Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Domestic Source Restrictions on Certain Naval Vessel Components (DFARS Case 2014-D022), 10391-10392 [2015-03855]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 38 / Thursday, February 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System 48 CFR Part 225 RIN 0750–AI36 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Domestic Source Restrictions on Certain Naval Vessel Components (DFARS Case 2014–D022) Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement the statutory domestic source restrictions on acquisition of certain naval vessel components. SUMMARY: Effective February 26, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, telephone 571–372– 6106. DATES: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 79 FR 56333 on September 19, 2014, to implement the domestic source restrictions in 10 U.S.C. 2534 on gyrocompasses, electronic navigation chart systems, steering controls, pumps, propulsion and machinery control systems, and totally enclosed lifeboats, to the extent they are unique to marine applications. One respondent submitted a public comment in response to the proposed rule. II. Discussion and Analysis DoD reviewed the public comment in the development of the final rule. A discussion of the comment is provided, as follows: A. Significant Changes From the Proposed Rule There is no change from the proposed rule to the final rule. rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES B. Analysis of Public Comment Comment: The respondent stated that the rule should require manufacture of the naval vessel components in the United States. Response: In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2534, the rule requires manufacture of the naval vessel components in the United States or Canada. 10 U.S.C. 2534(b) requires the VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 Feb 25, 2015 Jkt 235001 manufacturer of the items to be a part of the national technology and industrial base. The term ‘‘national technology and industrial base’’ is defined at 10 U.S.C. 2500 to mean ‘‘the persons and organizations that are engaged in research, development, production, integration, services, or information technology activities conducted within the United States and Canada.’’ Therefore, it is necessary to allow manufacture in Canada, as well as the United States. III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because this law has been implemented in the Defense Logistics Agency and Department of Navy regulations for many years, and moving the regulations to the DFARS will have no impact on the public. V. Paperwork Reduction Act The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 225 Government procurement. Manuel Quinones, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, 48 CFR part 225 is amended as follows: PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 225 continues to read as follows: ■ PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 10391 Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1. 2. Amend section 225.7008 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: ■ 225.7008 Waiver of restrictions of 10 U.S.C. 2534. * * * * * (b) In accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section, the USD(AT&L) has waived the restrictions of 10 U.S.C. 2534(a) for certain items manufactured in the United Kingdom, including air circuit breakers for naval vessels (see 225.7006) and the naval vessel components listed at 225.7010–1. 3. Add sections 225.7010, 225.7010–1, 225.7010–2, 225.7010–3, and 225.7010– 4 to read as follows: ■ 225.7010 Restriction on certain naval vessel components. 225.7010–1 Restriction. In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2534, do not acquire the following components of naval vessels, to the extent they are unique to marine applications, unless manufactured in the United States or Canada: (a) Gyrocompasses. (b) Electronic navigation chart systems. (c) Steering controls. (d) Pumps. (e) Propulsion and machinery control systems. (f) Totally enclosed lifeboats. 225.7010–2 Exceptions. This restriction does not apply to— (a) Contracts or subcontracts that do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; or (b) Acquisition of spare or repair parts needed to support components for naval vessels manufactured outside the United States. Support includes the purchase of spare gyrocompasses, electronic navigation chart systems, steering controls, pumps, propulsion and machinery control systems, or totally enclosed lifeboats, when those from alternate sources are not interchangeable. 225.7010–3 Waiver. (a) The waiver criteria at 225.7008(a) apply to this restriction. (b) The Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) has waived the restriction of 10 U.S.C. 2534 for certain items manufactured in the United Kingdom, including the items listed in section 225.7010–1. See 225.7008. E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM 26FER1 10392 225.7010–4 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 38 / Thursday, February 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations Implementation. