Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 4- Draft, 6076-6084 [2015-02210]
Download as PDF
6076
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
Dated: January 27, 2015.
Joel Beauvais,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–02200 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2012–0217; FRL–9922–38–
OW]
RIN 2040–A537
Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate
List 4— Draft
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
EPA is publishing for public
review and comment a draft list of
contaminants that are currently not
subject to any proposed or promulgated
national primary drinking water
regulations. These contaminants are
known or anticipated to occur in public
water systems and may require
regulation under the Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA). This draft list is the
fourth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL
4) published by the agency since the
SDWA amendments of 1996. This Draft
CCL 4 includes 100 chemicals or
chemical groups and 12 microbial
contaminants. The EPA seeks comment
on the Draft CCL 4 and on
improvements to the selection process
for future CCLs for the agency to
consider.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2012–0217, by one of the following
methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Water Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail code: 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: Water Docket, EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20004. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2012–
0217. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I.B
of the GENERAL INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Water Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20004. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the EPA Docket Center is
(202) 566–2426.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on chemical contaminants
contact Meredith Russell, Office of
Ground Water and Drinking Water,
Standards and Risk Management
Division, at (202) 564–0814 or email
russell.meredith@epa.gov. For
information on microbial contaminants
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contact Hannah Holsinger, Office of
Ground Water and Drinking Water,
Standards and Risk Management
Division, at (202) 564–0403 or email
holsinger.hannah@epa.gov. For general
information contact the EPA Safe
Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426–
4791 or email: hotline-sdwa@epa.gov.
Abbreviations and Acronyms
ATSDR—Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry
CA—California
CASRN—Chemical Abstract Services
Registry Number
CDC—Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
CCL—Contaminant Candidate List
CCL 1—EPA’s First Contaminant Candidate
List
CCL 2—EPA’s Second Contaminant
Candidate List
CCL 3—EPA’s Third Contaminant Candidate
List
CCL 4—EPA’s Fourth Contaminant
Candidate List
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations
EPA—United States Environmental
Protection Agency
ESA—Ethanesulfonic acid
FL—Florida
FR—Federal Register
HPC—Heterotrophic Plate Count
IL—Illinois
MCL—Maximum Contaminant Level
MCLG—Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
MMWR—Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
Report
NC—North Carolina
NCOD—National Contaminant Occurrence
Database
NDWAC—National Drinking Water Advisory
Council
NRC—National Academy of Science’s
National Research Council
NPDWR—National Primary Drinking Water
Regulation
OH—Ohio
PCCL 3—Preliminary Contaminant Candidate
List 3
PCCL 4—Preliminary Contaminant Candidate
List 4
PFOA—Perfluorooctanoic Acid
PFOS—Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid
PWS—Public Water System
SAB—Science Advisory Board
SDWA—Safe Drinking Water Act
SD—South Dakota
STORET—EPA’s Storage and Retrieval
database of water quality monitoring data
collected by water resource management
groups across the U.S.
TX—Texas
UCM—Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
UCMR 1—First Unregulated Contaminant
Monitoring Rule
UCMR 2—Second Unregulated Contaminant
Monitoring Rule
USDA—United States Department of
Agriculture
USEPA—United States Environmental
Protection Agency
USGS—United States Geological Survey
WHO—World Health Organization
WI—Wisconsin
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action impose any
requirements on my public water
system?
B. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
II. Purpose, Background and Summary of
This Action
A. What is the purpose of this action?
B. Statutory Requirements for CCL,
Regulatory Determinations and
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
1. Contaminant Candidate List
2. Regulatory Determinations
3. Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
C. Interrelationship of the CCL, Regulatory
Determinations and Unregulated
Contaminant Monitoring
D. Summary of Previous CCLs and
Regulatory Determinations
1. The First Contaminant Candidate List
2. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL
1 Contaminants
3. The Second Contaminant Candidate List
4. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL
2 Contaminants
5. The Third Contaminant Candidate List
6. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL
3 Contaminants
E. Summary of the Approach Used To
Identify and Evaluate Candidates for CCL
4
1. Carry Forward of CCL 3 Contaminants
2. Summary and Evaluation of CCL 4
Nominated Contaminants
3. Evaluation of Previous Negative
Regulatory Determinations
F. What is included on EPA’s Draft CCL 4?
III. Request for Comment
IV. EPA’s Next Steps
V. References
I. General Information
A. Does this action impose any
requirements on my public water
system?
Make sure to submit your comments
by the comment period deadline. To
ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify
the appropriate docket identification
number in the subject line on the first
page of your response. It would also be
helpful if you provided the name, date,
and Federal Register citation related to
your comments.
II. Purpose, Background and Summary
of This Action
This section briefly summarizes the
purpose of this action, the statutory
requirements, previous activities related
to the Contaminant Candidate List (CCL)
and the approach used to develop the
Draft CCL 4.
A. What is the purpose of this action?
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA),
as amended in 1996, requires EPA to
publish a list every five years of
currently unregulated contaminants that
may pose risks for drinking water
(referred to as the Contaminant
Candidate List, or CCL). This list is
subsequently used to make regulatory
determinations on whether to regulate at
least five contaminants from the CCL
with national primary drinking water
regulations (NPDWRs) (SDWA section
1412(b)(1)). The purpose of today’s
action is to present EPA’s draft list of
contaminants on the CCL 4 and the
rationale for the selection process used
to make the list. Today’s action only
addresses the CCL 4. Regulatory
determinations for contaminants on the
CCL are a separate agency action.
EPA requests comment on the Draft
CCL 4 and suggestions for further
improvements to the selection process
for future CCLs for the agency to
consider.
B. Statutory Requirements for CCL,
Regulatory Determinations and
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Draft Contaminant Candidate List
4 (CCL 4) and the Final CCL 4, when
published, will not impose any
requirements on regulated entities.
Section 1412(b)(1) of the SDWA, as
amended in 1996, requires EPA to
publish the CCL every five years. The
SDWA specifies that the list must
include contaminants that are not
subject to any proposed or promulgated
NPDWRs, are known or anticipated to
occur in public water systems (PWSs),
and may require regulation under the
SDWA. The unregulated contaminants
considered for listing shall include, but
not be limited to, hazardous substances
identified in section 101(14) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980, and substances registered
as pesticides under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible.
• Describe any assumptions that you
used.
• Provide any technical information
and/or data you used that support your
views.
• Provide full references for any peer
reviewed publication you used that
support your views.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns.
• Offer alternatives.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
1. Contaminant Candidate List
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6077
Act. The SDWA directs the agency to
consider the health effects and
occurrence information for unregulated
contaminants to identify those
contaminants that present the greatest
public health concern related to
exposure from drinking water. The
statute further directs the agency to take
into consideration the effect of
contaminants upon subgroups that
comprise a meaningful portion of the
general population (such as infants,
children, pregnant women, the elderly
and individuals with a history of serious
illness or other subpopulations) that are
identifiable as being at greater risk of
adverse health effects due to exposure to
contaminants in drinking water than the
general population. EPA considers agerelated subgroups as ‘‘lifestages’’ in
reference to a distinguishable time
frame in an individual’s life
characterized by unique and relatively
stable behavioral and/or physiological
characteristics that are associated with
development and growth. Thus,
childhood is viewed as a sequence of
lifestages, from conception through fetal
development, infancy and adolescence
(see https://www2.epa.gov/children/
early-life-stages).
2. Regulatory Determinations
Section 1412(b)(1)(B)(ii) of the SDWA,
as amended in 1996, requires EPA at
five year intervals, to make
determinations of whether or not to
regulate no fewer than five
contaminants from the CCL. The 1996
SDWA Amendments specify three
criteria to determine whether a
contaminant may require regulation:
• The contaminant may have an
adverse effect on the health of persons;
• The contaminant is known to occur
or there is a substantial likelihood that
the contaminant will occur in public
water systems with a frequency and at
levels of public health concern; and
• In the sole judgment of the
Administrator, regulation of such
contaminant presents a meaningful
opportunity for health risk reduction for
persons served by public water systems.
If EPA determines that these three
statutory criteria are met and makes a
final determination to regulate a
contaminant, the agency has 24 months
to publish a proposed Maximum
Contaminant Level Goal 1 (MCLG) and
1 The MCLG is the ‘‘maximum level of a
contaminant in drinking water at which no known
or anticipated adverse effect on the health of
persons would occur, and which allows an
adequate margin of safety. Maximum contaminant
level goals are non-enforceable health goals.’’ (40
CFR 141.2; 42 U.S.C. 300g–1)
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
6078
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
NPDWR 2. After the proposal, the
agency has 18 months to publish and
promulgate a final MCLG and NPDWR
(SDWA section 1412(b)(1)(E)) 3.
3. Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
Section 1445 of the SDWA mandates
that EPA promulgate regulations
(known as the Unregulated Contaminant
Monitoring Rule or UCMR) to establish
criteria for a monitoring program for
unregulated contaminants. The SDWA
requires all large public water systems
and a representative sample of smaller
public water systems to monitor for
unregulated contaminants. The statute
requires EPA to issue a list every five
years of not more than 30 unregulated
contaminants to be monitored. The
SDWA also specifies that EPA include
the results of such monitoring, along
with monitoring data for regulated
contaminants and reliable information
from other public and private sources,
in a national drinking water occurrence
database. EPA developed the National
Contaminant Occurrence Database
(NCOD) to contain the monitoring data
from the UCMR program and other data
as specified by the SDWA. The current
UCMR (UCMR 3) requires monitoring
for 30 contaminants (28 chemicals and
two viruses) (77 FR 26071, May 2, 2012
(USEPA, 2012a)). Sampling is occurring
during 2013–2015. Twenty-one of the
contaminants being monitored under
UCMR3 are included on the CCL 3 and
20 contaminants being monitored under
UCMR3 are included on the Draft CCL
4.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Interrelationship of the CCL,
Regulatory Determinations and
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
The CCL is the first step in evaluating
the subset of potential contaminants
that may require future NPDWRs. The
CCL serves as the initial screening of
potential contaminants, and inclusion
on the CCL does not mean that any
particular contaminant will necessarily
be regulated in the future. The UCMR
provides a mechanism to obtain
nationally representative occurrence
data for contaminants. Most unregulated
contaminants chosen by EPA for
monitoring have been selected from the
CCL. When selecting contaminants for
2 An NPDWR is a legally enforceable standard
that applies to public water systems. An NPDWR
sets a legal limit (called a maximum contaminant
level or MCL) or specifies a certain treatment
technique for public water systems for a specific
contaminant or group of contaminants. The MCL is
the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed
in drinking water and is set as close to the MCLG
as feasible, using the best available treatment
technology and taking cost into consideration.
3 The statute authorizes a nine month extension
of this promulgation date.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
monitoring under the UCMR, EPA
considers the availability of health
effects data and the need for national
occurrence data for contaminants, as
well as analytical method availability
and cost, availability of analytical
standards and laboratory capacity to
support a nationwide monitoring
program. The contaminant occurrence
data collected under the UCMR serves
to better inform future CCLs and
regulatory determinations.
Contaminants on the CCL are evaluated
to see which ones have sufficient
information to allow the agency to make
a regulatory determination. Those
contaminants with sufficient
information to make a regulatory
determination are then evaluated based
on the three statutory criteria in SDWA
section 1412(b)(1), to determine whether
a regulation is required (called a
positive determination) or not required
(called a negative determination). EPA
must make regulatory determinations
for at least five contaminants listed on
the CCL every five years. For those
contaminants without sufficient
information to allow the agency to make
a regulatory determination, EPA
encourages research to provide the
information needed to determine
whether to regulate the contaminant.
Today’s action addresses only the CCL
4 and not the UCMR or regulatory
determinations.
D. Summary of Previous CCLs and
Regulatory Determinations
1. The First Contaminant Candidate List
The first CCL (CCL 1) was published
on March 2, 1998 (63 FR 10274 (USEPA,
1998)). CCL 1 was developed based on
recommendations by the National
Drinking Water Advisory Council
(NDWAC) and review by technical
experts. It contained 50 chemicals and
10 microbial contaminants/groups. EPA
consulted with the scientific
community, including the Science
Advisory Board, on a process for
developing the first CCL.
2. The Regulatory Determinations for
CCL 1 Contaminants
EPA published its final regulatory
determinations for a subset of
contaminants listed on CCL 1 on July
18, 2003 (68 FR 42898 (USEPA, 2003)).
