Expansion of Online Public File Obligations to Cable and Satellite TV Operators and Broadcast and Satellite Radio Licensees, 8031-8052 [2015-02531]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
• Written Submissions: You may
submit written submissions by Fax at
301–402–0169, or by Mail/Hand
Delivery/Courier (For paper, disk, or
CD–ROM submissions) to: Jerry Moore,
NIH Regulations Officer, Office of
Management Assessment, 6011
Executive Boulevard, Suite 601, MSC
7669, Rockville, MD 20852–7669.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regulatory Process: Jerry Moore, NIH
Regulations Officer, Office of
Management Assessment, Telephone
(301–496–4607) (not a toll-free number),
Fax (301–402–0169), or by email at
jm40z@nih.gov.
Technical Information: Jerry Sheehan,
Assistant Director for Policy
Development, National Library of
Medicine, National Institutes of Health,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Telephone (301–496–6221)
(not a toll-free number), Fax (301–402–
2586), or by email at sheehanjr@
nlm.nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HHS
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) on Clinical Trials
Registration and Results Submission in
the Federal Register on November 21,
2014 (79 FR 69566). The NPRM
proposes requirements for submitting
registration and summary results
information, including adverse event
information, for specified clinical trials
of drugs (including biological products)
and devices and for pediatric
postmarket surveillances of a device to
ClinicalTrials.gov, the clinical trial
registry and results data bank operated
by the National Library of Medicine.
The proposed rule provides for the
expanded registry and results data bank
specified in Title VIII of the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 (FDAAA) to enhance patient
enrollment, provide a mechanism to
track subsequent progress of clinical
trials, provide more complete results
information, and enhance patient access
to and understanding of the results of
clinical trials. The deadline for written
comments was originally established as
February 19, 2015. Since the NPRM was
published, the Department has received
requests to extend the period for the
public submission of comments.
Effective with this notice, we are
extending the comment period with a
deadline of 5 p.m. EST on March 23,
2015.
NIH published a related request for
public comments on a draft NIH Policy
on Dissemination of NIH-Funded
Clinical Trial Information in the NIH
Guide for Contracts and Grants (NOT–
OD–15–019) on November 19, 2014. See
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
notice-files/NOT-OD-15-019.html. The
draft NIH Policy aims to promote broad
and responsible dissemination of
information on clinical trials funded by
the NIH through registration and
submission of summary results
information to ClinicalTrials.gov. The
original deadline for written comments
on the draft NIH Policy was February
19, 2015, but the deadline is also being
extended until 5 p.m. EST on March 23,
2015.
Instructions for Submitting
Comments: We welcome comments
from the public on all issues set forth in
the proposed rule, and on specific
issues identified in the document. All
submissions received must include the
agency name, the Docket No., and
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
for this rulemaking. All comments
received at https://www.regulations.gov
may be posted without change,
including any personal information
provided. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means NIH will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
You can assist us in considering your
comment by referencing the number
assigned to each key issue discussed in
section III.C of the preamble or the
number of the section of this proposed
rule to which your comment relates. For
access to background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number found in the brackets in
the heading of this document into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts.
Dated: January 16, 2015.
Francis S. Collins,
Director, National Institutes of Health.
Approved: February 5, 2015.
Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Secretary, HHS.
[FR Doc. 2015–02990 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 25, 73, and 76
[MB Docket No. 14–127; FCC 14–209]
Expansion of Online Public File
Obligations to Cable and Satellite TV
Operators and Broadcast and Satellite
Radio Licensees
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8031
In this document, the
Commission proposes to expand to
cable operators, satellite TV providers,
broadcast radio licensees, and satellite
radio licensees the requirement that
public inspection files be posted to the
FCC’s online database. In 2012, the
Commission adopted online public file
rules for broadcast television stations
that required them to post public file
documents to a central, FCC-hosted
online database rather than maintaining
the files locally at their main studios.
Now that television broadcasters have
completed their transition to the online
file, the Commission believes it is
appropriate to commence the process of
expanding the online file to other media
entities to extend the benefits of
improved public access to public
inspection files and, ultimately, reduce
the burden of maintaining these files.
DATES: Comments may be filed on or
before March 16, 2015, and reply
comments may be filed April 14, 2015.
Written comments on the proposed
information collection requirements,
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13, should
be submitted on or before April 14,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by MB Docket No. 14–127, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202)
418–0432.
In addition to filing comments with
the Secretary, a copy of any comments
on the Paperwork Reduction Act
proposed information collection
requirements contained herein should
be submitted to the Federal
Communications Commission via email
to PRA@fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@
fcc.gov and also to Nicholas A. Fraser,
Office of Management and Budget, via
email to Nicholas-A.-Fraser@
omb.eop.gov. For detailed instructions
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
8032
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the supplementary information
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim
Matthews, Media Bureau, Policy
Division, 202–418–2154, or email at
kim.matthews@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 14–
209, adopted on December 17, 2014 and
released on December 18, 2014. The full
text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during
regular business hours in the FCC
Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS at
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.
Alternative formats are available for
people with disabilities (Braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format) by
sending an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or
calling the Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Analysis
This NPRM contains proposed new
and modified information collection
requirements. The Commission, as part
of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork burdens, invites the general
public and the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to comment on the
information collection requirements
contained in this document, as required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, Public Law 104–13. Comments
should address: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimates; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees. In addition, pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4), the Commission seeks
specific comment on how it might
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
further reduce the information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
To view a copy of this information
collection request (ICR) submitted to
OMB: (1) Go to the Web page https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain,
(2) look for the section of the Web page
called ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3)
click on the downward-pointing arrow
in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the
‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4)
select ‘‘Federal Communications
Commission’’ from the list of agencies
presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box,
(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the
right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6)
when the list of FCC ICRs currently
under review appears, look for the Title
of this ICR and then click on the ICR
Reference Number. A copy of the FCC
submission to OMB will be displayed.
OMB Control Numbers: 3060–xxxx.
Title: Sections 25.701, Other DBS
Public Interest Obligations, and 25.702,
Other SDARS Public Interest
Obligations.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: New collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit entities.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 3 respondents and 3
responses.
Estimated Hours per Response: 18 hrs.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement, Recordkeeping
requirement, Third party disclosure
requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 54 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $592.
Obligation to Respond: Required to be
obtained or retained for benefits. The
statutory authority for this information
collection is contained in sections 154,
301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 319, 332, 605,
and 721 of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality with
this collection of information.
Privacy Act Assessment: The
Commission prepared a system of
records notice (SORN), FCC/MB–2,
‘‘Broadcast Station Public Inspection
Files,’’ that covers the PII contained in
the broadcast station public inspection
files located on the Commission’s Web
site. The Commission will revise
appropriate privacy requirements as
necessary to include any entities and
information added to the online public
file in this proceeding.
Needs and Uses: In FCC 14–209, the
Commission proposes to expand the
requirement that public inspection files
be posted to the FCC-hosted online
public file database to Direct Broadcast
Satellite (DBS) providers and Satellite
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Digital Audio Radio Services (SDARS)
licensees, among other entities. The
Commission’s goal is to make
information that these entities are
already required to make publicly
available more accessible, by placing
this information online, while also
reducing costs both for the government
and the public sector. The public and
FCC use the information in the public
file to evaluate information about the
DBS or SDARS entity’s performance and
to ensure that the entity is operating
pursuant to the FCC’s rules. In addition,
maintenance of political files by DBS
and SDARS entities enables the public
to assess money expended and time
allotted to a political candidate and to
ensure that equal access was afforded to
other legally qualified candidates for
public office.
OMB Control Numbers: 3060–0214.
Title: Sections 73.3526 and 73.3527,
Local Public Inspection Files; Sections
76.1701 and 73.1943, Political Files.
Form Numbers: None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit entities; Not for profit institutions;
State, Local or Tribal government;
Individuals or households.
Number of Respondents/Responses:
24,961 respondents; 59,902 responses.
Estimated Hours per Response: 1–52
hours per response.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement, Recordkeeping
requirement, Third party disclosure
requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 1,860,656
hours.
Total Annual Cost: $3,653,372.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. The statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in sections 154, 303, 334,
336, and 339 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality with
this collection of information.
Privacy Act Assessment: The
Commission prepared a system of
records notice (SORN), FCC/MB–2,
‘‘Broadcast Station Public Inspection
Files,’’ that covers the PII contained in
the broadcast station public inspection
files located on the Commission’s Web
site. The Commission will revise
appropriate privacy requirements as
necessary to include any entities and
information added to the online public
file in this proceeding.
Needs and Uses: In FCC 14–209, the
Commission proposes to expand the
requirement that public inspection files
be posted to the FCC-hosted online
public file database to commercial and
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
noncommercial broadcast radio
licensees, among other entities. The
Commission’s goal is to make
information that these entities are
already required to make publicly
available more accessible, by placing
this information online, while also
reducing costs both for the government
and the public sector. Among other
things, the public and FCC use the
information in the public file to evaluate
information about the broadcast
licensee’s performance and to ensure
that the station is addressing issues
concerning the community which it is
licensed to serve. In addition,
maintenance of political files by
broadcast and cable entities enables the
public to assess money expended and
time allotted to a political candidate and
to ensure that equal access was afforded
to other legally qualified candidates for
public office.
OMB Control Number: 3060–0316.
Title: 47 CFR Sections 76.1700,
Records to be maintained locally by
Cable System Operators; 76.1702, Equal
Employment Opportunity; 76.1703,
Commercial Records on Children’s
Programs; 76.1707, Leased Access;
76.1711, Emergency Alert System (EAS)
Tests and Activation.
Form Number: Not applicable.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit entities.
Number of Respondents/Responses:
3,000 respondents; 3,000 responses.
Estimated Hours per Response: 18
hours.
Frequency of Response:
Recordkeeping requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 54,000 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $591,840.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. The statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in Sections 151, 152, 153,
154, 301, 302, 302a, 303, 303a, 307, 308,
309, 312, 315, 317, 325, 339, 340, 341,
503, 521, 522, 531, 532, 534, 535, 536,
537, 543, 544, 544a, 545, 548, 549, 552,
554, 556, 558, 560, 561, 571, 572, and
573 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality with
this collection of information.
Privacy Act Assessment: The
Commission prepared a system of
records notice (SORN), FCC/MB–2,
‘‘Broadcast Station Public Inspection
Files,’’ that covers the PII contained in
the broadcast station public inspection
files located on the Commission’s Web
site. The Commission will revise
appropriate privacy requirements as
necessary to include any entities and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
information added to the online public
file in this proceeding.
Needs and Uses: In FCC 14–209, the
Commission proposes to expand the
requirement that public inspection files
be posted to the FCC-hosted online
public file database to cable operators,
among other entities. The Commission’s
goal is to make information that these
entities are already required to make
publicly available more accessible, by
placing this information online, while
also reducing costs both for the
government and the public sector.
Among other things, the public and FCC
use the information in the public file to
evaluate information about the
broadcast licensee’s performance and to
ensure that the station is addressing
issues concerning the community which
it is licensed to serve. In addition,
maintenance of political files by
broadcast and cable entities enables the
public to assess money expended and
time allotted to a political candidate and
to ensure that equal access was afforded
to other legally qualified candidates for
public office. Section 76.1700 contains
the recordkeeping requirements
applicable to cable systems, including
public inspection file requirements.
This NPRM proposes to revise Section
76.1700 to reflect the requirement that
cable operators maintain their public
inspection file online on the Web site
hosted by the FCC. In addition, this
NPRM proposes a reorganization of
Section 76.1700 to more clearly address
which records must be maintained in
the public inspection file versus those
that must be made available to the
Commission or franchising authority
upon request. Among other changes, the
Commission proposes to clarify that
proof-of-performance test data and
signal leakage logs and repair data must
be made available only to the
Commission and, in the case of proofof-performance test data, also to the
franchisor, and not to the public.
Accordingly, this information would not
be required to be included in the public
inspection file or in the online public
inspection file.
Summary of the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
I. Introduction
1. In this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (‘‘NPRM’’), we propose to
expand to cable operators, satellite TV
(also referred to as ‘‘Direct Broadcast
Satellite’’ or ‘‘DBS’’) providers,
broadcast radio licensees, and satellite
radio (also referred to as ‘‘Satellite
Digital Audio Radio Services’’ or
‘‘SDARS’’) licensees the requirement
that public inspection files be posted to
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8033
the FCC’s online database. In 2012, we
adopted online public file rules for
broadcast television stations that
required them to post public file
documents to a central, FCC-hosted
online database rather than maintaining
the files locally at their main studios.
Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure
Requirements for Television Broadcast
Licensee Public Interest Obligations,
Second Report and Order, 77 FR 27631
(May 11, 2012) (‘‘Second Report and
Order’’). Our goal was to modernize the
procedures television broadcasters use
to inform the public about how they are
serving their communities, to make
information concerning broadcast
service more accessible to the public
and, over time, to reduce the cost of
broadcasters’ compliance. We initiate
this proceeding to extend our
modernization effort to include the
public file documents that cable
operators, DBS providers, and broadcast
and satellite radio licensees are required
to maintain. While the Commission first
included only television broadcasters in
its public file database to ‘‘ease the
initial implementation of the online
public file,’’ television broadcasters
have successfully transitioned to the
online file over the past two years.
Accordingly, we now believe it is
appropriate to commence the process of
expanding the online file to other media
entities in order to extend the benefits
of improved public access to public
inspection files and, ultimately, reduce
the burden on these other entities of
maintaining these files.
II. Background
2. One of a broadcaster’s fundamental
public interest obligations is to air
programming responsive to the needs
and interests of its community of
license. To ensure that stations meet
this obligation, the Commission relies
on viewers and listeners as an important
source of information about the nature
of a station’s programming, operations,
and compliance with Commission rules.
To provide the public with access to
information about station operations,
the Commission’s rules have long
required television and radio broadcast
stations to maintain a physical public
inspection file, including a political file,
at their respective stations or
headquarters and to place in the file
records that provide information about
station operations. The purpose of the
public inspection file requirement is to
‘‘make information to which the public
already has a right more readily
available, so that the public will be
encouraged to play a more active part in
dialogue with broadcast licensees.’’
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8034
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
3. The Commission promulgated its
first political file rule in 1938. That
initial rule was essentially identical to
our current political file regulation in its
requirement that the file be available for
public inspection and include both
candidate requests for time and the
disposition of those requests, including
the ‘‘charges made’’ for the broadcast
time. In 1965, following action by
Congress to allow greater public
participation in the broadcast licensing
process, the Commission adopted a
broader public inspection file rule to
enable local inspection of broadcast
applications, reports, and related
documents. The Commission noted that
Congress’ actions ‘‘zealously guarded
the rights of the general public to be
informed’’ and that the Commission’s
goal was to make ‘‘practically accessible
to the public information to which it is
entitled.’’
4. Cable, DBS, and SDARS entities
also have public and political file
requirements modeled, in large part, on
the longstanding broadcast
requirements. In 1974, the Commission
adopted a public inspection file
requirement for cable, noting that ‘‘[i]f
the public is to play an informed role in
the regulation of cable television, it
must have at least basic information
about a local system’s operations and
proposals.’’ The Commission also noted
that ‘‘[r]equiring cable systems to
maintain a public file merely follows
our policy for broadcast licensees and is
necessary for similar reasons’’ and that
‘‘[t]hrough greater disclosure we hope to
encourage a greater interaction between
the Commission, the public, and the
cable industry.’’ With respect to DBS
providers, the Commission adopted
public and political inspection file
requirements in 1998 in conjunction
with the imposition of certain public
interest obligations, including political
broadcasting requirements, on those
entities. DBS providers were required to
‘‘abide by political file obligations
similar to those requirements placed on
terrestrial broadcasters and cable
systems’’ and were also required to
maintain a public file with records
relating to other DBS public interest
obligations. Finally, the Commission
imposed equal employment opportunity
and political broadcast requirements on
SDARS licensees in 1997, noting that
the rationale behind imposing these
requirements on broadcasters also
applies to satellite radio.
5. In 2002, Congress adopted the
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
(‘‘BCRA’’) which amended the political
file requirements in section 315 of the
Communications Act of 1934. 47 U.S.C.
315. The amendments apply to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
broadcast television, cable, and DBS.
The BCRA essentially codified the
Commission’s existing political file
obligations by requiring that
information regarding any request to
purchase advertising time made on
behalf of a legally qualified candidate
for public office be placed in the
political file. In addition, the BCRA
expanded political file obligations by
requiring that television, cable, and DBS
entities also place in the political file
information related to any
advertisements that discuss a ‘‘political
matter of national importance,’’
including in the case of an issue
advertisement the name of the person or
entity purchasing the time and a list of
the chief executive officers or members
of the executive committee or of the
board of directors of any such entity.
A. Online Public File
6. In 2012 the Commission replaced
the decades-old requirement that
commercial and noncommercial
television stations maintain public files
at their main studios with a requirement
to post most of the documents in those
files to a central, online public file
hosted by the Commission. See Second
Report and Order, 77 FR 27631 (May 11,
2012). As noted above, the
Commission’s goals were to modernize
the procedures television broadcasters
use to inform the public about how they
are serving their communities, make
information concerning broadcast
service more accessible to the public,
and reduce broadcasters’ cost of
compliance. The television online
public file rules were the culmination of
a more than decade-long effort to make
information regarding how a television
broadcast station serves the public
interest ‘‘easier to understand and more
accessible,’’ ‘‘promote discussion
between the licensee and its
community,’’ and ‘‘lessen the need for
government involvement in ensuring
that a station is meeting its public
interest obligation.’’
7. In June 2011, the Commission staff
released ‘‘The Information Needs of
Communities’’ Report (‘‘INC Report’’), a
comprehensive report on the current
state of the media landscape created by
a working group including Commission
staff, scholars, and consultants. See
www.fcc.gov/infoneedsreport. The INC
Report discussed both the need to
empower citizens to ensure that
broadcasters serve their communities in
exchange for the use of public spectrum,
and the need to remove unnecessary
burdens on broadcasters who aim to
serve their communities. The INC
Report recommended an online system
for public inspection files in order to
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ensure greater public access. The INC
Report further suggested that
governments at all levels collect and
publish data in forms that make it easy
for citizens, entrepreneurs, software
developers, and reporters to access and
analyze information to enable them to
present the data in more useful formats,
and noted that greater transparency by
government and media companies can
help reduce the cost of reporting,
empower consumers, and foster
innovation.
8. Based upon commenter
suggestions, in the Second Report and
Order the Commission determined that
each television station’s entire public
file would be hosted online by the
Commission. The Commission took a
number of steps to minimize the burden
of the online file on stations.
Broadcasters were required to upload
only those items required to be in the
public file but not otherwise filed with
the Commission or available on the
Commission’s Web site. Any document
or information required to be kept in the
public file and that is required to be
filed with the Commission
electronically in the Consolidated
DataBase System (‘‘CDBS’’) is imported
to the online public file and updated by
the Commission. In addition, television
stations were not required to upload
their existing political files to the online
file; rather, stations were required only
to upload new political file content on
a going-forward basis. Because of
privacy concerns, stations also were not
required to upload letters and emails
from the public to the online file; rather,
they must continue to retain them in a
correspondence file at the main studio.
9. In addition, to smooth the
transition for both television stations
and the Commission and to allow
smaller broadcasters additional time to
begin posting their political files online,
the Commission phased-in the new
political file posting requirement.
Stations affiliated with the top four
national networks (ABC, NBC, CBS, and
Fox) and licensed to serve communities
in the top 50 Designated Market Areas
(‘‘DMAs’’) were required to begin
posting their political file documents
online starting August 2, 2012, but other
stations were exempted from posting
their political file documents online
until July 1, 2014. In the Second Report
and Order, the Commission also
rejected several proposals in the FNPRM
to increase public file requirements in
conjunction with implementation of the
online file. Rather, the Commission
determined that stations would be
required to place in their online files
only material that is already required to
be placed in their local files.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
10. The Commission stated in the
Second Report and Order that it was
deferring consideration of whether to
adopt online posting for radio licensees
and multichannel video programming
distributors (‘‘MVPDs’’) until it had
gained experience with online posting
of public files of television broadcasters.
The Commission noted that starting the
online public file process with the much
smaller number of television licensees,
rather than with all broadcasters and
MVPDs, would ‘‘ease the initial
implementation of the online public
file.’’ In response to the FNPRM, a group
of public television licensees requested
that the Commission permit NCE radio
stations, or at least those licensed to the
same entity as, or under common
control with, an NCE–TV station, to
maintain their public inspection files
online on the Commission’s Web site on
a voluntary basis. While the
Commission declined to grant this
request, it stated that ‘‘as we and the
broadcasting industry gain more
experience with the online public file
we will revisit the possibility of
allowing stations not required to use the
online public file to use it on a
voluntary basis.’’ In addition, the
Commission delegated to the
Commission staff ‘‘the authority to
allow (but not require) radio stations to
voluntarily post their public files at
such time the staff determines that such
an option is feasible and desirable.’’ To
date, the Commission staff has not made
this option available to radio stations,
instead focusing initially on ensuring
that the database was functioning
smoothly and was capable of handling
the increase in volume once all
television stations were required to use
the online file beginning July 1, 2014.
B. Petition for Rulemaking
11. In July 2014, the Campaign Legal
Center, Common Cause, and the
Sunlight Foundation (collectively,
‘‘Petitioners’’ or ‘‘CLC’’) filed a joint
Petition for Rulemaking requesting that
the Commission initiate a rulemaking to
expand to cable and satellite systems
the requirement that public and
political file documents be posted to the
FCC’s online database. See Campaign
Legal Center, et al., Petition for
Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 14–127, at
1 (July 31, 2014) (‘‘Petition’’). The
Petitioners argue that cable and satellite
services have increasingly become
outlets for political advertising.
According to Petitioners, political
spending on cable is projected to
constitute as much as 25 percent of total
projected political television spending
in the 2014 election cycle. Petitioners
also assert that, due to advances in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
technology, satellite television providers
are preparing to sell household-specific
‘‘addressable advertising,’’ a feature that
has attracted interest from advertising
campaigns. Petitioners assert that
moving the television public file online
has resulted in ‘‘unquestionably
substantial’’ public benefits, which
would also arise if cable and satellite
systems were required to upload their
public and political files online. In
addition, Petitioners argue that
television broadcasters experienced few
problems moving to the online file, and
cable and satellite systems would also
likely not be burdened by the online
filing requirement.
12. On August 7, 2014, the Media
Bureau issued a Public Notice seeking
comment on the Petition and, in
addition, on whether it should initiate
a rulemaking to expand online public
file obligations to broadcast radio
stations. See Public Notice, Commission
Seeks Comment on Petition for
Rulemaking Filed by the Campaign
Legal Center, Common Cause, and the
Sunlight Foundation Seeking Expansion
of Online Public File Obligations to
Cable and Satellite TV Operators,
Bureau Also Seeks Comment on
Expanding Online Public File
Obligations to Radio Licensees, 79 FR
51136–01 (August 27, 2014)(‘‘Public
Notice’’). The National Association of
Broadcasters (‘‘NAB’’) filed comments
supporting the extension of the online
public file to cable and satellite
providers, stating that there is ‘‘no
rational basis’’ for requiring television
broadcasters, but not their competitors
in the video marketplace, to disclose
public and political file material online.
The National Cable &
Telecommunications Association
(‘‘NCTA’’) argued that, if the
Commission were to open a proceeding
to expand online file obligations, it
should examine how to tailor any online
posting requirements to minimize
burdens on cable operators and avoid
requiring them to upload files of little
interest to the public. With respect to
radio, while CLC and the American
Public Media Group supported the
initiation of a rulemaking to require all
radio stations to post their public and
political files to the FCC’s online
database, the majority of commenters
addressing this issue either objected to
extending the online filing requirement
to radio and/or argued that the
Commission should carefully consider
the financial burden on struggling radio
stations as well as the technical and
financial challenges to the FCC that
would be posed by expanding the
online file to include radio. In addition,
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8035
a number of commenters also argued
that extending the online public file to
radio at this time is premature and that,
at most, the Commission should first
consider a voluntary online public file
for radio before mandating online filing.
III. Discussion
13. We propose to adopt a phased-in
approach to expanding the online file
requirements to cable and DBS
providers and broadcast and satellite
radio entities. The implementation of
the television online file represents a
significant achievement in the
Commission’s ongoing effort to
modernize disclosure procedures to
improve access to public file material.
Since it was launched on August 2,
2012, more than 650,000 documents
have been successfully uploaded into
the online file, and the site has
generated close to six million page
views. Despite initial concerns, NAB
characterized the first wave of
implementation as ‘‘uneventful.’’ As of
July 1, 2014, all television broadcast
stations have fully transitioned to the
online file and, with this transition now
complete, it is time to seek comment on
expanding the online file to encompass
cable, satellite, and radio public file
material.
14. As the Commission stated in the
Second Report and Order, this
modernization of the public inspection
file is ‘‘plain common sense.’’ The
evolution of the Internet and the spread
of broadband infrastructure have
transformed the way society accesses
information today. It is no longer
reasonable to require the public to incur
the substantial expense and
inconvenience of traveling to a station
or headquarters’ office to review the
public file and make paper copies when
a centralized, online file would permit
review with a quick and essentially
costless Internet search.
A. Benefits of Expanding the Online
Public File
15. Our goal in this proceeding is to
modernize the outdated procedures for
providing public access to cable, DBS,
radio, and SDARS files in a manner that
avoids unnecessary burdens on these
entities. By taking advantage of the
efficiencies made possible by digital
technology, we intend to make
information that cable and DBS
providers and broadcast and satellite
radio licensees are already required to
make publicly available more accessible
while also reducing costs both for the
government and the private sector. The
Internet is an effective, low-cost means
of maintaining contact with, and
distributing information to, viewers and
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8036
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
listeners. Placing the public file online
will permit 24-hour access from any
location, without requiring a visit to the
site where the paper file is maintained,
thereby improving access to information
about how cable, satellite, and radio
entities are serving their communities
and meeting their public interest
obligations. As the Commission stated
in the Second Report and Order, the
public benefits of posting public file
information online, while difficult to
quantify with exactitude, are
unquestionably substantial.
16. Expansion of the online public file
to more media is particularly important
with respect to improving public access
to political files. As Petitioners point
out, political advertising is increasingly
shifting from broadcast television to
cable and satellite television, and the
advent of technological advances such
as addressable advertising are likely to
further this trend. Political advertising
on radio is also on the rise. According
to CLC, political advertising
expenditures on radio in 2012 ranked
third behind spending on broadcast
television and cable and could reach as
high as 7 percent of overall spending on
political advertising in 2014. Adding
cable, satellite television, and broadcast
and satellite radio political file material
to the existing television online
database would facilitate public access
to disclosure records for all these media
and allow the public to view and
analyze political advertising
expenditures more easily in each market
as well as nationwide.
17. We propose to take the same
general approach to transitioning cable,
DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS to the
online file that the Commission took
with television broadcasters, tailoring
the requirements as necessary to the
different services. We also propose to
take similar measures to minimize the
effort and cost entities must undertake
to move their public files online.
Specifically, we propose to require
entities only to upload to the online file
public file documents that are not
already on file with the Commission or
that the Commission maintains in its
own database. We also propose to
exempt existing political file material
from the online file requirement and to
require only that political file
documents be uploaded on a goingforward basis.
