Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 5028-5032 [2015-01182]
Download as PDF
5028
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘Procedure,’’ of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–32–121, dated May 27, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model
DHC–8–400, –401 and –402 airplanes,
certificated in any category, serial numbers
4001 through 4454 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32; Main Landing Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of two
in-service incidents where one side of the
main landing gear (MLG) did not achieve
down-lock. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct insufficiently greased stabilizer
brace lock linkage of the MLG and overtorqued lock linkage attachment bolts, which
could lead to the failure to extend and downlock the MLG, and could affect the safe
landing of the airplane.
rljohnson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection
Within 1,000 flight hours or 6 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first: Do a detailed inspection of the
apex joints of the stabilizer brace lock link in
the main landing gear (MLG) for clearance, in
accordance with paragraph 3.B.,
‘‘Procedure,’’ of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–32–121, dated May 27, 2013.
(1) If the clearance gap is 0.001 inches
(0.025 millimeters) or greater, do the action
in paragraph (h) of this AD at the time
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) If the clearance gap is less than 0.001
inches (0.025 millimeters), before further
flight, rectify the clearance gap, in
accordance with paragraph 3.B.,
‘‘Procedure,’’ of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–32–121, dated May 27, 2013; and do the
action in paragraph (h) of this AD at the time
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD. If the
clearance gap cannot be rectified in
accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–32–121, dated May 27, 2013: Before
further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA;
or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA);
or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). After the repair is done,
do the action in paragraph (h) of this AD at
the time specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD.
Note 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD:
Completion of the actions in this AD does not
affect the actions specified in the existing
maintenance review board (MRB) task
number 320001–201.
(h) Lubrication
Within 1,000 flight hours or 6 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first: Lubricate the apex joints of the
stabilizer brace lock link in the MLG, in
accordance with paragraph 3.B.,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:34 Jan 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170,
FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA
DAO. If approved by the DAO, the approval
must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–19, dated
July 31, 2013, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating it in Docket No.
FAA–2014–0188.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–121,
dated May 27, 2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series
Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada;
telephone 416–375–4000; fax 416–375–4539;
email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
14, 2015.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–01180 Filed 1–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0173; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–069–AD; Amendment
39–18083; AD 2015–02–16]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2009–06–
06 for all Airbus Model A310 and
A300–600 series airplanes. AD 2009–
06–06 required revising the
Airworthiness Limitations Section of
the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness to incorporate new
limitations and maintenance tasks for
aging systems maintenance. This new
AD requires revising the maintenance or
inspection program to incorporate new
maintenance requirements and
airworthiness limitations. This AD was
prompted by a determination that more
restrictive maintenance requirements
and airworthiness limitations are
necessary. We are issuing this AD to
prevent reduced structural integrity and
reduced control of these airplanes due
to the failure of system components.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
March 6, 2015.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of March 6, 2015.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain other publications listed in
this AD as of April 28, 2009 (74 FR
12228, March 24, 2009).
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0173; or in
person at the Docket Management
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–2125;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rljohnson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2009–06–06,
Amendment 39–15842 (74 FR 12228,
March 24, 2009). AD 2009–06–06
applied to all Airbus Model A310 and
Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R,
and F4–600R series airplanes, and
Model A300 C4–605R Variant F
airplanes (collectively called Model
A300–600 series airplanes series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on March 28, 2014 (79
FR 17451).
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2013–0075, dated March 20,
2013 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for Airbus Model
A310–203, –204, –221, –222, –304,
–322, –324, and –325 airplanes; Model
A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, and B4–
622 airplanes; Model A300 B4–605R
and B4–622R airplanes; Model A300
F4–605R and F4–622R airplanes; and
Model A300 C4–605R Variant F
airplanes. The MCAI states:
The airworthiness limitations for Airbus
aeroplanes are currently published in
Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS)
documents.