EPA identified nine contaminants from
the 60 contaminants listed on CCL 1
that had sufficient data and information
available to make regulatory
determinations. The nine contaminants
were Acanthamoeba, aldrin, dieldrin,
hexachlorobutadiene, manganese,
metribuzin, naphthalene, sodium and
sulfate. The agency determined that an
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NPDWR was not necessary for any of
these nine contaminants at that time.
The agency subsequently issued
guidance on Acanthamoeba and Health
Advisories for manganese, sodium and
sulfate.
3. The Second Contaminant Candidate
List
The agency published its Final CCL 2
on February 24, 2005 (70 FR 9071
(USEPA, 2005)). The agency carried
forward the 51 remaining chemical and
microbial contaminants from CCL 1
(that did not have regulatory
determinations) to CCL 2.
4. The Regulatory Determinations for
CCL 2 Contaminants
EPA published its final regulatory
determinations for a subset of
contaminants listed on CCL 2 on July
30, 2008 (73 FR 44251 (USEPA, 2008b)).
EPA identified 11 contaminants from
the 51 contaminants listed on CCL 2
that had sufficient data and information
available to make regulatory
determinations. The 11 contaminants
were boron, the dacthal mono- and diacid degradates; 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (pchlorophenyl) ethylene (DDE); 1,3dichloropropene; 2,4-dinitrotoluene;
2,6-dinitrotoluene; s-ethyl
propylthiocarbamate (EPTC); fonofos;
terbacil; and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane.
The agency made a final determination
that an NPDWR was not necessary for
any of these 11 contaminants. New or
updated Health Advisories were
subsequently issued for boron, the
dacthal degradates, 2,4-dinitrotoluene,
2,6-dinitrotoluene and 1,1,2,2tetrachloroethane.
5. The Third Contaminant Candidate
List
The agency published its Final CCL 3
on October 8, 2009 (74 FR 51850
(USEPA, 2009e)). The CCL 3 contained
104 chemicals or chemical groups and
12 microbial contaminants. In
developing CCL 3, EPA improved and
built upon the process that was used for
CCL 1 and CCL 2. In 1998, the agency
requested advice from the National
Academy of Sciences’ National Research
Council (NRC) on how to improve the
CCL process. The NRC recommended a
more reproducible process whereby a
broadly defined ‘‘universe’’ of potential
drinking water contaminants is
identified, assessed and reduced to a
preliminary CCL (PCCL) using simple
screening criteria (NRC, 2001). All of the
contaminants on the PCCL would then
be evaluated in more detail to assess the
likelihood that specific contaminants
could occur in drinking water at levels
that pose a public health concern. In
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
6079
• Identification of a broad universe of
potential drinking water contaminants
(the CCL 3 Universe);
• Screening the CCL 3 Universe to a
PCCL, using criteria based on the
potential to occur in public water
systems and the potential for public
health concern;
• Evaluation of the PCCL
contaminants based on a more detailed
evaluation of occurrence and health
effects data, using a scoring and
classification system; and
• Incorporating public input and
expert review in the CCL 3 process.
EPA also considered new information
on contaminants identified by
surveillance efforts, which included
collaboration with internal EPA offices
and other federal agencies and the
review of scientific publications and
data. The agency provided the public
with the opportunity to nominate
contaminants to be considered for the
Draft CCL 3 and sought public comment
on the Draft CCL 3 before the list was
finalized.
Exhibit 1 illustrates the multi-step
CCL 3 approach. This generalized
process was applied to both chemical
and microbial contaminants, though the
specific execution of particular steps
differs between them.
A complete description of the CCL 3
process can be found in the Draft and
Final CCL 3 Federal Register documents
(73 FR 9628, February 21, 2008 (USEPA,
2008a) and 74 FR 51850, October 8,
2009 (USEPA, 2009e)). Supporting
documents that explain each stage of the
CCL 3 process in further detail (i.e.,
identifying the CCL 3 Universe,
screening to the PCCL, and the
classification of the PCCL to the CCL)
can be found at: https://water.epa.gov/
scitech/drinkingwater/dws/ccl/ccl3_
processflowdiagram.cfm and in the CCL
3 docket at www.regulations.gov (Docket
ID: EPA–HQ–OW–2007–1189).
6. The Regulatory Determinations for
CCL 3 Contaminants
agency is removing perchlorate and
these five contaminants from the Draft
CCL 4, pending the result of the final
regulatory determinations for CCL 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
On February 11, 2011, as a separate
action, the agency issued a positive
regulatory determination for
perchlorate, a chemical listed in CCL 1,
CCL 2 and CCL 3 (76 FR 7762; USEPA,
2011). Recently, EPA published
preliminary regulatory determinations
for five unregulated contaminants (79
FR 62716, October 20, 2014 (USEPA,
2014a)). The five contaminants include:
1,3-dinitrobenzene; dimethoate;
strontium; terbufos; and terbufos
sulfone. The agency is making
preliminary determinations to regulate
one contaminant (strontium) and to not
regulate four contaminants (1,3dinitrobenzene, dimethoate, terbufos,
and terbufos sulfone). Therefore, the
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E. Summary of the Approach Used To
Identify and Evaluate Candidates for
CCL 4
EPA proposes an abbreviated three
step evaluation and selection process for
CCL 4: (1) Carrying forward CCL 3
contaminants (except those with
regulatory determinations), (2) seeking
and evaluating nominations from the
public for additional contaminants to
consider, and (3) evaluating any new
data for those contaminants with
previous negative regulatory
determinations from CCL 1 or CCL 2 for
potential inclusion on the CCL 4. The
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
EN04FE15.182
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2002, the agency sought input from the
NDWAC on how to implement the
NRC’s recommendations to improve the
CCL process. NDWAC agreed that EPA
should proceed with the NRC’s
recommendations and provided
additional considerations and
recommendations in a 2004 report
(NDWAC, 2004).
Based on these consultations, public
input and peer review, EPA developed
a multi-step process to select
contaminants for the CCL 3, which
included the following key steps:
6080
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
agency also seeks comment on how to
further improve upon the process
developed for CCL 3 as a tool for future
CCLs.
1. Carry Forward of CCL 3 Contaminants
EPA carried forward all contaminants
listed on CCL 3 to the Draft CCL 4 with
the exception of perchlorate, for which
the agency made a positive regulatory
determination, and the five CCL 3
contaminants with preliminary
regulatory determinations (listed in
Section D.6 of this notice), pending their
final determinations. This carry forward
process is consistent with that
previously used in CCL 2. The agency
has taken this approach based on the
following considerations: (1) In
developing the CCL 3, the agency
implemented a robust process
recommended by the NRC and the
NDWAC to screen and score the
universe of potential contaminants, (2)
EPA used the best available, peerreviewed data and information to
evaluate contaminants for CCL 3; and
(3) Carrying forward CCL 3
contaminants allows the agency to focus
resources on evaluating contaminants
nominated by the public for CCL 4 and
review new data for CCL 1 or CCL 2
contaminants with previous negative
regulatory determinations.
2. Summary and Evaluation of CCL 4
Nominated Contaminants
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
a. CCL 4 Nominations Summary
EPA sought public nominations in a
Federal Register document on May 8,
2012, for contaminants to be considered
for possible inclusion in the CCL 4 (77
FR 27057 (USEPA, 2012b)). In the
document, the agency also requested
supporting information that has been
made available since the development
of the CCL 3, or existing information
that was not considered for CCL 3,
which shows that the nominated
contaminant may have an adverse effect
on people and occurs or is likely to
occur in public water systems.
EPA received nominations for 59
unique contaminants for the CCL 4,
including 54 chemicals and five
microbials. Eight contaminants were
nominated by more than one
organization or individual. Aldicarb,
bisphenol A, carbaryl, chlorpyrifos,
Toxoplasma gondii, and Microcystin-LR
were each nominated by two separate
organizations or individuals. Manganese
and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) were
each nominated by three different
organizations or individuals.
Nominations were received from 10
different organizations and/or
individuals. The agency did not require
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
nominators to provide their name or an
affiliated organization. Two nominators
remained anonymous while providing
documentation and rationale for the
contaminants. Two other individuals
identified themselves but did not
provide an organization affiliation. The
identified organizations that nominated
contaminants were:
• American Water Works Association,
• Natural Resources Defense Council,
• Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection,
• Minnesota Department of Health,
• New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection, and
• U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA).
EPA received three general types of
nominations:
• Specific individual chemicals,
• Specific individual organisms, and
• Groups of contaminants (e.g.,
Heterotrophic Plate Count was
considered as a group).
The American Water Works
Association also provided a letter with
recommendations for the CCL 4 process.
The full text of this letter and all of the
nomination submittals in their original
form can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov (docket ID: EPA–
HQ–OW–2012–0217). Exhibit 2 contains
the specific contaminants identified in
public nominations. A more detailed
summary of the nominations process is
included in the support document
‘‘Summary of Nominations for the
Fourth Contaminant Candidate List’’
(USEPA, 2015e).
NOMINATED CHEMICAL
CONTAMINANTS—Continued
Common Name – Registry
Name
CASRN
Carbaryl ................................
Cesium 137 ..........................
Chlorothalonil ........................
Chlorpyrifos ...........................
Dibutyl phthalate ...................
Dicamba ................................
Dichlorvos .............................
Dicofol ...................................
Dicyclohexyl phthalate ..........
Diethyl phthalate ...................
Di-isononyl phthalate ............
Dimethyl phthalate ................
Di-n-octyl phthalate ...............
Endosulfan ............................
Fluometuron ..........................
Linezolid ................................
Linuron ..................................
Malathion ..............................
Manganese ...........................
Methicillin ..............................
Methyl parathion ...................
Methyl tertiary butyl ether
(MTBE) ..............................
Microcystin-LR ......................
Nonylphenol ..........................
Nonylphenol ethoxylate ........
Octylphenol ...........................
Octylphenol ethoxylate .........
Oxacillin ................................
Penicillin ................................
63–25–2
10045–97–3
1897–45–6
2921–88–2
84–74–2
1918–00–9
62–73–7
115–32–2
84–61–7
84–66–2
28553–12–0
131–11–3
117–84–0
115–29–7
2164–17–2
165800–03–3
330–55–2
121–75–5
7439–96–5
61–32–5
298–00–0
1634–04–4
101043–37–2
25154–52–3
9016–45–9
27193–28–8
9036–19–5
66–79–5
(multiple
CASRNs)
Perfluorooctanoic acid
(PFOA) ..............................
335–67–1
Permethrin ............................
52645–53–1
Phosmet ................................
732–11–6
Progesterone ........................
57–83–0
Radon ...................................
10043–92–2
Spiramycin ............................
8025–81–8
Strontium 90 .........................
121831–99–0
EXHIBIT 2. CONTAMINANTS NOMINATED Testosterone .........................
58–22–0
FOR CONSIDERATION ON THE DRAFT Trichlorfon .............................
52–68–6
101–20–2
CCL 4: NOMINATED MICROBIAL Triclocarban ..........................
Triclosan ...............................
3380–34–5
CONTAMINANTS
Tylosin ..................................
1401–69–0
Vancomycin ..........................
1404–90–6
Adenovirus
Virginiamycin ........................
11006–76–1
Heterotrophic Plate Count Bacteria (HPC)
Naegleria fowleri
Toxoplasma gondii
b. Evaluation of Nominated
Vibrio cholerae
Contaminants and Data Sources
The SDWA specifies that the CCL
only include those contaminants
without any proposed or promulgated
NPDWRs. Two nominated contaminants
CASRN
are covered under the existing NPDWR
for beta photon emitters (40 CFR
77439–76–0 141.66(d)(1)) (i.e., strontium 90 and
cesium 137), hence, the agency will not
319–84–6 consider them for CCL 4. Radon was
116–06–3 also nominated, but is not eligible for
CCL 4 since the agency developed and
68555–24–8 proposed a NPDWR (64 FR 59245,
26787–78–0
November 2, 1999 (USEPA, 1999)).
86–50–0
1405–89–6 Aldicarb was nominated but is not
25057–89–0 eligible for CCL 4 since it has an
85–68–7 existing NPDWR (40 CFR 141.61(c));
80–05–7 (Note, in response to an administrative
1689–84–5 petition, the agency issued an
NOMINATED CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS
Common Name – Registry
Name
3-chloro-4-dichloromethyl-5hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone ....
alphaHexachlorocyclohexane ....
Aldicarb .................................
Alkylphenol mono- to trioxylates .............................
Amoxicillin .............................
Azinphos-methyl ...................
Bacitracin zinc ......................
Bentazone .............................
Benzyl butyl phthalate ..........
Bisphenol A ..........................