18. With only minor exceptions—
requiring cable operators to provide
information about the geographic areas
they serve, clarifying the documents
required to be included in the cable
public file, and requiring cable, DBS,
broadcast radio, and SDARS entities to
provide the location and contact
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
information for their local file—we do
not propose new or modified public
inspection file requirements in this
proceeding. Our goal is simply to adapt
our existing public file requirements to
an online format. We seek comment on
this approach. While we propose to
place the entire public file online, we
invite comment on whether we should
instead require only that certain
components of the public file be placed
on the Commission’s online database.
We note that limiting online file
requirements to certain components of
the public file would require entities to
upload certain documents and maintain
others in the local public file, thereby
potentially imposing a greater burden
than moving documents to the online
file over time. We seek comment on
these issues. One benefit of this
proceeding, however, is to ensure that,
within a short timeframe, there will be
less need for the public to visit the
affected entities, which will enable such
entities to improve security and
minimize risks to employees. We seek
comment on these issues, including
ways to further reduce the burdens of
the public file and limit visits to the
affected entities.
B. Expansion of the Online File to
Broadcast Radio
19. While no commenter responding
to the Public Notice opposed the
extension of the online public file to
cable or DBS providers, as discussed
above a number of commenters either
opposed imposing online public file
obligations on broadcast radio or urged
the Commission carefully to consider a
number of obstacles unique to radio
before requiring radio stations to use the
online file. In general, these commenters
argue that many radio stations are very
small and have limited financial
resources and small staffs. Some argue
that, for many stations, the additional
responsibility of maintaining an online
file would take time and resources that
would be better devoted to providing
local programming and information.
Other commenters note that many small
stations already face significant
economic challenges simply to stay on
the air and might be unable to withstand
any additional financial pressure an
online public file obligation would
impose. Finally, some commenters
argue that local radio listeners that
might be interested in accessing the
current public file can do so easily.
These commenters contend that moving
the public file online would not
improve access for current listeners but
only encourage complaints from
advocacy groups and that responding to
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
these complaints would further strain
stations’ limited resources.
20. In the television online public file
proceeding, the Commission rejected
similar arguments regarding the burden
an online file requirement would pose
and concluded that the benefits of the
online file outweighed any potential
burden. The Commission also took a
number of steps to minimize the costs
of moving public files online, most of
which we propose to take in this
proceeding as well. With respect to
radio, we recognize that concerns
regarding the potential cost of an online
public file requirement carry more
weight, particularly for very small radio
stations, which may struggle financially
and have fewer resources than small
television stations. While we believe
that moving toward an online public file
makes sense in today’s world for all
entities that currently have public file
requirements, we are committed to
considering carefully all concerns raised
in this proceeding with respect to
potential online file requirements. With
respect to broadcast radio licensees, as
discussed further below, we propose to
commence the transition to an online
file with commercial stations in larger
markets with five or more full-time
employees, while postponing
temporarily all online file requirements
for other radio stations. We believe that
this approach addresses the concerns
raised by commenters and will help
ensure that the transition to the online
file is not unduly burdensome.
21. We reject the argument that we
should not expand the online file
requirement to broadcast radio because
doing so will benefit only non-local
advocacy groups. Making the file
available online will make it easier for
the public generally to access the file,
including local listeners, and will give
the Commission and the public the
information needed to evaluate whether
stations are meeting their
responsibilities to their local
community.
C. Online File Capacity and Technical
Issues
22. We recognize that adding cable,
DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS
entities to the Commission’s online file
will greatly increase the number of users
of the file and the volume of material
that must be uploaded. NAB notes that,
if radio stations are required to use the
online file, there could be more than
17,500 broadcast entities uploading
quarterly issues/programs lists on the
same four dates in a year. In addition,
we recognize that there is likely to be a
heavy demand on the online file during
peak political seasons, when many
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
broadcast stations take new advertising
orders and modify existing orders on a
daily basis. NAB urges the Commission
to consider increasing its online
capacity to accommodate the significant
increase in network traffic that will
occur when a large number of filings
must be uploaded on the same date and
consider ways to stagger filings to
relieve network congestion. Other
commenters argue the Commission
should consider expanding the
traditional 10-day filing window for
many broadcast reports to a 30-day
filing window to place less stress on the
database. We seek comment on these
proposals to stagger or otherwise alter
filing deadlines and any other
suggestions for ways in which the
Commission could improve
performance of its online public file
database.
23. The Commission noted in the
Second Report and Order that allowing
the use of private web hosting services
in connection with the online file would
allow for greater station efficiencies. As
several commenters note, work to
establish an interface between the
online file database and web hosting
services has not yet been finished. Once
work on this interface is completed, we
anticipate that this would enable an
entity to establish a link between its
own privately-maintained electronic file
database at the system or station to
enable automatic synchronization with
the database hosted at the FCC. We
recognize that web hosting services
could assist many entities with their
obligation to maintain the online public
file, particularly smaller entities, and
continue to examine issues related to
implementation of such services. We
also intend to investigate adding the
capability to permit entities to upload
documents to multiple online files using
a single upload.
24. Television stations are not
required to upload material to the
online file that is already filed with the
Commission or available on a
Commission database, and we propose
to take a similar approach with respect
to cable, DBS, broadcast radio, and
SDARS entities. Broadcast radio
licensees, like television broadcasters,
file material electronically with the
Commission via CDBS (which is
currently being migrated to LMS),
which is already connected to the
online public file. Filings and data
concerning cable systems, however, are
currently maintained in the
Commission’s Cable Operations and
Licensing System (‘‘COALS’’) database,
which does not currently interface with
the Commission’s online file database.
The Commission intends to create a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
connection between this database and
the online file database as appropriate
and plans to complete that process
before the effective date of any cable
online filing requirement that may be
adopted in this proceeding.
D. Proposed Online File Rules for Cable,
DBS, Broadcast Radio, and SDARS
25. In general, we propose to adopt a
similar approach with respect to cable,
DBS, broadcast and satellite radio
online file requirements as we did for
the television online file. Specifically,
we propose that these entities’ entire
public files be hosted online by the
Commission and that entities be
responsible for uploading only items
now required to be in the public file but
not otherwise filed with the
Commission or available on the
Commission’s Web site. As with the
television online file, we propose that
the Commission itself upload to the
online public file material that is
already on file with the Commission or
that currently resides in a Commission
database.
26. Political file. With respect to the
political file, we also propose that cable
operators, broadcast radio licensees,
DBS operators, and SDARS entities not
be required to upload their existing
political files to the online file. Instead,
as we required with television licensees,
we propose that these entities be
permitted to maintain at the station
those documents already in place in
their political file at the time the new
rules become effective, and only upload
documents to the online political files
on a going-forward basis. Under this
proposal, existing political file material
must be retained in the local political
file at the station or cable system for the
remainder of the two-year retention
period. Exempting existing political file
material from the online file will
substantially reduce the burden of
transitioning to the online public file
while allowing online access to the
political file material most likely to be
of interest to the public. The retention
period for the political file for cable,
DBS, and radio is two years, similar to
the political file retention period for
television stations. Consequently, as the
Commission noted in the Second Report
and Order, exempting the existing
political file will require entities to
continue to maintain this file locally
only for a relatively short period.
Consistent with the requirement we
imposed on television broadcasters in
the Second Report and Order, we also
propose that, following the effective
date of the new rules, cable, DBS,
broadcast radio, and SDARS entities be
required to upload new records to their
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8037
online political file immediately absent
unusual circumstances. We seek
comment generally on these proposals.
27. Organization. In light of the
expansion of the online file we propose
herein, we invite comment on any steps
we might take to improve the
organization of the online file and
facilitate the uploading and
downloading of material. With respect
to the television online political file, the
Commission designed an organizational
structure of folders and subfolders that
ensures that the contents of the files are
orderly as required by our rules. Each
political file is first organized by year,
then by type. Beyond that, we
‘‘populated’’ some additional subfolders
by creating folders for major races and
jurisdictions. The Commission then
provided stations with the ability to
create additional subfolders and
subcategories for specific candidates, or
other organizing structure, in
compliance with their own practices.
We intend to take the same approach in
designing the online political file for
cable, DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS
entities, and invite comment on this
approach. We expect entities required to
upload material to the online political
file to do so in an organized manner so
that candidates and members of public
seeking information can easily navigate
it.
28. Compliance dates. We intend to
give entities sufficient time to
familiarize themselves with the online
public file before the effective date of
any posting requirement. With respect
to documents required to be placed in
the file on a ‘‘going forward’’ basis,
television stations were required to
begin using the online public file upon
the effective date of the Second Report
and Order, which was 30 days after the
Commission announced in the Federal
Register that OMB had completed its
review under the Paperwork Reduction
Act and had approved the information
collection. Should we follow the same
timeline for documents required to be
placed in the file on a ‘‘going forward’’
basis in this proceeding?
29. With respect to existing public file
materials, we also seek comment on the
amount of time we should provide
entities to upload these documents to
the online public file. Television
stations were given six months from the
effective date of the Second Report and
Order to complete the uploading
process. Is this amount of time sufficient
for cable, DBS, and broadcast and
satellite radio? Should we adopt a
staggered date by service (cable, DBS,
broadcast radio, and SDARS) or by some
other basis? Should any of these entities
be given more time to upload existing
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8038
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
files? We note that we propose below to
temporarily exempt radio stations in
smaller markets from online public file
requirements, and seek comment on
whether also to temporarily exempt
stations with few employees. We
propose to permit these stations to
commence uploading material to the
online file early on a voluntary basis.
This would provide these radio stations
with more time to upload existing
public file material and to budget for
any additional cost or staff resources
necessary to accomplish this task.
30. Back-up files. In addition,
consistent with the approach the
Commission took in the Second Report
and Order, we propose that cable, DBS,
and broadcast and satellite radio entities
not be required to maintain back-up
copies of all public file materials.
Instead, as we do for the television
online file, the Commission itself will
create a mirror copy of each public file
daily to ensure that, if the data in the
online public file are compromised, the
file can be reconstituted using the backup copy. If the Commission’s online file
becomes temporarily inaccessible for
the uploading of new documents, we
will require entities to maintain those
documents and upload them to the file
once it is available again for upload.
However, consistent with the approach
taken with respect to television
broadcasters, we propose that cable,
DBS, and all radio entities be required
to maintain local back-up files for the
political file to ensure that they can
comply with their statutory obligation to
make that information available to
candidates, the public, and others as
soon as possible. Stations will only be
required to make these backups
available if and during such rare times
as the Commission’s online public file
is unavailable and the Commission has
tools available to entities that will
minimize any burden caused by this
requirement. We seek comment on this
approach.
31. Format. The Commission
determined in the Second Report and
Order that it would not establish
specific formatting requirements for
documents posted to the online file and
we do not anticipate changes to that
approach at this time. We propose to
require cable, DBS, and broadcast and
satellite radio entities to upload any
electronic documents in their existing
format to the extent feasible; we will
then display the documents in both the
uploaded format and in a pdf version.
To the extent that a required document
already exists in a searchable format, we
propose to require these entities to
upload the filing in that format to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
extent technically feasible. We seek
comment on these proposals.
32. Announcements and links.
Consistent with the Commission’s
approach in the Second Report and
Order, we propose to require cable
operators, DBS providers, and broadcast
and satellite radio licensees that have
Web sites to place a link to the online
public file on their home pages. We also
propose that these entities that have
Web sites include on their home page
contact information for a representative
who can assist any person with
disabilities with issues related to the
content of the public file. We do not
propose that cable and DBS operators or
broadcast or satellite radio stations be
required to make on-air announcements
regarding the change in location of their
public file. As required of television
stations in the Second Report and
Order, however, we propose to require
radio stations to revise their on-air preand post-filing renewal announcements
to reflect the availability of a station’s
renewal application on the
Commission’s Web site, as reflected in
Appendix B. We invite comment on
these proposals.
33. Location of public inspection file
and designated contact information. As
the Commission required with respect
to television stations, we also propose
that cable and DBS operators and
broadcast and satellite radio licensees
be required to provide information in
the online public file about the location
of the local public file and the
individual who may be contacted for
questions about the file. This
information would be provided when
the operator or licensee first establishes
its online public file, but should be
updated if and when staffing or location
changes occur. We believe this
information is necessary to inform the
public of the location of the existing
political file (until its retention period
expires in two years), which will be
publicly available at the local public file
location, as well as the correspondence
folder retained by commercial
broadcasters. We seek comment on this
proposal.
34. EEO materials. In the Second
Report and Order, we continued to
require that television stations make
their EEO materials available on their
Web sites, if they have one, and we
propose to take the same approach in
this proceeding with respect to cable
operators, DBS providers, and broadcast
and satellite radio licensees. Similar to
television stations, we propose to permit
these entities to fulfill this Web site
posting requirement by providing, on
their own Web site, a link to the EEO
materials on their online public file
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
page on the Commission’s Web site. We
seek comment on this proposal.
35. No major changes to public file
obligations. Finally, with only minor
exceptions, we do not propose to
impose new public file obligations on
cable, DBS, or broadcast or satellite
radio entities in connection with this
transition to the online public file.
While we propose below a
reorganization of the existing cable
public file rules for purposes of
clarification and seek comment on other
minor changes to those rules, our
intention for purposes of the initial
transition to a centralized, online file for
cable operators, DBS providers, and
broadcast and satellite radio licensees is
to simply adapt our existing
requirements to the online file format.
We seek comment generally on these
proposals.
36. OVS. We note that Open Video
System (‘‘OVS’’) operators have several
public file obligations. Should OVS
operators be required to make this
information available on the
Commission’s online public file
database, or is it sufficient that this
information be made available by the
operator locally? How can we identify
those entities that do not have Physical
System IDs (‘‘PSIDs’’) or facility ID
numbers?
E. Requirements and Issues Unique to
Each Service
37. Certain issues related to the online
public file requirement are unique to
each service. Accordingly, we address
each service separately below and also
address whether and how to phase-in
certain requirements for each service.
1. Cable Public Inspection File
a. Current Rules
38. The FCC’s rules regarding records
to be maintained by cable systems
distinguish between records that must
be retained for inspection by the public
and those that must be made available
to Commission representatives or local
franchisors only. The rules also impose
different recordkeeping requirements
based on the number of subscribers to
the cable system. Operators of cable
systems with fewer than 1,000
subscribers are exempt from many
public inspection file requirements,
including the political file, sponsorship
identification, EEO records, and records
regarding children’s commercial
programming. Operators of systems with
between 1,000 and 5,000 subscribers
must provide certain information ‘‘upon
request’’ but must also ‘‘maintain for
public inspection’’ a political file, while
operators of systems having 5,000 or
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
more subscribers must ‘‘maintain for
public inspection’’ a political file and
records regarding, among other things,
sponsorship identification, EEO, and
children’s programming commercials.
The rules state that the public
inspection file must be maintained ‘‘at
the office which the system operator
maintains for the ordinary collection of
subscriber charges, resolution of
subscriber complaints, and other
business or at any accessible place in
the community served by the system
unit(s).’’
39. Cable system political file
requirements are similar to those for
television stations. The political file
must contain a ‘‘complete and orderly
record . . . of all requests for cablecast
time made by or on behalf of a
candidate for public office’’ including
the disposition of such requests. The file
must also show the ‘‘schedule of time
purchased, when spots actually aired,
the rates charged, and the classes of
time purchased.’’ With respect to issue
advertisements, the file must disclose
the name of the purchasing organization
and a list of the board of directors.
These records must be filed
‘‘immediately absent unusual
circumstances,’’ and must be retained
for at least two years.
b. Proposed Online Public File
Requirements
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Content Required To Be Maintained
in the Online File
40. As discussed above, consistent
with the rules we adopted for television
broadcasters, we propose to require that
cable operators upload to the online
public file all documents and
information that are required to be in
the public file but which are not also
filed in COALS or maintained by the
Commission on its own Web site. The
Commission proposes to import these
latter documents or information into the
online public file itself.
41. We note that the only document
that cable operators file with the
Commission that must also be retained
in their public inspection files is the
EEO program annual report, which we
propose that the Commission upload to
the online file. Cable operators are not
required to maintain in their public
inspection files documents similar to
The Public and Broadcasting manual,
which television and radio broadcasters
must retain in their public files and
which the Commission makes available
to the online file for television stations
and will make available to the online
file for radio stations. Accordingly, as
the Commission maintains very few
documents cable operators must retain
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
in their public inspection files, most
documents in the cable online file will
be required to be uploaded by cable
operators themselves.
42. Certain information that must be
included in cable operators’ public files
is collected through FCC Form 325
(Annual Cable Operator Report), which
is filed annually by cable systems with
20,000 or more subscribers. For
example, operators must maintain at the
‘‘local office’’ a ‘‘current’’ listing of the
cable television channels delivered to
subscribers and must ‘‘maintain for
public inspection’’ a list of all broadcast
television stations carried in fulfillment
of the must-carry requirements. Some of
this information is also collected on
FCC Form 325. Cable operators required
to file the form are required to identify
on the form whether a broadcast station
is carried pursuant to must-carry
obligations, but the form does not
request all of the specific information
about the system’s must-carry channels
that is required to be placed in the
public file pursuant to 47 CFR 76.1709.
We invite comment on whether the
Commission should make FCC Form
325 available in the online file for those
systems required to file this form
annually. We also invite comment on
any other ways we can import to the
online file information cable operators
would otherwise be required to upload
to the file themselves in order to reduce
the burden on operators of uploading
information to the online file.
43. NCTA requests that the
Commission review the ongoing need
for channel lineups to be placed in the
public inspection file as this
information is provided to consumers in
paper format and, according to NCTA, is
available on operators’ Web sites. We
seek comment on this request. If most
operators maintain this information
electronically, we believe it would not
be burdensome to require operators to
upload this information to the online
public file. We seek comment on this
view. If we were to require all cable
systems to upload channel lineups to
the online file, should we require this
information to be uploaded or updated
annually or on some other schedule? To
the extent an operator maintains the
required information on a channel
lineup its own Web site, we also seek
comment on whether the operator
should be permitted to provide a link
directly to this channel lineup in lieu of
uploading this information to the public
file.
44. As discussed below, we propose
to clarify our rules regarding proof-ofperformance test data and signal leakage
logs and repair data. Specifically, we
propose to make it clear in our rules that
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8039
this information must be made available
only to the Commission and, in the case
of proof-of-performance test data, also to
the franchisor, and not to the public.
Accordingly, this information would not
be required to be included in the online
public inspection file, thereby reducing
the amount of material cable operators
would be required to upload to the file.
45. We propose that cable systems be
required to upload other material
currently required to be maintained for
public inspection or made available to
the public ‘‘upon request.’’ For cable
systems with 1,000 or more subscribers,
this material would include new
political file material, sponsorship
identification information, commercial
records on children’s programs, certain
EEO materials, leased access policy
information, records concerning
operator interests in video
programming, and copies of requests for
waiver of the prohibition on scrambling/
encryption. While cable systems with
1,000 or more subscribers but fewer
than 5,000 subscribers are currently
required to provide certain materials to
the public only ‘‘upon request,’’ we
believe these systems should be
required to place these materials in the
online file as this will facilitate public
access to these materials. We believe
this requirement will be no more
burdensome than placing the materials
in a physical file and should be less
burdensome over time. We invite
comment on this approach.
46. We also propose to exempt cable
systems with fewer than 1,000
subscribers from all online public file
requirements, either permanently or at
least initially. As discussed above, these
systems have far fewer public file
requirements than larger systems and
are not required to maintain a political
file. Alternatively, we could exempt
systems with fewer than 1,000
subscribers that maintain public file
information on their own Web sites. We
seek comment on these possible
approaches and any other suggestions
for ways we should provide regulatory
relief to very small cable systems.
47. Political file. As discussed above,
consistent with the approach we
adopted for television broadcasters, we
propose that cable operators not be
required to upload their existing
political files to the online file; rather,
we propose that they be permitted to
maintain existing material in their
physical political file and only upload
documents to the online political file on
a going-forward basis. We believe this
approach will minimize the burden of
transitioning to the online file for cable
operators, while providing convenient
access to the information most likely to
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8040
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
be of interest to the public, and invite
comment on this proposal. We note that
Time Warner Cable, which is not
currently required to maintain its public
file online, already posts its political
files online to save costs and expedite
access to this material. We invite
comment on whether there are any
aspects of our current cable political file
requirements that are unclear and that
should be clarified in connection with
our proposal to transition to an online
political file.
48. To smooth the transition for both
cable operators and the Commission and
to allow smaller cable systems
additional time to begin posting their
political files online, we propose to
phase-in the requirement to commence
uploading political file documents to
the online file for smaller cable systems.
We invite comment on ways in which
this phase-in period should be
structured. One approach would be to
start by requiring cable systems with
5,000 or more subscribers to post new
political file materials online, while
exempting systems with fewer than
5,000 subscribers for some period of
time. As cable systems with fewer than
1,000 subscribers are exempt from all
political file requirements, this
temporary exemption would apply to
systems with 1,000 or more subscribers
but fewer than 5,000 subscribers. As
discussed above, the rules currently
exempt systems with fewer than 5,000
subscribers from some recordkeeping
requirements, and we invite comment
on whether this 5,000 subscriber cutoff
should also be used to provide
regulatory relief in this context. Another
approach would be to define ‘‘small
cable system’’ for purposes of the
exemption as a system with fewer than
15,000 subscribers that is not affiliated
with a larger operator serving more than
10 percent of all MVPD subscribers. The
Commission used this definition for
purposes of determining eligibility for a
streamlined financial hardship waiver
in the CALM Act Report and Order. The
Commission explained in that Order
that it believed that the streamlined
waiver ‘‘should be available only to
those systems that are most likely to
face financial hardships in complying
with’’ the Commission’s CALM Act
requirements. We invite comment on
the appropriate definition of ‘‘small
cable system’’ for purposes of the
political file exemption and on the
appropriate period of time we should
exempt small systems from the
requirement to commence posting
political file material online. Should
there be a means of providing the public
with information regarding which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
systems’ political files are included in
the online file, and which are exempt,
either temporarily or permanently?
49. While we are proposing to delay
the transition to the online political file
for small cable systems, we propose to
allow these systems to commence
uploading documents to the online
political file on a voluntary basis at the
same time that online political file
requirements become effective for larger
cable systems. In addition, if we were to
decide to exempt systems with fewer
than 1,000 subscribers from all online
public file obligations, we propose to
allow these systems to participate in the
online file database on a voluntary
basis. Regardless of whether we
determine to delay or exempt small
systems from online filing requirements,
we believe it is appropriate to permit
any system that desires to participate in
the online database to do so voluntarily.
We invite comment on this proposal.
50. Geographic information. We
propose to require cable operators,
when first establishing their online
public file, to provide a list of the
geographic areas served by the system.
The Commission currently lacks precise
information about the geographic areas
served by cable systems and we believe
that making this information available
in the online public file will make the
information in the file, and especially
the political file, more useful to
subscribers, advertisers, candidates, and
others. We propose to require cable
systems to provide information
regarding the ZIP Codes served by the
system and the Designated Market Area
(‘‘DMA’’) or areas it serves, and we seek
comment on this proposal. We also seek
comment on alternative proposals for
collecting geographic information, such
as Census Block or Census Tract
information. We note that operators
would have to provide this information
when they first establish their public
files on the Commission’s database, and
update it only to reflect changes.
Therefore, we do not believe this
requirement would be burdensome.
51. We also invite comment on any
ways to facilitate access to the online
database by consumers. Cable operators
are currently required to maintain their
public files on a per-system basis and
we tentatively conclude that the same
should apply to the online database.
However, as NCTA notes, cable public
files cannot be organized by call sign
and the analogous unit, a physical
system identifier, is not readily known
by consumers. If we require cable
operators to provide information on the
geographic area served by the system,
should we use that geographic
information to help identify cable
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
systems in the cable online file? Are
there other ways in which systems can
be identified to consumers so that they
can quickly find the information they
are seeking?
(ii) Clarification and Streamlining of
Current Recordkeeping Requirements
52. NCTA argues that we should
streamline cable public file
requirements to avoid requiring cable
operators to incur the cost of posting
unnecessary material. While we decline
to undertake a comprehensive review of
cable public inspection file
requirements in this proceeding, we
seek comment on several issues raised
by NCTA and propose to clarify certain
requirements. First, NCTA asks that we
eliminate the requirement that proof-ofperformance and signal leakage
information be retained in the public
inspection file. We note that the current
recordkeeping rules regarding this
information are unclear. While 47 CFR
76.1700(a), which sets out
recordkeeping requirements, includes
‘‘proof-of-performance test data’’ and
‘‘signal leakage logs and repair records’’
in the list of items either to be made
available ‘‘upon request’’ (for systems
with 1,000 or more but fewer than 5,000
subscribers) or to be maintained in the
public inspection file (for systems with
5,000 or more subscribers), the rule
sections specifically addressing these
requirements require only that this
information be maintained for
inspection by the Commission and local
franchisor. We agree with NCTA that
this information is unlikely to be of
interest to the general public and does
not need to be made available online.
Accordingly, we propose to clarify that
this information must be maintained
and made available to the Commission
and franchisor upon request, but does
not need to be maintained in the
system’s public inspection file or
uploaded to the online file. We seek
comment on this proposal.
53. Second, NCTA requests that the
Commission evaluate whether it should
exclude headend location information
from any online public inspection file as
it is of no interest to the general public
and revealing this information in a
centralized database available to
Internet users ‘‘raises potentially serious
security risks.’’ We propose to exclude
headend location information from the
online public file and seek comment on
this proposal.
54. Third, NCTA requests that the
Commission consider eliminating the
current requirement that cable operators
post certain EEO materials on the
system’s own Web site, if it has one, as
these materials would be available on
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
the Commission’s online public file. As
discussed above, in the Second Report
and Order, we continued to require that
television stations make certain EEO
materials available on their Web sites, if
they have one, and we propose to take
the same approach in this proceeding
with respect to cable operators, DBS
providers, and broadcast and satellite
radio licensees. Consistent with the
rules for television stations, however,
we propose to permit these entities to
fulfill this Web site posting requirement
by providing, on their own Web site, a
link to the EEO materials on their online
public file page on the Commission’s
Web site.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(iii) Reorganization of the Cable Public
Inspection File Rules
55. We believe that a limited
reorganization and clarification of the
public inspection file rules would make
them easier to locate and understand.
The public inspection file rules for
broadcasters are contained in two rule
sections that identify all public
inspection file requirements for
commercial and noncommercial
educational broadcasters, with
references to other rule sections as
appropriate. In contrast, the cable
recordkeeping requirements are spread
over several rule sections in part 76,
subpart U (Documents to be Maintained
for Inspection), with some requirements
contained in a separate rule subpart.
While 47 CFR 76.1700 of the rules
includes references to many of these
recordkeeping requirements it does not
cite them all. Revising our rules to
identify all cable recordkeeping
requirements in a single rule section,
with references to other sections as
appropriate, would make these
requirements easier to locate and
facilitate compliance. Moreover, as
confirmed by our discussion above
regarding maintenance of proof-ofperformance and signal leakage
information, some of the current rules
are confusing and inconsistent. We
propose to revise 47 CFR 76.1700 to
include references to all public
inspection file requirements and to
more clearly address which records
must be maintained in the file versus
those that must be made available to the
Commission or franchising authority.
