United States Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup), 4853-4855 [2015-01618]
Download as PDF
4853
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 19
Thursday, January 29, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Document Number: AMS–FV–14–0040; FV–
15–326]
United States Standards for Grades of
Maple Sirup (Syrup)
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final notice.
AGENCY:
This notice revises the United
States Standards for Grades of Maple
Sirup (Syrup). The U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) is revising the
standards to replace the current grade
classification requirements with new
color and flavor descriptors, and revise
Grade A requirements to be free from
damage. The USDA Color Standards for
Maple Sirup will become obsolete, and
color will be determined using a
spectrophotometer, or any method that
provides equivalent results. AMS has
also changed the spelling from ‘‘sirup’’
to ‘‘syrup.’’ These revisions will
improve the marketing of maple syrup
in the United States and internationally.
DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Richard E. Peterson,
Agricultural Marketing Specialist,
Specialty Crops Inspection Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program,
Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Room 1536,
South Building; STOP 0240,
Washington, DC 20250; telephone (202)
720–5021; fax (202) 690–1527; or, email
richard.peterson@ams.usda.gov. Copies
of the revised U.S. Standards for Grades
of Maple Syrup are available on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
or https://www.ams.usda.gov/scihome.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act
of 1946 (Act) (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627), as
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Jan 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
amended, directs and authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture ‘‘to develop and
improve standards of quality, condition,
quantity, grade and packaging, and
recommend and demonstrate such
standards in order to encourage
uniformity and consistency in
commercial practices.’’
AMS is committed to carrying out this
authority in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards
available upon request. The U.S.
Standards for Grades of Fruits and
Vegetables not connected with Federal
Marketing Orders or U.S. Import
Requirements no longer appear in the
Code of Federal Regulations, but are
maintained by the USDA, AMS, Fruit
and Vegetable Program, and are
available on the Internet at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/scihome.
AMS has revised the voluntary U.S.
Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup
(Syrup) using the procedures that
appear in part 36 of Title 7 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
Background
In September 2011, AMS received a
petition from the International Maple
Syrup Institute (IMSI) seeking to revise
the U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple
Sirup (Syrup). IMSI represents maple
producers, state governments and
associations, vendors, maple equipment
manufacturers, organizations, and
others in Canada and the United States.
The petitioner stated that the patchwork
of grading systems in the United States
is confusing to consumers and fails to
define the grades of maple syrup in
meaningful terms. The petitioner’s
overall goal was to foster development
of harmonized grade standards for
maple syrup in the United States and
Canada. AMS proposed revisions to the
U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple
Sirup (Syrup) based on the IMSI
petition. Specifically, AMS proposed
replacing the current grade
classification requirements with new
color and flavor descriptors, and
revising Grade A requirements to be free
from damage. The USDA Color
Standards for Maple Sirup will become
obsolete, and the color classes will be
determined using a spectrophotometer,
or by any method that provides
equivalent results. AMS also proposed
changing the spelling from ‘‘sirup’’ to
the more commonly used term ‘‘syrup.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The U.S. Standards for Grades of
Maple Sirup (Syrup) are voluntary
standards issued under the authority of
the Act, which provides for the
development of official U.S. grades to
designate different levels of quality.
These grade standards are available for
use by producers, suppliers, buyers, and
consumers; and, serve as the basis for
the Federal inspection and grading of
commodities as provided under the Act.
Like all standards for fresh and
processed fruits, vegetables, and
specialty crops, these standards are
designed to facilitate marketing by
providing a convenient basis for buying
and selling maple syrup, and for
identifying product value.
This notice announces the revision to
the second issuance of the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup
(Syrup), which became effective on
January 14, 1980. The changes to the
grade standards are as follows:
Title. Change the spelling of ‘‘sirup’’
to the more common spelling ‘‘syrup.’’
Color. Under current U.S. standards,
producers include a grade statement and
color descriptor on maple syrup labels.
