National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma, 9622-9628 [2015-03803]
Download as PDF
9622
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 63 STANDARDS—STATE OF LOUISIANA—Continued
[Excluding Indian Country]
Subpart
Source category
LDEQ 1 2
XXXXXX ..................
YYYYYY ..................
ZZZZZZ ...................
AAAAAAA ................
BBBBBBB ................
CCCCCCC ..............
DDDDDDD ..............
EEEEEEE ................
FFFFFFF–
GGGGGGG.
HHHHHHH ..............
Metal Fabrication and Finishing Area Sources .............................................................................................
Ferroalloys Production Facilities Area Sources .............................................................................................
Aluminum, Copper, and Other Nonferrous Foundries Area Sources ...........................................................
Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing Area Sources .......................................................
Chemical Preparation Industry Area Sources ...............................................................................................
Paints and Allied Products Manufacturing Area Sources .............................................................................
Prepared Feeds Areas Sources ....................................................................................................................
Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production Area Sources ............................................................................
(Reserved) .....................................................................................................................................................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production Major Sources ....................................................................
X
1 Authorities
which may not be delegated include: § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Emission Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of
Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to
Monitoring; § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; and all authorities identified in the subparts (e.g., under
‘‘Delegation of Authority’’) that cannot be delegated.
2 Program delegated to Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) for standards promulgated by EPA, as amended in the Federal Register through July 1, 2013.
3 The LDEQ was previously delegated this subpart on March 26, 2004 (69 FR 15687). The LDEQ has adopted the subpart unchanged and applied for delegation of the standard. The subpart was vacated and remanded to EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d 1232 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Court’s holding this
subpart is not delegated to LDEQ at this time.
4 This subpart was issued a partial vacatur on October 29, 2007 (72 FR 61060) by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
5 Final rule. See 78 FR 7138 (January 31, 2013).
6 This subpart was vacated and remanded to EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on March 13,
2007. See, Sierra Club v. EPA, 479 F. 3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Because of the D.C. Court’s holding this subpart is not delegated to LDEQ at this
time.
7 Initial Final Rule on February 16, 2012 (77 FR 9304). Final on reconsideration of certain new source issues on April 24, 2013 (78 FR 24073).
Portions of this subpart are in proposed reconsideration pending final action on June 25, 2013 (78 FR 38001).
*
*
*
*
*
This rule is effective on April 27,
2015 without further notice, unless EPA
receives relevant adverse comment by
March 26, 2015. If EPA receives such
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the updated
NESHAPs delegation will not take
effect.
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2015–03730 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 61 and 63
[EPA–R06–OAR–2008–0063; FRL–9923–22–
Region 6]
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation
of Authority to Oklahoma
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; delegation of
authority.
AGENCY:
The Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality (ODEQ) has
submitted updated regulations for
receiving delegation of Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) authority for
implementation and enforcement of
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs)
for all sources (both part 70 and nonpart 70 sources). The delegation of
authority under this action does not
apply to sources located in Indian
Country. EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the delegation of
certain NESHAPs to ODEQ.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Feb 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2008–0063, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
• Email: Mr. Rick Barrett at
barrett.richard@epa.gov. Please also
send a copy by email to the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section below.
• Mail or delivery: Mr. Rick Barrett,
Air Permits Section (6PD–R),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2008–0063.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information through
https://www.regulations.gov or email, if
you believe that it is CBI or otherwise
protected from disclosure. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment along with
any disk or CD–ROM submitted. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters and any form of
encryption and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Rick Barrett (6PD–R), (214) 665–7227,
barrett.richard@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with Mr. Barrett or Mr. Bill
Deese at (214) 665–7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refers to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What does this action do?
II. What is the authority for delegation?
III. What criteria must Oklahoma’s programs
meet to be approved?
IV. How did ODEQ meet the approval
criteria?
V. What is being delegated?
VI. What is not being delegated?
VII. How will applicability determinations be
made?
VIII. What authority does EPA have?
IX. What information must ODEQ provide to
EPA?
X. What is EPA’s oversight role?
XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or
ODEQ?
XII. How will unchanged authorities be
delegated to ODEQ in the future?
XIII. Final Action
XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What does this action do?
EPA is taking direct final action to
approve the delegation of certain
NESHAPs to ODEQ. With this
delegation, ODEQ has the primary
responsibility to implement and enforce
the delegated standards.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. What is the authority for delegation?
Section 112(l) of the CAA, and 40 CFR
part 63, subpart E, authorize EPA to
delegate authority to any State or local
agency which submits adequate
regulatory procedures for
implementation and enforcement of
emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants. The hazardous air pollutant
standards are codified at 40 CFR parts
61 and 63.
III. What criteria must Oklahoma’s
program meet to be approved?
Section 112(l)(5) of the CAA enables
EPA to approve state air toxics programs
or rules to operate in place of the
Federal air toxics program or rules. 40
CFR part 63, subpart E governs EPA’s
approval of State rules or programs
under section 112(l).
EPA will approve an air toxics
program if we find that:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
(1) The State program is ‘‘no less
stringent’’ than the corresponding
Federal program or rule;
(2) The State has adequate authority
and resources to implement the
program;
(3) The schedule for implementation
and compliance is sufficiently
expeditious; and
(4) The program otherwise complies
with Federal guidance.
In order to obtain approval of its
program to implement and enforce
Federal section 112 rules as
promulgated without changes (straight
delegation), a state must demonstrate
that it meets the approval criteria of 40
CFR 63.91(d). 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3)
provides that interim or final Title V
program approval will satisfy the
criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d) for part 70
sources (sources required to obtain
operating permits pursuant to Title V of
the Clean Air Act).
IV. How did ODEQ meet the NESHAPs
program approval criteria?
As to the NESHAPs standards in 40
CFR parts 61 and 63, as part of its Title
V submission ODEQ stated that it
intended to use the mechanism of
incorporation by reference to adopt
unchanged Federal section 112 into its
regulations. This commitment applied
to both existing and future standards as
they applied to part 70 sources. EPA’s
final interim approval of Oklahoma’s
Title V operating permits program
delegated the authority to implement
certain NESHAPs on February 5, 1996
(61 FR 4220). On December 5, 2001,
EPA granted final full approval of the
State’s operating permits program (66
FR 63170). These interim and final Title
V program approvals satisfy the upfront
approval criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d).
Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a State
has satisfied up-front approval criteria,
it needs only to reference the previous
demonstration and reaffirm that it still
meets the criteria for any subsequent
submittals of the section 112 standards.
