The Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System Advisory Board: Request for Nominations, 8643-8645 [2015-03300]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Notices
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (40 CFR part 60, subpart CC).
Estimated number of respondents: 41
(total).
Frequency of response: Initially,
occasionally, and semiannually.
Total estimated burden: 803 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost: $316,386 (per
year), includes $237,800 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance
costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is no
change of hours in the total estimated
response burden in this ICR compared
with the ICR currently approved by
OMB.
Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies
Division.
[FR Doc. 2015–03296 Filed 2–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OECA–2014–0067; FRL–9921–
67–OEI]
Information Collection Request
Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP
for Primary Copper Smelters (Renewal)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency has submitted an information
collection request (ICR), ‘‘NESHAP for
Primary Copper Smelters (40 CFR part
63, subpart QQQ) (Renewal)’’ (EPA ICR
No. 1850.07, OMB Control No. 2060–
0476) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
This is a proposed extension of the ICR,
which is currently approved through
February 28, 2015. Public comments
were previously requested via the
Federal Register (79 FR 30117) on May
27, 2014, during a 60-day comment
period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments.
A fuller description of the ICR is given
below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An Agency may
not conduct or sponsor and a person is
not required to respond to a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before March 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID Number EPA–
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Feb 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
HQ–OECA–2014–0067, to (1) EPA
online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to
docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via
email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Yellin, Monitoring, Assistance,
and Media Programs Division, Office of
Compliance, Mail Code 2227A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564–2970; fax number: (202) 564–0050;
email address: yellin.patrick@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents, which explain
in detail the information that the EPA
will be collecting, are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket
can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
EPA Docket Center, EPA William
Jefferson Clinton West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The telephone number
for the Docket Center is 202–566–1744.
For additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
Abstract: Owners and operators of a
primary copper smelter are subject to
the regulation only if it is a major source
of hazardous air pollutant (HAP)
emitting or has the potential to emit any
single HAP at the rate of 10 tons or more
per year or any combination of HAP at
a rate of 25 tons or more per year. New
facilities include those that commenced
construction or reconstruction after the
date of proposal. This information is
being collected to assure compliance
with 40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQ.
These notifications, reports, and records
are essential in determining compliance,
and are required of all affected facilities
subject to NESHAP.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities:
Owners and operators of primary copper
smelter.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (40 CFR part 63, Subpart
QQQ).
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8643
Estimated number of respondents: 3
(total).
Frequency of response: Initially,
occasionally, quarterly, and
semiannually.
Total estimated burden: 9,380 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost: $926,544 (per
year), includes $8,220 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance
costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is an
increase of 543 hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared
with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This change in hours is due to the
removal of burden for submitting initial
notifications, which is not required for
existing sources and the addition of
managerial and clerical staff that are
now involved in recordkeeping
activities.
Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies
Division.
[FR Doc. 2015–03297 Filed 2–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9922–97–OSWER]
The Hazardous Waste Electronic
Manifest System Advisory Board:
Request for Nominations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Request for nominations.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) invites
nominations of qualified candidates to
be considered for a three-year
appointment to the Hazardous Waste
Electronic Manifest System Advisory
Board (the Board). Pursuant to the
Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest
Establishment Act (e-Manifest Act), the
EPA is establishing the nine member
Advisory Board to provide practical and
independent advice, consultation, and
recommendations to the EPA
Administrator on the activities,
functions, policies and regulations
associated with the Hazardous Waste
Electronic Manifest (e-Manifest) System.
The EPA Administrator or designee will
serve as chair of the Board. This notice
solicits nominations to fill the
remaining eight positions of the Board,
which will be active upon
establishment. The Board is considered
established once a Board Charter is filed
with Congress, which is anticipated no
later than October 5, 2015.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM
18FEN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8644
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Notices
To maintain the representation
required by statute, nominees will be
selected to represent: state agencies
overseeing the intrastate and/or
interstate cradle-to-grave tracking of
hazardous waste from the original
generation to its ultimate disposal (three
positions); stakeholders from the
hazardous waste management and
transportation sectors who are affected
by state and federal hazardous waste
manifest programs (three positions); and
the information technology sector (two
positions).
