option
of choosing a multiyear or annual
renewal each time you renew? Please
explain why you prefer the option that
you chose.
If the only option for renewal is
multiyear, how would you suggest the
annual renewal is phased over to a
multiyear renewal?
3. Would you prefer a multiyear
renewal program that requires payment
every other year, or one that requires
payment every 3 years? Please explain
why you chose this option.
4. What are the benefits of a multiyear
renewal?
5. Are there any negative impacts of
a multiyear renewal?
6. What, if any, concerns would you
need to have addressed prior to
selecting the multiyear renewal option?
7. What are the impacts to mortgages
from multiyear information verification
and COD renewal? Will lenders require
additional information from the
National Vessel Documentation Center
(NVDC) to manage loans?
8. What period of renewal is best for
mortgage lenders?
9. What other suggestions do you have
for reducing the burden of obtaining a
COD?
This document is issued under
authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
Dated: February 18, 2015.
J.C. Burton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Director of
Inspections and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–03651 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11361-11362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03651]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Part 67
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0990]
RIN 1625-AB56
Vessel Documentation Renewal Fees
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard seeks public comment on whether to increase
the period of validity for renewing endorsements on Certificates of
Documentation. A separate fee of $26 for annual renewals of
endorsements upon the Certificate of Documentation was established in a
recent rulemaking. The Coast Guard is considering options for
implementing multiyear renewals and updating the fee for services, and
seeks information on factors to consider when implementing these
changes.
DATES: Comments and related material must either be submitted to the
online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or before June 1, 2015
or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0990 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
document, call or email Ms. Mary Jager, CG-DCO-832, Coast Guard;
telephone 202-372-1331, email Mary.K.Jager@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Ms.
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.
[[Page 11362]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Comments
We encourage you to submit comments (or related material) on the
possibility of extending the period of validity and modifying the fee
for renewal on endorsements on the Certificate of Documentation (COD).
We will consider all submissions and may adjust our final action based
on your comments. Comments should be marked with docket number USCG-
2010-0990 and should provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may provide personal contact information so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your comments; but
please note that all comments will be posted to the online docket
without change and that any personal information you include can be
searchable online (see the Federal Register Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets, 73 FR 3316, Jan. 17, 2008).
Mailed or hand-delivered comments should be in an unbound 8\1/2\ x
11 inch format suitable for reproduction. The Docket Management
Facility will acknowledge receipt of mailed comments if you enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope with your submission.
Documents mentioned in this request for comments, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following the Web site's instructions. You can also
view the docket online at the Docket Management Facility (see the
mailing address under ADDRESSES) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We are not planning to hold a public meeting but will consider
doing so if public comments indicate a meeting would be helpful. We
would issue a separate Federal Register notice to announce the date,
time, and location of such a meeting.
Background
On August 12, 2014, the Coast Guard published a final rule entitled
``Vessel Documentation Renewal Fees'' in the Federal Register (79 FR
47015). The final rule contained the Coast Guard's revision of 46 CFR
part 67, setting out fees for services provided.
The Coast Guard received 2,720 comment submissions on the proposed
fees published on March 4, 2013 (78 FR 14053). Comments were received
from individuals, law firms, commercial vessel documentation services,
industry groups, and maritime corporations. We considered all comments
in promulgating the final rule. The Coast Guard received 1,316 comments
regarding the implementation of the new fee. The majority of these
comments (757 comments) suggested the Coast Guard institute a multiyear
renewal option program. We made no changes to the final rule. However,
we are now seeking public comments in considering options that could be
proposed in a future rulemaking. This document provides the public with
an opportunity to continue this discussion.
Discussion
The legal basis for charging fees for this service is found in
section 10401 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L.
101-508, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388), codified at 46 U.S.C. 2110,
which requires that the Coast Guard establish user fees for Coast Guard
vessel documentation services. That section provides that the Secretary
of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating (Secretary)
shall establish a fee or charge for a service or thing of value that is
provided to the recipient or user of that service. The Secretary is
empowered in 46 U.S.C. 2104 to delegate the authorities in 46 U.S.C.
Subtitle II to the Coast Guard. The Secretary exercised that
delegation's authority for fees in Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1(92)(a).
In establishing these fees, we are required to use the criteria
found in 31 U.S.C. 9701. Under this provision the fees must be fair,
and must be based on the costs to the government, the value of the
service or thing to the recipient, and the public policy or interest
served (see 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)). One of the vessel documentation
services the Coast Guard provides, and for which user fees are required
under 46 U.S.C. 2110, is renewal of endorsements upon a COD. A COD is
(1) required for the operation of a vessel in certain trades, (2)
serves as evidence of vessel nationality, and (3) permits owners of
vessels to benefit from preferred mortgages (46 CFR 67.1). An
endorsement means an entry that may be made on a COD, and, except for a
recreational endorsement, is conclusive evidence that a vessel is
entitled to engage in a specified trade (46 CFR 67.3).
The Coast Guard sets fees at an amount calculated to achieve
recovery of the costs of providing the service, in a manner consistent
with the general user charges principles set out in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-25. Under that OMB Circular,
each recipient should pay a reasonable user charge for Federal
Government services, resources, or goods from which he or she derives a
special benefit. The user fee should be at an amount sufficient for the
Federal Government to recover the full costs of providing the service,
resource, or good (see OMB Circular A-25, sec. 6(a)(2)(a)).
After reviewing the comments to the proposed rule, the Coast Guard
is seeking comment on whether it should consider extending the period
of validity and modifying the fee for renewal on endorsements on the
COD.
Request for Information
Through this document, the Coast Guard asks for comments and
information to consider in updating renewal of endorsements on COD
processes and fees. Please consider the following questions when
preparing comments:
1. Would you prefer a multiyear renewal program with fees charged
at the time of renewal, or would you prefer to continue annual renewals
including an annual fee for service? Please explain why you prefer the
renewal period and its fee payment schedule.
2. Would you prefer having the option of choosing a multiyear or
annual renewal each time you renew? Please explain why you prefer the
option that you chose.
If the only option for renewal is multiyear, how would you suggest
the annual renewal is phased over to a multiyear renewal?
3. Would you prefer a multiyear renewal program that requires
payment every other year, or one that requires payment every 3 years?
Please explain why you chose this option.
4. What are the benefits of a multiyear renewal?
5. Are there any negative impacts of a multiyear renewal?
6. What, if any, concerns would you need to have addressed prior to
selecting the multiyear renewal option?
7. What are the impacts to mortgages from multiyear information
verification and COD renewal? Will lenders require additional
information from the National Vessel Documentation Center (NVDC) to
manage loans?
8. What period of renewal is best for mortgage lenders?
9. What other suggestions do you have for reducing the burden of
obtaining a COD?
This document is issued under authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
Dated: February 18, 2015.
J.C. Burton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Director of Inspections and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-03651 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P