ODEQ has affirmed that it still meets the
up-front approval criteria.
V. What is being delegated?
By letter dated January 11, 2008,
ODEQ requested EPA to update its
existing NESHAP delegation. With
certain exceptions noted in section VI
below, Oklahoma’s request included
NESHAPs in 40 CFR part 61 and 40 CFR
part 63. ODEQ’s request included newly
incorporated NESHAPs promulgated by
EPA and amendments to existing
standards currently delegated, as
amended between September 2, 2004
and September 1, 2006. These NESHAPs
were adopted by the ODEQ on March
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9623
27, 2007, and became effective on June
15, 2007.
VI. What is not being delegated?
The following part 61 and 63
authorities listed below are not
delegated. All of the inquiries and
requests concerning implementation
and enforcement of the excluded
standards in the State of Oklahoma
should be directed to the EPA Region 6
Office.
• 40 CFR part 61, subpart B (National
Emission Standards for Radon
Emissions from Underground Uranium
Mines);
• 40 CFR part 61, subpart H (National
Emission Standards for Emissions of
Radionuclides Other Than Radon From
Department of Energy Facilities);
• 40 CFR part 61, subpart I (National
Emission Standards for Radionuclide
Emissions from Federal Facilities Other
Than Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart
H);
• 40 CFR part 61, subpart K (National
Emission Standards for Radionuclide
Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus
Plants);
• 40 CFR part 61, subpart Q (National
Emission Standards for Radon
Emissions from Department of Energy
facilities);
• 40 CFR part 61, subpart R (National
Emission Standards for Radon
Emissions from Phosphogypsum
Stacks);
• 40 CFR part 61, subpart T (National
Emission Standards for Radon
Emissions from the Disposal of Uranium
Mill Tailings); and
• 40 CFR part 61, subpart W (National
Emission Standards for Radon
Emissions from Operating Mill
Tailings).
In addition, EPA cannot delegate to a
State any of the Category II Subpart A
authorities set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(g)
(2). These include the following
provisions: § 63.6(g), Approval of
Alternative Non-Opacity Standards;
§ 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative
Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and
(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to
Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of
Major Alternatives to Monitoring; and
§ 63.10(f), Approval of Major
Alternatives to Recordkeeping and
Reporting. In addition, some Part 63
standards have certain provisions that
cannot be delegated to the States.
Therefore, any Part 63 standard that
provides that certain authorities cannot
be delegated are retained by EPA and
not delegated to ODEQ. Furthermore, no
authorities are delegated that require
rulemaking in the Federal Register to
implement, or where Federal overview
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
9624
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
is the only way to ensure national
consistency in the application of the
standards or requirements of CAA
section 112. Finally, section 112(r), the
accidental release program authority, is
not being delegated by this approval.
In addition, this delegation to ODEQ
to implement and enforce certain
NESHAPs does not extend to sources or
activities located in Indian country, as
defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Under this
definition, EPA treats as reservations,
trust lands validly set aside for the use
of a Tribe even if the trust lands have
not been formally designated as a
reservation. Consistent with previous
federal program approvals or
delegations, EPA will continue to
implement the NESHAPs in Indian
country because ODEQ has not
submitted information to demonstrate
authority over sources and activities
located within the exterior boundaries
of Indian reservations and other areas in
Indian country.1
VII. How will applicability
determinations under section 112 be
made?
In approving this delegation, ODEQ
will obtain concurrence from EPA on
any matter involving the interpretation
of section 112 of the CAA or 40 CFR
parts 61 and 63 to the extent that
implementation, administration, or
enforcement of these sections have not
been covered by EPA determinations or
guidance.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
VIII. What authority does EPA have?
We retain the right, as provided by
CAA section 112(l)(7), to enforce any
applicable emission standard or
requirement under section 112. EPA
also has the authority to make certain
decisions under the General Provisions
(subpart A) of part 63. We are granting
ODEQ some of these authorities, and
retaining others, as explained in
sections V and VI above. In addition,
1 The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act of 2005 includes a
provision relating to Oklahoma and EPA programs,
providing:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if
the Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency (referred to in this section as the
‘‘Administrator’’) determines that a regulatory
program submitted by the State of Oklahoma for
approval by the Administrator under a law
administered by the Administrator meets applicable
requirements of the law, and the Administrator
approves the State to administer the State program
under the law with respect to areas in the State that
are not Indian country, on request of the State, the
Administrator shall approve the State to administer
the State program in the areas of the State that are
in Indian country, without any further
demonstration of authority by the State.
H.R. 3, Section 10211(a). Oklahoma has not
applied to administer the NESHAPS program in
Indian country in accordance with this statute.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
EPA may review and disapprove of
State determinations and subsequently
require corrections. (See 40 CFR
63.91(g) and 65 FR 55810, 55823,
September 14, 2000, as amended at 70
FR 59887, October 13, 2005; 72 FR
27443, May 16, 2007.)
Furthermore, we retain any authority
in an individual emission standard that
may not be delegated according to
provisions of the standard. Also, listed
in the footnotes of the part 63 delegation
table at the end of this rule are the
authorities that cannot be delegated to
any State or local agency which we
therefore retain.
IX. What information must ODEQ
provide to EPA?
ODEQ must provide any additional
compliance related information to EPA,
Region 6, Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance within 45 days
of a request under 40 CFR 63.96(a). In
receiving delegation for specific General
Provisions authorities, ODEQ must
submit to EPA Region 6 on a semiannual basis, copies of determinations
issued under these authorities. For parts
61 and 63 standards, these
determinations include: Section 63.1,
Applicability Determinations; Section
63.6(e), Operation and Maintenance
Requirements—Responsibility for
Determining Compliance; Section
63.6(f), Compliance with Non-Opacity
Standards—Responsibility for
Determining Compliance; Section
63.6(h), Compliance with Opacity and
Visible Emissions Standards—
Responsibility for Determining
Compliance; Sections 63.7(c)(2)(i) and
(d), Approval of Site-Specific Test
Plans; Section 63.7(e)(2)(i), Approval of
Minor Alternatives to Test Methods;
Section 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval
of Intermediate Alternatives to Test
Methods; Section 63.7(e)(iii), Approval
of Shorter Sampling Times and Volumes
When Necessitated by Process Variables
or Other Factors; Sections 63.7(e)(2)(iv),
(h)(2), and (h)(3), Waiver of Performance
Testing; Sections 63.8(c)(1) and (e)(1),
Approval of Site-Specific Performance
Evaluation (Monitoring) Test Plans;
Section 63.8(f), Approval of Minor
Alternatives to Monitoring; Section
63.8(f), Approval of Intermediate
Alternatives to Monitoring; Section 63.9
and 63.10, Approval of Adjustments to
Time Periods for Submitting Reports;
Section 63.10(f), Approval of Minor
Alternatives to Recordkeeping and
Reporting; Section 63.7(a)(4), Extension
of Performance Test Deadline.
