Biomass Crop Assistance Program, 10569-10575 [2015-04092]
Download as PDF
10569
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 39
Friday, February 27, 2015
RIN 0560–AI27
0513, 1400 Independence Ave. SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0513.
All written comments will be
available for inspection online at
www.regulations.gov and at the mail
address above during business hours
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. A copy of this
rule is available through the FSA home
page at https://www.fsa.usda.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Novak, telephone (202) 720–4053.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication
(Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.)
should contact the USDA Target Center
at (202) 720–2600 (voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Biomass Crop Assistance Program
Background
Commodity Credit Corporation
and Farm Service Agency, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
BCAP is an FSA administered
program using Commodity Credit
Corporation (CCC) funds. Section 9010
of the 2014 Farm Bill (Pub. L. 113–79)
amends 7 U.S.C. 8111 and reauthorizes
BCAP with certain changes. BCAP
provides assistance to biomass
producers and owners in two payment
categories:
• Matching payments to eligible
material owners for the delivery of
eligible material to qualified Biomass
Conversion Facilities (BCFs). Qualified
BCFs use biomass feedstocks to produce
heat, power, biobased products,
research, or advanced biofuels. The
2014 Farm Bill adds research as an
authorized use of material by BCFs.
• Establishment and annual payments
to producers who enter into contracts
with CCC to produce eligible biomass
crops on contract acres within BCAP
project areas.
This rule implements all the required
2014 Farm Bill changes to both parts of
the program and seeks comment on
FSA’s implementation of BCAP, given
the required changes and changes to
funding. The rule also includes several
discretionary changes, including the
removal of the participant’s option for
assignment of BCAP payments to third
parties, and a clarification of how the
two-year period of eligibility for
matching payments, commencing with
the effective date of this rule, will be
calculated.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1450
AGENCY:
The Farm Service Agency
(FSA) is amending the Biomass Crop
Assistance Program (BCAP) regulations
to implement changes required by the
Agricultural Act of 2014 (the 2014 Farm
Bill). BCAP provides financial
assistance to producers who establish,
collect, harvest, store, and transport
biomass crops. The 2014 Farm Bill
reauthorizes BCAP, with certain
changes that are implemented in this
rule. The changes include reducing the
payment rate per ton for collection,
harvest, storage, and transportation of
eligible materials, and limiting the cost
share per acre for establishment of
biomass crops. The requirements for
eligible material and eligible land are
revised in this rule, as required by the
2014 Farm Bill. The general scope of
BCAP is not changing with this rule.
DATES:
Effective Date: May 28, 2015.
Comment Date: We will consider
comments we receive by April 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
comments on this rule. In your
comment, please specify RIN 0560–AI27
and include the volume, date, and page
number of this issue of the Federal
Register. You may submit comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments;
• Mail, Hand Delivery, or Courier:
Kelly Novak, FSA CEPD, USDA, STOP
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
Definitions and Terms Used in This
Rule
This rule adds, removes, or revises the
following definitions:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• ‘‘Agricultural residue’’ is being
added and includes crop residues and
woody orchard wastes. Both these types
of residues can be eligible materials.
• ‘‘Beginning farmer or rancher’’ is
being removed, because that term is
defined in 7 CFR part 718, which is
referenced in § 1450.2.
• ‘‘Dry ton’’ is being revised to clarify
requirements for measuring moisture
content of eligible woody materials.
• ‘‘Eligible crop’’ is being revised to
clarify that noxious and invasive species
are ineligible for establishment and
annual payments, and to move specific
eligibility requirements to § 1450.200.
• ‘‘Eligible land’’ is being added to
reflect the 2014 Farm Bill requirements,
which add eligibility for Conservation
Reserve Program (CRP) acreage or land
in the Agricultural Conservation
Easement Program (ACEP) that expires
in the current year of a BCAP project
area signup and has not yet received a
CRP or ACEP annual rental payment in
the current year.
• ‘‘Eligible material’’ is being revised
to reflect the 2014 Farm Bill required
changes for matching payments, and to
move the specific eligibility
requirements for material for matching
payments to section § 1450.103.
• ‘‘Native sod’’ is being revised to
reflect the 2014 Farm Bill’s change in
definition for native sod that is required
for other USDA programs. For the
purposes of consistency with crop
insurance and the Noninsured Crop
Disaster Assistance Program (NAP)
regulations that now restrict the
eligibility of native sod for those
programs, the definition of native sod
for the purposes of BCAP will now
include ground that has never been
tilled or the producer cannot
substantiate that the ground has ever
been tilled.
• ‘‘Socially disadvantaged farmer or
rancher’’ is being removed, because that
term is defined in 7 CFR part 718,
which is referenced in § 1450.2.
Matching Payments
The changes to the BCAP matching
payments required by the 2014 Farm
Bill include a reduced payment rate of
up to $1 for each $1 per ton provided
by the biomass conversion facility, in an
amount not to exceed $20 per dry ton
(previously $45 per ton) for a period of
up to 2 years. The rate is being changed
in § 1450.106.
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
10570
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
As specified in the 2014 Farm Bill
and in this rule, bagasse, which
includes sugar cane and sorghum
biomass, is now specifically excluded
from the definition of an eligible
material and the requirements for
eligible materials in Subpart B. This rule
also requires that all eligible material be
collected or harvested directly from the
land according to an approved
conservation plan, forest stewardship
plan, or equivalent plan. For example,
manufacturing wood wastes that are not
harvested directly from the land, such
as sawdust or sawmill residues, are not
eligible woody material. Woody
material, including orchard waste, must
be collected and harvested directly from
the land and must also be a by-product
of preventive treatments for hazardous
fuel reductions, or reduction or
containment of disease or insect
infestations. Woody material that is a
by-product of preventative treatments
solely for the purpose of restoring
ecosystem health is no longer eligible.
Woody material that can be used to
create a higher-value product (such as a
mulch product) is not eligible. The 2014
Farm Bill definition of ‘‘eligible
material’’ also specifies that eligible
material can now be used by a biomass
conversion facility for the purpose of
research, in addition to heat, power,
biobased products and advanced
biofuels.
The 2014 Farm Bill clarifies that the
rate for matching payments must be
based on a ‘‘dry’’ ton. Therefore, this
rule adds a requirement that biomass
conversion facilities must use the
applicable American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) standards to
determine dry ton weight of eligible
materials. In addition, the eligible
material owner, as specified in
§ 1450.104, is required to submit a
request for payment on approved
eligible woody material deliveries based
on the dry ton weight that was
determined using an ASTM standard.
The 2014 Farm Bill continues the
matching payment eligibility period of 2
years total per eligible material owner.
This rule specifies that any matching
payments received before the effective
date of this final rule will not count
towards an eligible material owner’s 2year period of eligibility for matching
payments. This is a discretionary
decision. FSA determined that the
revised requirements for eligible
materials and the reduction in payment
rate changed the scope of the matching
payments part of BCAP to the extent
that a new 2-year period of payment
eligibility for eligible material owners is
appropriate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
Project Areas
The changes to BCAP establishment
and annual payments required by the
2014 Farm Bill include:
• Project area selection criteria will
include consideration of existing project
areas and continuation of funding to
advance the maturity of such project
areas;
• Land eligibility will now include
expiring CRP land and ACEP land, but
the 2014 Farm Bill prohibits the
Secretary from making a BCAP payment
if a CRP or ACEP payment was received
in the same year;
• Establishment payment rates are
reduced to not more than 50 percent of
the costs of establishing an eligible
perennial crop, not to exceed $500 per
acre, except that socially disadvantaged
farmers or ranchers may be reimbursed
up to $750 per acre; and
• Any plant that is an invasive or
noxious species is explicitly excluded
from the definition of ‘‘eligible crop.’’
The 2014 Farm Bill also provides
specific authority for the Secretary to
consider whether the biomass
conversion facility for the project area
has equity sufficient to be in operation
by the date on which the eligible crops
are ready for harvest. Under prior
regulations, CCC could require
information demonstrating that the
biomass conversion facility would have
sufficient equity available to operate.
We are requesting comments on how we
should apply this criterion in future
Requests for Proposals (see Comments
Requested section below).
