Order Denying Export Privileges, 9434-9435 [2015-03590]
Download as PDF
9434
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 35 / Monday, February 23, 2015 / Notices
international organizations rely on these
statistic-based tools, as do American
businesses, state and local governments,
and news organizations.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households: International travelers
departing the United States 18 years or
older which includes U.S. and non-U.S.
residents for all countries except
Canada.
Frequency: Monthly.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: February 18, 2015.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–03550 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
production activity has been requested
at this time.
In accordance with the FTZ Board’s
regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman of the
FTZ Staff is designated examiner to
review the application and make
recommendations to the FTZ Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive
Secretary at the address below. The
closing period for their receipt is April
6, 2015. Rebuttal comments in response
to material submitted during the
foregoing period may be submitted
during the subsequent 15-day period to
April 20, 2015.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ
Board’s Web site, which is accessible
via www.trade.gov/ftz.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Whiteman at
Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202)
482–0473.
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
Dated: February 13, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[B–8–2015]
[FR Doc. 2015–03614 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Foreign-Trade Zone 72—Indianapolis,
Indiana; Expansion of Subzone 72B;
Eli Lilly and Company; Plainfield,
Indiana
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by
the Indianapolis Airport Authority,
grantee of FTZ 72, requesting an
expansion of Subzone 72B on behalf of
Eli Lilly and Company (Eli Lilly) to
include a site in Plainfield, Indiana. The
application was submitted pursuant to
the provisions of the Foreign-Trade
Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–
81u), and the regulations of the FTZ
Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally
docketed on February 13, 2015.
Subzone 72B was approved on July
26, 1985 (Board Order 309, 50 FR 3l404,
8–2–1985), and expanded on April 15,
2002 (Board Order 1222, 67 FR 20086,
4–24–2002). The subzone currently
consists of two sites: Site 1 (359 acres)—
five parcels in the Indianapolis area,
Marion County; and, Site 3 (751 acres)—
State Road 63, Clinton, Vermillion
County.
The current request would add a site
(34 acres) located at 2222 Stanley Road
in Plainfield, Hendricks County, to the
subzone. No additional authorization for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:19 Feb 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of:
Ernesto Salgado-Guzman; Inmate Number—
68370–097; Willacy County; Correctional
Institution; 1800 Industrial Drive;
Raymondville, TX 78580
and with an address at:
16738 Harper Blvd.; Madera, CA 93638
On May 5, 2014, in the U.S. District
Court, Eastern District of California,
Ernesto Salgado-Guzman (‘‘SalgadoGuzman’’), was convicted of violating
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control
Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’).
Specifically, Salgado-Guzman
knowingly and willfully exported and
caused to be exported and attempted to
export and attempted to cause to be
exported from the United States to
Mexico caliber rifles, defense articles
which were on the United States
Munitions List, without having first
obtained from the Department of State a
license for such export or written
authorization for such export. Salgado-
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Guzman was sentenced to 46 months
imprisonment, 36 months of supervised
release and a $100 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 83(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 2410(h). The
denial of export privileges under this
provision may be for a period of up to
10 years from the date of the conviction.
15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8
of the Regulations states that the Bureau
of Industry and Security’s Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
BIS has received notice of SalgadoGuzman’s conviction for violating the
AECA, and have provided notice and an
opportunity for Salgado-Guzman to
make a written submission to BIS, as
provided in Section 766.25 of the
Regulations. BIS has received and
reviewed a submission from SalgadoGuzman.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny SalgadoGuzman’s export privileges under the
Regulations for a period of 10 years from
the date of Salgado-Guzman’s
conviction. I have also decided to
revoke all licenses issued pursuant to
the Act or Regulations in which
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. 2401–
2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August
11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 35 / Monday, February 23, 2015 / Notices
Salgado-Guzman had an interest at the
time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until
May 5, 2024, Ernesto Salgado-Guzman,
with last known addresses of Inmate
Number—68370–097, Willacy County,
Correctional Institution, 1800 Industrial
Drive, Raymondville, TX 78580 and
16738 Harper Blvd., Madera, CA 93638,
and when acting for or on his behalf, his
successors, assigns, employees, agents
or representatives (the ‘‘Denied
Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:19 Feb 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Salgado-Guzman
by ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Salgado-Guzman may
file an appeal of this Order with the
Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security. The appeal must
be filed within 45 days from the date of
this Order and must comply with the
provisions of Part 756 of the
Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Salgado-Guzman. This
Order shall be published in the Federal
Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until May 5, 2024.
Issued this 12th day of February, 2015.
