Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 7475-7477 [2015-02623]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7475
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 27 / Tuesday, February 10, 2015 / Notices
This revision to 0920–0821
incorporates burden estimates provided
for the emergency information
collection 0920–1031 and 0920–1034,
which have been updated and
annualized. The total additional burden
requested for this revision is 105,571
respondents and 85,063 burden hours.
The estimated total burden for 0920–
0821 is 109,429 respondents and 85,382
burden hours. There is no burden to
respondents other than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Respondent
Traveler
Traveler
Traveler
Traveler
...............
...............
...............
...............
Traveler ...............
Traveler
Traveler
Traveler
Traveler
Traveler
Traveler
Traveler
Traveler
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
Airline Travel Illness or Death Investigation Form .....................................
Maritime Conveyance Illness or Death Investigation Form .......................
Land Travel Illness or Death Investigation Form .......................................
Ebola Entry Screening Risk Assessment Form (Ill traveler interview:
English, French, Arabic, or other as needed).
United States Travel Health Declaration (English: Hard Copy, fillable
PDF, electronic portal).
United States Travel Health Declaration (French translation guide) .........
United States Travel Health Declaration (Arabic translation guide) ..........
Ebola Entry Screening Risk Assessment Form (English hard copy) ........
Ebola Entry Screening Risk Assessment French translation guide ..........
Ebola Entry Screening Risk Assessment Arabic translation guide ...........
IVR Active Monitoring Survey (English: Recorded) ...................................
IVR Active Monitoring Survey (French: Recorded) ...................................
IVR Active Monitoring: Arabic translation assistance ................................
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015–02624 Filed 2–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–15–15EC]
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) has submitted the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for
the proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address any of the
following: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Number of
respondents
Form
15:20 Feb 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) Minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and (e) Assess information
collection costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the items contained in this notice
should be directed to the Attention:
CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management
and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or
by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Improving Organizational
Management and Worker Behavior
through Worksite Communication—
New—National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
NIOSH, under Public Law 91–596,
Sections 20 and 22 (Section 20–22,
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in minutes)
1,626
1,873
259
100
1
1
1
1
5/60
5/60
5/60
15/60
49,238
1
15/60
1,586
176
3,447
111
13
49,238
1,586
176
1
1
1
1
1
21
21
21
15/60
15/60
15/60
15/60
15/60
4/60
4/60
4/60
1977) has the responsibility to conduct
research relating to innovative methods,
techniques, and approaches dealing
with occupational safety and health
problems.
This research assesses best practices
for communicating and employing a
strategic health and safety management
system (HSMS) to facilitate workers’
health and safety behaviors, including
ways that lateral communication from
management influences worker
perceptions and behaviors. Currently,
ambivalence exists about how to
strategically communicate aspects of an
HSMS top-down in the mining industry.
Research indicates that, to answer
questions about effectively using an
HSMS to improve safety, research needs
to follow a sample of workplaces over
time, measuring the introduction or
utilization of an HSMS and then
measuring outcomes of interest at the
workplace level and worker level.
Therefore, analyzing workers’
perceptions of the organization’s HSMS,
leaders’ implementation of the
organization’s HSMS, and
communication gaps between these two
groups, may provide more insight into
the best, most feasible practices and
approaches to worker H&S performance
within a system. This project is
initiating such an approach by
implementing a series of multilevel
intervention (MLI) case studies that
assess the utility of a safety system that
includes aspects of both safety
management on the organizational level
and behavior-based safety on the worker
level. By studying these levels
separately and introducing an
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7476
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 27 / Tuesday, February 10, 2015 / Notices
intervention to bridge these two groups
together to improve safety, the
communication practices within an
HSMS may be enhanced.