DATES: Nominations should be received
on or before March 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Nominations should be
submitted via email to eManifest@
epa.gov, and identified with ‘‘BOARD
NOMINATION’’ in the subject line of
the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Raia, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery, (MC:
5303P), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC, 20460, Phone:
703–308–8577; or by email:
raia.anthony@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The eManifest Act was signed into law on
October 5, 2012 (https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s710enr/pdf/BILLS112s710enr.pdf). Under the terms of the
e-Manifest Act, the EPA is required to
establish a national electronic
Information Technology (IT) manifest
system. This system is to enable users
of the uniform hazardous waste
manifest forms (EPA Form 8700–22 and
Continuation Sheet 8700–22A) to have
the option to more efficiently track their
hazardous waste shipments
electronically, in lieu of the paper
manifest, from the point of generation,
during transportation, and to the point
of receipt by an off-site facility that is
permitted to treat, store, recycle, or
dispose of the hazardous waste.
Electronic manifests obtained from the
national system will augment or replace
the paper forms that are currently used
for this purpose, and which result in
substantial paperwork costs and other
inefficiencies. Congress intended that
the EPA develop a system that, among
other things, meets the needs of the user
community and decreases the
administrative burden associated with
the current paper-based manifest system
on the user community. The agency
anticipates that utilizing electronic
manifests will reduce burden by
reporting facilities by 300,000 to
700,000 hours annually, and will save
approximately $75 million dollars. To
ensure that these goals are met, the Act
directs the EPA to establish the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Feb 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest
System Advisory Board (the Board) by
October 5, 2015 to assess the
effectiveness of the electronic manifest
system and make recommendations to
the EPA Administrator for improving
the system.
In addition, the e-Manifest Act directs
the EPA to develop a system that
attracts sufficient user participation and
service revenues to ensure the viability
of the system. As a result, the Act
provides the EPA broad discretion to
establish reasonable user fees, as the
Administrator determines are necessary,
to pay costs incurred in developing,
operating, maintaining, and upgrading
the system, including any costs incurred
in collecting and processing data from
any paper manifest submitted to the
system after the date on which the
system enters operation. The Board will
also meet to assess the adequacy and
reasonableness of the service fees and,
if necessary, make recommendations to
the EPA Administrator to adjust the fees
accordingly.
Prior to system deployment the Board
will be asked to provide
recommendations on important system
development matters, as well as on user
fee regulatory proposals under
consideration. Substantial system
development planning work is under
completion and the agency is currently
conducting additional system
development procurement activities.
Upon completion of those activities the
agency will launch into extensive
system design, development, and
testing, and anticipates the initial
system deployment to occur no later
than spring 2018.
The system will provide the
functionality of the current paper
manifest process, in a more efficient,
electronic workflow, and will meet all
requirements specified in the e-Manifest
Act and e-Manifest Final Rule, which
was published on February 7, 2014
(https://www.epa.gov/osw/laws-regs/
state/revision/frs/fr231.pdf). The initial
system is envisioned to be a national,
electronic system (internet-based) that
will enable current users of the manifest
form to sign, transmit, archive, and
retrieve manifests electronically. The eManifest system is further envisioned to
allow a fully electronic mobile
workflow. The mobile workflow will
provide both on-line and off-line
capabilities which could enable users to
complete an electronic manifest even
when internet access is unavailable. The
EPA envisions that the system will
provide all data processing (paper and
electronic formats), data storage, and
data reporting back out to industry and
state users, as well as appropriate public
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accessibility of data. Finally, e-Manifest
aligns with the agency’s E-Enterprise
business strategy. E-Enterprise for the
Environment is a transformative 21st
century strategy—jointly governed by
states and EPA—for modernizing
government agencies’ delivery of
environmental protection. Under this
strategy, the agency will streamline its
business processes and systems to
reduce reporting burden on states and
regulated facilities, and improve the
effectiveness and efficiency of
regulatory programs for the EPA, states
and tribes.