We invite comment on these proposed
revisions, which are set out in
Appendix B.
2. DBS Public Inspection File
a. Current Rules
56. DBS providers are required to
maintain a public file containing four
categories of information: Information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
regarding compliance with the carriage
obligation for noncommercial
programming (the ‘‘noncommercial setaside’’); information regarding
compliance with the commercial limits
in children’s programming; certain EEO
materials; and a political file. With
respect to the noncommercial set-aside,
the rules require that DBS providers
‘‘keep and permit public inspection of a
complete and orderly record of,’’ among
other things, measurements of channel
capacity, a record of entities to whom
noncommercial capacity is being
provided, the rates paid by the entity to
whom capacity is provided, and a
record of entities requesting capacity
and the disposition of those requests.
With respect to compliance with the
children’s programming commercial
limits, DBS providers airing children’s
programming must maintain records
sufficient to verify compliance with the
rules and ‘‘make such records available
to the public.’’ With respect to EEO
materials, DBS operators are required to
maintain in their public file EEO reports
and certain EEO program information.
57. DBS providers are also required to
‘‘keep and permit public inspection of a
complete and orderly political file’’ and
to ‘‘prominently disclose the physical
location of the file and the telephonic
and electronic means to access’’ it. The
file must include, among other things,
records of ‘‘all requests for DBS
origination time’’ and the schedule of
time purchased, when spots actually
aired, the rates charged, and the classes
of time purchased for each request.
These records must be placed in the file
‘‘as soon as possible’’ and must be
retained for at least two years. Unlike
broadcasters and cable systems, DBS
providers must ‘‘make available via fax,
email, or by mail upon telephone
request, photocopies of documents in
their political files and shall assist
callers by answering questions about the
contents of their political files.’’ In 2004,
the Commission explained that it was
requiring DBS providers to abide by
political file obligations similar to those
requirements placed on terrestrial
broadcasters and cable systems. Because
DBS is a national service and each
provider’s headquarters is not
necessarily readily accessible to most of
its viewers and to candidates, we
require DBS providers to make their
political files available upon telephone
or electronic request. They may provide
access to the file by fax, email, via
Internet Web site access, or, if so
requested, by mailing photocopies of the
documents in their political files. We
expect that DBS providers will assist
callers by promptly answering questions
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8041
about how to access the contents of the
DBS providers’ political files. DBS
providers may require individuals
requesting documents to pay for
photocopying if the requester prefers
delivery by mail, but the DBS provider
must pay for postage. DBS providers are
encouraged to put their political files on
their respective Web sites but must
provide alternatives for individuals who
do not have Internet access. In view of
these requirements and expectations, we
do not find it necessary to require that
a provider maintain a public file in
every community that receives its
signal. We do, however, require, that
DBS providers prominently disclose the
toll-free telephone number and email
address of the department responsible
for responding to requests for access to
the political file. In addition, because
DBS experience with the political
broadcasting rules is relatively new, and
to facilitate a future Staff Report, we
will require that DBS providers
maintain all requests for time from
candidates or individuals on behalf of
candidates, including general requests
for availabilities and rate information. In
addition, and for the same reasons, DBS
providers will be required to retain
information in their political files for
four years, until 2006, and thereafter for
two years, as is required of cable
operators and terrestrial broadcast
stations.
b. Proposed Online Public File
Requirements
58. We propose to treat DBS providers
in the same manner as television, cable,
and broadcast and satellite radio entities
by requiring them to upload to the
online file only material that is not
already on file at the Commission.
Similar to cable operators, the only
document that DBS providers file with
the Commission that must also be
retained in their public inspection files
is the EEO program annual report,
which we propose that the Commission
upload to the online file. Like cable
operators, the other information DBS
providers are required to maintain in
their public inspection files is not
currently filed with or maintained by
the Commission. Accordingly, most
material required to be kept in the
online file would have to be uploaded
by DBS providers themselves, which
includes channel capacity
measurements and other records related
to the use of and requests for
noncommercial capacity, records related
to compliance with children’s
commercial limits, certain EEO
materials, and political file material.
59. We do not believe that requiring
DBS providers to upload this material to
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8042
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
the online file would be onerous. As
compared to television and radio
broadcasters and cable operators, DBS
providers have the fewest number of
public file requirements. In addition,
there are currently only two U.S. DBS
operators, each of which has sufficient
financial resources to comply with any
online file requirements we ultimately
adopt in this proceeding. We agree with
Petitioners that the transition to an
online file is particularly important for
DBS because of that service’s
nationwide reach. Each DBS provider is
required to maintain only one public
and political file for the entire U.S. at its
headquarters, making in-person access
very difficult. While staff members must
copy and mail public and political file
documents upon request under the
current rules, making this material
available online would considerably
improve public access. Moreover, we
believe that, for DBS providers,
maintaining an online file hosted by the
Commission will prove to be more
efficient and less expensive over time
than maintaining a local file,
particularly in light of the extra steps
DBS providers are required to take to
assist callers requesting materials from
the file.
60. We tentatively conclude,
consistent with our approach for
television stations and our proposal
herein for cable systems and broadcast
radio licensees, that DBS providers
should not be required to upload their
existing political files to the online file
but rather should be permitted to
maintain existing material in their
physical political file and only upload
documents to the online political file on
a going-forward basis. If we require DBS
providers to upload their political files,
we propose to eliminate the requirement
that they mail photocopies of
documents in that file to individuals
requesting copies, as these materials
would be available online Additionally,
to the extent that political file materials
relate to ads shown on a local or hyperlocal basis, we seek comment on how
DBS providers can indicate in their
public files the area in which such ads
were or will be shown. We also invite
comment on whether there are any
aspects of our current DBS political file
requirements that are unclear and that
should be clarified in connection with
our proposal to transition to an online
political file.
3. Broadcast Radio Public Inspection
File
a. Current Rules
61. The public inspection file rules for
radio broadcasters are generally similar
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
to those for television broadcasters.
Every permittee or licensee of an AM or
FM station in the commercial or
noncommercial educational broadcast
service must maintain a public
inspection file containing, among other
things, FCC authorizations,
applications, contour maps, ownership
reports, EEO materials, issues/programs
lists, and time brokerage (also known as
‘‘local marketing’’) and joint sales
agreements. The file must be maintained
at the station’s main studio.
62. Radio stations must maintain a
political file as part of the public
inspection file. The political file must
contain a ‘‘complete and orderly record’’
of requests for broadcast time made by
or on behalf of a candidate for public
office.’’ The file must also show the
‘‘schedule of time purchased, when
spots actually aired, the rates charged,
and the classes of time purchased.’’
With respect to issue advertisements,
stations must disclose the name of the
purchasing organization and a list of the
board of directors. These records must
be filed ‘‘as soon as possible, meaning
immediately, absent unusual
circumstances,’’ and must be retained
for at least two years.
b. Proposed Online Public File
Requirements
(i) Content Required To Be Maintained
in the Online File
63. As discussed above, consistent
with the rules we adopted for television
broadcasters we propose to require that
radio broadcast licensees upload to the
online public file all documents and
information that are required to be in
the public file but that are not also filed
in CDBS (or LMS) or otherwise
maintained by the Commission on its
own Web site. Under this proposal,
radio stations would be required to
upload citizen agreements, certain EEO
materials, issues/programs lists, local
public notice announcements, time
brokerage agreements, joint sales
agreements, materials related to FCC
investigations or complaints (other than
investigative information requests from
the Commission), and any new political
file material. We propose that any
document or information required to be
in the public file that is electronically
filed with CDBS (or LMS) will be
imported to the online file by the
Commission. For radio broadcasters,
under this proposal the documents the
Commission would upload to the online
file include authorizations, applications
and related materials, contour maps,
ownership reports and related materials,
EEO Reports, The Public and
Broadcasting manual, and Letters of
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Inquiry and other investigative requests
from the Commission, unless otherwise
directed by the inquiry itself.
64. While all stations will have
issues/programs lists and materials
related to local public notice
announcements, few will have time
brokerage agreements and very few will
have citizen agreements or materials
related to an FCC investigation or
complaint. While many stations will
have political file material, in general
we expect that these files will be smaller
for radio stations than for television
stations as fewer political
advertisements air on radio. In addition,
radio stations with fewer than five fulltime employees are exempt from many
of the EEO recordkeeping requirements.
We seek comment on these issues.
65. Political file. As discussed above,
consistent with the approach we
adopted for television broadcasters and
that we propose herein for cable
operators, we propose that broadcast
radio licensees not be required to
upload their existing political files to
the online file, but rather that they be
permitted to maintain existing material
in their local political file and only
upload documents to the online
political file on a going-forward basis.
We believe this approach will minimize
the burden of transitioning to the online
file for radio licensees. We seek
comment on this approach.
66. Delay in implementation for small
market stations. We propose to
implement the online public file for
broadcast radio stations by imposing
requirements, at first, only on stations
with more resources. We propose to
delay all mandatory online filing for
other radio stations for some period of
time. As discussed above, several
commenters express concern about
whether radio stations have sufficient
resources to implement and maintain an
online public file, particularly small
stations with limited financial resources
and small staffs. Some commenters
argue that we should postpone any
consideration of moving to an online
file for broadcast radio or, if we do
adopt online file obligations for that
medium in this proceeding, that we
exempt smaller stations and/or NCE
stations. Those advocating an
exemption for NCE stations argue that
many of these stations have very small
staffs and limited resources and that
compliance with an online requirement
would create a severe financial and
staffing hardship. Ampers and NFCB
also note that NCEs are prohibited from
accepting funds from political
candidates and organizations advocating
on behalf of a candidate or political
issue, making online access to the
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
political file less important for these
stations. Other commenters argue that,
in order to minimize the risk of online
public file requirements becoming the
‘‘proverbial straw that breaks the
camel’s back’’ for already struggling
small radio stations, the Commission
should not require small stations to
upload the contents of their existing
public files, or at least should provide
stations with an extended period of time
during which they could incrementally
add those materials to the online file.
67. Another issue raised by radio
commenters is the lack of computer or
Internet access at some small, rural
stations. According to NAB, some radio
stations in remote locations, including
Alaska, Maine, and areas of the
Southwest, do not have access to
reliable Internet service or even are
without Internet access altogether. Other
stations have no in-house computing
resources or broadband capacity.
According to Native Public Media,
many Native-owned NCE radio stations
operate on Tribal lands where
broadband penetration rates are between
five and 10 percent. Moreover,
according to these commenters, in
communities where broadband is
theoretically available actual access is
often severely hampered by high
latency, slow dial-up speeds, and
unreliable coverage. Native Public
Media argues that it would be difficult,
if not impossible, to require stations
facing these circumstances to upload
large files to the Commission’s online
database. In addition, these commenters
argue that the cost of maintaining an
online file would significantly outweigh
the benefits in communities where
listeners have limited Internet access.
68. We recognize that some radio
stations may face financial or other
obstacles that could make the transition
to an online public file more difficult.
Accordingly, we believe that it is
reasonable to commence the transition
to an online public file for radio with
stations with more resources while
delaying, for some period of time, all
mandatory online public file
requirements for other stations. We
propose that other stations be permitted
to voluntarily transition to the online
file early, but not be required to
participate until we have gained some
experience with the inclusion of
stations with greater resources. Adding
radio stations to the online file
incrementally over time will give us
more time to address any technical
issues that may arise in connection with
our online file database as the volume
of users increases. Given the large
number of radio stations and the volume
of material they will be uploading to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
online file, we believe it makes sense to
proceed in stages to include radio
stations in the Commission’s online
database.
69. We seek comment generally on
this approach. Is it appropriate to
temporarily exempt a certain category of
radio stations from all online public file
requirements or should we instead
temporarily exempt some stations from
only the online political file? How
should we define the category of
stations that should be eligible for a
temporary exemption? We note that, in
the television online file proceeding, we
implemented the online political file
first with television stations in the top
50 DMAs that were also affiliated with
the top four networks. With respect to
radio, however, network affiliation is
not a useful way to identify stations
with more resources. Accordingly, we
propose to begin implementation of
online public file requirements for radio
with commercial stations in markets 1
through 50, as defined by Nielsen Audio
(formerly Arbitron), that have five or
more full-time employees. We propose
that these stations commence
compliance with online public file
requirements at the same time as cable,
DBS, and SDARS entities. With respect
to all other radio stations, we propose to
delay all online public file requirements
for two years. This two-year delay is the
same length of time we delayed, in the
television online file proceeding, the
implementation of political file
obligations for television stations in
smaller markets and those unaffiliated
with the top four networks. We propose
to initially exempt NCE radio stations as
well as those with fewer than five fulltime employees from the online public
file to help ensure that we commence
online file requirements for radio with
stations with greater resources. With
respect to radio stations with fewer than
five full-time employees, as noted above
our rules exempt these stations from
many EEO requirements. One advantage
of tying an exemption for small radio
stations to this EEO exemption is that
information regarding the stations that
are exempt from EEO requirements is
readily available to the public, as this
information is filed with the FCC and is
available via the FCC’s Web site. We
seek comment on this and any other
possible approach to structuring the
temporary delay in online file
requirements for certain radio stations.
We also seek comment on whether we
should permanently exclude certain
radio stations, such as NCEs and
stations with fewer than five full-time
employees, from all online public file
requirements, rather than simply
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8043
delaying implementation of online file
requirements for these stations.
70. While we are proposing to delay
the transition to the online public file
for certain radio stations, we also
propose to allow these stations to
commence uploading all or part of their
public file documents to the online file
on a voluntary basis before the delayed
effective date of any online file
requirement for these stations. As
discussed above, public television
licensees in the television online file
proceeding requested that we allow NCE
radio stations, or at least those licensed
to the same entity as, or under common
control with, an NCE television station,
to maintain their public inspection files
online on the Commission’s Web site on
a voluntary basis. Public television
licensees argued that this would allow
radio stations that were jointly owned or
operated with television stations to
avoid duplicative efforts from having to
maintain two separate public file
systems, involving some of the same
documents. If we decide to delay
implementation of online file
requirements for all or some NCEs in
this proceeding, we believe it is
appropriate to allow them and any other
smaller radio station to voluntarily
transition to the Commission’s online
file early. We seek comment on this
proposal.
71. We believe our proposal addresses
many of the concerns raised regarding
radio stations that may have fewer
resources and, therefore, might find
transitioning to the online file more
burdensome. These stations would not
be required to commence uploading
documents to the Commission’s
database until stations with more
resources have completed part or all of
their transition to the online file. This
delayed transition will assist small
stations to budget for any initial costs to
upload documents to the file and any
extra staff time required for this effort.
In the meantime, stations may
commence uploading documents to the
online database early on a voluntary
basis. We invite comment on this
approach and on ways we can help
ensure that permitting stations to
commence uploading documents early
on a voluntary basis is not confusing to
members of the public trying to locate
and access public file material.
(ii) Contour Map and Main Studio
Information
72. Radio stations are currently
required to include in their public
inspection files ‘‘any service contour
maps submitted with any application’’
together with ‘‘any other information in
the application showing service
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
8044
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
contours and/or main studio and
transmitter location.’’ We propose to
have the Commission create contour
maps for the online file based upon
existing data. Given the complexities of
AM contour mapping, we may not be
able to use the same tools that we used
to map TV contours and that we
anticipate using to map FM contours.
We seek comment on ways to address
this issue. Should AM stations be
required to upload contour maps to the
online file?
73. We also propose to require
stations to provide information to the
online file regarding the location of the
station’s main studio. The Commission’s
rules do not currently require the
reporting of this information and it is
not included on contour maps. We
believe that information regarding the
location of the main studio would help
members of the public to engage in an
active dialogue with radio licensees
regarding their service, which is one of
the goals of this proceeding. In addition,
we believe this information is necessary
to inform the public of the location of
the correspondence file and existing
political file (until its retention period
expires in two years), both of which will
be publicly available at the station.
Therefore, consistent with the approach
we took in the television station online
file proceeding, we propose to require
stations to include in the online public
file the station’s main studio address
and telephone number, and the email
address of the station’s designated
contact for questions about the public
file. In addition, we propose that
stations with a main studio located
outside of their community of license be
required to list the location of the
correspondence file and existing
political file, as well as the required
local or toll free number. We seek
comment on this proposal.
(iii) Letters From the Public
74. In the Second Report and Order,
the Commission exempted letters and
emails from the public from the online
public file and instead required that
such material be maintained at the
station in a correspondence file. The
Commission determined that including
these documents in the online file could
risk exposing personally identifiable
information and that requiring stations
to redact such information prior to
uploading these documents would be
overly burdensome. The Commission
determined that letters and emails from
the public should be maintained at the
station’s main studio either in a paper
file or electronically on a computer.
Further, the Commission clarified that,
as required under the current public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
inspection file rules, this file should
include all letters and emails from the
public regarding operation of the station
unless the letter writer has requested
that the letter not be made public or the
licensee feels that it should be excluded
due to the nature of its content. Finally,
the Commission determined that it
would not require stations to retain
social media messages in their
correspondence file. We propose to take
the same approach with respect to
broadcast radio stations and the letters
and emails they receive from the public,
and seek comment on this proposal.
(iv) Donor Lists
75. NCE stations are required to retain
in the public inspection file lists of
donors supporting specific programs.
Native Public Media asks that, for the
same reason the Commission excluded
letters and emails from the public from
the television online file requirement,
donor lists also be excluded from any
NCE online file requirements to ensure
the privacy of donors. In the Second
Report and Order we required NCE
television broadcasters to include donor
lists in their online public files, and we
propose to take the same approach with
respect to radio. We seek comment on
this issue. Is there a reason to treat NCE
radio station donor lists differently from
NCE television station donor lists?
4. Satellite Radio Public Inspection File
a. Current Requirements
76. Licensees in the satellite radio
service are required to maintain a public
file with two categories of material.
First, as discussed above, SDARS
licensees are required to comply with
EEO requirements similar to those
imposed on broadcasters, including the
requirement to file EEO reports and to
maintain those reports in their public
file together with other EEO program
information. Second, also as discussed
above, satellite radio licensees are
required to maintain a political file. In
addition, SiriusXM, the current, sole
U.S. SDARS licensee, is required to
retain a third category of material in the
public file. SiriusXM made a voluntary
commitment to make capacity available
for noncommercial educational and
informational programming, similar to
the requirement imposed on DBS
providers, in connection with its merger
application. As part of its approval of
the merger, the Commission required
that the merged entity reserve channels
for educational and informational
programming, offer those channels to
qualified programmers, and comply
with the public file requirements of 47
CFR 25.701(f)(6), which sets forth public
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
file requirements for the noncommercial
set-aside for DBS providers.
b. Proposed Online Public File
Requirements
77. We propose to treat satellite radio
licensees in the same manner as
television, cable, DBS, and broadcast
radio entities by requiring them to
upload to the online file only material
that is not already on file at the
Commission. We seek comment on this
proposal. Similar to cable operators and
DBS providers, the only document that
SDARS entities file with the
Commission that must be retained in the
public inspection file is the EEO
program annual report, which we
propose that the Commission upload to
the online file. We do not believe that
requiring SDARS licensees to upload to
the online file other material required to
be maintained in the public file would
be burdensome as the number of public
file requirements for this service is
fewer than for other services and
entities discussed in this item and
because the current, sole U.S. SDARS
licensee has ample financial resources
to comply with any online file
requirement we ultimately adopt in this
proceeding. We also believe that, similar
to DBS, the transition to an online file
is particularly important for satellite
radio because of that service’s
nationwide reach and the fact that the
current licensee maintains only one
public and political file for the entire
U.S., making in-person access very
difficult.
78. With respect to the political file,
we propose to treat satellite radio
similar to DBS, as they are both
nationwide services with few licensed
service providers. As we do with respect
to the DBS political file herein, we
tentatively conclude, consistent with
our approach for television stations and
our proposal herein for cable systems
and radio broadcasters, that SDARS
licensees should not be required to
upload their existing political files to
the online file but rather should be
permitted to maintain existing material
in their physical political file, and only
upload documents to the online
political file on a going-forward basis. In
addition, to the extent that political file
materials relate to ads shown on a local
or hyper-local basis, we seek comment
on how satellite radio licensees can
indicate in their public files the area in
which such ads were or will be shown.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Procedural Matters
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
1. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(‘‘RFA’’), the Commission has prepared
this Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (‘‘IRFA’’) concerning the
possible significant economic impact on
small entities of the policies and rules
proposed in this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (‘‘NPRM’’). Written public
comments are requested on this IRFA.
Comments must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and must be filed
by the deadlines for comments provided
on the first page of this NPRM. The
Commission will send a copy of this
NPRM, including this IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (‘‘SBA’’). In
addition, this NPRM and IRFA (or
summaries thereof) will be published in
the Federal Register.
2. This NPRM proposes to expand to
cable and Direct Broadcast Satellite
(‘‘DBS’’) operators and broadcast and
satellite radio (‘‘SDARS’’) licensees the
requirement that public and political
files be posted to the online public file
database hosted by the Commission. In
2012, the Commission adopted online
public file rules for broadcast television
stations which required them to post
public file documents to a central, FCChosted online database rather than
maintaining the files locally at their
main studios. The Commission’s goal
was to modernize the procedures
television broadcasters use to inform the
public about how they are serving their
communities by harnessing current
technology to make information more
accessible to the public and, over time,
to reduce the cost of compliance. We are
initiating this proceeding to extend our
modernization effort to include the
public file documents required to be
maintained by cable operators, DBS
providers, broadcast radio licensees,
and SDARS licensees. While the
Commission first included only
television broadcasters in its public file
database to ‘‘ease the initial
implementation of the online public
file,’’ television broadcasters have now
successfully transitioned to the online
file over the past two years.
Accordingly, we now believe it is
appropriate to commence the process of
expanding the online file to other media
in order to extend the benefits of
improved public access to public
inspection files and, ultimately, reduce
the burden on these other entities of
maintaining those files.
3. In general, this NPRM proposes to
adopt a similar approach with respect to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
cable, DBS, and broadcast and satellite
radio online file requirements as we did
for the television online file.
Specifically, we propose that these
entities’ entire public files be hosted
online by the Commission and that
entities be responsible for uploading
only items now required to be in the
public file but not otherwise filed with
the Commission or available on the
Commission’s Web site. As with the
television online file, we propose that
the Commission itself upload to the
online public file material that is
already on file with the Commission or
that currently resides in a Commission
database. With respect to the political
file, we also propose that cable, DBS,
broadcast radio, and satellite radio
entities not be required to upload their
existing political files to the online file.
Instead, as we required with television
licensees, we propose that these entities
be permitted to maintain at the station
those documents already in place in
their political file at the time the new
rules become effective, and only upload
documents to the online political file on
a going-forward basis. With respect to
radio, this NPRM proposes to commence
the transition to the online file with
commercial stations in larger markets
with five or more full-time employees.
In addition, the item invites comment
on whether to temporarily delay the
requirement to upload new political file
material to the online file for small cable
systems.
4. The proposed action is authorized
pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 303, 315,
317, 335, 601, 611, 651 and 653 of the
Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 151,
152, 154(i), 303, 315, 317, 335, 601, 611,
651, and 653.
5. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of, and where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that may be affected by
the proposed rules, if adopted. The RFA
generally defines the term ‘‘small
entity’’ as having the same meaning as
the terms ‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small
organization,’’ and ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction.’’ In addition, the term
‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning
as the term ‘‘small business concern’’
under the Small Business Act. A small
business concern is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the SBA. Below, we
provide a description of such small
entities, as well as an estimate of the
number of such small entities, where
feasible.
6. Cable Companies and Systems. The
Commission has developed its own
small business size standards for the
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8045
purpose of cable rate regulation. Under
the Commission’s rules, a ‘‘small cable
company’’ is one serving 400,000 or
fewer subscribers nationwide. Industry
data shows that there were are currently
660 cable operators. Of this total, all but
ten cable operators nationwide are small
under this size standard. In addition,
under the Commission’s rate regulation
rules, a ‘‘small system’’ is a cable system
serving 15,000 or fewer subscribers.
Current Commission records show 4,629
cable systems nationwide. Of this total,
4,057 cable systems have less than
20,000 subscribers, and 572 systems
have 20,000 or more subscribers, based
on the same records. Thus, under this
standard, we estimate that most cable
systems are small entities.
7. Cable System Operators (Telecom
Act Standard). The Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, also contains
a size standard for small cable system
operators, which is ‘‘a cable operator
that, directly or through an affiliate,
serves in the aggregate fewer than 1
percent of all subscribers in the United
States and is not affiliated with any
entity or entities whose gross annual
revenues in the aggregate exceed
$250,000,000.’’ There are approximately
54 million cable video subscribers in the
United States today. Accordingly, an
operator serving fewer than 540,000
subscribers shall be deemed a small
operator if its annual revenues, when
combined with the total annual
revenues of all its affiliates, do not
exceed $250 million in the aggregate.
Based on available data, we find that all
but ten incumbent cable operators are
small entities under this size standard.
We note that the Commission neither
requests nor collects information on
whether cable system operators are
affiliated with entities whose gross
annual revenues exceed $250 million.
Although it seems certain that some of
these cable system operators are
affiliated with entities whose gross
annual revenues exceed $250,000,000,
we are unable at this time to estimate
with greater precision the number of
cable system operators that would
qualify as small cable operators under
the definition in the Communications
Act.
8. Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS)
Service. DBS service is a nationally
distributed subscription service that
delivers video and audio programming
via satellite to a small parabolic ‘‘dish’’
antenna at the subscriber’s location.
DBS, by exception, is now included in
the SBA’s broad economic census
category, Wired Telecommunications
Carriers, which was developed for small
wireline businesses. Under this
category, the SBA deems a wireline
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8046
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
business to be small if it has 1,500 or
fewer employees. Census data for 2007
shows that there were 3,188 firms that
operated for that entire year. Of this
total, 2,940 firms had fewer than 100
employees, and 248 firms had 100 or
more employees. Therefore, under this
size standard, the majority of such
businesses can be considered small
entities. However, the data we have
available as a basis for estimating the
number of such small entities were
gathered under a superseded SBA small
business size standard formerly titled
‘‘Cable and Other Program
Distribution.’’ As of 2002, the SBA
defined a small Cable and Other
Program Distribution provider as one
with $12.5 million or less in annual
receipts. Currently, only two entities
provide DBS service, which requires a
great investment of capital for operation:
DIRECTV and DISH Network. Each
currently offers subscription services.
DIRECTV and DISH Network each
report annual revenues that are in
excess of the threshold for a small
business. Because DBS service requires
significant capital, we believe it is
unlikely that a small entity as defined
under the superseded SBA size standard
would have the financial wherewithal to
become a DBS service provider.
9. Radio Broadcasting. The SBA
defines a radio broadcast station as a
small business if such station has no
more than $38.5 million in annual
receipts. Business concerns included in
this industry are those ‘‘primarily
engaged in broadcasting aural programs
by radio to the public.’’ According to
review of the BIA Publications, Inc.
Master Access Radio Analyzer Database
as of November 26, 2013, about 11,331
(or about 99.9 percent) of the then
number of commercial radio stations
(11,341) have revenues of $35.5 million
or less and thus qualify as small entities
under the SBA definition. The
Commission has estimated the number
of licensed noncommercial radio
stations to be 4,082. The Commission
does not compile and otherwise does
not have access to information on the
revenue of NCE stations that would
permit it to determine how many such
stations would qualify as small entities.