Darker syrups with rich bold flavor are
currently labeled as Grade B for
Reprocessing and are not intended for
retail sale. However, consumers are
increasingly seeking the darkest color
class of maple syrup for cooking and
table use. The revision of the U.S.
standards will categorize Grade B syrup
that contains no damage or off flavors/
odors as Grade A to allow the darker
syrup to be packaged in retail size
containers (less than 5 gallons).
Specifically, the Grade A classification
is revised to include four new color and
flavor classes of maple syrup:
• U.S. Grade A Golden (delicate taste,
≥75.0 percent light transmittance (%Tc))
• U.S. Grade A Amber (rich taste,
50.0–74.9%Tc)
• U.S. Grade A Dark (robust taste,
25.0–49.9%Tc)
• U.S. Grade A Very Dark (strong
taste, <25.0%Tc)
The four color and flavor classes of
maple syrup will be determined by
using a spectrophotometer that provides
a measure of percent of light
transmission using matched square
optical cells with a 10 millimeter (mm)
light path at a wavelength of 560
nanometers (nm), with the color values
expressed in percent of light
transmission as compared to analytical
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4854
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 19 / Thursday, January 29, 2015 / Notices
reagent glycerol fixed at one hundred
percent transmission, and symbolized
by %Tc values; or by any method that
provides equivalent results.
Further, the revisions remove
references to the USDA permanent glass
color standards for maple sirup, which
will no longer be applicable.
Composition. Grade A syrup is the
quality of maple syrup that:
• Is not more than 68.9 percent solids
content by weight (Brix);
• Has good uniform color;
• Has good flavor and odor, and
intensity of flavor (maple taste)
normally associated with the color class;
• Is free from off flavors and odors
considered as damage;
• Is free from cloudiness, turbidity,
sediment, and is clean, and
• Contains no deviants.
Off flavors/odors are defined as any
specific and identifiable or
unidentifiable flavor or smell defect not
normally found in good quality maple
syrup. Off flavors may be related to
natural factors such as woody, buddy, or
fermented flavors or due to production,
handling, or storage, e.g., burnt,
chemical, or fermentation.
Processing Grade. The standards are
being revised to remove ‘‘U.S. Grade B
for Reprocessing’’ classification and
includes a new ‘‘Processing Grade.’’
This new grade of syrup:
• Is intended for use at commercial
markets;
• Is not intended to be sold at retail
markets;
• Does not meet the ‘‘U.S. Grade A’’
quality requirements;
• May be used in the manufacturing
of other products;
• Must be packed in containers of 5gallons or 20-liters or larger;
• May not be packaged in consumersize containers for retail sales;
• May be any color class and any
light transmittance;
• Must not be more than 68.9 percent
solids content by weight (Brix);
• May have a very strong taste; and
• May contain off flavors and odors.
The ‘‘Processing Grade’’ syrup also
must be:
• Fairly free of damage, turbidity, or
cloudiness, and
• Fairly clean.
USDA grades for maple syrup are not
mandatory, but producers, processors,
and handlers/packers that label maple
syrup as a particular U.S. grade are
responsible for ensuring the accuracy of
the grade statement indicated, and that
the maple syrup meets the current
Federal standards for that grade. The
existing regulations governing the
inspection and grading of processed
fruits, vegetables, and miscellaneous
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Jan 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
products (7 CFR 52.53) provide for the
appropriate use of approved
identification marks. While most
products must be officially inspected
prior to use of an official USDA grade
mark, maple syrup and honey may bear
official USDA grade marks without
official inspection (see 7 CFR 52.53(h)).
AMS published a proposed notice in
the Federal Register on May 7, 2014 (79
FR 26200) with a 60-day public
comment period.
