Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing Operations; Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan; Sea Turtle Conservation; Modification to Fishing Activities, 6925-6930 [2015-02607]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
652.247–70
[Amended]
652.247–71
The proposed rule, the
BDTRP and its amendments, the BDTRT
meeting summaries with consensus
recommendations, and other
background documents are available at
www.regulations.gov, or the Take
Reduction Team Web site: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/trt/
bdtrp.htm, or by submitting a request to
Stacey Horstman (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacey Horstman, NMFS Southeast
Region, Stacey.Horstman@noaa.gov,
727–824–5312; Kristy Long, NMFS
Office of Protected Resources,
Kristy.Long@noaa.gov, 206–526–4792;
or Carrie Upite, NMFS Greater Atlantic
Region, Carrie.Upite@noaa.gov, 978–
282–8475.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
125. In newly redesignated section
652.247–70, in the introductory text,
remove ‘‘642.1406–2–70(a)’’ and add
‘‘647.305–70’’ in its place and remove
the clause date ‘‘(JUL 1988)’’ and add in
its place ‘‘(DATE)’’.
■
[Amended]
126. In newly redesignated section
652.247–71, in the introductory text,
remove ‘‘642.1406–2–70(b)’’ and add
‘‘647.305–71’’ in its place and remove
the clause date ‘‘(DEC 1994)’’ and add
in its place ‘‘(DATE)’’.
■
Dated: December 23, 2014.
Corey M. Rindner,
Procurement Executive, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014–30714 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
Background
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 222, 223, and 229
[Docket No. 110812495–4999–03]
RIN 0648–BB37
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Commercial Fishing Operations;
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction
Plan; Sea Turtle Conservation;
Modification to Fishing Activities
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) issues this
final rule amending the Bottlenose
Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BDTRP)
and its implementing regulations under
the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA). The rule requires the yearround use of modified pound net
leaders for offshore Virginia pound nets
in specified waters of the lower
mainstem Chesapeake Bay and coastal
state waters. Virginia pound net-related
definitions, gear prohibitions, and nonregulatory measures are also finalized.
This final rule is based on consensus
recommendations of the Bottlenose
Dolphin Take Reduction Team
(BDTRT). For consistency, NMFS also
amends current regulations and
definitions for Virginia pound nets
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) for sea turtle conservation.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
11, 2015.
rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:55 Feb 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
This final rule amends: (1) The
BDTRP and its implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 229.2, 229.3, and
229.35 in accordance with section 118(f)
of the MMPA; and (2) current
definitions and regulations issued under
the ESA for sea turtle conservation at 50
CFR 222.102, 223.205, and 223.206
(d)(10). The BDTRP was originally
published on April 26, 2006, and was
amended on December 19, 2008, and
July 31, 2012. NMFS is further
amending the BDTRP to meet its
MMPA-mandated goal of reducing
incidental mortality and serious injury
of strategic stocks of bottlenose dolphin
from the Virginia pound net fishery.
Regulations for this amendment are
based on the BDTRT’s consensus
recommendations, which are generally
consistent with existing regulations
enacted under the ESA for sea turtle
conservation, with some revisions and
updates. Therefore, amendments to the
ESA sea turtle conservation regulations
for the Virginia pound net fishery are
finalized within the same rulemaking
for consistency in definitions and
regulations.
Details regarding the development
and justification of this final rule were
provided in the preamble of the
proposed rule (79 FR 21695; April 17,
2014) and are not repeated here.
Virginia Pound Net Fishing
Requirements
This final rule requires the year-round
use of modified pound net leaders for
offshore Virginia pound nets within the
Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net
Regulated Area. It removes the landbased inspection program for modified
pound net leaders under the ESA.
Instead, under both the MMPA and
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6925
ESA, it requires fishermen to attend a
one-time compliance training before
setting modified pound net leaders and
to keep on board the vessel a valid
modified pound net leader compliance
training certificate issued by NMFS. The
rule also requires that all three sections
of pound net gear (leader, heart, and
pound) be fished at the same time with
the exception of a continuous 10-day
period to deploy, remove, and/or repair
gear. Virginia pound net-related
definitions are added for effective
implementation of the regulatory
measures, including hard lay lines,
modified pound net leader, nearshore
pound net, offshore pound net, and
pound net. Lastly, non-regulatory
measures are finalized under the BDTRP
including outreach and coordination to
help with compliance and monitoring of
regulatory measures for the Virginia
pound net fishery.
Comments on the Proposed Rule and
Responses
NMFS received five comment letters
on the proposed rule via email or
www.regulations.gov. One comment
letter was received from multiple
organizations, including The Humane
Society of the United States, Whale and
Dolphin Conservation, Oceana, and
Center for Biological Diversity. Other
comment letters were received from the
Marine Mammal Commission, one
Virginia pound net fisherman, and two
citizens. The comments are summarized
below under Regulatory or NonRegulatory Changes. NMFS’ response
follows each comment.
Comments on Regulatory Changes
Comment 1: Four comment letters,
including one from multiple
environmental organizations, expressed
general support for the proposed rule
and recommended NMFS adopt the
measures as proposed.
Response: We appreciate the
commenters’ support, and we are
finalizing these measures as proposed.
Comment 2: One comment letter from
multiple environmental organizations
expressed concern over the delay from
when the BDTRT’s consensus
recommendations were received in
September 2009 to when NMFS
published the proposed rule. The letter
references requirements in section
118(f)(7)(B)(i) of the MMPA that
publication of proposed take reduction
plans and amendments must occur no
later than 60 days after the take
reduction team submits them to NMFS.
The letter also expressed concern that
this delay needlessly delayed
conservation measures meant to protect
bottlenose dolphins.
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
6926
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Response: We acknowledge and regret
the extensive delay from the time when
the BDTRT provided us with their
recommendations to when the proposed
rule was published. There were many
unforeseen factors that contributed to
the delay. However, some important
conservation benefits were immediately
provided for protected species despite
the delay.
Immediately following the September
2009 BDTRT meeting and as
recommended by the Team, we sent the
Virginia Marine Resources Commission
(VMRC) a letter with the BDTRT’s
recommendations to reduce bottlenose
dolphin serious injury and mortality
from the Virginia pound net fishery.
After receiving our letter, the VMRC
promptly held public hearings and
related meetings to discuss similar state
regulations for the fishery. We sent the
VMRC a follow-up comment letter
supporting their actions and requested
they adopt the BDTRT’s
recommendations. The VMRC
subsequently enacted two regulations
on December 18, 2009 and July 16, 2010
for the pound net fishery based in part
on the BDTRT’s recommendations.
Importantly, the regulation issued in
December 2009 required fishermen
using offshore pound nets in the
Virginia tidal waters east of the
Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel to use a
modified leader year-round. This
includes the area in the southern
portion of Chesapeake Bay near
Lynnhaven Inlet where the majority
(77%) of dolphin entanglements in
pound net leaders were documented.
The state regulation issued in July 2010
required fishermen using offshore nets
in the sea turtle Pound Net Regulated
Area I to use modified leaders from May
6 through July 31. This provided an
additional two weeks of conservation
benefits in this area than were required
at the time under the ESA sea turtle
conservation regulations. Bottlenose
dolphin stranding data confirm a
conservation benefit to dolphins from
the enactment of these state regulations.
When comparing stranding data for the
two-years immediately before (2008–
2009) and after (2010–2011) the state’s
2010 regulations, there was a 64%
decrease in the total average annual
number of bottlenose dolphin
interactions with pound nets in the
regulated waters. Additional regulations
are still needed however to help ensure
pound net entanglements do not cause
mortality or serious injury of bottlenose
dolphins to exceed the Potential
Biological Removal (PBR) level for
affected stock(s), especially the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:55 Feb 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
Northern North Carolina Estuarine
System Stock.