The mandatory instructions and
airworthiness limitations applicable to the
Aging Systems Maintenance (ASM) are
specified in Airbus A310 or A300–600 ALS
Part 4 documents, which are approved by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:34 Jan 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
EASA AD 2007–0092 [https://
ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2007_
0092.pdf/AD_2007-0092, which corresponds
to FAA AD 2009–06–06, Amendment 39–
15842 (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009)] was
issued to require compliance to the
requirements as specified in these
documents.
The revision 02 of Airbus A310 and Airbus
A300–600 ALS Part 4 documents introduces
more restrictive maintenance requirements
and/or airworthiness limitations. Failure to
comply with the instructions of ALS Part 4
could result in an unsafe condition.
For the reasons described above, this new
AD retains the requirements of EASA AD
2007–0092, which is superseded, and
requires the implementation of the new or
more restrictive maintenance requirements
and/or airworthiness limitations as specified
in Airbus A310 ALS Part 4, Revision 02, or
Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4, Revision 02, as
applicable to aeroplane type/model.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-01730002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comment
received on the NPRM (74 FR 12228,
March 24, 2009), and the FAA’s
response to the comment.
Request To Include Variation to Service
Information
FedEx asked that Airbus A300–600
Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated
August 24, 2012, to Airbus A300–600
ALS Part 4—Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 02, dated April
18, 2012, be included with the service
information referenced for
accomplishing the actions specified in
the NPRM (74 FR 12228, March 24,
2009). FedEx stated that this variation
provides additional trimmable
horizontal stabilizer actuator (THSA)
part numbers and is approved by EASA.
We agree with the commenter’s
request. The referenced variation added
some dash numbers that were not
previously listed in the Airworthiness
Limitation Items (ALI), but all airplanes
affected by the NPRM (74 FR 12228,
March 24, 2009) have this basic part
number. We have revised paragraph (j)
of this AD to refer to Airbus A300–600
Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated
August 24, 2012, to Airbus A300–600
ALS Part 4—Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 02, dated April
18, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5029
‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer’’
Paragraph in this AD
Since late 2006, we have included a
standard paragraph titled ‘‘Airworthy
Product’’ in all MCAI ADs in which the
FAA develops an AD based on a foreign
authority’s AD.
We have become aware that some
operators have misunderstood or
misinterpreted the Airworthy Product
paragraph to allow the owner/operator
to use messages provided by the
manufacturer as approval of deviations
during the accomplishment of an ADmandated action. The Airworthy
Product paragraph does not approve
messages or other information provided
by the manufacturer for deviations to
the requirements of the AD-mandated
actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the
requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified
unsafe condition and does not cover
deviations from other AD requirements.
However, deviations to AD-required
actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17,
and anyone may request the approval
for an alternative method of compliance
to the AD-required actions using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and
misinterpretation of the Airworthy
Product paragraph, we have changed the
paragraph and retitled it ‘‘Contacting the
Manufacturer.’’ This paragraph now
clarifies that for any requirement in this
AD to obtain corrective actions from a
manufacturer, the actions must be
accomplished using a method approved
by the FAA, the EASA, or Airbus’s
EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA).
The Contacting the Manufacturer
paragraph also clarifies that, if approved
by the DOA, the approval must include
the DOA-authorized signature. The DOA
signature indicates that the data and
information contained in the document
are EASA-approved, which is also FAAapproved. Messages and other
information provided by the
manufacturer that do not contain the
DOA-authorized signature approval are
not EASA-approved, unless EASA
directly approves the manufacturer’s
message or other information.
This clarification does not remove
flexibility previously afforded by the
Airworthy Product paragraph.
Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never
intended for required actions. This is
also consistent with the
recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation
Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
5030
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
identifying those actions in
manufacturers’ service instructions that
are ‘‘Required for Compliance’’ with
ADs. We continue to work with
manufacturers to implement this
recommendation. But once we
determine that an action is required, any
deviation from the requirement must be
approved as an alternative method of
compliance.
We also have decided not to include
a generic reference to either the
‘‘delegated agent’’ or ‘‘design approval
holder (DAH) with State of Design
Authority design organization
approval,’’ but instead we have
provided the specific delegation
approval granted by the State of Design
Authority for the DAH throughout this
AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR
17451, March 28, 2014) for correcting
the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 17451,
March 28, 2014).
