Energy Conservation Standards for Portable Air Conditioners: Public Meeting and Availability of the Preliminary Technical Support Document, 10628-10632 [2015-04110]
Download as PDF
10628
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2013–BT–STD–0033]
RIN 1904–AD02
Energy Conservation Standards for
Portable Air Conditioners: Public
Meeting and Availability of the
Preliminary Technical Support
Document
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting and
availability of preliminary technical
support document.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) will hold a public meeting
to discuss and receive comments on the
preliminary analysis it has conducted
for purposes of establishing energy
conservation standards for portable air
conditioners (ACs). The meeting will
cover the analytical framework, models,
and tools that DOE is using to evaluate
potential standards for this product; the
results of preliminary analyses
performed by DOE for this product; the
potential energy conservation standard
levels derived from these analyses that
DOE could consider for this product;
and any other issues relevant to the
development of energy conservation
standards for portable ACs. In addition,
DOE encourages written comments on
these subjects. To inform interested
parties and to facilitate this process,
DOE has prepared an agenda, a
preliminary technical support document
(TSD), and briefing materials, which are
available on the DOE Web site at:
https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/
rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=76.
SUMMARY:
Meeting: DOE will hold a public
meeting on Wednesday, March 18, 2015,
from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., in Washington,
DC. The meeting will also be broadcast
as a webinar. See section IV, ‘‘Public
Participation,’’ of this notice of public
meeting (NOPM) for webinar
registration information, participant
instructions, and information about the
capabilities available to webinar
participants.
Comments: DOE will accept
comments, data, and information
regarding this preliminary analysis
before and after the public meeting, but
no later than April 28, 2015. See section
IV, ‘‘Public Participation,’’ for details.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at the U.S. Department of Energy,
Forrestal Building, Room 8E–089, 1000
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Any comments submitted must
identify docket number EERE–2013–
BT–STD–0033 and/or regulatory
information number (RIN) number
1904–AD02. Comments may be
submitted using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: PortableAC2013STD0033@
ee.doe.gov. Include the docket number
EERE–2013–BT–STD–0033 and/or RIN
1904–AD02 in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (CD), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
[Please note that comments and CDs
sent by mail are often delayed and may
be damaged by mail screening
processes.]
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 950
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone (202)
586–2945. If possible, please submit all
items on CD, in which case it is not
necessary to include printed copies.
Docket: The docket is available for
review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices,
comments, and other supporting
documents/materials. All documents in
the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. However,
not all documents listed in the index
may be publicly available, such as
information that is exempt from public
disclosure.
A link to the docket Web page can be
found at: https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2013-BT-STD0033. The regulations.gov Web page
contains instructions on how to access
all documents in the docket, including
public comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald Majette, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–7935. Email:
ronald.majette@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Sarah Butler, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Telephone: (202) 586–1777. Email:
Sarah.Butler@hq.doe.gov.
For further information on how to
submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket,
contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202)
586–2945 or by email:
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority
II. History of Energy Conservation Standards
Rulemaking for Portable Air
Conditioners
A. Background
B. Current Rulemaking Process
III. Summary of the Analyses Performed by
DOE
A. Engineering Analysis
B. Markups To Determine Prices
C. Energy Use Analysis
D. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period
Analyses
E. National Impact Analysis
IV. Public Participation
A. Attendance at Public Meeting
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests To
Speak
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
D. Submission of Comments
V. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority
Title III, Part B 1 of the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act of 1975, as
amended, (EPCA or the Act), Public Law
94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291–6309, as
codified) sets forth a variety of
provisions designed to improve energy
efficiency and established the Energy
Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles, a
program covering most major household
appliances.2 EPCA authorizes DOE to
establish technologically feasible,
economically justified energy
conservation standards for covered
products or equipment that would be
likely to result in significant national
energy savings. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(I)–(VII)) In addition to
specifying a list of covered products,
EPCA contains provisions that enable
the Secretary of Energy to classify
additional types of consumer products
as covered products. For a given
product to be classified as a covered
product, the Secretary must determine
that:
(1) Classifying the product as a
covered product is necessary for the
purposes of EPCA; and
(2) The average annual per-household
energy use by products of each type is
1 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part B was redesignated Part A.
2 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the American
Energy Manufacturing Technical Corrections Act
(AEMTCA), Public Law 112–210 (Dec. 18, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
likely to exceed 100 kilowatt-hours
(kWh) per year. (42 U.S.C. 6292(b)(1))
To prescribe an energy conservation
standard pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)
and (p) for covered products added
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6292(b)(1), the
Secretary must also determine that:
(1) The average household energy use
of the products has exceeded 150 kWh
per household for a 12-month period;
(2) The aggregate 12-month energy use
of the products has exceeded 4.2
terawatt-hours (TWh);
(3) Substantial improvement in energy
efficiency is technologically feasible;
and
(4) Application of a labeling rule
under 42 U.S.C. 6294 is unlikely to be
sufficient to induce manufacturers to
produce, and consumers and other
persons to purchase, covered products
of such type (or class) that achieve the
maximum energy efficiency that is
technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(l)(1))
Under EPCA, the energy conservation
program consists essentially of four
parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3)
Federal energy conservation standards,
and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. The testing requirements
consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must
use as the basis for: (1) Certifying to
DOE that their products comply with
the applicable energy conservation
standards adopted under EPCA, and (2)
making representations about the
efficiency of those products. Similarly,
DOE must use these test procedures to
determine whether the products comply
with any relevant standards
promulgated under EPCA.
