Revisions of Boundaries for Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary; Intent To Prepare Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 5699-5701 [2015-01949]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
PART 238—SAVINGS AND LOAN
HOLDING COMPANIES (REGULATION
LL)
10. The authority citation for part 238
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 559; 12 U.S.C.
1462, 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1467, 1467a, 1468,
1813, 1817, 1829e, 1831i, 1972; 15 U.S.C. 78l.
11. In subpart A, add new § 238.9 to
read as follows:
■
§ 238.9 Small Bank Holding Company
Policy Statement.
(a) The Board’s Small Bank Holding
Company Policy Statement (12 CFR part
225, appendix C) (Policy Statement)
applies to savings and loan holding
companies as if they were bank holding
companies. To qualify or rely on the
Policy Statement, savings and loan
holding companies must meet all
qualifying requirements in the Policy
Statement as if they were a bank holding
company. For purposes of applying the
Policy Statement, the term ‘‘nonbank
subsidiary’’ as used in the Policy
Statement refers to a subsidiary of a
savings and loan holding company other
than a savings association or a
subsidiary of a savings association.
(b) The Board may exclude any
savings and loan holding company,
regardless of asset size, from the Policy
Statement under paragraph (a) of this
section if the Board determines that
such action is warranted for supervisory
purposes.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, January 29, 2015.
Michael Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015–02040 Filed 1–30–15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
Sanctuaries Act, as amended, (NMSA),
the Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS) of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) is initiating a
review of Flower Garden Banks National
Marine Sanctuary (FGBNMS or
Sanctuary) boundaries, based on the
recommendation contained within the
Sanctuary Expansion Action Plan of the
FGBNMS Management Plan (April
2012). The review process, as required
by the NMSA, will be conducted
concurrently with a public process
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). This document also
informs the public that NOAA will
coordinate its responsibilities under
section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) with its
ongoing NEPA process, including the
use of NEPA documents and public and
stakeholder meetings to also meet the
requirements of section 106. The public
scoping process is intended to solicit
information and comments on the range
and significance of issues related to the
expansion of the FGBNMS boundaries.
The results of this scoping process will
assist NOAA in formulating alternatives
for the draft environmental impact
statement for the proposed revised
sanctuary boundaries.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 6, 2015. Public hearings will be
held as detailed below:
(1) New Orleans, LA
Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2015
Location: Hilton New Orleans Airport,
Cocodrie Room
Address: 901 Airline Drive, Kenner, LA
70062
Time: 6:00–8:00 p.m.
(2) Houston, TX
Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015
Location: Bayland Community Center
Address: 6400 Bissonnet Street,
Houston, TX 77074
Time: 6:00–8:00 p.m.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
(3) Galveston, TX
Revisions of Boundaries for Flower
Garden Banks National Marine
Sanctuary; Intent To Prepare Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of intent to revise
boundaries; intent to prepare
environmental impact statement.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
In accordance with section
304(e) of the National Marine
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Location: Flower Garden Banks NMS
Office, NOAA Galveston Laboratory
Address: 4700 Avenue U, Building 216,
Galveston, TX 77551
Time: 6:00–8:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NOS-20140154, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5699
complete the required fields and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: George Schmahl, Sanctuary
Superintendent, Flower Garden Banks
National Marine Sanctuary, 4700
Avenue U, Bldg. 216, Galveston, TX
77551.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NOAA. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. ONMS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Drinnen, 409–621–5151 Ext. 105,
fgbexpansion@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information
I. Background
The National Marine Sanctuaries Act
(NMSA) (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.)
authorizes the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary) to designate and protect as a
national marine sanctuaries areas of the
marine environment that are of special
national significance due to their
conservation, recreational, ecological,
historical, scientific, cultural,
archeological, educational, or esthetic
qualities. Day-to-day management of
national marine sanctuaries has been
delegated by the Secretary to the ONMS.
The primary objective of the NMSA is
to protect the biological and cultural
resources of the sanctuary system, such
as coral reefs, marine animals, historical
shipwrecks, historic structures, and
archaeological sites.
Flower Garden Banks National Marine
Sanctuary was designated on January
17, 1992 (Pub. L. 102–251, Title I, Sec.