The 2014 Farm Bill clarifies that
eligible crops for a project area do not
include invasive or noxious species or
varieties of plants. Therefore, this rule
amends § 1450.200 to effect that
exclusion. If a project area proposal
includes species or plant varieties
whose potential to be invasive or
noxious has not yet been determined,
the 2014 Farm Bill requires CCC to use
‘‘credible risk assessment tools or other
credible sources’’ to determine which
plants are invasive or noxious in a
particular area. We are requesting
comments on which credible risk
assessment tools or other credible
sources for determination CCC should
use (see Comments Requested section
below). The requirement to use credible
risk assessment tools to determine
which plants are invasive or noxious is
in addition to the existing National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requirements that apply to BCAP, which
are not changing. FSA will continue to
require the appropriate level of (NEPA)
review, consistent with 7 CFR 799, for
BCAP project area proposals.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
As required by the 2014 Farm Bill,
this rule amends § 1450.202 to include
status as an existing project area as a
new criterion in selecting BCAP project
areas for funding, in order to advance
the maturity of existing project areas.
The 2014 Farm Bill does not specify
what is meant by ‘‘maturity’’ of a project
area. Different factors could be
considered when determining
‘‘maturity,’’ including the harvesting of
longer term crops, such as biomass
trees, or the expansion of a project area,
making it more economically viable in
the long term. We are requesting
comments on how FSA should apply
this criterion (see Comments Requested
section below).
This rule amends § 1450.204 to make
the changes in the definition of eligible
land required by the 2014 Farm Bill.
Specifically, CRP contract acreage and
Grassland Reserve Program (GRP)
contract acreage were previously not
eligible for BCAP, regardless of whether
or not the CRP or GRP contract was due
to expire within the year. The 2014
Farm Bill allows CRP acres that are in
their expiring year, and which have not
yet received an annual rental payment,
to be eligible for enrollment into BCAP.
The 2014 Farm Bill consolidates noneasement GRP acres into the CRP, so
GRP acres are included in the
provisions for expiring CRP land. The
2014 Farm Bill also consolidates GRP
easements and Wetland Reserve
Program (WRP) contract acreage into the
newly created ACEP, administered by
the USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS). Therefore,
§ 1450.204 now specifies that the
expiring ACEP acres are also eligible for
enrollment in BCAP, provided no
current year annual payment was
received. This rule removes obsolete
references to GRP and WRP acreage
eligibility.
This rule is revising the levels and
rates for establishment payments in
§ 1450.213 to reflect the limits provided
in the 2014 Farm Bill. Specifically, the
2014 Farm Bill reduces the cost share
for establishment payments from 75
percent to 50 percent of actual
establishment costs and sets a payment
limit of $500 per acre. The limit is $750
per acre if the producer is a socially
disadvantaged farmer or rancher. There
was no previous cap on payments per
acre.
Removal of Assignment Provisions
As a discretionary decision, this rule
removes § 1450.9 ‘‘Assignments.’’ That
section included provisions that
allowed participants to assign BCAP
payments, including both matching and
establishment payments, to third
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
parties. This change is intended to
improve program integrity and
transparency. BCAP payments, as
specified in the 2014 Farm Bill, are
intended to benefit the land owner or
operator or the eligible material owner.
The removal of assignment of payments,
under the matching payment portion of
the program, lessens the potential for
inappropriate assignment of payments
to biomass conversion facilities under
unauthorized value sharing
arrangements. The removal of
assignments, under the project area
portion of the program, will likely
provide greater clarity to stakeholders in
project areas, which include project area
sponsors and the contracting producers.
The removal of the assignment of
payment will help clarify that any crop
establishment or harvesting services
provided by the project sponsor or any
other provider to the producer are
services outside the scope of the BCAP
program and the BCAP contract, and
that financial responsibility for those
actions is between the service provider
and the producer.
Policy Changes for Project Area
Activities
FSA will make certain changes to the
way the establishment and annual
payments portion of BCAP is
implemented. These policies do not
require changes to the regulations. As
noted below, we are requesting
comments on this rule and on
implementation issues; these changes
are being explained to provide
information for the commenters (see
Comments Requested section below).
The requirements for project area
signup are largely unchanged by the
2014 Farm Bill. FSA will continue to
initiate project area signup by first
requesting project area proposals. Once
FSA receives proposals, FSA will select
and designate geographic-and-eligiblecrop-specific project areas, and then
announce producer signup at FSA
county offices.
The process for producer signup is
changing, to improve program
effectiveness. In an effort to provide
more timely outreach during signup,
FSA will be evaluating and adjusting
the timing of the producer signup
process. In previous years, BCAP signup
periods for establishment payments in
approved project areas were relatively
short and at less than optimal times for
establishing crops. Therefore, FSA is
revising the producer signup process to
allow project area signups to take place
on a continuous basis within the
constraints of available funding.
As noted below in the Comments
Requested section, FSA welcomes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
public input on BCAP implementation
issues and policies. Most of the itemized
issues pertain to changes the 2014 Farm
Bill made to the establishment and
annual payments component of the
program.
Funding Changes in the 2014 Farm Bill
The 2014 Farm Bill specifies the
annual amount of funds authorized for
BCAP and specifies how funding may
be allocated among various activities.
Specifically, the 2014 Farm Bill
provides mandatory funding of $25
million for each of fiscal years 2014
through 2018, and specifies that the
Secretary must use not less than 10
percent, nor more than 50 percent, of
the funding for each fiscal year for
BCAP matching payments. The $25
million each fiscal year is subject to
sequestration or other reductions
through the appropriations process.
Section 716 of the Consolidated and
Further Continuing Appropriations Act,
2015 (Pub. L. 113–235) effectively
limited the funding available for BCAP
in fiscal year 2015 to $23 million. The
previous authorization for BCAP
provided such sums as necessary from
the mandatory appropriation for CCC;
however, subsequent Congressional
actions in the annual appropriations
acts placed restrictions on the amount of
funding available. The overall result of
the 2014 Farm Bill changes in funding
is to provide a more stable and
predictable stream of funding for BCAP,
although the annual amount of funding
available is less than in some previous
years.
The 2014 Farm Bill also specifically
authorizes funding of technical
assistance from available BCAP funds.
BCAP included technical assistance
previously, but FSA did not have the
specific authorization to use BCAP
funds for those activities. FSA plans to
expand technical assistance activities to
provide BCAP with enhanced
compliance spot checks, greater breadth
of environmental reviews, outreach, and
training. In addition, BCAP technical
assistance will continue to include the
development and evaluation of
conservation plans, forest stewardship
plans, or equivalent plans for
participants.
As noted in the next section, FSA
seeks comments on how FSA should
prioritize and implement various BCAP
activities, given the funding
authorization provided in the 2014
Farm Bill.
Miscellaneous Corrections
This rule makes several minor
technical corrections, such as correcting
typographical errors.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10571
Comments Requested on BCAP
Implementation
FSA is requesting public comments
on how BCAP should be implemented
in future years, given the new
requirements in the 2014 Farm Bill and
the limited funding authority. FSA is, in
particular, requesting public comments
on the following questions:
• What information could FSA
reasonably collect that would provide
assurance that the biomass conversion
facility has sufficient equity to be in
operation by the date on which project
area eligible crops are ready for harvest?
• How could FSA best determine if
expansion of a project area would
advance the maturity of that project
area?
• What credible risk tools and sources
should FSA consider in determining
whether proposed crops are potentially
invasive?
• With a new cost share cap of 50
percent for establishment costs for
perennial crops in project areas, what
establishment practices should FSA
consider as most important to support?
• With the new limits to the BCAP
budget, what priorities should FSA
consider in implementing the program?
Please provide information on these
issues, and any other issues of concern
with BCAP implementation, to the
contacts listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Specific comments addressing the
issues raised above are most helpful; all
comments are welcome. Proposals for
alternatives should address data
sources, costs, and the provisions of the
2014 Farm Bill that support the
alternative. The following suggestions
may be helpful for preparing your
comments:
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible.
• Describe any assumptions that you
used.
• Provide any technical information
and data on which you based your
views.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your points.
• Offer specific alternatives to the
current regulations or policies and
indicate the source of necessary data,
the estimated cost of obtaining the data,
and how the data can be verified.
Submit your comments by the
comment period deadline.