Comments
AMS received comments on the
proposed changes to the maple syrup
standards from 10 respondents. Seven
favored the revision as proposed. One
respondent, a maple producer and
packer, favored the revision, with the
exception of the product labeling. Two
commenters opposed the revision. After
the comment period ended, AMS
contacted the petitioner, IMSI, for
technical assistance. Comments and
responses are as follows:
Comment: The petitioner, IMSI, noted
that they were very satisfied with the
content of the proposed revision, and
that the changes would harmonize
United States and Canadian markets to
the benefit of consumers and
stakeholders. They also stated that their
intent was to encourage maple syrup
producers and packers to include all
label provisions specified in the IMSI
proposal, including the product color
and taste descriptors. However, they
also recognized the voluntary nature of
USDA regulations.
Comment: A national trade
association, the North American Maple
Syrup Council, several state
associations, and stakeholders
supported revising the classification of
the current Grade B for Reprocessing
(very dark and strongly flavored) syrup
to Grade A (if free from damage and offflavors/odors) to help meet the growing
demand for this product. Commenters
also noted that reclassifying the darkest
color syrup to be sold at the retail level
will also help small farming operations
maintain profitability, while
introducing new consumers to this
product.
Comment: Several trade associations
and stakeholders urged the USDA to
quickly enact the revisions to the
standards.
Comment: One stakeholder, a maple
producer and packer, supported the
change overall, but was concerned about
the complexity and length of each grade
name, and the limited space on each
container’s label.
Response: AMS is not adding labeling
requirements for these voluntary U.S.
grade standards. Product labeling falls
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
under the regulations of the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) (21 CFR part
101), or state maple syrup regulations
and requirements.
Comment: One stakeholder noted that
the current standard is adequate, and
that AMS resources should be spent on
actual food safety issues.
Response: The issue of food safety is
outside the scope of this revision to the
U.S. grade standards. AMS is revising
the standards based on a petition from
IMSI. AMS reviewed the request and
found that it had merit. AMS believes
that the revision should improve the
marketing of maple syrup in the United
States and internationally.
Comment: One commenter, a
stakeholder from Maine asked several
questions. AMS’ responses are listed
below:
Question 1: Where are Maine and the
other states in the amendment process?
Response: You may contact the
individual state departments of
agriculture for the status of any
amendments to state maple syrup grade
regulations.
Question 2: Will AMS amend
commercial grade syrup from the
current five-gallon container to one
gallon to allow small producers to sell
commercial grade syrup to small
bakeries, restaurants, or other
companies in the food industry?
Response: There is no U.S.
commercial grade for maple syrup. The
revisions to the U.S. standards would
categorize the former Grade B syrup
(containing no damage or off flavors/
odors) as Grade A to allow the darker
syrup to be packaged in retail size
containers (less than 5 gallons). The
revisions also include a new
‘‘Processing Grade,’’ a grade that does
not meet the quality requirements for
‘‘U.S. Grade A,’’ and may contain off
flavors. Processing grade maple syrup
may be used in the manufacturing of
other products, and must be packed in
containers of 5 gallons or 20 liters or
larger.
Question 3: Will AMS include a
variance to the color grade for when
bottled syrup may darken over time so
the vendor will not have to remove it
from sale?
Response: USDA grades for maple
syrup are not mandatory, but producers,
processors, and handlers/packers that
label maple syrup as a particular U.S.
grade are responsible for ensuring the
accuracy of the grade statement
indicated, and that the maple syrup
meets the current Federal standards for
that grade, which includes the correct
color classification. Individual states
also may impose this requirement.
Contact your state representative for
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 19 / Thursday, January 29, 2015 / Notices
more information on the
implementation of state labeling
regulations for maple syrup.
Question 4: How will inspectors be
trained and equipment calibrated, and
what type of lighting will be used to
grade the colors proposed in the revised
standard?
Response: AMS will train staff to
grade the product under the revised
grade standards. AMS values and relies
on trained, educated employees to
accomplish its mission. Quality training
and development programs are designed
to provide the most effective training
possible. AMS training may be provided
through classroom training, computer/
web based training, distance learning,
on-the job training, or combination of
methods. With regard to calibration of
equipment, the equipment will be
calibrated and cross checked as
appropriate, with detailed instructions
from manufacturers taken into account.
