Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program: Payment of Fees To Cover Credit Subsidy Costs, 6470-6475 [2015-02262]
Download as PDF
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
6470
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
borrowers and public entities); and (iv)
other factors that HUD determines may
be relevant to this calculation.
Taking these factors into
consideration, HUD determined that the
initial fee to be imposed on the program
is 2.42 percent, which percentage will
be applied to guaranteed loan
disbursements as they occur in fiscal
year 2015. The fee will be effective after
available credit subsidy appropriations
are depleted, which HUD anticipates
will occur around May 2015. Note that
future notices may provide for a
combination of up-front and periodic
fees.
The expected cost of a Section 108
loan guarantee is difficult to estimate
accurately using historical program
data, because there have been no
defaults in the history of the program.
HUD has never had to invoke its full
faith and credit guarantee, nor has it
paid out on any guarantee from the
credit subsidy reserved each year for
future losses.2 This is due to a variety
of factors, including the availability of
CDBG funds as security. Borrowers may
plan to make payments on Section 108
loans from CDBG grant funds. However,
when a borrower plans to make Section
108 loan payments from other
anticipated sources, it has been able to
repay the Section 108 loan using CDBG
funds when there are shortfalls in
anticipated repayment sources, as
authorized by Section 108 of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C.
5308).
The proposed fee of 2.42 percent
offsets the expected cost to the
government due to default, financing
costs, and other relevant factors. To
arrive at this measure, HUD analyzed
data on comparable municipal debt over
an extended 16- to 23-year period. The
estimated rate is based on the default
and recovery rates for general purpose
municipal debt and industrial
development bonds. The cumulative
default rates on industrial development
bonds were higher than the default rates
on general purpose municipal debt
during the period from which the data
were taken. These two subsectors of
municipal debt were chosen because
their purposes and loan terms most
closely resemble those of Section 108
loans. In this regard, Section 108 loans
can be broken down into two categories:
(i) Loans that finance public
infrastructure and activities to support
subsidized housing (other than
2 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Study of HUD’s Section 108 Loan
Guarantee Program, (prepared by Econometrica, Inc.
and The Urban Institute), September 2012.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
financing new construction) and (ii)
development projects (e.g., retail,
commercial, industrial). The 2.42
percent fee was derived by weighting
the default and recovery data for general
purpose municipal debt and the data for
industrial development bonds according
to the expected composition of the
Section 108 portfolio by corresponding
project type. Based on dollar amount of
Section 108 commitments awarded
during the period 2005—2013, HUD
expects that 27 percent of the Section
108 portfolio will be similar to general
purpose municipal debt and 73 percent
of the portfolio will be similar to
industrial development bonds. In
determining the appropriate level of fee,
HUD will consider the amount required
to fully offset the cost to the Federal
Government associated with making a
loan guarantee. Credit subsidy cost
calculations incorporate assumptions
based on: (i) data on default frequency
for municipal debt where such debt is
comparable to loans in the Section 108
portfolio; (ii) data on recovery rates on
collateral security for comparable
municipal debt; (iii) the expected
composition of the Section 108 cohort
by end users of the guaranteed loan
funds (e.g., third party borrowers and
public entities); and (iv) other relevant
information (e.g., statutory changes) that
would affect the applicability of the
default and recovery data on
comparable municipal debt.
III. Solicitation of Comment
HUD solicits comment on the initial
fee to be imposed on the Section 108
Program.
Dated: December 17, 2014.
Clifford Taffet,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Community Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 2015–02261 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 570
[Docket No. FR–5767–P–01]
RIN 2506–AC35
Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program:
Payment of Fees To Cover Credit
Subsidy Costs
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
amend HUD’s Section 108 Loan
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Guarantee Program (Section 108
Program) regulations to permit HUD, in
accordance with statutory authority, to
collect fees from Section 108 borrowers
to offset the costs of Section 108 loan
guarantees. HUD is proposing this rule
to ensure that it can begin to make
Section 108 loan guarantee
commitments without appropriated
subsidy. The Department of Housing
and Urban Development Appropriations
Act, 2014, authorizes HUD to collect
fees from borrowers for this program. In
anticipation of further appropriations
acts authorizing the collection of fees for
Section 108 loan guarantees, HUD
proposes to add a new section to its
current regulations to reflect that when
appropriations for credit subsidy costs
as authorized by Congress are either not
available or insufficient and HUD has
statutory authority to collect fees, HUD
will impose a fee on Section 108
Program borrowers and explain the
basis for the fee imposed. The proposed
new regulatory section would provide
for HUD to set the fee by notice.
Elsewhere in today’s Federal Register,
HUD is publishing the notice that would
propose the fee to be established for the
fiscal year 2015, subject to statutory
authorization.
DATES: Comment Due Date: March 9,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule to the Regulations
Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Communications must refer to the above
docket number and title. There are two
methods for submitting public
comments. All submissions must refer
to the above docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
2. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments electronically through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make them immediately available to the
public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of the rule.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at the
above address. Due to security measures
at the HUD Headquarters building, an
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled in
advance by calling the Regulations
Division at 202–708–3055 (this is not a
toll-free number). Individuals with
speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339. Copies of all comments submitted
are available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Webster, Director, Financial
Management Division, Office of Block
Grant Assistance, Office of Community
Planning and Development, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 7th Street SW., Room 7180,
Washington, DC 20410; telephone
number 202–708–1871 (this is not a tollfree number). Individuals with speech
or hearing impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339. FAX inquiries (but not comments)
may be sent to Mr. Webster at 202–708–
1798 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Section 108 Program is the loan
guarantee component of the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
program and is authorized by section
108 (42 U.S.C. 5308) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974,
as amended (HCD Act). HUD’s
regulations implementing the Section
108 Program are codified at 24 CFR part
570, subpart M (entitled ‘‘Loan
Guarantees’’). The Section 108 Program
provides States and local governments
with access to long-term (up to 20 year)
fixed-rate loans at relatively low interest
rates to finance certain categories of
eligible CDBG activities. Under section
108(a) of the HCD Act and authorizing
language in HUD’s annual
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
appropriations, HUD enters into
commitments to guarantee, and
subsequently guarantees, promissory
notes issued by units of general local
government (or their designated public
agencies) or States. Under section 108(r)
of the HCD Act, HUD, acting on behalf
of these borrowers, periodically arranges
for the issuance of a series of trust
certificates based on a large pool of such
notes and engages underwriters
(investment banking firms) to market
and sell interests in the trust certificates
to private investors in a public offering.
HUD guarantees the timely payment
of the principal of and interest on the
trust certificates and, under the
provisions of the section 108 statute, the
full faith and credit of the United States
is pledged to honor the guarantee.
Because of the federal guarantee,
interest payable on the trust certificates
and the underlying notes can be set at
relatively low, fixed-rates and investors
are willing to purchase interests in the
certificates because of the security
provided by such guarantee. Proceeds of
the sale, less certain underwriting and
trust administration fees and costs, are
advanced to the borrowers, who pay
interest on a given year’s principal
installment at the fixed interest rate
borne by the trust certificate of
corresponding maturity.
