Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Annual Survey of Business Owners, 7411-7413 [2015-02734]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 27 / Tuesday, February 10, 2015 / Notices
or part of an individual’s income is
derived from any public assistance
program, or protected genetic
information in employment or in any
program or activity conducted or funded
by the Department. (Not all prohibited
bases will apply to all programs and/or
employment activities.)
How To File a Complaint
If you wish to file an employment
complaint, you must contact your
agency’s EEO Counselor within 45 days
of the date of the alleged discriminatory
act, event, or in the case of a personnel
action. Additional information can be
found online at https://
www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_
file.html.
If you wish to file a Civil Rights
program complaint of discrimination,
complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF),
found online at https://
www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_
cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call
(866) 632–9992 to request the form. You
may also write a letter containing all of
the information requested in the form.
Send your completed complaint form or
letter to us by mail at U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Director, Office of
Adjudication, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–
9410, by fax (202) 690–7442 or email at
program.intake@usda.gov.
Persons With Disabilities
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Individuals who are deaf, hard of
hearing or have speech disabilities and
you wish to file either an EEO or
program complaint please contact
USDA through the Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339 or (800) 845–
6136 (in Spanish).
Persons with disabilities who wish to
file a program complaint, please see
information above on how to contact us
by mail directly or by email. If you
require alternative means of
communication for program information
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.)
please contact USDA’s TARGET Center
at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).
Dated: January 6, 2015.
Jasper Schneider,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–02680 Filed 2–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:20 Feb 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Annual Survey of
Business Owners
U.S. Census Bureau,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before April 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Patrice Norman, U.S.
Census Bureau, EWD, 6K071,
Washington, DC 20233–6600, (301) 763–
7198, Patrice.C.Norman@census.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The Census Bureau plans to conduct
the Annual Survey of Business Owners
(ASBO) for employer businesses. In the
ASBO, respondents will be asked
questions about their businesses as well
as several questions about the gender,
ethnicity, race, and veteran status of the
principal owner(s). This survey will be
the first annual collection of
information on the characteristics of
U.S. businesses by ownership
categories, i.e., by gender, ethnicity,
race, and veteran status. The survey will
be conducted as a joint project with the
Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, a
Missouri nonprofit corporation and a
private foundation exempt from taxes
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code. The ASBO will
supplement the five-year Survey of
Business Owners program and provide
more timely updates on the status,
nature, and scope of women-,
minority-, and veteran-owned
businesses. The ASBO statistics will be
used by government program officials,
industry organization leaders, economic
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7411
and social analysts, and business
entrepreneurs. Examples of data uses
include:
• To assess business assistance needs
and allocate available program
resources.
• To establish and evaluate contract
procurement practices affecting small
and disadvantaged businesses.
• To create a framework for planning,
directing, and assessing programs that
promote the activities of disadvantaged
groups.
• To assess minority-owned
businesses by industry and area and to
educate industry associations,
corporations, and government entities.
• To analyze economic and
demographic shifts and differences in
ownership and performance among
geographic areas.
• To analyze business operations in
comparison to similar firms, compute
market share, and assess business
growth and future prospects.
The ASBO will be based on the
quinquennial 2012 Survey of Business
Owners long form (SBO–1) with 19
additional questions, including a set of
questions on the sources of capital used
for expansion, which will be asked each
year, and a rotating panel of questions
that will be determined prior to data
collection each year. Each year the new
panel of questions will be submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) as a revision to the current data
collection’s OMB approval. The
following changes will be made to the
2012 SBO:
• An additional question on where
the business’s customers are located in
relation to the business.
• An additional question on the
reasons for owning the business.
• An additional question on whether
the business had profits, losses, or broke
even.
• An additional question on where
the owner would like the company to be
in five years.
• An additional question on issues
that have negatively impacted the
profitability of the business.
• The question on what sources of
capital were used for expansion or
capital improvements to the business
during the reference year has been
expanded into seven questions. The
new questions ask:
Æ The total amount of money put into
the business in 2014.
Æ The total amount of money that the
owner personally put into the business.
Æ The total amount of money
received from family, friends, and
employees that was put into the
business.
Æ The total amount of money
received from any formal debit
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7412
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 27 / Tuesday, February 10, 2015 / Notices
financing from a bank or other financial
institution, a business credit card
carrying a balance, or a business line of
credit.
