Safety Zone; Triathlon National Championships, Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 7968-7970 [2015-03074]
Download as PDF
7968
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
3. In appendix C to part 4022, Rate Set
257, as set forth below, is added to the
table.
■
Appendix C to Part 4022—Lump Sum
Interest Rates for Private-Sector
Payments
*
For plans with a valuation
date
*
*
*
On or after
Rate set
*
257 ................................
Before
*
4–1–15
Deferred annuities
(percent)
Immediate
annuity rate
(percent)
*
3–1–15
*
0.50
Issued in Washington, DC, on this 6th day
of February 2015.
Judith Starr,
General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
i1
i2
i3
4.00
*
4.00
4.00
*
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0751]
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, contact
MST1 Joseph McCollum, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747–
7148 or by email at
Joseph.P.McCollum@USCG.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 1625–AA00
Table of Acronyms
Safety Zone; Triathlon National
Championships, Milwaukee Harbor,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
[FR Doc. 2015–03050 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
A. Regulatory History and Information
ACTION:
On December 30, 2014, The Coast
Guard published an NPRM entitled
Safety Zone; Triathlon National
Championships, Milwaukee Harbor,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin in the Federal
Register (79 FR 78369). We did not
receive any comments in response to the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested and none was held.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone within
Milwaukee Harbor in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of
Milwaukee Harbor due to the 2015
Olympic and Sprint Distance National
Championships. This safety zone is
necessary to protect the surrounding
public and vessels from the hazards
associated with the 2015 Olympic and
Sprint Distance National
Championships.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective from
August 1, 2015, until August 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2014–0751. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
11:18 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 160.5; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
In 2014, the Coast Guard was
informed that the Olympic and Sprint
Distance National Championships are
scheduled to return to Milwaukee
Harbor in 2015. Within and around
Milwaukee Harbor at Lakeshore inlet,
this event is expected to involve
thousands of participants competing in
a swim race surrounded by thousands of
spectators. The swim portion of this
event is anticipated to occur on three
days during the second week of August,
2015. The Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan has determined that the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
n1
*
n2
*
7
8
likelihood of transiting watercraft
during the swim competition involving
a large number of competitors presents
a significant risk of serious injuries or
fatalities.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
The Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan has determined that a safety
zone is necessary to mitigate the
aforementioned safety risks. Thus, this
rule establishes a safety zone that
encompasses all waters of Milwaukee
Harbor, including Lakeshore inlet and
the Marina at Pier Wisconsin, west of an
imaginary line across the entrance to the
Marina at Pier Wisconsin connecting
coordinates 43°02.253′ N., 087°53.623′
W. and 43°01.737′ N., 087°53.727′ W.
(NAD 83).
This rule will be effective from
August 1, 2015, until August 30, 2015.
Additionally, the Coast Guard
anticipates that this safety zone will be
enforced from 10:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m.
on August 7; from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30
p.m. on August 8, and from 6:30 a.m.
until 11:30 a.m. on August 9, 2015. This
2015 enforcement schedule may change,
and in the event of a change, the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will
issue a Notice of Enforcement with an
updated enforcement schedule.
The Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan will notify the public that the
zone in this rule is or will be enforced
by all appropriate means to the affected
segments of the public including
publication in the Federal Register as
practicable, in accordance with 33 CFR
165.7(a). Such means of notification
may also include, but are not limited to
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local
Notice to Mariners.
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan or her designated
on-scene representative. The Captain of
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not
a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. Overall, we
expect the economic impact of this rule
to be minimal and that a full Regulatory
Evaluation is unnecessary.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601–612, we have considered
whether this rule would have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor
within the waters of the marina at Pier
Wisconsin or Lakeshore inlet during the
times in which the safety zone is
enforced in August of 2015.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will be
enforced for a limited time during the
month of August; further, this safety
zone has been designed to allow traffic
to pass safely around the zone whenever
possible, and vessels will be allowed to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
11:18 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
pass through the zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process. If
this rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section, above. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7969
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and thus,
is categorically excluded under
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
7970
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0751 to read as
follows:
■
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan to act on her behalf. The
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or her designated on-scene
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or her on-scene
representative.
Dated: January 30, 2014.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2015–03074 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am]
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T09–0751 Safety Zone; Triathlon
National Championships, Milwaukee
Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of Milwaukee
Harbor, including Lakeshore inlet and
the marina at Pier Wisconsin, west of an
imaginary line across the entrance to the
Marina at Pier Wisconsin connecting
coordinates 43°02.253′ N, 087°53.623′ W
and 43°01.737′ N, 087°53.727′ W (NAD
83).
(b) Effective period. This safety zone
is effective from August 1, 2015, until
August 30, 2015. The Coast Guard
anticipates that this safety zone will be
enforced from 10:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m.
on August 7; from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30
p.m. on August 8, and from 6:30 a.m.
until 11:30 a.m. on August 9, 2015. This
2015 enforcement schedule may change,
and in the event of a change, the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will
issue a Notice of Enforcement with an
updated enforcement schedule.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring in this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic except as permitted by the
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:42 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0690; FRL–9921–31–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia’s Redesignation Request and
Associated Maintenance Plan of the
West Virginia Portion of the
Martinsburg-Hagerstown, WV-MD
Nonattainment Area for the 1997
Annual Fine Particulate Matter
Standard; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendments.
published in the Federal Register on
Tuesday, November 25, 2014 (79 FR
70099).
This document is effective on
February 13, 2015.