Although the system has not been
completed, the Board is established in
accordance with the provisions of the
Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest
Establishment Act, 42 U.S.C. 6939(g),
and the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2. The Board
is in the public interest and supports the
EPA in performing its duties and
responsibilities. Pursuant to the eManifest Act, the Board will be
comprised of nine members, of which
one (1) member is the Administrator (or
a designee), who will serve as
Chairperson of the Board, and eight (8)
members will be individuals appointed
by the EPA Administrator:
—At least two (2) of whom have
expertise in information technology;
(IT);
—At least three (3) of whom have
experience in using, or represent users
of, the manifest system to track the
transportation of hazardous waste under
federal and state manifest programs; and
—At least three (3) state
representatives responsible for
processing those manifests.
The Board will meet at least annually
as required by the e-Manifest Act.
However, additional meetings by
teleconference may occur approximately
once every six (6) months or as needed
and approved by the Designated Federal
Officer (DFO).
Member Nominations: Pursuant to the
e-Manifest Act, the Board will assist the
agency in evaluating the effectiveness of
the e-Manifest IT system and associated
user fees; identifying key issues
associated with the system, including
the need (and timing) for user fee
adjustments; system enhancements; and
providing independent advice on
matters and policies related to the eManifest program. The e-Manifest Board
will provide recommendations on
matters related to the operational
activities, functions, policies, and
regulations of the EPA under the eManifest Act, including proposing
actions to encourage the use of the
electronic (paperless) system, and
actions related to the E-Enterprise
E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM
18FEN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Notices
strategy that intersect with e-Manifest.
These intersections may include issues
such as business to business
communications, performance
standards for mobile devices, and Cross
Media Electronic Reporting Rule
(CROMERR) compliant e-signatures.
Any interested person and/or
organization may nominate qualified
individuals for membership. The EPA
values and welcomes diversity. In an
effort to obtain nominations of diverse
candidates, the agency encourages
nominations of women and men of all
racial and ethnic groups. All
nominations will be considered.
However, applicants need to be aware of
the specific representation required by
the e-Manifest Act.
Further, state and industry nominees
should have a comprehensive
knowledge of hazardous waste
generation, transportation, treatment,
storage, and disposal under RCRA
Subtitle C at the federal, state, and local
levels. Nominees who represent the
states, should have comprehensive
knowledge of state programs that
currently collect manifests from
generators and treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities (TSDFs), and track
manifest data in state tracking systems/
databases. Nominees who represent
industry should have strong knowledge
of existing industry systems/devices/
approaches and business operations in
order to provide valuable input on eManifest integration into current
industry data systems. IT nominees
should have core competencies and
experience in large scale systems and
application development and
integration, deployment and
maintenance, user help desk and
support, and expertise relevant to
support the complexity of an e-Manifest
system. Examples of this expertise may
include but are not limited to: Expertise
with web-based and mobile
technologies, particularly that support
large scale operations for geographically
diverse users; expertise in IT security,
including perspective on federal IT
security requirements; expertise in
electronic signature and user
management approaches; expertise with
scalable hosting solutions such as
cloud-based hosting; and expertise in
user experience. Existing knowledge of,
or willingness to gain an understanding
of EPA shared services and enterprise
architecture is a plus. Another plus for
any nominee is experience in setting
and/or managing fee based systems in
general. Additional criteria used to
evaluate nominees will include:
• Excellent interpersonal, oral and
written communication skills;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Feb 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
• Demonstrated experience
developing group recommendations;
• Willingness to commit time to the
Board and demonstrated ability to work
constructively on committees;
• Absence of financial conflicts of
interest;
• Impartiality (including the
appearance of impartiality); and
• Background and experiences that
would help members contribute to the
diversity of perspectives on the Board,
e.g., geographic, economic, social,
cultural, educational backgrounds,
professional affiliations and other
considerations.
