Stanislaus National Forest, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Rim Fire Reforestation, 10663-10664 [2015-04109]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices
ajwages@fs.fed.us or 928–402–6222.
Individuals who use telecommunication
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service at
(800) 877–8339 between 8:00 a.m. and
8:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Selecting
to do an EIS upfront was a shortcut for
doing an EA and then not being able to
certify proposed action did not have a
significant impact in a FONSI. However,
through discussions with term-grazing
permittees, it was determined that if
livestock were allowed to graze along
river that neither Forest Service nor
term-grazing permittees had time or
money to conduct monitoring necessary
to determine appropriateness of this
proposed action along river corridor. By
withdrawing complexity inherent in
proposed action to graze along river,
need for an EIS evaporated. Therefore,
project planning will continue through
an EA process. Environmental Impact
Statement will be retracted on February
18, 2015.
Dated: February 17, 2015.
Richard Reitz,
Globe Ranger District, Tonto National Forest.
Dated: February 18, 2015.
Kelly Jardine,
Tonto Basin Ranger District, Tonto National
Forest.
[FR Doc. 2015–04073 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
by the Final EIS and Draft Record of
Decision (ROD) in May 2016. A final
decision is expected in August 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be: mailed
to the Stanislaus National Forest; Attn:
Rim Reforestation; 19777 Greenley
Road; Sonora, CA 95370; delivered to
the address shown during business
hours (M–F 8:00 am to 4:30 pm); or,
submitted by FAX (209) 533–1890.
Submit electronic comments, in
common (.doc, .pdf, .rtf, .txt) formats, to:
comments-pacificsouthwest-stanislaus@
fs.fed.us with Subject: Rim
Reforestation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Benech, Stanislaus National
Forest; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora,
CA 95370; phone (209) 532–3671; or
email: mbenech@fs.fed.us. A scoping
package, maps and other information
are online at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/
project/?project=45612.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
General Background
The Rim Fire started on August 17,
2013 in a remote area of the Stanislaus
National Forest near the confluence of
the Clavey and Tuolumne Rivers about
20 miles east of Sonora, California. Over
the next several weeks it burned
257,314 acres, including 154,430 acres
of NFS lands, becoming the third largest
wildfire in California history. The Rim
Fire Reforestation project is located
within the Rim Fire perimeter in the
Stanislaus National Forest on portions
of the Mi-Wok and Groveland Ranger
Districts.
Forest Service
Purpose and Need for Action
Stanislaus National Forest, CA; Notice
of Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for Rim Fire
Reforestation
The primary purposes of the project
are to: (1) Return Mixed Conifer Forest
to the Landscape; (2) Restore Old Forest
for Wildlife Habitat and Connectivity;
(3) Reduce Fuels for Future Fire
Resiliency; (4) Enhance Deer Habitat;
and, (5) Eradicate Noxious Weeds.
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Action
The Stanislaus National
Forest proposes about 42,000 acres of
reforestation, plantation thinning,
additional deer habitat and noxious
weed treatments on National Forest
System (NFS) lands within the 2013
Rim Fire in order to: Return mixed
conifer forest to the landscape; restore
old forest for wildlife; reduce fuels;
enhance deer habitat; and, eradicate
noxious weeds.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
action should be submitted within 45
days of the date of publication of this
Notice of Intent. Completion of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
is expected in November 2015 followed
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
The Forest Service proposed action
includes about 42,000 acres of
reforestation, plantation thinning,
additional deer habitat and noxious
weed eradication treatments on NFS
lands within the 2013 Rim Fire.
Reforestation treatments (30,065
acres) include: Hand, mechanical and
manual herbicide site preparation
(Glyphosate); prescribed burning;
planting a diversity of conifer tree
species using various patterns and
densities (trees per acre) across the
landscape (up and down slopes with
fewer on ridges and more in drainage
bottoms) to develop resilient mixed
conifer forest and enhance wildlife
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10663
(including deer) habitat; manual
herbicide release (Glyphosate) when
vegetation competition begins to inhibit
survival and growth; and, noxious weed
eradication as described below. The
reforestation treatment (30,065 acres)
includes thinning and planting on 7,307
acres of existing plantations currently
under-stocked due to high burn severity
from the 2013 Rim Fire.
Plantation Thinning treatments
(11,359 acres) include: Hand and
mechanical site preparation; prescribed
burning and thinning to achieve an
Individual, Clumpy, Open (ICO) pattern
to maximize heterogeneity and wildlife
(including deer) habitat while creating
more fire resilient stands; and, noxious
weed eradication as described below.
Additional Deer Habitat treatments
(407 acres) include: Prescribed burning;
and, noxious weed eradication as
described below.
Noxious Weed Eradication treatments
(4,160 acres) include: Weed treatments
with a variety of EPA approved
herbicides (such as Glyphosate,
Clopyralid, Aminopyralid, Clethodim
and Fluazifop-P-butyl). These noxious
weed treatments overlap (within and up
to 100 feet adjacent to) the reforestation,
plantation thinning and additional deer
habitat treaments described above.