In prescribing a new or amended
energy conservation standard, DOE is
required to consider standards that: (1)
Achieve the maximum improvement in
energy efficiency that is technologically
feasible and economically justified; and
(2) result in significant conservation of
energy. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A) and
(o)(3)(B)) To determine whether a
proposed standard is economically
justified, DOE will, after receiving
comments on the proposed standard,
determine whether the benefits of the
standard exceed its burdens to the
greatest extent practicable, using the
following seven factors:
1. The economic impact of the standard on
manufacturers and consumers of products
subject to the standard;
2. The savings in operating costs
throughout the estimated average life of the
covered products in the type (or class)
compared to any increase in the price, initial
charges, or maintenance expenses for the
covered products which are likely to result
from the standard;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
3. The total projected amount of energy
savings likely to result directly from the
standard;
4. Any lessening of the utility or the
performance of the covered products likely to
result from the standard;
5. The impact of any lessening of
competition, as determined in writing by the
Attorney General, that is likely to result from
the standard;
6. The need for national energy
conservation; and
7. Other factors the Secretary of Energy
considers relevant.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i))
Before proposing a standard, DOE
typically seeks public input on the
analytical framework, models, and tools
that DOE will use to evaluate standards
for the product at issue and the results
of preliminary analyses DOE performed
for the product. This notice announces
the availability of the preliminary TSD,
which details the preliminary analyses,
discusses the comments DOE received
from interested parties that are relevant
to the rulemaking, and summarizes the
preliminary results of DOE’s analyses.
In addition, DOE is announcing a public
meeting to solicit feedback from
interested parties on its analytical
framework, models, and preliminary
results.
II. History of Energy Conservation
Standards Rulemaking for Portable Air
Conditioners
A. Background
Under the authority established in
EPCA, DOE published a notice of
proposed determination that tentatively
determined that portable ACs qualify as
a covered product. 78 FR 40403 (July 5,
2013). DOE tentatively determined that
(1) classifying portable ACs as a covered
product is necessary or appropriate to
carry out the purposes of EPCA, and (2)
the average U.S. household energy use
for portable ACs is likely to exceed 100
kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. (42
U.S.C. 6292(b)(1))
DOE published a Notice of Data
Availability (NODA) on May 9, 2014
(the May 2014 NODA), reviewing
various industry test procedures for
portable ACs and presenting results
from its investigative testing. DOE
requested comment and additional
information regarding the results and
potential methodologies. 79 FR 26639.
Comments received in response to the
May 2014 NODA have helped DOE
identify issues related to the
preliminary analyses, as well as
informed the analysis for the test
procedure rulemaking. On February 12,
2015, DOE issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR) for a portable AC
test procedure which is available at:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10629
https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/product.aspx/
productid/79.
B. Current Rulemaking Process
DOE typically first develops a
framework document that describes the
approaches and methods DOE will use
in evaluating the need for new or
amended standards. For this
rulemaking, DOE began the rulemaking
process by publishing a notice of
proposed determination (NOPD) on July
5, 2013 (hereinafter the ‘‘July 2013
NOPD’’). 78 FR 40403. After the
framework stage, or in this case the
NOPD, DOE then presents the initial
analytical results in a preliminary TSD
such as this one.
Comments received since publication
of the July 2013 NOPD have helped DOE
identify and resolve issues related to the
preliminary analyses. Chapter 2 of the
preliminary TSD summarizes and
addresses the comments received.
III. Summary of the Analyses
Performed by DOE
For the products covered in this
rulemaking, DOE conducted in-depth
technical analyses in the following
areas: (1) Engineering; (2) markups to
determine product price; (3) energy use;
(4) life-cycle cost and payback period;
and (5) national impacts analysis (NIA).
The preliminary TSD that presents the
methodology and results of each of
these analyses is available at: https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/
rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=76.
DOE also conducted, and has
included in the preliminary TSD,
several other analyses that support the
major analyses listed above or are
preliminary analyses that will be
expanded upon for a NOPR if DOE
determines to proceed with an energy
conservation standards rulemaking for
portable ACs. These analyses include:
(1) The market and technology
assessment; (2) the screening analysis,
which contributes to the engineering
analysis; and (3) the shipments analysis,
which contributes to the Life-Cycle
Costs (LCC) and Payback Period (PBP)
analysis and NIA. In addition to these
analyses, DOE has begun preliminary
work on the manufacturer impact
analysis and has identified the methods
to be used for the consumer subgroup
analysis, the emissions analysis, the
employment impact analysis, the
regulatory impact analysis, and the
utility impact analysis. DOE will
expand on these analyses in any
subsequent NOPR.
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
10630
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules
A. Engineering Analysis
The engineering analysis establishes
the relationship between the cost and
efficiency levels of portable ACs. This
relationship serves as the basis for the
cost-benefit calculations performed for
individual consumers and the nation.
As a first step in the engineering
analysis, DOE established one product
class, based on a characterization of the
relevant portable AC products and
markets. For this product class, DOE
identified existing technology options
that could improve the energy efficiency
of portable ACs. DOE then reviewed
each technology option to decide
whether it (1) is technologically feasible;
(2) is practicable to manufacture, install,
and service; (3) would adversely affect
product utility or product availability;
or (4) would have adverse impacts on
health and safety. The engineering
analysis identifies representative
baseline products, which is the starting
point for analyzing technologies that
provide energy efficiency
improvements. ‘‘Baseline product’’
refers to a model or models having
features and technologies typically
found in minimally efficient products
currently available on the market. DOE
then identified design options to
improve the efficiency of portable ACs
and considered these options in the
analysis as candidate standard levels
(CSLs). DOE estimated the manufacturer
production costs for the baseline and
each of the four CSLs. The manufacturer
production costs were derived from
product teardowns, using more efficient
components and modeling efficiency
savings from alternative product
configurations. The main outputs of the
engineering analysis are the
manufacturer production costs
(including material, labor, and
overhead) and efficiencies at the
baseline and each of 4 CSLs as a
function of cooling capacity for the
single product class. Chapter 5 of the
preliminary TSD discusses the
engineering analysis.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Markups To Determine Prices
DOE derives customer prices based on
manufacturer markups, retailer
markups, distributor markups,
contractor markups (where appropriate),
and sales taxes. In deriving these
markups, DOE determines the major
distribution channels for product sales,
the markup associated with each party
in each distribution channel, and the
existence and magnitude of differences
between markups for baseline products
(baseline markups) and higherefficiency products (incremental
markups). DOE calculates both overall
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
baseline and overall incremental
markups based on the markups at each
step in each distribution channel.