Nominations must include a resume,
which provides the nominee’s
background, experience and educational
qualifications, as well as a brief
statement (one page or less) describing
the nominee’s interest in serving on the
Board and addressing the other criteria
previously described. Nominees are
encouraged to provide any additional
information that they feel would be
useful for consideration, such as:
Availability to participate as a member
of the Board; how the nominee’s
background, skills and experience
would contribute to the diversity of the
Board; and any concerns the nominee
has regarding membership. Nominees
should be identified by name,
occupation, position, current business
address, email, and telephone number.
Interested candidates may selfnominate. The agency will acknowledge
receipt of nominations.
Persons selected for membership will
receive compensation for travel and a
nominal daily compensation (if
appropriate) while attending meetings.
Additionally, selected candidates will
be designated as Special Government
Employees (SGEs) or consultants.
Candidates designated as SGEs will be
required to fill out the ‘‘Confidential
Financial Disclosure Form for
Environmental Protection Agency
Special Government Employees’’ (EPA
Form 3310–48). This confidential form
provides information to the EPA ethics
officials to determine whether there is a
conflict between the SGE’s public duties
and their private interests, including an
appearance of a loss of impartiality as
defined by federal laws and regulations.
One example of a potential conflict of
interest may be for IT professional(s)
serving in an organization which is
awarded any related e-Manifest system
development contract(s).
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8645
Dated: February 6, 2015.
Barnes Johnson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and
Recovery, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2015–03300 Filed 2–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–0687]
Information Collection Being
Submitted for Review and Approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burdens, and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), the Federal Communication
Commission (FCC or Commission)
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collections.
Comments are requested concerning:
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before March 20, 2015.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contacts below as soon as
possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB, via email
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM
18FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8643-8645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03300]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9922-97-OSWER]
The Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System Advisory Board:
Request for Nominations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Request for nominations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) invites
nominations of qualified candidates to be considered for a three-year
appointment to the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System Advisory
Board (the Board). Pursuant to the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest
Establishment Act (e-Manifest Act), the EPA is establishing the nine
member Advisory Board to provide practical and independent advice,
consultation, and recommendations to the EPA Administrator on the
activities, functions, policies and regulations associated with the
Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest (e-Manifest) System. The EPA
Administrator or designee will serve as chair of the Board. This notice
solicits nominations to fill the remaining eight positions of the
Board, which will be active upon establishment. The Board is considered
established once a Board Charter is filed with Congress, which is
anticipated no later than October 5, 2015.
[[Page 8644]]
To maintain the representation required by statute, nominees will
be selected to represent: state agencies overseeing the intrastate and/
or interstate cradle-to-grave tracking of hazardous waste from the
original generation to its ultimate disposal (three positions);
stakeholders from the hazardous waste management and transportation
sectors who are affected by state and federal hazardous waste manifest
programs (three positions); and the information technology sector (two
positions).
DATES: Nominations should be received on or before March 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Nominations should be submitted via email to
eManifest@epa.gov, and identified with ``BOARD NOMINATION'' in the
subject line of the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Raia, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, (MC:
5303P), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20460, Phone:
703-308-8577; or by email: raia.anthony@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The e-Manifest Act was signed into law on
October 5, 2012 (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s710enr/pdf/BILLS-112s710enr.pdf). Under the terms of the e-Manifest Act, the EPA
is required to establish a national electronic Information Technology
(IT) manifest system. This system is to enable users of the uniform
hazardous waste manifest forms (EPA Form 8700-22 and Continuation Sheet
8700-22A) to have the option to more efficiently track their hazardous
waste shipments electronically, in lieu of the paper manifest, from the
point of generation, during transportation, and to the point of receipt
by an off-site facility that is permitted to treat, store, recycle, or
dispose of the hazardous waste. Electronic manifests obtained from the
national system will augment or replace the paper forms that are
currently used for this purpose, and which result in substantial
paperwork costs and other inefficiencies. Congress intended that the
EPA develop a system that, among other things, meets the needs of the
user community and decreases the administrative burden associated with
the current paper-based manifest system on the user community. The
agency anticipates that utilizing electronic manifests will reduce
burden by reporting facilities by 300,000 to 700,000 hours annually,
and will save approximately $75 million dollars. To ensure that these
goals are met, the Act directs the EPA to establish the Hazardous Waste
Electronic Manifest System Advisory Board (the Board) by October 5,
2015 to assess the effectiveness of the electronic manifest system and
make recommendations to the EPA Administrator for improving the system.
