Stanislaus National Forest, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Rim Fire Reforestation, 10663-10664 [2015-04109]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices ajwages@fs.fed.us or 928–402–6222. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877–8339 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Selecting to do an EIS upfront was a shortcut for doing an EA and then not being able to certify proposed action did not have a significant impact in a FONSI. However, through discussions with term-grazing permittees, it was determined that if livestock were allowed to graze along river that neither Forest Service nor term-grazing permittees had time or money to conduct monitoring necessary to determine appropriateness of this proposed action along river corridor. By withdrawing complexity inherent in proposed action to graze along river, need for an EIS evaporated. Therefore, project planning will continue through an EA process. Environmental Impact Statement will be retracted on February 18, 2015. Dated: February 17, 2015. Richard Reitz, Globe Ranger District, Tonto National Forest. Dated: February 18, 2015. Kelly Jardine, Tonto Basin Ranger District, Tonto National Forest. [FR Doc. 2015–04073 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE by the Final EIS and Draft Record of Decision (ROD) in May 2016. A final decision is expected in August 2016. ADDRESSES: Comments may be: mailed to the Stanislaus National Forest; Attn: Rim Reforestation; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370; delivered to the address shown during business hours (M–F 8:00 am to 4:30 pm); or, submitted by FAX (209) 533–1890. Submit electronic comments, in common (.doc, .pdf, .rtf, .txt) formats, to: comments-pacificsouthwest-stanislaus@ fs.fed.us with Subject: Rim Reforestation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Benech, Stanislaus National Forest; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370; phone (209) 532–3671; or email: mbenech@fs.fed.us. A scoping package, maps and other information are online at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/ project/?project=45612. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: General Background The Rim Fire started on August 17, 2013 in a remote area of the Stanislaus National Forest near the confluence of the Clavey and Tuolumne Rivers about 20 miles east of Sonora, California. Over the next several weeks it burned 257,314 acres, including 154,430 acres of NFS lands, becoming the third largest wildfire in California history. The Rim Fire Reforestation project is located within the Rim Fire perimeter in the Stanislaus National Forest on portions of the Mi-Wok and Groveland Ranger Districts. Forest Service Purpose and Need for Action Stanislaus National Forest, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Rim Fire Reforestation The primary purposes of the project are to: (1) Return Mixed Conifer Forest to the Landscape; (2) Restore Old Forest for Wildlife Habitat and Connectivity; (3) Reduce Fuels for Future Fire Resiliency; (4) Enhance Deer Habitat; and, (5) Eradicate Noxious Weeds. Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. AGENCY: ACTION: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposed Action The Stanislaus National Forest proposes about 42,000 acres of reforestation, plantation thinning, additional deer habitat and noxious weed treatments on National Forest System (NFS) lands within the 2013 Rim Fire in order to: Return mixed conifer forest to the landscape; restore old forest for wildlife; reduce fuels; enhance deer habitat; and, eradicate noxious weeds. DATES: Comments on the proposed action should be submitted within 45 days of the date of publication of this Notice of Intent. Completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is expected in November 2015 followed SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 The Forest Service proposed action includes about 42,000 acres of reforestation, plantation thinning, additional deer habitat and noxious weed eradication treatments on NFS lands within the 2013 Rim Fire. Reforestation treatments (30,065 acres) include: Hand, mechanical and manual herbicide site preparation (Glyphosate); prescribed burning; planting a diversity of conifer tree species using various patterns and densities (trees per acre) across the landscape (up and down slopes with fewer on ridges and more in drainage bottoms) to develop resilient mixed conifer forest and enhance wildlife PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10663 (including deer) habitat; manual herbicide release (Glyphosate) when vegetation competition begins to inhibit survival and growth; and, noxious weed eradication as described below. The reforestation treatment (30,065 acres) includes thinning and planting on 7,307 acres of existing plantations currently under-stocked due to high burn severity from the 2013 Rim Fire. Plantation Thinning treatments (11,359 acres) include: Hand and mechanical site preparation; prescribed burning and thinning to achieve an Individual, Clumpy, Open (ICO) pattern to maximize heterogeneity and wildlife (including deer) habitat while creating more fire resilient stands; and, noxious weed eradication as described below. Additional Deer Habitat treatments (407 acres) include: Prescribed burning; and, noxious weed eradication as described below. Noxious Weed Eradication treatments (4,160 acres) include: Weed treatments with a variety of EPA approved herbicides (such as Glyphosate, Clopyralid, Aminopyralid, Clethodim and Fluazifop-P-butyl). These noxious weed treatments overlap (within and up to 100 feet adjacent to) the reforestation, plantation thinning and additional deer habitat treaments described above. No treatments are proposed within Wilderness, Inventoried Roadless Areas, or the wild classification segments of Wild and Scenic Rivers or Proposed Wild and Scenic Rivers. Project design will incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) according to regional and national guidance. Implementation is expected to begin in fall 2016 and continue for up to 10 years. Possible