DATES:
Rose
Quinto, (215) 814–2182 or by email at
quinto.rose@.epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On
November 25, 2014 (79 FR 70099), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published a final rulemaking action
announcing the approval of West
Virginia’s request to redesignate to
attainment the Martinsburg-Hagerstown,
WV-MD nonattainment area for the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Need for Correction
As published, the final redesignation
contains an error. EPA inadvertently
added the word ‘‘Moderate’’ in the table
for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The
intent of the final rule was to
redesignate the Area to attainment.
Moderate is a classification for
nonattainment areas. This action
corrects the table of 40 CFR part 81 for
West Virginia’s 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Air pollution, National Parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: January 28, 2015.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
III.
Accordingly, 40 CFR part 81 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
AGENCY:
This document corrects an
error in the rule language of a final rule
pertaining to West Virginia’s request to
redesignate to attainment the West
Virginia portion of the MartinsburgHagerstown, WV-MD nonattainment
area for the 1997 annual fine particulate
matter (PM2.5) national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS), which was
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 81.349 is amended by
revising the entry for ‘‘Martinsburg, WVHagerstown, MD: Berkeley County’’ at
the end of the table titled ‘‘West
Virginia—1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS’’
to read as follows:
■
§ 81.349
*
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
*
West Virginia.
*
13FER1
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7968-7970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03074]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0751]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Triathlon National Championships, Milwaukee Harbor,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone within Milwaukee
Harbor in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of Milwaukee Harbor due to the 2015 Olympic and
Sprint Distance National Championships. This safety zone is necessary
to protect the surrounding public and vessels from the hazards
associated with the 2015 Olympic and Sprint Distance National
Championships.
DATES: This final rule is effective from August 1, 2015, until August
30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-0751. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
contact MST1 Joseph McCollum, Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747-7148 or by email at
Joseph.P.McCollum@USCG.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Regulatory History and Information
On December 30, 2014, The Coast Guard published an NPRM entitled
Safety Zone; Triathlon National Championships, Milwaukee Harbor,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin in the Federal Register (79 FR 78369). We did not
receive any comments in response to the proposed rule. No public
meeting was requested and none was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
In 2014, the Coast Guard was informed that the Olympic and Sprint
Distance National Championships are scheduled to return to Milwaukee
Harbor in 2015. Within and around Milwaukee Harbor at Lakeshore inlet,
this event is expected to involve thousands of participants competing
in a swim race surrounded by thousands of spectators. The swim portion
of this event is anticipated to occur on three days during the second
week of August, 2015. The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan has
determined that the likelihood of transiting watercraft during the swim
competition involving a large number of competitors presents a
significant risk of serious injuries or fatalities.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan has determined that a safety
zone is necessary to mitigate the aforementioned safety risks. Thus,
this rule establishes a safety zone that encompasses all waters of
Milwaukee Harbor, including Lakeshore inlet and the Marina at Pier
Wisconsin, west of an imaginary line across the entrance to the Marina
at Pier Wisconsin connecting coordinates 43[deg]02.253' N.,
087[deg]53.623' W. and 43[deg]01.737' N., 087[deg]53.727' W. (NAD 83).
This rule will be effective from August 1, 2015, until August 30,
2015. Additionally, the Coast Guard anticipates that this safety zone
will be enforced from 10:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. on August 7; from 6:30
a.m. until 4:30 p.m. on August 8, and from 6:30 a.m. until 11:30 a.m.
on August 9, 2015. This 2015 enforcement schedule may change, and in
the event of a change, the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will issue
a Notice of Enforcement with an updated enforcement schedule.
The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will notify the public that
the zone in this rule is or will be enforced by all appropriate means
to the affected segments of the public including publication in the
Federal Register as practicable, in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7(a).
Such means of notification may also include, but are not limited to
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners.
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her designated on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or her designated on-scene representative. The Captain of
[[Page 7969]]
the Port Lake Michigan or her designated on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will
not raise any novel legal or policy issues. Overall, we expect the
economic impact of this rule to be minimal and that a full Regulatory
Evaluation is unnecessary.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, we have
considered whether this rule would have significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor within the waters of the marina at Pier Wisconsin or
Lakeshore inlet during the times in which the safety zone is enforced
in August of 2015.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will be enforced for a limited time during the month of August;
further, this safety zone has been designed to allow traffic to pass
safely around the zone whenever possible, and vessels will be allowed
to pass through the zone with the permission of the Captain of the
Port.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If this
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the For Further
Information Contact section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and
thus, is categorically excluded under paragraph (34)(g) of the
Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist
[[Page 7970]]
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0751 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0751 Safety Zone; Triathlon National Championships,
Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
(a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of
Milwaukee Harbor, including Lakeshore inlet and the marina at Pier
Wisconsin, west of an imaginary line across the entrance to the Marina
at Pier Wisconsin connecting coordinates 43[deg]02.253' N,
087[deg]53.623' W and 43[deg]01.737' N, 087[deg]53.727' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This safety zone is effective from August 1,
2015, until August 30, 2015. The Coast Guard anticipates that this
safety zone will be enforced from 10:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. on August
7; from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. on August 8, and from 6:30 a.m. until
11:30 a.m. on August 9, 2015. This 2015 enforcement schedule may
change, and in the event of a change, the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan will issue a Notice of Enforcement with an updated enforcement
schedule.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring in this
safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or her designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic except as
permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her designated
on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on
her behalf. The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her designated on-
scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative to obtain permission to do so.
Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan or her on-scene representative.
Dated: January 30, 2014.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2015-03074 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P