X. What is EPA’s oversight role?
EPA must oversee ODEQ’s decisions
to ensure the delegated authorities are
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
being adequately implemented and
enforced. We will integrate oversight of
the delegated authorities into the
existing mechanisms and resources for
oversight currently in place. If, during
oversight, we determine that ODEQ
made decisions that decreased the
stringency of the delegated standards,
then ODEQ shall be required to take
corrective actions and the source(s)
affected by the decisions will be
notified, as required by 40 CFR
63.91(g)(1)(ii). We will initiate
withdrawal of the program or rule if the
corrective actions taken are insufficient.
XI. Should sources submit notices to
EPA or ODEQ?
All of the information required
pursuant to the general provisions and
the relevant subpart of the Federal
NESHAPs (40 CFR parts 61 and 63)
should be submitted by sources located
outside of Indian country, directly to the
ODEQ at the following address:
Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality, 707 North Robinson, P.O. Box
1677, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101–
1677. The ODEQ is the primary point of
contact with respect to delegated
NESHAPs. Sources do not need to send
a copy to EPA. EPA Region 6 waives the
requirement that notifications and
reports for delegated standards be
submitted to EPA in addition to ODEQ
in accordance with 40 CFR 63.9(a)(4)(ii)
and 63.10(a)(4)(ii). For those standards
that are not delegated, sources must
continue to submit all appropriate
information to EPA.
XII. How will unchanged authorities be
delegated to ODEQ in the future?
In the future, ODEQ will only need to
send a letter of request for approval to
EPA, Region 6, for NESHAP regulations
that ODEQ has adopted by reference.
The letter must reference the previous
up-front approval demonstration and
reaffirm that it still meets the up-front
approval criteria. We will respond in
writing to the request stating that the
request for delegation is either granted
or denied. A Federal Register action
will be published to inform the public
and affected sources of the delegation,
indicate where source notifications and
reports should be sent, and to amend
the relevant portions of the Code of
Federal Regulations showing which
NESHAPs standards have been
delegated to ODEQ.
XIII. Final Action
The public was provided the
opportunity to comment on the
proposed approval of the program and
mechanism for delegation of section 112
standards, as they apply to part 70
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
sources, on March 10, 1995, for the
proposed interim approval of ODEQ’s
operating permits program. (60 FR
13088). In EPA’s final full approval of
ODEQ’s operating permits program on
February 5, 1996 (61 FR 4220), EPA
discussed that no adverse comments
were received from the public on the
proposed final delegation of the
operating permits program. In today’s
action, the public is given the
opportunity to comment on the
approval of ODEQ’s request for
delegation of authority to implement
and enforce certain section 112
standards for all sources (both part 70
and non-part 70 sources) which have
been adopted by reference into
Oklahoma’s state regulations. However,
the Agency views the approval of this
request as a noncontroversial action and
anticipates no adverse comments.
Therefore, EPA is publishing this rule
without prior proposal. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register publication, EPA is
publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
program and delegation of authority
described in this action if adverse
comments are received. This action will
be effective April 27, 2015 without
further notice unless the Agency
receives relevant adverse comments by
March 26, 2015.
If EPA receives relevant adverse
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public the rule will not
take effect. We will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. The EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. Please note that if we receive
relevant adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of the
rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of a
relevant adverse comment.
XIV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the
delegation is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the State, and
the EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law. This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state request to receive
delegation of certain Federal standards,
and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing delegation submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve submissions
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a delegation submission
for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA to use VCS in place of a delegation
submission that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus,
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9625
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by April 27, 2015.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 61
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Arsenic, Benzene,
Beryllium, Hazardous substances,
Mercury, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vinyl chloride.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 6, 2015.
Wren Stenger,
Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting
Division, Region 6.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are
amended as follows:
PART 61—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS
1. The authority citation for part 61
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
9626
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 61.04
Address.
*
2. Section 61.04 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(6)(iv) to read as
follows:
■
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(iv) Oklahoma. The Oklahoma
Department of Environmental Quality
(ODED) has been delegated the
following part 61 standards
promulgated by EPA, as amended in the
Federal Register through September 1,
2006. The (X) symbol is used to indicate
each subpart that has been delegated.
DELEGATION STATUS FOR NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (PART 61 STANDARDS)
FOR OKLAHOMA
[Excluding Indian country]
Subpart
Source category
ODEQ 1
A ..................
B ..................
C ..................
D ..................
E ..................
F ..................
G .................
H ..................
I ...................
General Provisions .....................................................................................................................................................
Radon Emissions From Underground Uranium Mines ..............................................................................................
Beryllium ....................................................................................................................................................................
Beryllium Rocket Motor Firing ...................................................................................................................................
Mercury ......................................................................................................................................................................
Vinyl Chloride .............................................................................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than Radon From Department of Energy Facilities ..........................................
Radionuclide Emissions From Federal Facilities Other Than Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees and Not
Covered by Subpart H.
Equipment Leaks (Fugitive Emission Sources) of Benzene .....................................................................................
Radionuclide Emissions From Elemental Phosphorus Plants ...................................................................................
Benzene Emissions From Coke By-Product Recovery Plants ..................................................................................
Asbestos ....................................................................................................................................................................
Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Glass Manufacturing Plants ...............................................................................
Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Primary Copper Smelters ..................................................................................
Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Arsenic Trioxide and Metallic Arsenic Production Facilities ..............................
Radon Emissions From Department of Energy Facilities ..........................................................................................
Radon Emissions From Phosphogypsum Stacks ......................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Radon Emissions From the Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings .................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Equipment Leaks (Fugitives Emission Sources) .......................................................................................................
Radon Emissions From Operating Mill Tailings ........................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Benzene Emissions From Benzene Storage Vessels ...............................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Benzene Emissions From Benzene Transfer Operations .........................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Benzene Waste Operations .......................................................................................................................................
X
........................
X
X
X
X
........................
........................
........................
J ..................
K ..................
L ..................
M .................
N ..................
O .................
P ..................
Q .................
R ..................
S ..................
T ..................
U ..................
V ..................
W .................
X ..................
Y ..................
Z–AA ...........
