Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 5915-5918 [2015-02074]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations Airbus’s EASA design organization approval (DOA). (l) New Repetitive Inspections For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(5) of this AD: At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(2) of this AD, perform an HFEC inspection to detect cracks of the aft face of the wing rear spar web in the area adjacent to the build slot, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011. Repeat the inspection thereafter at the applicable time specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011, except as specified in paragraph (m) of this AD. Accomplishment of the initial inspection required by this paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (j) of this AD. (1) At the earlier of the applicable times specified in the ‘‘Threshold Inspection’’ column in table 1 through table 4 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011, specifies ‘‘(FH)’’ and ‘‘(FC)’’ in the ‘‘Threshold Inspection’’ columns, this AD specifies ‘‘total flight hours’’ and ‘‘total flight cycles.’’ The inspection threshold for airplanes on which Airbus Modification 11130 (Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6063) has been done is determined from the point of embodiment of Airbus Modification 11130, and is not based on total flight cycles. (2) At the earlier of the applicable times specified in the ‘‘Grace Period’’ column in table 1 through table 4 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011, specifies ‘‘(FH)’’ and ‘‘(FC)’’ in the ‘‘Grace Period’’ columns, this AD specifies ‘‘flight hours’’ and ‘‘flight cycles.’’ Where Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011, specifies a grace period, this AD requires compliance within the specified time after the effective date of this AD. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES (m) Compliance Time Exceptions The repetitive inspection required by paragraph (l) of this AD must be accomplished at the earlier of the applicable times specified in the ‘‘Repeat Interval’’ column of table 1 through table 4 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011, specifies ‘‘(FC)’’ and ‘‘(FH)’’ in the ‘‘Repeat Interval’’ columns, this AD specifies ‘‘flight hours’’ and ‘‘flight cycles.’’ (n) New Repair If any crack is detected during any inspection required by paragraph (l) of this AD: Before further flight, repair the crack, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:27 Feb 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 2011, specifies to contact Airbus for an approved repair: Before further flight, repair the crack using a method approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. Repair of any cracking, as required by this paragraph, does not terminate the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (l) of this AD. (o) Credit for Previous Actions (1) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by paragraphs (j) and (k) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, dated August 12, 1994. (2) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by paragraphs (j), (k), (l), and (n) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 03, dated October 25, 1999, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD. (p) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425–227–2125; fax 425–227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013–0013R1, dated February 20, 2013, for related information. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov/ #!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0138-0003. (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference in this AD is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (r)(5) and (r)(6) of this AD. Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 (r) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on effective March 11, 2015. (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, Revision 04, dated February 22, 2011. (ii) Reserved. (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on December 27, 1995 (60 FR 58213, November 27, 1995). (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–0213, dated August 12, 1994. (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6059, dated August 12, 1994. (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. (6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 15, 2015. John P. Piccola, Jr., Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015–01188 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2014–0344; Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–034–AD; Amendment 39–18095; AD 2015–02–26] RIN 2120–AA64 (q) Related Information PO 00000 5915 Sfmt 4700 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013–24– 13 for certain The Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM 04FER1 5916 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES –400, –500, –600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes. AD 2013–24– 13 required replacing the pivot link assembly for certain airplanes, replacing the seat track link assemblies or modifying the existing seat track link assembly for certain airplanes, or modifying the existing seat track link assembly fastener for certain other airplanes. AD 2013–24–13 also required inspecting, changing, or repairing the seat track link assembly for certain other airplanes. Since we issued AD 2013–24– 13, a certain paragraph reference in that AD was found to be mis-identified; this AD corrects this paragraph reference. We are issuing this AD to prevent seat detachment in an emergency landing, which could cause injury to occupants of the passenger compartment and affect emergency egress. DATES: This AD is effective March 11, 2015. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of January 7, 2014 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013). ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https:// www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 0344; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Piccola, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:27 Feb 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6483; fax: 425–917–6590; email: sarah.piccola@ faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013). AD 2013–24–13 applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, –500, –600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July 2, 2014 (79 FR 37676). The NPRM was prompted by the discovery that a paragraph reference was mis-identified in AD 2013–24–13. The NPRM proposed to continue to require replacing the pivot link assembly for certain airplanes, replacing the seat track link assemblies or modifying the existing seat track link assembly for certain airplanes, or modifying the existing seat track link assembly fastener for certain other airplanes. The NPRM also proposed to continue to require inspecting, changing, or repairing the seat track link assembly for certain other airplanes. We are issuing this AD to prevent seat detachment in an emergency landing, which could cause injury to occupants of the passenger compartment and affect emergency egress. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014) and the FAA’s response to each comment. Boeing stated that it concurred with the content of the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014). Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions Aviation Partners Boeing stated that the installation of winglets per Supplemental Type Certificates (STC) ST00830SE (https://rgl.faa.gov/ Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/ rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008 616A7862578880060456C?Open Document&Highlight=st00830se) and STC ST01219SE (https://rgl.faa.gov/ Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/ rgstc.nsf/0/ebd1cec7b301293e86257 cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does not affect the accomplishment of the manufacturer’s service instructions. PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Request To Withdraw the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014) KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (KLM) requested that the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014) be withdrawn. KLM stated that superseding AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with another AD having a different AD number would be an unnecessary burden to operators of Model 737–600, –700, –800, and –900 series airplanes. KLM stated that the main reason for superseding AD 2013– 24–13 was because of a typographical error that only affects operators of Model 737–100, –200, –300, –400, and –500 series airplanes. KLM suggested that the FAA issue an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) letter for the operators of Model 737–100, –200, –300, –400, and –500 series airplanes, instead of superseding AD 2013–24–13. We do not agree to withdraw the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014). An AMOC letter to address this situation is not appropriate. Paragraph (i) of AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), included a cross-reference to paragraph (g)(3) of that AD, but should have referred to paragraph (g)(4) of that AD. By changing this incorrect reference in the NPRM to ‘‘paragraph (g)(4),’’ an additional concurrent action is required for airplanes identified as Group 5 in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013. Therefore, notice and opportunity for public comment was necessary. We added a clarifying phrase in paragraph (i) of this AD explaining that there is a corrected paragraph reference (i.e., ‘‘(g)(3)’’ was changed to ‘‘(g)(4)’’), which results in a new concurrent action for Group 5 airplanes. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes: • Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; and • Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014). We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM 04FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 1,281 airplanes of U.S. registry. 5917 We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: ESTIMATED COSTS Action Labor cost Replacement or modification [retained actions from AD 2013-24-13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013)]. Up to 41 work-hours × $85 per hour = $3,485. Concurrent installation or modification (Groups 1, 2, 4, and 5 airplanes) [retained actions from AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013)]. 1 Up to 60 work-hours × $85 per hour = $5,100. Cost per product U.S. airplanes Up to $15,478. Up to $18,963. 1,281 Up to $18,089. Up to $23,189. 214 Parts cost Cost on U.S. operators Up to $24,291,603. Up to $4,962,446. 1 We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide a cost estimate for the actions required for airplanes in Group 6 identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013. This new AD adds no new costs to affected operators. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:27 Feb 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), and adding the following new AD: ■ 2015–02–26 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39–18095; Docket No. FAA–2014–0344; Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–034–AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective March 11, 2015. (b) Affected ADs This AD replaces AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013). (c) Applicability This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category. (1) The Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300,—400, and –500 series PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013. (2) The Boeing Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737– 53–1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by a report that a Boeing study found that the seat track attachment of body station 520 flexible joint is structurally deficient in resisting a 9g forward emergency load condition in certain seating configurations. We are issuing this AD to prevent seat detachment in an emergency landing, which could cause injury to occupants of the passenger compartment and affect emergency egress. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Retained Repair or Replacement of Seat Track Link Assembly or Seat Track Link Assembly Fastener, With No Changes This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with no changes. Within 60 months after January 7, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013–24–13), do the actions specified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), or (g)(4) of this AD, as applicable. (1) For Model 737–600, –700, 700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes: Install new, improved pivot link assemblies, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737– 53–1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011. (2) For airplanes in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013: Replace the seat track link assembly, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM 04FER1 5918 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53– 1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013. (3) For airplanes in Group 6, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013: Inspect, change, or repair the seat track link assembly, as applicable, using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. (4) For airplanes in Group 5, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013: Modify the existing seat track link assembly fastener, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53– 1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013. (h) Retained Optional Modification of Seat Track Link Assembly, With No Changes This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (h) of AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with no changes. In lieu of the replacement specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, doing the optional modification of the seat track link assembly, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013, is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, provided the modification is done within the compliance time specified in paragraph (g) of this AD. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES (i) Retained Concurrent Actions, With New Concurrent Action for Group 5 Airplanes This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with a corrected paragraph reference (i.e., ‘‘(g)(3)’’ was changed to ‘‘(g)(4)’’), which results in a new concurrent action for Group 5 airplanes. For airplanes in Groups 1, 2, 4, and 5, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013: Before or concurrently with the accomplishment of the actions specified in paragraph (g)(2) or (g)(4) of this AD, install a new seat track link assembly or modify the seat track link assembly, as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1120, Revision 1, dated May 13, 1993. (j) Retained Credit for Previous Actions, With No Changes This paragraph restates the credit provisions specified in paragraph (j) of AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with no changes. (1) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before January 7, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013)), using Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1244, dated April 17, 2003; Revision 1, dated May 29, 2003; Revision 2, dated March 15, 2007; or Revision 3, dated December 4, 2008; which are not incorporated by reference in this AD. (2) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(4) of this AD, if those actions were VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:27 Feb 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 performed before January 7, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013–24–13, Amendment 39–17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013)), using Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, dated May 7, 2007, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD. (k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by The Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (l) Related Information (1) For more information about this AD, contact Sarah Piccola, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917– 6483; fax: 425–917–6590; email: sarah.piccola@faa.gov. (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (m)(4) and (m)(5) of this AD. (m) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on January 7, 2014 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013). (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1120, Revision 1, dated May 13, 1993. (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011. (iii) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013. (4) For information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124– PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https:// www.myboeingfleet.com. (5) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 21, 2015. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015–02074 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 91 [Docket No.: FAA–2000–7360; Amdt. No. 91–335] RIN 2120–AK59 Removal of Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 87—Prohibition Against Certain Flights Within the Territory and Airspace of Ethiopia Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Immediately adopted final rule. AGENCY: This action removes the prohibition against certain flights within the territory and airspace of Ethiopia contained in Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) No. 87 from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The prohibition only applied to flight operations within the territory and airspace of Ethiopia north of 12 degrees north latitude conducted by United States (U.S.) air carriers or commercial operators; persons exercising the privileges of an airman certificate issued by the FAA, unless that person was engaged in the operation of a U.S.registered aircraft for a foreign air carrier; and operators using an aircraft registered in the United States, except where the operator of such aircraft was a foreign air carrier. The FAA has now determined that the safety and security situation that prompted the above flight prohibition has significantly improved, and that it is safe for U.S. civil flights to be operated within the entire territory and airspace of Ethiopia, subject to the approval of and in accordance with the SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM 04FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5915-5918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0344; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-034-AD; 
Amendment 39-18095; AD 2015-02-26]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-24-13 for 
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300,