NIOSH proposes a 3 year approval for
a project that seeks to empirically
understand what HSMS communication
practices are important for mine worker
H&S and how those practices can be
developed, implemented, and
maintained over time via desired
communication from mine site
leadership. The following questions
guide this study:
What impact does the MLI
communication model that was
designed and implemented have on: (1)
Workers’ health/safety behaviors,
including those that lower exposure to
dust; (2) workers’ perceptions of their
organization’s values; and (3) changes in
managers’ strategic HSMS
communication and implementation
with workers to facilitate health/safety
performance, including those that lower
exposure to dust.
To answer the above questions,
NIOSH researchers developed a
multilevel intervention (MLI) that
focuses on both management and
workers’ communication about, and
subsequent actions taken, to reduce
respirable dust exposure over time. This
MLI will inform how leadership
communicates to their employees and
what affect(s) this communication has
on individual behavior such as
corrective dust actions taken by
workers. By assessing the ongoing
safety/health interactions between
individual workers and their
organizational capacities (i.e. levels of
leadership and management of safety),
and how these interactions influence
and shape personal H&S performance,
we can better understand what aspects
of both systems need attention in a
merged, more balanced and
comprehensive system of health and
safety management (DeJoy, 2005).
Specifically, this project is using mine
technology, the Helmet-CAM, as a
communication medium to help merge
these two worksite systems. Previous
research indicates that the use of
information technology can enhance
lateral and horizontal communication
within organizations, showing support
for using the Helmet-CAM in the current
study (Hinds & Kiesler, 1995). NIOSH
researchers can analyze what and how
communication practices should be
implemented to influence worker
perceptions of their organization’s H&S
values and how this impacts their
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:20 Feb 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
subsequent H&S behavior. Eventually,
practices used to influence behavior
related to dust control can be
extrapolated to inform ways to
communicate about and manage
additional health/safety problems
within the industry via an HSMS as
implemented by site leaders.
The Helmet-CAM incorporates video
footage and real-time dust
measurements of workers while
performing their job duties and tasks in
various locations throughout the
workday. This technology has been a
viable assessment tool to provide a
comparison of where and when miners
are exposed to their highest respirable
dust concentrations. As a result,
Helmet-CAM technology is being
employed at many mines as a way to
identify dust exposures of workers and
to help reduce dust hazards in the
environment. However, we do not yet
know how mine site management is
using, if at all, this technology to
communicate with workers about their
personal health and safety behaviors.
Discussions about the tasks workers
perform when exposure levels are high
and what actions they can take to
reduce their dust exposure may be
valuable to the industry in helping
advance the way engineering-control
technology is used from a behavioral
vantage point as well.
Previous research (Yorio et al. 2014)
identified three areas that influence the
relationship between the strategic
HSMS and its overall success in
implementing and encouraging worker
behavior change: Worksite leadership,
organizational values, and worker
perceptions and interpretations of
management. Data on these three
contingencies are collected from the
management and worker levels during
three time points throughout a six-week
intervention to assess the ongoing
communication via the Helmet-CAM
and effects of the communication on
behavior. Data collection and analysis
pertaining to these three areas may
occur via a pre/post survey with
workers and pre/mid/post interviews/
focus groups with workers and mine site
leaders, some of which include dialogue
around Helmet-CAM footage as
provided by the workers who choose to
participate.
NIOSH proposes this intervention
design at a minimum of three and no
more than five industrial mineral metal/
nonmetal mine sites. All of the data
collection instruments have been used
in previous studies to examine worker
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and leadership variables and factors.
Therefore, NIOSH knows that the data
collection instruments are valid and
reliable to use in studying the worker
and leader levels simultaneously,
within the same mine. Industrial
mineral sites will be recruited who have
inquired interest in learning how to use
the Helmet-CAM on their site and/or
interest in improving their site wide
communication efforts. Only a small
sample of workers will participate at
each mine site because of the time
required for completion and to ensure
the longitudinal data can be adequately
collected over the six weeks. In other
words, we would rather collect data
multiple times with the same worker
and have fewer participants than collect
data from more workers but not have the
ability to appropriately follow-up
during the subsequent two visits.