Bromoxynil ............................
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
administrative stay of the effective date
of the maximum contaminant levels for
aldicarbs).
For the remaining 55 nominated
contaminants, EPA reviewed the
nominations and supporting
information to determine if any new
data were provided that had not been
previously evaluated for CCL 3. Seven
of the nominated contaminants were on
CCL 3 and were carried forward to the
Draft CCL 4, however the agency
subsequently excluded those seven from
the CCL 4 Universe. The agency also
collected additional data for the
nominated contaminants, when it was
available, from both updated CCL 3 data
sources and from new data sources that
were not available at the time the
agency finalized CCL 3. A complete list
of references provided by nominators
can be found in the support document
‘‘Summary of Nominations for the
Fourth Contaminant Candidate List’’
(USEPA, 2015e). A more detailed
description of the CCL data sources
collected by EPA may be found in the
support document ‘‘Data Sources for the
Contaminant Candidate List 4’’ (USEPA,
2015c). If new data were available, EPA
screened and scored the nominated
contaminants using the same process
that was used in CCL 3.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Data Sources for Chemical and
Microbial Contaminants
For nominated chemicals, occurrence
data was collected from updated CCL 3
data sources including:
• 2006 production data collected in
the Chemical Update System under the
Inventory Update Rule,
• 2010 data from the Toxics Release
Inventory,
• 2003–2009 data from the USDA
Pesticide Data Program, and
• EPA’s Storage and Retrieval
(STORET) data as of January 2013.
Additional occurrence data for the
nominated chemicals were collected
from data sources that are new since the
CCL 3 including:
• United States Geological Survey
(USGS) studies that focused on
contaminant occurrence in source
waters for public water systems (Hopple
et al., 2009, and Kingsbury et al., 2008)
and water quality in public-supply
wells (Toccalino et al., 2010);
• Individual State public water
supply data provided to EPA during the
second Six-Year Review of regulated
contaminants (for the time period
covering 1998–2005) from States
including: CA, EPA Region 9 Tribes, FL,
IL, NC, OH, SD, TX and WI;
• Data from The California State
Water Resources Control Board’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
Groundwater Ambient Monitoring
Assessment program; and
• New data from an EPA literature
review of published studies on
pharmaceuticals, personal care products
and other contaminants.
In addition to health effects data
provided by the nominators, EPA
searched for health effects data for the
nominated chemicals from data sources
used in CCL 3 that may have been
updated including:
• EPA’s Integrated Risk Information
System program,
• EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs,
• The Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry (ATSDR),
• The California EPA (Office of
Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment),
• The Institute of Medicine,
• The National Toxicology Program,
and
• The World Health Organization
(WHO).
EPA also considered new or updated
health effects information contained in
the agency’s Office of Superfund
Remediation and Technology
Innovation Provisional Peer Reviewed
Toxicity Values.
For microbial contaminants, EPA
evaluated waterborne disease outbreak
data, and occurrence and health effects
data, from data sources used in CCL 3,
which have been updated (Murray et al.,
2011; CDC, 2008; CDC, 2011). EPA also
collected and evaluated information for
microbial contaminants from data
sources that are new since publication
of the Final CCL 3.
A more detailed description of the
data sources used to evaluate
contaminants for CCL 4 can be found in
the support document ‘‘Data Sources for
the Contaminant Candidate List 4’’
(USEPA, 2015c) available at https://
www.regulations.gov (Docket ID: EPA–
HQ–OW–2012–0217).
c. Outcomes for the CCL 4 Nominated
Contaminants
Forty-three of the nominated
chemicals were included in the CCL 4
Universe. Forty of the nominated
chemicals were previously included in
the CCL 3 Universe and were carried
forward to the CCL 4 Universe. In
addition to these 40, EPA added three
nominated chemicals (i.e., octylphenol
ethoxylate, oxacillin, and
virginiamycin) to the CCL 4 Universe
based on health effects and/or
occurrence data that is newly available
since the Final CCL 3. EPA screened all
of the nominated chemicals in the CCL
4 Universe according to the screening
criteria developed for CCL 3 and based
on that evaluation, the agency included
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6081
20 of the nominated chemicals on the
PCCL 4. Eighteen of those 20 chemicals
were also included in the PCCL 3, and
EPA added two new chemicals
(manganese and nonylphenol) to the
PCCL 4. The data used to screen the
nominated chemicals from the CCL 4
Universe to the PCCL 4 can be found in
the ‘‘Screening Document for the Draft
PCCL 4 Nominated Contaminants’’
(USEPA, 2015d). EPA further evaluated
the nominated chemicals on the PCCL 4
based on the classification process
developed in CCL 3 and determined that
manganese and nonylphenol should be
added to the Draft CCL 4 based on new
health and/or occurrence information
(in addition to the chemicals carried
forward from the CCL 3). The data that
the agency used to further evaluate the
nominated contaminants from the PCCL
4, and to select those that were included
in the Draft CCL 4, can be found in the
‘‘Contaminant Information Sheets (CISs)
for the Draft Fourth Preliminary
Contaminant Candidate List (PCCL 4)
Nominated Contaminants’’ (USEPA,
2015b).
Manganese is an element that
naturally occurs in oxide forms and in
combinations with other elements in
many minerals. Manganese is an
essential nutrient for humans and
animals. Manganese ores are used in a
variety of applications in the United
States. Its principal use is in steel
production to improve hardness,
stiffness and strength (ATSDR, 2012). In
2003 and as part of the first (CCL 1)
Regulatory Determination process, EPA
made a negative regulatory
determination for manganese based on
the health and occurrence data available
at that time. However, CCL 4
nominators cited more than 20 recent
studies that indicate concern for
neurological effects in children and
infants exposed to excess manganese,
which were not available at the time
manganese was considered for the first
Regulatory Determination or CCL 3. In
addition, new monitoring studies from
USGS and drinking water monitoring
information from several States support
an earlier survey (i.e., the National
Inorganics and Radionuclides Survey),
which indicates manganese is known to
occur in drinking water. EPA has
determined that the new health effects
information and additional occurrence
data merit listing manganese in the Draft
CCL 4.
Nonylphenol is used in the
preparation of lubricating oil additives,
resins, plasticizers and antioxidants for
plastics and rubber. Additionally, 60
percent of nonylphenol is used in the
production of nonylphenol ethoxylates,
which are found in detergents and used
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6082
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
in the treatment of textiles.
Nonylphenol was previously considered
for CCL 3. It was included in the CCL
3 Universe, but was not included in the
PCCL 3 or CCL 3. Updated health and
occurrence data are now available for
nonylphenol, and these data were
considered by the agency in evaluating
nonylphenol for the Draft CCL 4.
Nonylphenol and some of its
degradation products have been found
to have estrogenic activity in rats and
mice (WHO, 2004), and additional
occurrence data are available from a
USGS National Reconnaissance
monitoring study of ambient water
(Kolpin et al., 2002). EPA has
determined that this updated health
data and additional occurrence data
show that nonylphenol is anticipated to
occur in PWSs, has potential adverse
health effects and, therefore, merits
listing on the Draft CCL 4.
EPA considered adding dicofol to the
Draft CCL 4, however, both of the most
recent manufacturers of the pesticide
ceased all production as of May 17,
2011, and agreed to an EPA registration
cancellation, which effectively prohibits
all labeled uses of existing stocks after
October 31, 2016. Use of dicofol has
declined significantly in recent years. In
addition, the chemical properties of
dicofol indicate that it has low mobility
in water because it is expected to adsorb
to organic matter in soil and sediment
and it has moderately low solubility in
water. As a result, the agency did not
list dicofol on the Draft CCL 4 because
it is not known or anticipated to occur
in drinking water.
EPA evaluated the microbial
contaminants nominated for the CCL 4
(see Exhibit 2) using the same process
developed for the CCL 3. Taylor et al.
(2001) was used as the basis of the
microbial CCL 3 Universe, which
includes a list of 1,415 known human
pathogens. EPA added 10 additional
microbes to the CCL 3 Universe based
on CCL 3 public nominations and other
available data, thus bringing the total
number of microbes in the CCL 3
Universe to 1,425. More detailed
information about the selection of the
CCL 3 Universe for microbial
contaminants can be found in the
support document ‘‘Final Contaminant
Candidate List 3 Microbes: Identifying
the Universe’’ (USEPA, 2009b).
The microbes in the CCL 3 Universe
were subsequently screened into the
PCCL 3 by applying 12 criteria to
narrow the CCL 3 Universe of all human
pathogens to just those pathogens that
could be transmitted through drinking
water. More detailed information on the
screening process developed under CCL
3 for the microbial contaminants can be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
found in the support document ‘‘Final
Contaminant Candidate List 3 Microbes:
Screening to the PCCL’’ (USEPA,
2009d).
All the microbes nominated for the
CCL 4, with the exception of
Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC)
bacteria, were already included in both
the CCL 3 Universe and PCCL 3. Thus,
the agency carried forward those
microbes to the CCL 4 Universe and
PCCL 4, respectively.
EPA reviewed new and/or updated
sources of information for the
nominated microbes on the PCCL 4 (i.e.,
Adenovirus, Naegleria fowleri,
Toxoplasma gondii and Vibrio
cholerae), and determined that there
were no new data that would change the
scores or listing decisions for these
contaminants.
Vibrio cholerae and Toxoplasma
gondii will remain on the Draft PCCL 4
because there are no new data that
would change the CCL 3 scores or
listing decisions for these contaminants.
Naegleria fowleri and Adenovirus were
on the Final CCL 3 and are therefore
being carried forward to the Draft CCL
4, along with the other microbes
included on the Final CCL 3. A detailed
description of the CCL 3 scoring
protocol for microbes can be found in
the support document ‘‘Final
Contaminant Candidate List 3 Microbes:
PCCL to CCL Process’’ (USEPA, 2009c).
The data used to further evaluate the
nominated microbes on the PCCL 4 can
be found in the ‘‘Contaminant
Information Sheets (CISs) for the Draft
Fourth Preliminary Contaminant
Candidate List (PCCL 4) Nominated
Contaminants’’ (USEPA, 2015b).
The group of HPC bacteria was
nominated for CCL 4, but EPA is not
including it on the Draft CCL 4. HPC
may include both pathogenic and
harmless bacteria. However, available
epidemiological evidence shows no
relationship between gastrointestinal
illness and HPC bacteria in drinking
water (Calderon, 1988; Calderon and
Mood, 1991; Payment et al., 1997; WHO,
2003). Thus, EPA considers the
potential health risk of HPC bacteria in
drinking water as likely negligible and
is not including HPC on the Draft CCL
4. In addition, HPC bacteria are
addressed by the treatment technique
requirements under the Surface Water
Treatment Rule, where they can be
monitored in lieu of a disinfectant
residual.
3. Evaluation of Previous Negative
Regulatory Determinations
EPA evaluated the 20 contaminants
from CCL 1 and CCL 2 for which the
agency made negative regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
determinations. EPA collected and
evaluated new or updated data for the
previous negative regulatory
determinations, if data were available,
from the data sources listed in section
II.E.2(b), ‘‘Evaluation of Nominated
Contaminants and Data Sources.’’ Since
regulatory determinations for the CCL 3
contaminants were recently made using
the best available data, EPA did not
include the CCL 3 regulatory
determinations in this evaluation. EPA
is adding manganese to the Draft CCL 4,
as previously discussed in section
11.E.2, ‘‘Summary and Evaluation for
CCL 4 Nominated Contaminants.’’ The
agency concluded there was not
sufficient new information for any of the
other 19 contaminants with previous
negative regulatory determinations to
justify including them on the Draft CCL
4. A listing of previous negative
regulatory determinations is included in
sections II.D.2 and II.D.4.
F. What is included on EPA’s Draft CCL
4?
The Draft CCL 4 includes 100
chemicals and 12 microbes.
EXHIBIT 3. DRAFT CONTAMINANT CANDIDATE LIST 4: MICROBIAL CONTAMINANTS
Pathogens
Adenovirus
Caliciviruses
Campylobacter jejuni
Enterovirus
Escherichia coli (0157)
Helicobacter pylori
Hepatitis A virus
Legionella pneumophila
Mycobacterium avium
Naegleria fowleri
Salmonella enterica
Shigella sonnei
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS 4
Common name—Registry
name
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ....
1,1-Dichloroethane ...............
1,2,3-Trichloropropane .........
1,3-Butadiene .......................
1,4-Dioxane ..........................
17 alpha-Estradiol .................
1-Butanol ..............................
2-Methoxyethanol .................
2-Propen-1-ol ........................
