Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 10094-10095 [2015-03805]
Download as PDF
10094
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices
libraries are based on the NSLP
information for the school district
nearby. In the E-rate Modernization
Order, among other things, the
Commission took steps to streamline the
application process, provide exemptions
from competitive bidding, implement a
‘‘district-wide’’ discount calculation
mechanism, establish budgets for
internal broadband connectivity, and
extend the document retention period to
ten years. FCC Forms 470 and 471
execute these changes for the E-rate
application process and enable the
Commission to collect data to facilitate
measurement of progress towards the
adopted performance goals established
in the E-rate Modernization Order.
In addition, this collection is
necessary to allow the Commission to
evaluate the extent to which the E-rate
program is meeting the statutory
objectives specified in section 254(h) of
the 1996 Act.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
the Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–03845 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Agreement Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreement
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreement to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. A copy of the
agreement is available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 012288–001.
Title: Hoegh/NYK Atlantic/Pacific
Space Charter Agreement.
Parties: Hoegh Autoliners AS and
Nippon Yusen Kaisha.
Filing Party: Joshua Stein, Esq.; Cozen
O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW., Suite
1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The amendment adds the
trade between the U.S. West Coast, on
the one hand, and China, South Korea,
and Japan, on the other hand, to the
geographic scope of the agreement,
revises the duration of the agreement,
changes the name of the agreement to
reflect the new geographic scope, and
restates the agreement.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: February 20, 2015.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
Proposed Project
[FR Doc. 2015–03893 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–15–15FY]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) has submitted the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for
the proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address any of the
following: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) Minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and (e) Assess information
collection costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the items contained in this notice
should be directed to the Attention:
CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management
and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or
by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
State Health Department Access to
Electronic Health Record Data from
Healthcare Facilities during a
Healthcare-Associated Infection
Outbreak: A Retrospective
Assessment—New—National Center for
Emerging and Zoonotic Infections
Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Two years ago, contaminated steroid
injections caused the largest fungal
meningitis outbreak in the United
States, affecting 20 states and resulting
in 751 infections and 64 deaths. The
subsequent healthcare-associated
infection (HAI) outbreak response
required significant collaboration
between healthcare providers and
facilities and public health departments
(HDs). Following the outbreak response,
HDs reported that various challenges
with access to patient health
information in electronic health records
(EHRs) hindered the efficient and rapid
identification of potential fungal
meningitis cases in healthcare facilities.
The fungal meningitis outbreak
experience highlights the need to better
understand the landscape of granting
and using access to EHRs for outbreak
investigations.
The Division of Healthcare Quality
Promotion (a component of NCEZID),
the Office for State, Tribal, Local and
Territorial Support, and the Office of
Public Health Scientific Services at the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) are partnering with
Association of State and Territorial
Health Officials and The Keystone
Center to evaluate the challenges
surrounding HDs access to EHRs in
healthcare facilities’ during an HAI
outbreak investigation. The evaluation
seeks to compile information across
states from experts in the public and
private sector to assess experiences,
identify issues, and seek
recommendations for improving HDs
access to EHRs during future outbreaks.
In addition to a study report, the
insights from healthcare facility staff
will be used to build a toolkit to help
state HDs understand the perspectives
and needs of the healthcare facilities
related to EHR access. The toolkit will
provide perceived barriers,
recommendations to overcome those
barriers, best practices that support EHR
access, and practical tools such as
templates, memorandums of
understanding (MOUs), and policies.
The toolkit will be distributed to HDs,
healthcare facilities, and other
stakeholders to support awareness and
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
10095
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices
strengthen relationships between public
health and clinical care.
These activities will facilitate the
quick and efficient identification of
cases in future outbreaks and protect the
health and safety of patients. This
request corresponds with an initial
ongoing data collection (Phase I), State
Health Department Access to Electronic
Health Record Data during an Outbreak:
A Retrospective Assessment, which
involves interviews with four types of
Health Department staff: Healthcareassociated infection coordinator,
epidemiologist, legal counsel, and
informatics director (OMB Number
0920–0879, approved on 04/24/2014).
Phase I data analysis is ongoing.
For Phase II of this study, we will be
requesting participation from hospital
and clinic staff in their official
capacities across the same 15 states
included in the Phase I request. The
investigation. In hospitals, the
evaluation team will be conducting
interviews with staff members serving
in one of three roles: Infection
preventionist, informatics director, and
other as referred (e.g. privacy officer,
risk management, etc.). In clinics, the
evaluation team will be conducting
interviews with the clinic director, and
other as referred (e.g. patient records
manager, etc.)
The maximum estimates for burden
hours are derived from interview guide
pilot testing and data collection with
HDs during Phase I data collection, in
which interviews took 27 minutes. The
total annual burden is 90 hours.
The data to be collected do not
involve questions of a personal or
sensitive nature and should have no
impact on the individual’s privacy.
There are no costs to the respondents
other than their time.
states chosen for Phase I and Phase II
data collections are: Florida, Indiana,
Kansas, Maryland, Michigan,
Minnesota, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.
Data will be collected from 150 hospital
and clinic staff in their official
capacities using one 30-minute
telephone interview per person and
limiting interviews to two hospitals and
two clinics per state. Hospital
participants include: Infection
preventionists, informatics directors,
and others as referred. Clinic
participants include: Clinic directors
and others as referred.