Notice and Comment
We are issuing this final rule without
prior notice and opportunity for
comment. The Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) exempts rules
‘‘relating to agency management or
personnel or to public property, loans,
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
10572
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
grants, benefits, or contracts’’ from the
statutory requirement for prior notice
and opportunity for comment. 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2). However, FSA is providing a
60-day comment period and we invite
you to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. We will consider the comments
we receive and may conduct additional
rulemaking based on the comments.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review,’’ direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasized the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) designated this rule as not
significant under Executive Order
12866, and therefore, OMB has not
reviewed this rule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA),
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule whenever an agency is required by
APA or any other law to publish a
proposed rule, unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule is exempt from notice and
comment rulemaking requirements of
the APA and no other law requires that
a proposed rule be published for this
rulemaking initiative.
Environmental Review
The environmental impacts of this
final rule have been considered in a
manner consistent with the provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321–4347), the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500–1508), and the FSA regulations for
compliance with NEPA (7 CFR part
799). The 2014 Farm Bill extended and
revised BCAP and authorized its
funding through 2018. FSA has no
discretion in these BCAP provisions or
changes; the only discretionary
provisions in this final rule are minor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
editorial clarifications. The general
scope of BCAP, as implemented under
the 2008 Farm Bill, is unchanged. As
such, FSA has determined that this final
rule does not constitute a major Federal
action that would significantly affect the
quality of the human environment,
individually or cumulatively. Therefore,
FSA will not prepare an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement for this regulatory action.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ requires consultation with
State and local officials that would be
directly affected by proposed Federal
financial assistance. The objectives of
the Executive Order are to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened Federalism, by relying on
State and local processes for State and
local government coordination and
review of proposed Federal financial
assistance and direct Federal
development. For reasons specified in
the final rule related notice regarding 7
CFR part 3015, subpart V (48 FR 29115,
June 24, 1983), the programs and
activities within this rule are excluded
from the scope of Executive Order
12372.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform.’’ This rule will not preempt
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies unless they represent an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The rule does not have retroactive
effect. Before any judicial action may be
brought regarding the provisions of this
rule, the administrative appeal
provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 are
to be exhausted.
Executive Order 13132
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism.’’
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
States, on the relationship between the
Federal government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, except as required
by law. Nor does this rule impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments. Therefore,
consultation with the States is not
required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Governments.’’ Executive Order 13175
requires Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with tribes on a governmentto-government basis on policies that
have tribal implications, including
regulations, legislative comments or
proposed legislation, and other policy
statements or actions that have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
FSA has assessed the impact of this
rule on Indian tribes and determined
that this rule does not, to our
knowledge, have tribal implications that
require tribal consultation under
Executive Order 13175. If a Tribe
requests consultation, FSA will work
with the USDA Office of Tribal
Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided where changes,
additions, and modifications identified
in this rule are not expressly mandated
by the 2014 Farm Bill.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L.
104–4) requires Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and Tribal
governments, or the private sector.
Agencies generally need to prepare a
written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with Federal mandates that may
result in expenditures of $100 million or
more in any 1 year for State, local, or
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector. UMRA generally
requires agencies to consider
alternatives and adopt the more cost
effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates,
as defined in Title II of UMRA, for State,
local, and Tribal governments or the
private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of UMRA.
SBREFA
SBREFA normally requires that an
agency delay the effective date of a
major rule for 60 days from the date of
publication to allow for Congressional
review. This rule is not a major rule
under SBREFA. Therefore, FSA is not
required to delay the effective date for
60 days from the date of publication to
allow for Congressional review.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal
Domestic Assistance Program found in
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance to which this rule applies is
the Biomass Crop Assistance Program—
10:087.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The regulatory changes in this rule do
not require changes to the information
collection requests currently approved
by OMB control number 0560–0082.
E-Government Act Compliance
FSA and CCC are committed to
complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1450
Administrative practice and
procedure, Agriculture, Energy,
Environmental protection, Grant
programs—agriculture, Natural
resources, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Technical assistance.
For the reasons discussed above, CCC
amends 7 CFR part 1450 as follows:
PART 1450—BIOMASS CROP
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (BCAP)
1. The authority citation for part 1450
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8111.
Subpart A—Common Provisions
§ 1450.1
[Amended]
2. Amend § 1450.1, in paragraph (b),
by removing the word ‘‘Program’’ and
adding the word ‘‘Programs’’ in its
place.
■
§ 1450.2
[Amended]
3. Amend § 1450.2 as follows:
a. Add, in alphabetical order,
definitions for ‘‘Agricultural residue’’
and ‘‘Eligible land’’, to read as set forth
below;
■ b. Remove the definitions for
‘‘Beginning farmer or rancher’’ and
‘‘Socially disadvantaged farmer or
rancher’’;
■ c. Revise the definitions for ‘‘Dry ton’’,
‘‘Eligible crop’’, ‘‘Eligible material’’, and
‘‘Technical assistance’’, to read as set
forth below;
■ d. In paragraph (2) of the definition of
‘‘Native sod’’, add the words ‘‘or the
producer cannot substantiate that the
ground has ever been tilled’’
immediately after the word ‘‘tilled’’; and
■ e. In the definition of ‘‘Yard waste’’,
remove the word ‘‘byproducts’’ and add
the word ‘‘by-products’’ in its place.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 1450.3
Definitions.
§ 1450.9
*
*
*
*
*
Agricultural residue means crop
residue from agricultural lands,
including woody orchard waste.
*
*
*
*
*
Dry ton means one U.S. ton measuring
2,000 pounds. One dry ton is the
amount of renewable biomass that
would weigh one U.S. ton at zero
percent moisture content. Woody
material dry ton weight is determined in
accordance with applicable American
Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) standards.
Eligible crop means a crop of
renewable biomass as defined in this
section that is eligible for establishment
payments and annual payments as
specified in Subpart C of this part.
Eligible land means agricultural and
nonindustrial private forest lands on
which eligible crops for establishment
payments and annual payments may be
grown, as specified in subpart C of this
part.
Eligible material means renewable
biomass, including agricultural residue,
as defined in this section that is
harvested directly from the land and
that is eligible for matching payments,
as specified in subpart B of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
Technical assistance means assistance
in determining the eligibility of land
and practices for BCAP, implementing
and certifying practices, ensuring
contract performance, and providing
annual rental rate surveys. BCAP
technical assistance may include, but is
not limited to: technical expertise and
services, information, and tools
necessary for the conservation of natural
resources on land; technical services
provided directly to farmers, ranchers,
and other eligible entities, such as
conservation planning, technical
consultation, and assistance with design
and implementation of eligible
practices; and technical infrastructure,
including activities, processes, tools,
and functions needed to support
delivery of technical and program
services, such as technical standards,
resource inventories, training, data,
technology, monitoring, compliance
spot checks, and effects analyses.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1450.9
■
[Removed]
4. Remove § 1450.9.
§§ 1450.10 to 1450.13
[Redesignated]
5. Redesignate §§ 1450.10 through
1450.13 as §§ 1450.9 through 1450.12.
■ 6. Revise newly redesignated
§ 1450.9(b) to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10573
Appeals.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Determinations by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, U.S.
Forest Service, Department of Interior,
Bureau of Land Management, or other
authorized technical assistance provider
may be appealed in accordance with
procedures established in part 614 of
this title or otherwise established by the
respective Agency.
Subpart B—Matching Payments
7. Revise § 1450.101(a)(2)(v) and (vi)
to read as follows:
■
§ 1450.101
facility.
Qualified biomass conversion
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) Use commercial weight scales that
are certified for accuracy by applicable
State or local authorities and accurate
moisture measurement equipment to
determine the dry ton weight equivalent
of actual tonnage delivered. Woody
material dry ton weight must be
determined in accordance with
applicable ASTM standards; and
(vi) Purchase eligible material at a fair
market price that is consistent with
similar products, regardless of whether
or not the seller has applied for or
receives a matching payment authorized
by this subpart or if the seller and
purchaser are related entities.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 1450.102 as follows:
■ a. In paragraph (a)(2), remove the
words ‘‘eligible material’’ and add the
words ‘‘eligible material, regardless of
whether the eligible material is
produced on contract acreage
authorized by subpart C of this part,’’ in
their place; and
■ b. Revise paragraph (a)(3).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 1450.102
Eligible material owner.
