Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings and Miscellaneous and General Requirements, 9189-9190 [2015-03315]
Download as PDF
9189
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 34
Friday, February 20, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS
AUTHORITY
5 CFR Part 2429
Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings and
Miscellaneous and General
Requirements
Federal Labor Relations
Authority.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Labor Relations
Authority (FLRA) is engaged in an
initiative to make electronic filing or
‘‘eFiling’’ available to parties in all cases
before the FLRA. Making eFiling
available is another way in which the
FLRA is using technology to improve
the customer-service experience. These
eFiling enhancements are expected to
increase efficiency by reducing
procedural filing errors and processing
delays.
DATES: Effective March 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments about
this final rule can be emailed to
engagetheFLRA@flra.gov or sent to the
Case Intake and Publication Office,
Federal Labor Relations Authority, 1400
K Street NW., Washington, DC 20424.
All written comments will be available
for public inspection during normal
business hours at the Case Intake and
Publication Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina
Grippando, Counsel for Regulatory and
Public Affairs, Federal Labor Relations
Authority, Washington, DC 20424, (202)
218–7776.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the first
stage of its eFiling initiative, the FLRA
enabled parties to use eFiling to file
requests for Federal Service Impasses
Panel assistance in the resolution of
negotiation impasses. See 77 FR 5987
(Feb. 7, 2012). The second stage of the
FLRA’s eFiling initiative provided
parties with an option to use eFiling to
electronically file 11 types of documents
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:44 Feb 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
in cases filed with the FLRA’s threemember adjudicatory body, the
Authority. Parties may now file such
documents. See 77 FR 26430 (May 4,
2012). The third stage of the FLRA’s
eFiling initiative provided parties with
the option to use eFiling to
electronically file certain documents
involved in representation and unfair
labor practice proceedings. See 77 FR
37751 (June 25, 2012).
The fourth stage of the FLRA’s eFiling
initiative is the subject of this Final
Rule. In this stage, parties will be able
to use the FLRA’s eFiling system to file
certain documents involved in unfair
labor practice proceedings before the
FLRA’s Office of Administrative Law
Judges. This rule modifies the FLRA’s
existing regulations to allow eFiling of
those documents. As the FLRA’s eFiling
procedures develop, the revisions set
forth in this action may be evaluated
and revised further.
Executive Order 12866
Sectional Analysis
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Sectional analysis of the amendments
and revisions to part 2429,
Miscellaneous and General
Requirements, are as follows:
Part 2429—Miscellaneous and General
Requirements
Section 2429.24(d)
This section is amended to reflect the
addition of eFiling as an authorized
means of filing documents with the
Office of Administrative Law Judges
pursuant to paragraph (f)(15) of this
section and corrects the person with
whom such documents must be filed by
replacing appropriate administrative
law judge with Chief Administrative
Law Judge.
Section 2429.24(f)(15)
This section is added to reflect that
documents filed with the Office of
Administrative Law Judges are now
documents that can be filed using
eFiling as an alternative to the filing
methods discussed in paragraph (e) of
this section.
As described above, this amendment
updates the regulations to merely
expand the Federal Labor Relations
Authority’s current electronic filing
system. This rule pertains to agency
organization, procedure, or practice, and
it is exempt from prior notice and
public comment pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(A).
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The FLRA is an independent
regulatory agency, and as such, is not
subject to the requirements of E.O.
12866.
Executive Order 13132
The FLRA is an independent
regulatory agency, and as such, is not
subject to the requirements of E.O.
13132.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Chairman of the FLRA has
determined that this rule, as amended,
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
because this rule applies only to federal
agencies, federal employees, and labor
organizations representing those
employees.
This rule change will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This action is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The amended regulations contain no
additional information collection or
record-keeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
E:\FR\FM\20FER1.SGM
20FER1
9190
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 34 / Friday, February 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: February 12, 2015.
Carol Waller Pope,
Chairman.
proposals to relocate retail services or
add a new retail service facility. The
final rule also will require the Postal
Service to provide information about the
anticipated new location for relocated
services or for a new retail service
facility when the Postal Service first
gives notice of the proposal.
DATES: Effective date: March 23, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Hancock, Real Estate Specialist,
U.S. Postal Service®, at
Richard.A.Hancock2@usps.gov or 919–
420–5284.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 27, 2014, the Postal Service
published a proposed rule (79 FR
63880) to revise the Postal Service’s
procedures concerning the expansion,
relocation, and construction of Post
Offices to clarify those procedures, and
to require the Postal Service to provide
more information to communities and
elected officials about certain types of
projects earlier in the planning phase.
