Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 7986-7989 [2015-02537]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Thomas J. Curry,
Comptroller of the Currency.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, February 6, 2015.
Robert DeV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
Dated: January 21, 2015.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–02998 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am]
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P; 6510–01–P; 6714–01–C
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0085; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–078–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A330–243, A330–243F,
A330–341, A330–342, and A330–343
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports indicating that
certain hinge sleeves on the cowl doors
of the thrust reverser units (TRUs) were
not heat treated. This proposed AD
would require replacing the sleeves of
certain hinges on the cowl doors of the
TRUs with new parts. We are proposing
this AD to prevent, in the event of a fanblade-off event due to high vibration, inflight loss of TRU heavy components,
which might damage airplane structure
or control surfaces, and consequent
reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 30, 2015.
SUMMARY:
12 On Dec. 18, 2014, the OCC issued an interim
final rule with request for comment (IFR) amending
12 CFR 5.47. 79 FR 75417. The effective date of the
IFR was Jan. 1, 2015. In an effort to provide the
fullest opportunity for public comment, the OCC
invites comment on the IFR through both the
process outlined in the IFR and the EGRPRA
Review Process outlined above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Aviation Administration
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
EP13FE15.002
7986
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0085; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1138;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–0085; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–078–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2014–0062, dated March 11,
2014 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for all Airbus
Model A330–243, A330–243F, A330–
341, A330–342, and A330–343
airplanes. The MCAI states:
A manufacturing discrepancy (lack of heat
treatment) on a batch of the N°3 and N°4
hinge sleeves installed on [a] Thrust Reverser
Unit (TRU) was identified. Those parts are
only installed on A330 aeroplanes equipped
with Rolls-Royce (RR) Trent 700 engines.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
This condition, if not corrected, in case of
a Fan Blade Off event due to high vibration
level, could cause in-flight loss of some
heavy components of the TRU, possibly
resulting in injury to persons on the ground
[or damage to airplane structure or control
surfaces, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane].
As current hinge sleeves are not serialized,
it is not possible to identify the TRU hinge
sleeves which did not receive the heat
treatment. The part supplier has developed
an identification procedure for these TRU
hinge sleeves in order to identify the affected
hinge sleeves, and to allow a better part
traceability in the future.
For the reason described above, this
[EASA] AD requires identification and
replacement of the affected TRU hinge
sleeves.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0085.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A330–78–3021, Revision 03, dated
October 15, 2014. Aircelle has issued
Service Bulletin 78–AG924, dated
September 26, 2012. This service
information describes procedures for
modifying and marking the sleeves for
hinges number 3 and number 4 on the
cowl doors of Rolls-Royce Trent 700
engines. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI. This service information is
reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for
ways to access this service information.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Explanation of ‘‘RC’’ Procedures and
Tests in Service Information
The FAA worked in conjunction with
industry, under the Airworthiness
Directives Implementation Aviation
Rulemaking Committee (AD ARC), to
enhance the AD system. One
enhancement was a new process for
annotating which procedures and tests
in the service information are required
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7987
for compliance with an AD.
Differentiating these procedures and
tests from other tasks in the service
information is expected to improve an
owner’s/operator’s understanding of
crucial AD requirements and help
provide consistent judgment in AD
compliance. The actions specified in
Airbus Service Bulletin A330–78–3021,
Revision 03, dated October 15, 2014,
include procedures and tests that are
identified as RC (required for
compliance) because these procedures
have a direct effect on detecting,
preventing, resolving, or eliminating an
identified unsafe condition.
As specified in a NOTE under the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–78–3021,
Revision 03, dated October 15, 2014,
procedures and tests identified as RC
must be done to comply with the
proposed AD. However, procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may
be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the
operators’ maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of
an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC), provided the procedures and
tests identified as RC can be done and
the airplane can be put back in a
serviceable condition. Any substitutions
or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC will require approval of
an AMOC.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 24 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 29 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $0 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $59,160, or $2,465 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on action would take
up to 1 work-hour and require parts
costing $0, for a cost of $85 per product.
We have no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need this
action.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
7988
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2015–0085;
Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–078–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 30,
2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A330–
243, A330–243F, A330–341, A330–342, and
A330–343 airplanes, certificated in any
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 78, Exhaust.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports
indicating that certain hinge sleeves on the
cowl doors of the thrust reverser units were
not heat treated. We are issuing this AD to
prevent, in the event of a fan-blade-off event
due to high vibration, in-flight loss of thrust
reverser unit (TRU) heavy components,
which might damage airplane structure or
control surfaces, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Identification of TRU Part Number
Within 12 months after the effective date
of this AD: Identify the part number of the
TRUs, in accordance with Aircelle Service
Bulletin 78–AG924, dated September 26,
2012.