Æ The total amount of financial
capital received from angel investors,
venture capitalists, or other businesses
in return for a share(s) of ownership in
the business.
Æ What types of funding the owner
tried to get and whether or not the
owner received the funds.
Æ Whether the business needed
financing but did not apply and why the
business did not apply.
• The 2014 ASBO’s rotating panel of
questions will focus on Innovation and
Research and Development and is
modeled after questions asked on the
Microbusiness Innovation Science and
Technology Survey (MIST). The
National Science Foundation (NSF) is
currently conducting a pilot for the
MIST during 2015. The sample size is
limited to 4,000 businesses and only
covers the manufacturing and
professional and technical services
industries. Expanding the ASBO to
include these questions will
significantly increase the industry
coverage by including all NAICS
industries except 111, 112, 481111, 482,
491, 525, 813, 814, and 92. This section
will consist of eight questions that will
only be asked on the 2014 survey. A
new set of questions will be asked on
the 2015 survey. The 2014 new
questions consist of the following:
Æ During 2014, were any of the
following improvements made to the
goods and/or services sold by this
business:
D Sold a new good or service that no
company has ever offered before.
D Sold a new good or service that
your company has never offered before.
D Improved good’s performance by
making changes in materials,
equipment, components, or software.
D Developed a new use for a good or
service.
D Added a new feature to a good or
service.
D Made it easier for customers to use
a good or service.
D Don’t know.
D Did not make any innovations to the
goods and/or services sold by this
business.
Æ During 2014, were any of the
following improvements made to the
production processes used by this
business?
D Applied a new way of purchasing,
accounting, computing, maintenance,
inventory control, or other support
activities.
D Reduced costs by changing the way
a good or service was distributed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:20 Feb 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
D Upgraded a technique, equipment,
or software to significantly improve a
good or service.
D Made a significant improvement in
a technique or process by increasing
automation, decreasing energy
consumption, or using better software.
D Decreased production costs by
improving the materials, software, or
other components.
D Changed a delivery method to be
faster or more reliable.
D Don’t know.
D Did not make any improvements to
the production processes used by this
business.
Æ Did this business conduct any of
the following research and development
activities in 2014:
D Conducted work that might lead to
a patent.
D Developed and tested prototypes
that were derived from scientific
research or technical findings.
D Produced findings that could be
published in academic journals or
presented at scientific conferences.
D Applied scientific or technical
knowledge in a way that has never been
done before.
D Created new scientific or technical
solutions that can be generalized to
other situations.
D Conducted work to discover
previously unknown scientific facts,
structures, or relationships.
D Conducted work to extend the
understanding of scientific facts,
relationships or principles in ways that
could be useful to others.
Æ What was the total cost paid for
research and development activities?
Æ How much of the total cost was
used for research and development
activities performed by this business?
Æ How much of the cost for research
and development performed by this
business was spent on the following:
D Employee payroll.
D Equipment purchases.
D Software and licensing purchases.
D Other expenses.
Æ How much of the cost for research
and development performed by this
business was paid for by the following:
D This business.
D Another U.S. business.
D U.S. college or university.
D U.S. nonprofit organization.
D U.S. federal government.
D U.S. state or local government.
D Other.
Æ How many of each type of worker
worked on the research and
development activities:
D Owners.
D Paid employees.
D Other paid workers.
D Unpaid workers.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Businesses which reported any
business activity on any one of the
following Internal Revenue Service tax
forms will be eligible for selection: 1040
(Schedule C), ‘‘Profit or Loss from
Business (Sole Proprietorship); 1065,
‘‘U.S. Return of Partnership Income’’;
941, ‘‘Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax
Return’’; 944, ‘‘Employer’s Annual
Federal Tax Return’’; or any one of the
1120 corporate tax forms. Current plans
will only request responses from
businesses filing the 941, 944, or 1120
tax forms. Estimates for businesses filing
the 1040 or 1065 tax returns will be
created using statistical modeling of
administrative data and will only
provide data by race, gender, ethnicity,
and veteran status by geography,
industry, and size of firm.
We will seek separate clearance from
OMB to test our proposed ASBO
questionnaire. We intend to conduct
cognitive interviews with between 15
and 20 businesses in two rounds.