(a) * * *
(3) Certify that the eligible material for
which a payment may be issued as
specified in § 1450.106 has been
harvested according to a conservation
plan, forest stewardship plan, or
equivalent plan, and, if woody eligible
material collected or harvested on land
other than contract acreage, the woody
material is a by-product of preventative
treatments that was removed to reduce
hazardous fuels or to reduce or contain
disease or insect infestation.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 1450.103 as follows:
■ a. Revise the section heading;
■ b. Revise paragraph (a), introductory
text;
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
10574
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
c. Remove paragraph (a)(1) and
redesignate paragraphs (a)(2) through (4)
as paragraphs (a)(1) through (3);
■ d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(2)(i);
■ e. Revise paragraphs (b)(1), (3) and (4)
and add paragraphs (b)(5) through (10);
and
■ f. Add paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1450.103
Eligible material for payments.
(a) Except for the exclusions specified
in paragraph (b) of this section, in order
to qualify for matching payments,
eligible material must meet the
following requirements:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(i) By-products of preventative
treatments that were removed to reduce
hazardous fuels or to reduce or contain
disease or insect infestation; and
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Any eligible material delivered
before May 28, 2015;
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Material that is whole grain from
any crop that is eligible to receive
payments under title I of the
Agricultural Act of 2014 or an
amendment made by that title,
including, but not limited to, barley,
corn, grain sorghum, oats, rice, or
wheat; honey; mohair; certain oilseeds
such as canola, crambe, flaxseed,
mustard seed, rapeseed, safflower seed,
soybeans, sesame seed, and sunflower
seeds; peanuts; pulse; chickpeas, lentils,
and dry peas; dairy products; sugar; and
wool and cotton boll fiber;
(4) Animal waste and by-products of
animal waste including fats, oil, grease,
and manure;
(5) Food waste and yard waste;
(6) Algae;
(7) Woody eligible material that is not
a by-product of a preventative treatment
to reduce hazardous fuel or to reduce or
contain disease or insect infestation;
(8) Any woody eligible material
collected or harvested outside contract
acreage that would otherwise be used
for higher-value products;
(9) Any otherwise eligible material
collected or harvested outside contract
acreage that, after delivery to a biomass
conversion facility, its campus, or its
affiliated facilities, must be separated
from an eligible material used for a
higher-value market product in order to
be used for heat, power, biobased
products, research, or advanced
biofuels; or
(10) Bagasse.
(c) For eligible woody material
harvested or collected from public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
lands, a person having the right to
harvest or collect eligible material
pursuant to a contract or permit with
the U.S. Forest Service or other
appropriate Federal agency will not be
eligible for additional haul costs unless
the facility is a further distance than
specified in the contract requirement or
the material was not a mandatory
removal item from Federal lands.
■ 10. Amend § 1450.104 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b), and (f)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 1450.104
Signup.
(a) Applications for participation and
requests for payments under this
subpart will be accepted as specified in
the FSA announcement(s) in a given
fiscal year through the end of the
announced sign up period on a
continuous basis, subject to the
availability of funds.
(b) An eligible material owner must
apply to participate in the matching
payments component of BCAP before
delivery is made to a qualified biomass
conversion facility and before payment
for the eligible material is received from
the qualified biomass conversion
facility. The application must be
submitted to the FSA county office
servicing the tracts of land where the
collection and harvest will occur and
must be approved by CCC, before any
delivery is made to or payment is made
by the qualified biomass conversion
facility for the eligible material.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) Total actual tonnage delivered and
a total dry weight tonnage equivalent
amount determined by the qualified
biomass conversion facility using
standard moisture determinations
applicable to the eligible material
(Woody material dry ton weight is
determined in accordance with
applicable ASTM standards);
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Amend § 1450.106 as follows:
■ a. Revise paragraph (a); and
■ b. In paragraph (b), remove the
amount ‘‘$45’’ and add the amount
‘‘$20’’ in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1450.106
Payments.
(a) Payments under this subpart will
be made for a term not to exceed 2
years, commencing on the date that CCC
issues the first payment under this
subpart to the participant. The 2-year
eligibility period for each participant
runs from the date that the participant
is first issued any matching payment
from CCC, regardless of payment for
subsequent deliveries to any other
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
biomass conversion facility. The
eligibility period will not include any
BCAP matching payments received
prior to May 28, 2015.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart C—Establishment Payments
and Annual Payments
12. Add § 1450.200(b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1450.200
General.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Eligible crops include renewable
biomass, as defined § 1450.2, excluding:
(1) Any crop that is eligible to receive
payments under title I of the
Agricultural Act of 2014 or an
amendment made by that title,
including, but not limited to, barley,
corn, grain sorghum, oats, rice, or
wheat; honey; mohair; certain oilseeds
such as canola, crambe, flaxseed,
mustard seed, rapeseed, safflower seed,
soybeans, sesame seed, and sunflower
seeds; peanuts; pulse; chickpeas, lentils,
and dry peas; dairy products; sugar; and
wool and cotton boll fiber; and
(2) Any plant that CCC has
determined to be either a noxious weed
or an invasive species. With respect to
noxious weeds and invasive species, a
list of such plants will be available in
the FSA county office.
■ 13. Amend § 1450.201 as follows:
■ a. In paragraph (a)(3), add the words
‘‘has or’’ immediately before the word
‘‘will’’; and
■ b. Revise paragraph (a)(4).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 1450.201 Project area proposal
submission requirements.
(a) * * *
(4) Any other information that gives
CCC a reasonable assurance that the
biomass conversion facility will be in
operation in a timely manner so that it
will use the eligible crops, as
determined by CCC.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Amend § 1450.202 as follows:
■ a. In paragraph (a)(8), remove the
word ‘‘and’’;
■ b. Revise paragraph (a)(9); and
■ c. Add paragraph (a)(10).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 1450.202
Project area selection criteria.
(a) * * *
(9) Status as an existing project area
that has received funding under this
subpart and the continuation of funding
such project areas to advance the
maturity of such project areas; and
(10) Any other necessary additional
information, as determined by CCC.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
adding the words ‘‘the BCAP contract’’
in their place.
15. Amend § 1450.204 as follows:
a. Revise paragraphs (b)(3) and (4);
and
■ b. Remove paragraph (b)(5).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 1450.204
Eligible land.
(b) * * *
(3) Land enrolled in the Conservation
Reserve Program (CRP) as specified in
part 1410 of this chapter for which
either:
(i) The enrollment is not expiring in
the current fiscal year; or
(ii) A CRP payment for this land has
been received in the current fiscal year;
or
(4) Land enrolled in the Agricultural
Conservation Easement Program (ACEP)
for which either:
(i) The enrollment is not expiring in
the current fiscal year; or
(ii) An ACEP payment for this land
has been received in the current fiscal
year.
Signed at Washington, DC, on February 23,
2015.
Val Dolcini,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation, and Administrator, Farm
Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015–04092 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0074]
RIN 0579–AC36
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza;
Technical Amendment
16. Amend § 1450.211, in paragraph
(g)(4), by adding the word ‘‘by’’
immediately before the word ‘‘CCC’’.
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
§ 1450.212
SUMMARY:
§ 1450.211
AGENCY:
[Amended]
■
[Amended]
17. Amend § 1450.212, in paragraph
(d), by removing the words ‘‘agreed to’’
and adding the word ‘‘determined’’ in
their place.
■ 18. Amend § 1450.213 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1450.213 Levels and rates for
establishment payments.
(a) CCC will pay not more than 50
percent of the actual or average cost
(whichever is lower) of establishing
non-woody perennial crops and woody
perennial crops specified in the
conservation plan, forest stewardship
plan, or equivalent plan, not to exceed
$500 per acre. For socially
disadvantaged farmers or ranchers, as
defined in part 718 of this title,
establishment payments may not exceed
$750 per acre.
(b) The average cost of performing a
practice will be determined by CCC
based on recommendations from the
State Technical Committee. Such cost
may be the average cost in a State, a
county, or a part of a State or county,
as determined by CCC. The average cost
as determined by CCC will be used for
payment purposes, if it is less than the
actual cost for an individual participant.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1450.215
[Amended]
19. Amend § 1450.215, in paragraph
(c), by removing the words ‘‘the
contract’’ each time they appear and
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
In a final rule published in
the Federal Register on December 1,
2014, and effective on that date, we
adopted, with changes, an interim rule
that amended the regulations
concerning the importation of live birds
and poultry (including hatching eggs)
and bird and poultry products from
regions where any subtype of highly
pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is
considered to exist. As part of this
action, we intended to clarify that table
eggs from regions considered to have
HPAI may only be imported under
APHIS permit for scientific,
educational, or research purposes to
approved establishments, and only if
the Administrator has determined that
the importation can be made under
conditions that will prevent the
introduction of HPAI into the United
States. However, we did not add
references to HPAI to one of the table
egg provisions of the final rule as we
intended. This document corrects that
oversight.