Data collection will take place with
no more than 150 mine workers and 30
mine site leaders over three years. The
respondents targeted for this study
includes any active mine worker and
any active site leader at an industrial
mineral metal/nonmetal mine. It is
estimated that a sample of up to 150
mine workers will participate in the
intervention, which includes wearing
the Helmet-CAM for a portion of their
job tasks (no more than two hours total)
during three time periods (when NIOSH
is present during the field visit). In
addition to wearing the Helmet-CAM,
workers will be asked to complete a pre
and post-test survey (∼15 minutes) and
an interview during three time points
throughout the study (∼30 minutes
each). The interviews include a
debriefing of Helmet-CAM footage with
participants at various mining
operations who agreed to participate. It
also is estimated that a sample of up to
30 mine site leaders will participate in
interviews/focus groups about HSMS
practices at the same participating
mining operations. The interviews/focus
groups also occur three times during
each of the NIOSH field visits and will
take no more than 45 minutes each. All
participants will be between the ages of
18 and 75, currently employed, and
living in the United States. Participation
will require no more than 4.5 hours of
workers’ time over the six-week
intervention and no more than 2.5 hours
of site leaders’ time over the six-week
intervention period.
There are 278 total burden hours.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time.
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
7477
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 27 / Tuesday, February 10, 2015 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Form name
Mine Site Leaders/Managers ..........................
Mine Recruitment Script .................................
Pre/Mid/Post HSMS Interview/Focus Group
Questions.
Mine Worker Recruitment Script ....................
Mine Worker Survey ......................................
Pre/Mid/Post Behaviors and Helmet-CAM
Interview Questions.
Mine Worker ....................................................
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015–02623 Filed 2–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–15–0572]
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) has submitted the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for
the proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address any of the
following: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) Minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:20 Feb 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and (e) Assess information
collection costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the items contained in this notice
should be directed to the Attention:
CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management
and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or
by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Health Message Testing System
(HMTS)—(0920–0572, Expiration
February 28, 2015)—Extension—Office
of the Associate Director for
Communication (OADC), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Before CDC disseminates a health
message to the public, the message
always undergoes scientific review.
However, even though the message is
based on sound scientific content, there
is no guarantee that the public will
understand a health message or that the
message will move people to take
recommended action. Communication
theorists and researchers agree that for
health messages to be as clear and
influential as possible, target audience
members or representatives must be
involved in developing the messages
and provisional versions of the
messages must be tested with members
of the target audience.
In the interest of timely health
message dissemination, many programs
forgo the important step of testing
messages on dimensions such as clarity,
salience, appeal, and persuasiveness
(i.e., the ability to influence behavioral
intention). Skipping this step avoids the
delay involved in the standard OMB
review process, but at a high potential
cost. Untested messages can waste
communication resources and
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
10
10
1
3
5/60
45/60
50
50
50
1
2
3
5/60
15/60
90/60
opportunities because the messages can
be perceived as unclear or irrelevant.
Untested messages can also have
unintended consequences, such as
jeopardizing the credibility of Federal
health officials.
The Health Message Testing System
(HMTS), a generic information
collection, enables programs across CDC
to collect the information they require
in a timely manner to:
• Ensure quality and prevent waste in
the dissemination of health information
by CDC to the public.
• Refine message concepts and to test
draft materials for clarity, salience,
appeal, and persuasiveness to target
audiences.
• Guide the action of health
communication officials who are
responding to health emergencies,
Congressionally-mandated campaigns
with short timeframes, media-generated
public concern, time-limited
communication opportunities, trends,
and the need to refresh materials or
dissemination strategies in an ongoing
campaign.
Each testing instrument will be based
on specific health issues or topics.
Although it is not possible to develop
one instrument for use in all instances,
the same kinds of questions are asked in
most message testing. This package
includes generic questions and formats
that can be used to develop health
message testing data collection
instruments. These include a list of
screening questions, comprised of
demographic and introductory
questions, along with other questions
that can be used to create a mix of
relevant questions for each proposed
message testing data collection method.