Alternatives In addition to the Proposed Action, the EIS will evaluate the required No Action alternative and likely consider other alternatives identified through the inderdisciplinary process and public participation. Responsible Official Jeanne M. Higgins, Forest Supervisor; Stanislaus National Forest; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370. Nature of Decision To Be Made The responsible official will decide whether to adopt and implement the proposed action, an alternative to the proposed action, or take no action with respect to the Rim Fire Reforestation project. Scoping Process Public participation is important at numerous points during the analysis. The Forest Service seeks information, E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1 10664 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices comments and assistance from federal, state, and local agencies and individuals or organizations that may be interested in or affected by the proposed action. The Forest Service conducts scoping according to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 1501.7). In addition to other public involvment, this Notice of Intent initiates an early and open process for determining the scope of issues to be addressed in the EIS and for identifying the significant issues related to a proposed action. This scoping process allows the Forest Service to not only identify significant environmental issues deserving of study, but also to deemphasize insignificant issues, narrowing the scope of the EIS process accordingly (40 CFR 1500.4(g)). comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal and will be available for public inspection. Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 21. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Comment Requested This Notice of Intent initiates the scoping proces which guides the development of the EIS. Comments on the proposed action should be submitted within 45 days of the date of publication of this Notice of Intent. Dated: February 20, 2015. Jeanne M. Higgins, Forest Supervisor. Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent Environmental Review A draft EIS will be available for comment when the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer’s position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate during the comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 [FR Doc. 2015–04109 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration Request for Extension and Revision of a Currently Approved Information Collection Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), this notice announces our intention to request a 3year extension and revision of a currently approved information collection for ‘‘Export Inspection and Weighing Waiver for High Quality Specialty Grain Transported in Containers.’’ SUMMARY: We will consider comments that we receive by April 28, 2015. ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit comments on this notice by any of the following methods: • Internet: Go to https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Mail, hand deliver, or courier to Irene Omade, GIPSA, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 2530–S, Washington, DC 20250–3604. • Fax to (202) 690–2173. Instructions: All comments should be identified as ‘‘High Quality Specialty Grain Exported in Containers Information Collection,’’ and should DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 reference to the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register. The information collection package, public comments, and other documents relating to this action will be available for public inspection in the above office during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). Please call GIPSA’s Management and Budget Services at (202) 720–7486 to arrange a viewing of these documents. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding the collection of information activities and the use of the information, contact Candace Hildreth at (202) 720–0203. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Congress enacted The United States Grain Standards Act (USGSA) (7 U.S.C. 71– 87k) to facilitate the marketing of grain in interstate and foreign commerce. The USGSA, with few exceptions, requires that all grain shipped from the United States must be officially inspected and officially weighed. The USGSA authorizes the Department of Agriculture to waive the mandatory inspection and weighing requirements of the USGSA in circumstances when the objectives of the USGSA would not be impaired. The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) amended section 7 CFR 800.18 of the regulations to waive the mandatory inspection and weighing requirements of the USGSA for high quality specialty grain exported in containers. GIPSA established this waiver to facilitate the marketing of high quality specialty grain exported in containers. GIPSA determined that this action was consistent with the objectives of the USGSA and would promote the continuing development of the high quality specialty grain export market. To ensure that exporters of high quality specialty grain complied with this waiver, GIPSA required exporters to maintain records generated during the normal course of business that pertain to these shipments and make these documents available to GIPSA upon request for review or copying purposes (76 FR 45397). These records shall be maintained for a period of 3 years. This information collection requirement is essential to ensure that exporters who ship high quality specialty grain in containers comply with the waiver provisions. GIPSA does not require exporters of high quality specialty grain to complete and submit new Federal government record(s), form(s), or report(s). Title: Export Inspection and Weighing Waiver for High Quality Specialty Grain Transported in Containers. E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10663-10664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Stanislaus National Forest, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an 
Environmental Impact Statement for Rim Fire Reforestation