Comment 3: One comment letter from
multiple environmental organizations
stated that the BDTRP is not meeting its
MMPA-mandated goals for take
reduction plans because mortality and
serious injury levels of some stocks of
bottlenose dolphins exceeds PBR levels
and greatly exceeds the long-term goal.
Amending the BDTRP with the
proposed Virginia pound net regulations
was stated as a minimally needed step
in achieving required goals.
Furthermore, this amendment was
viewed as especially important given
the Unusual Mortality Event declared
for the Atlantic United States’ coast in
July 2013, currently resulting in the loss
of over 1,300 bottlenose dolphins, of
which the greatest losses have occurred
in Virginia.
Response: We agree that this
amendment is necessary to further
reduce bottlenose dolphin serious injury
and mortality for Virginia pound net
gear and to help the BDTRP meet its
required goals. We recognize there are
some stocks of bottlenose dolphins from
which mortality and serious injury from
commercial fishing gear is likely
exceeding that stock’s PBR. As required
by the MMPA, we are continuing to
monitor the implementation of the
BDTRP and will convene the BDTRT as
needed to develop recommendations to
help further reduce mortality and
serious injury of dolphin stock(s).
Within the past year, we convened the
BDTRT three times to provide us with
recommendations for reducing mortality
and serious injury to bottlenose
dolphins from commercial gillnet gear
in North Carolina specifically, and the
North Carolina Division of Marine
Fisheries has implemented all of the
BDTRT’s regulatory recommendations
from each of these meetings. These
regulatory measures in North Carolina
also provide conservation benefit to
some of the same stocks affected by
Virginia pound net gear. We will
continue to implement the BDTRT’s
recommendations, as resources allow, to
help meet required goals.
Comment 4: One pound net fisherman
expressed concern about the need to
change their offshore pound net
leader(s) from a traditional to a modified
leader and claimed a loss of $30–40,000
from this change.
Response: We acknowledge that any
fisherman who has to modify pound net
leaders as a result of this rule will incur
additional operating costs if
replacement gear is required. We
calculated the one-time initial cost to
change an offshore pound net leader
from a traditional to a modified leader
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
as $7,068 per leader. Because nets need
to be routinely replaced due to normal
use, the subsequent increase in costs
would be equal to the difference in cost
between a traditional and a modified
leader, or $1,650. The economic
analysis provided in the proposed rule
concluded that all entities expected to
be directly affected by this rule were
expected to already use modified
leaders in these areas even if not
required during certain times of the year
because: (1) Of the added expense in
maintaining both leader types and
switching out the gear when modified
leaders were not required; and (2)
absence of demonstrated differences in
harvest rates between nets using
traditional versus modified leaders to
offset the added gear costs. As stated
earlier, all identified entities expected to
be directly affected by this rule are
expected to currently possess modified
leaders and increased gear costs were
not identified in the comment as a
contributor to the estimated loss of
$30,000 to $40,000. Therefore, if the
comment refers to anticipated losses
other than from harvest reductions,
specific gear-related increased costs
would be limited to permanently
changing leaders and not the purchase
of new leaders. We acknowledge that,
despite research findings showing no
significant differences between catch
from traditional versus modified
leaders, this result may not apply to all
fishermen who have different fishing
preferences, skills, and behaviors.
Although this loss may be consistent
with the experience of this fisherman, it
would be inconsistent with the best
scientific information available.
Therefore, we believe these effects are
overstated and would also not be
expected to accrue to other fishermen.
Comments on Non-Regulatory Changes
Comment 5: One commenter
recommended NMFS continue to
monitor for evidence of protected
species bycatch in Virginia pound net
leaders to evaluate the effectiveness of
the rule once it is implemented.
Response: We agree, and will
continue to monitor protected species
entanglement and stranding data to
assess the effectiveness of the rule at
reducing sea turtle and bottlenose
dolphin interactions with Virginia
pound net gear. We will also monitor
entanglement and stranding data to
assess whether additional amendments
to the BDTRP or sea turtle conservation
regulations are needed.
Comment 6: One commenter raised
concerns that enforcement of the
proposed regulations would be difficult
without: (1) Including specific
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
information on how violations of the
regulations would be assessed; and (2)
requesting additional funding to support
collaborative on-water enforcement.
Response: We agree that enforcement
of regulations is important. However,
we do not include specific details in
regulations, such as how violations will
be assessed, because the MMPA and
ESA have statutory and regulatory
requirements for establishing
appropriate penalties. Federal agents
and State officers authorized under
Cooperative Enforcement Agreements
monitor compliance and investigate
potential violations of the statutes and
regulations enforced by NOAA. In
general, when an investigating agent or
officer identifies a statutory or
regulatory violation, they may pursue
one of several available options,
depending on the nature and
seriousness of the violation. We often
rely on partnerships with State officers
to assist in enforcing regulations, such
as with this regulation and the
collaborative on-water monitoring and
enforcement with the state of Virginia
discussed in the proposed rule. When
fiscal year budget appropriations are
provided, we carefully consider all
program and management needs to
prioritize potential funding available to
support enforcement-related needs.
Comment 7: One commenter
expressed that NMFS should collaborate
with commercial fishermen affected by
these regulations and marine mammal
experts.
Response: We agree, and included on
the BDTRT are Virginia pound net and
other commercial fishermen, as well as
experts in the conservation or biology of
marine mammal species as required
under section 118(f)(6)(C) of the MMPA.
The BDTRT provided us with consensus
recommendations to reduce mortality
and serious injury of dolphins from
Virginia pound net gear. This regulation
is based on their recommendations.
Classification
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration during
the proposed rule stage that this rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for this
determination was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
One comment was received regarding
the expected economic effects of the
proposed rule. This comment is
addressed in the comments and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:55 Feb 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
response section of this final rule. The
comment stated that this rule would
have a larger economic effect on the
fishing operation of the commenter than
described in the proposed rule. No other
comments were received that
challenged the economic analysis
provided, and the information provided
in the comment is inconsistent with the
best scientific information available
regarding the catch efficiency of pound
net gear using different leaders.
Although not an issue raised through
public comment, subsequent to
publication of the proposed rule, NMFS
reconsidered its analysis with respect to
the appropriate universe of affected
entities. In the proposed rule, NMFS
identified 16 entities upon which the
proposed rule would directly apply, or
less than one percent of the estimated
3,000 licensed commercial finfish
fishermen in Virginia. The basis for
consideration of the 16 entities within
the context of the 3,000 licensed
fishermen was consideration that the 16
entities use multiple gears in addition to
pound nets to harvest saltwater species
and the species they harvested with
their pound nets are also commonly,
and for some species primarily,
harvested by other fishermen within the
3,000 licensed fishermen, who also fish
with multiple gears. As a result, in the
original analysis, these 16 entities were
considered part of the general
commercial finfish industry and not
sufficiently distinct to be considered a
separate industry. Even if NMFS
considered this component to be a
distinct fishing sector and, as a result,
this rule would be expected to directly
apply to 100 percent of the entities in
the sector, the outcome would be the
same, because of the absence of
expected adverse economic effects on
these entities. As noted in the proposed
rule, all fishermen using an offshore
pound net are expected to already be
using the modified pound net leaders
required by this final rule for three main
reasons: (1) The modified pound net
leaders are currently required yearround or seasonally within the BDPNRA
by state or federal regulations; (2)
research on the catch efficiency of
modified pound net leaders within the
BDPNRA showed no significant
differences in harvest weight for the
species analyzed when compared to
using traditional leaders; and (3)
incurring the costs associated with
maintaining two types of leaders and
switching the gear when modified
leaders were not required by either
current state or federal regulations
would not make rational economic
sense given the absence of
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6927
improvements in catch efficiency.