The focus of this OMB request is to
conduct interviews with 150 healthcare
facilities’ staff, hospitals and clinics, in
their official capacity who has been
asked by HDs to provide access to their
EHRs during an HAI outbreak
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
15
30
30
30
1
1
1
1
Interview Guide ..............................................
Interview Guide ..............................................
30
30
Form name
HD Epidemiologist ..........................................
Infection Preventionist ....................................
Informatics Director .........................................
Other as referred by Infection Preventionist
or Informatics Director (for example, privacy officer or risk management specialist).
Clinic Director .................................................
Other as referred by Clinic Director (for example, patient records manager).
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015–03805 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[60 Day–15–15PI]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
1
1
Type of respondent
Interview
Interview
Interview
Interview
Guide
Guide
Guide
Guide
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. To request more
information on the below proposed
project or to obtain a copy of the
information collection plan and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send
comments to Leroy A. Richardson, 1600
Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA
30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval. Comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60/60
30/60
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital
or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; to develop,
acquire, install and utilize technology
and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information, to search
data sources, to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10094-10095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03805]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30Day-15-15FY]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted
the following information collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for the proposed
information collection is published to obtain comments from the public
and affected agencies.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should address any of the following: (a)
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses; and
(e) Assess information collection costs.
To request additional information on the proposed project or to
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written comments and/or
suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice should be
directed to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written
comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
State Health Department Access to Electronic Health Record Data
from Healthcare Facilities during a Healthcare-Associated Infection
Outbreak: A Retrospective Assessment--New--National Center for Emerging
and Zoonotic Infections Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Two years ago, contaminated steroid injections caused the largest
fungal meningitis outbreak in the United States, affecting 20 states
and resulting in 751 infections and 64 deaths. The subsequent
healthcare-associated infection (HAI) outbreak response required
significant collaboration between healthcare providers and facilities
and public health departments (HDs). Following the outbreak response,
HDs reported that various challenges with access to patient health
information in electronic health records (EHRs) hindered the efficient
and rapid identification of potential fungal meningitis cases in
healthcare facilities. The fungal meningitis outbreak experience
highlights the need to better understand the landscape of granting and
using access to EHRs for outbreak investigations.
The Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (a component of
NCEZID), the Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support,
and the Office of Public Health Scientific Services at the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are partnering with Association of
State and Territorial Health Officials and The Keystone Center to
evaluate the challenges surrounding HDs access to EHRs in healthcare
facilities' during an HAI outbreak investigation. The evaluation seeks
to compile information across states from experts in the public and
private sector to assess experiences, identify issues, and seek
recommendations for improving HDs access to EHRs during future
outbreaks.
In addition to a study report, the insights from healthcare
facility staff will be used to build a toolkit to help state HDs
understand the perspectives and needs of the healthcare facilities
related to EHR access. The toolkit will provide perceived barriers,
recommendations to overcome those barriers, best practices that support
EHR access, and practical tools such as templates, memorandums of
understanding (MOUs), and policies. The toolkit will be distributed to
HDs, healthcare facilities, and other stakeholders to support awareness
and
[[Page 10095]]
strengthen relationships between public health and clinical care.
These activities will facilitate the quick and efficient
identification of cases in future outbreaks and protect the health and
safety of patients. This request corresponds with an initial ongoing
data collection (Phase I), State Health Department Access to Electronic
Health Record Data during an Outbreak: A Retrospective Assessment,
which involves interviews with four types of Health Department staff:
Healthcare-associated infection coordinator, epidemiologist, legal
counsel, and informatics director (OMB Number 0920-0879, approved on
04/24/2014). Phase I data analysis is ongoing.
For Phase II of this study, we will be requesting participation
from hospital and clinic staff in their official capacities across the
same 15 states included in the Phase I request. The states chosen for
Phase I and Phase II data collections are: Florida, Indiana, Kansas,
Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. Data will
be collected from 150 hospital and clinic staff in their official
capacities using one 30-minute telephone interview per person and
limiting interviews to two hospitals and two clinics per state.
Hospital participants include: Infection preventionists, informatics
directors, and others as referred. Clinic participants include: Clinic
directors and others as referred.
The focus of this OMB request is to conduct interviews with 150
healthcare facilities' staff, hospitals and clinics, in their official
capacity who has been asked by HDs to provide access to their EHRs
during an HAI outbreak investigation. In hospitals, the evaluation team
will be conducting interviews with staff members serving in one of
three roles: Infection preventionist, informatics director, and other
as referred (e.g. privacy officer, risk management, etc.). In clinics,
the evaluation team will be conducting interviews with the clinic
director, and other as referred (e.g. patient records manager, etc.)
The maximum estimates for burden hours are derived from interview
guide pilot testing and data collection with HDs during Phase I data
collection, in which interviews took 27 minutes. The total annual
burden is 90 hours.
The data to be collected do not involve questions of a personal or
sensitive nature and should have no impact on the individual's privacy.
There are no costs to the respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondent Form name Number of responses per per response
respondents respondent (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HD Epidemiologist..................... Interview Guide......... 15 1 60/60
Infection Preventionist............... Interview Guide......... 30 1 30/60
Informatics Director.................. Interview Guide......... 30 1
Other as referred by Infection Interview Guide......... 30 1
Preventionist or Informatics Director
(for example, privacy officer or risk
management specialist).
Clinic Director....................... Interview Guide......... 30 1
Other as referred by Clinic Director Interview Guide......... 30 1
(for example, patient records
manager).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-03805 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P