BB ...............
CC–EE ........
FF ................
1
*
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
........................
X
........................
X
........................
X
Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ).
*
*
*
*
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
3. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart E—Approval of State
Programs and Delegation of Federal
Authorities
4. Section 63.99 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(37)(i) to read as
follows:
■
§ 63.99
Delegated Federal authorities.
(a) * * *
(37) * * *
(i) The following table lists the
specific part 63 standards that have
been delegated unchanged to the
Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality for all sources. The ‘‘X’’ symbol
is used to indicate each subpart that has
been delegated. The delegations are
subject to all of the conditions and
limitations set forth in Federal law,
regulations, policy, guidance, and
determinations. Some authorities cannot
be delegated and are retained by EPA.
These include certain General
Provisions authorities and specific parts
of some standards. Any amendments
made to these rules after September 1,
2006 are not delegated.
DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 63 STANDARDS—STATE OF OKLAHOMA
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Excluding Indian country]
Subpart
Source category
ODEQ 1 2
A ..................
F ..................
G .................
H ..................
I ...................
J ..................
General Provisions .....................................................................................................................................................
Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON)—Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) ...................
HON—SOCMI Process Vents, Storage Vessels, Transfer Operations and Wastewater .........................................
HON—Equipment Leaks ............................................................................................................................................
HON—Certain Processes Negotiated Equipment Leak Regulation ..........................................................................
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production .........................................................................................................
X
X
X
X
X
(3)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
9627
DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 63 STANDARDS—STATE OF OKLAHOMA—Continued
[Excluding Indian country]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Subpart
Source category
ODEQ 1 2
K ..................
L ..................
M .................
N ..................
O .................
P ..................
Q .................
R ..................
S ..................
T ..................
U ..................
V ..................
W .................
X ..................
Y ..................
Z ..................
AA ...............
BB ...............
CC ...............
DD ...............
EE ...............
FF ................
GG ...............
HH ...............
II ..................
JJ .................
KK ...............
LL ................
MM ..............
NN ...............
OO ...............
PP ...............
QQ ...............
RR ...............
SS ...............
TT ................
UU ...............
VV ...............
WW .............
XX ...............
YY ...............
ZZ–BBB .......
CCC ............
DDD ............
EEE .............
FFF ..............
GGG ............
HHH ............
III .................
JJJ ...............
KKK .............
LLL ..............
MMM ...........
NNN ............
OOO ............
PPP .............
QQQ ............
RRR ............
SSS .............
TTT ..............
UUU ............
VVV .............
WWW ..........
XXX .............
AAAA ...........
CCCC ..........
DDDD ..........
EEEE ...........
FFFF ...........
GGGG .........
HHHH ..........
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Coke Oven Batteries ..................................................................................................................................................
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning ................................................................................................................................
Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks .......................................................................................
Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers ..........................................................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Industrial Process Cooling Towers ............................................................................................................................
Gasoline Distribution ..................................................................................................................................................
Pulp and Paper Industry ............................................................................................................................................
Halogenated Solvent Cleaning ..................................................................................................................................
Group I Polymers and Resins ...................................................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Epoxy Resins Production and Non-Nylon Polyamides Production ...........................................................................
Secondary Lead Smelting ..........................................................................................................................................
Marine Tank Vessel Loading .....................................................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing Plants ......................................................................................................................
Phosphate Fertilizers Production Plants ....................................................................................................................
Petroleum Refineries .................................................................................................................................................
Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations .................................................................................................................
Magnetic Tape Manufacturing ...................................................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities ......................................................................................................
Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities ..................................................................................................................
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities .....................................................................................................................
Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations ................................................................................................................
Printing and Publishing Industry ................................................................................................................................
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants .........................................................................................................................
Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfide, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills .......
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Tanks—Level 1 ..........................................................................................................................................................
Containers ..................................................................................................................................................................
Surface Impoundments ..............................................................................................................................................
Individual Drain Systems ...........................................................................................................................................
Closed Vent Systems, Control Devices, Recovery Devices and Routing to a Fuel Gas System or a Process ......
Equipment Leaks—Control Level 1 ...........................................................................................................................
Equipment Leaks—Control Level 2 Standards ..........................................................................................................
Oil—Water Separators and Organic—Water Separators ..........................................................................................
Storage Vessels (Tanks)—Control Level 2 ...............................................................................................................
Ethylene Manufacturing Process Units Heat Exchange Systems and Waste Operations .......................................
Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards .................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Steel Pickling—HCI Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration ...........................................................
Mineral Wool Production ............................................................................................................................................
Hazardous Waste Combustors ..................................................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Pharmaceuticals Production ......................................................................................................................................
Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facilities .....................................................................................................
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production ....................................................................................................................
Group IV Polymers and Resins .................................................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Portland Cement Manufacturing ................................................................................................................................
Pesticide Active Ingredient Production ......................................................................................................................
Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing .................................................................................................................................
Amino/Phenolic Resins ..............................................................................................................................................
Polyether Polyols Production .....................................................................................................................................
Primary Copper Smelting ...........................................................................................................................................
Secondary Aluminum Production ..............................................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Primary Lead Smelting ..............................................................................................................................................
Petroleum Refineries—Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units and Sulfur Recovery Plants ...............
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) ...............................................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Ferroalloys Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese ..............................................................................
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills .................................................................................................................................
Nutritional Yeast Manufacturing .................................................................................................................................
Plywood and Composite Wood Products ..................................................................................................................
Organic Liquids Distribution .......................................................................................................................................
Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Processes (MON) .....................................................................................
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production .......................................................................................................
Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production ....................................................................................................................
........................
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
9628
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 63 STANDARDS—STATE OF OKLAHOMA—Continued
[Excluding Indian country]
Subpart
Source category
ODEQ 1 2
IIII ................
JJJJ .............
KKKK ...........
MMMM ........
NNNN ..........
OOOO .........
PPPP ...........
QQQQ .........
RRRR ..........
SSSS ...........
TTTT ...........
UUUU ..........
VVVV ...........
WWWW .......
XXXX ...........
YYYY ...........
ZZZZ ...........
AAAAA ........
BBBBB ........
CCCCC .......
DDDDD .......
EEEEE ........
FFFFF .........
GGGGG ......
HHHHH .......
IIIII ...............
JJJJJ ...........
KKKKK ........
LLLLL ..........
MMMMM .....
NNNNN .......
OOOOO ......
PPPPP ........
QQQQQ ......
RRRRR .......
SSSSS ........
TTTTT .........