No treatments are proposed within
Wilderness, Inventoried Roadless Areas,
or the wild classification segments of
Wild and Scenic Rivers or Proposed
Wild and Scenic Rivers. Project design
will incorporate Best Management
Practices (BMPs) according to regional
and national guidance. Implementation
is expected to begin in fall 2016 and
continue for up to 10 years.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed Action,
the EIS will evaluate the required No
Action alternative and likely consider
other alternatives identified through the
inderdisciplinary process and public
participation.
Responsible Official
Jeanne M. Higgins, Forest Supervisor;
Stanislaus National Forest; 19777
Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide
whether to adopt and implement the
proposed action, an alternative to the
proposed action, or take no action with
respect to the Rim Fire Reforestation
project.
Scoping Process
Public participation is important at
numerous points during the analysis.
The Forest Service seeks information,
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
10664
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices
comments and assistance from federal,
state, and local agencies and individuals
or organizations that may be interested
in or affected by the proposed action.
The Forest Service conducts scoping
according to the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations (40 CFR 1501.7). In addition
to other public involvment, this Notice
of Intent initiates an early and open
process for determining the scope of
issues to be addressed in the EIS and for
identifying the significant issues related
to a proposed action. This scoping
process allows the Forest Service to not
only identify significant environmental
issues deserving of study, but also to
deemphasize insignificant issues,
narrowing the scope of the EIS process
accordingly (40 CFR 1500.4(g)).
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits
of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comment Requested
This Notice of Intent initiates the
scoping proces which guides the
development of the EIS. Comments on
the proposed action should be
submitted within 45 days of the date of
publication of this Notice of Intent.
Dated: February 20, 2015.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Forest Supervisor.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft EIS will be available for
comment when the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice
of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early
stage, it is important to give reviewers
notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft EIS stage but that are
not raised until after completion of the
final EIS may be waived or dismissed by
the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803
F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and
Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this
proposed action participate during the
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
[FR Doc. 2015–04109 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
Request for Extension and Revision of
a Currently Approved Information
Collection
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), this notice
announces our intention to request a 3year extension and revision of a
currently approved information
collection for ‘‘Export Inspection and
Weighing Waiver for High Quality
Specialty Grain Transported in
Containers.’’
SUMMARY:
We will consider comments that
we receive by April 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
comments on this notice by any of the
following methods:
• Internet: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail, hand deliver, or courier to
Irene Omade, GIPSA, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Room
2530–S, Washington, DC 20250–3604.
• Fax to (202) 690–2173.
Instructions: All comments should be
identified as ‘‘High Quality Specialty
Grain Exported in Containers
Information Collection,’’ and should
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reference to the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register. The
information collection package, public
comments, and other documents
relating to this action will be available
for public inspection in the above office
during regular business hours (7 CFR
1.27(b)). Please call GIPSA’s
Management and Budget Services at
(202) 720–7486 to arrange a viewing of
these documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information regarding the collection of
information activities and the use of the
information, contact Candace Hildreth
at (202) 720–0203.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Congress
enacted The United States Grain
Standards Act (USGSA) (7 U.S.C. 71–
87k) to facilitate the marketing of grain
in interstate and foreign commerce. The
USGSA, with few exceptions, requires
that all grain shipped from the United
States must be officially inspected and
officially weighed. The USGSA
authorizes the Department of
Agriculture to waive the mandatory
inspection and weighing requirements
of the USGSA in circumstances when
the objectives of the USGSA would not
be impaired.
The Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration (GIPSA)
amended section 7 CFR 800.18 of the
regulations to waive the mandatory
inspection and weighing requirements
of the USGSA for high quality specialty
grain exported in containers. GIPSA
established this waiver to facilitate the
marketing of high quality specialty grain
exported in containers. GIPSA
determined that this action was
consistent with the objectives of the
USGSA and would promote the
continuing development of the high
quality specialty grain export market.
To ensure that exporters of high
quality specialty grain complied with
this waiver, GIPSA required exporters to
maintain records generated during the
normal course of business that pertain
to these shipments and make these
documents available to GIPSA upon
request for review or copying purposes
(76 FR 45397). These records shall be
maintained for a period of 3 years. This
information collection requirement is
essential to ensure that exporters who
ship high quality specialty grain in
containers comply with the waiver
provisions. GIPSA does not require
exporters of high quality specialty grain
to complete and submit new Federal
government record(s), form(s), or
report(s).
Title: Export Inspection and Weighing
Waiver for High Quality Specialty Grain
Transported in Containers.
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10663-10664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04109]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Stanislaus National Forest, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for Rim Fire Reforestation
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Stanislaus National Forest proposes about 42,000 acres of
reforestation, plantation thinning, additional deer habitat and noxious
weed treatments on National Forest System (NFS) lands within the 2013
Rim Fire in order to: Return mixed conifer forest to the landscape;
restore old forest for wildlife; reduce fuels; enhance deer habitat;
and, eradicate noxious weeds.