These stations rely primarily on grants
and contributions for their operations,
so we will assume that all of these
entities qualify as small businesses. We
note that in assessing whether a
business entity qualifies as small under
the above definition, business control
affiliations must be included. This
estimate, therefore, likely overstates the
number of small entities that might be
affected, because the revenue figure on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
which it is based does not include or
aggregate revenues from affiliated
companies.
10. In addition, an element of the
definition of ‘‘small business’’ is that the
entity not be dominant in its field of
operation. The Commission is unable at
this time to define or quantify the
criteria that would establish whether a
specific radio station is dominant in its
field of operation. Accordingly, the
estimate of small businesses to which
rules may apply does not exclude any
radio station from the definition of a
small business on this basis and
therefore may be over-inclusive to that
extent. Also, as noted, an additional
element of the definition of ‘‘small
business’’ is that the entity must be
independently owned and operated.
The Commission notes that it is difficult
at times to assess these criteria in the
context of media entities and the
estimates of small businesses to which
they apply may be over-inclusive to this
extent.
11. Satellite Radio. The rules
proposed in this NPRM would affect the
sole, current U.S. provider of satellite
radio (‘‘SDARS’’) services, XM-Sirius,
which offers subscription services. XMSirius reported revenue of $3.8 billion
in 2013 and a net income of $377
million. In light of these figures, we
believe it is unlikely that this entity
would be considered small.
12. Open Video Systems. The open
video system (OVS) framework was
established in 1996, and is one of four
statutorily recognized options for the
provision of video programming
services by local exchange carriers. The
OVS framework provides opportunities
for the distribution of video
programming other than through cable
systems. Because OVS operators provide
subscription services, OVS falls within
the SBA small business size standard
covering cable services, which is
‘‘Wired Telecommunications Carriers.’’
The SBA has developed a small
business size standard for this category,
which is: All such businesses having
1,500 or fewer employees. Census data
for 2007 shows that there were 3,188
firms that operated for that entire year.
Of this total, 2,940 firms had fewer than
100 employees, and 248 firms had 100
or more employees. Therefore, under
this size standard, we estimate that the
majority of these businesses can be
considered small entities.
13. Certain rule changes proposed in
this NPRM would affect reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements. Cable, DBS, radio, and
SDARS entities are currently required to
maintain a ‘‘local’’ copy of their public
inspection files. This NPRM proposes to
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
require that these files be maintained
online in the database hosted by the
Commission. Entities subject to this
requirement would be required to
upload certain documents currently
maintained in their local files to the
online database.
14. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standard; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
15. This NPRM proposes a number of
measures to minimize the effort and cost
entities must undertake to move their
pubic files online. Specifically, we
propose to require entities only to
upload to the online file public file
documents that are not already on file
with the Commission or that the
Commission maintains in its own
database. We also propose to exempt
existing political file material from the
online file requirement and to require
only that political file documents be
uploaded on a going-forward basis. In
addition, with only minor exceptions—
requiring cable operators to provide
information about the geographic areas
they serve, clarifying the documents
required to be included in the cable
public file, and requiring cable, DBS,
broadcast radio, and SDARS entities to
provide the location and contact
information for their local file—we do
not propose new or modified public
inspection file requirements in this
proceeding. Our goal is simply to adapt
our existing public file requirements to
an online format. While we recognize
that entities may incur a modest, onetime transitional cost to upload some
portions of their existing public file to
the online database, we believe this
initial expense will be offset by the
public benefits of online disclosure. We
also believe that, over time, entities will
benefit from the lower costs of sending
documents electronically to the
Commission as opposed to creating and
maintaining a paper file at the local or
headquarters’ office or main studio and
assisting the public in accessing it.
While we propose to place the entire
public file online, we invite comment
on whether we should instead require
only that certain components of the
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
public file be placed on the
Commission’s online database. We note
that limiting online file requirements to
certain components of the public file
would require entities to upload certain
documents and maintain others in the
local public file, thereby potentially
imposing a greater burden than moving
documents to the online file over time.
16. In addition, with respect to radio
licensees this NPRM proposes to
commence the transition to an online
file with commercial stations in larger
markets with five or more full-time
employees, while postponing
temporarily all online file requirements
for other radio stations. This NPRM also
proposes to exempt small cable systems
temporarily from the requirement to
commence uploading new political file
material to the online public file and
proposes to exempt very small cable
systems from all requirements to upload
documents to the Commission’s online
database. Finally, this NPRM also seeks
comment on whether we should
exclude certain radio stations from all
online public file requirements, rather
than simply delaying implementation of
certain requirements.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rule
None.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
17. This document contains proposed
information collection requirements.
The Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to comment on the information
collection requirements contained in
this document, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In
addition, pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
we seek specific comment on how we
might ‘‘further reduce the information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees.’’
C. Ex Parte Rules
18. Permit-But-Disclose. This
proceeding will be treated as a ‘‘permitbut-disclose’’ proceeding in accordance
with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Persons making ex parte presentations
must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with rule
§ 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
rule § 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable.pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
D. Filing Requirements
19. Comments and Replies. Pursuant
to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS). See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998).
D Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
D Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number.
D Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8047
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
D All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St. SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes and boxes must be disposed
of before entering the building.
D Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
D U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
D People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
20. Additional Information. For
additional information on this
proceeding, please contact Kim
Matthews of the Media Bureau, Policy
Division, Kim.Matthews@fcc.gov, (202)
418–2154.
V. Ordering Clauses
21. Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to the authority contained in
sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 335 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
303(r), and 335 this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking is adopted.
22. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
23. It is further ordered that the
Petition for Rulemaking filed by the
Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause,
and the Sunlight Foundation is granted.
List of Subjects
47 CFR Part 25
Direct Broadcast Satellite, Satellite
radio.
47 CFR Part 73
Broadcast radio.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
8048
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
47 CFR Part 76
Cable television.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
parts 25, 73, and 76 as follows:
PART 25—SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
1. The Authority citation for Part 25
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Interprets or applies sections 4,
301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 319, 332, 705, and
721 of the Communications Act, as amended,
47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 319,
332, 605, and 721, unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 25.601 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 25.601
Equal employment opportunities.
Notwithstanding other EEO
provisions within these rules, an entity
that uses an owned or leased FixedSatellite Service or Direct Broadcast
Satellite Service or 17/24 GHz
Broadcasting-Satellite Service facility
(operating under this part) to provide
video programming directly to the
public on a subscription basis must
comply with the equal employment
opportunity requirements set forth in
part 76, subpart E, of this chapter, if
such entity exercises control (as defined
in part 76, subpart E, of this chapter)
over the video programming it
distributes. Notwithstanding other EEO
provisions within these rules, a licensee
or permittee of a direct broadcast
satellite station operating as a
broadcaster, and a licensee or permittee
in the satellite DARS service, must
comply with the equal employment
opportunity requirements set forth in
part 73.
■ 3. Section 25.701 is amended by
revising the section heading and
paragraphs (d), (e)(3), and (f)(6) to read
as follows:
§ 25.701 Other DBS public interest
obligations.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Political file. Each DBS provider
shall maintain a complete and orderly
political file.
(1) The political file shall contain, at
a minimum:
(i) A record of all requests for DBS
origination time, the disposition of
those requests, and the charges made, if
any, if the request is granted. The
‘‘disposition’’ includes the schedule of
time purchased, when spots actually
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
aired, the rates charged, and the classes
of time purchased; and
(ii) A record of the free time provided
if free time is provided for use by or on
behalf of candidates.
(2) All records required to be retained
by this section must be placed in the
political file as soon as possible and
must be retained for a period of two
years. After the effective date of this
section, DBS providers shall place all
new political file material required to be
retained by this section in the online file
hosted by the Commission.
(3) DBS providers shall assist callers
by answering questions about the
contents of their political files.
(e) * * *
(3) DBS providers airing children’s
programming must maintain in the
online file hosted by the Commission
records sufficient to verify compliance
with this rule. Such records must be
maintained for a period sufficient to
cover the limitations period specified in
47 U.S.C. 503(b)(6)(B).
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(6) Public file. (i) In addition to the
political file requirements in § 25.701,
each DBS provider shall maintain in the
online file hosted by the Commission a
complete and orderly record of:
(A) Quarterly measurements of
channel capacity and yearly average
calculations on which it bases its four
percent reservation, as well as its
response to any capacity changes;
(B) A record of entities to whom
noncommercial capacity is being
provided, the amount of capacity being
provided to each entity, the conditions
under which it is being provided and
the rates, if any, being paid by the
entity;
(C) A record of entities that have
requested capacity, disposition of those
requests and reasons for the disposition.
(ii) All records required by paragraph
(f)(6)(i) of this section shall be placed in
the online file hosted by the
Commission as soon as possible and
shall be retained for a period of two
years.
(iii) Each DBS provider must also
place in the online file hosted by the
Commission the records required to be
placed in the public inspection file by
§ 25.701(e) (commercial limits in
children’s programs) and by § 25.601
and 47 CFR part 76, subpart E (equal
employment opportunity requirements)
and retain those records for the period
required by those rules.
(iv) Each DBS provider must provide
a link to the public inspection file
hosted on the Commission’s Web site
from the home page of its own Web site,
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
if the provider has a Web site, and
provide on its Web site contact
information for a representative who
can assist any person with disabilities
with issues related to the content of the
public files. Each DBS provider also
must include in the online public file
the address of the provider’s local
public file and the name, phone
number, and email address of the
provider’s designated contact for
questions about the public file.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 25.702 is added to read as
follows:
§ 25.702 Other SDARS Public interest
obligations.
(a) Political broadcasting
requirements. The following political
broadcasting rules shall apply to all
SDARS licensees: 47 CFR 73.1940
(Legally qualified candidates for public
office), 73.1941 (Equal opportunities),
and 73.1944 (Reasonable access).
(b) Political file. Each SDARS licensee
shall maintain a complete and orderly
political file.
(1) The political file shall contain, at
a minimum:
(i) A record of all requests for SDARS
origination time, the disposition of
those requests, and the charges made, if
any, if the request is granted. The
‘‘disposition’’ includes the schedule of
time purchased, when spots actually
aired, the rates charged, and the classes
of time purchased; and
(ii) A record of the free time provided
if free time is provided for use by or on
behalf of candidates.
(2) SDARS licensees shall place all
records required by this section in the
political file as soon as possible and
shall retain the records for a period of
two years. After the effective date of this
section, SDARS licensees shall place all
new political file material required to be
retained by this section in the online file
hosted by the Commission.
(c) Public inspection file. Each SDARS
applicant or licensee must also place in
the online file hosted by the
Commission the records required to be
placed in the public inspection file by
47 CFR 25.601 and 73.2080 (equal
employment opportunities (EEO)) and
retain those records for the period
required by those rules. Each SDARS
licensee must provide a link to the
public inspection file hosted on the
Commission’s Web site from the home
page of its own Web site, if the licensee
has a Web site, and provide on its Web
site contact information for a
representative who can assist any
person with disabilities with issues
related to the content of the public files.
Each SDARS licensee also must include
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
in the online public file the address of
the licensee’s local public file and the
name, phone number, and email address
of the licensee’s designated contact for
questions about the public file.
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
5. The Authority citation for Part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336,
and 339.
6. Section 73.1943 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
■
§ 73.1943
Political file.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Location of the file. A licensee or
applicant must post all of the contents
added to its political file after the
effective date of this subsection in the
political file component of its online
public file hosted by the Commission. A
station must retain in its political file
maintained at the station, at the location
specified in § 73.3526(b) or § 73.3527(b),
all material required to be included in
the political file and added to the file
prior to the effective date of this
subsection. The online political file
must be updated in the same manner as
paragraph (c) of this section.
■ 7. Section 73.3526 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 73.3526 Local public inspection file of
commercial stations.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Location of the file. The public
inspection file shall be located as
follows:
(1) For radio licensees temporarily
exempt from the online file, as
discussed in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, a hard copy of the public
inspection file shall be maintained at
the main studio of the station. For all
licensees, letters and emails from the
public, as required by paragraph (e)(9)
of this section, shall be maintained at
the main studio of the station. An
applicant for a new station or change of
community shall maintain its file at an
accessible place in the proposed
community of license or at its proposed
main studio.
(2)(i) A television station licensee or
applicant, and any radio station licensee
or applicant not temporarily exempt as
described in this paragraph, shall place
the contents required by paragraph (e) of
this section, of its public inspection file
on the online file hosted by the
Commission, with the exception of
letters and emails from the public as
required by paragraph (e)(9) of this
section, which shall be retained at the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and the
political file as required by paragraph
(e)(6) of this section, as discussed in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section. Any
radio station not in the top 50 Nielsen
Audio markets, and any radio station
with fewer than five full-time
employees, shall continue to retain the
public inspection file at the station in
the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section until [2 years
following the effective date of the
Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14–
127]. However, any radio station that is
not required to place its public
inspection file in the online file hosted
by the Commission before [2 years
following the effective date of the
Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14–
127] may choose to do so, instead of
retaining the public inspection file at
the station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(ii) A station must provide a link to
the public inspection file hosted on the
Commission’s Web site from the home
page of its own Web site, if the station
has a Web site, and provide contact
information on its Web site for a station
representative that can assist any person
with disabilities with issues related to
the content of the public files. A station
also is required to include in the online
public file the station’s main studio
address and telephone number, and the
email address of the station’s designated
contact for questions about the public
file. To the extent this section refers to
the local public inspection file, it refers
to the public file of an individual
station, which is either maintained at
the station or on the Commission’s Web
site, depending upon where the
documents are required to be
maintained under the Commission’s
rules.
(3)(i) A licensee or applicant shall
place the contents required by
paragraph (e)(6) of this section of its
political inspection file in the online file
hosted by the Commission. Political
inspection file material in existence 30
days after the effective date of this
provision shall continue to be retained
at the station in the manner discussed
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until
the end of its retention period.
(ii) Any television station not in the
top 50 DMAs, and any station not
affiliated with one of the top four
broadcast networks, regardless of the
size of the market it serves, shall
continue to retain the political file at the
station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section until July
1, 2014. For these stations, effective July
1, 2014, any new political file material
shall be placed in the online file hosted
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8049
by the Commission, while the material
in the political file as of July 1, 2014, if
not placed in the Commission’s Web
site, shall continue to be retained at the
station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the
end of its retention period. However,
any station that is not required to place
its political file in the online file hosted
by the Commission before July 1, 2014
may choose to do so, instead of
retaining the political file at the station
in the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section.
(iii) Any radio station not in the top
50 Nielsen Audio markets, and any
radio station with fewer than five fulltime employees, shall continue to retain
the political file at the station in the
matter discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section until [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127]. For these
stations, effective [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127], any new
political file material shall be placed in
the online file hosted by the
Commission, while the material in the
political file as of [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127], if not placed in
the online file hosted by the
Commission, shall continue to be
retained at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section until the end of its retention
period. However, any station that is not
required to place its political file on the
Commission’s Web site before [2 years
following the effective date of the
Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14–
127] may choose to do so, instead of
retaining the political file at the station
in the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section.
(4) The Commission will
automatically link the following items
to the electronic version of all licensee
and applicant public inspection files, to
the extent that the Commission has
these items electronically:
Authorizations, applications, contour
maps; ownership reports and related
materials; portions of the Equal
Employment Opportunity file held by
the Commission; ‘‘The Public and
Broadcasting’’; Letters of Inquiry and
other investigative information requests
from the Commission, unless otherwise
directed by the inquiry itself; Children’s
television programming reports; and
DTV transition education reports. In the
event that the online public file does not
reflect such required information, the
licensee will be responsible for posting
such material.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
8050
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
8. Section 73.3527 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 73.3527 Local public inspection file of
noncommercial educational stations.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Location of the file. The public
inspection file shall be located as
follows:
(1) For radio licensees, a hard copy of
the public inspection file shall be
maintained at the main studio of the
station until [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127] except that, as
discussed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section, any radio station may
voluntarily place its public inspection
file online before [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127] if it chooses to
do so instead of retaining the file at the
station. An applicant for a new station
or change of community shall maintain
its file at an accessible place in the
proposed community of license or at its
proposed main studio.
(2)(i) A noncommercial educational
television station licensee or applicant
shall place the contents required by
paragraph (e) of its public inspection
file in the online file hosted by the
Commission, with the exception of the
political file as required by paragraph
(e)(5) of this section, which may be
retained at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section until July 1, 2014. Effective July
1, 2014, any new political file material
shall be placed in the online file hosted
by the Commission, while the material
in the political file as of July 1, 2014, if
not placed on the Commission’s Web
site, shall continue to be retained at the
station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the
end of its retention period. However,
any noncommercial educational station
that is not required to place its political
file in the online file hosted by the
Commission before July 1, 2014 may
choose to do so instead of retaining the
political file at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section.
(ii) Beginning [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127], noncommercial
educational radio station licensees and
applicants shall place the contents
required by paragraph (e) of this section
in the online public inspection file
hosted by the Commission. For these
stations, effective [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127], any new
political file material shall be placed on
the Commission’s Web site, while the
material in the political file as of [2
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
years following the effective date of the
Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14–
127], if not placed in the online file
hosted by the Commission, shall
continue to be retained at the station in
the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section until the end of its
retention period. However, any radio
station that is not required to place its
public inspection file in the online file
hosted by the Commission before [2
years following the effective date of the
Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14–
127] may choose to do so, instead of
retaining the public inspection file at
the station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(iii) A station must provide a link to
the public inspection file hosted on the
Commission’s Web site from the home
page of its own Web site, if the station
has a Web site, and provide contact
information for a station representative
on its Web site that can assist any
person with disabilities with issues
related to the content of the public files.
A station also is required to include in
the online public file the station’s main
studio address and telephone number,
and the email address of the station’s
designated contact for questions about
the public file. To the extent this section
refers to the local public inspection file,
it refers to the public file of an
individual station, which is either
maintained at the station or on the
Commission’s Web site, depending
upon where the documents are required
to be maintained under the
Commission’s rules.
(3) The Commission will
automatically link the following items
to the electronic version of all licensee
and applicant public inspection files, to
the extent that the Commission has
these items electronically:
Authorizations; applications; contour
maps; ownership reports and related
materials; portions of the Equal
Employment Opportunity file held by
the Commission; and ‘‘The Public and
Broadcasting’’.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Section 73.3580 is amended by
revising paragraphs (d)(4)(i) and (ii) to
read as follows:
§ 73.3580 Local public notice of filing of
broadcast applications.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Pre-filing announcements. During
the period and beginning on the first
day of the sixth calendar month prior to
the expiration of the license, and
continuing to the date on which the
application is filed, the following
announcement shall be broadcast on the
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1st and 16th day of each calendar
month. Stations broadcasting primarily
in a foreign language should broadcast
the announcements in that language.
Radio announcement: On (date of last
renewal grant) (Station’s call letters) was
granted a license by the Federal
Communication Commission to serve
the public interest as a public trustee
until (expiration date).
Our license will expire on (date). We
must file an application for renewal
with the FCC (date four calendar
months prior to expiration date). When
filed, a copy of this application will be
available for public inspection at
www.fcc.gov. It contains information
concerning this station’s performance
during the last (period of time covered
by the application).
Individuals who wish to advise the
FCC of facts relating to our renewal
application and to whether this station
has operated in the public interest
should file comments and petitions with
the FCC by (date first day of last full
calendar month prior to the month of
expiration).
Further information concerning the
FCC’s broadcast license renewal process
is available at (address of location of the
station’s public inspection file) or may
be obtained from the FCC, Washington,
DC 20554.
Television announcement: On (date of
last renewal grant) (Station’s call letters)
was granted a license by the Federal
Communication Commission to serve
the public interest as a public trustee
until (expiration date).
Our license will expire on (date). We
must file an application for renewal
with the FCC (date four calendar
months prior to expiration date). When
filed, a copy of this application will be
available for public inspection at
www.fcc.gov. It contains information
concerning this station’s performance
during the last (period of time covered
by the application).
Individuals who wish to advise the
FCC of facts relating to our renewal
application and to whether this station
has operated in the public interest
should file comments and petitions with
the FCC by (date first day of last full
calendar month prior to the month of
expiration).
Further information concerning the
FCC’s broadcast license renewal process
is available at (address of location of the
station) or may be obtained from the
FCC, Washington, DC 20554.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Post-filing announcements. During
the period beginning of the date on
which the renewal application is filed to
the sixteenth day of the next to last full
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
calendar month prior to the expiration
of the license, all applications for
renewal of broadcast station licenses
shall broadcast the following
announcement on the 1st and 16th day
of each calendar month. Stations
broadcasting primarily in a foreign
language should broadcast the
announcements in that language.
Television announcement: On (date of
last renewal grant) (Station’s call letters)
was granted a license by the Federal
Communications Commission to serve
the public interest as a public trustee
until (expiration date).
Our license will expire on (date). We
have filed an application for renewal
with the FCC.
A copy of this application is available
for public inspection at www.fcc.gov. It
contains information concerning this
station’s performance during the last
(period of time covered by application).
Individuals who wish to advise the
FCC of facts relating to our renewal
application and to whether this station
has operated in the public interest
should file comments and petitions with
the FCC by (date first day of last full
calendar month prior to the month of
expiration).
Further information concerning the
FCC’s broadcast license renewal process
is available at (address of location of the
station) or may be obtained from the
FCC, Washington, DC 20554.
Radio announcement: On (date of last
renewal grant) (Station’s call letters) was
granted a license by the Federal
Communications Commission to serve
the public interest as a public trustee
until (expiration date).
Our license will expire on (date). We
have filed an application for renewal
with the FCC.
A copy of this application is available
for public inspection at www.fcc.gov. It
contains information concerning this
station’s performance during the last
(period of time covered by application).
Individuals who wish to advise the
FCC of facts relating to our renewal
application and to whether this station
has operated in the public interest
should file comments and petitions with
the FCC by (date first day of last full
calendar month prior to the month of
expiration).
Further information concerning the
FCC’s broadcast license renewal process
is available at (address of location of the
station’s public inspection file) or may
be obtained from the FCC, Washington,
DC 20554.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
PART 76—MULTICHANNEL VIDEO
AND CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE
10. The Authority citation for Part 76
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154,
301, 302, 302a, 303, 303a, 307, 308, 309, 312,
315, 317, 325, 339, 340, 341, 503, 521, 522,
531, 532, 534, 535, 536, 537, 543, 544, 544a,
545, 548, 549, 552, 554, 556, 558, 560, 561,
571, 572, 573.
11. Section 76.630 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 76.630 Compatibility with consumer
electronics equipment.
(a) * * *
(2) Requests for waivers of this
prohibition must demonstrate either a
substantial problem with theft of basic
tier service or a strong need to scramble
basic signals for other reasons. As part
of this showing, cable operators are
required to notify subscribers by mail of
waiver requests. The notice to
subscribers must be mailed no later than
30 calendar days from the date the
request for waiver was filed with the
Commission, and cable operators must
inform the Commission in writing, as
soon as possible, of that notification
date. The notification to subscribers
must state:
On (date of waiver request was filed with
the Commission), (cable operator’s name)
filed with the Federal Communications
Commission a request for waiver of the rule
prohibiting scrambling of channels on the
basic tier of service. 47 CFR 76.630(a). The
request for waiver states (a brief summary of
the waiver request). A copy of the request for
waiver shall be available for public
inspection at www.fcc.gov.
Individuals who wish to comment on this
request for waiver should mail comments to
the Federal Communications Commission by
no later than 30 days from (the date the
notification was mailed to subscribers).
Those comments should be addressed to the:
Federal Communications Commission, Media
Bureau, Washington, DC 20554, and should
include the name of the cable operator to
whom the comments are applicable.
Individuals should also send a copy of their
comments to (the cable operator at its local
place of business).
Cable operators may file comments in reply
no later than 7 days from the date subscriber
comments must be filed.
*
*
*
*
*
12. Section 76.1700 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 76.1700 Records to be maintained by
cable system operators.
(a) Public inspection file. The
following records must be placed in the
online public file hosted by the
Commission, except as indicated in
§ 76.1700(d) and except that the records
listed in 76.1700(1) (political file) that
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8051
are in existence 30 days after the
effective date of this provision shall
continue to be retained at the system
and made available to the public in the
manner discussed in paragraph (e) of
this section until the end of the
retention period. In addition, any cable
system with fewer than 5,000
subscribers shall continue to retain the
political file at the system in the manner
discussed in paragraph (e) of this
section until [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127]. For these
systems, effective [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127], any new
political file material shall be placed in
the online file hosted by the
Commission, while the material in the
political file as of [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 14–127], if not placed on
the Commission’s Web site, shall
continue to be retained at the system in
the manner discussed in paragraph (e)
of this section until the end of its
retention period. However, any system
that is not required to place its political
file on the Commission’s Web site
before [2 years following the effective
date of the Report and Order in MB
Docket No. 14–127] may choose to do
so, instead of retaining the political file
at the system in the manner discussed
in paragraph (e) of this section.
(1) Political file. All requests for
cablecast time made by or on behalf of
a candidate for public office and all
other information required to be
maintained pursuant to § 76.1701;
(2) Equal employment opportunity.
All EEO materials described in
§ 76.1702 except for any EEO program
annual reports, which the Commission
will link to the electronic version of all
systems’ public inspection files;
(3) Commercial records on children’s
programs. Sufficient records to verify
compliance with § 76.225 in accordance
with § 76.1703;
(4) Performance tests (channels
delivered). The operator of each cable
television system shall maintain at its
local office a current listing of the cable
television channels which that system
delivers to its subscribers in accordance
with § 76.1705;
(5) Leased access. If a cable operator
adopts and enforces written policy
regarding indecent leased access
programming, such a policy shall be
published in accordance with § 76.1707;
(6) Principal headend. The operator of
every cable system shall maintain the
designation and location of its principal
headend in accordance with § 76.1708;
(7) Availability of signals. The
operator of every cable television system
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8052
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
shall maintain a list of all broadcast
television stations carried by its system
in fulfillment of the must-carry
requirements in accordance with
§ 76.1709;
(8) Operator interests in video
programming. Cable operators shall
maintain records regarding the nature
and extent of their attributable interests
in all video programming services as
well as information regarding their
carriage of such vertically integrated
video programming services on cable
systems in which they have an
attributable interests in accordance with
§ 76.1710;
(9) Sponsorship identification.
Whenever sponsorship announcements
are omitted pursuant to § 76.1615(f) of
subpart T, the cable television system
operator shall maintain a list in
accordance with § 76.1715;
(10) Compatibility with consumer
electronics equipment. Cable system
operators generally may not scramble or
otherwise encrypt signals carried on the
basic service tier. Copies of requests for
waivers of this prohibition must be
available in the public inspection file in
accordance with § 76.630.
(b) Information available to the
franchisor. These records must be made
available by cable system operators to
local franchising authorities on
reasonable notice and during regular
business hours, except as indicated in
§ 76.1700(d).
(1) Proof-of-performance test data.
The proof of performance tests shall be
made available upon request in
accordance with § 76.1704;
(2) Complaint resolution. Cable
system operators shall establish a
process for resolving complaints from
subscribers about the quality of the
television signal delivered. Aggregate
data based upon these complaints shall
be made available for inspection in
accordance with § 76.1713.