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Stanislaus National Forest proposes about 42,000 acres of 
reforestation, plantation thinning, additional deer habitat and noxious 
weed treatments on National Forest System (NFS) lands within the 2013 
Rim Fire in order to: Return mixed conifer forest to the landscape; 
restore old forest for wildlife; reduce fuels; enhance deer habitat; 
and, eradicate noxious weeds.

DATES: Comments on the proposed action should be submitted within 45 
days of the date of publication of this Notice of Intent. Completion of 
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is expected in November 
2015 followed by the Final EIS and Draft Record of Decision (ROD) in 
May 2016. A final decision is expected in August 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be: mailed to the Stanislaus National Forest; 
Attn: Rim Reforestation; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370; 
delivered to the address shown during business hours (M-F 8:00 am to 
4:30 pm); or, submitted by FAX (209) 533-1890. Submit electronic 
comments, in common (.doc, .pdf, .rtf, .txt) formats, to: comments-pacificsouthwest-stanislaus@fs.fed.us with Subject: Rim Reforestation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Benech, Stanislaus National 
Forest; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370; phone (209) 532-3671; or 
email: mbenech@fs.fed.us. A scoping package, maps and other information 
are online at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=45612.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

General Background

    The Rim Fire started on August 17, 2013 in a remote area of the 
Stanislaus National Forest near the confluence of the Clavey and 
Tuolumne Rivers about 20 miles east of Sonora, California. Over the 
next several weeks it burned 257,314 acres, including 154,430 acres of 
NFS lands, becoming the third largest wildfire in California history. 
The Rim Fire Reforestation project is located within the Rim Fire 
perimeter in the Stanislaus National Forest on portions of the Mi-Wok 
and Groveland Ranger Districts.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The primary purposes of the project are to: (1) Return Mixed 
Conifer Forest to the Landscape; (2) Restore Old Forest for Wildlife 
Habitat and Connectivity; (3) Reduce Fuels for Future Fire Resiliency; 
(4) Enhance Deer Habitat; and, (5) Eradicate Noxious Weeds.

Proposed Action

    The Forest Service proposed action includes about 42,000 acres of 
reforestation, plantation thinning, additional deer habitat and noxious 
weed eradication treatments on NFS lands within the 2013 Rim Fire.
    Reforestation treatments (30,065 acres) include: Hand, mechanical 
and manual herbicide site preparation (Glyphosate); prescribed burning; 
planting a diversity of conifer tree species using various patterns and 
densities (trees per acre) across the landscape (up and down slopes 
with fewer on ridges and more in drainage bottoms) to develop resilient 
mixed conifer forest and enhance wildlife (including deer) habitat; 
manual herbicide release (Glyphosate) when vegetation competition 
begins to inhibit survival and growth; and, noxious weed eradication as 
described below. The reforestation treatment (30,065 acres) includes 
thinning and planting on 7,307 acres of existing plantations currently 
under-stocked due to high burn severity from the 2013 Rim Fire.
    Plantation Thinning treatments (11,359 acres) include: Hand and 
mechanical site preparation; prescribed burning and thinning to achieve 
an Individual, Clumpy, Open (ICO) pattern to maximize heterogeneity and 
wildlife (including deer) habitat while creating more fire resilient 
stands; and, noxious weed eradication as described below.
    Additional Deer Habitat treatments (407 acres) include: Prescribed 
burning; and, noxious weed eradication as described below.
    Noxious Weed Eradication treatments (4,160 acres) include: Weed 
treatments with a variety of EPA approved herbicides (such as 
Glyphosate, Clopyralid, Aminopyralid, Clethodim and Fluazifop-P-butyl). 
These noxious weed treatments overlap (within and up to 100 feet 
adjacent to) the reforestation, plantation thinning and additional deer 
habitat treaments described above.
    No treatments are proposed within Wilderness, Inventoried Roadless 
Areas, or the wild classification segments of Wild and Scenic Rivers or 
Proposed Wild and Scenic Rivers. Project design will incorporate Best 
Management Practices (BMPs) according to regional and national 
guidance. Implementation is expected to begin in fall 2016 and continue 
for up to 10 years.

Possible Alternatives

    In addition to the Proposed Action, the EIS will evaluate the 
required No Action alternative and likely consider other alternatives 
identified through the inderdisciplinary process and public 
participation.

Responsible Official

    Jeanne M. Higgins, Forest Supervisor; Stanislaus National Forest; 
19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The responsible official will decide whether to adopt and implement 
the proposed action, an alternative to the proposed action, or take no 
action with respect to the Rim Fire Reforestation project.

Scoping Process

    Public participation is important at numerous points during the 
analysis. The Forest Service seeks information,

[[Page 10664]]

comments and assistance from federal, state, and local agencies and 
individuals or organizations that may be interested in or affected by 
the proposed action.
    The Forest Service conducts scoping according to the Council on 
Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 1501.7). In addition to 
other public involvment, this Notice of Intent initiates an early and 
open process for determining the scope of issues to be addressed in the 
EIS and for identifying the significant issues related to a proposed 
action. This scoping process allows the Forest Service to not only 
identify significant environmental issues deserving of study, but also 
to deemphasize insignificant issues, narrowing the scope of the EIS 
process accordingly (40 CFR 1500.4(g)).

Comment Requested

    This Notice of Intent initiates the scoping proces which guides the 
development of the EIS. Comments on the proposed action should be 
submitted within 45 days of the date of publication of this Notice of 
Intent.

Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent 
Environmental Review

    A draft EIS will be available for comment when the Environmental 
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal 
Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is 
important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to 
public participation in the environmental review process. First, 
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure their participation in the 
environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and 
alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont 
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, 
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage 
but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be 
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, 
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action 
participate during the comment period so that substantive comments and 
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it 
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
    To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should 
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to 
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also 
address the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives 
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer 
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
    Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who 
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal 
and will be available for public inspection.

    Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 
1909.15, Section 21.

    Dated: February 20, 2015.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2015-04109 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.