Notice of Intent To Create a New Information Collection, 5502-5503 [2015-01912]
Download as PDF
5502
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 21
Monday, February 2, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Notice of Intent To Create a New
Information Collection
National Agricultural Statistics
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the intent of the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) to seek the approval to conduct
a new data collection to comply with a
mandate in the 2014 Farm Bill. (. . . the
Secretary of Agriculture should
recognize the threat feral swine pose to
the domestic swine population and the
entire agriculture industry . . .).
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by April 3, 2015 to be assured
of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number 0535–
NEW, by any of the following methods:
• Email: ombofficer@nass.usda.gov.
Include docket number above in the
subject line of the message.
• Efax: (855) 838–6382
• Mail: Mail any paper, disk, or CD–
ROM submissions to: David Hancock,
NASS Clearance Officer, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Room 5336
South Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–
2024.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Hand
deliver to: David Hancock, NASS
Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 5336 South Building,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R.
Renee Picanso, Associate Administrator,
National Agricultural Statistics Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, (202)
720–4333. Copies of this information
collection and related instructions can
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
be obtained without charge from David
Hancock, NASS—OMB Clearance
Officer, at (202) 690–2388 or at
ombofficer@nass.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Feral Swine Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0535–NEW.
Type of Request: Intent to Seek
Approval for a 3 Year Period to Conduct
a New Information Collection.
Abstract: On April 2, 2014 the
Undersecretary for USDA’s Marketing
and Regulatory Programs, Edward
Avalos announced that the USDA was
kicking off a national effort to reduce
the devastating damage caused by feral
swine. The $20 million program aims to
help states deal with a rapidly
expanding population of invasive wild
swine. ‘‘Feral swine are one of the most
destructive invaders a state can have,’’
said Undersecretary Avalos. ‘‘They have
expanded their range from 17 to 39
states in the last 30 years and cause
damage to crops, kill young livestock,
destroy property, harm natural
resources, and carry diseases that
threaten other animals as well as people
and water supplies. It’s critical that we
act now to begin appropriate
management of this costly problem.’’
On Feb 3, 1999, Executive Order
13112 was signed by President Clinton
establishing the National Invasive
Species Council. The Executive Order
requires that a Council of Departments
dealing with invasive species be
created. Currently there are 13
Departments and Agencies on the
Council. (Executive Order 13112 of
February 3, 1999—Invasive Species
Federal Register: Feb 8, 1999 (Volume
64, Number 25)).
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS), Wildlife
Services’ (WS) National Wildlife
Research Center (NWRC) is the only
Federal research organization devoted
exclusively to resolving conflicts
between people and wildlife through
the development of effective, selective,
and socially responsible methods, tools,
and techniques. As increased
urbanization leads to a loss of
traditional wildlife habitat, the potential
for conflicts between people and
wildlife increases. Such conflicts can
take many forms, including property
and natural resource damage, human
health and safety concerns, and disease
transmission among wildlife, livestock,
and humans.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The high reproductive rate and
adaptability of feral swine has resulted
in populations that have dramatically
increased in size and distribution. This
invasive animal now occurs across
much of the United States where it
causes a range of agricultural and
environmental damage through
depredation, rooting, and wallowing
activities. Furthermore, feral swine
compete with native wildlife and
livestock for habitats, are carriers of
exotic and endemic diseases, and
transmit parasites to livestock and
humans. Feral swine are considered a
major emerging threat to American
agriculture (Seward et al. 2004). Recent
data shows that the proportions of U.S.
counties with agricultural production
that also have feral swine present are
increasing. Over the period of 1998–
2013, the proportion of counties with
hog, and crop production that are
affected by feral swine has increased.
Feral swine damage crops through
direct consumption of crops and other
behaviors, such as rooting, trampling,
and wallowing, which can destroy fields
or reduce productivity. Field crops
commonly damaged by feral swine
include soybeans, corn, grain sorghum,
wheat, oats, peanuts, and rice, among
others. Rooting can affect the plant
composition of a pasture by promoting
the growth of undesirable plants where
hogs have destroyed desirable forage
grasses. Once pastures are degraded in
this way, landowners must spend
considerable money and time restoring
them to pre-swine conditions
(Whitehouse 1999, Mapston 2004).