Thomas Andrukonis,
Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–03590 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–928]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting an
administrative review of the
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9435
antidumping duty order on uncovered
innerspring units (‘‘innerspring units’’)
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’). The period of review is
February 1, 2013, through January 31,
2014. The review covers two exporters
of subject merchandise: Comfort Coil
Technology Sdn Bhd (‘‘Comfort Coil’’)
and Creative Furniture & Bedding
Manufacturing (‘‘Creative Furniture’’).
The Department preliminarily
determines that Comfort Coil had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR. The Department also
preliminarily determines that Creative
Furniture did not cooperate to the best
of its ability and is, therefore, applying
adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’) to
Creative Furniture’s PRC-origin
merchandise. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4031.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 19, 2009, the Department
published in the Federal Register notice
of an antidumping duty order on
innerspring units from the PRC (‘‘the
Order’’).1 On February 28, 2014, Leggett
& Platt, Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’) submitted a
request for the Department to conduct
an administrative review of the Order
that examines Comfort Coil’s and
Creative Furniture’s exports of subject
merchandise made during the POR.2 On
April 1, 2014, the Department published
in the Federal Register a notice of
initiation of this administrative review
of the Order concerning Comfort Coil’s
and Creative Furniture’s POR exports of
subject merchandise.3 4
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is uncovered innerspring units
1 See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of Antidumping
Duty Order, 74 FR 7661 (February 19, 2009).
2 See Request for Antidumping Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s
Republic of China, dated February 28, 2014.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262, 18272
(April 1, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
4 Comfort Coil and Creative Furniture are both
located in market economy countries. As a result,
the Department is examining each company’s
respective PRC exports of subject merchandise for
this administrative review.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 35 (Monday, February 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9434-9435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03590]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of:
Ernesto Salgado-Guzman; Inmate Number--68370-097; Willacy County;
Correctional Institution; 1800 Industrial Drive; Raymondville, TX
78580
and with an address at:
16738 Harper Blvd.; Madera, CA 93638
On May 5, 2014, in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of
California, Ernesto Salgado-Guzman (``Salgado-Guzman''), was convicted
of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778
(2012)) (``AECA''). Specifically, Salgado-Guzman knowingly and
willfully exported and caused to be exported and attempted to export
and attempted to cause to be exported from the United States to Mexico
caliber rifles, defense articles which were on the United States
Munitions List, without having first obtained from the Department of
State a license for such export or written authorization for such
export. Salgado-Guzman was sentenced to 46 months imprisonment, 36
months of supervised release and a $100 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR'' or
``Regulations'') \1\ provides, in pertinent part, that ``[t]he Director
of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director
of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of
any person who has been convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (``EAA''), the EAR, or any order, license or
authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal
Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 83(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).'' 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 2410(h). The denial of export
privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10 years
from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the Regulations states that
the Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of Exporter Services may
revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS'') licenses
previously issued in which the person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2014). The Regulations
issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app.
2401-2420 (2000)) (``EAA''). Since August 21, 2001, the EAA has been
in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by
successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of
August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014)), has continued the
Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. IV 2010)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BIS has received notice of Salgado-Guzman's conviction for
violating the AECA, and have provided notice and an opportunity for
Salgado-Guzman to make a written submission to BIS, as provided in
Section 766.25 of the Regulations. BIS has received and reviewed a
submission from Salgado-Guzman.
Based upon my review and consultations with BIS's Office of Export
Enforcement, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I
have decided to deny Salgado-Guzman's export privileges under the
Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Salgado-Guzman's
conviction. I have also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant
to the Act or Regulations in which
[[Page 9435]]
Salgado-Guzman had an interest at the time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until May 5, 2024, Ernesto
Salgado-Guzman, with last known addresses of Inmate Number--68370-097,
Willacy County, Correctional Institution, 1800 Industrial Drive,
Raymondville, TX 78580 and 16738 Harper Blvd., Madera, CA 93638, and
when acting for or on his behalf, his successors, assigns, employees,
agents or representatives (the ``Denied Person''), may not, directly or
indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to
as ``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation,
or business organization related to Salgado-Guzman by ownership,
control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection
in the conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the
provisions of this Order in order to prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Salgado-
Guzman may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of
Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45
days from the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of
Part 756 of the Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be delivered to the Salgado-
Guzman. This Order shall be published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective immediately and shall remain in
effect until May 5, 2024.
Issued this 12th day of February, 2015.
Thomas Andrukonis,
Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2015-03590 Filed 2-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P