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
rljohnson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Related Service Information
Airbus has issued A310
Airworthiness Limitations Section
(ALS) Part 4—Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
November 30, 2012; and A300–600 ALS
Part 4—Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012. The
service information describes
procedures for revising the maintenance
or inspection program to incorporate
new maintenance requirements and
airworthiness limitations. You can find
this information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0173.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 156
airplanes of U.S. registry.
The ALS revision required by AD
2009–06–06, Amendment 39–15842 (74
FR 12228, March 24, 2009), and retained
in this AD takes about 1 work-hour per
product, at an average labor rate of $85
per work-hour. Based on these figures,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:34 Jan 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
the estimated cost of the actions that
were required by AD 2009–06–06 is $85
per product.
We also estimate that it takes about 1
work-hour per product to comply with
the basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be
$13,260, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0173; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
holidays. The AD docket contains this
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2009–06–06, Amendment 39–15842 (74
FR 12228, March 24, 2009), and adding
the following new AD:
■
2015–02–16 Airbus: Amendment 39–18083.
Docket No. FAA–2014–0173; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–069–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective March 6, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2009–06–06,
Amendment 39–15842 (74 FR 12228, March
24, 2009).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A310–
203, –204, –221, –222, –304, –322, –324, and
–325 airplanes; Model A300 B4–601, B4–603,
B4–620, and B4–622 airplanes; Model A300
B4–605R and B4–622R airplanes; Model
A300 F4–605R and F4–622R airplanes, and
Model A300 C4–605R Variant F airplanes;
certificated in any category; all manufacturer
serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27, Flight Controls; Code 32,
Landing Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination
that more restrictive maintenance
requirements and airworthiness limitations
are necessary. We are issuing this AD to
prevent reduced structural integrity and
reduced control of these airplanes due to the
failure of system components.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rljohnson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(g) Retained Revision of Airworthiness
Limitation Section (ALS) To Incorporate
Limitations and Maintenance Tasks for
Aging Systems Maintenance
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (n) of AD 2009–06–06,
Amendment 39–15842 (74 FR 12228, March
24, 2009). Within 3 months after April 28,
2009 (the effective date of AD 2009–06–06),
revise the ALS of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness (ICA) to
incorporate Airbus A310 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated
December 21, 2006 (for Model A310 series
airplanes); or Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 01,
dated December 21, 2006 (for Model A300–
600 series airplanes). For all tasks identified
in Airbus A310 ALS Part 4—Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 01, dated December
21, 2006; and Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 01,
dated December 21, 2006; do the tasks at the
later of the times specified in paragraphs
(g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable,
except as provided by paragraph (h) of this
AD. The repetitive inspections must be
accomplished thereafter at the interval
specified in Airbus A310 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated
December 21, 2006; or Airbus A300–600 ALS
Part 4—Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006; as
applicable.
(1) At the initial compliance times
(thresholds) specified in Airbus A310 ALS
Part 4—Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006; or
Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated
December 21, 2006; as applicable; with the
compliance times starting from the later of
the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and
(g)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Since first flight of the airplane.
(ii) Since the applicable part was new or
refurbished if the part’s life (in flight hours,
flight cycles, landings, or calendar time, as
applicable) can be conclusively determined.
(2) Within 3 months after doing the
revision of the ALS of the ICA required by
paragraph (h) of this AD.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: For
additional guidance on the trimmable
horizontal stabilizer actuators (THSA) life
limits, refer to Airbus Operators Information
Telex (OIT) SE 999.0074/05/BB, dated
August 3, 2005.
Note 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD: For
additional guidance on the THSA life limits
and calculation method for unknown history
of parts, refer to Airbus OIT SE 999.0008/07/
LB, dated January 16, 2007; and Airbus
Service Information Letter 05–008, Revision
01, dated February 21, 2007.