Traditional leaders installed on offshore
pound nets were calculated to cost
$5,418 to make and install/remove.
Maintaining and using both types of
leaders (i.e., traditional and modified)
would require expenditure of this cost,
in addition to the cost of making a
modified leader, as well as labor costs
of switching leaders. If harvest and
revenue is not increased by switching to
the traditional leader, as demonstrated
by available research, then bearing these
additional gear and labor costs would be
unjustified. Thus, even though this final
rule will require the use of modified
pound net leaders on offshore pound
nets year-round in the BDPRNA, all
fishermen who will be potentially
affected are expected to currently use
modified leaders when using pound
nets in this area. Additionally, no
fisherman who may have previously
switched leaders over the course of the
year, as suggested by the one public
comment, is expected to incur
significant adverse economic effects
because switching leaders will no longer
be allowed as a result of this final rule.
Therefore, the available information is
sufficient to support a certification that
this rule will not have a significant
adverse economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As
a result, a final regulatory flexibility
analysis was not required and none was
prepared.
NMFS determined this action is
consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies
of the Virginia Coastal Zone
Management Program. This
determination was submitted for review
by the responsible state agencies under
section 307 of the Coastal Zone
Management Act on April 17, 2014. The
Commonwealth of Virginia concurred
with the consistency determination in a
letter dated May 8, 2014.
This action contains policies with
federalism implications that were
sufficient to warrant preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement
under Executive Order 13132 and a
federalism consultation with officials in
the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Accordingly, the Assistant Secretary for
Legislative and Intergovernmental
Affairs provided notice of the proposed
action to the appropriate officials in
Virginia. The Commonwealth of
Virginia did not respond.
The final rule does not contain
collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The sea turtle conservation regulations
have a current Paperwork Reduction Act
collection requirement in place (OMB
control number 0648–0559) for the
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
6928
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
inspection program. This final rule
removes that collection of information
requirement.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 222
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, and Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 223
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, and Transportation.
50 CFR Part 229
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Marine
mammals, Reporting and record keeping
requirements.
Dated: February 3, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR parts 222, 223, and
229 are amended as follows:
PART 222—GENERAL ENDANGERED
AND THREATENED MARINE SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 222
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
742a et seq.
2. In § 222.102:
A. The definition for ‘‘Hard lay lines’’
is added in alphabetical order;
■ B. The definition for ‘‘Modified pound
net leader’’ is revised;
■ C. The definitions for ‘‘Nearshore
pound net leader or nearshore pound
net’’, ‘‘Offshore pound net leader or
offshore pound net’’, and ‘‘Pound net’’
are added in alphabetical order; and
■ D. The definitions for ‘‘Pound net
leader,’’ ‘‘Pound Net Regulated Area I,’’
and ‘‘Pound Net Regulated Area II’’ are
revised.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 222.102
Definitions.
rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
Hard lay lines mean lines that are at
least as stiff as 5⁄16 inch (0.8 cm)
diameter line composed of polyester
wrapped around a blend of
polypropylene and polyethylene and 42
visible twists of strands per foot of line.
*
*
*
*
*
Modified pound net leader means a
pound net leader that is affixed to or
resting on the sea floor and made of a
lower portion of mesh and an upper
portion of only vertical lines such that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:55 Feb 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
the mesh size is equal to or less than 8
inches (20.3 cm) stretched mesh; at any
particular point along the leader, the
height of the mesh from the seafloor to
the top of the mesh must be no more
than one-third the depth of the water at
mean lower low water directly above
that particular point; the mesh is held
in place by a bottom chain that forms
the lowermost part of the pound net
leader; the vertical lines extend from the
top of the mesh up to a top line, which
is a line that forms the uppermost part
of the pound net leader; the vertical
lines are equal to or greater than 5⁄16
inch (0.8 cm) in diameter and strung
vertically at a minimum of every 2 feet
(61 cm); and the vertical lines are hard
lay lines.
Nearshore pound net leader or
nearshore pound net means a pound net
with every part of the leader (from the
most offshore pole at the pound end of
the leader to the most inshore pole of
the leader) in less than 14 feet (4.3 m)
of water at any tidal condition.
*
*
*
*
*
Offshore pound net leader or offshore
pound net means a pound net with any
part of the leader (from the most
offshore pole at the pound end of the
leader to the most inshore pole of the
leader) in water greater than or equal to
14 feet (4.3 m) at any tidal condition.
*
*
*
*
*
Pound net means a fixed entrapment
gear attached to posts or stakes with
three continuous sections from offshore
to inshore consisting of:
(1) A pound made of mesh netting
that entraps the fish;
(2) At least one heart made of a mesh
netting that is generally in the shape of
a heart and aids in funneling fish into
the pound; and
(3) A leader, which is a long, straight
element consisting of mesh or vertical
lines that directs the fish offshore
towards the pound.
Pound net leader means a long
straight net that directs fish offshore
towards the pound, an enclosure that
captures the fish. Some pound net
leaders are all mesh, while others have
stringers and mesh. Stringers, also
known as vertical lines, are spaced a
regular distance apart and are not
crossed by other lines to form mesh.
Pound Net Regulated Area I means
Virginia waters of the mainstem
Chesapeake Bay and the portion of the
James River seaward of the Hampton
Roads Bridge Tunnel (Interstate
Highway-64) and the York River
seaward of the Coleman Memorial
Bridge (Route 17), bounded to the south
and east by the Chesapeake Bay Bridge
Tunnel (Route 13; extending from
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
approximately 37°07′ N. lat., 75°58′ W.
long. to 36°55′ N. lat., 76°08′ W. long.),
and to the north by the following points
connected by straight lines and in the
order listed:
Point
Area description
1 ...........
Where 37°19.0′ N. lat. meets the
shoreline of the Severn River
fork, near Stump Point, Virginia
(western portion of Mobjack
Bay), which is approximately
76°26.75′ W. long.
37°19.0′ N. lat., 76°13.0′ W. long.
37°13.0′ N. lat., 76°13.0′ W. long.
Where 37°13.0′ N. lat. meets the
eastern shoreline of Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, near Elliotts
Creek, which is approximately
76°00.75′ W. long.
2 ...........
3 ...........
4 ...........
Pound Net Regulated Area II means
Virginia waters of the Chesapeake Bay
outside of Pound Net Regulated Area I,
bounded by the Maryland-Virginia State
line to the north and by the COLREGS
line at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay
and 37°07′ N. lat. between Kiptopeke
and Smith Island, Northampton County,
Virginia to the south and east. This area
includes the Great Wicomico River
seaward of the Jessie Dupont Memorial
Highway Bridge (Route 200), the
Rappahannock River downstream of the
Robert Opie Norris Jr. Bridge (Route 3),
the Piankatank River downstream of the
Route 3 Bridge, and all other tributaries
within these boundaries.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 223—THREATENED MARINE
AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
3. The authority citation for part 223
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 1543; subpart B,
§ 223.201–202 also issued under 16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 5503(d) for
§ 223.206(d)(9).
4. In § 223.205, paragraphs (b)(17)
through (b)(20) are revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 223.205
Sea turtles.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(17) Set, fish with, or fail to remove
a modified pound net leader in Pound
Net Regulated Area I or Pound Net
Regulated Area II defined in 50 CFR
222.102 and referenced in 50 CFR
223.206(d)(10) at any time from May 6
through July 15 unless the pound net
licensee and the vessel operator meet
the modified pound net leader
compliance training requirements in
accordance with § 223.206(d)(10)(vii).