The benchmark survey will be
conducted in 2015 in the 11 States
(Alabama, Arkansas, California, Florida,
Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina,
Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina,
and Texas) that have high feral swine
densities and a significant presence of
corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, grain
sorghum (Texas), and peanuts. The
initial survey will be used to create a
benchmark for the following objectives:
1. Describe the monetary loss for all
crops caused by feral swine to
producers of corn, soybeans, wheat,
rice, peanuts, and grain sorghum (TX
only) in each of the surveyed states.
2. Describe the monetary loss to
livestock caused by feral swine for
producers of corn, soybeans, wheat,
rice, peanuts, and grain sorghum (TX
only) in each of the surveyed states.
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 21 / Monday, February 2, 2015 / Notices
3. Describe the monetary loss to
property caused by feral swine for
producers of corn, soybeans, wheat,
rice, grain sorghum (TX only) and
peanuts in each of the surveyed states.
4. Describe feral swine control costs
incurred by producers of corn,
soybeans, wheat, rice, peanuts, and
grain sorghum (TX only) in each of the
surveyed states. Variables that will be
measured include hunting, trapping, use
of fencing, or the use of repellents. No
data will be collected on the use of
chemical or physical contraception
usage.
5. Describe the total net income to
producers of corn, soybeans, wheat,
rice, peanuts, and grain sorghum (TX
only) in each of the surveyed states for
allowing the hunting of feral swine on
their operations.
Based on the results of this survey,
Wildlife Service plans to publish State
level data if possible. Also, there may be
a follow-up survey to measure the
effectiveness of control measures
implemented by Wildlife Services. This
follow-up survey will also be contingent
upon availability of funding.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: These data will be collected
under the authority of 7 U.S.C. 2204(a).
Individually identifiable data collected under
this authority are governed by Section 1770
of the Food Security Act of 1985, 7 U.S.C.
2276, which requires USDA to afford strict
confidentiality to non-aggregated data
provided by respondents. This Notice is
submitted in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 Public Law 104–13
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) and Office of
Management and Budget regulations at 5 CFR
part 1320.
NASS also complies with OMB
Implementation Guidance,
‘‘Implementation Guidance for Title V
of the E-Government Act, Confidential
Information Protection and Statistical
Efficiency Act of 2002 (CIPSEA),’’
Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 115, June
15, 2007, p. 33362.
Estimate of Burden: Reporting burden
for this collection of information is
estimated to average 30 minutes per
response. This was determined by our
Survey Methodologists, who compared
the length and difficulty of the
questions with similar surveys. They
also took into account the projected
number of farmers who will skip some
sections of the questionnaire due to the
presence or absence of damage due to
feral swine. Burden is based on an
estimated minimum response rate of
80%. On similar types of surveys and
through the use of a mail questionnaire
and telephone follow-up to nonrespondents NASS has been able to
contact and collect some data from
approximately 80% of the target sample.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
After removing the out of business
operations and those with no items of
interest we hope to have at least a 65 to
70% usable response rate.
NASS will be utilizing several pieces
of publicity and informational materials
to encourage respondents to participate
in this important survey. NASS will
conduct the survey initially by mail
with phone follow-up for non-response.
Respondents: Farm Operators.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 10,800.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 5,500 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical,
technological or other forms of
information technology collection
methods.
All responses to this notice will
become a matter of public record and be
summarized in the request for OMB
approval.
Signed at Washington, DC, January 16,
2015.
R. Renee Picanso,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–01912 Filed 1–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Alaska Pacific Halibut and
Sablefish Fisheries: Individual Fishing
Quota (IFQ).
OMB Control Number: 0648–0272.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular (revision
and extension of a currently approved
information collection).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5503
Number of Respondents: 1,639.
Average Hours Per Response:
Application for Eligibility to receive
QS/IFQ (TEC) and QS holder form,
Application for Transfer of QS/IFQ to or
from a CQE, Application for Transfer of
QS/IFQ (includes sweep-up);
Application for Military Transfer,
Application for Emergency Medical
Transfer; 2 hours each; Identification of
Ownership Interest, Application for
IFQ/CDQ Hired Master Permit,
Application for Registered Buyer permit
and QS/IFQ Designated Beneficiary
Form, Application for replacement of
certificates, permits, or licenses, 30
minutes each; 18 minutes for Registered
Buyer landing report; 6 minutes for IFQ
Administrative Waiver; 12 minutes each
for Prior Notice of Landing (PNOL); 15
minutes for IFQ Departure Report and
Transshipment Authorization; and 6
minutes for Dockside Sales Receipt.