To accommodate borrowers that
require financing for projects in the
months between the periodic public
offering of fixed-rate trust certificates,
interim financing is made available
pursuant to an agreement between HUD
and an interim lender. HUD guarantees
promissory notes that initially are
issued to the interim lender and bear
interest at rates that adjust monthly.
Such notes are typically pooled with
other issuers’ notes in the next public
offering of fixed-rate trust certificates, at
which time, under the terms of the
notes, the interest rates convert to the
fixed rates borne by the trust
certificates.
Contemporaneously with HUD’s
guarantee, borrowers enter into
contracts with HUD in which they agree
to use funds for eligible activities, to
make the payments required under their
notes and to reimburse HUD from
sources pledged as security in the
contract for any payments made on their
behalf. Section 108 notes are secured by
pledges of annual CDBG allocations,
which are the local government’s own
allocations in the case of CDBG
entitlement communities and the State’s
allocations in the case of local
governments in non-entitlement areas or
States that borrow on behalf of these
areas. HUD is also authorized to require
borrowers to furnish other security,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6471
such as interests in real property and
pledges of local revenues, in addition to
pledged CDBG funds.
Historically, Congress has annually
appropriated funds to cover the credit
subsidy costs of the Section 108
Program. These appropriations,
consistent with the Federal Credit
Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et
seq.), reflect the net present value of
future costs to the Federal Government
of operating the Section 108 Program.
These costs, referred to here as credit
subsidy costs, are the estimated longterm cost to the federal government of
the loan guarantee, excluding
administrative costs and any incidental
effects on governmental receipts or
outlays. More specifically, the cost is
the net present value of expected cash
outflows by HUD (e.g., due to default)
and the expected cash inflows to HUD
(e.g., from recovery on collateral),
discounted to the point of disbursement
of the guaranteed loan. In recent years,
the budgeted Section 108 credit subsidy
rates (i.e., credit subsidy cost expressed
as a percentage of loan disbursements)
have ranged from 2.48% in FY 2012 to
2.56% in FY 2014.
The President’s FY 2014 Budget
Request 1 did not request an
appropriation for the credit subsidy
costs of new Section 108 guaranteed
loans but instead called for statutory
authorization to allow HUD to collect
fees to offset such costs, making the
Section 108 Program a zero credit
subsidy program. To assist with the
conversion to a fee-based financing
mechanism, HUD’s FY 2014
Congressional Justification for the
Section 108 Program proposed to allow
Section 108 borrowers to include the fee
in the guaranteed loan amount.2
Borrowers would also have the option to
utilize existing statutory authority that
permits the fee to be paid with CDBG
funds.
Both the Senate Report (S. Rep. No.
113–45) accompanying the Senate’s FY
2014 Transportation, Housing and
Urban Development and Related
Agencies Appropriation bill and the
House Report (H.R. Rep. No. 113–136)
accompanying the House’s FY 2014
Transportation, Housing and Urban
Development and Related Agencies
Appropriation bill accepted HUD’s
request to convert the Section 108
Program into a fee-based program. The
Senate bill adopted the President’s
proposal to eliminate the credit subsidy
1 The President’s Budget for FY 2014 can be
found at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/
collectionGPO.action?collectionCode=BUDGET.
2 https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/
huddoc?id=COMDEVLOANGUAR.pdf at page R–2.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
6472
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
been authorized to collect a fee for the
Section 108 Program and Congress has
not appropriated a subsidy for the
Section 108 Program or the appropriated
subsidy is insufficient to offset the costs
of the Section 108 loan guarantees, HUD
will collect a fee for the program. When
such conditions occur, HUD will
announce its intent to impose a fee
through notice published in the Federal
Register and explain the basis for the fee
imposed.
HUD will provide for announcement
of the fee through notice in the Federal
Register rather than codifying the fee in
§ 570.712, as the fee may change from
year to year. The imposition of the fee
is dependent upon the authority
provided for in annual appropriations
acts. HUD will solicit comment on the
initial proposed fee through this initial
proposed rule and Notice, and may
solicit comment on future Notices that
impose the fee if changes to the
assumptions underlying the fee
calculation or the fee structure itself
raise new considerations for borrowers.
The fee to be imposed will not be
expressed as a dollar amount but rather
as percentages of the principal amount
of the guaranteed loan. The fee will be
based on a determination that such fees,
when collected, will reduce the credit
subsidy cost to a level that eliminates
the need for appropriated subsidy
budget authority. The required fees may
include both an up-front and a periodic
component, depending on market
conditions and the credit risk to the
Section 108 program. New § 570.712
would provide that each public entity or
its designated public agency and each
State issuing debt obligations would be
responsible for the payment of all fees
charged under this section.
II. This Proposed Rule
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
entirely in FY 2014. Accordingly, the
Senate Report states that the Senate
Committee on Appropriations expects
HUD to implement a fee based program
upon enactment of the fee authority to
ensure that there is no delay for grantees
that wish to utilize the program under
a new fee-based structure.
The Department of Housing and
Urban Development Appropriations
Act, 2014 3 (2014 HUD Appropriations
Act) authorized HUD to collect such
fees. The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act
included a credit subsidy appropriation
designed to enable HUD to continue
making loan guarantee commitments
during the rulemaking process and
prevent a gap in the availability of the
program.
This proposed rule is consistent with
the expectations expressed in the joint
explanatory statement (160 Cong. Rec.
H1193–94 (daily ed., January 15, 2014)
(joint explanatory statement submitted
by Congressman Rogers)), which
explains that ‘‘HUD is not expected to
be ready to implement a new fee-based
section 108 loan program upon
enactment of this Act. Instead, prior to
the collection of fees, HUD is directed
to establish regulations articulating how
a fee-based, zero-subsidy program shall
be implemented.’’
Further, the 2014 HUD
Appropriations Act authorizes HUD to
impose a fee to eliminate the need for
credit subsidy appropriations. Such
authority is necessary because, in 1988,
Congress amended the statute
authorizing the Section 108 Program,
section 108 of the HCD Act (42 U.S.C.
5308), to add subsection (m), which
limits HUD’s ability to impose a fee or
charge with respect to a Section 108
guaranteed loan. The 2014 HUD
Appropriations Act provides HUD the
discretion to collect a fee from Section
108 borrowers ‘‘notwithstanding
subsection (m) of such section 108.’’ 4
In addition to establishing new
§ 570.712, this proposed rule would
make related amendments to other
sections of part 570, subpart M.
A. New § 570.712 (Collection of Fees;
Procedure To Determine Amount of
Fee).
This rule proposes to amend the
Section 108 regulations at 24 CFR part
570, subpart M, to establish a new
section, § 570.712, entitled ‘‘Collection
of fees; procedure to determine amount
of the fee,’’ that would provide for the
collection of fees for the Section 108
Loan Guarantee Program. New § 570.712
would provide that where HUD has
3 See
Title II of Division L of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2014 (Pub. L. 113–76, 128 Stat.
5, approved January 17, 2014; see 128 Stat. 604)
(2014 HUD Appropriations Act).