(h) Retained Revision of ALS To Incorporate
Certain Other Limitations and Maintenance
Tasks for Aging Systems Maintenance
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (o) of AD 2009–06–06,
Amendment 39–15842 (74 FR 12228, March
24, 2009), with revised affected airplane
language. For airplanes on which any life
limitation/maintenance task has been
complied with in accordance with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:34 Jan 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
requirements of paragraph (f), (g), (k), (l), or
(m) of AD 2009–06–06: The last
accomplishment of each limitation/task must
be retained as a starting point for the
accomplishment of each corresponding
limitation/task interval now introduced
Airbus A310 ALS Part 4—Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 01, dated December
21, 2006; and Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 01,
dated December 21, 2006; as applicable.
(i) Retained No Alternative Inspections/
Limitations
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (p) of AD 2009–06–06,
Amendment 39–15842 (74 FR 12228, March
24, 2009). Except as provided by paragraph
(l) of this AD: After accomplishing the
actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, no alternative inspection, inspection
intervals, or limitations may be used, except
as required by paragraph (j) of this AD.
(j) New Requirements of This AD:
Maintenance/Inspection Program Revision
Within 3 months after the effective date of
this AD: Revise the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate Airbus A310 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
November 30, 2012 (for Model A310 series
airplanes); or Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02,
dated April 18, 2012, and Airbus A300–600
Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated August
24, 2012, to Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02,
dated April 18, 2012 (for Model A300–600
series airplanes). For all limitation/
replacement/inspection tasks identified in
Airbus A310 ALS Part 4—Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 02, dated November
30, 2012; or Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02,
dated April 18, 2012, and Airbus A300–600
Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated August
24, 2012, to Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02,
dated April 18, 2012; the initial compliance
times for the tasks are at the later of the times
specified in paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this
AD, as applicable. Doing any limitation/
replacement/inspection task required by this
paragraph terminates the corresponding task
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(1) At the initial compliance times
(thresholds) specified in Airbus A310 ALS
Part 4—Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 02, dated November 30, 2012; or
Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
April 18, 2012, and Airbus A300–600
Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated August
24, 2012, to Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02,
dated April 18, 2012; as applicable; with the
compliance times starting from the later of
the times specified in paragraphs (j)(1)(i) and
(j)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Since first flight of the airplane.
(ii) Since the applicable part was new or
refurbished if the part’s life (in flight hours,
flight cycles, landings, or calendar time, as
applicable) can be conclusively determined.
(2) Within 3 months after the effective date
of this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5031
(k) New Limitation: No Alternative Actions
or Intervals
After accomplishment of the revision
required by paragraph (j) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or
intervals, may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it
to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2125; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the
effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by
the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0075, dated
March 20, 2013, for related information. You
may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0173-0002.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference in
this AD is available at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (n)(5) and (n)(6) of this AD.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on March 6, 2015.
(i) Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
April 18, 2012.
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
5032
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Airbus A300–600 Variation
0CVLG120001/C0S, dated August 24, 2012,
to Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
April 18, 2012.
(iii) Airbus A310 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
November 30, 2012.
(4) The following service information was
approved for IBR on April 28, 2009 (74 FR
12228, March 24, 2009).
(i) Airbus A300–600 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated
December 21, 2006.
(ii) Airbus A310 ALS Part 4—Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated
December 21, 2006.
(5) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(6) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(7) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
13, 2015.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–01182 Filed 1–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0525; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–235–AD; Amendment
39–18078; AD 2015–02–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
rljohnson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330–300, A340–200,
and A340–300 series airplanes. This AD
was prompted by a report of substantial
inner skin disbonding damage found on
a rudder. This AD requires performing
an inspection for damage of certain
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:34 Jan 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
rudders, and repair if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
damage of the rudder, which could
result in reduced structural integrity of
the rudder.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
March 6, 2015.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of March 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;
D=FAA-2014-0525; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1138;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Airbus Model A330–
300, A340–200, and A340–300 series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on August 13, 2014 (79
FR 47387).