Approved lighting sources are used to
make critical color evaluations and
comparisons. USDA lighting sources are
designed to provide uniform color and
spectral quality.
Question 5: Will this change result in
more Canadian products on shelves and
add financial benefits to the United
States, or will it hurt jobs and sales?
Response: This revision is intended to
improve marketing of maple syrup in
the United States and internationally.
According to the petitioner, each mapleproducing state intends to revise its
standards to reflect Federal grade
standards. Overall, the revised grade
standards should have a positive effect
on the maple syrup industry.
Question 6: Will this change increase
the amount of interstate maple syrup
sales, and allow marketing of product
from one region as if it were from
another region?
Response: As stated previously, these
revisions will improve the marketing of
maple syrup in the United States and
internationally, (see question 5).
However, these standards do not excuse
failure to comply with provisions of
applicable Federal or state laws
including provisions to prevent
misbranding.
Question 7: Was there an economic
study conducted that proves these
changes are productive to U.S.
consumers and producers?
Response: The revised grade
standards are based on a petition from
IMSI. IMSI represents maple industry
stakeholders including maple
producers, state governments and
associations, vendors, maple equipment
manufacturers, organizations, and
others in Canada and the United States.
The purpose of the standards is to foster
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Jan 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
and assist in the development of new or
expanded markets, and improve the
marketing of maple syrup in the United
States and internationally. As such, the
revised grade standards should have a
positive effect on the maple syrup
industry.
Question 8: Will this revision hurt or
help existing branding such as Vermont
Fancy, and can Maine producers use
their own branding?
Response: The U.S. Standards for
Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup) are
voluntary grade standards. States do
have the option to allow branding if
they wish. The 2014 Vermont Maple
Product Regulations allow for using
current grade terminology such as
‘‘Vermont Fancy’’ until January 1, 2017.
Refer to the ‘‘Maine Maple Regulations’’
for that state’s maple branding
requirements.
Question 9: U.S. maple production is
too small to come up on the USDA
radar.
Response: We disagree. An example
of this is reflected in the 2013 National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
report. The report states: Nationally,
maple syrup production in 2013 totaled
3.25 million gallons, up 70 percent from
2012. In 2012, prevailing high
temperatures limited sap flow. The
number of taps is estimated at 10.6
million, 8 percent above the 2012 total
of 9.77 million. Yield per tap is
estimated to be 0.308 gallons, up 58
percent from the previous season’s
revised yield. All states showed an
increase in production from the
previous year.
Question 10: Will revised USDA color
standards (maple sirup color grading
kits) be available?
Response: The revised standards
specify that ‘‘color may be determined
by spectrophotometer, or any method
that provides equivalent results.’’ The
current USDA Color Standards for
Maple Sirup permanent kit will no
longer meet the revised requirements for
color. There are no plans to revise the
USDA maple sirup grading kit. Other
entities are free to develop grading kits
in the marketplace.
Question 11: The upper brix limit for
Grade A, now set at 68.9 percent, should
be set at 70 percent brix because small
producers do not have the precision
equipment to grade to 68.9 percent brix.
Response: The upper limit in Grade A
for brix of not more than 68.9 percent
can be determined using the same
instrumentation that is currently being
used to verify the minimum brix
requirement of 66.0 percent. In response
to AMS’ inquiry on how IMSI arrived at
68.9 percent brix as the upper limit for
Grade A, the petitioner responded that
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4855
it was a consensus decision among
maple syrup producers and packer
stakeholders to require an upper limit,
and that 68.9 percent brix is currently
the upper limit for ‘‘Brix Maple
Regulations in Vermont and New
Hampshire.’’ IMSI added that there is no
advantage to going to a higher limit and
noted that going higher would result in
a product that is uncharacteristically
thick, and would significantly increase
production costs.
The official grade of a lot of maple
syrup covered by these standards will
be determined by the procedures set
forth in the Regulations Governing
Inspection and Certification of
Processed Products, Thereof, and
Certain Other Processed Food Products
(7 CFR 52.1 to 52.83).