4 2014 HUD Appropriations Act at 128 Stat. 614.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
B. Related Amendments to Existing
Regulations
1. Definition of ‘‘Credit Subsidy Cost’’
The proposed rule would amend
§ 570.701 (Definitions) to add a
definition of ‘‘credit subsidy cost.’’
Specifically, ‘‘credit subsidy cost’’
would be defined as the estimated longterm cost to the Federal Government of
a Section 108 loan guarantee or a
modification thereof, calculated on a net
present value basis, excluding
administrative costs and any incidental
effects on governmental receipts or
outlays. This definition is the definition
of ‘‘cost’’ in the Federal Credit Reform
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Act of 1990 5 (2 U.S.C. 661–661f at
§ 661a), modified to exclude direct
loans, which are not authorized under
the Section 108 program.
2. Requirements for Payment of Fees
and Payment Options
Paragraph (g) of § 570.705 (Loan
requirements) would be amended to
add, as a loan requirement, that each
public entity or its designated public
agency and each State issuing debt
obligations must pay any and all fees
charged by HUD for the purpose of
paying the credit subsidy costs of the
loan guarantee. In addition to including
this requirement, the rule proposes to
remove redundant language in
§ 570.705(g) addressing a borrower’s
ability to pay issuance, underwriting,
servicing, and other costs with
guaranteed loan funds. This language
duplicates authority granted in
§ 570.703.
As permitted by § 570.705(c)(1)(i),
borrowers will be able to pay the fee
using CDBG funds. To further facilitate
the payment of these charges, HUD also
proposes to permit the payment of these
fees from guaranteed loan proceeds. As
such, § 570.703 (Eligible activities)
would be amended to provide that
guaranteed loan funds may be used for
the payment of fees charged by HUD,
when such fees are paid from the
disbursement of guaranteed loan funds.
Additionally, to notify the public of
plans to use grant funds or loan
proceeds to pay the fee, HUD proposes
changes to § 570.704 (Application
requirements) to require applicants to
include the estimated amount of the fee
to be paid in the application for loan
guarantee assistance. Use of grant funds
for fees or payments of principal and
interest must also be included in each
applicant’s consolidated plan.
Specific solicitation of comment: HUD
acknowledges that financing the fees
could also result in net higher costs to
borrowers because the fee needed to
achieve zero subsidy would have to
account for risk of default and the
borrower would have to pay interest on
the financed fee. HUD specifically seeks
comment on whether to require
borrowers to pay fee amounts from other
sources or allow borrowers to add
upfront fees to the face value of the
guaranteed loan by paying fees from
guaranteed loan funds at the time of
loan disbursement.
5 The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act references
section 502 of the Congressional Budget Act of
1974. Section 502 was added to the Congressional
Budget Act of 1974 by the Federal Credit Reform
Act of 1990, Public Law 101–508, title XIII, subtitle
B, § 13201(a), 104 Stat. 1388–610.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Exemption From Statutory Primary
Objective
HUD proposes to amend paragraph
(a)(3)(iii) of § 570.200 of HUD’s CDBG
regulations to clarify that when the fee
is paid from the proceeds of a
guaranteed loan, grant funds used to
repay that loan are not subject to the
requirement that not less than 70
percent of a grantee’s aggregate CDBG
expenditures over a specified one-,
two-, or three-year period shall be for
activities benefitting low- and moderateincome persons.6 This exclusion from
the overall benefit calculation would be
added to make clear that payment of
fees is covered by the existing exclusion
of grant funds used for repayment of
Section 108 guaranteed loans at
§ 570.200(a)(3)(iii). Expenditures of
guaranteed loan funds for payment of
the fee are treated as part of the cost of
carrying out the activity financed with
the guaranteed loan. Section 108
activities that benefit low- and
moderate-income persons are already
included in the calculation, and such
activities should only be considered
once when calculating overall benefit.
III. Proposed 2015 Fee: 2.42% of the
Principal Obligation of the Loan
As noted in the Summary to this
proposed rule, elsewhere in today’s
Federal Register, HUD proposes the
initial fee to be imposed for the Section
108 Program.
In determining the appropriate level
of fee, HUD will consider the amount
required to fully offset the cost to the
Federal Government associated with
making a loan guarantee. Credit subsidy
cost calculations incorporate
assumptions based on: (i) data on
default frequency for municipal debt
where such debt is comparable to loans
in the Section 108 portfolio; (ii) data on
recovery rates on collateral security for
comparable municipal debt; (iii) the
expected composition of the Section 108
cohort by end users of the guaranteed
loan funds (e.g., third party borrowers
and public entities); and (iv) other
relevant information (e.g., statutory
changes) that would affect the
applicability of the default and recovery
data on comparable municipal debt.
Paragraph (b) of § 570.712 would
provide that HUD will publish a notice
in the Federal Register with the fee
structure and levels, taking into
consideration total available
commitment authority and what level of
fees may be needed to operate the
program for the covered period. Such
6 See Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974, as amended (Pub. L. 93–383, § 101(c)
(1974); 42 U.S.C. 5301).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
notice will set forth the fee financing
structure to be applied, the effective
date, and any other necessary
information regarding payment of the
fee. HUD anticipates issuing such
notices prior to the beginning of the
fiscal year, with an effective date of the
beginning of the fiscal year, and may
provide updated notices as necessary.
Additionally, HUD will periodically
publish the estimated subsidy cost and
fee as part of the President’s Budget.
IV. Justification for Abbreviated Public
Comment Period
It is the general practice of HUD to
provide a 60-day public comment
period on all proposed rules. However,
HUD is shortening its usual 60-day
public comment period to 30 days for
this proposed rule. As stated in this
preamble, HUD anticipates that in the
coming fiscal years appropriated funds
will no longer be available for the credit
subsidy costs of the Section 108
program or available in amounts
sufficient to maintain the program.
Imposition of a fee, as statutorily
authorized, will maintain the continued
availability of Section 108 guaranteed
loan financing. Through HUD’s
Congressional Justifications for FY 2014
and 2015, HUD has provided public
notice of its proposal to make the
Section 108 program a fee-based
program.
Section 108 is a valuable financing
source for community and economic
development projects. As stated in
HUD’s Congressional Justifications for
FY 2015 and FY 2014, States and local
governments face daunting challenges
in addressing their community and
economic development needs, and the
Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program
enables CDBG grantees to borrow up to
5 times their current CDBG allocation to
finance economic development, public
facilities and housing activities
consistent with CDBG program
requirements.
For these reasons and those already
presented in this preamble, it is
important to implement a Section 108
fee-based program as soon as possible to
ensure the continued availability of the
Section 108 program, and therefore
HUD has determined that a 30-day
public comment period is appropriate.
V. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review—Executive Order
12866
Under Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), a
determination must be made whether a
regulatory action is significant, and
therefore, subject to review by the Office
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6473
of Management and Budget (OMB) in
accordance with the requirements of the
order. This rule was determined to
constitute a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. The fee
proposed to be imposed under this rule
would only be at such level to cover the
costs of administration of the program
that would have otherwise been covered
by appropriations.