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2013–0270R1, dated
November 27, 2013 (referred to after this
as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for Airbus Model A330–300, A340–200,
and A340–300 series airplanes. The
MCAI states:
One A310 operator found substantial inner
skin disbonding damage on a rudder. The
results of the subsequent investigation
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
revealed that the most probable cause of this
damage was a blunt impact with no visible
damage from outside during the rudder
handling. Such type of damage might grow
with pressure variation during ground-airground cycles, and tests performed with
other rudders showed a rapid propagation of
damage during artificial pressure cycling.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could affect the structural integrity
of the rudder.
For the affected A310 and A300–600
aeroplanes, EASA issued AD 2013–0039
[https://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_
2013_0039.pdf/AD_2013-0039], to address
and correct this potential unsafe condition.
As potentially affected rudders can also be
installed on A330 and A340 aeroplanes,
Airbus issued Alert Operator Transmission
(AOT) A55L001–12 [dated December 20,
2012], pending Aircraft Maintenance Manual
(AMM) 27–21–41 PB401 revision, to provide
operators with updated rudder handling
procedures.
EASA issued AD 2013–0270 [https://
ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2013_
0270.pdf/AD_2013-0270], to require
identification of affected rudders P/N [part
number] A55471500XXX (where XXX stands
for any numerical value), a one-time
ultrasonic test (UT) inspection of each
affected rudder to detect signs of disbonding
and, depending on findings, accomplishment
of applicable corrective action(s).
After [EASA] AD 2013–0270 was issued,
operators commented that the batch of
rudders to be inspected was not correctly
defined.
For the reason described above, [EASA] AD
2013–0270 is revised to clarify that no action
is required for rudders previously inspected
in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
(ASB) A330–55–3038 or SB A340–55–4034
[which are required by FAA AD 2009–10–11,
Amendment 39–15907 (74 FR 23622, May 20,
2009)], as applicable to aeroplane model,
provided the rudder has never been removed
and/or installed on an aeroplane since this
inspection.
Required actions include an elasticity
of laminate checker inspection of the
rudder side panel to detect external and
internal disbonding, and a woodpecker
or tap test inspection to detect external
disbonding, and repair if necessary. You
may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-05250002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comment
received on the NPRM (79 FR 47387,
August 13, 2014) and the FAA’s
response.
Request To Correct Certain Document
Numbers
Lufthansa Technik (Lufthansa) asked
that we correct certain document
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5028-5032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01182]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0173; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-069-AD;
Amendment 39-18083; AD 2015-02-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2009-06-06 for
all Airbus Model A310 and A300-600 series airplanes. AD 2009-06-06
required revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate new limitations
and maintenance tasks for aging systems maintenance. This new AD
requires revising the maintenance or inspection program to incorporate
new maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations. This AD was
prompted by a determination that more restrictive maintenance
requirements and airworthiness limitations are necessary. We are
issuing this AD to prevent reduced structural integrity and reduced
control of these airplanes due to the failure of system components.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 6, 2015.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of March 6,
2015.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of April
28, 2009 (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009).
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0173; or in person at the
Docket Management
[[Page 5029]]
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51;
email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2125;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2009-06-06, Amendment 39-15842 (74 FR 12228,
March 24, 2009). AD 2009-06-06 applied to all Airbus Model A310 and
Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series airplanes, and
Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300-
600 series airplanes series airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on March 28, 2014 (79 FR 17451).
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013-0075, dated March 20, 2013 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Model A310-
203, -204, -221, -222, -304, -322, -324, and -325 airplanes; Model A300
B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, and B4-622 airplanes; Model A300 B4-605R and
B4-622R airplanes; Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes; and Model
A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes. The MCAI states:
The airworthiness limitations for Airbus aeroplanes are
currently published in Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS)
documents.
The mandatory instructions and airworthiness limitations
applicable to the Aging Systems Maintenance (ASM) are specified in
Airbus A310 or A300-600 ALS Part 4 documents, which are approved by
the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). EASA AD 2007-0092
[https://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2007_0092.pdf/AD_2007-0092,
which corresponds to FAA AD 2009-06-06, Amendment 39-15842 (74 FR
12228, March 24, 2009)] was issued to require compliance to the
requirements as specified in these documents.