3-Hydroxycarbofuran ............
4,4’-Methylenedianiline .........
Acephate ...............................
Acetaldehyde ........................
Acetamide .............................
Acetochlor .............................
Acetochlor ethanesulfonic
acid (ESA) .........................
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
CASRN
630–20–6
75–34–3
96–18–4
106–99–0
123–91–1
57–91–0
71–36–3
109–86–4
107–18–6
16655–82–6
101–77–9
30560–19–1
75–07–0
60–35–5
34256–82–1
187022–11–3
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS 4—
Continued
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS 4—
Continued
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Common name—Registry
name
CASRN
194992–44–4
107–02–8
Norethindrone (19Norethisterone) .................
n-Propylbenzene ...................
o-Toluidine ............................
Oxirane, methyl- ...................
Oxydemeton-methyl ..............
Oxyfluorfen ...........................
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid
(PFOS) ..............................
Perfluorooctanoic acid
(PFOA) ..............................
Permethrin ............................
Profenofos ............................
Quinoline ...............................
RDX (Hexahydro-1,3,5trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) .........
sec-Butylbenzene .................
Tebuconazole .......................
Tebufenozide ........................
Tellurium ...............................
Thiodicarb .............................
Thiophanate-methyl ..............
Toluene diisocyanate ............
Tribufos .................................
Triethylamine ........................
Triphenyltin hydroxide
(TPTH) ..............................
Urethane ...............................
Vanadium ..............................
Vinclozolin .............................
Ziram .....................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
142363–53–9
171262–17–2
319–84–6
62–53–3
741–58–2
100–44–7
25013–16–5
133–06–2
14866–68–3
74–87–3
110429–62–4
7440–48–4
80–15–9
N/A
141–66–2
55290–64–7
298–04–4
330–54–1
517–09–9
474–86–2
114–07–8
50–28–2
50–27–1
53–16–7
57–63–6
13194–48–4
107–21–1
75–21–8
96–45–7
22224–92–6
50–00–0
7440–56–4
74–97–5
75–45–6
110–54–3
302–01–2
7439–96–5
72–33–3
10265–92–6
67–56–1
74–83–9
1634–04–4
51218–45–2
171118–09–5
152019–73–3
2212–67–1
7439–98–7
98–95–3
55–63–0
872–50–4
55–18–5
62–75–9
621–64–7
86–30–6
930–55–2
25154–52–3
Jkt 235001
95–53–4
75–56–9
301–12–2
42874–03–3
1763–23–1
335–67–1
52645–53–1
41198–08–7
91–22–5
121–82–4
135–98–8
107534–96–3
112410–23–8
13494–80–9
59669–26–0
23564–05–8
26471–62–5
78–48–8
121–44–8
76–87–9
51–79–6
7440–62–2
50471–44–8
137–30–4
4 Contaminants on the Final CCL 3 but not
on the Draft CCL 4 are: 1,3-dinitrobenzene,
dimethoate, perchlorate, strontium, terbufos,
and terbufos sulfone.
III. Request for Comment
The purpose of this document is to
present the Draft CCL 4 and seek
comment on the contaminants selected
for the Draft CCL 4, including any
supporting data that can be used in
developing the Final CCL 4. Data that
the agency obtained and evaluated for
developing the Draft CCL 4 may be
found in the CCL 4 support documents
located in the docket for this document.
Specifically, the agency is asking for
public comments on including
manganese and nonylphenol on the CCL
4, and any additional data and
information on manganese and
nonylphenol health effects and
concentrations in finished or ambient
water. EPA is also seeking comment on
ways the agency can improve or refine
the selection process developed for CCL
3, and will take these comments into
consideration when developing future
CCLs. The agency will consider all
information and comments received in
determining the Final CCL 4, in the
development of future CCLs, and in the
EPA’s efforts to set drinking water
priorities in the future.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
IV. EPA’s Next Steps
Between now and the publication of
the Final CCL 4, the agency will
CASRN
evaluate comments received during the
public comment period for this
document, consult with the EPA’s
68–22–4 Science Advisory Board and revise the
103–65–1 CCL 4 as appropriate.
Common name—Registry
name
Acetochlor oxanilic acid (OA)
Acrolein .................................
Alachlor ethanesulfonic acid
(ESA) .................................
Alachlor oxanilic acid (OA) ...
AlphaHexachlorocyclohexane ....
Aniline ...................................
Bensulide ..............................
Benzyl chloride .....................
Butylated hydroxyanisole ......
Captan ..................................
Chlorate ................................
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride) ...................................
Clethodim ..............................
Cobalt ...................................
Cumene hydroperoxide ........
Cyanotoxins ..........................
Dicrotophos ...........................
Dimethipin .............................
Disulfoton ..............................
Diuron ...................................
Equilenin ...............................
Equilin ...................................
Erythromycin .........................
Estradiol (17-beta estradiol)
Estriol ....................................
Estrone .................................
Ethinyl Estradiol (17-alpha
Ethinyl Estradiol) ...............
Ethoprop ...............................
Ethylene glycol .....................
Ethylene oxide ......................
Ethylene thiourea ..................
Fenamiphos ..........................
Formaldehyde .......................
Germanium ...........................
Halon 1011
(bromochloromethane) ......
HCFC–22 ..............................
Hexane .................................
Hydrazine ..............................
Manganese ...........................
Mestranol ..............................
Methamidophos ....................
Methanol ...............................
Methyl bromide
(Bromomethane) ...............
Methyl tertiary butyl ether
(MTBE) ..............................
Metolachlor ...........................
Metolachlor ethanesulfonic
acid (ESA) .........................
Metolachlor oxanilic acid
(OA) ...................................
Molinate ................................
Molybdenum .........................
Nitrobenzene ........................
Nitroglycerin ..........................
N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone .........
N-nitrosodiethylamine
(NDEA) ..............................
N-nitrosodimethylamine
(NDMA) .............................
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
(NDPA) ..............................
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine .......
N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR)
Nonylphenol ..........................
6083
Sfmt 4703
V. References
ATSDR. 2012. ToxFAQs for Manganese.
Atlanta, GA. October, 2012. Available on the
Internet at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/
tf.asp?id=101&tid=23.
Calderon, R.L. 1988. Bacteria Colonizing
Point-of-Entry Granular Activated Carbon
filters and their Relationship to Human
Health. EPA CR–813978–01–0, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC.
Calderon, R.L. and Mood, E.W. 1991.
Bacteria Colonizing Point-of-Use Granular
Activated Carbon Filters and their
Relationship to Human Health. EPA CR
811904–01–0, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC.
CDC. 2008. Surveillance for Waterborne
Disease and Outbreaks Associated with
Drinking Water and Water not Intended for
Drinking—United States, 2005–2006. MMWR
57 (SS–9).
CDC. 2011. Surveillance for Waterborne
Disease and Outbreaks Associated with
Drinking Water—United States, 2007–2008.
MMWR 60 (SS–12).
Code of Federal Regulations. Revised as of
July 1, 2012. Title 40 Protection of the
Environment. Subpart G—National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations: Maximum
Contaminant Levels and Maximum Residual
Disinfectant Levels. Section 141.61 (c).
Code of Federal Regulations. Revised as of
July 1, 2012. Title 40 Protection of the
Environment. Subpart G—National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations: Maximum
Contaminant Levels and Maximum Residual
Disinfectant Levels. Section 141.66 (d)(1).
Hopple, J.A., G.C. Delzer, and J.A.
Kingsbury. 2009. Anthropogenic Organic
Compounds in Source Water of Selected
Community Water Systems that Use
Groundwater, 2002–05. U.S. Geological
Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–
5200. 74 pp. Available on the Internet at:
https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5200/pdf/
sir2009-5200.pdf.
Kingsbury, J.A., G.C. Delzer, and J.A.
Hopple. 2008. Anthropogenic Organic
Compounds in Source Water of Nine
Community Water Systems that Withdraw
from Streams, 2002–05. U.S. Geological
Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–
5208. 66 pp. Available on the Internet at:
https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5208/pdf/
sir2008-5208.pdf.
Kolpin, D. W., E. T. Furlong, M. T. Meyer,
E. M. Thurman, S. D. Zaugg, L. B. Barber, and
H. T. Buxton. 2002. Pharmaceuticals,
Hormones, and Other Organic Wastewater
Contaminants in U.S. Streams, 1999–2000: A
National Reconnaissance. Environmental
Science and Technology, v. 36, no. 6.
Murray, P. R., E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen,
M. L. Landry, and M. A. Pfaller (ed.). 2011.
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6084
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 10th
Edition, ASM Press, Washington, DC.
National Drinking Water Advisory Council
(NDWAC). 2004. National Drinking Water
Advisory Council Report on the CCL
Classification Process to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, May 19,
2004.
National Research Council (NRC). 2001.
Classifying Drinking Water Contaminants for
Regulatory Consideration. National Academy
Press, Washington, DC.
Payment, P., J. Siemiatycki, L. Richardson,
G. Renaud, E. Franco, and M. Prevost. 1997.
A prospective epidemiological study of
gastrointestinal health effects due to the
consumption of drinking water. Int. J.
Environ. Health Res. (7): 5–31.
Taylor, L.H., S.M. Latham, and M.E.
Woolhouse. 2001. Risk Factors for Human
Disease Emergence (Appendix A). Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Vol 256, pp. 983–989.
Toccalino, P.L., J.E. Norman, and K.J. Hitt.
2010. Quality of Source Water from Publicsupply Wells in the United States, 1993–
2007. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific
Investigations Report 2010–5024. 206 pp.
Available on the Internet at: https://
pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5024/.
USEPA, 1998. Announcement of the
Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List;
Notice. Federal Register. Vol. 63, No. 40. p.
10273, March 2, 1998.
USEPA, 1999. National Primary Drinking
Water Regulations; Radon-222; Proposed
Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 64, No. 211. p.
59245, November 2, 1999.
USEPA. 2003. Announcement of
Regulatory Determinations for Priority
Contaminants on the Drinking Water
Contaminant Candidate List. Federal
Register. Vol. 68, No. 138. p. 42898, July 18,
2003.
USEPA. 2005. Notice—Drinking Water
Contaminant Candidate List 2; Final Notice.
Federal Register. Vol. 70, No. 36. p. 9071,
February 24, 2005.
USEPA. 2008a. Drinking Water
Contaminant Candidate List 3—Draft.
Federal Register. Vol. 73, No. 35. p. 9628,
February 21, 2008.
USEPA. 2008b. Drinking Water: Regulatory
Determinations Regarding Contaminants on
the Second Drinking Water Contaminant
Candidate List. Federal Register. Vol. 73, No.
174. p. 44251, July 30, 2008.
USEPA. 2009a. Final Contaminant
Candidate List 3 Chemicals: Identifying the
Universe. EPA 815–R09–006. August, 2009.
USEPA. 2009b. Final Contaminant
Candidate List 3 Microbes: Identifying the
Universe. EPA 815–R–09–004. August, 2009.
USEPA. 2009c. Final Contaminant
Candidate List 3 Microbes: PCCL to CCL
Process. EPA 815–R–09–009. August, 2009.
USEPA. 2009d. Final Contaminant
Candidate List 3 Microbes: Screening to the
PCCL. EPA 815–R–09–0005. August, 2009.
USEPA. 2009e. Drinking Water
Contaminant Candidate List 3—Final.
Federal Register. Vol. 74, No. 194. p. 51850,
October 8, 2009.
USEPA. 2011. Drinking Water: Regulatory
Determination on Perchlorate. Federal
Register. Vol. 76, No. 29. p. 7762, February
11, 2011.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
USEPA. 2012a. Revisions to the
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
Regulation (UCMR 3) for Public Water
Systems. Federal Register. Vol. 77, No. 85. p.
26071, May 2, 2012.
USEPA. 2012b. Request for Nominations of
Drinking Water Contaminants for the Fourth
Contaminant Candidate List. Federal
Register. Vol. 77, No. 89. p. 27057, May 8,
2012.
USEPA. 2014a. Announcement of
Preliminary Regulatory Determination for
Contaminants on the Third Drinking Water
Contaminant Candidate List. Federal
Register. Vol. 79, No. 202, p. 62716, October
20, 2014.
USEPA. 2015b. Contaminant Information
Sheets (CISs) for the Draft Fourth Preliminary
Contaminant Candidate List (PCCL 4)
Nominated Contaminants. EPA 815–R–15–
003. January, 2015.
USEPA. 2015c. Data Sources for the
Contaminant Candidate List 4. EPA 815–R–
15–004. January, 2015.