Consistent with Executive Order
12866, HUD prepared a regulatory
impact analysis (RIA) for the rule. Based
on recent annual program activity, HUD
determined that the amount to cover the
costs of the program is generally not
more than $5 million in a fiscal year.
Transfers resulting from the proposed
fee to be imposed are likely to range
from $4 million to $6 million. The clear
economic benefit of the imposition of
the proposed fee would be to continue
to provide for the guarantee of loans that
are underprovided by the private sector.
HUD’s RIA, which describes in detail
the costs and benefits and impact of the
proposed rule is available at
www.regulations.gov under the docket
number for this rule.
The docket file is available for public
inspection between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 5 p.m. weekdays in the Regulations
Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Due to security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, please schedule
an appointment to review the docket file
by calling the Regulations Division at
202–708–3055 (this is not a toll-free
number). Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access the
above telephone number via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), generally requires
an agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule proposes to implement the
statutorily authorized power for HUD to
collect fees from borrowers to cover the
credit subsidy costs of operating the
program. As discussed in this preamble,
HUD proposes to assist Section 108
borrowers’ transition to a fee-based
financing mechanism by allowing
borrowers to include the fee in the
guaranteed loan amount. This rule also
proposes to permit borrowers to pay the
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
6474
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
fee with pledged CDBG funds. The
amount of the fee would be determined
by the amount required to fully offset
the credit subsidy cost of the program.
The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act
authorized HUD to charge a fee for the
Section 108 Program. Charging a fee will
become a practical necessity at such
time when current appropriations for
the program’s credit subsidy costs are
exhausted.
This proposed rule reflects statutorily
authorized actions which HUD
determined that it must take to ensure
uninterrupted operation of the Section
108 Loan Guarantee Program. By
allowing borrowers to include the fee in
the guaranteed loan amount or pay the
fee with pledged CDBG funds, HUD has
strived to minimize the impact that
imposing a fee may otherwise have on
the program. Accordingly, it is HUD’s
determination that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Notwithstanding HUD’s
determination that this rule will not
have a significant effect on a substantial
number of small entities, HUD
specifically invites comments regarding
any less burdensome alternatives to this
rule that will meet HUD’s objectives as
described in this preamble.
Environmental Review
In accordance with 24 CFR
50.19(c)(6), this proposed rule involves
establishment of a rate or cost
determinations and related external
administrative requirements and
procedures which do not constitute a
development decision that affects the
physical condition of specific project
areas or building sites. Accordingly,
under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6), this proposed
rule is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either: Imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments and is not
required by statute; or the rule preempts
state law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
proposed rule does not have federalism
implications and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments nor
preempt state law within the meaning of
the Executive Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements
for federal agencies to assess the effects
of their regulatory actions on state,
local, and tribal governments, and on
the private sector. This proposed rule
does not impose any federal mandates
on any state, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector,
within the meaning of UMRA.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) program number for
the Section 108 Loan Guarantee
program is 14.248.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 570
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa,
Community Development Block Grants,
Grant programs—education, Grant
programs—housing and community
development, Guam, Indians, Loan
programs—housing and community
development, Low and moderate
income housing, Northern Mariana
Islands, Pacific Islands Trust Territory,
Puerto Rico, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Student
aid, Virgin Islands.
Accordingly, for the reasons described
in the preamble, HUD proposes to
amend 24 CFR part 570 as follows:
PART 570—COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS
1. The authority citation for 24 part
570 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d) and 5301–
5320.
2. In § 570.200, revise paragraph
(a)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
■
§ 570.200
General Policies.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Funds expended for the
repayment of loans guaranteed under
the provisions of subpart M (including
repayment of the portion of a loan used
to pay any issuance, servicing,
underwriting, or other costs as may be
incurred under § 570.705(g)) shall also
be excluded;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 570.701, add in alphabetical
order the definition of ‘‘Credit Subsidy
Cost’’ to read as follows:
§ 570.701
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Credit subsidy cost means the
estimated long-term cost to the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Government of a Section 108 loan
guarantee or a modification thereof,
calculated on a net present value basis,
excluding administrative costs and any
incidental effects on governmental
receipts or outlays.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 570.703, add paragraph (n) to
read as follows:
§ 570.703
Eligible activities.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) Payment of fees charged by HUD
pursuant to § 570.712.
■ 5. Amend § 570.704, by revising
paragraphs (a)(1)(i)(D) and (a)(1)(v) and
removing and reserving paragraph (c)(2).
§ 570.704
Application requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) A description of any CDBG funds,
including guaranteed loan funds and
grant funds, that will be used to pay fees
required under § 570.705(g). The
description must include an estimate of
the amount of CBDG funds that will be
used for this purpose. If the applicant
will use grant funds to pay required
fees, it must include this planned use of
grant funds in its consolidated plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) If an application for loan guarantee
assistance is to be submitted by an
entitlement or nonentitlement public
entity simultaneously with the public
entity’s submission for its grant, the
public entity shall include and identify
in its proposed and final consolidated
plan the activities to be undertaken with
the guaranteed loan funds, the national
objective to be met by each of these
activities, the amount of any program
income expected to be received during
the program year, and the amount of
guaranteed loan funds to be used. The
public entity shall also include in the
consolidated plan a description of the
pledge of grants, as required under
§ 570.705(b)(2), and the use of grant
funds to pay for any fees required under
§ 570.705(g). In such cases the proposed
and final application requirements of
paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iii), and (iv) of this
section will be deemed to have been
met.
(c) * * *
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 570.705, by revising the
heading of paragraph (c) and paragraph
(g) to read as follows:
§ 570.705
Loan requirements.
*
*
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
*
05FEP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(c) Use of grants for loan repayment,
issuance, underwriting, servicing, and
other costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Issuance, underwriting, servicing,
and other costs. (1) Each public entity
or its designated public agency and each
State issuing debt obligations under this
subpart must pay the issuance,
underwriting, servicing, trust
administration and other costs
associated with the private sector
financing of the debt obligations.
(2) Each public entity or its
designated public agency and each State
issuing debt obligations under this
subpart must pay any and all fees
charged by HUD pursuant to § 570.712.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Add § 570.712 to read as follows:
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 570.712 Collection of fees; procedure to
determine amount of the fee.
This section contains additional
procedures for guarantees of debt
obligations under section 108 when
HUD is required or authorized to collect
fees to pay the credit subsidy costs of
the loan guarantee program.
(a) Collection of fees. HUD may
collect fees from borrowers for the
purpose of paying the credit subsidy
cost of the loan guarantee. Each public
entity or its designated public agency
and each State issuing debt obligations
under this subpart is responsible for the
payment of any and all fees charged
pursuant to this section. Such fees are
payable from grants allocated to the
issuer pursuant to the Act or from other
sources, but are only payable from
guaranteed loan funds if the fee is
deducted from a disbursement of
guaranteed loan funds.