Accordingly, no changes to the
standards were made as a result of
comments received. However, AMS has
made changes to the description of the
processing grade for clarity.
The revisions to this maple syrup
grade standard in this notice provide a
common language for trade and better
reflect the current marketing of maple
syrup. The changes are effective 30 days
after the date of publication in the
Federal Register.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: January 23, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–01618 Filed 1–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency
Information Collection; Data on
Nonresident Applicants
Farm Service Agency, USDA.
Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Farm Service Agency (FSA) is
requesting comments from all interested
individuals and organizations on a new
information collection that will be used
to determine the applicant’s citizenship.
DATES: We will consider comments that
we receive by March 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
comments on this notice. In your
comments, include date, volume, and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register. You may submit comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 19 (Thursday, January 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4853-4855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01618]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 19 / Thursday, January 29, 2015 /
Notices
[[Page 4853]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Document Number: AMS-FV-14-0040; FV-15-326]
United States Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup)
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice revises the United States Standards for Grades of
Maple Sirup (Syrup). The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is revising the standards to
replace the current grade classification requirements with new color
and flavor descriptors, and revise Grade A requirements to be free from
damage. The USDA Color Standards for Maple Sirup will become obsolete,
and color will be determined using a spectrophotometer, or any method
that provides equivalent results. AMS has also changed the spelling
from ``sirup'' to ``syrup.'' These revisions will improve the marketing
of maple syrup in the United States and internationally.
DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Richard E. Peterson,
Agricultural Marketing Specialist, Specialty Crops Inspection Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 1536,
South Building; STOP 0240, Washington, DC 20250; telephone (202) 720-
5021; fax (202) 690-1527; or, email richard.peterson@ams.usda.gov.
Copies of the revised U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple Syrup are
available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or https://www.ams.usda.gov/scihome.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing
Act of 1946 (Act) (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627), as amended, directs and
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture ``to develop and improve
standards of quality, condition, quantity, grade and packaging, and
recommend and demonstrate such standards in order to encourage
uniformity and consistency in commercial practices.''
AMS is committed to carrying out this authority in a manner that
facilitates the marketing of agricultural commodities and makes copies
of official standards available upon request. The U.S. Standards for
Grades of Fruits and Vegetables not connected with Federal Marketing
Orders or U.S. Import Requirements no longer appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations, but are maintained by the USDA, AMS, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, and are available on the Internet at https://www.ams.usda.gov/scihome.
AMS has revised the voluntary U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple
Sirup (Syrup) using the procedures that appear in part 36 of Title 7 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
Background
In September 2011, AMS received a petition from the International
Maple Syrup Institute (IMSI) seeking to revise the U.S. Standards for
Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup). IMSI represents maple producers, state
governments and associations, vendors, maple equipment manufacturers,
organizations, and others in Canada and the United States. The
petitioner stated that the patchwork of grading systems in the United
States is confusing to consumers and fails to define the grades of
maple syrup in meaningful terms. The petitioner's overall goal was to
foster development of harmonized grade standards for maple syrup in the
United States and Canada. AMS proposed revisions to the U.S. Standards
for Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup) based on the IMSI petition.
Specifically, AMS proposed replacing the current grade classification
requirements with new color and flavor descriptors, and revising Grade
A requirements to be free from damage. The USDA Color Standards for
Maple Sirup will become obsolete, and the color classes will be
determined using a spectrophotometer, or by any method that provides
equivalent results. AMS also proposed changing the spelling from
``sirup'' to the more commonly used term ``syrup.''
The U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup) are voluntary
standards issued under the authority of the Act, which provides for the
development of official U.S. grades to designate different levels of
quality. These grade standards are available for use by producers,
suppliers, buyers, and consumers; and, serve as the basis for the
Federal inspection and grading of commodities as provided under the
Act. Like all standards for fresh and processed fruits, vegetables, and
specialty crops, these standards are designed to facilitate marketing
by providing a convenient basis for buying and selling maple syrup, and
for identifying product value.