DATES:
Effective February 27, 2015.
Mr.
Javier Vargas, Case Manager, National
Import Export Services, Animal Health
Policy and Programs, VS, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD
20737; (301) 851–3300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a final
rule 1 that was published in the Federal
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1 To view the rule, supporting analyses, and
comments we received, go to https://
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10575
Register on December 1, 2014 (79 FR
70997–71007, Docket No. APHIS–2006–
0074), and effective on that date, we
adopted, with changes, an interim rule
that amended the regulations
concerning the importation of live birds
and poultry (including hatching eggs)
and bird and poultry products from
regions where any subtype of highly
pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is
considered to exist. As part of this
action, we intended to amend the
regulations in § 94.6(c)(4) to clarify that
table eggs from regions considered to
have HPAI that do not meet the
requirements of § 94.6(c)(1) through
§ 94.6(c)(3) may only be imported if the
Administrator has determined that the
importation can be made under
conditions that will prevent the
introduction of HPAI into the United
States. However, we did not add
references to HPAI in § 94.6(c)(4) of the
table egg provisions of the final rule as
we intended. We are amending the
regulations to correct that oversight.
We also wish to clarify a statement we
made in the preamble to the final rule
regarding the requirements for
importing table eggs from HPAI regions.
We incorrectly stated that table eggs
moved to approved establishments for
breaking and pasteurization require an
APHIS permit. Such eggs do not require
an APHIS permit for importation and, as
indicated in § 94.6(c)(2), may be moved
from the port of arrival in the United
States, under seal of the United States
Department of Agriculture, to an
approved establishment for breaking
and pasteurization.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Meat and meat products, Milk, Poultry
and poultry products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 9 CFR part 94 is
amended as follows:
PART 94—RINDERPEST, FOOT-ANDMOUTH DISEASE, NEWCASTLE
DISEASE, HIGHLY PATHOGENIC
AVIAN INFLUENZA, AFRICAN SWINE
FEVER, CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER,
SWINE VESICULAR DISEASE, AND
BOVINE SPONGIFORM
ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED
AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS.
1. The authority citation for part 94
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, 7781–
7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.4.
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS2006-0074.
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10569-10575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04092]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 10569]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1450
RIN 0560-AI27
Biomass Crop Assistance Program
AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation and Farm Service Agency, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Farm Service Agency (FSA) is amending the Biomass Crop
Assistance Program (BCAP) regulations to implement changes required by
the Agricultural Act of 2014 (the 2014 Farm Bill). BCAP provides
financial assistance to producers who establish, collect, harvest,
store, and transport biomass crops. The 2014 Farm Bill reauthorizes
BCAP, with certain changes that are implemented in this rule. The
changes include reducing the payment rate per ton for collection,
harvest, storage, and transportation of eligible materials, and
limiting the cost share per acre for establishment of biomass crops.
The requirements for eligible material and eligible land are revised in
this rule, as required by the 2014 Farm Bill. The general scope of BCAP
is not changing with this rule.
DATES:
Effective Date: May 28, 2015.
Comment Date: We will consider comments we receive by April 28,
2015.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit comments on this rule. In your
comment, please specify RIN 0560-AI27 and include the volume, date, and
page number of this issue of the Federal Register. You may submit
comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments;
Mail, Hand Delivery, or Courier: Kelly Novak, FSA CEPD,
USDA, STOP 0513, 1400 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20250-0513.
All written comments will be available for inspection online at
www.regulations.gov and at the mail address above during business hours
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. A copy
of this rule is available through the FSA home page at https://www.fsa.usda.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Novak, telephone (202) 720-4053.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
BCAP is an FSA administered program using Commodity Credit
Corporation (CCC) funds. Section 9010 of the 2014 Farm Bill (Pub. L.
113-79) amends 7 U.S.C. 8111 and reauthorizes BCAP with certain
changes. BCAP provides assistance to biomass producers and owners in
two payment categories:
Matching payments to eligible material owners for the
delivery of eligible material to qualified Biomass Conversion
Facilities (BCFs). Qualified BCFs use biomass feedstocks to produce
heat, power, biobased products, research, or advanced biofuels. The
2014 Farm Bill adds research as an authorized use of material by BCFs.
Establishment and annual payments to producers who enter
into contracts with CCC to produce eligible biomass crops on contract
acres within BCAP project areas.
This rule implements all the required 2014 Farm Bill changes to
both parts of the program and seeks comment on FSA's implementation of
BCAP, given the required changes and changes to funding. The rule also
includes several discretionary changes, including the removal of the
participant's option for assignment of BCAP payments to third parties,
and a clarification of how the two-year period of eligibility for
matching payments, commencing with the effective date of this rule,
will be calculated.
Definitions and Terms Used in This Rule
This rule adds, removes, or revises the following definitions:
``Agricultural residue'' is being added and includes crop
residues and woody orchard wastes. Both these types of residues can be
eligible materials.
``Beginning farmer or rancher'' is being removed, because
that term is defined in 7 CFR part 718, which is referenced in Sec.
1450.2.
``Dry ton'' is being revised to clarify requirements for
measuring moisture content of eligible woody materials.
``Eligible crop'' is being revised to clarify that noxious
and invasive species are ineligible for establishment and annual
payments, and to move specific eligibility requirements to Sec.
1450.200.
``Eligible land'' is being added to reflect the 2014 Farm
Bill requirements, which add eligibility for Conservation Reserve
Program (CRP) acreage or land in the Agricultural Conservation Easement
Program (ACEP) that expires in the current year of a BCAP project area
signup and has not yet received a CRP or ACEP annual rental payment in
the current year.
``Eligible material'' is being revised to reflect the 2014
Farm Bill required changes for matching payments, and to move the
specific eligibility requirements for material for matching payments to
section Sec. 1450.103.
``Native sod'' is being revised to reflect the 2014 Farm
Bill's change in definition for native sod that is required for other
USDA programs. For the purposes of consistency with crop insurance and
the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) regulations that
now restrict the eligibility of native sod for those programs, the
definition of native sod for the purposes of BCAP will now include
ground that has never been tilled or the producer cannot substantiate
that the ground has ever been tilled.
``Socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher'' is being
removed, because that term is defined in 7 CFR part 718, which is
referenced in Sec. 1450.2.
Matching Payments
The changes to the BCAP matching payments required by the 2014 Farm
Bill include a reduced payment rate of up to $1 for each $1 per ton
provided by the biomass conversion facility, in an amount not to exceed
$20 per dry ton (previously $45 per ton) for a period of up to 2 years.
The rate is being changed in Sec. 1450.106.
[[Page 10570]]
As specified in the 2014 Farm Bill and in this rule, bagasse, which
includes sugar cane and sorghum biomass, is now specifically excluded
from the definition of an eligible material and the requirements for
eligible materials in Subpart B. This rule also requires that all
eligible material be collected or harvested directly from the land
according to an approved conservation plan, forest stewardship plan, or
equivalent plan. For example, manufacturing wood wastes that are not
harvested directly from the land, such as sawdust or sawmill residues,
are not eligible woody material. Woody material, including orchard
waste, must be collected and harvested directly from the land and must
also be a by-product of preventive treatments for hazardous fuel
reductions, or reduction or containment of disease or insect
infestations. Woody material that is a by-product of preventative
treatments solely for the purpose of restoring ecosystem health is no
longer eligible. Woody material that can be used to create a higher-
value product (such as a mulch product) is not eligible. The 2014 Farm
Bill definition of ``eligible material'' also specifies that eligible
material can now be used by a biomass conversion facility for the
purpose of research, in addition to heat, power, biobased products and
advanced biofuels.
The 2014 Farm Bill clarifies that the rate for matching payments
must be based on a ``dry'' ton. Therefore, this rule adds a requirement
that biomass conversion facilities must use the applicable American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards to determine dry ton
weight of eligible materials. In addition, the eligible material owner,
as specified in Sec. 1450.104, is required to submit a request for
payment on approved eligible woody material deliveries based on the dry
ton weight that was determined using an ASTM standard.