101). At that time, the sanctuary
consisted of two areas known as East
and West Flower Garden Banks (56 FR
63634). In 1996, Congress added Stetson
Bank to the sanctuary (Pub. L. 104–283).
FGBNMS regulations were first
published on December 5, 1991 (56 FR
63634) and became effective on January
18, 1994 (58 FR 65664). Current
FGBNMS regulations can be found at 15
CFR part 922, subpart L.
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
5700
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FGBNMS is located in the
northwestern Gulf of Mexico. The
banks’salt domes range in depth from 55
feet to over 500 feet, providing
conditions supporting several distinct
habitats (including the northern-most
coral reefs in the continental United
States) and essential habitat for a variety
of marine species. The combination of
location and geology makes the
sanctuary an extremely productive and
nationally significant ecosystem.
II. Need for Action
NOAA published a revised FGBNMS
Management Plan in April 2012, which
described the need to protect additional
sensitive biological resources and
geological features associated with reefs
and banks in the northwestern Gulf of
Mexico. The expansion of sanctuary
protection for certain critical areas
would address concerns about impacts
of anchoring, safe access by fishers and
divers, damage as a result of
unregulated activities, and the need to
protect unique features in these areas.
Based on six years of input from the
public and the FGBNMS Advisory
Council, NOAA developed a Sanctuary
Expansion Action Plan as part of the
2012 management plan revision. The
action plan’s primary purpose was to
’’evaluate and expand, as appropriate,
the network of protected areas within
the sanctuary to include five to twelve
additional reefs and banks, and modify
the boundary of East and West Flower
Garden and Stetson Banks to include
critical adjacent habitats.’’ This proposal
was developed in particular by the
Sanctuary Advisory Council’s (SAC)
boundary expansion working group,
which was comprised of researchers, oil
and gas production representatives,
recreational divers, Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management (BOEM)
representatives, and ONMS staff. The
working group met initially in February
2007, and then periodically over the
course of 10 months, to discuss the
concept in detail. The working group
employed a consensus driven,
constituent-based process to address the
concept of boundary expansion. All
participants discussed a variety of
issues, considerations, priorities and
concerns for each step of the process.
The following recommendation was
developed by the working group and
adopted as a recommendation to NOAA
by the SAC:
Expand the sanctuary, with boundaries
based on a critical habitat area and a 500meter buffer zone, by modifying the existing
boundaries of East and West Flower Garden
Banks and Stetson Bank, and adding
Horseshoe Bank, McGrail Bank, Geyer Bank,
Bright Bank, Sonnier Bank, Alderdice Bank,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
MacNeil Bank, Rankin Bank, and 28 Fathom
Bank.
It is important to note that certain
activities related to oil and gas
exploration and development are
already prohibited within a significant
portion of each of the banks
recommended for expansion, as these
areas have been designated ‘‘no activity
zones’’ by BOEM under lease
stipulations that have been in place
since 1973. (These restrictions are
contained within ‘‘Notice to Lessees’’
(NTL) No. 2009–G39 for ‘‘BiologicallySensitive Underwater Features and
Areas’’, for the Central and Western
planning areas of the OCS in the Gulf of
Mexico region.) NOAA has now decided
that the SAC’s recommendation should
be further explored through a public
review process. Additional information
on the SAC recommendation can be
found in the FGBNMS Sanctuary
Expansion Action Plan at the following
link: https://flowergarden.noaa.gov/
document_library/mgmtdocs/fmp2012/
fmpexpansionactionplan.pdfith.
In accordance Section 304(e) of the
National Marine Sanctuaries Act, as
amended (NMSA), 16 U.S.C. 1431 et
seq., NOAA is initiating a review of the
FGBNMS boundaries to ‘‘evaluate and
expand, as appropriate’’ the network of
protected areas within the sanctuary.
The action under consideration will
evaluate options for the expansion of
the sanctuary by incorporating selected
reefs and banks in the northwestern
Gulf of Mexico for their long-term
protection and management. An
environmental impact statement will
describe the various reefs and banks to
be considered, alternative scenarios for
incorporating additional areas, and
NOAA’s preferred alternative. In
addition, NOAA will analyze various
regulatory scenarios for any new
potential sanctuary areas, as well as for
the existing sanctuary as described in
the 2012 final management plan.