In addition, the e-Manifest Act directs the EPA to develop a system
that attracts sufficient user participation and service revenues to
ensure the viability of the system. As a result, the Act provides the
EPA broad discretion to establish reasonable user fees, as the
Administrator determines are necessary, to pay costs incurred in
developing, operating, maintaining, and upgrading the system, including
any costs incurred in collecting and processing data from any paper
manifest submitted to the system after the date on which the system
enters operation. The Board will also meet to assess the adequacy and
reasonableness of the service fees and, if necessary, make
recommendations to the EPA Administrator to adjust the fees
accordingly.
Prior to system deployment the Board will be asked to provide
recommendations on important system development matters, as well as on
user fee regulatory proposals under consideration. Substantial system
development planning work is under completion and the agency is
currently conducting additional system development procurement
activities. Upon completion of those activities the agency will launch
into extensive system design, development, and testing, and anticipates
the initial system deployment to occur no later than spring 2018.
The system will provide the functionality of the current paper
manifest process, in a more efficient, electronic workflow, and will
meet all requirements specified in the e-Manifest Act and e-Manifest
Final Rule, which was published on February 7, 2014 (https://www.epa.gov/osw/laws-regs/state/revision/frs/fr231.pdf). The initial
system is envisioned to be a national, electronic system (internet-
based) that will enable current users of the manifest form to sign,
transmit, archive, and retrieve manifests electronically. The e-
Manifest system is further envisioned to allow a fully electronic
mobile workflow. The mobile workflow will provide both on-line and off-
line capabilities which could enable users to complete an electronic
manifest even when internet access is unavailable. The EPA envisions
that the system will provide all data processing (paper and electronic
formats), data storage, and data reporting back out to industry and
state users, as well as appropriate public accessibility of data.
Finally, e-Manifest aligns with the agency's E-Enterprise business
strategy. E-Enterprise for the Environment is a transformative 21st
century strategy--jointly governed by states and EPA--for modernizing
government agencies' delivery of environmental protection. Under this
strategy, the agency will streamline its business processes and systems
to reduce reporting burden on states and regulated facilities, and
improve the effectiveness and efficiency of regulatory programs for the
EPA, states and tribes.
Although the system has not been completed, the Board is
established in accordance with the provisions of the Hazardous Waste
Electronic Manifest Establishment Act, 42 U.S.C. 6939(g), and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2. The Board is in
the public interest and supports the EPA in performing its duties and
responsibilities. Pursuant to the e-Manifest Act, the Board will be
comprised of nine members, of which one (1) member is the Administrator
(or a designee), who will serve as Chairperson of the Board, and eight
(8) members will be individuals appointed by the EPA Administrator:
--At least two (2) of whom have expertise in information
technology; (IT);
--At least three (3) of whom have experience in using, or represent
users of, the manifest system to track the transportation of hazardous
waste under federal and state manifest programs; and
--At least three (3) state representatives responsible for
processing those manifests.
The Board will meet at least annually as required by the e-Manifest
Act. However, additional meetings by teleconference may occur
approximately once every six (6) months or as needed and approved by
the Designated Federal Officer (DFO).