(18) Alter or replace any portion of a
modified pound net leader so that the
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
altered or replaced portion no longer
meets the modified pound net leader
definition in 50 CFR 222.102, unless
that alteration or replacement occurs
outside the regulated period of May 6
through July 15.
(19) Set, fish with, or fail to remove
a modified pound net leader at any time
from May 6 through July 15 in Pound
Net Regulated Area I or Pound Net
Regulated Area II unless the fisherman
has on board the vessel a valid modified
pound net leader compliance training
certificate issued by NMFS.
(20) Set, fish with, or fail to remove
pound net gear in Pound Net Regulated
Area I or Pound Net Regulated Area II,
unless it has the all three continuous
sections as defined in 50 CFR 222.102,
except that one or more sections may be
missing for a maximum period of 10
days for purposes of setting, removing,
and/or repairing pound nets.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 223.206, paragraph (d)(10)(vii)
is revised to read as follows:
§ 223.206 Exemptions to prohibitions
relating to sea turtles.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(10) * * *
(vii) Modified pound net leader
compliance training. Any pound net
licensee and any vessel operator who
have modified pound net leaders set in
Pound Net Regulated Area I or Pound
Net Regulated Area II at any time from
May 6 through July 15 must have
completed modified pound net leader
compliance training and possess on
board the vessel a valid modified pound
net leader compliance training
certificate issued by NMFS. NMFS
retains discretion to provide exemptions
in limited circumstances where
appropriate. Notice will be given by
NMFS announcing the times and
locations of modified pound net leader
compliance training.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 229—AUTHORIZATION FOR
COMMERCIAL FISHERIES UNDER THE
MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT
OF 1972
6. The authority citation for part 229
continues to read as follows:
rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq;
§ 229.32(f) also issued under 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.
7. In § 229.2, the definitions ‘‘Hard lay
lines,’’ ‘‘Modified pound net leader,’’
‘‘Nearshore pound net,’’ ‘‘Offshore
pound net,’’ and ‘‘Pound net’’ are added
in alphabetical order to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:55 Feb 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 229.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Hard lay lines mean lines that are at
least as stiff as 5⁄16 inch (0.8 cm)
diameter line composed of polyester
wrapped around a blend of
polypropylene and polyethylene and 42
visible twists of strands per foot of line.
*
*
*
*
*
Modified pound net leader means a
pound net leader that is affixed to or
resting on the sea floor and made of a
lower portion of mesh and an upper
portion of only vertical lines such that
the mesh size is equal to or less than 8
inches (20.3 cm) stretched mesh; at any
particular point along the leader, the
height of the mesh from the seafloor to
the top of the mesh must be no more
than one-third the depth of the water at
mean lower low water directly above
that particular point; the mesh is held
in place by a bottom chain that forms
the lowermost part of the pound net
leader; the vertical lines extend from the
top of the mesh up to a top line, which
is a line that forms the uppermost part
of the pound net leader; the vertical
lines are equal to or greater than 5⁄16
inch (0.8 cm) in diameter and strung
vertically at a minimum of every 2 feet
(61 cm); and the vertical lines are hard
lay lines.
Nearshore pound net means a pound
net with every part of the leader (from
the most offshore pole at the pound end
of the leader to the most inshore pole of
the leader) in less than 14 feet (4.3 m)
of water at any tidal condition.
*
*
*
*
*
Offshore pound net means a pound
net with any part of the leader (from the
most offshore pole at the pound end of
the leader to the most inshore pole of
the leader) in water greater than or equal
to 14 feet (4.3 m) at any tidal condition.
*
*
*
*
*
Pound net means a fixed entrapment
gear attached to posts or stakes with
three continuous sections from offshore
to inshore consisting of:
(1) A pound made of mesh netting
that entraps the fish;
(2) At least one heart made of a mesh
netting that is generally in the shape of
a heart and aids in funneling fish into
the pound; and
(3) A leader, which is a long, straight
element consisting of mesh or vertical
lines that directs the fish offshore
towards the pound.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 229.3 paragraph (s) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 229.3
*
PO 00000
*
Prohibitions.
*
Frm 00033
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
6929
(s) General Bottlenose Dolphin Take
Reduction Plan. (1) It is prohibited to
set, fish with, or possess on board a
vessel unless stowed, or fail to remove,
any gillnet or pound net from the waters
specified in § 229.35(c) unless the gear
complies with the specified restrictions
set forth in § 229.35(d).
(2) It is prohibited to set, fish with, or
fail to remove a modified pound net
leader in the Bottlenose Dolphin Pound
Net Regulated Area unless the
fisherman has on board the vessel a
valid modified pound net leader
compliance training certificate issued by
NMFS.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. In § 229.35 paragraphs (a) and (c)
are revised, a definition for ‘‘Bottlenose
Dolphin Pound Net Regulated Area’’ is
added to paragraph (b), and paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) is added to read as follows:
§ 229.35 Bottlenose Dolphin Take
Reduction Plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. The purpose of
this section is to implement the
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction
Plan (BDTRP) to reduce incidental
mortality and serious injury of strategic
stocks of bottlenose dolphins within the
Western North Atlantic coastal
morphotype in specific Category I and II
commercial fisheries from New Jersey
through Florida. Specific Category I and
II commercial fisheries within the scope
of the BDTRP are indentified and
updated in the annual List of Fisheries.
Gear restricted by this section includes
small, medium, and large mesh gillnets
and pound nets. The geographic scope
of the BDTRP is all tidal and marine
waters within 6.5 nautical miles (12 km)
of shore from the New York-New Jersey
border southward to Cape Hatteras,
North Carolina, and within 14.6 nautical
miles (27 km) of shore from Cape
Hatteras, southward to, and including
the east coast of Florida down to the
fishery management council
demarcation line between the Atlantic
Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (as
described in § 600.105 of this title).
(b) * * *
Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net
Regulated Area means all Virginia
marine waters of the Atlantic Ocean
within 3 nautical miles (5.56 km) of
shoreline and all adjacent tidal waters,
bounded on the north by 38°01.6′ N.
(Maryland/Virginia border) and on the
south by 36°33′ N (Virginia/North
Carolina border); and all southern
Virginia waters of the mainstem
Chesapeake Bay bounded on the south
and west by the Hampton Roads Bridge
Tunnel across the James River and the
Coleman Memorial Bridge across the
York River; and north and east by the
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
6930
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
following points connected by straight
lines in the order listed:
Point
Area description
1 ...........
Where 37°19.0′ N. lat. meets the
shoreline of the Severn River
fork, near Stump Point, Virginia
(western portion of Mobjack
Bay), which is approximately
76°26.75′ W. long.
37°19.0′ N. lat., 76°13.0′ W. long.
37°13.0′ N. lat., 76°13.0′ W. long.
Where 37°13.0′ N. lat. meets the
eastern shoreline of Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, near Elliotts
Creek, which is approximately
76°00.75′ W. long.
2 ...........
3 ...........
4 ...........
*
*
*
*
(c) BDTRP Regulated Waters—(1)
Gillnets. The regulations pertaining to
gillnets in this section apply to New
Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland State
waters; Northern North Carolina State
waters; Northern Virginia State waters;
South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida
waters; Southern North Carolina State
waters; and Southern Virginia State
waters as defined in § 229.35(b), except
rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:55 Feb 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
for the waters identified in
§ 229.34(a)(2), with the following
modification and addition. From
Chincoteague to Ship Shoal Inlet in
Virginia (37° 52′ N. 75° 24.30′ W. to 37°
11.90′ N. 75° 48.30′ W) and South
Carolina, Georgia, and Florida waters,
those waters landward of the 72
COLREGS demarcation line
(International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972), as
depicted or noted on nautical charts
published by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (Coast
Charts 1:80,000 scale), and as described
in 33 CFR part 80 are excluded from the
regulations.