The 2014 Farm Bill continues the matching payment eligibility
period of 2 years total per eligible material owner. This rule
specifies that any matching payments received before the effective date
of this final rule will not count towards an eligible material owner's
2-year period of eligibility for matching payments. This is a
discretionary decision. FSA determined that the revised requirements
for eligible materials and the reduction in payment rate changed the
scope of the matching payments part of BCAP to the extent that a new 2-
year period of payment eligibility for eligible material owners is
appropriate.
Project Areas
The changes to BCAP establishment and annual payments required by
the 2014 Farm Bill include:
Project area selection criteria will include consideration
of existing project areas and continuation of funding to advance the
maturity of such project areas;
Land eligibility will now include expiring CRP land and
ACEP land, but the 2014 Farm Bill prohibits the Secretary from making a
BCAP payment if a CRP or ACEP payment was received in the same year;
Establishment payment rates are reduced to not more than
50 percent of the costs of establishing an eligible perennial crop, not
to exceed $500 per acre, except that socially disadvantaged farmers or
ranchers may be reimbursed up to $750 per acre; and
Any plant that is an invasive or noxious species is
explicitly excluded from the definition of ``eligible crop.''
The 2014 Farm Bill also provides specific authority for the
Secretary to consider whether the biomass conversion facility for the
project area has equity sufficient to be in operation by the date on
which the eligible crops are ready for harvest. Under prior
regulations, CCC could require information demonstrating that the
biomass conversion facility would have sufficient equity available to
operate. We are requesting comments on how we should apply this
criterion in future Requests for Proposals (see Comments Requested
section below).
The 2014 Farm Bill clarifies that eligible crops for a project area
do not include invasive or noxious species or varieties of plants.
Therefore, this rule amends Sec. 1450.200 to effect that exclusion. If
a project area proposal includes species or plant varieties whose
potential to be invasive or noxious has not yet been determined, the
2014 Farm Bill requires CCC to use ``credible risk assessment tools or
other credible sources'' to determine which plants are invasive or
noxious in a particular area. We are requesting comments on which
credible risk assessment tools or other credible sources for
determination CCC should use (see Comments Requested section below).
The requirement to use credible risk assessment tools to determine
which plants are invasive or noxious is in addition to the existing
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements that apply to
BCAP, which are not changing. FSA will continue to require the
appropriate level of (NEPA) review, consistent with 7 CFR 799, for BCAP
project area proposals.
As required by the 2014 Farm Bill, this rule amends Sec. 1450.202
to include status as an existing project area as a new criterion in
selecting BCAP project areas for funding, in order to advance the
maturity of existing project areas. The 2014 Farm Bill does not specify
what is meant by ``maturity'' of a project area. Different factors
could be considered when determining ``maturity,'' including the
harvesting of longer term crops, such as biomass trees, or the
expansion of a project area, making it more economically viable in the
long term. We are requesting comments on how FSA should apply this
criterion (see Comments Requested section below).
This rule amends Sec. 1450.204 to make the changes in the
definition of eligible land required by the 2014 Farm Bill.
Specifically, CRP contract acreage and Grassland Reserve Program (GRP)
contract acreage were previously not eligible for BCAP, regardless of
whether or not the CRP or GRP contract was due to expire within the
year. The 2014 Farm Bill allows CRP acres that are in their expiring
year, and which have not yet received an annual rental payment, to be
eligible for enrollment into BCAP. The 2014 Farm Bill consolidates non-
easement GRP acres into the CRP, so GRP acres are included in the
provisions for expiring CRP land. The 2014 Farm Bill also consolidates
GRP easements and Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) contract acreage into
the newly created ACEP, administered by the USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS). Therefore, Sec. 1450.204 now specifies
that the expiring ACEP acres are also eligible for enrollment in BCAP,
provided no current year annual payment was received. This rule removes
obsolete references to GRP and WRP acreage eligibility.
This rule is revising the levels and rates for establishment
payments in Sec. 1450.213 to reflect the limits provided in the 2014
Farm Bill. Specifically, the 2014 Farm Bill reduces the cost share for
establishment payments from 75 percent to 50 percent of actual
establishment costs and sets a payment limit of $500 per acre. The
limit is $750 per acre if the producer is a socially disadvantaged
farmer or rancher. There was no previous cap on payments per acre.
Removal of Assignment Provisions
As a discretionary decision, this rule removes Sec. 1450.9
``Assignments.'' That section included provisions that allowed
participants to assign BCAP payments, including both matching and
establishment payments, to third
[[Page 10571]]
parties. This change is intended to improve program integrity and
transparency. BCAP payments, as specified in the 2014 Farm Bill, are
intended to benefit the land owner or operator or the eligible material
owner. The removal of assignment of payments, under the matching
payment portion of the program, lessens the potential for inappropriate
assignment of payments to biomass conversion facilities under
unauthorized value sharing arrangements. The removal of assignments,
under the project area portion of the program, will likely provide
greater clarity to stakeholders in project areas, which include project
area sponsors and the contracting producers. The removal of the
assignment of payment will help clarify that any crop establishment or
harvesting services provided by the project sponsor or any other
provider to the producer are services outside the scope of the BCAP
program and the BCAP contract, and that financial responsibility for
those actions is between the service provider and the producer.
Policy Changes for Project Area Activities
FSA will make certain changes to the way the establishment and
annual payments portion of BCAP is implemented. These policies do not
require changes to the regulations. As noted below, we are requesting
comments on this rule and on implementation issues; these changes are
being explained to provide information for the commenters (see Comments
Requested section below).
The requirements for project area signup are largely unchanged by
the 2014 Farm Bill. FSA will continue to initiate project area signup
by first requesting project area proposals. Once FSA receives
proposals, FSA will select and designate geographic-and-eligible-crop-
specific project areas, and then announce producer signup at FSA county
offices.
The process for producer signup is changing, to improve program
effectiveness. In an effort to provide more timely outreach during
signup, FSA will be evaluating and adjusting the timing of the producer
signup process. In previous years, BCAP signup periods for
establishment payments in approved project areas were relatively short
and at less than optimal times for establishing crops. Therefore, FSA
is revising the producer signup process to allow project area signups
to take place on a continuous basis within the constraints of available
funding.
As noted below in the Comments Requested section, FSA welcomes
public input on BCAP implementation issues and policies. Most of the
itemized issues pertain to changes the 2014 Farm Bill made to the
establishment and annual payments component of the program.
Funding Changes in the 2014 Farm Bill
The 2014 Farm Bill specifies the annual amount of funds authorized
for BCAP and specifies how funding may be allocated among various
activities. Specifically, the 2014 Farm Bill provides mandatory funding
of $25 million for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018, and
specifies that the Secretary must use not less than 10 percent, nor
more than 50 percent, of the funding for each fiscal year for BCAP
matching payments. The $25 million each fiscal year is subject to
sequestration or other reductions through the appropriations process.
Section 716 of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations
Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) effectively limited the funding available
for BCAP in fiscal year 2015 to $23 million. The previous authorization
for BCAP provided such sums as necessary from the mandatory
appropriation for CCC; however, subsequent Congressional actions in the
annual appropriations acts placed restrictions on the amount of funding
available. The overall result of the 2014 Farm Bill changes in funding
is to provide a more stable and predictable stream of funding for BCAP,
although the annual amount of funding available is less than in some
previous years.
The 2014 Farm Bill also specifically authorizes funding of
technical assistance from available BCAP funds. BCAP included technical
assistance previously, but FSA did not have the specific authorization
to use BCAP funds for those activities. FSA plans to expand technical
assistance activities to provide BCAP with enhanced compliance spot
checks, greater breadth of environmental reviews, outreach, and
training. In addition, BCAP technical assistance will continue to
include the development and evaluation of conservation plans, forest
stewardship plans, or equivalent plans for participants.
As noted in the next section, FSA seeks comments on how FSA should
prioritize and implement various BCAP activities, given the funding
authorization provided in the 2014 Farm Bill.
Miscellaneous Corrections
This rule makes several minor technical corrections, such as
correcting typographical errors.
Comments Requested on BCAP Implementation
FSA is requesting public comments on how BCAP should be implemented
in future years, given the new requirements in the 2014 Farm Bill and
the limited funding authority. FSA is, in particular, requesting public
comments on the following questions:
What information could FSA reasonably collect that would
provide assurance that the biomass conversion facility has sufficient
equity to be in operation by the date on which project area eligible
crops are ready for harvest?