III. Process
The process for considering the
expansion of FGBNMS is composed of
four primary stages:
1. Information collection and
characterization, including the
consideration of public comment;
2. Preparation and release of a draft
environmental impact statement (DEIS)
that identifies boundary expansion
alternatives, as well as a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend
the sanctuary regulations to reflect any
new boundary if proposed;
3. Public review and comment on the
DEIS and NPRM;
4. Preparation and release of a final
environmental impact statement,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
including a response to public
comments, with a final rule if
appropriate.
With this document, NOAA is
opening a public comment period to:
1. Gather information and public
comments from individuals,
organizations, and government agencies
on whether FGBNMS should expand its
boundary, suggestions for the extent of
an expanded boundary, and the
potential effects of a boundary
expansion; and
2. Help determine the scope of issues
to be addressed in the preparation of an
environmental analysis under NEPA.
[INFORMATION ON DATES AND
LOCATIONS FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS
WILL BE ADDED LATER].
IV. Consultation Under Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act
This document confirms that NOAA
will fulfill its responsibility under
section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA, 16 U.S.C. 470)
through the ongoing NEPA process,
pursuant to 36 CFR 800.8(a) including
the use of NEPA documents and public
and stakeholder meetings to meet the
section 106 requirements. The NHPA
specifically applies to any agency
undertaking that may affect historic
properties. Pursuant to 36 CFR
800.16(1)(1), historic properties
includes any prehistoric or historic
district, site, building, structure or
object included in, or eligible for
inclusion in, the National Register of
Historic Places maintained by the
Secretary of the Interior. The term
includes artifacts, records, and remains
that are related to and located within
such properties. The term includes
properties of traditional religious and
cultural importance to an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization and that
meet the National Register criteria. In
fulfilling its responsibility under the
NHPA and NEPA, NOAA intends to
identify consulting parties; identify
historic properties and assess the effects
of the undertaking on such properties;
initiate formal consultation with the
State Historic Preservation Officer, the
Advisory Council of Historic
Preservation, and other consulting
parties; involve the public in
accordance with NOAA’s NEPA
procedures, and develop in consultation
with identified consulting parties
alternatives and proposed measures that
might avoid, minimize or mitigate any
adverse effects on historic properties
and describe them in any environmental
assessment or draft environmental
impact statement.
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
V. Consultation Under Section 304(a)(5)
of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act
This document confirms that NOAA
will fulfill its responsibility under
section 304(a)(5) of the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act (NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1431
et seq.), which states that the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
(GMFMC) should be provided with the
opportunity to prepare draft regulations
for fishing within Federal waters, if
NOAA pursues the addition of areas
within the Gulf of Mexico to the
sanctuary and if regulations regarding
fishing are needed. The NMSA further
declares that draft regulations prepared
by the GMFMC, or a GMFMC
determination that regulations are not
necessary, shall be accepted and issued
as proposed regulations unless the
GMFMC’s action fails to fulfill the
purposes and policies of the Act and the
goals and objectives of the proposed
designation. If the GMFMC declines to
make a determination with respect to
the need for regulations, makes a
determination that is rejected by the
Secretary of Commerce, or fails to
prepare draft regulations in a timely
manner, then NOAA shall prepare
fishing regulations.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
Dated: January 15, 2015.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director for the Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries.