However, programs may request to use
additional questions if needed.
Message testing questions will focus
on issues such as comprehension,
impressions, personal relevance,
content and wording, efficacy of
response, channels, and spokesperson/
sponsor. Such information will enable
message developers to enhance the
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7475-7477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02623]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30Day-15-15EC]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted
the following information collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for the proposed
information collection is published to obtain comments from the public
and affected agencies.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should address any of the following: (a)
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses; and
(e) Assess information collection costs.
To request additional information on the proposed project or to
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written comments and/or
suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice should be
directed to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written
comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Improving Organizational Management and Worker Behavior through
Worksite Communication--New--National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
NIOSH, under Public Law 91-596, Sections 20 and 22 (Section 20-22,
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1977) has the responsibility to
conduct research relating to innovative methods, techniques, and
approaches dealing with occupational safety and health problems.
This research assesses best practices for communicating and
employing a strategic health and safety management system (HSMS) to
facilitate workers' health and safety behaviors, including ways that
lateral communication from management influences worker perceptions and
behaviors. Currently, ambivalence exists about how to strategically
communicate aspects of an HSMS top-down in the mining industry.
Research indicates that, to answer questions about effectively using an
HSMS to improve safety, research needs to follow a sample of workplaces
over time, measuring the introduction or utilization of an HSMS and
then measuring outcomes of interest at the workplace level and worker
level.
Therefore, analyzing workers' perceptions of the organization's
HSMS, leaders' implementation of the organization's HSMS, and
communication gaps between these two groups, may provide more insight
into the best, most feasible practices and approaches to worker H&S
performance within a system. This project is initiating such an
approach by implementing a series of multilevel intervention (MLI) case
studies that assess the utility of a safety system that includes
aspects of both safety management on the organizational level and
behavior-based safety on the worker level. By studying these levels
separately and introducing an
[[Page 7476]]
intervention to bridge these two groups together to improve safety, the
communication practices within an HSMS may be enhanced.
NIOSH proposes a 3 year approval for a project that seeks to
empirically understand what HSMS communication practices are important
for mine worker H&S and how those practices can be developed,
implemented, and maintained over time via desired communication from
mine site leadership. The following questions guide this study:
What impact does the MLI communication model that was designed and
implemented have on: (1) Workers' health/safety behaviors, including
those that lower exposure to dust; (2) workers' perceptions of their
organization's values; and (3) changes in managers' strategic HSMS
communication and implementation with workers to facilitate health/
safety performance, including those that lower exposure to dust.
To answer the above questions, NIOSH researchers developed a
multilevel intervention (MLI) that focuses on both management and
workers' communication about, and subsequent actions taken, to reduce
respirable dust exposure over time. This MLI will inform how leadership
communicates to their employees and what affect(s) this communication
has on individual behavior such as corrective dust actions taken by
workers. By assessing the ongoing safety/health interactions between
individual workers and their organizational capacities (i.e. levels of
leadership and management of safety), and how these interactions
influence and shape personal H&S performance, we can better understand
what aspects of both systems need attention in a merged, more balanced
and comprehensive system of health and safety management (DeJoy, 2005).
Specifically, this project is using mine technology, the Helmet-
CAM, as a communication medium to help merge these two worksite
systems. Previous research indicates that the use of information
technology can enhance lateral and horizontal communication within
organizations, showing support for using the Helmet-CAM in the current
study (Hinds & Kiesler, 1995). NIOSH researchers can analyze what and
how communication practices should be implemented to influence worker
perceptions of their organization's H&S values and how this impacts
their subsequent H&S behavior. Eventually, practices used to influence
behavior related to dust control can be extrapolated to inform ways to
communicate about and manage additional health/safety problems within
the industry via an HSMS as implemented by site leaders.