Burden Hours: 3,112.
Needs and Uses: This request is for
revision and extension of a currently
approved information collection. Forms
that are no longer applicable have been
removed.
The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) established the Individual
Fishing Quotas (IFQs) Program to
improve the long-term productivity of
the sablefish and Pacific halibut
fisheries by further promoting the
conservation and management
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et
seq., as amended in 2006 (MagnusonStevens Act) (with respect to sablefish)
and the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of
1982 (with respect to Pacific halibut)
while retaining the character and
distribution of the fishing fleets as much
as possible. The IFQ Program includes
several provisions, such as ownership
caps and vessel use caps that protect
small producers, part-time participants,
and entry-level participants that
otherwise could be adversely affected by
excessive consolidation.
The IFQ Program also includes other
restrictions to prevent the halibut and
sablefish fisheries from domination by
large boats or by any particular vessel
class. NMFS designed the requirements
to maintain a predominantly owneroperated fishery, which was a key
characteristic of the halibut and
sablefish fisheries prior to the
implementation of the IFQ Program. The
IFQ Program provides each fisherman
an IFQ that can be used any time during
the open season to allow each fisherman
to set his/her own pace and fishing
effort.
Under the IFQ Program, quota share
(QS) represents a harvesting privilege
for a person. Annually, NMFS issues
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5502-5503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01912]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 21 / Monday, February 2, 2015 /
Notices
[[Page 5502]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Notice of Intent To Create a New Information Collection
AGENCY: National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the intent of the National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS) to seek the approval to conduct a new data collection to
comply with a mandate in the 2014 Farm Bill. (. . . the Secretary of
Agriculture should recognize the threat feral swine pose to the
domestic swine population and the entire agriculture industry . . .).
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by April 3, 2015 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number 0535-
NEW, by any of the following methods:
Email: ombofficer@nass.usda.gov. Include docket number
above in the subject line of the message.
Efax: (855) 838-6382
Mail: Mail any paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions to:
David Hancock, NASS Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Room 5336 South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20250-2024.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Hand deliver to: David Hancock,
NASS Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 5336 South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Renee Picanso, Associate
Administrator, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, (202) 720-4333. Copies of this information
collection and related instructions can be obtained without charge from
David Hancock, NASS--OMB Clearance Officer, at (202) 690-2388 or at
ombofficer@nass.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Feral Swine Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0535-NEW.
Type of Request: Intent to Seek Approval for a 3 Year Period to
Conduct a New Information Collection.
Abstract: On April 2, 2014 the Undersecretary for USDA's Marketing
and Regulatory Programs, Edward Avalos announced that the USDA was
kicking off a national effort to reduce the devastating damage caused
by feral swine. The $20 million program aims to help states deal with a
rapidly expanding population of invasive wild swine. ``Feral swine are
one of the most destructive invaders a state can have,'' said
Undersecretary Avalos. ``They have expanded their range from 17 to 39
states in the last 30 years and cause damage to crops, kill young
livestock, destroy property, harm natural resources, and carry diseases
that threaten other animals as well as people and water supplies. It's
critical that we act now to begin appropriate management of this costly
problem.''
On Feb 3, 1999, Executive Order 13112 was signed by President
Clinton establishing the National Invasive Species Council. The
Executive Order requires that a Council of Departments dealing with
invasive species be created. Currently there are 13 Departments and
Agencies on the Council. (Executive Order 13112 of February 3, 1999--
Invasive Species Federal Register: Feb 8, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 25)).
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Wildlife
Services' (WS) National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC) is the only
Federal research organization devoted exclusively to resolving
conflicts between people and wildlife through the development of
effective, selective, and socially responsible methods, tools, and
techniques. As increased urbanization leads to a loss of traditional
wildlife habitat, the potential for conflicts between people and
wildlife increases. Such conflicts can take many forms, including
property and natural resource damage, human health and safety concerns,
and disease transmission among wildlife, livestock, and humans.