[FR Doc. 2015–01949 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1120
[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2015–0003]
Substantial Product Hazard List:
Extension Cords
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC or Commission) is
proposing a rule to specify that
extension cords (both indoor and
outdoor use extension cords) that do not
contain one or more readily observable
characteristics set forth in the proposed
rule constitute a substantial product
hazard under the Consumer Product
Safety Act (CPSA). The rule would
amend 16 CFR part 1120, which lists
products that the Commission has
determined present a substantial
product hazard if the products have or
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
lack specified characteristics that are
readily observable, have been addressed
by a voluntary standard, such standard
has been effective in reducing the risk
of injury associated with the product,
and there is substantial compliance with
the standard.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by April 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2015–
0003, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The Commission does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail
(email), except through
www.regulations.gov. The Commission
encourages you to submit electronic
comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
submissions by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received may be posted
without change, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other
personal information provided, to: http:
//www.regulations.gov. Do not submit
confidential business information, trade
secret information, or other sensitive or
protected information that you do not
want to be available to the public. If
furnished at all, such information
should be submitted in writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number CPSC–2015–0003, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arthur Lee, Office of Hazard
Identification and Reduction, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, National
Product Testing and Evaluation Center,
5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850;
telephone: 301–987–2008; alee@
cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The Commission proposes to issue a
rule under section 15(j) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2064(j), which would amend the
substantial product hazard list in 16
CFR part 1120 (part 1120). The
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5701
substantial product hazard list in part
1120 would be amended to add
extension cords that lack certain readily
observable characteristics. Four
characteristics apply to all general-use
extension cords (indoor and outdoor
extension cords including indoor
seasonal extension cords):
(1) Minimum wire size;
(2) sufficient strain relief;
(3) proper polarity; and
(4) proper continuity.
In addition, one characteristic (outlet
covers) applies to certain 2-wire indoor
extension covers and one characteristic
(jacketed insulated cord) applies to
outdoor extension cords. Under the
proposed amendment to part 1120,
extension cords that do not contain one
or more of the specified readily
observable characteristics would be
deemed to create a substantial product
hazard under section 15(a)(2) of the
CPSA because such products pose a risk
of electrical shock or fire. These
identified, readily observable
characteristics for extension cords have
been addressed in a voluntary standard,
Underwriters Laboratories (UL),
Standard for Cord Sets and PowerSupply Cords, UL 817, 11th Edition,
dated March 16, 2001, revised February
3, 2014 (UL 817).1
As detailed in this notice, the
Commission determines preliminarily
that:
• Minimum wire size; sufficient
strain relief; polarization; continuity;
outlet covers (for indoor cords); and
flexible jacketed insulation (for outdoor
cords) are all readily observable
characteristics of extension cords;
• the identified readily observable
characteristics are addressed by a
voluntary standard, UL 817;
• conformance to UL 817 has been
effective in reducing the risk of injury
from shock and fire associated with
indoor and outdoor extension cords;
and
• extension cords sold in the United
States substantially comply with UL
817.
A. Background and Statutory Authority
Section 223 of the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act of 2008
(CPSIA), amended section 15 of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064, to add a new
subsection (j). Section 15(j) of the CPSA
provides the Commission with the
authority to specify, by rule, for any
consumer product or class of consumer
products, characteristics whose
existence or absence are deemed a
1 The UL mark and logo are trademarks of UL,
LLC (formerly known as Underwriters Laboratories,
Inc.).
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5699-5701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01949]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 922
Revisions of Boundaries for Flower Garden Banks National Marine
Sanctuary; Intent To Prepare Draft Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of intent to revise boundaries; intent to prepare
environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 304(e) of the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act, as amended, (NMSA), the Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) is initiating a review of Flower Garden Banks
National Marine Sanctuary (FGBNMS or Sanctuary) boundaries, based on
the recommendation contained within the Sanctuary Expansion Action Plan
of the FGBNMS Management Plan (April 2012). The review process, as
required by the NMSA, will be conducted concurrently with a public
process under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This
document also informs the public that NOAA will coordinate its
responsibilities under section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) with its ongoing NEPA process, including the
use of NEPA documents and public and stakeholder meetings to also meet
the requirements of section 106. The public scoping process is intended
to solicit information and comments on the range and significance of
issues related to the expansion of the FGBNMS boundaries. The results
of this scoping process will assist NOAA in formulating alternatives
for the draft environmental impact statement for the proposed revised
sanctuary boundaries.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 6, 2015. Public hearings will
be held as detailed below:
(1) New Orleans, LA
Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2015
Location: Hilton New Orleans Airport, Cocodrie Room
Address: 901 Airline Drive, Kenner, LA 70062
Time: 6:00-8:00 p.m.