(c) Information available to the
Commission. These records must be
made available by cable system
operators to the Commission on
reasonable notice and during regular
business hours, except as indicated in
§ 76.1700(d).
(1) Proof-of-performance test data.
The proof of performance tests shall be
made available upon request in
accordance with § 76.1704;
(2) Signal leakage logs and repair
records. Cable operators shall maintain
a log showing the date and location of
each leakage source in accordance with
§ 76.1706;
(3) Emergency alert system and
activations. Every cable system shall
keep a record of each test and activation
of the Emergency Alert System (EAS).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:53 Feb 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
The test is performed pursuant to the
procedures and requirements of part 11
of this chapter and the EAS Operating
Handbook. The records are kept in
accordance with part 11 and § 76.1711
of this chapter;
(4) Complaint resolution. Cable
system operators shall establish a
process for resolving complaints from
subscribers about the quality of the
television signal delivered. Aggregate
data based upon these complaints shall
be made available for inspection in
accordance with § 76.1713;
(5) Subscriber records and public
inspection file. The operator of a cable
television system shall make the system,
its public inspection file, and its records
of subscribers available for inspection
upon request in accordance with
§ 76.1716.
(d) Exceptions to the public
inspection file requirements. The
operator of every cable television system
having fewer than 1,000 subscribers is
exempt from the online public file and
from the public record requirements
contained in § 76.1701 (political file);
§ 76.1702 (EEO records available for
public inspection); § 76.1703
(commercial records for children’s
programming); § 76.1704 (proof-ofperformance test data); § 76.1706 (signal
leakage logs and repair records);
§ 76.1714 (FCC rules and regulations);
and § 76.1715 (sponsorship
identification).
(e) Location of records. Political file
material that continues to be retained at
the system shall be retained in a public
inspection file maintained at the office
in the community served by the system
that the system operator maintains for
the ordinary collection of subscriber
charges, resolution of subscriber
complaints, and other business and, if
the system operator does not maintain
such an office in the community, at any
accessible place in the communities
served by the system (such as a public
registry for documents or an attorney’s
office). Public file locations will be open
at least during normal business hours
and will be conveniently located. The
public inspection file shall be available
for public inspection at any time during
regular business hours for the facility
where they are kept. All or part of the
public inspection file may be
maintained in a computer database, as
long as a computer terminal capable of
accessing the database is made
available, at the location of the file, to
members of the public who wish to
review the file.
(f) Links and contact and geographic
information. A system must provide a
link to the public inspection file hosted
on the Commission’s Web site from the
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
home page of its own Web site, if the
system has a Web site, and provide
contact information on its Web site for
a system representative who can assist
any person with disabilities with issues
related to the content of the public files.
A system also is required to include in
the online public file the address of the
system’s local public file and the name,
phone number, and email address of the
system’s designated contact for
questions about the public file. In
addition, a system must provide on the
online public file a list of the geographic
areas served by the system. To the
extent this section refers to the local
public inspection file, it refers to the
public file of a physical system, which
is either maintained at the location
described in paragraph (e) of this
section or on the Commission’s Web
site, depending upon where the
documents are required to be
maintained under the Commission’s
rules.
(g) Reproduction of records. Copies of
any material in the public inspection
file shall be available for machine
reproduction upon request made in
person, provided the requesting party
shall pay the reasonable cost of
reproduction. Requests for machine
copies shall be fulfilled at a location
specified by the system operator, within
a reasonable period of time, which in no
event shall be longer than seven days.
The system operator is not required to
honor requests made by mail but may
do so if it chooses.
■ 13. Section 76.1709 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read
as follows:
§ 76.1709
Availability of signals.
(a) The operator of every cable
television system shall maintain for
public inspection a file containing a list
of all broadcast television stations
carried by its system in fulfillment of
the must-carry requirements pursuant to
§ 76.56. Such list shall include the call
sign, community of license, broadcast
channel number, cable channel number,
and in the case of a noncommercial
educational broadcast station, whether
that station was carried by the cable
system on March 29, 1990.
(b) Such records must be maintained
in accordance with the provisions of
§ 76.1700.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–02531 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8031-8052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02531]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 25, 73, and 76
[MB Docket No. 14-127; FCC 14-209]
Expansion of Online Public File Obligations to Cable and
Satellite TV Operators and Broadcast and Satellite Radio Licensees
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission proposes to expand to cable
operators, satellite TV providers, broadcast radio licensees, and
satellite radio licensees the requirement that public inspection files
be posted to the FCC's online database. In 2012, the Commission adopted
online public file rules for broadcast television stations that
required them to post public file documents to a central, FCC-hosted
online database rather than maintaining the files locally at their main
studios. Now that television broadcasters have completed their
transition to the online file, the Commission believes it is
appropriate to commence the process of expanding the online file to
other media entities to extend the benefits of improved public access
to public inspection files and, ultimately, reduce the burden of
maintaining these files.
DATES: Comments may be filed on or before March 16, 2015, and reply
comments may be filed April 14, 2015. Written comments on the proposed
information collection requirements, subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13, should be submitted on or before
April 14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by MB Docket No. 14-127,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Federal
Communications Commission's Web site: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery,
by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: (202) 418-
0530 or TTY: (202) 418-0432.
In addition to filing comments with the Secretary, a copy of any
comments on the Paperwork Reduction Act proposed information collection
requirements contained herein should be submitted to the Federal
Communications Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov and to
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov and also to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via email to Nicholas-A.-Fraser@omb.eop.gov. For
detailed instructions
[[Page 8032]]
for submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the supplementary information section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Matthews, Media Bureau, Policy
Division, 202-418-2154, or email at kim.matthews@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 14-209, adopted on December 17, 2014
and released on December 18, 2014. The full text of this document is
available for public inspection and copying during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS at https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word,
and/or Adobe Acrobat. Alternative formats are available for people with
disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) by
sending an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or calling the Commission's Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-
0432 (TTY).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
This NPRM contains proposed new and modified information collection
requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection
requirements contained in this document, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Comments should address: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on the respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to further reduce the information
collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25
employees. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the
Commission seeks specific comment on how it might further reduce the
information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.
To view a copy of this information collection request (ICR)
submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web page https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the Web page called ``Currently
Under Review,'' (3) click on the downward-pointing arrow in the
``Select Agency'' box below the ``Currently Under Review'' heading, (4)
select ``Federal Communications Commission'' from the list of agencies
presented in the ``Select Agency'' box, (5) click the ``Submit'' button
to the right of the ``Select Agency'' box, (6) when the list of FCC
ICRs currently under review appears, look for the Title of this ICR and
then click on the ICR Reference Number. A copy of the FCC submission to
OMB will be displayed.
OMB Control Numbers: 3060-xxxx.
Title: Sections 25.701, Other DBS Public Interest Obligations, and
25.702, Other SDARS Public Interest Obligations.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: New collection.
Respondents: Business or other for profit entities.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 3 respondents and 3 responses.
Estimated Hours per Response: 18 hrs.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement,
Recordkeeping requirement, Third party disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 54 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $592.
Obligation to Respond: Required to be obtained or retained for
benefits. The statutory authority for this information collection is
contained in sections 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 319, 332, 605, and
721 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for
confidentiality with this collection of information.
Privacy Act Assessment: The Commission prepared a system of records
notice (SORN), FCC/MB-2, ``Broadcast Station Public Inspection Files,''
that covers the PII contained in the broadcast station public
inspection files located on the Commission's Web site. The Commission
will revise appropriate privacy requirements as necessary to include
any entities and information added to the online public file in this
proceeding.
Needs and Uses: In FCC 14-209, the Commission proposes to expand
the requirement that public inspection files be posted to the FCC-
hosted online public file database to Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS)
providers and Satellite Digital Audio Radio Services (SDARS) licensees,
among other entities. The Commission's goal is to make information that
these entities are already required to make publicly available more
accessible, by placing this information online, while also reducing
costs both for the government and the public sector. The public and FCC
use the information in the public file to evaluate information about
the DBS or SDARS entity's performance and to ensure that the entity is
operating pursuant to the FCC's rules. In addition, maintenance of
political files by DBS and SDARS entities enables the public to assess
money expended and time allotted to a political candidate and to ensure
that equal access was afforded to other legally qualified candidates
for public office.
OMB Control Numbers: 3060-0214.
Title: Sections 73.3526 and 73.3527, Local Public Inspection Files;
Sections 76.1701 and 73.1943, Political Files.
Form Numbers: None.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for profit entities; Not for profit
institutions; State, Local or Tribal government; Individuals or
households.
Number of Respondents/Responses: 24,961 respondents; 59,902
responses.
Estimated Hours per Response: 1-52 hours per response.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement,
Recordkeeping requirement, Third party disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 1,860,656 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $3,653,372.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The
statutory authority for this information collection is contained in
sections 154, 303, 334, 336, and 339 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for
confidentiality with this collection of information.
Privacy Act Assessment: The Commission prepared a system of records
notice (SORN), FCC/MB-2, ``Broadcast Station Public Inspection Files,''
that covers the PII contained in the broadcast station public
inspection files located on the Commission's Web site. The Commission
will revise appropriate privacy requirements as necessary to include
any entities and information added to the online public file in this
proceeding.
Needs and Uses: In FCC 14-209, the Commission proposes to expand
the requirement that public inspection files be posted to the FCC-
hosted online public file database to commercial and
[[Page 8033]]
noncommercial broadcast radio licensees, among other entities. The
Commission's goal is to make information that these entities are
already required to make publicly available more accessible, by placing
this information online, while also reducing costs both for the
government and the public sector. Among other things, the public and
FCC use the information in the public file to evaluate information
about the broadcast licensee's performance and to ensure that the
station is addressing issues concerning the community which it is
licensed to serve. In addition, maintenance of political files by
broadcast and cable entities enables the public to assess money
expended and time allotted to a political candidate and to ensure that
equal access was afforded to other legally qualified candidates for
public office.
OMB Control Number: 3060-0316.
Title: 47 CFR Sections 76.1700, Records to be maintained locally by
Cable System Operators; 76.1702, Equal Employment Opportunity; 76.1703,
Commercial Records on Children's Programs; 76.1707, Leased Access;
76.1711, Emergency Alert System (EAS) Tests and Activation.
Form Number: Not applicable.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for profit entities.
Number of Respondents/Responses: 3,000 respondents; 3,000
responses.
Estimated Hours per Response: 18 hours.
Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 54,000 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $591,840.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The
statutory authority for this information collection is contained in
Sections 151, 152, 153, 154, 301, 302, 302a, 303, 303a, 307, 308, 309,
312, 315, 317, 325, 339, 340, 341, 503, 521, 522, 531, 532, 534, 535,
536, 537, 543, 544, 544a, 545, 548, 549, 552, 554, 556, 558, 560, 561,
571, 572, and 573 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for
confidentiality with this collection of information.
Privacy Act Assessment: The Commission prepared a system of records
notice (SORN), FCC/MB-2, ``Broadcast Station Public Inspection Files,''
that covers the PII contained in the broadcast station public
inspection files located on the Commission's Web site. The Commission
will revise appropriate privacy requirements as necessary to include
any entities and information added to the online public file in this
proceeding.
Needs and Uses: In FCC 14-209, the Commission proposes to expand
the requirement that public inspection files be posted to the FCC-
hosted online public file database to cable operators, among other
entities. The Commission's goal is to make information that these
entities are already required to make publicly available more
accessible, by placing this information online, while also reducing
costs both for the government and the public sector. Among other
things, the public and FCC use the information in the public file to
evaluate information about the broadcast licensee's performance and to
ensure that the station is addressing issues concerning the community
which it is licensed to serve. In addition, maintenance of political
files by broadcast and cable entities enables the public to assess
money expended and time allotted to a political candidate and to ensure
that equal access was afforded to other legally qualified candidates
for public office. Section 76.1700 contains the recordkeeping
requirements applicable to cable systems, including public inspection
file requirements. This NPRM proposes to revise Section 76.1700 to
reflect the requirement that cable operators maintain their public
inspection file online on the Web site hosted by the FCC. In addition,
this NPRM proposes a reorganization of Section 76.1700 to more clearly
address which records must be maintained in the public inspection file
versus those that must be made available to the Commission or
franchising authority upon request. Among other changes, the Commission
proposes to clarify that proof-of-performance test data and signal
leakage logs and repair data must be made available only to the
Commission and, in the case of proof-of-performance test data, also to
the franchisor, and not to the public. Accordingly, this information
would not be required to be included in the public inspection file or
in the online public inspection file.
Summary of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
I. Introduction
1. In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``NPRM''), we propose to
expand to cable operators, satellite TV (also referred to as ``Direct
Broadcast Satellite'' or ``DBS'') providers, broadcast radio licensees,
and satellite radio (also referred to as ``Satellite Digital Audio
Radio Services'' or ``SDARS'') licensees the requirement that public
inspection files be posted to the FCC's online database. In 2012, we
adopted online public file rules for broadcast television stations that
required them to post public file documents to a central, FCC-hosted
online database rather than maintaining the files locally at their main
studios. Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for
Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest Obligations, Second
Report and Order, 77 FR 27631 (May 11, 2012) (``Second Report and
Order''). Our goal was to modernize the procedures television
broadcasters use to inform the public about how they are serving their
communities, to make information concerning broadcast service more
accessible to the public and, over time, to reduce the cost of
broadcasters' compliance. We initiate this proceeding to extend our
modernization effort to include the public file documents that cable
operators, DBS providers, and broadcast and satellite radio licensees
are required to maintain. While the Commission first included only
television broadcasters in its public file database to ``ease the
initial implementation of the online public file,'' television
broadcasters have successfully transitioned to the online file over the
past two years. Accordingly, we now believe it is appropriate to
commence the process of expanding the online file to other media
entities in order to extend the benefits of improved public access to
public inspection files and, ultimately, reduce the burden on these
other entities of maintaining these files.
II. Background
2. One of a broadcaster's fundamental public interest obligations
is to air programming responsive to the needs and interests of its
community of license. To ensure that stations meet this obligation, the
Commission relies on viewers and listeners as an important source of
information about the nature of a station's programming, operations,
and compliance with Commission rules. To provide the public with access
to information about station operations, the Commission's rules have
long required television and radio broadcast stations to maintain a
physical public inspection file, including a political file, at their
respective stations or headquarters and to place in the file records
that provide information about station operations. The purpose of the
public inspection file requirement is to ``make information to which
the public already has a right more readily available, so that the
public will be encouraged to play a more active part in dialogue with
broadcast licensees.''
[[Page 8034]]
3. The Commission promulgated its first political file rule in
1938. That initial rule was essentially identical to our current
political file regulation in its requirement that the file be available
for public inspection and include both candidate requests for time and
the disposition of those requests, including the ``charges made'' for
the broadcast time. In 1965, following action by Congress to allow
greater public participation in the broadcast licensing process, the
Commission adopted a broader public inspection file rule to enable
local inspection of broadcast applications, reports, and related
documents. The Commission noted that Congress' actions ``zealously
guarded the rights of the general public to be informed'' and that the
Commission's goal was to make ``practically accessible to the public
information to which it is entitled.''
4. Cable, DBS, and SDARS entities also have public and political
file requirements modeled, in large part, on the longstanding broadcast
requirements. In 1974, the Commission adopted a public inspection file
requirement for cable, noting that ``[i]f the public is to play an
informed role in the regulation of cable television, it must have at
least basic information about a local system's operations and
proposals.'' The Commission also noted that ``[r]equiring cable systems
to maintain a public file merely follows our policy for broadcast
licensees and is necessary for similar reasons'' and that ``[t]hrough
greater disclosure we hope to encourage a greater interaction between
the Commission, the public, and the cable industry.'' With respect to
DBS providers, the Commission adopted public and political inspection
file requirements in 1998 in conjunction with the imposition of certain
public interest obligations, including political broadcasting
requirements, on those entities. DBS providers were required to ``abide
by political file obligations similar to those requirements placed on
terrestrial broadcasters and cable systems'' and were also required to
maintain a public file with records relating to other DBS public
interest obligations. Finally, the Commission imposed equal employment
opportunity and political broadcast requirements on SDARS licensees in
1997, noting that the rationale behind imposing these requirements on
broadcasters also applies to satellite radio.
5. In 2002, Congress adopted the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
(``BCRA'') which amended the political file requirements in section 315
of the Communications Act of 1934. 47 U.S.C. 315. The amendments apply
to broadcast television, cable, and DBS. The BCRA essentially codified
the Commission's existing political file obligations by requiring that
information regarding any request to purchase advertising time made on
behalf of a legally qualified candidate for public office be placed in
the political file. In addition, the BCRA expanded political file
obligations by requiring that television, cable, and DBS entities also
place in the political file information related to any advertisements
that discuss a ``political matter of national importance,'' including
in the case of an issue advertisement the name of the person or entity
purchasing the time and a list of the chief executive officers or
members of the executive committee or of the board of directors of any
such entity.
A. Online Public File
6. In 2012 the Commission replaced the decades-old requirement that
commercial and noncommercial television stations maintain public files
at their main studios with a requirement to post most of the documents
in those files to a central, online public file hosted by the
Commission. See Second Report and Order, 77 FR 27631 (May 11, 2012). As
noted above, the Commission's goals were to modernize the procedures
television broadcasters use to inform the public about how they are
serving their communities, make information concerning broadcast
service more accessible to the public, and reduce broadcasters' cost of
compliance. The television online public file rules were the
culmination of a more than decade-long effort to make information
regarding how a television broadcast station serves the public interest
``easier to understand and more accessible,'' ``promote discussion
between the licensee and its community,'' and ``lessen the need for
government involvement in ensuring that a station is meeting its public
interest obligation.''
7. In June 2011, the Commission staff released ``The Information
Needs of Communities'' Report (``INC Report''), a comprehensive report
on the current state of the media landscape created by a working group
including Commission staff, scholars, and consultants. See www.fcc.gov/infoneedsreport. The INC Report discussed both the need to empower
citizens to ensure that broadcasters serve their communities in
exchange for the use of public spectrum, and the need to remove
unnecessary burdens on broadcasters who aim to serve their communities.
The INC Report recommended an online system for public inspection files
in order to ensure greater public access. The INC Report further
suggested that governments at all levels collect and publish data in
forms that make it easy for citizens, entrepreneurs, software
developers, and reporters to access and analyze information to enable
them to present the data in more useful formats, and noted that greater
transparency by government and media companies can help reduce the cost
of reporting, empower consumers, and foster innovation.
8. Based upon commenter suggestions, in the Second Report and Order
the Commission determined that each television station's entire public
file would be hosted online by the Commission. The Commission took a
number of steps to minimize the burden of the online file on stations.
Broadcasters were required to upload only those items required to be in
the public file but not otherwise filed with the Commission or
available on the Commission's Web site. Any document or information
required to be kept in the public file and that is required to be filed
with the Commission electronically in the Consolidated DataBase System
(``CDBS'') is imported to the online public file and updated by the
Commission. In addition, television stations were not required to
upload their existing political files to the online file; rather,
stations were required only to upload new political file content on a
going-forward basis. Because of privacy concerns, stations also were
not required to upload letters and emails from the public to the online
file; rather, they must continue to retain them in a correspondence
file at the main studio.
9. In addition, to smooth the transition for both television
stations and the Commission and to allow smaller broadcasters
additional time to begin posting their political files online, the
Commission phased-in the new political file posting requirement.
Stations affiliated with the top four national networks (ABC, NBC, CBS,
and Fox) and licensed to serve communities in the top 50 Designated
Market Areas (``DMAs'') were required to begin posting their political
file documents online starting August 2, 2012, but other stations were
exempted from posting their political file documents online until July
1, 2014. In the Second Report and Order, the Commission also rejected
several proposals in the FNPRM to increase public file requirements in
conjunction with implementation of the online file. Rather, the
Commission determined that stations would be required to place in their
online files only material that is already required to be placed in
their local files.
[[Page 8035]]
10. The Commission stated in the Second Report and Order that it
was deferring consideration of whether to adopt online posting for
radio licensees and multichannel video programming distributors
(``MVPDs'') until it had gained experience with online posting of
public files of television broadcasters. The Commission noted that
starting the online public file process with the much smaller number of
television licensees, rather than with all broadcasters and MVPDs,
would ``ease the initial implementation of the online public file.'' In
response to the FNPRM, a group of public television licensees requested
that the Commission permit NCE radio stations, or at least those
licensed to the same entity as, or under common control with, an NCE-TV
station, to maintain their public inspection files online on the
Commission's Web site on a voluntary basis. While the Commission
declined to grant this request, it stated that ``as we and the
broadcasting industry gain more experience with the online public file
we will revisit the possibility of allowing stations not required to
use the online public file to use it on a voluntary basis.'' In
addition, the Commission delegated to the Commission staff ``the
authority to allow (but not require) radio stations to voluntarily post
their public files at such time the staff determines that such an
option is feasible and desirable.'' To date, the Commission staff has
not made this option available to radio stations, instead focusing
initially on ensuring that the database was functioning smoothly and
was capable of handling the increase in volume once all television
stations were required to use the online file beginning July 1, 2014.
B. Petition for Rulemaking
11. In July 2014, the Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, and the
Sunlight Foundation (collectively, ``Petitioners'' or ``CLC'') filed a
joint Petition for Rulemaking requesting that the Commission initiate a
rulemaking to expand to cable and satellite systems the requirement
that public and political file documents be posted to the FCC's online
database. See Campaign Legal Center, et al., Petition for Rulemaking,
MB Docket No. 14-127, at 1 (July 31, 2014) (``Petition''). The
Petitioners argue that cable and satellite services have increasingly
become outlets for political advertising. According to Petitioners,
political spending on cable is projected to constitute as much as 25
percent of total projected political television spending in the 2014
election cycle. Petitioners also assert that, due to advances in
technology, satellite television providers are preparing to sell
household-specific ``addressable advertising,'' a feature that has
attracted interest from advertising campaigns. Petitioners assert that
moving the television public file online has resulted in
``unquestionably substantial'' public benefits, which would also arise
if cable and satellite systems were required to upload their public and
political files online. In addition, Petitioners argue that television
broadcasters experienced few problems moving to the online file, and
cable and satellite systems would also likely not be burdened by the
online filing requirement.
12. On August 7, 2014, the Media Bureau issued a Public Notice
seeking comment on the Petition and, in addition, on whether it should
initiate a rulemaking to expand online public file obligations to
broadcast radio stations. See Public Notice, Commission Seeks Comment
on Petition for Rulemaking Filed by the Campaign Legal Center, Common
Cause, and the Sunlight Foundation Seeking Expansion of Online Public
File Obligations to Cable and Satellite TV Operators, Bureau Also Seeks
Comment on Expanding Online Public File Obligations to Radio Licensees,
79 FR 51136-01 (August 27, 2014)(``Public Notice''). The National
Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') filed comments supporting the
extension of the online public file to cable and satellite providers,
stating that there is ``no rational basis'' for requiring television
broadcasters, but not their competitors in the video marketplace, to
disclose public and political file material online. The National Cable
& Telecommunications Association (``NCTA'') argued that, if the
Commission were to open a proceeding to expand online file obligations,
it should examine how to tailor any online posting requirements to
minimize burdens on cable operators and avoid requiring them to upload
files of little interest to the public. With respect to radio, while
CLC and the American Public Media Group supported the initiation of a
rulemaking to require all radio stations to post their public and
political files to the FCC's online database, the majority of
commenters addressing this issue either objected to extending the
online filing requirement to radio and/or argued that the Commission
should carefully consider the financial burden on struggling radio
stations as well as the technical and financial challenges to the FCC
that would be posed by expanding the online file to include radio. In
addition, a number of commenters also argued that extending the online
public file to radio at this time is premature and that, at most, the
Commission should first consider a voluntary online public file for
radio before mandating online filing.
III. Discussion
13. We propose to adopt a phased-in approach to expanding the
online file requirements to cable and DBS providers and broadcast and
satellite radio entities. The implementation of the television online
file represents a significant achievement in the Commission's ongoing
effort to modernize disclosure procedures to improve access to public
file material. Since it was launched on August 2, 2012, more than
650,000 documents have been successfully uploaded into the online file,
and the site has generated close to six million page views. Despite
initial concerns, NAB characterized the first wave of implementation as
``uneventful.'' As of July 1, 2014, all television broadcast stations
have fully transitioned to the online file and, with this transition
now complete, it is time to seek comment on expanding the online file
to encompass cable, satellite, and radio public file material.
14. As the Commission stated in the Second Report and Order, this
modernization of the public inspection file is ``plain common sense.''
The evolution of the Internet and the spread of broadband
infrastructure have transformed the way society accesses information
today. It is no longer reasonable to require the public to incur the
substantial expense and inconvenience of traveling to a station or
headquarters' office to review the public file and make paper copies
when a centralized, online file would permit review with a quick and
essentially costless Internet search.
A. Benefits of Expanding the Online Public File
15. Our goal in this proceeding is to modernize the outdated
procedures for providing public access to cable, DBS, radio, and SDARS
files in a manner that avoids unnecessary burdens on these entities. By
taking advantage of the efficiencies made possible by digital
technology, we intend to make information that cable and DBS providers
and broadcast and satellite radio licensees are already required to
make publicly available more accessible while also reducing costs both
for the government and the private sector. The Internet is an
effective, low-cost means of maintaining contact with, and distributing
information to, viewers and
[[Page 8036]]
listeners. Placing the public file online will permit 24-hour access
from any location, without requiring a visit to the site where the
paper file is maintained, thereby improving access to information about
how cable, satellite, and radio entities are serving their communities
and meeting their public interest obligations. As the Commission stated
in the Second Report and Order, the public benefits of posting public
file information online, while difficult to quantify with exactitude,
are unquestionably substantial.
16. Expansion of the online public file to more media is
particularly important with respect to improving public access to
political files. As Petitioners point out, political advertising is
increasingly shifting from broadcast television to cable and satellite
television, and the advent of technological advances such as
addressable advertising are likely to further this trend. Political
advertising on radio is also on the rise. According to CLC, political
advertising expenditures on radio in 2012 ranked third behind spending
on broadcast television and cable and could reach as high as 7 percent
of overall spending on political advertising in 2014. Adding cable,
satellite television, and broadcast and satellite radio political file
material to the existing television online database would facilitate
public access to disclosure records for all these media and allow the
public to view and analyze political advertising expenditures more
easily in each market as well as nationwide.
17. We propose to take the same general approach to transitioning
cable, DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS to the online file that the
Commission took with television broadcasters, tailoring the
requirements as necessary to the different services. We also propose to
take similar measures to minimize the effort and cost entities must
undertake to move their public files online. Specifically, we propose
to require entities only to upload to the online file public file
documents that are not already on file with the Commission or that the
Commission maintains in its own database. We also propose to exempt
existing political file material from the online file requirement and
to require only that political file documents be uploaded on a going-
forward basis.
18. With only minor exceptions--requiring cable operators to
provide information about the geographic areas they serve, clarifying
the documents required to be included in the cable public file, and
requiring cable, DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS entities to provide
the location and contact information for their local file--we do not
propose new or modified public inspection file requirements in this
proceeding. Our goal is simply to adapt our existing public file
requirements to an online format. We seek comment on this approach.
