Signature Brands, LLC; Filing of Color Additive Petition, 6468-6469 [2015-02239]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
6468
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
5846, 5851); National Environmental Policy
Act sec. 102 (42 U.S.C. 4332); Nuclear Waste
Policy Act secs. 131, 132, 133, 135, 137, 141,
148 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153, 10155,
10157, 10161, 10168); Government
Paperwork Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44
U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy Policy Act of 2005,
Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat. 788 (2005).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under Nuclear
Waste Policy Act secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d)
(42 U.S.C. 10162(b), 10168(c), (d)).
Section 72.46 also issued under Atomic
Energy Act sec. 189 (42 U.S.C. 2239); Nuclear
Waste Policy Act sec. 134 (42 U.S.C. 10154).
Section 72.96(d) also issued under Nuclear
Waste Policy Act sec. 145(g) (42 U.S.C.
10165(g)).
Subpart J also issued under Nuclear Waste
Policy Act secs. 117(a), 141(h) (42 U.S.C.
10137(a), 10161(h)).
Subpart K also issued under Nuclear Waste
Policy Act sec. 218(a) (42 U.S.C. 10198).
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark A. Satorius,
Executive Director for Operations.
2. In § 72.214, Certificate of
Compliance No. 1014 is revised to read
as follows:
In proposed rule document 2014–
27286, appearing on pages 77102
through 77335 in the issue of Tuesday,
December 23, 2014, make the following
corrections:
1. On pages 77103 to 77104, in
footnote 1, ‘‘https://.frbservices.org/
files/communications/pdf/general/
2013_fed_res_paymt_study_detailed_
rpt.pdf’’ should read ‘‘https://
www.frbservices.org/files/
communications/pdf/general/2013_fed_
res_paymt_study_detailed_rpt.pdf’’.
2. On page 77105, in footnote 19,
‘‘https://www.fdic.gov/
householdsurvey/report.pdf’’ should
read ‘‘https://www.fdic.gov/
householdsurvey/2013report.pdf’’.
3. On page 77107, in footnote 36,
‘‘https://.com/blackhawkcomments-onparent-company-safeways-spinoffannouncement/’’ should read ‘‘https://
blackhawknetwork.com/blackhawkcomments-on-parent-companysafeways-spin-off-announcement/’’.
4. On page 77109, in footnote 43,
‘‘https://.consumerfinance.gov/f/201309_
cfpb_payroll-cardbulletin.pdf’’ should
read ‘‘https://www.consumerfinance.gov/
f/201309_cfpb_payroll-cardbulletin.pdf’’.
5. On page 77120, in the third
column, in the third paragraph, on the
fifth and sixth line, ‘‘et se’’ should read
‘‘et seq.’’.
6. On page 77131, in footnote 206,
‘‘https://www.consumer.ftc.gov//0182gift-cards’’ should read ‘‘https://
www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0182gift-cards’’.
7. On page 77141, in footnote 222,
‘‘https://www.federalreserve.gov/
publications/es/2014_Prepaid_Cards_
Final.pdf’’ should read ‘‘https://
www.federalreserve.gov/publications/
files/2014_Prepaid_Cards_Final.pdf’’.
8. On page 77154, in footnote 258,
‘‘https://www.nielsen.com/content//
■
§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel
storage casks.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
Certificate Number: 1014.
Initial Certificate Effective Date: May
31, 2000.
Amendment Number 1 Effective Date:
July 15, 2002.
Amendment Number 2 Effective Date:
June 7, 2005.
Amendment Number 3 Effective Date:
May 29, 2007.
Amendment Number 4 Effective Date:
January 8, 2008.
Amendment Number 5 Effective Date:
July 14, 2008.
Amendment Number 6 Effective Date:
August 17, 2009.
Amendment Number 7 Effective Date:
December 28, 2009.
Amendment Number 8 Effective Date:
May 2, 2012, as corrected on November
16, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML12213A170), superseded by
Amendment 8, Revision 1 on April 21,
2015.
Amendment Number 8, Revision No.
1, Effective Date: April 21, 2015.
Amendment Number 9 Effective Date:
March 11, 2014.
SAR Submitted by: Holtec
International.
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis
Report for the HI–STORM 100 Cask
System.
Docket Number: 72–1014.
Certificate Expiration Date: May 31,
2020.
Model Number: HI–STORM 100.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26 day
of January.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
[FR Doc. 2015–02309 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
12 CFR Parts 1005 and 1026
[Docket No. CFPB–2014–0031]
RIN 3170–AA22
Prepaid Accounts under the Electronic
Fund Transfer Act (Regulation E) and
the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z)
Correction
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
corporate/us/en/reportsdownloads/
2014%20Reports/the-digitalconsumerreport-feb-2014.pdf’’ should
read ‘‘https://www.nielsen.com/content/
dam/corporate/us/en/reportsdownloads/2014%20Reports/thedigital-consumer-report-feb-2014.pdf’’.
9. On the same page, in the same
footnote, ‘‘https://
www.Federalreserve.gov//mobile-devicereport-201203.pdf’’ should read ‘‘https://
www.Federalreserve.gov/econresdata/
mobile-device-report-201203.pdf’’.
10. On the same page, in footnote 259,
in the fifth line, ‘‘100 a.m.’’ should read
‘‘100 Am.’’.
11. On page 77179, in footnote 296,
‘‘https://
cfsinnovation.s3.amazonaws.com/_
Prepaid_Industry_Scorecard_2014.pdf’’
should read ‘‘https://
cfsinnovation.s3.amazonaws.com/CFSI_
Prepaid_Industry_Scorecard_2014.pdf’’.
12. On page 77227, in footnote 365,
on the ninth line, ‘‘1026.4(c)(4)).’’
should read ‘‘1026.4(C)(4).)’’.