(b) Amount of fee. (1) HUD shall
calculate the level of the fee as a
percentage of the principal amount of
the guaranteed loan as provided by this
section based on a determination that
such fees when collected will reduce
the credit subsidy cost to the level
established by applicable appropriation
acts. The amount of the fee payable by
the public entity or State shall be
determined by applying separately the
percentages announced by Federal
Register notice to guaranteed loan
disbursements as they occur or
periodically to outstanding principal
balances, or both.
(2) HUD shall publish the proposed
fees required under paragraph (a) of this
section in the Federal Register and
provide a 30-day public comment
period for the purpose of inviting
comment on the proposed fee prior to
adoption of the fee if changes to the
assumptions underlying the fee
calculation or the fee structure itself
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
raise new considerations for Borrowers.
After consideration of public comments,
HUD will publish a second Federal
Register notice announcing the fee to be
applied, the effective date of the fee, and
any other necessary information
regarding payment of the fee.
Dated: December 17, 2014.
Clifford Taffet,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Community Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 2015–02262 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
This Summit will be broadcast via
webinar and recorded for later viewing.
For webinar participants, participation
in all Summit sessions, including the
group brainstorming sessions, will be
possible. See the Supplementary
Information section for the proposed
agenda. In order to best prepare for the
Quality Summit, the USPTO requests
that those interested in attending the
Quality Summit send an email to
WorldClassPatentQuality@uspto.gov
indicating their planned attendance by
March 18, 2015.
Written comments should
be sent by electronic mail message over
the Internet addressed to:
WorldClassPatentQuality@uspto.gov.
Comments may also be submitted by
postal mail addressed to: Mail Stop
Comments—Patents, Commissioner for
Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria,
Virginia 22313–1450, marked to the
attention of Michael Cygan, Senior Legal
Advisor, Office of Patent Legal
Administration, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for Patent Examination
Policy.
Although comments may be
submitted by postal mail, the USPTO
prefers to receive comments by
electronic mail message over the
Internet because sharing comments with
the public is more easily accomplished.
Electronic comments are preferred to be
submitted in plain text, but also may be
submitted in ADOBE® portable
document format or MICROSOFT
WORD® format. Comments not
submitted electronically should be
submitted on paper in a format that
facilitates convenient digital scanning
into ADOBE® portable document
format.
The comments will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Commissioner for Patents, currently
located in Madison East, Tenth Floor,
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
Comments also will be available for
viewing via the USPTO’s Internet Web
site (https://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_
events/Patent-Quality-Initiative.jsp).
Because comments will be made
available for public inspection,
information that the submitter does not
desire to make public, such as an
address or phone number, should not be
included in the comments. It would be
helpful to the USPTO if written
comments included information about:
(1) the name and affiliation of the
individual responding; and (2) an
indication of whether comments offered
represent views of the respondent’s
organization or are the respondent’s
personal views.
ADDRESSES:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
37 CFR Part 1
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2014–0043]
Request for Comments on Enhancing
Patent Quality
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments; notice of
meeting.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is seeking
public input and guidance to direct its
continued efforts towards enhancing
patent quality. These efforts focus on
improving patent operations and
procedures to provide the best possible
work products, to enhance the customer
experience, and to improve existing
quality metrics. In pursuit of these
goals, the USPTO is launching a
comprehensive and enhanced quality
initiative. This initiative begins with a
request for public comments on the set
of proposals outlined in this document
and will continue with a two-day
‘‘Quality Summit’’ with the public to
discuss the outlined proposals. The
conversation with the public held at this
Quality Summit, complemented by
written comments to these proposals, is
the first of many steps toward
developing a new paradigm of patent
quality at the USPTO. Through an active
and long-term partnership with the
public, the USPTO seeks to ensure the
issuance of the best quality patents and
provide the best customer service
possible.
DATES: Comment Deadline Date: To be
ensured of consideration, written
comments must be received on or before
May 6, 2015.
The USPTO will hold a Quality
Summit on March 25 and 26, 2015 at
the Madison Building, USPTO
Headquarters, in Alexandria, Virginia.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6475
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6470-6475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02262]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 570
[Docket No. FR-5767-P-01]
RIN 2506-AC35
Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program: Payment of Fees To Cover
Credit Subsidy Costs
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would amend HUD's Section 108 Loan
Guarantee Program (Section 108 Program) regulations to permit HUD, in
accordance with statutory authority, to collect fees from Section 108
borrowers to offset the costs of Section 108 loan guarantees. HUD is
proposing this rule to ensure that it can begin to make Section 108
loan guarantee commitments without appropriated subsidy. The Department
of Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act, 2014, authorizes
HUD to collect fees from borrowers for this program. In anticipation of
further appropriations acts authorizing the collection of fees for
Section 108 loan guarantees, HUD proposes to add a new section to its
current regulations to reflect that when appropriations for credit
subsidy costs as authorized by Congress are either not available or
insufficient and HUD has statutory authority to collect fees, HUD will
impose a fee on Section 108 Program borrowers and explain the basis for
the fee imposed. The proposed new regulatory section would provide for
HUD to set the fee by notice.
Elsewhere in today's Federal Register, HUD is publishing the notice
that would propose the fee to be established for the fiscal year 2015,
subject to statutory authorization.
DATES: Comment Due Date: March 9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule to the Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Communications must refer
to the above docket number and title. There are two methods for
submitting public comments. All submissions must refer to the above
docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410-0500.
2. Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
[[Page 6471]]
viewed by other commenters and interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must
be submitted through one of the two methods specified above. Again,
all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of the
rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at
the above address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, an appointment to review the public comments must be
scheduled in advance by calling the Regulations Division at 202-708-
3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or
hearing impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the
Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339. Copies of all comments submitted
are available for inspection and downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Webster, Director, Financial
Management Division, Office of Block Grant Assistance, Office of
Community Planning and Development, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 7180, Washington, DC 20410;
telephone number 202-708-1871 (this is not a toll-free number).
Individuals with speech or hearing impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 800-877-
8339. FAX inquiries (but not comments) may be sent to Mr. Webster at
202-708-1798 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Section 108 Program is the loan guarantee component of the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and is authorized by
section 108 (42 U.S.C. 5308) of the Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974, as amended (HCD Act). HUD's regulations implementing the
Section 108 Program are codified at 24 CFR part 570, subpart M
(entitled ``Loan Guarantees''). The Section 108 Program provides States
and local governments with access to long-term (up to 20 year) fixed-
rate loans at relatively low interest rates to finance certain
categories of eligible CDBG activities. Under section 108(a) of the HCD
Act and authorizing language in HUD's annual appropriations, HUD enters
into commitments to guarantee, and subsequently guarantees, promissory
notes issued by units of general local government (or their designated
public agencies) or States. Under section 108(r) of the HCD Act, HUD,
acting on behalf of these borrowers, periodically arranges for the
issuance of a series of trust certificates based on a large pool of
such notes and engages underwriters (investment banking firms) to
market and sell interests in the trust certificates to private
investors in a public offering.