While we propose to place the entire public file online, we invite
comment on whether we should instead require only that certain
components of the public file be placed on the Commission's online
database. We note that limiting online file requirements to certain
components of the public file would require entities to upload certain
documents and maintain others in the local public file, thereby
potentially imposing a greater burden than moving documents to the
online file over time. We seek comment on these issues. One benefit of
this proceeding, however, is to ensure that, within a short timeframe,
there will be less need for the public to visit the affected entities,
which will enable such entities to improve security and minimize risks
to employees. We seek comment on these issues, including ways to
further reduce the burdens of the public file and limit visits to the
affected entities.
B. Expansion of the Online File to Broadcast Radio
19. While no commenter responding to the Public Notice opposed the
extension of the online public file to cable or DBS providers, as
discussed above a number of commenters either opposed imposing online
public file obligations on broadcast radio or urged the Commission
carefully to consider a number of obstacles unique to radio before
requiring radio stations to use the online file. In general, these
commenters argue that many radio stations are very small and have
limited financial resources and small staffs. Some argue that, for many
stations, the additional responsibility of maintaining an online file
would take time and resources that would be better devoted to providing
local programming and information. Other commenters note that many
small stations already face significant economic challenges simply to
stay on the air and might be unable to withstand any additional
financial pressure an online public file obligation would impose.
Finally, some commenters argue that local radio listeners that might be
interested in accessing the current public file can do so easily. These
commenters contend that moving the public file online would not improve
access for current listeners but only encourage complaints from
advocacy groups and that responding to these complaints would further
strain stations' limited resources.
20. In the television online public file proceeding, the Commission
rejected similar arguments regarding the burden an online file
requirement would pose and concluded that the benefits of the online
file outweighed any potential burden. The Commission also took a number
of steps to minimize the costs of moving public files online, most of
which we propose to take in this proceeding as well. With respect to
radio, we recognize that concerns regarding the potential cost of an
online public file requirement carry more weight, particularly for very
small radio stations, which may struggle financially and have fewer
resources than small television stations. While we believe that moving
toward an online public file makes sense in today's world for all
entities that currently have public file requirements, we are committed
to considering carefully all concerns raised in this proceeding with
respect to potential online file requirements. With respect to
broadcast radio licensees, as discussed further below, we propose to
commence the transition to an online file with commercial stations in
larger markets with five or more full-time employees, while postponing
temporarily all online file requirements for other radio stations. We
believe that this approach addresses the concerns raised by commenters
and will help ensure that the transition to the online file is not
unduly burdensome.
21. We reject the argument that we should not expand the online
file requirement to broadcast radio because doing so will benefit only
non-local advocacy groups. Making the file available online will make
it easier for the public generally to access the file, including local
listeners, and will give the Commission and the public the information
needed to evaluate whether stations are meeting their responsibilities
to their local community.
C. Online File Capacity and Technical Issues
22. We recognize that adding cable, DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS
entities to the Commission's online file will greatly increase the
number of users of the file and the volume of material that must be
uploaded. NAB notes that, if radio stations are required to use the
online file, there could be more than 17,500 broadcast entities
uploading quarterly issues/programs lists on the same four dates in a
year. In addition, we recognize that there is likely to be a heavy
demand on the online file during peak political seasons, when many
[[Page 8037]]
broadcast stations take new advertising orders and modify existing
orders on a daily basis. NAB urges the Commission to consider
increasing its online capacity to accommodate the significant increase
in network traffic that will occur when a large number of filings must
be uploaded on the same date and consider ways to stagger filings to
relieve network congestion. Other commenters argue the Commission
should consider expanding the traditional 10-day filing window for many
broadcast reports to a 30-day filing window to place less stress on the
database. We seek comment on these proposals to stagger or otherwise
alter filing deadlines and any other suggestions for ways in which the
Commission could improve performance of its online public file
database.
23. The Commission noted in the Second Report and Order that
allowing the use of private web hosting services in connection with the
online file would allow for greater station efficiencies. As several
commenters note, work to establish an interface between the online file
database and web hosting services has not yet been finished. Once work
on this interface is completed, we anticipate that this would enable an
entity to establish a link between its own privately-maintained
electronic file database at the system or station to enable automatic
synchronization with the database hosted at the FCC. We recognize that
web hosting services could assist many entities with their obligation
to maintain the online public file, particularly smaller entities, and
continue to examine issues related to implementation of such services.
We also intend to investigate adding the capability to permit entities
to upload documents to multiple online files using a single upload.
24. Television stations are not required to upload material to the
online file that is already filed with the Commission or available on a
Commission database, and we propose to take a similar approach with
respect to cable, DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS entities. Broadcast
radio licensees, like television broadcasters, file material
electronically with the Commission via CDBS (which is currently being
migrated to LMS), which is already connected to the online public file.
Filings and data concerning cable systems, however, are currently
maintained in the Commission's Cable Operations and Licensing System
(``COALS'') database, which does not currently interface with the
Commission's online file database. The Commission intends to create a
connection between this database and the online file database as
appropriate and plans to complete that process before the effective
date of any cable online filing requirement that may be adopted in this
proceeding.
D. Proposed Online File Rules for Cable, DBS, Broadcast Radio, and
SDARS
25. In general, we propose to adopt a similar approach with respect
to cable, DBS, broadcast and satellite radio online file requirements
as we did for the television online file. Specifically, we propose that
these entities' entire public files be hosted online by the Commission
and that entities be responsible for uploading only items now required
to be in the public file but not otherwise filed with the Commission or
available on the Commission's Web site. As with the television online
file, we propose that the Commission itself upload to the online public
file material that is already on file with the Commission or that
currently resides in a Commission database.
26. Political file. With respect to the political file, we also
propose that cable operators, broadcast radio licensees, DBS operators,
and SDARS entities not be required to upload their existing political
files to the online file. Instead, as we required with television
licensees, we propose that these entities be permitted to maintain at
the station those documents already in place in their political file at
the time the new rules become effective, and only upload documents to
the online political files on a going-forward basis. Under this
proposal, existing political file material must be retained in the
local political file at the station or cable system for the remainder
of the two-year retention period. Exempting existing political file
material from the online file will substantially reduce the burden of
transitioning to the online public file while allowing online access to
the political file material most likely to be of interest to the
public. The retention period for the political file for cable, DBS, and
radio is two years, similar to the political file retention period for
television stations. Consequently, as the Commission noted in the
Second Report and Order, exempting the existing political file will
require entities to continue to maintain this file locally only for a
relatively short period. Consistent with the requirement we imposed on
television broadcasters in the Second Report and Order, we also propose
that, following the effective date of the new rules, cable, DBS,
broadcast radio, and SDARS entities be required to upload new records
to their online political file immediately absent unusual
circumstances. We seek comment generally on these proposals.
27. Organization. In light of the expansion of the online file we
propose herein, we invite comment on any steps we might take to improve
the organization of the online file and facilitate the uploading and
downloading of material. With respect to the television online
political file, the Commission designed an organizational structure of
folders and subfolders that ensures that the contents of the files are
orderly as required by our rules. Each political file is first
organized by year, then by type. Beyond that, we ``populated'' some
additional subfolders by creating folders for major races and
jurisdictions. The Commission then provided stations with the ability
to create additional subfolders and subcategories for specific
candidates, or other organizing structure, in compliance with their own
practices. We intend to take the same approach in designing the online
political file for cable, DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS entities, and
invite comment on this approach. We expect entities required to upload
material to the online political file to do so in an organized manner
so that candidates and members of public seeking information can easily
navigate it.
28. Compliance dates. We intend to give entities sufficient time to
familiarize themselves with the online public file before the effective
date of any posting requirement. With respect to documents required to
be placed in the file on a ``going forward'' basis, television stations
were required to begin using the online public file upon the effective
date of the Second Report and Order, which was 30 days after the
Commission announced in the Federal Register that OMB had completed its
review under the Paperwork Reduction Act and had approved the
information collection. Should we follow the same timeline for
documents required to be placed in the file on a ``going forward''
basis in this proceeding?
29. With respect to existing public file materials, we also seek
comment on the amount of time we should provide entities to upload
these documents to the online public file. Television stations were
given six months from the effective date of the Second Report and Order
to complete the uploading process. Is this amount of time sufficient
for cable, DBS, and broadcast and satellite radio? Should we adopt a
staggered date by service (cable, DBS, broadcast radio, and SDARS) or
by some other basis? Should any of these entities be given more time to
upload existing
[[Page 8038]]
files? We note that we propose below to temporarily exempt radio
stations in smaller markets from online public file requirements, and
seek comment on whether also to temporarily exempt stations with few
employees. We propose to permit these stations to commence uploading
material to the online file early on a voluntary basis. This would
provide these radio stations with more time to upload existing public
file material and to budget for any additional cost or staff resources
necessary to accomplish this task.
30. Back-up files. In addition, consistent with the approach the
Commission took in the Second Report and Order, we propose that cable,
DBS, and broadcast and satellite radio entities not be required to
maintain back-up copies of all public file materials. Instead, as we do
for the television online file, the Commission itself will create a
mirror copy of each public file daily to ensure that, if the data in
the online public file are compromised, the file can be reconstituted
using the back-up copy. If the Commission's online file becomes
temporarily inaccessible for the uploading of new documents, we will
require entities to maintain those documents and upload them to the
file once it is available again for upload. However, consistent with
the approach taken with respect to television broadcasters, we propose
that cable, DBS, and all radio entities be required to maintain local
back-up files for the political file to ensure that they can comply
with their statutory obligation to make that information available to
candidates, the public, and others as soon as possible. Stations will
only be required to make these backups available if and during such
rare times as the Commission's online public file is unavailable and
the Commission has tools available to entities that will minimize any
burden caused by this requirement. We seek comment on this approach.
31. Format. The Commission determined in the Second Report and
Order that it would not establish specific formatting requirements for
documents posted to the online file and we do not anticipate changes to
that approach at this time. We propose to require cable, DBS, and
broadcast and satellite radio entities to upload any electronic
documents in their existing format to the extent feasible; we will then
display the documents in both the uploaded format and in a pdf version.
To the extent that a required document already exists in a searchable
format, we propose to require these entities to upload the filing in
that format to the extent technically feasible. We seek comment on
these proposals.
32. Announcements and links. Consistent with the Commission's
approach in the Second Report and Order, we propose to require cable
operators, DBS providers, and broadcast and satellite radio licensees
that have Web sites to place a link to the online public file on their
home pages. We also propose that these entities that have Web sites
include on their home page contact information for a representative who
can assist any person with disabilities with issues related to the
content of the public file. We do not propose that cable and DBS
operators or broadcast or satellite radio stations be required to make
on-air announcements regarding the change in location of their public
file. As required of television stations in the Second Report and
Order, however, we propose to require radio stations to revise their
on-air pre- and post-filing renewal announcements to reflect the
availability of a station's renewal application on the Commission's Web
site, as reflected in Appendix B. We invite comment on these proposals.
33. Location of public inspection file and designated contact
information. As the Commission required with respect to television
stations, we also propose that cable and DBS operators and broadcast
and satellite radio licensees be required to provide information in the
online public file about the location of the local public file and the
individual who may be contacted for questions about the file. This
information would be provided when the operator or licensee first
establishes its online public file, but should be updated if and when
staffing or location changes occur. We believe this information is
necessary to inform the public of the location of the existing
political file (until its retention period expires in two years), which
will be publicly available at the local public file location, as well
as the correspondence folder retained by commercial broadcasters. We
seek comment on this proposal.
34. EEO materials. In the Second Report and Order, we continued to
require that television stations make their EEO materials available on
their Web sites, if they have one, and we propose to take the same
approach in this proceeding with respect to cable operators, DBS
providers, and broadcast and satellite radio licensees. Similar to
television stations, we propose to permit these entities to fulfill
this Web site posting requirement by providing, on their own Web site,
a link to the EEO materials on their online public file page on the
Commission's Web site. We seek comment on this proposal.
35. No major changes to public file obligations. Finally, with only
minor exceptions, we do not propose to impose new public file
obligations on cable, DBS, or broadcast or satellite radio entities in
connection with this transition to the online public file. While we
propose below a reorganization of the existing cable public file rules
for purposes of clarification and seek comment on other minor changes
to those rules, our intention for purposes of the initial transition to
a centralized, online file for cable operators, DBS providers, and
broadcast and satellite radio licensees is to simply adapt our existing
requirements to the online file format. We seek comment generally on
these proposals.
36. OVS. We note that Open Video System (``OVS'') operators have
several public file obligations. Should OVS operators be required to
make this information available on the Commission's online public file
database, or is it sufficient that this information be made available
by the operator locally? How can we identify those entities that do not
have Physical System IDs (``PSIDs'') or facility ID numbers?
E. Requirements and Issues Unique to Each Service
37. Certain issues related to the online public file requirement
are unique to each service. Accordingly, we address each service
separately below and also address whether and how to phase-in certain
requirements for each service.
1. Cable Public Inspection File
a. Current Rules
38. The FCC's rules regarding records to be maintained by cable
systems distinguish between records that must be retained for
inspection by the public and those that must be made available to
Commission representatives or local franchisors only. The rules also
impose different recordkeeping requirements based on the number of
subscribers to the cable system. Operators of cable systems with fewer
than 1,000 subscribers are exempt from many public inspection file
requirements, including the political file, sponsorship identification,
EEO records, and records regarding children's commercial programming.
Operators of systems with between 1,000 and 5,000 subscribers must
provide certain information ``upon request'' but must also ``maintain
for public inspection'' a political file, while operators of systems
having 5,000 or
[[Page 8039]]
more subscribers must ``maintain for public inspection'' a political
file and records regarding, among other things, sponsorship
identification, EEO, and children's programming commercials. The rules
state that the public inspection file must be maintained ``at the
office which the system operator maintains for the ordinary collection
of subscriber charges, resolution of subscriber complaints, and other
business or at any accessible place in the community served by the
system unit(s).''
39. Cable system political file requirements are similar to those
for television stations. The political file must contain a ``complete
and orderly record . . . of all requests for cablecast time made by or
on behalf of a candidate for public office'' including the disposition
of such requests. The file must also show the ``schedule of time
purchased, when spots actually aired, the rates charged, and the
classes of time purchased.'' With respect to issue advertisements, the
file must disclose the name of the purchasing organization and a list
of the board of directors. These records must be filed ``immediately
absent unusual circumstances,'' and must be retained for at least two
years.
b. Proposed Online Public File Requirements
(i) Content Required To Be Maintained in the Online File
40. As discussed above, consistent with the rules we adopted for
television broadcasters, we propose to require that cable operators
upload to the online public file all documents and information that are
required to be in the public file but which are not also filed in COALS
or maintained by the Commission on its own Web site. The Commission
proposes to import these latter documents or information into the
online public file itself.
41. We note that the only document that cable operators file with
the Commission that must also be retained in their public inspection
files is the EEO program annual report, which we propose that the
Commission upload to the online file. Cable operators are not required
to maintain in their public inspection files documents similar to The
Public and Broadcasting manual, which television and radio broadcasters
must retain in their public files and which the Commission makes
available to the online file for television stations and will make
available to the online file for radio stations. Accordingly, as the
Commission maintains very few documents cable operators must retain in
their public inspection files, most documents in the cable online file
will be required to be uploaded by cable operators themselves.
42. Certain information that must be included in cable operators'
public files is collected through FCC Form 325 (Annual Cable Operator
Report), which is filed annually by cable systems with 20,000 or more
subscribers. For example, operators must maintain at the ``local
office'' a ``current'' listing of the cable television channels
delivered to subscribers and must ``maintain for public inspection'' a
list of all broadcast television stations carried in fulfillment of the
must-carry requirements. Some of this information is also collected on
FCC Form 325. Cable operators required to file the form are required to
identify on the form whether a broadcast station is carried pursuant to
must-carry obligations, but the form does not request all of the
specific information about the system's must-carry channels that is
required to be placed in the public file pursuant to 47 CFR 76.1709. We
invite comment on whether the Commission should make FCC Form 325
available in the online file for those systems required to file this
form annually. We also invite comment on any other ways we can import
to the online file information cable operators would otherwise be
required to upload to the file themselves in order to reduce the burden
on operators of uploading information to the online file.
43. NCTA requests that the Commission review the ongoing need for
channel lineups to be placed in the public inspection file as this
information is provided to consumers in paper format and, according to
NCTA, is available on operators' Web sites. We seek comment on this
request. If most operators maintain this information electronically, we
believe it would not be burdensome to require operators to upload this
information to the online public file. We seek comment on this view. If
we were to require all cable systems to upload channel lineups to the
online file, should we require this information to be uploaded or
updated annually or on some other schedule? To the extent an operator
maintains the required information on a channel lineup its own Web
site, we also seek comment on whether the operator should be permitted
to provide a link directly to this channel lineup in lieu of uploading
this information to the public file.
44. As discussed below, we propose to clarify our rules regarding
proof-of-performance test data and signal leakage logs and repair data.
Specifically, we propose to make it clear in our rules that this
information must be made available only to the Commission and, in the
case of proof-of-performance test data, also to the franchisor, and not
to the public. Accordingly, this information would not be required to
be included in the online public inspection file, thereby reducing the
amount of material cable operators would be required to upload to the
file.
45. We propose that cable systems be required to upload other
material currently required to be maintained for public inspection or
made available to the public ``upon request.'' For cable systems with
1,000 or more subscribers, this material would include new political
file material, sponsorship identification information, commercial
records on children's programs, certain EEO materials, leased access
policy information, records concerning operator interests in video
programming, and copies of requests for waiver of the prohibition on
scrambling/encryption. While cable systems with 1,000 or more
subscribers but fewer than 5,000 subscribers are currently required to
provide certain materials to the public only ``upon request,'' we
believe these systems should be required to place these materials in
the online file as this will facilitate public access to these
materials. We believe this requirement will be no more burdensome than
placing the materials in a physical file and should be less burdensome
over time. We invite comment on this approach.
46. We also propose to exempt cable systems with fewer than 1,000
subscribers from all online public file requirements, either
permanently or at least initially. As discussed above, these systems
have far fewer public file requirements than larger systems and are not
required to maintain a political file. Alternatively, we could exempt
systems with fewer than 1,000 subscribers that maintain public file
information on their own Web sites. We seek comment on these possible
approaches and any other suggestions for ways we should provide
regulatory relief to very small cable systems.
47. Political file. As discussed above, consistent with the
approach we adopted for television broadcasters, we propose that cable
operators not be required to upload their existing political files to
the online file; rather, we propose that they be permitted to maintain
existing material in their physical political file and only upload
documents to the online political file on a going-forward basis. We
believe this approach will minimize the burden of transitioning to the
online file for cable operators, while providing convenient access to
the information most likely to
[[Page 8040]]
be of interest to the public, and invite comment on this proposal. We
note that Time Warner Cable, which is not currently required to
maintain its public file online, already posts its political files
online to save costs and expedite access to this material. We invite
comment on whether there are any aspects of our current cable political
file requirements that are unclear and that should be clarified in
connection with our proposal to transition to an online political file.
48. To smooth the transition for both cable operators and the
Commission and to allow smaller cable systems additional time to begin
posting their political files online, we propose to phase-in the
requirement to commence uploading political file documents to the
online file for smaller cable systems. We invite comment on ways in
which this phase-in period should be structured. One approach would be
to start by requiring cable systems with 5,000 or more subscribers to
post new political file materials online, while exempting systems with
fewer than 5,000 subscribers for some period of time. As cable systems
with fewer than 1,000 subscribers are exempt from all political file
requirements, this temporary exemption would apply to systems with
1,000 or more subscribers but fewer than 5,000 subscribers. As
discussed above, the rules currently exempt systems with fewer than
5,000 subscribers from some recordkeeping requirements, and we invite
comment on whether this 5,000 subscriber cutoff should also be used to
provide regulatory relief in this context. Another approach would be to
define ``small cable system'' for purposes of the exemption as a system
with fewer than 15,000 subscribers that is not affiliated with a larger
operator serving more than 10 percent of all MVPD subscribers. The
Commission used this definition for purposes of determining eligibility
for a streamlined financial hardship waiver in the CALM Act Report and
Order. The Commission explained in that Order that it believed that the
streamlined waiver ``should be available only to those systems that are
most likely to face financial hardships in complying with'' the
Commission's CALM Act requirements. We invite comment on the
appropriate definition of ``small cable system'' for purposes of the
political file exemption and on the appropriate period of time we
should exempt small systems from the requirement to commence posting
political file material online. Should there be a means of providing
the public with information regarding which systems' political files
are included in the online file, and which are exempt, either
temporarily or permanently?
49. While we are proposing to delay the transition to the online
political file for small cable systems, we propose to allow these
systems to commence uploading documents to the online political file on
a voluntary basis at the same time that online political file
requirements become effective for larger cable systems. In addition, if
we were to decide to exempt systems with fewer than 1,000 subscribers
from all online public file obligations, we propose to allow these
systems to participate in the online file database on a voluntary
basis. Regardless of whether we determine to delay or exempt small
systems from online filing requirements, we believe it is appropriate
to permit any system that desires to participate in the online database
to do so voluntarily. We invite comment on this proposal.
50. Geographic information. We propose to require cable operators,
when first establishing their online public file, to provide a list of
the geographic areas served by the system. The Commission currently
lacks precise information about the geographic areas served by cable
systems and we believe that making this information available in the
online public file will make the information in the file, and
especially the political file, more useful to subscribers, advertisers,
candidates, and others. We propose to require cable systems to provide
information regarding the ZIP Codes served by the system and the
Designated Market Area (``DMA'') or areas it serves, and we seek
comment on this proposal. We also seek comment on alternative proposals
for collecting geographic information, such as Census Block or Census
Tract information. We note that operators would have to provide this
information when they first establish their public files on the
Commission's database, and update it only to reflect changes.
Therefore, we do not believe this requirement would be burdensome.
51. We also invite comment on any ways to facilitate access to the
online database by consumers. Cable operators are currently required to
maintain their public files on a per-system basis and we tentatively
conclude that the same should apply to the online database. However, as
NCTA notes, cable public files cannot be organized by call sign and the
analogous unit, a physical system identifier, is not readily known by
consumers. If we require cable operators to provide information on the
geographic area served by the system, should we use that geographic
information to help identify cable systems in the cable online file?
Are there other ways in which systems can be identified to consumers so
that they can quickly find the information they are seeking?
(ii) Clarification and Streamlining of Current Recordkeeping
Requirements
52. NCTA argues that we should streamline cable public file
requirements to avoid requiring cable operators to incur the cost of
posting unnecessary material. While we decline to undertake a
comprehensive review of cable public inspection file requirements in
this proceeding, we seek comment on several issues raised by NCTA and
propose to clarify certain requirements. First, NCTA asks that we
eliminate the requirement that proof-of-performance and signal leakage
information be retained in the public inspection file. We note that the
current recordkeeping rules regarding this information are unclear.
While 47 CFR 76.1700(a), which sets out recordkeeping requirements,
includes ``proof-of-performance test data'' and ``signal leakage logs
and repair records'' in the list of items either to be made available
``upon request'' (for systems with 1,000 or more but fewer than 5,000
subscribers) or to be maintained in the public inspection file (for
systems with 5,000 or more subscribers), the rule sections specifically
addressing these requirements require only that this information be
maintained for inspection by the Commission and local franchisor. We
agree with NCTA that this information is unlikely to be of interest to
the general public and does not need to be made available online.
Accordingly, we propose to clarify that this information must be
maintained and made available to the Commission and franchisor upon
request, but does not need to be maintained in the system's public
inspection file or uploaded to the online file. We seek comment on this
proposal.
53. Second, NCTA requests that the Commission evaluate whether it
should exclude headend location information from any online public
inspection file as it is of no interest to the general public and
revealing this information in a centralized database available to
Internet users ``raises potentially serious security risks.'' We
propose to exclude headend location information from the online public
file and seek comment on this proposal.
54. Third, NCTA requests that the Commission consider eliminating
the current requirement that cable operators post certain EEO materials
on the system's own Web site, if it has one, as these materials would
be available on
[[Page 8041]]
the Commission's online public file. As discussed above, in the Second
Report and Order, we continued to require that television stations make
certain EEO materials available on their Web sites, if they have one,
and we propose to take the same approach in this proceeding with
respect to cable operators, DBS providers, and broadcast and satellite
radio licensees. Consistent with the rules for television stations,
however, we propose to permit these entities to fulfill this Web site
posting requirement by providing, on their own Web site, a link to the
EEO materials on their online public file page on the Commission's Web
site.
(iii) Reorganization of the Cable Public Inspection File Rules
55. We believe that a limited reorganization and clarification of
the public inspection file rules would make them easier to locate and
understand. The public inspection file rules for broadcasters are
contained in two rule sections that identify all public inspection file
requirements for commercial and noncommercial educational broadcasters,
with references to other rule sections as appropriate. In contrast, the
cable recordkeeping requirements are spread over several rule sections
in part 76, subpart U (Documents to be Maintained for Inspection), with
some requirements contained in a separate rule subpart. While 47 CFR
76.1700 of the rules includes references to many of these recordkeeping
requirements it does not cite them all. Revising our rules to identify
all cable recordkeeping requirements in a single rule section, with
references to other sections as appropriate, would make these
requirements easier to locate and facilitate compliance. Moreover, as
confirmed by our discussion above regarding maintenance of proof-of-
performance and signal leakage information, some of the current rules
are confusing and inconsistent. We propose to revise 47 CFR 76.1700 to
include references to all public inspection file requirements and to
more clearly address which records must be maintained in the file
versus those that must be made available to the Commission or
franchising authority. We invite comment on these proposed revisions,
which are set out in Appendix B.
2. DBS Public Inspection File
a. Current Rules
56. DBS providers are required to maintain a public file containing
four categories of information: Information regarding compliance with
the carriage obligation for noncommercial programming (the
``noncommercial set-aside''); information regarding compliance with the
commercial limits in children's programming; certain EEO materials; and
a political file. With respect to the noncommercial set-aside, the
rules require that DBS providers ``keep and permit public inspection of
a complete and orderly record of,'' among other things, measurements of
channel capacity, a record of entities to whom noncommercial capacity
is being provided, the rates paid by the entity to whom capacity is
provided, and a record of entities requesting capacity and the
disposition of those requests. With respect to compliance with the
children's programming commercial limits, DBS providers airing
children's programming must maintain records sufficient to verify
compliance with the rules and ``make such records available to the
public.'' With respect to EEO materials, DBS operators are required to
maintain in their public file EEO reports and certain EEO program
information.
57. DBS providers are also required to ``keep and permit public
inspection of a complete and orderly political file'' and to
``prominently disclose the physical location of the file and the
telephonic and electronic means to access'' it. The file must include,
among other things, records of ``all requests for DBS origination
time'' and the schedule of time purchased, when spots actually aired,
the rates charged, and the classes of time purchased for each request.
These records must be placed in the file ``as soon as possible'' and
must be retained for at least two years. Unlike broadcasters and cable
systems, DBS providers must ``make available via fax, email, or by mail
upon telephone request, photocopies of documents in their political
files and shall assist callers by answering questions about the
contents of their political files.'' In 2004, the Commission explained
that it was requiring DBS providers to abide by political file
obligations similar to those requirements placed on terrestrial
broadcasters and cable systems. Because DBS is a national service and
each provider's headquarters is not necessarily readily accessible to
most of its viewers and to candidates, we require DBS providers to make
their political files available upon telephone or electronic request.