(2) Houston, TX
Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015
Location: Bayland Community Center
Address: 6400 Bissonnet Street, Houston, TX 77074
Time: 6:00-8:00 p.m.
(3) Galveston, TX
Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Location: Flower Garden Banks NMS Office, NOAA Galveston Laboratory
Address: 4700 Avenue U, Building 216, Galveston, TX 77551
Time: 6:00-8:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any one of the following
methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NOS-2014-0154, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields and enter or attach
your comments.
Mail: George Schmahl, Sanctuary Superintendent, Flower
Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary, 4700 Avenue U, Bldg. 216,
Galveston, TX 77551.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NOAA. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. ONMS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Drinnen, 409-621-5151 Ext. 105,
fgbexpansion@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information
I. Background
The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.)
authorizes the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to designate and
protect as a national marine sanctuaries areas of the marine
environment that are of special national significance due to their
conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific,
cultural, archeological, educational, or esthetic qualities. Day-to-day
management of national marine sanctuaries has been delegated by the
Secretary to the ONMS. The primary objective of the NMSA is to protect
the biological and cultural resources of the sanctuary system, such as
coral reefs, marine animals, historical shipwrecks, historic
structures, and archaeological sites.
Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary was designated on
January 17, 1992 (Pub. L. 102-251, Title I, Sec. 101). At that time,
the sanctuary consisted of two areas known as East and West Flower
Garden Banks (56 FR 63634). In 1996, Congress added Stetson Bank to the
sanctuary (Pub. L. 104-283). FGBNMS regulations were first published on
December 5, 1991 (56 FR 63634) and became effective on January 18, 1994
(58 FR 65664). Current FGBNMS regulations can be found at 15 CFR part
922, subpart L.
[[Page 5700]]
FGBNMS is located in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. The
banks'salt domes range in depth from 55 feet to over 500 feet,
providing conditions supporting several distinct habitats (including
the northern-most coral reefs in the continental United States) and
essential habitat for a variety of marine species. The combination of
location and geology makes the sanctuary an extremely productive and
nationally significant ecosystem.
II. Need for Action
NOAA published a revised FGBNMS Management Plan in April 2012,
which described the need to protect additional sensitive biological
resources and geological features associated with reefs and banks in
the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. The expansion of sanctuary protection
for certain critical areas would address concerns about impacts of
anchoring, safe access by fishers and divers, damage as a result of
unregulated activities, and the need to protect unique features in
these areas.
Based on six years of input from the public and the FGBNMS Advisory
Council, NOAA developed a Sanctuary Expansion Action Plan as part of
the 2012 management plan revision. The action plan's primary purpose
was to ''evaluate and expand, as appropriate, the network of protected
areas within the sanctuary to include five to twelve additional reefs
and banks, and modify the boundary of East and West Flower Garden and
Stetson Banks to include critical adjacent habitats.'' This proposal
was developed in particular by the Sanctuary Advisory Council's (SAC)
boundary expansion working group, which was comprised of researchers,
oil and gas production representatives, recreational divers, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) representatives, and ONMS staff. The
working group met initially in February 2007, and then periodically
over the course of 10 months, to discuss the concept in detail. The
working group employed a consensus driven, constituent-based process to
address the concept of boundary expansion. All participants discussed a
variety of issues, considerations, priorities and concerns for each
step of the process.
The following recommendation was developed by the working group and
adopted as a recommendation to NOAA by the SAC:
Expand the sanctuary, with boundaries based on a critical
habitat area and a 500-meter buffer zone, by modifying the existing
boundaries of East and West Flower Garden Banks and Stetson Bank,
and adding Horseshoe Bank, McGrail Bank, Geyer Bank, Bright Bank,
Sonnier Bank, Alderdice Bank, MacNeil Bank, Rankin Bank, and 28
Fathom Bank.