The Helmet-CAM incorporates video footage and real-time dust
measurements of workers while performing their job duties and tasks in
various locations throughout the workday. This technology has been a
viable assessment tool to provide a comparison of where and when miners
are exposed to their highest respirable dust concentrations. As a
result, Helmet-CAM technology is being employed at many mines as a way
to identify dust exposures of workers and to help reduce dust hazards
in the environment. However, we do not yet know how mine site
management is using, if at all, this technology to communicate with
workers about their personal health and safety behaviors. Discussions
about the tasks workers perform when exposure levels are high and what
actions they can take to reduce their dust exposure may be valuable to
the industry in helping advance the way engineering-control technology
is used from a behavioral vantage point as well.
Previous research (Yorio et al. 2014) identified three areas that
influence the relationship between the strategic HSMS and its overall
success in implementing and encouraging worker behavior change:
Worksite leadership, organizational values, and worker perceptions and
interpretations of management. Data on these three contingencies are
collected from the management and worker levels during three time
points throughout a six-week intervention to assess the ongoing
communication via the Helmet-CAM and effects of the communication on
behavior. Data collection and analysis pertaining to these three areas
may occur via a pre/post survey with workers and pre/mid/post
interviews/focus groups with workers and mine site leaders, some of
which include dialogue around Helmet-CAM footage as provided by the
workers who choose to participate.
NIOSH proposes this intervention design at a minimum of three and
no more than five industrial mineral metal/nonmetal mine sites. All of
the data collection instruments have been used in previous studies to
examine worker and leadership variables and factors. Therefore, NIOSH
knows that the data collection instruments are valid and reliable to
use in studying the worker and leader levels simultaneously, within the
same mine. Industrial mineral sites will be recruited who have inquired
interest in learning how to use the Helmet-CAM on their site and/or
interest in improving their site wide communication efforts. Only a
small sample of workers will participate at each mine site because of
the time required for completion and to ensure the longitudinal data
can be adequately collected over the six weeks. In other words, we
would rather collect data multiple times with the same worker and have
fewer participants than collect data from more workers but not have the
ability to appropriately follow-up during the subsequent two visits.
Data collection will take place with no more than 150 mine workers
and 30 mine site leaders over three years. The respondents targeted for
this study includes any active mine worker and any active site leader
at an industrial mineral metal/nonmetal mine. It is estimated that a
sample of up to 150 mine workers will participate in the intervention,
which includes wearing the Helmet-CAM for a portion of their job tasks
(no more than two hours total) during three time periods (when NIOSH is
present during the field visit). In addition to wearing the Helmet-CAM,
workers will be asked to complete a pre and post-test survey (~15
minutes) and an interview during three time points throughout the study
(~30 minutes each). The interviews include a debriefing of Helmet-CAM
footage with participants at various mining operations who agreed to
participate. It also is estimated that a sample of up to 30 mine site
leaders will participate in interviews/focus groups about HSMS
practices at the same participating mining operations. The interviews/
focus groups also occur three times during each of the NIOSH field
visits and will take no more than 45 minutes each. All participants
will be between the ages of 18 and 75, currently employed, and living
in the United States. Participation will require no more than 4.5 hours
of workers' time over the six-week intervention and no more than 2.5
hours of site leaders' time over the six-week intervention period.
There are 278 total burden hours. There is no cost to respondents
other than their time.
[[Page 7477]]
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of burden per
Type of respondents Form name respondents responses per response (in
respondent hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mine Site Leaders/Managers......... Mine Recruitment Script.... 10 1 5/60
Pre/Mid/Post HSMS Interview/ 10 3 45/60
Focus Group Questions.
Mine Worker........................ Mine Worker Recruitment 50 1 5/60
Script.
Mine Worker Survey......... 50 2 15/60
Pre/Mid/Post Behaviors and 50 3 90/60
Helmet-CAM Interview
Questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-02623 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