Cognitive interviews will begin in
January 2015 and will continue through
March 2015. Upon completion of each
round of interviews, the interview team
will meet and decide on the
recommended changes to the
questionnaire. The questionnaire will be
revised after each round and the
interview protocol updated to reflect the
new version of the questionnaire. We
will also conduct usability testing of the
electronic instrument. We intend to
conduct interviews with between 10
and 12 businesses in two rounds. These
interviews will be conducted in July
2015.
The 2014 data collection of the ASBO
will begin in September 2015 and will
continue through January 2016. The
2015 data collection will begin in June
2016 and will continue through
September 2016 and the 2016 data
collection will begin in June 2017 and
will continue through September 2017.
II. Method of Collection
The Census Bureau will use a letteronly mailout with an electronic-only
data collection. The mailout will be
conducted from our National Processing
Center in Jeffersonville, Indiana. Two
mail follow-ups to nonrespondents will
be conducted at approximately onemonth intervals.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607–XXXX
(this is a new collection).
Form Number(s): ASBO–1, Annual
Survey of Business Owners.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Large and small
businesses.
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 27 / Tuesday, February 10, 2015 / Notices
Estimated Number of Respondents:
200,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 35
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 116,667.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.
Sections 8(b), 131, 193, and 224.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: February 5, 2015
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
The proposed subzone (14.45 acres) is
located at 107 Scott Drive, Leominster,
Massachusetts. A notification of
proposed production activity has been
submitted and will be published
separately for public comment.
In accordance with the FTZ Board’s
regulations, Kathleen Boyce of the FTZ
Staff is designated examiner to review
the application and make
recommendations to the FTZ Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive
Secretary at the address below. The
closing period for their receipt is March
23, 2015. Rebuttal comments in
response to material submitted during
the foregoing period may be submitted
during the subsequent 15-day period to
April 6, 2015.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ
Board’s Web site, which is accessible
via www.trade.gov/ftz.
For further information, contact
Kathleen Boyce at Kathleen.Boyce@
trade.gov or (202) 482–1346.
Dated: February 4, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–02736 Filed 2–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
[FR Doc. 2015–02734 Filed 2–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A–570–001]
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–6–2015]
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Foreign-Trade Zone 27; Boston,
Massachusetts; Application for
Subzone Spectro Coating Corporation
d/b/a Claremont Flock, LLC;
Leominster, Massachusetts
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by
the Massachusetts Port Authority,
grantee of FTZ 27, requesting subzone
status for the facility of Spectro Coating
Corporation d/b/a Claremont Flock,
LLC, located in Leominster,
Massachusetts. The application was
submitted pursuant to the provisions of
the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the
regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR
part 400). It was formally docketed on
February 3, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:20 Feb 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Potassium Permanganate From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request by
Pacific Accelerator Limited (‘‘PAL’’), the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on
potassium permanganate from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) for
the period of review (‘‘POR’’) January 1,
2013, through December 31, 2013. The
Department has preliminarily
determined that PAL had no reviewable
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DATES:
7413
Effective Date: February 10,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexander Montoro, AD/CVD
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0238.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by the order are
shipments of potassium permanganate,
an inorganic chemical produced in freeflowing, technical, and pharmaceutical
grades. Potassium permanganate is
currently classifiable under item
2841.61.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS item number is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise remains dispositive.
Background
On February 28, 2014, based on a
timely request for review by PAL 1, the
Department initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping order on
potassium permanganate from the PRC.2
On March 20, 2014, the Department
issued Section A, C, and D
questionnaires to PAL.3 On April 24,
May 16, and May 23, 2014, we received
Section A, C and D questionnaire
responses from PAL, respectively. On
July 10, 2014, the Department issued a
supplemental questionnaire asking PAL
to confirm whether it had any entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.4
On September 5, 2014, we extended the
preliminary results to December 3,
2014.5 On November 18, 2014, we fully
1 See letter from Pacific Accelerator Limited
entitled, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Potassium
Permanganate from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated January 30, 2014.
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 11401
(February 28, 2014).
3 See the Department’s letter to Pacific
Accelerator Limited entitled, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Potassium Permanganate
from the People’s Republic of China:
Questionnaire,’’ dated March 20, 2014
(‘‘Questionnaire’’).
4 See the Department’s letter to Pacific
Accelerator Limited entitled, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Potassium Permanganate
from the People’s Republic of China: Supplemental
Section C Questionnaire,’’ dated July 10, 2014
(‘‘Section C Supplemental’’).