This notice announces the revision to the second issuance of the
U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup), which became
effective on January 14, 1980. The changes to the grade standards are
as follows:
Title. Change the spelling of ``sirup'' to the more common spelling
``syrup.''
Color. Under current U.S. standards, producers include a grade
statement and color descriptor on maple syrup labels. Darker syrups
with rich bold flavor are currently labeled as Grade B for Reprocessing
and are not intended for retail sale. However, consumers are
increasingly seeking the darkest color class of maple syrup for cooking
and table use. The revision of the U.S. standards will categorize Grade
B syrup that contains no damage or off flavors/odors as Grade A to
allow the darker syrup to be packaged in retail size containers (less
than 5 gallons). Specifically, the Grade A classification is revised to
include four new color and flavor classes of maple syrup:
U.S. Grade A Golden (delicate taste, >=75.0 percent light
transmittance (%Tc))
U.S. Grade A Amber (rich taste, 50.0-74.9%Tc)
U.S. Grade A Dark (robust taste, 25.0-49.9%Tc)
U.S. Grade A Very Dark (strong taste, <25.0%Tc)
The four color and flavor classes of maple syrup will be determined
by using a spectrophotometer that provides a measure of percent of
light transmission using matched square optical cells with a 10
millimeter (mm) light path at a wavelength of 560 nanometers (nm), with
the color values expressed in percent of light transmission as compared
to analytical
[[Page 4854]]
reagent glycerol fixed at one hundred percent transmission, and
symbolized by %Tc values; or by any method that provides equivalent
results.
Further, the revisions remove references to the USDA permanent
glass color standards for maple sirup, which will no longer be
applicable.
Composition. Grade A syrup is the quality of maple syrup that:
Is not more than 68.9 percent solids content by weight
(Brix);
Has good uniform color;
Has good flavor and odor, and intensity of flavor (maple
taste) normally associated with the color class;
Is free from off flavors and odors considered as damage;
Is free from cloudiness, turbidity, sediment, and is
clean, and
Contains no deviants.
Off flavors/odors are defined as any specific and identifiable or
unidentifiable flavor or smell defect not normally found in good
quality maple syrup. Off flavors may be related to natural factors such
as woody, buddy, or fermented flavors or due to production, handling,
or storage, e.g., burnt, chemical, or fermentation.
Processing Grade. The standards are being revised to remove ``U.S.
Grade B for Reprocessing'' classification and includes a new
``Processing Grade.'' This new grade of syrup:
Is intended for use at commercial markets;
Is not intended to be sold at retail markets;
Does not meet the ``U.S. Grade A'' quality requirements;
May be used in the manufacturing of other products;
Must be packed in containers of 5-gallons or 20-liters or
larger;
May not be packaged in consumer-size containers for retail
sales;
May be any color class and any light transmittance;
Must not be more than 68.9 percent solids content by
weight (Brix);
May have a very strong taste; and
May contain off flavors and odors.
The ``Processing Grade'' syrup also must be:
Fairly free of damage, turbidity, or cloudiness, and
Fairly clean.
USDA grades for maple syrup are not mandatory, but producers,
processors, and handlers/packers that label maple syrup as a particular
U.S. grade are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the grade
statement indicated, and that the maple syrup meets the current Federal
standards for that grade. The existing regulations governing the
inspection and grading of processed fruits, vegetables, and
miscellaneous products (7 CFR 52.53) provide for the appropriate use of
approved identification marks. While most products must be officially
inspected prior to use of an official USDA grade mark, maple syrup and
honey may bear official USDA grade marks without official inspection
(see 7 CFR 52.53(h)).
AMS published a proposed notice in the Federal Register on May 7,
2014 (79 FR 26200) with a 60-day public comment period.
Comments
AMS received comments on the proposed changes to the maple syrup
standards from 10 respondents. Seven favored the revision as proposed.