[[Page 5916]]

-400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes. AD 
2013-24-13 required replacing the pivot link assembly for certain 
airplanes, replacing the seat track link assemblies or modifying the 
existing seat track link assembly for certain airplanes, or modifying 
the existing seat track link assembly fastener for certain other 
airplanes. AD 2013-24-13 also required inspecting, changing, or 
repairing the seat track link assembly for certain other airplanes. 
Since we issued AD 2013-24-13, a certain paragraph reference in that AD 
was found to be mis-identified; this AD corrects this paragraph 
reference. We are issuing this AD to prevent seat detachment in an 
emergency landing, which could cause injury to occupants of the 
passenger compartment and affect emergency egress.

DATES: This AD is effective March 11, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of January 7, 
2014 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information 
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call 425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0344; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Piccola, Aerospace Engineer, 
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle 
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6483; fax: 425-917-6590; email: 
sarah.piccola@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 to supersede AD 2013-24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, 
December 3, 2013). AD 2013-24-13 applied to certain The Boeing Company 
Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, 
and -900 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register 
on July 2, 2014 (79 FR 37676). The NPRM was prompted by the discovery 
that a paragraph reference was mis-identified in AD 2013-24-13. The 
NPRM proposed to continue to require replacing the pivot link assembly 
for certain airplanes, replacing the seat track link assemblies or 
modifying the existing seat track link assembly for certain airplanes, 
or modifying the existing seat track link assembly fastener for certain 
other airplanes. The NPRM also proposed to continue to require 
inspecting, changing, or repairing the seat track link assembly for 
certain other airplanes. We are issuing this AD to prevent seat 
detachment in an emergency landing, which could cause injury to 
occupants of the passenger compartment and affect emergency egress.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79 
FR 37676, July 2, 2014) and the FAA's response to each comment.
    Boeing stated that it concurred with the content of the NPRM (79 FR 
37676, July 2, 2014).

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that the installation of winglets 
per Supplemental Type Certificates (STC) ST00830SE (https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008616A7862578880060456C?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00830se) and 
STC ST01219SE (https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgstc.nsf/0/ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does 
not affect the accomplishment of the manufacturer's service 
instructions.

Request To Withdraw the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014)

    KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (KLM) requested that the NPRM (79 FR 
37676, July 2, 2014) be withdrawn. KLM stated that superseding AD 2013-
24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with another 
AD having a different AD number would be an unnecessary burden to 
operators of Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 series airplanes. KLM 
stated that the main reason for superseding AD 2013-24-13 was because 
of a typographical error that only affects operators of Model 737-100, 
-200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. KLM suggested that the FAA 
issue an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) letter for the 
operators of Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series 
airplanes, instead of superseding AD 2013-24-13.
    We do not agree to withdraw the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014). 
An AMOC letter to address this situation is not appropriate. Paragraph 
(i) of AD 2013-24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 
2013), included a cross-reference to paragraph (g)(3) of that AD, but 
should have referred to paragraph (g)(4) of that AD. By changing this 
incorrect reference in the NPRM to ``paragraph (g)(4),'' an additional 
concurrent action is required for airplanes identified as Group 5 in 
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, 
dated May 23, 2013. Therefore, notice and opportunity for public 
comment was necessary. We added a clarifying phrase in paragraph (i) of 
this AD explaining that there is a corrected paragraph reference (i.e., 
``(g)(3)'' was changed to ``(g)(4)''), which results in a new 
concurrent action for Group 5 airplanes.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have 
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; 
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 37676, July 2, 2014).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the 
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

[[Page 5917]]

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,281 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Cost per                       Cost on U.S.
           Action                Labor cost       Parts cost        product      U.S. airplanes     operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement or modification   Up to 41 work-   Up to $15,478..  Up to $18,963..           1,281  Up to
 [retained actions from AD     hours x $85                                                        $24,291,603.
 2013[dash]24[dash]13,         per hour =
 Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR     $3,485.
 72558, December 3, 2013)].
 
Concurrent installation or    Up to 60 work-   Up to $18,089..  Up to $23,189..             214  Up to
 modification (Groups 1, 2,    hours x $85                                                        $4,962,446.
 4, and 5 airplanes)           per hour =
 [retained actions from AD     $5,100.
 2013-24-13, Amendment 39-
 17687 (78 FR 72558,
 December 3, 2013)]. \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide a cost estimate for the actions required
  for airplanes in Group 6 identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1,
  dated May 23, 2013.