DATES: Comments on the proposed action should be submitted within 45
days of the date of publication of this Notice of Intent. Completion of
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is expected in November
2015 followed by the Final EIS and Draft Record of Decision (ROD) in
May 2016. A final decision is expected in August 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be: mailed to the Stanislaus National Forest;
Attn: Rim Reforestation; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370;
delivered to the address shown during business hours (M-F 8:00 am to
4:30 pm); or, submitted by FAX (209) 533-1890. Submit electronic
comments, in common (.doc, .pdf, .rtf, .txt) formats, to: comments-pacificsouthwest-stanislaus@fs.fed.us with Subject: Rim Reforestation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Benech, Stanislaus National
Forest; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370; phone (209) 532-3671; or
email: mbenech@fs.fed.us. A scoping package, maps and other information
are online at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=45612.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
General Background
The Rim Fire started on August 17, 2013 in a remote area of the
Stanislaus National Forest near the confluence of the Clavey and
Tuolumne Rivers about 20 miles east of Sonora, California. Over the
next several weeks it burned 257,314 acres, including 154,430 acres of
NFS lands, becoming the third largest wildfire in California history.
The Rim Fire Reforestation project is located within the Rim Fire
perimeter in the Stanislaus National Forest on portions of the Mi-Wok
and Groveland Ranger Districts.
Purpose and Need for Action
The primary purposes of the project are to: (1) Return Mixed
Conifer Forest to the Landscape; (2) Restore Old Forest for Wildlife
Habitat and Connectivity; (3) Reduce Fuels for Future Fire Resiliency;
(4) Enhance Deer Habitat; and, (5) Eradicate Noxious Weeds.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposed action includes about 42,000 acres of
reforestation, plantation thinning, additional deer habitat and noxious
weed eradication treatments on NFS lands within the 2013 Rim Fire.
Reforestation treatments (30,065 acres) include: Hand, mechanical
and manual herbicide site preparation (Glyphosate); prescribed burning;
planting a diversity of conifer tree species using various patterns and
densities (trees per acre) across the landscape (up and down slopes
with fewer on ridges and more in drainage bottoms) to develop resilient
mixed conifer forest and enhance wildlife (including deer) habitat;
manual herbicide release (Glyphosate) when vegetation competition
begins to inhibit survival and growth; and, noxious weed eradication as
described below. The reforestation treatment (30,065 acres) includes
thinning and planting on 7,307 acres of existing plantations currently
under-stocked due to high burn severity from the 2013 Rim Fire.
Plantation Thinning treatments (11,359 acres) include: Hand and
mechanical site preparation; prescribed burning and thinning to achieve
an Individual, Clumpy, Open (ICO) pattern to maximize heterogeneity and
wildlife (including deer) habitat while creating more fire resilient
stands; and, noxious weed eradication as described below.
Additional Deer Habitat treatments (407 acres) include: Prescribed
burning; and, noxious weed eradication as described below.
Noxious Weed Eradication treatments (4,160 acres) include: Weed
treatments with a variety of EPA approved herbicides (such as
Glyphosate, Clopyralid, Aminopyralid, Clethodim and Fluazifop-P-butyl).
These noxious weed treatments overlap (within and up to 100 feet
adjacent to) the reforestation, plantation thinning and additional deer
habitat treaments described above.
No treatments are proposed within Wilderness, Inventoried Roadless
Areas, or the wild classification segments of Wild and Scenic Rivers or
Proposed Wild and Scenic Rivers. Project design will incorporate Best
Management Practices (BMPs) according to regional and national
guidance. Implementation is expected to begin in fall 2016 and continue
for up to 10 years.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed Action, the EIS will evaluate the
required No Action alternative and likely consider other alternatives
identified through the inderdisciplinary process and public
participation.
Responsible Official
Jeanne M. Higgins, Forest Supervisor; Stanislaus National Forest;
19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide whether to adopt and implement
the proposed action, an alternative to the proposed action, or take no
action with respect to the Rim Fire Reforestation project.
Scoping Process
Public participation is important at numerous points during the
analysis. The Forest Service seeks information,
[[Page 10664]]
comments and assistance from federal, state, and local agencies and
individuals or organizations that may be interested in or affected by
the proposed action.
The Forest Service conducts scoping according to the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 1501.7). In addition to
other public involvment, this Notice of Intent initiates an early and
open process for determining the scope of issues to be addressed in the
EIS and for identifying the significant issues related to a proposed
action. This scoping process allows the Forest Service to not only
identify significant environmental issues deserving of study, but also
to deemphasize insignificant issues, narrowing the scope of the EIS
process accordingly (40 CFR 1500.4(g)).
Comment Requested
This Notice of Intent initiates the scoping proces which guides the
development of the EIS. Comments on the proposed action should be
submitted within 45 days of the date of publication of this Notice of
Intent.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft EIS will be available for comment when the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the environmental review process. First,
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and
alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage
but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate during the comment period so that substantive comments and
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also
address the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21.
Dated: February 20, 2015.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2015-04109 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P