One respondent, a maple producer and packer, favored the revision, with
the exception of the product labeling. Two commenters opposed the
revision. After the comment period ended, AMS contacted the petitioner,
IMSI, for technical assistance. Comments and responses are as follows:
Comment: The petitioner, IMSI, noted that they were very satisfied
with the content of the proposed revision, and that the changes would
harmonize United States and Canadian markets to the benefit of
consumers and stakeholders. They also stated that their intent was to
encourage maple syrup producers and packers to include all label
provisions specified in the IMSI proposal, including the product color
and taste descriptors. However, they also recognized the voluntary
nature of USDA regulations.
Comment: A national trade association, the North American Maple
Syrup Council, several state associations, and stakeholders supported
revising the classification of the current Grade B for Reprocessing
(very dark and strongly flavored) syrup to Grade A (if free from damage
and off-flavors/odors) to help meet the growing demand for this
product. Commenters also noted that reclassifying the darkest color
syrup to be sold at the retail level will also help small farming
operations maintain profitability, while introducing new consumers to
this product.
Comment: Several trade associations and stakeholders urged the USDA
to quickly enact the revisions to the standards.
Comment: One stakeholder, a maple producer and packer, supported
the change overall, but was concerned about the complexity and length
of each grade name, and the limited space on each container's label.
Response: AMS is not adding labeling requirements for these
voluntary U.S. grade standards. Product labeling falls under the
regulations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (21 CFR part
101), or state maple syrup regulations and requirements.
Comment: One stakeholder noted that the current standard is
adequate, and that AMS resources should be spent on actual food safety
issues.
Response: The issue of food safety is outside the scope of this
revision to the U.S. grade standards. AMS is revising the standards
based on a petition from IMSI. AMS reviewed the request and found that
it had merit. AMS believes that the revision should improve the
marketing of maple syrup in the United States and internationally.
Comment: One commenter, a stakeholder from Maine asked several
questions. AMS' responses are listed below:
Question 1: Where are Maine and the other states in the amendment
process?
Response: You may contact the individual state departments of
agriculture for the status of any amendments to state maple syrup grade
regulations.
Question 2: Will AMS amend commercial grade syrup from the current
five-gallon container to one gallon to allow small producers to sell
commercial grade syrup to small bakeries, restaurants, or other
companies in the food industry?
Response: There is no U.S. commercial grade for maple syrup. The
revisions to the U.S. standards would categorize the former Grade B
syrup (containing no damage or off flavors/odors) as Grade A to allow
the darker syrup to be packaged in retail size containers (less than 5
gallons). The revisions also include a new ``Processing Grade,'' a
grade that does not meet the quality requirements for ``U.S. Grade A,''
and may contain off flavors. Processing grade maple syrup may be used
in the manufacturing of other products, and must be packed in
containers of 5 gallons or 20 liters or larger.
Question 3: Will AMS include a variance to the color grade for when
bottled syrup may darken over time so the vendor will not have to
remove it from sale?
Response: USDA grades for maple syrup are not mandatory, but
producers, processors, and handlers/packers that label maple syrup as a
particular U.S. grade are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the
grade statement indicated, and that the maple syrup meets the current
Federal standards for that grade, which includes the correct color
classification. Individual states also may impose this requirement.
Contact your state representative for
[[Page 4855]]
more information on the implementation of state labeling regulations
for maple syrup.
Question 4: How will inspectors be trained and equipment
calibrated, and what type of lighting will be used to grade the colors
proposed in the revised standard?
Response: AMS will train staff to grade the product under the
revised grade standards. AMS values and relies on trained, educated
employees to accomplish its mission. Quality training and development
programs are designed to provide the most effective training possible.
AMS training may be provided through classroom training, computer/web
based training, distance learning, on-the job training, or combination
of methods. With regard to calibration of equipment, the equipment will
be calibrated and cross checked as appropriate, with detailed
instructions from manufacturers taken into account. Approved lighting
sources are used to make critical color evaluations and comparisons.
USDA lighting sources are designed to provide uniform color and
spectral quality.