(h) Replacement of Thrust Reverser Unit
Hinge Sleeves
If the results of the part identification
required by paragraph (g) of this AD reveal
that the TRUs are affected: Within the
compliance time defined in paragraph (g) of
this AD, replace hinge sleeves numbers 3 and
4 of each TRU cowl door, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–78–3021, Revision 03,
dated October 15, 2014.
Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD: RollsRoyce Alert Service Bulletin RB.211–78–
AG924, dated September 26, 2012, is an
additional source of guidance for replacing
the TRUs.
(i) Optional Terminating Action for
Paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD
Modifying an airplane by incorporating
Airbus Modification 202463 in production
terminates the requirements specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD for that
airplane.
(j) Parts Installation Limitations
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a TRU on any airplane
unless it has been determined, using Aircelle
Service Bulletin 78–AG924, dated September
26, 2012, that the cowl door hinge sleeves
installed on the TRU are not affected by the
requirements of this AD.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the service
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information identified in paragraphs (j)(1),
(j)(2), or (j)(3) of this AD, which are not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–78–3021,
dated October 17, 2012.
(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–78–3021,
Revision 01, dated July 30, 2013.
(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–78–3021,
Revision 02, dated April 17, 2014.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227 1138; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9–ANM–116–
AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Required for Compliance (RC): Where
Airbus Service Bulletin A330–78–3021,
Revision 03, dated October 15, 2014, contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC,
those procedures and tests must be done to
comply with this AD; any procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in accordance
with the operators’ maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the
procedures and tests identified as RC can be
done and the airplane can be put back in a
serviceable condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(3) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0062, dated
March 11, 2014, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2015–0085.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
30, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–02537 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0083; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–131–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330–200, A330–200
Freighter, and A330–300 series
airplanes; and all A340–200 and A340–
300 series airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by reports that a bracket
that attaches the cockpit instrument
panel to the airplane structure, does not
sustain the fatigue loads of the design
service goal. This proposed AD would
require repetitive inspections of that
bracket for cracking and to determine if
both lugs are fully broken, an inspection
for cracking of an adjacent bracket, if
necessary, and corrective actions if
necessary. This AD would also provide
an optional modification, which would
terminate the repetitive inspections. We
are proposing this AD to detect and
correct cracking on a bracket of the
cockpit instrument panel, which,
combined with failure of the horizontal
beam, could lead to collapse of the
cockpit panel, and reduced
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0083; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1138;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–0083; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–131–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7989
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2014–0127, dated May 15,
2014 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for certain Airbus
Model A330–200, A330–200 Freighter,
and A330–300 series airplanes; and all
A340–200, and A340–300 series
airplanes. The MCAI states:
During flight tests, high stress levels have
been measured on the bracket No 6 which
attaches the cockpit instrument panel to the
aeroplane structure, apparently introduced
through the nose landing gear due to bumps
on the runway. Airbus determined that the
bracket does not sustain the fatigue loads
during the Design Service Goal (DSG). This
condition, if not detected and corrected,
combined with failure of the horizontal
beam, could lead to collapse of the cockpit
panel, possibly resulting in reduced control
of the aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Airbus developed a program to inspect the
condition of the affected cockpit instrument
panel bracket No 6, and designed a stronger
(reinforced titanium undrilled) bracket. The
new bracket can be installed in-service
through Airbus Service Bulletin (SB) A330–
25–3548 or SB A340–25–4354, as applicable
to aeroplane type.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires repetitive inspections of
the cockpit instrument panel bracket No 6
and, depending on findings, the
accomplishment of applicable corrective
actions. This [EASA] AD also provides the
installation of the stronger bracket as
optional terminating action for the repetitive
actions required by this [EASA] AD.
The corrective actions include replacing
bracket No. 6 and bracket No. 7 with
serviceable parts, and repair, as
applicable.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0083.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7986-7989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02537]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-0085; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-078-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A330-243, A330-243F, A330-341, A330-342, and A330-343
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports indicating that
certain hinge sleeves on the cowl doors of the thrust reverser units
(TRUs) were not heat treated. This proposed AD would require replacing
the sleeves of certain hinges on the cowl doors of the TRUs with new
parts. We are proposing this AD to prevent, in the event of a fan-
blade-off event due to high vibration, in-flight loss of TRU heavy
components, which might damage airplane structure or control surfaces,
and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
[[Page 7987]]
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0085; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0085;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-078-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0062, dated March 11, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model
A330-243, A330-243F, A330-341, A330-342, and A330-343 airplanes. The
MCAI states:
A manufacturing discrepancy (lack of heat treatment) on a batch
of the N[deg]3 and N[deg]4 hinge sleeves installed on [a] Thrust
Reverser Unit (TRU) was identified. Those parts are only installed
on A330 aeroplanes equipped with Rolls-Royce (RR) Trent 700 engines.