(2) Pound nets. The regulations
pertaining to pound nets in this section
apply to the Bottlenose Dolphin Pound
Net Regulated Area.
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Pound nets. (A) Year-round, any
offshore pound net in the Bottlenose
Dolphin Pound Net Regulated Area
must use a modified pound net leader.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
(B) Year-round, any nearshore and
offshore pound nets set in the
Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net
Regulated Area must have all three
continuous sections as defined in 50
CFR 229.2, except that one or more
sections may be missing for a maximum
period of 10 days for purposes of
setting, removing, and/or repairing
pound nets.
(C) The pound net licensee and the
vessel operator of any offshore pound
net set in the Bottlenose Dolphin Pound
Net Regulated Area must have
completed modified pound net leader
compliance training and possess on
board the vessel a valid modified pound
net leader compliance training
certificate issued by NMFS. NMFS
retains discretion to provide exemptions
in limited circumstances where
appropriate. Notice will be given by
NMFS announcing the times and
locations of modified pound net leader
compliance training.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–02607 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6925-6930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02607]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 222, 223, and 229
[Docket No. 110812495-4999-03]
RIN 0648-BB37
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing
Operations; Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan; Sea Turtle
Conservation; Modification to Fishing Activities
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issues this final
rule amending the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BDTRP) and
its implementing regulations under the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA). The rule requires the year-round use of modified pound net
leaders for offshore Virginia pound nets in specified waters of the
lower mainstem Chesapeake Bay and coastal state waters. Virginia pound
net-related definitions, gear prohibitions, and non-regulatory measures
are also finalized. This final rule is based on consensus
recommendations of the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Team (BDTRT).
For consistency, NMFS also amends current regulations and definitions
for Virginia pound nets under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for sea
turtle conservation.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 11, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The proposed rule, the BDTRP and its amendments, the BDTRT
meeting summaries with consensus recommendations, and other background
documents are available at www.regulations.gov, or the Take Reduction
Team Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/trt/bdtrp.htm,
or by submitting a request to Stacey Horstman (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacey Horstman, NMFS Southeast
Region, Stacey.Horstman@noaa.gov, 727-824-5312; Kristy Long, NMFS
Office of Protected Resources, Kristy.Long@noaa.gov, 206-526-4792; or
Carrie Upite, NMFS Greater Atlantic Region, Carrie.Upite@noaa.gov, 978-
282-8475.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This final rule amends: (1) The BDTRP and its implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 229.2, 229.3, and 229.35 in accordance with
section 118(f) of the MMPA; and (2) current definitions and regulations
issued under the ESA for sea turtle conservation at 50 CFR 222.102,
223.205, and 223.206 (d)(10). The BDTRP was originally published on
April 26, 2006, and was amended on December 19, 2008, and July 31,
2012. NMFS is further amending the BDTRP to meet its MMPA-mandated goal
of reducing incidental mortality and serious injury of strategic stocks
of bottlenose dolphin from the Virginia pound net fishery. Regulations
for this amendment are based on the BDTRT's consensus recommendations,
which are generally consistent with existing regulations enacted under
the ESA for sea turtle conservation, with some revisions and updates.
Therefore, amendments to the ESA sea turtle conservation regulations
for the Virginia pound net fishery are finalized within the same
rulemaking for consistency in definitions and regulations.
Details regarding the development and justification of this final
rule were provided in the preamble of the proposed rule (79 FR 21695;
April 17, 2014) and are not repeated here.
Virginia Pound Net Fishing Requirements
This final rule requires the year-round use of modified pound net
leaders for offshore Virginia pound nets within the Bottlenose Dolphin
Pound Net Regulated Area. It removes the land-based inspection program
for modified pound net leaders under the ESA. Instead, under both the
MMPA and ESA, it requires fishermen to attend a one-time compliance
training before setting modified pound net leaders and to keep on board
the vessel a valid modified pound net leader compliance training
certificate issued by NMFS. The rule also requires that all three
sections of pound net gear (leader, heart, and pound) be fished at the
same time with the exception of a continuous 10-day period to deploy,
remove, and/or repair gear. Virginia pound net-related definitions are
added for effective implementation of the regulatory measures,
including hard lay lines, modified pound net leader, nearshore pound
net, offshore pound net, and pound net. Lastly, non-regulatory measures
are finalized under the BDTRP including outreach and coordination to
help with compliance and monitoring of regulatory measures for the
Virginia pound net fishery.
Comments on the Proposed Rule and Responses
NMFS received five comment letters on the proposed rule via email
or www.regulations.gov. One comment letter was received from multiple
organizations, including The Humane Society of the United States, Whale
and Dolphin Conservation, Oceana, and Center for Biological Diversity.
Other comment letters were received from the Marine Mammal Commission,
one Virginia pound net fisherman, and two citizens. The comments are
summarized below under Regulatory or Non-Regulatory Changes. NMFS'
response follows each comment.
Comments on Regulatory Changes
Comment 1: Four comment letters, including one from multiple
environmental organizations, expressed general support for the proposed
rule and recommended NMFS adopt the measures as proposed.
Response: We appreciate the commenters' support, and we are
finalizing these measures as proposed.
Comment 2: One comment letter from multiple environmental
organizations expressed concern over the delay from when the BDTRT's
consensus recommendations were received in September 2009 to when NMFS
published the proposed rule. The letter references requirements in
section 118(f)(7)(B)(i) of the MMPA that publication of proposed take
reduction plans and amendments must occur no later than 60 days after
the take reduction team submits them to NMFS. The letter also expressed
concern that this delay needlessly delayed conservation measures meant
to protect bottlenose dolphins.
[[Page 6926]]
Response: We acknowledge and regret the extensive delay from the
time when the BDTRT provided us with their recommendations to when the
proposed rule was published. There were many unforeseen factors that
contributed to the delay. However, some important conservation benefits
were immediately provided for protected species despite the delay.
Immediately following the September 2009 BDTRT meeting and as
recommended by the Team, we sent the Virginia Marine Resources
Commission (VMRC) a letter with the BDTRT's recommendations to reduce
bottlenose dolphin serious injury and mortality from the Virginia pound
net fishery. After receiving our letter, the VMRC promptly held public
hearings and related meetings to discuss similar state regulations for
the fishery. We sent the VMRC a follow-up comment letter supporting
their actions and requested they adopt the BDTRT's recommendations. The
VMRC subsequently enacted two regulations on December 18, 2009 and July
16, 2010 for the pound net fishery based in part on the BDTRT's
recommendations. Importantly, the regulation issued in December 2009
required fishermen using offshore pound nets in the Virginia tidal
waters east of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel to use a modified
leader year-round. This includes the area in the southern portion of
Chesapeake Bay near Lynnhaven Inlet where the majority (77%) of dolphin
entanglements in pound net leaders were documented. The state
regulation issued in July 2010 required fishermen using offshore nets
in the sea turtle Pound Net Regulated Area I to use modified leaders
from May 6 through July 31. This provided an additional two weeks of
conservation benefits in this area than were required at the time under
the ESA sea turtle conservation regulations. Bottlenose dolphin
stranding data confirm a conservation benefit to dolphins from the
enactment of these state regulations. When comparing stranding data for
the two-years immediately before (2008-2009) and after (2010-2011) the
state's 2010 regulations, there was a 64% decrease in the total average
annual number of bottlenose dolphin interactions with pound nets in the
regulated waters. Additional regulations are still needed however to
help ensure pound net entanglements do not cause mortality or serious
injury of bottlenose dolphins to exceed the Potential Biological
Removal (PBR) level for affected stock(s), especially the Northern
North Carolina Estuarine System Stock.