Auto & Light Duty Truck (Surface Coating) ...............................................................................................................
Paper and other Web (Surface Coating) ...................................................................................................................
Metal Can (Surface Coating) .....................................................................................................................................
Misc. Metal Parts and Products (Surface Coating) ...................................................................................................
Surface Coating of Large Appliances ........................................................................................................................
Fabric Printing Coating and Dyeing ...........................................................................................................................
Plastic Parts (Surface Coating) ..................................................................................................................................
Surface Coating of Wood Building Products .............................................................................................................
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture ............................................................................................................................
Surface Coating for Metal Coil ...................................................................................................................................
Leather Finishing Operations .....................................................................................................................................
Cellulose Production Manufacture .............................................................................................................................
Boat Manufacturing ....................................................................................................................................................
Reinforced Plastic Composites Production ................................................................................................................
Tire Manufacturing .....................................................................................................................................................
Combustion Turbines .................................................................................................................................................
Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE) .................................................................................................
Lime Manufacturing Plants ........................................................................................................................................
Semiconductor Manufacturing ...................................................................................................................................
Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching and Battery Stacks .............................................................................................
Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters Major Sources .....................................................
Iron Foundries ............................................................................................................................................................
Integrated Iron and Steel ...........................................................................................................................................
Site Remediation ........................................................................................................................................................
Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing .......................................................................................................................
Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants ................................................................................................................................
Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing ....................................................................................................
Clay Ceramics Manufacturing ....................................................................................................................................
Asphalt Roofing and Processing ...............................................................................................................................
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operation ..................................................................................................
Hydrochloric Acid Production, Fumed Silica Production ...........................................................................................
(Reserved) .................................................................................................................................................................
Engine Test Facilities .................................................................................................................................................
Friction Products Manufacturing ................................................................................................................................
Taconite Iron Ore Processing ....................................................................................................................................
Refractory Products Manufacture ..............................................................................................................................
Primary Magnesium Refining .....................................................................................................................................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
1 Program
delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ).
which may not be delegated include: § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Emission Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of
Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to
Monitoring; § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; and all authorities identified in the subparts (e.g., under
‘‘Delegation of Authority’’) that cannot be delegated.
3 The ODEQ has adopted this subpart unchanged and applied for delegation of the standard. The subpart was vacated and remanded to EPA
by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d 1232
(D.C. Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Court’s holding, this subpart is not delegated to ODEQ at this time.
2 Authorities
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–03803 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Feb 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9622-9628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03803]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 61 and 63
[EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0063; FRL-9923-22-Region 6]
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants;
Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; delegation of authority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) has
submitted updated regulations for receiving delegation of Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) authority for implementation and enforcement of
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for
all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources). The delegation of
authority under this action does not apply to sources located in Indian
Country. EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of
certain NESHAPs to ODEQ.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 27, 2015 without further notice,
unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by March 26, 2015. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the updated NESHAPs
delegation will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2008-0063, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.
Email: Mr. Rick Barrett at barrett.richard@epa.gov. Please
also send a copy by email to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
Mail or delivery: Mr. Rick Barrett, Air Permits Section
(6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2008-
0063. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information through
https://www.regulations.gov or email, if you believe that it is CBI or
otherwise protected from disclosure. The https://www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment along with
any disk or CD-ROM submitted. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters and any form of encryption and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
[[Page 9623]]
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available at either location
(e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rick Barrett (6PD-R), (214) 665-
7227, barrett.richard@epa.gov. To inspect the hard copy materials,
please schedule an appointment with Mr. Barrett or Mr. Bill Deese at
(214) 665-7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refers to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What does this action do?
II. What is the authority for delegation?
III. What criteria must Oklahoma's programs meet to be approved?
IV. How did ODEQ meet the approval criteria?
V. What is being delegated?
VI. What is not being delegated?
VII. How will applicability determinations be made?
VIII. What authority does EPA have?
IX. What information must ODEQ provide to EPA?
X. What is EPA's oversight role?
XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or ODEQ?
XII. How will unchanged authorities be delegated to ODEQ in the
future?
XIII. Final Action
XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What does this action do?
EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of
certain NESHAPs to ODEQ. With this delegation, ODEQ has the primary
responsibility to implement and enforce the delegated standards.
II. What is the authority for delegation?
Section 112(l) of the CAA, and 40 CFR part 63, subpart E, authorize
EPA to delegate authority to any State or local agency which submits
adequate regulatory procedures for implementation and enforcement of
emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. The hazardous air
pollutant standards are codified at 40 CFR parts 61 and 63.
III. What criteria must Oklahoma's program meet to be approved?
Section 112(l)(5) of the CAA enables EPA to approve state air
toxics programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxics
program or rules. 40 CFR part 63, subpart E governs EPA's approval of
State rules or programs under section 112(l).
EPA will approve an air toxics program if we find that:
(1) The State program is ``no less stringent'' than the
corresponding Federal program or rule;
(2) The State has adequate authority and resources to implement the
program;
(3) The schedule for implementation and compliance is sufficiently
expeditious; and
(4) The program otherwise complies with Federal guidance.
In order to obtain approval of its program to implement and enforce
Federal section 112 rules as promulgated without changes (straight
delegation), a state must demonstrate that it meets the approval
criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3) provides that interim
or final Title V program approval will satisfy the criteria of 40 CFR
63.91(d) for part 70 sources (sources required to obtain operating
permits pursuant to Title V of the Clean Air Act).
IV. How did ODEQ meet the NESHAPs program approval criteria?
As to the NESHAPs standards in 40 CFR parts 61 and 63, as part of
its Title V submission ODEQ stated that it intended to use the
mechanism of incorporation by reference to adopt unchanged Federal
section 112 into its regulations. This commitment applied to both
existing and future standards as they applied to part 70 sources. EPA's
final interim approval of Oklahoma's Title V operating permits program
delegated the authority to implement certain NESHAPs on February 5,
1996 (61 FR 4220). On December 5, 2001, EPA granted final full approval
of the State's operating permits program (66 FR 63170). These interim
and final Title V program approvals satisfy the upfront approval
criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a State has
satisfied up-front approval criteria, it needs only to reference the
previous demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria
for any subsequent submittals of the section 112 standards. ODEQ has
affirmed that it still meets the up-front approval criteria.