Chapter 6 of the preliminary TSD
addresses the markups analysis.
C. Energy Use Analysis
The energy use analysis provides
estimates of the annual energy
consumption of portable ACs. The
energy use analysis seeks to estimate the
range of energy consumption of the
products that meet each of the efficiency
levels considered in a given rulemaking
as they are used in the field. DOE uses
these values in the LCC and PBP
analyses and in the NIA. Chapter 7 of
the preliminary TSD addresses the
energy use analysis.
D. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period
Analyses
The life-cycle cost (LCC) and payback
period (PBP) analyses determine the
economic impact of potential standards
on individual consumers. The LCC is
the total cost of purchasing, installing,
and operating a portable AC over the
course of its lifetime. The LCC analysis
compares the LCC of a portable AC
designed to meet possible energy
conservation standards with the LCC of
a portable AC likely to be installed in
the absence of standards. DOE
determines LCCs by considering: (1)
Total installed cost to the consumer
(which consists of manufacturer selling
price, distribution chain markups, and
sales taxes); (2) the range of annual
energy consumption of portable ACs
that meet each of the efficiency levels
considered as they are used in the field;
(3) the operating cost of portable ACs
(e.g., energy cost); (4) portable AC
lifetime; and (5) a discount rate that
reflects the real consumer cost of capital
and puts the LCC in present-value
terms. The PBP represents the number
of years needed to recover the increase
in purchase price of higher efficiency
portable ACs through savings in the
operating cost. PBP is calculated by
dividing the incremental increase in
installed cost of the higher efficiency
product, compared to the baseline
product, by the annual savings in
operating costs.
For portable ACs, DOE determined
the range in annual energy consumption
using outputs from the engineering
analysis (power consumption at each
efficiency level) and from publically
available information on portable ACs.
Total installed costs at each CSL are
based on the engineering and markups
analysis. Recognizing that several inputs
to the determination of consumer LCC
and PBP are either variable or uncertain
(e.g., annual energy consumption,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
product lifetime, electricity price,
discount rate), DOE conducts the LCC
and PBP analysis by modeling both the
uncertainty and variability in the inputs
using Monte Carlo simulation and
probability distributions.
The average annual energy
consumption derived in the LCC
analysis is used as an input in the NIA.
Chapter 8 of the preliminary TSD
addresses the LCC and PBP analyses.
E. National Impact Analysis
The NIA estimates the national energy
savings (NES) and the net present value
(NPV) of total consumer costs and
savings expected to result from potential
new standards at each CSL. DOE
calculated NES and NPV for each CSL
as the difference between a base-case
forecast (without new standards) and
the standards-case forecast (with
standards). Cumulative energy savings
are the sum of the annual NES
determined for the lifetime of portable
ACs shipped during the analysis period.
Energy savings include the full-fuel
cycle energy savings (i.e., the energy
needed to extract, process, and deliver
primary fuel sources such as coal and
natural gas, and the conversion and
distribution losses of generating
electricity from those fuel sources). The
NPV is the sum over time of the
discounted net savings each year, which
consists of the difference between total
operating cost savings and increases in
total installed costs. NPV results are
reported for discount rates of 3 percent
and 7 percent.
To calculate the NES and NPV, DOE
projected future shipments and
efficiency distributions (for each CSL)
for the single portable AC product class.
DOE recognizes the uncertainty in
projecting shipments and efficiency
distributions, and as a result the NIA
includes several different scenarios for
each. Other inputs to the NIA include
the estimated portable AC lifetime,
consumer product costs, and average
annual energy savings. Chapter 10 of the
preliminary TSD addresses the NIA.
IV. Public Participation
DOE invites input from the public on
all the topics described above. The
preliminary analytical results are
subject to revision following further
review and input from the public. A
complete and revised TSD will be made
available upon issuance of a NOPR. The
final rule establishing any new energy
conservation standards will contain the
final analytical results and will be
accompanied by a final rule TSD.
DOE encourages those who wish to
participate in the public meeting to
obtain the preliminary TSD from DOE’s
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules
A. Attendance at Public Meeting
DOE requires visitors to with laptop
computers and other devices, such as
tablets, to be checked upon entry into
the building. Any person wishing to
bring these devices into the Forrestal
Building will be required to obtain a
property pass. Visitors should avoid
bringing these devices, or allow an extra
45 minutes to check in. Please report to
the visitor’s desk to have devices
checked before proceeding through
security.
Due to the REAL ID Act implemented
by the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), there have been recent
changes regarding ID requirements for
individuals wishing to enter Federal
buildings from specific states and U.S.
territories. Driver’s licenses from the
following states or territory will not be
accepted for building entry and one of
the alternate forms of ID listed below
will be required. DHS has determined
that regular driver’s licenses (and ID
cards) from the following jurisdictions
are not acceptable for entry into DOE
facilities: Alaska, American Samoa,
Arizona, Louisiana, Maine,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York,
Oklahoma, and Washington. Acceptable
alternate forms of Photo-ID include: U.S.