Comment 3: One comment letter from multiple environmental
organizations stated that the BDTRP is not meeting its MMPA-mandated
goals for take reduction plans because mortality and serious injury
levels of some stocks of bottlenose dolphins exceeds PBR levels and
greatly exceeds the long-term goal. Amending the BDTRP with the
proposed Virginia pound net regulations was stated as a minimally
needed step in achieving required goals. Furthermore, this amendment
was viewed as especially important given the Unusual Mortality Event
declared for the Atlantic United States' coast in July 2013, currently
resulting in the loss of over 1,300 bottlenose dolphins, of which the
greatest losses have occurred in Virginia.
Response: We agree that this amendment is necessary to further
reduce bottlenose dolphin serious injury and mortality for Virginia
pound net gear and to help the BDTRP meet its required goals. We
recognize there are some stocks of bottlenose dolphins from which
mortality and serious injury from commercial fishing gear is likely
exceeding that stock's PBR. As required by the MMPA, we are continuing
to monitor the implementation of the BDTRP and will convene the BDTRT
as needed to develop recommendations to help further reduce mortality
and serious injury of dolphin stock(s). Within the past year, we
convened the BDTRT three times to provide us with recommendations for
reducing mortality and serious injury to bottlenose dolphins from
commercial gillnet gear in North Carolina specifically, and the North
Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries has implemented all of the
BDTRT's regulatory recommendations from each of these meetings. These
regulatory measures in North Carolina also provide conservation benefit
to some of the same stocks affected by Virginia pound net gear. We will
continue to implement the BDTRT's recommendations, as resources allow,
to help meet required goals.
Comment 4: One pound net fisherman expressed concern about the need
to change their offshore pound net leader(s) from a traditional to a
modified leader and claimed a loss of $30-40,000 from this change.
Response: We acknowledge that any fisherman who has to modify pound
net leaders as a result of this rule will incur additional operating
costs if replacement gear is required. We calculated the one-time
initial cost to change an offshore pound net leader from a traditional
to a modified leader as $7,068 per leader. Because nets need to be
routinely replaced due to normal use, the subsequent increase in costs
would be equal to the difference in cost between a traditional and a
modified leader, or $1,650. The economic analysis provided in the
proposed rule concluded that all entities expected to be directly
affected by this rule were expected to already use modified leaders in
these areas even if not required during certain times of the year
because: (1) Of the added expense in maintaining both leader types and
switching out the gear when modified leaders were not required; and (2)
absence of demonstrated differences in harvest rates between nets using
traditional versus modified leaders to offset the added gear costs. As
stated earlier, all identified entities expected to be directly
affected by this rule are expected to currently possess modified
leaders and increased gear costs were not identified in the comment as
a contributor to the estimated loss of $30,000 to $40,000. Therefore,
if the comment refers to anticipated losses other than from harvest
reductions, specific gear-related increased costs would be limited to
permanently changing leaders and not the purchase of new leaders. We
acknowledge that, despite research findings showing no significant
differences between catch from traditional versus modified leaders,
this result may not apply to all fishermen who have different fishing
preferences, skills, and behaviors. Although this loss may be
consistent with the experience of this fisherman, it would be
inconsistent with the best scientific information available. Therefore,
we believe these effects are overstated and would also not be expected
to accrue to other fishermen.
Comments on Non-Regulatory Changes
Comment 5: One commenter recommended NMFS continue to monitor for
evidence of protected species bycatch in Virginia pound net leaders to
evaluate the effectiveness of the rule once it is implemented.
Response: We agree, and will continue to monitor protected species
entanglement and stranding data to assess the effectiveness of the rule
at reducing sea turtle and bottlenose dolphin interactions with
Virginia pound net gear. We will also monitor entanglement and
stranding data to assess whether additional amendments to the BDTRP or
sea turtle conservation regulations are needed.
Comment 6: One commenter raised concerns that enforcement of the
proposed regulations would be difficult without: (1) Including specific
[[Page 6927]]
information on how violations of the regulations would be assessed; and
(2) requesting additional funding to support collaborative on-water
enforcement.
Response: We agree that enforcement of regulations is important.
However, we do not include specific details in regulations, such as how
violations will be assessed, because the MMPA and ESA have statutory
and regulatory requirements for establishing appropriate penalties.
Federal agents and State officers authorized under Cooperative
Enforcement Agreements monitor compliance and investigate potential
violations of the statutes and regulations enforced by NOAA. In
general, when an investigating agent or officer identifies a statutory
or regulatory violation, they may pursue one of several available
options, depending on the nature and seriousness of the violation. We
often rely on partnerships with State officers to assist in enforcing
regulations, such as with this regulation and the collaborative on-
water monitoring and enforcement with the state of Virginia discussed
in the proposed rule. When fiscal year budget appropriations are
provided, we carefully consider all program and management needs to
prioritize potential funding available to support enforcement-related
needs.
Comment 7: One commenter expressed that NMFS should collaborate
with commercial fishermen affected by these regulations and marine
mammal experts.
Response: We agree, and included on the BDTRT are Virginia pound
net and other commercial fishermen, as well as experts in the
conservation or biology of marine mammal species as required under
section 118(f)(6)(C) of the MMPA. The BDTRT provided us with consensus
recommendations to reduce mortality and serious injury of dolphins from
Virginia pound net gear. This regulation is based on their
recommendations.
Classification
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for this determination was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here. One comment was received
regarding the expected economic effects of the proposed rule. This
comment is addressed in the comments and response section of this final
rule. The comment stated that this rule would have a larger economic
effect on the fishing operation of the commenter than described in the
proposed rule. No other comments were received that challenged the
economic analysis provided, and the information provided in the comment
is inconsistent with the best scientific information available
regarding the catch efficiency of pound net gear using different
leaders.
Although not an issue raised through public comment, subsequent to
publication of the proposed rule, NMFS reconsidered its analysis with
respect to the appropriate universe of affected entities. In the
proposed rule, NMFS identified 16 entities upon which the proposed rule
would directly apply, or less than one percent of the estimated 3,000
licensed commercial finfish fishermen in Virginia. The basis for
consideration of the 16 entities within the context of the 3,000
licensed fishermen was consideration that the 16 entities use multiple
gears in addition to pound nets to harvest saltwater species and the
species they harvested with their pound nets are also commonly, and for
some species primarily, harvested by other fishermen within the 3,000
licensed fishermen, who also fish with multiple gears. As a result, in
the original analysis, these 16 entities were considered part of the
general commercial finfish industry and not sufficiently distinct to be
considered a separate industry. Even if NMFS considered this component
to be a distinct fishing sector and, as a result, this rule would be
expected to directly apply to 100 percent of the entities in the
sector, the outcome would be the same, because of the absence of
expected adverse economic effects on these entities. As noted in the
proposed rule, all fishermen using an offshore pound net are expected
to already be using the modified pound net leaders required by this
final rule for three main reasons: (1) The modified pound net leaders
are currently required year-round or seasonally within the BDPNRA by
state or federal regulations; (2) research on the catch efficiency of
modified pound net leaders within the BDPNRA showed no significant
differences in harvest weight for the species analyzed when compared to
using traditional leaders; and (3) incurring the costs associated with
maintaining two types of leaders and switching the gear when modified
leaders were not required by either current state or federal
regulations would not make rational economic sense given the absence of
improvements in catch efficiency. Traditional leaders installed on
offshore pound nets were calculated to cost $5,418 to make and install/
remove. Maintaining and using both types of leaders (i.e., traditional
and modified) would require expenditure of this cost, in addition to
the cost of making a modified leader, as well as labor costs of
switching leaders. If harvest and revenue is not increased by switching
to the traditional leader, as demonstrated by available research, then
bearing these additional gear and labor costs would be unjustified.