V. What is being delegated?
By letter dated January 11, 2008, ODEQ requested EPA to update its
existing NESHAP delegation. With certain exceptions noted in section VI
below, Oklahoma's request included NESHAPs in 40 CFR part 61 and 40 CFR
part 63. ODEQ's request included newly incorporated NESHAPs promulgated
by EPA and amendments to existing standards currently delegated, as
amended between September 2, 2004 and September 1, 2006. These NESHAPs
were adopted by the ODEQ on March 27, 2007, and became effective on
June 15, 2007.
VI. What is not being delegated?
The following part 61 and 63 authorities listed below are not
delegated. All of the inquiries and requests concerning implementation
and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State of Oklahoma
should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office.
40 CFR part 61, subpart B (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from Underground Uranium Mines);
40 CFR part 61, subpart H (National Emission Standards for
Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than Radon From Department of Energy
Facilities);
40 CFR part 61, subpart I (National Emission Standards for
Radionuclide Emissions from Federal Facilities Other Than Nuclear
Regulatory Commission Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart H);
40 CFR part 61, subpart K (National Emission Standards for
Radionuclide Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus Plants);
40 CFR part 61, subpart Q (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from Department of Energy facilities);
40 CFR part 61, subpart R (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum Stacks);
40 CFR part 61, subpart T (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from the Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings); and
40 CFR part 61, subpart W (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings).
In addition, EPA cannot delegate to a State any of the Category II
Subpart A authorities set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(g) (2). These include
the following provisions: Sec. 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-
Opacity Standards; Sec. 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity
Standards; Sec. 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives
to Test Methods; Sec. 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to
Monitoring; and Sec. 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to
Recordkeeping and Reporting. In addition, some Part 63 standards have
certain provisions that cannot be delegated to the States. Therefore,
any Part 63 standard that provides that certain authorities cannot be
delegated are retained by EPA and not delegated to ODEQ. Furthermore,
no authorities are delegated that require rulemaking in the Federal
Register to implement, or where Federal overview
[[Page 9624]]
is the only way to ensure national consistency in the application of
the standards or requirements of CAA section 112. Finally, section
112(r), the accidental release program authority, is not being
delegated by this approval.
In addition, this delegation to ODEQ to implement and enforce
certain NESHAPs does not extend to sources or activities located in
Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Under this definition,
EPA treats as reservations, trust lands validly set aside for the use
of a Tribe even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as
a reservation. Consistent with previous federal program approvals or
delegations, EPA will continue to implement the NESHAPs in Indian
country because ODEQ has not submitted information to demonstrate
authority over sources and activities located within the exterior
boundaries of Indian reservations and other areas in Indian country.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act of 2005 includes a provision relating to Oklahoma and EPA
programs, providing:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the Administrator
of the Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this section
as the ``Administrator'') determines that a regulatory program
submitted by the State of Oklahoma for approval by the Administrator
under a law administered by the Administrator meets applicable
requirements of the law, and the Administrator approves the State to
administer the State program under the law with respect to areas in
the State that are not Indian country, on request of the State, the
Administrator shall approve the State to administer the State
program in the areas of the State that are in Indian country,
without any further demonstration of authority by the State.
H.R. 3, Section 10211(a). Oklahoma has not applied to administer
the NESHAPS program in Indian country in accordance with this
statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. How will applicability determinations under section 112 be made?
In approving this delegation, ODEQ will obtain concurrence from EPA
on any matter involving the interpretation of section 112 of the CAA or
40 CFR parts 61 and 63 to the extent that implementation,
administration, or enforcement of these sections have not been covered
by EPA determinations or guidance.
VIII. What authority does EPA have?
We retain the right, as provided by CAA section 112(l)(7), to
enforce any applicable emission standard or requirement under section
112. EPA also has the authority to make certain decisions under the
General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63. We are granting ODEQ some of
these authorities, and retaining others, as explained in sections V and
VI above. In addition, EPA may review and disapprove of State
determinations and subsequently require corrections. (See 40 CFR
63.91(g) and 65 FR 55810, 55823, September 14, 2000, as amended at 70
FR 59887, October 13, 2005; 72 FR 27443, May 16, 2007.)
Furthermore, we retain any authority in an individual emission
standard that may not be delegated according to provisions of the
standard. Also, listed in the footnotes of the part 63 delegation table
at the end of this rule are the authorities that cannot be delegated to
any State or local agency which we therefore retain.
IX. What information must ODEQ provide to EPA?
ODEQ must provide any additional compliance related information to
EPA, Region 6, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance within 45
days of a request under 40 CFR 63.96(a). In receiving delegation for
specific General Provisions authorities, ODEQ must submit to EPA Region
6 on a semi-annual basis, copies of determinations issued under these
authorities. For parts 61 and 63 standards, these determinations
include: Section 63.1, Applicability Determinations; Section 63.6(e),
Operation and Maintenance Requirements--Responsibility for Determining
Compliance; Section 63.6(f), Compliance with Non-Opacity Standards--
Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Section 63.6(h), Compliance
with Opacity and Visible Emissions Standards--Responsibility for
Determining Compliance; Sections 63.7(c)(2)(i) and (d), Approval of
Site-Specific Test Plans; Section 63.7(e)(2)(i), Approval of Minor
Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval
of Intermediate Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(iii),
Approval of Shorter Sampling Times and Volumes When Necessitated by
Process Variables or Other Factors; Sections 63.7(e)(2)(iv), (h)(2),
and (h)(3), Waiver of Performance Testing; Sections 63.8(c)(1) and
(e)(1), Approval of Site-Specific Performance Evaluation (Monitoring)
Test Plans; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Minor Alternatives to
Monitoring; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Intermediate Alternatives to
Monitoring; Section 63.9 and 63.10, Approval of Adjustments to Time
Periods for Submitting Reports; Section 63.10(f), Approval of Minor
Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; Section 63.7(a)(4),
Extension of Performance Test Deadline.
X. What is EPA's oversight role?
EPA must oversee ODEQ's decisions to ensure the delegated
authorities are being adequately implemented and enforced. We will
integrate oversight of the delegated authorities into the existing
mechanisms and resources for oversight currently in place. If, during
oversight, we determine that ODEQ made decisions that decreased the
stringency of the delegated standards, then ODEQ shall be required to
take corrective actions and the source(s) affected by the decisions
will be notified, as required by 40 CFR 63.91(g)(1)(ii). We will
initiate withdrawal of the program or rule if the corrective actions
taken are insufficient.
XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or ODEQ?