USEPA. 2015d. Screening Document for
the Draft PCCL 4 Nominated Contaminants.
EPA 815–R–15–002. January, 2015.
USEPA. 2015e. Summary of Nominations
for the Fourth Contaminant Candidate List.
EPA 815–R–15–001. January, 2015.
WHO. 2003. Emerging Issues in Water and
Infectious Disease Series: Heterotrophic Plate
Counts and Drinking-water Safety. ed. J.
Bartram, J. Cotruvo, M. Exner, C. Fricker, and
A. Glasmacher. IWA Publishing, London,
UK. P. 119–122.
WHO. 2004. Integrated Risk Assessment:
Nonylphenol Case Study. ed. D. Bontje, J.
Hermens, T. Vermeire, and T. Damstra. 63
pp. December, 2004. Available on the
Internet at: https://www.who.int/ipcs/
methods/Nonylphenol.pdf.
Dated: January 27, 2015.
Kenneth J. Kopocis,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Water.
[FR Doc. 2015–02210 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number and the File Symbol of interest
as shown in the body of this document,
by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Lewis, Registration Division (RD)
(7505P), main telephone number: (703)
305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov. The mailing
address is: Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. As part of the mailing
address, include the contact person’s
name, division, and mail code. The
division to contact is listed at the end
of each application summary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
producer, food manufacturer, or
AGENCY
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0022; FRL–9921–98]
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
Pesticide Product Registration;
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
Receipt of Applications for New Uses
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
applies to them. Potentially affected
Agency (EPA).
entities may include:
ACTION: Notice.
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
SUMMARY: EPA has received applications
112).
to register new uses for pesticide
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
products containing currently registered
311).
active ingredients. Pursuant to the
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
code 32532).
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby
B. What should I consider as I prepare
providing notice of receipt and
my comments for EPA?
opportunity to comment on these
applications.
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
Comments must be received on
or before March 6, 2015.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6076-6084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02210]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0217; FRL-9922-38-OW]
RIN 2040-A537
Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 4-- Draft
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is publishing for public review and comment a draft list
of contaminants that are currently not subject to any proposed or
promulgated national primary drinking water regulations. These
contaminants are known or anticipated to occur in public water systems
and may require regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).
This draft list is the fourth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 4)
published by the agency since the SDWA amendments of 1996. This Draft
CCL 4 includes 100 chemicals or chemical groups and 12 microbial
contaminants. The EPA seeks comment on the Draft CCL 4 and on
improvements to the selection process for future CCLs for the agency to
consider.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2012-0217, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
code: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Hand Delivery: Water Docket, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC)
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2012-
0217. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting
comments, go to Section I.B of the GENERAL INFORMATION section of this
document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Water Docket, EPA/
DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number
for the EPA Docket Center is (202) 566-2426.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on chemical
contaminants contact Meredith Russell, Office of Ground Water and
Drinking Water, Standards and Risk Management Division, at (202) 564-
0814 or email russell.meredith@epa.gov. For information on microbial
contaminants contact Hannah Holsinger, Office of Ground Water and
Drinking Water, Standards and Risk Management Division, at (202) 564-
0403 or email holsinger.hannah@epa.gov. For general information contact
the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791 or email:
hotline-sdwa@epa.gov.
Abbreviations and Acronyms
ATSDR--Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
CA--California
CASRN--Chemical Abstract Services Registry Number
CDC--Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CCL--Contaminant Candidate List
CCL 1--EPA's First Contaminant Candidate List
CCL 2--EPA's Second Contaminant Candidate List
CCL 3--EPA's Third Contaminant Candidate List
CCL 4--EPA's Fourth Contaminant Candidate List
CFR--Code of Federal Regulations
EPA--United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESA--Ethanesulfonic acid
FL--Florida
FR--Federal Register
HPC--Heterotrophic Plate Count
IL--Illinois
MCL--Maximum Contaminant Level
MCLG--Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
MMWR--Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
NC--North Carolina
NCOD--National Contaminant Occurrence Database
NDWAC--National Drinking Water Advisory Council
NRC--National Academy of Science's National Research Council
NPDWR--National Primary Drinking Water Regulation
OH--Ohio
PCCL 3--Preliminary Contaminant Candidate List 3
PCCL 4--Preliminary Contaminant Candidate List 4
PFOA--Perfluorooctanoic Acid
PFOS--Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid
PWS--Public Water System
SAB--Science Advisory Board
SDWA--Safe Drinking Water Act
SD--South Dakota
STORET--EPA's Storage and Retrieval database of water quality
monitoring data collected by water resource management groups across
the U.S.
TX--Texas
UCM--Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
UCMR 1--First Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule
UCMR 2--Second Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule
USDA--United States Department of Agriculture
USEPA--United States Environmental Protection Agency
USGS--United States Geological Survey
WHO--World Health Organization
WI--Wisconsin
[[Page 6077]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action impose any requirements on my public water
system?
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
II. Purpose, Background and Summary of This Action
A. What is the purpose of this action?
B. Statutory Requirements for CCL, Regulatory Determinations and
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
1. Contaminant Candidate List
2. Regulatory Determinations
3. Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
C. Interrelationship of the CCL, Regulatory Determinations and
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
D. Summary of Previous CCLs and Regulatory Determinations
1. The First Contaminant Candidate List
2. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL 1 Contaminants
3. The Second Contaminant Candidate List
4. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL 2 Contaminants
5. The Third Contaminant Candidate List
6. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL 3 Contaminants
E. Summary of the Approach Used To Identify and Evaluate
Candidates for CCL 4
1. Carry Forward of CCL 3 Contaminants
2. Summary and Evaluation of CCL 4 Nominated Contaminants
3. Evaluation of Previous Negative Regulatory Determinations
F. What is included on EPA's Draft CCL 4?
III. Request for Comment
IV. EPA's Next Steps
V. References
I. General Information
A. Does this action impose any requirements on my public water system?
The Draft Contaminant Candidate List 4 (CCL 4) and the Final CCL 4,
when published, will not impose any requirements on regulated entities.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
Explain your views as clearly as possible.
Describe any assumptions that you used.
Provide any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
Provide full references for any peer reviewed publication
you used that support your views.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
Offer alternatives.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline.
To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket
identification number in the subject line on the first page of your
response. It would also be helpful if you provided the name, date, and
Federal Register citation related to your comments.
II. Purpose, Background and Summary of This Action
This section briefly summarizes the purpose of this action, the
statutory requirements, previous activities related to the Contaminant
Candidate List (CCL) and the approach used to develop the Draft CCL 4.
A. What is the purpose of this action?
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996, requires
EPA to publish a list every five years of currently unregulated
contaminants that may pose risks for drinking water (referred to as the
Contaminant Candidate List, or CCL). This list is subsequently used to
make regulatory determinations on whether to regulate at least five
contaminants from the CCL with national primary drinking water
regulations (NPDWRs) (SDWA section 1412(b)(1)). The purpose of today's
action is to present EPA's draft list of contaminants on the CCL 4 and
the rationale for the selection process used to make the list. Today's
action only addresses the CCL 4. Regulatory determinations for
contaminants on the CCL are a separate agency action.
EPA requests comment on the Draft CCL 4 and suggestions for further
improvements to the selection process for future CCLs for the agency to
consider.
B. Statutory Requirements for CCL, Regulatory Determinations and
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
1. Contaminant Candidate List
Section 1412(b)(1) of the SDWA, as amended in 1996, requires EPA to
publish the CCL every five years. The SDWA specifies that the list must
include contaminants that are not subject to any proposed or
promulgated NPDWRs, are known or anticipated to occur in public water
systems (PWSs), and may require regulation under the SDWA. The
unregulated contaminants considered for listing shall include, but not
be limited to, hazardous substances identified in section 101(14) of
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980, and substances registered as pesticides under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. The SDWA directs the
agency to consider the health effects and occurrence information for
unregulated contaminants to identify those contaminants that present
the greatest public health concern related to exposure from drinking
water. The statute further directs the agency to take into
consideration the effect of contaminants upon subgroups that comprise a
meaningful portion of the general population (such as infants,
children, pregnant women, the elderly and individuals with a history of
serious illness or other subpopulations) that are identifiable as being
at greater risk of adverse health effects due to exposure to
contaminants in drinking water than the general population. EPA
considers age-related subgroups as ``lifestages'' in reference to a
distinguishable time frame in an individual's life characterized by
unique and relatively stable behavioral and/or physiological
characteristics that are associated with development and growth. Thus,
childhood is viewed as a sequence of lifestages, from conception
through fetal development, infancy and adolescence (see https://www2.epa.gov/children/early-life-stages).
2. Regulatory Determinations
Section 1412(b)(1)(B)(ii) of the SDWA, as amended in 1996, requires
EPA at five year intervals, to make determinations of whether or not to
regulate no fewer than five contaminants from the CCL. The 1996 SDWA
Amendments specify three criteria to determine whether a contaminant
may require regulation:
The contaminant may have an adverse effect on the health
of persons;
The contaminant is known to occur or there is a
substantial likelihood that the contaminant will occur in public water
systems with a frequency and at levels of public health concern; and
In the sole judgment of the Administrator, regulation of
such contaminant presents a meaningful opportunity for health risk
reduction for persons served by public water systems.
If EPA determines that these three statutory criteria are met and
makes a final determination to regulate a contaminant, the agency has
24 months to publish a proposed Maximum Contaminant Level Goal \1\
(MCLG) and
[[Page 6078]]
NPDWR \2\. After the proposal, the agency has 18 months to publish and
promulgate a final MCLG and NPDWR (SDWA section 1412(b)(1)(E)) \3\.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The MCLG is the ``maximum level of a contaminant in drinking
water at which no known or anticipated adverse effect on the health
of persons would occur, and which allows an adequate margin of
safety. Maximum contaminant level goals are non-enforceable health
goals.'' (40 CFR 141.2; 42 U.S.C. 300g-1)
\2\ An NPDWR is a legally enforceable standard that applies to
public water systems. An NPDWR sets a legal limit (called a maximum
contaminant level or MCL) or specifies a certain treatment technique
for public water systems for a specific contaminant or group of
contaminants. The MCL is the highest level of a contaminant that is
allowed in drinking water and is set as close to the MCLG as
feasible, using the best available treatment technology and taking
cost into consideration.
\3\ The statute authorizes a nine month extension of this
promulgation date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
Section 1445 of the SDWA mandates that EPA promulgate regulations
(known as the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule or UCMR) to
establish criteria for a monitoring program for unregulated
contaminants. The SDWA requires all large public water systems and a
representative sample of smaller public water systems to monitor for
unregulated contaminants. The statute requires EPA to issue a list
every five years of not more than 30 unregulated contaminants to be
monitored. The SDWA also specifies that EPA include the results of such
monitoring, along with monitoring data for regulated contaminants and
reliable information from other public and private sources, in a
national drinking water occurrence database. EPA developed the National
Contaminant Occurrence Database (NCOD) to contain the monitoring data
from the UCMR program and other data as specified by the SDWA. The
current UCMR (UCMR 3) requires monitoring for 30 contaminants (28
chemicals and two viruses) (77 FR 26071, May 2, 2012 (USEPA, 2012a)).
Sampling is occurring during 2013-2015. Twenty-one of the contaminants
being monitored under UCMR3 are included on the CCL 3 and 20
contaminants being monitored under UCMR3 are included on the Draft CCL
4.
C. Interrelationship of the CCL, Regulatory Determinations and
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
The CCL is the first step in evaluating the subset of potential
contaminants that may require future NPDWRs. The CCL serves as the
initial screening of potential contaminants, and inclusion on the CCL
does not mean that any particular contaminant will necessarily be
regulated in the future. The UCMR provides a mechanism to obtain
nationally representative occurrence data for contaminants. Most
unregulated contaminants chosen by EPA for monitoring have been
selected from the CCL. When selecting contaminants for monitoring under
the UCMR, EPA considers the availability of health effects data and the
need for national occurrence data for contaminants, as well as
analytical method availability and cost, availability of analytical
standards and laboratory capacity to support a nationwide monitoring
program. The contaminant occurrence data collected under the UCMR
serves to better inform future CCLs and regulatory determinations.
Contaminants on the CCL are evaluated to see which ones have sufficient
information to allow the agency to make a regulatory determination.
Those contaminants with sufficient information to make a regulatory
determination are then evaluated based on the three statutory criteria
in SDWA section 1412(b)(1), to determine whether a regulation is
required (called a positive determination) or not required (called a
negative determination). EPA must make regulatory determinations for at
least five contaminants listed on the CCL every five years. For those
contaminants without sufficient information to allow the agency to make
a regulatory determination, EPA encourages research to provide the
information needed to determine whether to regulate the contaminant.