HUD guarantees the timely payment of the principal of and interest
on the trust certificates and, under the provisions of the section 108
statute, the full faith and credit of the United States is pledged to
honor the guarantee. Because of the federal guarantee, interest payable
on the trust certificates and the underlying notes can be set at
relatively low, fixed-rates and investors are willing to purchase
interests in the certificates because of the security provided by such
guarantee. Proceeds of the sale, less certain underwriting and trust
administration fees and costs, are advanced to the borrowers, who pay
interest on a given year's principal installment at the fixed interest
rate borne by the trust certificate of corresponding maturity.
To accommodate borrowers that require financing for projects in the
months between the periodic public offering of fixed-rate trust
certificates, interim financing is made available pursuant to an
agreement between HUD and an interim lender. HUD guarantees promissory
notes that initially are issued to the interim lender and bear interest
at rates that adjust monthly. Such notes are typically pooled with
other issuers' notes in the next public offering of fixed-rate trust
certificates, at which time, under the terms of the notes, the interest
rates convert to the fixed rates borne by the trust certificates.
Contemporaneously with HUD's guarantee, borrowers enter into
contracts with HUD in which they agree to use funds for eligible
activities, to make the payments required under their notes and to
reimburse HUD from sources pledged as security in the contract for any
payments made on their behalf. Section 108 notes are secured by pledges
of annual CDBG allocations, which are the local government's own
allocations in the case of CDBG entitlement communities and the State's
allocations in the case of local governments in non-entitlement areas
or States that borrow on behalf of these areas. HUD is also authorized
to require borrowers to furnish other security, such as interests in
real property and pledges of local revenues, in addition to pledged
CDBG funds.
Historically, Congress has annually appropriated funds to cover the
credit subsidy costs of the Section 108 Program. These appropriations,
consistent with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et
seq.), reflect the net present value of future costs to the Federal
Government of operating the Section 108 Program. These costs, referred
to here as credit subsidy costs, are the estimated long-term cost to
the federal government of the loan guarantee, excluding administrative
costs and any incidental effects on governmental receipts or outlays.
More specifically, the cost is the net present value of expected cash
outflows by HUD (e.g., due to default) and the expected cash inflows to
HUD (e.g., from recovery on collateral), discounted to the point of
disbursement of the guaranteed loan. In recent years, the budgeted
Section 108 credit subsidy rates (i.e., credit subsidy cost expressed
as a percentage of loan disbursements) have ranged from 2.48% in FY
2012 to 2.56% in FY 2014.
The President's FY 2014 Budget Request \1\ did not request an
appropriation for the credit subsidy costs of new Section 108
guaranteed loans but instead called for statutory authorization to
allow HUD to collect fees to offset such costs, making the Section 108
Program a zero credit subsidy program. To assist with the conversion to
a fee-based financing mechanism, HUD's FY 2014 Congressional
Justification for the Section 108 Program proposed to allow Section 108
borrowers to include the fee in the guaranteed loan amount.\2\
Borrowers would also have the option to utilize existing statutory
authority that permits the fee to be paid with CDBG funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The President's Budget for FY 2014 can be found at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionGPO.action?collectionCode=BUDGET.
\2\ https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=COMDEVLOANGUAR.pdf at page R-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both the Senate Report (S. Rep. No. 113-45) accompanying the
Senate's FY 2014 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development and
Related Agencies Appropriation bill and the House Report (H.R. Rep. No.
113-136) accompanying the House's FY 2014 Transportation, Housing and
Urban Development and Related Agencies Appropriation bill accepted
HUD's request to convert the Section 108 Program into a fee-based
program. The Senate bill adopted the President's proposal to eliminate
the credit subsidy
[[Page 6472]]
entirely in FY 2014. Accordingly, the Senate Report states that the
Senate Committee on Appropriations expects HUD to implement a fee based
program upon enactment of the fee authority to ensure that there is no
delay for grantees that wish to utilize the program under a new fee-
based structure.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act,
2014 \3\ (2014 HUD Appropriations Act) authorized HUD to collect such
fees. The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act included a credit subsidy
appropriation designed to enable HUD to continue making loan guarantee
commitments during the rulemaking process and prevent a gap in the
availability of the program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Title II of Division L of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2014 (Pub. L. 113-76, 128 Stat. 5, approved
January 17, 2014; see 128 Stat. 604) (2014 HUD Appropriations Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed rule is consistent with the expectations expressed in
the joint explanatory statement (160 Cong. Rec. H1193-94 (daily ed.,
January 15, 2014) (joint explanatory statement submitted by Congressman
Rogers)), which explains that ``HUD is not expected to be ready to
implement a new fee-based section 108 loan program upon enactment of
this Act. Instead, prior to the collection of fees, HUD is directed to
establish regulations articulating how a fee-based, zero-subsidy
program shall be implemented.''
Further, the 2014 HUD Appropriations Act authorizes HUD to impose a
fee to eliminate the need for credit subsidy appropriations. Such
authority is necessary because, in 1988, Congress amended the statute
authorizing the Section 108 Program, section 108 of the HCD Act (42
U.S.C. 5308), to add subsection (m), which limits HUD's ability to
impose a fee or charge with respect to a Section 108 guaranteed loan.
The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act provides HUD the discretion to collect
a fee from Section 108 borrowers ``notwithstanding subsection (m) of
such section 108.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 2014 HUD Appropriations Act at 128 Stat. 614.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. This Proposed Rule
A. New Sec. 570.712 (Collection of Fees; Procedure To Determine Amount
of Fee).
This rule proposes to amend the Section 108 regulations at 24 CFR
part 570, subpart M, to establish a new section, Sec. 570.712,
entitled ``Collection of fees; procedure to determine amount of the
fee,'' that would provide for the collection of fees for the Section
108 Loan Guarantee Program. New Sec. 570.712 would provide that where
HUD has been authorized to collect a fee for the Section 108 Program
and Congress has not appropriated a subsidy for the Section 108 Program
or the appropriated subsidy is insufficient to offset the costs of the
Section 108 loan guarantees, HUD will collect a fee for the program.
When such conditions occur, HUD will announce its intent to impose a
fee through notice published in the Federal Register and explain the
basis for the fee imposed.
HUD will provide for announcement of the fee through notice in the
Federal Register rather than codifying the fee in Sec. 570.712, as the
fee may change from year to year. The imposition of the fee is
dependent upon the authority provided for in annual appropriations
acts. HUD will solicit comment on the initial proposed fee through this
initial proposed rule and Notice, and may solicit comment on future
Notices that impose the fee if changes to the assumptions underlying
the fee calculation or the fee structure itself raise new
considerations for borrowers.
The fee to be imposed will not be expressed as a dollar amount but
rather as percentages of the principal amount of the guaranteed loan.
The fee will be based on a determination that such fees, when
collected, will reduce the credit subsidy cost to a level that
eliminates the need for appropriated subsidy budget authority. The
required fees may include both an up-front and a periodic component,
depending on market conditions and the credit risk to the Section 108
program. New Sec. 570.712 would provide that each public entity or its
designated public agency and each State issuing debt obligations would
be responsible for the payment of all fees charged under this section.
B. Related Amendments to Existing Regulations
In addition to establishing new Sec. 570.712, this proposed rule
would make related amendments to other sections of part 570, subpart M.