The high reproductive rate and adaptability of feral swine has
resulted in populations that have dramatically increased in size and
distribution. This invasive animal now occurs across much of the United
States where it causes a range of agricultural and environmental damage
through depredation, rooting, and wallowing activities. Furthermore,
feral swine compete with native wildlife and livestock for habitats,
are carriers of exotic and endemic diseases, and transmit parasites to
livestock and humans. Feral swine are considered a major emerging
threat to American agriculture (Seward et al. 2004). Recent data shows
that the proportions of U.S. counties with agricultural production that
also have feral swine present are increasing. Over the period of 1998-
2013, the proportion of counties with hog, and crop production that are
affected by feral swine has increased. Feral swine damage crops through
direct consumption of crops and other behaviors, such as rooting,
trampling, and wallowing, which can destroy fields or reduce
productivity. Field crops commonly damaged by feral swine include
soybeans, corn, grain sorghum, wheat, oats, peanuts, and rice, among
others. Rooting can affect the plant composition of a pasture by
promoting the growth of undesirable plants where hogs have destroyed
desirable forage grasses. Once pastures are degraded in this way,
landowners must spend considerable money and time restoring them to
pre-swine conditions (Whitehouse 1999, Mapston 2004).
The benchmark survey will be conducted in 2015 in the 11 States
(Alabama, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North
Carolina, Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina, and Texas) that have
high feral swine densities and a significant presence of corn,
soybeans, wheat, rice, grain sorghum (Texas), and peanuts. The initial
survey will be used to create a benchmark for the following objectives:
1. Describe the monetary loss for all crops caused by feral swine
to producers of corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, peanuts, and grain sorghum
(TX only) in each of the surveyed states.
2. Describe the monetary loss to livestock caused by feral swine
for producers of corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, peanuts, and grain
sorghum (TX only) in each of the surveyed states.
[[Page 5503]]
3. Describe the monetary loss to property caused by feral swine for
producers of corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, grain sorghum (TX only) and
peanuts in each of the surveyed states.
4. Describe feral swine control costs incurred by producers of
corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, peanuts, and grain sorghum (TX only) in
each of the surveyed states. Variables that will be measured include
hunting, trapping, use of fencing, or the use of repellents. No data
will be collected on the use of chemical or physical contraception
usage.
5. Describe the total net income to producers of corn, soybeans,
wheat, rice, peanuts, and grain sorghum (TX only) in each of the
surveyed states for allowing the hunting of feral swine on their
operations.
Based on the results of this survey, Wildlife Service plans to
publish State level data if possible. Also, there may be a follow-up
survey to measure the effectiveness of control measures implemented by
Wildlife Services. This follow-up survey will also be contingent upon
availability of funding.
Authority: These data will be collected under the authority of
7 U.S.C. 2204(a). Individually identifiable data collected under
this authority are governed by Section 1770 of the Food Security Act
of 1985, 7 U.S.C. 2276, which requires USDA to afford strict
confidentiality to non-aggregated data provided by respondents. This
Notice is submitted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) and Office of
Management and Budget regulations at 5 CFR part 1320.
NASS also complies with OMB Implementation Guidance,
``Implementation Guidance for Title V of the E-Government Act,
Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of
2002 (CIPSEA),'' Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 115, June 15, 2007, p.
33362.
Estimate of Burden: Reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response. This was
determined by our Survey Methodologists, who compared the length and
difficulty of the questions with similar surveys. They also took into
account the projected number of farmers who will skip some sections of
the questionnaire due to the presence or absence of damage due to feral
swine. Burden is based on an estimated minimum response rate of 80%. On
similar types of surveys and through the use of a mail questionnaire
and telephone follow-up to non-respondents NASS has been able to
contact and collect some data from approximately 80% of the target
sample. After removing the out of business operations and those with no
items of interest we hope to have at least a 65 to 70% usable response
rate.
NASS will be utilizing several pieces of publicity and
informational materials to encourage respondents to participate in this
important survey. NASS will conduct the survey initially by mail with
phone follow-up for non-response.
Respondents: Farm Operators.
Estimated Annual Number of Respondents: 10,800.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 5,500 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, technological or other forms of
information technology collection methods.
All responses to this notice will become a matter of public record
and be summarized in the request for OMB approval.
Signed at Washington, DC, January 16, 2015.
R. Renee Picanso,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-01912 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-20-P