Passport or Passport Card; an Enhanced
Driver’s License or Enhanced ID-Card
issued by the states of Minnesota, New
York or Washington (Enhanced licenses
issued by these states are clearly marked
Enhanced or Enhanced Driver’s
License); a military ID or other Federal
government issued Photo-ID card.
In addition, you can attend the public
meeting via webinar. Webinar
registration information, participant
instructions, and information about the
capabilities available to webinar
participants will be published on DOE’s
Web site at: https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/
rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=76. Participants
are responsible for ensuring their
systems are compatible with the
webinar software.
The time and date of the public
meeting are listed in the DATES and
ADDRESSES sections at the beginning of
this notice. Please note that foreign
nationals participating in the public
meeting are subject to advance security
screening procedures which require
advance notice prior to attendance at
the public meeting. If a foreign national
wishes to participate in the public
meeting, please inform DOE of this fact
as soon as possible by contacting Ms.
Regina Washington at (202) 586–1214 or
by email: Regina.Washington@
ee.doe.gov so that the necessary
procedures can be completed.
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests To
Speak
Any person who has an interest in
today’s document or who is a
representative of a group or class of
persons that has an interest in these
issues may request an opportunity to
make an oral presentation. Such persons
may hand-deliver requests to speak,
along with a computer diskette or CD in
WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or
text (ASCII) file format to Ms. Brenda
Edwards at the address shown in the
ADDRESSES section at the beginning of
this document between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m. Monday through Friday, except
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Web site and to be prepared to discuss
its contents. Once again, a copy of the
preliminary TSD is available at: https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/
rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=76. However,
public meeting participants need not
limit their comments to the topics
identified in the preliminary TSD; DOE
is also interested in receiving views
concerning other relevant issues that
participants believe would affect energy
conservation standards for this product
or that DOE should address in the
NOPR.
Furthermore, DOE welcomes all
interested parties, regardless of whether
they participate in the public meeting,
to submit in writing by April 28, 2015
comments, data, and information on
matters addressed in the preliminary
TSD and on other matters relevant to
consideration of energy conservation
standards for portable ACs.
The public meeting will be conducted
in an informal conference style. A court
reporter will be present to record the
minutes of the meeting. There shall be
no discussion of proprietary
information, costs or prices, market
shares, or other commercial matters
regulated by United States antitrust
laws.
After the public meeting and the
closing of the comment period, DOE
will consider all timely-submitted
comments and additional information
obtained from interested parties, as well
as information obtained through further
analyses. Afterwards, the Department
will publish either a determination that
standards for portable ACs are not
appropriate or a NOPR proposing to
establish standards. The NOPR will
include proposed energy conservation
standards for the products covered by
the rulemaking, and members of the
public will be given an opportunity to
submit written and oral comments on
the proposed standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10631
Federal holidays. Requests may also be
sent by mail to the address shown in the
ADDRESSES section or email to
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
DOE will designate a DOE official to
preside at the public meeting and may
also employ a professional facilitator to
aid discussion. The meeting will not be
a judicial or evidentiary-type public
hearing, but DOE will conduct it in
accordance with section 336 of EPCA.
(42 U.S.C. 6306) A court reporter will
record the proceedings and prepare a
transcript. DOE reserves the right to
schedule the order of presentations and
to establish the procedures governing
the conduct of the public meeting. After
the public meeting, interested parties
may submit further comments on the
proceedings as well as on any aspect of
the rulemaking until the end of the
comment period.
The public meeting will be conducted
in an informal conference style. DOE
will present summaries of comments
received before the public meeting,
allow time for presentations by
participants, and encourage all
interested parties to share their views on
issues affecting this rulemaking. Each
participant will be allowed to make a
prepared general statement (within
DOE-determined time limits) prior to
the discussion of specific topics. DOE
will permit other participants to
comment briefly on any general
statements.
At the end of all prepared statements
on a topic, DOE will permit participants
to clarify their statements briefly and
comment on statements made by others.
Participants should be prepared to
answer questions from DOE and other
participants concerning these issues.
DOE representatives may also ask
questions of participants concerning
other matters relevant to this
rulemaking. The official conducting the
public meeting will accept additional
comments or questions from those
attending, as time permits. The
presiding official will announce any
further procedural rules or modification
of the above procedures that may be
needed for the proper conduct of the
public meeting.
A transcript of the public meeting will
be posted on the DOE Web site and will
also be included in the docket, which
can be viewed as described in the
Docket section at the beginning of this
notice. In addition, any person may buy
a copy of the transcript from the
transcribing reporter.
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
10632
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules
D. Submission of Comments
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DOE will accept comments, data, and
other information regarding this
rulemaking before or after the public
meeting, but no later than the date
provided at the beginning of this notice.
Please submit comments, data, and
other information as provided in the
ADDRESSES section. Submit electronic
comments in WordPerfect, Microsoft
Word, PDF, or text (ASCII) file format
and avoid the use of special characters
or any form of encryption. Comments in
electronic format should be identified
by the Docket Number EERE–20XX–BT–
STD–0033 and/or RIN 1904–AD02 and,
wherever possible, carry the electronic
signature of the author. No
telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit two copies: One copy of
the document including all the
information believed to be confidential
and one copy of the document with the
information believed to be confidential
deleted. DOE will make its own
determination as to the confidential
status of the information and treat it
according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when
evaluating requests to treat submitted
information as confidential include: (1)
A description of the items; (2) whether
and why such items are customarily
treated as confidential within the
industry; (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from
other sources; (4) whether the
information has previously been made
available to others without obligation
concerning its confidentiality; (5) an
explanation of the competitive injury to
the submitting person which would
result from public disclosure; (6) a date
upon which such information might
lose its confidential nature due to the
passage of time; and (7) why disclosure
of the information would be contrary to
the public interest.