1. Definition of ``Credit Subsidy Cost''
The proposed rule would amend Sec. 570.701 (Definitions) to add a
definition of ``credit subsidy cost.'' Specifically, ``credit subsidy
cost'' would be defined as the estimated long-term cost to the Federal
Government of a Section 108 loan guarantee or a modification thereof,
calculated on a net present value basis, excluding administrative costs
and any incidental effects on governmental receipts or outlays. This
definition is the definition of ``cost'' in the Federal Credit Reform
Act of 1990 \5\ (2 U.S.C. 661-661f at Sec. 661a), modified to exclude
direct loans, which are not authorized under the Section 108 program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act references section 502 of
the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. Section 502 was added to the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by the Federal Credit Reform Act of
1990, Public Law 101-508, title XIII, subtitle B, Sec. 13201(a),
104 Stat. 1388-610.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Requirements for Payment of Fees and Payment Options
Paragraph (g) of Sec. 570.705 (Loan requirements) would be amended
to add, as a loan requirement, that each public entity or its
designated public agency and each State issuing debt obligations must
pay any and all fees charged by HUD for the purpose of paying the
credit subsidy costs of the loan guarantee. In addition to including
this requirement, the rule proposes to remove redundant language in
Sec. 570.705(g) addressing a borrower's ability to pay issuance,
underwriting, servicing, and other costs with guaranteed loan funds.
This language duplicates authority granted in Sec. 570.703.
As permitted by Sec. 570.705(c)(1)(i), borrowers will be able to
pay the fee using CDBG funds. To further facilitate the payment of
these charges, HUD also proposes to permit the payment of these fees
from guaranteed loan proceeds. As such, Sec. 570.703 (Eligible
activities) would be amended to provide that guaranteed loan funds may
be used for the payment of fees charged by HUD, when such fees are paid
from the disbursement of guaranteed loan funds. Additionally, to notify
the public of plans to use grant funds or loan proceeds to pay the fee,
HUD proposes changes to Sec. 570.704 (Application requirements) to
require applicants to include the estimated amount of the fee to be
paid in the application for loan guarantee assistance. Use of grant
funds for fees or payments of principal and interest must also be
included in each applicant's consolidated plan.
Specific solicitation of comment: HUD acknowledges that financing
the fees could also result in net higher costs to borrowers because the
fee needed to achieve zero subsidy would have to account for risk of
default and the borrower would have to pay interest on the financed
fee. HUD specifically seeks comment on whether to require borrowers to
pay fee amounts from other sources or allow borrowers to add upfront
fees to the face value of the guaranteed loan by paying fees from
guaranteed loan funds at the time of loan disbursement.
[[Page 6473]]
3. Exemption From Statutory Primary Objective
HUD proposes to amend paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of Sec. 570.200 of
HUD's CDBG regulations to clarify that when the fee is paid from the
proceeds of a guaranteed loan, grant funds used to repay that loan are
not subject to the requirement that not less than 70 percent of a
grantee's aggregate CDBG expenditures over a specified one-, two-, or
three-year period shall be for activities benefitting low- and
moderate-income persons.\6\ This exclusion from the overall benefit
calculation would be added to make clear that payment of fees is
covered by the existing exclusion of grant funds used for repayment of
Section 108 guaranteed loans at Sec. 570.200(a)(3)(iii). Expenditures
of guaranteed loan funds for payment of the fee are treated as part of
the cost of carrying out the activity financed with the guaranteed
loan. Section 108 activities that benefit low- and moderate-income
persons are already included in the calculation, and such activities
should only be considered once when calculating overall benefit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended (Pub. L. 93-383, Sec. 101(c) (1974); 42 U.S.C. 5301).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Proposed 2015 Fee: 2.42% of the Principal Obligation of the Loan
As noted in the Summary to this proposed rule, elsewhere in today's
Federal Register, HUD proposes the initial fee to be imposed for the
Section 108 Program.
In determining the appropriate level of fee, HUD will consider the
amount required to fully offset the cost to the Federal Government
associated with making a loan guarantee. Credit subsidy cost
calculations incorporate assumptions based on: (i) data on default
frequency for municipal debt where such debt is comparable to loans in
the Section 108 portfolio; (ii) data on recovery rates on collateral
security for comparable municipal debt; (iii) the expected composition
of the Section 108 cohort by end users of the guaranteed loan funds
(e.g., third party borrowers and public entities); and (iv) other
relevant information (e.g., statutory changes) that would affect the
applicability of the default and recovery data on comparable municipal
debt.
Paragraph (b) of Sec. 570.712 would provide that HUD will publish
a notice in the Federal Register with the fee structure and levels,
taking into consideration total available commitment authority and what
level of fees may be needed to operate the program for the covered
period. Such notice will set forth the fee financing structure to be
applied, the effective date, and any other necessary information
regarding payment of the fee. HUD anticipates issuing such notices
prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, with an effective date of
the beginning of the fiscal year, and may provide updated notices as
necessary. Additionally, HUD will periodically publish the estimated
subsidy cost and fee as part of the President's Budget.
IV. Justification for Abbreviated Public Comment Period
It is the general practice of HUD to provide a 60-day public
comment period on all proposed rules. However, HUD is shortening its
usual 60-day public comment period to 30 days for this proposed rule.
As stated in this preamble, HUD anticipates that in the coming fiscal
years appropriated funds will no longer be available for the credit
subsidy costs of the Section 108 program or available in amounts
sufficient to maintain the program. Imposition of a fee, as statutorily
authorized, will maintain the continued availability of Section 108
guaranteed loan financing. Through HUD's Congressional Justifications
for FY 2014 and 2015, HUD has provided public notice of its proposal to
make the Section 108 program a fee-based program.
Section 108 is a valuable financing source for community and
economic development projects. As stated in HUD's Congressional
Justifications for FY 2015 and FY 2014, States and local governments
face daunting challenges in addressing their community and economic
development needs, and the Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program enables
CDBG grantees to borrow up to 5 times their current CDBG allocation to
finance economic development, public facilities and housing activities
consistent with CDBG program requirements.
For these reasons and those already presented in this preamble, it
is important to implement a Section 108 fee-based program as soon as
possible to ensure the continued availability of the Section 108
program, and therefore HUD has determined that a 30-day public comment
period is appropriate.
V. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review--Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), a
determination must be made whether a regulatory action is significant,
and therefore, subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the order. This rule was
determined to constitute a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined
in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. The fee proposed to be
imposed under this rule would only be at such level to cover the costs
of administration of the program that would have otherwise been covered
by appropriations.
Consistent with Executive Order 12866, HUD prepared a regulatory
impact analysis (RIA) for the rule. Based on recent annual program
activity, HUD determined that the amount to cover the costs of the
program is generally not more than $5 million in a fiscal year.
Transfers resulting from the proposed fee to be imposed are likely to
range from $4 million to $6 million. The clear economic benefit of the
imposition of the proposed fee would be to continue to provide for the
guarantee of loans that are underprovided by the private sector. HUD's
RIA, which describes in detail the costs and benefits and impact of the
proposed rule is available at www.regulations.gov under the docket
number for this rule.