The proposed rule would require the
Postal Service to notify communities
and officials, and solicit and consider
their input, regarding proposals to
relocate retail services or add a new
retail service facility. As a significant
change from the current rule, the
proposed rule would require the Postal
Service to provide information about the
anticipated new location for relocated
services or for a new retail service
facility when the Postal Service first
gives notice of the proposal. The Postal
Service established a 30-day comment
period and invited comments on the
proposed rule. The Postal Service
received five responses.
[FR Doc. 2015–03315 Filed 2–19–15; 8:45 am]
Comments and Response
BILLING CODE 6727–01–P
Below is a summary of the comments,
in order of the specific sections of the
proposed rule to which they relate.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 2429
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government employees,
Labor management relations.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the FLRA amends 5 CFR part
2429, as follows:
PART 2429—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 2429
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134; § 2429.18 also
issued under 28 U.S.C. 2112(a).
2. Section 2429.24 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) and adding
paragraph (f)(15) to read as follows:
■
§ 2429.24 Place and method of filing;
acknowledgement.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Unless electronically filed
pursuant to paragraph (f)(15) of this
section, a document filed with the
Office of Administrative Law Judges
pursuant to this subchapter shall be
submitted to the address for the Chief
Administrative Law Judge, as set forth
in the appendix.
(f) * * *
(15) Documents submitted to the
Office of Administrative Law Judges
under 5 CFR part 2423, including
answers to complaints, motions, briefs,
pre-hearing disclosures, stipulations,
and any other documents as permitted
by the eFiling system for the Office of
Administrative Law Judges.
*
*
*
*
*
POSTAL SERVICE
General Comments; 241.4(a)
39 CFR Part 241
Relocating Retail Services; Adding
New Retail Service Facilities
Postal ServiceTM.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule revises the
Postal Service’s current procedures
concerning the expansion, relocation,
and construction of Post OfficesTM to
clarify these procedures, and to require
the Postal Service to provide more
information to communities and elected
officials about certain types of projects
earlier in the planning phase. Under the
final rule, the Postal Service will notify
communities and officials, and solicit
and consider their input, regarding
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:44 Feb 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
One respondent asserted that there is
no substantive reason for changing the
current rule and that the Postal Service
should retain the current rule. The
respondent suggested that defining
‘‘customer service facility’’ is
unnecessary.
We disagree with the comment. The
Postal Service Office of Inspector
General (OIG) specifically
recommended that the Postal Service
revise its regulations to enhance
transparency and public input. Based on
past experience, we agreed with the
OIG’s recommendation. The current rule
does not define ‘‘customer service
facility’’ and as the Postal Service
evolves to adapt to a fast changing
marketplace, providing definitions in
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the new rule will clarify when the new
rule applies.
Another respondent commented that
the new rule should define ‘‘relocation’’
and the definition should state a
maximum permitted distance for
relocating retail services.
We expect readers of the new rule
will understand ‘‘relocation’’ to have its
ordinary dictionary meaning. We also
disagree that the new rule should
include an arbitrary distance limitation
because such a limitation could prevent
appropriately accounting for important
factors, such as the setting (urban,
suburban, or rural), site conditions
(public transit availability, location on a
one-way street, etc.) and the proximity
of other Postal Service retail locations.
Temporary, Emergency, and Provisional
Relocations; 241.4(a)(2)
One respondent suggested that some
causes of relocation added to the
‘‘emergency’’ category in the proposed
rule are inconsistent with a definition of
‘‘emergency’’ as a sudden event
requiring immediate action. The
respondent also expressed concern that
expanding the ‘‘emergency’’ category
increases the universe of relocations
that can occur without community
input because the new rule, as
proposed, provided for the Postal
Service to determine when it is prudent
to obtain community input on the longterm location after an emergency
relocation. The respondent questioned
adding examples of relocations arising
from safety concerns without limiting
those concerns to some specified level
of seriousness, and the respondent
urged retaining a 180-day limit for both
temporary and emergency relocations.
We appreciate the concerns raised in
these comments. The current rule lists
‘‘lease termination’’ as an example of an
event that may require an emergency
relocation, but the current rule is silent
on lease expirations. Nor does the
current rule recognize that some lessors
reserve a right during the lease term to
require the Postal Service to move to a
different location, e.g., a substitute
space in the lessor’s project. However,
the Postal Service believes it is prudent
to provide in the final rule for soliciting
and considering community input
regarding relocations arising from such
events. While these events may not be
completely unexpected like other events
listed as ‘‘emergencies’’, their timing is
not always predictable. The Postal
Service may not know when a lessor
will exercise its right to terminate a
lease or its right to require the Postal
Service to move to different premises.