Federal Aviation Administration
V. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this NOPM.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 13,
2015.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
[FR Doc. 2015–04110 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No.FAA–2015–0426; Notice No. 25–
15–03–SC]
Special Conditions: Bombardier
Aerospace Incorporated, Models BD–
500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11 Series
Airplanes; Electronic Flight Control
System: Pitch and Roll Limiting
Functions
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the Bombardier
Aerospace Models BD–500–1A10 and
BD–500–1A11 Series Airplanes. These
airplanes will have a novel or unusual
design feature associated with the flyby-wire electronic flight control system
(EFCS) that limits pitch- and rollattitude functions to prevent the
airplane from attaining certain pitch
attitudes and roll angles. This system
generates the actual surface commands
that provide for stability augmentation
and flight control for all three-airplane
axes (longitudinal, lateral, and
directional). The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These proposed
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or
before April 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2015–0426
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at
https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Jacobsen, FAA, Standardization Branch,
ANM–113 Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2011; facsimile
425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background
On December 10, 2009, Bombardier
Aerospace applied for a type certificate
for their new Models BD–500–1A10 and
BD–500–1A11 series airplanes (hereafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘CSeries’’).
The CSeries airplanes are swept-wing
monoplanes with an aluminum alloy
fuselage, sized for 5-abreast seating.
Passenger capacity is designated as 110
for the Model BD–500–1A10 and 125 for
the Model BD–500–1A11. Maximum
takeoff weight is 131,000 pounds for the
Model BD–500–1A10 and 144,000
pounds for the Model BD–500–1A11.
The CSeries airplanes will have a fly-bywire EFCS.
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10628-10632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04110]
[[Page 10628]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE-2013-BT-STD-0033]
RIN 1904-AD02
Energy Conservation Standards for Portable Air Conditioners:
Public Meeting and Availability of the Preliminary Technical Support
Document
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting and availability of preliminary
technical support document.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will hold a public meeting
to discuss and receive comments on the preliminary analysis it has
conducted for purposes of establishing energy conservation standards
for portable air conditioners (ACs). The meeting will cover the
analytical framework, models, and tools that DOE is using to evaluate
potential standards for this product; the results of preliminary
analyses performed by DOE for this product; the potential energy
conservation standard levels derived from these analyses that DOE could
consider for this product; and any other issues relevant to the
development of energy conservation standards for portable ACs. In
addition, DOE encourages written comments on these subjects. To inform
interested parties and to facilitate this process, DOE has prepared an
agenda, a preliminary technical support document (TSD), and briefing
materials, which are available on the DOE Web site at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=76.
DATES: Meeting: DOE will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, March 18,
2015, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., in Washington, DC. The meeting will also
be broadcast as a webinar. See section IV, ``Public Participation,'' of
this notice of public meeting (NOPM) for webinar registration
information, participant instructions, and information about the
capabilities available to webinar participants.
Comments: DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding
this preliminary analysis before and after the public meeting, but no
later than April 28, 2015. See section IV, ``Public Participation,''
for details.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of
Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 8E-089, 1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121.
Any comments submitted must identify docket number EERE-2013-BT-
STD-0033 and/or regulatory information number (RIN) number 1904-AD02.
Comments may be submitted using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: PortableAC2013STD0033@ee.doe.gov. Include the
docket number EERE-2013-BT-STD-0033 and/or RIN 1904-AD02 in the subject
line of the message.
Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. If possible, please submit all items on
a compact disc (CD), in which case it is not necessary to include
printed copies. [Please note that comments and CDs sent by mail are
often delayed and may be damaged by mail screening processes.]
Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Suite
600, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone (202) 586-2945. If possible,
please submit all items on CD, in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
Docket: The docket is available for review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices, comments, and other supporting
documents/materials. All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. However, not all documents listed in the
index may be publicly available, such as information that is exempt
from public disclosure.
A link to the docket Web page can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2013-BT-STD-0033. The
regulations.gov Web page contains instructions on how to access all
documents in the docket, including public comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald Majette, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies, EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-7935. Email:
ronald.majette@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Sarah Butler, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 586-1777. Email: Sarah.Butler@hq.doe.gov.
For further information on how to submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket, contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202)
586-2945 or by email: Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority
II. History of Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking for Portable
Air Conditioners
A. Background
B. Current Rulemaking Process
III. Summary of the Analyses Performed by DOE
A. Engineering Analysis
B. Markups To Determine Prices
C. Energy Use Analysis
D. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analyses
E. National Impact Analysis
IV. Public Participation
A. Attendance at Public Meeting
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests To Speak
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
D. Submission of Comments
V. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority
Title III, Part B \1\ of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975, as amended, (EPCA or the Act), Public Law 94-163 (42 U.S.C. 6291-
6309, as codified) sets forth a variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency and established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles, a program
covering most major household appliances.\2\ EPCA authorizes DOE to
establish technologically feasible, economically justified energy
conservation standards for covered products or equipment that would be
likely to result in significant national energy savings. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(I)-(VII)) In addition to specifying a list of covered
products, EPCA contains provisions that enable the Secretary of Energy
to classify additional types of consumer products as covered products.
For a given product to be classified as a covered product, the
Secretary must determine that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated Part A.
\2\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the American Energy Manufacturing Technical
Corrections Act (AEMTCA), Public Law 112-210 (Dec. 18, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Classifying the product as a covered product is necessary for
the purposes of EPCA; and
(2) The average annual per-household energy use by products of each
type is
[[Page 10629]]
likely to exceed 100 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. (42 U.S.C.