They may provide access to the file by fax, email, via Internet Web
site access, or, if so requested, by mailing photocopies of the
documents in their political files. We expect that DBS providers will
assist callers by promptly answering questions about how to access the
contents of the DBS providers' political files. DBS providers may
require individuals requesting documents to pay for photocopying if the
requester prefers delivery by mail, but the DBS provider must pay for
postage. DBS providers are encouraged to put their political files on
their respective Web sites but must provide alternatives for
individuals who do not have Internet access. In view of these
requirements and expectations, we do not find it necessary to require
that a provider maintain a public file in every community that receives
its signal. We do, however, require, that DBS providers prominently
disclose the toll-free telephone number and email address of the
department responsible for responding to requests for access to the
political file. In addition, because DBS experience with the political
broadcasting rules is relatively new, and to facilitate a future Staff
Report, we will require that DBS providers maintain all requests for
time from candidates or individuals on behalf of candidates, including
general requests for availabilities and rate information. In addition,
and for the same reasons, DBS providers will be required to retain
information in their political files for four years, until 2006, and
thereafter for two years, as is required of cable operators and
terrestrial broadcast stations.
b. Proposed Online Public File Requirements
58. We propose to treat DBS providers in the same manner as
television, cable, and broadcast and satellite radio entities by
requiring them to upload to the online file only material that is not
already on file at the Commission. Similar to cable operators, the only
document that DBS providers file with the Commission that must also be
retained in their public inspection files is the EEO program annual
report, which we propose that the Commission upload to the online file.
Like cable operators, the other information DBS providers are required
to maintain in their public inspection files is not currently filed
with or maintained by the Commission. Accordingly, most material
required to be kept in the online file would have to be uploaded by DBS
providers themselves, which includes channel capacity measurements and
other records related to the use of and requests for noncommercial
capacity, records related to compliance with children's commercial
limits, certain EEO materials, and political file material.
59. We do not believe that requiring DBS providers to upload this
material to
[[Page 8042]]
the online file would be onerous. As compared to television and radio
broadcasters and cable operators, DBS providers have the fewest number
of public file requirements. In addition, there are currently only two
U.S. DBS operators, each of which has sufficient financial resources to
comply with any online file requirements we ultimately adopt in this
proceeding. We agree with Petitioners that the transition to an online
file is particularly important for DBS because of that service's
nationwide reach. Each DBS provider is required to maintain only one
public and political file for the entire U.S. at its headquarters,
making in-person access very difficult. While staff members must copy
and mail public and political file documents upon request under the
current rules, making this material available online would considerably
improve public access. Moreover, we believe that, for DBS providers,
maintaining an online file hosted by the Commission will prove to be
more efficient and less expensive over time than maintaining a local
file, particularly in light of the extra steps DBS providers are
required to take to assist callers requesting materials from the file.
60. We tentatively conclude, consistent with our approach for
television stations and our proposal herein for cable systems and
broadcast radio licensees, that DBS providers should not be required to
upload their existing political files to the online file but rather
should be permitted to maintain existing material in their physical
political file and only upload documents to the online political file
on a going-forward basis. If we require DBS providers to upload their
political files, we propose to eliminate the requirement that they mail
photocopies of documents in that file to individuals requesting copies,
as these materials would be available online Additionally, to the
extent that political file materials relate to ads shown on a local or
hyper-local basis, we seek comment on how DBS providers can indicate in
their public files the area in which such ads were or will be shown. We
also invite comment on whether there are any aspects of our current DBS
political file requirements that are unclear and that should be
clarified in connection with our proposal to transition to an online
political file.
3. Broadcast Radio Public Inspection File
a. Current Rules
61. The public inspection file rules for radio broadcasters are
generally similar to those for television broadcasters. Every permittee
or licensee of an AM or FM station in the commercial or noncommercial
educational broadcast service must maintain a public inspection file
containing, among other things, FCC authorizations, applications,
contour maps, ownership reports, EEO materials, issues/programs lists,
and time brokerage (also known as ``local marketing'') and joint sales
agreements. The file must be maintained at the station's main studio.
62. Radio stations must maintain a political file as part of the
public inspection file. The political file must contain a ``complete
and orderly record'' of requests for broadcast time made by or on
behalf of a candidate for public office.'' The file must also show the
``schedule of time purchased, when spots actually aired, the rates
charged, and the classes of time purchased.'' With respect to issue
advertisements, stations must disclose the name of the purchasing
organization and a list of the board of directors. These records must
be filed ``as soon as possible, meaning immediately, absent unusual
circumstances,'' and must be retained for at least two years.
b. Proposed Online Public File Requirements
(i) Content Required To Be Maintained in the Online File
63. As discussed above, consistent with the rules we adopted for
television broadcasters we propose to require that radio broadcast
licensees upload to the online public file all documents and
information that are required to be in the public file but that are not
also filed in CDBS (or LMS) or otherwise maintained by the Commission
on its own Web site. Under this proposal, radio stations would be
required to upload citizen agreements, certain EEO materials, issues/
programs lists, local public notice announcements, time brokerage
agreements, joint sales agreements, materials related to FCC
investigations or complaints (other than investigative information
requests from the Commission), and any new political file material. We
propose that any document or information required to be in the public
file that is electronically filed with CDBS (or LMS) will be imported
to the online file by the Commission. For radio broadcasters, under
this proposal the documents the Commission would upload to the online
file include authorizations, applications and related materials,
contour maps, ownership reports and related materials, EEO Reports, The
Public and Broadcasting manual, and Letters of Inquiry and other
investigative requests from the Commission, unless otherwise directed
by the inquiry itself.
64. While all stations will have issues/programs lists and
materials related to local public notice announcements, few will have
time brokerage agreements and very few will have citizen agreements or
materials related to an FCC investigation or complaint. While many
stations will have political file material, in general we expect that
these files will be smaller for radio stations than for television
stations as fewer political advertisements air on radio. In addition,
radio stations with fewer than five full-time employees are exempt from
many of the EEO recordkeeping requirements. We seek comment on these
issues.
65. Political file. As discussed above, consistent with the
approach we adopted for television broadcasters and that we propose
herein for cable operators, we propose that broadcast radio licensees
not be required to upload their existing political files to the online
file, but rather that they be permitted to maintain existing material
in their local political file and only upload documents to the online
political file on a going-forward basis. We believe this approach will
minimize the burden of transitioning to the online file for radio
licensees. We seek comment on this approach.
66. Delay in implementation for small market stations. We propose
to implement the online public file for broadcast radio stations by
imposing requirements, at first, only on stations with more resources.
We propose to delay all mandatory online filing for other radio
stations for some period of time. As discussed above, several
commenters express concern about whether radio stations have sufficient
resources to implement and maintain an online public file, particularly
small stations with limited financial resources and small staffs. Some
commenters argue that we should postpone any consideration of moving to
an online file for broadcast radio or, if we do adopt online file
obligations for that medium in this proceeding, that we exempt smaller
stations and/or NCE stations. Those advocating an exemption for NCE
stations argue that many of these stations have very small staffs and
limited resources and that compliance with an online requirement would
create a severe financial and staffing hardship. Ampers and NFCB also
note that NCEs are prohibited from accepting funds from political
candidates and organizations advocating on behalf of a candidate or
political issue, making online access to the
[[Page 8043]]
political file less important for these stations. Other commenters
argue that, in order to minimize the risk of online public file
requirements becoming the ``proverbial straw that breaks the camel's
back'' for already struggling small radio stations, the Commission
should not require small stations to upload the contents of their
existing public files, or at least should provide stations with an
extended period of time during which they could incrementally add those
materials to the online file.
67. Another issue raised by radio commenters is the lack of
computer or Internet access at some small, rural stations. According to
NAB, some radio stations in remote locations, including Alaska, Maine,
and areas of the Southwest, do not have access to reliable Internet
service or even are without Internet access altogether. Other stations
have no in-house computing resources or broadband capacity. According
to Native Public Media, many Native-owned NCE radio stations operate on
Tribal lands where broadband penetration rates are between five and 10
percent. Moreover, according to these commenters, in communities where
broadband is theoretically available actual access is often severely
hampered by high latency, slow dial-up speeds, and unreliable coverage.
Native Public Media argues that it would be difficult, if not
impossible, to require stations facing these circumstances to upload
large files to the Commission's online database. In addition, these
commenters argue that the cost of maintaining an online file would
significantly outweigh the benefits in communities where listeners have
limited Internet access.
68. We recognize that some radio stations may face financial or
other obstacles that could make the transition to an online public file
more difficult. Accordingly, we believe that it is reasonable to
commence the transition to an online public file for radio with
stations with more resources while delaying, for some period of time,
all mandatory online public file requirements for other stations. We
propose that other stations be permitted to voluntarily transition to
the online file early, but not be required to participate until we have
gained some experience with the inclusion of stations with greater
resources. Adding radio stations to the online file incrementally over
time will give us more time to address any technical issues that may
arise in connection with our online file database as the volume of
users increases. Given the large number of radio stations and the
volume of material they will be uploading to the online file, we
believe it makes sense to proceed in stages to include radio stations
in the Commission's online database.
69. We seek comment generally on this approach. Is it appropriate
to temporarily exempt a certain category of radio stations from all
online public file requirements or should we instead temporarily exempt
some stations from only the online political file? How should we define
the category of stations that should be eligible for a temporary
exemption? We note that, in the television online file proceeding, we
implemented the online political file first with television stations in
the top 50 DMAs that were also affiliated with the top four networks.
With respect to radio, however, network affiliation is not a useful way
to identify stations with more resources. Accordingly, we propose to
begin implementation of online public file requirements for radio with
commercial stations in markets 1 through 50, as defined by Nielsen
Audio (formerly Arbitron), that have five or more full-time employees.
We propose that these stations commence compliance with online public
file requirements at the same time as cable, DBS, and SDARS entities.
With respect to all other radio stations, we propose to delay all
online public file requirements for two years. This two-year delay is
the same length of time we delayed, in the television online file
proceeding, the implementation of political file obligations for
television stations in smaller markets and those unaffiliated with the
top four networks. We propose to initially exempt NCE radio stations as
well as those with fewer than five full-time employees from the online
public file to help ensure that we commence online file requirements
for radio with stations with greater resources. With respect to radio
stations with fewer than five full-time employees, as noted above our
rules exempt these stations from many EEO requirements. One advantage
of tying an exemption for small radio stations to this EEO exemption is
that information regarding the stations that are exempt from EEO
requirements is readily available to the public, as this information is
filed with the FCC and is available via the FCC's Web site. We seek
comment on this and any other possible approach to structuring the
temporary delay in online file requirements for certain radio stations.
We also seek comment on whether we should permanently exclude certain
radio stations, such as NCEs and stations with fewer than five full-
time employees, from all online public file requirements, rather than
simply delaying implementation of online file requirements for these
stations.
70. While we are proposing to delay the transition to the online
public file for certain radio stations, we also propose to allow these
stations to commence uploading all or part of their public file
documents to the online file on a voluntary basis before the delayed
effective date of any online file requirement for these stations. As
discussed above, public television licensees in the television online
file proceeding requested that we allow NCE radio stations, or at least
those licensed to the same entity as, or under common control with, an
NCE television station, to maintain their public inspection files
online on the Commission's Web site on a voluntary basis. Public
television licensees argued that this would allow radio stations that
were jointly owned or operated with television stations to avoid
duplicative efforts from having to maintain two separate public file
systems, involving some of the same documents. If we decide to delay
implementation of online file requirements for all or some NCEs in this
proceeding, we believe it is appropriate to allow them and any other
smaller radio station to voluntarily transition to the Commission's
online file early. We seek comment on this proposal.
71. We believe our proposal addresses many of the concerns raised
regarding radio stations that may have fewer resources and, therefore,
might find transitioning to the online file more burdensome. These
stations would not be required to commence uploading documents to the
Commission's database until stations with more resources have completed
part or all of their transition to the online file. This delayed
transition will assist small stations to budget for any initial costs
to upload documents to the file and any extra staff time required for
this effort. In the meantime, stations may commence uploading documents
to the online database early on a voluntary basis. We invite comment on
this approach and on ways we can help ensure that permitting stations
to commence uploading documents early on a voluntary basis is not
confusing to members of the public trying to locate and access public
file material.
(ii) Contour Map and Main Studio Information
72. Radio stations are currently required to include in their
public inspection files ``any service contour maps submitted with any
application'' together with ``any other information in the application
showing service
[[Page 8044]]
contours and/or main studio and transmitter location.'' We propose to
have the Commission create contour maps for the online file based upon
existing data. Given the complexities of AM contour mapping, we may not
be able to use the same tools that we used to map TV contours and that
we anticipate using to map FM contours. We seek comment on ways to
address this issue. Should AM stations be required to upload contour
maps to the online file?
73. We also propose to require stations to provide information to
the online file regarding the location of the station's main studio.
The Commission's rules do not currently require the reporting of this
information and it is not included on contour maps. We believe that
information regarding the location of the main studio would help
members of the public to engage in an active dialogue with radio
licensees regarding their service, which is one of the goals of this
proceeding. In addition, we believe this information is necessary to
inform the public of the location of the correspondence file and
existing political file (until its retention period expires in two
years), both of which will be publicly available at the station.
Therefore, consistent with the approach we took in the television
station online file proceeding, we propose to require stations to
include in the online public file the station's main studio address and
telephone number, and the email address of the station's designated
contact for questions about the public file. In addition, we propose
that stations with a main studio located outside of their community of
license be required to list the location of the correspondence file and
existing political file, as well as the required local or toll free
number. We seek comment on this proposal.
(iii) Letters From the Public
74. In the Second Report and Order, the Commission exempted letters
and emails from the public from the online public file and instead
required that such material be maintained at the station in a
correspondence file. The Commission determined that including these
documents in the online file could risk exposing personally
identifiable information and that requiring stations to redact such
information prior to uploading these documents would be overly
burdensome. The Commission determined that letters and emails from the
public should be maintained at the station's main studio either in a
paper file or electronically on a computer. Further, the Commission
clarified that, as required under the current public inspection file
rules, this file should include all letters and emails from the public
regarding operation of the station unless the letter writer has
requested that the letter not be made public or the licensee feels that
it should be excluded due to the nature of its content. Finally, the
Commission determined that it would not require stations to retain
social media messages in their correspondence file. We propose to take
the same approach with respect to broadcast radio stations and the
letters and emails they receive from the public, and seek comment on
this proposal.
(iv) Donor Lists
75. NCE stations are required to retain in the public inspection
file lists of donors supporting specific programs. Native Public Media
asks that, for the same reason the Commission excluded letters and
emails from the public from the television online file requirement,
donor lists also be excluded from any NCE online file requirements to
ensure the privacy of donors. In the Second Report and Order we
required NCE television broadcasters to include donor lists in their
online public files, and we propose to take the same approach with
respect to radio. We seek comment on this issue. Is there a reason to
treat NCE radio station donor lists differently from NCE television
station donor lists?
4. Satellite Radio Public Inspection File
a. Current Requirements
76. Licensees in the satellite radio service are required to
maintain a public file with two categories of material. First, as
discussed above, SDARS licensees are required to comply with EEO
requirements similar to those imposed on broadcasters, including the
requirement to file EEO reports and to maintain those reports in their
public file together with other EEO program information. Second, also
as discussed above, satellite radio licensees are required to maintain
a political file. In addition, SiriusXM, the current, sole U.S. SDARS
licensee, is required to retain a third category of material in the
public file. SiriusXM made a voluntary commitment to make capacity
available for noncommercial educational and informational programming,
similar to the requirement imposed on DBS providers, in connection with
its merger application. As part of its approval of the merger, the
Commission required that the merged entity reserve channels for
educational and informational programming, offer those channels to
qualified programmers, and comply with the public file requirements of
47 CFR 25.701(f)(6), which sets forth public file requirements for the
noncommercial set-aside for DBS providers.
b. Proposed Online Public File Requirements
77. We propose to treat satellite radio licensees in the same
manner as television, cable, DBS, and broadcast radio entities by
requiring them to upload to the online file only material that is not
already on file at the Commission. We seek comment on this proposal.
Similar to cable operators and DBS providers, the only document that
SDARS entities file with the Commission that must be retained in the
public inspection file is the EEO program annual report, which we
propose that the Commission upload to the online file. We do not
believe that requiring SDARS licensees to upload to the online file
other material required to be maintained in the public file would be
burdensome as the number of public file requirements for this service
is fewer than for other services and entities discussed in this item
and because the current, sole U.S. SDARS licensee has ample financial
resources to comply with any online file requirement we ultimately
adopt in this proceeding. We also believe that, similar to DBS, the
transition to an online file is particularly important for satellite
radio because of that service's nationwide reach and the fact that the
current licensee maintains only one public and political file for the
entire U.S., making in-person access very difficult.
78. With respect to the political file, we propose to treat
satellite radio similar to DBS, as they are both nationwide services
with few licensed service providers. As we do with respect to the DBS
political file herein, we tentatively conclude, consistent with our
approach for television stations and our proposal herein for cable
systems and radio broadcasters, that SDARS licensees should not be
required to upload their existing political files to the online file
but rather should be permitted to maintain existing material in their
physical political file, and only upload documents to the online
political file on a going-forward basis. In addition, to the extent
that political file materials relate to ads shown on a local or hyper-
local basis, we seek comment on how satellite radio licensees can
indicate in their public files the area in which such ads were or will
be shown.
[[Page 8045]]
IV. Procedural Matters
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
1. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended (``RFA''), the Commission has prepared this Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') concerning the possible significant
economic impact on small entities of the policies and rules proposed in
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``NPRM''). Written public comments
are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to
the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments provided on
the first page of this NPRM. The Commission will send a copy of this
NPRM, including this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (``SBA''). In addition, this NPRM and
IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published in the Federal Register.
2. This NPRM proposes to expand to cable and Direct Broadcast
Satellite (``DBS'') operators and broadcast and satellite radio
(``SDARS'') licensees the requirement that public and political files
be posted to the online public file database hosted by the Commission.
In 2012, the Commission adopted online public file rules for broadcast
television stations which required them to post public file documents
to a central, FCC-hosted online database rather than maintaining the
files locally at their main studios. The Commission's goal was to
modernize the procedures television broadcasters use to inform the
public about how they are serving their communities by harnessing
current technology to make information more accessible to the public
and, over time, to reduce the cost of compliance. We are initiating
this proceeding to extend our modernization effort to include the
public file documents required to be maintained by cable operators, DBS
providers, broadcast radio licensees, and SDARS licensees. While the
Commission first included only television broadcasters in its public
file database to ``ease the initial implementation of the online public
file,'' television broadcasters have now successfully transitioned to
the online file over the past two years. Accordingly, we now believe it
is appropriate to commence the process of expanding the online file to
other media in order to extend the benefits of improved public access
to public inspection files and, ultimately, reduce the burden on these
other entities of maintaining those files.
3. In general, this NPRM proposes to adopt a similar approach with
respect to cable, DBS, and broadcast and satellite radio online file
requirements as we did for the television online file. Specifically, we
propose that these entities' entire public files be hosted online by
the Commission and that entities be responsible for uploading only
items now required to be in the public file but not otherwise filed
with the Commission or available on the Commission's Web site. As with
the television online file, we propose that the Commission itself
upload to the online public file material that is already on file with
the Commission or that currently resides in a Commission database. With
respect to the political file, we also propose that cable, DBS,
broadcast radio, and satellite radio entities not be required to upload
their existing political files to the online file. Instead, as we
required with television licensees, we propose that these entities be
permitted to maintain at the station those documents already in place
in their political file at the time the new rules become effective, and
only upload documents to the online political file on a going-forward
basis. With respect to radio, this NPRM proposes to commence the
transition to the online file with commercial stations in larger
markets with five or more full-time employees. In addition, the item
invites comment on whether to temporarily delay the requirement to
upload new political file material to the online file for small cable
systems.
4. The proposed action is authorized pursuant to sections 1, 2,
4(i), 303, 315, 317, 335, 601, 611, 651 and 653 of the Communications
Act, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 303, 315, 317, 335, 601, 611, 651, and
653.
5. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and where
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules, if adopted. The RFA generally defines
the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms
``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental
jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same
meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business
Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned
and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3)
satisfies any additional criteria established by the SBA. Below, we
provide a description of such small entities, as well as an estimate of
the number of such small entities, where feasible.
6. Cable Companies and Systems. The Commission has developed its
own small business size standards for the purpose of cable rate
regulation. Under the Commission's rules, a ``small cable company'' is
one serving 400,000 or fewer subscribers nationwide. Industry data
shows that there were are currently 660 cable operators. Of this total,
all but ten cable operators nationwide are small under this size
standard. In addition, under the Commission's rate regulation rules, a
``small system'' is a cable system serving 15,000 or fewer subscribers.
Current Commission records show 4,629 cable systems nationwide. Of this
total, 4,057 cable systems have less than 20,000 subscribers, and 572
systems have 20,000 or more subscribers, based on the same records.
Thus, under this standard, we estimate that most cable systems are
small entities.
7. Cable System Operators (Telecom Act Standard). The
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, also contains a size standard
for small cable system operators, which is ``a cable operator that,
directly or through an affiliate, serves in the aggregate fewer than 1
percent of all subscribers in the United States and is not affiliated
with any entity or entities whose gross annual revenues in the
aggregate exceed $250,000,000.'' There are approximately 54 million
cable video subscribers in the United States today. Accordingly, an
operator serving fewer than 540,000 subscribers shall be deemed a small
operator if its annual revenues, when combined with the total annual
revenues of all its affiliates, do not exceed $250 million in the
aggregate. Based on available data, we find that all but ten incumbent
cable operators are small entities under this size standard. We note
that the Commission neither requests nor collects information on
whether cable system operators are affiliated with entities whose gross
annual revenues exceed $250 million. Although it seems certain that
some of these cable system operators are affiliated with entities whose
gross annual revenues exceed $250,000,000, we are unable at this time
to estimate with greater precision the number of cable system operators
that would qualify as small cable operators under the definition in the
Communications Act.
8. Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) Service. DBS service is a
nationally distributed subscription service that delivers video and
audio programming via satellite to a small parabolic ``dish'' antenna
at the subscriber's location. DBS, by exception, is now included in the
SBA's broad economic census category, Wired Telecommunications
Carriers, which was developed for small wireline businesses. Under this
category, the SBA deems a wireline
[[Page 8046]]
business to be small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. Census data
for 2007 shows that there were 3,188 firms that operated for that
entire year. Of this total, 2,940 firms had fewer than 100 employees,
and 248 firms had 100 or more employees. Therefore, under this size
standard, the majority of such businesses can be considered small
entities. However, the data we have available as a basis for estimating
the number of such small entities were gathered under a superseded SBA
small business size standard formerly titled ``Cable and Other Program
Distribution.'' As of 2002, the SBA defined a small Cable and Other
Program Distribution provider as one with $12.5 million or less in
annual receipts. Currently, only two entities provide DBS service,
which requires a great investment of capital for operation: DIRECTV and
DISH Network. Each currently offers subscription services. DIRECTV and
DISH Network each report annual revenues that are in excess of the
threshold for a small business. Because DBS service requires
significant capital, we believe it is unlikely that a small entity as
defined under the superseded SBA size standard would have the financial
wherewithal to become a DBS service provider.
9. Radio Broadcasting. The SBA defines a radio broadcast station as
a small business if such station has no more than $38.5 million in
annual receipts. Business concerns included in this industry are those
``primarily engaged in broadcasting aural programs by radio to the
public.'' According to review of the BIA Publications, Inc. Master
Access Radio Analyzer Database as of November 26, 2013, about 11,331
(or about 99.9 percent) of the then number of commercial radio stations
(11,341) have revenues of $35.5 million or less and thus qualify as
small entities under the SBA definition. The Commission has estimated
the number of licensed noncommercial radio stations to be 4,082. The
Commission does not compile and otherwise does not have access to
information on the revenue of NCE stations that would permit it to
determine how many such stations would qualify as small entities. These
stations rely primarily on grants and contributions for their
operations, so we will assume that all of these entities qualify as
small businesses. We note that in assessing whether a business entity
qualifies as small under the above definition, business control
affiliations must be included. This estimate, therefore, likely
overstates the number of small entities that might be affected, because
the revenue figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate
revenues from affiliated companies.
10. In addition, an element of the definition of ``small business''
is that the entity not be dominant in its field of operation. The
Commission is unable at this time to define or quantify the criteria
that would establish whether a specific radio station is dominant in
its field of operation. Accordingly, the estimate of small businesses
to which rules may apply does not exclude any radio station from the
definition of a small business on this basis and therefore may be over-
inclusive to that extent. Also, as noted, an additional element of the
definition of ``small business'' is that the entity must be
independently owned and operated. The Commission notes that it is
difficult at times to assess these criteria in the context of media
entities and the estimates of small businesses to which they apply may
be over-inclusive to this extent.
11. Satellite Radio. The rules proposed in this NPRM would affect
the sole, current U.S. provider of satellite radio (``SDARS'')
services, XM-Sirius, which offers subscription services. XM-Sirius
reported revenue of $3.8 billion in 2013 and a net income of $377
million. In light of these figures, we believe it is unlikely that this
entity would be considered small.
12. Open Video Systems. The open video system (OVS) framework was
established in 1996, and is one of four statutorily recognized options
for the provision of video programming services by local exchange
carriers. The OVS framework provides opportunities for the distribution
of video programming other than through cable systems. Because OVS
operators provide subscription services, OVS falls within the SBA small
business size standard covering cable services, which is ``Wired
Telecommunications Carriers.'' The SBA has developed a small business
size standard for this category, which is: All such businesses having
1,500 or fewer employees. Census data for 2007 shows that there were
3,188 firms that operated for that entire year. Of this total, 2,940
firms had fewer than 100 employees, and 248 firms had 100 or more
employees. Therefore, under this size standard, we estimate that the
majority of these businesses can be considered small entities.
13. Certain rule changes proposed in this NPRM would affect
reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements. Cable, DBS,
radio, and SDARS entities are currently required to maintain a
``local'' copy of their public inspection files. This NPRM proposes to
require that these files be maintained online in the database hosted by
the Commission. Entities subject to this requirement would be required
to upload certain documents currently maintained in their local files
to the online database.
14. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standard; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small
entities.
15. This NPRM proposes a number of measures to minimize the effort
and cost entities must undertake to move their pubic files online.
Specifically, we propose to require entities only to upload to the
online file public file documents that are not already on file with the
Commission or that the Commission maintains in its own database. We
also propose to exempt existing political file material from the online
file requirement and to require only that political file documents be
uploaded on a going-forward basis. In addition, with only minor
exceptions--requiring cable operators to provide information about the
geographic areas they serve, clarifying the documents required to be
included in the cable public file, and requiring cable, DBS, broadcast
radio, and SDARS entities to provide the location and contact
information for their local file--we do not propose new or modified
public inspection file requirements in this proceeding. Our goal is
simply to adapt our existing public file requirements to an online
format. While we recognize that entities may incur a modest, one-time
transitional cost to upload some portions of their existing public file
to the online database, we believe this initial expense will be offset
by the public benefits of online disclosure. We also believe that, over
time, entities will benefit from the lower costs of sending documents
electronically to the Commission as opposed to creating and maintaining
a paper file at the local or headquarters' office or main studio and
assisting the public in accessing it. While we propose to place the
entire public file online, we invite comment on whether we should
instead require only that certain components of the
[[Page 8047]]
public file be placed on the Commission's online database. We note that
limiting online file requirements to certain components of the public
file would require entities to upload certain documents and maintain
others in the local public file, thereby potentially imposing a greater
burden than moving documents to the online file over time.