    This new AD adds no new costs to affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a 
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 
2013-24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), and 
adding the following new AD:

2015-02-26 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18095; Docket No. FAA-
2014-0344; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-034-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective March 11, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2013-24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, 
December 3, 2013).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) 
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300,--400, 
and -500 series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special Attention 
Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013.
    (2) The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -
900 series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that a Boeing study found that 
the seat track attachment of body station 520 flexible joint is 
structurally deficient in resisting a 9g forward emergency load 
condition in certain seating configurations. We are issuing this AD 
to prevent seat detachment in an emergency landing, which could 
cause injury to occupants of the passenger compartment and affect 
emergency egress.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Retained Repair or Replacement of Seat Track Link Assembly or Seat 
Track Link Assembly Fastener, With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 
2013-24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with 
no changes. Within 60 months after January 7, 2014 (the effective 
date of AD 2013-24-13), do the actions specified in paragraph 
(g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), or (g)(4) of this AD, as applicable.
    (1) For Model 737-600, -700, 700C, -800, and -900 series 
airplanes: Install new, improved pivot link assemblies, in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service 
Bulletin 737-53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011.
    (2) For airplanes in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, as identified in 
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, 
dated May 23, 2013: Replace the seat track link assembly, in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing

[[Page 5918]]

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated 
May 23, 2013.
    (3) For airplanes in Group 6, as identified in Boeing Special 
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 
2013: Inspect, change, or repair the seat track link assembly, as 
applicable, using a method approved in accordance with the 
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
    (4) For airplanes in Group 5, as identified in Boeing Special 
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 
2013: Modify the existing seat track link assembly fastener, in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special 
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 
2013.

(h) Retained Optional Modification of Seat Track Link Assembly, With No 
Changes

    This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (h) of AD 
2013-24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with 
no changes. In lieu of the replacement specified in paragraph (g)(2) 
of this AD, doing the optional modification of the seat track link 
assembly, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of 
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, 
dated May 23, 2013, is acceptable for compliance with the 
requirements of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, provided the 
modification is done within the compliance time specified in 
paragraph (g) of this AD.

(i) Retained Concurrent Actions, With New Concurrent Action for Group 5 
Airplanes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD 
2013-24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013), with 
a corrected paragraph reference (i.e., ``(g)(3)'' was changed to 
``(g)(4)''), which results in a new concurrent action for Group 5 
airplanes. For airplanes in Groups 1, 2, 4, and 5, as identified in 
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, 
dated May 23, 2013: Before or concurrently with the accomplishment 
of the actions specified in paragraph (g)(2) or (g)(4) of this AD, 
install a new seat track link assembly or modify the seat track link 
assembly, as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1120, Revision 1, 
dated May 13, 1993.

(j) Retained Credit for Previous Actions, With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the credit provisions specified in 
paragraph (j) of AD 2013-24-13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, 
December 3, 2013), with no changes.
    (1) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by 
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before 
January 7, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013-24-13, Amendment 39-
17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013)), using Boeing Service 
Bulletin 737-53-1244, dated April 17, 2003; Revision 1, dated May 
29, 2003; Revision 2, dated March 15, 2007; or Revision 3, dated 
December 4, 2008; which are not incorporated by reference in this 
AD.
    (2) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by 
paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(4) of this AD, if those actions were 
performed before January 7, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013-24-
13, Amendment 39-17687 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013)), using 
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, dated May 7, 
2007, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local 
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 
attention of the person identified in paragraph (l) of this AD. 
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by The 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization 
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make 
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must 
meet the certification basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571, 
Amendment 45, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Sarah Piccola, 
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, 
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind 
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6483; fax: 425-
917-6590; email: sarah.piccola@faa.gov.
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not 
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in 
paragraphs (m)(4) and (m)(5) of this AD.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on 
January 7, 2014 (78 FR 72558, December 3, 2013).
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1120, Revision 1, dated May 
13, 1993.
    (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 
27, 2011.
    (iii) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, 
Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013.
    (4) For information identified in this AD, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. 
Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000, 
extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (5) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
425-227-1221.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 21, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-02074 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.