It is important to note that certain activities related to oil and gas
exploration and development are already prohibited within a significant
portion of each of the banks recommended for expansion, as these areas
have been designated ``no activity zones'' by BOEM under lease
stipulations that have been in place since 1973. (These restrictions
are contained within ``Notice to Lessees'' (NTL) No. 2009-G39 for
``Biologically-Sensitive Underwater Features and Areas'', for the
Central and Western planning areas of the OCS in the Gulf of Mexico
region.) NOAA has now decided that the SAC's recommendation should be
further explored through a public review process. Additional
information on the SAC recommendation can be found in the FGBNMS
Sanctuary Expansion Action Plan at the following link: https://flowergarden.noaa.gov/document_library/mgmtdocs/fmp2012/fmpexpansionactionplan.pdfith.
In accordance Section 304(e) of the National Marine Sanctuaries
Act, as amended (NMSA), 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq., NOAA is initiating a
review of the FGBNMS boundaries to ``evaluate and expand, as
appropriate'' the network of protected areas within the sanctuary. The
action under consideration will evaluate options for the expansion of
the sanctuary by incorporating selected reefs and banks in the
northwestern Gulf of Mexico for their long-term protection and
management. An environmental impact statement will describe the various
reefs and banks to be considered, alternative scenarios for
incorporating additional areas, and NOAA's preferred alternative. In
addition, NOAA will analyze various regulatory scenarios for any new
potential sanctuary areas, as well as for the existing sanctuary as
described in the 2012 final management plan.
III. Process
The process for considering the expansion of FGBNMS is composed of
four primary stages:
1. Information collection and characterization, including the
consideration of public comment;
2. Preparation and release of a draft environmental impact
statement (DEIS) that identifies boundary expansion alternatives, as
well as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend the sanctuary
regulations to reflect any new boundary if proposed;
3. Public review and comment on the DEIS and NPRM;
4. Preparation and release of a final environmental impact
statement, including a response to public comments, with a final rule
if appropriate.
With this document, NOAA is opening a public comment period to:
1. Gather information and public comments from individuals,
organizations, and government agencies on whether FGBNMS should expand
its boundary, suggestions for the extent of an expanded boundary, and
the potential effects of a boundary expansion; and
2. Help determine the scope of issues to be addressed in the
preparation of an environmental analysis under NEPA.
[INFORMATION ON DATES AND LOCATIONS FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS WILL BE ADDED
LATER].
IV. Consultation Under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act
This document confirms that NOAA will fulfill its responsibility
under section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA, 16
U.S.C. 470) through the ongoing NEPA process, pursuant to 36 CFR
800.8(a) including the use of NEPA documents and public and stakeholder
meetings to meet the section 106 requirements. The NHPA specifically
applies to any agency undertaking that may affect historic properties.
Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.16(1)(1), historic properties includes any
prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure or object
included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of
Historic Places maintained by the Secretary of the Interior. The term
includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and
located within such properties. The term includes properties of
traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization and that meet the National Register
criteria. In fulfilling its responsibility under the NHPA and NEPA,
NOAA intends to identify consulting parties; identify historic
properties and assess the effects of the undertaking on such
properties; initiate formal consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Officer, the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation,
and other consulting parties; involve the public in accordance with
NOAA's NEPA procedures, and develop in consultation with identified
consulting parties alternatives and proposed measures that might avoid,
minimize or mitigate any adverse effects on historic properties and
describe them in any environmental assessment or draft environmental
impact statement.
[[Page 5701]]
V. Consultation Under Section 304(a)(5) of the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act
This document confirms that NOAA will fulfill its responsibility
under section 304(a)(5) of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA,
16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.), which states that the Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (GMFMC) should be provided with the opportunity to
prepare draft regulations for fishing within Federal waters, if NOAA
pursues the addition of areas within the Gulf of Mexico to the
sanctuary and if regulations regarding fishing are needed. The NMSA
further declares that draft regulations prepared by the GMFMC, or a
GMFMC determination that regulations are not necessary, shall be
accepted and issued as proposed regulations unless the GMFMC's action
fails to fulfill the purposes and policies of the Act and the goals and
objectives of the proposed designation. If the GMFMC declines to make a
determination with respect to the need for regulations, makes a
determination that is rejected by the Secretary of Commerce, or fails
to prepare draft regulations in a timely manner, then NOAA shall
prepare fishing regulations.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
Dated: January 15, 2015.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director for the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries.
[FR Doc. 2015-01949 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P