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Temporary rule; trip limit reduction. into two 6-month time periods, January through June and July through December. For the January 1 through June 30, 2015, fishing season, the commercial quota is 394,829 lb (179,091 kg), gutted weight (438,260 lb (198,791 kg), round weight), as specified in 50 CFR 622.190(a)(4)(i)(C). Under 50 CFR 622.191(a)(6)(ii), NMFS is required to reduce the commercial trip limit for vermilion snapper from 1,000 lb (454 kg), gutted weight (1,110 lb (503 kg), round weight), to 500 lb (227 kg), gutted weight (555 lb (252 kg), round weight), when 75 percent of the fishing season quota is reached or projected to be reached, by filing a notification to that effect with the Office of the Federal Register, as implemented by the final rule for Regulatory Amendment 18 (78 FR 47574, August 6, 2013). Based on current information, NMFS has determined that 75 percent of the available commercial quota for the January 1 through June 30, 2015, fishing season for vermilion snapper will be reached by March 2, 2015. Accordingly, NMFS is reducing the commercial trip limit for vermilion snapper to 500 lb (227 kg), gutted weight (555 lb (252 kg), round weight), in or from the South Atlantic EEZ at 12:01 a.m., local time, on March 2, 2015. This 500-lb (227-kg), gutted weight, trip limit will remain in effect until July 1, 2015, or until the quota is reached and the commercial sector closes, whichever occurs first. NMFS reduces the commercial trip limit for vermilion snapper in or from the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the South Atlantic to 500 lb (227 kg), gutted weight. This trip limit reduction is necessary to protect the South Atlantic vermilion snapper resource. DATES: This rule is effective 12:01 a.m., local time, March 2, 2015, until 12:01 a.m., local time, July 1, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Britni LaVine, NMFS Southeast Regional Office, telephone: 727–824– 5305, email: britni.lavine@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The snapper-grouper fishery includes vermilion snapper in the South Atlantic and is managed under the Fishery Management Plan for the SnapperGrouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region (FMP). The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council prepared the FMP and is implemented by NMFS under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by regulations at 50 CFR part 622. The commercial quota for vermilion snapper in the South Atlantic is divided Classification The Regional Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS, has determined this temporary rule is necessary for the conservation and management of South Atlantic vermilion snapper and is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws. This action is taken under 50 CFR 622.191(a)(6)(ii) and is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866. These measures are exempt from the procedures of the Regulatory Flexibility Act because the temporary rule is issued without opportunity for prior notice and comment. This action responds to the best scientific information available. The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA (AA), finds that the need to immediately implement this commercial trip limit reduction constitutes good cause to waive the requirements to provide prior notice and opportunity for public comment pursuant to the authority set forth in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), because prior notice and opportunity for public comment on this temporary rule is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest. Such (a) 10 U.S.C. 2534(h) prohibits the use of contract clauses or certifications to implement this restriction. (b) Agencies shall accomplish implementation of this restriction through use of management and oversight techniques that achieve the objectives of this section without imposing a significant management burden on the Government or the contractor involved. [FR Doc. 2015–03855 Filed 2–25–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 622 [Docket No. 130312235–3658–02] RIN 0648–XD733 Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; SnapperGrouper Resources of the South Atlantic; Trip Limit Reduction AGENCY: rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 Feb 25, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 procedures are unnecessary, because the rule establishing the trip limit has already been subject to notice and comment, and all that remains is to notify the public of the trip limit reduction. They are contrary to the public interest, because there is a need to immediately implement this action to protect the vermilion snapper resource since the capacity of the fishing fleet allows for rapid harvest of the quota. Prior notice and opportunity for public comment on this action would require time and would increase the probability that the commercial sector could exceed the quota. For the aforementioned reasons, the AA also finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in the effectiveness of this action under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: February 23, 2015. Emily H. Menashes, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2015–04024 Filed 2–23–15; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 660 [Docket No. 140528460–5122–02] RIN 0648–BE25 Fisheries Off West Coast States; Highly Migratory Fisheries; California Swordfish Drift Gillnet Fishery; Vessel Monitoring System and Pre-Trip Notification Requirements National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: NMFS is issuing regulations that require use of a NMFS-approved vessel monitoring system (VMS) and institute a pre-trip notification requirement for West Coast large-mesh swordfish drift gillnet (DGN) vessel owners and operators. The DGN fishery operates under the authority of the Federal Fishery Management Plan for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species (HMS FMP). Installing and operating VMS on vessels in this fishery will provide NMFS and law enforcement personnel with the ability to monitor the DGN fishery for compliance with conservation measures, efficiently deploy agents to inspect vessels, and provide the ability SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM 26FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10391-10392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03855]