This condition, if not corrected, in case of a Fan Blade Off
event due to high vibration level, could cause in-flight loss of
some heavy components of the TRU, possibly resulting in injury to
persons on the ground [or damage to airplane structure or control
surfaces, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane].
As current hinge sleeves are not serialized, it is not possible
to identify the TRU hinge sleeves which did not receive the heat
treatment. The part supplier has developed an identification
procedure for these TRU hinge sleeves in order to identify the
affected hinge sleeves, and to allow a better part traceability in
the future.
For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD requires
identification and replacement of the affected TRU hinge sleeves.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0085.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A330-78-3021, Revision 03, dated
October 15, 2014. Aircelle has issued Service Bulletin 78-AG924, dated
September 26, 2012. This service information describes procedures for
modifying and marking the sleeves for hinges number 3 and number 4 on
the cowl doors of Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines. The actions described
in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe
condition identified in the MCAI. This service information is
reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to access this service
information.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Explanation of ``RC'' Procedures and Tests in Service Information
The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the
Airworthiness Directives Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee
(AD ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement was a new process
for annotating which procedures and tests in the service information
are required for compliance with an AD. Differentiating these
procedures and tests from other tasks in the service information is
expected to improve an owner's/operator's understanding of crucial AD
requirements and help provide consistent judgment in AD compliance. The
actions specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-3021, Revision 03,
dated October 15, 2014, include procedures and tests that are
identified as RC (required for compliance) because these procedures
have a direct effect on detecting, preventing, resolving, or
eliminating an identified unsafe condition.
As specified in a NOTE under the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-3021, Revision 03, dated October 15,
2014, procedures and tests identified as RC must be done to comply with
the proposed AD. However, procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not
identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operators' maintenance or inspection program
without obtaining approval of an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC), provided the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done
and the airplane can be put back in a serviceable condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC will
require approval of an AMOC.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 24 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 29 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $59,160, or $2,465 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on action would
take up to 1 work-hour and require parts costing $0, for a cost of $85
per product. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need this action.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
[[Page 7988]]
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2015-0085; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-
078-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 30, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A330-243, A330-243F, A330-
341, A330-342, and A330-343 airplanes, certificated in any category,
all manufacturer serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 78, Exhaust.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports indicating that certain hinge
sleeves on the cowl doors of the thrust reverser units were not heat
treated. We are issuing this AD to prevent, in the event of a fan-
blade-off event due to high vibration, in-flight loss of thrust
reverser unit (TRU) heavy components, which might damage airplane
structure or control surfaces, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Identification of TRU Part Number
Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD: Identify
the part number of the TRUs, in accordance with Aircelle Service
Bulletin 78-AG924, dated September 26, 2012.
(h) Replacement of Thrust Reverser Unit Hinge Sleeves
If the results of the part identification required by paragraph
(g) of this AD reveal that the TRUs are affected: Within the
compliance time defined in paragraph (g) of this AD, replace hinge
sleeves numbers 3 and 4 of each TRU cowl door, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-
3021, Revision 03, dated October 15, 2014.
Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD: Rolls-Royce Alert Service
Bulletin RB.211-78-AG924, dated September 26, 2012, is an additional
source of guidance for replacing the TRUs.
(i) Optional Terminating Action for Paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD
Modifying an airplane by incorporating Airbus Modification
202463 in production terminates the requirements specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD for that airplane.
(j) Parts Installation Limitations
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a TRU
on any airplane unless it has been determined, using Aircelle
Service Bulletin 78-AG924, dated September 26, 2012, that the cowl
door hinge sleeves installed on the TRU are not affected by the
requirements of this AD.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (h) of this AD if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the service information identified
in paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2), or (j)(3) of this AD, which are not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-3021, dated October 17,
2012.
(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-3021, Revision 01, dated
July 30, 2013.
(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-3021, Revision 02, dated
April 17, 2014.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227 1138; fax 425-227-1149. Information
may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Required for Compliance (RC): Where Airbus Service Bulletin
A330-78-3021, Revision 03, dated October 15, 2014, contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operators' maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in a serviceable condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.
(3) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0062, dated March 11, 2014,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0085.
[[Page 7989]]
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 30, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-02537 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P