Member Nominations: Pursuant to the e-Manifest Act, the Board will
assist the agency in evaluating the effectiveness of the e-Manifest IT
system and associated user fees; identifying key issues associated with
the system, including the need (and timing) for user fee adjustments;
system enhancements; and providing independent advice on matters and
policies related to the e-Manifest program. The e-Manifest Board will
provide recommendations on matters related to the operational
activities, functions, policies, and regulations of the EPA under the
e-Manifest Act, including proposing actions to encourage the use of the
electronic (paperless) system, and actions related to the E-Enterprise
[[Page 8645]]
strategy that intersect with e-Manifest. These intersections may
include issues such as business to business communications, performance
standards for mobile devices, and Cross Media Electronic Reporting Rule
(CROMERR) compliant e-signatures.
Any interested person and/or organization may nominate qualified
individuals for membership. The EPA values and welcomes diversity. In
an effort to obtain nominations of diverse candidates, the agency
encourages nominations of women and men of all racial and ethnic
groups. All nominations will be considered. However, applicants need to
be aware of the specific representation required by the e-Manifest Act.
Further, state and industry nominees should have a comprehensive
knowledge of hazardous waste generation, transportation, treatment,
storage, and disposal under RCRA Subtitle C at the federal, state, and
local levels. Nominees who represent the states, should have
comprehensive knowledge of state programs that currently collect
manifests from generators and treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDFs), and track manifest data in state tracking systems/
databases. Nominees who represent industry should have strong knowledge
of existing industry systems/devices/approaches and business operations
in order to provide valuable input on e-Manifest integration into
current industry data systems. IT nominees should have core
competencies and experience in large scale systems and application
development and integration, deployment and maintenance, user help desk
and support, and expertise relevant to support the complexity of an e-
Manifest system. Examples of this expertise may include but are not
limited to: Expertise with web-based and mobile technologies,
particularly that support large scale operations for geographically
diverse users; expertise in IT security, including perspective on
federal IT security requirements; expertise in electronic signature and
user management approaches; expertise with scalable hosting solutions
such as cloud-based hosting; and expertise in user experience. Existing
knowledge of, or willingness to gain an understanding of EPA shared
services and enterprise architecture is a plus. Another plus for any
nominee is experience in setting and/or managing fee based systems in
general. Additional criteria used to evaluate nominees will include:
Excellent interpersonal, oral and written communication
skills;
Demonstrated experience developing group recommendations;
Willingness to commit time to the Board and demonstrated
ability to work constructively on committees;
Absence of financial conflicts of interest;
Impartiality (including the appearance of impartiality);
and
Background and experiences that would help members
contribute to the diversity of perspectives on the Board, e.g.,
geographic, economic, social, cultural, educational backgrounds,
professional affiliations and other considerations.
Nominations must include a resume, which provides the nominee's
background, experience and educational qualifications, as well as a
brief statement (one page or less) describing the nominee's interest in
serving on the Board and addressing the other criteria previously
described. Nominees are encouraged to provide any additional
information that they feel would be useful for consideration, such as:
Availability to participate as a member of the Board; how the nominee's
background, skills and experience would contribute to the diversity of
the Board; and any concerns the nominee has regarding membership.
Nominees should be identified by name, occupation, position, current
business address, email, and telephone number. Interested candidates
may self-nominate. The agency will acknowledge receipt of nominations.
Persons selected for membership will receive compensation for
travel and a nominal daily compensation (if appropriate) while
attending meetings. Additionally, selected candidates will be
designated as Special Government Employees (SGEs) or consultants.
Candidates designated as SGEs will be required to fill out the
``Confidential Financial Disclosure Form for Environmental Protection
Agency Special Government Employees'' (EPA Form 3310-48). This
confidential form provides information to the EPA ethics officials to
determine whether there is a conflict between the SGE's public duties
and their private interests, including an appearance of a loss of
impartiality as defined by federal laws and regulations. One example of
a potential conflict of interest may be for IT professional(s) serving
in an organization which is awarded any related e-Manifest system
development contract(s).
Dated: February 6, 2015.
Barnes Johnson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2015-03300 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P