[[Page 10391]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 225

RIN 0750-AI36


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Domestic 
Source Restrictions on Certain Naval Vessel Components (DFARS Case 
2014-D022)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement the statutory 
domestic source restrictions on acquisition of certain naval vessel 
components.

DATES: Effective February 26, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, telephone 571-
372-6106.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 79 FR 
56333 on September 19, 2014, to implement the domestic source 
restrictions in 10 U.S.C. 2534 on gyrocompasses, electronic navigation 
chart systems, steering controls, pumps, propulsion and machinery 
control systems, and totally enclosed lifeboats, to the extent they are 
unique to marine applications.
    One respondent submitted a public comment in response to the 
proposed rule.

II. Discussion and Analysis

    DoD reviewed the public comment in the development of the final 
rule. A discussion of the comment is provided, as follows:

A. Significant Changes From the Proposed Rule

    There is no change from the proposed rule to the final rule.

B. Analysis of Public Comment

    Comment: The respondent stated that the rule should require 
manufacture of the naval vessel components in the United States.
    Response: In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2534, the rule requires 
manufacture of the naval vessel components in the United States or 
Canada. 10 U.S.C. 2534(b) requires the manufacturer of the items to be 
a part of the national technology and industrial base. The term 
``national technology and industrial base'' is defined at 10 U.S.C. 
2500 to mean ``the persons and organizations that are engaged in 
research, development, production, integration, services, or 
information technology activities conducted within the United States 
and Canada.'' Therefore, it is necessary to allow manufacture in 
Canada, as well as the United States.

III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess 
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, 
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. 
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not 
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning 
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule 
under 5 U.S.C. 804.

IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the 
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., 
because this law has been implemented in the Defense Logistics Agency 
and Department of Navy regulations for many years, and moving the 
regulations to the DFARS will have no impact on the public.

V. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The rule does not contain any information collection requirements 
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 225

    Government procurement.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR part 225 is amended as follows:

PART 225--FOREIGN ACQUISITION

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 225 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.


0
2. Amend section 225.7008 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:


225.7008  Waiver of restrictions of 10 U.S.C. 2534.

* * * * *
    (b) In accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (a)(1)(i) 
through (iii) of this section, the USD(AT&L) has waived the 
restrictions of 10 U.S.C. 2534(a) for certain items manufactured in the 
United Kingdom, including air circuit breakers for naval vessels (see 
225.7006) and the naval vessel components listed at 225.7010-1.

0
3. Add sections 225.7010, 225.7010-1, 225.7010-2, 225.7010-3, and 
225.7010-4 to read as follows:


225.7010  Restriction on certain naval vessel components.


225.7010-1  Restriction.

    In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2534, do not acquire the following 
components of naval vessels, to the extent they are unique to marine 
applications, unless manufactured in the United States or Canada:
    (a) Gyrocompasses.
    (b) Electronic navigation chart systems.
    (c) Steering controls.
    (d) Pumps.
    (e) Propulsion and machinery control systems.
    (f) Totally enclosed lifeboats.


225.7010-2  Exceptions.

    This restriction does not apply to--
    (a) Contracts or subcontracts that do not exceed the simplified 
acquisition threshold; or
    (b) Acquisition of spare or repair parts needed to support 
components for naval vessels manufactured outside the United States. 
Support includes the purchase of spare gyrocompasses, electronic 
navigation chart systems, steering controls, pumps, propulsion and 
machinery control systems, or totally enclosed lifeboats, when those 
from alternate sources are not interchangeable.


225.7010-3  Waiver.

    (a) The waiver criteria at 225.7008(a) apply to this restriction.
    (b) The Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and 
Logistics) has waived the restriction of 10 U.S.C. 2534 for certain 
items manufactured in the United Kingdom, including the items listed in 
section 225.7010-1. See 225.7008.

[[Page 10392]]

225.7010-4  Implementation.

    (a) 10 U.S.C. 2534(h) prohibits the use of contract clauses or 
certifications to implement this restriction.
    (b) Agencies shall accomplish implementation of this restriction 
through use of management and oversight techniques that achieve the 
objectives of this section without imposing a significant management 
burden on the Government or the contractor involved.

[FR Doc. 2015-03855 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.