5 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary, through James Doyle, Office
Director, from Alexander Montoro, International
Trade Compliance Analyst, ‘‘Potassium
Permanganate from the People’s Republic of China;
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
Continued
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7411-7413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02734]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Annual Survey
of Business Owners
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on
or before April 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Patrice Norman, U.S. Census Bureau, EWD, 6K071,
Washington, DC 20233-6600, (301) 763-7198, Patrice.C.Norman@census.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Census Bureau plans to conduct the Annual Survey of Business
Owners (ASBO) for employer businesses. In the ASBO, respondents will be
asked questions about their businesses as well as several questions
about the gender, ethnicity, race, and veteran status of the principal
owner(s). This survey will be the first annual collection of
information on the characteristics of U.S. businesses by ownership
categories, i.e., by gender, ethnicity, race, and veteran status. The
survey will be conducted as a joint project with the Ewing Marion
Kauffman Foundation, a Missouri nonprofit corporation and a private
foundation exempt from taxes under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code. The ASBO will supplement the five-year Survey of Business
Owners program and provide more timely updates on the status, nature,
and scope of women-, minority-, and veteran-owned businesses. The ASBO
statistics will be used by government program officials, industry
organization leaders, economic and social analysts, and business
entrepreneurs. Examples of data uses include:
To assess business assistance needs and allocate available
program resources.
To establish and evaluate contract procurement practices
affecting small and disadvantaged businesses.
To create a framework for planning, directing, and
assessing programs that promote the activities of disadvantaged groups.
To assess minority-owned businesses by industry and area
and to educate industry associations, corporations, and government
entities.
To analyze economic and demographic shifts and differences
in ownership and performance among geographic areas.
To analyze business operations in comparison to similar
firms, compute market share, and assess business growth and future
prospects.
The ASBO will be based on the quinquennial 2012 Survey of Business
Owners long form (SBO-1) with 19 additional questions, including a set
of questions on the sources of capital used for expansion, which will
be asked each year, and a rotating panel of questions that will be
determined prior to data collection each year. Each year the new panel
of questions will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) as a revision to the current data collection's OMB approval. The
following changes will be made to the 2012 SBO:
An additional question on where the business's customers
are located in relation to the business.
An additional question on the reasons for owning the
business.
An additional question on whether the business had
profits, losses, or broke even.
An additional question on where the owner would like the
company to be in five years.
An additional question on issues that have negatively
impacted the profitability of the business.
The question on what sources of capital were used for
expansion or capital improvements to the business during the reference
year has been expanded into seven questions. The new questions ask:
[cir] The total amount of money put into the business in 2014.
[cir] The total amount of money that the owner personally put into
the business.
[cir] The total amount of money received from family, friends, and
employees that was put into the business.
[cir] The total amount of money received from any formal debit
[[Page 7412]]
financing from a bank or other financial institution, a business credit
card carrying a balance, or a business line of credit.
[cir] The total amount of financial capital received from angel
investors, venture capitalists, or other businesses in return for a
share(s) of ownership in the business.
[cir] What types of funding the owner tried to get and whether or
not the owner received the funds.
[cir] Whether the business needed financing but did not apply and
why the business did not apply.
The 2014 ASBO's rotating panel of questions will focus on
Innovation and Research and Development and is modeled after questions
asked on the Microbusiness Innovation Science and Technology Survey
(MIST). The National Science Foundation (NSF) is currently conducting a
pilot for the MIST during 2015. The sample size is limited to 4,000
businesses and only covers the manufacturing and professional and
technical services industries. Expanding the ASBO to include these
questions will significantly increase the industry coverage by
including all NAICS industries except 111, 112, 481111, 482, 491, 525,
813, 814, and 92. This section will consist of eight questions that
will only be asked on the 2014 survey. A new set of questions will be
asked on the 2015 survey. The 2014 new questions consist of the
following:
[cir] During 2014, were any of the following improvements made to
the goods and/or services sold by this business:
[ssquf] Sold a new good or service that no company has ever offered
before.
[ssquf] Sold a new good or service that your company has never
offered before.
[ssquf] Improved good's performance by making changes in materials,
equipment, components, or software.
[ssquf] Developed a new use for a good or service.
[ssquf] Added a new feature to a good or service.
[ssquf] Made it easier for customers to use a good or service.