6292(b)(1))
To prescribe an energy conservation standard pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
6295(o) and (p) for covered products added pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
6292(b)(1), the Secretary must also determine that:
(1) The average household energy use of the products has exceeded
150 kWh per household for a 12-month period;
(2) The aggregate 12-month energy use of the products has exceeded
4.2 terawatt-hours (TWh);
(3) Substantial improvement in energy efficiency is technologically
feasible; and
(4) Application of a labeling rule under 42 U.S.C. 6294 is unlikely
to be sufficient to induce manufacturers to produce, and consumers and
other persons to purchase, covered products of such type (or class)
that achieve the maximum energy efficiency that is technologically
feasible and economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(1))
Under EPCA, the energy conservation program consists essentially of
four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. The
testing requirements consist of test procedures that manufacturers of
covered products must use as the basis for: (1) Certifying to DOE that
their products comply with the applicable energy conservation standards
adopted under EPCA, and (2) making representations about the efficiency
of those products. Similarly, DOE must use these test procedures to
determine whether the products comply with any relevant standards
promulgated under EPCA.
In prescribing a new or amended energy conservation standard, DOE
is required to consider standards that: (1) Achieve the maximum
improvement in energy efficiency that is technologically feasible and
economically justified; and (2) result in significant conservation of
energy. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A) and (o)(3)(B)) To determine whether a
proposed standard is economically justified, DOE will, after receiving
comments on the proposed standard, determine whether the benefits of
the standard exceed its burdens to the greatest extent practicable,
using the following seven factors:
1. The economic impact of the standard on manufacturers and
consumers of products subject to the standard;
2. The savings in operating costs throughout the estimated
average life of the covered products in the type (or class) compared
to any increase in the price, initial charges, or maintenance
expenses for the covered products which are likely to result from
the standard;
3. The total projected amount of energy savings likely to result
directly from the standard;
4. Any lessening of the utility or the performance of the
covered products likely to result from the standard;
5. The impact of any lessening of competition, as determined in
writing by the Attorney General, that is likely to result from the
standard;
6. The need for national energy conservation; and
7. Other factors the Secretary of Energy considers relevant.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i))
Before proposing a standard, DOE typically seeks public input on
the analytical framework, models, and tools that DOE will use to
evaluate standards for the product at issue and the results of
preliminary analyses DOE performed for the product. This notice
announces the availability of the preliminary TSD, which details the
preliminary analyses, discusses the comments DOE received from
interested parties that are relevant to the rulemaking, and summarizes
the preliminary results of DOE's analyses. In addition, DOE is
announcing a public meeting to solicit feedback from interested parties
on its analytical framework, models, and preliminary results.
II. History of Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking for Portable
Air Conditioners
A. Background
Under the authority established in EPCA, DOE published a notice of
proposed determination that tentatively determined that portable ACs
qualify as a covered product. 78 FR 40403 (July 5, 2013). DOE
tentatively determined that (1) classifying portable ACs as a covered
product is necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of EPCA,
and (2) the average U.S. household energy use for portable ACs is
likely to exceed 100 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. (42 U.S.C.
6292(b)(1))
DOE published a Notice of Data Availability (NODA) on May 9, 2014
(the May 2014 NODA), reviewing various industry test procedures for
portable ACs and presenting results from its investigative testing. DOE
requested comment and additional information regarding the results and
potential methodologies. 79 FR 26639. Comments received in response to
the May 2014 NODA have helped DOE identify issues related to the
preliminary analyses, as well as informed the analysis for the test
procedure rulemaking. On February 12, 2015, DOE issued a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NOPR) for a portable AC test procedure which is
available at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/product.aspx/productid/79.
B. Current Rulemaking Process
DOE typically first develops a framework document that describes
the approaches and methods DOE will use in evaluating the need for new
or amended standards. For this rulemaking, DOE began the rulemaking
process by publishing a notice of proposed determination (NOPD) on July
5, 2013 (hereinafter the ``July 2013 NOPD''). 78 FR 40403. After the
framework stage, or in this case the NOPD, DOE then presents the
initial analytical results in a preliminary TSD such as this one.
Comments received since publication of the July 2013 NOPD have
helped DOE identify and resolve issues related to the preliminary
analyses. Chapter 2 of the preliminary TSD summarizes and addresses the
comments received.
III. Summary of the Analyses Performed by DOE
For the products covered in this rulemaking, DOE conducted in-depth
technical analyses in the following areas: (1) Engineering; (2) markups
to determine product price; (3) energy use; (4) life-cycle cost and
payback period; and (5) national impacts analysis (NIA). The
preliminary TSD that presents the methodology and results of each of
these analyses is available at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=76.
DOE also conducted, and has included in the preliminary TSD,
several other analyses that support the major analyses listed above or
are preliminary analyses that will be expanded upon for a NOPR if DOE
determines to proceed with an energy conservation standards rulemaking
for portable ACs. These analyses include: (1) The market and technology
assessment; (2) the screening analysis, which contributes to the
engineering analysis; and (3) the shipments analysis, which contributes
to the Life-Cycle Costs (LCC) and Payback Period (PBP) analysis and
NIA. In addition to these analyses, DOE has begun preliminary work on
the manufacturer impact analysis and has identified the methods to be
used for the consumer subgroup analysis, the emissions analysis, the
employment impact analysis, the regulatory impact analysis, and the
utility impact analysis. DOE will expand on these analyses in any
subsequent NOPR.
[[Page 10630]]
A. Engineering Analysis
The engineering analysis establishes the relationship between the
cost and efficiency levels of portable ACs. This relationship serves as
the basis for the cost-benefit calculations performed for individual
consumers and the nation.