All of the information required pursuant to the general provisions
and the relevant subpart of the Federal NESHAPs (40 CFR parts 61 and
63) should be submitted by sources located outside of Indian country,
directly to the ODEQ at the following address: Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality, 707 North Robinson, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma 73101-1677. The ODEQ is the primary point of contact
with respect to delegated NESHAPs. Sources do not need to send a copy
to EPA. EPA Region 6 waives the requirement that notifications and
reports for delegated standards be submitted to EPA in addition to ODEQ
in accordance with 40 CFR 63.9(a)(4)(ii) and 63.10(a)(4)(ii). For those
standards that are not delegated, sources must continue to submit all
appropriate information to EPA.
XII. How will unchanged authorities be delegated to ODEQ in the future?
In the future, ODEQ will only need to send a letter of request for
approval to EPA, Region 6, for NESHAP regulations that ODEQ has adopted
by reference. The letter must reference the previous up-front approval
demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the up-front approval
criteria. We will respond in writing to the request stating that the
request for delegation is either granted or denied. A Federal Register
action will be published to inform the public and affected sources of
the delegation, indicate where source notifications and reports should
be sent, and to amend the relevant portions of the Code of Federal
Regulations showing which NESHAPs standards have been delegated to
ODEQ.
XIII. Final Action
The public was provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed
approval of the program and mechanism for delegation of section 112
standards, as they apply to part 70
[[Page 9625]]
sources, on March 10, 1995, for the proposed interim approval of ODEQ's
operating permits program. (60 FR 13088). In EPA's final full approval
of ODEQ's operating permits program on February 5, 1996 (61 FR 4220),
EPA discussed that no adverse comments were received from the public on
the proposed final delegation of the operating permits program. In
today's action, the public is given the opportunity to comment on the
approval of ODEQ's request for delegation of authority to implement and
enforce certain section 112 standards for all sources (both part 70 and
non-part 70 sources) which have been adopted by reference into
Oklahoma's state regulations. However, the Agency views the approval of
this request as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse
comments. Therefore, EPA is publishing this rule without prior
proposal. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal
Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the program and delegation of
authority described in this action if adverse comments are received.
This action will be effective April 27, 2015 without further notice
unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by March 26, 2015.
If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public the rule will
not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent
final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive
relevant adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of the
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of a relevant adverse comment.
XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the delegation is not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and the EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state request to receive delegation of
certain Federal standards, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing delegation submissions, EPA's role is to approve
submissions provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a delegation submission for failure to use VCS. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA to use VCS in place of
a delegation submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the
Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 27, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 61
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Arsenic, Benzene, Beryllium, Hazardous
substances, Mercury, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Vinyl chloride.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 6, 2015.
Wren Stenger,
Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, Region 6.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are
amended as follows:
PART 61--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
[[Page 9626]]
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. Section 61.04 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(6)(iv) to read as
follows:
Sec. 61.04 Address.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(iv) Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODED) has been delegated the following part 61 standards promulgated
by EPA, as amended in the Federal Register through September 1, 2006.
The (X) symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been
delegated.
Delegation Status for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (Part 61 Standards) for Oklahoma
[Excluding Indian country]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart Source category ODEQ \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................ General Provisions.......... X
B........................ Radon Emissions From ...............
Underground Uranium Mines.
C........................ Beryllium................... X
D........................ Beryllium Rocket Motor X
Firing.
E........................ Mercury..................... X
F........................ Vinyl Chloride.............. X
G........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
H........................ Emissions of Radionuclides ...............
Other Than Radon From
Department of Energy
Facilities.
I........................ Radionuclide Emissions From ...............
Federal Facilities Other
Than Nuclear Regulatory
Commission Licensees and
Not Covered by Subpart H.
J........................ Equipment Leaks (Fugitive X
Emission Sources) of
Benzene.
K........................ Radionuclide Emissions From ...............
Elemental Phosphorus Plants.
L........................ Benzene Emissions From Coke X
By-Product Recovery Plants.
M........................ Asbestos.................... X
N........................ Inorganic Arsenic Emissions X
From Glass Manufacturing
Plants.
O........................ Inorganic Arsenic Emissions X
From Primary Copper
Smelters.
P........................ Inorganic Arsenic Emissions X
From Arsenic Trioxide and
Metallic Arsenic Production
Facilities.
Q........................ Radon Emissions From ...............
Department of Energy
Facilities.
R........................ Radon Emissions From ...............
Phosphogypsum Stacks.
S........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
T........................ Radon Emissions From the ...............
Disposal of Uranium Mill
Tailings.
U........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
V........................ Equipment Leaks (Fugitives X
Emission Sources).
W........................ Radon Emissions From ...............
Operating Mill Tailings.
X........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
Y........................ Benzene Emissions From X
Benzene Storage Vessels.
Z-AA..................... (Reserved).................. ...............
BB....................... Benzene Emissions From X
Benzene Transfer Operations.
CC-EE.................... (Reserved).................. ...............
FF....................... Benzene Waste Operations.... X
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ).
* * * * *
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
3. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart E--Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal
Authorities
0
4. Section 63.99 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(37)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.99 Delegated Federal authorities.
(a) * * *
(37) * * *
(i) The following table lists the specific part 63 standards that
have been delegated unchanged to the Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality for all sources. The ``X'' symbol is used to
indicate each subpart that has been delegated. The delegations are
subject to all of the conditions and limitations set forth in Federal
law, regulations, policy, guidance, and determinations. Some
authorities cannot be delegated and are retained by EPA. These include
certain General Provisions authorities and specific parts of some
standards. Any amendments made to these rules after September 1, 2006
are not delegated.
Delegation Status for Part 63 Standards--State of Oklahoma
[Excluding Indian country]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart Source category ODEQ 1 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................ General Provisions.......... X
F........................ Hazardous Organic NESHAP X
(HON)--Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing
Industry (SOCMI).
G........................ HON--SOCMI Process Vents, X
Storage Vessels, Transfer
Operations and Wastewater.
H........................ HON--Equipment Leaks........ X
I........................ HON--Certain Processes X
Negotiated Equipment Leak
Regulation.
J........................ Polyvinyl Chloride and (\3\)
Copolymers Production.
[[Page 9627]]
K........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
L........................ Coke Oven Batteries......... X
M........................ Perchloroethylene Dry X
Cleaning.
N........................ Chromium Electroplating and X
Chromium Anodizing Tanks.
O........................ Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers.. X
P........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
Q........................ Industrial Process Cooling X
Towers.
R........................ Gasoline Distribution....... X
S........................ Pulp and Paper Industry..... X
T........................ Halogenated Solvent Cleaning X
U........................ Group I Polymers and Resins. X
V........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
W........................ Epoxy Resins Production and X
Non-Nylon Polyamides
Production.