Today's action addresses only the CCL 4 and not the UCMR or regulatory
determinations.
D. Summary of Previous CCLs and Regulatory Determinations
1. The First Contaminant Candidate List
The first CCL (CCL 1) was published on March 2, 1998 (63 FR 10274
(USEPA, 1998)). CCL 1 was developed based on recommendations by the
National Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC) and review by
technical experts. It contained 50 chemicals and 10 microbial
contaminants/groups. EPA consulted with the scientific community,
including the Science Advisory Board, on a process for developing the
first CCL.
2. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL 1 Contaminants
EPA published its final regulatory determinations for a subset of
contaminants listed on CCL 1 on July 18, 2003 (68 FR 42898 (USEPA,
2003)). EPA identified nine contaminants from the 60 contaminants
listed on CCL 1 that had sufficient data and information available to
make regulatory determinations. The nine contaminants were
Acanthamoeba, aldrin, dieldrin, hexachlorobutadiene, manganese,
metribuzin, naphthalene, sodium and sulfate. The agency determined that
an NPDWR was not necessary for any of these nine contaminants at that
time. The agency subsequently issued guidance on Acanthamoeba and
Health Advisories for manganese, sodium and sulfate.
3. The Second Contaminant Candidate List
The agency published its Final CCL 2 on February 24, 2005 (70 FR
9071 (USEPA, 2005)). The agency carried forward the 51 remaining
chemical and microbial contaminants from CCL 1 (that did not have
regulatory determinations) to CCL 2.
4. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL 2 Contaminants
EPA published its final regulatory determinations for a subset of
contaminants listed on CCL 2 on July 30, 2008 (73 FR 44251 (USEPA,
2008b)). EPA identified 11 contaminants from the 51 contaminants listed
on CCL 2 that had sufficient data and information available to make
regulatory determinations. The 11 contaminants were boron, the dacthal
mono- and di-acid degradates; 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl)
ethylene (DDE); 1,3-dichloropropene; 2,4-dinitrotoluene; 2,6-
dinitrotoluene; s-ethyl propylthiocarbamate (EPTC); fonofos; terbacil;
and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane. The agency made a final determination
that an NPDWR was not necessary for any of these 11 contaminants. New
or updated Health Advisories were subsequently issued for boron, the
dacthal degradates, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, 2,6-dinitrotoluene and 1,1,2,2-
tetrachloroethane.
5. The Third Contaminant Candidate List
The agency published its Final CCL 3 on October 8, 2009 (74 FR
51850 (USEPA, 2009e)). The CCL 3 contained 104 chemicals or chemical
groups and 12 microbial contaminants. In developing CCL 3, EPA improved
and built upon the process that was used for CCL 1 and CCL 2. In 1998,
the agency requested advice from the National Academy of Sciences'
National Research Council (NRC) on how to improve the CCL process. The
NRC recommended a more reproducible process whereby a broadly defined
``universe'' of potential drinking water contaminants is identified,
assessed and reduced to a preliminary CCL (PCCL) using simple screening
criteria (NRC, 2001). All of the contaminants on the PCCL would then be
evaluated in more detail to assess the likelihood that specific
contaminants could occur in drinking water at levels that pose a public
health concern. In
[[Page 6079]]
2002, the agency sought input from the NDWAC on how to implement the
NRC's recommendations to improve the CCL process. NDWAC agreed that EPA
should proceed with the NRC's recommendations and provided additional
considerations and recommendations in a 2004 report (NDWAC, 2004).
Based on these consultations, public input and peer review, EPA
developed a multi-step process to select contaminants for the CCL 3,
which included the following key steps:
Identification of a broad universe of potential drinking
water contaminants (the CCL 3 Universe);
Screening the CCL 3 Universe to a PCCL, using criteria
based on the potential to occur in public water systems and the
potential for public health concern;
Evaluation of the PCCL contaminants based on a more
detailed evaluation of occurrence and health effects data, using a
scoring and classification system; and
Incorporating public input and expert review in the CCL 3
process.
EPA also considered new information on contaminants identified by
surveillance efforts, which included collaboration with internal EPA
offices and other federal agencies and the review of scientific
publications and data. The agency provided the public with the
opportunity to nominate contaminants to be considered for the Draft CCL
3 and sought public comment on the Draft CCL 3 before the list was
finalized.
Exhibit 1 illustrates the multi-step CCL 3 approach. This
generalized process was applied to both chemical and microbial
contaminants, though the specific execution of particular steps differs
between them.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04FE15.182
A complete description of the CCL 3 process can be found in the
Draft and Final CCL 3 Federal Register documents (73 FR 9628, February
21, 2008 (USEPA, 2008a) and 74 FR 51850, October 8, 2009 (USEPA,
2009e)). Supporting documents that explain each stage of the CCL 3
process in further detail (i.e., identifying the CCL 3 Universe,
screening to the PCCL, and the classification of the PCCL to the CCL)
can be found at: https://water.epa.gov/scitech/drinkingwater/dws/ccl/ccl3_processflowdiagram.cfm and in the CCL 3 docket at
www.regulations.gov (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2007-1189).
6. The Regulatory Determinations for CCL 3 Contaminants
On February 11, 2011, as a separate action, the agency issued a
positive regulatory determination for perchlorate, a chemical listed in
CCL 1, CCL 2 and CCL 3 (76 FR 7762; USEPA, 2011). Recently, EPA
published preliminary regulatory determinations for five unregulated
contaminants (79 FR 62716, October 20, 2014 (USEPA, 2014a)). The five
contaminants include: 1,3-dinitrobenzene; dimethoate; strontium;
terbufos; and terbufos sulfone. The agency is making preliminary
determinations to regulate one contaminant (strontium) and to not
regulate four contaminants (1,3-dinitrobenzene, dimethoate, terbufos,
and terbufos sulfone). Therefore, the agency is removing perchlorate
and these five contaminants from the Draft CCL 4, pending the result of
the final regulatory determinations for CCL 3.
E. Summary of the Approach Used To Identify and Evaluate Candidates for
CCL 4
EPA proposes an abbreviated three step evaluation and selection
process for CCL 4: (1) Carrying forward CCL 3 contaminants (except
those with regulatory determinations), (2) seeking and evaluating
nominations from the public for additional contaminants to consider,
and (3) evaluating any new data for those contaminants with previous
negative regulatory determinations from CCL 1 or CCL 2 for potential
inclusion on the CCL 4. The
[[Page 6080]]
agency also seeks comment on how to further improve upon the process
developed for CCL 3 as a tool for future CCLs.
1. Carry Forward of CCL 3 Contaminants
EPA carried forward all contaminants listed on CCL 3 to the Draft
CCL 4 with the exception of perchlorate, for which the agency made a
positive regulatory determination, and the five CCL 3 contaminants with
preliminary regulatory determinations (listed in Section D.6 of this
notice), pending their final determinations. This carry forward process
is consistent with that previously used in CCL 2. The agency has taken
this approach based on the following considerations: (1) In developing
the CCL 3, the agency implemented a robust process recommended by the
NRC and the NDWAC to screen and score the universe of potential
contaminants, (2) EPA used the best available, peer-reviewed data and
information to evaluate contaminants for CCL 3; and (3) Carrying
forward CCL 3 contaminants allows the agency to focus resources on
evaluating contaminants nominated by the public for CCL 4 and review
new data for CCL 1 or CCL 2 contaminants with previous negative
regulatory determinations.
2. Summary and Evaluation of CCL 4 Nominated Contaminants
a. CCL 4 Nominations Summary
EPA sought public nominations in a Federal Register document on May
8, 2012, for contaminants to be considered for possible inclusion in
the CCL 4 (77 FR 27057 (USEPA, 2012b)). In the document, the agency
also requested supporting information that has been made available
since the development of the CCL 3, or existing information that was
not considered for CCL 3, which shows that the nominated contaminant
may have an adverse effect on people and occurs or is likely to occur
in public water systems.
EPA received nominations for 59 unique contaminants for the CCL 4,
including 54 chemicals and five microbials. Eight contaminants were
nominated by more than one organization or individual. Aldicarb,
bisphenol A, carbaryl, chlorpyrifos, Toxoplasma gondii, and
Microcystin-LR were each nominated by two separate organizations or
individuals. Manganese and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) were each
nominated by three different organizations or individuals.
Nominations were received from 10 different organizations and/or
individuals. The agency did not require nominators to provide their
name or an affiliated organization. Two nominators remained anonymous
while providing documentation and rationale for the contaminants. Two
other individuals identified themselves but did not provide an
organization affiliation. The identified organizations that nominated
contaminants were:
American Water Works Association,
Natural Resources Defense Council,
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection,
Minnesota Department of Health,
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
EPA received three general types of nominations:
Specific individual chemicals,
Specific individual organisms, and
Groups of contaminants (e.g., Heterotrophic Plate Count
was considered as a group).
The American Water Works Association also provided a letter with
recommendations for the CCL 4 process. The full text of this letter and
all of the nomination submittals in their original form can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov (docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0217). Exhibit 2
contains the specific contaminants identified in public nominations. A
more detailed summary of the nominations process is included in the
support document ``Summary of Nominations for the Fourth Contaminant
Candidate List'' (USEPA, 2015e).
Exhibit 2. Contaminants Nominated for Consideration on the Draft CCL 4:
Nominated Microbial Contaminants
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adenovirus
Heterotrophic Plate Count Bacteria (HPC)
Naegleria fowleri
Toxoplasma gondii
Vibrio cholerae
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nominated Chemical Contaminants
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Name - Registry Name CASRN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3-chloro-4-dichloromethyl-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone...... 77439-76-0
alpha-Hexachlorocyclohexane............................. 319-84-6
Aldicarb................................................ 116-06-3
Alkylphenol mono- to tri-oxylates....................... 68555-24-8
Amoxicillin............................................. 26787-78-0
Azinphos-methyl......................................... 86-50-0
Bacitracin zinc......................................... 1405-89-6
Bentazone............................................... 25057-89-0
Benzyl butyl phthalate.................................. 85-68-7
Bisphenol A............................................. 80-05-7
Bromoxynil.............................................. 1689-84-5
Carbaryl................................................ 63-25-2
Cesium 137.............................................. 10045-97-3
Chlorothalonil.......................................... 1897-45-6
Chlorpyrifos............................................ 2921-88-2
Dibutyl phthalate....................................... 84-74-2
Dicamba................................................. 1918-00-9
Dichlorvos.............................................. 62-73-7
Dicofol................................................. 115-32-2
Dicyclohexyl phthalate.................................. 84-61-7
Diethyl phthalate....................................... 84-66-2
Di-isononyl phthalate................................... 28553-12-0
Dimethyl phthalate...................................... 131-11-3
Di-n-octyl phthalate.................................... 117-84-0
Endosulfan.............................................. 115-29-7
Fluometuron............................................. 2164-17-2
Linezolid............................................... 165800-03-3
Linuron................................................. 330-55-2
Malathion............................................... 121-75-5
Manganese............................................... 7439-96-5
Methicillin............................................. 61-32-5
Methyl parathion........................................ 298-00-0
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)...................... 1634-04-4
Microcystin-LR.......................................... 101043-37-2
Nonylphenol............................................. 25154-52-3
Nonylphenol ethoxylate.................................. 9016-45-9
Octylphenol............................................. 27193-28-8
Octylphenol ethoxylate.................................. 9036-19-5
Oxacillin............................................... 66-79-5
Penicillin.............................................. (multiple
CASRNs)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)........................... 335-67-1
Permethrin.............................................. 52645-53-1
Phosmet................................................. 732-11-6
Progesterone............................................ 57-83-0
Radon................................................... 10043-92-2
Spiramycin.............................................. 8025-81-8
Strontium 90............................................ 121831-99-0
Testosterone............................................ 58-22-0
Trichlorfon............................................. 52-68-6
Triclocarban............................................ 101-20-2
Triclosan............................................... 3380-34-5
Tylosin................................................. 1401-69-0
Vancomycin.............................................. 1404-90-6
Virginiamycin........................................... 11006-76-1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Evaluation of Nominated Contaminants and Data Sources
The SDWA specifies that the CCL only include those contaminants
without any proposed or promulgated NPDWRs. Two nominated contaminants
are covered under the existing NPDWR for beta photon emitters (40 CFR
141.66(d)(1)) (i.e., strontium 90 and cesium 137), hence, the agency
will not consider them for CCL 4. Radon was also nominated, but is not
eligible for CCL 4 since the agency developed and proposed a NPDWR (64
FR 59245, November 2, 1999 (USEPA, 1999)). Aldicarb was nominated but
is not eligible for CCL 4 since it has an existing NPDWR (40 CFR
141.61(c)); (Note, in response to an administrative petition, the
agency issued an
[[Page 6081]]
administrative stay of the effective date of the maximum contaminant
levels for aldicarbs).