[ssquf] Don't know.
[ssquf] Did not make any innovations to the goods and/or services
sold by this business.
[cir] During 2014, were any of the following improvements made to
the production processes used by this business?
[ssquf] Applied a new way of purchasing, accounting, computing,
maintenance, inventory control, or other support activities.
[ssquf] Reduced costs by changing the way a good or service was
distributed.
[ssquf] Upgraded a technique, equipment, or software to
significantly improve a good or service.
[ssquf] Made a significant improvement in a technique or process by
increasing automation, decreasing energy consumption, or using better
software.
[ssquf] Decreased production costs by improving the materials,
software, or other components.
[ssquf] Changed a delivery method to be faster or more reliable.
[ssquf] Don't know.
[ssquf] Did not make any improvements to the production processes
used by this business.
[cir] Did this business conduct any of the following research and
development activities in 2014:
[ssquf] Conducted work that might lead to a patent.
[ssquf] Developed and tested prototypes that were derived from
scientific research or technical findings.
[ssquf] Produced findings that could be published in academic
journals or presented at scientific conferences.
[ssquf] Applied scientific or technical knowledge in a way that has
never been done before.
[ssquf] Created new scientific or technical solutions that can be
generalized to other situations.
[ssquf] Conducted work to discover previously unknown scientific
facts, structures, or relationships.
[ssquf] Conducted work to extend the understanding of scientific
facts, relationships or principles in ways that could be useful to
others.
[cir] What was the total cost paid for research and development
activities?
[cir] How much of the total cost was used for research and
development activities performed by this business?
[cir] How much of the cost for research and development performed
by this business was spent on the following:
[ssquf] Employee payroll.
[ssquf] Equipment purchases.
[ssquf] Software and licensing purchases.
[ssquf] Other expenses.
[cir] How much of the cost for research and development performed
by this business was paid for by the following:
[ssquf] This business.
[ssquf] Another U.S. business.
[ssquf] U.S. college or university.
[ssquf] U.S. nonprofit organization.
[ssquf] U.S. federal government.
[ssquf] U.S. state or local government.
[ssquf] Other.
[cir] How many of each type of worker worked on the research and
development activities:
[ssquf] Owners.
[ssquf] Paid employees.
[ssquf] Other paid workers.
[ssquf] Unpaid workers.
Businesses which reported any business activity on any one of the
following Internal Revenue Service tax forms will be eligible for
selection: 1040 (Schedule C), ``Profit or Loss from Business (Sole
Proprietorship); 1065, ``U.S. Return of Partnership Income''; 941,
``Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return''; 944, ``Employer's Annual
Federal Tax Return''; or any one of the 1120 corporate tax forms.
Current plans will only request responses from businesses filing the
941, 944, or 1120 tax forms. Estimates for businesses filing the 1040
or 1065 tax returns will be created using statistical modeling of
administrative data and will only provide data by race, gender,
ethnicity, and veteran status by geography, industry, and size of firm.
We will seek separate clearance from OMB to test our proposed ASBO
questionnaire. We intend to conduct cognitive interviews with between
15 and 20 businesses in two rounds. Cognitive interviews will begin in
January 2015 and will continue through March 2015. Upon completion of
each round of interviews, the interview team will meet and decide on
the recommended changes to the questionnaire. The questionnaire will be
revised after each round and the interview protocol updated to reflect
the new version of the questionnaire. We will also conduct usability
testing of the electronic instrument. We intend to conduct interviews
with between 10 and 12 businesses in two rounds. These interviews will
be conducted in July 2015.
The 2014 data collection of the ASBO will begin in September 2015
and will continue through January 2016. The 2015 data collection will
begin in June 2016 and will continue through September 2016 and the
2016 data collection will begin in June 2017 and will continue through
September 2017.
II. Method of Collection
The Census Bureau will use a letter-only mailout with an
electronic-only data collection. The mailout will be conducted from our
National Processing Center in Jeffersonville, Indiana. Two mail follow-
ups to nonrespondents will be conducted at approximately one-month
intervals.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607-XXXX (this is a new collection).
Form Number(s): ASBO-1, Annual Survey of Business Owners.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Large and small businesses.
[[Page 7413]]
Estimated Number of Respondents: 200,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 35 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 116,667.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. Sections 8(b), 131, 193, and 224.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: February 5, 2015
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-02734 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P