Thus, even though this final rule will require the use of modified
pound net leaders on offshore pound nets year-round in the BDPRNA, all
fishermen who will be potentially affected are expected to currently
use modified leaders when using pound nets in this area. Additionally,
no fisherman who may have previously switched leaders over the course
of the year, as suggested by the one public comment, is expected to
incur significant adverse economic effects because switching leaders
will no longer be allowed as a result of this final rule. Therefore,
the available information is sufficient to support a certification that
this rule will not have a significant adverse economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As a result, a final regulatory
flexibility analysis was not required and none was prepared.
NMFS determined this action is consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies of the Virginia Coastal Zone
Management Program. This determination was submitted for review by the
responsible state agencies under section 307 of the Coastal Zone
Management Act on April 17, 2014. The Commonwealth of Virginia
concurred with the consistency determination in a letter dated May 8,
2014.
This action contains policies with federalism implications that
were sufficient to warrant preparation of a federalism summary impact
statement under Executive Order 13132 and a federalism consultation
with officials in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Accordingly, the
Assistant Secretary for Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
provided notice of the proposed action to the appropriate officials in
Virginia. The Commonwealth of Virginia did not respond.
The final rule does not contain collection-of-information
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The sea turtle
conservation regulations have a current Paperwork Reduction Act
collection requirement in place (OMB control number 0648-0559) for the
[[Page 6928]]
inspection program. This final rule removes that collection of
information requirement.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 222
Endangered and threatened species, Exports, and Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 223
Endangered and threatened species, Exports, and Transportation.
50 CFR Part 229
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Marine mammals, Reporting and record keeping
requirements.
Dated: February 3, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR parts 222, 223, and
229 are amended as follows:
PART 222--GENERAL ENDANGERED AND THREATENED MARINE SPECIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 222 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 742a et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 222.102:
0
A. The definition for ``Hard lay lines'' is added in alphabetical
order;
0
B. The definition for ``Modified pound net leader'' is revised;
0
C. The definitions for ``Nearshore pound net leader or nearshore pound
net'', ``Offshore pound net leader or offshore pound net'', and ``Pound
net'' are added in alphabetical order; and
0
D. The definitions for ``Pound net leader,'' ``Pound Net Regulated Area
I,'' and ``Pound Net Regulated Area II'' are revised.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 222.102 Definitions.
* * * * *
Hard lay lines mean lines that are at least as stiff as \5/16\ inch
(0.8 cm) diameter line composed of polyester wrapped around a blend of
polypropylene and polyethylene and 42 visible twists of strands per
foot of line.
* * * * *
Modified pound net leader means a pound net leader that is affixed
to or resting on the sea floor and made of a lower portion of mesh and
an upper portion of only vertical lines such that the mesh size is
equal to or less than 8 inches (20.3 cm) stretched mesh; at any
particular point along the leader, the height of the mesh from the
seafloor to the top of the mesh must be no more than one-third the
depth of the water at mean lower low water directly above that
particular point; the mesh is held in place by a bottom chain that
forms the lowermost part of the pound net leader; the vertical lines
extend from the top of the mesh up to a top line, which is a line that
forms the uppermost part of the pound net leader; the vertical lines
are equal to or greater than \5/16\ inch (0.8 cm) in diameter and
strung vertically at a minimum of every 2 feet (61 cm); and the
vertical lines are hard lay lines.
Nearshore pound net leader or nearshore pound net means a pound net
with every part of the leader (from the most offshore pole at the pound
end of the leader to the most inshore pole of the leader) in less than
14 feet (4.3 m) of water at any tidal condition.
* * * * *
Offshore pound net leader or offshore pound net means a pound net
with any part of the leader (from the most offshore pole at the pound
end of the leader to the most inshore pole of the leader) in water
greater than or equal to 14 feet (4.3 m) at any tidal condition.
* * * * *
Pound net means a fixed entrapment gear attached to posts or stakes
with three continuous sections from offshore to inshore consisting of:
(1) A pound made of mesh netting that entraps the fish;
(2) At least one heart made of a mesh netting that is generally in
the shape of a heart and aids in funneling fish into the pound; and
(3) A leader, which is a long, straight element consisting of mesh
or vertical lines that directs the fish offshore towards the pound.
Pound net leader means a long straight net that directs fish
offshore towards the pound, an enclosure that captures the fish. Some
pound net leaders are all mesh, while others have stringers and mesh.
Stringers, also known as vertical lines, are spaced a regular distance
apart and are not crossed by other lines to form mesh.
Pound Net Regulated Area I means Virginia waters of the mainstem
Chesapeake Bay and the portion of the James River seaward of the
Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel (Interstate Highway-64) and the York River
seaward of the Coleman Memorial Bridge (Route 17), bounded to the south
and east by the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel (Route 13; extending from
approximately 37[deg]07' N. lat., 75[deg]58' W. long. to 36[deg]55' N.
lat., 76[deg]08' W. long.), and to the north by the following points
connected by straight lines and in the order listed:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Area description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................. Where 37[deg]19.0' N. lat. meets the
shoreline of the Severn River fork,
near Stump Point, Virginia (western
portion of Mobjack Bay), which is
approximately 76[deg]26.75' W. long.
2............................. 37[deg]19.0' N. lat., 76[deg]13.0' W.
long.
3............................. 37[deg]13.0' N. lat., 76[deg]13.0' W.
long.
4............................. Where 37[deg]13.0' N. lat. meets the
eastern shoreline of Chesapeake Bay,
Virginia, near Elliotts Creek, which is
approximately 76[deg]00.75' W. long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pound Net Regulated Area II means Virginia waters of the Chesapeake
Bay outside of Pound Net Regulated Area I, bounded by the Maryland-
Virginia State line to the north and by the COLREGS line at the mouth
of the Chesapeake Bay and 37[deg]07' N. lat. between Kiptopeke and
Smith Island, Northampton County, Virginia to the south and east. This
area includes the Great Wicomico River seaward of the Jessie Dupont
Memorial Highway Bridge (Route 200), the Rappahannock River downstream
of the Robert Opie Norris Jr. Bridge (Route 3), the Piankatank River
downstream of the Route 3 Bridge, and all other tributaries within
these boundaries.
* * * * *
PART 223--THREATENED MARINE AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
0
3. The authority citation for part 223 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 1543; subpart B, Sec. 223.201-202
also issued under 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 5503(d) for
Sec. 223.206(d)(9).
0
4. In Sec. 223.205, paragraphs (b)(17) through (b)(20) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 223.205 Sea turtles.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(17) Set, fish with, or fail to remove a modified pound net leader
in Pound Net Regulated Area I or Pound Net Regulated Area II defined in
50 CFR 222.102 and referenced in 50 CFR 223.206(d)(10) at any time from
May 6 through July 15 unless the pound net licensee and the vessel
operator meet the modified pound net leader compliance training
requirements in accordance with Sec. 223.206(d)(10)(vii).
(18) Alter or replace any portion of a modified pound net leader so
that the
[[Page 6929]]
altered or replaced portion no longer meets the modified pound net
leader definition in 50 CFR 222.102, unless that alteration or
replacement occurs outside the regulated period of May 6 through July
15.
(19) Set, fish with, or fail to remove a modified pound net leader
at any time from May 6 through July 15 in Pound Net Regulated Area I or
Pound Net Regulated Area II unless the fisherman has on board the
vessel a valid modified pound net leader compliance training
certificate issued by NMFS.