For the remaining 55 nominated contaminants, EPA reviewed the
nominations and supporting information to determine if any new data
were provided that had not been previously evaluated for CCL 3. Seven
of the nominated contaminants were on CCL 3 and were carried forward to
the Draft CCL 4, however the agency subsequently excluded those seven
from the CCL 4 Universe. The agency also collected additional data for
the nominated contaminants, when it was available, from both updated
CCL 3 data sources and from new data sources that were not available at
the time the agency finalized CCL 3. A complete list of references
provided by nominators can be found in the support document ``Summary
of Nominations for the Fourth Contaminant Candidate List'' (USEPA,
2015e). A more detailed description of the CCL data sources collected
by EPA may be found in the support document ``Data Sources for the
Contaminant Candidate List 4'' (USEPA, 2015c). If new data were
available, EPA screened and scored the nominated contaminants using the
same process that was used in CCL 3.
Data Sources for Chemical and Microbial Contaminants
For nominated chemicals, occurrence data was collected from updated
CCL 3 data sources including:
2006 production data collected in the Chemical Update
System under the Inventory Update Rule,
2010 data from the Toxics Release Inventory,
2003-2009 data from the USDA Pesticide Data Program, and
EPA's Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data as of January
2013.
Additional occurrence data for the nominated chemicals were
collected from data sources that are new since the CCL 3 including:
United States Geological Survey (USGS) studies that
focused on contaminant occurrence in source waters for public water
systems (Hopple et al., 2009, and Kingsbury et al., 2008) and water
quality in public-supply wells (Toccalino et al., 2010);
Individual State public water supply data provided to EPA
during the second Six-Year Review of regulated contaminants (for the
time period covering 1998-2005) from States including: CA, EPA Region 9
Tribes, FL, IL, NC, OH, SD, TX and WI;
Data from The California State Water Resources Control
Board's Groundwater Ambient Monitoring Assessment program; and
New data from an EPA literature review of published
studies on pharmaceuticals, personal care products and other
contaminants.
In addition to health effects data provided by the nominators, EPA
searched for health effects data for the nominated chemicals from data
sources used in CCL 3 that may have been updated including:
EPA's Integrated Risk Information System program,
EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs,
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR),
The California EPA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment),
The Institute of Medicine,
The National Toxicology Program, and
The World Health Organization (WHO).
EPA also considered new or updated health effects information
contained in the agency's Office of Superfund Remediation and
Technology Innovation Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values.
For microbial contaminants, EPA evaluated waterborne disease
outbreak data, and occurrence and health effects data, from data
sources used in CCL 3, which have been updated (Murray et al., 2011;
CDC, 2008; CDC, 2011). EPA also collected and evaluated information for
microbial contaminants from data sources that are new since publication
of the Final CCL 3.
A more detailed description of the data sources used to evaluate
contaminants for CCL 4 can be found in the support document ``Data
Sources for the Contaminant Candidate List 4'' (USEPA, 2015c) available
at https://www.regulations.gov (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0217).
c. Outcomes for the CCL 4 Nominated Contaminants
Forty-three of the nominated chemicals were included in the CCL 4
Universe. Forty of the nominated chemicals were previously included in
the CCL 3 Universe and were carried forward to the CCL 4 Universe. In
addition to these 40, EPA added three nominated chemicals (i.e.,
octylphenol ethoxylate, oxacillin, and virginiamycin) to the CCL 4
Universe based on health effects and/or occurrence data that is newly
available since the Final CCL 3. EPA screened all of the nominated
chemicals in the CCL 4 Universe according to the screening criteria
developed for CCL 3 and based on that evaluation, the agency included
20 of the nominated chemicals on the PCCL 4. Eighteen of those 20
chemicals were also included in the PCCL 3, and EPA added two new
chemicals (manganese and nonylphenol) to the PCCL 4. The data used to
screen the nominated chemicals from the CCL 4 Universe to the PCCL 4
can be found in the ``Screening Document for the Draft PCCL 4 Nominated
Contaminants'' (USEPA, 2015d). EPA further evaluated the nominated
chemicals on the PCCL 4 based on the classification process developed
in CCL 3 and determined that manganese and nonylphenol should be added
to the Draft CCL 4 based on new health and/or occurrence information
(in addition to the chemicals carried forward from the CCL 3). The data
that the agency used to further evaluate the nominated contaminants
from the PCCL 4, and to select those that were included in the Draft
CCL 4, can be found in the ``Contaminant Information Sheets (CISs) for
the Draft Fourth Preliminary Contaminant Candidate List (PCCL 4)
Nominated Contaminants'' (USEPA, 2015b).
Manganese is an element that naturally occurs in oxide forms and in
combinations with other elements in many minerals. Manganese is an
essential nutrient for humans and animals. Manganese ores are used in a
variety of applications in the United States. Its principal use is in
steel production to improve hardness, stiffness and strength (ATSDR,
2012). In 2003 and as part of the first (CCL 1) Regulatory
Determination process, EPA made a negative regulatory determination for
manganese based on the health and occurrence data available at that
time. However, CCL 4 nominators cited more than 20 recent studies that
indicate concern for neurological effects in children and infants
exposed to excess manganese, which were not available at the time
manganese was considered for the first Regulatory Determination or CCL
3. In addition, new monitoring studies from USGS and drinking water
monitoring information from several States support an earlier survey
(i.e., the National Inorganics and Radionuclides Survey), which
indicates manganese is known to occur in drinking water. EPA has
determined that the new health effects information and additional
occurrence data merit listing manganese in the Draft CCL 4.
Nonylphenol is used in the preparation of lubricating oil
additives, resins, plasticizers and antioxidants for plastics and
rubber. Additionally, 60 percent of nonylphenol is used in the
production of nonylphenol ethoxylates, which are found in detergents
and used
[[Page 6082]]
in the treatment of textiles. Nonylphenol was previously considered for
CCL 3. It was included in the CCL 3 Universe, but was not included in
the PCCL 3 or CCL 3. Updated health and occurrence data are now
available for nonylphenol, and these data were considered by the agency
in evaluating nonylphenol for the Draft CCL 4. Nonylphenol and some of
its degradation products have been found to have estrogenic activity in
rats and mice (WHO, 2004), and additional occurrence data are available
from a USGS National Reconnaissance monitoring study of ambient water
(Kolpin et al., 2002). EPA has determined that this updated health data
and additional occurrence data show that nonylphenol is anticipated to
occur in PWSs, has potential adverse health effects and, therefore,
merits listing on the Draft CCL 4.
EPA considered adding dicofol to the Draft CCL 4, however, both of
the most recent manufacturers of the pesticide ceased all production as
of May 17, 2011, and agreed to an EPA registration cancellation, which
effectively prohibits all labeled uses of existing stocks after October
31, 2016. Use of dicofol has declined significantly in recent years. In
addition, the chemical properties of dicofol indicate that it has low
mobility in water because it is expected to adsorb to organic matter in
soil and sediment and it has moderately low solubility in water. As a
result, the agency did not list dicofol on the Draft CCL 4 because it
is not known or anticipated to occur in drinking water.
EPA evaluated the microbial contaminants nominated for the CCL 4
(see Exhibit 2) using the same process developed for the CCL 3. Taylor
et al. (2001) was used as the basis of the microbial CCL 3 Universe,
which includes a list of 1,415 known human pathogens. EPA added 10
additional microbes to the CCL 3 Universe based on CCL 3 public
nominations and other available data, thus bringing the total number of
microbes in the CCL 3 Universe to 1,425. More detailed information
about the selection of the CCL 3 Universe for microbial contaminants
can be found in the support document ``Final Contaminant Candidate List
3 Microbes: Identifying the Universe'' (USEPA, 2009b).
The microbes in the CCL 3 Universe were subsequently screened into
the PCCL 3 by applying 12 criteria to narrow the CCL 3 Universe of all
human pathogens to just those pathogens that could be transmitted
through drinking water. More detailed information on the screening
process developed under CCL 3 for the microbial contaminants can be
found in the support document ``Final Contaminant Candidate List 3
Microbes: Screening to the PCCL'' (USEPA, 2009d).
All the microbes nominated for the CCL 4, with the exception of
Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC) bacteria, were already included in both
the CCL 3 Universe and PCCL 3. Thus, the agency carried forward those
microbes to the CCL 4 Universe and PCCL 4, respectively.
EPA reviewed new and/or updated sources of information for the
nominated microbes on the PCCL 4 (i.e., Adenovirus, Naegleria fowleri,
Toxoplasma gondii and Vibrio cholerae), and determined that there were
no new data that would change the scores or listing decisions for these
contaminants.
Vibrio cholerae and Toxoplasma gondii will remain on the Draft PCCL
4 because there are no new data that would change the CCL 3 scores or
listing decisions for these contaminants. Naegleria fowleri and
Adenovirus were on the Final CCL 3 and are therefore being carried
forward to the Draft CCL 4, along with the other microbes included on
the Final CCL 3. A detailed description of the CCL 3 scoring protocol
for microbes can be found in the support document ``Final Contaminant
Candidate List 3 Microbes: PCCL to CCL Process'' (USEPA, 2009c). The
data used to further evaluate the nominated microbes on the PCCL 4 can
be found in the ``Contaminant Information Sheets (CISs) for the Draft
Fourth Preliminary Contaminant Candidate List (PCCL 4) Nominated
Contaminants'' (USEPA, 2015b).
The group of HPC bacteria was nominated for CCL 4, but EPA is not
including it on the Draft CCL 4. HPC may include both pathogenic and
harmless bacteria. However, available epidemiological evidence shows no
relationship between gastrointestinal illness and HPC bacteria in
drinking water (Calderon, 1988; Calderon and Mood, 1991; Payment et
al., 1997; WHO, 2003). Thus, EPA considers the potential health risk of
HPC bacteria in drinking water as likely negligible and is not
including HPC on the Draft CCL 4. In addition, HPC bacteria are
addressed by the treatment technique requirements under the Surface
Water Treatment Rule, where they can be monitored in lieu of a
disinfectant residual.
3. Evaluation of Previous Negative Regulatory Determinations
EPA evaluated the 20 contaminants from CCL 1 and CCL 2 for which
the agency made negative regulatory determinations. EPA collected and
evaluated new or updated data for the previous negative regulatory
determinations, if data were available, from the data sources listed in
section II.E.2(b), ``Evaluation of Nominated Contaminants and Data
Sources.'' Since regulatory determinations for the CCL 3 contaminants
were recently made using the best available data, EPA did not include
the CCL 3 regulatory determinations in this evaluation. EPA is adding
manganese to the Draft CCL 4, as previously discussed in section
11.E.2, ``Summary and Evaluation for CCL 4 Nominated Contaminants.''
The agency concluded there was not sufficient new information for any
of the other 19 contaminants with previous negative regulatory
determinations to justify including them on the Draft CCL 4. A listing
of previous negative regulatory determinations is included in sections
II.D.2 and II.D.4.
F. What is included on EPA's Draft CCL 4?
The Draft CCL 4 includes 100 chemicals and 12 microbes.