As a first step in the engineering analysis, DOE established one
product class, based on a characterization of the relevant portable AC
products and markets. For this product class, DOE identified existing
technology options that could improve the energy efficiency of portable
ACs. DOE then reviewed each technology option to decide whether it (1)
is technologically feasible; (2) is practicable to manufacture,
install, and service; (3) would adversely affect product utility or
product availability; or (4) would have adverse impacts on health and
safety. The engineering analysis identifies representative baseline
products, which is the starting point for analyzing technologies that
provide energy efficiency improvements. ``Baseline product'' refers to
a model or models having features and technologies typically found in
minimally efficient products currently available on the market. DOE
then identified design options to improve the efficiency of portable
ACs and considered these options in the analysis as candidate standard
levels (CSLs). DOE estimated the manufacturer production costs for the
baseline and each of the four CSLs. The manufacturer production costs
were derived from product teardowns, using more efficient components
and modeling efficiency savings from alternative product
configurations. The main outputs of the engineering analysis are the
manufacturer production costs (including material, labor, and overhead)
and efficiencies at the baseline and each of 4 CSLs as a function of
cooling capacity for the single product class. Chapter 5 of the
preliminary TSD discusses the engineering analysis.
B. Markups To Determine Prices
DOE derives customer prices based on manufacturer markups, retailer
markups, distributor markups, contractor markups (where appropriate),
and sales taxes. In deriving these markups, DOE determines the major
distribution channels for product sales, the markup associated with
each party in each distribution channel, and the existence and
magnitude of differences between markups for baseline products
(baseline markups) and higher-efficiency products (incremental
markups). DOE calculates both overall baseline and overall incremental
markups based on the markups at each step in each distribution channel.
Chapter 6 of the preliminary TSD addresses the markups analysis.
C. Energy Use Analysis
The energy use analysis provides estimates of the annual energy
consumption of portable ACs. The energy use analysis seeks to estimate
the range of energy consumption of the products that meet each of the
efficiency levels considered in a given rulemaking as they are used in
the field. DOE uses these values in the LCC and PBP analyses and in the
NIA. Chapter 7 of the preliminary TSD addresses the energy use
analysis.
D. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analyses
The life-cycle cost (LCC) and payback period (PBP) analyses
determine the economic impact of potential standards on individual
consumers. The LCC is the total cost of purchasing, installing, and
operating a portable AC over the course of its lifetime. The LCC
analysis compares the LCC of a portable AC designed to meet possible
energy conservation standards with the LCC of a portable AC likely to
be installed in the absence of standards. DOE determines LCCs by
considering: (1) Total installed cost to the consumer (which consists
of manufacturer selling price, distribution chain markups, and sales
taxes); (2) the range of annual energy consumption of portable ACs that
meet each of the efficiency levels considered as they are used in the
field; (3) the operating cost of portable ACs (e.g., energy cost); (4)
portable AC lifetime; and (5) a discount rate that reflects the real
consumer cost of capital and puts the LCC in present-value terms. The
PBP represents the number of years needed to recover the increase in
purchase price of higher efficiency portable ACs through savings in the
operating cost. PBP is calculated by dividing the incremental increase
in installed cost of the higher efficiency product, compared to the
baseline product, by the annual savings in operating costs.
For portable ACs, DOE determined the range in annual energy
consumption using outputs from the engineering analysis (power
consumption at each efficiency level) and from publically available
information on portable ACs. Total installed costs at each CSL are
based on the engineering and markups analysis. Recognizing that several
inputs to the determination of consumer LCC and PBP are either variable
or uncertain (e.g., annual energy consumption, product lifetime,
electricity price, discount rate), DOE conducts the LCC and PBP
analysis by modeling both the uncertainty and variability in the inputs
using Monte Carlo simulation and probability distributions.
The average annual energy consumption derived in the LCC analysis
is used as an input in the NIA. Chapter 8 of the preliminary TSD
addresses the LCC and PBP analyses.
E. National Impact Analysis
The NIA estimates the national energy savings (NES) and the net
present value (NPV) of total consumer costs and savings expected to
result from potential new standards at each CSL. DOE calculated NES and
NPV for each CSL as the difference between a base-case forecast
(without new standards) and the standards-case forecast (with
standards). Cumulative energy savings are the sum of the annual NES
determined for the lifetime of portable ACs shipped during the analysis
period. Energy savings include the full-fuel cycle energy savings
(i.e., the energy needed to extract, process, and deliver primary fuel
sources such as coal and natural gas, and the conversion and
distribution losses of generating electricity from those fuel sources).
The NPV is the sum over time of the discounted net savings each year,
which consists of the difference between total operating cost savings
and increases in total installed costs. NPV results are reported for
discount rates of 3 percent and 7 percent.
To calculate the NES and NPV, DOE projected future shipments and
efficiency distributions (for each CSL) for the single portable AC
product class. DOE recognizes the uncertainty in projecting shipments
and efficiency distributions, and as a result the NIA includes several
different scenarios for each. Other inputs to the NIA include the
estimated portable AC lifetime, consumer product costs, and average
annual energy savings. Chapter 10 of the preliminary TSD addresses the
NIA.
IV. Public Participation
DOE invites input from the public on all the topics described
above. The preliminary analytical results are subject to revision
following further review and input from the public. A complete and
revised TSD will be made available upon issuance of a NOPR. The final
rule establishing any new energy conservation standards will contain
the final analytical results and will be accompanied by a final rule
TSD.
DOE encourages those who wish to participate in the public meeting
to obtain the preliminary TSD from DOE's
[[Page 10631]]
Web site and to be prepared to discuss its contents. Once again, a copy
of the preliminary TSD is available at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=76. However,
public meeting participants need not limit their comments to the topics
identified in the preliminary TSD; DOE is also interested in receiving
views concerning other relevant issues that participants believe would
affect energy conservation standards for this product or that DOE
should address in the NOPR.
Furthermore, DOE welcomes all interested parties, regardless of
whether they participate in the public meeting, to submit in writing by
April 28, 2015 comments, data, and information on matters addressed in
the preliminary TSD and on other matters relevant to consideration of
energy conservation standards for portable ACs.