How could FSA best determine if expansion of a project
area would advance the maturity of that project area?
What credible risk tools and sources should FSA consider
in determining whether proposed crops are potentially invasive?
With a new cost share cap of 50 percent for establishment
costs for perennial crops in project areas, what establishment
practices should FSA consider as most important to support?
With the new limits to the BCAP budget, what priorities
should FSA consider in implementing the program?
Please provide information on these issues, and any other issues of
concern with BCAP implementation, to the contacts listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Specific comments addressing the issues raised above
are most helpful; all comments are welcome. Proposals for alternatives
should address data sources, costs, and the provisions of the 2014 Farm
Bill that support the alternative. The following suggestions may be
helpful for preparing your comments:
Explain your views as clearly as possible.
Describe any assumptions that you used.
Provide any technical information and data on which you
based your views.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your points.
Offer specific alternatives to the current regulations or
policies and indicate the source of necessary data, the estimated cost
of obtaining the data, and how the data can be verified.
Submit your comments by the comment period deadline.
Notice and Comment
We are issuing this final rule without prior notice and opportunity
for comment. The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) exempts rules
``relating to agency management or personnel or to public property,
loans,
[[Page 10572]]
grants, benefits, or contracts'' from the statutory requirement for
prior notice and opportunity for comment. 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). However,
FSA is providing a 60-day comment period and we invite you to
participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or
views. We will consider the comments we receive and may conduct
additional rulemaking based on the comments.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,''
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasized the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as
not significant under Executive Order 12866, and therefore, OMB has not
reviewed this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA), generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule whenever an agency is required by APA
or any other law to publish a proposed rule, unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. This rule is exempt from notice
and comment rulemaking requirements of the APA and no other law
requires that a proposed rule be published for this rulemaking
initiative.
Environmental Review
The environmental impacts of this final rule have been considered
in a manner consistent with the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347), the regulations
of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and
the FSA regulations for compliance with NEPA (7 CFR part 799). The 2014
Farm Bill extended and revised BCAP and authorized its funding through
2018. FSA has no discretion in these BCAP provisions or changes; the
only discretionary provisions in this final rule are minor editorial
clarifications. The general scope of BCAP, as implemented under the
2008 Farm Bill, is unchanged. As such, FSA has determined that this
final rule does not constitute a major Federal action that would
significantly affect the quality of the human environment, individually
or cumulatively. Therefore, FSA will not prepare an environmental
assessment or environmental impact statement for this regulatory
action.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,'' requires consultation with State and local officials that
would be directly affected by proposed Federal financial assistance.
The objectives of the Executive Order are to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism, by relying
on State and local processes for State and local government
coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance and
direct Federal development. For reasons specified in the final rule
related notice regarding 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V (48 FR 29115, June
24, 1983), the programs and activities within this rule are excluded
from the scope of Executive Order 12372.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform.'' This rule will not preempt State or local laws,
regulations, or policies unless they represent an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule. The rule does not have retroactive effect.
Before any judicial action may be brought regarding the provisions of
this rule, the administrative appeal provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and
780 are to be exhausted.
Executive Order 13132
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13132,
``Federalism.'' The policies contained in this rule do not have any
substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the
Federal government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, except as
required by law. Nor does this rule impose substantial direct
compliance costs on State and local governments. Therefore,
consultation with the States is not required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments.'' Executive Order 13175 requires Federal agencies
to consult and coordinate with tribes on a government-to-government
basis on policies that have tribal implications, including regulations,
legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy
statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian tribes or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
FSA has assessed the impact of this rule on Indian tribes and
determined that this rule does not, to our knowledge, have tribal
implications that require tribal consultation under Executive Order
13175. If a Tribe requests consultation, FSA will work with the USDA
Office of Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful consultation is
provided where changes, additions, and modifications identified in this
rule are not expressly mandated by the 2014 Farm Bill.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L.
104-4) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, or the
private sector. Agencies generally need to prepare a written statement,
including a cost benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with
Federal mandates that may result in expenditures of $100 million or
more in any 1 year for State, local, or Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. UMRA generally requires agencies
to consider alternatives and adopt the more cost effective or least
burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. This
rule contains no Federal mandates, as defined in Title II of UMRA, for
State, local, and Tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore,
this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
SBREFA
SBREFA normally requires that an agency delay the effective date of
a major rule for 60 days from the date of publication to allow for
Congressional review. This rule is not a major rule under SBREFA.
Therefore, FSA is not required to delay the effective date for 60 days
from the date of publication to allow for Congressional review.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal Domestic Assistance Program
found in
[[Page 10573]]
the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance to which this rule applies
is the Biomass Crop Assistance Program--10:087.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The regulatory changes in this rule do not require changes to the
information collection requests currently approved by OMB control
number 0560-0082.
E-Government Act Compliance
FSA and CCC are committed to complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies
to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1450
Administrative practice and procedure, Agriculture, Energy,
Environmental protection, Grant programs--agriculture, Natural
resources, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Technical
assistance.
For the reasons discussed above, CCC amends 7 CFR part 1450 as
follows:
PART 1450--BIOMASS CROP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (BCAP)
0
1. The authority citation for part 1450 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8111.
Subpart A--Common Provisions
Sec. 1450.1 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 1450.1, in paragraph (b), by removing the word
``Program'' and adding the word ``Programs'' in its place.
Sec. 1450.2 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 1450.2 as follows:
0
a. Add, in alphabetical order, definitions for ``Agricultural residue''
and ``Eligible land'', to read as set forth below;
0
b. Remove the definitions for ``Beginning farmer or rancher'' and
``Socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher'';
0
c. Revise the definitions for ``Dry ton'', ``Eligible crop'',
``Eligible material'', and ``Technical assistance'', to read as set
forth below;
0
d. In paragraph (2) of the definition of ``Native sod'', add the words
``or the producer cannot substantiate that the ground has ever been
tilled'' immediately after the word ``tilled''; and
0
e. In the definition of ``Yard waste'', remove the word ``byproducts''
and add the word ``by-products'' in its place.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1450.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Agricultural residue means crop residue from agricultural lands,
including woody orchard waste.
* * * * *
Dry ton means one U.S. ton measuring 2,000 pounds. One dry ton is
the amount of renewable biomass that would weigh one U.S. ton at zero
percent moisture content. Woody material dry ton weight is determined
in accordance with applicable American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) standards.
Eligible crop means a crop of renewable biomass as defined in this
section that is eligible for establishment payments and annual payments
as specified in Subpart C of this part.
Eligible land means agricultural and nonindustrial private forest
lands on which eligible crops for establishment payments and annual
payments may be grown, as specified in subpart C of this part.
Eligible material means renewable biomass, including agricultural
residue, as defined in this section that is harvested directly from the
land and that is eligible for matching payments, as specified in
subpart B of this part.
* * * * *
Technical assistance means assistance in determining the
eligibility of land and practices for BCAP, implementing and certifying
practices, ensuring contract performance, and providing annual rental
rate surveys. BCAP technical assistance may include, but is not limited
to: technical expertise and services, information, and tools necessary
for the conservation of natural resources on land; technical services
provided directly to farmers, ranchers, and other eligible entities,
such as conservation planning, technical consultation, and assistance
with design and implementation of eligible practices; and technical
infrastructure, including activities, processes, tools, and functions
needed to support delivery of technical and program services, such as
technical standards, resource inventories, training, data, technology,
monitoring, compliance spot checks, and effects analyses.
* * * * *
Sec. 1450.9 [Removed]
0
4. Remove Sec. 1450.9.
Sec. Sec. 1450.10 to 1450.13 [Redesignated]
0
5. Redesignate Sec. Sec. 1450.10 through 1450.13 as Sec. Sec. 1450.9
through 1450.12.
0
6. Revise newly redesignated Sec. 1450.9(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 1450.9 Appeals.
* * * * *
(b) Determinations by the Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Forest Service, Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management,
or other authorized technical assistance provider may be appealed in
accordance with procedures established in part 614 of this title or
otherwise established by the respective Agency.