Exhibit 3. Draft Contaminant Candidate List 4: Microbial Contaminants
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pathogens
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adenovirus
Caliciviruses
Campylobacter jejuni
Enterovirus
Escherichia coli (0157)
Helicobacter pylori
Hepatitis A virus
Legionella pneumophila
Mycobacterium avium
Naegleria fowleri
Salmonella enterica
Shigella sonnei
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chemical Contaminants \4\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common name--Registry name CASRN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane............................... 630-20-6
1,1-Dichloroethane...................................... 75-34-3
1,2,3-Trichloropropane.................................. 96-18-4
1,3-Butadiene........................................... 106-99-0
1,4-Dioxane............................................. 123-91-1
17 alpha-Estradiol...................................... 57-91-0
1-Butanol............................................... 71-36-3
2-Methoxyethanol........................................ 109-86-4
2-Propen-1-ol........................................... 107-18-6
3-Hydroxycarbofuran..................................... 16655-82-6
4,4'-Methylenedianiline................................. 101-77-9
Acephate................................................ 30560-19-1
Acetaldehyde............................................ 75-07-0
Acetamide............................................... 60-35-5
Acetochlor.............................................. 34256-82-1
Acetochlor ethanesulfonic acid (ESA).................... 187022-11-3
[[Page 6083]]
Acetochlor oxanilic acid (OA)........................... 194992-44-4
Acrolein................................................ 107-02-8
Alachlor ethanesulfonic acid (ESA)...................... 142363-53-9
Alachlor oxanilic acid (OA)............................. 171262-17-2
Alpha-Hexachlorocyclohexane............................. 319-84-6
Aniline................................................. 62-53-3
Bensulide............................................... 741-58-2
Benzyl chloride......................................... 100-44-7
Butylated hydroxyanisole................................ 25013-16-5
Captan.................................................. 133-06-2
Chlorate................................................ 14866-68-3
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)......................... 74-87-3
Clethodim............................................... 110429-62-4
Cobalt.................................................. 7440-48-4
Cumene hydroperoxide.................................... 80-15-9
Cyanotoxins............................................. N/A
Dicrotophos............................................. 141-66-2
Dimethipin.............................................. 55290-64-7
Disulfoton.............................................. 298-04-4
Diuron.................................................. 330-54-1
Equilenin............................................... 517-09-9
Equilin................................................. 474-86-2
Erythromycin............................................ 114-07-8
Estradiol (17-beta estradiol)........................... 50-28-2
Estriol................................................. 50-27-1
Estrone................................................. 53-16-7
Ethinyl Estradiol (17-alpha Ethinyl Estradiol).......... 57-63-6
Ethoprop................................................ 13194-48-4
Ethylene glycol......................................... 107-21-1
Ethylene oxide.......................................... 75-21-8
Ethylene thiourea....................................... 96-45-7
Fenamiphos.............................................. 22224-92-6
Formaldehyde............................................ 50-00-0
Germanium............................................... 7440-56-4
Halon 1011 (bromochloromethane)......................... 74-97-5
HCFC-22................................................. 75-45-6
Hexane.................................................. 110-54-3
Hydrazine............................................... 302-01-2
Manganese............................................... 7439-96-5
Mestranol............................................... 72-33-3
Methamidophos........................................... 10265-92-6
Methanol................................................ 67-56-1
Methyl bromide (Bromomethane)........................... 74-83-9
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)...................... 1634-04-4
Metolachlor............................................. 51218-45-2
Metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid (ESA)................... 171118-09-5
Metolachlor oxanilic acid (OA).......................... 152019-73-3
Molinate................................................ 2212-67-1
Molybdenum.............................................. 7439-98-7
Nitrobenzene............................................ 98-95-3
Nitroglycerin........................................... 55-63-0
N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone.................................. 872-50-4
N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA)............................ 55-18-5
N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)........................... 62-75-9
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine (NDPA)....................... 621-64-7
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine.................................. 86-30-6
N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR)............................. 930-55-2
Nonylphenol............................................. 25154-52-3
Norethindrone (19-Norethisterone)....................... 68-22-4
n-Propylbenzene......................................... 103-65-1
o-Toluidine............................................. 95-53-4
Oxirane, methyl-........................................ 75-56-9
Oxydemeton-methyl....................................... 301-12-2
Oxyfluorfen............................................. 42874-03-3
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS).................... 1763-23-1
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)........................... 335-67-1
Permethrin.............................................. 52645-53-1
Profenofos.............................................. 41198-08-7
Quinoline............................................... 91-22-5
RDX (Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine)........... 121-82-4
sec-Butylbenzene........................................ 135-98-8
Tebuconazole............................................ 107534-96-3
Tebufenozide............................................ 112410-23-8
Tellurium............................................... 13494-80-9
Thiodicarb.............................................. 59669-26-0
Thiophanate-methyl...................................... 23564-05-8
Toluene diisocyanate.................................... 26471-62-5
Tribufos................................................ 78-48-8
Triethylamine........................................... 121-44-8
Triphenyltin hydroxide (TPTH)........................... 76-87-9
Urethane................................................ 51-79-6
Vanadium................................................ 7440-62-2
Vinclozolin............................................. 50471-44-8
Ziram................................................... 137-30-4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Contaminants on the Final CCL 3 but not on the Draft CCL 4 are: 1,3-
dinitrobenzene, dimethoate, perchlorate, strontium, terbufos, and
terbufos sulfone.
III. Request for Comment
The purpose of this document is to present the Draft CCL 4 and seek
comment on the contaminants selected for the Draft CCL 4, including any
supporting data that can be used in developing the Final CCL 4. Data
that the agency obtained and evaluated for developing the Draft CCL 4
may be found in the CCL 4 support documents located in the docket for
this document. Specifically, the agency is asking for public comments
on including manganese and nonylphenol on the CCL 4, and any additional
data and information on manganese and nonylphenol health effects and
concentrations in finished or ambient water. EPA is also seeking
comment on ways the agency can improve or refine the selection process
developed for CCL 3, and will take these comments into consideration
when developing future CCLs. The agency will consider all information
and comments received in determining the Final CCL 4, in the
development of future CCLs, and in the EPA's efforts to set drinking
water priorities in the future.
IV. EPA's Next Steps
Between now and the publication of the Final CCL 4, the agency will
evaluate comments received during the public comment period for this
document, consult with the EPA's Science Advisory Board and revise the
CCL 4 as appropriate.
V. References
ATSDR. 2012. ToxFAQs for Manganese. Atlanta, GA. October, 2012.
Available on the Internet at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tf.asp?id=101&tid=23.
Calderon, R.L. 1988. Bacteria Colonizing Point-of-Entry Granular
Activated Carbon filters and their Relationship to Human Health. EPA
CR-813978-01-0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC.
Calderon, R.L. and Mood, E.W. 1991. Bacteria Colonizing Point-
of-Use Granular Activated Carbon Filters and their Relationship to
Human Health. EPA CR 811904-01-0, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC.
CDC. 2008. Surveillance for Waterborne Disease and Outbreaks
Associated with Drinking Water and Water not Intended for Drinking--
United States, 2005-2006. MMWR 57 (SS-9).
CDC. 2011. Surveillance for Waterborne Disease and Outbreaks
Associated with Drinking Water--United States, 2007-2008. MMWR 60
(SS-12).
Code of Federal Regulations. Revised as of July 1, 2012. Title
40 Protection of the Environment. Subpart G--National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations: Maximum Contaminant Levels and Maximum
Residual Disinfectant Levels. Section 141.61 (c).
Code of Federal Regulations. Revised as of July 1, 2012. Title
40 Protection of the Environment. Subpart G--National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations: Maximum Contaminant Levels and Maximum
Residual Disinfectant Levels. Section 141.66 (d)(1).
Hopple, J.A., G.C. Delzer, and J.A. Kingsbury. 2009.
Anthropogenic Organic Compounds in Source Water of Selected
Community Water Systems that Use Groundwater, 2002-05. U.S.
Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5200. 74 pp.
Available on the Internet at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5200/pdf/sir2009-5200.pdf.
Kingsbury, J.A., G.C. Delzer, and J.A. Hopple. 2008.
Anthropogenic Organic Compounds in Source Water of Nine Community
Water Systems that Withdraw from Streams, 2002-05. U.S. Geological
Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5208. 66 pp. Available
on the Internet at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5208/pdf/sir2008-5208.pdf.
Kolpin, D. W., E. T. Furlong, M. T. Meyer, E. M. Thurman, S. D.
Zaugg, L. B. Barber, and H. T. Buxton. 2002. Pharmaceuticals,
Hormones, and Other Organic Wastewater Contaminants in U.S. Streams,
1999-2000: A National Reconnaissance. Environmental Science and
Technology, v. 36, no. 6.
Murray, P. R., E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. L. Landry, and
M. A. Pfaller (ed.). 2011.
[[Page 6084]]
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 10th Edition, ASM Press,
Washington, DC.
National Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC). 2004. National
Drinking Water Advisory Council Report on the CCL Classification
Process to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, May 19, 2004.
National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Classifying Drinking
Water Contaminants for Regulatory Consideration. National Academy
Press, Washington, DC.
Payment, P., J. Siemiatycki, L. Richardson, G. Renaud, E.
Franco, and M. Prevost. 1997. A prospective epidemiological study of
gastrointestinal health effects due to the consumption of drinking
water. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. (7): 5-31.
Taylor, L.H., S.M. Latham, and M.E. Woolhouse. 2001. Risk
Factors for Human Disease Emergence (Appendix A). Phil. Trans. R.
Soc. Lond. B. Vol 256, pp. 983-989.
Toccalino, P.L., J.E. Norman, and K.J. Hitt. 2010. Quality of
Source Water from Public-supply Wells in the United States, 1993-
2007. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-
5024. 206 pp. Available on the Internet at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5024/.
USEPA, 1998. Announcement of the Drinking Water Contaminant
Candidate List; Notice. Federal Register. Vol. 63, No. 40. p. 10273,
March 2, 1998.
USEPA, 1999. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Radon-
222; Proposed Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 64, No. 211. p. 59245,
November 2, 1999.
USEPA. 2003. Announcement of Regulatory Determinations for
Priority Contaminants on the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate
List. Federal Register. Vol. 68, No. 138. p. 42898, July 18, 2003.
USEPA. 2005. Notice--Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List
2; Final Notice. Federal Register. Vol. 70, No. 36. p. 9071,
February 24, 2005.
USEPA. 2008a. Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 3--
Draft. Federal Register. Vol. 73, No. 35. p. 9628, February 21,
2008.
USEPA. 2008b. Drinking Water: Regulatory Determinations
Regarding Contaminants on the Second Drinking Water Contaminant
Candidate List. Federal Register. Vol. 73, No. 174. p. 44251, July
30, 2008.
USEPA. 2009a. Final Contaminant Candidate List 3 Chemicals:
Identifying the Universe. EPA 815-R09-006. August, 2009.
USEPA. 2009b. Final Contaminant Candidate List 3 Microbes:
Identifying the Universe. EPA 815-R-09-004. August, 2009.
USEPA. 2009c. Final Contaminant Candidate List 3 Microbes: PCCL
to CCL Process. EPA 815-R-09-009. August, 2009.
USEPA. 2009d. Final Contaminant Candidate List 3 Microbes:
Screening to the PCCL. EPA 815-R-09-0005. August, 2009.
USEPA. 2009e. Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 3--
Final. Federal Register. Vol. 74, No. 194. p. 51850, October 8,
2009.
USEPA. 2011. Drinking Water: Regulatory Determination on
Perchlorate. Federal Register. Vol. 76, No. 29. p. 7762, February
11, 2011.
USEPA. 2012a. Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant
Monitoring Regulation (UCMR 3) for Public Water Systems. Federal
Register. Vol. 77, No. 85. p. 26071, May 2, 2012.
USEPA. 2012b. Request for Nominations of Drinking Water
Contaminants for the Fourth Contaminant Candidate List. Federal
Register. Vol. 77, No. 89. p. 27057, May 8, 2012.
USEPA. 2014a. Announcement of Preliminary Regulatory
Determination for Contaminants on the Third Drinking Water
Contaminant Candidate List. Federal Register. Vol. 79, No. 202, p.
62716, October 20, 2014.
USEPA. 2015b. Contaminant Information Sheets (CISs) for the
Draft Fourth Preliminary Contaminant Candidate List (PCCL 4)
Nominated Contaminants. EPA 815-R-15-003. January, 2015.
USEPA. 2015c. Data Sources for the Contaminant Candidate List 4.
EPA 815-R-15-004. January, 2015.
USEPA. 2015d. Screening Document for the Draft PCCL 4 Nominated
Contaminants. EPA 815-R-15-002. January, 2015.
USEPA. 2015e. Summary of Nominations for the Fourth Contaminant
Candidate List. EPA 815-R-15-001. January, 2015.
WHO. 2003. Emerging Issues in Water and Infectious Disease
Series: Heterotrophic Plate Counts and Drinking-water Safety. ed. J.
Bartram, J. Cotruvo, M. Exner, C. Fricker, and A. Glasmacher. IWA
Publishing, London, UK. P. 119-122.
WHO. 2004. Integrated Risk Assessment: Nonylphenol Case Study.
ed. D. Bontje, J. Hermens, T. Vermeire, and T. Damstra. 63 pp.
December, 2004. Available on the Internet at: https://www.who.int/ipcs/methods/Nonylphenol.pdf.>
Dated: January 27, 2015.
Kenneth J. Kopocis,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2015-02210 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P