The docket file is available for public inspection between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in the Regulations Division, Office
of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Due to security
measures at the HUD Headquarters building, please schedule an
appointment to review the docket file by calling the Regulations
Division at 202-708-3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may access the above telephone number via
TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 800-
877-8339.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule proposes to implement the statutorily authorized power
for HUD to collect fees from borrowers to cover the credit subsidy
costs of operating the program. As discussed in this preamble, HUD
proposes to assist Section 108 borrowers' transition to a fee-based
financing mechanism by allowing borrowers to include the fee in the
guaranteed loan amount. This rule also proposes to permit borrowers to
pay the
[[Page 6474]]
fee with pledged CDBG funds. The amount of the fee would be determined
by the amount required to fully offset the credit subsidy cost of the
program.
The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act authorized HUD to charge a fee for
the Section 108 Program. Charging a fee will become a practical
necessity at such time when current appropriations for the program's
credit subsidy costs are exhausted.
This proposed rule reflects statutorily authorized actions which
HUD determined that it must take to ensure uninterrupted operation of
the Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program. By allowing borrowers to
include the fee in the guaranteed loan amount or pay the fee with
pledged CDBG funds, HUD has strived to minimize the impact that
imposing a fee may otherwise have on the program. Accordingly, it is
HUD's determination that this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Notwithstanding HUD's determination that this rule will not have a
significant effect on a substantial number of small entities, HUD
specifically invites comments regarding any less burdensome
alternatives to this rule that will meet HUD's objectives as described
in this preamble.
Environmental Review
In accordance with 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6), this proposed rule involves
establishment of a rate or cost determinations and related external
administrative requirements and procedures which do not constitute a
development decision that affects the physical condition of specific
project areas or building sites. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6),
this proposed rule is categorically excluded from environmental review
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either: Imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by statute; or the rule preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This proposed rule does not have
federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local governments nor preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and
tribal governments, and on the private sector. This proposed rule does
not impose any federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector, within the meaning of UMRA.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) program number
for the Section 108 Loan Guarantee program is 14.248.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 570
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Community
Development Block Grants, Grant programs--education, Grant programs--
housing and community development, Guam, Indians, Loan programs--
housing and community development, Low and moderate income housing,
Northern Mariana Islands, Pacific Islands Trust Territory, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Student aid, Virgin Islands.
Accordingly, for the reasons described in the preamble, HUD
proposes to amend 24 CFR part 570 as follows:
PART 570--COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS
0
1. The authority citation for 24 part 570 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d) and 5301-5320.
0
2. In Sec. 570.200, revise paragraph (a)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 570.200 General Policies.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Funds expended for the repayment of loans guaranteed under
the provisions of subpart M (including repayment of the portion of a
loan used to pay any issuance, servicing, underwriting, or other costs
as may be incurred under Sec. 570.705(g)) shall also be excluded;
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 570.701, add in alphabetical order the definition of
``Credit Subsidy Cost'' to read as follows:
Sec. 570.701 Definitions.
* * * * *
Credit subsidy cost means the estimated long-term cost to the
Government of a Section 108 loan guarantee or a modification thereof,
calculated on a net present value basis, excluding administrative costs
and any incidental effects on governmental receipts or outlays.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 570.703, add paragraph (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 570.703 Eligible activities.
* * * * *
(n) Payment of fees charged by HUD pursuant to Sec. 570.712.
0
5. Amend Sec. 570.704, by revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i)(D) and
(a)(1)(v) and removing and reserving paragraph (c)(2).
Sec. 570.704 Application requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) A description of any CDBG funds, including guaranteed loan
funds and grant funds, that will be used to pay fees required under
Sec. 570.705(g). The description must include an estimate of the
amount of CBDG funds that will be used for this purpose. If the
applicant will use grant funds to pay required fees, it must include
this planned use of grant funds in its consolidated plan.
* * * * *
(v) If an application for loan guarantee assistance is to be
submitted by an entitlement or nonentitlement public entity
simultaneously with the public entity's submission for its grant, the
public entity shall include and identify in its proposed and final
consolidated plan the activities to be undertaken with the guaranteed
loan funds, the national objective to be met by each of these
activities, the amount of any program income expected to be received
during the program year, and the amount of guaranteed loan funds to be
used. The public entity shall also include in the consolidated plan a
description of the pledge of grants, as required under Sec.
570.705(b)(2), and the use of grant funds to pay for any fees required
under Sec. 570.705(g). In such cases the proposed and final
application requirements of paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iii), and (iv) of
this section will be deemed to have been met.
(c) * * *
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 570.705, by revising the heading of paragraph (c) and
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 570.705 Loan requirements.
* * * * *
[[Page 6475]]
(c) Use of grants for loan repayment, issuance, underwriting,
servicing, and other costs.
* * * * *
(g) Issuance, underwriting, servicing, and other costs. (1) Each
public entity or its designated public agency and each State issuing
debt obligations under this subpart must pay the issuance,
underwriting, servicing, trust administration and other costs
associated with the private sector financing of the debt obligations.
(2) Each public entity or its designated public agency and each
State issuing debt obligations under this subpart must pay any and all
fees charged by HUD pursuant to Sec. 570.712.
* * * * *
0
7. Add Sec. 570.712 to read as follows:
Sec. 570.712 Collection of fees; procedure to determine amount of the
fee.
This section contains additional procedures for guarantees of debt
obligations under section 108 when HUD is required or authorized to
collect fees to pay the credit subsidy costs of the loan guarantee
program.
(a) Collection of fees. HUD may collect fees from borrowers for the
purpose of paying the credit subsidy cost of the loan guarantee. Each
public entity or its designated public agency and each State issuing
debt obligations under this subpart is responsible for the payment of
any and all fees charged pursuant to this section. Such fees are
payable from grants allocated to the issuer pursuant to the Act or from
other sources, but are only payable from guaranteed loan funds if the
fee is deducted from a disbursement of guaranteed loan funds.
(b) Amount of fee. (1) HUD shall calculate the level of the fee as
a percentage of the principal amount of the guaranteed loan as provided
by this section based on a determination that such fees when collected
will reduce the credit subsidy cost to the level established by
applicable appropriation acts. The amount of the fee payable by the
public entity or State shall be determined by applying separately the
percentages announced by Federal Register notice to guaranteed loan
disbursements as they occur or periodically to outstanding principal
balances, or both.
(2) HUD shall publish the proposed fees required under paragraph
(a) of this section in the Federal Register and provide a 30-day public
comment period for the purpose of inviting comment on the proposed fee
prior to adoption of the fee if changes to the assumptions underlying
the fee calculation or the fee structure itself raise new
considerations for Borrowers. After consideration of public comments,
HUD will publish a second Federal Register notice announcing the fee to
be applied, the effective date of the fee, and any other necessary
information regarding payment of the fee.
Dated: December 17, 2014.
Clifford Taffet,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development.
[FR Doc. 2015-02262 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P