Similarly, a lease may expire
unexpectedly when the Postal Service
E:\FR\FM\20FER1.SGM
20FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9189-9190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03315]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 34 / Friday, February 20, 2015 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 9189]]
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
5 CFR Part 2429
Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings and Miscellaneous and General
Requirements
AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations Authority.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) is engaged in an
initiative to make electronic filing or ``eFiling'' available to
parties in all cases before the FLRA. Making eFiling available is
another way in which the FLRA is using technology to improve the
customer-service experience. These eFiling enhancements are expected to
increase efficiency by reducing procedural filing errors and processing
delays.
DATES: Effective March 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments about this final rule can be emailed to
engagetheFLRA@flra.gov or sent to the Case Intake and Publication
Office, Federal Labor Relations Authority, 1400 K Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20424. All written comments will be available for public
inspection during normal business hours at the Case Intake and
Publication Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina Grippando, Counsel for Regulatory
and Public Affairs, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC
20424, (202) 218-7776.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the first stage of its eFiling
initiative, the FLRA enabled parties to use eFiling to file requests
for Federal Service Impasses Panel assistance in the resolution of
negotiation impasses. See 77 FR 5987 (Feb. 7, 2012). The second stage
of the FLRA's eFiling initiative provided parties with an option to use
eFiling to electronically file 11 types of documents in cases filed
with the FLRA's three-member adjudicatory body, the Authority. Parties
may now file such documents. See 77 FR 26430 (May 4, 2012). The third
stage of the FLRA's eFiling initiative provided parties with the option
to use eFiling to electronically file certain documents involved in
representation and unfair labor practice proceedings. See 77 FR 37751
(June 25, 2012).
The fourth stage of the FLRA's eFiling initiative is the subject of
this Final Rule. In this stage, parties will be able to use the FLRA's
eFiling system to file certain documents involved in unfair labor
practice proceedings before the FLRA's Office of Administrative Law
Judges. This rule modifies the FLRA's existing regulations to allow
eFiling of those documents. As the FLRA's eFiling procedures develop,
the revisions set forth in this action may be evaluated and revised
further.
Sectional Analysis
Sectional analysis of the amendments and revisions to part 2429,
Miscellaneous and General Requirements, are as follows:
Part 2429--Miscellaneous and General Requirements
Section 2429.24(d)
This section is amended to reflect the addition of eFiling as an
authorized means of filing documents with the Office of Administrative
Law Judges pursuant to paragraph (f)(15) of this section and corrects
the person with whom such documents must be filed by replacing
appropriate administrative law judge with Chief Administrative Law
Judge.
Section 2429.24(f)(15)
This section is added to reflect that documents filed with the
Office of Administrative Law Judges are now documents that can be filed
using eFiling as an alternative to the filing methods discussed in
paragraph (e) of this section.
As described above, this amendment updates the regulations to
merely expand the Federal Labor Relations Authority's current
electronic filing system. This rule pertains to agency organization,
procedure, or practice, and it is exempt from prior notice and public
comment pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A).
Executive Order 12866
The FLRA is an independent regulatory agency, and as such, is not
subject to the requirements of E.O. 12866.
Executive Order 13132
The FLRA is an independent regulatory agency, and as such, is not
subject to the requirements of E.O. 13132.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the Chairman of the FLRA has determined that this rule,
as amended, will not have a significant impact on a substantial number
of small entities, because this rule applies only to federal agencies,
federal employees, and labor organizations representing those
employees.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule change will not result in the expenditure by state,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This action is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The amended regulations contain no additional information
collection or record-keeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
[[Page 9190]]
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 2429
Administrative practice and procedure, Government employees, Labor
management relations.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the FLRA amends 5 CFR part
2429, as follows:
PART 2429--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 2429 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134; Sec. 2429.18 also issued under 28
U.S.C. 2112(a).
0
2. Section 2429.24 is amended by revising paragraph (d) and adding
paragraph (f)(15) to read as follows:
Sec. 2429.24 Place and method of filing; acknowledgement.
* * * * *
(d) Unless electronically filed pursuant to paragraph (f)(15) of
this section, a document filed with the Office of Administrative Law
Judges pursuant to this subchapter shall be submitted to the address
for the Chief Administrative Law Judge, as set forth in the appendix.
(f) * * *
(15) Documents submitted to the Office of Administrative Law Judges
under 5 CFR part 2423, including answers to complaints, motions,
briefs, pre-hearing disclosures, stipulations, and any other documents
as permitted by the eFiling system for the Office of Administrative Law
Judges.
* * * * *
Dated: February 12, 2015.
Carol Waller Pope,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2015-03315 Filed 2-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6727-01-P