16. In addition, with respect to radio licensees this NPRM proposes
to commence the transition to an online file with commercial stations
in larger markets with five or more full-time employees, while
postponing temporarily all online file requirements for other radio
stations. This NPRM also proposes to exempt small cable systems
temporarily from the requirement to commence uploading new political
file material to the online public file and proposes to exempt very
small cable systems from all requirements to upload documents to the
Commission's online database. Finally, this NPRM also seeks comment on
whether we should exclude certain radio stations from all online public
file requirements, rather than simply delaying implementation of
certain requirements.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rule
None.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
17. This document contains proposed information collection
requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection
requirements contained in this document, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek specific comment on how we might
``further reduce the information collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.''
C. Ex Parte Rules
18. Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a
``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's
ex parte rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy
of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral
presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a
different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda
summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons attending or
otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted
in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already
reflected in the presenter's written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such
data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other
filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where
such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex
parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must
be filed consistent with rule Sec. 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed
by rule Sec. 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and
memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format
(e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable.pdf). Participants in this
proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte
rules.
D. Filing Requirements
19. Comments and Replies. Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of
the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may
file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on
the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using the
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). See Electronic
Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
[ssquf] Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
[ssquf] Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file
an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket or
rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
[ssquf] Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
[ssquf] All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for
the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St. SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours are
8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes must be disposed of
before entering the building.
[ssquf] Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
[ssquf] U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail
must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554.
[ssquf] People with Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or
call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530
(voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).
20. Additional Information. For additional information on this
proceeding, please contact Kim Matthews of the Media Bureau, Policy
Division, Kim.Matthews@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2154.
V. Ordering Clauses
21. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to the authority
contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 335 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
303(r), and 335 this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is adopted.
22. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a
copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration.
23. It is further ordered that the Petition for Rulemaking filed by
the Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, and the Sunlight Foundation is
granted.
List of Subjects
47 CFR Part 25
Direct Broadcast Satellite, Satellite radio.
47 CFR Part 73
Broadcast radio.
[[Page 8048]]
47 CFR Part 76
Cable television.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR parts 25, 73, and 76
as follows:
PART 25--SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
0
1. The Authority citation for Part 25 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Interprets or applies sections 4, 301, 302, 303, 307,
309, 319, 332, 705, and 721 of the Communications Act, as amended,
47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 319, 332, 605, and 721,
unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Section 25.601 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 25.601 Equal employment opportunities.
Notwithstanding other EEO provisions within these rules, an entity
that uses an owned or leased Fixed-Satellite Service or Direct
Broadcast Satellite Service or 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service
facility (operating under this part) to provide video programming
directly to the public on a subscription basis must comply with the
equal employment opportunity requirements set forth in part 76, subpart
E, of this chapter, if such entity exercises control (as defined in
part 76, subpart E, of this chapter) over the video programming it
distributes. Notwithstanding other EEO provisions within these rules, a
licensee or permittee of a direct broadcast satellite station operating
as a broadcaster, and a licensee or permittee in the satellite DARS
service, must comply with the equal employment opportunity requirements
set forth in part 73.
0
3. Section 25.701 is amended by revising the section heading and
paragraphs (d), (e)(3), and (f)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 25.701 Other DBS public interest obligations.
* * * * *
(d) Political file. Each DBS provider shall maintain a complete and
orderly political file.
(1) The political file shall contain, at a minimum:
(i) A record of all requests for DBS origination time, the
disposition of those requests, and the charges made, if any, if the
request is granted. The ``disposition'' includes the schedule of time
purchased, when spots actually aired, the rates charged, and the
classes of time purchased; and
(ii) A record of the free time provided if free time is provided
for use by or on behalf of candidates.
(2) All records required to be retained by this section must be
placed in the political file as soon as possible and must be retained
for a period of two years. After the effective date of this section,
DBS providers shall place all new political file material required to
be retained by this section in the online file hosted by the
Commission.
(3) DBS providers shall assist callers by answering questions about
the contents of their political files.
(e) * * *
(3) DBS providers airing children's programming must maintain in
the online file hosted by the Commission records sufficient to verify
compliance with this rule. Such records must be maintained for a period
sufficient to cover the limitations period specified in 47 U.S.C.
503(b)(6)(B).
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(6) Public file. (i) In addition to the political file requirements
in Sec. 25.701, each DBS provider shall maintain in the online file
hosted by the Commission a complete and orderly record of:
(A) Quarterly measurements of channel capacity and yearly average
calculations on which it bases its four percent reservation, as well as
its response to any capacity changes;
(B) A record of entities to whom noncommercial capacity is being
provided, the amount of capacity being provided to each entity, the
conditions under which it is being provided and the rates, if any,
being paid by the entity;
(C) A record of entities that have requested capacity, disposition
of those requests and reasons for the disposition.
(ii) All records required by paragraph (f)(6)(i) of this section
shall be placed in the online file hosted by the Commission as soon as
possible and shall be retained for a period of two years.
(iii) Each DBS provider must also place in the online file hosted
by the Commission the records required to be placed in the public
inspection file by Sec. 25.701(e) (commercial limits in children's
programs) and by Sec. 25.601 and 47 CFR part 76, subpart E (equal
employment opportunity requirements) and retain those records for the
period required by those rules.
(iv) Each DBS provider must provide a link to the public inspection
file hosted on the Commission's Web site from the home page of its own
Web site, if the provider has a Web site, and provide on its Web site
contact information for a representative who can assist any person with
disabilities with issues related to the content of the public files.
Each DBS provider also must include in the online public file the
address of the provider's local public file and the name, phone number,
and email address of the provider's designated contact for questions
about the public file.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 25.702 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 25.702 Other SDARS Public interest obligations.
(a) Political broadcasting requirements. The following political
broadcasting rules shall apply to all SDARS licensees: 47 CFR 73.1940
(Legally qualified candidates for public office), 73.1941 (Equal
opportunities), and 73.1944 (Reasonable access).
(b) Political file. Each SDARS licensee shall maintain a complete
and orderly political file.
(1) The political file shall contain, at a minimum:
(i) A record of all requests for SDARS origination time, the
disposition of those requests, and the charges made, if any, if the
request is granted. The ``disposition'' includes the schedule of time
purchased, when spots actually aired, the rates charged, and the
classes of time purchased; and
(ii) A record of the free time provided if free time is provided
for use by or on behalf of candidates.
(2) SDARS licensees shall place all records required by this
section in the political file as soon as possible and shall retain the
records for a period of two years. After the effective date of this
section, SDARS licensees shall place all new political file material
required to be retained by this section in the online file hosted by
the Commission.
(c) Public inspection file. Each SDARS applicant or licensee must
also place in the online file hosted by the Commission the records
required to be placed in the public inspection file by 47 CFR 25.601
and 73.2080 (equal employment opportunities (EEO)) and retain those
records for the period required by those rules. Each SDARS licensee
must provide a link to the public inspection file hosted on the
Commission's Web site from the home page of its own Web site, if the
licensee has a Web site, and provide on its Web site contact
information for a representative who can assist any person with
disabilities with issues related to the content of the public files.
Each SDARS licensee also must include
[[Page 8049]]
in the online public file the address of the licensee's local public
file and the name, phone number, and email address of the licensee's
designated contact for questions about the public file.
PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
0
5. The Authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336, and 339.
0
6. Section 73.1943 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 73.1943 Political file.
* * * * *
(d) Location of the file. A licensee or applicant must post all of
the contents added to its political file after the effective date of
this subsection in the political file component of its online public
file hosted by the Commission. A station must retain in its political
file maintained at the station, at the location specified in Sec.
73.3526(b) or Sec. 73.3527(b), all material required to be included in
the political file and added to the file prior to the effective date of
this subsection. The online political file must be updated in the same
manner as paragraph (c) of this section.
0
7. Section 73.3526 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 73.3526 Local public inspection file of commercial stations.
* * * * *
(b) Location of the file. The public inspection file shall be
located as follows:
(1) For radio licensees temporarily exempt from the online file, as
discussed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a hard copy of the
public inspection file shall be maintained at the main studio of the
station. For all licensees, letters and emails from the public, as
required by paragraph (e)(9) of this section, shall be maintained at
the main studio of the station. An applicant for a new station or
change of community shall maintain its file at an accessible place in
the proposed community of license or at its proposed main studio.
(2)(i) A television station licensee or applicant, and any radio
station licensee or applicant not temporarily exempt as described in
this paragraph, shall place the contents required by paragraph (e) of
this section, of its public inspection file on the online file hosted
by the Commission, with the exception of letters and emails from the
public as required by paragraph (e)(9) of this section, which shall be
retained at the station in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section; and the political file as required by paragraph (e)(6) of
this section, as discussed in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. Any
radio station not in the top 50 Nielsen Audio markets, and any radio
station with fewer than five full-time employees, shall continue to
retain the public inspection file at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until [2 years following
the effective date of the Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127].
However, any radio station that is not required to place its public
inspection file in the online file hosted by the Commission before [2
years following the effective date of the Report and Order in MB Docket
No. 14-127] may choose to do so, instead of retaining the public
inspection file at the station in the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section.
(ii) A station must provide a link to the public inspection file
hosted on the Commission's Web site from the home page of its own Web
site, if the station has a Web site, and provide contact information on
its Web site for a station representative that can assist any person
with disabilities with issues related to the content of the public
files. A station also is required to include in the online public file
the station's main studio address and telephone number, and the email
address of the station's designated contact for questions about the
public file. To the extent this section refers to the local public
inspection file, it refers to the public file of an individual station,
which is either maintained at the station or on the Commission's Web
site, depending upon where the documents are required to be maintained
under the Commission's rules.
(3)(i) A licensee or applicant shall place the contents required by
paragraph (e)(6) of this section of its political inspection file in
the online file hosted by the Commission. Political inspection file
material in existence 30 days after the effective date of this
provision shall continue to be retained at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the end of its
retention period.
(ii) Any television station not in the top 50 DMAs, and any station
not affiliated with one of the top four broadcast networks, regardless
of the size of the market it serves, shall continue to retain the
political file at the station in the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section until July 1, 2014. For these stations,
effective July 1, 2014, any new political file material shall be placed
in the online file hosted by the Commission, while the material in the
political file as of July 1, 2014, if not placed in the Commission's
Web site, shall continue to be retained at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the end of its
retention period. However, any station that is not required to place
its political file in the online file hosted by the Commission before
July 1, 2014 may choose to do so, instead of retaining the political
file at the station in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section.
(iii) Any radio station not in the top 50 Nielsen Audio markets,
and any radio station with fewer than five full-time employees, shall
continue to retain the political file at the station in the matter
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until [2 years following
the effective date of the Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127].
For these stations, effective [2 years following the effective date of
the Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127], any new political file
material shall be placed in the online file hosted by the Commission,
while the material in the political file as of [2 years following the
effective date of the Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127], if not
placed in the online file hosted by the Commission, shall continue to
be retained at the station in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section until the end of its retention period. However, any
station that is not required to place its political file on the
Commission's Web site before [2 years following the effective date of
the Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127] may choose to do so,
instead of retaining the political file at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(4) The Commission will automatically link the following items to
the electronic version of all licensee and applicant public inspection
files, to the extent that the Commission has these items
electronically: Authorizations, applications, contour maps; ownership
reports and related materials; portions of the Equal Employment
Opportunity file held by the Commission; ``The Public and
Broadcasting''; Letters of Inquiry and other investigative information
requests from the Commission, unless otherwise directed by the inquiry
itself; Children's television programming reports; and DTV transition
education reports. In the event that the online public file does not
reflect such required information, the licensee will be responsible for
posting such material.
* * * * *
[[Page 8050]]
0
8. Section 73.3527 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 73.3527 Local public inspection file of noncommercial
educational stations.
* * * * *
(b) Location of the file. The public inspection file shall be
located as follows:
(1) For radio licensees, a hard copy of the public inspection file
shall be maintained at the main studio of the station until [2 years
following the effective date of the Report and Order in MB Docket No.
14-127] except that, as discussed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section, any radio station may voluntarily place its public inspection
file online before [2 years following the effective date of the Report
and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127] if it chooses to do so instead of
retaining the file at the station. An applicant for a new station or
change of community shall maintain its file at an accessible place in
the proposed community of license or at its proposed main studio.
(2)(i) A noncommercial educational television station licensee or
applicant shall place the contents required by paragraph (e) of its
public inspection file in the online file hosted by the Commission,
with the exception of the political file as required by paragraph
(e)(5) of this section, which may be retained at the station in the
manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until July 1,
2014. Effective July 1, 2014, any new political file material shall be
placed in the online file hosted by the Commission, while the material
in the political file as of July 1, 2014, if not placed on the
Commission's Web site, shall continue to be retained at the station in
the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the end
of its retention period. However, any noncommercial educational station
that is not required to place its political file in the online file
hosted by the Commission before July 1, 2014 may choose to do so
instead of retaining the political file at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(ii) Beginning [2 years following the effective date of the Report
and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127], noncommercial educational radio
station licensees and applicants shall place the contents required by
paragraph (e) of this section in the online public inspection file
hosted by the Commission. For these stations, effective [2 years
following the effective date of the Report and Order in MB Docket No.
14-127], any new political file material shall be placed on the
Commission's Web site, while the material in the political file as of
[2 years following the effective date of the Report and Order in MB
Docket No. 14-127], if not placed in the online file hosted by the
Commission, shall continue to be retained at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the end of its
retention period. However, any radio station that is not required to
place its public inspection file in the online file hosted by the
Commission before [2 years following the effective date of the Report
and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127] may choose to do so, instead of
retaining the public inspection file at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(iii) A station must provide a link to the public inspection file
hosted on the Commission's Web site from the home page of its own Web
site, if the station has a Web site, and provide contact information
for a station representative on its Web site that can assist any person
with disabilities with issues related to the content of the public
files. A station also is required to include in the online public file
the station's main studio address and telephone number, and the email
address of the station's designated contact for questions about the
public file. To the extent this section refers to the local public
inspection file, it refers to the public file of an individual station,
which is either maintained at the station or on the Commission's Web
site, depending upon where the documents are required to be maintained
under the Commission's rules.
(3) The Commission will automatically link the following items to
the electronic version of all licensee and applicant public inspection
files, to the extent that the Commission has these items
electronically: Authorizations; applications; contour maps; ownership
reports and related materials; portions of the Equal Employment
Opportunity file held by the Commission; and ``The Public and
Broadcasting''.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 73.3580 is amended by revising paragraphs (d)(4)(i) and (ii)
to read as follows:
Sec. 73.3580 Local public notice of filing of broadcast applications.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Pre-filing announcements. During the period and beginning on
the first day of the sixth calendar month prior to the expiration of
the license, and continuing to the date on which the application is
filed, the following announcement shall be broadcast on the 1st and
16th day of each calendar month. Stations broadcasting primarily in a
foreign language should broadcast the announcements in that language.
Radio announcement: On (date of last renewal grant) (Station's call
letters) was granted a license by the Federal Communication Commission
to serve the public interest as a public trustee until (expiration
date).
Our license will expire on (date). We must file an application for
renewal with the FCC (date four calendar months prior to expiration
date). When filed, a copy of this application will be available for
public inspection at www.fcc.gov. It contains information concerning
this station's performance during the last (period of time covered by
the application).
Individuals who wish to advise the FCC of facts relating to our
renewal application and to whether this station has operated in the
public interest should file comments and petitions with the FCC by
(date first day of last full calendar month prior to the month of
expiration).
Further information concerning the FCC's broadcast license renewal
process is available at (address of location of the station's public
inspection file) or may be obtained from the FCC, Washington, DC 20554.
Television announcement: On (date of last renewal grant) (Station's
call letters) was granted a license by the Federal Communication
Commission to serve the public interest as a public trustee until
(expiration date).
Our license will expire on (date). We must file an application for
renewal with the FCC (date four calendar months prior to expiration
date). When filed, a copy of this application will be available for
public inspection at www.fcc.gov. It contains information concerning
this station's performance during the last (period of time covered by
the application).
Individuals who wish to advise the FCC of facts relating to our
renewal application and to whether this station has operated in the
public interest should file comments and petitions with the FCC by
(date first day of last full calendar month prior to the month of
expiration).
Further information concerning the FCC's broadcast license renewal
process is available at (address of location of the station) or may be
obtained from the FCC, Washington, DC 20554.
* * * * *
(ii) Post-filing announcements. During the period beginning of the
date on which the renewal application is filed to the sixteenth day of
the next to last full
[[Page 8051]]
calendar month prior to the expiration of the license, all applications
for renewal of broadcast station licenses shall broadcast the following
announcement on the 1st and 16th day of each calendar month. Stations
broadcasting primarily in a foreign language should broadcast the
announcements in that language.
Television announcement: On (date of last renewal grant) (Station's
call letters) was granted a license by the Federal Communications
Commission to serve the public interest as a public trustee until
(expiration date).
Our license will expire on (date). We have filed an application for
renewal with the FCC.
A copy of this application is available for public inspection at
www.fcc.gov. It contains information concerning this station's
performance during the last (period of time covered by application).
Individuals who wish to advise the FCC of facts relating to our
renewal application and to whether this station has operated in the
public interest should file comments and petitions with the FCC by
(date first day of last full calendar month prior to the month of
expiration).
Further information concerning the FCC's broadcast license renewal
process is available at (address of location of the station) or may be
obtained from the FCC, Washington, DC 20554.
Radio announcement: On (date of last renewal grant) (Station's call
letters) was granted a license by the Federal Communications Commission
to serve the public interest as a public trustee until (expiration
date).
Our license will expire on (date). We have filed an application for
renewal with the FCC.
A copy of this application is available for public inspection at
www.fcc.gov. It contains information concerning this station's
performance during the last (period of time covered by application).
Individuals who wish to advise the FCC of facts relating to our
renewal application and to whether this station has operated in the
public interest should file comments and petitions with the FCC by
(date first day of last full calendar month prior to the month of
expiration).
Further information concerning the FCC's broadcast license renewal
process is available at (address of location of the station's public
inspection file) or may be obtained from the FCC, Washington, DC 20554.
* * * * *
PART 76--MULTICHANNEL VIDEO AND CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE
0
10. The Authority citation for Part 76 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154, 301, 302, 302a, 303,
303a, 307, 308, 309, 312, 315, 317, 325, 339, 340, 341, 503, 521,
522, 531, 532, 534, 535, 536, 537, 543, 544, 544a, 545, 548, 549,
552, 554, 556, 558, 560, 561, 571, 572, 573.
0
11. Section 76.630 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 76.630 Compatibility with consumer electronics equipment.
(a) * * *
(2) Requests for waivers of this prohibition must demonstrate
either a substantial problem with theft of basic tier service or a
strong need to scramble basic signals for other reasons. As part of
this showing, cable operators are required to notify subscribers by
mail of waiver requests. The notice to subscribers must be mailed no
later than 30 calendar days from the date the request for waiver was
filed with the Commission, and cable operators must inform the
Commission in writing, as soon as possible, of that notification date.
The notification to subscribers must state:
On (date of waiver request was filed with the Commission),
(cable operator's name) filed with the Federal Communications
Commission a request for waiver of the rule prohibiting scrambling
of channels on the basic tier of service. 47 CFR 76.630(a). The
request for waiver states (a brief summary of the waiver request). A
copy of the request for waiver shall be available for public
inspection at www.fcc.gov.
Individuals who wish to comment on this request for waiver
should mail comments to the Federal Communications Commission by no
later than 30 days from (the date the notification was mailed to
subscribers). Those comments should be addressed to the: Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, Washington, DC 20554, and
should include the name of the cable operator to whom the comments
are applicable. Individuals should also send a copy of their
comments to (the cable operator at its local place of business).
Cable operators may file comments in reply no later than 7 days
from the date subscriber comments must be filed.
* * * * *
0
12. Section 76.1700 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 76.1700 Records to be maintained by cable system operators.
(a) Public inspection file. The following records must be placed in
the online public file hosted by the Commission, except as indicated in
Sec. 76.1700(d) and except that the records listed in 76.1700(1)
(political file) that are in existence 30 days after the effective date
of this provision shall continue to be retained at the system and made
available to the public in the manner discussed in paragraph (e) of
this section until the end of the retention period. In addition, any
cable system with fewer than 5,000 subscribers shall continue to retain
the political file at the system in the manner discussed in paragraph
(e) of this section until [2 years following the effective date of the
Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127]. For these systems, effective
[2 years following the effective date of the Report and Order in MB
Docket No. 14-127], any new political file material shall be placed in
the online file hosted by the Commission, while the material in the
political file as of [2 years following the effective date of the
Report and Order in MB Docket No. 14-127], if not placed on the
Commission's Web site, shall continue to be retained at the system in
the manner discussed in paragraph (e) of this section until the end of
its retention period. However, any system that is not required to place
its political file on the Commission's Web site before [2 years
following the effective date of the Report and Order in MB Docket No.
14-127] may choose to do so, instead of retaining the political file at
the system in the manner discussed in paragraph (e) of this section.
(1) Political file. All requests for cablecast time made by or on
behalf of a candidate for public office and all other information
required to be maintained pursuant to Sec. 76.1701;
(2) Equal employment opportunity. All EEO materials described in
Sec. 76.1702 except for any EEO program annual reports, which the
Commission will link to the electronic version of all systems' public
inspection files;
(3) Commercial records on children's programs. Sufficient records
to verify compliance with Sec. 76.225 in accordance with Sec.
76.1703;
(4) Performance tests (channels delivered). The operator of each
cable television system shall maintain at its local office a current
listing of the cable television channels which that system delivers to
its subscribers in accordance with Sec. 76.1705;
(5) Leased access. If a cable operator adopts and enforces written
policy regarding indecent leased access programming, such a policy
shall be published in accordance with Sec. 76.1707;
(6) Principal headend. The operator of every cable system shall
maintain the designation and location of its principal headend in
accordance with Sec. 76.1708;
(7) Availability of signals. The operator of every cable television
system
[[Page 8052]]
shall maintain a list of all broadcast television stations carried by
its system in fulfillment of the must-carry requirements in accordance
with Sec. 76.1709;
(8) Operator interests in video programming. Cable operators shall
maintain records regarding the nature and extent of their attributable
interests in all video programming services as well as information
regarding their carriage of such vertically integrated video
programming services on cable systems in which they have an
attributable interests in accordance with Sec. 76.1710;
(9) Sponsorship identification. Whenever sponsorship announcements
are omitted pursuant to Sec. 76.1615(f) of subpart T, the cable
television system operator shall maintain a list in accordance with
Sec. 76.1715;
(10) Compatibility with consumer electronics equipment. Cable
system operators generally may not scramble or otherwise encrypt
signals carried on the basic service tier. Copies of requests for
waivers of this prohibition must be available in the public inspection
file in accordance with Sec. 76.630.
(b) Information available to the franchisor. These records must be
made available by cable system operators to local franchising
authorities on reasonable notice and during regular business hours,
except as indicated in Sec. 76.1700(d).
(1) Proof-of-performance test data. The proof of performance tests
shall be made available upon request in accordance with Sec. 76.1704;
(2) Complaint resolution. Cable system operators shall establish a
process for resolving complaints from subscribers about the quality of
the television signal delivered. Aggregate data based upon these
complaints shall be made available for inspection in accordance with
Sec. 76.1713.
(c) Information available to the Commission. These records must be
made available by cable system operators to the Commission on
reasonable notice and during regular business hours, except as
indicated in Sec. 76.1700(d).
(1) Proof-of-performance test data. The proof of performance tests
shall be made available upon request in accordance with Sec. 76.1704;
(2) Signal leakage logs and repair records. Cable operators shall
maintain a log showing the date and location of each leakage source in
accordance with Sec. 76.1706;
(3) Emergency alert system and activations. Every cable system
shall keep a record of each test and activation of the Emergency Alert
System (EAS). The test is performed pursuant to the procedures and
requirements of part 11 of this chapter and the EAS Operating Handbook.
The records are kept in accordance with part 11 and Sec. 76.1711 of
this chapter;
(4) Complaint resolution. Cable system operators shall establish a
process for resolving complaints from subscribers about the quality of
the television signal delivered. Aggregate data based upon these
complaints shall be made available for inspection in accordance with
Sec. 76.1713;
(5) Subscriber records and public inspection file. The operator of
a cable television system shall make the system, its public inspection
file, and its records of subscribers available for inspection upon
request in accordance with Sec. 76.1716.
(d) Exceptions to the public inspection file requirements. The
operator of every cable television system having fewer than 1,000
subscribers is exempt from the online public file and from the public
record requirements contained in Sec. 76.1701 (political file); Sec.
76.1702 (EEO records available for public inspection); Sec. 76.1703
(commercial records for children's programming); Sec. 76.1704 (proof-
of-performance test data); Sec. 76.1706 (signal leakage logs and
repair records); Sec. 76.1714 (FCC rules and regulations); and Sec.
76.1715 (sponsorship identification).
(e) Location of records. Political file material that continues to
be retained at the system shall be retained in a public inspection file
maintained at the office in the community served by the system that the
system operator maintains for the ordinary collection of subscriber
charges, resolution of subscriber complaints, and other business and,
if the system operator does not maintain such an office in the
community, at any accessible place in the communities served by the
system (such as a public registry for documents or an attorney's
office). Public file locations will be open at least during normal
business hours and will be conveniently located. The public inspection
file shall be available for public inspection at any time during
regular business hours for the facility where they are kept. All or
part of the public inspection file may be maintained in a computer
database, as long as a computer terminal capable of accessing the
database is made available, at the location of the file, to members of
the public who wish to review the file.
(f) Links and contact and geographic information. A system must
provide a link to the public inspection file hosted on the Commission's
Web site from the home page of its own Web site, if the system has a
Web site, and provide contact information on its Web site for a system
representative who can assist any person with disabilities with issues
related to the content of the public files. A system also is required
to include in the online public file the address of the system's local
public file and the name, phone number, and email address of the
system's designated contact for questions about the public file. In
addition, a system must provide on the online public file a list of the
geographic areas served by the system. To the extent this section
refers to the local public inspection file, it refers to the public
file of a physical system, which is either maintained at the location
described in paragraph (e) of this section or on the Commission's Web
site, depending upon where the documents are required to be maintained
under the Commission's rules.
(g) Reproduction of records. Copies of any material in the public
inspection file shall be available for machine reproduction upon
request made in person, provided the requesting party shall pay the
reasonable cost of reproduction. Requests for machine copies shall be
fulfilled at a location specified by the system operator, within a
reasonable period of time, which in no event shall be longer than seven
days. The system operator is not required to honor requests made by
mail but may do so if it chooses.
0
13. Section 76.1709 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 76.1709 Availability of signals.
(a) The operator of every cable television system shall maintain
for public inspection a file containing a list of all broadcast
television stations carried by its system in fulfillment of the must-
carry requirements pursuant to Sec. 76.56. Such list shall include the
call sign, community of license, broadcast channel number, cable
channel number, and in the case of a noncommercial educational
broadcast station, whether that station was carried by the cable system
on March 29, 1990.
(b) Such records must be maintained in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 76.1700.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-02531 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P