The public meeting will be conducted in an informal conference
style. A court reporter will be present to record the minutes of the
meeting. There shall be no discussion of proprietary information, costs
or prices, market shares, or other commercial matters regulated by
United States antitrust laws.
After the public meeting and the closing of the comment period, DOE
will consider all timely-submitted comments and additional information
obtained from interested parties, as well as information obtained
through further analyses. Afterwards, the Department will publish
either a determination that standards for portable ACs are not
appropriate or a NOPR proposing to establish standards. The NOPR will
include proposed energy conservation standards for the products covered
by the rulemaking, and members of the public will be given an
opportunity to submit written and oral comments on the proposed
standards.
A. Attendance at Public Meeting
The time and date of the public meeting are listed in the DATES and
ADDRESSES sections at the beginning of this notice. Please note that
foreign nationals participating in the public meeting are subject to
advance security screening procedures which require advance notice
prior to attendance at the public meeting. If a foreign national wishes
to participate in the public meeting, please inform DOE of this fact as
soon as possible by contacting Ms. Regina Washington at (202) 586-1214
or by email: Regina.Washington@ee.doe.gov so that the necessary
procedures can be completed.
DOE requires visitors to with laptop computers and other devices,
such as tablets, to be checked upon entry into the building. Any person
wishing to bring these devices into the Forrestal Building will be
required to obtain a property pass. Visitors should avoid bringing
these devices, or allow an extra 45 minutes to check in. Please report
to the visitor's desk to have devices checked before proceeding through
security.
Due to the REAL ID Act implemented by the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), there have been recent changes regarding ID
requirements for individuals wishing to enter Federal buildings from
specific states and U.S. territories. Driver's licenses from the
following states or territory will not be accepted for building entry
and one of the alternate forms of ID listed below will be required. DHS
has determined that regular driver's licenses (and ID cards) from the
following jurisdictions are not acceptable for entry into DOE
facilities: Alaska, American Samoa, Arizona, Louisiana, Maine,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Oklahoma, and Washington.
Acceptable alternate forms of Photo-ID include: U.S. Passport or
Passport Card; an Enhanced Driver's License or Enhanced ID-Card issued
by the states of Minnesota, New York or Washington (Enhanced licenses
issued by these states are clearly marked Enhanced or Enhanced Driver's
License); a military ID or other Federal government issued Photo-ID
card.
In addition, you can attend the public meeting via webinar. Webinar
registration information, participant instructions, and information
about the capabilities available to webinar participants will be
published on DOE's Web site at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=76. Participants are
responsible for ensuring their systems are compatible with the webinar
software.
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests To Speak
Any person who has an interest in today's document or who is a
representative of a group or class of persons that has an interest in
these issues may request an opportunity to make an oral presentation.
Such persons may hand-deliver requests to speak, along with a computer
diskette or CD in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or text (ASCII)
file format to Ms. Brenda Edwards at the address shown in the ADDRESSES
section at the beginning of this document between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Requests may also be
sent by mail to the address shown in the ADDRESSES section or email to
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
DOE will designate a DOE official to preside at the public meeting
and may also employ a professional facilitator to aid discussion. The
meeting will not be a judicial or evidentiary-type public hearing, but
DOE will conduct it in accordance with section 336 of EPCA. (42 U.S.C.
6306) A court reporter will record the proceedings and prepare a
transcript. DOE reserves the right to schedule the order of
presentations and to establish the procedures governing the conduct of
the public meeting. After the public meeting, interested parties may
submit further comments on the proceedings as well as on any aspect of
the rulemaking until the end of the comment period.
The public meeting will be conducted in an informal conference
style. DOE will present summaries of comments received before the
public meeting, allow time for presentations by participants, and
encourage all interested parties to share their views on issues
affecting this rulemaking. Each participant will be allowed to make a
prepared general statement (within DOE-determined time limits) prior to
the discussion of specific topics. DOE will permit other participants
to comment briefly on any general statements.
At the end of all prepared statements on a topic, DOE will permit
participants to clarify their statements briefly and comment on
statements made by others. Participants should be prepared to answer
questions from DOE and other participants concerning these issues. DOE
representatives may also ask questions of participants concerning other
matters relevant to this rulemaking. The official conducting the public
meeting will accept additional comments or questions from those
attending, as time permits. The presiding official will announce any
further procedural rules or modification of the above procedures that
may be needed for the proper conduct of the public meeting.
A transcript of the public meeting will be posted on the DOE Web
site and will also be included in the docket, which can be viewed as
described in the Docket section at the beginning of this notice. In
addition, any person may buy a copy of the transcript from the
transcribing reporter.
[[Page 10632]]
D. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and other information regarding
this rulemaking before or after the public meeting, but no later than
the date provided at the beginning of this notice. Please submit
comments, data, and other information as provided in the ADDRESSES
section. Submit electronic comments in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word,
PDF, or text (ASCII) file format and avoid the use of special
characters or any form of encryption. Comments in electronic format
should be identified by the Docket Number EERE-20XX-BT-STD-0033 and/or
RIN 1904-AD02 and, wherever possible, carry the electronic signature of
the author. No telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person submitting information that
he or she believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public
disclosure should submit two copies: One copy of the document including
all the information believed to be confidential and one copy of the
document with the information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE
will make its own determination as to the confidential status of the
information and treat it according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat
submitted information as confidential include: (1) A description of the
items; (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as
confidential within the industry; (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from other sources; (4) whether the
information has previously been made available to others without
obligation concerning its confidentiality; (5) an explanation of the
competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from
public disclosure; (6) a date upon which such information might lose
its confidential nature due to the passage of time; and (7) why
disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.
V. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this NOPM.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2015.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2015-04110 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P