13. On page 77262, in footnote 430,
‘‘https://.pewtrusts.org/en/research-andanalysis/reports/2014/02/06/consumerscontinue-to-load-up-on-prepaid-cards’’
should read ‘‘https://www.pewtrusts.org/
en/research-and-analysis/reports/2014/
02/06/consumers-continue-to-load-upon-prepaid-cards’’.
PART 1005 [Corrected]
Supplement I to Part 1005 [Corrected]
14. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on
page 77315, in the first column, in the
first paragraph, on the eleventh line,
‘‘2(a)(15))–2)’’ should read ‘‘2(a)(15)–
2)’’.
15. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on
the same page, in the same column, in
the second paragraph, on the forty-first
line, ‘‘2(a)(15))–2.i.F’’ should read
‘‘2(a)(15)–2.i.F’’.
16. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on
the same page, in the third column, in
the second paragraph, on the first line,
‘‘12(a))–’’ should read ‘‘12(a)–’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2014–27286 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FDA–2015–C–0245]
Signature Brands, LLC; Filing of Color
Additive Petition
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
ACTION:
Notice of petition.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
announcing that we have filed a
petition, submitted by Signature Brands,
LLC, proposing that the color additive
regulations be amended to provide for
the safe use of mica-based pearlescent
pigments in egg decorating kits for
coloring shell eggs.
DATES: The color additive petition was
filed on December 22, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Anderson, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740–
3835, 240–402–1309.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice that we
have filed a color additive petition (CAP
5C0301), submitted by Signature
Brands, LLC, c/o Keller and Heckman,
LLP, 1001 G Street NW., Suite 500 West,
Washington, DC 20001. The petition
proposes to amend the color additive
regulations in § 73.350 Mica-based
pearlescent pigments (21 CFR 73.350),
to provide for the safe use of mica-based
pearlescent pigments in egg decorating
kits for coloring shell eggs.
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.32(r) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
SUMMARY:
Dated: January 30, 2015.
Dennis M. Keefe,
Director, Office of Food Additive Safety,
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2015–02239 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 570
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of the notice.
[Docket No. FR–5767–N–02]
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 2506–AC35
Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program:
Announcement of Proposed Fee To
Cover Credit Subsidy Costs and
Solicitation of Comment
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Feb 04, 2015
This notice announces and
solicits public comment on the fee that
HUD proposes to collect from borrowers
of loans guaranteed under the HUD’s
Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program
(Section 108 Program) for the purpose of
covering the credit subsidy costs of
operating the program. Elsewhere in
today’s Federal Register, HUD is
publishing a proposed rule that would
amend its regulations for the Section
108 Program to permit HUD to collect a
fee for the Section 108 Program.
DATES: Comment Due Date: March 9,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule to the Regulations
Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Communications must refer to the above
docket number and title. There are two
methods for submitting public
comments. All submissions must refer
to the above docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
2. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments electronically through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make them immediately available to the
public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
SUMMARY:
Jkt 235001
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at the
above address. Due to security measures
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6469
at the HUD Headquarters building, an
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled in
advance by calling the Regulations
Division at 202–708–3055 (this is not a
toll-free number). Individuals with
speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339. Copies of all comments submitted
are available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Webster, Director, Financial
Management Division, Office of Block
Grant Assistance, Office of Community
Planning and Development, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 7th Street SW., Room 7180,
Washington, DC 20410; telephone
number 202–708–1871 (this is not a tollfree number). Individuals with speech
or hearing impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339. FAX inquiries (but not comments)
may be sent to Mr. Webster at 202–708–
1798 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
HUD’s proposed rule, published
elsewhere in today’s Federal Register,
describes the current Congressional
funding status of the Section 108
Program. HUD’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2014
Appropriations Act 1 authorized HUD in
FY 2014 to impose a fee to eliminate the
need for credit subsidy appropriations.
As discussed in more detail in the
preamble to the proposed rule,
imposition of a fee, as statutorily
authorized, will permit the Section 108
guaranteed loan financing to remain
available.
II. Proposed 2015 Fee: 2.42 Percent of
the Principal Obligation of the Loan
As described in the proposed rule,
when determining the appropriate level
of fee to charge, HUD took into
consideration the amount required to
fully offset the credit subsidy cost to the
Federal Government associated with
making a loan guarantee. Credit subsidy
cost calculations incorporate
assumptions based on: (i) Data on
default frequency for municipal debt
where such debt is comparable to loans
in the Section 108 loan portfolio; (ii)
data on recovery rates on collateral
security for comparable municipal debt;
(iii) the expected composition of the
Section 108 portfolio by end users of the
guaranteed loan funds (e.g., third party
1 The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act is Title II of
Division L of Public Law 113–73, approved January
17, 2014.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6468-6469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02239]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FDA-2015-C-0245]
Signature Brands, LLC; Filing of Color Additive Petition
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
[[Page 6469]]
ACTION: Notice of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing
that we have filed a petition, submitted by Signature Brands, LLC,
proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to provide for
the safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments in egg decorating kits
for coloring shell eggs.
DATES: The color additive petition was filed on December 22, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Anderson, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-1309.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice
that we have filed a color additive petition (CAP 5C0301), submitted by
Signature Brands, LLC, c/o Keller and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G Street NW.,
Suite 500 West, Washington, DC 20001. The petition proposes to amend
the color additive regulations in Sec. 73.350 Mica-based pearlescent
pigments (21 CFR 73.350), to provide for the safe use of mica-based
pearlescent pigments in egg decorating kits for coloring shell eggs.
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.32(r) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
Dated: January 30, 2015.
Dennis M. Keefe,
Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2015-02239 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