The revision 02 of Airbus A310 and Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4
documents introduces more restrictive maintenance requirements and/
or airworthiness limitations. Failure to comply with the
instructions of ALS Part 4 could result in an unsafe condition.
For the reasons described above, this new AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2007-0092, which is superseded, and requires
the implementation of the new or more restrictive maintenance
requirements and/or airworthiness limitations as specified in Airbus
A310 ALS Part 4, Revision 02, or Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4,
Revision 02, as applicable to aeroplane type/model.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0173-0002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comment received on the NPRM (74 FR
12228, March 24, 2009), and the FAA's response to the comment.
Request To Include Variation to Service Information
FedEx asked that Airbus A300-600 Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated
August 24, 2012, to Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012, be included with the
service information referenced for accomplishing the actions specified
in the NPRM (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009). FedEx stated that this
variation provides additional trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuator
(THSA) part numbers and is approved by EASA.
We agree with the commenter's request. The referenced variation
added some dash numbers that were not previously listed in the
Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI), but all airplanes affected by the
NPRM (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009) have this basic part number. We have
revised paragraph (j) of this AD to refer to Airbus A300-600 Variation
0CVLG120001/C0S, dated August 24, 2012, to Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--
Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012.
``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in this AD
Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
We have become aware that some operators have misunderstood or
misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to allow the owner/
operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer as approval of
deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated action. The
Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or other
information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed the paragraph and retitled
it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now clarifies that
for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a
manufacturer, the actions must be accomplished using a method approved
by the FAA, the EASA, or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA).
The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature. The DOA signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are EASA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DOA-authorized signature approval are not EASA-
approved, unless EASA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by
[[Page 5030]]
identifying those actions in manufacturers' service instructions that
are ``Required for Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with
manufacturers to implement this recommendation. But once we determine
that an action is required, any deviation from the requirement must be
approved as an alternative method of compliance.
We also have decided not to include a generic reference to either
the ``delegated agent'' or ``design approval holder (DAH) with State of
Design Authority design organization approval,'' but instead we have
provided the specific delegation approval granted by the State of
Design Authority for the DAH throughout this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 17451, March 28, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 17451, March 28, 2014).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information
Airbus has issued A310 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part
4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated November 30, 2012;
and A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
April 18, 2012. The service information describes procedures for
revising the maintenance or inspection program to incorporate new
maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations. You can find
this information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0173.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 156 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The ALS revision required by AD 2009-06-06, Amendment 39-15842 (74
FR 12228, March 24, 2009), and retained in this AD takes about 1 work-
hour per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that were required
by AD 2009-06-06 is $85 per product.
We also estimate that it takes about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $13,260, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0173; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2009-06-06, Amendment 39-15842 (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009), and
adding the following new AD:
2015-02-16 Airbus: Amendment 39-18083. Docket No. FAA-2014-0173;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-069-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective March 6, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2009-06-06, Amendment 39-15842 (74 FR 12228,
March 24, 2009).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A310-203, -204, -221, -222, -
304, -322, -324, and -325 airplanes; Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-
620, and B4-622 airplanes; Model A300 B4-605R and B4-622R airplanes;
Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R
Variant F airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer
serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
Controls; Code 32, Landing Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination that more restrictive
maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations are
necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent reduced structural
integrity and reduced control of these airplanes due to the failure
of system components.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
[[Page 5031]]
(g) Retained Revision of Airworthiness Limitation Section (ALS) To
Incorporate Limitations and Maintenance Tasks for Aging Systems
Maintenance
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (n) of AD
2009-06-06, Amendment 39-15842 (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009). Within
3 months after April 28, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-06-06),
revise the ALS of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA)
to incorporate Airbus A310 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006 (for Model A310 series
airplanes); or Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006 (for Model A300-
600 series airplanes). For all tasks identified in Airbus A310 ALS
Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated December 21,
2006; and Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006; do the tasks at the later of
the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable, except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD. The
repetitive inspections must be accomplished thereafter at the
interval specified in Airbus A310 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006; or Airbus A300-
600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated
December 21, 2006; as applicable.