(20) Set, fish with, or fail to remove pound net gear in Pound Net
Regulated Area I or Pound Net Regulated Area II, unless it has the all
three continuous sections as defined in 50 CFR 222.102, except that one
or more sections may be missing for a maximum period of 10 days for
purposes of setting, removing, and/or repairing pound nets.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 223.206, paragraph (d)(10)(vii) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 223.206 Exemptions to prohibitions relating to sea turtles.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(10) * * *
(vii) Modified pound net leader compliance training. Any pound net
licensee and any vessel operator who have modified pound net leaders
set in Pound Net Regulated Area I or Pound Net Regulated Area II at any
time from May 6 through July 15 must have completed modified pound net
leader compliance training and possess on board the vessel a valid
modified pound net leader compliance training certificate issued by
NMFS. NMFS retains discretion to provide exemptions in limited
circumstances where appropriate. Notice will be given by NMFS
announcing the times and locations of modified pound net leader
compliance training.
* * * * *
PART 229--AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMERCIAL FISHERIES UNDER THE MARINE
MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1972
0
6. The authority citation for part 229 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq; Sec. 229.32(f) also issued
under 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
0
7. In Sec. 229.2, the definitions ``Hard lay lines,'' ``Modified pound
net leader,'' ``Nearshore pound net,'' ``Offshore pound net,'' and
``Pound net'' are added in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 229.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Hard lay lines mean lines that are at least as stiff as \5/16\ inch
(0.8 cm) diameter line composed of polyester wrapped around a blend of
polypropylene and polyethylene and 42 visible twists of strands per
foot of line.
* * * * *
Modified pound net leader means a pound net leader that is affixed
to or resting on the sea floor and made of a lower portion of mesh and
an upper portion of only vertical lines such that the mesh size is
equal to or less than 8 inches (20.3 cm) stretched mesh; at any
particular point along the leader, the height of the mesh from the
seafloor to the top of the mesh must be no more than one-third the
depth of the water at mean lower low water directly above that
particular point; the mesh is held in place by a bottom chain that
forms the lowermost part of the pound net leader; the vertical lines
extend from the top of the mesh up to a top line, which is a line that
forms the uppermost part of the pound net leader; the vertical lines
are equal to or greater than \5/16\ inch (0.8 cm) in diameter and
strung vertically at a minimum of every 2 feet (61 cm); and the
vertical lines are hard lay lines.
Nearshore pound net means a pound net with every part of the leader
(from the most offshore pole at the pound end of the leader to the most
inshore pole of the leader) in less than 14 feet (4.3 m) of water at
any tidal condition.
* * * * *
Offshore pound net means a pound net with any part of the leader
(from the most offshore pole at the pound end of the leader to the most
inshore pole of the leader) in water greater than or equal to 14 feet
(4.3 m) at any tidal condition.
* * * * *
Pound net means a fixed entrapment gear attached to posts or stakes
with three continuous sections from offshore to inshore consisting of:
(1) A pound made of mesh netting that entraps the fish;
(2) At least one heart made of a mesh netting that is generally in
the shape of a heart and aids in funneling fish into the pound; and
(3) A leader, which is a long, straight element consisting of mesh
or vertical lines that directs the fish offshore towards the pound.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 229.3 paragraph (s) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 229.3 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(s) General Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan. (1) It is
prohibited to set, fish with, or possess on board a vessel unless
stowed, or fail to remove, any gillnet or pound net from the waters
specified in Sec. 229.35(c) unless the gear complies with the
specified restrictions set forth in Sec. 229.35(d).
(2) It is prohibited to set, fish with, or fail to remove a
modified pound net leader in the Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net Regulated
Area unless the fisherman has on board the vessel a valid modified
pound net leader compliance training certificate issued by NMFS.
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 229.35 paragraphs (a) and (c) are revised, a definition for
``Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net Regulated Area'' is added to paragraph
(b), and paragraph (d)(2)(ii) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 229.35 Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. The purpose of this section is to implement
the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BDTRP) to reduce incidental
mortality and serious injury of strategic stocks of bottlenose dolphins
within the Western North Atlantic coastal morphotype in specific
Category I and II commercial fisheries from New Jersey through Florida.
Specific Category I and II commercial fisheries within the scope of the
BDTRP are indentified and updated in the annual List of Fisheries. Gear
restricted by this section includes small, medium, and large mesh
gillnets and pound nets. The geographic scope of the BDTRP is all tidal
and marine waters within 6.5 nautical miles (12 km) of shore from the
New York-New Jersey border southward to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina,
and within 14.6 nautical miles (27 km) of shore from Cape Hatteras,
southward to, and including the east coast of Florida down to the
fishery management council demarcation line between the Atlantic Ocean
and the Gulf of Mexico (as described in Sec. 600.105 of this title).
(b) * * *
Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net Regulated Area means all Virginia
marine waters of the Atlantic Ocean within 3 nautical miles (5.56 km)
of shoreline and all adjacent tidal waters, bounded on the north by
38[deg]01.6' N. (Maryland/Virginia border) and on the south by
36[deg]33' N (Virginia/North Carolina border); and all southern
Virginia waters of the mainstem Chesapeake Bay bounded on the south and
west by the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel across the James River and the
Coleman Memorial Bridge across the York River; and north and east by
the
[[Page 6930]]
following points connected by straight lines in the order listed:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Area description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................. Where 37[deg]19.0' N. lat. meets the
shoreline of the Severn River fork,
near Stump Point, Virginia (western
portion of Mobjack Bay), which is
approximately 76[deg]26.75' W. long.
2............................. 37[deg]19.0' N. lat., 76[deg]13.0' W.
long.
3............................. 37[deg]13.0' N. lat., 76[deg]13.0' W.
long.
4............................. Where 37[deg]13.0' N. lat. meets the
eastern shoreline of Chesapeake Bay,
Virginia, near Elliotts Creek, which is
approximately 76[deg]00.75' W. long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(c) BDTRP Regulated Waters--(1) Gillnets. The regulations
pertaining to gillnets in this section apply to New Jersey, Delaware,
and Maryland State waters; Northern North Carolina State waters;
Northern Virginia State waters; South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida
waters; Southern North Carolina State waters; and Southern Virginia
State waters as defined in Sec. 229.35(b), except for the waters
identified in Sec. 229.34(a)(2), with the following modification and
addition. From Chincoteague to Ship Shoal Inlet in Virginia (37[deg]
52' N. 75[deg] 24.30' W. to 37[deg] 11.90' N. 75[deg] 48.30' W) and
South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida waters, those waters landward of
the 72 COLREGS demarcation line (International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972), as depicted or noted on nautical
charts published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(Coast Charts 1:80,000 scale), and as described in 33 CFR part 80 are
excluded from the regulations.
(2) Pound nets. The regulations pertaining to pound nets in this
section apply to the Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net Regulated Area.
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Pound nets. (A) Year-round, any offshore pound net in the
Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net Regulated Area must use a modified pound
net leader.
(B) Year-round, any nearshore and offshore pound nets set in the
Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net Regulated Area must have all three
continuous sections as defined in 50 CFR 229.2, except that one or more
sections may be missing for a maximum period of 10 days for purposes of
setting, removing, and/or repairing pound nets.
(C) The pound net licensee and the vessel operator of any offshore
pound net set in the Bottlenose Dolphin Pound Net Regulated Area must
have completed modified pound net leader compliance training and
possess on board the vessel a valid modified pound net leader
compliance training certificate issued by NMFS. NMFS retains discretion
to provide exemptions in limited circumstances where appropriate.
Notice will be given by NMFS announcing the times and locations of
modified pound net leader compliance training.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-02607 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P