X........................ Secondary Lead Smelting..... X
Y........................ Marine Tank Vessel Loading.. X
Z........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
AA....................... Phosphoric Acid X
Manufacturing Plants.
BB....................... Phosphate Fertilizers X
Production Plants.
CC....................... Petroleum Refineries........ X
DD....................... Off-Site Waste and Recovery X
Operations.
EE....................... Magnetic Tape Manufacturing. X
FF....................... (Reserved).................. ...............
GG....................... Aerospace Manufacturing and X
Rework Facilities.
HH....................... Oil and Natural Gas X
Production Facilities.
II....................... Shipbuilding and Ship Repair X
Facilities.
JJ....................... Wood Furniture Manufacturing X
Operations.
KK....................... Printing and Publishing X
Industry.
LL....................... Primary Aluminum Reduction X
Plants.
MM....................... Chemical Recovery Combustion X
Sources at Kraft, Soda,
Sulfide, and Stand-Alone
Semichemical Pulp Mills.
NN....................... (Reserved).................. ...............
OO....................... Tanks--Level 1.............. X
PP....................... Containers.................. X
QQ....................... Surface Impoundments........ X
RR....................... Individual Drain Systems.... X
SS....................... Closed Vent Systems, Control X
Devices, Recovery Devices
and Routing to a Fuel Gas
System or a Process.
TT....................... Equipment Leaks--Control X
Level 1.
UU....................... Equipment Leaks--Control X
Level 2 Standards.
VV....................... Oil--Water Separators and X
Organic--Water Separators.
WW....................... Storage Vessels (Tanks)-- X
Control Level 2.
XX....................... Ethylene Manufacturing X
Process Units Heat Exchange
Systems and Waste
Operations.
YY....................... Generic Maximum Achievable X
Control Technology
Standards.
ZZ-BBB................... (Reserved).................. ...............
CCC...................... Steel Pickling--HCI Process X
Facilities and Hydrochloric
Acid Regeneration.
DDD...................... Mineral Wool Production..... X
EEE...................... Hazardous Waste Combustors.. X
FFF...................... (Reserved).................. ...............
GGG...................... Pharmaceuticals Production.. X
HHH...................... Natural Gas Transmission and X
Storage Facilities.
III...................... Flexible Polyurethane Foam X
Production.
JJJ...................... Group IV Polymers and Resins X
KKK...................... (Reserved).................. ...............
LLL...................... Portland Cement X
Manufacturing.
MMM...................... Pesticide Active Ingredient X
Production.
NNN...................... Wool Fiberglass X
Manufacturing.
OOO...................... Amino/Phenolic Resins....... X
PPP...................... Polyether Polyols Production X
QQQ...................... Primary Copper Smelting..... X
RRR...................... Secondary Aluminum X
Production.
SSS...................... (Reserved).................. ...............
TTT...................... Primary Lead Smelting....... X
UUU...................... Petroleum Refineries-- X
Catalytic Cracking Units,
Catalytic Reforming Units
and Sulfur Recovery Plants.
VVV...................... Publicly Owned Treatment X
Works (POTW).
WWW...................... (Reserved).................. ...............
XXX...................... Ferroalloys Production: X
Ferromanganese and
Silicomanganese.
AAAA..................... Municipal Solid Waste X
Landfills.
CCCC..................... Nutritional Yeast X
Manufacturing.
DDDD..................... Plywood and Composite Wood X
Products.
EEEE..................... Organic Liquids Distribution X
FFFF..................... Misc. Organic Chemical X
Production and Processes
(MON).
GGGG..................... Solvent Extraction for X
Vegetable Oil Production.
HHHH..................... Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat X
Production.
[[Page 9628]]
IIII..................... Auto & Light Duty Truck X
(Surface Coating).
JJJJ..................... Paper and other Web (Surface X
Coating).
KKKK..................... Metal Can (Surface Coating). X
MMMM..................... Misc. Metal Parts and X
Products (Surface Coating).
NNNN..................... Surface Coating of Large X
Appliances.
OOOO..................... Fabric Printing Coating and X
Dyeing.
PPPP..................... Plastic Parts (Surface X
Coating).
QQQQ..................... Surface Coating of Wood X
Building Products.
RRRR..................... Surface Coating of Metal X
Furniture.
SSSS..................... Surface Coating for Metal X
Coil.
TTTT..................... Leather Finishing Operations X
UUUU..................... Cellulose Production X
Manufacture.
VVVV..................... Boat Manufacturing.......... X
WWWW..................... Reinforced Plastic X
Composites Production.
XXXX..................... Tire Manufacturing.......... X
YYYY..................... Combustion Turbines......... X
ZZZZ..................... Reciprocating Internal X
Combustion Engines (RICE).
AAAAA.................... Lime Manufacturing Plants... X
BBBBB.................... Semiconductor Manufacturing. X
CCCCC.................... Coke Ovens: Pushing, X
Quenching and Battery
Stacks.
DDDDD.................... Industrial/Commercial/ X
Institutional Boilers and
Process Heaters Major
Sources.
EEEEE.................... Iron Foundries.............. X
FFFFF.................... Integrated Iron and Steel... X
GGGGG.................... Site Remediation............ X
HHHHH.................... Miscellaneous Coating X
Manufacturing.
IIIII.................... Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali X
Plants.
JJJJJ.................... Brick and Structural Clay X
Products Manufacturing.
KKKKK.................... Clay Ceramics Manufacturing. X
LLLLL.................... Asphalt Roofing and X
Processing.
MMMMM.................... Flexible Polyurethane Foam X
Fabrication Operation.
NNNNN.................... Hydrochloric Acid X
Production, Fumed Silica
Production.
OOOOO.................... (Reserved).................. ...............
PPPPP.................... Engine Test Facilities...... X
QQQQQ.................... Friction Products X
Manufacturing.
RRRRR.................... Taconite Iron Ore Processing X
SSSSS.................... Refractory Products X
Manufacture.
TTTTT.................... Primary Magnesium Refining.. X
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ).
\2\ Authorities which may not be delegated include: Sec. 63.6(g),
Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Emission Standards; Sec.
63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; Sec.
63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test
Methods; Sec. 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring;
Sec. 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and
Reporting; and all authorities identified in the subparts (e.g., under
``Delegation of Authority'') that cannot be delegated.
\3\ The ODEQ has adopted this subpart unchanged and applied for
delegation of the standard. The subpart was vacated and remanded to
EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d
1232 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Court's holding, this
subpart is not delegated to ODEQ at this time.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-03803 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P