Subpart B--Matching Payments
0
7. Revise Sec. 1450.101(a)(2)(v) and (vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 1450.101 Qualified biomass conversion facility.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) Use commercial weight scales that are certified for accuracy by
applicable State or local authorities and accurate moisture measurement
equipment to determine the dry ton weight equivalent of actual tonnage
delivered. Woody material dry ton weight must be determined in
accordance with applicable ASTM standards; and
(vi) Purchase eligible material at a fair market price that is
consistent with similar products, regardless of whether or not the
seller has applied for or receives a matching payment authorized by
this subpart or if the seller and purchaser are related entities.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 1450.102 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(2), remove the words ``eligible material'' and add
the words ``eligible material, regardless of whether the eligible
material is produced on contract acreage authorized by subpart C of
this part,'' in their place; and
0
b. Revise paragraph (a)(3).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 1450.102 Eligible material owner.
(a) * * *
(3) Certify that the eligible material for which a payment may be
issued as specified in Sec. 1450.106 has been harvested according to a
conservation plan, forest stewardship plan, or equivalent plan, and, if
woody eligible material collected or harvested on land other than
contract acreage, the woody material is a by-product of preventative
treatments that was removed to reduce hazardous fuels or to reduce or
contain disease or insect infestation.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 1450.103 as follows:
0
a. Revise the section heading;
0
b. Revise paragraph (a), introductory text;
[[Page 10574]]
0
c. Remove paragraph (a)(1) and redesignate paragraphs (a)(2) through
(4) as paragraphs (a)(1) through (3);
0
d. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (a)(2)(i);
0
e. Revise paragraphs (b)(1), (3) and (4) and add paragraphs (b)(5)
through (10); and
0
f. Add paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1450.103 Eligible material for payments.
(a) Except for the exclusions specified in paragraph (b) of this
section, in order to qualify for matching payments, eligible material
must meet the following requirements:
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(i) By-products of preventative treatments that were removed to
reduce hazardous fuels or to reduce or contain disease or insect
infestation; and
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Any eligible material delivered before May 28, 2015;
* * * * *
(3) Material that is whole grain from any crop that is eligible to
receive payments under title I of the Agricultural Act of 2014 or an
amendment made by that title, including, but not limited to, barley,
corn, grain sorghum, oats, rice, or wheat; honey; mohair; certain
oilseeds such as canola, crambe, flaxseed, mustard seed, rapeseed,
safflower seed, soybeans, sesame seed, and sunflower seeds; peanuts;
pulse; chickpeas, lentils, and dry peas; dairy products; sugar; and
wool and cotton boll fiber;
(4) Animal waste and by-products of animal waste including fats,
oil, grease, and manure;
(5) Food waste and yard waste;
(6) Algae;
(7) Woody eligible material that is not a by-product of a
preventative treatment to reduce hazardous fuel or to reduce or contain
disease or insect infestation;
(8) Any woody eligible material collected or harvested outside
contract acreage that would otherwise be used for higher-value
products;
(9) Any otherwise eligible material collected or harvested outside
contract acreage that, after delivery to a biomass conversion facility,
its campus, or its affiliated facilities, must be separated from an
eligible material used for a higher-value market product in order to be
used for heat, power, biobased products, research, or advanced
biofuels; or
(10) Bagasse.
(c) For eligible woody material harvested or collected from public
lands, a person having the right to harvest or collect eligible
material pursuant to a contract or permit with the U.S. Forest Service
or other appropriate Federal agency will not be eligible for additional
haul costs unless the facility is a further distance than specified in
the contract requirement or the material was not a mandatory removal
item from Federal lands.
0
10. Amend Sec. 1450.104 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (f)(1) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1450.104 Signup.
(a) Applications for participation and requests for payments under
this subpart will be accepted as specified in the FSA announcement(s)
in a given fiscal year through the end of the announced sign up period
on a continuous basis, subject to the availability of funds.
(b) An eligible material owner must apply to participate in the
matching payments component of BCAP before delivery is made to a
qualified biomass conversion facility and before payment for the
eligible material is received from the qualified biomass conversion
facility. The application must be submitted to the FSA county office
servicing the tracts of land where the collection and harvest will
occur and must be approved by CCC, before any delivery is made to or
payment is made by the qualified biomass conversion facility for the
eligible material.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) Total actual tonnage delivered and a total dry weight tonnage
equivalent amount determined by the qualified biomass conversion
facility using standard moisture determinations applicable to the
eligible material (Woody material dry ton weight is determined in
accordance with applicable ASTM standards);
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec. 1450.106 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraph (a); and
0
b. In paragraph (b), remove the amount ``$45'' and add the amount
``$20'' in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1450.106 Payments.
(a) Payments under this subpart will be made for a term not to
exceed 2 years, commencing on the date that CCC issues the first
payment under this subpart to the participant. The 2-year eligibility
period for each participant runs from the date that the participant is
first issued any matching payment from CCC, regardless of payment for
subsequent deliveries to any other biomass conversion facility. The
eligibility period will not include any BCAP matching payments received
prior to May 28, 2015.
* * * * *
Subpart C--Establishment Payments and Annual Payments
0
12. Add Sec. 1450.200(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 1450.200 General.
* * * * *
(b) Eligible crops include renewable biomass, as defined Sec.
1450.2, excluding:
(1) Any crop that is eligible to receive payments under title I of
the Agricultural Act of 2014 or an amendment made by that title,
including, but not limited to, barley, corn, grain sorghum, oats, rice,
or wheat; honey; mohair; certain oilseeds such as canola, crambe,
flaxseed, mustard seed, rapeseed, safflower seed, soybeans, sesame
seed, and sunflower seeds; peanuts; pulse; chickpeas, lentils, and dry
peas; dairy products; sugar; and wool and cotton boll fiber; and
(2) Any plant that CCC has determined to be either a noxious weed
or an invasive species. With respect to noxious weeds and invasive
species, a list of such plants will be available in the FSA county
office.
0
13. Amend Sec. 1450.201 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(3), add the words ``has or'' immediately before the
word ``will''; and
0
b. Revise paragraph (a)(4).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 1450.201 Project area proposal submission requirements.
(a) * * *
(4) Any other information that gives CCC a reasonable assurance
that the biomass conversion facility will be in operation in a timely
manner so that it will use the eligible crops, as determined by CCC.
* * * * *
0
14. Amend Sec. 1450.202 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(8), remove the word ``and'';
0
b. Revise paragraph (a)(9); and
0
c. Add paragraph (a)(10).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1450.202 Project area selection criteria.
(a) * * *
(9) Status as an existing project area that has received funding
under this subpart and the continuation of funding such project areas
to advance the maturity of such project areas; and
(10) Any other necessary additional information, as determined by
CCC.
* * * * *
[[Page 10575]]
0
15. Amend Sec. 1450.204 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (b)(3) and (4); and
0
b. Remove paragraph (b)(5).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1450.204 Eligible land.
(b) * * *
(3) Land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) as
specified in part 1410 of this chapter for which either:
(i) The enrollment is not expiring in the current fiscal year; or
(ii) A CRP payment for this land has been received in the current
fiscal year; or
(4) Land enrolled in the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program
(ACEP) for which either:
(i) The enrollment is not expiring in the current fiscal year; or
(ii) An ACEP payment for this land has been received in the current
fiscal year.
Sec. 1450.211 [Amended]
0
16. Amend Sec. 1450.211, in paragraph (g)(4), by adding the word
``by'' immediately before the word ``CCC''.
Sec. 1450.212 [Amended]
0
17. Amend Sec. 1450.212, in paragraph (d), by removing the words
``agreed to'' and adding the word ``determined'' in their place.
0
18. Amend Sec. 1450.213 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1450.213 Levels and rates for establishment payments.
(a) CCC will pay not more than 50 percent of the actual or average
cost (whichever is lower) of establishing non-woody perennial crops and
woody perennial crops specified in the conservation plan, forest
stewardship plan, or equivalent plan, not to exceed $500 per acre. For
socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers, as defined in part 718 of
this title, establishment payments may not exceed $750 per acre.
(b) The average cost of performing a practice will be determined by
CCC based on recommendations from the State Technical Committee. Such
cost may be the average cost in a State, a county, or a part of a State
or county, as determined by CCC. The average cost as determined by CCC
will be used for payment purposes, if it is less than the actual cost
for an individual participant.
* * * * *
Sec. 1450.215 [Amended]
0
19. Amend Sec. 1450.215, in paragraph (c), by removing the words ``the
contract'' each time they appear and adding the words ``the BCAP
contract'' in their place.
Signed at Washington, DC, on February 23, 2015.
Val Dolcini,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation, and
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-04092 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P