(1) At the initial compliance times (thresholds) specified in
Airbus A310 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 01,
dated December 21, 2006; or Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006; as
applicable; with the compliance times starting from the later of the
times specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Since first flight of the airplane.
(ii) Since the applicable part was new or refurbished if the
part's life (in flight hours, flight cycles, landings, or calendar
time, as applicable) can be conclusively determined.
(2) Within 3 months after doing the revision of the ALS of the
ICA required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: For additional guidance on
the trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuators (THSA) life limits,
refer to Airbus Operators Information Telex (OIT) SE 999.0074/05/BB,
dated August 3, 2005.
Note 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD: For additional guidance on
the THSA life limits and calculation method for unknown history of
parts, refer to Airbus OIT SE 999.0008/07/LB, dated January 16,
2007; and Airbus Service Information Letter 05-008, Revision 01,
dated February 21, 2007.
(h) Retained Revision of ALS To Incorporate Certain Other Limitations
and Maintenance Tasks for Aging Systems Maintenance
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (o) of AD
2009-06-06, Amendment 39-15842 (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009), with
revised affected airplane language. For airplanes on which any life
limitation/maintenance task has been complied with in accordance
with the requirements of paragraph (f), (g), (k), (l), or (m) of AD
2009-06-06: The last accomplishment of each limitation/task must be
retained as a starting point for the accomplishment of each
corresponding limitation/task interval now introduced Airbus A310
ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 01, dated December
21, 2006; and Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006; as applicable.
(i) Retained No Alternative Inspections/Limitations
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (p) of AD
2009-06-06, Amendment 39-15842 (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009). Except
as provided by paragraph (l) of this AD: After accomplishing the
actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, no
alternative inspection, inspection intervals, or limitations may be
used, except as required by paragraph (j) of this AD.
(j) New Requirements of This AD: Maintenance/Inspection Program
Revision
Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD: Revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate
Airbus A310 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02,
dated November 30, 2012 (for Model A310 series airplanes); or Airbus
A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
April 18, 2012, and Airbus A300-600 Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated
August 24, 2012, to Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems
Maintenance, Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012 (for Model A300-600
series airplanes). For all limitation/replacement/inspection tasks
identified in Airbus A310 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 02, dated November 30, 2012; or Airbus A300-600 ALS Part
4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012,
and Airbus A300-600 Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated August 24,
2012, to Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012; the initial compliance times for
the tasks are at the later of the times specified in paragraphs
(j)(1) and (j)(2) of this AD, as applicable. Doing any limitation/
replacement/inspection task required by this paragraph terminates
the corresponding task required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(1) At the initial compliance times (thresholds) specified in
Airbus A310 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02,
dated November 30, 2012; or Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing
Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012, and Airbus
A300-600 Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated August 24, 2012, to Airbus
A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance, Revision 02, dated
April 18, 2012; as applicable; with the compliance times starting
from the later of the times specified in paragraphs (j)(1)(i) and
(j)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Since first flight of the airplane.
(ii) Since the applicable part was new or refurbished if the
part's life (in flight hours, flight cycles, landings, or calendar
time, as applicable) can be conclusively determined.
(2) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD.
(k) New Limitation: No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After accomplishment of the revision required by paragraph (j)
of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals,
may be used unless the actions or intervals are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-2125; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0075, dated March 20, 2013,
for related information. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0173-0002.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference in this AD is available at the addresses
specified in paragraphs (n)(5) and (n)(6) of this AD.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
March 6, 2015.
(i) Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012.
[[Page 5032]]
(ii) Airbus A300-600 Variation 0CVLG120001/C0S, dated August 24,
2012, to Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 02, dated April 18, 2012.
(iii) Airbus A310 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 02, dated November 30, 2012.
(4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
April 28, 2009 (74 FR 12228, March 24, 2009).
(i) Airbus A300-600 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006.
(ii) Airbus A310 ALS Part 4--Ageing Systems Maintenance,
Revision 01, dated December 21, 2006.
(5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 13, 2015.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-01182 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P