Question 5: Will this change result in more Canadian products on
shelves and add financial benefits to the United States, or will it
hurt jobs and sales?
Response: This revision is intended to improve marketing of maple
syrup in the United States and internationally. According to the
petitioner, each maple-producing state intends to revise its standards
to reflect Federal grade standards. Overall, the revised grade
standards should have a positive effect on the maple syrup industry.
Question 6: Will this change increase the amount of interstate
maple syrup sales, and allow marketing of product from one region as if
it were from another region?
Response: As stated previously, these revisions will improve the
marketing of maple syrup in the United States and internationally, (see
question 5). However, these standards do not excuse failure to comply
with provisions of applicable Federal or state laws including
provisions to prevent misbranding.
Question 7: Was there an economic study conducted that proves these
changes are productive to U.S. consumers and producers?
Response: The revised grade standards are based on a petition from
IMSI. IMSI represents maple industry stakeholders including maple
producers, state governments and associations, vendors, maple equipment
manufacturers, organizations, and others in Canada and the United
States. The purpose of the standards is to foster and assist in the
development of new or expanded markets, and improve the marketing of
maple syrup in the United States and internationally. As such, the
revised grade standards should have a positive effect on the maple
syrup industry.
Question 8: Will this revision hurt or help existing branding such
as Vermont Fancy, and can Maine producers use their own branding?
Response: The U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup) are
voluntary grade standards. States do have the option to allow branding
if they wish. The 2014 Vermont Maple Product Regulations allow for
using current grade terminology such as ``Vermont Fancy'' until January
1, 2017. Refer to the ``Maine Maple Regulations'' for that state's
maple branding requirements.
Question 9: U.S. maple production is too small to come up on the
USDA radar.
Response: We disagree. An example of this is reflected in the 2013
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) report. The report
states: Nationally, maple syrup production in 2013 totaled 3.25 million
gallons, up 70 percent from 2012. In 2012, prevailing high temperatures
limited sap flow. The number of taps is estimated at 10.6 million, 8
percent above the 2012 total of 9.77 million. Yield per tap is
estimated to be 0.308 gallons, up 58 percent from the previous season's
revised yield. All states showed an increase in production from the
previous year.
Question 10: Will revised USDA color standards (maple sirup color
grading kits) be available?
Response: The revised standards specify that ``color may be
determined by spectrophotometer, or any method that provides equivalent
results.'' The current USDA Color Standards for Maple Sirup permanent
kit will no longer meet the revised requirements for color. There are
no plans to revise the USDA maple sirup grading kit. Other entities are
free to develop grading kits in the marketplace.
Question 11: The upper brix limit for Grade A, now set at 68.9
percent, should be set at 70 percent brix because small producers do
not have the precision equipment to grade to 68.9 percent brix.
Response: The upper limit in Grade A for brix of not more than 68.9
percent can be determined using the same instrumentation that is
currently being used to verify the minimum brix requirement of 66.0
percent. In response to AMS' inquiry on how IMSI arrived at 68.9
percent brix as the upper limit for Grade A, the petitioner responded
that it was a consensus decision among maple syrup producers and packer
stakeholders to require an upper limit, and that 68.9 percent brix is
currently the upper limit for ``Brix Maple Regulations in Vermont and
New Hampshire.'' IMSI added that there is no advantage to going to a
higher limit and noted that going higher would result in a product that
is uncharacteristically thick, and would significantly increase
production costs.
The official grade of a lot of maple syrup covered by these
standards will be determined by the procedures set forth in the
Regulations Governing Inspection and Certification of Processed
Products, Thereof, and Certain Other Processed Food Products (7 CFR
52.1 to 52.83).
Accordingly, no changes to the standards were made as a result of
comments received. However, AMS has made changes to the description of
the processing grade for clarity.
The revisions to this maple syrup grade standard in this notice
provide a common language for trade and better reflect the current
marketing of maple syrup. The changes are effective 30 days after the
date of publication in the Federal Register.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
Dated: January 23, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-01618 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P